DUCK LAKE - Montcalm County
DUCK LAKE - Montcalm County
DUCK LAKE - Montcalm County
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>DUCK</strong> <strong>LAKE</strong><br />
<strong>LAKE</strong> IMPROVEMENT BOARD<br />
MEETING MINUTES<br />
July 9, 2012<br />
____________________________________________________________________<br />
A meeting of the Duck Lake, Lake Improvement Board was held at the <strong>Montcalm</strong> Drain<br />
Commission, 211 West Main, Stanton, Michigan on the 9 th day of July, 2012 at 3:00 P.M.<br />
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Sandborn at 3:00 p.m.<br />
PRESENT: Marv Sandborn, Chairman<br />
Abutting Property Owners Representative<br />
Donald E. Cooper, Secretary/Treasurer<br />
<strong>Montcalm</strong> <strong>County</strong> Drain Commissioner<br />
Bob Gagne, Member<br />
Crystal Township Representative<br />
Betty Kellenberger, Member<br />
<strong>Montcalm</strong> <strong>County</strong> Board of Commissioners<br />
ABSENT: Marie Nico, Member<br />
Crystal Township Representative<br />
ALSO<br />
PRESENT: Pam Tyning, Progressive AE;<br />
Carrie Wills, Drain Commission<br />
David Wight, Lawrence Wight, Ginny Wallgren, Ron Massaneri, Dick Walthorn,<br />
Judy Sandborn, Property owners<br />
Charlie Braman, Bob Naumann, Crystal Township Board Members<br />
Tom Porter, <strong>County</strong> Commissioner<br />
A motion was made by Bob and seconded by Don to accept the agenda as presented.<br />
Motion carried.<br />
A motion was made by Betty and seconded by Bob to approve the minutes from March<br />
27, 2012 with a correction to the paragraph about the watershed plan: “there is a plan in place for<br />
the lower Maple River watershed district but none for the upper Maple River watershed area”<br />
Motion carried.
OLD BUSINESS<br />
Update Weed Control Program<br />
Pam reported that Sonar was used on April 18 and the bump up was on May 9. Twenty-three<br />
acres of Algae was treated on May 23. The survey done on June 26 found Starry Stonewart.<br />
Sixteen acres were treated on June 28 along the West shore, the North shore, West of the island,<br />
and around the pilings. The pondweed cannot be treated this year because sonar was used. The<br />
weeds could be harvested, but there is not a big enough area to warrant the cost. Marv would like<br />
to use sonar again next year but DEQ only permits the use of sonar every three years. Marv<br />
would like a meeting with the DEQ to discuss the issue as soon as possible. Pam will try to set<br />
something up.<br />
The state set up the time limit and other restrictions for using sonar. The only exceptions to the<br />
rule are if the treatment was a failure that year and if you are using an experimental permit. All<br />
the experiments for multi-year use have been completed. For experimental you would need a<br />
monitoring program as well as the management plan.<br />
Ron: Would the shallowness of the lake be a factor that would allow them the experimental<br />
permit? Is there any way to find information on other shallow lakes that have treated with sonar?<br />
Pam will see if she can find some information to share.<br />
Marv: Wants to make a sonar program a top priority for the board.<br />
Pam: Sonar is only allowed every three years because it has the potential to kill other plants as<br />
well. That could cause unrepairable damage to the lake. Over use can also cause plants to build<br />
up and immunity to the chemical. The new hybrids being found in other lakes have already built<br />
up an immunity to the treatment.<br />
Ron: Is there another herbicide available that has similar results but would not build up the<br />
immunity.<br />
Pam: There are other systemic herbicides that don’t affect the other natural plants but they don’t<br />
have the multi-year affect. Clipper is a new chemical but it is more expensive and is used mainly<br />
in smaller volume areas like channels.<br />
A motion was made by Bob and seconded by Betty to make it the boards #1 priority to pursue the<br />
DEQ for sonar application in 2013. Motion carried.<br />
Ginny: The lake is much better this year but she would like to get rid of some of the silt buildup.<br />
Marv: A dredge is just too expensive.<br />
Bob: The state might allow the silt to be dumped in Saginaw where they just dumped river<br />
sediment.<br />
Pam: The cost of hauling the sediment away is very expensive.<br />
NEW BUSINESS<br />
Administration of Lake Improvement Board<br />
The township board is considering a resolution to get more local control over the lake<br />
improvement board. They would like more local control, include lake board meeting with the<br />
township meetings, handle funds, and oversee the day to day operation. Some people would like<br />
a more active involvement and complain that meetings are not convenient for public attendance.<br />
Discussion: The lake improvement board is its own entity. The board would have no control over<br />
the funds or the day to day operations. The township board can be provided with a finance sheet<br />
on a monthly basis and a copy of all board minutes will be forwarded to them. There has been<br />
some controversy over harvesting. Some people feel it has been a waste of time and money. The
DEQ does not permit chemical treatment out more than 300 feet from the shore or in depths<br />
beyond the 5 foot contour except for sonar which is a whole lake treatment. Harvesting is the<br />
only way to clean the middle of the lake. When weeds are harvested in July there is regrowth.<br />
Can the harvesting be done later in the summer? Harvesting is done in June or July to assist with<br />
boat traffic.<br />
Charlie: How do you dissolve a lake board?<br />
Pam: The board is dissolved the same way it is created: by a petition of 2/3 of the abutting<br />
property owners. However, the reason for creating the board has to have been resolved. The lake<br />
board can become inactive with no more meetings, treatments, or tax assessments.<br />
Ron: What are peoples’ reasons for wanting to dissolve the board?<br />
Charlie: They don’t see any benefit of the program. Some say they don’t use the lake. They feel<br />
they are being taxed for anything the board wants.<br />
Don: There is an appeal process for the assessment but they would have to prove that they don’t<br />
use the lake and get no benefit from it.<br />
Public Comment<br />
Ginny asked how long Marv has been the chairperson for the lake board?<br />
Marv: He is not exactly sure, but at least 15 years.<br />
There being no further business to come before the board, a motion was made by Bob and<br />
seconded by Betty to adjourn the meeting at 4:35 p.m. Motion carried.<br />
_____________________________<br />
Don Cooper, Secretary/Treasurer<br />
Dated: July 9, 2012<br />
State of Michigan )<br />
) ss:<br />
<strong>County</strong> of <strong>Montcalm</strong> )<br />
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the minutes of a meeting of the<br />
Duck Lake Improvement Board, <strong>Montcalm</strong> <strong>County</strong>, Michigan held on July 9, 2012 and that said<br />
minutes are on file in the office of the <strong>Montcalm</strong> <strong>County</strong> Drain Commissioner and are available<br />
to the public.<br />
I further certify that notice of the meeting was posted at least 18 hours before the meeting at the<br />
office of the <strong>Montcalm</strong> <strong>County</strong> Drain Commissioner, which is the principal office of the Duck<br />
Lake, Lake Improvement Board.<br />
_______________________________<br />
Donald E. Cooper<br />
<strong>Montcalm</strong> <strong>County</strong> Drain Commissioner