24.03.2013 Views

Letters from a Planter's Daughter: Understanding Freedom and ...

Letters from a Planter's Daughter: Understanding Freedom and ...

Letters from a Planter's Daughter: Understanding Freedom and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

169<br />

<strong>Letters</strong> <strong>from</strong> a Planter’s <strong>Daughter</strong><br />

To those who in the 19th century held up the sanctity of marriage <strong>and</strong> the<br />

family as the foundation of society, slavery represented a perversion of<br />

the social order. 101 That great number of former slaves legitimated their<br />

marriages after emancipation suggests one of two, or a mixture of both,<br />

reasons: that the idea of a lasting, permanent union was as important to<br />

slave families as the white middle class; or that white middle-class ideals<br />

may have influenced the enslaved men <strong>and</strong> women who lived among<br />

them. 102 In either case, maintaining the integrity of the family unit would<br />

have been a concern for free African-American women—especially women<br />

who, like the Townsends, knew firsth<strong>and</strong> how sexual abuse by a white<br />

master affected a family. 103 To be a full-time wife <strong>and</strong> mother, the cultural<br />

norm for middle- <strong>and</strong> upper-class white women, may have been desirable<br />

precisely because it was an impossibility under slavery. 104<br />

Until 1868, Susanna’s story contradicted the broad assertion that<br />

freedom, for African-American women, had meaning almost exclusively<br />

within a family context—Susanna, after all, sought independence <strong>from</strong><br />

her family both through education <strong>and</strong> direct control of her inheritance. 105<br />

Care must also be taken not to assume that Susanna understood freedom<br />

as the right to enter into the unfreedom of domestic patriarchy. 106 In Susanna’s<br />

case, marriage provided an escape <strong>from</strong> the patriarchal authority<br />

not of a husb<strong>and</strong>, but her half-brother Wesley. And in June 1868, Susanna<br />

had run short of options. She was panicked, hiding her pregnancy <strong>from</strong><br />

Wesley, Adelaide, the father of the child, <strong>and</strong> Cabaniss, but she grasped<br />

also at a possible solution: marriage. She could see herself in a little house<br />

in Kansas if there is no more than three rooms <strong>and</strong> an acre of grown—one<br />

bedroom for husb<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> wife, a second room to cook <strong>and</strong> eat, <strong>and</strong> a third<br />

room perhaps as a nursery for the baby no one knew was coming. 107 It<br />

would not have been a fully independent life, but perhaps she would, at<br />

101 Carl N. Degler, At Odds: Women <strong>and</strong> the Family in America <strong>from</strong> the Revolution to the<br />

Present (New York, New York: Oxford University Press, 1980), 112.<br />

102 Ibid. 116<br />

103 Deborah Gray White, Ar’n’t I a Woman? Female Slaves in the Plantation South (New<br />

York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2nd edition, 1999), 162.<br />

104 Schwalm, A Hard Fight for We.<br />

105 Ibid.<br />

106 Thavolia Glymph writes of the fallacy of “freedom for enslaved women [coming] to be<br />

understood as the right to patriarchy <strong>and</strong> its kindred domestic norms,” Out of the House<br />

of Bondage: The Transformation of the Plantation Household (Cambridge: Cambridge<br />

University Press, 2008), 4.<br />

107 Susanna Townsend to S.D. Cabaniss, letter dated 4 June 1866.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!