21.03.2013 Views

1 - History of Ericsson - History of Ericsson

1 - History of Ericsson - History of Ericsson

1 - History of Ericsson - History of Ericsson

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fig. 3 X 8460<br />

Isopreference diagram<br />

for a 3000 c/s low pass circuit<br />

The diagram is split in the following opinion regions:<br />

Excellent >74 db<br />

Good 74-66 db<br />

Fair 66-58 db<br />

Poor 58-50 db<br />

Unsatisfactory < 50 db<br />

(Taken from a paper written by Munson & Karlin)<br />

deviations-whicb, however, is impossible-or that we have to increase the<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> local switching equipment which is engaged also on<br />

long distance calls, in order to meet future subscriber demands.<br />

Speech Level and Noise<br />

As an example we can study the influence <strong>of</strong> speech and noise levels on<br />

the quality <strong>of</strong> a call. On the basis <strong>of</strong> investigations carried out by many<br />

administrations, CC1TT has made recommendations for the total reference<br />

equivalent and its distribution over the different parts <strong>of</strong> a telephone network<br />

in order to ensure a sufficient speech level for the listener.<br />

We have also to consider, however, that noise can jeopardize intelligibility<br />

even if the speech level in itself is sufficient. For cheap local calls this may be<br />

<strong>of</strong> less importance, but becomes more so on expensive long distance calls.<br />

Room noise the subscribers themselves can get rid <strong>of</strong>, but the reduction <strong>of</strong><br />

circuit noise-such as noise from relay contacts or switches, intelligible or<br />

unintelligible crosstalk, intermodulation or singing in carrier circuits, echo in<br />

2- to 4-wire switching points-must be the task <strong>of</strong> the administrations.<br />

For maintenance and supervision people it is essential to have an idea how<br />

a combination <strong>of</strong> speech and noise levels will influence the transmission. For<br />

that purpose we can use the isopreference contours-presented by KARLIN 3<br />

fig. 3. On the coordinate axes the relative levels <strong>of</strong> speech and noise are expressed<br />

in decibels. In the coordinate plane are drawn a number <strong>of</strong> "isopreference<br />

contours" based on opinion tests. Every contour represents a combination<br />

<strong>of</strong> speech and noise levels for which the listeners have the same<br />

preference. The figures beside the contours express relative "preference levels"<br />

in db. It is said that a relative level <strong>of</strong> about 75 db corresponds to good performance,<br />

but 50 db will be too poor. As the opinion test was carried out with<br />

a restricted number <strong>of</strong> persons under specific conditions, one has to be careful<br />

in drawing conclusions, but in spite <strong>of</strong> that we may say that:<br />

• A high preference level corresponds to better performance.<br />

• All isopreference contours have maximum points, indicating maximum<br />

permissible noise level for a certain performance.<br />

• A line through the maximum points, starting at 82 db speech level,<br />

splits the plane into two regions:<br />

10 20 30<br />

NOISE SPECTRUM LEVEL<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!