RECYCLE AND REDESIGN - Texas FCCLA
RECYCLE AND REDESIGN - Texas FCCLA
RECYCLE AND REDESIGN - Texas FCCLA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Voice—Pitch,<br />
Tempo, Volume<br />
0-3 points<br />
Body<br />
Language/Clothing<br />
Choice<br />
0-3 points<br />
Grammar/Word<br />
Usage/Pronunciation<br />
0-3 points<br />
Responses to<br />
Judges’ Questions<br />
0-5 points<br />
0<br />
No voice qualities are<br />
used effectively<br />
0<br />
Body language shows<br />
nervousness and<br />
unease/inappropriate<br />
clothing<br />
0<br />
Extensive (more than 5)<br />
grammatical and<br />
pronunciation errors<br />
0<br />
Did not<br />
answer judges’<br />
questions<br />
1<br />
Unable to<br />
answer some<br />
questions<br />
1<br />
Voice quality is<br />
adequate<br />
1<br />
Body language shows<br />
minimal amount of<br />
nervousness; clothing is<br />
appropriate<br />
1<br />
Some (3-5) grammatical<br />
and pronunciation<br />
errors<br />
2<br />
Responded to<br />
all questions<br />
but without<br />
ease or<br />
accuracy to<br />
questions<br />
2<br />
Voice is good but could<br />
improve<br />
2<br />
Body language is good<br />
and clothing is<br />
professional<br />
2<br />
Few (1-2) grammatical<br />
and pronunciation<br />
errors<br />
3<br />
Responded<br />
adequately to<br />
all questions<br />
4<br />
Gave<br />
appropriate<br />
responses to<br />
judges’<br />
questions<br />
3<br />
Voice quality is<br />
outstanding and<br />
pleasing to listen to<br />
3<br />
Body language and<br />
clothing choice both<br />
enhance the<br />
presentation<br />
3<br />
Presentation has no<br />
grammatical or<br />
pronunciation errors<br />
5<br />
Responses to<br />
questions were<br />
appropriate<br />
and given<br />
without<br />
hesitation<br />
Design and Construction Skills Points<br />
Effectiveness of<br />
Product Design<br />
0-5 points<br />
Overall Quality of<br />
Workmanship<br />
0-5 points<br />
Creativity,<br />
Imagination and<br />
Innovation<br />
0- 4 points<br />
Selected Skill Areas<br />
0-24 points<br />
0<br />
Both form and function<br />
need improvement<br />
0<br />
Low quality; not<br />
marketable<br />
0<br />
No evidence<br />
1 2<br />
Satisfactory form OR<br />
function but not both<br />
1 2<br />
Marginal quality of<br />
workmanship<br />
1<br />
Little evidence<br />
3 4<br />
Good form and function<br />
3 4<br />
Fair quality; somewhat<br />
marketable<br />
2 3<br />
Some evidence<br />
5<br />
Outstanding form <strong>AND</strong><br />
function<br />
5<br />
Very good quality,<br />
marketable<br />
4<br />
Highly creative,<br />
innovative<br />
See separate Recycle and Redesign Skill Area Rubric for additional criteria ratings. Transfer total points<br />
earned for the 8 selected skill areas to the “Points” column at right.<br />
Reason for point deduction____________________________________________<br />
__________________________________________________________________<br />
__________________________________________________________________<br />
__________________________________________________________________<br />
__________________________________________________________________<br />
Comments:<br />
Verification of total scores (please initial)<br />
_______________ __________________ _________________<br />
Judge Event Chair Tally Room<br />
SUBTOTAL<br />
Point<br />
deductions<br />
from one<br />
judge’s rubrics<br />
GR<strong>AND</strong><br />
TOTAL<br />
(100 possible)
Change language