22.03.2013 Views

COMMENTARY - US Pharmacopeial Convention

COMMENTARY - US Pharmacopeial Convention

COMMENTARY - US Pharmacopeial Convention

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>COMMENTARY</strong>– <strong>US</strong>P 32-NF 27 Second Supplement<br />

Response: Comment not incorporated. The relative response factors are different<br />

between the drug substance monograph and the drug product monograph because the<br />

methods are different between the two monographs.<br />

Comment Summary #3: The commenter suggested adding a Reference Standard<br />

containing a mixture of related compounds for peak identification to the Related<br />

compounds test.<br />

Response: Comment not incorporated because no supporting data was provided. The<br />

Expert Committee is willing to consider future changes upon receipt of supporting data.<br />

Comment Summary #4: The commenter indicated providing a relative response factor<br />

for 3'-N-{[4-(Acetylamino)phenyl]sulfonyl}-3'-demethylazithromycin to prevent the<br />

overestimation of this impurity in the Related compounds test.<br />

Response: Comment not incorporated because the current requirements reflect the<br />

approved marketed product.<br />

Comment Summary #5: The commenter suggested providing a combined specification<br />

for 14-demethyl-14-(hydroxymethyl) azithromycin and desosaminylazithromycin in the<br />

Related compounds test.<br />

Response: Comment not incorporated the current Related compounds test reflect the<br />

approved marketed product.<br />

Comment Summary #6: The commenter suggested revising the acceptance criteria in<br />

the Related compounds test to harmonize this monograph with the limits stated in the<br />

European Pharmacopoeia monograph for this drug.<br />

Response: Comment not incorporated because the current limits reflect the acceptance<br />

criteria in the approved marketed product.<br />

Comment Summary #7: The commenter submitted an ‘Intent to Comment’ letter.<br />

Response: Comment not incorporated because no supporting data was provided. The<br />

Expert Committee is willing to consider future changes upon receipt of supporting data.<br />

Monograph/Section(s): Behenoyl Polyoxylglycerides/Water<br />

Expert Committee(s): Excipient Monographs 2<br />

No. of Commenters: 1<br />

Comment Summary #1: The commenter indicated the Water should be increased from<br />

“0.5%” to “1.0%” for all the polyoxylglyceride monographs because polyoxyglycerides<br />

are highly hydroscopic.<br />

Response: Comment incorporated.<br />

Monograph/Section(s): Citalopram Hydrobromide/Related Compounds Test 2<br />

Expert Committee(s): Monograph Development–Psychiatrics and Psychoactives<br />

No. of Commenters: 2<br />

Comment Summary #1: The commenter suggested including a Note to indicate the<br />

location of the bromide peak and the clear instructions to disregard this peak.<br />

Response: Comment incorporated.<br />

Comment Summary #2: The commenter suggested three revisions: 1) increase the<br />

limit of Citalopram Related Compounds A, C, D, G, and H from “0.10%” each to “0.15%”<br />

each, 2) revise the limit of any individual unspecified impurity from “0.10%” to “0.1%,”<br />

and 3) increase the limit for total specified and unspecified impurities from “0.50%” to<br />

“0.75%.”<br />

- 11 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!