Ongoing Evaluation of a Self-Exclusion Program - Connecticut ...

Recommendations

Info

Did the self-excluder return to gamble after self-excluding? Yes: 18% No: 82% If yes, number <strong>of</strong> times: 1-2 times: 13% 5-6 times: 4% 9 + times: 13% Did not return: 71%
Why did self-excluders return? To win money: 82% To stay in action: 12% Be in that environment: 25% Couldn’t control impulses: 28% Other: 6% * <strong>Self</strong>-Excluders may have chosen more than 1
Page 1 and 2: Ongoing Evaluation of a Self-Exclus
Page 3 and 4: Method • The data reported in thi
Page 5 and 6: Race/Ethnicity % African American 1
Page 7 and 8: Household Income % $0- 24,999 16 $2
Page 9 and 10: Months Gambled at Mohegan Sun Mean
Page 11 and 12: Mean Estimated Losses Overall Male
Page 13 and 14: SOGS Results Cont. Mean SOGS Score
Page 15 and 16: Top 8 Problem Gambling Areas Overal
Page 17 and 18: Follow-Up Study Methodology • Sel
Page 19 and 20: Have any of these been a problem fo
Page 21 and 22: How well was the S.E. Program adver
Page 23: Did self-excluders believe employee
Page 27 and 28: Probability of Returning to Mohegan
Page 29 and 30: Satisfaction with S.E. Satisfied: 5
Page 31 and 32: Summary: Follow-Up Survey • After
Page 33 and 34: Summary Cont. • One-third of self
Page 35 and 36: Summary Cont. • 2 out of 3 self-e

Ongoing Evaluation of a Self-Exclusion Program - Connecticut ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?