23.03.2013 Views

Chapter: Pushing back the one who passes in front of ... - Hoor al-Ayn

Chapter: Pushing back the one who passes in front of ... - Hoor al-Ayn

Chapter: Pushing back the one who passes in front of ... - Hoor al-Ayn

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

prayer <strong>the</strong>reby <strong>in</strong>v<strong>al</strong>idat<strong>in</strong>g it which is not true <strong>of</strong> enact<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> easy matter [i.e. push<strong>in</strong>g <strong>back</strong>]. Al-<br />

Ismaa`eelee reported <strong>the</strong> hadeeth with <strong>the</strong> word<strong>in</strong>g, "and if he refuses <strong>the</strong>n place his hand on his chest<br />

and push him <strong>back</strong>," this is explicit that <strong>the</strong> push<strong>in</strong>g <strong>back</strong> is to be d<strong>one</strong> with <strong>the</strong> hand. This was d<strong>one</strong> by<br />

Abu Sa`eed to <strong>the</strong> slave <strong>who</strong> wished to pass <strong>in</strong> <strong>front</strong> <strong>of</strong> him – he pushed him <strong>back</strong> by push<strong>in</strong>g his chest –<br />

<strong>the</strong>n when <strong>the</strong> slave returned he pushed him <strong>back</strong> with more force as occurs <strong>in</strong> <strong>al</strong>-Bukhaaree and o<strong>the</strong>rs.<br />

Al-Bayhaqee quoted from ash-Shaafi`ee that "<strong>the</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> fight<strong>in</strong>g was to push <strong>back</strong> with more force<br />

than was employed on <strong>the</strong> first occasion."<br />

Qaadee Ayaadh said, "if he pushed him <strong>back</strong> <strong>in</strong> a permissible manner and caused his death <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

no retribution [qawad] aga<strong>in</strong>st him by agreement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scholars but is blood m<strong>one</strong>y due upon him or<br />

not? There are two op<strong>in</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scholars concern<strong>in</strong>g this both <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se be<strong>in</strong>g voiced by <strong>the</strong> Ma<strong>al</strong>ikee<br />

scholars."<br />

Qaadee Ayaadh and ibn Batta<strong>al</strong> report a consensus that it is not permissible to w<strong>al</strong>k from <strong>one</strong>s place <strong>in</strong><br />

order to push <strong>back</strong> or to perform a great de<strong>al</strong> <strong>of</strong> movement and action <strong>in</strong> push<strong>in</strong>g <strong>back</strong>. This is because<br />

<strong>the</strong>se types <strong>of</strong> actions are more detriment<strong>al</strong> to <strong>the</strong> prayer <strong>the</strong>n hav<strong>in</strong>g some<strong>one</strong> w<strong>al</strong>k <strong>in</strong> <strong>front</strong> <strong>of</strong> you.<br />

An-Nawawee said, "I do not know <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> leg<strong>al</strong> jurists <strong>who</strong> were <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> op<strong>in</strong>ion that this push<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>back</strong> was obligatory." Al-Haafidh followed this up by say<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> Dhaahirees had explicitly stated<br />

that it was obligatory. The liter<strong>al</strong> sense <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hadeeth supports <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

His say<strong>in</strong>g [no.2], "for <strong>in</strong>deed he is a shaytaan." Al-Haafidh said, "apply<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> term shaytaan to <strong>the</strong><br />

human be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>who</strong> <strong>passes</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>front</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>one</strong> pray<strong>in</strong>g is someth<strong>in</strong>g permissible for <strong>the</strong>ir occurs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Qur`aan <strong>the</strong> say<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ex<strong>al</strong>ted, "<strong>the</strong> shaytaans <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> humans and j<strong>in</strong>n." The reason for this<br />

application is that he has d<strong>one</strong> an action <strong>of</strong> Shaytaan. It is said that <strong>the</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g is that it is Shaytaan<br />

<strong>who</strong> has <strong>in</strong>cited him to pass <strong>in</strong> <strong>front</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>one</strong> <strong>who</strong> is pray<strong>in</strong>g and not go <strong>back</strong>. Ibn Batta<strong>al</strong> said: <strong>the</strong><br />

permissibility <strong>of</strong> apply<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> term shaytaan to <strong>the</strong> <strong>one</strong> <strong>who</strong> causes fitna <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> religion can be derived<br />

from this hadeeth."<br />

Al-Haafidh said, "this is built upon <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> word shaytaan can be liter<strong>al</strong>ly applied to humans and<br />

figuratively applied to j<strong>in</strong>ns but such a premise requires <strong>in</strong>vestigation."<br />

It is <strong>al</strong>so said that <strong>the</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Shaytaan is companion as occurs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first hadeeth. Ibn Abee Jumrah<br />

derived from his say<strong>in</strong>g, "for <strong>in</strong>deed he is a shaytaan" that <strong>the</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> fight<strong>in</strong>g is to push <strong>back</strong><br />

gently and not to liter<strong>al</strong>ly fight, this because combat<strong>in</strong>g shaytaan is through seek<strong>in</strong>g refuge with Allaah<br />

and erect<strong>in</strong>g a barrier from him by mention<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Name <strong>of</strong> Allaah and <strong>the</strong> likes. He went on to say, "so<br />

does <strong>the</strong> fight<strong>in</strong>g lie <strong>in</strong> fight<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> distraction that <strong>the</strong> <strong>one</strong> <strong>who</strong> is pray<strong>in</strong>g faces due to some<strong>one</strong> pass<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>front</strong> <strong>of</strong> him or does it lie <strong>in</strong> his try<strong>in</strong>g to bridle <strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>one</strong> pass<strong>in</strong>g (by push<strong>in</strong>g him <strong>back</strong>)? The<br />

second option is more obvious."<br />

Al-Haafidh said, "o<strong>the</strong>rs said: ra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> first is more obvious because <strong>the</strong> concentration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>one</strong><br />

pray<strong>in</strong>g takes precedence over his be<strong>in</strong>g concerned with bridl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r. Ibn Abee Shaybah<br />

reported from ibn Mas`ud that some<strong>one</strong> pass<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>front</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>one</strong> pray<strong>in</strong>g severs h<strong>al</strong>f his prayer. Abu<br />

Nu`aym reported from Umar, ‘that if <strong>the</strong> people knew how much <strong>the</strong>ir prayer was dim<strong>in</strong>ished due to<br />

some<strong>one</strong> pass<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>front</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong>y would never cease to pray towards someth<strong>in</strong>g that would act as a<br />

sutrah from <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> people.’ So <strong>the</strong>se two narrations dictate that <strong>the</strong> push<strong>in</strong>g <strong>back</strong> is l<strong>in</strong>ked to <strong>the</strong><br />

distraction that <strong>the</strong> <strong>one</strong> pray<strong>in</strong>g faces and is not specified to <strong>the</strong> <strong>one</strong> pass<strong>in</strong>g. These two narrations even<br />

if <strong>the</strong>y end at a Sahaabah <strong>the</strong>y have <strong>the</strong> rul<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> Messenger, s<strong>al</strong>l<strong>al</strong>laahu <strong>al</strong>ayhi wa<br />

s<strong>al</strong>laam, because <strong>the</strong> likes <strong>of</strong> this is not said from person<strong>al</strong> op<strong>in</strong>ion."

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!