25.03.2013 Views

Guidelines for Management of Ischaemic Stroke 2008 - ESO

Guidelines for Management of Ischaemic Stroke 2008 - ESO

Guidelines for Management of Ischaemic Stroke 2008 - ESO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>ESO</strong>-<strong>Guidelines</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ischaemic</strong> <strong>Stroke</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong> a larger proportion <strong>of</strong> patients. Most such studies have used a be<strong>for</strong>e-and-after<br />

intervention design, were neither randomized nor masked with respect to intervention<br />

or evaluation <strong>of</strong> outcome, and lacked concurrent controls [23, 53]. The types <strong>of</strong><br />

interventions included education and training programmes, helicopter transfer,<br />

telemedicine and reorganization <strong>of</strong> pre-hospital and in-hospital protocols <strong>for</strong> acute<br />

stroke patients.<br />

Direct presentation to the ED via ambulance or EMS transportation is the fastest way<br />

<strong>of</strong> referral [28, 53, 63-65]. Helicopter transport can reduce the time between referral<br />

and hospital arrival [66, 67], and also promotes access to thrombolytic therapy in<br />

remote and rural areas [68]. In mixed rural and urban areas, air and ground distances<br />

can be compared using simple rules [69]. No studies have compared air and ground<br />

transport specifically in stroke patients. In one study, predominantly in trauma<br />

patients, ground ambulances provided shorter arrival times at distances less than 10<br />

miles (≅16 km) from the hospital; even with only short delays in despatching air<br />

transport, air was faster only <strong>for</strong> distances longer than 45 miles (≅72km) [70]. One<br />

economic study showed that helicopter transfer <strong>of</strong> patients with suspected acute<br />

ischaemic stroke <strong>for</strong> potential thrombolysis is cost-effective [71].<br />

Telemedicine using a bidirectional video-conferencing equipment to provide health<br />

services or assist health care personnel at distant sites is a feasible, valid and<br />

reliable means <strong>of</strong> facilitating thrombolysis delivery to patients in distant or rural<br />

hospitals, where timely air or ground transportation is not feasible. The quality <strong>of</strong><br />

treatment, complication rates, and short and long term outcomes are similar <strong>for</strong> acute<br />

stroke patients treated with rtPA via a telemedicine consultation at local hospitals and<br />

those treated in academic centres [72-81].<br />

Activation <strong>of</strong> the stroke code as a special infrastructure with immediate calling <strong>of</strong> a<br />

stroke neurologist at a stroke unit and priority transfer <strong>of</strong> the patients to this centre is<br />

effective in increasing the percentage <strong>of</strong> patients treated with thrombolysis, and also<br />

in shortening pre-hospital delays [82, 83].<br />

- 12 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!