25.03.2013 Views

Stalking : policing and prosecuting practices in three Australian ...

Stalking : policing and prosecuting practices in three Australian ...

Stalking : policing and prosecuting practices in three Australian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure Figure Figure 1: 1: Victoria - <strong>Stalk<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Offences<br />

Reported <strong>and</strong> Cleared<br />

1998/99<br />

1997/98<br />

1996/97<br />

1995/96<br />

1994/95<br />

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200<br />

number<br />

Note<br />

Note<br />

manner <strong>in</strong> which <strong>polic<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

court <strong>practices</strong> are carried out<br />

across the states.<br />

Polic<strong>in</strong>g Trends<br />

Cleared<br />

R eported<br />

Source: Source: Statistical Services, Victorian<br />

Police, unpublished statistics<br />

Before exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the numbers of<br />

stalk<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cidents reported to<br />

police <strong>and</strong> recorded by the courts,<br />

it is important to clarify the<br />

difficulties entailed <strong>in</strong> compar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>ter-jurisdictional data. It is<br />

crucial to note that the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

data is not be<strong>in</strong>g presented as a<br />

comparative analysis of the <strong>three</strong><br />

different states. Given the number<br />

of ways <strong>in</strong> which different<br />

jurisdictions count various offences,<br />

there is no methodologically<br />

sound manner <strong>in</strong> which<br />

different data can be compared<br />

(see Ogilvie 2000).<br />

The number of stalk<strong>in</strong>g cases<br />

reported to police is <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sically<br />

l<strong>in</strong>ked to victim responses to the<br />

crime. Police statistics are not<br />

necessarily representative of the<br />

“real” extent of crim<strong>in</strong>ality,<br />

because victims do not always<br />

report crimes. In relation to<br />

stalk<strong>in</strong>g, the research data<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicate that responses from<br />

victims to stalk<strong>in</strong>g range from<br />

ignor<strong>in</strong>g the pursuer, to obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

restra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g orders aga<strong>in</strong>st them.<br />

For example, <strong>in</strong> Fremouw et al.’s<br />

(1997) research, the cop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

strategies employed by victims<br />

altered accord<strong>in</strong>g to the sex of the<br />

victim, but none of the top five<br />

responses <strong>in</strong>cluded contact<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

police. Instead, the females were<br />

more likely to ignore or hang up<br />

on unwanted phone calls while<br />

the males were more likely to<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> Institute of Crim<strong>in</strong>ology<br />

Figure Figure Figure 2: 2: Queensl<strong>and</strong> , <strong>Stalk<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

Offences Reported <strong>and</strong> Cleared<br />

1999<br />

1998<br />

1997<br />

1996<br />

1995<br />

1994<br />

1993<br />

Note: The scale is different <strong>in</strong> each of the above <strong>three</strong> graphs.<br />

0 100 200 300 400<br />

number<br />

500 600 700 800<br />

confront their stalker (Fremouw<br />

et al. 1997).<br />

In general, however, it<br />

would appear that a reasonable<br />

percentage of victims report<br />

stalk<strong>in</strong>g to the police. The<br />

National Violence aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

Women survey recorded that 55<br />

per cent of female victims <strong>and</strong> 48<br />

per cent of male victims reported<br />

stalk<strong>in</strong>g to police (National<br />

Institute of Justice 1998, p.15).<br />

The Women’s Safety Survey<br />

recorded that 58 per cent of<br />

women who had been stalked by<br />

a male <strong>in</strong> the last 12 months,<br />

reported the <strong>in</strong>cidents to police,<br />

followed by 57 per cent hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

reported the behaviour if they<br />

experienced stalk<strong>in</strong>g at some time<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g their lifetime (<strong>Australian</strong><br />

Bureau of Statistics 1996, p. 68).<br />

Similarly, Pathé <strong>and</strong> Mullen<br />

report that 69 per cent of their<br />

respondents referred the matter<br />

to the police (1997, p. 14). What<br />

has not been exam<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

previously is the number of cases<br />

that are reported to police, <strong>and</strong><br />

the proportion of those reported<br />

that are eventually cleared.<br />

<strong>Stalk<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Offences<br />

Reported <strong>and</strong> Cleared<br />

Figures 1 to 3 show the number<br />

of stalk<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cidents reported <strong>and</strong><br />

the clearance rate for Victoria,<br />

Queensl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> South Australia.<br />

Victoria has the highest<br />

number of stalk<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cidents<br />

reported, peak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1997/98 at<br />

959 <strong>and</strong> then dropp<strong>in</strong>g slightly to<br />

805 <strong>in</strong> 1998/99 (see Figure 1). In<br />

4<br />

Cleared<br />

Reported<br />

Source Source: Source Statistical Services, Queensl<strong>and</strong><br />

Police, unpublished statistics<br />

Figure Figure 3: 3: 3: South Australia, <strong>Stalk<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

Offences Reported <strong>and</strong> Cleared<br />

1999<br />

1998<br />

1997<br />

1996<br />

1995<br />

1994<br />

Cleared<br />

Reported<br />

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350<br />

number<br />

Source Source: Source Office of Crime Statistics,<br />

South Australia, unpublished statistics<br />

1998/99 Victoria had a clearance<br />

rate of 74 per cent.<br />

This is followed by<br />

Queensl<strong>and</strong>, which had a peak<br />

report<strong>in</strong>g number <strong>in</strong> 1997 at 674<br />

(see Figure 2). In 1999, the<br />

Queensl<strong>and</strong> police recorded 620<br />

cases of reported stalk<strong>in</strong>g. The<br />

clearance rate for the same year<br />

however was lower than Victoria,<br />

at 57 per cent <strong>in</strong> 1999.<br />

South Australia has the third<br />

highest number of stalk<strong>in</strong>g cases<br />

reported, peak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1998 with<br />

333 cases, <strong>and</strong> then dropp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

slightly to 318 <strong>in</strong> 1999 (see Figure<br />

3). In 1999, South Australia’s<br />

clearance rate was similar to<br />

Queensl<strong>and</strong>’s, at 59 per cent.<br />

It should be noted here that<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g cleared does not necessarily<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicate that charges are be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

prosecuted. Charges may be<br />

dismissed, withdrawn or simply<br />

not proceeded with due to lack of<br />

evidence. However, related<br />

research has shown that of those<br />

cleared, relatively few are cleared<br />

as a result of be<strong>in</strong>g dismissed<br />

(Ogilvie 2000). The number of<br />

these offences recorded by the<br />

police which are processed by the<br />

courts is the next issue.<br />

Courts Data<br />

There is very little research<br />

focuss<strong>in</strong>g upon court <strong>practices</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

relation to stalk<strong>in</strong>g. One exception<br />

is Keenahan <strong>and</strong> Barlow (1997)<br />

who note that the number of cases<br />

dismissed or aga<strong>in</strong>st which no<br />

action was taken far outweighs<br />

the number of convictions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!