22.03.2013 Views

Cascade NTFP Regional Profile.pdf - First Nations in British ...

Cascade NTFP Regional Profile.pdf - First Nations in British ...

Cascade NTFP Regional Profile.pdf - First Nations in British ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Cascade</strong>s <strong>NTFP</strong> <strong>Profile</strong><br />

<strong>Regional</strong> Forest Land Use<br />

Similar to other forested areas of the Prov<strong>in</strong>ce, the primary management objectives of the<br />

forest landbase are centred on timber harvest<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Review of the Lillooet LRMP Perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to NTFRs<br />

Found with<strong>in</strong> the Lillooet LRMP (2004) is direction concern<strong>in</strong>g the management of<br />

NTFRs. Objective number 4 <strong>in</strong> section 2.1, reads: “Encourage <strong>in</strong>novative silvicultural<br />

and harvest<strong>in</strong>g regimes to achieve management objectives for non-timber resources”.<br />

There are two areas of management direction for this objective:<br />

4.1 Encourage timber harvest<strong>in</strong>g where it would benefit wildlife (refer to details<br />

<strong>in</strong> wildlife, Species at Risk, and Forest Biodiversity and Grassland Ecosystems)<br />

4.2 Where management for non-timber resources has the potential to make<br />

harvest<strong>in</strong>g timber harvest land base (THLB) uneconomical, consider <strong>in</strong>novative<br />

regimes to resolve the conflicts<br />

The measures of success/target are: Innovative silvicultural and harvest<strong>in</strong>g regimes used<br />

to achieve management objectives for non-timber resources. The <strong>in</strong>tent is:<br />

The entire THLB will not require <strong>in</strong>novative silvicultural or harvest<strong>in</strong>g systems to<br />

achieve management objectives for nontimber resources. A significant proportion<br />

of the plan area is currently managed us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>novative practices. These practices<br />

might <strong>in</strong>clude: adjusted cutblock, size or shape to reta<strong>in</strong> visual quality; modified<br />

clearcut systems, such as small patch clearcuts, feathered edges, green tree<br />

retention or deciduous tree retention; harvest and leave patterns; alternative<br />

harvest<strong>in</strong>g systems, such as highlead, helicopter, small mach<strong>in</strong>ery or horselogg<strong>in</strong>g;<br />

and alternative silvicultural systems, such as selection or shelterwood (p.<br />

8).<br />

Objective 10 reads: “M<strong>in</strong>imize impacts of resource management activities on botanical<br />

forest products”. Its management direction is: “10.1 Review the impacts of resource<br />

management activities on the use and collection of botanical forest products.” There are<br />

no measures of success listed.<br />

Section 3.3 Cultural and Historic Resources also conta<strong>in</strong>s language perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to NTFRs<br />

<strong>in</strong> relation to <strong>First</strong> <strong>Nations</strong>. Objective 3 reads: “3. Manage <strong>First</strong> <strong>Nations</strong> cultural symbols<br />

e.g., traditionally used plants, animals, and natural features), so that their value is<br />

acknowledged <strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g for other resource activities”. There is no other text to<br />

support this objective, likely because the Prov<strong>in</strong>ce rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> consultations with<br />

the <strong>First</strong> <strong>Nations</strong> on this document.<br />

Section 3.5, Access and Transportation does not address issues concern<strong>in</strong>g the access of<br />

NTFRs. Section 3.5.2 does mention the need to work with <strong>First</strong> <strong>Nations</strong> on the<br />

transportation <strong>in</strong>frastructure to meet the needs of their activities.<br />

Section 4.3.3 grizzly bear <strong>in</strong>cludes discussion about NTFRs such as the huckleberry and<br />

its management. Referenced with<strong>in</strong> this discussion is the need to prevent damage to<br />

huckleberries though timber harvest<strong>in</strong>g.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!