Ongoing Evaluation of a Self-Exclusion Program - Connecticut ...

Recommendations

Info

Summary Cont. • Of those who had not returned, 2 out of 3 thought it was improbable they would return. • Of those who returned, money was the primary motivation. For those who did not return, the prime motivators were determination to stay abstinent and fear of arrest.
Summary Cont. • 2 out of 3 self-excluders were in favor of S.E. being permanent. • Only 10% of the self-excluders were unsatisfied with having selfexcluded and only 3% would not recommend self-exclusion.
Page 1 and 2: Ongoing Evaluation of a Self-Exclus
Page 3 and 4: Method • The data reported in thi
Page 5 and 6: Race/Ethnicity % African American 1
Page 7 and 8: Household Income % $0- 24,999 16 $2
Page 9 and 10: Months Gambled at Mohegan Sun Mean
Page 11 and 12: Mean Estimated Losses Overall Male
Page 13 and 14: SOGS Results Cont. Mean SOGS Score
Page 15 and 16: Top 8 Problem Gambling Areas Overal
Page 17 and 18: Follow-Up Study Methodology • Sel
Page 19 and 20: Have any of these been a problem fo
Page 21 and 22: How well was the S.E. Program adver
Page 23 and 24: Did self-excluders believe employee
Page 25 and 26: Why did self-excluders return? To w
Page 27 and 28: Probability of Returning to Mohegan
Page 29 and 30: Satisfaction with S.E. Satisfied: 5
Page 31 and 32: Summary: Follow-Up Survey • After
Page 33: Summary Cont. • One-third of self

Ongoing Evaluation of a Self-Exclusion Program - Connecticut ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?