Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Conwy Deposit Local Development Plan 

2007 – 2022 

(Revised edition 2011) 

REGISTER OF SITE ALLOCATION 

REPRESENTATIONS 

November 2011

This document is available to view and download on the Council’s 

web-site at: www.conwy.gov.uk/ldp . Copies are also available to 

view at main libraries and Council offices and can be obtained from 

the Planning Policy Service, 26 Castle Street, Conwy LL32 8AY or 

by telephoning (01492) 575447. If you would like to talk to a 

planning officer working on the Local Development Plan about any 

aspect of this document please contact the Planning Policy Service 

on (01492) 575180 / 575181 / 575124. 

If you would like an extract or summary of this document on 

cassette, in large type, in Braille or any other format, please call 

the Planning Policy Service on (01492) 575180. 

You are granted a non-exclusive, royalty free, revocable licence solely to view 

the Licensed Data for non-commercial purposes for the period during which 

Conwy County Borough Council makes it available; 

You are not permitted to copy, sub-license, distribute, sell or otherwise make 

available the Licensed Data to third parties in any form; and 

Third party rights to enforce the terms of this licence shall be reserved to 

Ordnance Survey.

CONTENTS 

1. INTRODUCTION 

2. SETTLEMENT AREAS 

2.1 Abergele 

2.2 Betws yn Rhos 

2.3 Castell 

2.4 Cerrigydrudion 

2.5 Colwyn Bay 

2.6 Conwy 

2.7 Deganwy 

2.8 Dolgarrog 

2.9 Dwygyfylchi 

2.10 Eglwysbach 

2.11 Glan Conwy 

2.12 Groes 

2.13 Gyffin 

2.14 Henryd 

2.15 Kinmel Bay 

2.16 Llanddulas 

2.17 Llandudno 

2.18 Llandudno Junction 

2.19 Llanfairfechan 

2.20 Llanfairtalhaiarn 

2.21 Llangernyw 

2.22 Llanrhos 

2.23 Llanrwst 

2.24 Llansannan 

2.25 Llysfaen 

2.26 Mochdre 

2.27 Old Colwyn 

2.28 Penmaenmawr 

2.29 Penrhyn Bay 

2.30 Rhos-on-Sea 

2.31 Tal y Bont 

2.32 Towyn 

2.33 Trofarth 

2.34 Tyn y Groes 

3. APPENDIX 1

1. INTRODUCTION 

The Revised Deposit Conwy Local Development Plan (LDP) was published for 

consultation between 14 th March and 26 th April 2011. Over the consultation 

period the Council received 6000 comments from organisations and members 

of the public. 

During the consultation on the Revised Deposit LDP a number of comments 

were made about the proposed LDP allocations (sites for development) and a 

number of new alternative sites have been submitted for consideration. In 

accordance with Regulation 20 of Town and Country Planning (Local 

Development Plan (Wales) Regulations 2005, this ‘Site Allocation 

Representations Register’ details the following information: 

Comments received to ‘delete’ an LDP proposed allocation 

Comments received to ‘amend’ the LDP proposed allocation 

Comments received to amend a ‘settlement boundary’ 

Comments received to consider a ‘new alternative development site’ 

for allocation in the LDP 

The Council is now consulting on such representations. A Register of Site 

Allocation Representations has been produced for this purpose. This includes 

relevant alternative sites submitted during the 2009 consultation on the ‘first’ 

Deposit LDP. 

The Register of Site Allocation Representations does not reflect the 

position of the Council itself. It has yet to decide whether it is in favour of 

any of these suggested changes. 

1.2 DOCUMENTS THAT ARE RELEVANT TO THIS CONSULTATION: 

Site Allocation Representations Register 

The register (this document) contains the maps and basic representation details 

of new sites, changes to settlement boundaries, plus those sites currently within 

the LDP where objections have been received. 

The register is structured into settlements, in alphabetical order. If a settlement 

is not listed in the register, it simply means than no site allocation 

representations were received in that area. Each entry on the register has a 

site location map and the site is outlined in red. The details of any 

representations made on the site are given below the site map. In some cases, 

comments were received to the first deposit of the LDP during the consultation 

in 2009 and where these are still relevant, they have been included in this 

register. 

4

Site Representations Report – Appendix 1 

The Representations Report for sites contains a summary of all the comments 

made concerning sites. It is possible to see a summary of each individual 

representation relating to sites by locating it first in this register and then looking 

at the relevant pages in the Representations Report for Sites. Full versions of 

the representations can be viewed on line at www.conwy.jdi-consult.net/ldp or in 

hard copy at the Castle Street Offices, Conwy. 

Both the Site Allocation Representations Register and the Representation 

Report can viewed at local libraries, Council offices and on the Council’s 

website www.conwy.gov.uk/ldp 

1.3 MAKING COMMENTS ON SITE ALLOCATION REPRESENTATIONS 

The purpose of this consultation is to seek your views on the site 

representations received to the Revised Deposit Conwy LDP (2011) as 

detailed in this Site Register. Comments will only be accepted by the 

Council in direct relation to the comments detailed in this register. For 

example, if a site appears in this register and has been suggested as an 

alternative site to one that has been allocated in the LDP, then you can 

say whether you agree with this representation, or disagree. 

The Council is not inviting further comment on the Revised Deposit 

Conwy LDP (2011) or the sites proposed for allocation within it. Any 

further comments received by the Council on the Revised Deposit Conwy 

LDP will not be considered. In addition, no new site suggestions will be 

accepted at this stage. 

If you wish to make a comment about any of the site allocation representations, 

you may do so by one of the following means; 

1. Consultation website www.conwy.jdi-consult.net/ldp 

2. Completing the representations form (available at local libraries, Council 

offices and on the Council’s website) 

3. Email cdll-ldp@conwy.gov.uk 

4. Writing a letter and sending it by either post or fax to the address below: 

Conwy County Borough Council 

26 Castle Street 

Conwy 

LL32 8AY 

Fax: 01492 592713 

Please note that if you are making comments using methods 3 or 4, 

please ensure that you include the site number and name and which 

representation you are commenting upon. You will find these details in 

this Site Allocation Representations Register. 

5

The consultation period for the alternative sites will last for 6 weeks 

commencing on 28 th November 2011 and ending at 4.45pm on 13 th January 

2012. Any representations received after this time will not be considered. 

1.4 NEXT STEPS FOLLOWING THIS CONSULTATION 

At the end of the 7 week consultation period, all duly made representations will 

be compiled into a report which will be available for public viewing. 

The Council will consider all duly made previous comments submitted to the 

Plan along with the results of this Site Representations consultation before 

proposing amendments to the LDP. 

A ‘focussed changes’ document will be presented to Council in early 2012 

proposing changes prior to submitting the LDP for Examination in Public in mid 

2012. This will include a list of changes that officers consider should be made 

to the Plan. A Planning Inspector appointed by the Welsh Government will 

examine the LDP, focussed changes and supporting evidence base and make a 

decision as to whether he/she considers the plan to be sound. If the Inspector 

decides that further changes are needed to make the plan sound then these 

would need to be incorporated before the Council adopts the plan. 

6

Llandudno 

Site information 

Number: 413/116 

Name: Nant y Gamar Road 

Area (ha): 1.76 

Use: Housing 

Site Allocated in 2009 Deposit LDP? No 

Site Allocated in the 2011 Revised Deposit LDP? Contingency site 

Representation Details: 

Site Allocation Representations Yes see Appendix 1 page 8 

made during consultation on 2009 

Deposit LDP? 

Type of Representation Include as additional allocation for housing. 

Supplementary studies submitted SA/SEA submitted 

with the representation? i.e. 

SA/SEA 

Site Allocation Representations 


Revised Deposit LDP? 

Yes see Appendix 1 pages 810 - 821 

Type of Representation Two types of representation received: 

1. Delete the contingency site. 

2. Amend the contingency site so that it 

becomes a substantive allocation rather 

Supplementary studies submitted 


SA/SEA 

No 

than a contingency site. 

73



Number: 119/CR29 

Name: Queen’s Road, Adjacent Medical Centre 

Area (ha): 2.67 

Use: Housing 


Site Allocated in the 2011 Revised Deposit LDP? No 


Site Allocation Representations Yes see Appendix 1 pages 810 – 821 



Type of Representation Include as alternative to 116/413 Nant y Gamar 



SA/SEA 

Road contingency site. 

No 

74



Number: 122/414 

Name: Queen’s Road, Adjacent Roundabout 

Area (ha): 1.74 

Use: Housing 




Site Allocation Representations Yes see Appendix 1 pages 810 - 821 






SA/SEA 

Road contingency site 

No 

75



Number: CR4 

Name: Pier Pavilion 

Area (ha): 0.35 

Use: Holiday Accommodation Zone 


Site Allocated in the 2011 Revised Deposit LDP? Within a holiday accommodation 

designation. 








SA/SEA 

Road contingency site. 

No 

76



Number: 363 

Name: Adjoining Bryn Berain, Craigside 

Area (ha): 0.50 

Use: Housing 







Type of Representation Include as additional housing allocation 

Supplementary studies submitted No 


SA/SEA 

77



Number: 364 

Name: Adjoining Craigside Manor and Limpley Lodge 

Area (ha): 0.84 

Use: Housing 







Type of Representation Include as additional housing allocation. 



SA/SEA 

78



Number: 434 

Name: Plas yn Dre 

Area (ha): 0.22 

Use: Housing 


Site Allocated in the 2011 Revised Deposit LDP? Yes 





Type of Representation Delete the allocation. 

Supplementary studies submitted N/A 


SA/SEA 

79



Number: CR34 

Name: Former Goods Yard 

Area (ha): 1.34 

Use: Employment 







Type of Representation Site may be at risk of flooding – possible deletion 



SA/SEA 

No 

80



Number: CR42 

Name: Triangle Field, Land at Conway Road 

Area (ha): 2.46 







Deposit LDP? 

Type of Representation Include as additional employment site 



SA/SEA 




Type of Representation Delete the contingency site. 



SA/SEA 

81



Number: 133 (part of site) 

Name: Land at Tan yr Allt, Tan y Bryn Road 

Area (ha): 0.82 

Use: Housing 






Deposit LDP? 

Type of Representation Include as additional housing allocation. 



SA/SEA 

82

Llandudno Junction 


Number: 165/367 

Name: Pentywyn Road 

Area (ha): 7.76 

Use: Housing 




Site Allocation Representations Yes see Appendix 1 pages 8 


Deposit LDP? 




SA/SEA 




Yes see Appendix 1 pages 372 and 801 - 809 


1. Delete the contingency site 

2. Amend the contingency site to become a 

substantive allocation rather than a 



SA/SEA 

No 

contingency site. 

83



Number: 14 

Name: Woodlands 

Area (ha): 1.92 

Use: Housing 




Site Allocation Representations Yes see Appendix 1 pages 822 - 823 



Type of Representation Delete the contingency site. 



SA/SEA 

84



Number: 176 

Name: Esgyryn 

Area (ha): 8.55 

Use: Mixed Use Housing and Employment 

Site Allocated in 2009 Deposit LDP? Yes 



Site Allocation Representations made 

during consultation on 2009 Deposit 

LDP? 

Yes see Appendix 1 pages 8, 11, and 276 

Type of Representation Three types of representation received: 

1. Delete the allocation; 2. Amend settlement 

boundary to include site within the boundary; 

3 Amend the allocation to include more housing 

than employment and show the allocation as being 

Supplementary studies submitted with 

the representation? i.e. SA/SEA 

Site Allocation Representations made 

during consultation on 2011 Revised 

Deposit LDP? 

mixed use on the proposals map. 

SA/SEA submitted 

Yes see Appendix 1 pages 550 – 551 and 976 

Type of Representation Four types of representation received: 

1. Delete the allocation; 2 Amend the allocation so 

it becomes a contingency site; 3. Amend the 

settlement boundary to exclude the site; 4.Amend 

the allocation to include more housing than 

employment and show the allocation as being mixed 

Supplementary studies submitted with 

the representation? i.e. SA/SEA 

use on the proposals map. 

Yes SA/SEA detail included within the text of 

representation number 3 above. 

85



Number: CR14 (part of larger site area) 

Name: Former Hotpoint Factory 

Area (ha): 3.52 


Site Allocated in 2009 Deposit LDP? No (but highlighted on proposals map as part 

of the existing employment land supply) 

Site Allocated in the 2011 Revised Deposit LDP? Site included in the LDP but 

recognised as existing employment land supply and therefore not shown as an 

allocation. 





Yes see Appendix 1 pages 551, 555, 976 and 977 


1. Include as an alternative mixed use site to 

site 176 Esgyryn 

2. Include as an alternative mixed use site to 


with the representation? i.e. SA/SEA 

No 

site CR12 Bodlondeb Fields. 

86



Number: CR40 

Name: Land at Glan Conwy Corner/Black Cat Corner. 

Area (ha): 3.18 





Site Allocation Representations Yes see Appendix 1 page 277 and 975 


Deposit LDP? 

Type of Representation Additional or alternative to other employment sites 



SA/SEA 

in the area. 





Type of Representation Additional or alternative to other employment sites 



SA/SEA 

in the area. 


87



Number: 439 

Name: Former Social Club 

Area (ha): 0.98 

Use: Housing 

Site Allocated in 2009 Deposit LDP? Yes 






Type of Representation Delete the allocation. 



SA/SEA 

88



Number: CR18 

Name: Land between railway line and A55 

Area (ha): 5.42 







Deposit LDP? 

Type of Representation Include as additional employment allocation 



SA/SEA 

89



Number: R21 (also R41 and CR43) 

Name: Land adjacent to waste water treatment works 

Area (ha): 2.11 







Deposit LDP? 




SA/SEA 

90



Number: CR44 

Name: Land adjacent to Afon Conwy Motel 

Area (ha): 1.6 







Deposit LDP? 

Type of Representation Include as additional employment allocation 



SA/SEA 

91

ATODIAD 1 

APPENDIX 1

CYNNWYS 

INDEX 

Cynllun Datblygu Lleol Conwy i’w Archwilio Gan Y Cyhoedd (2009) 

Conwy Deposit Local Development Plan (2009) 

Policy HOU/1 – Meeting the Housing Need ....................................................................................................................... 4 

Policy HOU/1 – Dinerth Hall Farm, Rhos on Sea ............................................................................................................ 14 

Policy HOU/1 – Land Adjacent to Llandrillo College ....................................................................................................... 28 

Policy HOU/1 – Off Dolwen Road (Bryn Rodyn) ............................................................................................................. 31 

Policy HOU/1 – Adjacent to Parc Hanes, Kinmel Bay ..................................................................................................... 34 

Policy HOU/1 – Land off Derwen Lane, Penrhyn Bay ..................................................................................................... 35 

Policy HOU/1 – Land off Bryn Castell, Conwy ................................................................................................................ 49 

Policy HOU/1 – Land at Sychnant Pass Road, Conwy .................................................................................................. 50 

Policy HOU/1 – Opposite School, Llanfair TH ................................................................................................................. 51 

Policy HOU/1 – East of Trem Arfon, Llanrwst ................................................................................................................. 52 

Policy HOU/1 – Coed Digain, Llangernyw ...................................................................................................................... 57 

Policy HOU/1 – Traingle Field, Cerrigydrudion ............................................................................................................... 58 

Policy HOU/1 – Pencoed Road, Llanddulas ................................................................................................................... 59 

Policy HOU/1 – Ffordd y Mynydd, Betws yn Rhos .......................................................................................................... 60 

Policy HOU/1 – Ffordd Llanelwy, Betws yn Rhos ............................................................................................................ 61 

Policy HOU/1 – North of St. George Road & Rhuddlan Road, Abergele ........................................................................ 62 

Policy HOU/1 – Land to East of Llanfair Road, Abergele .............................................................................................. 164 

Policy HOU/1 – North of Groesffordd, Dwygyfylchi ....................................................................................................... 265 

Policy HOU/1 – Glyn Farm, Colwyn Bay ....................................................................................................................... 266 

Policy HOU/1 – Adjacent to Glanarfon Llanfairfechan .................................................................................................. 272 

Policy HOU/1 – Off Heol Martin, Eglwysbach ............................................................................................................... 273 

Policy HOU/1 – Top Llan Road, Llanrwst Road, Glan Conwy ....................................................................................... 274 

Policy HOU/1 – Adjacent Plas Penrhyn, Penrhyn Bay .................................................................................................. 275 

Policy EMP/2 – Site Allocations to Meet B1, B2 & B8 Employment Demand and Free Stock Levels ........................... 277 

Policy CFS/1 – Community Facilities and Services........................................................................................................ 279 

Policy MWS/3 – Safeguarding Hard Rock Reserves .................................................................................................... 280 

Cynllun Datblygu Lleol Conwy i’w Archwilio Gan Y Cyhoedd (Argraffiad Diwgiedig 2011) 

Conwy Deposit Local Development Plan (Revised Edition 2011) 

Policy HOU/1 – Meeting the Housing Need .................................................................................................................. 281 

Policy HOU/1 – Site 1, Rhuddlan Road, Abergele ........................................................................................................ 387 

Policy HOU/1 – Llanfair Road, Abergele ....................................................................................................................... 415 

Policy HOU/1 – Land South of Siamber Wen, Abergele ............................................................................................... 444 

Policy HOU/1 – Site 2, Rhuddlan Road, Abergele ........................................................................................................ 474 

Policy HOU/1 – Tandderwen Farm, Abergele ............................................................................................................... 502 

Policy HOU/1 – Abergele Business Park ...................................................................................................................... 525 

Policy HOU/1 – Esgyryn, Llandudno Junction ............................................................................................................... 550 

Policy HOU/1 – Social Club/Youth club, Llandudno Junction ....................................................................................... 552 

Policy HOU/1 – Plas Penrhyn, Penrhyn Bay ................................................................................................................. 553 

Policy HOU/1 – Plas yn Dre, Llandudno ....................................................................................................................... 554 

Policy HOU/1 – Bodlondeb, Conwy ............................................................................................................................. 555 

Policy HOU/1 – Adjacent to Glanafon, Llanfairfechan ................................................................................................... 557 

Policy HOU/1 – West of Penmaen Park, Llanfairfechan ............................................................................................... 558 

Policy HOU/1 – Opposite Bryn y Neuadd, Llanfairfechan ............................................................................................. 560 

Policy HOU/1 – Cwm Road, Penmaenmawr ................................................................................................................. 561 

Policy HOU/1 – Dinerth Hall Farm, Rhos on Sea .......................................................................................................... 568 

Policy HOU/1 – Dinerth Road, Rhos on Sea.................................................................................................................. 569 

Policy HOU/1 – Lawson Road, Colwyn Bay .................................................................................................................. 570 

Policy HOU/1 – Douglas Road, Colwyn Bay ................................................................................................................. 571 

Policy HOU/1 – Lansdowne Road, Colwyn Bay ............................................................................................................ 572 

Policy HOU/1 – Bryn Hyfryd/Ffordd Tan yr Ysgol, Llanrwst .......................................................................................... 573 

Policy HOU/1 – North West of Llanrwst ........................................................................................................................ 574 

Policy HOU/1 – Off the A470, Llanrwst ......................................................................................................................... 575 

Policy HOU/1 – East of Llanrwst, Llanrwst .................................................................................................................... 576 

Policy HOU/1 – Top Llan Road, Glan Conwy ................................................................................................................ 584 

Policy HOU/1 – Pencoed Road, Llanddulas ................................................................................................................. 585 

Policy HOU/1 – South of the Mill, Llanddulas ............................................................................................................... 586 

Policy HOU/1 – Ty Mawr, Llysfaen ............................................................................................................................... 587 

Policy HOU/1 – Ysgol Cynfran, Llysfaen ....................................................................................................................... 594 

Policy HOU/1 – Adjacent to former Rectory, Llysfaen ................................................................................................... 608 

Policy HOU/1 – Ysguborwen Road, Dwygyfylchi .......................................................................................................... 623 

Policy HOU/1 – Adjacent to Vadre, Dwygyfylchi ........................................................................................................... 707 

Policy HOU/1 – The Smithy, Llanfair TH ....................................................................................................................... 791 

Policy HOU/1 – Off Heol Martin, Eglwysbach ............................................................................................................... 792 

Policy HOU/1 – East of Aled View, Llansannan ............................................................................................................ 793 

Policy HOU/1 – Tan y Ffordd, Dolgarrog ...................................................................................................................... 794

Policy HOU/1 – Gwydr Road, Dolgarrog ....................................................................................................................... 795 

Policy HOU/1 – Ffordd Llanelwy, Betws yn Rhos ......................................................................................................... 796 

Policy HOU/1 – Minafon, Betws yn Rhos ...................................................................................................................... 797 

Policy HOU/1 – Dolwen Road, Old Colwyn ................................................................................................................... 798 

Policy HOU/1 – Opposite Bryn Rodyn, Old Colwyn ...................................................................................................... 799 

Policy HOU/1 – Henryd Road, Gyffin ............................................................................................................................ 800 

Policy HOU/1 – Pentywyn Road ................................................................................................................................... 801 

Policy HOU/1 – Nant y Gamar Road ............................................................................................................................. 810 

Policy HOU/1 – The Woodland ..................................................................................................................................... 822 

Policy HOU/1 – Adjacent to site 205/328 ...................................................................................................................... 824 

Policy HOU/1 – Site D, East of Llanrwst ....................................................................................................................... 825 

Policy HOU/1 – Site E, Adjacent to Bryn Hyfryd ........................................................................................................... 826 

Policy HOU/1 – Conway Road ...................................................................................................................................... 827 

Policy HOU/1 – Off Derwen Lane ................................................................................................................................. 828 

Policy HOU/1 – North of Groesffordd ............................................................................................................................ 829 

Policy EMP/2 – New B1, B2 & B8 Employment Development ...................................................................................... 975 

Policy EMP/2 – Esgyryn, Llandudno Junction ............................................................................................................... 976 

Policy EMP/2 – Adjacent to Bodlondeb ......................................................................................................................... 977 

Policy EMP/2 – The Former Goods yard, Llandudno .................................................................................................... 978 

Policy EMP/2 – Abergele South East ............................................................................................................................ 979 

Policy EMP/2 – Abergele Business Park ...................................................................................................................... 980 

Policy EMP/2 – Land at Orme View Filling Station, Dwygyfylchi ................................................................................. 1002 

Policy EMP/2 – Land at Memorial Hall, Dolgarrog ...................................................................................................... 1003 

Policy EMP/2 – Llandudno Triangle Field ................................................................................................................... 1004 

Policy EMP/2 – Orme View Filling Station .................................................................................................................. 1005 

Policy TOU/7 – Tourism and Recreation Development................................................................................................ 1006 

Policy CFS/10 – New Allotments ................................................................................................................................ 1007 

Policy CFS/13 – New Open Space Allocations ........................................................................................................... 1018

LDP - Deposit Plan 

SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES 

Policy HOU/1 Meeting The Housing Needs 

Rep No Name 

771 Mrs Kim Batey [982] 

Summary Support policy 4.37, 4.46, Hou/1, STR/1, DP2 regarding Abergele. 

801 Mr David John Vaughan [2179] 

Summary Support policy 4.37, 4.46, Hou/1, STR/1, DP2 regarding Abergele 

People Type 

1 Support 

1 Support 

1017 Mr Jonathan Collins [1053] 1 Support 

Summary Please find attached: 

Deposit Stage Representation Form 

A map outlining the SSSI area in pink (this was confirmed by the CCW in July 2008) 

A map outlining the area to be considred for development in green 

I have struggled a bit filling out the form, however, we would like the area highlighted in green on the map to be considered in the LDP for affordable housing. 

I'm not sure what the next step is, however, I look forward to hearing from you. 

(see attached maps) 

Change Sought: We would like the area highlighted in green on the map to be considered in the LDP for affordable housing. 

800 Mrs Julie Rathbone [999] 1 Support 


791 Mr Lewis Karl Rathbone [997] 1 Support 


790 Mrs Linda Marston [995] 1 Support 


789 Mrs Kathryn Anderton [994] 1 Support 

Summary Abergele needs affordable housing. Support policy 4.37, 4.46, Hou/1, STR/1, DP2 regarding Abergele 

787 Mr Samuel Andrew Rathbone [993] 1 Support 

Summary Did not expect an action group to be formed opposing affordable housing. When I finish my education I would like to settle in my home town. Support policy 

4.37, 4.46, Hou/1, STR/1, DP2 regarding Abergele 

785 Mrs Gillian Vaughan [992] 1 Support 


784 Mrs Ann Davies [991] 1 Support 


783 Miss Tracey Sutcliffe [990] 1 Support 


781 Mr Craig Vaughan [989] 1 Support 


769 Mr James Batey [980] 1 Support 


1456 Denbighshire County Council - Planning Policy (Martha Savage) [1843] 1 Support 

Summary The 6300 figure for delivering dwellings over the Plan period is, in the interim, considered reasonable and will not increase the requirement for housing in 

Denbighshire. 

Change Sought: Note para 2.5.2 of Denbighshire's response: 'The Welsh Assembly Government released revised household projections on the 11th of June 2009 (after the 

publication of Conwy's Deposit document) based upon mortality rates, fertility and migration (based upon the previous 5 years). Whilst these household 

projections should be noted, because a new method has been used to calculate them, it is considered appropriate to wait until time-series data is available to 

compare the robustness of the projections with real time data before using them.' 

772 

Mr Michael Batey [984] 

1 Support 


767 

Summary 

766 

Summary 

764 

Summary 

Mrs Joanne Pamment [973] 

Support policy 4.37, 4.46, Hou/1, STR/1, DP2 regarding Abergele. 

Mrs Jade Jones [972] 


Mr Mark Kenneth May [971] 


1 Support 

1 Support 

1 Support 

4



Rep No Name People Type 

762 Mrs Sue Jones [970] 1 Support 


759 

Mr James Vaughan [968] 


758 

Ms Yvonne Williams [967] 


751 

Mrs Lissete Faux [961] 

Summary Support policy 4.37, 4.46, Hou/1, STR/1, DP2. 

750 

Mr Keneth Anderton [959] 

Summary Support policy 4.37, 4.46, Hou/1, STR/1, DP2 regarding housing in Abergele. 

749 

Mr Karl Andrew Anthony Rathbone [957] 

Summary I am concerned that the short sighted Abergele Action Group will jeopardise new housing for Abergele which local businesses need. 

Support policy 4.37, 4.46, Hou/1, STR/1, DP2. 

1754 Watkin Jones Homes (Mr Goronwy Owen) [879] 

Summary We support the delivery of 6,300 new dwellings and which includes for the provision of 1,900 AHLN within the plan. 

1 Support 

1 Support 

1 Support 

1 Support 

1 Support 

1 Support 

1392 Awdurdod Parc Cenedlaethol Eryri / Snowdonia National Park Authority (Tim Polisi a Chynlluniau Strategol Eryri Policy and Strategic Plans 

Team) [1663] 

1 Support 

Summary We welcome the policy to deal with affordable housing in the Main Villages (Tier 2), the Small Villages and the Hamlets which are partly within the National 

Park. The policy ensures that the aims of the shared settlements are compatible with the draft Snowdonia Local Development Plan policies. 

Change Sought: None. 

774 

Mr Kristian Evans [986] 

1 Support 


5156 Ainscough Strategic Land. (Mr Nigel McGurk) [2073] 1 Support 

Summary Support polilcy HOU/1 

Change Sought: Our client feels that this policy should emphasise the need to promote sustainable growth in housing to reflect the location of the settlement and to support 

local housing need. 

The housing figures set out within Table 5 HOU1B which relates to the Main Villages should be increased to reflect local needs housing. Previously developed 

land located within settlements can have a major role to play in supplying much needed housing for the County and the figures in Table 5 should reflect this. 

7146 Cyngor Cymuned Llansannan (Mr Eifion Jones) [2082] 

1 Support 

Summary What is the future of the plots where planning permission has already been given under the Local Development Plan and that the development hasn't yet 

begun? 

1431 Leith Planning Ltd (Mr Chris Plenderleith) [1791] 1 Object 

Summary The Council have not paid due regard to the needs of an ageing population and has failed to make reference to other forms of special needs housing other 

than affordable. Given the current and future population projections for those aged 65 and over this cannot be ignored. 

Change Sought: The Council have not paid due regard to the needs of an ageing population and has failed to make reference to other forms of special needs housing other 

than affordable. Given the current and future population projections for those aged 65 and over this cannot be ignored. 

514 GVA (Mr Ben Lewis) [794] 1 Object 

Summary The representations seek to promote the inclusion of land at Dinerth Road, Rhos on Sea as a residential allocation within the LDP. 

Change Sought: Include Government Offices at Dinerth Road as a residential allocation within the LDP. 

1256 Anwyl Construction Ltd (Mr Mike Pender) [1514] 1 Object 

Summary This objection is mainly in relation to the site appraisals referred to in Policy HOU/2 and set out in Background Paper No 9. But it also refers to HOU/1 being 

the overall housing requirement as this will have an impact on the delivery of planning obligations especially affordable housing. This objection relates to 

validity of the site developer appraisals and the extent to which they assert that developer contributions - especially affordable housing- have been assessed 

and demonstrate that 50% affordable housing on site with scope for other developer contributions are economically viable. 

Change Sought: It is submitted that the development appraisals are flawed and the 50% affordable housing requirement cannot be achieved and so the policies are unsound. 

Rather than start with a fixed % and then negotiate at site specific level is it not better to simply say that the % affordable will be based on an indicative but 

lower target of say 20% and each site appraisal started from that point. 

1252 Anwyl Construction Ltd (Mr Mike Pender) [1514] 

1 Object 

Summary The LDP housing requirement figure set out in Policy HOU/1 is unrealistic and too low . In accordance with national guidance it does not take proper account 

of the evidence base. See attachment. 

Change Sought: The Plan should be changed to provide a requirement of 9,000 or more dwellings. 

77 

Mr E H Willliams [142] 

1 Object 

Summary A Housing Needs Study undertaken on behalf of the Caerhun Community Council identified the need for approx 13 affordable dwellings for local need in the 

community. A previous version of the draft UDP allocated land south of Hendy in Tal Y Bont for this purpose. In the current draft Plan there is no allocation for 

AHLN in Tal Y Bont, despite the wording of the policy making clear that in Tier 2 Main Villages, AHLN only will be provided on allocated sites. This ommission 

makes the policy unsound in relation to Tal Y Bont as there is no clear mechanism for meeting the objective of promoting AHLN in Tal Y Bont. 

Change Sought: Land south of Hendy in Tal Y bont should be allocated as AHLN, sufficient to provide for up to 13 dwellings. 

5




7255 Abergele Town Council [506] 1 Object 

Summary HOU/1: Policy DP/2 

Abergele has seen and absorbed significant growth over the periods of the Coastal Colwyn Local Plan and the Colwyn Borough Local Plan. This has resulted 

in large scale housing growth to the south of the town (e.g. Tan y Gopa 

area), off Sea Road and in Pensarn. 

It indicated its preference for housing growth for option 1 (ie 3750 dwellings over the plan period). This remains the Town Councils objective for the LDP. 

The Town Council finds no significant justification or evidence base for the housing figure now set out, that target having risen to 6300 dwellings (+10%). 

Change Sought: Reduce level of growth from 6300 to 3750. 

58 

Bay of Colwyn Town Council (Mrs Tina Earley) [123] 

1 Object 

Summary Members expressed concern that four of the proposed sites - Glyn Farm, Colwyn Bay, Dinerth Hall Farm, Rhos on Sea, Llandrillo College, Rhos on Sea and 

Dolwen, Old Colwyn are situated on greenfield sites whilst only one - 94 Conwy Road is on a brownfield site. 

Members felt that more consideration should have been given to brownfield sites such as the Education Office on Dinerth Road. This site could well replace 

one or more of the greenfield sites. 

Change Sought: Replace Education Office, Dinerth Road site for one or more of the following greenfield sites. 

55 

Glyn Farm Colwyn Bay, Dinerth Hall Farm Rhos on Sea, Llandrillo College Rhos on Sea, Dolwen Old Colwyn 

Mrs Gillian Rowlands [120] 1 Object 

Summary Inclusion of land adj Tynddol Cottage in plan. Five acres which part of is currently a market garden with greenhouses. 

Change Sought: Include the land adjacent to Tynddol Cottage in LDP. 


1 Object 

Summary We do not see why there is a requirement for tier 1 and tier 2 villages. 

Change Sought: We propose that AHLN be provided at 30% on all development sites in the plan. This reflects the percentage of AHLN required over the period of the plan 

period. 

82 Friends of Plas Gogarth (Dr Neil McKenzie) [148] 1 Object 

Summary Our principal objection is that local council tax payers residing adjacent to certain Urban Development Strategy Area sites e.g. 

Site ref. 432 have not been consulted. 

Change Sought: Local residents should receive details of planned developments well in advance of decisions, be invited to attend progress meetings, and points raised by 

individuals and action groups should be shown to have been taken into consideration. 

If residents' objections are rejected in a manner to which is deemed unsatisfactory by the residents then the matter shall be referred to an official, impartial 

arbitration body whose decision shall be binding. 


Summary We have reviewed the Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment and must express concern that site selection has been carried out 

without adequate regard to TAN 15 on flooding, which is clearly a relevant consideration to sustainability and strategic environment assessment. Until this is 

remedied all sites in the floodplain should be deleted and the units re-allocated to other sites. For the avoidance of doubt liability to flooding is a key material 

consideration in the allocation of sites and has been disregarded by the Council on the allocation of sites. 

Change Sought: Site selection has been carried out without adequate regard to TAN 15 on flooding. Until this is remedied all sites in the floodplain should be deleted and the 

units re-allocated to other sites. 

441 G Powys Jones (G Powys Jones) [150] 1 Object 

Summary Whilst no objection is raised to the broad strategy contained in the policy, It is considered that the allocations to the respective settlements in policy 1a to be 

far too prescriptive and that greater flexibility is warranted. There is no justification for such allocations, other than one which appears to be based on 

perceived demand. 

Change Sought: To omit any references within the policy to the numbers or percentages of the whole ''allocated'' to each settlement area. 

36 Mr and Mrs David Gee [103] 2 Object 

Summary Paragraph 1.2 and all subsequent paragraphs that relate to Green Wedge2 and site ref 8 should be modified to include the site for residential with openspace 

and or allotments. 

Change Sought: Change paragraph 1.2 and all subsequent paragraphs that relate to Green Wedge 2 and site ref 8 to include the site for residential with openspace and or 

allotments 

4 Mr Alan Holden [14] 1 Object 

Summary Abergele has seen significant increase in housing development over the past few years and the town in becoming contested. Further housing provision would 

make congestion worse. The planned housing also involves building on the football pitches, which so many of our children have enjoyed playing on over the 

years. Sport also keeps them fit and healthy. The leisure facilities are already limited in Abergele and the loss of the pitches would reduce this further. The 

school run is also significantly congested and further housing development would only increase this. It is already difficult getting appointments at the doctor's 

surgery. 

Change Sought: To abandon new housing development in Abergele, certainly not on any recreational land/sports fields. 

112 Mr and Mrs David Gee [103] 2 Object 

Summary Fails to meet CE4 as not flexible enough to meet changing circumstances. 

Proposal to add additional text headed Contingency Plan and should read something like 

If at any time during the currency of the plan it becomes likely that the land designated for housing is insufficient to meet housing needs the following areas 

will be redesignated as housing development areas: 

List to include most or all of the field of approx 0.8 hectares situated between Hawes Drive and Maes y Castell, Deganwy. 

Change Sought: Proposal to add additional text headed Contingency Plan and should read something like 

If at any time during the currency of the plan it becomes likely that the land designated for housing is insufficient to meet housing needs the following areas 

will be redesignated as housing development areas: 

551 

List to include most or all of the field of approx 0.8 hectares situated between Hawes Drive and Maes y Castell, Deganwy. 

Mr C.B. Jones [834] 1 Object 

Summary The dwelling requirement within Policy HOU/1 does not take account of the new local authority household projections,using the recently published 2006based 

household projections, the dwelling requirement in Conwy could be in the region of 9,300 dwellings or 620 dwellings per annum. This represents a 

substantial increase on the LDP suggested dwelling requirement of 6,300 dwellings. 

Change Sought: The overall dwelling requirement should be increased to the level proposed within the new local authority 2006 based household projections.in terms of 

dwellings the latest household projections provide a dwelling requirement of about 9,300 dwellings. The shortfall in housing allocations should be addressed 

through the identification of further housing sites in the most sustainable parts of the County, close to the key employment areas and public transport hubs of 

Llandudno Junction. The search for alternative sites should include for the provision of additional housing sites on the edge of Conwy town. 

6




1516 Sian Hooson (Ms Sian Hooson) [828] 1 Object 

Summary Incorporate within the Deposit LDP and Housing Strategy for Conwy the priority issue identified within the Strategy for Older People in Wales: Influence and 

develop age friendly planning of the built environment. It is recommended that this issue be considered as a strategic driver for housing. 

Change Sought: Incorporate within the Deposit LDP and Housing Strategy for Conwy the priority issue identified within the Strategy for Older People in Wales: Influence and 

develop age friendly planning of the built environment. It is recommended that this issue be considered as a strategic driver for housing. 

25 MR ANDREW DINEEN [60] 1 Object 

Summary Re; Site number 444. Living in Bryn Pydew, I believe there is already a risk that the village has been allowed to overdevelop.The roads are too busy and any 

further increase would seriously damage the quality of life for the residents of the village. The infrastructure cannot support the development of further 

housing. I have so far found nobody who supports the plan, other than the landowner. 

Change Sought: A halt to any further residential new build in Bryn Pydew and a realisation that the village cannot cope with any increase in traffic 

539 

MISS SHARRON FITZGERALD [808] 

1 Object 

Summary I object to use of greenfield sites to the east of Abergele & on land to the east of llanfair Road. I consider that the LDP fails the following tests of soundness: 

P1, C2, CE1 & CE2. 

The strategy, policies and housing allocations for Abergele are not appropriate. There has been insufficient consideration of the impact of housing allocations 

on the local infrastructure. 

Change Sought: Cancel the LDP plans for Abergele. 

1585 Carter Jonas (Mrs Charlene Sussums) [50] 1 Object 

Summary It is considered that upon examining the Draft Local Development Plan, insufficient 

housing allocation has been put forward in order to satisfy the housing land supply for 

Conwy. Additional housing site suggested in Mochdre (site ref 358). 

Change Sought: Include site 358 inMochdre as an additional housing allocation. See attachment for site plan. 

1196 Mr Gwyn Jones [1277] 

1 Object 

Summary Objection to the LDP on the basis that land at Towyn Way West is not allocated for residential or other development and that the settlement boundary has not 

been appropriately amended to incorporate the site. The Authority's assessment of the site is not accepted. 

Change Sought: Allocate the site - land ad Towyn Way West, Towyn. 

1234 Phillips Planning Services LTD (Mr Paul Watson) [1483] 1 Object 

Summary Client proposes the allocation of site 249 North of Towyn End Road, as an additional residential site in the Plan. See attachment. 

Change Sought: Include site 249 North of Towyn End Road for residential use in the Plan. 

957 

Mr Christopher Pullen [1038] 

1 Object 

Summary Engineering maintenance yard off Clobryn Road and adjacent Pentregwyddel Terrace, Llysfaen - settlement boundary should revert back to boundary line 

used in adopted Colwyn Borough Local Plan. 

Change Sought: Revert back to settlement boundary line as used in Colwyn Borough Local Plan. 

895 

Environment Agency Wales (Mrs Deborah Hemsworth) [1036] 

1 Object 

Summary Your plan seeks to concentrate future development in areas where there is provision of existing infrastructure and previously developed land. We agree that 

development in such areas is beneficial as it allows for a more sustainable form of development. However, as you are aware, large areas of the existing 

development in the plan area is at risk of flooding. Your plan therefore seeks to continue to concentrate development here. Without the information provided 

by a SFCA, you are not in a position as yet to state what percentage of housing can be located in any one area as in your Policy HOU/1. 

Change Sought: Undertake an SFCA before allocating land for housing in flood risk areas . 

885 

Summary 

Jones Peckover (D. Ll. Jones) [1032] 

1 Object 

We therefore propose that the Rhydgaled site be supplemented or replaced by the inclusion of the additional land shown edged red on the attached plan. 

See attached map 

Change Sought: We therefore propose that the Rhydgaled site be supplemented or replaced by the inclusion of the additional land shown edged red on the attached plan. This 

area extends to approximately 6 acres, has excellent road frontage, and immediately abuts the existing settlement area of Groes Village. It is considered, 

therefore, that it forms a natural extension to the existing village envelope, and its inclusion for residential allocation will support existing community facilities 

within the village, where a Post Office, village Shop and Petrol Station have closed in recent years. 

See attached map 

6963 Mr Andrew James Quick [1959] 

1 Object 

Summary Objection to the housing growth and spatial distribution of development in Abergele. There is no significant justification or evidence base for the housing 

figure of 6,300 dwellings. Abergele has seen and absorbed significant growth over previous plans, this has resulted in large scale housing growth to the South 

of the town, off Sea Road and in Pensarn. 

Change Sought: Housing growth option one would be more appropriate, delivering 3750 dwellings over the plan period. With greater emphasis on bringing vacant and empty 

homes back into use, reducing the demand on Greenfield land. 

1144 Master Mark Sweeney [1160] 1 Object 

Summary Objection on grounds of pollution and environmental concerns. 

Change Sought: Remove housing allocation from plan 

7140 Goodwin Planning Services Ltd (Mr Stephen Goodwin) [1162] 

1 Object 

Summary The Council has previously assessed the suitability of the site adjoining Pinewood stables, Sychnant Pass Road for housing and considered it as "suitable for 

development". It was only ruled out of the current plan on the basis of highway issues which have been fully addressed. 

The site is highly accessible to jobs, shops, services, schools etc by means other than the private car. 

There is a shortfall of housing land allocated in the plan even when compared to the low level of growth currently proposed. The allocation of the site will 

assist in meeting this shortfall in what is a highly sustainable and accessible location 

(for more detail see full submission) 

Change Sought: That the site known as land opposite Pinewood Stables, Sychnant Pass Road, as shown on he plan at Appendix 1 Conwy be allocated for housing purposes 

under policy HOU/1 and Tabel 13. 

7137 Goodwin Planning Services Ltd (Mr Stephen Goodwin) [1162] 1 Object 

Summary The site at Peulwys Farm performs extremely well against the Council's criteria and against National Planning Policy criteria for assessing sites to be 

allocated for housing development within the Local Development Plan. It represents an extension to the largest settlement within the county which is 

acknowledged as having sufficient services etc to accommodate additional development. It is accessible to local shops, services, schools, leisure facilities. 

The Council themselves acknowledge that there is insufficient capacity on brownfield sites within the settlement limits to meet even the low level of housing 

currently suggested in the Draft Plan and that, as a result, there will be a need to release greenfield sites on the edge of existing settlements. 

Change Sought: That the site at Peulwys Farm, Peulwys Lane, Old Colwyn shown on the plan attached at Appendix 1 be allocated for housing purposes under policy HOU/1 

and Table 13. 

7





Summary We believe the 6300 market units is well below the level of housing indicated by the evidence base. We believe the Council's figure will lead to a substantial 

under provision of housing within the County to 2022 which will have a significant adverse effect on the County in terms of raising house prices, reducing 

availability of affordable housing, potential increases in commuting (based on the Council's employment growth strategy) and the decline of some settlements. 

We believe the figure should realistically be 9300. (For justification see full submission). 

Change Sought: Part 1 of policy HOU/1 should be amended to read (changes in italics):- "Over the period 2007/2022, Conwy County Borough Council will plan, monitor and 

review the delivery of 9300 new dwellings (an average annual rate of 620 new dwellings)....." 

1253 Anwyl Construction Ltd (Mr Mike Pender) [1514] 

1 Object 

Summary Objection to evidence base on which policy HOU/1 applies. It is incomplete/not up to date and does not support or justify the policies and proposals. See 

attachment. 

Change Sought: To make the Plan sound there needs to be an up to date evidence base to support realistic policies - especially on the overall housing requirement , the 

reasonable allowance for commitments etc, site capacity, the residual need for new allocations, 50% requirement for affordable housing , open space 

requirement , green wedges, landscape areas , renewable energy and planning obligations. 

181 paul jenkins [456] 1 Object 

Summary Increased housing is useless without corresponding transport improvement. The existence of a primary and secondary school in Derwen Lane, Penrhyn 

Bay,which can only be accessed via Llanrhos Road already causes traffic chaos. There are regular hold-ups at Toll Bar roundabout, and when the 

Eisteddfodd is in town traffic queues right back to Wormhout Way and down the A470 as far as Black Cat.More housing/congestion would be a nightmare. 

Change Sought: No increased housing without improved road access 


Summary It is considered that the Esgyryn site should be included within the settlement boundary, consistent with approach adopted on other sites. 

Change Sought: It is considered that the Esgyryn site should be included within the settlement boundary, consistent with approach adopted on other sites. 

1235 Barton Willmore (Mr Ben Stephenson) [1495] 

1 Object 

Summary Object to proposed settlement boundary in Conwy. It should be amended to include land to the north of Llanrwst Road and south of the castle walls as an 

additional site. See attachment. 

Change Sought: Amend the Conwy settlement boundary and include land to the north of Llanrwst Road and south of the castle walls as an additional site. See attachment. 

1200 Mr Hugh Rhys-Williams [1280] 

1 Object 

Summary Policy HOU/1 fails the test of soudness C3 since it does not have regard to the Wales Spatial Plan's objective to develop Wales as a modern bilingual society 

(see attached letter). 

Change Sought: Policy HOU/1 should have more regard to the Wales Spatial Plan's objective of developing Wales as a modern bilingual society. 

96 Miss Shirley Bond [158] 1 Object 

Summary Objection to housing developments in Abergele on environmental and economic grounds grounds. 

Change Sought: Removal of housing developments in Abergele from plan. 

805 Campaign for the Protection of Rural Wales (Mr Richard Waters) [985] 1 Object 

Summary Llanrwst 

Llanrwst is identified in the Plan as an urban area, and is the main settlement in the southern part of the County Borough. 

In contrast to the indicated levels of growth for the coastal urban areas, there is little indication of the intended level of growth in Llanrwst (para.3.26). Whilst, 

under Policy HOU/1, Table 5 HOU 1B indicates there will be 96 new dwellings built on non-strategic allocations in the town, the same table also indicates the 

unlikely position that there won't be any new dwellings from existing permissions or from windfall sites. 

Change Sought: The plan should be amended to be more realistic and explicit in respect of house building and housing needs in Llanrwst 

95 Gareth Williams Planning Representative (Mr Gareth Williams) [157] 1 Object 

Summary Comend the need to secure additional areas in order to supply affordable housing. A pragmatic and courageous to recognise that due to shortage of 

brownfield sites tracts of green wedge may need to be allocated. 

Need for moral and spiritual growth as well. Places of worship are not mentioned within the LDP. 

Insertion of wording "including places of worship" into the document in HOU/1 point 4 (p 73); Section 3.2 (p33), 3.31 and 3.33 (pp 44, 45); and SO13 (p 28) 

Change Sought: Insertion of wording "including places of worship" into the document in HOU/1 point 4 (p 73); Section 3.2 (p33), 3.31 and 3.33 (pp 44, 45); and SO13 (p 28) 

13 MR STEPHEN NOAKES [41] 1 Object 

Summary I object to you considering a greenfield site for housing of any kind when you have sufficient brownfield sites within the county i.e. Dolgarrog Aluminium site - 

this has sufficient housing for at least several hundred houses. Also access to this land would be from the Tyn-y-Groes B road to Tal-y-cafn which is a single 

lane road and totally unsuitable for major housing. The village of Tyn-y-groes already has 3 housing estates and any future development would ruin its 

character. 

Change Sought: No changes would be acceptable - Tyn-y-Groes does not need housing when you have the Dolgarrog site. 

94 Mr G M Hines [155] 1 Object 

Summary Objection to housing developments in Abergele 

Change Sought: To remove housing developments in Abergele from Plan 

1181 Mr Emyr Lloyd Hughes [1235] 

1 Object 

Summary Sites in the Towyn/Kinmel Bay area identified as 'committed' or designated as allocations in the LDP (together with other flood plain sites) have not been 

justified in terms of TAN 15 nor subject to full FCA appraisal in line with the TAN. 

Change Sought: Justification in terms of TAN 15 is required, along with full FCA appraisal. 

5164 Beech Developments (NW) Ltd [765] 1 Object 

Summary It is considered that Policy HOU/1 is unsound by reference to Test CE2 in that, having regard to the background documents and other material 

considerations, the proposed level of house building for the Plan period is too low and does not, therefore, satisfactorily meet the needs of the County. 

Change Sought: It is, therefore, suggested that HOU/1 should be amended to provide for 9200 dwellings. It is proposed that a site at the junction of Pentywyn Road and Marl 

lane in Llandudno Junction be allocated as part of this process. 

1773 Mostyn Estates Limited (Mr Peter Caldwell) [717] 

1 Object 

Summary Site Ref 413-Land at Nant-y-Gamar Road south 

This site should be allocated for housing. For supporting information - see original submission. 

Change Sought: Allocate the following site for housing.Site Ref 413-Land at Nant-y-Gamar Road south of Ysgol Gogarth, Llandudno 

8




1384 Mr Jonathan Cawley [1659] 1 Object 

Summary objection to LDDP on the basis that the Cawley Brothers Yard site at Llanrwst has not been allocated for housing. It could make a much needed contribution 

to the town's housing need on a sustainable site. 

Change Sought: Include the site for housing in the Plan. 




Conwy. Additional site in Glan Conwy proposed (site ref 305). See attachment for full response. 

Change Sought: Additional site in Glan Conwy proposed (site ref 305). See attachment for site plan. 

1385 The Order of the Sisters of St Joseph of the Apparition [1660] 1 Object 

Summary Proposal for the inclusion of site 382 Tyddyn Bach, Penmaenmawr as a housing site allocation in the Plan. See attachment for full response. 

Change Sought: Inclusion of site 382 Tyddyn Bach, Penmaenmawr as a housing site allocation in the Plan. See attachment for full response. 

1546 Countryside Council for Wales (Mr Richard Ninnes) [1948] 1 Object 

Summary CCW considers that the proposed level of housing growth would appear to be realistic for the Plan period. 

Concern that the Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment my not have appraised the chosen growth option to a degree compliant 

with the Test of Significance CE2. CCW notes that for the Deposit Stage revised growth options have been considered, which did not form a part of the 

assessment at the Preferred Strategy stage (Sustainability Report 2009, para. 7.6). Concern with the statement: the appraisal of growth options has been 

"only undertaken as a brief exercise at this stage of appraisal" 

Change Sought: Ensure that the chosen growth strategy and sites are fully explored through SA/SEA 

1398 Awdurdod Parc Cenedlaethol Eryri / Snowdonia National Park Authority (Tim Polisi a Chynlluniau Strategol Eryri Policy and Strategic Plans 1 Object 

Team) [1663] 

Summary An explanation is needed regarding the difference between the figures in the table and the figures in the written statement. 

e.g. 1: The figure of 1696 in the written statement refers to random development sites but the table on page 73 notes that it is sites with planning permission 

that come to a total of 1696. 

e.g. 2: The same misunderstanding with the land allocation figures - (the table refers to 3340 as the figure for land allocations but the written statement refers 

to 3340 of planning permissions that haven't been developed. 

Change Sought: An explanation is needed regarding the difference between the figures in the table and the figures in the written statement. 

e.g. 1: The figure of 1696 in the written statement refers to random development sites but the table on page 73 notes that it is sites with planning permission 

that come to a total of 1696. 

e.g. 2: The same misunderstanding with the land allocation figures - (the table refers to 3340 as the figure for land allocations but the written statement refers 

to 3340 of planning permissions that haven't been developed. 

1397 Awdurdod Parc Cenedlaethol Eryri / Snowdonia National Park Authority (Tim Polisi a Chynlluniau Strategol Eryri Policy and Strategic Plans 

Team) [1663] 

1 Object 

Summary An explanation is needed as to why there is no reference to random sites within the main villages in table HOU1b 

Change Sought: An explanation is needed as to why there is no reference to random sites within the main villages in table HOU1b 




Conwy. Additional site in Old Colwyn proposed (ssite ref 344). See attachment for full response. 

Change Sought: Additional site in Old Colwyn proposed (ssite ref 344). See attachment for site plan. 

1391 Awdurdod Parc Cenedlaethol Eryri / Snowdonia National Park Authority (Tim Polisi a Chynlluniau Strategol Eryri Policy and Strategic Plans 1 Object 

Team) [1663] 

Summary Housing Figure 6300 (420 per year) - based on projections which are based on 2005 information rather than on the regional work which was completed in 

2007 on projections based on 2003 data. The national policy notes that there is a need for local planning authorities to work together to determine WAG 

settlement projections or agree on their own projections based on policies. We do not believe that the figures based on 2005 data have been discussed or 

agreed jointly on a regional level. 

Change Sought: We don't believe the figures based on the 2005 data have been discussed or agreed on the whole regionally. 






6945 Mrs Pauline Last [1956] 

1 Object 







1 Object 

Summary The planned delivery of 6300 dwellings will not meet the level of changes in population and household numbers contained in national forecasts nor will it 

deliver a rate of development commensurate with regional house development needs nor indications of county level requirements forecasting based on 

population and household formation trends. See point 1 in the attachment. 

Change Sought: Under provision of allocations in the Plan. Allocate a residential site in Penmaenmawr. Land lying between Cwm Road, Graigllwyd Road and Merton Park is 

suggested. See schedule 2 of the attachment for further information. 

390 Mr David Mortimer Jones [586] 1 Object 

Summary Site 4, Land off Henryd Road, Conwy should be considered more seriously for development. 

Change Sought: Site 4, Henryd Road, Conwy as an alternative to Site 446 Land at Sychnant Pass Road, Conwy and Site 368 Land off Bryn Castell, Conwy. 

306 MR Phillip Dykes [587] 1 Object 

Summary Could you please look to include my garden, which has Cert of Lawfulness (ref 0/34226 dated 17.01.08) within your revised LDP settlement limit. Please see 

attached OS plan. 

Change Sought: Could you please look to include my garden, which has Cert of Lawfulness (ref 0/34226 dated 17.01.08) within your revised LDP settlement limit. Please see 

attached OS plan. 

9




1625 cyng William Edwards [614] 1 Object 

Summary I believe that the policy on AHLN in minor villages and hamlets needs more flexibility, and also needs to be more specific in order to cater for a neglected but 

vital group of people who may well find their ambitions thwarted by the yardstick used to describe affordable homes. What exactly is meant by 'affordable 

homes'and 'exceptional circumstaces'. Example included in full response, attached. 

Change Sought: Policy HOU/1 para 1e needs more flexibility, and to be more specific in its definitions. See attachment for a local example where an application was refused 

for various reasons. 

1634 cyng William Edwards [614] 1 Object 

Summary (Table 5 HOU1/b)There is no equivalent Welsh word for 'Hamlet'. In my ward of Uwchaled, Llangwm is classified as a minor village, whereas Llanfihangel 

Glyn Myfyr is classified as a hamlet. Both villages have a recognisable village centre with a similar number of houses therein. I see this as an anomaly which 

gives Llangwm an undue advantage over Llanfihangel in terms of AHLN. Personally, I find the distinction made in English between a minor village and a 

hamlet as being out of kilter with the Welsh tradition of small villages and larger villages. 

Change Sought: Hamlets and minor villages should be treated as one and the same, if only because both are equally important to the culture and language, and both need to 

be sustainable as opposed to being stuck in a time warp. 

345 

Dexter Products [641] 

1 Object 

Summary Insufficient land has been allocated for housing within the plan area and in Llanfairfechan in particular. Ths restricts the flexibility to deliver the required 

housing land and affordable housing within th eplan period in the event of allocated sites not being implemented. Llanfairfechan is capable of providing more 

housing units in a sustainable manner than that shown in the proposals map and the figure given in Policy HOU/1. Use of brownfield/underutilised brownfield 

employment sites should be given priority for housing in appropriate locations. 

Change Sought: Allocate the Dexter products site at Llanerch Road, Llanfairfechan for housing purposes 

356 Mr Leslie John Simpson [650] 1 Object 

Summary The proposed housing allocation in relation to the coastal eastern part of the county is totally different to the Preferred Strategy. Since the Deposit LDP is in 

effect a different document from the Preferred Strategy as it relates to housing, there should have been further consultation with the general public. 

Loss of recreation grounds - Health 

The proposed development of St George Road will result in the loss of public recreation grounds. 

Countryside 

The land to be developed south east of Abergele (off St George Road and Llanfair Road) consists of outstandingly beautiful countryside. 

Change Sought: Remove housing sites from plan 

1583 Mj General Christopher Last [1955] 

1 Object 






368 

Drivers Jones LLP (Mr Ben Simpson) [662] 

1 Object 

Summary Sites 2a and 2b as shown on the map submitted by Drivers Jonas, should be included within the settlement limit of Llysfaen. This accords with policies DP/2 

and HOU/1 

Change Sought: Amend settlement boundary of Llysfaen to incorporate sites 2a and 2b as shown on the map submitted by Drivers Jonas. 


1 Object 

Summary The provision of land in rural areas for housing is too low at only 10% of the overall land allocation. 

Change Sought: In order that existing rural business' and facilities such as schools and bus services etc are protected for the long term the percentage allowance should be 

increased to 20% and conversely the percentage in urban areas should be reduced to 80%. 

1705 Mr Paul McQueen [1652] 

1 Object 









Conwy. Additional site in Llanfairfechan proposed for housing (site ref 384). See attachment for full response. 

Change Sought: Additional site in Llanfairfechan proposed for housing (site ref 384). See attachment for site plan. 

1695 Miss T A Owen [1649] 

1 Object 






1522 Ms Jan Williams [1931] 1 Object 

Summary Support for new housing suggestion in Penmaenmawr - Land to the south of Merton Park, and west of Parc Moel Lus (Tyddyn Bach). 

Change Sought: Support for new housing suggestion in Penmaenmawr - Land to the south of Merton Park, and west of Parc Moel Lus (Tyddyn Bach). 




Conwy. Additional site proposed in Llanfairfechan (site ref 385). See attachment for full response. 

Change Sought: Additional site proposed in Llanfairfechan (site ref 385). See attachment for site plan. 






10




503 Miss Victoria Barwis [777] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the allocation of housing land to the east of Abergele [sites 81&82 and on the land east of Llanfair Road site 78 on the scenic route. 

There is an over reliance on greenfield sites in teh LDP together with a failure to adequetly address the capacity of previously developed land. 

The stratergy, policy and housing allocations are not appropriate for abergele 

The impact of housing in neighbouring authorities has not been considered. 

There has been insufficient consideration of the impact on local infrastructure. 

The scale is in excess of local need. 

Environmental impact on loacl wildlife not considered. 

Change Sought: No further housing develop in Abergele required. Space to be left as green space 




Conwy. Additional site in glan Conwy proposed (site ref 302). See attachment for full response. 


1531 Home Builders Federation Ltd (Mr Richard Price) [1934] 1 Object 

Summary Objection to the dwelling requirement as it does not accord with national guidance, is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base and is not 

sufficiently flexible to enable the LDP to deal with changing circumstances. 

Change Sought: The dwelling requirement should be increased to a level more akin to the figure proposed within the new local authority household projections of 8,675 

households. In terms of dwellings, by our estimation this would yield a dwelling requirement of 9,298 dwellings. 




Conwy. Additional site in Glan Conwy suggested (site ref 307). See attachment for full response. 

Change Sought: Additional site in Glan Conwy suggested (site ref 307). See attachment for site plan. 




Conwy. Additional site in Glan Conwy (site ref 306) proposed. See attachment for full response. 

Change Sought: Additional site in Glan Conwy (site ref 306) proposed. See attachment for site plan. 

263 Davis Meade Property Consultants (J E Bibby, MRICS, FAAV) [548] 1 Object 

Summary Consideration of alternative site at Sychnant Pass Road, Conwy for inclusion in LDP. 

Change Sought: Land at Sychnant Pass Road, Conwy to be included in LDP 

1524 mr colin perrin [759] 

1 Object 

Summary Objection to site 62/278 and recommendation to reconsider site 163. Objection relates to highways and access. Support for site 163 and reasons set out in 

full response, attached. 

Change Sought: Alternative site suggestion - site 163, Land opposite school in Eglwysbach. The area within flood risk would be given up as amenity space and school parking. 

The site's agricultural merit is significantly reduced by its topography, size and access. The site is well located, between the post office and playing fields, 

opposite the school. See attachment for full response. 






1700 Miss Victoria Kennedy [1650] 

1 Object 






7154 Mr D E Davies [2092] 

1 Object 

Summary Revision of housing strategy to option 3 levels of growth, in order to take account of economic and age structure priorities and deliver affordable housing 

requirements. Allocate the land south of Llain Hiraethog, Llansannan. 

Change Sought: Revision of housing strategy to option 3 levels of growth and allocate the land south of Llain Hiraethog, Llansannan. 

1818 Town and Country Planning Services (Conwy) (Mr K Evans) [2030] 1 Object 

Summary CLDP-section 3 strategy and paragraph 3.25 Policy HOU/1 

New site allocation objection - suggested site list number 328 -Land South West of Caerffynnon Road, 

Request for site 328 to be allocated as part of a spatial strategy for Llanfairfechan neighbourhood area in the CDLP and the settlement extended to 

encompass the allocation. ( For justification see full submission) 

Change Sought: Allocate land for 30 dwellings as a housing land option providing open space. Extend settlement limits to encompass the new allocation. 

1820 Mr Terry Stevens [2042] 1 Object 

Summary The amendment of the settlement boundary of Llandudno Junction shown on Proposals Map 2 to include the mixed use employment/housing allocation at 

Esgyryn within the settlement limits. While the Dept. fully supports the allocation it considers the Plan would be more logical and consistent if the settlement 

boundary was amended to incorporate the allocation. As currently indicated the proposal would result in a significant new employment /housing development 

being located outside the settlement boundary. 

Change Sought: The amendment of the settlement boundary of Llandudno Junction shown on Proposals Map 2 to include the mixed use employment/housing allocation at 

Esgyryn within the settlement limits. 

1824 Mr E R Davies [2043] 1 Object 

Summary Additional site proposed adjoining the school, Llanfairtalhaearn. 

Change Sought: Include additional site. 

1830 Mrs Gwenda Pugh [2053] 

1 Object 

Summary I would like to appeal against the decision not to include the site at Cwm Eithin, Cerrigydrudion in the LDP. We feel the decision may have been based on old 

plans showing the entrance to be narrower than it actually is. 

Change Sought: Include the site at Cwm Eithin, Cerrigydrudion in the LDP 

11




7142 Cyngor Cymuned Llysfaen Community Council (Mr Gwyndaf Morris) [2079] 1 Object 

Summary The Community Council cannot see any reason for the removal of plot 338 Land at Bryn Heulog Road and feel that it should be included in the deposit plan. 

Change Sought: Include plot 338 Land at Bryn Heulog Road in the LDP 

1803 Mr Alun Owen [2024] 

1 Object 

Summary Has anyone in the Planning Department wondered what effect such a potentially massive increase in population could have on the character of the town? Is 

the present infrastructure sufficient? And what effect might it all have on the Welsh language? 

Change Sought: Reduce the projected new dwellings within the Abergele, Towyn and Kinmel Bay area. 

7152 O Jones and Sons Ltd [2090] 

1 Object 


requirements. Include the site adj to Pinehurst, Llanfairfechan. 

Change Sought: Change to growth option 3. Include site adj Pinehurst, Llanfairfechan. 

7160 Mrs Anne Pitts [2098] 

1 Object 

Summary Revision of housing strategy to option 3 level of growth in order to take into account of economic and age structure priorities and deliver affordable housing 

requirements. Include Land at Bryn y Pjn, Ty'n y Groes. 

Change Sought: Revision of housing strategy to option 3. Include Land at Bryn y Pin, Ty'n y Groes. 

7155 Mr Tudur Wyn Jones [2093] 

1 Object 


requirements. Allocate the land south of Dolwen Road, Betws yn Rhos. 

Change Sought: Revision of housing strategy to option 3 levels and allocate the land south of Dolwen Road, Betws yn Rhos. 

7163 Mr John Whyte [2094] 

1 Object 


requirements. Allocate Land adj. Ty Mawr Farm, Tan y Graig Road, Llysfaen. 

Change Sought: Revision of housing strategy to option 3. Allocate Land adj. Ty Mawr Farm, Tan y Graig Road, Llysfaen. 

7156 BHSF [2095] 

1 Object 


requirements. Allocate the land adj Fugro Robertson's site, Deganwy. 

Change Sought: Revision of housing strategy to option 3 levels of growth. Allocate the land adj Fugro Robertson's site, Deganwy. 

7158 Mr Tom Thomas [2096] 

1 Object 


requirements. Include site adj Eglwys Santes Fair, Llanrhos. 

Change Sought: Revision of housing strategy to option 3 level. Include site adj Eglwys Santes Fair, Llanrhos. 

7159 Mr Bryn Jones [2097] 

1 Object 


requirements. Include Land North Maes Yr Haf, Betws yn Rhos. 

Change Sought: Revision of housing strategy to option 3. Include Land North Maes Yr Haf, Betws yn Rhos. 

7161 Mr Colin Proffitt [2099] 

1 Object 


requirements. Include Land at Bodhyfryd, Llanrwst Road, Gyffin. 

Change Sought: Revision of housing strategy to option 3. Include Land at Bodhyfryd, Llanrwst Road, Gyffin. 

7150 Mr Alun Edwards [2101] 

1 Object 


requirements. Allocate sites at Tan y FFordd, Dolgarrog and land off Gwydyr road, Dolgarrog. 

Change Sought: Change to growth option 3. Allocate sites at Tan y FFordd, Dolgarrog and land off Gwydyr road, Dolgarrog. 

7233 Welsh Assembly Government (Mr Mark Newey) [2176] 

1 Object 

Summary Errors- tables HOU1b/2a/paragraphs 4.44/4.57 making understanding housing plans confusing. Lowest level of growth/high proportion of unidentified windfall 

sites - with contingencies still renders plan inflexible/doesn't provide certainty. Lacking coherence- adopting incompatible housing/employment growth 

scenarios. Failing to provide for migration likely to restrict housing supply, adversely impacting economic prosperity/population structure, increasing AH need. 

Should consider alternative options that meet AHLN. Housing/employment sites phasing isn't adequately covered. Housing level could increase to match 

migration without undermining priority issue? (preserving natural environment). Unclear how priority issue (minimal Greenfield allocations) and capacity 

considerations/environmental constraint factors (claimed to influence growth in housing level) have been determined. 

Change Sought: Change errors. Use higher level of housing growth. More detail on housing employment site phasing. Look into increasing housing growth level in relation its 

environmental effects. 

7162 Mr Gary Davies [2089] 1 Object 

Summary Inclusion of a policy for housing within clusters of dwellings. Revision of housing strategy to option 3 level of growth in order to take into account of economic 

and age structure priorities and deliver affordable housing requirements. 

Change Sought: Inclusion of a policy for housing within clusters of dwellings. Revision of housing strategy to option 3 level of growth in order to take into account of economic 

and age structure priorities and deliver affordable housing requirements. 

1646 Cllr John Alexander Maclennan [1984] 

1 Object 






1684 Mrs Pamela Summers owen [1989] 

1 Object 






12




1617 Mr Ivor Balmory [1980] 

1 Object 






1626 Mrs Jayne Howgate [1981] 

1 Object 






7149 Mr & Mrs G Harding [2100] 

1 Object 

Summary Revision of housing strategy to option 3 level of growth, in order to take account of economic and age structure priorities and deliver affordable housing 

requirements. Include the site at Geulan Road, Llysfaen as an additional site. 

Change Sought: Select growth option 3 and include land at Geulan Road, Llysfaen as a housing allocation. 

1637 Mrs Sarah Bellingham Livesey [1983] 

1 Object 






1678 Mr Allun Derick Wyn Owen [1988] 

1 Object 






1799 Redrow (Mr Robin Buckley) [1996] 

1 Object 

Summary Redrow object to Policy HOU/1 - Meeting the Housing Needs for the following reasons:- 

1.The Policy makes insufficient and unsustainable provision for new housing over the plan period, Which is not in line with 2006 population projections of 

9,300 dwellings. 

2.Pursuing higher levels of growth could have significant benefits for the communities of the Borough by helping to provide more affordable homes, helping 

more young people remain in the area and supporting better economic growth. 

3.The distribution of housing and employment growth between the Urban Development Strategy Areas appears to be driven by existing commitments rather 

than the specific needs of settlements. 

Change Sought: Plan needs to take into account the need for more growth and identify the settlements where this is most needed. 

1805 Redrow (Mr Robin Buckley) [1996] 1 Object 

Summary Redrow object to Table HOU1b - Settlement Hierarchy for the following reasons:- 

1.The Table makes no allowance for slippage to existing commitments as a result of sites not coming forward. 

2.The Table includes a grossly exaggerated windfall allowance. Only an allowance for smaller sites should be made going forward. Moreover, a significant 

element of the windfall allowance comprises possible future conversions (circa 950 units), but due to the collapse of the market for apartments, past 

performance from this source of supply will not provide a reliable guide in the short to medium term. 

3.There is an element of double-counting between existing permissions and future windfalls because the stock of existing permissions includes many small 

sites which will contribute to future windfall completions 

Change Sought: All existing commitments should be reassessed and those which are unlikely to deliver completions during the plan period should be discounted. A 10% 

slippage factor should be applied to the remainder to take into account unknown constraints. Sites which should be discounted, or at least alternative 

assumptions made about their capacity, include apartment schemes which are no longer viable/fundable. 

There is an element of double-counting between existing permissions and future windfalls because the stock of existing permissions includes many small 

sites (< 10 units) which will contribute to future windfall completions - these should be stripped out of the committed supply. 

A more pessimistic view of windfalls from conversions should be applied. 

13


Policy HOU/1 Meeting The Housing Needs, Dinerth Hall Farm, Rhos on Sea 


994 

Gary Kershaw [1047] 

1 Object 

Summary This estate already has its share of problems from the inconsiderate parking caused by the close proximity to Llandrillo College and the traffic chaos when the 

Rugby Club holds an event. 

It would be even worse with more traffic in and out of Llandudno Road. 

The roads are narrow and in a bad state of repair and the road network is unsuitable for public transport. There is also a lack of amenities. 

Dinarth Hall is a working farm and the proposed site in the plan is a flood plain. Residents on Brookfield Drive have had problems with insurance to this effect. 

Change Sought: We hope at the time of decision Dinarth Hall Farm will be released from the LDP. 

1139 

Summary 

Debi Powell [1155] 

- Unsuitable road network 

- Traffic increase onto Llandudno Road 

- Unsuitable for public transport 

- That it is a flood plain 

- Loss of green fields and traffic chaos when the Rugby Club hold an event 

- Lack of amenities 

1 Object 

Change Sought: Remove the Dinerth Hall Farm site from the LDP 

880 Mrs Mary Griffiths [987] 1 Object 

Summary Objection to Dinerth Hall Farm Site, Rhos on Sea 

Change Sought: Deletion of Dinerth Hall Farm site, Rhos on Sea and use of alternative site at Welsh Assembly Offices, Dinerth Road, Rhos on Sea. 

412 Mrs Elinor Mason [706] 1 Object 

Summary Welsh Assembly site offices at Dinerth Road to close. This site should be used rather than green site as it is a brown field site. 

Surface water problem at Dinerth Hall Farm fields. 

Narrower than average roads lead to proposed site. This will cause more traffic problems. 

Change Sought: Dinerth Road Government Offices site should be used instead of Dinerth Hall Farm site. 

996 A Stockinger [1048] 1 Object 







290 

Cllr Philip Edwards [191] 

1 Object 

Summary Objection on grounds that it contradicts decision to top using greenfield sites for housing developments. 

Infrastructure is inadequate and will create extra traffic. Insufficient facilties for community. 

Loss of agricultural land, natural amenity for local people and possibly lies in a flood zone. 

Will detrimentally change character of area. 

Change Sought: Removal of Dinerth Hall Farm from plan. 

1142 Tom Powell [1158] 1 Object 

Summary - Unsuitable road network 







1140 Bob Powell [1156] 1 Object 








898 J Buckley [1037] 1 Object 

Summary I have lived in the area now for many years and together with many other residents feel that this estate with its narrow roads is not capable of dealing of 

dealing with a further influx of traffic from Llandudno Road. 

With its close proximity to Llandrillo College and the Colwyn Bay Rugby Club, there are often problems caused by inconsiderate parking. 

With the concern for conserving the grassed areas, why are we covering the only open grassed area between Rhos and Penrhyn Bay with buildings and 

tarmac? 

There are no amenities in the area and only an hourly bus service. 

Change Sought: Remove Dinerth Hall Farm site from Plan 

14




993 

Mary E. Griffiths [1046] 

1 Object 







990 Mr and Mrs Ashworth [1044] 2 Object 







987 C. D Underwood [1043] 1 Object 







1160 Ms Elsie Roberts [1170] 1 Object 








1141 George Powell [1157] 1 Object 








752 

Mrs Wendy Hughes [963] 

1 Object 

Summary Objection to site 71/348 Dinerth Hall Farm, Rhos on Sea. Proposal will have detrimental effect on property values in the area, will cause increased traffic flow, 

there are access isues and the proposals would be detrimental to the area's picturesque surroundings and tranquility. 

Change Sought: Removal of site 71/348 from the Plan. 

678 Miss E.S Lamb [907] 1 Object 

Summary 1) Traffic. The surrounding areas are already unable to cope with the increased traffic especially now Llandrillo College has expanded. Also when there are 

large events at the Rugby Club. 

2) The Drainage System will be seriously overloaded causing blocked drains and then flooding. 

3) The state of our roads is a disgrace. This Highways Department cannot keep existing roads in good condition. 

4) Farmers are supposed to be growing more food as directed by the government. This is to help cut down on the carbon footprint. 

More land going under concrete will cause more flooding. 

Change Sought: Remove Dinerth Hall Farm from the LDP 

646 R P Mason [892] 1 Object 

Summary It would be even worse with mroe traffic in and out of Llandudno Road. 

The roads are narrow, in a bad state of repair, and the road network is unsuitable for public transport (which is needed). 

Dinerth Hall is a working farm and the proposed site in the plan is a flood plain. I understand that residents of Brookfield Drive have had problems with 

insurance to this effect. The land is often water logged and residentson Marston Drive, backing onto the site, have had flooding into their back gardens. 

Change Sought: I hope that at the time of decision this site will be released from the plan. 

207 Mr and Mrs M Edwards [491] 2 Object 

Summary Strongly object to the building of houses 

The land is on a flood plane 

It is in the green belt area 

Excess traffic on already narrow and busy roads. 

Houses would be completely out of character. 

We believe it is illegal to build dwellings close to farm buildings because of mice/vermin. 

Good agricultural land and also used for grazing. 

Established trees dividing the fields. 

Haven for wildlife. 

Change Sought: Removal of Dinerth Hall Farm Site 

15




686 Miss Brenda M Westwell [911] 1 Object 

Summary I wish to register my objections to the proposed building of dwellings on land adjoining Dinerth Hall Farm and Cambrian Drive. 

My concerns are - 

Loss of wildlife habitat, this land was supposed to be designated as Green Space. 

The narrow and congested roads will be made more hazardours by extra traffic and thoughtless parking. 

Possible problems with drainage and sewers. 

Depreciation of property values due to noise and traffic etc. 


462 Mrs B Gorsy [753] 1 Object 

Summary I would like to object to them building from Marsden Road to Penrhyn Bay. Their will be far too many cars and it will be bad for the environment, taking more 

greenery away. 

Change Sought: Deletion of Dinerth Hall Farm site, Rhos on Sea 

626 Mr Austin Stevenson [883] 1 Object 

Summary 1. Access Roads are not wide enough - roads must be widened 

2. Drainage inadequate - major alterations to drain system required 

3. Council has no proposals for increasing amenities written policy from council to increase in services 


748 

Ms Vera Pile [956] 

1 Object 

Summary Object to the LDP for Dinerth Hall farm due to: 1. This land is a flood plain, most unsuitable for houses to be built on. 

2, roads are most unsuitable for any more traffic, and parking facilities are none existent when there are functions on either at the college or rugby club. 

3. There is also a lack of amenities for more families to be brought into the community, doctors surgeries etc. 

4. It is more important to the local community to leave a few green fields around for the wildlife, instead of covering every open space with concrete. 

Change Sought: remove allocation 

288 

Mr and Mrs John Kelly [567] 

1 Object 

Summary 1) There is no necessity for a further 70 houses to be built either on the above land or indeed elsewhere in the area. The population has not increased to 

warrant such development. 

2)The increase in traffic. Emergency vehichles would have great difficulty in getting through. 

3)Noise and dirt created during the building of these houses would be unbearable 

4) The area at the moment is occupied mainly by retired people and to go ahead with this development would lead to disruption 

5)If the land is to be developed preference would be for bungalows 


580 Mr and Mrs Leslie and Joyce Barratt [854] 2 Object 

Summary 1. The population in this area has not increased enough to warrant such a development 

2. The traffic from Llandrillo College has increased tremendously since we moved here over 20 years ago. 

3. The upheaval of this proposed development would disrupt the whole area 

4. The proposed development is also very close to the flood plain 

5. The Council should clarify if there would be houses or bungalows 

6. We have not been informed of any meetings 


459 

Mr Leslie Kirkham [750] 

1 Object 

Summary The ground adjacent to the plan for the above site is usually flooded after rainfall and I understand that originally there was a river which drained the water into 

it from the surrounding hills. 

There is a serious problem with flooding, which is very difficult for the population, hard to resolve and expensive to alleviate. 

We are getting to be a more "built up" area and less like a village open green belt of open land. I very strongly believe in green space between cities, 

compact housing areas will spoil the village and rural outlook of Rhos on Sea. 

Change Sought: Remove Dinerth Hall Farm site from plan 

1159 

Summary 

Change Sought: 

1127 

Summary 


1163 

Summary 


Ms Beth Powell [1169] 







Remove the Dinerth Hall Farm site from the LDP 

Barbara Jones [1146] 








Mr Mario D'Angelo [1173] 








1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

16



Rep No Name 

458 Mr John Myers [749] 

Summary Objection on the grounds of reduction of market value for properties bordering the land. 

The roads are too narrow and already showing signs of being used to capacity. 

Part of the land in question has been described as a flood plain giving rise to drainage problems. 

Change Sought: Remove Dinerth Hall Farm site from plan. 

1162 

Summary 

Ms Amanda D'Angelo [1172] 








1161 

Summary 

D Roberts [1171] 








657 

Summary 


1057 

Summary 

Mr Terence Dillon [897] 

1) The proposed dwellings will considerably effect the open aspect from the rear of my bungalow 

2) The tranquility and peace of this retirement area will be detroyed 

3) Why not just have bungalows? 

4) Cambrian Drive already has parking problems due to the narrowness of the drive 

5) Why build on valuable farmland? 

6) A plague on land developers who perpetually enroach on other people's property willy nilly. 

Remove Dinerth Hall Farm from the LDP 

Sarah Brown [736] 





- Loss of green fields 

- Traffic chaos when the Rugby Club hold an event 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

461 Mr David Hugh Roberts [751] 1 Object 

Summary object on the grounds that it is to be on a green field site. 

Traffic along Marston Drive and Marston Road is bad enough now without the additional traffic that will be generated if development goes ahead. Marston 

Drive is a narrow road and is already in a bad state of repair. With so many parked vehicles Marston Road is often reduced to single line traffic. 

Fuel tankers use Marston Road and Marston Drive to gain access to the Spar Filling Station on the corner of Dinerth Road. 

Change Sought: Remove Dinerth Hall Farm site from plan 

1039 

Summary 


1081 

Summary 


1096 

Summary 


R. B Owen [1064] 








Remove Dinerth Hall Farm site from Plan 

C Mercer [1103] 








Remove Dinerth Hall Farm site from Plan 

Elizabeth M Reeves [1118] 








1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

17




1128 Anthony Kelly [1147] 1 Object 








1095 L J Reeves [1117] 1 Object 








1093 D Price [1116] 1 Object 








1092 I A Price [1115] 1 Object 








1091 A Baker [1114] 1 Object 








1090 Ken Barker [1113] 1 Object 








1040 

Summary 

Philip Prescott [1065] 








1 Object 


1088 M Neathy [1111] 1 Object 








1084 H Thomas [1106] 1 Object 









18




1137 John Jones [1153] 1 Object 








1082 D Williams [1104] 1 Object 









1099 A Andrew [1121] 1 Object 








1080 Nerys Stocks [1102] 1 Object 









1079 Michael Williams [1101] 1 Object 









1078 Marc Williams [1100] 1 Object 









1077 Doris Davies [1099] 1 Object 









1076 Dan O' Driscoll [1098] 1 Object 









1075 C O' Driscoll [1097] 1 Object 









19













1073 M Williams [1095] 1 Object 









1072 E M Kibble [1094] 1 Object 









1071 J Fenton [1093] 1 Object 









1138 Wendy Williams [1154] 1 Object 








1083 M Thomas [1105] 1 Object 









1110 G Brown [1132] 1 Object 








1126 E M Bowley [1145] 1 Object 








1124 P H Oliver [1144] 1 Object 








20




1122 N Roberts [1143] 1 Object 








1121 C Pile [1142] 1 Object 








1119 V Pile [1141] 1 Object 








1118 

Summary 

M Edwards [1140] 







1 Object 


1117 Janet Edwards [1139] 1 Object 

Summary 









1116 Richard Hughes [1138] 1 Object 








1115 Len Hughes [1137] 1 Object 








1114 Karen Hughes [1136] 1 Object 








1113 Martin Bottomley [1135] 1 Object 








21




1097 Gwilym Roberts [1119] 1 Object 

Summary 








1111 Charlotte Roberts [1133] 1 Object 








1098 E A Roberts [1120] 1 Object 








1109 M T Clarke [1131] 1 Object 








1108 Beryl Thomas [1130] 1 Object 








1107 Grace Myers [1129] 1 Object 








1106 John Myers [1128] 1 Object 








1105 J Cooke [1127] 1 Object 








1104 J Baker [1126] 1 Object 








22




1103 Peter McCall [1125] 1 Object 








1102 Doreen McCall [1124] 1 Object 








1101 Dorothy Worth [1123] 1 Object 








1100 G Worth [1122] 1 Object 








1089 George Neathy [1112] 1 Object 








1112 

Summary 

Carole A Bottomley [1134] 







1 Object 


1047 Ann Wilson [1070] 1 Object 









1065 Phyl M Haynes [1087] 1 Object 









1042 R Noughley [1067] 1 Object 









23




1062 Jean Williams [1084] 1 Object 









1061 Roy Gibbons [1083] 1 Object 


















1058 C Williams [1081] 1 Object 









1056 Joanne Lewis [1079] 1 Object 









1041 Karen Prescott [1066] 1 Object 









1046 Patricia M. Parkinson [1069] 1 Object 









1064 Joyce E Stubbs [1086] 1 Object 









1048 K Gough [1071] 1 Object 









24




1050 P Gough [1072] 1 Object 









1051 M Humphreys [1073] 1 Object 









1052 

Summary 

Margeret Jones [1074] 








1 Object 


1053 M McKeeman [1076] 1 Object 









1054 A McKeeman [1077] 1 Object 









1055 James Lewis [1078] 1 Object 









1044 V Smith [1068] 1 Object 









1068 E Benson [1091] 1 Object 









1136 G Underwood [1152] 1 Object 








25




1134 M Hayward [1151] 1 Object 








1133 G Hayward [1150] 1 Object 








1131 P Stockinger [1149] 1 Object 








1129 Keeley Thomas [1148] 1 Object 








1070 

Summary 

R H Benson [1092] 








1 Object 


1067 Ivy Evans [1089] 1 Object 









1066 M Husband [1088] 1 Object 









1063 G.T Williams [1085] 1 Object 









1827 Mrs Dympna Greaves [2050] 1 Object 

Summary I object on firstly on account of the environment and saving the planet. 

Too much traffic causing polution and noise. 

Flooding because the land will be covered in concrete. 

Sewage, the draiange system is not good in this area. 

The fields currently accomodate cattle and sheep. 

Not enough facilities i.e. hospitals, social services, dentists, schools, work, refuse and waste. 

Change Sought: Remove Dinerth Hall Farm from the LDP. 

26




1662 AM/AC Darren Millar [1982] 1 Object 

Summary There is no credible evidence base that the allocation of this green-field site for housing development is appropriate. 

There are a number of previously developed sites in the Rhos-on-Sea area which have not been considered for development which could address local 

housing need and demand (for example the Government Buildings at Dinerth Road). 

The previously developed sites should be fully assessed and considered against the Local Housing Market Assessment (LHMA) when this has been 

completed. It is premature of the Council to allocate sites until the alternative previously developed sites have been properly considered in conjunction with 

the LHMA. 


27


Policy HOU/1 Meeting The Housing Needs, Land Adjacent to Llandrillo College 


744 The Occupier [952] 1 Object 

Summary Government Offices in Dinerth Road Rhos on Sea should replace the proposed site at the College for the following reasons: 

Already developed with services and appropriate access. 

It is a brownfield site and not a green wedge. 

Level and does not impact on the local landscape. 

There would be no undo effect on the local environment. 

More housing could be accommodated on the larger site. 

There would be no loss of open space or recreational aspect. 

Any concern on legal issues such as covenants would not apply. 

The site is not on or close to a flood plain. 

Pressure from local residents to further development may not arise. 

Change Sought: Replace Site 213 with Government Buildings Dinerth Road 













739 Mr and Mrs H Clough [949] 2 Object 











Change Sought: Replace Site 213 with Government Offices, Dinerth Road 

488 Mr David Tweedale [513] 1 Object 











Change Sought: Use Government Buildings in Dinerth Road as an alternative site to Site 213 

746 Ms Deborah Couper [954] 1 Object 












642 

Mr Colin Winship [889] 

1 Object 

Summary My objection is because this is a greenfield site of open plan and beauty that is used for recreational purposes by the community as intended by the late Mr. 

Victor Wilde. He gave this land to the people of Rhos. I am unable to understand how this land can be put forward for planning/or sold, without ownership of 

the deeds. 

Change Sought: I propose that the brownfield sit eof the old Government buildings, just off Dinerth Road be used for development instead as part of the Local Development 

Plan for the Rhos-on-Sea area. 

747 Ms Joan Hide [955] 1 Object 












28




489 E Warburton [772] 1 Object 











Change Sought: Government Buildings Dinerth Road proposed as alternative site to Site 213 

722 Mr and Mrs Frank Addison [516] 2 Object 











Change Sought: Replace site 213 with Government Buildings at Dinerth Road 

699 L Ellis [924] 1 Object 











Change Sought: Replace land adjacent to Llandrillo College with land at Dinerth Road. 

725 The Occupiers [938] 2 Object 












726 Mr and Mrs Ward [939] 2 Object 












724 M Lawley [937] 1 Object 











Change Sought: Replace Site 213 with Government Building Dinerth Road 

29




704 The Occupiers [926] 1 Object 











Change Sought: Replace Site 213 with land at Government Buildings Dinerth Road 

701 R Brooke [925] 1 Object 











Change Sought: Replace Site 213 with land at Government Buildings Dinerth Road 













732 Ms Joan M Evans [942] 1 Object 
























378 Mr and Mrs A Laurence [680] 2 Object 

Summary Objection on grounds of increased traffic and issues of safety. 

Change Sought: Remove site 213 from plan. Suggested alternative site of Government Buildings, Dinerth Road 

737 Mr and Mrs A Hughes [946] 2 Object 












30


Policy HOU/1 Meeting The Housing Needs, Off Dolwen Road (Bryn Rodyn) 


119 Mr Norman Jones [190] 1 Object 

Summary Llanelian/Dolwen Road have considerable amount of small scale development leading to traffic congestion. 

Scale of proposed development too large. Would not object to smaller scale (up to 20 houses). 

National economic decline and reduction in immigration negates the need for housing development. 

If there is a need for further development serious consideration should be given to Abergele/Towyn/Kinmel Bay area. 

Serious consideration should be given to large number of disused properties in area before further development considered. 

Change Sought: Remove or reduce scale of development at Llanelian Road/Dolwen Road 

1780 Mr Andrew Jones [39] 

Summary Remove 335 Bryn Rodyn from the LDP 

See attached letter. 

Change Sought: Remove Bryn Rodyn from the LDP 

1 Object 

842 Mr Mark Roberts [958] 1 Object 

Summary Objection to Dolwen Road site, Old Colwyn 

Change Sought: Deletion of Dolwen Road site, Old Colwyn 

589 MR DAVID HARTLEY-WILLIAMS [860] 1 Object 

Summary We believe the LDP is not a clear and open process that the layman can understand. 

The documentation and language makes it too daunting for many members of the public to read, understand and object to. 

Land at 335 Dolwen Road is designated as 'of special landscape value'. 

The road leading to the plot is a danger spot, wide enough for one vehicle only.The problem has been highlighted for years, and the consequential 

development of an additional 75 homes would dramatically increase traffic, amplifying current prolems and dangers. Development would have a significant 

impact on wildlife. 

Change Sought: Refuse any further housing development in this vicinity. 

Simplify future LDP comment processes 

765 Mr Neil Coleclough [966] 1 Object 

Summary - It is my understanding that the land is not currently within the settlement boundary, and cannot therefore be classed as urban 

- The land has not been developed previously, and is, in fact officially classified as being of Special Landscape Value. 

The road which leads to Plot 335 (Dolwen Road) is classified by North Wales Police as a "Site of Community Concern". It is incredibly narrow in sections and 

has no pavement on either side of the road. 

The assessment claims that developing the site would have no effect on its biodiversity. 

Change Sought: Remove Dolwen Road from the LDP 

353 Mr Alan Whitehead [631] 1 Object 

Summary The piece of land is designated as rural, although in the assessment it states that the land is urban. 

Public transport in this area is very poor. 

Dolwen Road is a very busy road. The volume of traffic, including HGV vehicles, the omission of pavements, the narrowing of the road to virtually one car 

passing at a time, renders this road, dangerous. 

To add another 70+ houses without major road improvements would add more traffic. 

Heavy rainfall makes the road dangerous. 

Plot 335 has a wide variety of animal and plant life. 


460 Mr Peter Abrahams [748] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the inclusion of this site because: 

- traffic/ highways concerns 

- land is allocated within Colwyn Borough Plan as a 'Special Landscape area' 

- it is not within the settlement boundary 

- land is previouosly undeveloped 

- land opposite was offered for inclusion in the LDP but was refused over highway issues 

- pressure on facilities - doctors, schools, etc. 

- impact on biodiversity/ environment 

Change Sought: Remove plot 335 from the plan 

674 Mr Mark Jones-Williams [905] 1 Object 

Summary - The plot itself is in a rural area, 'green belt land' and should not be considered for development. 

- The building of 40 or more properties would carry an additional burden on the sewage/drainage system. 

- The building of 40 or more properties would also mean the addition of at least 60 more cars 

- The impact on local GP surgery availability for current residents with an additional burden of a further 40 families. 

Finally Plot 344 was removed from the LDP at an earlier stage due to Highways Issues - Why do you therefore propose to proceed with the development of 

plot 335 when this is on the same stretch of road. 


242 

Mrs Sian Constantine [511] 

1 Object 

Summary Site 335 We object to the inclusion of this site in the Plan on the following grounds:- 

1) It does not form a natural rounding off or infill 

2) It encroaches unnaturally into the countryside and has effect on the wildlife in the area 

3) It is land previously in the Colwyn Borough Local Plan as a Special Landscape Area and we do not believe anything has changed 

4) Concern about the highway issue, including: the narrow stretch of road, extra volume of traffic 

Plot 344 opposite the site was removed from the plan at an earlier stage due to Highway issues. 

Change Sought: remove site 335 

743 

Mr and Mrs R.M and J.L Jackman [951] 

2 Object 

Summary 1) The danger of the roundabout at the junction Abergele Road/ Llanelian Road must be sorted out before an increase in traffic volume takes place. 

2) The "long overdue" widening of Dolwen Road must be carried out before site traffic to any such development is allowed. 

The HG Vehicles to Bryn Rodyn Farm are already a problem 

N.B) Not being conversant with planning forms and little knowledge of planning procedures, we trust that note will be taken of our concerns. 


31



Rep No Name 

455 Mr Sunil Sethi [747] 

Summary Sites 335, 347 and 353 should be removed from the LDP. This area is greed wedge/belt. It is an area of outstanding natural beauty. 

It has inadequate road infrastructure and inadequeate local amenities eg schools, hospital, shops and GP surgery. 

Change Sought: Remove sites from plan 

1018 Mr John Standing [927] 

Summary Objection to Dolwen Road, Old Colwyn site. 

Change Sought: Deletion of Dowen Road site, Old Colwyn. 

People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

121 Mr Michael Owen [201] 1 Object 

Summary "A County of outstanding natural beauty, which will respect, protect and enhance its environment and heritage." 

The proposed development on either side of Llanelian Road is counter to the excellent objective above. This land is indeed a beautiful, natural habitat for: the 

cuckoo, the badger, the fox, the curlew, the bat and many other creatures. It is wonderful Welsh countryside and the hedges of gorse,oak,blackthorn,holly 

and elder are amongst the finest on view anywhere in the world. 

Change Sought: I suggest that areas either side of Llanelian Road remain greenfield because of their outstanding natural beauty and richness. 

841 Mrs Claire Hughes [813] 1 Object 

Summary Deposit Local Development Plan - Plot 355 

Development - It is not true that this land has been developed - it remains farming land. It was designated Special Landscape in the 1999 Plan - what has 

changed since then? 

Change Sought: Remove site 355 Dolwen Road from plan 

705 Mrs Helen Jones-Williams [923] 1 Object 

Summary - There is a woodland area adjoining this piece of land - any housing development would totally desecrate this beautiful environment. 

- The volume of traffic using the road would increase immensely and make accidents more likely to happen. 

- I would like to know why a plot of land (Plot 344) was removed from the LDP at an earlier stage due to 'Highways Issues' - when Plot 335 is going ahead 

even though they are both on the same stretch of road? 

- This land currently is an area classed as 'rural' - which I believe means that is land that cannot be developed. 

- The way in which local residents were made aware of this LDP proposal can only be described as 'underhand'. 

Change Sought: I ask that Plot 335 be removed from the LDP. 

7141 Goodwin Planning Services Ltd (Mr Stephen Goodwin) [1162] 

1 Object 

Summary The allocation of the site would also be consistent with national policy as set out in Planning Policy Wales (as amended by MIPS 01/2006). We believe that 

the allocation of the larger site for residential purposes would have the ability to meet a number of the aims and objectives of national policy as follows:- 

To provide a greater choice for people over the type of housing and the location within which they live; 

To provide an edge of settlement development with a mix of affordable and market housing which represents a rounding off of the existing settlement 

boundaries; 

To locate development where it is easily accessible by public transport, walking, cycling to local jobs, shops, services etc; 

To assimilate development into the landscape through the use of a site which is bounded on three sites by development and particularly to the south by land 

which is at a higher level; 

To make an efficient use of land through the provision of a mix of housing types with an average density of over 30 dwellings per hectare. 

Change Sought: That the site at Dolwen Road, Old Colwyn identified in red on the attached plan be allocated for housing development under policy HOU/1 and Table 13. 

1022 Mr Huw M Owen [1058] 1 Object 

Summary The land is not currently within the settlement boundary. It is not an Urban area as defined in the report. 

land is in open countryside and has "Special Landscape Value" status 

plots in Old Colwyn 360, 350, 346 have been excluded from the LDP because the land reaches open countryside. This has not been considered in the 

assessment for this plot which clearly reaches open countryside. 

The road infrastructure cannot accommodate further increases in traffic. The road is narrow at the Llanelian Rd/Dolwen Rd junction 

The plot of land opposite plot 335 was rejected for inclusion due to highway issues. 

Change Sought: Plot 335 should be rejected from the LDP due its distance from schools and other amenities (Note plot 350 similar distance from amenities was rejected for 

this reason) 

1020 Quadrant Business and Property Consultants (Mr Roger Griffiths) [1057] 

1 Object 

Summary As per my letters of 9th July 2004; and 29th March 2007 - I am writing to ask that allocation shown in the recently published Plan be reconsidered and 

extended as per the Plan attached. 

I would contend that the topography is suitable for an extended development and there is sufficient local demand. I have included the wooded areas as these 

could form part of the amenity space for the development, but more critically that they could then be managed and protected more appropriately. 

I trust that this will be given due consideration. 

Change Sought: I am writing to ask that allocation shown in the recently published Plan be reconsidered and extended as per the Plan attached 

1815 Mr & Mrs F Illingworth [2028] 

1 Object 

Summary The land is not within the settlement boundary and is currently classified as rural. The land has never been previously developed and the whole area around 

is "Special Landscape Value". 

Public services are inadequate, with no doctor or dentist within the immediate area and only a limited bus service. 

Dolwen Road is very narrow with no pavements either side and extra traffic would only increase the danger to pedestrians. 


1674 AM/AC Darren Millar [1982] 

1 Object 

Summary Firstly, it has not been prepared in accordance with the original Delivery Agreement. Secondly, the LDP has not been produced in accordance with the Conwy 

County Borough Council Community Involvement Scheme 

The allocation of this site for housing development demonstrates a clear over-reliance on green-field sites and a failure to properly assess the capacity of 

previously developed land in the locality. 

There is no credible evidence base that the allocation of this green-field site for housing development is appropriate. 


32




1837 Mrs Rose Jones [2059] 

1 Object 

Summary The plan is based on population growth for the last 17 years. The forecast for the enxt 10-20 years is significant economic decline. 

There are currently over 100 empty properties in the surrounding area which negates the need for a further 75. 

Additional traffic would be extremely damaging with severe conjestion already occuring. 

The Abergele/Kinmel Bay/Towyn areas have large undeveloped areas which may be more suitable. 

Change Sought: Remove the Dolwen road site from the LDP 

1825 Mr James Simpson [2048] 1 Object 

Summary The land is not within the settlement boundary. 

Then land has not previously been developed as stated. 

The land reaches into virgin countryside, other plots of land in the area have been excluded for this reason. 

The road leading to plot 335 is narrow, has no pavement and is barely wide enough for two cars, a substantial increase in traffic would only exascerbate the 

problem. 

Plot 344 which is on the opposite side of the road was rejected on highways issues. 


1816 Mr & Mrs John and Pat Smailes [2029] 1 Object 

Summary the site is at a very dangerous secion the Dolwen Road and any extra traffic entering these bends at that point would constitute a serious additional risk. 

Direclty opposite the site entrance is a small estate and the corner is the school bus stop. 

The entrance to the site is on a blind bend, unsighted until directly upon the entrance/exit. 

Change Sought: Remove Bryn Rodyn site from the LDP. 

1798 Miss Carly Roberts [2023] 1 Object 

Summary The land is outside of the settlement boundary and is therefore currently rural and not urban. 

It is currently designated as Special Landscape Value. 

It has not previously been developed. 

The road is dangerous at present and further traffic would increase this danger. 

There is an abundance of wildlife including badgers, plant and wildlife. 

There is a risk of the flood threat level being raised on nearby properties. 


1796 Mrs Heather Abrahams [2021] 1 Object 

Summary The land is not currently within the settlement boundary. 

The land has not previously been developed. 

The land is not urban but agricultural and rural. 

There are highway issues as the stretch of road is extremely dangerous and located on a blind bend. 

The land is currently designated at having special landscape value and has badgers and otters present. 

Change Sought: Remove Bryn Rhodyn from plan. 

1795 Ms Marjorie Fox [2020] 1 Object 

Summary Land not previously developed. 

Previously a Special Landscape Area and adjacent to woodlands with a multitude of wildlife. 

Extra vehicles would cause considerable highway issues. 

Change Sought: Remove Bryn Rhodyn from plan. 

1784 Mr Richard Bysouth [2007] 

1 Object 

Summary Remove Bryn Rodyn site due to accessibility issues, highways concerns, lack of bus service, access to doctors and schools. Access to the main sewer would 

be difficult and extra surface water would worsen the already existing flooding problem. 

The area is also adjacent to woodland which is legally protected and badgers and bats are common in the area and there is recent evidence of otters in the 

watercourse. 


1781 Mr & Mrs Brian and Frances Willingham [2006] 

2 Object 

Summary Remove Bryn Rodyn site from the LDP. 

Traffic conjestion and loss of wildlife and habitat. 


1778 Mrs Judith Roberts [2004] 1 Object 

Summary To apply a fiar process Plot 335 Bryn Rodyn Farm should be removed from the LDP 

Change Sought: remove Bryn Rodyn Farm from the LDP 

33


Policy HOU/1 Meeting The Housing Needs, Adj. to Parc Hanes, Kinmel Bay 


1822 Mr Terry Stevens [2042] 1 Support 

Summary The Dept. for the Economy & Transport supports the allocation of land adjacent to Parc Hanes, Towyn for approx. 15 units as indicated in Table 13 and 

Proposals Map 4. It is appreciated that development is constrained until the programmed flood mitigation works in the area are completed by EAW. 

The allocation provides the potential, as indicated in the Plan, to provide a secondary new vehicular access link from Park Hanes to Ogwen Avenue to serve 

the existing properties in the Ogwen Avenue/ Green Avenue area. It is envisaged that the development would be brought forward in conjunction with the 

adjoining committed Park Hanes development site. Given the link between the development and a new Ogwen Avenue access proposal the phasing of the 

development of the proposed 15 dwellings over 4 years as shown in Table 13 may be impractical, but it is appreciated that the phasing shown is indicative 

only. 

34


Policy HOU/1 Meeting The Housing Needs, Land off Derwen Lane,Penrhyn Bay 

Rep No Name 

440 

Summary 

Sarah Brown [736] 

Land off Derwen Lane 

I consider that the proposed development would have an adverse effect on: 

People Type 

1 Object 

a) residential amenity; 

b) from the traffic generated in the region of two schools and increased traffic movement through Penrhynside; 

c) on ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character. (I believe that the area is a nesting site for lapwings); 

d) on the best and most versatile agricultural land. (The proposed development is on A1 agricultural land and the development would significantly affect the 

livelihood of the tenant farmer); 

e) on essential community facilities. (An increase in population would put pressure on the two schools, the local medical centre and recreational facilities. 

Change Sought: Remove land off Derwen Lane from plan. 

439 

Summary 

Mrs Karen Wilby [735] 



1 Object 







Change Sought: Remove land off Derwen Lane from plan 

438 

Summary 

Mr Hywel Williams [733] 



1 Object 







Change Sought: Remove land off Derwen Lane from plan. 

445 Mr Geoffrey Taylor [743] 1 Object 

Summary I consider the proposal will have an adverse effect on firstly residential amenity, from traffic generated in the area of both Ysgol Y Creuddyn and Ysgol 

Glanwydden and increased traffic through Penrhynside. Secondly the loss of A1 agricultural land. Thirdly on the environment due to the proximity of a working 

dairy farm and the loss of habitat for nesting lapwings 

Change Sought: Area to be remain green wedge 

467 Mrs Linda Jackson [757] 1 Object 

Summary I consider this proposed development would have an adverse effect on the residential amenities. 

This site would increase the population at the schools and create a big traffic problem. 

We should be looking after the farmers that are left not taking away their farms, this farm having A1 agricultural land. 

The medical centre already has had to reduce time given to patients visits as they are too busy. 

This development would put pressure on the two schools and medical centre. 

Change Sought: Remove Derwen Lane site from LDP 

463 

Mrs Mary Nussey [752] 

1 Object 

Summary I consider that the proposed development would have an adverse effect on: 

a) Residential Amenity 

b) From traffic generated 

e) On environmental conditions 

f) On ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character. 

q) On the best and most versatile agricultural land. (The proposed development is on A1 

s) On essential community facilities 


1207 Mr Arnold Schofield [1344] 1 Object 

Summary Objection to sites 37,38 off Derwen Lane, Penrhyn Bay. See attachment. 

Change Sought: Remove sites 37,28 from the Plan. 

375 

Mrs Karen Lyon [675] 

1 Object 

Summary I consider that the proposed development will have an adverse effect on 

a. Residential amenity 

b. from the traffic generated in the region of two schools and increased traffic movement through Penrhynside. 

e. on environmental conditions arising from the noise and odours generated from a working dairy farm. 

f. on ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character. 

q. on the best and most versatile agricultural land. 

s. on essential community facilities. 


437 

Summary 

Mrs Catherine Williams [732] 



1 Object 







Change Sought: Remove land of Derwen Lane from plan 

35




466 Mrs Eva Christian [756] 1 Object 

Summary I believe that the proposed development would have an adverse effect on 

a) the residential amenity 

b) from the traffic generated in the region of two schools and from increased traffic movement through Penrhynside 

c) on Environmental conditions arising from the noise and odours generated from a working Dairy Farm. 

d) on ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character ( I believe that the area is a nesting site for Lapwings) 

e) on the best and most versatile agricultural land (the proposed development is on a1 agricultural land and would significantly affect the livelihood of the 

tenant farmer.) 

f) on essential community facilities (an increase in population would put severe pressure on the two schools, the local medical centre and recreational 

facilities.) 

Change Sought: Deletion of Derwen Lane Site, Penrhyn Bay 

1206 Mr Lee Watson [1339] 1 Object 

Summary Site 37/38 off Derwen Lane, Penrhyn Bay. Proposed development would have an adverse effect on residential amenity, from the traffic generated in the 

region of two schools, on environmental conditions arising from the noise and odours from the farm, on ecological and wildlife interests, on the best and most 

versatile agricultural land, and on essential community facilities. 

Change Sought: Removal of site 37,38 from the Plan. 

465 

Mr Richard Hopkins [755] 

1 Object 






q) On the best and most versatile agricultural land. 



376 

Capita Symonds (Mrs Julie Houghton) [676] 

1 Object 

Summary I consider that the proposed development would have an adverse effect on 






s. on essential community facilities. (An increase in population would put pressure on the two schools, the local Medical Centre and recreational facilities) 


464 

Mr Alun Davies [754] 

1 Object 



b) From traffic generated. 



q) On the best and most versatile agricultural land. 



989 Mr Arfon Williams [1045] 1 Object 

Summary Objection to Derwen Lane site, Penrhyn Bay 

Change Sought: Deletion of Derwen Lane site, Penrhyn Bay 

1158 Mr Peter Kerridge [1063] 1 Object 

Summary Derwen Fields sites 37/38 to be rejected. Winllan Field to be included. See attached sheets. 

Change Sought: Derwen Fields sites 37/38 to be rejected. Winllan Field to be included. See attached sheets. 

380 Mrs Marie Cubbon [683] 1 Object 


a) residential amenity 

b) from the traffic generated in the region of two schools and increased traffic movement through Penrhynside 

e) on environmental conditions arising from the noise and odours generated from a working dairy farm 

f) on ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character 

q) on the best and most versatile agricultural land 

s) on essential community facilities 

Added pressure on water, drainage and sewerage etc. 

Population increase by visitors in summer should be considered 


384 

Cllr Terence Davies [685] 

1 Object 









388 Miss Ilid Rees Williams [686] 1 Object 


a) Residential amenity 

b) from the traffic generated in the region of 2 schools and increased traffic movement through Penrhynside 


f) on ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character. 

s) on essential community facilities. 


36




393 Mr Martin Crawford [689] 1 Object 

Summary I consider that the proposed development would have an adverse effect on:a) 

residential amenity 

b) from the traffic generated in the region of two schools and traffic movement through Penrhynside 

c) on environmental conditions arising from the noise and odours generated from a working farm 

d) on ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character 

e) on the best and most versatile land 

f) on essential community facilities 


395 Mr Michael Berry [691] 1 Object 

Summary The proposed development of the land off Derwen Lane would adversely effect: 

1) Residential amenity 

2) Area by 2 Schools, through Penrhynside and gloddaeth view due to extra traffic. 

3) on ecological and wildlife interests and landscape 

4) on the best and most versatile agricultural land and livelihood of the tenant farmer 

5)on essential local facilities- increased pressure on two schools and medical centre 


403 Miss Judy Merritt [699] 1 Object 

Summary Adverse effect on residential amenity, from traffic generated in the region of two schools and from increased traffic movement along Gloddaaeth View and 

through Penrhynside; 

Impact on environmental conditions arising from the noise and odours generated from a working dairy farm; ecological and wildlife interests and landscape 

character; on the best and most versatile agricultural land; the proposed development is on A1 grade agricultural land and would significantly affect the 

livelihood of the farmer; on essential community facilities. An increase in population would put severe pressure on the two schools, local medical centre and 

recreational facilities. 

Change Sought: Remove site 37 and 38 from the plan 

397 Mrs Suzanne Radcliffe [701] 1 Object 

Summary I consider that the proposed development would have a terrible effect on the residential amenity, the local traffic for the schools and Penrhynside, the 

environmental conditions of noise and odours generated from a working farm, ecological and wildlife, essential community facilities. 


399 

Summary 


404 

Summary 


527 

Summary 


Mrs Muriel Baldwin [702] 

1 on essential community facilities (pressure on schools and medicla centre) 

2) Increase in traffic generated in an already confined area 

3)I also consider the proposed development would have an adverse effect on residential amenity. 

Remove Derwen Lane site from LDP 

Mrs Suzanne Burgess [704] 





f) on ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character. 

q) on the best and most versatile agricultural land. 



Mr Maurice Smith [796] 

a) The fields covered by the plan are essential if the farm is to remain economic. 

b) The introduction of a large number of low cost houses will be to the detriment of the balanced housing in the adjoining estate(s). 

c) A new estate will mean additional children who will require schooling. 

d) The existing road system is inadequate for the increased traffic. 

e) The wooded area backing the proposed estate is a valuable place of natural beauty with nature trails running through it. 


1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

879 Miss Sarah Watkins [1029] 1 Object 





1015 Mr David Clutton [1051] 

1 Object 

Summary The LDP is unsound regarding sites 37 and 38 because the fields proposed are prime agricultural land. These fields are essential for the economic operation 

of his dairy farm which, could become unviable if this plan goes ahead. 

There will be major problems with extra traffic going past two schools and through an existing housing estate on an already busy road which leads to the 

medical centre and local shops. 

The essential amenities of the schools and medical centre will also be put under undue pressure as they are already working at near capacity. 

Change Sought: Remove site 37 & 38 from plan 

420 Miss Moira Anglesey [709] 1 Object 



b) Increased traffic x2 school also through Penrhynside 

c) Ecological and wildlife, landscape character 

d) On good versatile agricultural land 

e) Pressure on schools, Medical Centre etc. 


37




436 Mr Paul Bowman [731] 1 Object 

Summary Adverse effect on: 

- Residential amenity (a) 

- Increased traffic movements in the area (b) 

- Environment conditions adjacent to a working farm (e) 

- Impact on wildlife and ecology (f) 

- Impact on resident farmer, A1 Agricultural land to be site of development (q) 

- Pressure on exisiting amenities (s) 


422 Mr Joseph Newman [711] 1 Object 

Summary Adverse effect on (a) residential amenity, (b) from the traffic generated in the region of 2 schools and increased traffic movement through Penrhynside 

(c)Environmental conditions arising from the noise and odours generated from a working dairy farm (d) Ecological and wildlife interests and landscape 

character (believe that the area is a nesting site for Lapwings) (e) on the best and most versatil agricultural land (the proposed development is on A1. 

agricultural land and the development would significantly affect the livelihood of the tennant farmer) (f) on essential community facilities (an increase in 

population would put pressure on the 2 schools, the local medical centre and recreational facilities) 

Change Sought: remove from plan 

379 

Summary 


423 

Summary 


425 

Summary 


Mrs Ann Curry [677] 

I consider that the proposed development would have an adverse effect on 



c) on environmental conditions arising from the noise and odours generated from a working dairy farm. 

f) on ecological and wildlife interests and lanscape and character 



Pressure on water, drainage, sewerage 

Population increase during summer months sould also be considered 


Mr Walter Johnstone [712] 

1) The development on the farmland would mess up the beautiful area of North Wales 

2) Plus lots more traffic in the area 

3) And bad area for dairy farming working - plus wildlife 


Ms Moira Nash [714] 

I consider that the proposed development would have an adverse effect on 


b. from the traffic generated in the region of two schools and increased traffic movement along Gloddaeth view and through Penrhynside. 






1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1016 Mrs Ann Clutton [1052] 

1 Object 

Summary The LDP is unsound regarding sites 37 and 38 because the fields proposed are prime agricultural land. The tenant farmer has stated that these fields are 

essential for the economic operation of his dairy farm which could become unviable if this plan goes ahead. 

There will be major problems with extra traffic going past two schools and through an existing housing estate on an already busy road which leads to the 

medical centre and local shops. 

The essential amenities of the schools and medical centre will also be put under undue pressure as they are already working at near capacity. 

Change Sought: Remove sites 37 & 38 from plan 

426 Mrs Gwen Mclivogue [715] 1 Object 

Summary I believe that the proposed development would have an adverse effect on a) the residential amenity b) from the traffic generated in the region of two schools 

and from increased traffic movement along Gloddaeth View and through Penrhynside c) on Environmental conditions arising from the noise and odours 

generated from a working Dairy Farm. d) on ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character e) on the best and most versatile agricultural land (the 

proposed development is on a1 agricultural land and would significantly affect the livelihood of the tenant farmer.) 


facilities.) 

Change Sought: Deletion of Derwen Lane Site, Penrhyn Bay 

374 Mrs Gillian Mayers [673] 1 Object 

Summary I would consider the development would have an adverse effect 

1) On essential community facilities (i.e. school and medical centre) 

2) Traffic will get even worse, very dangerous for schools and generating more traffic through Penrhynside 


427 Mr James Mcilvovogue [718] 1 Object 

Summary I believe that the proposed development would have an adverse effect on a) the residential amenity b) from the traffic generated in the region of two schools 

and from increased traffic movement along Gloddaeth View and through Penrhynside c) on Environmental conditions arising from the noise and odours 

generated from a working Dairy Farm. d) on ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character e) on the best and most versatile agricultural land (the 

proposed development is on a1 agricultural land and would significantly affect the livelihood of the tenant farmer.) 


facilities.) 

Change Sought: Deletion of Derwen Lane, Penrhyn Bay site. 

482 

Mr Neil Townend [725] 

1 Object 

Summary Deletion of Land off Derwen Lane, Penrhyn Bay. 

The inclusion of this land fails to consider the sustainability of Penrhyn Bay. Local employment and services are inadequate to accommodate such a large 

development. The site is also agricultural land which contradicts the LDP concerning agricultural land in Conwy. Finally by selecting such a large site in this 

area restricts the opportunity for sustainable expansion of small rural communities suffering decline due to available affordable housing. 

Change Sought: Deletion of Derwen Lane, Penrhyn Bay site. 

38




431 M Mitchell [726] 1 Object 

Summary I consider that the proposed development would have an adverse effect on the current residential situation. The use of A1 agricultural land for housing would 

effect significantly on the livelihood of the tenant farmer. 

Change Sought: Deletion of Derwen Lane, Penrhyn Bay site 

432 

Summary 


434 

Summary 


417 

Summary 


Susan Lloyd [728] 

The proposed development would have an adverse effect on: 

1) Residential amenity 

2) From traffic in the region of Penrhynside and children walking to school 

3) Using A1 agricultural land would affect the livelihood of the farmer 

4) On essential community facilities. Increase in population puts pressure on Doctors and Schools. 


Mr Alan Hall [729] 

The Local Development Plan is unsound regarding Site 37 and 38 because:- 

1) Derwen fields is category A1 agricultural land 

2) The road system would be totally inadequate to support more traffic 

3) Local amenities i.e. dentists, doctors and schools are at best stretched to capacity even now. 


Mr Graham Crossley [707] 



b) increased traffic generated outside two schools and through very narrow roads in Penrhynside 

c) to the ecological and wildlife interests 

d) on good, versatile agricultural land 

e) on essential community facilities (increased population = increased pressure on schools, doctors and already sparse recreational facilities.) 


1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

857 Mr Mark Parry [898] 1 Object 





811 Mr Ian Roberts [1002] 1 Object 

Summary a) Adverse effect on residential amenity 

b) Increased traffic generated near two schools 

c) Environmental conditions arising from noise and odours from working dairy farm 

d) Ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character 

e) Best and most versatile agricultural land 

s) Increased population pressure on local schools, medical centre and recreational facilities 


579 

Mr Alan Kewley [855] 

1 Object 

Summary The change that needs to be made to the Plan is to remove the fields identified at Derwen Lane from it. This will make the Plan sound because it will not allow 

the continued encroachment of housing in the Penrhyn area. By any stretch of the imagination Penrhyn Bay has been subject to more than its fair share of 

new housing in the last 15-20 years so much so now that the plans considers Penrhyn to be an urban area and not rural or a village which is the true essence 

of the area. 

Change Sought: The change that needs to be made to the Plan is to remove the fields identified at Derwen Lane from it. 

590 Mr Alastair Loraine [865] 1 Object 

Summary Removal of site 37/38 Off Derwen Lane, Penrhyn Bay. It is an historic boundary between Penrhyn Old Hall Farm and Gloddaeth isaf farm. Inevitably further 

development of Gloddaeth isaf farm for housing will happen creeping forward over future years. It is not appropriate use of grade 1 farmland. The future 

pressure on Ysgol Glanwydden and Ysgol Creuddyn has to be taken into account. The access road through Plas Penrhyn estate is reasonably narrow, very 

winding and already busy. 

Change Sought: Deletion of sites 37/38 Off Derwen Lane, Penrhyn Bay. See pdf of letter under http://www.conwy.gov.uk/upload/public/attachments/381/20090703124710.pdf 

644 Mr John Blakesley [870] 1 Object 

Summary This proposed allocation would adversely affect the countryside adjoining Penrhyn Bay and Penrhynside, the viability of the farm on which the land is situate, 

the scenery and an existing apiary immediately to the North of the site. The boundary of Penrhyn Bay should not be pushed in this direction and the land in 

question should be protected by designation as a green wedge. 

Change Sought: Delete this site from Policy HOU/1. 

619 Mr Keith Mitchell [875] 1 Object 

Summary 1)The vast influx of new residents, from 135 houses, will compromise the local schools 

2) The additional traffic created by building houses on the proposed site will adversely effect the village of Penrhynside 

3) Derwen Lane fields are a 'greenfield site' Category 1 Agricultural farmland forming part of the open countryside which should be protected. 

4) This land is vital to the livelihood of the tenant farmer and his family. 

5) Derwen Lane is a typical 'Country Lane' with its hedgerows and flora, a beautiful lane to walk down 

6) It is vital that new housing does not overwhelm the existing local structure 

Change Sought: I feel other sites in the area will offer a solution: 

a) Old council office site - Off Dinerth Road 

b) Vacated Dairy Site in Mochdre 


1 Object 

Summary Land off Derwen Lane, Penrhyn Bay drains into a significant flood plain with a record of repeated flooding. Adjacent land allocated under the LLandudno 

Conwy District Plan was only developable subject to surface water drainage provisions to mitigate run off by the use of flood storage and attenuation. Since 

that time the implications of sustainability have emerged including SUDS drainage. The density of developed proposed would make on site drainage 

impracticable and the and the flood plain would mitigate against watercourse disposal. the level of assessment of drainage is surprisingly negligible. 

Change Sought: Further assessment required, and reassessment of on site density. 

39




621 Mrs Rosemary Mitchelle [881] 1 Object 

Summary 1) the vast influx of residents will compromise the local schools 

2) The additional traffic will adversely affect Penrhynside village 

3) Derwen fields is a "greenfield site 

4) The farmland is vital to the livelihood of the farmer 

5) The whole nature of Derwen Lane as a beautiful country lane with high hedgerows, much admired by all 

6) It is vital that new housing developments do not overrwhelm existing properties 

Change Sought: I feel that smaller sites of Winllan Field, Dinerth Farm and 213 Llandrillo College are more suitable. 

883 Cllr Myra Wigzell [882] 1 Object 





641 Mr William Deiniol Jones [887] 1 Object 

Summary (Site 37/38 Off Derwen Lane, Penrhyn Bay) Population Growth. Would put large pressure on two schools, local medical centre and recreational facilities. 

Destruction of Grade 1 Agricultural Land. Cause terrible traffic problems in a already very busy area. Farmers future is very uncertain. Damage caused to 

wildlife. 

Change Sought: Delete site 37/38 Off Derwen Lane, Penrhyn Bay. 

640 Mr John Jordan [888] 1 Object 

Summary a) Residential amenity 



f) On ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character 

q) On the best and most versatile agricultural land 

s) On essential community facilities. 


643 Ms Sian Ellen Griffiths [891] 1 Object 

Summary (Site 37/38 Off Derwen Lane, Penrhyn Bay) Population Growth. Would put large pressure on two schools, local medical centre and recreational facilities. 

Destruction of Grade 1 Agricultural Land. Cause terrible traffic problems in a already very busy area. Farmers future is very uncertain. Damage caused to 

wildlife. 

Change Sought: Removal of site 37/38 Off Derwen Lane, Penrhyn Bay. 

1203 Mr Robert Williams [1325] 1 Object 

Summary Objection to sites 37,38 Off Derwen Lane, Penrhyn Bay. See attachment. 


649 

Mrs Verity Jones [894] 

1 Object 

Summary Proposed development at Derwen Lane would have an adverse effect on residential amenity, traffic generated in the region of two schools, on environmental 

conditions arising from noise and odour, and on the best and most versatile agricultural land. 

Change Sought: Removal of site 37/38 Off Derwen Lane, Penrhyn Bay from the Plan. 

868 Mrs Gwyneth Parry [1021] 1 Object 

Summary I consider the proposed development would have an adverse effect on:- 

Residential amenity 

From the traffic generated in the region of two schools and increased traffic movement through Penrhynside 

On environmental conditions arising from the noise and odours generated from a working dairy farm 

On ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character (I understand that the area is a nesting site for lapwings) 

On the best and most versatile agricultural land (the proposed development is on A1 agricultural land and the development would significantly affect the 

livelihood of the tenant farmer) 

On essential community facilities (an increase in population would put pressure on the two schools, the local medical centre and recreational facilities) 


700 Mr David Chambers [919] 1 Object 

Summary Objection to Penrhyn Bay. Proposal would have an adverse effect on resisdential amenity, on traffic generated in the region of two schools, on environmental 

conditions arising from noise and odours of the farm, on ecological and wildlife interests, on the best and most versatile agricultural land, and on essential 

community facilities. 

Change Sought: Removal of site 37/38 off Derwen Lane, Penrhyn Bay. 

373 Mr David Lyon [672] 1 Object 

Summary I consider the proposed development would have an adverse effect on 


b) Increased traffic around two schools and increased movement through Penrhynside 

c) on environmental conditions arising from the noise and odours generated from a working farm 

d) on ecological and wildlife interests, landscape and character - protected species RSPB etc 

e) on versatile agricultural land - designated A1 affecting the livelihood of the farmer 

f) on community facilities - school, medical centre 

g) over populated already 


742 Miss Elizabeth Hughes [950] 1 Object 

Summary a. Residential amenity 

b. From the traffic generated in the region of two schools and increased traffic movement. 

e. On environmental conditions arising 

f. On ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character. 

q. On the best and most versatile agricultural land 

s. On essential community facilities (an increase in population would put pressure on the two schools, the local medical centre and recreational facilities. 


1214 Mrs Sarah Hughes [948] 1 Object 

Summary Objection to the proposed allocation of sites 37,38 off Derwen Lane in Penrhyn Bay. See attachment. 


40




735 Mr Gareth Rawling [943] 1 Object 

Summary I consider that the proposed development would have a negative effect on the community. Another concern of mine is the traffic. 

I am also concerned about the ecological and wildlife interests. You cannot take away agricultural land - this will also affect the livelihood of the tenant farmer 

and his young family. 

Penrhynsides' community facilities would not be able to cope with an increased population. The school is already completely full, appointments are already 

hard to come by at the doctors. 

Other factors to consider: 

- Drainage 

- Access 

- Traffic 


7194 Mr Dafydd Jarrett [940] 1 Object 

Summary Our members WG Thomas & son as tenants of Gloddaeth Isa wish to object to the inclusion of land at Derwen Lane, Penrhyn Bay Housing Allocation in the 

county LDP (see attachment for full response). 

Change Sought: Remove allocation at Derwen Lane and reconsider classification of Penrhynside and Penrhyn Bay as one urban area - Penrhynside is a rural village type 

settlement. 

667 Mr Eldon Thomas [895] 1 Object 

Summary Object to sites 37/38 Off Derwen Lane, Penrhyn Bay. Proposed site would greatly affect the running of the dairy farm by developing grade 1-2 agricultural 

land. This development has no boundaries, and can eventually carry on through to the A470. The land would be better included as a green wedge. Increased 

traffic congestion is foreseen, and the land is a crucial part of a working dairy farm. Alternative site proposed is Land off Llanrhos road, Penrhyn Bay. It will 

have no effect on the Gloddaeth Isa farm, there is an existing residential grade access, development could be contained here. 

Change Sought: Removal of site 37/38 from the Plan. Alternative site at Land off Llanrhos road, Penrhyn Bay, is proposed. Further information contained in attached pdf 

document. 

710 Mrs Lynn Hocker [931] 1 Object 




Change Sought: Remove site 37/38 from the Plan. 

662 

Mrs Fiona Thomas [896] 

1 Object 





Change Sought: Removal of site 37/38 Off Derwen Lane, Penrhyn Bay. Alternative site proposed at Land Off Llanrhos road, Penrhyn Bay. 

692 Mr William Thomas [914] 1 Object 





Change Sought: Alternative site proposed is Land off Llanrhos road, Penrhyn Bay. It will have no effect on the Gloddaeth Isa farm, there is an existing residential grade 

access, development could be contained here. 

639 Mrs Jackie Jordan [885] 1 Object 



conditions arising from noise and odours from a working dairy farm 

f) On ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character 

q) On the best and most versatile agricultural land 

s) On essential community facilities. 


1213 Mr Arwel Hughes [1399] 1 Object 

Summary Objection to sites 37,38 off derwen Lane, Penrhyn Bay. See attachment. 


689 Mrs Catherine Thomas [904] 1 Object 



On grade 1, 2 agricultural land, which would greatly affect the viability of the dairy farm. 

Change Sought: Alternative site proposed is Land off Llanrhos road, Penrhyn Bay. It will have no effect on the Gloddaeth Isa farm, there is an existing residential grade 

access, development could be contained here. See attachment for full response. 

706 Mr Geoffrey Hocker [900] 1 Object 

Summary Site 37/38 would have an adverse effect on residential amenity, from the traffic generated in the region of two schools, on environmental conditions arising 

from noise and odours from the farm, on ecological and wildlife interests, on the best and most versatile agricultural land, and on essential community 

facilities. 


566 Mr Charles Henry Day [845] 1 Object 

Summary I have no objection to the planned allotments but think that the housing element will have an adverse effect on residential amenity, traffic generated, 

environmental conditions from the working dairy farm, on ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character, on agricultural land, and on essential 


Change Sought: Remove site. 

716 Miss Katie Gough [935] 1 Object 





41




552 Mr Tim Buckland [821] 1 Object 

Summary It is my firm assertion that the development of the land off Derwen Lane does not display a realistic development policy. I am privileged to live in an area of 

great natural beauty consisting of idyllic rolling countryside and nationally renowned sea fronts. Indeed the area was considered of significant beauty to hold 

the Eisteddfodd here in 2008. It would be a grave and incalculable error to develop this land and deny future generations the same picturesque and balanced 

landscape. 

Change Sought: The local development plan is unsound regarding site 37 & 38 because: 

Derwen fields are a "Green Field Site", category-1 agricultural farmland joined to a series of other fields forming a picturesque and idyllic landscape of open 

rolling countryside. 

It will be extremely difficult to prevent the onset of urban sprawl over the co-joined fields as there are only minor hedgerows between them. 

The tenant farmer has stated thet these fields are essential for the economic operation of his dairy farm. If the fields were lost to development the farm may 

go into liquidation, damaging the local economy and increasing the risk of further development on the remaining fields. 

The fields are backed on to by an old woodland that has many nature trails running through it. The LDP states that a buffer area will be left between the 

development and the wood. However this is totally inadequate as the open beauty of the area will be destroyed. 

The existing road system is totally inadequate to deal with the increase in traffic. Inevitably more hedgerows and countryside will be lost to allow for the roads 

to be widened. 

There will be a problem with traffic cutting through the village of Penrhynside along an already congested access road which is single file for most of its 

length. There are no traffic measures that could be implemented to stop this from occuring. 

There will be an additional 135 houses developed within the Penrhyn Bay area. This will undoubtedly place the local primary school under intense pressure 

for pupil places. It is wholey unacceptable for class sizes to rise above the recommended number as the quality of education provided will suffer. The school 

will therefore have to be enlarged to cope with the extra demand for places. The only options available are to expand the school within the existing grounds, 

causing the loss of play areas or to expand into the fields opposite, causing the loss of more green fields. These solutions are unacceptable as is the bussing 

of children to other primary schools that have space. 

This will be an extremely large large development of assisted and two bedroom starter homes, 100 in total. I recognise the need for assisted housing and 

starter homes but these should be on a much smaller scale where they are able to integrate into the existing infrastructure and not overwhelm it. 

The development of Winllan Field should be reappraised against Derwen Field to see which is the most suitable for development in the Penrhyn Bay area. 

576 Dr Andrew Clayton [851] 1 Object 

Summary b. The proposed development will increase traffic through an already busy area in the region of two schools 

q. The area allocated for development is agricultural land which is needed to support the livelihood of the tenant farmer 


494 Mr Allen Roberts [778] 1 Object 

Summary Land off Derwen Lane 

I consider that the proposed development would have an adverse affect on:a. 


b. From the traffic generated 

e. On environmental conditions 

F. On ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character 

q. On the best and most versatile agricultural land. 

s. On essential community facilities. 


875 Ms Sandra Ackers [1026] 1 Object 





493 Mr Matthew Roberts [774] 1 Object 

Summary - Residential amenity, views and house prices, noise, traffic congestion and disturbance. This is ribbon development of the worst sort. 

- Traffic generated 

- Environmental conditions 

- Ecological wildlife and landscape character 

- On the best agricultural land 

- On essential community facilities 


490 

Mrs Nest Reid [771] 

1 Object 

Summary - Too dense a development of AHLN in this site will attract many young families putting pressure on Ysgol Glanwydden and the already overstretched Medical 

Centre in Penrhyn Bay. 

- The small green wedge between it and Penrhyn Bay should be maintained. 

- The ability of Penrhyn bay to grow has already been exceeded by the building some 15 years ago of a large number of starter homes. 

- The location is not on a bus route. 

- Visitors appreciate the close juxtaposition of rural and seaside scenery. 

- It is also of note that these fields are a breeding site for lapwings. 

Change Sought: Changes to make the test sound 

I would propose the two following alternative sites:- 

The Government Offices in Dinerth Road site No 247 

The Old Milk Factory in Mochdre. (This also has the advantage of being close to a primary school and bus routes.) 

If these two sites are not large enough, I suggest a reduced number of houses (no more than 25) could be built on site 37 or 38 and the rest of the allocation 

shared between the Government Offices and the Old Milk Factory. Some high quality recreational and sports facilities could be developed adjacent to the 

houses on the Derwen Lane site. These could be shared by the schools and the houses and should include facilities for both adults and children. This would 

break up the mass of housing development in this traditionally rural environment. 

42




500 Mr Christopher Roberts [781] 1 Object 


b. From the traffic generated. 

e. On environmental conditions. 

F. On ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character. 




554 

mr steve jones [823] 

1 Object 

Summary object to the proposed development derwen lane perrhyn bay, because loss of livley hood of loal farmer. local infrstructure will not be able to cope with the 

development. schools, doctors ect. road safety with the increased volume of traffic. 

impact on wildlife diversity with the loss of habitat hedges fields ect. removal of green wedeg separating conerbations in the llandudo penrhyn bay area(urban 

sprawl) Loss of venue for urdd festival. 

Change Sought: do not buid houses in this area, 

872 Miss Sian Parry [1023] 1 Object 





542 Mr Anthony Burchell [815] 1 Object 

Summary - Residential amenity - under the Conwy County Borough Council Draft Unitary Development Plan (April 2001), Policy BE11 states that "development which 

would have an unacceptable detrimental effect on the structure and/or character of registered landscapes, parks and gardens of special historic interest, 

including views into and out of such places, will not be permitted". 

- From the traffic generated- On ecological and wildlife interests and landscape and character 

- On the best and most versatile agricultural land - On essential community facilities 


541 Mrs Barbara Burchell [814] 1 Object 

Summary - Residential amenity - under the Conwy County Borough Council Draft Unitary Development Plan (April 2001), Policy BE11 states that "development which 

would have an unacceptable detrimental effect on the structure and/or character of registered landscapes, parks and gardens of special historic interest, 

including views into and out of such places, will not be permitted". 

- From the traffic generated- On ecological and wildlife interests and landscape and character 

- On the best and most versatile agricultural land - On essential community facilities 


480 Mr Paul Mash [762] 1 Object 

Summary Adverse affect on residential amenity, generated traffic past two schools and through Penrhynside. I believe the area is a nesting site for lapwings. An 

increase in population would put pressure on the two schools, medical centre and recreational facilities, on the best most versatile agricultural land. 


876 

Mrs Rita Cleeve [1027] 

1 Object 


region of two schools, on the livelihood of the tenant farmer, and the pressure on the community facilities. 


878 Mr Ben Hall [1028] 1 Object 





478 Mrs Sarah Marsh [761] 1 Object 

Summary An adverse effect on residential amenity, generated traffic past schools and through Penrynside. I believe that the area is a nesting site for lapwings. An 

increase in population would put pressure on the two schools, recreational facilities and medical centre. On the best most versatile agricultural land. 


487 

Mrs Caroline Reid [770] 

1 Object 

Summary i) the development is likely to generate increased traffic flow. 

ii) the resulting increase in population would put considerable/ intolerable pressure on local facilities. 

iii) Derwen fields is a 'greenfield site' category 1 agricultural farmland that fully deserves protection and preservation. 

iv) The fields proposed for development border old woodlands and the destruction of existing hedgerows. 

Change Sought: Changes to make the test sound 

I propose the two following alternative sites:- 

The Government Offices in Dinerth Road site no. 247 

The Old Milk Factory in Mochdre. (This also has the advantage of being close to a primary school and bus routes. 

536 

Mr John Jones [807] 

1 Object 

Summary I consider that the proposed development would have an adverse affect on: 



c. on environmental conditions. 

d. On ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character 

e. on the best and most versatile agricultural land. 

f) on essential community facilities 


476 Mrs Jacqueline Jones [760] 1 Object 

Summary I consider that the proposed development will have a terrible effect on traffic entering Glanwydden Lane from Derwen Lane. This development needs to have 

direct access onto Glanwydden Lane. 


565 Mr Martyn Bottomley [844] 1 Object 

Summary Improvements are required in the road, drainage, sewerage, school and medical/dentist infrastructure to support residential development detailed on Map 2. 

Change Sought: Improvements are required in the road, drainage, sewerage, school and medical/dentist infrastructure to support residential development detailed on Map 2. 

43




820 

Mrs Ann Fender [1007] 

1 Object 




Change Sought: Removal of site 37/38 off Derwen Lane, Penrhyn Bay from the Plan. 

851 Mr Christopher Holland [1018] 1 Object 




Change Sought: Removal of site 37/38 from the Plan. Alternative sites 'Old Council Offices, Dinerth Road' and 'Old Milk Factory, Mochdre' are proposed. 

1208 MRS OLIVIA SCHOFIELD [825] 1 Object 

Summary Objection to sites 37,38 off Derwen Lane in the Plan. See attachment. 


497 Miss Helen O'Reilly [779] 1 Object 



e. On environmental conditions and wildlife interests and landscape character. 




856 Miss Janet Eardley [1019] 1 Object 




Change Sought: Removal of site 37/38 from the Plan. Alternative sites at 'Old Council Offices, Dinerth Road' and 'Old Milk Factory, Mochdre' are proposed. 

570 Mr Brian Moles [846] 1 Object 


b) From traffic generated by two schools and increased traffic movement through Penrhynside 

e) On environmental conditions arising from noise and smells from working dairy farm 

f) On ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character (lapwings nesting nearby) 

q) On best A1 agricultural land affecting livelihood of tenant farmer 

s) On essential community facilities with increase in population 


770 Mr David Whitfield [969] 1 Object 



versatile agricultural land, and on essential community facilities, and on water and sewage works ECT. 


522 

Miss Jacqueline Lang [795] 

1 Object 

Summary The development would have an adverse effect on residents due to increased traffic on Derwen Lane and through Penrhynside, noise and odours from a 

working farm. 

It would destroy wildlife (nesting site for lapwings). It would adversely affect the livelihood of the tenant farmer. An increase in population would put pressure 

on the schools, Medical Centre and recreational facilities. 


622 Mrs Lorna Loraine [880] 1 Object 

Summary Deletion of sites 37/38 Penrhyn Bay for inclusion in the LDP for proposed housing. Objection to use of prime Grade 1 farm land. The development would put 

further pressure on already oversubscribed schools. Also, once Derwen Lane is crossed by development, it will simply be a matter of time before the entire 

farm is developed for housing. 

Change Sought: Removal of sites 37/38 Off Derwen Lane, Penrhyn Bay. 

508 Mrs Janet Pheasey [786] 1 Object 

Summary I consider that the proposed development would have an adverse effect on:a. 


b. From the traffic generated in the region of two schools and increased traffic passing through Plas Penrhyn , Gloddaeth View. 

c. On essential community facilities. 


505 Mrs Glenys Roberts [785] 1 Object 








571 Mrs Hilary Kewley [784] 1 Object 

Summary The proposed site should be removed from the Plan to make it sound. This is because the infrastructure, amenities and services including roads cannot 

support the creation of 100 new homes. The Plan to build on farming land is flawed - it is not acceptable in my view to earmark farm land for housing 

development. 

Change Sought: The proposed site should be removed from the Plan to make it sound. 

556 

mrs haf jones [824] 

1 Object 

Summary developmnt in penrhyn bay glodaith farm. 

I object to the proposed developments on the fields of the farm on the following grounds. infrastructure the doctors and the schools are full and unable to 

cope with inc capacity. loss of rural space and the livley hood of local framer. reduction in wildlife habitat hedges ect. increased road traffic and condjestion. 

loss of popular venue for urdd festival. removal of green wedge between penrhyn bay and other areas (urban sprawl) 

Change Sought: do not build on these fields. 

44




398 Mrs Joanne Berry [309] 1 Object 

Summary The proposed development would have an adverse effect - 

1) on residential amenity 

2) from additional traffic generated near 2 schools, along Gloddaeth View, and through Penrhynside 

3) On ecological and wildlife interests and landscape 

4) On the best and most versatile agricultural land 

5) On essential community facilities - putting additional pressures, due to increased population 

6) from the potential of increasing flooding 


325 

Mrs Linda Daly [625] 

Summary Adverse effect on 


b) Traffic generation in two schools region and THROUGH PENRHYNSIDE 

c) Environmental conditions from noise and odours coming from a working dairy farm 

d) Ecological and wildlife interests (lapwings) 

e) On best agricultural land 

f) Essential community facilities 


1 Object 

247 

Miss Carol Stanley [532] 

1 Object 

Summary Penrhynside is not an urban area and has been incorrectly categorised. I consider that the proposed development would have an adverse effect on a) 

Residential amenity. b) From the traffic generated in the region of two schools and increased traffic movement through Penrhynside and the Gloddaeth 

Woods estate. c) Environmental conditions arising from noise and odours generated from a working farm. D) Environmental ecological wildlife interests and 

landscape character's) Agricultural land. F) Essential community facilities(pressure on schools, medical centre and recreational facilities). 

Change Sought: Removal of this proposal from the plan and put in place protection of this area from future development. 

988 Mrs Kelly Williams [505] 1 Object 

Summary Objection to Derwen Lane site, Penrhyn Bay 

Change Sought: Deletion of Derwen Lane site, Penrhyn Bay 

217 Mr Paul Bagnall [504] 1 Object 


1. Residential Amenities 

2. Increase the level of traffic adjacent to two schools 

3. Increase the traffic flow though the residential area of Penrhyn Side 

4. Agricultural land designated A1 

5. Significantly reduce the livelihood of the tenant dairy farmer 

6. Increase the amount of rain runoff due to reduced soak away because of buildings 

Change Sought: Traget more brownfield sites 

Take inconsideration the need for housing in the area and who will benifit, local young people or persons who will retire to the area 

Take in to consideration the volume of job losses in the area and low wages , and who could afford these homes 

322 Mrs Shirley Bowman [613] 1 Object 

Summary Adverse effect on: 


b) increased traffic in the area 

e) environment - adjacent to working farm 

f) impact on wildlife and ecology 

q) impact on resident farmer - this is agricultural land 

s) pressure on existing amenities 


320 Mr George Shepherd [598] 1 Object 

Summary Iincreased traffic movement through Penrhynside with which the village roads are ill equipped to cope. 

An adverse effect on residential amenities and on ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character. 

The proposed development plan is on A1 agricultural land and the development would significantly affect the livelihood of the tenant farmer. 

Pressure on essential community facilities. 


113 

Mr Andrew Jones [180] 

1 Object 

Summary Penrhynside is not an urban area and has been incorrectly categorised. I consider that the proposed development would have an adverse effect on 

a)Residential amenity. b)From the traffic generated in the region of two schools and increased traffic movement through Penrhynside and the Gloddaeth 

Woods estate. c)Environmental conditions arising from noise and odours generated from a working farm. D) Environmental ecological wildlife interests and 

landscape caracter.E)Agricultural land. F)Essential community facilities(pressure on schools, medical centre and recreational facilities). 

Change Sought: Removal of this proposal from the plan and protecton of this area from future development. 

873 Mr Ian Saunders [534] 123 Object 

Summary Objection on the grounds that the development would have adverse effects on the local amenities, such as schools shops and the medical centre, and there 

would be increased traffic generated. 

The site is Grade A1 agricultrual land and would significantly affect the livelihood of the tenant farmer. 

It would impact on the ecological and wildlife interest and the the general landscape character. 

The road system would be unable to cope with the increase in traffic generated. 

Change Sought: Remove sites 37 and 38 from plan 

413 Mr Lea Burgess [308] 1 Object 



b) From the traffic generated in the region of two schools and increased traffic movement through Penrhynside and Gloddaeth View 


f) on ecological, wildlife interests and landscape character 




45




537 Mr Geoff Sharrock [496] 1 Object 


b. From the traffic generated 






298 ms glengreen green [579] 1 Object 

Summary I consider the proposed development would have an adverse effect onthe traffic generated in the region of two schools and increased traffic movement 

through penrhynside. Already chaos outside these two schools and the volume of traffic through penrhynside is absolutely madness at present. This proposal 

would be a huge mistake in this area i strongly believe! 

Change Sought: Alternate plans elsewhere 

303 Mr Stephen Jones [582] 1 Object 

Summary The allotments are a good idea but I object to the housing element. 

The proposal would have an adverse effect on: 

a. Residential amenity. 

b. A working dairy farm, we don't need another farmer to lose his/her livelyhood or the loss of prime agricultural land. 

c. The local medical centre and schools, we don't any further demands placed on these excellent community facilities. 

Change Sought: Policy HOU/1 should be abandoned and our elected representatives should enact legislation which will allow local people to have the final say on any future 

proposals which may effect the environment in their locality. 

291 Mr Dafydd Aled Williams [572] 1 Object 

Summary Having lived here for 14 years we have experienced some development. 

Traffic has increased and parking is becoming difficult where Plas Penrhyn meets Trafford Park. 

The drains regularly reject heavy rainfall at the bottom of Derwen Lane between Ysgol Y Creuddyn and Ysgol Glanwydden even after recent work to improve 

the drains the road outside Ysgol Glanwydden floods. 

More houses on the farm land off Derwen Lane will cause more surface water when it rains and more strain on the existing seweres. 

The volume of people and cars will also be substantially higher and will cause conjestion to Llandudno road and A470. 

Change Sought: HOU/1 and Map2. 

I would like to see the land off Derwen Lane kept as farm land and not dedicated for housing development because of the increase risk of flooding at Ysgol 

Glanwydden and the increase in the traffic conjestion. 

302 Mr Clifford Matthews [584] 1 Object 

Summary I write to object to the development on two grounds. The village of Penrhyn Bay is still a villager. There are a great number of houses. To increase this 

number by developing the land at Derwen Lane would destroy the village nature of the area. How long is it before we see housing extending to the main Road 

(Llanrhos Road) 

The implications for children are huge. I worry particularly about the Primary School (Ysgol Glanwydden) An increase in houses equals an increase in 

children. A hundred houses could hear an increase of 80/100 extra children being fed into the school at different ages. What plans are in place to cater with 

this? The traffic is already a problem; extra families mean additional traffic in a location which is already lightly dangerous. 

Change Sought: Delete site from Plan 

1204 Mrs Anna Williams [457] 1 Object 

Summary Objection to sites 37,38 Off Derwen Lane, Penrhyn Bay. See attachment. 

Change Sought: Removal of sites 37,38 from the Plan. 

182 Mr Thomas Simpson [459] 1 Object 

Summary Increase in traffic in an already congested area 

The impact on capacity in the schools in the area. Our Primary School is more or less full at present. 

The impact on an already busy medical centre at Penrhyn Bay 

The possible loss of a working dairy farm. 

The proposed site contains an important lapwing-nesting site. We have already lost Bodafon fields nesting site due to commercial activity. 

Loss of Biodiversity (woodlands and fields) 

Possible blurring of community boundaries 

Finally, the disruption and distress caused to current residents by the associated building work if this development is allowed to proceed. 


183 Mr K Mitchell [461] 1 Object 

Summary Following the publication of your proposed housing sites for inclusion in the local development plan 2007-2022 I wish to object to the listing of sites 37-38 

Penrhyn Bay. 

The proposal to build on the above sites is a complete reversal of the county councils intent as outlined in the Unitary Development Plan 2001 which 

categorically states to restrict any further developments in the Penrhyn Bay area & lists the land concerned as an historic landscape; equally, permitting new 

housing on prime agricultural land is an act of irreversible folly. 


310 Mrs Alson Jones [595] 1 Object 

Summary Policy HOU/1 Land Off Derwen Lane Penrhyn Bay 

1. I believe that the increased traffic generated by development off Derwen Lane would have an adverse effect on persons living in the locality, the 2 schools 

and the playgroups which are opposite the proposed site. 

2. The proposal would have an adverse effect on a working dairy farm in the locality. 

3. The development would have an adverse effect on wildlife (I believe lapwings nest in the area)and the visual environment. 

4. The current infrastructure would not support further unnecessary housing development. 

Change Sought: The abandonment of the plan and prioritisation of brown field development to deal with the housing need for the declining population. 

46




372 Mrs Hafwen Williams [671] 1 Object 

Summary I consider that the proposed development would have an adverse affect on 




f. on ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character. (I believe that the area is a nesting site for lapwings) 

q. on the best and most versatile agricultural land. (The proposed development is on A1 agricultural land and the development would significantly affect the 


s. on essential community facilities. (An increase in population would put pressure on the two schools, the local Medical Centre and recreational facilities) 


429 Mrs Angela Saunders [540] 1 Object 

Summary I consider the proposed development would have an adverse effect on: 

a. residential amenity 

b. from traffic generated in the region of two schools and increased traffic movement along local roads 

e. on environmental conditions arising from being situated next to a working dairy farm 

f. on ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character 

q. on the best and most versatile agricultural land (the proposed developemnt is on A1 agricultural land and the devlopment would significantly affect the 


s. on essential community facilities (increased population would put pressure on the two schools, the medical centre and recreational facailities) 

Change Sought: Alternative sites to be investigated like the derelict land in the centre of Llandudno which is both an eyesore and centrally located. This would address both the 

provision of building land for homes and the overall look of the town. What about the land either site of the main dual carriageway into Llandudno from the 

A55 - this has excellent access and additional housing here would be able to access the facilities along the A55 to Llandudno corridor. 


Summary This is adjacent to the Cloddaeth SSSI and Creuddyn Peninsula Woods SAC, which suffers trampling from recreational use. CCW advises that development 

of this site would require measures to prevent adverse effects on the SSSI. At this stage, we cannot advise on the feasibility of potential measures, so advise 

you there is a risk that CCW would object to development proposals for the site. 

Change Sought: Include measures in Policy HOU/1, Land off Derwen Lane,Penrhyn Bay to mitigate effects on the SSSI. If this is not possible then remove site from the LDP. 

485 Mr Christopher Reid [768] 1 Object 

Summary I consider that the above proposal is unsound because: 

1) The development is proposed on a successful dairy farm 

2) The fields are A1 agricultural farmland and a 'greenfield site'. 

3) This development would be likely to increase traffic flow 

4) Local facilities particularly schools and doctors would find it difficult to cope with the increase in local population 

5) The proposed site borders native woodlands, animals and birds would be significantly effected by this development both in the construction phase and in 

the longer term. 

6) Many hedgerows will be destroyed. 


483 Mr Jonathon Gardner [767] 1 Object 

Summary I consider that the proposed development would have an adverse effect on residential amenity. 

From the traffic generated. 

On environmental conditions. 

On ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character 

On the best and most versatile agricultural land. 

On essential community facilities. 


285 Mr Graham Heginbottom [562] 1 Object 

Summary The proposed development would have an adverse effect on a) residential amenity, b) from the traffic generated in the region of two schools and from 

increased traffic movement among gloddaeth view and through Penrhynside, c) on environmental conditions arising from the noise and odours generated 

from a working dairy farm, d) on ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character, e) on the best and most versatile agricultural land 


facilities). 


281 Mrs Michelle Garner [560] 1 Object 

Summary Would have an adverse effect on the local community from the traffic generated in the region of the two schools. An increase in traffic and population within 

this area will put extra pressure on an already over subscribed primary school. 

Would have an adverse effect on the best and most versatile agricultural land. I consider that the proposed development would have an adverse effect on 

ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character. 

Change Sought: That the proposed development plan for Derwen Lane be removed from the LDP. 

286 Mrs Lilla Smith [563] 1 Object 

Summary The fields along Derwen Lane, part of Gloddaeth Isaf Farm are part of a working dairy farm with well-established hedges, teaming with wildlife making this a 

balanced environment for the existing newly built estate and schools. to build on these fields would deplete the environment and put a cureently balanced 

community out of kilter 


575 Mr Dylan Williams [849] 1 Object 

Summary a) residential amenity 

b) from the traggic generatied in the region of two schools and increased traffic through Penrhynside 

e) on environmental conditions arising from noise and odours generated from working dairy farm 

f) on ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character (area believed to be nesting site for lapwings) 




1612 Mr D.N Sutcliffe [1962] 

1 Object 

Summary The development would have an adverse impact upon the highway, existing services, and is likely to increase the risk of flooding due to an inadequate 

surface water drainage system. 

The development would result in the loss of green land. Sufficient brownfield sites have not been considered. CCBC has failed to introduce an empty homes 

strategy. 


47




287 

Mr Alan Smith [565] 

1 Object 

Summary The infrastructure of this area cannot sustain such a development. For example poor drainage and new sewage regularly rises above the surface of the 

road. Despite numerous requests to get the problem addressed over the last 5 years the problem still arises. Derwen Lane environmental officers have 

visited resident of Derwen Lane. The Planning department and Welsh Water likewise. A concern also that the raw sewage rises through the storm drain and 

spreads downhill to the estate below and footpath in close proximity with health and safety implications 


11 

Mr Peter Lloyd [28] 

Summary Site 37/38 Object on the following grounds: 

1. Increase in traffic in an already conjested area especially near Glanwyddan School 

2.Impact on capacity in the schools. Primary school is more or less full 

3. Impact on an already busy medical centre 

4. Loss of a dairy farm 

5. Loss of lapwing nesting site 

6. Loss of biodiversity 

7. Blurring of community boundaries 

8. Disruption and distress to current residents by associated building works. 

Also: 

Loss of most versitile land 

impact on residential amenities 

impact on essential community facilities 


1 Object 

63 Mr Michael Hendry [127] 1 Object 

Summary Derwen Lane proposed development contravenes policies P2, C1, C2, C4 and many others 

Change Sought: Removal of Derwen Lane Site 

284 Mrs Carol Heginbottom [558] 1 Object 

Summary The proposed development would have an adverse effect on a) residential amenity, b) from the traffic generated in the region of two schools and from 

increased traffic movement among gloddaeth view and through Penrhynside, c) on environmental conditions arising from the noise and odours generated 

from a working dairy farm, d) on ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character, e) on the best and most versatile agricultural land 


facilities). 


274 Llandudno Town Council (Ms Tessa Wildermoth MSc) [555] 1 Object 

Summary It was resolved that the Town Council object to the inclusion of sited 37/38 on the grounds that any development does not protect the unique natural 

environment; the pressure on the wildlife habitat; increased traffic, and increase in noise, odour and noxious emissions. Members also noted that this was 

prime agricultural land. 

The Town Council has no objection to the inclusion of site 449. 

Change Sought: Removal of site from plan 

321 Mrs Hazel Shepherd [2198] 1 Object 

Summary The proposed development would have an adverse effect on 

a) the most versatile agricultural land 

b) traffic generated in with which the village roads are ill equipped to cope 

c) on environmental conditions with houses being built so close to a working farm 

d) on ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character 

e) on essential community facilities 


5145 Mr David Sawyer [2069] 1 Object 

Summary I consider the proposed development at Derwen Lane would not fit into the area 

Change Sought: Remove Derwen Lane from the LDP 

1787 penrhyn against developement (Mr David Shorrocks) [2014] 1 Object 

Summary Penrhynside has been classified as an urban area. With a population of around 350 it should be reclassified as a minor village or a tier 2 village. 

Change Sought: Reclassify Penrhynside to either a minor village or a tier 2 village. 

7186 penrhyn against developement (Mr David Shorrocks) [2014] 

36 Object 

Summary Site 37 & 38 is a Green Field Site and category 2 agricultural land which is essential to the tenant farmer. 

The road system is totally inadequate at present and would be unable to cope with further traffic. 

The two local schools would be unable to cope with extra children without extending. 

Winllan Field should be reappraised against Derwen lane. 

Change Sought: Remove Derwen Lane from the LDP and reappraise Derwen Fields for development. 

48


Policy HOU/1 Meeting The Housing Needs, Land off Bryn Castell,Conwy 


1615 Beech Developments (NW) Ltd (Mr Mike Roberts) [1966] 

Summary Support the allocation of site 368 Bryn Castell. The site passes the tests of soundness and accords with national guidance being in a highly sustainable 

location 

1 Support 

549 Mr C.B. Jones [834] 1 Object 

Summary We object to the housing allocation at Bryn Castell and suggest its replacement with a new housing proposal on land to the north of Sychnant Pass Road, 

Conwy. The proposed replacement housing site is in a sustainable and accessible location and reflects the scale and pattern of development in the locality. It 

can be developed for housing without affecting the essential setting of the World Heritage Site and will make a valued contribution towards the provision of 

housing, including affordable housing and also maintain the economic prospertity and social fabric of the town. 

Change Sought: Deletion of housing allocation at Bryn Castell and its replacement with a proposed housing allocation on land to the north of Sychnant Pass Road, Conwy. 

Alternatively if the corresponding objection to the low housing provision is agreed the land at Sychnant Road can be considered as an additional housing site 

to allow the new dwelling requirement to be delivered on sustainable and accessible sites. 

218 Mr Arthur Stradling [508] 1 Object 

Summary site 368 is affected by a Cadw boundary. I feel site 20 Sychnant Pass Road would be more suitable. 

Change Sought: add site 20 instead of 368 

540 Mr Charles Keith Simpson [811] 1 Object 

Summary Impact on tourism 

Conwy is a World Heritage Site. 

One new development has just been completed resulting in the eyesore view of washing lines facing Bryn Castell. 

CADW have issued a plan of the site with their boundary line cutting across the site. This would seriously restrict any sympathetic development in this area. 

- Increased traffic 

- It is the junction of a main arterial road 

- In winter, due to the steepness of the hill we have a safety issue with ice forming. 

Change Sought: Alternative sites 

I would propose the Old Marine Garage site on Conway Road, Llandudno Junction. This has many advantages; it has a wonderful view down the Conwy 

River Valley which makes living there very attractive plus the site is fronted on two sides by existing housing: 

- It is on a main bus route 

- Walking distance to a mainline rail station 

- Supermarkets (5 or 10 minutes) 

- Local shops 

- Post Office 

- Banks 

- Pubs 

- Restaurants and takeaways 

- Schools 

- Access to A55 Trunk Road within minutes 

I am informed at present the Council has earmarked this land for Industrial Development but if the need for housing is so great, it must be more beneficial to 

keep housing where all the services for a vibrant community to flourish are already established. 

With land at the old Hotpoint site, Industrial Parks at Llandudno Junction, Tre Marl, Mochdre and Conwy Morfa, there is enough to absorb any potential 

business into existing Industrial Parks, rather than encroach onto an existing residential area. 

49


Policy HOU/1 Meeting The Housing Needs, Land at Sychnant Pass Rd,Conwy 



Summary Site 164 Opposite Lark Hill, Sychnant Pass Road, Conwy, should be reconsidered as a preferred suitable site. 

Change Sought: Replace Sychnant Pass Road site with the alternative, site 164, Opposite Lark Hill, Sychnant Pass Road, Conwy. 

1019 Landmark Consultancy (Mr David Collins) [1055] 

1 Object 

Summary I wish to register my objection to land, allocated in the LDP for residential purposes, at Sychnant Pass Road, Conwy. The land, owned by Conwy CBC, cannot 

be developed without suitable access, infrastructure and drainage provision. As you will be aware, your Council resolved to release this allocated site to Anwyl 

Construction Co. Ltd., to provide a resolution to these development problems. 

I, therefore, wish to support the objection submitted by Anwyl Construction Co. Ltd. as I believe that your allocation for the Conwy CBC land, in isolation, is 

unsound. 

Change Sought: The allocation should be amended to include the land shown hatched red on the accompanying plan, which resolves all the development concerns I have 

indicated and reflects the decisions made by your own Council to support this additional area of land. 

50


Policy HOU/1 Meeting The Housing Needs, Opposite School, Llanfair TH 


38 

Mr Clifford Davies [111] 

1 Object 

Summary Removal of site Ref 6 opposite school, Llanfair TH and replacement with an alternative site (plan attached). Busy school, petition awaiting from parents. The 

alternative site is considered more sustainable in terms of location within the existing settlement. The working smithy is expected to close within five years 

and this would enable access from Smithy Hill, with alternative access from the north east side (Church Street) 

Change Sought: Removal of site no 6 opposite school at Llanfair TH and replacement with alternative site at The Smithy 

1779 Mr Roy Charlesworth [2005] 1 Object 

Summary Objection to proposed housing site (site ref. 6 - opposite school) in Llanfairtalhaearn. It has not taken account that it is verging on open countryside in a 

conservation area, and it has not taken consideration of transport problems. An alternative and more sensible site would be on the other side of the village 

next to or opposite the Guide/Scouts building. There is already a housing network here and is more easily accessible fro the main Llansannan road. 

Change Sought: Remove site 6 - opposite school, from the Plan. An alternative and more sensible site would be on the other side of the village next to or opposite the 

Guide/Scouts building. 

There is already a housing network here and is more easily accessible fro the main Llansannan road. 

This site would avoid the traffic problem through the village, ease the problem on an alredy overused small one track road. 

It would also help to retain the beauty of the one area of the village yet untouched by development. 

Many tourists venture to the village and enjoy walking by the church and down to the graveyard opposite the school- this would go if the proposed 

development went ahead. 

51


Policy HOU/1 Meeting The Housing Needs, East of Trem Arfon, Llanrwst 


7230 A W Jones Building Contractors (Mr Aled Jones) [2173] 1 Support 

Summary The attached correspondence from the EAW and the Council's Highway and Transportation service confirms the suitability of the housing land allocation at 

Trem Arfon in terms of both flood risk issues and access arrangements. 

Change Sought: No Change 

7209 Mrs Roberta Thomas [482] 

1 Object 

Summary The strategy, policies and allocations (Trem Arfon) are not realistic and appropriate having considered the relevant alternatives and/or are not founded on a 

robust and credible evidence base 

SEE ATTACHED REPRESENTATION IN FULL 

Change Sought: To delete Trem Arfon and consider the submitted alternative sites 

7204 Mrs Diane Roberts [472] 

1 Object 





7205 Mr Paul Jenkins [476] 

1 Object 





7206 Mr and Mrs Lemalle [477] 

1 Object 





7207 Mrs J Thomas [480] 

1 Object 





7203 Mr Brian Cope [471] 

1 Object 





7216 Mrs Janice Spence [492] 

1 Object 





7210 Mr John Lynch [483] 

1 Object 





7215 Mr Arfon Wyn Jones [490] 

1 Object 





7211 Mr R Dingle [485] 

1 Object 





7212 Mr R Gardner [486] 

1 Object 






Summary Object to the inclusion of Trem Arfon on the gounds of traffic and encrouchment into open countryside. 

Change Sought: Remove Trem Arfon from LDP 

52




7214 Mrs Debra Huzarski [489] 

1 Object 





7213 Mr David Braslier [488] 

1 Object 





7208 Mr and Mrs Stone [481] 

1 Object 





99 Mr and Mrs Ronald Johnstone [162] 2 Object 

Summary There are no proper pavements approaching the site and Abergele Road are too narrow for any to be made. Children use the site for a play area. The land is 

not suitable due to the terrain and is boggy. Other sites suggested are far more suitable. Other houses values in close proximity to the site would be adversely 

affected should 'social housing' be built. 

Change Sought: Removal of site 47 from Plan 

7192 

Summary 


Mrs Jude Pyves [448] 

The allocation of Trem Arfon has not been prepared in accordance with the Delivery Agreement including the Community Involvement Scheme 


Delete the Trem Arfon site and consider the submitted alternative sites. 


1 Object 

106 

Mrs Hilda Pritchard [169] 

1 Object 

Summary Object to the inclusion of Site 47 on the following grounds: Access, impact on surface water drainage, footpath relocation, failure to identify alternative sites, 

unsuitable topography, residential amenity, traffic generated, impact on the welsh language and environmental impact 

Change Sought: Remove site 47 from plan 

105 

Mrs Gaynor Webb [168] 

1 Object 



Change Sought: Removal of Site 47 from plan 

104 

Mrs Jennifer Jones [167] 

1 Object 




103 

Mr and Mrs Colin Lovegrove [166] 

2 Object 



Change Sought: To remove site 47 from plan 

102 

Ms Marian Roberts [165] 

1 Object 




108 

Mr Dylan Rhys Jones [171] 

1 Object 



Change Sought: Remove Site 47 from plan 

100 

Mrs Doreen Hughes [163] 

1 Object 



Change Sought: Delete site and replace with one of the suggested alternatives. 

109 

Eluned Jones [172] 

1 Object 




98 

Mr Robert Hughes [161] 

1 Object 


unsuitable topography, ambiguity of status of development and full environmental impact upon site 47 and environs 


568 CDN Planning (Mr Rhys Davies BA (Hons) MRTPI) [131] 1 Object 

Summary Housing site at Trem Arfor should be deleted in favour of a more suitable site close to the town centre at Fron Ganol. (site 260) 

Change Sought: Deletion of site allocation for housing on land near Trem Arfor and its replacement with an alternative housing site at fron Ganol Llanrwst. 

Alternatively if housing figures are amended to take account ofthe 2006 based population projections the site could be allocated for housing in addition to 

other suitable sites. 

53





Summary This site includes broadleaved woodland and scrub. In line with policies for development to protect or enhance habitats and wildlife, this site may have limited 

potential for development that achieves that objective. 

Change Sought: Remove Trem Arfon from the LDP 

164 Mr Robert Dean [427] 1 Object 

Summary It has not been prepared in accordance with the Delivery Agreement including the Community Invovlement Scheme 

The plan and it's policies have not been subjected to Sustainability Appriasal including Stratgic Environmental Assessment 

The proposed site at Trem Arfon is not deliverable, realistic or appropriate considering the alternatives and/or are not founded on a robust and credible 

evidence base. 



7217 Mrs Gwenno Ford [30] 

1 Object 






1 Object 

Summary Land at trem Arfon, Llanrwst is exceedingly steep and with impracticable access for the density of development proposed and could not deliver sustainable 

homes for life. 

Change Sought: Further assessment required of site deliverability. 

101 

Mrs Sian Williams [164] 

1 Object 




1236 Mr Gareth Jones AC/AM [1015] 1 Object 

Summary Objection to the proposed allocation of site 47, Trem Arfon, Llanrwst, in the Plan. Objection relates to issues of access from all sides of the site, poor 

drainage, and the impact on the amenity of the local community. See attachment for full response. 

Change Sought: Remove site 47, Trem Arfon, from the Plan. 

7201 Mr Donald Owen [469] 

1 Object 





7200 Mrs Elsie Harries [468] 

1 Object 





7199 Mrs and Mr Pope [467] 

1 Object 





7198 Mr Alun Roberts [466] 

1 Object 





7197 Mrs Hughes [453] 

1 Object 





7196 Mrs Maia Starkey [452] 

1 Object 





107 

Mr Richard Newstead [170] 

1 Object 




7191 

Summary 


Mr and Mrs Cyril Wynne and Judith Jones [447] 

The allocation of Trem Arfon has not been prepared in accordance with the Delivery Agreement including the Community Involvement Scheme 


To delete Trem Arfon and consider the submitted alternative sites 

1 Object 

54




7202 Mr Gerwyn Jones [470] 

1 Object 





171 Mr Noel Parry [436] 1 Object 







159 Mr Gareth Jones [423] 1 Object 







151 Mr Brian Davies [422] 1 Object 






Change Sought: To revisit the Pre-Depoist LDP Preferred Stratgy and Alternative sites through community involvement. 

146 


Miss Sharon Evans [415] 1 Object 







111 

Town Cllr Christine Humphreys [174] 

1 Object 




110 

Mrs Eileen James [173] 

1 Object 




7195 Mr George Kennith Williams [449] 

1 Object 





7224 Mr & Miss Mathew & Ffion Berry [2035] 

1 Object 





7218 Mr and Mrs Forbes [2154] 

1 Object 





7219 Mrs B Jones [2155] 

1 Object 





7220 Mrs A Redrup [2156] 

1 Object 





55




7227 Llanrwst Town Council (Ms Gwenda M Jones) [2168] 

1 Object 

Summary Increased traffic on the access road would have serious effects on the 2 estates due to the cars parked on both sides of the road making it impossible for 

emergency access. Alternative access is very narrow and winding- vehicles have come off this road previously. There would be a steep hill from the estate to 

gain access to a narrow road. The land is boggy and recent downstream work may have adverse effects. Has a proper environmental survey been carried 

out? A footpath crosses the land and ancient wood are next to the site. Houses in close proximity would destroy the habitat. 

Change Sought: Remove Trem Arfon from the LDP 

7229 Mr & Mrs Davies [2169] 1 Object 

Summary We own 2 fields behind Bryn Hyfred which should be included in LDP in place of Trem Arfon. 

Change Sought: Include 2 fields behind Bryn Hyfryd instead of Trem Arfon. 

7225 Mr Paul Fisher [2036] 

1 Object 





7223 Ms Natalie Gilmore [2034] 

1 Object 





7222 Mr & Mrs Andrew & Helen Childs [2033] 

1 Object 





7221 Mr & Mrs John & Andrea Grove [2032] 

1 Object 





1767 Mr Elfyn Llwyd [2001] 1 Object 

Summary Objection to site 47 Trem Arfon, Llanrwst. This site's geography and location is unsatisfactory and it is hard to see how it is possible to ensure a development 

of affordable housing here considering the price of the infrastructure before starting the development. 

Change Sought: Remove site 47 from the Plan. Also, I have looked at a plan which shows many other lands in the area which are much more suitable for development and 

within the present Local Development Plan. 

7226 Miss Michelle Laidlaw [2037] 

1 Object 





56


Policy HOU/1 Meeting The Housing Needs, Coed Digain, Llangernyw 

Rep No Name 

655 

Summary 

Rossisle Ltd [833] 

There are the follwing concerns. 

1 The site is not within the settlement and the new boundary appears to be drawn around the site. 

2 It appears from the EA web page that the site lies within a floodplain. 

3 The site is too large and could swamp the viallge with too much housing too quickly if undertaken at a single phase. 

People Type 

1 Object 

4 The site is the only allocation in the village. If there are unknown ownership, legal or other technical constraints not yet known it will hamper the provision of 

housing within the village. 

Change Sought: Site 430 is also adjacent to the village boundary. This site can provide a small amount of additional market housing within the village leaving scope for a 

range of smaller sites to also be selected. Together these alternative sites could provide for a more organic village growth. 

57


Policy HOU/1 Meeting The Housing Needs, Triangle Field, Cerrigydrudion 


188 Welsh Assembly Government (Mr B Beachell) [455] 1 Support 

Summary Housing Allocation - Cerrigydrudion 

No objection in principle, however any access should not be within the first 80m of the western end of the site boundary to enable a minimum visibility splay of 

120m towards the A5. 

22607 Mrs M Norton [5205] 1 Object 

Summary I believe this site a most unsuitable location. Trem Eryri site would be much more suitable for the development of housing. 

Change Sought: Replace Triangle Field allocation with Trem Eryri site. 

58


Policy HOU/1 Meeting The Housing Needs, Pencoed Road, Llanddulas 


37 Bryn Dulas Farm Company (Mrs. Gertrud Rae) [108] 1 Object 

Summary Bryn Dulas Farm is the owner of land adjoining the proposed site. 

Farming in the already overpopulated area will become impossible due to the impact of more houses. Irreplaceable wild life habitats have already been 

deliberately and deviously destroyed by irresponsibly and backhandedly granted planning permissions. 

Llanddulas is already too big for its infrastructure. (School, roads, shopping, security etc). Nothing available to keep jobs off the streets. More housing without 

improved infrastructure would have devastating effect on living conditions which are already severely affected by landfill site (noise, smell and disruption) and 

lack of amenities. 

Change Sought: Definitely no more houses until infrastructure can cope. 

Retain rural aspect of village 

1588 Countryside Council for Wales (Mr Richard Ninnes) [1948] 

1 Object 

Summary This site is close to the Llanddulas Limestone and Gwych Castle Woods SSSI. Development of this site would need to address measures to avoid damage 

to the SSSI from increased recreational use. 

Change Sought: Include measures in Policy HOU/1, Pencoed Road, Llanddulas to mitigate effects on the SSSI. 

7232 Mr & Mrs Williams [2174] 71 Object 

Summary We the undersigned object on the grounds that we already have a jlarge volume of traffic in this vicinity. This appears to be the only access to the 

development. 

Change Sought: Remove Pencoed Road, Llanddulas from the LDP 


Summary Firstly, it has not been prepared in accordance with the original Delivery Agreement. Secondly, the LDP has not been produced in accordance with the Conwy 

County Borough Council Community Involvement Scheme 

The allocation of this site for housing development demonstrates a clear over-reliance on green-field sites and a failure to properly assess the capacity of 

previously developed land in the locality. 

My constituents have raised concerns over highway and pedestrian safety 

There is no credible evidence base that the allocation of this green-field site for housing development is appropriate. 

Change Sought: Revise the Delivery agreement due to the 'significance of these amendments' including all the relevant consultation 

59


Policy HOU/1 Meeting The Housing Needs, Fordd y Mynydd, Betws yn Rhos 


1751 Watkin Jones Homes (Mr Goronwy Owen) [879] 1 Object 

Summary Land at Ffordd y Mynydd, Betws yn Rhos (site 274) - we object to the inclusion of this land with the plan due to its poor accessibility from a narrow lane, the 

site's gradient and the loss of good quality agricultural land. 

Change Sought: Remove site 274 from the Plan. 

352 Betws yn Rhos Conservation Society (Mr John Wickins) [630] 1 Object 

Summary LDP Table 13 shows two potential housing development sites in Betws-yn-Rhos (ByR) are proposed for consideration in Stage 2 but there are issues noted 

elsewhere in the LDP for sewerage, water network and gas network. Our Society has previously raised the matter of the lack of capacity of the sewage works, 

which had not increased significantly despite recent modernisation by adding new tertiary clarifying filters. 

We further draw attention to DWR/Welsh Water's comments under this site (Ffordd y mynedd) regarding the overloading of the infrastructure capacity. This 

overloading is well known. 

Change Sought: Remove the Ffordd y Mynydd (housing site) from the LDP 

1839 Mrs V Morris [2061] 

1 Object 

Summary There are serious traffic issues, the roads are narrow with no footpaths, lorries get stuck and often knock into the church wall. The exisiting junctions are 

dangerous with little visibility. 

The steep incline proves difficult for mothers with pushchair and people with wheelchairs and is covered with a layer of thick ice during frosty weather. 

There is no regular bus service and the few buses that do exist stop at the opposite end of the village. 

Change Sought: Remove FFordd Y Mynydd from the LDP 

1840 Mrs Caroline Evans [196] 1 Object 

Summary Choice of site position - sites should ideally re-use previously developed land or redevelop exisiting builldings. 

Effect on Environment and Conservation - sites should have a minimal impact on diodiversity, we regularly view a wide range of wildlife on this site. 

Highway Constraints - the transport links are minimal and not suitable for seeking employment in the local area. Roads are narrow and dangerous and would 

not support extra traffic. 

Existing Infrastructure - there are already constraints on the sewerage system and further houses will only exascerbate this. 

Change Sought: Remove Ffordd y Mynydd from the LDP and utilise only Ffordd y Llanelwy 

1846 Cyngor Cymuned Betws yn Rhos Community Council (Mr Gwyndaf Morris) [2065] 1 Object 

Summary This is the fourth time the LDP has been altered and it must be lodged with the WAG. 

There are currently 10 unsold properties in the village. 

The sewerage system is at maximum capacity already. 

The school has no further capacity. 

The road structure and network is inadequate with issues with pavements. 

The bus and coach services are inadequate and do not have further capacity. 

Change Sought: Remove Ffordd y Mynydd from the LDP 

1833 Mr Gwyn Hughes [2056] 1 Object 

Summary The B5381 through Betws-yn-Rhos is only the width of a lorry near Cae Matw (road out of Betws Ffordd Llanelwy) the same at the bend around the cemetry 

(near the Wheatsheaf Inn) and again the road out of Betws towards Colwyn Bay by Airliewood/Bay Cottage. 

The capacity of the sewerage treatment plant is at its limit. 

Ten houses are already proposed or being built, there is no need for another ten houses. 

No footpath along Ffordd Llanelwy, very dangerous walking children to school. 

Change Sought: Remove Ffordd y Mynydd site from the LDP 

60


Policy HOU/1 Meeting The Housing Needs, Ffordd Llanelwy, Betws yn Rhos 


1841 Mrs Caroline Evans [196] 1 Support 

Summary Restrict the development of new dwellings in the village to the infill sites already identified in the current plant (site 284) and to restrict that housing to 

affordable housing as required for local need. 

Change Sought: Restrict the development in the village to site 284 and to restrict that housing to affordable housing. 

1757 Watkin Jones Homes (Mr Goronwy Owen) [879] 1 Support 

Summary We support the inclusion of this land as an allocated housing site within the plan. 

Change Sought: We propose the inclusion of the remainder of this field as an allocated housing site within the plan (full details previously provided). 

360 Betws yn Rhos Conservation Society (Mr John Wickins) [630] 1 Object 

Summary A further contradiction exists in Table 13, Site No. 284 Ffordd Llanelwy - shows an allocation of 5 houses in 2015-6. Yet Table 3.6 states there are no infra 

structure constraints. But in fact, sewerage, water and gas networks have been identified as constraints elsewhere. Table 3.6 also states there is access to a 

doctor's surgery in village which again contradicts Appendix 1 of BP8. DWR/Welsh Water's comments under apply to this site as well. 

The statement that the site capacity has been reduced is not a viable argument since another site in the village is being proposed for development. 

We reiterate the Society's request that no further housing developments be allowed in the village until all the infrastructure issues (sewerage, water and gas 

networks) be satisfactorily resolved 

Change Sought: Remove Ffordd Llanelwy from the LDP 

1229 Ms Beryl Fletcher [1466] 1 Object 

Summary Objection to site 284/91 Ffordd Llanelwy, Betws yn Rhos. See attachment. 

Change Sought: Remove site 284/91 from the Plan. 

1847 Cyngor Cymuned Betws yn Rhos Community Council (Mr Gwyndaf Morris) [2065] 1 Object 

Summary This is the fourth time the LDP has been altered and it must be lodged with the WAG. 

There are currently 10 unsold properties in the village. 

The sewerage system is at maximum capacity already. 

The school has no further capacity. 

The road structure and network is inadequate with issues with pavements. 

The bus and coach services are inadequate and do not have further capacity. 


1834 Mr Gwyn Hughes [2056] 1 Object 

Summary The B5381 through Betws-yn-Rhos is only the width of a lorry near Cae Matw (road out of Betws Ffordd Llanelwy) the same at the bend around the cemetry 

(near the Wheatsheaf Inn) and again the road out of Betws towards Colwyn Bay by Airliewood/Bay Cottage. 

The capacity of the sewerage treatment plant is at its limit. 

Ten houses are already proposed or being built, there is no need for another ten houses. 

No footpath along Ffordd Llanelwy, very dangerous walking children to school. 


61


Policy HOU/1 Meeting The Housing Needs, North of St. George rd, & Rhuddlan Rd, Abergele 


629 Mr Paul Luckock [146] 1 Support 

Summary I write in support of the Local Development Plan proposals for Abergele. 

I support the construction of a by pass road and the construction of additional houses to the west of the town. I judge we need such development to ensure 

the economic viability of the town and to ensure younger people are encouraged to remain and live and work in North Wales. 

I am also very relaxed about the construction of a Gypsy Traveller site. I judge that the Council should consult with the Gypsy Traveller community in North 

Wales to ensure the site is co-created with the residents of Abergele to ensure high quality design and construction to meet Gypsy and Traveller's needs. 

1823 Mr Terry Stevens [2042] 1 Support 

Summary The Dept. for the Economy & Transport supports the allocation of land at Abergele (part Council ownd site) for the development of approx. 220 dwellings as 

shown on Proposals Map 4. The development has the potential to provide a significant contribution to the affordable housing supply and a financial 

contribution to the funding of the construction of the first section (Abergele roundabout to St George Road) of the proposed new eastern Abergele by pass. 

Officers of DE&T would be pleased to work with the Council on the preparation of a Development Brief for the site. 

9202 P Marsh [3404] 1 Object 

Summary Object to the proposed housing allocation North of St. George Road, Abergele. Remove from the LDP. 

Change Sought: Remove site from the LDP 

9262 L Hynes [3424] 1 Object 



9259 Simon Jackson [3423] 1 Object 



9256 Izzy McQuillan [3422] 1 Object 



9253 Colin Batty [3421] 1 Object 



9250 D Lloyd [3420] 1 Object 



9247 D Lloyd [3419] 1 Object 



9244 C Brulz [3418] 1 Object 



9211 Alan Wilkins [3407] 1 Object 



9205 G Edwards [3405] 1 Object 



9214 Elfed Owen [3408] 1 Object 



9199 Adrian Lloyd-Williams [3403] 1 Object 



9196 C Bullock [3402] 1 Object 



9193 S Price [3401] 1 Object 



9190 Rita Crossley [3400] 1 Object 



9187 Carol Gibbons [3399] 1 Object 



9184 Colin Harris [3398] 1 Object 



9181 Sharon Ackers [3397] 1 Object 



62



Rep No Name 

9538 Mr J D Cuthbertson [3518] 



9208 

Summary 


9241 

Summary 


9295 

Summary 


9292 

Summary 


9289 

Summary 


9286 

Summary 


9283 

Summary 


9280 

Summary 


9277 

Summary 


9274 

Summary 


9265 

Summary 


9268 

Summary 


9172 

Summary 


9238 

Summary 


9235 

Summary 


9232 

Summary 


9229 

Summary 


9226 

Summary 


9223 

Summary 


9220 

Summary 


C Hall [3406] 

Object to the proposed housing allocation North of St. George Road, Abergele. Remove from the LDP. 

Remove site from the LDP 

E Thomas [3417] 



M P Burke [3435] 



C A Turner [3434] 



J I Fielden [3433] 



S Higgins [3432] 



D Maher [3431] 



M Campbell [3430] 



L King [3429] 



A King [3428] 



Mr Hynes [3425] 



S Morrell [3426] 



J Baertsch [3394] 



E A Zubel-Parsons [3416] 



Jean Glenister [3415] 



G Davies [3414] 



M Wilkins [3413] 



T C Williams [3412] 



Derek Gaskell [3411] 



R Jones [3410] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

63



Rep No Name 

9217 Linda Marsh [3409] 



9271 

Summary 


9073 

Summary 


9178 

Summary 


9100 

Summary 


9097 

Summary 


9094 

Summary 


9091 

Summary 


9088 

Summary 


9085 

Summary 


9082 

Summary 


9106 

Summary 


9076 

Summary 


9109 

Summary 


9070 

Summary 


8192 

Summary 


9067 

Summary 


9016 

Summary 


9013 

Summary 


9010 

Summary 


9007 

Summary 


G Avies [3427] 



Linda Roberts [3361] 



J Penketh [3396] 



P Curran [3370] 



Johney Barable [3369] 



Laura Hill [3368] 



Gillian Hill [3367] 



Marilyn Morris [3366] 



Neil Bachanan [3365] 



Bill Fry [3364] 



R A Spencer [3372] 



Mr E Hughes [3362] 



E Dyson [3373] 



Wyn Roberts [3360] 



Glyn Jones [3359] 

Object to the proposed housing allocation at North of St. George Street, Abergele. Remove from the LDP. 

Remove site from the LDP. 

Elaine Moss [3358] 



Joyce Berg [3341] 



Christine Finney [3340] 



Margaret Banks [3339] 



Heather Henderson [3338] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

64



Rep No Name 

9004 Cathy Henderson [3337] 



9079 

Summary 


9136 

Summary 


9169 

Summary 


9163 

Summary 


9160 

Summary 


9157 

Summary 


9154 

Summary 


9151 

Summary 


9148 

Summary 


9145 

Summary 


9103 

Summary 


9139 

Summary 


9175 

Summary 


9133 

Summary 


9130 

Summary 


9127 

Summary 


9124 

Summary 


9121 

Summary 


9118 

Summary 


9115 

Summary 


Marion Fry [3363] 



Keith Warrington [3382] 



R Ogley [3393] 



J Southeon [3391] 



L Wilkinson [3390] 



W Sharrock [3389] 



I Williams [3388] 



F Gaffrey [3387] 



N Colfer [3386] 



J Graham [3385] 



M Spencer [3371] 



Roberts Coard [3383] 



F Messenger [3395] 



James Given [3381] 



Carl Johnson [3380] 



M A De Salisi [3379] 



T Desmond [3378] 



K Griffiths [3377] 



M Bromley [3376] 



Diane Chester [3375] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

65



Rep No Name 

9112 Ron Carter [3374] 



9142 

Summary 


9421 

Summary 


11688 

Summary 


9469 

Summary 


9466 

Summary 


9463 

Summary 


9460 

Summary 


9457 

Summary 


9454 

Summary 


9430 

Summary 


9475 

Summary 


9424 

Summary 


9478 

Summary 


9418 

Summary 


8195 

Summary 


9415 

Summary 


9412 

Summary 


9409 

Summary 


9406 

Summary 


9403 

Summary 


Albert Crossley [3384] 



A Freeman [3479] 



Nicky Castle [3211] 



Gerogine Dorgan [3495] 



Gaynor Riley [3494] 



A Wilde [3493] 



V Wilde [3492] 



D Bamford [3491] 



A R Knight [3490] 



Erin Wynne-Woodhouse [3482] 



R Dignall [3497] 



D Gregory [3480] 



J Smith [3498] 



Kevin Jones [3478] 



William Jackson [3477] 



Mrs B Rylance [3476] 



Mrs Knight [3475] 



Apryl Evans [3474] 



Michael Evans [3473] 



Samantha Catterall [3472] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

66



Rep No Name 

9400 Kath Shone [3471] 



9427 

Summary 


9505 

Summary 


9535 

Summary 


9532 

Summary 


9529 

Summary 


9526 

Summary 


9523 

Summary 


9520 

Summary 


9517 

Summary 


9514 

Summary 


9472 

Summary 


9508 

Summary 


9391 

Summary 


9502 

Summary 


9499 

Summary 


9496 

Summary 


9493 

Summary 


9490 

Summary 


9487 

Summary 


9484 

Summary 


E Jones [3481] 



R Newman [3507] 



Mrs J Cuthbertson [3517] 



Mr M Graham [3516] 



Mr M Humphries [3515] 



Mrs V Humphries [3514] 



Mr K G Platt [3513] 



J Humphries [3512] 



Ann Roberts [3511] 



Paul Roberts [3510] 



D Wilkinson [3496] 



B Carpenter [3508] 



A Robinson [3468] 



Roberts S Nook [3506] 



John Allen [3505] 



Mary Allen [3504] 



Betty Ruddock [3503] 



Heulwen Parker [3502] 



Pat Wetton [3501] 



Eirian Jones [3500] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

67



Rep No Name 

9481 Norma Smith [3499] 



9511 

Summary 


13177 

Summary 


9451 

Summary 


9448 

Summary 


9445 

Summary 


9442 

Summary 


9439 

Summary 


9436 

Summary 


9433 

Summary 


9331 

Summary 


9397 

Summary 


9325 

Summary 


9334 

Summary 


9322 

Summary 


9319 

Summary 


9316 

Summary 


9313 

Summary 


9310 

Summary 


9307 

Summary 


9304 

Summary 


V Robertson [3509] 



P Stewart [3445] 



K Coulton [3489] 



J Restall [3488] 



Livia Pietromarchi [3487] 



Dorothy York [3486] 



Hazel Plumbley [3485] 



Thomas Glenday [3484] 



Victoria Glenday [3483] 



M R Lees [3448] 



Karen Bowyer [3470] 



L Hill [3446] 



M Coulton [3449] 



C Taberner [3444] 



E Barber [3443] 



D Evans [3442] 



N MacLean [3441] 



I Taberner [3440] 



C Jones [3439] 



J Hill [3438] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

68



Rep No Name 

8995 J R Roberts [3334] 



9328 

Summary 


9361 

Summary 


9298 

Summary 


9388 

Summary 


9385 

Summary 


9382 

Summary 


9379 

Summary 


9376 

Summary 


9373 

Summary 


9370 

Summary 


9553 

Summary 


9364 

Summary 


9556 

Summary 


9358 

Summary 


9355 

Summary 


9352 

Summary 


9349 

Summary 


9346 

Summary 


9343 

Summary 


9340 

Summary 


G A Turner [3447] 



Lyndon Wray [3458] 



Mr Gascoigne [3436] 



John Heatherington [3467] 



Barry Bayliss [3466] 



Stan Roberts [3465] 



Mrs Macro [3464] 



Len Pilling [3463] 



Mrs M Radakin [3462] 



M Worthing [3461] 



Mrs Parry-Jones [3523] 



Audrey Wray [3459] 



Mrs A Redmond [3524] 



E Swinton [3457] 



J Routledge [3456] 



J Roberts [3455] 



M Loseby [3454] 



D J Hearn [3453] 



W Barnes [3452] 



E Evans [3451] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

69



Rep No Name 

9337 Mrs P M Newnes [3450] 



9394 

Summary 


9367 

Summary 


11745 

Summary 


11826 

Summary 


11775 

Summary 


11772 

Summary 


11769 

Summary 


11766 

Summary 


11763 

Summary 


11757 

Summary 


11754 

Summary 


11781 

Summary 


11748 

Summary 


11784 

Summary 


11742 

Summary 


11739 

Summary 


11736 

Summary 


11733 

Summary 


11730 

Summary 


11727 

Summary 


Andrew Bowyer [3469] 



S Moore [3460] 



M Berg [3230] 



T D Edwards [3257] 



Joshua Davies [3240] 



Alex Jones [3239] 



Nicky Williams [3238] 



R C Davies [3237] 



M Curry [3236] 



L Royles [3234] 



G Burton [3233] 



E & R Forshaw [3242] 



E J Humphries [3231] 



S Bulm [3243] 



G Worley [3229] 



R Smith [3228] 



Tracy Cresswell [3227] 



E L Highcock [3226] 



Eva Highcock [3225] 



Martin Chambers [3224] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

70



Rep No Name 

11724 Linda Rossington [3223] 



11721 

Summary 


11751 

Summary 


11811 

Summary 


9001 

Summary 


8902 

Summary 


8899 

Summary 


8896 

Summary 


8893 

Summary 


8890 

Summary 


8887 

Summary 


8189 

Summary 


11778 

Summary 


11814 

Summary 


11712 

Summary 


11808 

Summary 


11805 

Summary 


11802 

Summary 


11799 

Summary 


11796 

Summary 


11793 

Summary 


Sarah Hughes [3222] 



Judith Domney [3232] 



Tom Griffiths [3252] 



M Watkins [3336] 



J Prys [3303] 



S Tudsall [3302] 



Ceira Lewis [3301] 



Mairlyn Lewis [3300] 



Treena Edwards [3299] 



O M J Fry [3298] 



B Parker [3297] 



Scott Whaton [3241] 



Ruth Williams [3253] 



M Holland [3219] 



Fiona Blad [3251] 



Billie Bennett [3250] 



R Hesk [3249] 



S Hughes [3248] 



A Wright [3247] 



K Rudnick [3246] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

71



Rep No Name 

11790 C J Bramwell [3245] 



11787 

Summary 


11817 

Summary 


11574 

Summary 


11607 

Summary 


11604 

Summary 


11601 

Summary 


11598 

Summary 


11595 

Summary 


11592 

Summary 


11589 

Summary 


11586 

Summary 


11718 

Summary 


11577 

Summary 


11616 

Summary 


11571 

Summary 


11568 

Summary 


11565 

Summary 


11562 

Summary 


11559 

Summary 


11556 

Summary 


P Faulkner [3244] 



Eirlys Williams [3254] 



James Morgan [3173] 



Ray Barlow [3184] 



Elaine Barlow [3183] 



Karen Hardcastle [3182] 



Jean Marsh [3181] 



M J Simpson [3180] 



S Williams [3179] 



D Humphries [3178] 



G Mathews [3177] 



A Kelly [3221] 



K E Hardy [3174] 



Sharon Craven [3187] 



Thomas Lloyd [3171] 



Stephen Hynes [3170] 



Jan Cawthorn [3169] 



H P Kershaw [3168] 



M Morgan [3167] 



R Hughes [3166] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

72



Rep No Name 

11553 K Shone [3165] 



11691 

Summary 


11583 

Summary 


11646 

Summary 


11829 

Summary 


11709 

Summary 


11706 

Summary 


11703 

Summary 


11664 

Summary 


11661 

Summary 


11658 

Summary 


11655 

Summary 


11610 

Summary 


11649 

Summary 


11613 

Summary 


11643 

Summary 


11640 

Summary 


11637 

Summary 


11634 

Summary 


11631 

Summary 


11625 

Summary 


B W Filkin [3212] 






Callum McKenna [3197] 



G R Jones [3258] 



A Poulter [3218] 



G Jones [3217] 



D Jones [3216] 



B Lloyd Jones [3203] 



B Waterson [3202] 



J Filkin [3201] 



A Davies [3200] 



Shirley Smart [3185] 



Jennifer Kay [3198] 



Louise Perrin [3186] 



Cian Hanna [3196] 



John Rogers [3195] 



W Hill [3194] 



M Lok [3193] 



K Davies [3192] 



I J Catto [3190] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

73



Rep No Name 

11622 A K Green [3189] 



11619 

Summary 


11715 

Summary 


11652 

Summary 


9049 

Summary 


11823 

Summary 


8929 

Summary 


8926 

Summary 


8923 

Summary 


8920 

Summary 


8917 

Summary 


8914 

Summary 


9058 

Summary 


8935 

Summary 


9052 

Summary 


8938 

Summary 


9046 

Summary 


9043 

Summary 


9040 

Summary 


9037 

Summary 


9166 

Summary 


Chad Billington [3188] 



M Brennand [3220] 



Elizabeth Gizzi [3199] 



Maurice Moss [3352] 



J Fisher [3256] 



G M Jones [3312] 



Gina Roberts [3311] 



Albert Knott [3310] 



Jack Olmerod [3309] 



Joanne Lovelady [3308] 



Michelle Brindle [3307] 



B Kitchen [3355] 



Eleri Brady [3314] 



Susan Williams [3353] 



S Woof [3315] 



Margaret Moss [3351] 



Rob Halliday [3350] 



Sue Palmer [3349] 



Gaz Heeter [3348] 



J Wood [3392] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

74



Rep No Name 

9064 Dawn Johnson [3357] 



9061 

Summary 


9034 

Summary 


9055 

Summary 


8965 

Summary 


9301 

Summary 


8992 

Summary 


8989 

Summary 


8986 

Summary 


8983 

Summary 


8980 

Summary 


8977 

Summary 


8974 

Summary 


8932 

Summary 


8968 

Summary 


9025 

Summary 


8962 

Summary 


8959 

Summary 


8956 

Summary 


8953 

Summary 


8950 

Summary 


E M Colto [3356] 



Peter Hughes [3347] 



Teresa Jones [3354] 



Margaret Wilson [3324] 



Andrew Evans [3437] 



Neil Jones-Davies [3333] 



Myra Moulson [3332] 



Liam Jones-Davies [3331] 



Derrick A Jones [3330] 



Joanne Ferguson [3329] 



Maria Hughes [3328] 



Chris Roberts [3327] 



Catrin Hughes [3313] 



Fiona Hughes [3325] 



Marian Davies [3344] 



Samantha Hunter [3323] 



Maxine Woolley [3322] 



Christopher Thomas [3321] 



Tracy Roberts [3320] 



Mr G Davies [3319] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

75



Rep No Name 

8947 Kate Fairhurst [3318] 



8944 

Summary 


8941 

Summary 


8971 

Summary 


11856 

Summary 


11889 

Summary 


11886 

Summary 


11880 

Summary 


11877 

Summary 


11874 

Summary 


11871 

Summary 


11868 

Summary 


11865 

Summary 


9031 

Summary 


11859 

Summary 


11901 

Summary 


11853 

Summary 


11850 

Summary 


11847 

Summary 


11844 

Summary 


11841 

Summary 


Connor Woods [3317] 



Sue Beesley [3316] 



Susan Jones [3326] 



Mr J B Starkie [3267] 






P N Jones [3277] 



Julia Hague [3275] 



Sarah Clayton [3274] 



Kemil Ramessur [3273] 



Pat Kendrick [3272] 



Sharan Hansen [3271] 



Susan Davies [3270] 



Jen Hughes [3346] 



Victoria Pedley [3268] 



D Morgan [3282] 



M Davies [3266] 



M D Bertlett [3265] 



W M Swales [3264] 



V A Law [3263] 



W Buck [3262] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

76



Rep No Name 

11838 G Watterson [3261] 



11835 

Summary 


11832 

Summary 


11862 

Summary 


8872 

Summary 


8998 

Summary 


9022 

Summary 


9019 

Summary 


8911 

Summary 


8908 

Summary 


8905 

Summary 


8884 

Summary 


8881 

Summary 


11895 

Summary 


8875 

Summary 


11898 

Summary 


8869 

Summary 


8866 

Summary 


8863 

Summary 


8860 

Summary 


11916 

Summary 


A Jones [3260] 



R Claxton [3259] 



Jonathan Moore [3269] 



P Highman [3292] 



M J Morpeth [3335] 



D Banks [3343] 



Norma Alcock [3342] 



G Green [3306] 



Olivia Fairhurst [3305] 



Paige Tudball [3304] 



G Evans [3296] 



Glenys Evans [3295] 



Barbara Taylor [3280] 



Mr M Costello [3293] 



Riaz Hakeem [3281] 



P Burslem [3291] 



J Burslem [3290] 



C Burslem [3289] 



J Parker [3288] 



P Parker [3287] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

77



Rep No Name 

11910 S Davidson [3285] 



11907 

Summary 


11904 

Summary 


9028 

Summary 


8878 

Summary 


9931 

Summary 


9616 

Summary 


9940 

Summary 


9619 

Summary 


9865 

Summary 


9937 

Summary 


9622 

Summary 


9757 

Summary 


9625 

Summary 


9934 

Summary 


9868 

Summary 


9874 

Summary 


9631 

Summary 


9613 

Summary 


8198 

Summary 


9634 

Summary 


Rowland Davidson [3284] 



Dilys Thomas [3283] 



Shaun Shepherd [3345] 



Robert Evans [3294] 



N Jones [3671] 



C Pugh [3544] 



Mrs E McDownell [3674] 



Glenys Eynon [3545] 



Mr B J Owen [3646] 



S Corlett [3673] 



Y Johns [3546] 



A Renshaw [3598] 



Matt Hazelwood [3547] 



Paul Smith [3672] 



Mr G S Preston [3647] 



Mr T W Keeting [3649] 



Mrs B Robshaw [3549] 



A L Price [3543] 



Mr V M Hunt [3550] 



Joan Hacking [3551] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

78



Rep No Name 

9751 John Morgan [3596] 



13150 

Summary 


9871 

Summary 


9637 

Summary 


13147 

Summary 


9640 

Summary 


9748 

Summary 


9961 

Summary 


9754 

Summary 


9601 

Summary 


9853 

Summary 


9589 

Summary 


8212 

Summary 


9958 

Summary 


9592 

Summary 


9772 

Summary 


9595 

Summary 


9955 

Summary 


9856 

Summary 


9598 

Summary 


9760 

Summary 


A Fazackeney [3670] 



Eileen Preston [3648] 



Carrie Rimmer [3552] 



D C Jeans [3669] 



Mark Rimmer [3553] 



Hannah Morgan [3595] 



Colin Griffiths [3681] 



Daphne Rawson [3597] 



Mr Poundall [3539] 



Mrs M Marshland [3642] 



Ms W Trimbel [3535] 



Gail Roberts [3604] 



Mrs Hill [3680] 



M Sambrookes [3536] 



Mr F Watson [3603] 



Mr Rutter [3537] 



E Owen [3679] 



Mr R Marshland [3643] 



Mrs Rutter [3538] 



J Unwin [3599] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

79



Rep No Name 

9952 L Stringer [3678] 



9943 

Summary 


9919 

Summary 


9949 

Summary 


9985 

Summary 


9604 

Summary 


9766 

Summary 


9607 

Summary 


9946 

Summary 


9610 

Summary 


9763 

Summary 


9862 

Summary 


9928 

Summary 


9769 

Summary 


8204 

Summary 


11918 

Summary 


9691 

Summary 


9730 

Summary 


9904 

Summary 


9694 

Summary 


9727 

Summary 


Mr Peter McDownell [3675] 



Teresa Roberts [3665] 



M Fortune [3677] 



Aneurin Wynne [3689] 



Mrs Poundall [3540] 



Simon Noon [3601] 



K Millar [3541] 






D R Sambrookes [3542] 



R Tradoe [3600] 



Mr G R Owen [3645] 



C Roberts [3668] 



Mr J Thomas [3602] 



Mrs D M Evans [3576] 



E D Jones [3655] 



C Edwards [3570] 



M Wharmby [3589] 



S Davies [3660] 



R Evans [3571] 



I Scattergood [3588] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

80



Rep No Name 

9697 R G Hughes [3572] 



9901 

Summary 


9892 

Summary 


9898 

Summary 


9643 

Summary 


8201 

Summary 


9733 

Summary 


8206 

Summary 


9895 

Summary 


8208 

Summary 


9721 

Summary 


9706 

Summary 


9982 

Summary 


9988 

Summary 


9709 

Summary 


9718 

Summary 


9715 

Summary 


9724 

Summary 


9820 

Summary 


9646 

Summary 


9745 

Summary 


G Pike [3659] 



Elizabeth Owen [3656] 



Jackie Leuly [3658] 



Clwydwen Morgan [3554] 



L Prewitt [3574] 



Gary Williams [3590] 



Miss J Hughes [3577] 



Natalie Haworth [3657] 



Mrs D Dyno [3578] 



M Williams [3586] 



Mrs G Carter [3581] 



Caroline Bond [3688] 



Robert Brown [3690] 



Mr & Mrs K Coulton [3582] 






C Parker [3584] 



A Taberner [3587] 



Janet Lloyd-Jones [3627] 



Jane Williams [3555] 



Mrs Parry [3594] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

81



Rep No Name 

9649 Susan Anguige [3556] 



9925 

Summary 


9883 

Summary 


9652 

Summary 


9742 

Summary 


9922 

Summary 


9655 

Summary 


9658 

Summary 


9907 

Summary 


9739 

Summary 


9688 

Summary 


9664 

Summary 


9886 

Summary 


9916 

Summary 


9667 

Summary 


9913 

Summary 


9736 

Summary 


9670 

Summary 


9889 

Summary 


9673 

Summary 


9910 

Summary 


Jean Hogan [3667] 



Mrs Alison Bird [3652] 



Paul Williams [3557] 



Joan Matthews [3593] 



L Kinsey [3666] 



Laura Williams [3558] 



Ron Wilkinson [3559] 



T Langford [3661] 



Simon Butterworth [3592] 



Mrs B G Purcell [3569] 



David Roberts [3561] 



Mr J R Thompson [3653] 



Janet Jones [3664] 



Harold Beeton [3562] 



J G Jones [3663] 



Julia Williams [3591] 



Ann Beeton [3563] 



Miss C Cashmore-Thorley [3654] 



Ruth Kyffin [3564] 



E R Rowlands [3662] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

82



Rep No Name 

9859 Miss D Olner [3644] 



8221 

Summary 


10000 

Summary 


10009 

Summary 


9829 

Summary 


9682 

Summary 


9805 

Summary 


10006 

Summary 


9685 

Summary 


10003 

Summary 


9775 

Summary 


9991 

Summary 


9778 

Summary 


9676 

Summary 


9799 

Summary 


9781 

Summary 


9997 

Summary 


9784 

Summary 


9796 

Summary 


9994 

Summary 


9838 

Summary 


Helen Roberts [3607] 



R G Edwards [3694] 



J A Lloyd [3697] 



I Bidzinski [3632] 



June Davies [3567] 



L Walmsley [3620] 



G R Evans [3696] 



Mrs E M Harrocks [3568] 






Nev Kelley [3609] 



G Beach [3691] 






S B West-Green [3565] 



G Bennett [3618] 



P Roberts [3611] 



M LL Edwards [3693] 



David Bruce [3612] 



F Hill [3617] 



Mr R Owen [3692] 



P Murray [3635] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

83



Rep No Name 

9787 D Rogers [3613] 



9877 

Summary 


9802 

Summary 


9811 

Summary 


9541 

Summary 


9823 

Summary 


Mrs L Keeting [3650] 



J Bennett [3619] 



Ranj Omar [3624] 



Mrs C B Haythorne [3519] 



G Lloyd-Jones [3628] 



3893 Cllr Samuel Rowlands [4396] 

Summary Objection to the allocation of Greenfield sites at St George's Road, Abergele for housing development. 

Change Sought: Deletion of St George's Road site, Abergele. 

9544 

Summary 


9817 

Summary 


9547 

Summary 


10024 

Summary 


9814 

Summary 


9550 

Summary 


9679 

Summary 


10021 

Summary 


8233 

Summary 


9559 

Summary 


10018 

Summary 


9826 

Summary 


9562 

Summary 


10015 

Summary 


Mrs K A Brown [3520] 






Mrs C Roberts [3521] 



John Branwell [3702] 



Lisa Bartlett [3625] 



Mr S Hopper [3522] 



B E M West-Green [3566] 



B Davies [3701] 



J Hardy [3631] 



Mr M Redmond [3525] 



A E Foxall [3700] 



B Nash [3630] 



D Cust [3526] 



Gladys Berdfing [3699] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

84



Rep No Name 

9808 E S Rowlands [3623] 



9565 

Summary 


10012 

Summary 


9835 

Summary 


8230 

Summary 


9793 

Summary 


9976 

Summary 


9847 

Summary 


9973 

Summary 


9850 

Summary 


9571 

Summary 


9790 

Summary 


9577 

Summary 


9568 

Summary 


9964 

Summary 


9583 

Summary 


9880 

Summary 


8215 

Summary 


9844 

Summary 


9841 

Summary 


9979 

Summary 


P Taylor [3527] 



Kirsty McLoughlin [3698] 



Mark Roberts [3634] 



Ivy Davies [3629] 



V Thomas [3616] 



D Muir [3686] 



Edna Phillips [3638] 



Ronald Peacock [3685] 



Peter Cross [3639] 



G B Sandy [3529] 



B Roberts [3614] 



Vicky Judge [3531] 



E Taylor [3528] 



Paul Lucas [3682] 



Mr E Slater [3533] 



Mrs I Humphrey-Evans [3651] 



John Lavington [3605] 



Laura Millward [3637] 



Gaynor Allen [3636] 



John Penlington [3687] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

85



Rep No Name 

8218 Georgina Roberts [3606] 

Summary Object to the proposed housing allocation at North of St. George Street, Abergele. Remove from the LDP. 

Change Sought: Remove site from the LDP. 

9967 

Summary 


9586 

Summary 


9580 

Summary 


9970 

Summary 


9574 

Summary 


Gwen Critchlow [3683] 



Mr R Borne [3534] 



Shaun Gibbons [3532] 



Rosalyn Peacock [3684] 



D A Newman [3530] 



6466 Mr Michael Poole [1377] 



5969 Mrs Doren Masterton [1918] 



6458 Mr Andrew Davidson [1376] 



6450 Mr Neil Owen [1375] 



5975 Mr Geoffrey D Masterton [1919] 



6442 Mr David Douglas Smith [1374] 



5981 Mrs Wendy Burbridge [1920] 



6474 Mrs Freda Gagie [1378] 



4245 Mrs Audrey Binns [1710] 



5957 Mr Edward Cullen [1916] 



6426 Mr Ian Woodhouse [1372] 



1949 Miss Laura Jayne Williams [1191] 



6410 Mrs Edna Roberts [1370] 



5993 Mr Brian James Allen [1922] 



6402 Mrs Elizabeth Vaughan [1369] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

86



Rep No Name 

5999 Mrs Nicola Jill Allen [1923] 



6434 Mrs S Pearsall [1373] 



5891 Mrs Sheila Nicholls [1905] 



6546 Mr and Mrs M G Carlin [1389] 



5879 Mr Lee Evans [1903] 



6538 Mr and Mrs Kenneth Atkinson [1388] 



4237 Mr Geraint R Evans [1709] 



6530 Mr and Mrs Malcolm and Pauline Rothwell [1386] 



5885 Mr Graham Nicholls [1904] 



5645 Miss Elizabeth V Bartley [1457] 



6522 Mrs Stephanie Lloyd Espley [1385] 



5963 Mr Raymond John Hughes [1917] 



6514 Miss Ruth Ellershaw [1384] 



6394 Dr Graham Lawler [1368] 



6506 Mr Max Cottrell [1383] 



5903 Mrs Margaret Taylor [1907] 



13223 Mrs Dawn Quilter [1382] 



5939 Mr John Kodnett [1913] 



6498 Mrs D T Jones [1381] 



5951 Mrs Ann Marie Hughes [1915] 



6490 Mrs Joan Smith [1380] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

87



Rep No Name 

2861 Mr John R Williams [1367] 



6482 Mrs Emily Shields [1379] 



4437 Mrs Sarah Jones [1735] 



6306 Mr Leslie Paul Baxter [1350] 



4253 Mrs Gwenifer Carter [1712] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1525 Mr Martin Hamilton [1932] 

1 Object 

Summary They show a complete lack of common sense and forethought for the future of the town. 

The towns infastructure cannot support such proposals. If as i heard the planning officer say at one of the meetings that the council is following government 

guidelines then surely if something is a guideline then its not statutory and in view of the overwhelming opposition you should be olbliged to drop this 

scheme.Remember your job is to serve the public and thats what were paying you for. 

Change Sought: Remove Abergele proposals. 

6322 Mr Thomas James Harold Bevan [1354] 



5333 Miss Mavis Allen [1940] 



6314 Mr Simon John Kent [1353] 



5347 Mrs M Davies [1942] 



5354 Mr John Gwilym Hughes [1943] 



2821 Mr Peter Brown [1352] 



7134 Mr Allan David Cliff Warner [1930] 

Summary Objection to the allocation of Greenfield sites at St George's Road, Abergele for housing development 


2813 Mrs Dorothy Rosina Curtress [1351] 



6338 Mr Dwyfor Williams [1356] 



13245 Mr Alan G White [1945] 



5368 Miss Harriet Passey [1946] 



2805 Mr Alan Charles Curtress [1349] 



6298 Mrs Joanna Kent [1348] 



2773 Mrs Joan Evans [1343] 



4429 Mr Gwilym Hughes [1734] 



1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

88



Rep No Name 

2789 Mr Jason Samuel Coilyon Smith [1346] 



4269 Mrs Joy Rettie [1714] 



5361 Mrs Nia Lloyd [1944] 



5753 Mr David Robert Rose [1476] 



5093 Mr Dominic Davies [2008] 



2781 Mr Anthony Parry [1345] 



2885 Mr John David Mortimer [1391] 



5909 Mrs Karen Hibberts [45] 



2901 Mr Stuart Douglas Sandham [1393] 



6378 Mrs Glenda Evans [1365] 



5101 Mr Ernest Ringwood [2009] 



2853 Mrs Chrsitine Bond [1364] 



6330 Mr Leslie MacDonald [1355] 



7065 Mr Barry Jones [1978] 



6386 Mrs Joyce Cottrell [1366] 



1844 Mrs M E Fry [2063] 

Summary Objection to St George's Road site, Abergele due to loss of playing fields. 

Change Sought: Deletion of St George's Road Site, Aberegele 

4261 Mr Mark Pendlebury [1713] 



7492 

Summary 


M Cunliffe [2254] 



2837 Mr John Burdock [1359] 



6346 Mr Brian Edgar Mulliner [1358] 



7496 

Summary 


C Mattok [2255] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

89



Rep No Name 

7372 Mr Arwel Williams [2256] 



2829 Mrs Joan Burdock [1357] 



6370 Mrs Doris Maureen Broadhead [1363] 



5483 Mr Ronald Carpenter [1428] 



2893 Mrs Margaret Ann Sandham [1392] 



5513 Mr James Sydney Williams [1433] 



4485 Ms Susannah Wynn-Jones [1742] 



5507 Mr P Holden [1432] 



6898 Mr Mike Burgess [1869] 



5501 Mrs Vera C M Lloyd [1431] 



5495 Mr Robert Hibberts [1430] 



13199 Mr Brett Pierce [1870] 



5627 Ms A Evans [1454] 



8851 

Summary 


Mrs Wendy Mailer [179] 



5693 Mrs Maureen Doris Bates [1465] 



6914 Mrs Jane Jones [1872] 



5477 Mrs Kathleen Ashton [1427] 



6938 Mr Alasdair Rettie [178] 



5471 Mrs Barbara Cullen [1426] 



6922 Mrs Anne Passey [1873] 



5465 Mrs Julie Alison O'Hagan [1425] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

90



Rep No Name 

5459 Mr Peter Allan Vosper [1424] 



5453 Mr Ian Gerald O'Hagan [1423] 



6930 Ms Wendy Robshaw [1874] 



5489 Mr Glyn Allan Jones [1429] 



6834 miss Kathleen Colburn [1860] 



5573 Mr Gerard Bernard Henshaw [1444] 



6810 Mrs Sheila Mary Edge [1857] 



5567 Mrs Kathleen Mary Evans [1443] 



5561 Mr Jeffrey Hopkin Evans [1442] 



5555 Mr Peter Field [1441] 



961 Mrs Joy Tingle [1039] 

Summary Objection to the proposed housing sites in Abergele, along with the proposed bypass and gypsy traveller site search area. 

Change Sought: Removal of residential sites in Abergele, and removal of bypass and gypsy traveller site search area. 

5549 Mr Victor Colin Grayson [1440] 



6826 Mrs Freda Bimson [1859] 



4133 Mr Kym Ward [1696] 



5537 Mrs Amanda Munslow [1438] 



4141 Mrs Barbara Knight [1697] 



5531 Mr William Roy Passey [1437] 



8854 

Summary 


Mr Darren Passey [194] 



5525 Mr Colin Robert Knowlson [1436] 



13259 Mrs Patricia Ann Knowlson [1435] 



6874 Mr John Jones [1865] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

91



Rep No Name 

6882 Mrs Valerie Hills [1866] 



5639 Mr Edward H James [1456] 



4597 Mr Elena Bidzinzki [1757] 



5633 Mrs Margaret James [1455] 



5543 Mr Stephen Parry [1439] 



4181 Mr Mark Jenkinson [1702] 



5843 Mrs Gwyneth Laura Richards [1897] 



2973 Mr Johnathan Richard Percy Hughes [1404] 



4173 Mrs Elizabeth Lally [1701] 



2965 Dr Eileen Mary [1403] 



5849 Mr Merfyn Wynn Richards [1898] 



2957 Mrs Margaret Ann Edwards [1402] 



4453 Mr Ronald clive barlow [1738] 



2949 Mr Jack Edwards [1401] 



5077 Mrs Dawn Smart [1887] 



2925 Mr Morris Gomer Williams [1397] 



2989 Dr Rodney Gilmore [1406] 



5861 Mr Brett Evans [1900] 



2917 Mrs Merlys Joan Williams [1396] 



13329 Mr Gary Hughes [1737] 



2909 Mrs Lenora Keeting [1395] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

92



Rep No Name 

13297 Mr Thomas Walton Keeting [1394] 



5867 Mrs Judith Carol Grayson [1901] 



4189 Mrs Janet R Morris [1703] 



5615 Miss Dawn Dunphy [1452] 



5873 Mr Sean Andrew Grayson [1902] 



5855 Miss Valerie Ann Grayson [1899] 



5813 Rev William Raymond Mortimer [1892] 



4445 Mrs Victoria Murphy [1736] 



5441 Mrs Meryl Elizabeth Williams [1420] 



5789 Miss Louise Parker [1888] 



5417 Mrs Vera Byrne [1416] 



1218 CDN Planning (Ms Julie Pearse) [1415] 

Summary Objection to residential site allocations in Abergele. Loss of countryside and green belt/pastures land. 

Change Sought: Remove residential site allocations in Abergele. 

4149 Mrs D Hurtar [1698] 



5807 Mrs Jacqueline Tetlow [1891] 



3045 Mrs Lilian Butterworth [1414] 



3029 Mr John Sutton Holmes [1412] 



2981 Mrs Donna Gilmore [1405] 



3021 Mrs Meinwen Vaughan holmes [1411] 



4461 Mr David Davies [1739] 



3013 Mrs Kathleen Young [1410] 



4157 Mrs Jane Pope [1699] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

93



Rep No Name 

1216 Mrs Carolynne Elizabeth Jones [1409] 



5831 Mrs Eunice Williams [1895] 



3005 Mr Kenneth Frederick Staney [1408] 



2997 Mrs Muriel Staney [1407] 



4165 Mr S Huknes [1700] 



5837 Mrs Dilys Ffrancon Phillips [1896] 



5447 Captain John Mercer [1422] 



4469 Mrs Rosina White [1740] 



2469 Mr Daniel Wilyman [1260] 



5621 Mr Brian Kennedy [1453] 



2525 Mr Humpherys [1268] 



2381 Mrs Brenda Smart [1249] 



2517 Mrs Denise Keatiey [1267] 



2493 Miss Michelle Sweet [1263] 



2509 Mr Cedric Arnold Smith [1266] 



2501 Mrs J Howard [1265] 



2485 Mr R A Williams [1262] 



2541 Mrs Lucille Whitehead [1270] 



2477 Mr Terrance Bowler [1261] 



2037 Mrs Susan Margaret Owen [1202] 



6202 Mrs Hazel R Browne [1321] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

94



Rep No Name 

2453 Mrs J P Davies [1258] 






2437 Mr Lawlor [1256] 



2053 Mr David Hargeaves [1204] 



2429 Mrs K Wade [1255] 



2061 Mr Trevor John Davies [1205] 



2421 Mr Ronald William Brown [1254] 



2413 Mrs Christine Hughes [1253] 



13289 Ms Jackie Rowlands [1264] 



7044 Mrs Helen Barnes [1975] 



1989 Mr Austin Deering [1196] 



2629 Mrs Joyce Davenport [1284] 



2621 Mrs Michelle Devysia Venmore Dickson [1283] 



1997 Mr Frank Laska [1197] 



2613 Mrs Menai Palferman [1282] 



2605 Mr Ian Palferman [1281] 



4397 Mr Alan Taylor [1730] 



2005 Mrs Catherine Evans [1198] 



2533 Mrs Humphreys [1269] 



2589 Mr Ian Thomason [1278] 



2397 June Oakes [1251] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

95



Rep No Name 

2013 Mr Michael P Halligan [1199] 



2581 Mrs Gloria Lawlor [1276] 



2573 Miss P Meyer [1275] 



2021 Mrs Linda Halligan [1200] 



2565 Mr S Jones [1274] 



2557 Mrs Norma Winkle [1273] 



2029 Mrs Carys Walford [1201] 



2549 Mrs Lisa Chow [1272] 



1189 Mr Gary Thomas Owain-Ashbrook [1271] 



2597 Mr Joshua Spencer Lloyd [1279] 



2229 Dr Robert Williams [1229] 



4325 Ms Rachel Mary Elizabeth Evans [1721] 



4333 Mr Alan Hill [1722] 



2133 Mr Kevin O'Hara [1214] 



2269 Mrs Lilian Miller [1234] 



2261 Mrs Janet S Mycock [1233] 



13265 Mrs Catherine Patricia O'Hara [1215] 



2253 Mr James Matthew Williams [1232] 



2245 Mr Stuart Williams [1231] 



2069 Rev David Rowlands [1206] 



2237 Mrs Moira Williams [1230] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

96



Rep No Name 

2277 Mr Alan Brian Landucci [1236] 



2149 Mrs Amanda Rawson [1217] 



2213 Mr Lee Taaffe [1227] 



2205 Mr Ashley Taaffe [1226] 



2157 Mr Norman Howell Jones [1218] 



2197 Mr Robert Allen Walters [1225] 



2189 Mrs Susan Howarth [1224] 



13273 Mrs Faith Margaret Ellis [1220] 



2181 Mr E A A Howarth [1223] 



13281 Mr Royden Leonard Robinson [1221] 



2141 Mr Robert Hill [1216] 



2325 Mr Brian Sellers [1242] 



1981 Mrs Victoria Foulkes [1195] 



2077 Mr Vincent Reginald Durkin [1207] 



2389 Mr Dylan M Williams [1250] 



2373 Mr Smart [1248] 



2085 Mr Peter Skinner [1208] 



2365 Mrs Heather Jones [1247] 



2357 Mrs Muriel [1246] 



2093 Mrs Erica Skinner [1209] 



2349 Mrs Olwen Gump [1245] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

97



Rep No Name 

7058 Mrs Janet Bolton [1977] 



2101 Mrs Margaret Elizabeth Gaskell [1210] 



7051 Mrs Denise Jones [1976] 



2317 Mrs Wendy Ann Hawkes [1241] 



2109 Mrs Elizabeth Anne Harrison [1211] 



2309 Mrs Rita Howards [1240] 



2301 Mr Kenneth John Sudlow [1239] 



2117 Mr Johnathon Adam Harrison [1212] 



2293 Mrs Mair Bissell [1238] 



2285 Mrs Maureen Landucci [1237] 



2125 Miss Joanne Claire Harrison [1213] 



2405 Mrs Carol Ann Brown [1252] 



2333 Miss Melanie Holmes [1243] 



7002 Mr Allan Tait [1969] 



4277 Miss Hannah Rettie [1715] 



2725 Mr Derek Chattwood [1328] 



6988 Miss Lisa Williams [1967] 



2757 Mr James Kelly [1333] 



4413 Mrs Norma Weatherall [1732] 



2749 Mrs Bethan Wyn [1332] 



6242 Mrs C Meredith [1327] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

98



Rep No Name 

6995 Mrs Susan Hartill [1968] 



7030 Mrs Valerie Lea [1973] 



4301 Mr Nathaniel Smart [1718] 



2741 Mrs Joan Macrae [1331] 



6226 Mr John Duckenfield [1324] 



4405 Mr John Weatherall [1731] 



6218 Mr Darren Jones [1323] 



7009 Mrs Jean Tait [1970] 



6210 Mr John Patrick Espley [1322] 



7023 Mrs Maureen Davies [1972] 



6194 Mr Gordon M Browne [1320] 



4309 Mr J Sheppard [1719] 



2637 Mr Alexander Dickson [1285] 



6234 Mrs Ruth Duckenfield [1326] 



1563 Miss Sarah Skellon [1954] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1468 Conwy Children and Young People's Partnership (Ms Alwen Sian Williams) [1867] 1 Object 

Summary If CCBC are going to build houses they shouldn't be built on playing fields even if there are needs for jobs. Children have to have somewhere to play, 

BOREDOM = YOBS. 

Change Sought: Remove any proposed site allocations that are on existing playing fields. This includes, for example, sites 81, 82 North of St George Road in Abergele (part of 

the site area is on existing playing fields/open space). 

5257 Mr Douglas Keith Owen [1951] 

1 Object 



5519 Mr David Burbridge [1434] 



1 Object 

793 Mr Kenneth Williams [979] 1 Object 

Summary I write to object to the proposed housing allocation as it relates to the Abergele area. 


The proposed development off St George Road will result in the loss of public recreation grounds. 

Projected housing requirements published by the Welsh Assembly Government are based upon past trends, which in the case of Abergele and the eastern 

coastal zone, have been distorted by exceptionally large developments unrelated to local need. 

Change Sought: Remove St. George Road and Rhuddlan Road from the LDP 

3037 Mr Owen Mervyn Edwards [1413] 1 Object 



99




13231 Miss Beverley Pouder [1952] 1 Object 



6418 Miss Esther Roberts [1371] 1 Object 



1548 Mr Ronald Sexton [1953] 1 Object 



6290 Ms Judith Barnsdale [1342] 1 Object 



2733 Mrs Sandra Chattwood [1329] 1 Object 



6282 Mrs Barbara Evans [1341] 1 Object 



8159 Stephen Anthony McCarten [812] 1 Object 



6274 Mrs Val Thelwell [1340] 1 Object 



1589 Mj General Christopher Last [1955] 1 Object 



6266 Mr Douglas Lowe [1338] 1 Object 



5405 Mrs Yan Chang Wong [848] 1 Object 



6258 Mrs Margaret Watt [1337] 1 Object 



6948 Mrs Pauline Last [1956] 1 Object 



2765 Mr George Coroneo [1336] 1 Object 



6966 Mr Andrew James Quick [1959] 1 Object 



6178 Mrs Rosemary Jones [1318] 1 Object 



4421 Miss Myra Doreen Gorst [1733] 1 Object 



1941 Mr Paul Ronald Williams [1186] 1 Object 



6082 Mrs Yvonne Johns [1302] 1 Object 



6074 Mr Matthew Hazlewood [1301] 1 Object 



1917 Mr Peter Scott [1183] 1 Object 



100



Rep No Name 

6066 Mrs Marian May Roberts [1300] 



6058 Mr Ronald Martin Williams [1299] 



1925 Mrs Pauline Scott [1184] 



6050 Mr Kevin Hall [1298] 



6042 Mrs Nia Pierce [1297] 



6186 Miss Lisa Marie Thomas [1319] 



2685 Cllr G Price Davies [1295] 



2701 Mrs Lilian Joan Ward [1304] 



2677 Miss Dilys Haf Roberts [1294] 



2669 Mr Nicholas Macrae [1293] 



1965 Miss Helen Margaret Stevenson [1193] 



2661 Mrs Elizabeth Mckinney [1292] 



2653 Mrs Sheila Davies [1291] 



13191 Mr Richard Stubbs [1288] 



1973 Mrs Sheila Shaw [1194] 



2645 mrs Margaret Maclennan [1287] 



5250 Mrs Meacock [1950] 



1933 S R Wilkinson [1185] 



6122 Mr Edward Booth [1311] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

294 Mr John Ryder [36] 1 Object 

Summary Abergele is already gridlocked at peak traffic times. With the proposal for this additional housing as well as that proposed for the site North of Llanfair Road, it 

will overload the comunity services, (ie. shops, recreation, medical). This can only exaserbate the traffic flow problem through the town centre caused by extra 

residents trying to avail themselves of the town facilities. Green open spaces used by clubs and residents alike should not be used for any form of 

development. 

Change Sought: Development of housing will naturally progress, but the volume in this proposal is too high for the available services, services that cannot easily be increased 

due to the layout of the town. Reduce the development and keep close to St. Georges Road and off the playing fields South of Rhuddlan Road. 

6170 Mr Charles Geoffrey Amatt [1317] 1 Object 



101



Rep No Name 

7037 Miss Lowri Peichard [1974] 



6162 Mr Peter Ellerton Slater [1316] 



1853 Mr Daivid Griffith Roberts [1175] 



6154 Mr Stephen John Ward [1315] 



6146 Mrs Carol Slater [1314] 



6138 Mr Derek Blinston [1313] 



1869 Mr Keith Taaffe [1177] 



2693 Mrs Christine Ward [1303] 



1877 Mrs Joyce Mary Taaffe [1178] 



1909 Mr Kenneth Howard Davies [1182] 






1885 Mrs Michele Hannah [1179] 



6106 Mrs Ruth Booth [1309] 






1893 Mr R Hannah [1180] 



6090 Mrs Carmel Stephens [1306] 



1901 Mrs Valerie Ellison [1181] 



2709 Mr Cyril Dennis Ward [1305] 



6010 Mr Adrian Kitching [1286] 



6130 Mrs Phyllis Maureen Jones [1312] 



13215 Mr Philip Clarke [515] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

102



Rep No Name 

5387 Mr George K Wong [840] 



4813 Mrs Muriel Doyle [1786] 



3517 Mr Peter Sedgwick [1579] 



4821 Miss Paula Badcott [1789] 



3509 Mrs Vera Fisher [1578] 



1279 Mrs Judith Lawlor [1577] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

605 Mrs Carol Moss [869] 1 Object 

Summary I understand the government has set targets for house building, however I object to any further large scale development of Abergele. I believe further 

development will, rather than meeting an existing demand from Abergele residents attract new people; who work away, retired people and in all likelihood the 

less desirable residents currently housed by authorities out side our borders. This will increase traffic and pressures on the infrastructure of Abergele. I 

believe Abergele needs the green space around it and this is more important than ever with the development which has taken place along the coast in recent 

years. 

Change Sought: Far better to focus development on areas such as Bodelwyddan which have space to grow or Conwy. I do see limited options for building on brown field sites 

such as the old Slaters Citroen depot, the old ATS site or down Peel Street. 

3501 Mrs Helen Mary [1576] 



3525 Mr Michael Carrington [1581] 



3493 Mr Douglas N Hartill [1575] 



13207 Miss Deborah Clarke [517] 



1272 Mrs H Owen [1574] 



3485 Mrs Sarah Sutton [1573] 



4845 Mr William John Binns [1793] 



3589 Mrs Margaret Morrison [1590] 



3973 Mr Mark Davies [1675] 



3581 Miss Elizabeth Jones [1589] 



3469 Sylvia H Dugdale [1571] 



4853 Mrs June Hatcher [1794] 



4829 Mr Brian Elliott [1790] 



1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

103



Rep No Name 

1293 Mr Robert Elias Williams [1592] 


Change Sought: Deletion of St George's Road site, Abergele 

3997 Michael John Dean Joe [1679] 



4373 Mr Thomas Rettie [1727] 



5393 Mrs Bea Wong [841] 



4341 Mr Barry Roberts [1723] 



4197 Mr S Dice [1704] 



3885 Miss Anna Ashbrook [1637] 



1340 Mr T Gwyn Jones [1636] 



4797 Ms G M Williams [1784] 



13313 Mrs Janet Sedgwick [1580] 



13171 

Summary 


Mr Steve Vousden [530] 



3453 Mr L R Fisher [1569] 



3557 Mrs Myra Mulliner [1586] 



5399 Mrs Kit Wong [847] 



3549 Mrs J Small [1585] 



5411 Mr George Wong [850] 



3541 Mr P J Small [1584] 



1286 Mr Mark Henry [1583] 



4805 Miss Emily Lloyd [1785] 



3533 Mrs J M Carrington [1582] 



3605 Mrs Gladys Griffiths [1593] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

104



Rep No Name 

3381 Mrs Ormesher [1549] 



4565 Mrs Ann Cooper [1753] 



3429 Mrs T Chilton [1555] 



3421 Mrs G Sullivan [1554] 



4949 Mr Robert Miller [1806] 



3413 Mrs Carol McClelland [1553] 



4957 Mrs Pauline Anderson [1807] 



3405 Mrs Ann Lea [1552] 



3989 Mr Michael John [1677] 



3461 Mr Liam Feery [1570] 



3389 Mrs Alma Covatt [1550] 



3981 Mrs Mary Dean [1676] 



13167 

Summary 


Mrs Leanda McGee [906] 



4965 Miss Rebecca Woodhouse [1808] 



3373 Mrs Elaine Baggaley [1548] 



3365 Mrs Barbara A Wood [1546] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

680 J Rose [910] 1 Object 

Summary I am very much against the proposed new houses. 

I have 4 grandchildren, 4 great grandchildren all Welsh, and I would like them to enjoy living in Abergele as I have done. With room to kick a ball around as 

their father did and still does. 


3357 Mr Kenneth Anderton [1545] 

1 Object 



4981 Mrs Christine Thompson [1810] 



7092 Mr Stephen Simpson [1544] 



3397 Mr John Edgar Lea [1551] 



1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

105



Rep No Name 

5291 Mr Neville Oliver [1563] 



1301 Mrs Mary Gwendoline Davies [1594] 



5326 Mr Rodger Mycock [1568] 



4861 Mrs Ann Thomas [1795] 



5319 Mrs Mary P Reid [1567] 



5312 Mrs Wendy Anne O'Brien [1566] 



6354 Mr John Bryan [1360] 






2173 Mrs Fay Robinson [1222] 



3437 Mrs Morfydd Hughes [1556] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

7252 Abergele Town Council [506] 1 Object 

Summary Loss of Playing field to deliver by-pass and housing sites 81 and 82. Policy STR5iii; Policy CFS13; Policy HOU 1 

The Allocation of the playing fields (Land off Rhuddlan Road roundabout, Abergele)for housing directly conflicts with national planning policy (as set out in 

Planning Policy Wales 2002 and Technical Advice Note 16 - Sport, Recreation 

and Open Space January 2009). These seek to ensure the protection and retention of existing playing fields and other open space where a shortfall exists. 

Change Sought: Remove allocations and retain land as playing field. 

4941 Mrs Carol Ann Landucci Jones [1805] 1 Object 



4885 Mr John Hatcher [1798] 1 Object 



6890 Mrs Helena Burgess [1868] 1 Object 



4893 Mr D M Thomas [1799] 1 Object 



5579 Mrs Barbara Forrest [1445] 1 Object 



615 Mrs Jean Foxall [578] 2 Object 

Summary We wish to register our complaint in the matter of the proposed new ring road for Abergele the proposed building of 220 mixed uses housing the proposed 

new 90 houses and the Gypsy/Traveller transit site. 

The only reason Abergele has a traffic congestion problem is because Abergele Town Council and or Conwy County Borough Council gave Planning 

permission for Tesco to build their supermarket which then in turn gave us a roundabout a pedestrian crossing, traffic lights (Abergele I'm sure must have the 

Guinness book of records for the largest amount of traffic controls in a small town.) 

The Doctors Surgery, the schools and Dental Surgeries in Abergele will not be able to sustain such a large number of extra residents. 

The best way of curing the traffic congestion in Abergele is to get rid of the Traffic lights. 

This proposed new road will not serve to ease any of the towns congestion it will only serve the proposed new house owners and the Gypsy's. Of course the 

builders will make a nice tidy profit so will the landowners and the Council will have imposed new houses on the Town which Abergele residents do not want. 

Change Sought: Deletion of Housing sites, by pass and Gypsy and Travellers site from Abergele. 

1266 Mr Kenneth Frank Ball [1558] 



4933 Mr Gareth Jones [1804] 



1 Object 

1 Object 

106




3445 Mr Eric Price Hughes [1557] 1 Object 



7253 Abergele Town Council [506] 

1 Object 

Summary Sites 81 and 82. 

In addition to its objection to the scale of housing growth proposed, the Town Council objects to the allocation of greenfield sites 78, 81 and 82 for housing in 

the deposit LDP. The allocation of such extensive areas of open countryside on the fringe of Abergele will absorb housing need which should otherwise be 

directed to brownfield sites. 

There is insufficient evidence within the LDP or its associated Background Papers to demonstrate that a comprehensive assessment of the scope for housing 

development on Previously Developed Land has been carried out. 

Change Sought: Remove housing allocations 81/82 from the LDP 

5298 Mr David Allan LLoyd [1564] 

1 Object 



3861 Mrs Christina J Earley [1633] 



4477 Mr Edward Arthur Jones [1741] 



3933 Mr Ivan Riachard Clark [1670] 



1691 Mr Keith Pickering [1648] 



4773 Miss Sophie Jessica Kelly [1781] 



1353 Ms Katherine Ann Foote [1643] 



5029 Mrs Ruth Rowlands [1817] 



3909 Mrs Gwyneth Mary Davies [1640] 



3901 Mrs Roberta Anne Owain Ashbrook [1639] 



4685 Mrs Derek Tucker [1769] 



6642 Mr Peter Harry Edge [1834] 






1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

277 

Mrs Ffion Alun [556] 

1 Object 

Summary There's no research at local level on the plans effects on the Welsh Language in the Abergele community. There's no space in the local schools for 300 new 

families in the houses, or for Gypsy and Traveller children. No research has been undertaken into this either. 


3829 Mrs Barbara P Birkin [1629] 



1333 Mrs Halliwell [1628] 



5801 Mr David Tetlow [1890] 



4581 Mr Alan Guy [1755] 



1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

107



Rep No Name 

3813 Mr George Michael [1626] 



4701 Mr Meirion Evans [1772] 



3797 Mrs Joyce Horton [1624] 



3877 Mrs Mary Goddard [1635] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1412 Mr David Jones MP [1667] 1 Object 

Summary Objection to site 81,82 Land to the East of Abergele being allocated in the Plan. It is very well used as playing fields and sports pitches, involves the use of a 

large greenfield site which is contrary to advice contained in Planning Policy Wales. A number of alternative sites are proposed to those allocated in Abergele 

in the LDP. See attachment for full response. 

Change Sought: Remove sites 81, 82 from the Plan. Suggested Alternative sites (see attachment). 

10877 

Summary 


Dr Dylan Parry [573] 



4613 Mr Henry Archdeacon [1759] 



4621 Mr Toni Wooller [1760] 



4645 Miss Brenda Hill [1764] 



1383 Mr Lee Briscoe [1658] 

Summary Objection to site 81/82 North of St George Road, Abergele. 

Change Sought: Remove site 81/82 North of St George Road, Abergele from the Plan. 

1379 Mr Martin Briscoe [1657] 



8857 

Summary 


mr lynsey wilson [566] 



1375 Ms Bernadette Bradbury [1656] 



1696 Miss T A Owen [1649] 



1724 

Summary 

Mr Nathan Rhys Titchiner [1655] 

Objection to the allocation of Greenfield sites at St George's Road, Abergele for housing development 


504 Miss Victoria Barwis [777] 

Summary I object to the allocation of housing land to the east of Abergele [sites 81&82 and on the land east of Llanfair Road site 78 on the scenic route. 

There is an over reliance on greenfield sites in the LDP together with a failure to adequately address the capacity of previously developed land. 

The strategy, policy and housing allocations are not appropriate for abergele 




Environmental impact on local wildlife not considered. 

Change Sought: Keep the land as green field 

1718 Mrs Sally Holmes [1654] 



4661 Mr Martin Cooke [1766] 



4589 Mr Ronald James Atkins [1756] 



1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

108



Rep No Name 

1712 Mr Anthony George Holmes [1653] 



4669 Mrs Marcella Cooke [1767] 



1371 Ms Jennifer Bradbury [1651] 



3917 Mrs Brenda Lightfoot [1668] 



4677 Mrs Margaret Tucker [1768] 



4653 Mrs Jane Kelly [1765] 



3653 Mrs I M Ottewell [1600] 



3709 Mr E Pope [1609] 



1312 Mrs Sheila Beaumont [1608] 



4765 Mrs Pamela Rose Hughes [1780] 



3701 Mrs Sylvia Dickson [1607] 



3941 Mrs Pauline Clark [1671] 



3677 Mr John Peter Hughes [1604] 



4781 Mr Ian Lloyd [1782] 



3669 Mr Davies [1603] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

264 Mr Philip Weaver [550] 1 Object 

Summary We feel the new relief road would destroy both an area of natural beauty and further reduce the limited sporting facilities available to the public. It would also 

result in a "Speed track" through the countryside, and, present problems for any housing development residents. 

We do not believe there is a need for additional housing, as; numerous properties are currently on the long term for sale registers of local estate agents. 

A "Travellers" site will invite an influx of anti-social elements with a corresponding increase in crime, intimidation of local residents, general nuisance, health 

and litter problems. The existing local amenities would also be further stretched by the demands of these travellers. 

Change Sought: Removal of proposed relief road, housing allocations and Travellers site in Abergele. 

3661 Capt David Tracey [1602] 



13157 

Summary 


Mrs Jill Sewell [541] 



4573 Mrs Carol Guy [1754] 



3637 Mr Geoffrey John Williams [1598] 



4789 Mrs Pauline hughes [1783] 



1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

109




3629 Mrs Joy Wellings [1597] 1 Object 



5381 Mr Jeremy Wong [835] 1 Object 



3621 Mrs Sarah McGregor [1596] 1 Object 



3613 Mr Kenneth Raymond Griffiths [1595] 1 Object 



13238 Mrs Jennifer Evans [836] 1 Object 



3949 Mr James William Green [1672] 1 Object 



4733 Mrs Beatrice Zena Powney [1776] 1 Object 



5262 Mrs Joan Alice Ball [1559] 1 Object 



3781 Mrs Elsie May Krinks [1622] 1 Object 



13321 Mr Ewan Evans [1621] 1 Object 



4709 Ms Caroline Passey Williams [1773] 1 Object 



3773 Mrs Marjorie Chalkley [1620] 1 Object 



4717 Mrs Miriam Passey [1774] 1 Object 



3765 Mr Derek Chalkley [1619] 1 Object 



1326 Mrs Joan Turner [1618] 1 Object 



4749 Mrs Delia Atkins [1778] 1 Object 



3757 Mrs Florence Felstead [1616] 1 Object 



3717 Mr Edward Lightfoot [1610] 1 Object 



3749 Mr Huw Michael Titchiner [1615] 1 Object 



511 

Mr Steve Jackson [787] 

1 Object 

Summary I object to the allocation of housing land to the east of abergele [sites 81&82 and on the land east of Llanfair Road site 78 on the scenic route. 

There is an over reliance on greenfield sites in the LDP together with a failure to adequately address the capacity of previously developed land. 

The strategy, policy and housing allocations are not appropriate for abergele 




Environmental impact on local wildlife not considered. 

Change Sought: Removal of the proposal from the plan 

110



Rep No Name 

3741 Mr William Frederick Gordon [1614] 



13184 Leonard Jinks Architecural Consultants Ltd (Leonard Jinks) [789] 



3733 Mr Michael Brian Titchiner [1613] 



1319 Mr Ian Dickson [1612] 



4741 Mr Brian Evans [1777] 



3725 Mrs Ellen Iona Titchiwer [1611] 



3789 Mr Roger Ashcroft Krinks [1623] 



4725 Mrs Rita Evans [1775] 



6698 Mrs Denise Gill [1842] 



3189 Mr Jefif Chase [1505] 



836 Mrs Clwyden Morgan [975] 

Summary Objection to Housing sites in Abergele, Gypsy site and By-pass 

Change Sought: Deletion of Proposals in Abergele 

3085 Mr Huw Jones [1491] 



3077 Mrs Margaret Sumner [1490] 



3069 Miss Carole Teece [1489] 



846 

Summary 


Mr Peter Matthews [977] 

I object to the allocation of the playing fields (land off Rhuddlan Road roundabout Abergele) for development. 

Deletion of Site. 

3061 Mrs J Roberts [1488] 



859 

Summary 


Mrs Rita Matthews [978] 

I object to the allocation of the playing fields (land off Rhuddlan Road roundabout, Abergele) for development. 

Deletion of Sites 81 & 82 

People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

591 mr phil moss [719] 1 Object 





years. 



6690 Mrs Tracy Jones [1840] 

1 Object 



3101 Mrs Mair Briggs [1493] 



1 Object 

111




5783 Misses Una and Anne Hughes and Vose [1482] 1 Object 



5777 Mr and Mrs J Garside [1481] 1 Object 



5771 Mr and Mrs Leon and Helen Field [1479] 1 Object 



4221 Mrs Bridget Marian Whetton [1707] 1 Object 



6706 Mr Glyn Jones [1844] 1 Object 



5765 Mr Llyr Huws Gruffydd [1478] 1 Object 



3597 Mr David Robert Wilson [1591] 1 Object 



6714 Mr Neil Spence [1845] 1 Object 



3573 Mr Herbert Towels [1588] 1 Object 



3053 Mr Thomas James Butterworth [1487] 1 Object 



6650 Mrs Janet Polter [1835] 1 Object 



3181 Mrs Rachel Poole [1504] 1 Object 



757 CDN Planning (Mr Andrew Mailer) [962] 1 Object 

Summary Objection to site North of St George Road, Abergele. 

Change Sought: Alternative sites at Former ATS Depot, Land at the Eastern edge of Abergele Business Park and vacant buildings/land on Peel Street Abergele. 

3173 Mrs Gillian Butt Davies [1503] 1 Object 



191 Mrs M Cooke [462] 1 Object 

Summary You have failed to comply with the community consultation process regarding plans to install a bypass, housing and Gypsy & Traveller campsite, my husband 

and I are very angry about these plans as we have recently bought out bungalow. Our solicitor sent us a report of the area which we paid hundreds of pounds 

for, these plans were not on this report. 

We think it is disgusting that residents have not been consulted about there plans. I believe a Mr Yates is responsible for these plans. Perhaps we can locate 

the houses & Gypsy site next to his home. 


3165 Mrs Eileen Whyatt [1502] 



3157 Mr Andrew Adams [1501] 



6610 Mr Alan Martin Hughes [1830] 



3149 Mrs Kath Adams [1500] 



3093 Mrs Frances Mahoney [1492] 



3141 Mrs Dorris Roberts [1499] 



1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

112



Rep No Name 

3477 Mr William G Halliday [1572] 



3133 Miss Jane Jones Davies [1498] 



4525 Mr L Bidzinski [1748] 



3125 Mr Anthony McGuinness [1497] 



3349 Mrs A Y Blinston [1543] 



6674 Miss Susan Phillips [1838] 



5284 Mrs Beryl Ann Oliver [1562] 



3109 Mrs Marjorie Edwards [1494] 



6682 Mrs Gillian Myra Slater [1839] 



4213 Mrs Betty Mavis Mills [1706] 



6618 Mrs Audrey Macdonald [1831] 



6786 Mrs Beryl Jones [1854] 



5305 Mr William Coulter [1565] 



5681 Mrs Dorothy Blanche Wood [1463] 



6770 Mrs Ethel Morrison Hunter [1852] 



5675 Mr Roderick Brian Wood [1462] 



4117 Mrs Joann Davis Evans [1694] 



5669 Mrs Alwena Parry [1461] 



6778 Mrs Valerie Patricia Jones [1853] 



5663 Mr Ronald Macrae [1460] 



4229 Mrs B Handeman [1708] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

113



Rep No Name 

5657 Mr John Francis Bird [1459] 



5699 Mr Michael Robert Bates [1467] 



5651 Mrs Susan Carol Bird [1458] 



4125 Mr Thomas John Jones [1695] 



5609 Mr Richard Thomas Corlett [1451] 



6794 Mrs Ellen Mary Hughes [1855] 



5603 Mrs Andrea S Travis [1450] 



6802 Mrs Susan Jones [1856] 



5597 Mrs Elsie Rowbottom [1448] 



5591 Mr Stanley Rowbottom [1447] 



889 Dorothy Groombridge [1033] 

Summary Objection to Gypsy & Traveller Search area and Proposed housing sites in Abergele 

Change Sought: Deletion of Gypsy & Traveller Search area and Proposed housing sites in Abergele 

4493 Mrs Ethel Audrey Pickering [1743] 



5741 Mr Arthur Harris [1474] 



3117 Mrs Doreen Elizabeth McGuinness [1496] 



6722 Mrs Mary Anwyn Spence [1846] 



7085 Mrs Sonia Simpson [1542] 



4093 Mr Ray Kennedy [1691] 



6730 Mrs Elanor Mary Davies [1847] 



3229 Mrs Sandra Jackson [1511] 



4101 Mr Ronald Anthony Jones [1692] 



5759 Mrs Carole Parker [1477] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

114



Rep No Name 

6738 Mr Tudor Hugh Morris Jones [1848] 



13337 Mr E Walsh [1744] 



6754 Mr Ednyfed Roberts [1850] 



4381 Mr Tim Rowlands [1728] 



4501 Mis Kathleen Walsh [1745] 



5735 Mrs Sandra Irene Williams [1473] 



4109 Mr Wayne Evans [1693] 



5729 Mr Idris Williams [1472] 



6762 Mr Frederick Hunter [1851] 



5723 Mr John Pendlebury [1471] 



828 

Summary 


Mr Simon Quinn [1009] 

Objection to Housing Site North of St George Road Abergele as it would involve the loss of Open Space and Greenfield land. 

Deletion of site. 

5717 Ms Rona Pendlebury [1470] 



3565 Ms Alwen L Williams [1587] 



5747 Mrs Dilys Gwenfor Rose [1475] 



4061 Mrs Claire Done [1687] 



4037 Mrs E M Sheppard [1684] 



5053 Mrs Pauline Monica Edwards [1820] 



5208 Mr Ian John Merton Coney [1531] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

730 

R Hannah [936] 

1 Object 

Summary More houses cause more congestion, greater demand for services in dentists, schools, parking, employment. Attend to infrastructure not super structure. 

I/we also have human rights to be met. 


3253 Miss Lisa Michelle Parry [1515] 



13252 Mrs Jo Kitching [1539] 



1 Object 

1 Object 

115



Rep No Name 

5021 Mr Michael Bimson [1816] 



4013 Mr Donald Hill [1681] 






5215 Mr Alburt D Bradshaw [1532] 



4005 Mrs Margaret Ruth Williams [1680] 



4533 Mrs C M Archdeacon [1749] 



6578 Mrs Annette Spedding [1826] 



3293 Mrs Betty Davidson [1520] 



6562 Mrs Zena Louise Williams [1824] 



5061 Mrs Joan Ann Davies [1821] 



4045 Mrs Elizabeth Done [1685] 



5069 Mr Graham Ellison [1822] 



3301 Mrs Susan Kaellen [1521] 



5194 Mrs Margaret Jane Owen [1529] 



3285 Mr Darren Stevenson [1519] 



4541 Mrs Sybil Wasley [1750] 



5187 Miss Alison Lloyd-Roberts [1528] 



4053 Mrs Jennie Mckinney [1686] 



4021 Miss Kate Judge [1682] 



3269 Miss S Hughes [1517] 



6554 Mrs Patricia Gaskell [1823] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

116




715 L Bimson [934] 1 Object 

Summary I wish to inform the department that I reject the proposals in the above plan:a) 

Bypass - Relief Rd 

b) Travellers - New age travellers? 

c) Large housing developments? 

I do not wish the historical Market Town of Abergele to become Abergele New Town! But I do wish to step out and go forward. I do understand policies and 

criteria from Europe, Central Government, and Welsh Assembly have to be acted upon. But local indigenous population must be consulted. Not as in the 

case of Abergele; too little, too late, not everyone is computer literate or wishes to be so. 


3309 Mr Ormesher [1522] 

1 Object 



5201 Mrs Margaret Lilian Stewart [1530] 



4549 Mrs G E Fall [1751] 



3277 Mrs Edith Clark [1518] 



4205 Mrs Dorothy Novak [1705] 



5236 Mrs Jean Holland [1535] 



6594 Miss Sarah Frangakis [1828] 



4029 Mr Michael Smart [1683] 



1245 Mrs Ann Highley Passey [1536] 



5375 Mrs Margaret Mercer [742] 



3237 Mr Edward Lyons [1512] 



3205 Mrs Lynne Smith [1507] 



4557 Mrs Patricia Ann Jenkins [1752] 



6634 Mr Geoffrey David Anderson [1833] 



3197 Miss Diana Evelyn Owen [1506] 



1238 Mrs Aurona Pendlebury [1525] 



3333 Mrs Julie Sheriff [1537] 



6602 Mr William Horrocks [1829] 



4989 Elizabeth Thomas [1811] 



1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

117



Rep No Name 

3325 Mrs Valerie Meredith [1524] 



4069 Mr Neil Jonathan McKinney [1688] 



6586 Mr John Davies [1827] 



5222 Mr Michael Killoran [1533] 



5013 Mrs A Durkin [1815] 



3341 Mrs Isobel Evans [1540] 



3221 Mr Brian Dugdale [1510] 



5229 Mrs Molly McKeown Coney [1534] 



5173 Mr John Wynne Pendlebury [1526] 



5180 Mr Larry Goddard [1527] 



3317 Mr Gorden Austin [1523] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

307 Mr Stewart Williams [585] 1 Object 

Summary The town doesn't have the infrastructure for more residents, (Doctors, Schools, etc.). I also find it hard to believe that there are 310 families homeless in 

Abergele to fill these houses. 

And a Gypsy camp site! Does no one remember the trouble we had when Gwrych Castle was infested with travellers? I for one don't want them on my 

doorstep. 

Abergele is a small town, and the impact of these ideas will hav a disproportionate effect on our environment. 

Change Sought: Remove site from plan 

5005 Mr Thomas Ronald Gaskell [1814] 



5045 Mrs Jennifer Lask [1819] 



7078 Mr Paul Jones [1541] 



13305 Mr Leslie Smith [1508] 



3261 Mrs J M Wynne Jones [1516] 



3213 Mr Clive Swombow [1509] 



8797 

Summary 


8788 

Summary 


10967 

Summary 


J Lloyd [2609] 



L Donovan [2606] 






1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

118



Rep No Name 

8791 D Henshall [2607] 



10964 

Summary 


10862 

Summary 


10859 

Summary 


10856 

Summary 


10853 

Summary 


10736 

Summary 


8794 

Summary 


8809 

Summary 


8800 

Summary 


8803 

Summary 


8785 

Summary 


10733 

Summary 


8806 

Summary 


10739 

Summary 


8758 

Summary 


8731 

Summary 


8734 

Summary 


8737 

Summary 


8740 

Summary 


8743 

Summary 





Mr M Trickett [2695] 



Mrs P A Ware [2694] 



Mr J Angor [2693] 



M Hollin [2692] 



P Peak [2652] 



K Stewart [2608] 



Mr Sam Passey [2613] 



Mrs Jane Watson [2610] 



Mr Tim Watson [2611] 



R Hamilton [2605] 



M Wilson [2651] 



Mr Daniel Watson [2612] 



R Baglin [2653] 



Mr Scott Walters [2596] 



Ms Elizabeth Taylor [2587] 



Mr William Taylor [2588] 



D H Edwards [2589] 



L W Edwards [2590] 



Mr Gareth Meredith [2591] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

119



Rep No Name 

8746 Mrs Christine Meredith [2592] 



8749 

Summary 


8761 

Summary 


8755 

Summary 


8782 

Summary 


8138 

Summary 


8764 

Summary 


8767 

Summary 


8770 

Summary 


8773 

Summary 


8776 

Summary 


8779 

Summary 


8752 

Summary 


10703 

Summary 


8111 

Summary 


10721 

Summary 


10718 

Summary 


8728 

Summary 


8602 

Summary 


10715 

Summary 


10712 

Summary 


Mrs Ruth Thomas [2593] 



Ms Helen Roberts [2597] 



Mrs Victoria Drior [2595] 



Mrs E Hall [2604] 



Mr David Taylor [2738] 



Mr Paul Roberts [2598] 



Ms Mary Done [2599] 



Mr Maurice Done [2600] 



Mr Roger Claytor [2601] 



Mr G Thomas [2602] 



A Carson [2603] 



Mr John H Thomas [2594] 



S Simmonds [2641] 



Mrs Pamela Owen [2633] 



C Hughes [2647] 



M L Yarwood [2646] 



Ms June Davis [2586] 



Ms Elen Robshaw [2541] 



Mr William Pool [2645] 



J Williams [2644] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

120



Rep No Name 

10679 M Hines [2631] 



10706 

Summary 


10676 

Summary 


8114 

Summary 


10685 

Summary 


10688 

Summary 


10700 

Summary 


10691 

Summary 


10694 

Summary 


10697 

Summary 


10709 

Summary 


8836 

Summary 


10994 

Summary 


8812 

Summary 


8815 

Summary 


8818 

Summary 


8821 

Summary 


8824 

Summary 


8827 

Summary 


10682 

Summary 


8833 

Summary 


V Taylor [2642] 






Mr Alun Owen [2634] 






M Barch [2636] 



Z L Davies [2640] 



N Corlett [2637] 



J O'Hanlon [2638] 



P O'Hanlon [2639] 



A Hughes [2643] 



Mr Elliot Rees [2622] 



M Macdonald [2748] 



Mr D Fisher [2614] 



Miss E Tanner [2615] 



Mrs C Norman [2616] 



Mrs M Elias [2617] 



Mr D Elias [2618] 



Mr W Meacock [2619] 



S A Roberts [2632] 



Mrs S Gulliver [2621] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

121



Rep No Name 

10991 G Hughes [2747] 



8839 

Summary 


8842 

Summary 


8845 

Summary 


10664 

Summary 


10667 

Summary 


10670 

Summary 


10673 

Summary 


8830 

Summary 


8584 

Summary 


8560 

Summary 


8563 

Summary 


8566 

Summary 


8569 

Summary 


8572 

Summary 


8575 

Summary 


8608 

Summary 


8581 

Summary 


8548 

Summary 


8617 

Summary 


8620 

Summary 


Mr Kyle Morgan [2623] 



Mr David Bamford [2624] 



Mr Jon Williams [2625] 



G Barker [2626] 



L J Hodgetts [2627] 



D W Thomas [2628] 



M McWilliams [2629] 



Mr Steven Williams Jr [2620] 






Nic Evans [2527] 



Mr C Murray [2528] 



Miss A Hughes [2529] 



Mrs M Humphries [2530] 



T Humphries [2531] 



Mrs C Berry [2532] 



J Midgley [2543] 



J Lee [2534] 



Mr D Sweeney [2523] 



Mrs J Roberts [2546] 



Ms Jennifer Evans [2547] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

122



Rep No Name 

8623 A Holt [2548] 



8626 

Summary 


8629 

Summary 


8632 

Summary 


8635 

Summary 


8578 

Summary 


8515 

Summary 


8103 

Summary 


8488 

Summary 


8494 

Summary 


8497 

Summary 


8500 

Summary 


8503 

Summary 


8506 

Summary 


8554 

Summary 


8512 

Summary 


8551 

Summary 


8518 

Summary 


8521 

Summary 


8524 

Summary 


8527 

Summary 


D Holt [2549] 



S Hames [2551] 



K Evans [2552] 



W Jenkins [2553] 



Ms Jill Hallard [2533] 



Mr G Sewell [2512] 



Mrs Annette Stitson [2502] 



Mr Matthew Handleman [2503] 



Mrs Dena Davies [2505] 



Ms Pat Williams [2506] 



Mr Garry Williams [2507] 



Mr Harrison Williams [2508] 



Nikki Orr [2509] 



Mr C Rettie [2525] 



J S Bird [2511] 



Mrs P Pownall [2524] 



Mrs Lisa Clarke [2513] 



Mr Neil Clarke [2514] 



R M Roberts [2515] 



E S Roberts [2516] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

123



Rep No Name 

8530 Mr M W Green [2517] 



8533 

Summary 


8596 

Summary 


8509 

Summary 


8701 

Summary 


8638 

Summary 


8680 

Summary 


8683 

Summary 


8686 

Summary 


8108 

Summary 


8689 

Summary 


8692 

Summary 


8674 

Summary 


8698 

Summary 


8671 

Summary 


8704 

Summary 


8707 

Summary 


8710 

Summary 


8713 

Summary 


8716 

Summary 


8719 

Summary 


H J Green [2518] 



Ms Shona Hollins-Davies [2539] 



Mr Scott Orr [2510] 



Mr Kevan Emmett [2577] 



L Jones [2554] 



Ms Deborah May [2569] 



Mr D Ratcliffe [2570] 



B W Hughes [2571] 



Ms Angela Jones [2572] 



Mrs Elaine McMahon [2573] 



Mr & Mrs Bryn & Bryn Knowlson-Roberts [2574] 



R Savery [2567] 



Ms Carole Vickers [2576] 



D Ansell [2566] 



Alexander Wallace [2578] 



Ms Justine Knowles [2579] 



Mr Marc Truesdale [2580] 



Mr Andrew Wall [2581] 



Ms Tina Schofield [2582] 



Mr Stephen S Fortune [2583] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

124



Rep No Name 

8722 Ms Karen Samuels [2584] 



8695 

Summary 


8647 

Summary 


8725 

Summary 


8599 

Summary 


10844 

Summary 


8605 

Summary 


10724 

Summary 


8611 

Summary 


8614 

Summary 


8677 

Summary 


8644 

Summary 


8593 

Summary 


8650 

Summary 


8653 

Summary 


8656 

Summary 


8659 

Summary 


8662 

Summary 


8665 

Summary 


8668 

Summary 


8641 

Summary 


G Griffiths [2575] 



Mrs Sue Smith [2557] 



Ms Sylvia Claytor [2585] 



Ms Emily Hollins-Davies [2540] 



S Toms [2689] 



K Russell [2542] 



J M Walker [2648] 



Ms Susan Haworth [2544] 



Mr Edward Haworth [2545] 



C Savery [2568] 



Mr Andy Smith [2556] 



Mrs Sheila Lawson [2538] 



Ms Yvette Hughes [2558] 



Mr Chris Roberts [2559] 



Mrs Lisa Roberts [2560] 



Berwyn Thomas [2561] 



T Parkin [2563] 



M Parkin [2564] 



E Prescott [2565] 



L Hyland [2555] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

125



Rep No Name 

11048 T Jarvis [2768] 



10048 

Summary 


11027 

Summary 


11030 

Summary 


11033 

Summary 


11036 

Summary 


11039 

Summary 


10838 

Summary 


11045 

Summary 


11178 

Summary 


11051 

Summary 


11054 

Summary 


11057 

Summary 


11060 

Summary 


11063 

Summary 


11066 

Summary 


11069 

Summary 


11042 

Summary 


10997 

Summary 


10961 

Summary 


8141 

Summary 


S Ralphs [2851] 



J C Jones [2760] 



M Nixon [2762] 



Ms Barbara Bruce [2763] 



Mr Ian Bruce [2764] 



G Jackson [2765] 



A Pybus [2687] 



A Chapman [2767] 



D Martin [2811] 



Ms Mary Jones [2769] 






I Roberts [2771] 






A M Lymm [2773] 






B Gibson [2775] 



J Jones [2766] 



Mrs J Brearly [2749] 



D Stocker [2734] 



Mr Les Morris [2752] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

126



Rep No Name 

11006 S Jones [2753] 



11009 

Summary 


11012 

Summary 


11015 

Summary 


11018 

Summary 


10045 

Summary 


11024 

Summary 


11181 

Summary 


11003 

Summary 


11088 

Summary 


11091 

Summary 


11094 

Summary 


11097 

Summary 


11175 

Summary 


11079 

Summary 


11021 

Summary 


11187 

Summary 


11072 

Summary 


11154 

Summary 


11157 

Summary 


11160 

Summary 


O Davies [2754] 



M S Chesworth [2755] 



K Williams [2756] 



G Williams [2757] 



E Hunt [2850] 



K Goddard [2759] 



S Roberts [2812] 



Ms Shirley Cooney [2751] 



J Hughes [2781] 



E Holland [2782] 



Lloyd Moroney [2783] 



Mr Ste Morris [2784] 



D Kirwan [2810] 



Ms Val Campion [2778] 



S Jones [2758] 



Ms Carole Perwent [2814] 



M Cowlum [2776] 



M Jones [2803] 



A Roddick [2804] 






People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

127



Rep No Name 

11163 F Bracegirdle [2806] 



11166 

Summary 


11169 

Summary 


11148 

Summary 


11184 

Summary 


11145 

Summary 


11190 

Summary 


11193 

Summary 


11196 

Summary 


11199 

Summary 


11253 

Summary 


11256 

Summary 


11259 

Summary 


11172 

Summary 


11121 

Summary 


10952 

Summary 


11082 

Summary 


11100 

Summary 


11103 

Summary 


11106 

Summary 


11109 

Summary 


Mr Steve Hill [2807] 



M J Coulen [2808] 



E M Lloyd [2801] 



J Parry [2813] 



Ms Joyce Tacliffe [2800] 



J Stone [2815] 



D M Smith [2816] 



B Smith [2817] 



J K May [2818] 



Ms Angela Ditchfield [2836] 



M J Tiernan [2837] 



Mrs M Williams [2838] 



A Roberts [2809] 



Mrs E Fullwood [2792] 



D Adams [2731] 



W G Roberts [2779] 



Ms Lyn Hughes [2785] 






D Jackson [2787] 






People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

128



Rep No Name 

11112 Sam Fairhurst [2789] 



11151 

Summary 


11118 

Summary 


11075 

Summary 


11124 

Summary 


11127 

Summary 


11130 

Summary 


11133 

Summary 


11136 

Summary 


11139 

Summary 


11142 

Summary 


11115 

Summary 


10829 

Summary 


10970 

Summary 


10805 

Summary 


10808 

Summary 


10811 

Summary 


10814 

Summary 


10817 

Summary 


10820 

Summary 


10799 

Summary 





Mr C Williams [2791] 



B Jenkinson [2777] 



Mrs M Crossland [2793] 



Mr H Crossland [2794] 



M G Gaskell [2795] 



G J Jones [2796] 



J Cawley [2797] 



W Cawley [2798] 



R A Williams [2799] 



Mrs J Williams [2790] 



Ms Eileen Bell [2683] 



L Moroney [2739] 



R Hapslain [2675] 



L E Povey [2676] 



Mrs Anne Clarke [2677] 



Mr D Clarke [2678] 



Mr A Williams [2679] 



Ms Julia Davies [2680] 



Mr Norman Hall [2673] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

129



Rep No Name 

10826 Mr Paul Evans [2682] 



10796 

Summary 


10832 

Summary 


10835 

Summary 


8101 

Summary 


10841 

Summary 


8344 

Summary 


10847 

Summary 


10958 

Summary 


10823 

Summary 


10772 

Summary 


10730 

Summary 


10745 

Summary 


10748 

Summary 


10754 

Summary 


10757 

Summary 


10760 

Summary 


10763 

Summary 


10802 

Summary 


10769 

Summary 


10973 

Summary 


Mrs Karen Hall [2672] 






B Williams [2685] 



Mr Daryl Stitson [2501] 



J Owen [2688] 



A Walmsley [2452] 



E R Wooly [2690] 



Ms Wilson [2733] 



Mr Paul Taylor [2681] 



Mr Michael Roberts [2664] 



D M Guiness [2650] 



Mr L J Roberts [2655] 



Mrs B Jones [2656] 



Mrs Susan Holden [2658] 



D C Airey [2659] 



Mr Matthew Waite [2660] 



Ms Isabel Valpuesta [2661] 



J Fletcher [2674] 



Ms Faye Hughes [2663] 



K Stringer [2740] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

130



Rep No Name 

10775 Nik Jones [2665] 



10778 

Summary 


10781 

Summary 


10784 

Summary 


10787 

Summary 


10790 

Summary 


10793 

Summary 


10766 

Summary 


10937 

Summary 


10850 

Summary 


10913 

Summary 


10916 

Summary 


10922 

Summary 


10925 

Summary 


10928 

Summary 


8125 

Summary 


10907 

Summary 


10934 

Summary 


10904 

Summary 


10940 

Summary 


10943 

Summary 


H C Brownhill [2666] 



D Bright [2667] 



R C Bright [2668] 



J Griffiths [2669] 



J Hall [2670] 



Mr Peter Hall [2671] 



Ms Anne Hughes [2662] 






Mr Ken Roberts [2691] 



R Mathews [2714] 



R Davies [2715] 



Ms Glenys Jones [2717] 



Mr R Wall [2718] 



Mrs J Wall [2719] 



J Young [2720] 



A P Mitchell [2712] 



P Taverner [2722] 



Mr Barry Hackney [2711] 



Mavis Williams [2724] 



Mr Roger Reid [2725] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

131



Rep No Name 

10946 R Fletcher [2727] 



8129 

Summary 


8132 

Summary 


10949 

Summary 


10727 

Summary 


10931 

Summary 


10880 

Summary 


10976 

Summary 


10979 

Summary 


10982 

Summary 


10985 

Summary 


10988 

Summary 


10865 

Summary 


10868 

Summary 


10910 

Summary 


10874 

Summary 


10955 

Summary 


10883 

Summary 


10886 

Summary 


10889 

Summary 


10892 

Summary 


V S Clark [2728] 



M Hilgart [2729] 



M Craven [2730] 



W J Walker [2649] 



J Lee [2721] 



Ms Lucie Stanley [2702] 



M Finney [2741] 



T Taylor [2742] 



Ms Joanne Roche [2743] 



Ms Gill Latham-Howe [2745] 



S Haslett [2746] 



Ms Wendy Price [2696] 



Mr Keith McWilliams [2697] 



P Mathews [2713] 



Mr Andrew Hesketh [2700] 



Mrs Gubbets [2732] 



Mr Tony McGuiness [2703] 



Mr Mike Bird [2704] 



A Guest [2705] 



T Feely [2706] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

132



Rep No Name 

10895 J Bolton [2707] 



10898 

Summary 


10901 

Summary 


10871 

Summary 


7615 

Summary 


7568 

Summary 


7548 

Summary 


7552 

Summary 


7572 

Summary 


7556 

Summary 


7560 

Summary 


7593 

Summary 


7611 

Summary 


7564 

Summary 


7619 

Summary 


7769 

Summary 


7773 

Summary 


7925 

Summary 


7929 

Summary 


8057 

Summary 


8061 

Summary 


Addien Evans [2709] 



A S Wynne [2710] 



Ms Jan Jones-Davies [2698] 



E G Davies [2295] 



J V Cooper [2278] 



S Cahill [2279] 



A Maclean [2280] 



Ms Carly Roberts [2281] 



D Maclean [2282] 



P Maclean [2283] 



Miss N Roberts [2289] 



Mr Burbridge [2294] 



L Maclean [2275] 



T Lewis [2296] 



Ms Julia Lawrence [2335] 



Ms Ann Jones [2336] 



Mr Glyn Thomas [2374] 



Mrs Lyndsey Thomas [2375] 



Mr James Hulse [2407] 



J Davies [2408] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

133



Rep No Name 

7576 O M Prichard-Ellis [2284] 



7396 

Summary 


8356 

Summary 


7599 

Summary 


7603 

Summary 


7607 

Summary 


7508 

Summary 


7512 

Summary 


7392 

Summary 


7544 

Summary 


7520 

Summary 


7540 

Summary 


7524 

Summary 


7400 

Summary 


7528 

Summary 


7404 

Summary 


7532 

Summary 


7536 

Summary 


7623 

Summary 


7516 

Summary 


7741 

Summary 


L Fogg [2268] 



Ms Jackie Jones [2456] 



G T Jones [2291] 



P Hibbs [2292] 



Mrs Davies [2293] 



P Barron [2263] 



D Potter [2264] 



S Fogg [2265] 



Ms Siobhan Haythorne [2277] 



D Frost [2267] 



Mr Carl Watto [2276] 



D C Parry [2269] 



D Grocock [2270] 



G Parry [2271] 



F Davies [2272] 



D Williams [2273] 






K Brewer [2297] 



C Potter [2266] 



Ms Jane Cuthbertson [2328] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

134



Rep No Name 

8065 N Walsh [2409] 



7705 

Summary 


7709 

Summary 


7713 

Summary 


7717 

Summary 


7721 

Summary 


7725 

Summary 


7697 

Summary 


7737 

Summary 


7693 

Summary 


7745 

Summary 


7749 

Summary 


7753 

Summary 


7757 

Summary 


7761 

Summary 


7765 

Summary 


7777 

Summary 


7733 

Summary 


7660 

Summary 


7588 

Summary 


7627 

Summary 


Mr Jason Jackson [2319] 






Ms Sarah Davies [2321] 



Mr Adrian Jones [2322] 



Ms Helena Edwards [2323] 



Falmai Jones [2324] 



Mr Matt Jones [2317] 



Mr Iwan Parry [2327] 



P Moroney [2316] 



Mr John Cuthbertson [2329] 



Ms Helen Botham [2330] 



Pat Botham [2331] 



D Davies [2332] 



Ms Barbra Frangakis [2333] 



Mr Peter Swift [2334] 



Mr Howard Jones [2337] 



Ms Rachel E Parry [2326] 



J Reddican [2307] 



R Heap [2287] 



M Blake [2298] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

135



Rep No Name 

7631 A Roberts [2299] 



7635 

Summary 


7639 

Summary 


7643 

Summary 


7648 

Summary 


7701 

Summary 


7656 

Summary 


8073 

Summary 


7664 

Summary 


7668 

Summary 


7673 

Summary 


7677 

Summary 


7681 

Summary 


7685 

Summary 


7689 

Summary 


7652 

Summary 


7302 

Summary 


7280 

Summary 


7283 

Summary 


7286 

Summary 


7290 

Summary 


A Mabon [2300] 






B Cunliffe [2302] 



B Warren [2304] 



Mr Marc Cunliffe [2318] 



G Venables [2306] 



Mr Paul Thomas [2411] 



S Reddican [2308] 






L Morris [2311] 



Miss S Crawford [2312] 



G E Jones [2313] 



C A Matton [2314] 






S Underhill [2305] 



J Millington [2214] 



E Hughes [2206] 



Mr Tony Holland [2207] 



M D Jones [2208] 



S Fletcher [2209] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

136



Rep No Name 

7294 J Whalley [2210] 



7408 

Summary 


7597 

Summary 


7412 

Summary 


7268 

Summary 


7416 

Summary 


7306 

Summary 


7420 

Summary 


7310 

Summary 


7314 

Summary 


7424 

Summary 


7318 

Summary 


7298 

Summary 


Miss Aleks [2211] 



Mr D Bennett [2290] 






Mr Chris Clark [2203] 

Object to the proposed housing allocation at North of St. George Road, Abergele. Remove from the LDP. 


C Lloyd [2215] 



C Haythorne [2216] 






G W Haythorne [2218] 



Ms Mary Moore [2219] 



Mr Rich Davies [2220] 



Mr Anthony Moore [2221] 






5117 Mrs Susan Mary Jones [2011] 



7072 Ms Jeanette Jones [1979] 






1627 

Summary 

Mrs Jayne Howgate [1981] 






7452 

Summary 


Cllr John Alexander Maclennan [1984] 






1685 

Summary 

Mrs Pamela Summers owen [1989] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

137



Rep No Name 

7276 A Evans [2205] 



5109 Mrs Muriel Landy [2010] 



7272 

Summary 


Mr Tony Brown [2204] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1800 Mr Alun Owen [2024] 

1 Object 

Summary As someone with a keen interest in education and the well-being of our young people, I am very concerned about the proposal to build houses on the local 

high school's playing fields. With the significant proposed increase in population, will we not require more, not fewer, playing felds for children. 

Change Sought: Remove proposals to develop on playing fields. 

5125 Mrs Jennifer Moore [2044] 



5133 Rev Charles Billington [2045] 



5141 Mr K F Shieons [2046] 



7258 

Summary 


7264 

Summary 


7322 

Summary 


Mrs A Ripley [2200] 



H Towers [2202] 

Object to the proposed housing allocation at North of St. George Road, Abergele. Remove from the LDP. 


G E Probert [2224] 



5085 Mrs Rhiannon E Hughes [1991] 



7500 

Summary 


7428 

Summary 


7355 

Summary 


7477 

Summary 


7359 

Summary 


7480 

Summary 


7363 

Summary 


7484 

Summary 


7351 

Summary 


7368 

Summary 


K Frost [2257] 






P Shaw [2245] 



M Lynam [2246] 



E LL Jones [2247] 



A O Robshaw [2248] 






S C Moroney [2250] 



M Beswick [2243] 



D May [2253] 



1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

138



Rep No Name 

7469 J Layton [2242] 



7376 

Summary 


7380 

Summary 


7504 

Summary 


7384 

Summary 


7388 

Summary 


7580 

Summary 


7584 

Summary 


7488 

Summary 


7453 

Summary 


7789 

Summary 


7436 

Summary 


7326 

Summary 


7440 

Summary 


7330 

Summary 


7444 

Summary 


7334 

Summary 


7473 

Summary 


7450 

Summary 


7432 

Summary 


7455 

Summary 





V Graham [2259] 



R Williams [2260] 



Ms Jodie Massey [2261] 



A W Davies [2262] 



Mr Tom Price [2285] 



A Heap [2286] 



P R Moroney [2252] 



J Pedley [2234] 



Mr Nathan Reynolds [2340] 



Mr Wayne Jones [2225] 



R Humphreys [2226] 



Chris Price [2227] 



J R Merrison [2228] 



Mrs M Thomeson [2229] 



G Lloyd [2230] 



C Morris [2244] 












People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

139



Rep No Name 

7339 Ms Elaine Nelson [2236] 



7459 

Summary 


7461 

Summary 


7343 

Summary 


7465 

Summary 


7347 

Summary 


7448 

Summary 


8440 

Summary 


8284 

Summary 


8287 

Summary 


8290 

Summary 


8293 

Summary 


8296 

Summary 


8299 

Summary 


7781 

Summary 


8437 

Summary 


8275 

Summary 


8443 

Summary 


8446 

Summary 


8314 

Summary 


8317 

Summary 


E Clare [2237] 



L Taylor [2238] 



Ms Anne Tregenza [2239] 



C Taylor [2240] 



D R Humphreys [2241] 






Mr Hywel Wyn-Jones [2484] 



Ms Karen Scott [2432] 



Mr Mark Scott [2433] 



Ms Ann Badcott [2434] 



L Durrant [2435] 



P Sinclair [2436] 



J Satelle [2437] 






H Bevan [2483] 



Mr Nick Holland [2429] 



Ms Pam Hughes [2485] 



D M Thomas [2486] 



Mr Dylan Scott [2442] 






People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

140



Rep No Name 

8320 A Maher [2444] 



8323 

Summary 


8326 

Summary 


8434 

Summary 


8254 

Summary 


8458 

Summary 


8461 

Summary 


8536 

Summary 


8539 

Summary 


8542 

Summary 


8545 

Summary 


8245 

Summary 


8281 

Summary 


8251 

Summary 


8278 

Summary 


8257 

Summary 


8260 

Summary 


8263 

Summary 


8266 

Summary 


8269 

Summary 


8272 

Summary 


E O Kelly [2445] 



Mrs S Norrey [2446] 



S Parker [2482] 



Ms Carole Harvey [2422] 



Mr W R Passey [2490] 



Ms Eve Hall [2491] 



Mrs L Cowdell [2519] 



Mr P Cowdell [2520] 






Mrs G Sweeney [2522] 



Ms Anita Poole [2419] 



Mr Keiran Holland [2431] 



Ms Caroline Smethhurst [2421] 



Ms Donna Bailey [2430] 



R Novak [2423] 



Ms Elizabeth Davis [2424] 



Mr Alwyn Roberts [2425] 



Ms Debbie Gilman [2426] 



Ms Elysia Gilman [2427] 



Mr P J Gizzi [2428] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

141



Rep No Name 

8338 Ms Rhian Jones [2450] 



8248 

Summary 


8428 

Summary 


8329 

Summary 


8404 

Summary 


8407 

Summary 


8410 

Summary 


8413 

Summary 


8416 

Summary 


8419 

Summary 


8398 

Summary 


8425 

Summary 


8395 

Summary 


8431 

Summary 


8464 

Summary 


8467 

Summary 


8470 

Summary 


8098 

Summary 


8476 

Summary 


8482 

Summary 


8422 

Summary 


Ms Margaret G Jones [2420] 



Mrs J Bradley [2480] 



M P Halligan [2447] 



Miss P R Clarke [2472] 



Mr E H Lloyd [2473] 



N Gascgoine [2474] 



W Howe [2475] 



Ms K Read [2476] 



Mr D Hughes [2477] 



Ms Frances Wall [2470] 



D Hughes [2479] 



Ms Ffion O'Kelly [2469] 



D Warner [2481] 






G Povey [2493] 



Mr Emrys Davies [2494] 



P W Vickers [2496] 



J T Roberts [2497] 






Mrs Hughes [2478] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

142



Rep No Name 

8371 J W Brett [2461] 



8449 

Summary 


8341 

Summary 


10742 

Summary 


8353 

Summary 


11262 

Summary 


8359 

Summary 


8362 

Summary 


8401 

Summary 


8368 

Summary 


8335 

Summary 


8374 

Summary 


8377 

Summary 


8380 

Summary 


8383 

Summary 


8386 

Summary 


8389 

Summary 


8392 

Summary 


8365 

Summary 


7901 

Summary 


7949 

Summary 


Mr M Bloomfield [2487] 



Ms Catherine Merrison [2451] 



J E Lewis [2654] 



Ms Molly Passey [2455] 



C Ralphs [2839] 



Mr Roy Benham [2457] 



. Arbuckle [2458] 



Ms Norma Catley [2471] 



Mr Edward Robshaw [2460] 



Mrs P A Knowson [2449] 



Ms Kate Mailer [2462] 



Mr Ian McMahon [2463] 



Ms Alison Scott [2464] 



A J Scott [2465] 



M L Williams [2466] 



Mr John W Jones [2467] 



M J Lea [2468] 



E Howe [2459] 



A Mantle [2368] 



Ms Jane Williams [2380] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

143



Rep No Name 

7869 Ms Marian Owen [2360] 



7873 

Summary 


7877 

Summary 


7881 

Summary 


7885 

Summary 


7889 

Summary 


7861 

Summary 


7897 

Summary 


7857 

Summary 


7905 

Summary 


7909 

Summary 


7913 

Summary 


7933 

Summary 


7937 

Summary 


7941 

Summary 


8455 

Summary 


7893 

Summary 


7825 

Summary 


8485 

Summary 


7793 

Summary 


7797 

Summary 


Mr Chris MacGillivray [2361] 



Mrs Tracey MacGillivray [2362] 

Object to the proposed housing allocation at North of St. George Street, Abergele. Remove from the LDP 


Ms Georgina Davies [2363] 



Mrs Lynn Shaw [2364] 



Mr Gary Shaw [2365] 



L Jeffers [2358] 



Mrs Gill Hare [2367] 



T Jeffers [2357] 



D Mantle [2369] 



C W Roberts [2370] 



R Stanger [2371] 



Nicky Roberts [2376] 



Mr Neil Roberts [2377] 



Ms Manon Bochi [2378] 



Mr P Mayles [2489] 



Mr Phil Hare [2366] 



Mr P Dreanan [2349] 



Mr John Cooke [2500] 



Mr Ieuan Jones [2341] 



Mr Joseph Davies [2342] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

144



Rep No Name 

7801 A Slater [2343] 



7805 

Summary 


7809 

Summary 


7813 

Summary 


7865 

Summary 


7821 

Summary 


7953 

Summary 


7829 

Summary 


7833 

Summary 


7837 

Summary 


7841 

Summary 


7845 

Summary 


7849 

Summary 


7853 

Summary 


7817 

Summary 


8242 

Summary 


7945 

Summary 


8037 

Summary 


8045 

Summary 


8049 

Summary 


8053 

Summary 


A Ostanek [2344] 



P Herndlhofer [2345] 



R Herndlhofer [2346] 



C Jeffers [2359] 



Mrs J Pamment [2348] 



Mr Peter Williams [2381] 



Mrs S Allen [2350] 



A Deering [2351] 






Mr Nick Roberts [2353] 



Ms Ann Wing [2354] 



G Wing [2355] 



I Walker [2356] 



Mrs P Smith [2347] 



Ms Amanda Peak [2418] 



Mr Craig Merrison [2379] 



. Wilson [2403] 



C Davies [2404] 






Ms Melanie Hulse [2406] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

145



Rep No Name 

8085 A Kirkham [2414] 



8089 

Summary 


8033 

Summary 


8239 

Summary 


8029 

Summary 


8077 

Summary 


8081 

Summary 


8302 

Summary 


8305 

Summary 


8308 

Summary 


8311 

Summary 


7785 

Summary 


8093 

Summary 


7993 

Summary 


7957 

Summary 


7961 

Summary 


7965 

Summary 


7969 

Summary 


7973 

Summary 


7977 

Summary 


7981 

Summary 


Mr Andy Kirkham [2415] 

Object to the proposed housing allocation at North of St. George Street, Abergele. Remove from the LDP 


Ms Dawn Lawson [2401] 



H & R Carmmell [2417] 



N Passey [2400] 



Mrs Alison Humphries [2412] 



Mr John Humphries [2413] 



K Satelle [2438] 



D Satelle [2439] 



Cameron G [2440] 



Mr Shaun Badcott [2441] 



M Gagon [2339] 



Mr Paul White [2416] 



Ms Mia . [2391] 



Ms Fiona Trusdale [2382] 



Mr Royston Jones [2383] 



Mr J Brodie [2384] 



Mr Frank Connah [2385] 



Mrs Debbie Connah [2386] 



Ms Rose Knight [2387] 



Ms Debbie Ratcliffe [2388] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

146



Rep No Name 

8041 Ms Nia Roberts [2402] 



7989 

Summary 


8452 

Summary 


8001 

Summary 


8005 

Summary 


8009 

Summary 


8013 

Summary 


8017 

Summary 


8021 

Summary 


8025 

Summary 


7985 

Summary 


10565 

Summary 


10358 

Summary 


10159 

Summary 


11358 

Summary 


10568 

Summary 


10156 

Summary 


10376 

Summary 


11361 

Summary 


8148 

Summary 


10153 

Summary 


Ms J Roberts [2390] 



Mrs C Bloomfield [2488] 



C Harrison [2393] 



S Harrison [2394] 



J Neil [2395] 



A Owen [2396] 



G Owen [2397] 



Mr Martin Owen [2398] 



Mr Will Owen [2399] 



Ms Abby Roberts [2389] 



N Woodward [3032] 



Judith Williams [2958] 



K Feeney [2890] 



Brian Davies [3098] 



Gareth Davies [3033] 



S A Feeney [2889] 



E Webb [2964] 



Ray Kenwed [3099] 



C H Reid [2888] 



T Roberts [2887] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

147



Rep No Name 

10373 M Hassen [2963] 



8183 

Summary 


10162 

Summary 


10150 

Summary 


8146 

Summary 


11364 

Summary 


10382 

Summary 


10147 

Summary 


11367 

Summary 


10562 

Summary 


10144 

Summary 


11370 

Summary 


10385 

Summary 


10379 

Summary 


10364 

Summary 


10421 

Summary 


10580 

Summary 


11331 

Summary 


10190 

Summary 


10361 

Summary 


10187 

Summary 


Phillip Platt [3100] 



Mrs B Ledwith [2891] 






R Fozard [2885] 



Carol Webb [3101] 



Fiona H Jones [2966] 



J Jackson [2884] 



Kath Davies [3102] 



L Evans [3031] 



W Hilditch [2883] 



R Offley [3103] 



M Anderson [2967] 



M Brimson [2965] 



K Hull [2960] 



S Pointon [2979] 



W Brennan [3038] 



Katie Edwards [3089] 



Mr D H Fisher [2900] 



Mr Mark Lovatt [2959] 



S Hewitt [2899] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

148



Rep No Name 

11334 Natalie Adamson [3090] 



10577 

Summary 


10184 

Summary 


11355 

Summary 


10181 

Summary 


11373 

Summary 


11346 

Summary 


10178 

Summary 


10367 

Summary 


10574 

Summary 


11349 

Summary 


10175 

Summary 


10370 

Summary 


10172 

Summary 


11352 

Summary 


10571 

Summary 


11337 

Summary 


11403 

Summary 


11394 

Summary 


10111 

Summary 


10409 

Summary 


Mr K Williams [3036] 



M Mathews [2898] 



Beryl Horseman [3097] 



I R Kelly [2897] 






Gemma Gagon [3094] 



C C Worley [2896] 






Mrs M Foster [3035] 



Daniel Remers [3095] 



Mr Reynolds [2895] 



G Done [2962] 



Mrs S Rossington [2894] 



E M Jones [3096] 



Mavis Thomas [3034] 



A P Rudd [3091] 



P Whitehead [3114] 



Mr P J Scott [3111] 



M W Parry [2872] 



J R Pericott [2975] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

149



Rep No Name 

10108 . Dovey [2871] 



11397 

Summary 


10547 

Summary 


10105 

Summary 


10412 

Summary 


11400 

Summary 


10141 

Summary 


10544 

Summary 


10406 

Summary 


10415 

Summary 


10099 

Summary 


11406 

Summary 


10096 

Summary 


11409 

Summary 


10418 

Summary 


10093 

Summary 


10541 

Summary 


8186 

Summary 


10090 

Summary 


10102 

Summary 


10394 

Summary 


N Reddican [3112] 



B J Phillips [3026] 



J Thorley [2870] 






C Whitehead [3113] 



J McMahon [2882] 



J E Edwards [3025] 



J Pericott [2974] 



G Rudd [2977] 



D Gillin [2868] 



G Holland [3115] 



J Mailer [2867] 



D W Holland [3116] 



E Burdock [2978] 



C F Daley [2866] 



H Williams [3024] 



M Fry [3117] 



B Christley [2865] 



D Hall [2869] 



Liz Davies [2970] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

150



Rep No Name 

10196 Mrs P Jenkins [2902] 



10138 

Summary 


10388 

Summary 


10135 

Summary 


11376 

Summary 


10556 

Summary 


10132 

Summary 


11379 

Summary 


10391 

Summary 


10129 

Summary 


10550 

Summary 


10126 

Summary 


10114 

Summary 


10553 

Summary 


11385 

Summary 


10123 

Summary 


10400 

Summary 


10307 

Summary 


10120 

Summary 


10214 

Summary 


10117 

Summary 


C Bullows [2881] 



Tudor Roberts [2968] 



A Pritchard [2880] 



J Wilson [3105] 



Ian Robertson [3029] 



W Davies [2879] 



Robin Griffiths [3106] 



John Davies [2969] 



S Kirkham [2878] 



Toni Foweler [3027] 



W Owen [2877] 



M Ditchfield [2873] 



Maureen Robertson [3028] 



Gareth Thomas [3108] 



J Probert [2876] 



G Lord [2972] 



C Dolan [2939] 



M Marr [2875] 



Ms Sheila Jones [2908] 



A Gozzard [2874] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

151



Rep No Name 

11391 Mrs H Hammond [3110] 



10559 

Summary 


11382 

Summary 


10328 

Summary 


10193 

Summary 


10274 

Summary 


10322 

Summary 


10271 

Summary 


10661 

Summary 


10628 

Summary 


10325 

Summary 


10268 

Summary 


11277 

Summary 


10631 

Summary 


10625 

Summary 


10277 

Summary 


10262 

Summary 


11280 

Summary 


10259 

Summary 


11283 

Summary 


10622 

Summary 


S Bastandy [3030] 



Helen Thomas [3107] 



J Sealey [2946] 



Mrs P Fisher [2901] 



Mrs W Nevin [2928] 






T A Jones [2927] 



Charlotte Parker [3069] 



Jade Thomas [3054] 



T Jones [2945] 



G Binning [2926] 



John Sams [3070] 



E Williams [3055] 



Jade Parry [3053] 



D Lee [2929] 






E Porter [3071] 



A Johnson [2923] 



N Porter [3072] 



Colin Lloyd [3052] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

152



Rep No Name 

10256 J Johnson [2922] 



11286 

Summary 


8151 

Summary 


10253 

Summary 


10331 

Summary 


10265 

Summary 


8175 

Summary 


10640 

Summary 


10304 

Summary 


8170 

Summary 


10643 

Summary 


10301 

Summary 


10310 

Summary 


10298 

Summary 


10646 

Summary 


10313 

Summary 


10658 

Summary 


10295 

Summary 


10619 

Summary 


8178 

Summary 


10292 

Summary 


T Pragnell [3073] 



A Smith [2947] 



G A Green [2921] 



Ms Katie Westwood [2948] 



M Binning [2925] 



Lynda Halliday [3063] 



Ray McGrady [3060] 



K Gill [2938] 



Paul Dunt [3058] 



Ian Jones [3061] 



H A Roberts [2937] 



J H Willis [2940] 



A & M Simms [2936] 



Freda McMurray [3062] 



Mr Hayden Feeney [2941] 



D Hook [3068] 



J Culshaw [2935] 



Howard Fergusson [3051] 



Peter Jones [3064] 



D S Roberts [2934] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

153



Rep No Name 

10634 Miss H Davies [3056] 



10649 

Summary 


10316 

Summary 


10283 

Summary 


10652 

Summary 


10280 

Summary 


10319 

Summary 


10655 

Summary 


10637 

Summary 


10589 

Summary 


11310 

Summary 


10220 

Summary 


11313 

Summary 


10484 

Summary 


10349 

Summary 


10595 

Summary 


11316 

Summary 


10211 

Summary 


10352 

Summary 


11289 

Summary 


10208 

Summary 


Gary Fletcher [3065] 



Mr R Wilyman [2942] 



A Priestly [2931] 






S Bridge [2930] 



M L Heywood [2943] 



J Pye [3067] 



Mrs G Sennat [3057] 



Brian Mouat [3041] 



Buggig Hughes [3081] 



R Rothwell [2910] 



Brian Laing [3082] 






B Hardy [2954] 



B Hart [3043] 



Linda Burney [3083] 



Ms Annette Sullivan [2907] 



Mrs D Galeandro [2955] 



T Dakin [3074] 



C A Hubbard [2906] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

154



Rep No Name 

10598 M J Hart [3044] 



8181 

Summary 


10205 

Summary 


11322 

Summary 


10202 

Summary 


8154 

Summary 


10583 

Summary 


10355 

Summary 


10199 

Summary 


11325 

Summary 


11328 

Summary 


11319 

Summary 


11301 

Summary 


11388 

Summary 


10247 

Summary 


10334 

Summary 


11292 

Summary 


10244 

Summary 


11295 

Summary 


10616 

Summary 


10337 

Summary 


. Poleman [3085] 



M Miller [2905] 



D Adamson [3086] 



R Miller [2904] 



Michelle Glass [2956] 






Charlie Hanma [2957] 



Mr T Jenkins [2903] 



D Harris [3087] 



Gordon Downing [3088] 



Gary Burney [3084] 



K Pealshaw [3078] 



Mr G Bennett [3109] 



Ms Rosa Lunt [2919] 



Mr James David Westwood [2949] 



N Perry [3075] 



Mr Michael Giblin [2918] 



Harriet Davies [3076] 



B S Ferrie [3050] 



D Edwards [2950] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

155



Rep No Name 

10241 Mr Phil Priestly [2917] 



11298 

Summary 


10223 

Summary 


10340 

Summary 


10346 

Summary 


10235 

Summary 


10613 

Summary 


10601 

Summary 


10232 

Summary 


11304 

Summary 


10343 

Summary 


10229 

Summary 


11307 

Summary 


10226 

Summary 


10250 

Summary 


10238 

Summary 


10496 

Summary 


10165 

Summary 


11514 

Summary 


10054 

Summary 


11439 

Summary 


John Pritchard [3077] 



L Devere Robinson [2911] 



Ms Sylvia Dugdale [2951] 



S Salt [2953] 



Ms Katy Higgins [2915] 



B Ferrie [3049] 



Mrs C Ineson [3045] 



Miss L Lugo [2914] 



Samantha Parker [3079] 



D Bennell [2952] 



Ms Liz Jennings [2913] 



Dean Becks-Whitworth [3080] 



Ms Beth Heaton [2912] 



Ms Peggy Davies [2920] 



Ms Karen Walford [2916] 



Mr David Ledwith [3009] 



Miss M Davies [2892] 












People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

156



Rep No Name 

11442 A J Roberts [3128] 



10051 

Summary 


11223 

Summary 


8162 

Summary 


11445 

Summary 


11517 

Summary 


11448 

Summary 


11511 

Summary 


10042 

Summary 


10514 

Summary 


11451 

Summary 


11226 

Summary 


10039 

Summary 


11214 

Summary 


10454 

Summary 


8165 

Summary 


10472 

Summary 


11694 

Summary 


10493 

Summary 


10397 

Summary 


10445 

Summary 


Soo Roch [2852] 



S Hetzler [2826] 









L Cluess [3153] 



P O'Donnell [3130] 






L Davies-Salmon [2849] 






J O'Donnell [3131] 



A Hetzler [2827] 



Mrs L Davies-Salmon [2848] 



M R Kirkam [2823] 



Mr T Allen [2992] 



V Brennan [2999] 



E Jackson [3000] 



Bryan Kinsey [3213] 



P Aldridge [3008] 



Mrs W Gibbons [2971] 



K M Scott [2989] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

157



Rep No Name 

10520 Mr I Roberts [3017] 



11523 

Summary 


11217 

Summary 


11436 

Summary 


10289 

Summary 


10517 

Summary 


10286 

Summary 


11520 

Summary 


11700 

Summary 


11220 

Summary 


10451 

Summary 


10169 

Summary 


11820 

Summary 


11457 

Summary 


10036 

Summary 


11484 

Summary 


10460 

Summary 


11235 

Summary 


10508 

Summary 


11250 

Summary 


11478 

Summary 


S Walker [3155] 



N E Hughes [2824] 






A J Brearley [2933] 



Jessica Anna Fenney [3016] 



M Atherton [2932] 



D Cluess [3154] 



. Gorski [3215] 



E Clough [2825] 



M H Parry [2991] 



Mr J Wells [2893] 



C Campbell [3255] 



Mr D Whitehead [3133] 



Ms Ellie Roberts [2847] 



Debbie Mock [3142] 



P Marwood [2995] 



Ms Joan Prescott [2830] 



Violet Jones [3013] 



T Ditchfield [2835] 






People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

158



Rep No Name 

11496 Jordan Dooley [3146] 



11247 

Summary 


11454 

Summary 


10463 

Summary 


11475 

Summary 


11244 

Summary 


10466 

Summary 


11238 

Summary 


11493 

Summary 


11487 

Summary 


10505 

Summary 


11241 

Summary 


11490 

Summary 


11481 

Summary 


11505 

Summary 


11508 

Summary 


10403 

Summary 


11460 

Summary 


11229 

Summary 


10469 

Summary 


10033 

Summary 


Mr R Meaks [2834] 



Mr D M Jones [3132] 



F Marwood [2996] 



D Skelly [3139] 



Mrs L Meaks [2833] 



M Garside [2997] 



Ms Enid Hughes [2831] 



Malcolm Godfrey [3145] 



S Thomas [3143] 



Morris Jones [3012] 



Ms Yvonne Callister [2832] 



Ian Jarvis [3144] 



Wendy Jones [3141] 






. Price [3150] 



G B Morris [2973] 



George Frost [3134] 



E Richards [2828] 






Mr Charles Cotton [2846] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

159



Rep No Name 

11463 M E Frost [3135] 



10511 

Summary 


11499 

Summary 


10030 

Summary 


11274 

Summary 


10457 

Summary 


10499 

Summary 


11469 

Summary 


10027 

Summary 


11472 

Summary 


11232 

Summary 


11502 

Summary 


10448 

Summary 


11466 

Summary 


10478 

Summary 


11535 

Summary 


10487 

Summary 


10066 

Summary 


11676 

Summary 


10430 

Summary 


10063 

Summary 


D Whitehouse [3014] 



Paul Hay [3147] 



Ms Dilys Price [2845] 






J Taylor [2994] 



John Oresswells [3010] 



Mat Denson [3137] 






P Broadhurst [3138] 



Ms Mel Jones [2829] 



Bruce Gibbs [3148] 



M Scott [2990] 






S M Owen [3002] 



T H Nicholls [3159] 



G P Jackson [3005] 



Ms Kate Thorley [2857] 



C McWaden [3207] 



A Cheetham [2983] 



J Woods [2856] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

160



Rep No Name 

11538 H Kershaw [3160] 



11205 

Summary 


10532 

Summary 


10069 

Summary 


11697 

Summary 


11673 

Summary 


10523 

Summary 


10433 

Summary 


11541 

Summary 


10057 

Summary 


10490 

Summary 


11544 

Summary 


11202 

Summary 


10075 

Summary 


11412 

Summary 


11685 

Summary 


10081 

Summary 


10538 

Summary 


11415 

Summary 


10424 

Summary 


10078 

Summary 


A P Tuite [2820] 



Pat Harrop [3021] 



Ms Pauline M Edwards [2858] 



Tony Goddard [3214] 



S James [3206] 



Mr M Payne [3018] 



Mr & Mrs Heaton [2985] 



M Sowden [3161] 



M Docker [2854] 



V Srinivasan [3007] 



P Davies [3162] 






Mr Rob Mailer [2860] 



S Sowden [3118] 



J M Domey [3210] 



J Crosley [2862] 



Mrs Hesketh [3023] 






T Pointon [2980] 



Ms Veronica Owen [2861] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

161



Rep No Name 

11268 Ms Lilian Redford [2841] 



11679 

Summary 


11682 

Summary 


8157 

Summary 


11430 

Summary 


10427 

Summary 


11265 

Summary 


10072 

Summary 


11433 

Summary 


10535 

Summary 


11271 

Summary 


10060 

Summary 


10481 

Summary 


11667 

Summary 


11208 

Summary 


10475 

Summary 


11424 

Summary 


10439 

Summary 


10526 

Summary 


11547 

Summary 


11421 

Summary 


Cerys Clark [3208] 



Fred Spicer [3209] 



F Cullen [2982] 



N McClelan [3124] 



Mrs E Lovatt [2981] 



Ms Tracy Williams [2840] 



Mrs O Kerr [2859] 



P Price [3125] 



Mrs Fenney [3022] 



Mr John Rushton [2842] 






N H Owen [3003] 



J A Goran [3204] 



B Clarkson [2821] 



B Jones [3001] 






Mrs Whitehouse [2987] 



Ms V Ashall [3019] 



Eileen Gibbs [3163] 



A Burgess [3121] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

162



Rep No Name 

11550 D Glover [3164] 



11211 

Summary 


10610 

Summary 


10442 

Summary 


11526 

Summary 


11670 

Summary 


10607 

Summary 


11529 

Summary 


10529 

Summary 


10436 

Summary 


11532 

Summary 


11427 

Summary 


E Stappleton [2822] 



C Evans [3048] 



S E McCarten [2988] 



L Hall [3156] 



L Beswick [3205] 



Mrs L Mouat [3047] 



Cllr A Wood [3157] 



Mr W Sheeady [3020] 



Helen Hughes [2986] 



P J Nicholls [3158] 



J Bentley [3123] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

163


Policy HOU/1 Meeting The Housing Needs, Land to east of Llanfair Road, Abergele 


630 Mr Paul Luckock [146] 1 Support 

Summary I write in support of the Local Development Plan proposals for Abergele. 

I support the construction of a by pass road and the construction of additional houses to the west of the town. I judge we need such development to ensure 

the economic viability of the town and to ensure younger people are encouraged to remain and live and work in North Wales. 

I am also very relaxed about the construction of a Gypsy Traveller site. I judge that the Council should consult with the Gypsy Traveller community in North 

Wales to ensure the site is co-created with the residents of Abergele to ensure high quality design and construction to meet Gypsy and Traveller's needs. 

11864 

Summary 


8874 

Summary 


9051 

Summary 


8910 

Summary 


11867 

Summary 


13145 

Summary 


9888 

Summary 


9855 

Summary 


11870 

Summary 


9825 

Summary 


9048 

Summary 


9057 

Summary 


9819 

Summary 


9981 

Summary 


11849 

Summary 


8916 

Summary 


8904 

Summary 


11852 

Summary 


8880 

Summary 


8913 

Summary 


Susan Davies [3270] 

Object to the proposed housing allocation at Llanfair Road, Abergele. Remove from the LDP. 


Mr M Costello [3293] 



Susan Williams [3353] 



G Green [3306] 



Sharan Hansen [3271] 



E D Jones [3655] 

Object to the proposed housing allocation at East of Llanfair Road, Abergele. Remove from the LDP. 


Miss C Cashmore-Thorley [3654] 



Mr R Marshland [3643] 



Pat Kendrick [3272] 



B Nash [3630] 



Maurice Moss [3352] 



B Kitchen [3355] 



Janet Lloyd-Jones [3627] 



Caroline Bond [3688] 



M D Bertlett [3265] 



Joanne Lovelady [3308] 



Paige Tudball [3304] 






Glenys Evans [3295] 



Michelle Brindle [3307] 



1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

164



Rep No Name 

9822 G Lloyd-Jones [3628] 

Summary Object to the proposed housing allocation at Llanfair Road, Abergele. Remove from the LDP. 


9846 

Summary 


11855 

Summary 


11861 

Summary 


9852 

Summary 


8877 

Summary 


9891 

Summary 


11858 

Summary 


9042 

Summary 


8907 

Summary 


11873 

Summary 


9054 

Summary 


8231 

Summary 


9978 

Summary 


11903 

Summary 


8234 

Summary 


9870 

Summary 


11900 

Summary 


9162 

Summary 


9840 

Summary 


8862 

Summary 


Edna Phillips [3638] 



Mr J B Starkie [3267] 



Jonathan Moore [3269] 



Mrs M Marshland [3642] 



Robert Evans [3294] 



Elizabeth Owen [3656] 



Victoria Pedley [3268] 



Rob Halliday [3350] 



Olivia Fairhurst [3305] 



Kemil Ramessur [3273] 



Teresa Jones [3354] 



Ivy Davies [3629] 



John Penlington [3687] 



Dilys Thomas [3283] 






Eileen Preston [3648] 



D Morgan [3282] 



J Southeon [3391] 



Gaynor Allen [3636] 



C Burslem [3289] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

165



Rep No Name 

9063 Dawn Johnson [3357] 



9027 

Summary 


9849 

Summary 


9060 

Summary 


8871 

Summary 


9861 

Summary 


9867 

Summary 


11906 

Summary 


8859 

Summary 


9837 

Summary 


9030 

Summary 


11909 

Summary 


9864 

Summary 


11915 

Summary 


9834 

Summary 


9858 

Summary 


9018 

Summary 


9885 

Summary 


9165 

Summary 


11876 

Summary 


9843 

Summary 


Shaun Shepherd [3345] 



Peter Cross [3639] 



E M Colto [3356] 



P Highman [3292] 



Mr G R Owen [3645] 



Mr G S Preston [3647] 



Rowland Davidson [3284] 



J Parker [3288] 



P Murray [3635] 



Jen Hughes [3346] 



S Davidson [3285] 



Mr B J Owen [3646] 



P Parker [3287] 



Mark Roberts [3634] 



Miss D Olner [3644] 



Norma Alcock [3342] 



Mr J R Thompson [3653] 



J Wood [3392] 



Sarah Clayton [3274] 



Laura Millward [3637] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

166



Rep No Name 

9021 D Banks [3343] 



9039 

Summary 


8868 

Summary 


11897 

Summary 


9882 

Summary 


9045 

Summary 


11885 

Summary 


9036 

Summary 


9828 

Summary 


11888 

Summary 


9033 

Summary 


8865 

Summary 


9873 

Summary 


9024 

Summary 


11894 

Summary 


11879 

Summary 


11633 

Summary 


11615 

Summary 


9969 

Summary 


11645 

Summary 


11642 

Summary 


Sue Palmer [3349] 



P Burslem [3291] 



Riaz Hakeem [3281] 



Mrs Alison Bird [3652] 



Margaret Moss [3351] 



P N Jones [3277] 



Gaz Heeter [3348] 



I Bidzinski [3632] 






Peter Hughes [3347] 



J Burslem [3290] 



Mr T W Keeting [3649] 



Marian Davies [3344] 



Barbara Taylor [3280] 



Julia Hague [3275] 



M Lok [3193] 



Sharon Craven [3187] 



Rosalyn Peacock [3684] 



Callum McKenna [3197] 



Cian Hanna [3196] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

167



Rep No Name 

9972 Ronald Peacock [3685] 



11639 

Summary 


11651 

Summary 


9975 

Summary 


9966 

Summary 


11630 

Summary 


11624 

Summary 


9990 

Summary 


11621 

Summary 


11618 

Summary 


9915 

Summary 


11636 

Summary 


11702 

Summary 


9951 

Summary 


11717 

Summary 


11714 

Summary 


9954 

Summary 


11711 

Summary 


11708 

Summary 


11648 

Summary 


11705 

Summary 


John Rogers [3195] 



Elizabeth Gizzi [3199] 



D Muir [3686] 



Gwen Critchlow [3683] 






I J Catto [3190] 



G Beach [3691] 



A K Green [3189] 



Chad Billington [3188] 



Janet Jones [3664] 



W Hill [3194] 






L Stringer [3678] 






M Brennand [3220] 



E Owen [3679] 



M Holland [3219] 



A Poulter [3218] 



Jennifer Kay [3198] 






People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

168



Rep No Name 

11612 Louise Perrin [3186] 



9960 

Summary 


11663 

Summary 


11660 

Summary 


9963 

Summary 


11657 

Summary 


11654 

Summary 


9957 

Summary 


11558 

Summary 


9993 

Summary 


10014 

Summary 


11570 

Summary 


11567 

Summary 


10017 

Summary 


11564 

Summary 


11576 

Summary 


10020 

Summary 


10011 

Summary 


11555 

Summary 


10023 

Summary 


11552 

Summary 


Colin Griffiths [3681] 



B Lloyd Jones [3203] 



B Waterson [3202] 



Paul Lucas [3682] 



J Filkin [3201] 






Mrs Hill [3680] 



M Morgan [3167] 



Mr R Owen [3692] 



Gladys Berdfing [3699] 



Thomas Lloyd [3171] 



Stephen Hynes [3170] 



A E Foxall [3700] 



Jan Cawthorn [3169] 



K E Hardy [3174] 






Kirsty McLoughlin [3698] 



R Hughes [3166] 



John Branwell [3702] 



K Shone [3165] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

169



Rep No Name 

11549 D Glover [3164] 



3890 Cllr Samuel Rowlands [4396] 

Summary Objection to the allocation of Greenfield sites at Llanfair Road, Abergele for housing development. 

Change Sought: Deletion of Llanfair Road site, Abergele. 

11687 

Summary 


11561 

Summary 


11594 

Summary 


9996 

Summary 


11609 

Summary 


11606 

Summary 


9999 

Summary 


11603 

Summary 


11600 

Summary 


11573 

Summary 


11597 

Summary 


9948 

Summary 


10005 

Summary 


11591 

Summary 


11588 

Summary 


10008 

Summary 


11585 

Summary 


11582 

Summary 


10002 

Summary 


Nicky Castle [3211] 



H P Kershaw [3168] 



M J Simpson [3180] 



M LL Edwards [3693] 



Shirley Smart [3185] 



Ray Barlow [3184] 



R G Edwards [3694] 



Elaine Barlow [3183] 



Karen Hardcastle [3182] 



James Morgan [3173] 



Jean Marsh [3181] 



M Fortune [3677] 



G R Evans [3696] 






D Humphries [3178] 



J A Lloyd [3697] 












People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

170



Rep No Name 

11813 Ruth Williams [3253] 



11720 

Summary 


8889 

Summary 


9906 

Summary 


8886 

Summary 


9909 

Summary 


8190 

Summary 


9903 

Summary 


9912 

Summary 


8895 

Summary 


11810 

Summary 


11807 

Summary 


11804 

Summary 


11801 

Summary 


9918 

Summary 


11798 

Summary 


8883 

Summary 


11828 

Summary 


11843 

Summary 


9984 

Summary 


11840 

Summary 


Sarah Hughes [3222] 



Treena Edwards [3299] 



T Langford [3661] 



O M J Fry [3298] 



E R Rowlands [3662] 



B Parker [3297] 






J G Jones [3663] 



Ceira Lewis [3301] 



Tom Griffiths [3252] 



Fiona Blad [3251] 



Billie Bennett [3250] 



R Hesk [3249] 



Teresa Roberts [3665] 






G Evans [3296] 



G R Jones [3258] 



V A Law [3263] 



Aneurin Wynne [3689] 



W Buck [3262] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

171



Rep No Name 

11837 G Watterson [3261] 



9987 

Summary 


11834 

Summary 


8892 

Summary 


9894 

Summary 


11792 

Summary 


11825 

Summary 


9897 

Summary 


11822 

Summary 


8901 

Summary 


9900 

Summary 


8898 

Summary 


11831 

Summary 


9942 

Summary 


11753 

Summary 


11750 

Summary 


9936 

Summary 


11747 

Summary 


11744 

Summary 


9939 

Summary 


11795 

Summary 


Robert Brown [3690] 






Mairlyn Lewis [3300] 



Natalie Haworth [3657] 



K Rudnick [3246] 



T D Edwards [3257] 



Jackie Leuly [3658] 






J Prys [3303] 



G Pike [3659] 



S Tudsall [3302] 



R Claxton [3259] 



Mr Peter McDownell [3675] 



G Burton [3233] 



Judith Domney [3232] 



S Corlett [3673] 



E J Humphries [3231] 



M Berg [3230] 



Mrs E McDownell [3674] 



A Wright [3247] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

172



Rep No Name 

11738 R Smith [3228] 



11762 

Summary 


11735 

Summary 


11732 

Summary 


9945 

Summary 


11729 

Summary 


11726 

Summary 


11846 

Summary 


11741 

Summary 


11777 

Summary 


11723 

Summary 


11789 

Summary 


9924 

Summary 


11786 

Summary 


11783 

Summary 


9927 

Summary 


9933 

Summary 


13148 

Summary 


11756 

Summary 


11774 

Summary 


11771 

Summary 


M Curry [3236] 



Tracy Cresswell [3227] 



E L Highcock [3226] 






Eva Highcock [3225] 



Martin Chambers [3224] 



W M Swales [3264] 



G Worley [3229] 



Scott Whaton [3241] 



Linda Rossington [3223] 



C J Bramwell [3245] 



Jean Hogan [3667] 



P Faulkner [3244] 



S Bulm [3243] 






Paul Smith [3672] 



D C Jeans [3669] 



L Royles [3234] 



Joshua Davies [3240] 



Alex Jones [3239] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

173



Rep No Name 

13151 A Fazackeney [3670] 

Summary Object to the proposed housing allocation at East of Llanfair Road, Abergele. Remove from the LDP. 


11768 

Summary 


11765 

Summary 


9930 

Summary 


9921 

Summary 


11780 

Summary 


9444 

Summary 


9330 

Summary 


9336 

Summary 


9600 

Summary 


9333 

Summary 


9603 

Summary 


9552 

Summary 


9597 

Summary 


9447 

Summary 


9342 

Summary 


9609 

Summary 


9441 

Summary 


9438 

Summary 


9612 

Summary 


9435 

Summary 


Nicky Williams [3238] 



R C Davies [3237] 






L Kinsey [3666] 



E & R Forshaw [3242] 



Livia Pietromarchi [3487] 



M R Lees [3448] 



Mrs P M Newnes [3450] 



Mr Poundall [3539] 



M Coulton [3449] 



Mrs Poundall [3540] 



Mrs Parry-Jones [3523] 



Mrs Rutter [3538] 



J Restall [3488] 



W Barnes [3452] 



D R Sambrookes [3542] 



Dorothy York [3486] 



Hazel Plumbley [3485] 



A L Price [3543] 



Thomas Glenday [3484] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

174



Rep No Name 

9432 Victoria Glenday [3483] 



9579 

Summary 


9606 

Summary 


9588 

Summary 


9657 

Summary 


9372 

Summary 


9582 

Summary 


9369 

Summary 


9366 

Summary 


9585 

Summary 


9339 

Summary 


9360 

Summary 


9327 

Summary 


9357 

Summary 


9354 

Summary 


9591 

Summary 


9351 

Summary 


9348 

Summary 


9594 

Summary 


9345 

Summary 


9363 

Summary 


Shaun Gibbons [3532] 



K Millar [3541] 



Ms W Trimbel [3535] 



Ron Wilkinson [3559] 



Mrs M Radakin [3462] 



Mr E Slater [3533] 



M Worthing [3461] 



S Moore [3460] 



Mr R Borne [3534] 



E Evans [3451] 



Lyndon Wray [3458] 



G A Turner [3447] 



E Swinton [3457] 



J Routledge [3456] 



M Sambrookes [3536] 






M Loseby [3454] 



Mr Rutter [3537] 



D J Hearn [3453] 



Audrey Wray [3459] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

175



Rep No Name 

9648 Susan Anguige [3556] 



9615 

Summary 


9288 

Summary 


9642 

Summary 


9285 

Summary 


9282 

Summary 


9645 

Summary 


9639 

Summary 


9276 

Summary 


9294 

Summary 


9273 

Summary 


9270 

Summary 


9651 

Summary 


9267 

Summary 


9654 

Summary 


9237 

Summary 


8222 

Summary 


9279 

Summary 


9312 

Summary 


9618 

Summary 


9324 

Summary 


C Pugh [3544] 



J I Fielden [3433] 



Clwydwen Morgan [3554] 



S Higgins [3432] 



D Maher [3431] 



Jane Williams [3555] 



Mark Rimmer [3553] 



L King [3429] 



M P Burke [3435] 



A King [3428] 



G Avies [3427] 



Paul Williams [3557] 



S Morrell [3426] 



Laura Williams [3558] 



E A Zubel-Parsons [3416] 



Helen Roberts [3607] 



M Campbell [3430] 



N MacLean [3441] 



Glenys Eynon [3545] 



L Hill [3446] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

176



Rep No Name 

9621 Y Johns [3546] 



13178 

Summary 


9321 

Summary 


9318 

Summary 


9291 

Summary 


9315 

Summary 


9378 

Summary 


9630 

Summary 


9309 

Summary 


9306 

Summary 


9303 

Summary 


9633 

Summary 


9300 

Summary 


9636 

Summary 


9624 

Summary 


9483 

Summary 


9684 

Summary 


9561 

Summary 


9495 

Summary 


9492 

Summary 


9564 

Summary 


P Stewart [3445] 



C Taberner [3444] 



E Barber [3443] 



C A Turner [3434] 



D Evans [3442] 



Mrs Macro [3464] 



Mrs B Robshaw [3549] 



I Taberner [3440] 






J Hill [3438] 



Joan Hacking [3551] 



Andrew Evans [3437] 



Carrie Rimmer [3552] 



Matt Hazelwood [3547] 



Eirian Jones [3500] 



Mrs E M Harrocks [3568] 



D Cust [3526] 



Mary Allen [3504] 



Betty Ruddock [3503] 



P Taylor [3527] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

177



Rep No Name 

9489 Heulwen Parker [3502] 



9501 

Summary 


9675 

Summary 


9558 

Summary 


9480 

Summary 


9678 

Summary 


9477 

Summary 


9474 

Summary 


9681 

Summary 


9471 

Summary 


9375 

Summary 


9486 

Summary 


9546 

Summary 


9534 

Summary 


9531 

Summary 


9540 

Summary 


9528 

Summary 


9525 

Summary 


9543 

Summary 


9498 

Summary 


9519 

Summary 


Roberts S Nook [3506] 



S B West-Green [3565] 



Mr M Redmond [3525] 



Norma Smith [3499] 



B E M West-Green [3566] 



J Smith [3498] 



R Dignall [3497] 



June Davies [3567] 



D Wilkinson [3496] 



Len Pilling [3463] 



Pat Wetton [3501] 



Mrs C Roberts [3521] 



Mrs J Cuthbertson [3517] 



Mr M Graham [3516] 



Mrs C B Haythorne [3519] 



Mr M Humphries [3515] 



Mrs V Humphries [3514] 



Mrs K A Brown [3520] 



John Allen [3505] 



J Humphries [3512] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

178



Rep No Name 

9465 Gaynor Riley [3494] 



9516 

Summary 


9513 

Summary 


9549 

Summary 


9510 

Summary 


9555 

Summary 


9507 

Summary 


9504 

Summary 


9522 

Summary 


9570 

Summary 


9468 

Summary 


9408 

Summary 


9879 

Summary 


9405 

Summary 


9402 

Summary 


9567 

Summary 


9876 

Summary 


9396 

Summary 


9414 

Summary 


9393 

Summary 


9390 

Summary 


Ann Roberts [3511] 



Paul Roberts [3510] 



Mr S Hopper [3522] 



V Robertson [3509] 



Mrs A Redmond [3524] 



B Carpenter [3508] 



R Newman [3507] 



Mr K G Platt [3513] 



G B Sandy [3529] 



Gerogine Dorgan [3495] 



Apryl Evans [3474] 



Mrs I Humphrey-Evans [3651] 



Michael Evans [3473] 



Samantha Catterall [3472] 



E Taylor [3528] 



Mrs L Keeting [3650] 



Karen Bowyer [3470] 



Mrs B Rylance [3476] 



Andrew Bowyer [3469] 



A Robinson [3468] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

179



Rep No Name 

9573 D A Newman [3530] 



9387 

Summary 


9384 

Summary 


9576 

Summary 


9381 

Summary 


9399 

Summary 


9780 

Summary 


9462 

Summary 


9774 

Summary 


9459 

Summary 


9456 

Summary 


9777 

Summary 


9453 

Summary 


9411 

Summary 


9429 

Summary 


9231 

Summary 


9426 

Summary 


9423 

Summary 


9783 

Summary 


9420 

Summary 


9417 

Summary 


John Heatherington [3467] 



Barry Bayliss [3466] 



Vicky Judge [3531] 



Stan Roberts [3465] 



Kath Shone [3471] 



P Roberts [3611] 



A Wilde [3493] 



Nev Kelley [3609] 



V Wilde [3492] 



D Bamford [3491] 






A R Knight [3490] 



Mrs Knight [3475] 



Erin Wynne-Woodhouse [3482] 






E Jones [3481] 



D Gregory [3480] 



David Bruce [3612] 



A Freeman [3479] 



Kevin Jones [3478] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

180



Rep No Name 

9786 D Rogers [3613] 



8196 

Summary 


9450 

Summary 


9003 

Summary 


9297 

Summary 


9066 

Summary 


9015 

Summary 


9771 

Summary 


9012 

Summary 


9009 

Summary 


9069 

Summary 


9006 

Summary 


9765 

Summary 


8216 

Summary 


9000 

Summary 


8219 

Summary 


8997 

Summary 


8994 

Summary 


9537 

Summary 


9105 

Summary 


8213 

Summary 


William Jackson [3477] 



K Coulton [3489] 



Cathy Henderson [3337] 



Mr Gascoigne [3436] 



Elaine Moss [3358] 



Joyce Berg [3341] 



Mr F Watson [3603] 



Christine Finney [3340] 



Margaret Banks [3339] 



Wyn Roberts [3360] 



Heather Henderson [3338] 



Simon Noon [3601] 



John Lavington [3605] 



M Watkins [3336] 



Georgina Roberts [3606] 



M J Morpeth [3335] 



J R Roberts [3334] 



Mr J D Cuthbertson [3518] 



R A Spencer [3372] 



Gail Roberts [3604] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

181



Rep No Name 

9087 Marilyn Morris [3366] 



9234 

Summary 


9750 

Summary 


9099 

Summary 


9096 

Summary 


9753 

Summary 


9093 

Summary 


9768 

Summary 


9756 

Summary 


8988 

Summary 


9759 

Summary 


9084 

Summary 


9081 

Summary 


9078 

Summary 


9762 

Summary 


9075 

Summary 


9072 

Summary 


9090 

Summary 


9810 

Summary 


8991 

Summary 


8949 

Summary 


Jean Glenister [3415] 



John Morgan [3596] 



P Curran [3370] 



Johney Barable [3369] 



Daphne Rawson [3597] 



Laura Hill [3368] 



Mr J Thomas [3602] 



A Renshaw [3598] 



Myra Moulson [3332] 



J Unwin [3599] 



Neil Bachanan [3365] 



Bill Fry [3364] 



Marion Fry [3363] 



R Tradoe [3600] 



Mr E Hughes [3362] 



Linda Roberts [3361] 



Gillian Hill [3367] 



Ranj Omar [3624] 



Neil Jones-Davies [3333] 



Mr G Davies [3319] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

182



Rep No Name 

8228 D Rowlands [3622] 



8946 

Summary 


8943 

Summary 


9807 

Summary 


8952 

Summary 


8937 

Summary 


9804 

Summary 


8934 

Summary 


8931 

Summary 


9813 

Summary 


8928 

Summary 


8925 

Summary 


9816 

Summary 


8922 

Summary 


8940 

Summary 


8970 

Summary 


8985 

Summary 


9789 

Summary 


8982 

Summary 


8979 

Summary 


9792 

Summary 


Kate Fairhurst [3318] 



Connor Woods [3317] 



E S Rowlands [3623] 



Tracy Roberts [3320] 



S Woof [3315] 



L Walmsley [3620] 



Eleri Brady [3314] 



Catrin Hughes [3313] 



Lisa Bartlett [3625] 



G M Jones [3312] 



Gina Roberts [3311] 






Albert Knott [3310] 



Sue Beesley [3316] 



Susan Jones [3326] 



Liam Jones-Davies [3331] 






Derrick A Jones [3330] 



Joanne Ferguson [3329] 



V Thomas [3616] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

183



Rep No Name 

8976 Maria Hughes [3328] 



8226 

Summary 


9795 

Summary 


9747 

Summary 


8967 

Summary 


9798 

Summary 


8964 

Summary 


8961 

Summary 


9801 

Summary 


8958 

Summary 


8955 

Summary 


8973 

Summary 


9204 

Summary 


9183 

Summary 


9693 

Summary 


9246 

Summary 


9243 

Summary 


9696 

Summary 


9240 

Summary 


9252 

Summary 


9207 

Summary 


L Rowlands [3621] 



F Hill [3617] 



Hannah Morgan [3595] 



Fiona Hughes [3325] 



G Bennett [3618] 



Margaret Wilson [3324] 



Samantha Hunter [3323] 



J Bennett [3619] 



Maxine Woolley [3322] 



Christopher Thomas [3321] 






G Edwards [3405] 



Colin Harris [3398] 



R Evans [3571] 



D Lloyd [3419] 



C Brulz [3418] 



R G Hughes [3572] 



E Thomas [3417] 



Colin Batty [3421] 



C Hall [3406] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

184



Rep No Name 

9690 C Edwards [3570] 



9201 

Summary 


9198 

Summary 


9195 

Summary 


9192 

Summary 


9189 

Summary 


9705 

Summary 


9102 

Summary 


8202 

Summary 


9213 

Summary 


9228 

Summary 


9663 

Summary 


9225 

Summary 


9222 

Summary 


9666 

Summary 


9219 

Summary 


9249 

Summary 


9669 

Summary 


9708 

Summary 


9210 

Summary 


9672 

Summary 


P Marsh [3404] 



Adrian Lloyd-Williams [3403] 



C Bullock [3402] 



S Price [3401] 



Rita Crossley [3400] 



Mrs G Carter [3581] 



M Spencer [3371] 



L Prewitt [3574] 



Elfed Owen [3408] 



M Wilkins [3413] 



David Roberts [3561] 



T C Williams [3412] 



Derek Gaskell [3411] 



Harold Beeton [3562] 






D Lloyd [3420] 



Ann Beeton [3563] 



Mr & Mrs K Coulton [3582] 



Alan Wilkins [3407] 



Ruth Kyffin [3564] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

185



Rep No Name 

9264 Mr Hynes [3425] 



9261 

Summary 


9687 

Summary 


9258 

Summary 


9255 

Summary 


9216 

Summary 


9123 

Summary 


9186 

Summary 


9732 

Summary 


9135 

Summary 


9132 

Summary 


9735 

Summary 


9129 

Summary 


9141 

Summary 


9738 

Summary 


9729 

Summary 


9120 

Summary 


9741 

Summary 


9117 

Summary 


9114 

Summary 


9744 

Summary 


L Hynes [3424] 



Mrs B G Purcell [3569] 



Simon Jackson [3423] 



Izzy McQuillan [3422] 



Linda Marsh [3409] 



T Desmond [3378] 



Carol Gibbons [3399] 



Gary Williams [3590] 



Keith Warrington [3382] 



James Given [3381] 



Julia Williams [3591] 



Carl Johnson [3380] 



Albert Crossley [3384] 



Simon Butterworth [3592] 



M Wharmby [3589] 



K Griffiths [3377] 



Joan Matthews [3593] 



M Bromley [3376] 



Diane Chester [3375] 



Mrs Parry [3594] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

186



Rep No Name 

9111 Ron Carter [3374] 



9108 

Summary 


9126 

Summary 


9159 

Summary 


9180 

Summary 


9177 

Summary 


9714 

Summary 


9174 

Summary 


9171 

Summary 


9717 

Summary 


9138 

Summary 


9720 

Summary 


8919 

Summary 


9156 

Summary 


9723 

Summary 


9153 

Summary 


9150 

Summary 


9726 

Summary 


9147 

Summary 


9144 

Summary 


9168 

Summary 


E Dyson [3373] 



M A De Salisi [3379] 



L Wilkinson [3390] 



Sharon Ackers [3397] 



J Penketh [3396] 



C Parker [3584] 



F Messenger [3395] 



J Baertsch [3394] 






Roberts Coard [3383] 



M Williams [3586] 



Jack Olmerod [3309] 



W Sharrock [3389] 



A Taberner [3587] 



I Williams [3388] 



F Gaffrey [3387] 



I Scattergood [3588] 



N Colfer [3386] 






R Ogley [3393] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

187




13266 Mrs Catherine Patricia O'Hara [1215] 1 Object 



2082 Mr Peter Skinner [1208] 1 Object 



5907 Mrs Karen Hibberts [45] 1 Object 



8850 Mrs Wendy Mailer [179] 1 Object 



2138 Mr Robert Hill [1216] 1 Object 



717 L Bimson [934] 1 Object 

Summary I wish to inform the department that I reject the proposals in the above plan:a) 

Bypass - Relief Rd 

b) Travellers - New age travellers? 

c) Large housing developments? 

I do not wish the historical Market Town of Abergele to become Abergele New Town! But I do wish to step out and go forward. I do understand policies and 

criteria from Europe, Central Government, and Welsh Assembly have to be acted upon. But local indigenous population must be consulted. Not as in the 

case of Abergele; too little, too late, not everyone is computer literate or wishes to be so. 

Change Sought: Remove Llanfair Road site from the LDP 

731 R Hannah [936] 1 Object 

Summary More houses cause more congestion, greater demand for services in dentists, schools, parking, employment. Attend to infrastructure not super structure. 

I/we also have human rights to be met. 


2130 Mr Kevin O'Hara [1214] 1 Object 



963 Mrs Joy Tingle [1039] 1 Object 

Summary Objection to the proposed housing sites in Abergele, along with the proposed bypass and gypsy traveller site search area. 

Change Sought: Removal of residential sites in Abergele, and removal of bypass and gypsy traveller site search area. 

2146 Mrs Amanda Rawson [1217] 1 Object 



13274 Mrs Faith Margaret Ellis [1220] 1 Object 



8856 mr lynsey wilson [566] 1 Object 



2074 Mr Vincent Reginald Durkin [1207] 1 Object 



13165 Dorothy Groombridge [1033] 1 Object 



681 J Rose [910] 1 Object 

Summary I am very much against the proposed new houses. 

I have 4 grandchildren, 4 great grandchildren all Welsh, and I would like them to enjoy living in Abergele as I have done. With room to kick a ball around as 

their father did and still does. 

Thank you Darren Millar and all those who have worked hard to stop this getting the go-ahead. 


8853 Mr Darren Passey [194] 1 Object 



826 Mr Simon Quinn [1009] 1 Object 

Summary Objection to Llanfair Road Housing site, as it is on Greenfield land. 

Change Sought: Deletion of Site 

13168 Mrs Leanda McGee [906] 1 Object 



188




2122 Miss Joanne Claire Harrison [1213] 1 Object 



10876 Dr Dylan Parry [573] 1 Object 



2090 Mrs Erica Skinner [1209] 1 Object 




Summary I write to object to the proposed housing allocation as it relates to the Abergele area. 


The proposed development off St George Road will result in the loss of public recreation grounds. 

Projected housing requirements published by the Welsh Assembly Government are based upon past trends, which in the case of Abergele and the eastern 

coastal zone, have been distorted by exceptionally large developments unrelated to local need. 


278 Mrs Ffion Alun [556] 1 Object 

Summary There's no research at local level on the plans effects on the Welsh Language in the Abergele community. There's no space in the local schools for 300 new 

families in the houses, or for Gypsy and Traveller children. No research has been undertaken into this either. 


2098 Mrs Margaret Elizabeth Gaskell [1210] 1 Object 



2114 Mr Johnathon Adam Harrison [1212] 1 Object 



5373 Mrs Margaret Mercer [742] 1 Object 



862 Mrs Rita Matthews [978] 1 Object 

Summary I object to housing site allocations on land to the East of Abergele (sites 81 & 82) and on land East of Llanfair Road (site 78) along the scenic route. 

Change Sought: Deletion of housing site allocations on land to the East of Abergele (sites 81 & 82) and on land East of Llanfair Road (site 78) along the scenic route. 

2106 Mrs Elizabeth Anne Harrison [1211] 1 Object 



280 Mr T L Riley [557] 1 Object 

Summary Regarding the proposed building of new houses off St.Georges Road and the building of a road to Llanfair Road across from the proposed building site 

These homes are not a good idea as this is the last remains of the GREEN BELT around Abergele. The land below Tan y Gopa has now been built on. Also 

these houses are not 'really needed' as only newcomers could afford them and there has already been extensive building in St Georges Road and the new 

houses below Tan y Gopa. 


486 Mr Neil Lilly [769] 1 Object 

Summary This will cause a big negative effect on the towns infrastructure, wildlife and general antique drainage systems. 

Change Sought: Do not build inthe designated green belt areas. 

192 Mrs M Cooke [462] 1 Object 

Summary You have failed to comply with the community consultation process regarding plans to install a bypass, housing and Gypsy & Traveller campsite, my husband 

and I are very angry about these plans as we have recently bought out bungalow. Our solicitor sent us a report of the area which we paid hundreds of pounds 

for, these plans were not on this report. 

We think it is disgusting that residents have not been consulted about there plans. I believe a Mr Yates is responsible for these plans. Perhaps we can locate 

the houses & Gypsy site next to his home. 


13158 Mrs Jill Sewell [541] 1 Object 



607 

Mrs Carol Moss [869] 

1 Object 





years. 



1986 Mr Austin Deering [1196] 

1 Object 



1978 Mrs Victoria Foulkes [1195] 



1 Object 

189




1850 Mr Daivid Griffith Roberts [1175] 1 Object 



1866 Mr Keith Taaffe [1177] 1 Object 



1970 Mrs Sheila Shaw [1194] 1 Object 



13208 Miss Deborah Clarke [517] 1 Object 



1962 Miss Helen Margaret Stevenson [1193] 1 Object 



13239 Mrs Jennifer Evans [836] 1 Object 


Change Sought: Deletion of Llanfair Road site, Abergele 

1938 Mr Paul Ronald Williams [1186] 1 Object 



837 Mrs Clwyden Morgan [975] 1 Object 

Summary Objection to Housing sites in Abergele, Gypsy site and By-pass 

Change Sought: Deletion of Proposals in Abergele 

1874 Mrs Joyce Mary Taaffe [1178] 1 Object 



891 

Mr Stewart Williams [585] 

1 Object 

Summary I am writing to you to say how apalled I am at Conwy Council's development plan for Abergele. 

In the past 25 years that I have lived here, Abergele has been subject to many of the council planning department's misconceived ideas. The thought of 310 

new houses is a strange one, for haven't the council always bleated that the town doesn't have the infrastructure for more residents, (Doctors, Schools, etc.). 

How quickly they change their tune when it suits them! I also find it hard to believe that there are 310 families homeless in Abergele to fill these houses! 


5391 Mrs Bea Wong [841] 1 Object 



1930 S R Wilkinson [1185] 1 Object 



1922 Mrs Pauline Scott [1184] 1 Object 



13172 Mr Steve Vousden [530] 1 Object 



5409 Mr George Wong [850] 1 Object 



1914 Mr Peter Scott [1183] 1 Object 



1882 Mrs Michele Hannah [1179] 1 Object 



1906 Mr Kenneth Howard Davies [1182] 1 Object 



1890 Mr R Hannah [1180] 1 Object 



792 CDN Planning (Mr Andrew Mailer) [962] 1 Object 

Summary Objection to Housing site allocation on Land to the East of Llanfair Road Abergele (sites 78) 

Change Sought: Alternative sites at Former ATS Depot, Land at the Eastern edge of Abergele Business Park and vacant buildings/land on Peel Street Abergele. 

1898 Mrs Valerie Ellison [1181] 1 Object 



190




5385 Mr George K Wong [840] 1 Object 



592 mr phil moss [719] 1 Object 





years. 

Change Sought: . Far better to focus development on areas such as Bodelwyddan which have space to grow or Conwy. I do see limited options for building on brown field 

sites such as the old Slaters Citroen depot, the old ATS site or down Peel Street. 

2066 Rev David Rowlands [1206] 

1 Object 



2058 Mr Trevor John Davies [1205] 



8160 

Summary 


Stephen Anthony McCarten [812] 



6943 Mr Alasdair Rettie [178] 



2050 Mr David Hargeaves [1204] 



1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

265 Mr Philip Weaver [550] 1 Object 

Summary We feel the new relief road would destroy both an area of natural beauty and further reduce the limited sporting facilities available to the public. It would also 

result in a "Speed track" through the countryside, and, present problems for any housing development residents. 

We do not believe there is a need for additional housing, as; numerous properties are currently on the long term for sale registers of local estate agents. 

A "Travellers" site will invite an influx of anti-social elements with a corresponding increase in crime, intimidation of local residents, general nuisance, health 

and litter problems. The existing local amenities would also be further stretched by the demands of these travellers. 

Change Sought: Removal of proposed relief road, housing allocations and Travellers site in Abergele. 

2154 Mr Norman Howell Jones [1218] 



6207 Mrs Hazel R Browne [1321] 



5379 Mr Jeremy Wong [835] 



13290 Ms Jackie Rowlands [1264] 



5397 Mrs Kit Wong [847] 



1994 Mr Frank Laska [1197] 



2490 Miss Michelle Sweet [1263] 



5403 Mrs Yan Chang Wong [848] 



2370 Mr Smart [1248] 



2034 Mrs Susan Margaret Owen [1202] 



13188 Leonard Jinks Architecural Consultants Ltd (Leonard Jinks) [789] 

Summary Obection to the allocation of Greenfield sites at Llanfair Road, Abergele for housing development. 


1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

191



Rep No Name 

2026 Mrs Carys Walford [1201] 



2018 Mrs Linda Halligan [1200] 



13216 Mr Philip Clarke [515] 



1946 Miss Laura Jayne Williams [1191] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

616 Mrs Jean Foxall [578] 2 Object 

Summary We wish to register our complaint in the matter of the proposed new ring road for Abergele the proposed building of 220 mixed uses housing the proposed 

new 90 houses and the Gypsy/Traveller transit site. 

The only reason Abergele has a traffic congestion problem is because Abergele Town Council and or Conwy County Borough Council gave Planning 

permission for Tesco to build their supermarket which then in turn gave us a roundabout a pedestrian crossing, traffic lights (Abergele I'm sure must have the 

Guinness book of records for the largest amount of traffic controls in a small town.) 

The Doctors Surgery, the schools and Dental Surgeries in Abergele will not be able to sustain such a large number of extra residents. 

The best way of curing the traffic congestion in Abergele is to get rid of the Traffic lights. 

This proposed new road will not serve to ease any of the towns congestion it will only serve the proposed new house owners and the Gypsy's. Of course the 

builders will make a nice tidy profit so will the landowners and the Council will have imposed new houses on the Town which Abergele residents do not want. 

Change Sought: Deletion of Housing sites, by pass and Gypsy and Travellers site from Abergele. 

2010 Mr Michael P Halligan [1199] 1 Object 



847 Mr Peter Matthews [977] 1 Object 

Summary I object to housing site allocations on land to the East of Abergele (Sites 81 & 82) and on land to the East of Llanfair Road (Site 78) along the Scenic Route 

Change Sought: Deletion of housing site allocations on land to the East of Abergele (Sites 81 & 82) and on land to the East of Llanfair Road (Site 78) along the Scenic Route 

2002 Mrs Catherine Evans [1198] 1 Object 



7254 Abergele Town Council [506] 

1 Object 

Summary Site 78. 

In addition to its objection to the scale of housing growth proposed, the Town Council objects to the allocation of greenfield sites 78, 81 and 82 for housing in 

the deposit LDP. The allocation of such extensive areas of open countryside on the fringe of Abergele will absorb housing need which should otherwise be 

directed to brownfield sites. 

There is insufficient evidence within the LDP or its associated Background Papers to demonstrate that a comprehensive assessment of the scope for housing 

development on Previously Developed Land has been carried out. 

Change Sought: Remove site 78 from the LDP 

4058 Mrs Claire Done [1687] 

1 Object 



4114 Mrs Joann Davis Evans [1694] 



3994 Michael John Dean Joe [1679] 



4002 Mrs Margaret Ruth Williams [1680] 



4010 Mr Donald Hill [1681] 



4018 Miss Kate Judge [1682] 



4026 Mr Michael Smart [1683] 



4034 Mrs E M Sheppard [1684] 



3978 Mrs Mary Dean [1676] 



1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

192



Rep No Name 

4050 Mrs Jennie Mckinney [1686] 



3970 Mr Mark Davies [1675] 



4066 Mr Neil Jonathan McKinney [1688] 



4202 Mrs Dorothy Novak [1705] 



4210 Mrs Betty Mavis Mills [1706] 



4218 Mrs Bridget Marian Whetton [1707] 



4090 Mr Ray Kennedy [1691] 



4098 Mr Ronald Anthony Jones [1692] 



3898 Mrs Roberta Anne Owain Ashbrook [1639] 



4042 Mrs Elizabeth Done [1685] 



1374 Ms Bernadette Bradbury [1656] 

Summary Objection to site 78 East of Llanfair Road, Abergele. 

Change Sought: Remove site 78 East of Llanfair Road, Abergele from the Plan. 

4530 Mrs C M Archdeacon [1749] 



1354 Ms Katherine Ann Foote [1643] 

Summary Objection to the allocation of Greenfield sites at Llanfair Road, Abergele for housing development 


1692 Mr Keith Pickering [1648] 



1697 Miss T A Owen [1649] 






1370 Ms Jennifer Bradbury [1651] 



1713 Mr Anthony George Holmes [1653] 

Summary Objection to Llanfair Road Site Abergele 

Change Sought: Deletion to Llanfair Road site Abergele 

3986 Mr Michael John [1677] 



1725 

Summary 

Mr Nathan Rhys Titchiner [1655] 

Objection to the allocation of Greenfield sites at Llanfair Road, Abergele for housing development 


4122 Mr Thomas John Jones [1695] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

193




1378 Mr Martin Briscoe [1657] 1 Object 



1382 Mr Lee Briscoe [1658] 1 Object 




Summary Objection to housing site 78 East of Llanfair Road, Abergele. Issues include the loss of open countryside, being contrary to national guidance, insufficient 

evidence given on assessment of brownfield land potential, access, agricultural land classification and the landscape setting. Alternative sites proposed. See 

attachment. 

Change Sought: Remove site 78 from the Plan. Alternative sites proposed (see attachment). 

3914 Mrs Brenda Lightfoot [1668] 



3930 Mr Ivan Riachard Clark [1670] 



3938 Mrs Pauline Clark [1671] 



3946 Mr James William Green [1672] 



1719 

Summary 

Mrs Sally Holmes [1654] 

Objection to the allocation of Greenfield sites at Llanfair Road, Abergele for housing development 


4450 Mr Ronald clive barlow [1738] 



4106 Mr Wayne Evans [1693] 






4402 Mr John Weatherall [1731] 



4410 Mrs Norma Weatherall [1732] 



4418 Miss Myra Doreen Gorst [1733] 



4426 Mr Gwilym Hughes [1734] 



4434 Mrs Sarah Jones [1735] 



4330 Mr Alan Hill [1722] 



13330 Mr Gary Hughes [1737] 



4322 Ms Rachel Mary Elizabeth Evans [1721] 



4458 Mr David Davies [1739] 



4466 Mrs Rosina White [1740] 



1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

194



Rep No Name 

4482 Ms Susannah Wynn-Jones [1742] 



4490 Mrs Ethel Audrey Pickering [1743] 



13338 Mr E Walsh [1744] 



4498 Mis Kathleen Walsh [1745] 



3386 Mrs Alma Covatt [1550] 



4442 Mrs Victoria Murphy [1736] 



4234 Mr Geraint R Evans [1709] 



4130 Mr Kym Ward [1696] 



4138 Mrs Barbara Knight [1697] 



4146 Mrs D Hurtar [1698] 



4154 Mrs Jane Pope [1699] 



4162 Mr S Huknes [1700] 



4170 Mrs Elizabeth Lally [1701] 



4178 Mr Mark Jenkinson [1702] 



4378 Mr Tim Rowlands [1728] 



4226 Mrs B Handeman [1708] 



3874 Mrs Mary Goddard [1635] 



4242 Mrs Audrey Binns [1710] 



4250 Mrs Gwenifer Carter [1712] 



4258 Mr Mark Pendlebury [1713] 



4266 Mrs Joy Rettie [1714] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

195



Rep No Name 

4274 Miss Hannah Rettie [1715] 



4298 Mr Nathaniel Smart [1718] 



4306 Mr J Sheppard [1719] 



4186 Mrs Janet R Morris [1703] 



3514 Mr Peter Sedgwick [1579] 



1294 Mr Robert Elias Williams [1592] 



3594 Mr David Robert Wilson [1591] 



3474 Mr William G Halliday [1572] 



3482 Mrs Sarah Sutton [1573] 



1273 Mrs H Owen [1574] 



3490 Mr Douglas N Hartill [1575] 



3498 Mrs Helen Mary [1576] 



3578 Miss Elizabeth Jones [1589] 



3506 Mrs Vera Fisher [1578] 



3458 Mr Liam Feery [1570] 



13314 Mrs Janet Sedgwick [1580] 



3522 Mr Michael Carrington [1581] 



3530 Mrs J M Carrington [1582] 



1287 Mr Mark Henry [1583] 



3538 Mr P J Small [1584] 



3546 Mrs J Small [1585] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

196



Rep No Name 

3906 Mrs Gwyneth Mary Davies [1640] 



1280 Mrs Judith Lawlor [1577] 



5286 Mrs Beryl Ann Oliver [1562] 



3394 Mr John Edgar Lea [1551] 



3402 Mrs Ann Lea [1552] 



3410 Mrs Carol McClelland [1553] 



3418 Mrs G Sullivan [1554] 



3426 Mrs T Chilton [1555] 



3434 Mrs Morfydd Hughes [1556] 



3442 Mr Eric Price Hughes [1557] 



3586 Mrs Margaret Morrison [1590] 



5264 Mrs Joan Alice Ball [1559] 



1341 Mr T Gwyn Jones [1636] 



5293 Mr Neville Oliver [1563] 



5300 Mr David Allan LLoyd [1564] 



5307 Mr William Coulter [1565] 



5314 Mrs Wendy Anne O'Brien [1566] 



5321 Mrs Mary P Reid [1567] 



5328 Mr Rodger Mycock [1568] 



3450 Mr L R Fisher [1569] 



1267 Mr Kenneth Frank Ball [1558] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

197



Rep No Name 

13322 Mr Ewan Evans [1621] 



3554 Mrs Myra Mulliner [1586] 



1320 Mr Ian Dickson [1612] 



3730 Mr Michael Brian Titchiner [1613] 



3738 Mr William Frederick Gordon [1614] 



3746 Mr Huw Michael Titchiner [1615] 



3754 Mrs Florence Felstead [1616] 



1327 Mrs Joan Turner [1618] 



3714 Mr Edward Lightfoot [1610] 



3770 Mrs Marjorie Chalkley [1620] 



3706 Mr E Pope [1609] 



3778 Mrs Elsie May Krinks [1622] 



3786 Mr Roger Ashcroft Krinks [1623] 



3794 Mrs Joyce Horton [1624] 



3810 Mr George Michael [1626] 



1334 Mrs Halliwell [1628] 



3826 Mrs Barbara P Birkin [1629] 



3858 Mrs Christina J Earley [1633] 



3762 Mr Derek Chalkley [1619] 



3626 Mrs Joy Wellings [1597] 



3882 Miss Anna Ashbrook [1637] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

198



Rep No Name 

13282 Mr Royden Leonard Robinson [1221] 



4338 Mr Barry Roberts [1723] 



6367 Mrs Gwyneth Mary Leech [1361] 



4474 Mr Edward Arthur Jones [1741] 



3602 Mrs Gladys Griffiths [1593] 



1302 Mrs Mary Gwendoline Davies [1594] 



3722 Mrs Ellen Iona Titchiwer [1611] 



3618 Mrs Sarah McGregor [1596] 



4538 Mrs Sybil Wasley [1750] 



3634 Mr Geoffrey John Williams [1598] 



3650 Mrs I M Ottewell [1600] 



3658 Capt David Tracey [1602] 



3666 Mr Davies [1603] 



3674 Mr John Peter Hughes [1604] 



3698 Mrs Sylvia Dickson [1607] 



1313 Mrs Sheila Beaumont [1608] 



3610 Mr Kenneth Raymond Griffiths [1595] 



5883 Mr Graham Nicholls [1904] 



5973 Mr Geoffrey D Masterton [1919] 



5835 Mrs Dilys Ffrancon Phillips [1896] 



5841 Mrs Gwyneth Laura Richards [1897] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

199



Rep No Name 

5847 Mr Merfyn Wynn Richards [1898] 



5853 Miss Valerie Ann Grayson [1899] 



5859 Mr Brett Evans [1900] 



5865 Mrs Judith Carol Grayson [1901] 



5811 Rev William Raymond Mortimer [1892] 






5805 Mrs Jacqueline Tetlow [1891] 



5889 Mrs Sheila Nicholls [1905] 



5901 Mrs Margaret Taylor [1907] 



5937 Mr John Kodnett [1913] 



5949 Mrs Ann Marie Hughes [1915] 



5955 Mr Edward Cullen [1916] 



5961 Mr Raymond John Hughes [1917] 



6775 Mrs Ethel Morrison Hunter [1852] 



5871 Mr Sean Andrew Grayson [1902] 



6895 Mrs Helena Burgess [1868] 



4522 Mr L Bidzinski [1748] 



6791 Mrs Beryl Jones [1854] 



6799 Mrs Ellen Mary Hughes [1855] 



6807 Mrs Susan Jones [1856] 



6815 Mrs Sheila Mary Edge [1857] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

200



Rep No Name 

6831 Mrs Freda Bimson [1859] 



6839 miss Kathleen Colburn [1860] 



5829 Mrs Eunice Williams [1895] 



6887 Mrs Valerie Hills [1866] 



5979 Mrs Wendy Burbridge [1920] 



6903 Mr Mike Burgess [1869] 



13200 Mr Brett Pierce [1870] 



6919 Mrs Jane Jones [1872] 



6927 Mrs Anne Passey [1873] 



6935 Ms Wendy Robshaw [1874] 



5074 Mrs Dawn Smart [1887] 



5787 Miss Louise Parker [1888] 



6879 Mr John Jones [1865] 



6997 Mr Allan Tait [1969] 



5967 Mrs Doren Masterton [1918] 



13232 Miss Beverley Pouder [1952] 



1549 Mr Ronald Sexton [1953] 



1565 Miss Sarah Skellon [1954] 



1590 Mj General Christopher Last [1955] 



6949 Mrs Pauline Last [1956] 



6967 Mr Andrew James Quick [1959] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

201



Rep No Name 

5245 Mrs Meacock [1950] 



6990 Mrs Susan Hartill [1968] 



5370 Miss Harriet Passey [1946] 



7004 Mrs Jean Tait [1970] 



7018 Mrs Maureen Davies [1972] 



7025 Mrs Valerie Lea [1973] 



7032 Miss Lowri Peichard [1974] 



7039 Mrs Helen Barnes [1975] 



7046 Mrs Denise Jones [1976] 



7053 Mrs Janet Bolton [1977] 



6983 Miss Lisa Williams [1967] 



7501 

Summary 


K Frost [2257] 



5991 Mr Brian James Allen [1922] 



5997 Mrs Nicola Jill Allen [1923] 



7096 Mrs Jane Margaret Taylor [1925] 



5090 Mr Dominic Davies [2008] 



5098 Mr Ernest Ringwood [2009] 



1843 Mrs M E Fry [2063] 

Summary Objection to Llanfair Road housing site, Abergele 

Change Sought: Deletion of Llanfair Road site, Abergle 

7493 

Summary 


M Cunliffe [2254] 



5252 Mr Douglas Keith Owen [1951] 



7373 

Summary 


Mr Arwel Williams [2256] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

202




6767 Mr Frederick Hunter [1851] 1 Object 



7131 Mr Allan David Cliff Warner [1930] 1 Object 



1526 Mr Martin Hamilton [1932] 

1 Object 

Summary They show a complete lack of common sense and forethought for the future of the town. 

The towns infastructure cannot support such proposals. If as i heard the planning officer say at one of the meetings that the council is following government 

guidelines then surely if something is a guideline then its not statutory and in view of the overwhelming opposition you should be olbliged to drop this scheme. 

Remember your job is to serve the public and thats what were paying you for. 

Change Sought: Remove Abergele proposals. 

5335 Miss Mavis Allen [1940] 



5349 Mrs M Davies [1942] 



5356 Mr John Gwilym Hughes [1943] 



5363 Mrs Nia Lloyd [1944] 



13246 Mr Alan G White [1945] 



7497 

Summary 


C Mattok [2255] 



4794 Ms G M Williams [1784] 






4706 Ms Caroline Passey Williams [1773] 



4714 Mrs Miriam Passey [1774] 



4722 Mrs Rita Evans [1775] 



4738 Mr Brian Evans [1777] 



4746 Mrs Delia Atkins [1778] 



4762 Mrs Pamela Rose Hughes [1780] 



5799 Mr David Tetlow [1890] 



4786 Mrs Pauline hughes [1783] 



6655 Mrs Janet Polter [1835] 



4802 Miss Emily Lloyd [1785] 



1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

203



Rep No Name 

4810 Mrs Muriel Doyle [1786] 



4818 Miss Paula Badcott [1789] 



4826 Mr Brian Elliott [1790] 



4842 Mr William John Binns [1793] 



4850 Mrs June Hatcher [1794] 



6783 Mrs Valerie Patricia Jones [1853] 



4778 Mr Ian Lloyd [1782] 



4642 Miss Brenda Hill [1764] 



4546 Mrs G E Fall [1751] 



4554 Mrs Patricia Ann Jenkins [1752] 



4562 Mrs Ann Cooper [1753] 



4570 Mrs Carol Guy [1754] 



4578 Mr Alan Guy [1755] 



4586 Mr Ronald James Atkins [1756] 



4594 Mr Elena Bidzinzki [1757] 



4698 Mr Meirion Evans [1772] 



4618 Mr Toni Wooller [1760] 



4882 Mr John Hatcher [1798] 



4650 Mrs Jane Kelly [1765] 



4658 Mr Martin Cooke [1766] 



4666 Mrs Marcella Cooke [1767] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

204



Rep No Name 

4674 Mrs Margaret Tucker [1768] 



4682 Mrs Derek Tucker [1769] 



4770 Miss Sophie Jessica Kelly [1781] 



5026 Mrs Ruth Rowlands [1817] 



4610 Mr Henry Archdeacon [1759] 



6695 Mrs Tracy Jones [1840] 



4858 Mrs Ann Thomas [1795] 



6583 Mrs Annette Spedding [1826] 



6591 Mr John Davies [1827] 



6599 Miss Sarah Frangakis [1828] 



6607 Mr William Horrocks [1829] 



6615 Mr Alan Martin Hughes [1830] 



6623 Mrs Audrey Macdonald [1831] 



6567 Mrs Zena Louise Williams [1824] 



6687 Mrs Gillian Myra Slater [1839] 



6559 Mrs Patricia Gaskell [1823] 



6703 Mrs Denise Gill [1842] 



6711 Mr Glyn Jones [1844] 



6719 Mr Neil Spence [1845] 



6727 Mrs Mary Anwyn Spence [1846] 



6735 Mrs Elanor Mary Davies [1847] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

205



Rep No Name 

6743 Mr Tudor Hugh Morris Jones [1848] 



6759 Mr Ednyfed Roberts [1850] 



6679 Miss Susan Phillips [1838] 



5010 Mrs A Durkin [1815] 



4890 Mr D M Thomas [1799] 



4930 Mr Gareth Jones [1804] 



4938 Mrs Carol Ann Landucci Jones [1805] 



4946 Mr Robert Miller [1806] 



4954 Mrs Pauline Anderson [1807] 



4962 Miss Rebecca Woodhouse [1808] 



4978 Mrs Christine Thompson [1810] 






5002 Mr Thomas Ronald Gaskell [1814] 



4194 Mr S Dice [1704] 



5018 Mr Michael Bimson [1816] 



6639 Mr Geoffrey David Anderson [1833] 



6647 Mr Peter Harry Edge [1834] 



5042 Mrs Jennifer Lask [1819] 



5050 Mrs Pauline Monica Edwards [1820] 



5058 Mrs Joan Ann Davies [1821] 



5066 Mr Graham Ellison [1822] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

206



Rep No Name 

4986 Elizabeth Thomas [1811] 



5643 Miss Elizabeth V Bartley [1457] 



6319 Mr Simon John Kent [1353] 



6295 Ms Judith Barnsdale [1342] 






6431 Mr Ian Woodhouse [1372] 



3026 Mr John Sutton Holmes [1412] 



3034 Mr Owen Mervyn Edwards [1413] 



5511 Mr James Sydney Williams [1433] 



6279 Mrs Val Thelwell [1340] 



5613 Miss Dawn Dunphy [1452] 



6271 Mr Douglas Lowe [1338] 



5745 Mrs Dilys Gwenfor Rose [1475] 



2778 Mr Anthony Parry [1345] 



2786 Mr Jason Samuel Coilyon Smith [1346] 



6303 Mrs Joanna Kent [1348] 



2802 Mr Alan Charles Curtress [1349] 



6311 Mr Leslie Paul Baxter [1350] 



2810 Mrs Dorothy Rosina Curtress [1351] 



6151 Mrs Carol Slater [1314] 



5517 Mr David Burbridge [1434] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

207



Rep No Name 

6239 Mrs Ruth Duckenfield [1326] 



2922 Mr Morris Gomer Williams [1397] 



6167 Mr Peter Ellerton Slater [1316] 



6175 Mr Charles Geoffrey Amatt [1317] 



6183 Mrs Rosemary Jones [1318] 



6191 Miss Lisa Marie Thomas [1319] 



6199 Mr Gordon M Browne [1320] 



6215 Mr John Patrick Espley [1322] 



6287 Mrs Barbara Evans [1341] 



6231 Mr John Duckenfield [1324] 



6327 Mr Thomas James Harold Bevan [1354] 



6247 Mrs C Meredith [1327] 



2746 Mrs Bethan Wyn [1332] 



2754 Mr James Kelly [1333] 



2722 Mr Derek Chattwood [1328] 



2730 Mrs Sandra Chattwood [1329] 



2738 Mrs Joan Macrae [1331] 



2762 Mr George Coroneo [1336] 



6263 Mrs Margaret Watt [1337] 



6223 Mr Darren Jones [1323] 



6535 Mr and Mrs Malcolm and Pauline Rothwell [1386] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

208



Rep No Name 

2818 Mr Peter Brown [1352] 



6479 Mrs Freda Gagie [1378] 



6487 Mrs Emily Shields [1379] 



6495 Mrs Joan Smith [1380] 



6503 Mrs D T Jones [1381] 



13224 Mrs Dawn Quilter [1382] 



6511 Mr Max Cottrell [1383] 



6463 Mr Andrew Davidson [1376] 



6527 Mrs Stephanie Lloyd Espley [1385] 



6455 Mr Neil Owen [1375] 



6543 Mr and Mrs Kenneth Atkinson [1388] 



6551 Mr and Mrs M G Carlin [1389] 



2882 Mr John David Mortimer [1391] 



2890 Mrs Margaret Ann Sandham [1392] 



2898 Mr Stuart Douglas Sandham [1393] 



13298 Mr Thomas Walton Keeting [1394] 



2906 Mrs Lenora Keeting [1395] 



2914 Mrs Merlys Joan Williams [1396] 



6519 Miss Ruth Ellershaw [1384] 



6383 Mrs Glenda Evans [1365] 



6335 Mr Leslie MacDonald [1355] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

209



Rep No Name 

4370 Mr Thomas Rettie [1727] 



6343 Mr Dwyfor Williams [1356] 



3378 Mrs Ormesher [1549] 



6351 Mr Brian Edgar Mulliner [1358] 



2834 Mr John Burdock [1359] 



6359 Mr John Bryan [1360] 



6471 Mr Michael Poole [1377] 



2850 Mrs Chrsitine Bond [1364] 



6143 Mr Derek Blinston [1313] 



6391 Mrs Joyce Cottrell [1366] 



2858 Mr John R Williams [1367] 



6399 Dr Graham Lawler [1368] 



6407 Mrs Elizabeth Vaughan [1369] 



6415 Mrs Edna Roberts [1370] 



6423 Miss Esther Roberts [1371] 



6439 Mrs S Pearsall [1373] 



6447 Mr David Douglas Smith [1374] 



6375 Mrs Doris Maureen Broadhead [1363] 



2426 Mrs K Wade [1255] 



2514 Mrs Denise Keatiey [1267] 



2354 Mrs Muriel [1246] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

210



Rep No Name 

2362 Mrs Heather Jones [1247] 



2378 Mrs Brenda Smart [1249] 



2386 Mr Dylan M Williams [1250] 



2394 June Oakes [1251] 



2402 Mrs Carol Ann Brown [1252] 



2330 Miss Melanie Holmes [1243] 



2418 Mr Ronald William Brown [1254] 



2322 Mr Brian Sellers [1242] 



2434 Mr Lawlor [1256] 






2450 Mrs J P Davies [1258] 



2466 Mr Daniel Wilyman [1260] 



2474 Mr Terrance Bowler [1261] 



2482 Mr R A Williams [1262] 



2498 Mrs J Howard [1265] 



6159 Mr Stephen John Ward [1315] 



2410 Mrs Christine Hughes [1253] 



2250 Mr James Matthew Williams [1232] 



2170 Mrs Fay Robinson [1222] 



2178 Mr E A A Howarth [1223] 



2186 Mrs Susan Howarth [1224] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

211



Rep No Name 

2194 Mr Robert Allen Walters [1225] 



2202 Mr Ashley Taaffe [1226] 



2210 Mr Lee Taaffe [1227] 



2226 Dr Robert Williams [1229] 



2346 Mrs Olwen Gump [1245] 



2242 Mr Stuart Williams [1231] 



2522 Mr Humpherys [1268] 



2258 Mrs Janet S Mycock [1233] 



2266 Mrs Lilian Miller [1234] 



2274 Mr Alan Brian Landucci [1236] 



2282 Mrs Maureen Landucci [1237] 



2290 Mrs Mair Bissell [1238] 



2298 Mr Kenneth John Sudlow [1239] 



2306 Mrs Rita Howards [1240] 



2314 Mrs Wendy Ann Hawkes [1241] 



2234 Mrs Moira Williams [1230] 



2690 Mrs Christine Ward [1303] 



2506 Mr Cedric Arnold Smith [1266] 



2674 Miss Dilys Haf Roberts [1294] 



2682 Cllr G Price Davies [1295] 



6047 Mrs Nia Pierce [1297] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

212



Rep No Name 

6055 Mr Kevin Hall [1298] 



6063 Mr Ronald Martin Williams [1299] 



6071 Mrs Marian May Roberts [1300] 



2658 Mrs Elizabeth Mckinney [1292] 



6087 Mrs Yvonne Johns [1302] 



2650 Mrs Sheila Davies [1291] 



2698 Mrs Lilian Joan Ward [1304] 



2706 Mr Cyril Dennis Ward [1305] 



6095 Mrs Carmel Stephens [1306] 















6135 Mrs Phyllis Maureen Jones [1312] 



6079 Mr Matthew Hazlewood [1301] 



2594 Mr Joshua Spencer Lloyd [1279] 



2530 Mrs Humphreys [1269] 



2538 Mrs Lucille Whitehead [1270] 



1190 Mr Gary Thomas Owain-Ashbrook [1271] 



2546 Mrs Lisa Chow [1272] 



2554 Mrs Norma Winkle [1273] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

213



Rep No Name 

2562 Mr S Jones [1274] 



2570 Miss P Meyer [1275] 



2666 Mr Nicholas Macrae [1293] 



2586 Mr Ian Thomason [1278] 



2826 Mrs Joan Burdock [1357] 



2602 Mr Ian Palferman [1281] 



2610 Mrs Menai Palferman [1282] 



2618 Mrs Michelle Devysia Venmore Dickson [1283] 



2626 Mrs Joyce Davenport [1284] 



2634 Mr Alexander Dickson [1285] 



6015 Mr Adrian Kitching [1286] 



2642 mrs Margaret Maclennan [1287] 



13196 Mr Richard Stubbs [1288] 



2578 Mrs Gloria Lawlor [1276] 



3338 Mrs Isobel Evans [1540] 



5595 Mrs Elsie Rowbottom [1448] 



5727 Mr Idris Williams [1472] 



5733 Mrs Sandra Irene Williams [1473] 



5739 Mr Arthur Harris [1474] 



5751 Mr David Robert Rose [1476] 



3114 Mrs Doreen Elizabeth McGuinness [1496] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

214



Rep No Name 

1239 Mrs Aurona Pendlebury [1525] 



3226 Mrs Sandra Jackson [1511] 



5168 Mr John Wynne Pendlebury [1526] 



7075 Mr Paul Jones [1541] 



3466 Sylvia H Dugdale [1571] 



3562 Ms Alwen L Williams [1587] 



3570 Mr Herbert Towels [1588] 



5757 Mrs Carole Parker [1477] 



5763 Mr Llyr Huws Gruffydd [1478] 



3314 Mr Gorden Austin [1523] 



5679 Mrs Dorothy Blanche Wood [1463] 



5196 Mrs Margaret Lilian Stewart [1530] 



5601 Mrs Andrea S Travis [1450] 



5607 Mr Richard Thomas Corlett [1451] 



5649 Mrs Susan Carol Bird [1458] 



5655 Mr John Francis Bird [1459] 



5661 Mr Ronald Macrae [1460] 



3322 Mrs Valerie Meredith [1524] 



3186 Mr Jefif Chase [1505] 



5781 Misses Una and Anne Hughes and Vose [1482] 



5182 Miss Alison Lloyd-Roberts [1528] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

215



Rep No Name 

5691 Mrs Maureen Doris Bates [1465] 



5697 Mr Michael Robert Bates [1467] 



5715 Ms Rona Pendlebury [1470] 



5175 Mr Larry Goddard [1527] 



5721 Mr John Pendlebury [1471] 



5667 Mrs Alwena Parry [1461] 



3138 Mrs Dorris Roberts [1499] 



3218 Mr Brian Dugdale [1510] 



3210 Mr Clive Swombow [1509] 



13306 Mr Leslie Smith [1508] 



3098 Mrs Mair Briggs [1493] 



3106 Mrs Marjorie Edwards [1494] 



3122 Mr Anthony McGuinness [1497] 



5769 Mr and Mrs Leon and Helen Field [1479] 



3202 Mrs Lynne Smith [1507] 



3082 Mr Huw Jones [1491] 



3146 Mrs Kath Adams [1500] 



3154 Mr Andrew Adams [1501] 



3194 Miss Diana Evelyn Owen [1506] 



3162 Mrs Eileen Whyatt [1502] 



3170 Mrs Gillian Butt Davies [1503] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

216



Rep No Name 

3178 Mrs Rachel Poole [1504] 



3130 Miss Jane Jones Davies [1498] 



3274 Mrs Edith Clark [1518] 



5189 Mrs Margaret Jane Owen [1529] 



13253 Mrs Jo Kitching [1539] 



3330 Mrs Julie Sheriff [1537] 



3306 Mr Ormesher [1522] 



3298 Mrs Susan Kaellen [1521] 



3290 Mrs Betty Davidson [1520] 



3090 Mrs Frances Mahoney [1492] 



3282 Mr Darren Stevenson [1519] 



3234 Mr Edward Lyons [1512] 



3266 Miss S Hughes [1517] 



3258 Mrs J M Wynne Jones [1516] 



3250 Miss Lisa Michelle Parry [1515] 



3058 Mrs J Roberts [1488] 



3066 Miss Carole Teece [1489] 



3074 Mrs Margaret Sumner [1490] 



5775 Mr and Mrs J Garside [1481] 



3050 Mr Thomas James Butterworth [1487] 



5475 Mrs Kathleen Ashton [1427] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

217



Rep No Name 

3346 Mrs A Y Blinston [1543] 



5505 Mr P Holden [1432] 



5415 Mrs Vera Byrne [1416] 



5493 Mr Robert Hibberts [1430] 



7089 Mr Stephen Simpson [1544] 



2986 Dr Rodney Gilmore [1406] 



3354 Mr Kenneth Anderton [1545] 



5589 Mr Stanley Rowbottom [1447] 



2994 Mrs Muriel Staney [1407] 



5673 Mr Roderick Brian Wood [1462] 



3002 Mr Kenneth Frederick Staney [1408] 



1217 Mrs Carolynne Elizabeth Jones [1409] 



2978 Mrs Donna Gilmore [1405] 



5481 Mr Ronald Carpenter [1428] 



5619 Mr Brian Kennedy [1453] 



5469 Mrs Barbara Cullen [1426] 



3010 Mrs Kathleen Young [1410] 



3018 Mrs Meinwen Vaughan holmes [1411] 



5463 Mrs Julie Alison O'Hagan [1425] 



5457 Mr Peter Allan Vosper [1424] 



3042 Mrs Lilian Butterworth [1414] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

218



Rep No Name 

1220 CDN Planning (Ms Julie Pearse) [1415] 

Summary Objection to residential site allocations in Abergele. Loss of countryside and green belt/pastures land. 

Change Sought: Remove residential site allocations in Abergele. 

5451 Mr Ian Gerald O'Hagan [1423] 



5445 Captain John Mercer [1422] 



3362 Mrs Barbara A Wood [1546] 



5439 Mrs Meryl Elizabeth Williams [1420] 



3370 Mrs Elaine Baggaley [1548] 



5487 Mr Glyn Allan Jones [1429] 



5523 Mr Colin Robert Knowlson [1436] 



5577 Mrs Barbara Forrest [1445] 



5571 Mr Gerard Bernard Henshaw [1444] 



5565 Mrs Kathleen Mary Evans [1443] 



5559 Mr Jeffrey Hopkin Evans [1442] 



5553 Mr Peter Field [1441] 



5547 Mr Victor Colin Grayson [1440] 



2946 Mr Jack Edwards [1401] 



5541 Mr Stephen Parry [1439] 



2954 Mrs Margaret Ann Edwards [1402] 



5499 Mrs Vera C M Lloyd [1431] 



5529 Mr William Roy Passey [1437] 



2970 Mr Johnathan Richard Percy Hughes [1404] 



13260 Mrs Patricia Ann Knowlson [1435] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

219



Rep No Name 

5203 Mr Ian John Merton Coney [1531] 



1246 Mrs Ann Highley Passey [1536] 



5625 Ms A Evans [1454] 



5631 Mrs Margaret James [1455] 



5637 Mr Edward H James [1456] 



2962 Dr Eileen Mary [1403] 



5535 Mrs Amanda Munslow [1438] 



7082 Mrs Sonia Simpson [1542] 



5210 Mr Alburt D Bradshaw [1532] 



5231 Mrs Jean Holland [1535] 



5224 Mrs Molly McKeown Coney [1534] 



5217 Mr Michael Killoran [1533] 



7806 

Summary 


10486 

Summary 


10636 

Summary 


8259 

Summary 


10612 

Summary 


10498 

Summary 


7858 

Summary 


10624 

Summary 


7794 

Summary 


A Ostanek [2344] 



G P Jackson [3005] 



Mrs G Sennat [3057] 



Ms Elizabeth Davis [2424] 



B Ferrie [3049] 



John Oresswells [3010] 



T Jeffers [2357] 



Jade Parry [3053] 



Mr Ieuan Jones [2341] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

220



Rep No Name 

7862 L Jeffers [2358] 



8538 

Summary 


10483 

Summary 


7818 

Summary 


7810 

Summary 


8268 

Summary 


10627 

Summary 


8247 

Summary 


7790 

Summary 


7822 

Summary 


8253 

Summary 


10489 

Summary 


8250 

Summary 


7846 

Summary 


10492 

Summary 


10495 

Summary 


7834 

Summary 


10615 

Summary 


7802 

Summary 


8262 

Summary 


10630 

Summary 


Mr P Cowdell [2520] 






Mrs P Smith [2347] 



P Herndlhofer [2345] 



Ms Elysia Gilman [2427] 



Jade Thomas [3054] 



Ms Margaret G Jones [2420] 



Mr Nathan Reynolds [2340] 



Mrs J Pamment [2348] 



Ms Carole Harvey [2422] 



V Srinivasan [3007] 



Ms Caroline Smethhurst [2421] 



Ms Ann Wing [2354] 



P Aldridge [3008] 



Mr David Ledwith [3009] 



A Deering [2351] 



B S Ferrie [3050] 



A Slater [2343] 



Mr Alwyn Roberts [2425] 



E Williams [3055] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

221



Rep No Name 

7814 R Herndlhofer [2346] 



7826 

Summary 


8256 

Summary 


7850 

Summary 


10618 

Summary 


7842 

Summary 


10633 

Summary 


7854 

Summary 


8265 

Summary 


7838 

Summary 


7830 

Summary 


7798 

Summary 


10621 

Summary 


8541 

Summary 


8244 

Summary 


10558 

Summary 


7962 

Summary 


8090 

Summary 


10552 

Summary 


7990 

Summary 


7986 

Summary 


Mr P Dreanan [2349] 



R Novak [2423] 



G Wing [2355] 



Howard Fergusson [3051] 



Mr Nick Roberts [2353] 



Miss H Davies [3056] 



I Walker [2356] 



Ms Debbie Gilman [2426] 






Mrs S Allen [2350] 



Mr Joseph Davies [2342] 



Colin Lloyd [3052] 






Ms Anita Poole [2419] 



S Bastandy [3030] 



Mr Royston Jones [2383] 



Mr Andy Kirkham [2415] 



Maureen Robertson [3028] 



Ms J Roberts [2390] 



Ms Abby Roberts [2389] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

222



Rep No Name 

8094 Mr Paul White [2416] 



10525 

Summary 


7982 

Summary 


10555 

Summary 


8086 

Summary 


8238 

Summary 


7994 

Summary 


10522 

Summary 


7974 

Summary 


7970 

Summary 


8241 

Summary 


8078 

Summary 


7966 

Summary 


8082 

Summary 


10561 

Summary 


10510 

Summary 


7978 

Summary 


10531 

Summary 


8042 

Summary 


8034 

Summary 


8030 

Summary 


Ms V Ashall [3019] 



Ms Debbie Ratcliffe [2388] 

Object to the proposed housing allocation at East of Llanfair Road, Abergele. Remove from the LDP 


Ian Robertson [3029] 



A Kirkham [2414] 



H & R Carmmell [2417] 



Ms Mia . [2391] 



Mr M Payne [3018] 



Mrs Debbie Connah [2386] 



Mr Frank Connah [2385] 



Ms Amanda Peak [2418] 



Mrs Alison Humphries [2412] 



Mr J Brodie [2384] 



Mr John Humphries [2413] 






D Whitehouse [3014] 



Ms Rose Knight [2387] 



Pat Harrop [3021] 



Ms Nia Roberts [2402] 



Ms Dawn Lawson [2401] 



N Passey [2400] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

223



Rep No Name 

8038 . Wilson [2403] 



10540 

Summary 


10534 

Summary 


8026 

Summary 


8046 

Summary 


8022 

Summary 


10528 

Summary 


10543 

Summary 


10564 

Summary 


8014 

Summary 


10546 

Summary 


8050 

Summary 


8010 

Summary 


8054 

Summary 


8006 

Summary 


10549 

Summary 


8002 

Summary 


8058 

Summary 


8018 

Summary 


8457 

Summary 


10519 

Summary 


H Williams [3024] 



Mrs Fenney [3022] 



Mr Will Owen [2399] 



C Davies [2404] 



Mr Martin Owen [2398] 



Mr W Sheeady [3020] 



J E Edwards [3025] 



N Woodward [3032] 



A Owen [2396] 



B J Phillips [3026] 






J Neil [2395] 



Ms Melanie Hulse [2406] 



S Harrison [2394] 



Toni Foweler [3027] 



C Harrison [2393] 



Mr James Hulse [2407] 



G Owen [2397] 



Mr W R Passey [2490] 



Mr I Roberts [3017] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

224



Rep No Name 

10579 W Brennan [3038] 



7898 

Summary 


8451 

Summary 


10582 

Summary 


7894 

Summary 


8454 

Summary 


7890 

Summary 


7886 

Summary 


10537 

Summary 


10588 

Summary 


7906 

Summary 


7882 

Summary 


8460 

Summary 


10594 

Summary 


10504 

Summary 


7878 

Summary 


7874 

Summary 


10597 

Summary 


7870 

Summary 


8535 

Summary 


10507 

Summary 


Mrs Gill Hare [2367] 



Mrs C Bloomfield [2488] 






Mr Phil Hare [2366] 



Mr P Mayles [2489] 



Mr Gary Shaw [2365] 



Mrs Lynn Shaw [2364] 



Mrs Hesketh [3023] 



Brian Mouat [3041] 



D Mantle [2369] 



Ms Georgina Davies [2363] 



Ms Eve Hall [2491] 



B Hart [3043] 



Morris Jones [3012] 



Mrs Tracey MacGillivray [2362] 



Mr Chris MacGillivray [2361] 



M J Hart [3044] 



Ms Marian Owen [2360] 



Mrs L Cowdell [2519] 



Violet Jones [3013] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

225



Rep No Name 

8307 Cameron G [2440] 



7958 

Summary 


7954 

Summary 


8301 

Summary 


10516 

Summary 


7950 

Summary 


10567 

Summary 


8304 

Summary 


7946 

Summary 


10570 

Summary 


7902 

Summary 


7938 

Summary 


7866 

Summary 


10513 

Summary 


7934 

Summary 


10573 

Summary 


7926 

Summary 


8310 

Summary 


7914 

Summary 


10576 

Summary 


8448 

Summary 


Ms Fiona Trusdale [2382] 



Mr Peter Williams [2381] 



K Satelle [2438] 



Jessica Anna Fenney [3016] 



Ms Jane Williams [2380] 



Gareth Davies [3033] 



D Satelle [2439] 



Mr Craig Merrison [2379] 



Mavis Thomas [3034] 



A Mantle [2368] 



Mr Neil Roberts [2377] 



C Jeffers [2359] 






Nicky Roberts [2376] 



Mrs M Foster [3035] 



Mr Glyn Thomas [2374] 



Mr Shaun Badcott [2441] 



R Stanger [2371] 



Mr K Williams [3036] 



Mr M Bloomfield [2487] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

226



Rep No Name 

7910 C W Roberts [2370] 



7942 

Summary 


7307 

Summary 


7281 

Summary 


7437 

Summary 


11414 

Summary 


7323 

Summary 


7433 

Summary 


7429 

Summary 


11429 

Summary 


7319 

Summary 


11432 

Summary 


7425 

Summary 


7315 

Summary 


11534 

Summary 


7311 

Summary 


11411 

Summary 


7299 

Summary 


7489 

Summary 


11666 

Summary 


7287 

Summary 


Ms Manon Bochi [2378] 



C Haythorne [2216] 



E Hughes [2206] 



Mr Wayne Jones [2225] 






G E Probert [2224] 









N McClelan [3124] 



Mr Anthony Moore [2221] 



P Price [3125] 



Mr Rich Davies [2220] 



Ms Mary Moore [2219] 



T H Nicholls [3159] 



G W Haythorne [2218] 



S Sowden [3118] 






P R Moroney [2252] 



J A Goran [3204] 



M D Jones [2208] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

227



Rep No Name 

7291 S Fletcher [2209] 



11546 

Summary 


7421 

Summary 


7409 

Summary 


11537 

Summary 


11543 

Summary 


7413 

Summary 


7303 

Summary 


11540 

Summary 


7417 

Summary 


7441 

Summary 


7295 

Summary 


7466 

Summary 


7930 

Summary 


11381 

Summary 


7364 

Summary 


7481 

Summary 


11384 

Summary 


7360 

Summary 


7478 

Summary 


11387 

Summary 


Eileen Gibbs [3163] 






Miss Aleks [2211] 



H Kershaw [3160] 



P Davies [3162] 






J Millington [2214] 



M Sowden [3161] 



C Lloyd [2215] 



Chris Price [2227] 



J Whalley [2210] 






Mrs Lyndsey Thomas [2375] 



Helen Thomas [3107] 






A O Robshaw [2248] 



Gareth Thomas [3108] 



E LL Jones [2247] 






Mr G Bennett [3109] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

228



Rep No Name 

7356 P Shaw [2245] 



7474 

Summary 


11390 

Summary 


7352 

Summary 


7470 

Summary 


7327 

Summary 


7456 

Summary 


7331 

Summary 


8187 

Summary 


7445 

Summary 


7335 

Summary 


11408 

Summary 


7348 

Summary 


11402 

Summary 


11393 

Summary 


7340 

Summary 


11399 

Summary 


7462 

Summary 


11396 

Summary 


7344 

Summary 


11690 

Summary 


C Morris [2244] 



Mrs H Hammond [3110] 



M Beswick [2243] 



J Layton [2242] 



R Humphreys [2226] 






J R Merrison [2228] 



M Fry [3117] 



Mrs M Thomeson [2229] 



G Lloyd [2230] 



D W Holland [3116] 



D R Humphreys [2241] 



P Whitehead [3114] 



Mr P J Scott [3111] 



Ms Elaine Nelson [2236] 



C Whitehead [3113] 



L Taylor [2238] 



N Reddican [3112] 



Ms Anne Tregenza [2239] 



B W Filkin [3212] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

229



Rep No Name 

11405 G Holland [3115] 



1686 Mrs Pamela Summers owen [1989] 



7284 

Summary 


11492 

Summary 


11495 

Summary 


11498 

Summary 


11501 

Summary 


11504 

Summary 


11507 

Summary 


Mr Tony Holland [2207] 



Malcolm Godfrey [3145] 



Jordan Dooley [3146] 



Paul Hay [3147] 



Bruce Gibbs [3148] 






. Price [3150] 



5114 Mrs Susan Mary Jones [2011] 



5106 Mrs Muriel Landy [2010] 



11510 

Summary 


11513 

Summary 


11516 

Summary 


11519 

Summary 


11486 

Summary 








L Cluess [3153] 



D Cluess [3154] 



S Thomas [3143] 






7067 Ms Jeanette Jones [1979] 






11681 

Summary 


11678 

Summary 


Fred Spicer [3209] 



Cerys Clark [3208] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

230



Rep No Name 

1628 Mrs Jayne Howgate [1981] 



5082 Mrs Rhiannon E Hughes [1991] 



11672 

Summary 


11522 

Summary 


11669 

Summary 


11531 

Summary 


S James [3206] 



S Walker [3155] 



L Beswick [3205] 



P J Nicholls [3158] 






11528 

Summary 


11525 

Summary 


11483 

Summary 


11675 

Summary 


11450 

Summary 


7277 

Summary 


7273 

Summary 


11693 

Summary 


7269 

Summary 


7265 

Summary 


7259 

Summary 


11696 

Summary 


11699 

Summary 


11816 

Summary 


Cllr A Wood [3157] 



L Hall [3156] 



Debbie Mock [3142] 



C McWaden [3207] 



J O'Donnell [3131] 



A Evans [2205] 



Mr Tony Brown [2204] 



Bryan Kinsey [3213] 



Mr Chris Clark [2203] 



H Towers [2202] 



Mrs A Ripley [2200] 



Tony Goddard [3214] 



. Gorski [3215] 






People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

231



Rep No Name 

11819 C Campbell [3255] 



11435 

Summary 


11438 

Summary 


11441 

Summary 


11489 

Summary 


11468 

Summary 


11480 

Summary 


11477 

Summary 








A J Roberts [3128] 



Ian Jarvis [3144] 



Mat Denson [3137] 



Wendy Jones [3141] 






5122 Mrs Jennifer Moore [2044] 



5130 Rev Charles Billington [2045] 



11474 

Summary 


11444 

Summary 


11471 

Summary 


11447 

Summary 


11465 

Summary 


11462 

Summary 


11459 

Summary 


11456 

Summary 


11453 

Summary 


11378 

Summary 


D Skelly [3139] 






P Broadhurst [3138] 



P O'Donnell [3130] 






M E Frost [3135] 



George Frost [3134] 



Mr D Whitehead [3133] 



Mr D M Jones [3132] 



Robin Griffiths [3106] 



5138 Mr K F Shieons [2046] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

232



Rep No Name 

7644 B Cunliffe [2302] 



11312 

Summary 


7682 

Summary 


11282 

Summary 


7678 

Summary 


11285 

Summary 


7674 

Summary 


7669 

Summary 


7665 

Summary 


11288 

Summary 


7661 

Summary 


11291 

Summary 


7657 

Summary 


7653 

Summary 


7690 

Summary 


7628 

Summary 


7485 

Summary 


8062 

Summary 


11306 

Summary 


8066 

Summary 


8074 

Summary 


Brian Laing [3082] 



G E Jones [2313] 



N Porter [3072] 



Miss S Crawford [2312] 



T Pragnell [3073] 



L Morris [2311] 






S Reddican [2308] 



T Dakin [3074] 



J Reddican [2307] 



N Perry [3075] 



G Venables [2306] 



S Underhill [2305] 






M Blake [2298] 



S C Moroney [2250] 



J Davies [2408] 



Dean Becks-Whitworth [3080] 



N Walsh [2409] 



Mr Paul Thomas [2411] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

233



Rep No Name 

7649 B Warren [2304] 



11303 

Summary 


11294 

Summary 


7632 

Summary 


11300 

Summary 


7636 

Summary 


11297 

Summary 


7640 

Summary 


11279 

Summary 


7624 

Summary 


7734 

Summary 


10639 

Summary 


7782 

Summary 


7770 

Summary 


10642 

Summary 


7766 

Summary 


7762 

Summary 


7758 

Summary 


10645 

Summary 


7754 

Summary 


7750 

Summary 


Samantha Parker [3079] 



Harriet Davies [3076] 






K Pealshaw [3078] 



A Mabon [2300] 



John Pritchard [3077] 






E Porter [3071] 



K Brewer [2297] 



Ms Rachel E Parry [2326] 



Ray McGrady [3060] 






Ms Julia Lawrence [2335] 



Ian Jones [3061] 



Mr Peter Swift [2334] 



Ms Barbra Frangakis [2333] 



D Davies [2332] 



Freda McMurray [3062] 



Pat Botham [2331] 



Ms Helen Botham [2330] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

234



Rep No Name 

7746 Mr John Cuthbertson [2329] 



7742 

Summary 


10648 

Summary 


7686 

Summary 


7714 

Summary 


7694 

Summary 


7698 

Summary 


11276 

Summary 


7702 

Summary 


7706 

Summary 


7738 

Summary 


7710 

Summary 


10651 

Summary 


10657 

Summary 


7718 

Summary 


7722 

Summary 


10654 

Summary 


7726 

Summary 


8403 

Summary 


10660 

Summary 


11363 

Summary 


Ms Jane Cuthbertson [2328] 



Gary Fletcher [3065] 



C A Matton [2314] 



Ms Sarah Davies [2321] 



P Moroney [2316] 



Mr Matt Jones [2317] 



John Sams [3070] 



Mr Marc Cunliffe [2318] 



Mr Jason Jackson [2319] 



Mr Iwan Parry [2327] 









D Hook [3068] 



Mr Adrian Jones [2322] 



Ms Helena Edwards [2323] 



J Pye [3067] 



Falmai Jones [2324] 



Miss P R Clarke [2472] 



Charlotte Parker [3069] 



Carol Webb [3101] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

235



Rep No Name 

11309 Buggig Hughes [3081] 



7521 

Summary 


11351 

Summary 


7517 

Summary 


7393 

Summary 


11354 

Summary 


7513 

Summary 


11357 

Summary 


7509 

Summary 


7608 

Summary 


11360 

Summary 


7604 

Summary 


7600 

Summary 


7525 

Summary 


11369 

Summary 


7369 

Summary 


11375 

Summary 


7377 

Summary 


11372 

Summary 


7381 

Summary 


8184 

Summary 


D Frost [2267] 



E M Jones [3096] 



C Potter [2266] 



S Fogg [2265] 



Beryl Horseman [3097] 



D Potter [2264] 



Brian Davies [3098] 



P Barron [2263] 



Mrs Davies [2293] 



Ray Kenwed [3099] 



P Hibbs [2292] 



G T Jones [2291] 



D C Parry [2269] 



R Offley [3103] 



D May [2253] 



J Wilson [3105] 









V Graham [2259] 



Phillip Platt [3100] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

236



Rep No Name 

7385 Ms Jodie Massey [2261] 



7594 

Summary 


7389 

Summary 


7581 

Summary 


11366 

Summary 


7585 

Summary 


7589 

Summary 


11348 

Summary 


7505 

Summary 


11327 

Summary 


7778 

Summary 


7774 

Summary 


11315 

Summary 


7620 

Summary 


11318 

Summary 


7616 

Summary 


7612 

Summary 


7577 

Summary 


11321 

Summary 


7561 

Summary 


7557 

Summary 


Miss N Roberts [2289] 






Mr Tom Price [2285] 



Kath Davies [3102] 



A Heap [2286] 



R Heap [2287] 



Daniel Remers [3095] 






Gordon Downing [3088] 



Mr Howard Jones [2337] 



Ms Ann Jones [2336] 



Linda Burney [3083] 



T Lewis [2296] 



Gary Burney [3084] 



E G Davies [2295] 



Mr Burbridge [2294] 



O M Prichard-Ellis [2284] 



D Adamson [3086] 



P Maclean [2283] 



D Maclean [2282] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

237



Rep No Name 

7573 Ms Carly Roberts [2281] 



11324 

Summary 


7397 

Summary 


11333 

Summary 


7401 

Summary 


7529 

Summary 


11345 

Summary 


7405 

Summary 


7533 

Summary 


7553 

Summary 


7537 

Summary 


7549 

Summary 


7565 

Summary 


7541 

Summary 


7545 

Summary 


11330 

Summary 


7569 

Summary 


7786 

Summary 


11336 

Summary 


10843 

Summary 


10122 

Summary 


D Harris [3087] 



L Fogg [2268] 



Natalie Adamson [3090] 



D Grocock [2270] 



G Parry [2271] 



Gemma Gagon [3094] 



F Davies [2272] 






A Maclean [2280] 






S Cahill [2279] 



L Maclean [2275] 



Mr Carl Watto [2276] 



Ms Siobhan Haythorne [2277] 



Katie Edwards [3089] 



J V Cooper [2278] 



M Gagon [2339] 



A P Rudd [3091] 



S Toms [2689] 



J Probert [2876] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

238



Rep No Name 

10831 Mrs J Williams [2684] 



10834 

Summary 


10119 

Summary 


10837 

Summary 


10210 

Summary 


10116 

Summary 


10125 

Summary 


10846 

Summary 


10113 

Summary 


10849 

Summary 


10969 

Summary 


10110 

Summary 


10972 

Summary 


10840 

Summary 


10131 

Summary 


10795 

Summary 


10798 

Summary 


10137 

Summary 


10801 

Summary 


10804 

Summary 


10134 

Summary 


B Williams [2685] 



M Marr [2875] 



A Pybus [2687] 



Ms Annette Sullivan [2907] 



A Gozzard [2874] 



W Owen [2877] 



E R Wooly [2690] 



M Ditchfield [2873] 



Mr Ken Roberts [2691] 



L Moroney [2739] 



M W Parry [2872] 



K Stringer [2740] 



J Owen [2688] 



W Davies [2879] 



Mrs Karen Hall [2672] 



Mr Norman Hall [2673] 



C Bullows [2881] 



J Fletcher [2674] 



R Hapslain [2675] 



A Pritchard [2880] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

239



Rep No Name 

10828 Ms Eileen Bell [2683] 



10810 

Summary 


10825 

Summary 


10813 

Summary 


10816 

Summary 


10128 

Summary 


10819 

Summary 


10822 

Summary 


10978 

Summary 


10807 

Summary 


10077 

Summary 


10975 

Summary 


10089 

Summary 


10891 

Summary 


10894 

Summary 


8122 

Summary 


10080 

Summary 


10885 

Summary 


10900 

Summary 


10092 

Summary 


10903 

Summary 


Mrs Anne Clarke [2677] 



Mr Paul Evans [2682] 



Mr D Clarke [2678] 



Mr A Williams [2679] 



S Kirkham [2878] 



Ms Julia Davies [2680] 



Mr Paul Taylor [2681] 



T Taylor [2742] 



L E Povey [2676] 



Ms Veronica Owen [2861] 



M Finney [2741] 



B Christley [2865] 



T Feely [2706] 



J Bolton [2707] 



G Beal [2708] 



J Crosley [2862] 



Mr Mike Bird [2704] 



A S Wynne [2710] 



C F Daley [2866] 



Mr Barry Hackney [2711] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

240



Rep No Name 

10906 A P Mitchell [2712] 



10074 

Summary 


10909 

Summary 


10912 

Summary 


10071 

Summary 


10897 

Summary 


10098 

Summary 


10789 

Summary 


10981 

Summary 


10104 

Summary 


10984 

Summary 


10987 

Summary 


10101 

Summary 


10888 

Summary 


10867 

Summary 


10107 

Summary 


10870 

Summary 


8119 

Summary 


10873 

Summary 


10095 

Summary 


10879 

Summary 


Mr Rob Mailer [2860] 



P Mathews [2713] 



R Mathews [2714] 



Mrs O Kerr [2859] 



Addien Evans [2709] 



D Gillin [2868] 



J Hall [2670] 



Ms Joanne Roche [2743] 



J Thorley [2870] 



Ms Gill Latham-Howe [2745] 



S Haslett [2746] 



D Hall [2869] 



A Guest [2705] 



Mr Keith McWilliams [2697] 



. Dovey [2871] 



Ms Jan Jones-Davies [2698] 



Mr David Beal [2699] 



Mr Andrew Hesketh [2700] 



J Mailer [2867] 



Ms Lucie Stanley [2702] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

241



Rep No Name 

10882 Mr Tony McGuiness [2703] 



10864 

Summary 


10696 

Summary 


10177 

Summary 


10192 

Summary 


10684 

Summary 


10189 

Summary 


10687 

Summary 


10690 

Summary 


8112 

Summary 


10693 

Summary 


10681 

Summary 


10183 

Summary 


10699 

Summary 


10702 

Summary 


10705 

Summary 


10708 

Summary 


10140 

Summary 


10186 

Summary 


10201 

Summary 


8835 

Summary 


Ms Wendy Price [2696] 



P O'Hanlon [2639] 



C C Worley [2896] 



Mrs P Fisher [2901] 






Mr D H Fisher [2900] 



M Barch [2636] 



N Corlett [2637] 



Mrs Pamela Owen [2633] 



J O'Hanlon [2638] 



S A Roberts [2632] 



M Mathews [2898] 



Z L Davies [2640] 



S Simmonds [2641] 



V Taylor [2642] 



A Hughes [2643] 



J McMahon [2882] 



S Hewitt [2899] 



R Miller [2904] 



Mr Elliot Rees [2622] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

242



Rep No Name 

8838 Mr Kyle Morgan [2623] 



10207 

Summary 


8271 

Summary 


8844 

Summary 


8400 

Summary 


8115 

Summary 


10666 

Summary 


10711 

Summary 


10669 

Summary 


10672 

Summary 


10198 

Summary 


10675 

Summary 


10678 

Summary 


10195 

Summary 


10663 

Summary 


10777 

Summary 


10180 

Summary 


10762 

Summary 


10765 

Summary 


10152 

Summary 


10768 

Summary 


C A Hubbard [2906] 



Mr P J Gizzi [2428] 



Mr Jon Williams [2625] 



Ms Norma Catley [2471] 



Mr Alun Owen [2634] 



L J Hodgetts [2627] 






D W Thomas [2628] 



M McWilliams [2629] 



Mr T Jenkins [2903] 






M Hines [2631] 



Mrs P Jenkins [2902] 



G Barker [2626] 



H C Brownhill [2666] 



I R Kelly [2897] 



Ms Isabel Valpuesta [2661] 



Ms Anne Hughes [2662] 



T Roberts [2887] 



Ms Faye Hughes [2663] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

243



Rep No Name 

10771 Mr Michael Roberts [2664] 



10759 

Summary 


10774 

Summary 


10756 

Summary 


10780 

Summary 


10146 

Summary 


10783 

Summary 


10786 

Summary 


10143 

Summary 


10068 

Summary 


10149 

Summary 


11684 

Summary 


10714 

Summary 


10174 

Summary 


10717 

Summary 


10720 

Summary 


10171 

Summary 


10723 

Summary 


8149 

Summary 


10161 

Summary 


10792 

Summary 


Mr Matthew Waite [2660] 



Nik Jones [2665] 



D C Airey [2659] 



D Bright [2667] 



J Jackson [2884] 



R C Bright [2668] 



J Griffiths [2669] 



W Hilditch [2883] 



Ms Pauline M Edwards [2858] 






J M Domey [3210] 



Mr William Pool [2645] 



Mr Reynolds [2895] 



M L Yarwood [2646] 






Mrs S Rossington [2894] 



J M Walker [2648] 



C H Reid [2888] 



Mrs B Ledwith [2891] 



Mr Peter Hall [2671] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

244



Rep No Name 

10741 J E Lewis [2654] 



10744 

Summary 


10158 

Summary 


10747 

Summary 


10753 

Summary 


10155 

Summary 


Mr L J Roberts [2655] 



K Feeney [2890] 



Mrs B Jones [2656] 



Mrs Susan Holden [2658] 



S A Feeney [2889] 



7060 Mr Barry Jones [1978] 



11120 

Summary 


11135 

Summary 


11237 

Summary 


11108 

Summary 


11111 

Summary 


11234 

Summary 


11114 

Summary 


11102 

Summary 


11231 

Summary 


11240 

Summary 


11123 

Summary 


11228 

Summary 


11126 

Summary 


11129 

Summary 


Mrs E Fullwood [2792] 



J Cawley [2797] 



Ms Enid Hughes [2831] 






Sam Fairhurst [2789] 



Ms Joan Prescott [2830] 









Ms Mel Jones [2829] 



Ms Yvonne Callister [2832] 



Mrs M Crossland [2793] 



E Richards [2828] 



Mr H Crossland [2794] 



M G Gaskell [2795] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

245



Rep No Name 

11225 A Hetzler [2827] 



11053 

Summary 


11117 

Summary 


11071 

Summary 


10915 

Summary 


11056 

Summary 


11059 

Summary 


11273 

Summary 


11062 

Summary 


11065 

Summary 


11105 

Summary 


11068 

Summary 


11222 

Summary 


11246 

Summary 


11074 

Summary 


11077 

Summary 


11243 

Summary 


11081 

Summary 


11099 

Summary 


11249 

Summary 


11270 

Summary 





Mr C Williams [2791] 



M Cowlum [2776] 






I Roberts [2771] 









A M Lymm [2773] 









B Gibson [2775] 



S Hetzler [2826] 



Mr R Meaks [2834] 



B Jenkinson [2777] 



Ms Val Campion [2778] 



Mrs L Meaks [2833] 



W G Roberts [2779] 



Ms Lyn Hughes [2785] 



T Ditchfield [2835] 



Mr John Rushton [2842] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

246



Rep No Name 

11132 G J Jones [2796] 



11204 

Summary 


11186 

Summary 


11201 

Summary 


11189 

Summary 


11192 

Summary 


11171 

Summary 


11195 

Summary 


11168 

Summary 


11252 

Summary 


11267 

Summary 


11255 

Summary 


11258 

Summary 


11264 

Summary 


11261 

Summary 


11198 

Summary 


11213 

Summary 


11138 

Summary 


11141 

Summary 


11219 

Summary 


11144 

Summary 


A P Tuite [2820] 



Ms Carole Perwent [2814] 






J Stone [2815] 



D M Smith [2816] 









M J Coulen [2808] 



Ms Angela Ditchfield [2836] 



Ms Lilian Redford [2841] 



M J Tiernan [2837] 



Mrs M Williams [2838] 



Ms Tracy Williams [2840] 



C Ralphs [2839] 



J K May [2818] 



M R Kirkam [2823] 



W Cawley [2798] 






E Clough [2825] 



Ms Joyce Tacliffe [2800] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

247



Rep No Name 

11147 E M Lloyd [2801] 



11216 

Summary 


11183 

Summary 


11153 

Summary 


11050 

Summary 


11156 

Summary 


11159 

Summary 


11210 

Summary 


11162 

Summary 


11165 

Summary 


11207 

Summary 


11150 

Summary 


10609 

Summary 


11017 

Summary 


10951 

Summary 


11423 

Summary 


10954 

Summary 


10957 

Summary 


11420 

Summary 


11426 

Summary 


8142 

Summary 


N E Hughes [2824] 



J Parry [2813] 






Ms Mary Jones [2769] 



A Roddick [2804] 






E Stappleton [2822] 



F Bracegirdle [2806] 



Mr Steve Hill [2807] 



B Clarkson [2821] 






C Evans [3048] 






D Adams [2731] 






Mrs Gubbets [2732] 



Ms Wilson [2733] 



A Burgess [3121] 



J Bentley [3123] 



Mr Les Morris [2752] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

248



Rep No Name 

10053 R Williams [2853] 



11005 

Summary 


11008 

Summary 


10606 

Summary 


11011 

Summary 


11014 

Summary 


10026 

Summary 


10960 

Summary 


10059 

Summary 


8841 

Summary 


10924 

Summary 


10927 

Summary 


10065 

Summary 


10930 

Summary 


10062 

Summary 


10948 

Summary 


10936 

Summary 


10396 

Summary 


10939 

Summary 


10942 

Summary 


10056 

Summary 





O Davies [2754] 



Mrs L Mouat [3047] 



M S Chesworth [2755] 



K Williams [2756] 






D Stocker [2734] 






Mr David Bamford [2624] 



Mr R Wall [2718] 



Mrs J Wall [2719] 



Ms Kate Thorley [2857] 



J Lee [2721] 



J Woods [2856] 



M Craven [2730] 






Mrs W Gibbons [2971] 



Mavis Williams [2724] 



Mr Roger Reid [2725] 



M Docker [2854] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

249



Rep No Name 

10945 R Fletcher [2727] 



8130 

Summary 


8133 

Summary 


10933 

Summary 


10035 

Summary 


10600 

Summary 


10041 

Summary 


11026 

Summary 


8144 

Summary 


11029 

Summary 


10038 

Summary 


10044 

Summary 


11035 

Summary 


10050 

Summary 


11038 

Summary 


11041 

Summary 


10032 

Summary 


11044 

Summary 


11047 

Summary 


10029 

Summary 


11032 

Summary 


V S Clark [2728] 



M Hilgart [2729] 



P Taverner [2722] 



Ms Ellie Roberts [2847] 



Mrs C Ineson [3045] 



L Davies-Salmon [2849] 



J C Jones [2760] 



R S Davies [2761] 



M Nixon [2762] 



Mrs L Davies-Salmon [2848] 



E Hunt [2850] 



Mr Ian Bruce [2764] 



Soo Roch [2852] 



G Jackson [2765] 






Mr Charles Cotton [2846] 



A Chapman [2767] 



T Jarvis [2768] 



Ms Dilys Price [2845] 



Ms Barbara Bruce [2763] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

250



Rep No Name 

10168 Mr J Wells [2893] 



11020 

Summary 


11023 

Summary 


10393 

Summary 


10996 

Summary 


11002 

Summary 


10285 

Summary 


10047 

Summary 


11090 

Summary 


10921 

Summary 


11093 

Summary 


11096 

Summary 


10164 

Summary 


11174 

Summary 


11177 

Summary 


11180 

Summary 


11087 

Summary 


10387 

Summary 


8484 

Summary 


10399 

Summary 


8487 

Summary 





K Goddard [2759] 



Liz Davies [2970] 



Mrs J Brearly [2749] 



Ms Shirley Cooney [2751] 



M Atherton [2932] 



S Ralphs [2851] 



E Holland [2782] 



Ms Glenys Jones [2717] 



Lloyd Moroney [2783] 



Mr Ste Morris [2784] 



Miss M Davies [2892] 



D Kirwan [2810] 



D Martin [2811] 









Tudor Roberts [2968] 



Mr John Cooke [2500] 



G Lord [2972] 



Mr Matthew Handleman [2503] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

251



Rep No Name 

8493 Mrs Dena Davies [2505] 



10390 

Summary 


8625 

Summary 


8499 

Summary 


8475 

Summary 


8502 

Summary 


8505 

Summary 


10384 

Summary 


8508 

Summary 


8511 

Summary 


10381 

Summary 


8496 

Summary 


8463 

Summary 


8415 

Summary 


8418 

Summary 


10417 

Summary 


8421 

Summary 


8424 

Summary 


10414 

Summary 


10402 

Summary 


10411 

Summary 


John Davies [2969] 



D Holt [2549] 



Mr Garry Williams [2507] 






Mr Harrison Williams [2508] 



Nikki Orr [2509] 



M Anderson [2967] 



Mr Scott Orr [2510] 



J S Bird [2511] 



Fiona H Jones [2966] 



Ms Pat Williams [2506] 






Ms K Read [2476] 



Mr D Hughes [2477] 



E Burdock [2978] 









G Rudd [2977] 



G B Morris [2973] 






People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

252



Rep No Name 

8481 B Smith [2499] 



8466 

Summary 


10408 

Summary 


8469 

Summary 


8099 

Summary 


10405 

Summary 


10378 

Summary 


8427 

Summary 


10354 

Summary 


8514 

Summary 


8568 

Summary 


10360 

Summary 


8571 

Summary 


8574 

Summary 


10357 

Summary 


10363 

Summary 


8580 

Summary 


8562 

Summary 


8583 

Summary 


10204 

Summary 


8619 

Summary 


G Povey [2493] 



J R Pericott [2975] 



Mr Emrys Davies [2494] 



P W Vickers [2496] 



J Pericott [2974] 



M Brimson [2965] 



Mrs J Bradley [2480] 



Charlie Hanma [2957] 



Mr G Sewell [2512] 



Mrs M Humphries [2530] 



Mr Mark Lovatt [2959] 



T Humphries [2531] 



Mrs C Berry [2532] 



Judith Williams [2958] 



K Hull [2960] 



J Lee [2534] 



Mr C Murray [2528] 






M Miller [2905] 



Ms Jennifer Evans [2547] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

253



Rep No Name 

8832 Mrs S Gulliver [2621] 



8622 

Summary 


10351 

Summary 


8577 

Summary 


8544 

Summary 


8409 

Summary 


8520 

Summary 


8523 

Summary 


10375 

Summary 


8526 

Summary 


8529 

Summary 


8565 

Summary 


8532 

Summary 


8517 

Summary 


8547 

Summary 


10369 

Summary 


8550 

Summary 


8553 

Summary 


10366 

Summary 


8559 

Summary 


10372 

Summary 


A Holt [2548] 



Mrs D Galeandro [2955] 



Ms Jill Hallard [2533] 



Mrs G Sweeney [2522] 



N Gascgoine [2474] 



Mr Neil Clarke [2514] 



R M Roberts [2515] 



E Webb [2964] 



E S Roberts [2516] 



Mr M W Green [2517] 



Miss A Hughes [2529] 



H J Green [2518] 



Mrs Lisa Clarke [2513] 



Mr D Sweeney [2523] 



G Done [2962] 



Mrs P Pownall [2524] 



Mr C Rettie [2525] 






Nic Evans [2527] 



M Hassen [2963] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

254



Rep No Name 

10459 P Marwood [2995] 



8334 

Summary 


8439 

Summary 


10465 

Summary 


8442 

Summary 


8445 

Summary 


10462 

Summary 


10468 

Summary 


8316 

Summary 


8433 

Summary 


8319 

Summary 


8322 

Summary 


10456 

Summary 


8325 

Summary 


8328 

Summary 


10420 

Summary 


8313 

Summary 


8289 

Summary 


10480 

Summary 


8274 

Summary 


8277 

Summary 


Mrs P A Knowson [2449] 



Mr Hywel Wyn-Jones [2484] 



M Garside [2997] 



Ms Pam Hughes [2485] 



D M Thomas [2486] 



F Marwood [2996] 









S Parker [2482] 



A Maher [2444] 



E O Kelly [2445] 



J Taylor [2994] 



Mrs S Norrey [2446] 



M P Halligan [2447] 



S Pointon [2979] 



Mr Dylan Scott [2442] 



Ms Ann Badcott [2434] 



N H Owen [3003] 



Mr Nick Holland [2429] 



Ms Donna Bailey [2430] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

255



Rep No Name 

10477 S M Owen [3002] 



8280 

Summary 


8283 

Summary 


8436 

Summary 


8286 

Summary 


8337 

Summary 


10471 

Summary 


8292 

Summary 


8295 

Summary 


8298 

Summary 


8430 

Summary 


8166 

Summary 


10474 

Summary 


8394 

Summary 


8163 

Summary 


10435 

Summary 


8382 

Summary 


8385 

Summary 


10432 

Summary 


8388 

Summary 


8376 

Summary 


Mr Keiran Holland [2431] 



Ms Karen Scott [2432] 



H Bevan [2483] 



Mr Mark Scott [2433] 



Ms Rhian Jones [2450] 



E Jackson [3000] 



L Durrant [2435] 



P Sinclair [2436] 



J Satelle [2437] 



D Warner [2481] 



V Brennan [2999] 



B Jones [3001] 



Ms Ffion O'Kelly [2469] 






Helen Hughes [2986] 



A J Scott [2465] 



M L Williams [2466] 



Mr & Mrs Heaton [2985] 



Mr John W Jones [2467] 



Mr Ian McMahon [2463] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

256



Rep No Name 

10429 A Cheetham [2983] 



10438 

Summary 


8397 

Summary 


10726 

Summary 


10426 

Summary 


8406 

Summary 


10423 

Summary 


8155 

Summary 


8391 

Summary 


8361 

Summary 


10453 

Summary 


8340 

Summary 


8343 

Summary 


10450 

Summary 


8352 

Summary 


8355 

Summary 


8379 

Summary 


8358 

Summary 


8412 

Summary 


8364 

Summary 


10444 

Summary 


Mrs Whitehouse [2987] 



Ms Frances Wall [2470] 



W J Walker [2649] 



Mrs E Lovatt [2981] 



Mr E H Lloyd [2473] 



T Pointon [2980] 



Michelle Glass [2956] 



M J Lea [2468] 



. Arbuckle [2458] 



Mr T Allen [2992] 



Ms Catherine Merrison [2451] 



A Walmsley [2452] 



M H Parry [2991] 



Ms Molly Passey [2455] 



Ms Jackie Jones [2456] 



Ms Alison Scott [2464] 



Mr Roy Benham [2457] 



W Howe [2475] 



E Howe [2459] 



K M Scott [2989] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

257



Rep No Name 

8367 Mr Edward Robshaw [2460] 



10441 

Summary 


8370 

Summary 


8373 

Summary 


10447 

Summary 


8784 

Summary 


10282 

Summary 


8769 

Summary 


8772 

Summary 


10261 

Summary 


8775 

Summary 


8778 

Summary 


8766 

Summary 


8781 

Summary 


8763 

Summary 


10255 

Summary 


8787 

Summary 


8790 

Summary 


10252 

Summary 


8793 

Summary 


8796 

Summary 


S E McCarten [2988] 



J W Brett [2461] 



Ms Kate Mailer [2462] 



M Scott [2990] 



R Hamilton [2605] 



A Priestly [2931] 



Mr Maurice Done [2600] 



Mr Roger Claytor [2601] 






Mr G Thomas [2602] 



A Carson [2603] 



Ms Mary Done [2599] 



Mrs E Hall [2604] 



Mr Paul Roberts [2598] 



J Johnson [2922] 



L Donovan [2606] 



D Henshall [2607] 



G A Green [2921] 



K Stewart [2608] 






People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

258



Rep No Name 

10258 A Johnson [2923] 



10273 

Summary 


8733 

Summary 


8628 

Summary 


10279 

Summary 


8616 

Summary 


8742 

Summary 


10276 

Summary 


10264 

Summary 


8748 

Summary 


8802 

Summary 


8751 

Summary 


8754 

Summary 


10270 

Summary 


8757 

Summary 


8760 

Summary 


10267 

Summary 


8745 

Summary 


10222 

Summary 


10966 

Summary 


10228 

Summary 


Mrs W Nevin [2928] 



Mr William Taylor [2588] 



S Hames [2551] 



S Bridge [2930] 



Mrs J Roberts [2546] 



Mr Gareth Meredith [2591] 



D Lee [2929] 



M Binning [2925] 



Mrs Ruth Thomas [2593] 



Mr Tim Watson [2611] 



Mr John H Thomas [2594] 



Mrs Victoria Drior [2595] 



T A Jones [2927] 



Mr Scott Walters [2596] 



Ms Helen Roberts [2597] 



G Binning [2926] 



Mrs Christine Meredith [2592] 



L Devere Robinson [2911] 






Ms Liz Jennings [2913] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

259



Rep No Name 

10990 G Hughes [2747] 



10993 

Summary 


10225 

Summary 


8811 

Summary 


10249 

Summary 


8817 

Summary 


10861 

Summary 


8820 

Summary 


10219 

Summary 


8823 

Summary 


8826 

Summary 


10213 

Summary 


8829 

Summary 


8814 

Summary 


10240 

Summary 


8736 

Summary 


10246 

Summary 


8805 

Summary 


8808 

Summary 


10729 

Summary 


10243 

Summary 


M Macdonald [2748] 



Ms Beth Heaton [2912] 



Mr D Fisher [2614] 



Ms Peggy Davies [2920] 






Mr M Trickett [2695] 



Mrs M Elias [2617] 



R Rothwell [2910] 






Mr W Meacock [2619] 



Ms Sheila Jones [2908] 



Mr Steven Williams Jr [2620] 



Miss E Tanner [2615] 



Mr Phil Priestly [2917] 



D H Edwards [2589] 



Ms Rosa Lunt [2919] 



Mr Daniel Watson [2612] 



Mr Sam Passey [2613] 



D M Guiness [2650] 



Mr Michael Giblin [2918] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

260



Rep No Name 

10231 Miss L Lugo [2914] 



10735 

Summary 


10963 

Summary 


10738 

Summary 


10852 

Summary 


10237 

Summary 


10855 

Summary 


10858 

Summary 


10234 

Summary 


8799 

Summary 


10732 

Summary 


13175 

Summary 


8643 

Summary 


8646 

Summary 


8649 

Summary 


8152 

Summary 


8652 

Summary 


10327 

Summary 


8730 

Summary 


8658 

Summary 


8613 

Summary 


P Peak [2652] 






R Baglin [2653] 



M Hollin [2692] 



Ms Karen Walford [2916] 



Mr J Angor [2693] 



Mrs P A Ware [2694] 



Ms Katy Higgins [2915] 



Mrs Jane Watson [2610] 



M Wilson [2651] 



. Cripps [2562] 



Mr Andy Smith [2556] 



Mrs Sue Smith [2557] 



Ms Yvette Hughes [2558] 



A Smith [2947] 



Mr Chris Roberts [2559] 



J Sealey [2946] 



Ms Elizabeth Taylor [2587] 



Berwyn Thomas [2561] 



Mr Edward Haworth [2545] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

261



Rep No Name 

10324 T Jones [2945] 



8661 

Summary 


8664 

Summary 


10321 

Summary 


8667 

Summary 


8739 

Summary 


8670 

Summary 


8655 

Summary 


10339 

Summary 


10348 

Summary 


8631 

Summary 


8634 

Summary 


10345 

Summary 


8637 

Summary 


8592 

Summary 


10342 

Summary 


10330 

Summary 


8598 

Summary 


8640 

Summary 


8601 

Summary 


8604 

Summary 


T Parkin [2563] 



M Parkin [2564] 






E Prescott [2565] 



L W Edwards [2590] 



D Ansell [2566] 



Mrs Lisa Roberts [2560] 



Ms Sylvia Dugdale [2951] 



B Hardy [2954] 



K Evans [2552] 



W Jenkins [2553] 



S Salt [2953] 



L Jones [2554] 



Mrs Sheila Lawson [2538] 



D Bennell [2952] 



Ms Katie Westwood [2948] 



Ms Emily Hollins-Davies [2540] 



L Hyland [2555] 



Ms Elen Robshaw [2541] 



K Russell [2542] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

262



Rep No Name 

10336 D Edwards [2950] 



8607 

Summary 


8610 

Summary 


10333 

Summary 


10318 

Summary 


8595 

Summary 


10294 

Summary 


8697 

Summary 


8700 

Summary 


10300 

Summary 


8706 

Summary 


8709 

Summary 


10297 

Summary 


8694 

Summary 


8715 

Summary 


10303 

Summary 


8718 

Summary 


8721 

Summary 


10291 

Summary 


8724 

Summary 


8727 

Summary 


J Midgley [2543] 



Ms Susan Haworth [2544] 



Mr James David Westwood [2949] 



M L Heywood [2943] 



Ms Shona Hollins-Davies [2539] 



J Culshaw [2935] 



Ms Carole Vickers [2576] 



Mr Kevan Emmett [2577] 



H A Roberts [2937] 



Ms Justine Knowles [2579] 



Mr Marc Truesdale [2580] 



A & M Simms [2936] 



G Griffiths [2575] 



Ms Tina Schofield [2582] 



K Gill [2938] 



Mr Stephen S Fortune [2583] 



Ms Karen Samuels [2584] 



D S Roberts [2934] 



Ms Sylvia Claytor [2585] 



Ms June Davis [2586] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

263



Rep No Name 

10288 A J Brearley [2933] 



8712 

Summary 


8685 

Summary 


8679 

Summary 


8682 

Summary 


10312 

Summary 


8703 

Summary 


10315 

Summary 


10306 

Summary 


8673 

Summary 


8109 

Summary 


10309 

Summary 


8688 

Summary 


8691 

Summary 


8676 

Summary 


Mr Andrew Wall [2581] 



B W Hughes [2571] 



Ms Deborah May [2569] 



Mr D Ratcliffe [2570] 



Mr Hayden Feeney [2941] 



Alexander Wallace [2578] 



Mr R Wilyman [2942] 



C Dolan [2939] 



R Savery [2567] 



Ms Angela Jones [2572] 



J H Willis [2940] 



Mrs Elaine McMahon [2573] 



Mr & Mrs Bryn & Bryn Knowlson-Roberts [2574] 



C Savery [2568] 



People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

264


Policy HOU/1 Meeting The Housing Needs, North of Groesffordd, Dwygyfylchi 


1616 Beech Developments (NW) Ltd (Mr Mike Roberts) [1966] 1 Support 

Summary Support the allocation but for a higher density that complies with national guidance. 

296 

Mrs Carys Jones [31] 

1 Object 

Summary There is no additional housing needed in the Dwygyfylchi area. At this present time there are over 100 properties in a five mile radius available for sale 

approxiamtley 40% of these are targeted as affordable housing. According to your LDP the Dwygyfylchi area needs one house to meet the affordable housing 

need. Why then is there a proposol to build 10 on the only available green space in our beautiful village. The local inferstucture can not deal with more 

houses the local school is already almost to full capacity. 

Change Sought: Dwygyfylchi removed from the development of more housing 

323 mr peter jobson [616] 1 Object 

Summary i would just like to log my objection to the building of more houses on one of the only fields left for children in the village left to play on,also the fact there are 

as we have been told over 100 properties currently on the market in this area yet no need for more unfordable housing to be built a the cost of more of the 

village green space. 

Change Sought: no houses to be built on fields 

348 

Ms Jan Roberts [651] 

1 Object 

Summary I totally object to the development North of Groesffordd. Obviously no thought or consideration for the people of Dwygyfylchi has gone into this proposal. 

Where do you expect the children to play safely as this is the only playing area in the village? 

Increased volume of traffic through the small village - additional danger for children and the elderley. 

Additional stretch on resources and facilities. 

Change Sought: I propose you consider the location of the build i.e llandudno as that's where our rates are spent. 

349 Mr & Mrs Ian & Rosemary Boulton [653] 1 Object 

Summary I am objecting to the plan for more houses in Dwygyfylchi. North of Groesfford. I do not think we need any more houses in the village.The land in question 

borders the field where the children play and would isolate the football field from the majority of houses in the village. 

We NEED green spaces. 

Change Sought: NO HOUSE BUILDING 

385 Penmaenmawr Town Council (Cllr Dafydd Lloyd-Borland) [682] 1 Object 

Summary In respect of the large housing allocation in Dwygyfylchi the Town Council strongly object to this on the grounds of overdevelopment of the village. Should 

this site be developed the existing facilities within the town would be put under considerable strain. The existing school may not be able to accommodate 

extra pupils. This allocation should be removed or significantly reduced. 

Change Sought: Removal of housing development north of Groesffordd, Dwygyfylchi from plan 

324 

Mr Andrew Stafford [617] 

1 Object 

Summary Dwygyfylchi can not support development of the area proposed, there is very little green land left in the area, the Gardd Eryri development should never have 

been commissioned, this site too is not needed or wanted in the village. 

Change Sought: Cancellation and protection of the area to prevent future development proposals 

297 

neil woods (neil woods) [571] 

1 Object 

Summary The area for these houses to built upon should remain as it is, common land for the children to enjoy and responsible dog owners to walk there pets. 

I as a child have loads of memories playing on that piece of land. It was one of the few places where most parents in Dwygyfylchi feel safe for there children 

to play, as so many properties overlook this piece of land, it is easy to spot any strangers or something that should not be happening. 

There are dozens of properties allready on the market, no need for further development. 

Change Sought: If further development, then why not choose the other piece of land on the opposite side of Maes Y LLan, granted there will be objections to this, but surely 

that land is more sustainable. 

7151 O Jones and Sons Ltd [2090] 

1 Object 


requirements. Adopt a higher expected housing yield for the site at Groess Ffordd, Dwygyfylchi (39-46 dwellings). 

Change to growth option 3. Adopt a higher expected housing yield for the site at Groess Ffordd, Dwygyfylchi (39-46 dwellings) 

Change Sought: Change to growth option 3. Adopt a higher expected housing yield for the site at Groess Ffordd, Dwygyfylchi (39-46 dwellings) 

265


Policy HOU/1 Meeting The Housing Needs, Glyn Farm, Colwyn Bay 


1348 Anwyl Construction Ltd (Mr Mike Pender) [1514] 1 Support 

Summary Support for the allocation of site 347/353 Glyn Farm, Colwyn Bay, however for various reasons the site is unlikely to deliver the 144 dwellings that appear in 

the Plan. There is a copse and gradients/rock outcrops which are likely to reduce the net developable area. 

Change Sought: You may wish to look at this again (site capacity). As landowners we would be happy to meet you to discuss the detailed future development of this site and 

assist its early delivery. 

5 

Mr Dyfrig Hughes Roberts [20] 

Summary I challenge Soundness Test CE2 on the following grounds in relation to the development of 144 houses at Glyn Farm. 

Highways safety 

public health and safety. 

Road improvement necessary 

Added traffic worsening problems 

Drainage and possible flood issues. 

Change Sought: Delete Glyn Farm allocation 

1 Object 

6 

Mrs Jeane Wild [22] 

1 Object 

Summary Remove Glyn Farm allocation of 144 houses. As there is only one ingress and egress supplying the houses already. I feel that it would be setrimental to the 

environment to put extra pressure on said highway and pedestrian access. 

Change Sought: Remove Glyn farm allocation 

27 

Mr Adrian Jenkins [94] 

1 Object 

Summary Removal of the Glyn Farm development site from the LDP. Any further developments would need a massive improvement in infrastructure, road access, 

drainage etc 

Change Sought: remove glyn farm allocation 

21 Mrs Valerie Hastings [56] 1 Object 

Summary Remove the Glyn Farm Allocation as the proposed development of 144 houses represents a negative or adverse impact on the highway access, sewerage 

and drainage, and possible flood issues which do not seem resolvable. A more appropriate site should be allocated (infilling replacement) which is 

deliverable over the plan period. 

Change of land use from agricultural/green/commom to residential housing development which could be accompanied by infilling in other parts of the town 

and by renovating/replacing many dilapidated properties in town. 

Change Sought: Remove the Glyn Farm Allocation 

16 Ms Sara Beasley [48] 1 Object 

Summary Council needs to revisit the pre-deposit consultation (Glyn Farm). The access road to Glyn View site is too narrow as cars always parked there. Drainage 

insufficient. 

To delete the proposed allocation at Glyn Farm (a greenfield site) for reasons set out in the attached. To consider the alternative site at Dinerth Road. See 

Glyn Farm Action Group Representation. 

Change Sought: To delete the proposed allocation at Glyn Farm (a greenfield site) for reasons set out in the attached. To consider the alternative site at Dinerth Road. See 

Glyn Farm Action Group Representation. 

986 Mr Keith Ansell [353] 1 Object 

Summary Remove the Glyn Farm allocation as proposed development of 144 houses will represent a detrimental impact on the highway, drainage, safety of 

pedestrians and possible flooding issues 

Change Sought: Remove the Glyn Farm allocation as proposed development of 144 houses will represent a detrimental impact on the highway, drainage, safety of 


15 Reverend Patrick Hastings [47] 1 Object 

Summary Change of land use from "agricultural/green/ common" for residential housing development, which could be accomplished by infilling in other parts of the town 

and by replacing/renovating many dilapidated properties in the town. 

The proposed development of 144 houses represents a negative or adverse impact on the highway access, sewerage and drainage, and possible flood 

issues which do not seem resolvable. 

Change Sought: Delete site. 

14 

Mr Simon Shaw [46] 

1 Object 

Summary Remove Glyn Farm allocation. The proposed development of 144 houses will have a detrimental impact on road safety of the intended new residents and all 

those living around the development. 

Council need to revisit pre deposit stage. Brownfield sites take priority over greenfield site at Glyn Farm 

Change Sought: remove Glyn Farm allocation 


Summary The development of 1 hectare of woodland appears inconsistent with this Plan's policies that development should protect or enhance habitats. 

Change Sought: Remove Glyn Farm from the LDP 

1 Object 

696 Cllr Chris Hughes [918] 

1 Object 

Summary CCBC should revisit the pre-deposit consultation. 

Change Sought: To delete the proposed allocation at Glyn Farm for the reasons set out in the attachment. To consider the alternative site at Dinerth Road. 

17 

Mr Edwin Brown [51] 

1 Object 

Summary Find a more appropriate site for 144 houses. The Glyn Farm site will have a detremental effect on the area, particularly traffic on the estate and the risk of 

poor drainage and the influx of more people and their safety. 

Change Sought: Remove Glyn Farm site from plan. 

30 

Mr Alan Roberts [98] 

1 Object 

Summary There has been no prior community involvement about including the Glyn Development and only very recently at a council meeting was this area precluded 

from development. 

I understand an alternative site at Dinerth Road is now available. Brownfield sites should be developed before intruding on greenfield sites. 

Change Sought: Removal of site 

956 Miss E Pope [32] 1 Object 


pedestrians and possible flood issues. A more appropriate site should be allocated which is deliverable over the plan period. 

Change Sought: Remove Glyn Farm site from plan 

266




574 CDN Planning (Mr Rhys Davies BA (Hons) MRTPI) [131] 1 Object 

Summary The housing site at Glyn Farm should be deleted in favour of other more suitable sites in Colwyn Bay and Old Colwyn. The site which formed the subject of 

planning application ref:0/35595 should be identified as an alternative to part of the Glyn Farm allocation 

Change Sought: Deletion of Glyn Farm allocation and allocation of land at Coed Coch Road for up to 14 houses. 

651 Mr John Blakesley [870] 1 Object 

Summary This area has been a haven for wildlife, including birds and badgers, for many years and any development would have a severe impact on biodiversity. 

Change Sought: Delete this site from HOU/1 

28 Mr William George Renshaw [95] 1 Object 

Summary Object to Glyn Farm due to: 

impact on value of property, 

inadequacy of vehicle access, 

inadequacy of drainage/sewerage network, 

anti-social behaviour/damage tresspassing 

disruption the development would cause. 

Also refer to Glyn Farm Action Group representation. 

Change Sought: revisit pre-deposit stage 

Delete Glyn Farm Allocation. 

32 Mr Nigel David Brereton [99] 1 Object 

Summary Impact on property values. 

Vehicular acces inadequate 

Sewers/drainage marginal capacity. 

Anti social behaviour/trespass of pedestrian traffic due to footpath through property. 

Disruption caused by builders. 

Economically not viable 

The Council need to re-visit the pre deposit stage, prioritise brownfield sites over greenfield site at Glyn Farm 

Change Sought: Remove site at Glyn Farm 

35 

Mr Justin Latchford [101] 

1 Object 

Summary Remove the Glyn Farm allocation, as the proposed development of 144 houses will have a detrimental effect to the highways, drainage, safety of pedestrians 

and cause flood issues. A more appropriate site should be allocated which is deliverable over the plan period. 

Change Sought: Remove Glyn Farm Site 

59 Mrs Valerie Barwell [124] 1 Object 

Summary Access to Glyn Farm site via Groes Road already very dangerous, cannot take further traffic. Ifrastructure and drainage already struggling. 

Change Sought: Removal of Glyn Farm site from LDP 

62 

Mr David Wallis [126] 

1 Object 

Summary Objection to proposed addition of areas around Glyn Farm, Colwyn Bay. Reasons include highway safety for pedestrians, cyclists and motor vehicles and 

also sewage management for the area. I have been informed that the Glyn Estate sewage piping capacity, down into the town is already at a maximum. 

Change Sought: Revisit process for the pre-deposit consultation with residents prior to any further progress. 

The LDP should seriously consider removing the area designated on map 347 from the forthcoming Conwy LDP. 

64 

Mr and Mrs William Davies [128] 

1 Object 

Summary The council needs to revisit the pre-deposit consultation. Access to Glyn Farm site via Groes Road is already very dangerous and cannot sustain extra 

traffic. Present infrastructure and drainage etc is already stuggling. 


68 

Ms Cheryl Voce [129] 

1 Object 

Summary The council needs to revisit the pre-deposit consultation. Access to Glyn Farm site via Groes Road is already very dangerous and cannot sustain extra 

traffic. Present infrastructure and drainage etc is already stuggling. 


19 

Mrs Rachel Fox [52] 

1 Object 

Summary Increase in traffic and limited access to the estate. Water and sewerage systems insufficient, and more problems expected due to vandelism along the 

footpath. 

Council need to revisit predeposit stage. Brownfield sites take priority over greenfield site at Glyn Farm 

Change Sought: Remove site due to access constraints and highway safety 

1004 Mrs Janice Hulse [529] 

1 Object 

Summary To delete the proposed allocation at Glyn Farm (a greenfield site) for the reasons set out in the attached. To consider the alternative site at Dinerth Road as 

shown in the attached location plan. 

Change Sought: Remove Glyn Farm Site from plan 

995 

Mr Dudley Drake [388] 

1 Object 

Summary The Local Development Plan has not been produced in alignment with community involvement scheme. Conwy County Borough Council need to revisit the 

pre-deposit consultation. See attached plan for alternative site to site at Glyn Farm Colwyn Bay. 


1024 Mr John Miller [391] 

1 Object 

Summary Objection on the grounds that land surface drainage is problematic, there is limited road access, badger setts are on the site, footpaths are compromised. 

Building on farmland in this locality would destroy the beauty and peace of the valley, have serious consequence for the environment, raise preservation and 

conservation issues, destroy amenities/leisure and tourism facilities. 

We believe the concept of building at Glyn Farm and along the Nant y Grlyn Valley to be flawed, inappropriate, misguided and incomprehensible. It sets an 

alarming precedent about building in open countryside. 


243 

Mr Basil Brammer [521] 

1 Object 

Summary Objection on grounds of inadequate drainage and possible flooding. Increased traffic increases the risk of accidents. 

Change Sought: Groes Road is too narrow to have more traffic. Most of the road is one way as cars are parked all down the one side. 144 new houses will mean at least 288 

more cars. It is the only road up to the estate. It is a good thing the emergency services are not stationed too far away, that is if they can get up here. 

267




1027 Sarah Miller [393] 1 Object 







1029 Mr Michael Gabbitus [394] 

1 Object 







1023 Ms Lorraine Fowler [396] 

1 Object 







1035 Ms Lorna Hobson [397] 

1 Object 






Change Sought: Remove Glyn Farm Site from Plan 

1030 Ms Isolbel Mitchell [398] 

1 Object 







1036 Anne Bleasdale-Thompson [1062] 

1 Object 







991 

Mr Jon Davies [357] 

1 Object 

Summary That the sites were not proposed in the pre-deposit consultation and the Glyn Farm site should be deleted from the LDP and that CBC should consider the 

alternative site at Dinerth Road and other sites which may be released as a result of the school modernisation programme. 

Council needs to revisit the pre deposit consultation. 


1033 N Roebuck [1060] 

1 Object 






Change Sought: Remove Glyn Farm Site from Plan 

270 

Clwyd West Labour Party (Ms Donna Hutton) [390] 

89 Object 

Summary Any proposals to develop a large site at Glyn Farm would raise concerns, including exacerbating the existing traffic hazard on Groes Road, the only way in 

and out of the area; overload of already possibly inadequate sewers and drains and land drainage. CCBCs own planners have raised similar objections to 

previous planning applications in the vicinity. BUT this is a new proposal, never seen before and not developed in line with the Community Involvement 

Scheme. Since the community has never been consulted, CCBC should re-visit the pre deposit consultation. 


1003 Mr and Dr Morgan and Hosking [528] 

2 Object 




268




979 

Mr Gordon Roberts [345] 

1 Object 

Summary No consideration given to volume of traffic ie. 144 houses means at least 300 extra cars using an already over used access road. 

Present drainage system already overloaded. 

Extra volume of traffic would be detrimental to emergency services. 


1002 Ms Jan Palethorpe [527] 

1 Object 



Change Sought: Remove Glyn Farm from plan 

1001 Mr Trevor Roebuck [526] 

1 Object 







1000 Mr Anthony Lacey [525] 1 Object 



Change Sought: To delete the proposed allocation at Glyn Farm (a greenfield site) for the reasons set out in the attached. To consider the alternative site at Dinerth Road as 


454 Mr Sunil Sethi [747] 1 Object 

Summary Sites 335, 347 and 353 should be removed from the LDP. This area is green wedge/belt. It is an area of outstanding natural beauty. 

It has inadequate road infrastructure and inadequeate local amenities et schools, hospital, shops, and GP surgery. 

Change Sought: Remove sites from plan 

999 Mr Peter Thompson [524] 1 Object 



Change Sought: To delete the proposed allocation at Glyn Farm (a greenfield site) for the reasons set out in the attached. To consider the alternative site at Dinerth Road as 


245 Cllr Abdul Khan [523] 1 Object 

Summary Objection on grounds that Glyn Farm Site was not proposed in pre deposit consultation. Proposal of alternative brownfield site at Dinerth Road and other 

sites which will be released as a result of the school modernisation programme. 

Site has already been affected by floods and 144 houses will increase flood risk, road leading from Glyn Avenue is very narrow and dangerous and safety 

concerns for pedestrians. 

Change Sought: Removal of Glyn Farm site and replace with alternative brownfield sites such a s Dinerth Road and sites released as a result of the school modernisation 

programme. 

244 Miss Morgan Ditchburn [522] 1 Object 

Summary Developing at Glyn Farm seems a very unsound idea. The one road leading to the area is already too busy and hazardous. Also to add a large 144 house 

estate would over populate the area beyond what it can cope with, with regards to community, sewers, drains, traffic etc. 

Building work would disrupt our home life as our house is right next to the proposed site. Noise, dirt, dust would affect us daily, plus there would be an 

intrusion on our privacy. I do not want the welfare of my children compromised. 

Change Sought: Remove Glyn Farm from the LDP 

1034 Mr Julian Anderson [1061] 

1 Object 







960 

Mr John Lewis [219] 

1 Object 

Summary Delete the proposed allocation at Glyn Farm for the reasons set out in the attachment to Glyn Farm Action Group representation to consider the alternative 

site at Dinerth Road, which is a brownfield site. 

Change Sought: Remove Glyn Farm Site from plan. 

117 

Mr David Shore [187] 

1 Object 

Summary Remove Glyn Farm allocation as a proposed development of 144 houses which represents a detrimental impact on the highway, drainage, safety of 

pedestrians and a possible flood issue. 

Change Sought: Removal of Glyn Farm Site from plan 

118 Mr Stephen Brown [188] 1 Object 

Summary Proposed development of 144 houses is inappropriate. Will impact on traffic, pedestrian safety and loss of green space. 

Drainage and flooding a serious consideration. 

Change Sought: Removal of Glyn Farm site from plan 

269



Rep No Name 

521 

Summary 

Glyn Community Association (Mr Paul Richards) [217] 

To delete the proposed allocation at Glyn Farm (a greenfield site) for reasons set out in the attached. 

To consider the alternative site at Dinerth Road which is marked on the attached map and is brownfield. 

People Type 

192 Object 

Council needs to revisit the predeposit consultation. 

Change Sought: To delete the proposed allocation at Glyn Farm (a greenfield site) for reasons set out in the attached. To consider the alternative at Dinerth Road which is 

marked on the attached map and is brownfield 

1026 Mrs Lesley Miller [392] 

1 Object 







959 Mrs June Lewis [218] 1 Object 

Summary Council needs to revisit the pre-deposit consultation. 


962 

Mrs S A Roberts [220] 

1 Object 

Summary No consideration has been given to the infrastructure of the local area. The junction of Abergele Road and Groes Road have a blind bend with a busy 

motorcycle garage opposite. 

If there was a road crash in that specific area, how would emergency services tackle another incident on the top estates? 

We have had years of pollution from brick lorries etc from the existing estate. 

The area where building is proposed is on a flood plain, adding to the inadequate sewage system. 

The building site proposed is a greenfield site. This outrage would remove that forever. Including the flora and fauna and wildlife. 


966 Mrs Linda Miller [224] 1 Object 

Summary Delete the Glyn Farm allocation for the reason given in the Glyn Farm Action Group Representation Form. 

Change Sought: Remove Glyn Farm Site from the plan 

970 Mrs Lynne Drake [242] 1 Object 

Summary No sites were identified at pre-deposit stage, the process is rendered invalid and should therefore be stopped, redesigned and started again. No-one at the 

Glyn was consulted in the early stages. Inclusion of the Glyn was a last minute situation. The whole thing has been rushed and badly designed. 

Glyn Farm is greenfield site. It has previously been subject to planning applications and refused. 

It would have adverse impact on landscape and infrastructure is not sufficient. 


550 

Summary 

Mr and Mrs John Hewinson [257] 

Regarding the Glyn Farm proposal: 

1 Object 

1 there was no opportunity to raise the matter with the LPA prior to the plan being placed on deposit 

2 the proposed development area is a green field site 

3 the proposed development will have a detrimental impact on the highway which will put residents safety at risk and also cause drainage problems that could 

lead to the flooding of existing premises. 

Change Sought: More appropriate sites should be allocated which are deliverable over the period of the plan, including the sourcing of known brown field sites which are not 

detailed in the LDP. 

973 

Roly Schwarz [260] 

1 Object 

Summary National policy may not have been followed. The proposal at the Glyn Farm site Colwyn Bay is on open green space, and a brown field site in the same area 

is/has not been considered (Dinerth Road). 


977 

Mrs Catherine Davies [344] 

1 Object 

Summary That the sites were not proposed in the pre-deposit consultation and the Glyn Farm site should be deleted from LDP and the CBC should consider alternative 

site at Dinerth Road as a brownfield site and should take account of any other site which may be released as result of school modication programme. 


1031 Mr Andrew Solomon [535] 

1 Object 







985 Mr Douglas Baines [348] 1 Object 


pedestrians and possible flooding issues. 

Change Sought: Remove the Glyn Farm allocation as proposed development of 144 houses will represent a detrimental impact on the highway, drainage, safety of 


270





Summary Firstly, it has not been prepared in accordance with the original Delivery Agreement. Secondly, the LDP has not been produced in accordance with the 

Conwy County Borough Council Community Involvement Scheme 

There is a great deal of concern over the potential impact of the development on the existing drainage infrastructure - especially given the history of localised 

flooding in the area. 

My constituents have raised concerns over highway and pedestrian safety 

There is no credible evidence base that the allocation of these green-field sites for housing development is appropriate. 

Change Sought: Revise the Delivery agreement due to the 'significance of these amendments' including all the relevant consultation 

7153 Mr Selwyn Rees [2091] 1 Object 


requirements. Amend site boundary of Glyn Farm to include farm buildings. 

Change Sought: Revision of housing strategy to option 3 levels of growth, in order to take account of economic and age structure priorities and deliver affordable housing 

requirements. Amend site boundary of Glyn Farm to include farm buildings. 

1786 Miss Sharon Walsh [2013] 1 Object 

Summary Development of 144 houses will have a detrimental impact on the highway, drainage and safety of pedestrians. 

Change Sought: Remove the Glyn Farm allocation. 

271


Policy HOU/1 Meeting The Housing Needs, Adj. to Glanarfon, Llanfairfechan 


344 

Mr Peter Mobbs [629] 

1 Object 

Summary a. If new housing is necessary in Llanfairfechan (and the LDP declares that demand is weak) then a solution would be to build multi apartments for the 

elderly on the southern plot (Area 1) on Penmaenmawr Road only. 

b. The current access to Maes Dolfor is already very busy and its ability to handle more traffic safely is doubtful. 

c. To cut down mature trees and a wood in the other areas and build with possible flood risk would seem to go against the quoted statements of the LDP. 

Change Sought: Amendment of site boundaries to Site 393 Maes Dolfor, Llanfairfechan 

583 Mr and Mrs David Wyn and Sarah Jones [858] 1 Object 

Summary LDP is not founded on an up to date housing needs assessment. The national average density is 30 dwellings per hectare. The Llanfairfechan allocation (site 

393) is 40 dwellings which is too intense and above the average. 

We are also extremely concerned that such an intense build by Maes Dolfor would have a detrimental impact on the drainage of surface water. There are 

already known subsidence issues with the houses on Maes Dolfor. Such an intense build would only exacerbate the situation. 

Change Sought: We propose site 328 - south of Caerffynon Road is a better location for access and space for the number of properties suggested. 

1826 Mr & Mrs Bleddyn & Frances Lewis [2049] 2 Object 

Summary The LDP is not founded on an up to date housing needs assessment. The national average density is 30 houses per hectare whilst site 393 is 40 dwellings. 

Site 328 is in a better location for access and space. 

There are already subsidence issues with the houses on Maes Dolfor and such an intense build would exascerbate the situation. 

Change Sought: Remove Maes Dolfor site from the LDP and replace it with site 328 

272


Policy HOU/1 Meeting The Housing Needs, Off Heol Martin,Eglwysbach 


1838 M W Horner [2060] 1 Object 

Summary The plan is speculative with no identifiable large scale demand in Eglwysbach. 

The sewerage system is already at overflow capacity with problems arising every time there is heavy rainfall. 

The existing highways are unclassified and already extremely busy and dangerous. 

There is no sign of any recreational facilities on the plan, children would have to negotiate the dangerous walk to the play area by the school. 

The school is near capacity and does not appear to be able to accommodate further children. 

Affordable housing will only be offered to people on the Housing Associations waiting list and no preference will be given to local people. 

Change Sought: Remove the Heol Martin site from the LDP. 

273


Policy HOU/1 Meeting The Housing Needs, Top Llan Rd, Llanrwst Rd, Glan Conwy 



Summary Housing Allocation - Glan Conwy 

No objection in principle, however any proposed access onto the A470 will need the approval of the Assembly. In addition, it is likely any proposed access 

shall incorporate a proposal to stop up the existing Top Llan Road/A470 junction and provide a diversion using the new access. 

1785 Mr John Hooson [2012] 

Summary Support the plan as development will improve local facilities and support local business. 

1 Support 


Summary This draft allocation is unrealistic for the following reasons:- 

i)It follows no logical boundary on the ground (unlike the application and allocation proposal by MacBryde Homes which have firm, long term defensible 

boundaries); 

ii)It is on a part of the site that is particularly steep and will therefore be extremely difficult to develop in isolation from the rest of the site (see further below); 

iii)It will not allow the substantial highway benefits to be provided which were put forward as part of the withdrawn application and which would follow from the 

allocation of the whole site. 

(see full submission for further detail). 

Change Sought: That the site at Top Llan Road/Llanrwst Road shown on the plan at Appendix 1 be allocated for housing. 

115 

Cllr Graham Rees JP [184] 

1 Object 

Summary Object to the inclusion of Gala Field due to lack of transparancy, the site had not been factored in the Sustainability Appraisal and the Conwy Local Housing 

market Assessment has not been used to identify the correct level of affordable housing in the area. 

Change Sought: Removal of Gala Field site from plan. 

773 Mrs Branwen Watts-Morgan [981] 1 Object 

Summary Affordable housing only on Carnival Field at realistic prices if plan were to go ahead. 

Change Sought: Affordable housing only on Carnival Field at realistic prices if plan were to go ahead. 

1184 Mr Emyr Lloyd Hughes [1235] 1 Object 

Summary The Top Road site in Glan Conwy designates steeply sloping land with restricted access onto the A470 trunk road for high density development but ignores 

more developable adjacent land. This site could not deliver sustainable homes for life in that context nor provide an acceptable means of access. 

Assessment is clearly lacking. 

Change Sought: Further assessment of the site's developability is required. 

754 

Glan Conwy Preservation Group (Mr Daniel Worsley) [965] 

399 Object 

Summary This allocation would be detrimental to the area's beauty and therefore the plan's tourism strategy. The site is on grade 2 agricultural/green field land and in 

an area of landscape beauty. The allocation goes against the Welsh Assembly's policy to protect the Welsh Language as the dwellings would most likely be 

taken by non-Welsh Speakers. There are over 20 dwellings in the village that have been on the market for 6 months so are more needed? There was a lack 

of consultation with the local community. The local infrastructure would not be able to meet needs of the population increase. 


274


Policy HOU/1 Meeting The Housing Needs, Adj Plas Penrhyn, Penrhyn Bay 

Rep No Name 

524 Miss Jacqueline Lang [795] 

Summary I have no objections to allotments. 

806 

Summary 

664 

Summary 

Mr Ian Roberts [1002] 

I have no objections to the planned allotments 

Mr Geoffrey Hocker [900] 

I have no objections to the planned allotments 

People Type 

1 Support 

1 Support 

1 Support 

405 

Cllr Terence Davies [685] 

1 Object 

Summary I have no objection to the planned allotments but consider that the housing element will have an adverse affect from traffic generated in an already confined 

area and on essential community facilities pressuring schools and medicla centre 

Change Sought: Remove Plas Penrhyn from LDP 

665 

Mr Geoffrey Hocker [900] 

1 Object 

Summary The housing element will have an adverse effect on traffic generated in an already confined area. Also it will put added pressure on the Medical Centre which 

is already difficult to get into, it will also overcrowd two schools. 

Change Sought: Remove housing element from site 

312 Mrs Alson Jones [595] 1 Object 

Summary Policy HOU/1 Adj Plas Penrhyn Penrhyn Bay 

I object to the housing element of the plan on the grounds that the existing infrastructure in terms of road traffic issues and utility provision would not support 

further housing. The allotments are a very good idea though. 

Change Sought: The provison for allotments only. 

679 

Llandudno Town Council (Ms Tessa Wildermoth MSc) [555] 

1 Object 

Summary We have no objection to the proposed allotments at Plas Penrhyn but we consider the housing element will have an adverse affect from traffic generated in 

an already confined area, on essential community facilities inc schools and medical centre. 

Change Sought: remove housing element of Plas Penrhyn site 

712 Mrs Lynn Hocker [931] 1 Object 

Summary Site 449, Penrhyn Bay. I have no objection to the planned allotments but think that the housing element will have an adverse effect on residential amenity, 

traffic generated, environmental conditions from the working dairy farm, on ecological and wildlife interests and landscape character, on agricultural land, and 

on essential community facilities. 

Change Sought: Removal of residential element from site 449 Plas Penrhyn , Penrhyn Bay. 

703 Mr David Chambers [919] 1 Object 




Change Sought: Removal of residential element on site 449 Plas Penrhyn, Penrhyn Bay. 

821 Mrs Ann Fender [1007] 1 Object 

Summary Site 449 Plas Penrhyn, Penrhyn Bay. Proposed development would have an adverse effect on residential amenity, from the traffic generated in the region of 

two schools, on environmental conditions arising from the noise and odours from the farm, on ecological and wildlife interests, on the best and most versatile 

agricultural land, and on essential community facilities. 

Change Sought: Removal site 449 from the Plan. 

786 Mr David Whitfield [969] 1 Object 



versatile agricultural land, and on essential community facilities, and on water and sewage works. 

Change Sought: Removal of residential element from site 449 Plas Penrhyn, Penrhyn Bay. 

525 Miss Jacqueline Lang [795] 1 Object 

Summary I believe the housing will have an adverse effect on residents 

1) traffic increase in already gridlocked area 

2) further pressure on Medical Centre and schools. 

Change Sought: Remove Plas Penrhyn from LDP 

738 Mrs Marie Lewis [947] 1 Object 

Summary The density of housing at the Plas Penrhyn Site should be reduced and greater consideration given to the provision of land use for allotments on this site. 

Change Sought: The density of housing at the Plas Penrhyn Site should be reduced and greater consideration given to the provision of land use for allotments on this site. 

611 Mr Alastair Loraine [865] 1 Object 

Summary Removal of site 449 Plas Penrhyn, Penrhyn Bay. Propose the site is designated for the sole use of allotments. The construction of more housing in a very 

compact site will cause incredible disruption to local residents. Penrhyn Bay has reached a population density that merits looking elsewhere for further 

residential developments. 

Change Sought: Removal of site 449 as part residential development and the designation of site 449 for the sole use of allotments. 

736 mr David Lewis [873] 1 Object 

Summary The density of housing at the Plas Penrhyn Site should be reduced and greater consideration should be given to the provision of land use for allotments on 

this site. 

Change Sought: The density of housing at the Plas Penrhyn Site should be reduced and greater consideration should be given to the provision of land use for allotments on 

this site. 

807 

Mr Ian Roberts [1002] 

1 Object 

Summary I have no objections to the planned allotments but think that the housing element will have an adverse effect on: traffic generated in an already congested 

area, on essential community facilities, putting pressure on the two schools and medical centre. 

Change Sought: Remove housing from Plas Penrhyn Site 

275


Policy HOU/1 Meeting The Housing Needs, Adj Plas Penrhyn, Penrhyn Bay 


721 

Miss Katie Gough [935] 

1 Object 





865 Mrs Gwyneth Parry [1021] 1 Object 





881 Mrs Margaret Burrows [1030] 1 Object 

Summary I have no objections to the planned allotments only but think that the housing element will have an adverse effect on & the allotments will have an effect on: 

The traffic generated in an already confined area; 

The housing will have an adverse effect on essential community facilities putting pressure on schools and medical centre. 

Change Sought: I have no objections to the planned allotments only but think that the housing element will have an adverse effect on & the allotments will have an effect on: 

The traffic generated in an already confined area; 

The housing will have an adverse effect on essential community facilities putting pressure on schools and medical centre. 

251 Mrs Anna Williams [457] 1 Object 

Summary I do not object the planned allotments at this site but I believe the housing element will have an adverse effect on the local community in the following ways: 

1) it would increase the traffic generated in an area which is already quite confined. 

2) it will put additional pressure on the community facilities which at present are running at full capacity, namely the local Primary school and Medical Centre. 

Change Sought: I believe the land should be defined as allotments. 

276


Policy EMP/2 Site Allocations to Meet B1, B2 and B8 Employment Demand and Free Stock Levels 



Summary Employment Allocation - Llanrwst 

The eastern corner of this site is within the TR111 preferred route for Llanrwst Bypass. With regard to the remainder of the site, the Assembly has no 

objection in principle, provided access is obtained via Ffordd Ty Gwyn. 

1441 Leith Planning Ltd (Mr Chris Plenderleith) [1791] 

1 Support 

Summary Whilst the level of employment land provision is not being challenged (albeit it would appear to be quite a substantial requirement) the distribution should be 

more balanced and appropriate. 

Change Sought: Whilst the level of employment land provision is not being challenged (albeit it would appear to be quite a substantial requirement) the distribution should be 

more balanced and appropriate. The provision of a different split of residential and employment land (7 hectares residential to 3.2 hectares of employment) at 

the mixed use site at Esgyryn will help to achieve this, and will further assist in the promotion of sustainable developments and reduced commuter travel. 

1197 Mr Gwyn Jones [1277] 

1 Object 

Summary Objection to the LDP on the basis that land at Towyn Way West is not allocated for residential or other development and that the settlement boundary has not 

been appropriately amended to incorporate the site. The Authority's assessment of the site is not accepted. 

Change Sought: Allocate Land at Towyn Way West, Towyn, in the Plan as mixed use, residential or employment. 


1 Object 

Summary We are concerned that it is not clear whether or not the new allocations have been taken through the SEA process. We therefore consider that this part of the 

plan does not appear to meet fully the SEA requirements and to be unsound. 

Change Sought: Ensure that the new allocations have been taken through the SEA process and that this is clearly detailed within the Plan. 

381 

Penmaenmawr Town Council (Cllr Dafydd Lloyd-Borland) [682] 

1 Object 

Summary In order for any town to thrive we feel that it is extremely important to protect employment sites in addition to allocating housing sites. It is noticeable that no 

employment sites have been allocated within the town boundaries of Penmaenmawr and Dwygyfylchi. In our opinion this is a serious omission. We accept 

that new employment sites are unlikely to come forward however, existing employment sites are under threat of potential housing development which has a 

higher land value. 

Change Sought: Allocate employment sites within the boundaries of Penmaenmawr and Dwygyfylchi 

1741 Barton Willmore (Mr Michael Courcier) [44] 1 Object 

Summary Esgyryn Llandudno Junction: 

From the documentation available, the deliverability of the employment element of the proposed mixed development has not been properly assessed. In 

particular, it has not been established that the proposed 90 dwellings would be sufficient to cross-fund the proposed employment development. 

Change Sought: In the absence of an adequate assessment of deliverability, the site (Esgyryn) should be deleted in preference to the Glan Conwy site. 


Summary It is considered that the allocation of mixed use development such as that proposed at Esgyryn is sound and robust however, the Council have disregarded a 

sustainable and viable development, as shown on the masterplan prepared by Pod in favour of a mixed development which is too heavily weighted towards 

employment and actively discourages sustainable development where people can live and work in the same site. 

Change Sought: The mix advocated by the adopted masterplan (whatever that means - it certainly not adopted in the development plan sense because it has not subject to 

adequate public consultation) is not deemed to be sustainable. The proposal by Pod design and outlined in greater detailed within the vision attached at 

appendix 5 is considered to be sustainable, viable and appropriate for the site and Llandudno Junction as a whole. 

1735 Barton Willmore (Mr Michael Courcier) [44] 1 Object 

Summary The Deposit Draft LDP makes inadequate provision for employment development. 

The Glan Conwy Corner site is well-placed to redress deficiencies as it is located immediately adjacent to the existing built-up area of Llandudno Junction; 

has high accessibility to the A55 and main-line rail services; and is suitable for a high amenity business park of the type that can attract high value service 

industries. The Wales Spatial Plan identifies such service industries as being fundamental to the growth of the North Wales economy. 

Change Sought: The site shown on the attached plan at Glan Conwy Corner should be allocated for employment development under Policy EMP/2 either as a substitute for 

one or more of the employment allocations made by the policy or in addition to them. 

1421 Leith Planning Ltd (Mr Chris Plenderleith) [1791] 

1 Object 

Summary Having reviewed the delivery agreement and the community involvement scheme concern is raised that land owners have not been sufficiently able to 

participate in the evolution of the LDP process. See section 6.5-6.8 of the attachment for full response. 

Change Sought: We would ask that any further dialogue concerning the Esgyryn site be conducted with the two principal land owners namely the Welsh Assembly and Leith 

Planning on behalf of Arfon Pierce. Concern is raised that the local authority have made assumptions on the matter of viability for the mixed use development 

at Esgryrn site without dialogue with the land owner, nor have the Council outlined how they have reached this conclusion. 

1578 Carter Jonas (Mrs Charlene Sussums) [50] 

Summary It is considered that upon examining the Deposit Local Development Plan, insufficient 

employment allocation has been put forward in order to satisfy the employment land 

demand and supply for Conwy. Accordingly it is considered that the plan is unsound and 

does not meet the soundness test of CE2. Additional site suggested. 

Change Sought: Additional site suggested - site south of hen ffordd Gonwy. See attachment for site plan. 






Change Sought: Additional site suggested - Land between railway line and A55, see attachment for site plan. 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1772 Mostyn Estates Limited (Mr Peter Caldwell) [717] 1 Object 

Summary Policy EMP/2 Employment Sites 

Land between Wormhout Way and Conway Road, Llandudno (Page 92) 

The Wales Spatial Plan identifies Llandudno area as a key employment centre for North Wales. 

With the opening of the Welsh Assembly Government offices it is expected that other quality businesses will seek to locate in the area. When The Point is 

developed there are no other identified sites available for quality development in the Plan period. This will have a detrimental effect on future employment 

prospects in the area. 

Change Sought: Proposal 

It is submitted that an additional B.1 site should be allocated for high quality office use on the entrance to Llandudno. This suggested site is situated adjacent 

to the A470 and is shown on the attached plan (3.85ha approx.) It is a sustainable site served by several bus routes, one mile from Llandudno Station and 

two miles from Junction 19 on the A55, good access and availability of services. This site should only be developed after The Point is substantially completed 

and would be subject to extensive landscaping and good design requirements. 

As there is no prestige site for an office park in Llandudno, Conwy and Colwyn Bay which is available for high quality development, the Inspector is requested 

to consider recommending that the site in Conway Road, Llandudno be allocated for high quality office development. 

277


Policy EMP/2 Site Allocations to Meet B1, B2 and B8 Employment Demand and Free Stock Levels 



1 Object 





Change Sought: Additional site suggested - between A55 and A547, Mochdre. 






Change Sought: Additional site suggested - Land adjacent to Afon Conwy Motel. See attachment for site plan. 






Change Sought: Additional site suggested - Land adjacent to Waste Water Treatment works. See attachment for site plan. 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1813 Redrow (Mr Robin Buckley) [1996] 1 Object 

Summary Redrow object to Policy EMP/2 - Site Allocation to Meet B1, B2 and B8 Employment Demand and Free Stock Levels, for the following reason:- 

1.Redrow object to the omission of land on the south east side of Abergele (refer to attached plan) for mixed use development, with potential to provided 14 

ha of high quality employment land linked to the construction of the East Abergele By-Pass. 

Change Sought: The land show on the attached plan should be allocated as a mixed use development area and development allowed to proceed in accordance with a 

development brief which will determine the precise form of the development, infrastructure requirements, phasing and the provision of community facilities. 

278


Policy CFS/1 Community Facilities and Services 


1812 CCBC (Mr Lyn Davies) [2026] 1 Support 

Summary Additional information identifies the need for a cemetary extension in Llanrwst and an additional cemetary in Abergele. 

Additional sites identified for inclusion in the LDP for cemetaries. 

Site references SR79 and SR80 

Change Sought: Additional sites identified for cemetaries. 

Site references SR79 and SR80 

279


Policy MWS/3 Safeguarding Hard Rock Reserves 


852 Hanson Aggregates (A.P Bower) [1017] 1 Support 

Summary 2. Policy MWS/3 - Safeguarding Hard Rock Reserves 

We support policy MWS/3 and the Council's recognition of the need to safeguard reserves, processing and transport facilities from other forms of 

development. 


1 Object 

Summary CCW notes the recognition of environmental constraints at identified sites, and recommends that the policy is cross-referenced to Policy NTE/1 and Policy 

NTE/4, to clarify that development will be subject to meeting those provisions. 

Change Sought: Policy MSW/3 is cross-referenced to Policy NTE/1 and Policy NTE/4, to clarify that development will be subject to meeting those provisions. 

1465 Denbighshire County Council - Planning Policy (Martha Savage) [1843] 1 Object 

Summary The LDP appears to have safeguarded existing hard rock mineral reserves rather than seeking to identify mineral deposits that should be safeguarded. There 

is no background paper to identify the approach taken with respect to safeguarding. Further clarification on the approach taken is necessary to provide further 

comment. 

Change Sought: Further clarification on the approach taken is necessary to provide further comment. 

1765 Mineral Products Association ltd (Mr Andrew Bromley) [2000] 1 Object 

Summary Policy MWS/3 - The policy must be extended to safeguard hard rock resources as well as reserves in accordance with national policy (MPPW, Para.13) and 

recommendations in the North Wales RTS (Page 75). 

Change Sought: The policy must be extended to safeguard hard rock resources as well as reserves in accordance with national policy (MPPW, Para.13) and 

recommendations in the North Wales RTS (Page 75). 

7235 Welsh Assembly Government (Mr Mark Newey) [2176] 1 Object 

Summary Paragraph 4.258 related to safeguarding rock quarries doesn't accord with NPP- seeks to maintain access to appropriate resources. Plan should state where 

resources lie outside existing permissions and safeguarded areas. Better quality resources should be distinguished on the basis of evidence. Paragraph 

4.258 mentions 'significant' sand/gravel resources (which needs defining) and then justify the lack of safeguarding for other resources. The LDP should set 

out intentions respecting prohibition notices and strategy for future use of dormant minerals- stated in paragraph 19 of MPPW. The proposals map doesn't 

indicate safeguarding for the jetty at Raynes as set out in policy MWS/3. 

Change Sought: The LDP should state where resources lie outside the existing permissions and safeguarded areas. Better quality resources should be distinguished on the 

basis of evidence. 'significance' should be defined and then justify why there is a lack of safeguarding for other sand a gravel resources present with the 

CCBC's area. The LDP should set out intentions in respect of prohibition notices and a strategy for future use of any dormant mineral sites. The proposals 

maps should indicate safeguarding for the jetty at Raynes 

280

Conwy Deposit Local Development Plan (Revised Edition 2011) 

SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES 

4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED 


19557 Castell Development Limited [4570] 1 Support 

Summary Castell Developments supports the strategic housing target of approximately 6,800 new dwellings and the contingency level of up to approximately 7,900 

dwellings. 

It supports the approach of locating approximately 85% of new dwellings within the Urban Development Strategy Area. 

It supports the approach of locating significant levels of new housing in Abergele. 

It welcomes the recognition in Table 4 that windfall development will play an important role in delivering the required levels of new housing. 

22389 Denbighshire County Council - Planning Policy (Ms Angela Loftus) [5171] 1 Support 

Summary The increased level of new housing to be provided over the period 2007 - 2022, in order to meet household forecasts for Conwy, is noted and welcomed. The 

strategy as to where these new homes should be located is a matter for Conwy CBC. 

22546 Awdurdod Parc Cenedlaethol Eryri / Snowdonia National Park Authority (Tim Polisi a Chynlluniau Strategol Eryri Policy and Strategic Plans 1 Support 

Team) [1663] 

Summary Profion Cadernid: 

Prawf C1 - Cynllun defnydd tir yw hwn sy'n ystyried cynlluniau a pholisïau a strategaethau perthnasol eraill sy'n ymwneud â'r ardal neu ardaloedd cyfagos. 

Mewn perthynas â'r prawf hwn, mae Awdurdod Parc Cenedlaethol Eryri yn ystyried bod Cynllun Datblygu Lleol Conwy yn gadarn mewn perthynas â CDLl 

Eryri. Mae Strategaeth Dai y Cynllun yn cyd-fynd gyda Strategaeth Cynllun Datblygu Lleol Eryri ac yn cydnabod y cysylltiad rhwng anheddiadau. 

19483 Landmark Consultancy (Mr David Collins) [1055] 1 Support 

Summary I fully support all of your allocations, which I feel reflect the fairness of distribution to meet the future needs within the existing communities. I also fully support 

the mechanism of new allocations and additional, reserve allocations scheduled under the contingency arrangements. 

I am aware of the adverse comments from interested pressure groups and those with vested interests but I feel that, as an Authority, the approach you have 

taken is commendable. 

13872 

I would urge Members to look to the future and ignore the short term "nimby" approach that so many objectors are driven by. 

Dwr Cymru Welsh Water (Mr Rhidian Clement) [4058] 1 Support 

Summary We note the allocations identified within the Plan and we will work with your Authority and potential developers to fully support sustainable economic 

development. However, we believe that due consideration must be given to maintaining service standards for our customers, as well as minimising the impact 

on the environment from pollution that can be caused by overloaded sewerage. Therefore this policy needs to cross reference to other policies within your 

plan, in particular Policy DP/1, DP/3, DP/4 DP/5 and DP/6. 

21061 D McGregor [4861] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as 

windfall sites or as rural exception sites. 

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them. 

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the 

settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land. 

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement. 

Change Sought: Delete sites 58, 329 and 330. 

21777 Mr Ben Baker [4855] 1 Object 








21781 Mr Iwan Hughes [4856] 1 Object 








20861 B Williams [4705] 1 Object 








281




20537 Mr Jack Burton [4704] 1 Object 








20533 D Drury [4703] 1 Object 








21045 Mr Paul Baker [4857] 1 Object 








20529 T Foley [4702] 1 Object 








21049 Ms Karen Baker [4858] 1 Object 








20525 S Jones [4701] 1 Object 








20521 L Beddows [4700] 1 Object 








282




21053 Ms Gemma Baker [4859] 1 Object 








22029 Mr Colin Cottrell [4698] 1 Object 








22221 J Murphy [4649] 1 Object 








20513 Ms Caroline Benjamin [4697] 1 Object 








21041 Ms Lucy Hughes [4854] 1 Object 








20509 M Benjamin [4696] 1 Object 








20505 R K Benjamin [4695] 1 Object 








283




21065 P McGregor [4862] 1 Object 








20177 Ms Sue Hancock [4694] 1 Object 








21069 G Bench [4863] 1 Object 








20501 H G Taylor [4693] 1 Object 








20857 Ms Pam Staley [4692] 1 Object 








21785 Mr David Jones [4864] 1 Object 








20853 Ms Margaret A Phillips [4691] 1 Object 








284




20173 Ms Ceris Phillips [4690] 1 Object 








21789 Ms Eileen Gallie [4865] 1 Object 








20849 Ms Hazel Old [4689] 1 Object 








21057 Mr A Bligh [4860] 1 Object 








22277 Mr Archie Owen [4849] 1 Object 








21517 T M Knight [5088] 1 Object 








21009 Ms Bryony Banwell [4843] 1 Object 








285




21901 K Williams [5067] 1 Object 








21013 M Bligh [4844] 1 Object 








20213 J Roberts [4928] 1 Object 








22057 D Jones [4925] 1 Object 








21017 Ms Helen Hughes [4845] 1 Object 








22053 J Broadbridge [4924] 1 Object 








21769 Mr Nigel Owen [4846] 1 Object 








286




21797 G J Jones [4869] 1 Object 








20969 C M Goss [4811] 1 Object 








21773 Ms Lynne Owen [4847] 1 Object 








21625 Mr Medwyn Jones [4713] 1 Object 








21613 B O Pearson [4706] 1 Object 








21029 Ms Jodi Gallimore [4851] 1 Object 








22169 Mrs May Dredge [4687] 1 Object 








287




20865 Mr Mike Oliver [4708] 1 Object 








21037 Ms Gill Galimore [4853] 1 Object 








20869 Gwynty Jones [4709] 1 Object 








21621 Mr Gareth Williams [4710] 1 Object 








21021 Mr Zak Owen [4848] 1 Object 








22001 Mr Peter Carpenter [4711] 1 Object 








21637 Eirwyn Davies [4717] 1 Object 








288




20873 Mr Iain Mumby [4712] 1 Object 








21629 Mr Paul Jones [4714] 1 Object 








20877 Mr Alan Mumby [4715] 1 Object 








21025 Mr Jason Stock [4850] 1 Object 








21633 Mr Peter Roberts [4716] 1 Object 








21617 Ms Anne Oliver [4707] 1 Object 








21033 Mr Alfie Roberts [4852] 1 Object 








289




20825 Ms Tesni Thomas [4659] 1 Object 
















20833 Ms Shannon Drury [4667] 1 Object 








21829 A Hughes [4881] 1 Object 








22165 G Saunders [4666] 1 Object 








21097 L Hughes [4882] 1 Object 








22229 P Jones [4665] 1 Object 








290




20441 R Hughes [4664] 1 Object 








21833 R Davies [4883] 1 Object 








22161 B H Jones [4663] 1 Object 








21837 Heddwyn Jones [4884] 1 Object 








21101 Ms Delyth Jones [4885] 1 Object 








20829 A Armstrong [4662] 1 Object 








22025 T Shelmerdine [4661] 1 Object 








291




21825 E M Jones [4880] 1 Object 








22021 J C James [4656] 1 Object 








20801 A Williams [4650] 1 Object 








21857 D Hughes [4894] 1 Object 








21853 G Breeze [4893] 1 Object 
















21849 B Greenfield [4892] 1 Object 








292




22157 D H Dorricott [4660] 1 Object 








22225 B Jones [4653] 1 Object 








21105 A McKereder [4886] 1 Object 








21113 E Parmintor [4889] 1 Object 








21841 D Parmintor [4888] 1 Object 








20821 R J Davies [4657] 1 Object 








21109 D A Gay [4887] 1 Object 








293




20433 N Lloyd [4658] 1 Object 








20837 L Webster [4669] 1 Object 








20809 Mr Hywel Hughes [4652] 1 Object 








20085 Ms Jade Davies [4756] 1 Object 








20541 Hannah . [4719] 1 Object 
















20489 Mr David Dredge [4686] 1 Object 








294




22037 C Jones [4868] 1 Object 








20485 Ms Gwyneth Jones [4685] 1 Object 








21081 A L Jones [4870] 1 Object 








20481 Mr John Davies [4684] 1 Object 








21801 Mr Martin Hampson [4871] 1 Object 








20477 Ms Anne Penketh [4683] 1 Object 








20473 Mr Stephen Evans [4682] 1 Object 








295




21805 J Pluck [4872] 1 Object 








20469 Mrs Elaine Brook [4680] 1 Object 








21609 Mr John Brook [4679] 1 Object 








20165 Ms Lindsay Marchant [4668] 1 Object 








20457 N Jones [4674] 1 Object 








21093 S Woods [4879] 1 Object 








20449 D Armstrong [4670] 1 Object 








296




20841 M Stanworth [4671] 1 Object 








21089 M Vaughan [4878] 1 Object 








20845 Y Stanworth [4672] 1 Object 








21809 K Ellis [4873] 1 Object 








20453 D Roberts [4673] 1 Object 








21605 J Williams [4678] 1 Object 








21817 S Roberts [4876] 1 Object 








297




20461 R Smith [4675] 1 Object 








21085 A Owen [4875] 1 Object 








21601 G Roberts [4676] 1 Object 
















20169 Mrs Lorraine Patterson [4688] 1 Object 








21821 C Owen [4877] 1 Object 








20197 S Barrett [4764] 1 Object 








298




20709 Mr Jon Cattell [4804] 1 Object 








20713 Mrs Denise Cattell [4805] 1 Object 








20945 H M Clarke [4772] 1 Object 








20941 B Davies [4771] 1 Object 








20609 K McGrane [4770] 1 Object 








21697 Mrs Sarah Ward [4806] 1 Object 








20937 J Rowson [4769] 1 Object 








299




20717 Mr Phil Ward [4807] 1 Object 








20933 N Griffiths [4768] 1 Object 








21681 R R Griffiths [4767] 1 Object 








21701 Ms Joyce Stafford [4808] 1 Object 








20605 K Coleman [4766] 1 Object 








21641 Mr Paul McCormack [4718] 1 Object 








20601 J Barrett [4765] 1 Object 








300




20705 Ms Sarah Shea [4803] 1 Object 








21709 C Owen [4810] 1 Object 








20929 Ms Maureen Jones [4763] 1 Object 








21713 M Bartlett [4812] 1 Object 








20925 Ms Jackie Roberts [4762] 1 Object 
















20193 Ms Sheila Johnston [4761] 1 Object 








301




20189 Mr William Heatley [4760] 1 Object 








21721 Ms Jayne Jones [4814] 1 Object 








21677 Ms Lesley Heatley [4759] 1 Object 








21725 Mr Steven Roberts [4815] 1 Object 








21673 Mr Gareth Owen [4758] 1 Object 








20597 Ms Hannah Jones [4757] 1 Object 








21729 Ms Dilys Carlisle [4816] 1 Object 








302




21705 Mr Mark Stafford [4809] 1 Object 








20641 Mr Ian Jones [4782] 1 Object 








20673 Ms Jean Johnson [4791] 1 Object 








20677 Anwel O'Leary [4792] 1 Object 








20669 A Rormes [4790] 1 Object 








20681 Mr Kevin O'Leary [4793] 1 Object 








20665 Ms Dilys Roberts [4789] 1 Object 








303




20953 Ms Hilda Green [4788] 1 Object 








20689 A Searle [4794] 1 Object 








20661 Ms Ellen Millington [4787] 1 Object 








20957 Ms Rebecca Scarlett [4795] 1 Object 








20657 Mrs Enid Williams [4786] 1 Object 








20653 Mr John Williams [4785] 1 Object 








21689 A Atherton [4796] 1 Object 








304




20649 Ms Lisa Hogan [4784] 1 Object 








21685 A Dugdale [4773] 1 Object 








20697 L M Armstrong [4800] 1 Object 








20721 Mr Andy Parry [4818] 1 Object 








20617 P Prouse [4775] 1 Object 








20965 Mr Howard Manwaring [4802] 1 Object 








20949 L Swainson [4776] 1 Object 








305




20621 S Swainson [4777] 1 Object 








20961 F Roberts [4797] 1 Object 
















20645 Mr Mike Williams [4783] 1 Object 








20629 Lam Jones [4779] 1 Object 








20633 Mr Andrew Gairns [4780] 1 Object 








20637 Ms Jennie Gairns [4781] 1 Object 








306












21693 M Gregson [4798] 1 Object 








20613 D Butler [4774] 1 Object 








20701 Ms Jill Hughes [4801] 1 Object 








22033 Mr Brian Roberts [4727] 1 Object 








21733 Ms Hollie Jones [4817] 1 Object 








20981 Zoe Parry [4831] 1 Object 








307




20897 Ms Sharon Harrison [4735] 1 Object 








21649 Ms Edna Austin [4734] 1 Object 








20737 Mr Peter Thomas [4832] 1 Object 








20569 Mrs & Mrs J & W Ward [4733] 1 Object 








20561 Mr & Mrs K & S Prior [4732] 1 Object 








20985 T Traynor [4833] 1 Object 








20741 B Thomas [4834] 1 Object 








308




21645 Mr John Jones [4731] 1 Object 








20893 Mr Paddy Williams [4730] 1 Object 








20557 Ms Linda Hughes [4729] 1 Object 








20989 Ms Christine Brown [4835] 1 Object 








21653 A Owen [4737] 1 Object 








20549 Mr James Lewis [4723] 1 Object 
















309




20745 Ms G Garland [4841] 1 Object 








20881 Mr James Northrop [4720] 1 Object 








20545 Mr Derek Hughes [4721] 1 Object 








21005 P M Williams [4840] 1 Object 








20885 N G Evans [4728] 1 Object 








21765 H Burton [4839] 1 Object 








20993 N Goss [4836] 1 Object 








310




20185 Mrs Lisa Lewis [4724] 1 Object 








21001 A Griffiths [4838] 1 Object 








22005 Phil Jones [4725] 1 Object 








20997 P Brown [4837] 1 Object 








20553 Mr Brandon Moody [4726] 1 Object 








20733 R Searle [4830] 1 Object 








20181 Mr Dave Parry [4722] 1 Object 








311












20749 Mr Wayne Harris [4842] 1 Object 








20589 Mr Brad Jones [4754] 1 Object 








20921 Ms Anne Forsberg [4753] 1 Object 








21737 Ms Julie Caffari [4819] 1 Object 








20585 Ms Charlotte Davies [4752] 1 Object 








20973 Lou Caffari [4820] 1 Object 








312




20581 Ms Elane Jones [4751] 1 Object 








21741 B Drury [4821] 1 Object 








22013 Joan Griffiths [4750] 1 Object 








20977 Mr Lee Hogan [4822] 1 Object 








21669 Mr Gwynfor Davies [4749] 1 Object 








20917 Ms Lesley Cockings [4748] 1 Object 








21745 Mr Neil Collison [4823] 1 Object 








313




20889 M Young [4736] 1 Object 








20905 Ms Cheryl Kesteven [4742] 1 Object 








20729 J Craddock Jnr [4829] 1 Object 








20573 P Owen [4738] 1 Object 








20577 A R Williams [4739] 1 Object 








20725 J Craddock [4828] 1 Object 








21657 Mrs Margaret Williams [4740] 1 Object 








314




21665 S Pritchard [4747] 1 Object 








20901 Ms Shiela Brady [4741] 1 Object 








20913 Mrs Slater [4746] 1 Object 








21757 Ms Jean Jones [4826] 1 Object 








21661 Mr Dave Kesteven [4743] 1 Object 








20909 Ms Joanne Graham [4744] 1 Object 








21753 Ms Michelle Harrison [4825] 1 Object 








315




22009 Mr Alan Graham [4745] 1 Object 








20593 Ms Alison Newell [4755] 1 Object 








21761 Ms Kate Lindley [4827] 1 Object 








21197 Ms Anita Jones [4915] 1 Object 








20773 Mr Roy Gill [4617] 1 Object 








19189 Cartrefi Conwy [4537] 1 Object 

Summary We are proposing the allocation of a site at land off Cae Tyddyn, Llanrwst. 

Change Sought: We are proposing the allocation of a site at land off Cae Tyddyn, Llanrwst. 

19248 Mr Ted Botfield [4543] 1 Object 

Summary It is considered that the site offered by this representation should be allocated for residential development in the Conwy LDP and also deleted from the Green 

Wedge designation which covers the Old Cowlyn Golf Course. 

Change Sought: Remove the land on the south east side of Coed Coch Road, Old Colwyn from the Green Wedge and allocate for housing. 









316




20133 Ms Alma Gill [4616] 1 Object 
















19279 Muller Austin Ltd [4544] 1 Object 

Summary It is considered that it would be sustainable to include the former Billington's Garage site, Conwy within the development boundary for Conwy. 

Including the site within the boundary would permit the redevelopment of this previously developed land in line with the objectives of Planing Policy Wales and 

would also capitalize on regeneration opportunities for the Conwy/Llandudno and Llandudno Junction hub in line with the objectives of the Wales Spatial Plan. 

Change Sought: Include the former Billington's Garage site within the development boundary for Conwy. 

20129 Mrs Jean Owen [4615] 1 Object 
















21177 H Coulson [4909] 1 Object 








21245 Pat Jones [4944] 1 Object 








22041 Mr Gereint Jones [4912] 1 Object 








317




19383 David Clayton Associates (Mr David Clayton MCIAT ACIOB) [4558] 1 Object 

Summary We enclose a location plan showing a 1.2 acre site in the village of Tyn-y-Groes. 

We understand that there is a need in the areas of Tyn-y-Groes, Dolgarrog and Eglwysbach for modestly priced housing and housing adapted for disable use. 

We wish to register our interest in developing the identified land for these or similar uses. 

The site received outline planning consent some years ago for a total of 16 dwellings. 

Change Sought: Allocate the site in Tyn-y-Groes for housing. 

20769 N Taylor [4613] 1 Object 








19462 Mrs Crenydd Cox [4561] 1 Object 

Summary 

The settlement boundary line in Llanfairfechan has been relocated in the proposed draft LDP maps, excluding an area of land between Tyddyn Bedol and 

Tyddyn Bedol Isaf which is viable for potential infill development. 

This relocation of the settlement boundary was carried out without consultation with the land ownerr and the local councillor, both of whom wish the area to 

remain within the settlement boundary. 

The settlement boundary in the draft UDP included this area of land. 

Change Sought: Re locate the settlement boundary at Llanfairfechan to include the area of land between Tyddyn Bedol Isaf and Tyddyn Bedol to allow it to be used for infill 

development. 

20121 Mr Edward H Williams [4612] 1 Object 








21201 M E Hughes [4916] 1 Object 








19473 Mrs Julia Brownsword [4564] 1 Object 

Summary Include candidate site references 363 and 364 in the LDP. 

Change Sought: Include candidate site references 363 and 364 in the LDP. 

20765 Mr Edward Gareth Williams [4611] 1 Object 








22061 Ms Sue Jones [4943] 1 Object 








318




21205 Mr Tony Hughes [4917] 1 Object 








20125 Mr Robert Owen [4614] 1 Object 








22069 M E Davies [4947] 1 Object 








20409 N Edwards [4626] 1 Object 
















20089 M E Griffiths [4926] 1 Object 








21597 Ms Bethan Coleman [4624] 1 Object 








319




22073 A C Jones [4948] 1 Object 








20153 Ms Fay Jones [4623] 1 Object 









Summary We are proposing the allocation of a site at land at Maes y Llan, Groesfordd, Dwygyfylchi. 

Change Sought: We are proposing the allocation of a site at land at Maes y Llan, Groesfordd, Dwygyfylchi. 

20209 R Goosey [4927] 1 Object 








20405 Mr Dennis Booth [4622] 1 Object 








20137 B Lomas [4618] 1 Object 








20149 Mr Kevin Bird [4621] 1 Object 









Summary We are proposing the allocation of a site at land off Llysfaen Road, Llysfaen. 

Change Sought: We are proposing the allocation of a site at land off Llysfaen Road, Llysfaen. 

320




21181 D Coulson [4910] 1 Object 









Summary We are proposing the allocation of a site at land off Berth y Glyd Road, Llysfaen. 

Change Sought: We are proposing the allocation of a site at land off Berth y Glyd Road, Llysfaen. 









20145 Ms Joan Halliday [4620] 1 Object 








20217 Ms Emma Barrett [4935] 1 Object 








21185 C Roberts [4911] 1 Object 








20141 Rolfe Lomas [4619] 1 Object 









Summary Policy HOU/1 is too prescriptive in the delivery of both open market and affordable housing. The policy is inflexible and the prescriptive nature, particulalry 

with regard to the delivery of affordable housing, is not realistic given the recent economic downturn and the overall fall in the delivery of housing and 

affordable housing. 

Again the first paragraph on page 111 is inflexible and restricts the provision of affordable housing. This paragraph restricts the delivery of AHLN to within the 

confinements of the settlement. 

Change Sought: The text above criteria (b), on page 109, should be amended at the end of the first sentence to include additional text as follows "...or where there is a need 

for additional housing within the locality". 

The first sentence of the paragraph regarding Tier 1 and Tier 2 Main Villages on page 110 should include the following additional text "...except where 

demand for market housing can be demonstrated". The reference to "small-scale schemes" within this paragraph is inflexible as the size of schemes for 

AHLN should not be limited to a specifc size but should respond to the requirements of the individual area. 

321




22065 Ms Katie Bebbington [4946] 1 Object 








20117 D Cope [4610] 1 Object 









Summary We are proposing the allocation of a site at land off Tan Y Fron, Deganwy. 

Change Sought: We are proposing the allocation of a site at land off Tan Y Fron, Deganwy. 

21577 Mrs Carole Grant [4589] 1 Object 








21209 Ms Trudy Roberts [4918] 1 Object 








20221 Dr H Rahil [4938] 1 Object 








21221 H Evans [4930] 1 Object 








21569 G B Thomas [4587] 1 Object 








322




21585 Ms Sarah Roberts [4599] 1 Object 








20397 Ms Kelly Camis [4598] 1 Object 








21573 Major D Grant [4588] 1 Object 








21225 J Aucher [4931] 1 Object 








20041 Mr Joshua Alex Sanders [4597] 1 Object 








21217 L Brookes-Fazakerley [4929] 1 Object 








21229 J L Smith [4932] 1 Object 








323




20753 R N Millner [4586] 1 Object 








20037 Mr Anthony Howard [4596] 1 Object 








20393 Mr James Camis [4595] 1 Object 








20381 Chris Jones [4590] 1 Object 








21237 B M Smith [4936] 1 Object 








21233 K Smithyman [4933] 1 Object 








20757 Mr Ifan P Jones [4594] 1 Object 








324




21581 Mr William Wooton [4593] 1 Object 








22289 Ms Sophie Davies [4934] 1 Object 








20389 Ms Melanie Manwaring [4592] 1 Object 








20385 Mr Phil Griffiths [4591] 1 Object 








22233 P Williams [4937] 1 Object 








19579 

Summary 

Menter Iaith Conwy (Mr Meirion Davies) [4581] 

Datblygiadau Niwediol 

Fel "cynllunwyr ieithyddol" proffesiynol credwn fod 2 achos fydd yn cael effaith sylweddol negyddol ar y Gymraeg fel iaith gymunedol. 

Llanrwst 

Datblygu 150 o dai yn Llanrwst. Gan fod y "teclyn" ond newydd gael ei fabwysiadu. 

Abergele 

Rydym hefyd yn arbennig o bryderus am ddatblygu 873 o dai yn ardal Abergele. Er bod Abergele tu hwnt i ardal sydd wedi ei ddinodi yn "ardal ieithyddol 

sensitive". Credwn bydd y datblygiad yma yn gwanhau y Gymraeg ym mhellach ac yn cael effaith negyddol ar ardaloedd agos megis Llanfairtalhearn. 

Change Sought: Credwn buasai parhau efo'r cynlluniau yma yn mynd yn groes i Strategaeth Gymunedol y sir sydd yn datgan; 

"Hunaniaeth Gymdeithasol a Diwylliannol - mae trigolion Bwrdeistref Sirol Conwy yn falch o'u diwylliant ac yn frwd dros barhau i warchod a datblygu'r 

Gymraeg." Tud 9. 

We believe that continuing with these schemes would be contrary to the county's Community Strategy that states; 

1 Object 

"Social and Cultural Identity - the residents of Conwy County Borough are proud of their culture and are keen to continue preserving and developing the 

Welsh language." Page 9. 


Summary We are proposing the allocation of a site at land to the rear of Hendy Tal y Bont. 

Change Sought: We are proposing the allocation of a site at land to the rear of Hendy Tal y Bont. 

325




20113 Mr Arwyn Roberts [4609] 1 Object 








19527 Mr Adrian Lloyd Jones [4569] 1 Object 

Summary The level of new build required within the LDP is far more than that which is actually required for the County Borough taking into account past population 

changes and likely future scenarios. 

The levels of new build houses proposed for Dwygyfylchi and Penmaenmawr are excesive to that which is actually required. Whilst some new houses may 

well be needed, the numbers being proposed are too great for such a small village. 

Change Sought: Reduce the housing allocation within the LDP. 

Reduce the housing allocation for Dwygyfylchi and Penmaenmawr. 

21593 V E David [4608] 1 Object 








20233 Mr Ben Liepins [4942] 1 Object 








20201 M Baldwin [4919] 1 Object 
















20109 Ms Pauline Williams [4607] 1 Object 








326




20229 Mr Malcolm Bleasdale [4941] 1 Object 








20401 Ms Brenda Roberts [4600] 1 Object 








21589 Ms Patricia Day [4605] 1 Object 








19486 Mr & Mrs Wennell [4568] 1 Object 

Summary Site 223 has failed the Stage 2 Site Assessment, we feel however that the site has merit and we would wish it to be put forard for consideration as a 

contingency site. 

My clients propose if needed to include the whole of their existing curtilage within the site to be considered for candidacy or as an alternative to that which 

they have already proposed. They propose to demolish their exisitng dwelling if successful and their existing access could be used in either case. 

Change Sought: Site 223 to be considered as a contingency site 

22045 P Roberts [4921] 1 Object 








22049 Ms Rebecca Jones [4922] 1 Object 








20225 Mrs Louise Rahil-Kirwin [4940] 1 Object 








327




20101 Ms Jennifer Heys [4604] 1 Object 








20003 Mr David Forrest [4584] 1 Object 








20097 Mr David Neil Roberts [4603] 1 Object 








21565 Mr Hadyn Thomas [4585] 1 Object 








21213 Mr Craig Jones [4923] 1 Object 








20093 Mr Gwyn Roberts [4601] 1 Object 








21241 Mrs D M Rahil [4939] 1 Object 








328




20105 V Hamilton-Shields [4606] 1 Object 








20421 Mr Colin MacKenzie [4645] 1 Object 








20077 Mrs Maura Livings [4641] 1 Object 
















21161 R Jones [4905] 1 Object 








20053 Ms Hazel Rahil [4633] 1 Object 








20061 Ms Michelle Stephens [4635] 1 Object 








329




21261 L Evans [4952] 1 Object 








20057 Mr Simon Rahil [4634] 1 Object 








21281 E MacGregor [4957] 1 Object 








21145 J Jones [4901] 1 Object 








21133 N Walls [4898] 1 Object 








20797 Mr David Livings [4642] 1 Object 








20157 S Williams [4643] 1 Object 








330




21153 E Holmes [4903] 1 Object 








20049 Ms Loren Edwards [4632] 1 Object 








21249 L J Jones [4949] 1 Object 








21141 M Walls [4900] 1 Object 








21277 A Butterworth [4956] 1 Object 








21269 T Evans [4954] 1 Object 








20081 Ms Liz MacKenzie [4644] 1 Object 








331




20413 J Webb [4639] 1 Object 
















21129 C Walls [4897] 1 Object 








20065 Ms Aimee Rahil [4636] 1 Object 








20073 Mr David Kirwin [4638] 1 Object 








20417 A Webb [4640] 1 Object 








21273 K Carlisle [4955] 1 Object 








332




20069 Ms Edwina Rahil [4637] 1 Object 








21149 E Johnson [4902] 1 Object 








21125 P Walls [4896] 1 Object 








19919 Mr David Bryan Jones [4532] 1 Object 

Summary We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails 

to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly 

in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language. 

Change Sought: Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change. 

21257 Ms Roxy Roberts [4951] 1 Object 








21173 Mr Kevin Jones [4908] 1 Object 








19222 Ms Mary Jamil [4534] 1 Object 





21285 Ms Diane Cattell [4958] 1 Object 








333




21157 C Cook [4904] 1 Object 








20045 Ms Jade Kristian [4631] 1 Object 








21253 R O Jones [4950] 1 Object 








21121 L Brookes [4895] 1 Object 








20789 A Roberts [4629] 1 Object 








21169 M E Cutts [4907] 1 Object 
















334




20781 S Hender [4627] 1 Object 
















19983 Mrs Elizabeth Gaynor Wade [4533] 1 Object 













21137 S Walls [4899] 1 Object 








20161 Mr Stephan Jones [4647] 1 Object 








21165 M A Powell [4906] 1 Object 








21961 G Howard [5129] 1 Object 








335




22189 H Parry [5022] 1 Object 








22305 R J Jones [5111] 1 Object 








21869 Ms Tracey Jones [5021] 1 Object 








21413 Ms Phyllis Roberts [5020] 1 Object 
















22177 G Gawer [5023] 1 Object 








21937 J O'Leary [5113] 1 Object 








336




21417 D Gawer [5024] 1 Object 








21405 Mr Dave Jones [5018] 1 Object 
















22273 S Davis [5114] 1 Object 








21397 M Lunt [5016] 1 Object 








21941 F Davis [5115] 1 Object 








21393 P Stephenson [5015] 1 Object 








337




21409 Mr Shaun Jones [5019] 1 Object 








21425 B Owen [5028] 1 Object 








20341 J S Neward [5104] 1 Object 








20281 Ms Ann Roberts [5033] 1 Object 








22261 Iori Davies [5032] 1 Object 








21429 O M Jones [5031] 1 Object 
















338












21545 V J Coffey [5110] 1 Object 








22117 S F Vick [5106] 1 Object 








22109 F Groves [5013] 1 Object 








22121 R Aughton [5107] 1 Object 








22181 Ms E Garland [5027] 1 Object 








21421 Dr Rowland [5026] 1 Object 








339




22125 L Owen [5108] 1 Object 








21873 C Truscott [5025] 1 Object 








22129 A Brown [5109] 1 Object 








20273 C Woodcock [5029] 1 Object 








21953 S Todd [5126] 1 Object 








21381 J M Roberts [5003] 1 Object 








21377 Mr Barry Jones [5002] 1 Object 








340




20361 T Barrett [5124] 1 Object 








22105 L Hill [5001] 1 Object 
















21865 K Stephenson [5014] 1 Object 








21373 E Webster [4999] 1 Object 








20353 DA Berrow [5122] 1 Object 
















341




21957 W Howard [5127] 1 Object 








22293 B Stratham [4997] 1 Object 








22257 W Colclough [4996] 1 Object 








22141 M Howard [5128] 1 Object 








20249 C S F Daw [4995] 1 Object 








22101 J A Webster [5000] 1 Object 








21457 E Newall [5059] 1 Object 








342




22113 Ms Lisa Davies [5102] 1 Object 








22217 M C Crowl [5117] 1 Object 








22185 Ms Grace Loom [5012] 1 Object 








21389 Mr Rob Jones [5011] 1 Object 








21949 R Atherton [5118] 1 Object 








21861 Mr Keith Roberts [5010] 1 Object 








20357 S Todd [5123] 1 Object 








343




20269 K Hunt [5009] 1 Object 








20253 R Pinkerton [5004] 1 Object 








20349 D Berrow [5120] 1 Object 








20261 P Lewis [5007] 1 Object 








21549 G Berrow [5121] 1 Object 








20257 G East [5006] 1 Object 








21385 S Hughes [5005] 1 Object 








344




21945 L Coleman [5116] 1 Object 








22133 B Fortune [5119] 1 Object 








21917 J Longmore [5085] 1 Object 








21505 Viv Healy [5082] 1 Object 








21461 I A Craig [5063] 1 Object 








21897 F A Craig [5062] 1 Object 








21509 N Williams [5083] 1 Object 








345




20321 A Longmore [5084] 1 Object 








20337 Mr/Ms Neward [5103] 1 Object 








21889 P Stubbs [5060] 1 Object 








22201 M Hall [5065] 1 Object 








21453 H J Smith [5058] 1 Object 








21513 M R Harris [5086] 1 Object 








21449 R Williams [5057] 1 Object 








346




21885 H Jones [5056] 1 Object 








20325 H L Harris [5087] 1 Object 








21881 S Hodgetts [5055] 1 Object 








21893 H E Jones [5061] 1 Object 








21905 Francis Hogan [5076] 1 Object 








21497 Ms Sue O'Grady [5079] 1 Object 








21909 Mr Paul Foulkes [5078] 1 Object 








347




21485 D M Healy [5073] 1 Object 








21489 R Dell [5074] 1 Object 








21481 Ms Fran Ashdown [5072] 1 Object 








22317 S J Dell [5075] 1 Object 








21465 J Hall [5064] 1 Object 








22209 Mr Adam Goss [5070] 1 Object 








21913 Ms Margaret Evans [5081] 1 Object 








348




21473 Mr Carl Hancock [5069] 1 Object 








21493 Ms Donna Foulkes [5077] 1 Object 








21469 Mr/Ms Townsend [5068] 1 Object 








21501 Ms Joan Mynott [5080] 1 Object 
















21445 Ms Kate Rowlands [5053] 1 Object 








21477 Ms Yvonne Leggett [5071] 1 Object 








349




21541 Ms Maureen Thomas [5100] 1 Object 








22269 R N Parry [5089] 1 Object 








21533 Mrs Sharon Winters-Jones [5097] 1 Object 








21561 Ms Nicola Thomas [5042] 1 Object 








22313 T Burton [5041] 1 Object 








21537 Mr Rhys Winters-Jones [5098] 1 Object 








22197 Ms Ellen Dorricott [5040] 1 Object 








350




21929 Mr John Bentley [5096] 1 Object 








22193 Ms Mandy Pritchard [5039] 1 Object 








22265 Mr John Hughes [5044] 1 Object 








20293 Ms Claire Hughes [5038] 1 Object 








20289 Mr Alwyn Evans [5037] 1 Object 








20333 Mr David Newall [5101] 1 Object 








20285 Les Evans [5036] 1 Object 








351




21437 Ms Anne Evans [5035] 1 Object 








20265 D Carlisle [5008] 1 Object 
















21925 Mr Mike Hogan [5093] 1 Object 








21433 Mr Dave Williams [5034] 1 Object 








21521 T Jones [5090] 1 Object 








21441 S Connor [5052] 1 Object 








352




22213 A S Pullin [5091] 1 Object 
















20313 Ms Lindsay Beecham [5050] 1 Object 








22297 Mr Gareth Thomas [5043] 1 Object 








20309 Mr Nick Lewis [5049] 1 Object 








21877 D G Hughes [5054] 1 Object 








20305 Mr Eryl Williams [5048] 1 Object 








353




20301 M Outram [5047] 1 Object 








21525 Ms Mary Armstrong [5094] 1 Object 








22301 M Jobson [5046] 1 Object 








21529 Ms Averil Bentley [5095] 1 Object 








20297 B Walding [5045] 1 Object 








21921 Ms Jennifer Rowlands [5092] 1 Object 








21329 P Seddon [4977] 1 Object 








354




21341 Mr Glyn Hughes [4983] 1 Object 








21313 Mr Paul Stafford [4971] 1 Object 








21993 Ms Edna Dunn [5144] 1 Object 








21317 E D Gollop [4972] 1 Object 








22093 Mr William Ivor [4973] 1 Object 








20377 Mr Alun Williams [5143] 1 Object 








21321 Ms Susan Gibbs [4974] 1 Object 








355




21989 Mrs Anona Sampson [5142] 1 Object 








21325 D Moody [4975] 1 Object 








22089 Ms Kelly Taylor [4970] 1 Object 








20373 Mr Ian Sampson [5141] 1 Object 








21965 Mr John Wilson Jones [5130] 1 Object 








21553 T Hopkinson [5140] 1 Object 








21333 C Duce [4978] 1 Object 








356




20245 Mr Brian Griffiths [4979] 1 Object 








21985 K Shah [5139] 1 Object 








22237 Ms Emma Kewley [4980] 1 Object 








21981 D Shah [5138] 1 Object 








21337 Mr Stuart Kewley [4981] 1 Object 








22241 Ms Shiela Thomas [4982] 1 Object 








22153 J Shah [5137] 1 Object 








357




22097 L J Cheetham [4976] 1 Object 








22374 Mrs Searl [5170] 1 Object 

Summary Whilst section 3.14.5 advises that Llandudno, Llandudno Junction and Conwy are to provide up to 20540 dwellings, the two sites proposed for development 

within Llandudno Junction represent just 8% of the provision for the three key towns. This figure is considered to be wholly insufficient to meet the needs of 

such a major town and particularly with so much employment land focus. 

It would be unsustainable to provide lots of employment land without the associated housing development at Llandudno Junction to support the objectives of 

sustainable development. It is considered that additional housing land should be provided within Llandudno Junction. 

Change Sought: Additional housing land should be provided within Llandudno Junction. This can be achieved through most effective and efficient use of sites that have 

already been allocated for development such as Esgyryn. 

21289 Ms Joan Truby [4959] 1 Object 








22540 Penmaenmawr Town Council (A M Jones) [5192] 1 Object 

Summary The overall figure of 6800 developments within the County is much too high to the current existing developments and is far too ambitious for the county to 

absorb without considerations for other factors such as public play areas, employment, schools, doctor, surgeries and dentistry provisions and transportation 

issues. 

All the developments with Penmaenmawr and Dwygyfylchi appear to be on greenfield sites and no consideration has been given for existing brownfield sites. 

Change Sought: The Town Council would welcome a substantial scaling down of the development with a need to actively seek existing brownfield sites for the developments 

to continue. 

22077 Ms Joan Burton [4960] 1 Object 








20241 Ms Jenny Roberts [4961] 1 Object 








22539 The Order of the Sisters of St Joseph of the Appartition [5191] 1 Object 

Summary The LDP is unsound given that the document has an overreliance on windfall sites and extant permission to meet the housing delivery targets of the district. 

Only 37% of the districts housing supply will be provided by allocated site up to 2022. Residential allocations provide the most secure and deliverable sources 

of swellings yet the council has chosen to rely on undelivered extant planning permissions and windfall sites. The potential for an undersupply of dwellings to 

occur and the lack of flexibility in the LDP to respond to such an occurrence renders the LDP unsound. 

Change Sought: Site reference 382, Land adjoining Tyddyn Bach, Penmaenmawr should be allocated for housing. 

22535 Penmaenmawr Golf Club (Mr Clive T Brown) [5184] 1 Object 

Summary We object to the candidate site reference 329. 

The area of land was erroneously the subject of an outline planning application by a previous committee of the club. This committee failed to realise the 

impact of building on this land would have on the ability of the club to continue to play golf on the existing adjoining areas. 

The committee failed to take account of the affect any injunction to stop playing golf on the grounds of safety would have on the credibility of the golf course. 

This will undermine the financial viability of the club for the future. 

Change Sought: Do not allocate the candidate site 329 or allow any development on the site. 

22523 Abergele Town Council (Mrs Mandy Evans ) [5181] 1 Object 





358




22461 Mr Peter Edmondson [5175] 1 Object 

Summary I enclose a mpa showing our property, outlined in red, known as the West Coast Factory, Llanfairfechan. 

I would be most grateful if you would consider this property for inclusion in the Local Development Plan with regard to future housing development. 

Change Sought: Include the West Coast Factory, Llanfairfechan as a housing allocation. 

22460 Dexter Products (Mr Chris Westmoreland) [5174] 1 Object 

Summary Please consider the area defined on the enclosed map, at Llanerch Road, Llanfairfechan to be considered for inclusion in the Developmenet Plan as an area 

for residential development. 

The tenant of the garage at the rear of the property is on a rolling 12 month notice to vacate so that will not be a problem. 

Change Sought: Please consider the area defined on the enclosed map, at Llanerch Road, Llanfairfechan to be considered for inclusion in the Developmenet Plan as an area 

for residential development. 

21997 Ms Leslie Evans [5145] 1 Object 








21293 Ms Hazel Brown [4963] 1 Object 








21309 Ms Sandra Stafford [4969] 1 Object 








22173 G Watson-Jones [5148] 1 Object 








21297 Ms Josie Jones [4964] 1 Object 








21301 Sam Roberts [4965] 1 Object 








359




22017 M Cox [5147] 1 Object 








22309 H K Irving [4966] 1 Object 








19999 Mr Gerry McCaffrey [5150] 1 Object 








21305 Pat Helm [4967] 1 Object 








22085 A Wise [4968] 1 Object 








19995 Mrs Anne McCaffrey [5149] 1 Object 



Rasing the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them. 

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and respresent development outside the 



Change Sought: Delete sites 58, 329 and 330 

22081 Ms Joyce Jones [4962] 1 Object 








360




21345 Ms Sheila Probin [4984] 1 Object 








21977 P Bolderson [5135] 1 Object 








20365 Mr Dennis Jones [5132] 1 Object 








21353 M Batchford [4988] 1 Object 








22245 M Barrett [4986] 1 Object 








21969 E A Thomas [5131] 1 Object 








21361 E Jones [4991] 1 Object 








361




22281 M Lomax [4989] 1 Object 








22253 M Jacklin [4992] 1 Object 








21349 CDR G G Croft [4985] 1 Object 








21357 G Jones [4990] 1 Object 
















20369 S Shah [5136] 1 Object 








22149 L V Jones [5134] 1 Object 








362




21365 J Collier [4993] 1 Object 








22145 Ms Marylyn Jones [5133] 1 Object 








22285 B E Roberts [4994] 1 Object 








19363 Mrs Jane Margaret Taylor [1925] 1 Object 





18487 Mrs Margaret Glenys Davies [1631] 1 Object 



in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language). 


18498 Mr Dylan Wyn Davies [1632] 1 Object 





19070 A Lloyd Davies [2909] 1 Object 





18113 Miss Nia Haf Davies [1634] 1 Object 





19474 Dr Aram Baghomian [1924] 1 Object 





18344 Mr Donald Short [1921] 1 Object 





19260 Mr Ian McAlpine [1642] 1 Object 





17776 Mrs Jean Selina West [1418] 1 Object 





363




19819 Mr Geoffrey Peter Simpson [1673] 1 Object 





19617 Mrs Judith Walker [2864] 1 Object 





18333 Mrs Marjorie Short [1914] 1 Object 





19703 Mrs Ann Vaughan [1674] 1 Object 





19081 Mr H Tracey [3040] 1 Object 





18322 Mr Allan Frederick Nicholls [1912] 1 Object 





18124 Mr David underwood Ferrand [1689] 1 Object 





18135 Mr Martin John Kay [1690] 1 Object 





18311 Mrs Jacqueline Ann Nicholls [1911] 1 Object 





19682 Mr Christopher Robin Ocego [1716] 1 Object 





20010 Miss P Watson-Jones [3783] 1 Object 








18300 Mr Harry Thompson [1910] 1 Object 





17919 William Wells [3011] 1 Object 





364




17787 Miss Roxanne Rebecca Taylor [1560] 1 Object 





19328 Mrs Gaenor Jones Baghomian [1419] 1 Object 





17655 Mr Caledfryn Williams [1192] 1 Object 





21073 Glan Conwy Preservation Group (Mr Daniel Worsley) [965] 1 Object 








17732 Mr Colin Masters [1949] 1 Object 





18443 Mrs Anwen Medlicott [1446] 1 Object 





19873 Mr Arthur Rodney Cannell [1464] 1 Object 





19828 Ms Lesley Taylor [2750] 1 Object 






Summary How has the capacity of the Tier 1 and 2 villages to accommodate the level of development proposed without significant harm to their character/biodiversity / 

landscape been decided? Fore.g. at Llysfaen, there is a proposal for an extra 250 houses. 

Change Sought: How has the capacity of the Tier 1 and 2 villages to accommodate the level of development proposed without significant harm to their character/biodiversity / 

landscape been decided? Fore.g. at Llysfaen, there is a proposal for an extra 250 houses. 

19318 Mrs Susan C Osborn [1468] 1 Object 





18355 Mr David Geraint Mark Davies [1941] 1 Object 





19435 Mr Ronald Garner [1927] 1 Object 





365



Rep No Name 

14130 

Summary 

Home Builders Federation Ltd (Mr Richard Price) [1934] 

We have concerns with the certainty of the land supply within Policy HOU/1, which are detailed below. 

Over reliance on windfall sites 

Empty Homes Strategy 

People Type 

1 Object 

Contingency Sites 

Change Sought: The reliance on windfall development should be reduced and more sites should be allocated in order to introduce more certainty into the housing land supply 

of the LDP. 

18476 

The LDP should have a new policy on the process and allocation of contingency sites 

Mrs Grace Margaret Jones [1630] 1 Object 





19667 Mr Graham Ellison [3560] 1 Object 





17721 Mr Howard George Oliver [1929] 1 Object 





18234 Mr Peter Woodhouse [1809] 1 Object 





19837 Miss Stephanie Taylor [1561] 1 Object 





17710 Miss Lynette Jane Oliver jones [1928] 1 Object 





19652 Mrs Christine Muriel McAlpine [1599] 1 Object 





18454 Mr Eric Watson [1605] 1 Object 





19445 Mrs Gloria Garner [1926] 1 Object 





18465 Mrs Margaret Watson [1606] 1 Object 





18157 Mr Adam Judge [1720] 1 Object 





19590 Mr Gavin Lavington [1513] 1 Object 





366




19136 C Royds [3191] 1 Object 





18146 Mrs Irene Farrend [1717] 1 Object 





19114 J Mitchell [3120] 1 Object 





18267 Mr Leslie Samuel Evans [1861] 1 Object 










18212 Mrs Davida Wooller [1779] 1 Object 





17699 Mrs Patricia Morris Jones [1849] 1 Object 





19125 B Royds [3175] 1 Object 





18223 Mrs Monica Jones [1792] 1 Object 





19313 Mr Alun Gwyn Jones [1837] 1 Object 





19204 Mrs Barbara Howarth [1771] 1 Object 





19158 J Clarkson [3286] 1 Object 





18201 Mr Phillip Lally [1762] 1 Object 





19417 Mr Geoffrey Hatcher [1800] 1 Object 





367




19316 Mrs Lorna Jones [1836] 1 Object 





19599 Miss Pat Roberts [1832] 1 Object 





19846 Mr David holmes [1801] 1 Object 





17617 Mrs Joan Lees [1802] 1 Object 





18256 Mrs Joan Wayre [1818] 1 Object 





19147 D C Clarkson [3279] 1 Object 





19280 Joyce Faulkner [3276] 1 Object 





19800 Mrs Barbara Ocego [1803] 1 Object 





18245 Mr Michael Joseph John's [1812] 1 Object 





19810 Mrs Glenda Holmes [1796] 1 Object 





20014 Mr J P Lamb [3768] 1 Object 








19608 Mr Kenneth Walker [2863] 1 Object 





17930 Joan Hughes [3042] 1 Object 





368




19709 Mrs Norah Patricia Roberts [1724] 1 Object 





19690 Mrs Brenda Holden [1906] 1 Object 





19213 Mrs Irene Cook [1725] 1 Object 













19791 Miss Charlotte Louise Schofield [1894] 1 Object 





18168 Mr Norman Cook [1726] 1 Object 





19092 Mrs Doreen E Tracey [3046] 1 Object 





18509 M Evans [3573] 1 Object 





19337 Miss Andrea C Osborn [1889] 1 Object 





18289 Mrs Carrie Thompson [1909] 1 Object 





19370 Mr Leonard Lees [1729] 1 Object 





19287 Broadbridge Bros. (Ms Done) [3766] 1 Object 

Summary My client requests that the site at Bryn Lupus Road, Llanrhos be allocated for residential development in the Local Development Plan. 

Change Sought: The site at Bryn Lupus Road, Llanrhos be allocated for residential development. 

18278 Miss Dawn Alison Poole [1871] 1 Object 





19290 Mr Peter Faulkner [3633] 1 Object 





369




17688 Mr Arfon Hughes [1746] 1 Object 





19503 Mr David Adams [1864] 1 Object 





19864 Mr Stephen Branwood [1747] 1 Object 





18179 Mr James William Fall [1758] 1 Object 





19511 Mr Mark Bond [1863] 1 Object 





17992 Mrs E J Evans [1862] 1 Object 





19626 Mrs Pauline Schofield [1893] 1 Object 





19382 Mr E R Davies [2043] 1 Object 

Summary I propose that condidate stie 109 should be reconsidered for partial small scale development for residential pruposed e.g. Affordable Housing. 

I do not consider the rasons stated in the LDP for it not being taken forward are sound: 

a) The top part of the site are not on a slope for building exclusion. 

b) The access road is exactly the same as for site 454 which was deemed acceptable. 

Change Sought: The settlement boundary should be modified to include all or part of site 109. 

14505 Mr Robert Malcolm Medlicott [1290] 1 Object 





17970 J Halliday [2495] 1 Object 





17626 Mr Selwyn Rees [2091] 1 Object 

Summary Site 67/643/353 should be considered separately from the larger Greenfield site to the south, as it is a Brownfield site that forms part of/directly adjoins the 

settlement & is entirely appropriate for a modest housing development. 

The site at Glyn Farm is an entirely acceptable and appropriate site for allocation within the LDP, and does not suffer from the access issues identified by the 

LPA, and is a suitable Brownfield site for a modest housing development. It should be allocated to assist in meeting the shortfalls in housing growth level set 

within the Plan. 

Change Sought: Allocate site 67/643/353 for housing. 

18047 Janet Williams [1176] 1 Object 





19444 Cyngor Cymuned Llansannan (Mr Eifion Jones) [2082] 1 Object 

Summary We are aware that the areas of land submitted for the Local Development Plan during March 2007 have either been withdrawn by their owners or deemed 

unsuitable by the Planning Service. 

This is of grave concern to us as a Council and we ask you to re-consider these sites once more as we need affordable housing in this village to ensure future 

growth. 

Change Sought: Re-consider the sites submitted in Llansannan during March 2007. 

370




17981 Mr D Smith [2498] 1 Object 





19975 Mr Thomas Ronald Wade [1203] 1 Object 





19176 Macbryde Homes Ltd [2074] 1 Object 

Summary The Council's figures of between 5500 and 6800 dwelling over the plan period are unrealistically low, will not deliver required levels of open market or 

affordable housing and will result in a decline in labour force to the detreiment of the economic prosperity of the County. 

Change Sought: Part 1 of Policy HOU/1 should be amended to read: 

Over the period 2007/2022, CCBC will plan, monitor and review the delivery of 7900 new dwellings (an average annual rate of 527 new dwellings) inclusive of 

completions, commitments, windfalls and new allocations and a contingency level of up to approximately 9000 dwellings (1,100 dwellings). 


Summary We have made separate representations in relation to the housing land supply, needs and levels of growth suggest in the Plan. The conclusion of these 

representations is that without additional housing provision the plan is unsound and there is a considerable shortfall in housing land supply to meet the needs 

identified by the evidence. 

The allocation of the site at Peulwys Farm, Peulwys Lane, Old Colwyn will address this. 

Change Sought: The allocation of the site at Peulwys Farm, Peulwys Lane, Old Colwyn 

19386 Mr Richard Waters [1041] 1 Object 

Summary Abergele Area 

The allocation of 870 dwellings is excessive. The exisitng commitments/windfall sites have been understated by at least 100 dwellings. More could be done to 

reduce the number of empty dwellings. 

Reasons for objection: 

1. Welsh language and culture 

a. Sustainability 

b. Conflict with national policy 

c. Conflict with the Spatial Plan 

d. Conflict with the Community Strategy 

e. Monitoring 

2. Loss of outstanding countryside 

3. Transport problems 

Change Sought: Revise the housing growth level for Abergele. 

22608 Ainscough Strategic Land. (Mr Nigel McGurk) [2073] 1 Object 

Summary The representation seeks to promote the strategic designation of the Former Aluminium Factory Site, Dolgarrog to a "Strategic Leisure led Mixed-use 

Economic Development site". 

Change Sought: Change the strategic designation of the Former Aluminium Factory Site, Dolgarrog to a "Strategic Leisure led Mixed-use Economic Development site". 

14081 

Amended Policy wording as detailed in the attached document. 

Llanrwst Town Council (Ms Gwenda M Jones) [2168] 1 Object 

Summary The Town Council question that there is a need for 150 new houses to meet the local needs in Llanrwst. 

There are many empty properties in Llanrwst which local people cannot afford to buy or rent. 

Other points which must be kept in mind are that 

* The Sewerage Plant is too small for the needs of the town at the present. 

* The Water pressure is low in the town. 

* Building these houses would take away the few green spaces which we have left in the town. 

Change Sought: Revise the housing figure for Llanrwst. 

19346 Mr Peter W Osborn [1469] 1 Object 










19273 Miss Jennifer Evans [1244] 1 Object 





18069 Mrs Glenys Kay [1259] 1 Object 





371




19537 Mrs Wendy Bainbridge [1971] 1 Object 





17627 Mr Gwyn Jones [1277] 1 Object 

Summary Ou client continues to object to the Plan on the basis that land at Towyn Way West has not been allocated for residenetial or other development and that the 

settlement boundary has not been appropriately amended. 

Whilst the site is situated within a flood risk zone, it is considered that the risk and consequences of flooding are likely to be accepetable and manageable. 

the land in part comprises previously developed land and is situated immediately adjacent to the settlement boundary. 

Change Sought: Allocate the land at Town Way West for residential or other development. 

19580 Ms Ann May Andrews [2504] 1 Object 





18080 Cll Jean Stubbs [1289] 1 Object 





14445 Beech Developments (NW) Ltd (Mr Mike Roberts) [1966] 1 Object 

Summary Having regard to our representations elsewhere in which it has been concluded that the overall housing requirement should be increased, there is a need to 

identify additional housing allocations to meet the housing requirement. The contingency sites provide the obvious reserve from which the bulk of these sites 

should be drawn. 

Land at Pentwyn Road, Deganwy is particularly suitable in this regard and should be allocated. 

However, we remain concerned about the abilitiy of the identified land supply to meet even the proposed housing taget of 6800 dwellings. Our particular 

concern is in relation to the assumed contribution from windfalls. 

Change Sought: The assumed level of contribution from windfalls is unrealistically high and should be amended appropriately. 

The consequece of this is that insufficent site are allocated. 

Pentwyn Road, Deganwy should be changed from an allocated site to a contingency site. 

19180 Beech Developments (NW) Ltd (Mr Mike Roberts) [1966] 1 Object 

Summary Objection to the land opposite Pinewood Stables, Sychnanat Pass Road not being allocated. 

The Council has previuosly assessed the suitability of the site for housing and considered it as suitable for development. 

The site is highly accessible to jobs, shops, services, school etc by means other than car. 

There is a shortfall of housing land allocated ini the Plan. The allocation of the site will assist in meeting this shortfall in what is a highly sustainable and 

accessible location. 

Change Sought: The site know as land opposite Pinweood Stables, Sychnant Pass Road be allocated for housing purposes. 

19495 Mrs Helga A Adams [1219] 1 Object 





18410 Mrs Karen Beck [2373] 1 Object 





17937 Mrs Linda Halligan [2448] 1 Object 





20013 Mrs Carys Jones [31] 1 Object 








19567 

Summary 

Mr and Mrs David Gee [103] 

Our previous objections and observations still stand. 

We consider the 2011 edition unsound because: 

1. It still only specifies 6800 new housing units with 9600 required by the previous UK government. 

2. Although a contingency level of up to 7900 units is mentioned it is far from clear where the additional 1100 units would be located. 

3. It appears some contingency is in Kinmel Bay with a high flood risk. 

4. 325 dwellings are to be found by means of the Empty Homes Strategy - this seems unreaslistic and unsound. 

Change Sought: The LDP would be improved if some of the land between Hawes Drive and Maes-y-Castell were designated as suitable for residential development. 

1 Object 

372




18014 Mrs T K Ralph [121] 1 Object 





19855 Miss J Pendlebury [2392] 1 Object 





18025 Mr Michael Halligan [546] 1 Object 





17948 M Rothwell [2453] 1 Object 





20025 Mr Darrell Owens [574] 1 Object 








20565 Mr & Mrs Roger Garland [576] 1 Object 








18036 Mr Cyril Jones [1174] 1 Object 






Summary I would like to amend site 164(SR44) North of Lark Hill, Sychnant Pass Road to propose a smaller site reduced from 2.635 to 1.8 hectares. 

I believe that the relative lack of allocated sites within easy reach of the town of Conwy does constiture an element of inflexibility which is likely to become 

noticeable long before 2022. 

No significant objection has been raised to this site. Although the site falls wtihin the World Heritage Site no part of the site is visible from any part of the 

World Hertiage Site itself including the town walls of Conwy or Conwy Castle. 

Change Sought: Allocate site 164(SR44) North of Lark Hill, Sychnant Pass Road for housing with a revised site plan in essence a smaller site reduced from 2.635 hectares to 

1.8 hectares. 

18058 Mrs Margaret Jean Williams [1228] 1 Object 





17644 Mr William Bryan Tomlinson [632] 1 Object 





19312 CEMEX UK Operations Ltd. [635] 1 Object 

Summary A significant and potentially unfeasible proportion of development identified to come forward is expected to arise from windfall sites. 

We would question the ability of ensuring the effective delivery of sustainable market housing sites in windfall locations in line with identified need. 

The allocation of a greater number of suitable, deliverable and available sites for housing in sites currently outside of, yet immediately adjacent to the 

development limits would provide a more sound approach towards ensuring sustainable future housing delivery. 

The site at Raynes Quarry is considered to provide such an opportunity. 

Change Sought: Allocate the site at Raynes Quarry for housing. 

373




20437 Ms Jan Roberts [651] 1 Object 
















18520 Glenys Fall [3583] 1 Object 





17959 G Rothwell [2454] 1 Object 





18399 D Woodhouse [2372] 1 Object 





13539 Mr Goronwy Owen [876] 1 Object 

Summary Cynnwys safle 435 Tir ir Dwyrain o Gorwel fel safle ar gyfer tai yn Llanfairfechan. Mae'r safle wedi'w asesu eisoes gan y cyngor ond ni gafodd ei gynnwys ar y 

rhestr gan fod pryderon am barcio ar ffyrdd lleol. Mae Asesiad Trafnidiaeth wedi ei gwblhau ar gyfer y safle erbyn hyn ac wedi ei gymeradwyo hyd at 30 

annedd yn y man cyntaf gan swyddogion priffyrdd. Mae'r safle ar gael i ddatblygu yn syth gyda mynediad oddiar stad Gorwel. 

Change Sought: Cynnwys safle 435 fel safle ar gyfer datblygu tai yn Llanfairfechan. 

18388 Kenneth Sudlow [2325] 1 Object 






Summary In total all types of windfall sites are estimated to deliver approximately 30+% of the total provision (2334 dwellings). This degree of reliance on windfalls, 

introduces a considerable degree of uncertainty with consequences for clarity and ability to deliver infrastructure. 

Additionally, the evidence for the continuation of the rate at which windfall sites have come forward in the past needs to be robust, clearly justifying why and 

how such a trend will continue over the plan period. If this cannot be evidenced it could result in a serious risk to the delivery of the strategy. 

Change Sought: Policy DP/2 may need to be strengthened to better guide the release of windfall sites in line with the strategy and the proposed monitoring at paragraph 5.1.5. 

Whilst policy HOU/1 states the level provision and contingency housing, the policy would be clearer if it were reworded to make clear that the contingency 

omponent is part of the overall provision to come forward when required, to ensure delivery of the required amount over the plan period. 

20685 mrs J Jones [577] 1 Object 








19267 Mr Eirwen Jones [2716] 1 Object 





19356 Mrs Gwyneth Mary Leech [1361] 1 Object 





374




18102 Mr Brian C Roberts [1347] 1 Object 





19485 Mr David Schofield [1958] 1 Object 





19193 Mr Christopher Howard [1362] 1 Object 





19882 Mrs Hazel Cannell [1957] 1 Object 





19103 S Jones-Roberts [2780] 1 Object 





19659 Mr Richard Thomas Byron Wade [1335] 1 Object 





19529 Mr Alastair Bainbridge [1960] 1 Object 





17743 Mrs Audrey Postles [1398] 1 Object 





17754 Rev Donald Postles [1400] 1 Object 





18003 Mr Stuart Lawson [2537] 1 Object 





18366 Mr Gordon Leech [1963] 1 Object 





18421 Mrs Rhiannon Lally [1387] 1 Object 





18190 Mr Roheryn Evans [1761] 1 Object 





17677 Mr Eifion T Parry [1296] 1 Object 





19384 Mrs Gwenda Pugh [2053] 1 Object 

Summary I would like to appeal against the decision not to include the site at Cwm Eithin, Cerrigydrudion in the LDP. We feel the decision may have been based on old 

plans showing the entrance to be narrower than it actually is. 

Change Sought: Allocate the site at Cwn Eithin, Cerrig y Drudion for housing. 

375




18432 Mrs Nia Evans [1390] 1 Object 





18091 Mr Frederick John Powney [1308] 1 Object 





18377 Mrs Jeanette Leech [1964] 1 Object 





20493 mr robert patterson [3860] 1 Object 








17765 Mr Frederick West [1417] 1 Object 





18916 Mr David Rhys Evans [4414] 1 Object 





19783 Mrs Doreen Murphy [4502] 1 Object 





18839 Mr Edward Leahy [4407] 1 Object 





18850 Mrs Pamela Elizabeth Williams [4408] 1 Object 





18861 Mr Clive Dawson Williams [4409] 1 Object 





19937 Mrs Menna Wyn Rowlands [4501] 1 Object 





18872 Mrs Michele Williams [4410] 1 Object 





18883 Mr Geraint Wyn Williams [4411] 1 Object 





376




18894 Mrs Gwyneth Price Davies [4412] 1 Object 





18707 Mrs Patricia Thorpe [4394] 1 Object 





18905 Mrs Edna Harrison [4413] 1 Object 





19767 Mrs K Tavernor [4504] 1 Object 





18927 Mrs Beryl Horsman [4415] 1 Object 





19955 Ms Nesta Mary Davies [4497] 1 Object 





18938 Mrs Sian Gaynor Elizabeth Brennan [4416] 1 Object 





19966 Mrs Eileen Mary Simpson [4496] 1 Object 





18960 Mrs Jennifer Ann Davies [4418] 1 Object 





19302 Mrs Pamela Cavalier Waitecross [4495] 1 Object 





18971 Miss M E Hughes [4419] 1 Object 





20517 Mr Colin Brown [4699] 1 Object 








20817 Mr Lee D Jones [4655] 1 Object 








377




19946 Mr Eurwyn E Rowlands [4500] 1 Object 





19407 Mr Wiggett [4508] 1 Object 










20029 Ms Lynda Bleasdale [4272] 1 Object 








19426 Mr John Fowler [4510] 1 Object 





18784 Mr Dennis Charles Roberts [4401] 1 Object 





18949 Mr I Hughes [4417] 1 Object 





14388 Mr & Mrs Steven & Valeria Owen [4425] 1 Object 

Summary Under this Development Plan, the Council intends to build 7200 new homes across Conwy, with seemingly no consideration for the local impact or the 

infrastructure needed for this. I object to the Local Development Plan as a whole and believe that the current plan is unsuitable for a number of reasons 

including that national statistics show that there is no current or future need for such housing, and there is insufficient infrastructure in many villages to be able 

to support this. There has clearly been a lack of thought, consideration and consultation put into this plan 

Change Sought: Reduce housing growth. 

18729 Cllr Samuel Rowlands [4396] 1 Object 





19927 Mrs Carys Irene Williams [4509] 1 Object 





18828 Mrs Margaret MaClenan [4406] 1 Object 





18751 Mrs Mona Morris [4398] 1 Object 





19775 Dora Sumner [4503] 1 Object 





378




18762 Mrs Cowburn [4399] 1 Object 





18773 Mrs Margaret Mary Davies [4400] 1 Object 





18795 Mrs Pearl Roberts [4402] 1 Object 





19399 Mrs Timmins [4505] 1 Object 





18806 Miss Sharon Marie Kregar [4403] 1 Object 





20023 Ms Hilary Moore [4404] 1 Object 








18817 Mrs Margaret Kenyon [4405] 1 Object 





20445 Ms Susan Lewis [4373] 1 Object 








18993 Miss Ann Lea Hughes [4421] 1 Object 





18740 Mrs Alison Humphries [4397] 1 Object 





14499 Mr Clifford & Jeffrey Frazier [4474] 1 Object 

Summary PPW sets out the approach for considering which sites should be allocated for housing. These have been adopted by the Council in their assessment 

methodology, however, in the case of the land north of Towyn Road, Abergele the Council have not taken into full account the planing hisotyr of the stie and 

its extant unrestricted permission for 192 residential chalets. 

As such the assessment of the site is not considered robust and has not been undertaken in full view of the criteria set out within PPW. 

Change Sought: Allocate the brownfield site at Towyn Road, Abergele in preference to other sites in the Abergele area. 


Summary The development boundary for Llysfaen should be extended to include the submitted site as it will allow for further substantial housing growth in Llysfaen. 

Extending the settlement limit to include the site would fit in with the existing settlement pattern and would effectively round off the existing settlement limit. 

The area of land includes land which contains a significant cluster of houses. Redefining the green wedge to exclude this cluster of housing will provide 

stronger defensible boundaries to the green wedge. 

The land is immediately available for development, is appropriate for residential development and in a sustainable location. 

Change Sought: Include land to the West of Rhianfa, Llysfaen for housing. 

379








Change Sought: Allocate the Residential Curtilage of Rhianfa, Llysfaen for housing. 




The area of land includes land which contains a significant cluster of houses. Redefining the green wedge to exclude this cluster of housing will provide 

stronger defensible boundaries to the green wedge. 


Change Sought: Allocate the land to the south of Rockhaven, Llysfaen for housing. 

19059 Mrs Sharron Claire Tinsley [4461] 1 Object 





14535 Chattelle Developments Ltd (Mr Willie Donnelly) [4484] 1 Object 

Summary Site 201/C15/SR60 was discounted during the site Assessment Process as it was condered unsuitable for allcation as it was within the Quarry Buffer Zone, 

Greenwedge and Safeguarded Hard Rock Reserve area set within the LDP proposals maps. 

However, bearing in mind the submissions put forward in the Landscape and Visual Impact Appraisal attached and in Sections 2, 4 and 5 in the main 

submission documenet relating to the Green Wedge designation, the safeguarded Hard Rock reserve Area designation and the Quarry Buffer Zone it is 

apparent that this assessment is not correct. 

Change Sought: Allocate site 201/C15/SR60 for housing. 

17798 Mrs Margaret Parkin [4462] 1 Object 





14506 Mr Gary Jones [4477] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the ludicrous plans to build around 7,000 new houses all over Conwy county's green spaces. 

Roads will become over congested, which will probably lead to the need to plough money into eventually redeveloping them, or maybe residents will be left to 

struggle through the traffic. Either way, pollution will increase. There is a danger that the classrooms in local schools will become overcrowded, as will the 

waiting rooms in local doctors and dental surgeries. 

Change Sought: Reduce the housing growth. 

14501 Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board [4475] 1 Object 

Summary We support the identification of Llanfairfechan as an urban area and the recognition of its potential for significant residential development. 

however, we consider that the choice of sites is incorrect and has not had propoer regard to the desirabilityo f selecting approporitate previously developed 

land. 

We seek to promote two alternative parcels of land at Brynyneuadd Hospital as alternative, preferable parcels of land for development. 

Change Sought: Allocate the two suggested parcels of land at Brynyneuadd Hospital. 

18982 Mrs E Evans [4420] 1 Object 





17809 Mr Terence Parkin [4463] 1 Object 





17613 The Representative Body of the Church in Wales [4490] 1 Object 

Summary The land being glebe land adjacent to the former Llanddulas Rectory should be allocated for housing. 

The proposed site is close to the centre of Llanddulas with local store, primary school, public house, post office, parish Church and community centre. 

The site is served by public transport with a regular bus service being on the main bus route betwen Abergele and Colwyn Bay. 

The site is a short distance from the North Wales coastal cycle path and is within easy walking distance to the main settlement centre. 

We are not aware of any significant environmental considerations. 

Change Sought: The land being glebe land adjacent to the former Llanddulas Rectory should be allocated for housing. 

17622 O Jones and Sons Ltd (Mr Gareth Jones) [4473] 1 Object 

Summary Allocate site 149/SR49. 

The site is entirely acceptable and appropriate for allocation, it does not suffer from any highway issues. As such is should be allocated to assist in meeting 

the shorstfalls in housing growth level set within the plan. 

Change Sought: Allocate site 149/SR49. 

17820 Mr Brian Jones [4464] 1 Object 





17831 Mrs Elisabeth Wynne Parry [4465] 1 Object 





380




17908 Mrs Jennifer Davies [4472] 1 Object 





17842 Mrs Pauline M Edwards [4466] 1 Object 





17853 Mr Tudor Hugh Morris Jones [4467] 1 Object 





17897 Mr John Maclennan [4471] 1 Object 










17875 Mrs Julie Jones [4469] 1 Object 






Summary We note that this Policy assumes a contribution towards housing land supply from windfall sites, but at the same time the policy proposes to severely restrict 

residential development in Tier 2 Main Villages, Minor Villages and elsewhere in hamlets and open countryside. There does not appear to be any policy in the 

Plan which makes clear the intended approach to previously developed sites which arise as potential windfall opportunities. It makes no sense whatsover that 

previously developed sites should be prevented from being redeveloped when they can make a valuable contribution to land supply in a sustainble fashion. 

Change Sought: A new policy needs to be included in the Plan to recognise the potential for previously developed sites to be brought forward to development where such sites 

demonstrate a reasonable level of sustainability and where their development would not conflict with the key strategic objectives of the Plan. 

14468 Cyngor Tref Bodelwyddan Town Council (Ms Jenny Prendergast) [4455] 1 Object 

Summary Bodelwyddan Town council passed a resolution at its meeting on 21st April 2011 to support the objections to the LDP raised by Abergele Town Council. 

Bodelwyddan Town Council are also conerned that the LDP for Conwy and LDP for Denbighshire both cite large scale building of houses and industrial units 

within a small distance of each other. 

If both these plans were to meet approval there will be a substantial strain on the infrastructure servicing both communities, the education and health services 

would be put under a considerable amount of pressure. 

Change Sought: Reduce housng growth. 

14490 Mr & Mrs EA & J Watson [4102] 2 Object 

Summary The Town Council considers the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence 

to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has (or is capable of delivering) the necessary infrastructure and houseuilding capacity to support 

growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including 

the Welsh Language) 

Change Sought: Reduce the level of housing growth. 

19573 Cyngor Cymuned Llangernyw (Mrs Elwen Owen) [4577] 1 Object 

Summary Mae Cyngor Cymuned Llangernyw yn bryderus am y nifer o dai ychwanegol y gellir eu hadeiladu yn y sir ac yn arbennig y nifer sydd wedi ei glustnodi ar gyfer 

Abergele. 

Gofynnwn y cwestiwn a oes gan y Cyngor Bwrdeistref Sirol ddigon o adnoddau i gynnal y boblogaeth fydd yn dod yn sgil y datblygiadau tai? 

Ond ar y llaw arall rydym yn awyddus i bentrefi bach fod yn bentrefi byw - ac nid yn llawn o bobl mewn oed - ac rydym yn falch y bydd modd i godi tai 

fforddiadwy yn y pentrefi os oes galwad lleol. 


19572 Mr & Mrs T & M Williams [4575] 1 Object 

Summary Cawson ein brawychu a'n siomi pan glywsom fod Sir Conwy yn bwriadu adeiladu miloedd o dai yn Sir Conwy yn eu Cynllun Datblygu LLeol. 

Dymunwn fynegi ein ngwrthwynebiad llwyraf i'r bwriad hwn ar sail y rhesymau a ganlyn: 

* Mae maintioli'r datblygiad yn gwbl afresymol. 

* Byddai adeiladu cynifer a hyn o dai yn rhoi straen afresymol ar yr isadeiledd lleol. 

* Nid yw'r datblygiad yn gwneud unrhyw synnwyr o safbwynt amgylcheddol. 

* Bydd y datblygiad yn rhwym o achosi newid demograffig sylweddol ac yn sicr o ddod a newidiadau diwylliannol enfawr yn ei sgil. 


19463 Mr Crispin Lems Jones [4531] 1 Object 





381









19004 Mr Lewis Jones [4422] 1 Object 





14459 Penrhyn Homes Ltd (Mr A Roberts) [4447] 1 Object 

Summary The land is excluded from the settlement. It would be logical to follow the established boundary pattern in this part of Llysfaen and therefore should lie within 

the Main Village settlement boundary. 

Detail 

The land was included and formed part of a planning application for residential development (0/27227) in 2003. It part is surfaced and its limits can clearly be 

seen from the attached aerial photograph where the land is edged in red. 

The land It is not green wedge or of identified landscape quality worthy of protection. 

Change Sought: For the reasons set out above Penrhyn Homes consider that the plan in its current form is unsound. Adjustment of the settlement boundary to include the 

land shown on the attached aerial photograph would correct this. 

14460 K & C Developments (Mr C White) [4450] 1 Object 

Summary The land (which is defined on the attached plan) is excluded from the settlement. It is logically part of the urban and built form of Conwy/Gyffin and therefore 

should lie within the Urban Development Strategy Area. 

Detail 

The land has never been located outside a development boundary in any previous adopted plan. 

Prior to the adjacent land being developed for 3 dwellings, the land formed part of nursery grounds, within the same use and planning unit. This use falls 

within the definition of previously developed land at table 4.1 of Planning Policy Wales 2011. 

Change Sought: For the reasons set out above K+C Developments consider that the plan in its current form is unsound. Adjustment of the settlement boundary to reflect the 

attached plan would correct this 

20033 Ms Sandra Allen [4451] 1 Object 








17605 Mr H V Griffith [4487] 1 Object 

Summary Site reference 260 Fron Ganol, School Bank Road, Llanrwst should be allocated for housing. 

The site is suitable for allocation as it is located in an accessible and sustainable location, in close proximity to the local services as well as close to 

employment opportunities. The site can make a valued contribution to the deliverability of the Council's LDP strategy as well as comply with the aims of PPW 

in terms of housing delivery and promoting sustainble and accessible forms of development. 

Change Sought: Allocate site reference 260 Fron Ganol, School Bank Road, Llanrwst for housing. 

17886 Mrs Elisabeth Brealey [4470] 1 Object 





17606 Mr Christoper R G Davies [4489] 1 Object 

Summary The land forming part of Gwern Tyno Farm should be allocated for housing. 

The proposed site would form a logical extension of the existing development in Upper Colwyn Bay. Within the exisitng development there is a local store, 

primary school, public house and restaurant and community centre. 

The site is served by public transport with a bus service and there are no significant environmental considerations. 

Change Sought: Allocate land forming part of Gwern Tyno Farm for housing. 

19015 Mrs Judith Ann Hughes [4457] 1 Object 





19026 Mr Gareth Hughes [4458] 1 Object 





19249 Mr Cliff Cox [4494] 1 Object 





382




19037 Mr Gwilym Price Owen [4459] 1 Object 





19048 Mr Barry Keith Davies [4460] 1 Object 





17630 P & W Broilers Ltd (Mr Rikki Proffitt) [4493] 1 Object 

Summary Our client objects to revision of the settlement boundary in vicinity of our clients land holdings at Gwellyn Avenue, Kinmel Bay. Our cleint considers that the 

settletment boundary should remain as previously proposed and follow the line of the River Gele which adjoins our clients ownership to the south. 

Change Sought: The settletment boundary should remain as previously proposed and follow the line of the River Gele which adjoins our clients ownership to the south. 


Summary Our client objects to deletion of the allocation of land at Gwellyn Avenue, Kinmel Bay for housing development. Our client considers that the land should 

continue to be included as an allocation for housing development. 

Change Sought: Reallocate the land at Gwellyn Avenue, Kinmel Bay for housing. 


Summary Our client objects to omission of land to the south of Gwellyn Avenue, Kinmel Bay from the Strategic Policy HOU/1. Our client considers that the land should 

continue to be included as an allocation for housing development and should therefore be listed as a proposed housing allocation for Kinmel Bay for the 

provision of approximately 135 dwellings. 

Change Sought: Alocate the land south of Gwellyn Avenue, Kinmel Bay for housing. 

20813 A B Malone [4654] 1 Object 








20026 Cllr Gail Hall [4452] 1 Object 







Change Sought: Delete sites 58,329 and 330. 

18619 Mr Reginald Harrison [4335] 1 Object 





14147 Cllr Janet Finch-Saunders [4271] 1 Object 

Summary In terms of the L.D.P. itself, I have spoken up on several ocassions with my genuine concerns about the actual housing numbers proposed and wish to 

formally place on record my firm objections to these numbers. We do not want to see the mass destruction to our green field sites and I consider these 

current proposals to be massive over development and is not supported by any tangible evidence. 

Change Sought: Revise housing numbers proposed. 

17634 Mr Liam Jones [4279] 1 Object 

Summary Include candidate site 435 within the plan. 

This site has been previously assessed however it was removed due to highway officers concerns regarding the network and capacity problems. The existing 

highway problems in the village are caused by illegal parking and as such could be resolved by robust action by the relevant authorities. A traffic assessment 

has been carried out and is attached. 

The site could be completed in phases with suitable highway improvement works or following relocation of the school from the centre of the village. The site is 

deliverable in the short term with access from Gorwel Estate. 

Change Sought: Allocate site 435 for housing. 

19745 Mrs Sylvia Lousie Edwards [4514] 1 Object 





14172 Mr Mathew Turley [4284] 1 Object 

Summary The established need for 6,800 houses is too ambitious for a county of our size to absorb. Travel to work time and cost are existing barriers to low wage 

employment being sustainable and affordable for existing unemployed residents. There is no significant employment development opportunities proposed 

within the LDP to meet existing need. Without this and with in-migration to take up new houses, total unemployment levels will soar and potentially the long 

term unemployed will be further disadvantaged. There are no proposals to upgrade the highways infrastructure to accommodate such high inward migration. 

Change Sought: Reduce the proposed housing level. 

383




14176 Mr Paul Turley [4286] 1 Object 





Change Sought: Reduce housing figure. 

19901 Mr Tegwyn Williams [4525] 1 Object 





14178 Ms Rebecca Turley [4287] 1 Object 





Change Sought: Reduce housing figure. 

18542 Mr Dennis Stephen [4323] 1 Object 





18597 Mr & Mrs Peter Jones [4332] 1 Object 





19910 Mrs Brenda Williams [4524] 1 Object 





18641 Mrs Valerie Irene Gunning [4341] 1 Object 





18586 Mrs Jean Tomlinson [4330] 1 Object 





18674 Mr Daniel Tinsley [4391] 1 Object 





19753 Mr John I McGrory [4522] 1 Object 





19640 Mr Ron Edwards [4515] 1 Object 





18553 Mr Dewi Wyn Jones [4324] 1 Object 





18663 Mr Graham Tinsley [4345] 1 Object 





19737 Mrs Gwerfyl Owen Davies [4520] 1 Object 





384




18564 Mrs Jean Jones [4326] 1 Object 





18652 Mr John Raymond Stuart Gunning [4343] 1 Object 





19519 Miss Ydwen Davies [4523] 1 Object 





19638 Mrs Gillian Rutherford [4517] 1 Object 





18575 Ms Christine Ryder [4328] 1 Object 





18608 Mrs Gwendolyn Davies [4333] 1 Object 





19168 Redrow (Ms Victoria Murray) [4513] 1 Object 

Summary The Policy fails to meet an appropriate level of housing land supply. This is due to inadequate housing land allocation provision compunded by an unrealistic 

and inappropriate assumption regarding the density to be applied to new development. 

Change Sought: Additional housing land allocation should be made. 

21973 Mr & Mrs C H Baines [4125] 1 Object 








18685 Mr Raymond Halliday [4392] 1 Object 





14174 Ms Angela Turley [4285] 3 Object 





Change Sought: Reduce housing level. 

20031 Ms Mary Halliwell [4115] 1 Object 








18630 Mrs Susan D Jones [4338] 1 Object 





19891 Mr Eurwyn Davies [4526] 1 Object 





385




19761 Mr Dennis Holden [4512] 1 Object 





18696 Mr Barry Thorpe [4393] 1 Object 





19546 Mr Gary Bernard Whitney [4528] 1 Object 





20497 Mr Frank Bradfield [4073] 1 Object 








19167 Redrow (Ms Victoria Murray) [4513] 1 Object 

Summary In order to meeet a more realistic housing target for the settlement of Abergele including Town and Kinmel Bay the land identilfied on the attached plan should 

be allocated for residential use with provision for a link road linking allocated sites to the north and south west. 

It will assist in addressing the affordable housing requirement and will enable the provision of infrastrucutre that is necessary to meet the highways 

requirements of the sites allocated within the plan. 

The site will assist in matching housing and employment land provision. 

Change Sought: Allocate the site on the attached plan for housing. 

19729 Mr Cledwyn Davies [4521] 1 Object 





18531 Mr Dewi Jones [4156] 1 Object 





19715 Mrs Angela Whitney [4529] 1 Object 





20034 M & AC Marsden & Bellow [4068] 1 Object 








386


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Site 1, Rhuddlan Road, Abergele 



Summary These sites form the gateway to the town from the east and will result in the loss to development of existing playing fields. 

Parts of the land are at risk of flooding and comprise best and most versatile agricultural land protected from development by national planning policies. No 

assessment of archaeological potential has been undertaken. 

Development is shown to be dependant on the Abergele Traffic Improvement Scheme (funded by developer contributions) but the plan fails to identify how or 

if these can be delivered. Development will introduce unacceptable traffic growth and flows through the town centre. 

Change Sought: Deletion of site 







Change Sought: Deletion of site. 





























22351 Mostyn Estates Limited (Mr Edward Hiller) [5167] 1 Object 

Summary Plan unsound as it will not produce 6800 dwellings due to- 

1.Limited number of new sites expected to produce and sell a high numbers of dwellings. Not realistic. 

2. Overdependency on windfall sites, 

3. Dependency on purchase of empty dwellings. 

The allocation of contingency housing sites at the present time will assist in attaining the housing target. 

The contingency housing sites be allocated for housing now to ensure 6800 new dwellings by 2020. 

Change Sought: Mostyn Estates Limited propose that the contingency housing sites plus possible other sites be allocated at the present time to ensure the completion of 6800 

new dwellings by 2022. 








387





















































19236 Mr Donald ralph Catherall [1858] 1 Object 














388

























19242 M Catherall [2736] 1 Object 







14484 Mrs H Fullylove [3235] 1 Object 

Summary The plan in its present form is totally unreaslistic in relation to the infrastructure of Abergele, there can be no real evidence base that can lead to the view that 

the small market town of Abergele can support the introduction of 800 plus homes. 

It does not offer any clear solution to the issues of trafic congestion. 

It adopts an overoptimistic view as to the jobs availability. 

It does not take account of the already overstretched services in Health and Education. 

It does not take account of the impact of Denbighshire's Plan to build 1700 homes in Bodelwyddan. 

Change Sought: Redcue housing growth. 








14404 Mrs Cynthia Joan Hurley [1625] 1 Object 

Summary I wish to object again to the proposed LDP in Abergele. We do not need nor do we have the capacity and infrastructure to cope with any more houses and 

people, it will be unsustainable as well as damaging the environment as the houses will go on green land and spoil even more of our beautiful area. If the 

council would look at all the empty homes here and all the chapels and churches that are boarded up, if these were utilised there wouldn't be the need for new 

houses to be built anywhere else. 

Change Sought: Reduce the housing growth for Abergele. 















389








































Summary I object to the large number of properties suggested for Abergele. 

The scale of these proposals will put a strain on local schools, medical facilities and environmental services. 

In particular, Tandderwen Farm is adjacent to our property. It is approximately five feet higher than our garden and less than five yards from our bungalow. 

The use of bull-dozers etc will surely cause serious instability. We also have excess water draining from the field into our garden and fear that pathways and 

roads will increase the amount of flooding wihch we experience. There are also several springs and a well. 

Change Sought: Reduce the amount of housing proposed. 









Summary I object as follows: 

a) Unfair ratio distribution of new housing compared to the other regions 

b) Refusing to send a representative to a public meeting called by Town Council 

c) Not informing householders directly 

d) Not consulting with the medical centre, school and hospital 

e) Effect on the medical services 

f) Effect of Denbighshire's Plan 

g) Effect on schools in the area 

h) Effect on traffic management in the area 

i) Not including information on the Traffic Management needed 

j) Not enough consultation time 

k) Choosing Easter weekend as the closing time for objections 

Change Sought: Delete site 

390











19393 L Grimes-Thomas [2410] 1 Object 














































Development is shown to be dependant on the Abergele Traffic Improvement Scheme but the plan fails to identify how or if these can be delivered. 

Development will introduce unacceptable traffic growth and flows through the town centre. 

Also the proposed pedestrian access. 


391



































































392











14478 Mr M Fullylove [2536] 1 Object 







Change Sought: Reduce the housing growth. 





























13439 Mrs P I Leahy [3093] 1 Object 

Summary The Plan in its present form is totally unrealistic in relation to the infrastructure of Abergele, there can be no real evidence base that can lead to the veiw that 

Abergele can support the introduction of 800 homes. 

It does not offer any clear solution to the issue of traffic congestion in the town centre. 


It does not take account of already stretched services in Health and Eduction. 

It does not take account of the impact the policies of Denbigshire will have on Abergele. 

Change Sought: Reduce the housing allocation for Abergele. 








393



































































394














































13445 Mr E Leahy [3092] 1 Object 















395





1 Object 

Summary The indicative plan at page 112 of the Deposit Plan shows a red dotted line passing along our property. 

Separate discussions with officers and Local Member have provided conflicting information as to the intended use of this access. 

The land along the frontage of St George Road is in our ownership and would not allow for satisfactory forward visibility to serve an access at this point. An 

increase in movements (either by vehicles, pedestrians or cyclists wold result in a significant loss of amneity through disturbance to garden and habitiable 

rooms). Highways safety would also be unnacceptably prejudiced. 

Change Sought: In the absence of any evidence to demonstrate that there is an overwhelming and public need for any form of emergency access at this point, the plan should 

be adjusted to remove reference to access at this point. 














Change Sought: Deletion of stie 











































396



































































397



































































398



































































399

























18477 Mrs Grace Margaret Jones [1630] 1 Object 










































400




13393 Mr M G Ralph [868] 1 Object 

Summary I'm writing to register my protest at the revised LDP. My objections are as follows: 

Loss of amenity 

Traffic conjestion 

Strain on infrastructure 

All these points need to be taken very seriously indeed. Abergele does not need this LDP. 

Change Sought: Adjust the level of housing growth for Abergele. 

























































401





Summary I'm writing to register my protest at the new LD Plans. My objections are: 



Stress on infrastructure 

All these points need to be taken very seriously. 






























13400 Mr Bob Pearson [734] 1 Object 

Summary I m apalled to see the proposed plan for housing in and around the Abergele Area. 

The infrastructure struggles to manage the amount of people living in the location, not to mention the huge number of people entering the area when the 

caravan parks open. 

There are delays when travelling in any direction around town, the hospitals and doctors cannot cope at present and a large increase of children is bound to 

have a significant effect on the schools. 

This plan has been ill thought out. 























402












Summary Adding 870 houses in Abergele out of a total of 1870 for all the urban areas is unbalanced and unsustainable. 

No consultation has been made with the Abergele surgery or schools which are close to capacity. Also the traffic flow has not been considered correctly, most 

of the flow is east-west/west-east and therefore a relief road to Llanfair TH wil not make a significant difference. 

The development in Bodelwyddan has not been taken into account. 

It has not been prepared in accordance with the Delivery Agreement - no Conwy Officers attended the meeeting organised by the Abergele Town Council. 

Change Sought: Dramatically reduce the number of proposed houses for Abergele. 


















































403
































14374 Mr Peter Bolton [1040] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the allocation of 850 homes in the Abergele area: 

No evidence to justify a housing need of this proportion. 

The allocation of greenfield sites. 

The balance will tilt in favour of excessive development. 

Will be at the expense of local housing needs. 

The already burgeoning infrastructure. 

Economic development is patchy with an over reliance on seasonal tourism and low paid jobs. 

The current level of council tax, policy precent and water charges are now extremely high in return for basic services. The additional houses will serve to 

exacerbate this very difficult situation. 

Change Sought: Revise housing growth 






















404



































































405



































































406












Summary The roads in Abergele cannot cope with any extra traffic that this development will bring. 

The schools, Medical Centre and local hospitals will also be over stretched by such a rise in population. 

We also feel that the extra propulation will not benefit the town in any way, especially with so few shops compared to years ago. The newcomers will simply 

go elsewhere to do their shopping as indeed we have to. 



















































407















































Summary Much of this land is of high landscape and agricultural quality and should not be the subject of development. The plan does not show how infrastructure to 

serve a significantly enlarged population - including medical and education - will be delivered. The plan takes no cognisance of the proposals by 

Denbighshire to develop the neighbouring village of Bodelwyddan, which is also reliant on the infrastructure of Abergele. Housing growth levels (1360 units) 

proposed exceed of the needs of the town and will result in increased traffic through town and harmful change to the character of the town. 

Change Sought: Abandon or significantly reduce the development of this site; consider the cumulative impact of housing development both in Conwy and Denbighshire. 















408













































Change Sought: Reduce housing growth for Abergele. 






















409





















































19644 Mrs Maria Gmur-Pierre [4507] 1 Object 














410



































































411







































19454 Mr Peter David Fowler [4511] 1 Object 







19648 Mr Andrew Richard Pierre [4506] 1 Object 





















412



































































413





















































414


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Llanfair Road, Abergele 



Summary Parts of the site are at risk of flooding, lie adjacent to watercourses with significant ecological interest (otters and other species) and may comprise the best 

and most versatile land protected from development by national planning policies. 

No agricultural impact assessment has been undertaken. Archaeological potential has been identified but no known assessment is available for review. 

The site is peripheral to the town, in an area of sensitive landscape quality which positively contribute to its setting. 

Access will be principally car-borne with poor linkages by other modes with unacceptable impacts on the movements in town. 





















































415



































































416



























































417

























































22410 Environment Agency Wales (Mrs Deborah Hemsworth) [1036] 1 Object 

Summary Sites 78,MS20 and 79/80 have a small area of C2 and site 79/80 has a significant potion of the north of the site in C1. With sites affected by the C2 zone, it 

states that no development will tak place immediately adjacent to the river. However, no work has been submitted which demonstrates that climate change 

has been considered for the lifetime of the development. The limit of the flood plain area may extend further into the site once this allowance has been 

considered. 

Change Sought: Further work to determine where this limit should lie needs to be undertaken. 

418



































































419












Summary I am apalled to see the proposed plan for housing in and around the Abergele Area. 

















































420




























































421




























































422

















Change Sought: Reduce the housing allocation. 











































423



































































424




























































425




























































426




























































427




























































428




























































429





























































430










































serve a significantly enlarged population - including medical and education - will be delivered. The plan takes no cognisance of the proposals by Denbighshire 

to develop the neighbouring village of Bodelwyddan, which is also reliant on the infrastructure of Abergele. Housing growth levels (1360 units) proposed 

exceed of the needs of the town and will result in increased traffic through town and harmful change to the character of the town. 

Change Sought: Abandon or significantly reduce the development proposals for this site; consider the cumulative impact of housing development both in Conwy and 

Denbighshire 






















431





























































432


















Change Sought: Redcue housing growth 


















































433


































































434



































































435



































































436



































































437



































































438



































































439





















































19639 Mrs Gillian Rutherford [4517] 1 Object 







440



















Summary arts of the site are at risk of flooding, lie adjacent to watercourses with significant ecological interest (otters and other species) and may comprise the best 









































441




























































442





















































443


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Land South of Siamber Wen, Abergele 





















































444




























































445




























































446




























































447




























































448


































































449





























































450





























































451







































Change Sought: Reduce housing growth 





















Change Sought: Deletion of Site. 

452



































































453




























































454




























































455




























































456



































































457

































































458





























































459
































































considered. 


460




























































461



































































462




























































463




























































464



































































465




























































466




























































467




























































468




























































469




























































470


































































471




























































472
















Change Sought: Abandon or substantially reduce the proposed development of the site; consider the cumulative impact of housing development both in Conwy and 

Denbighshire 








473





























































Change Sought: Change of plan 

474



































































475



































































476





























































477

























































Change Sought: Revise housing growth. 








478



































































479



































































480




















































Change Sought: Abandon or substantially reduce the development of this site; consider the cumulative impact of housing development both in Conwy and Denbighshire 















481


































































482




































































483



































































484



































































485



































































486
























Change Sought: Redcue the housing allocation. 














Change Sought: Dramatically reduce the proposed number of houses for Abergele. 





























487



































































488



































































489




































































490



































































491

































































492



































































493



































































494



































































495



































































496



































































497



































































498



































































499



































































500

























501


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Tandderwen Farm, Abergele 



Summary Parts of the land are at risk of flooding and comprise best and most versatile land protected from development by national planning policies. No assessment 

of agricultural land quality and loss has been undertaken nor have any strategic archaeological potential studies been undertaken. 

The site is accessible only from a new road linking to the Rhuddlan Road Roundabout which is dependant on the Abergele Traffic Improvement Scheme, 

delivery of which the plan fails to identify. The number of houses proposed would be at a very high density. This is inappropriate to the character of the town. 































































502




































































503







































































504






































































505
















19635 Mrs Meryl Elizabeth Williams [1420] 1 Object 











































Summary arts of the land are at risk of flooding and comprise best and most versatile land protected from development by national planning policies. No assessment of 

agricultural land quality and loss has been undertaken nor have any strategic archaeological potential studies been undertaken. 










506









































Summary Risk of flooding; impact on high quality land. No assessment of archaeological potential. 

The number of houses proposed would be at very high density. 

The plan fails to identify how highway improvements can be delivered. No consideration given to Bodelwyddan proposal. 

There is no assessment of the landscape or cultural impact of imposing engineered solutions to deliver development would create and integrate with the 

existing settlement. 

Change Sought: Abandon the proposal unless and until necessary assessments as identified are satisfactorily completed. In any event, radically reduce the density of housing 

proposed. 



















507























































considered. 














508






































































509






































































510

































































511




































































512






































































513








































































514






































































515






































































516






































































517





































































518






































































519







































































520






































































521






































































522






































































523




















































524


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Abergele Business Park 



Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One of the themes of the LDP is to create jobs. The removal of this previously developed land site 

from employment uses is illogical and sequentially unsustainable. 

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable and previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing 

potential the effect of which would reduce the scale of new and windfall allocation for the town. 

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective 





















































525



































































526



































































527




































































528




























































529
































































530
















Change Sought: Reduce housing growth for Abergele. 








19392 North Wales Technology Park Ltd (Mr Steve West) [3717] 1 Object 

Summary There is concern that the plan in referring to only 2 hectares of housing will not allow the required flexibility to provide more than the 2 hectares referred to in 

the Plan. 

Although the take-up rate of employment land has been slow on the Business Park it does now include a numer of businesses. There are therefore significant 

employment opportunities and the provision of more housing close to these facilities would be more in-line with National Planninig Policy than to rely on 

greenfield sites to the east of Abergele. 

Change Sought: Change to the mixed use allocation at the Abergele Buisness Park to allow a minimum of 3 hectares to be allocated for housing. 




































531



































































532






























































533





























































534


































































535




































































536



































































537



































































538



































































539


























Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. It was proposed at the last deposit plan as an alternative site. The removal of this previously 

developed land site from employment uses is illogical and sequentially indefensible. 

Additional housing at this location would place unsustaniable strain on the infrastructure of the town. 

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objectives. 

Change Sought: Abandon the proposal 




































540



































































541



































































542



































































543






















































Summary 

This site has planning permission for employment uses. One of the themes of the LDP is to create jobs. The removal of this previously developed land site 













544


































































545



































































546



































































547



































































548











549


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Esgyryn, Llandudno Junction 










new dwellings by 2022 

13484 HE & DP Watson & Mayne [3856] 1 Object 

Summary It is with deep concern that I write to strongly object to the proposal of the farmland known as Esgyryn Site to be developed for housing. 

This is prime agricultural land which is being swallowed up in development. 

We already experience a great deal of traffic coming down the lane off the roundabout on the A470 - with a further 120 houses it would be extremely 

unacceptable. 

There are several large areas in Llandudno Junction which are an eyesore - cannot development be put to better use there rather than using green belt land 

which everyone enjoys. 

Change Sought: Remove the housing allocation at Esgyryn Site. 

13438 Mr & Mrs Brown [3824] 1 Object 

Summary We are concerned about the proposed development of Esgyryn Site mainly because of the possible effect on the wild life. 

These are mature oaks and hedges supporting a varied population of insects and birds. Also there are several bats to be seen feeding on insects flying above 

the hedges at certain times of the year. Winter visitors on the fields are Redwings and Fieldfares. 

Surely a better use of this greenfield land would be for food production? 

Change Sought: Remove the housing allocation at Esgyryn, Llandudno Junction. 

13498 Mrs Thelma Hey [3867] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the amount of new housing proposed for Llandudno Junction. 

Planning permission has already been granted for 420 houses. Where are these new people going to find jobs? 

Esgyryn site is agricultural land, green and beautiful. 

If you must build at all it should be only to create jobs and only if it would lead to at least 2000 well paid jobs. 

Change Sought: Remove the housing allocation at Esgyryn, Llandudno Junction. 

13436 Mr & Mrs J R Lee [3823] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the housing allocation at Esgyryn, Llandudno Junction: 

Topography - the land slopes steeply down to our properties so new buildings will overlook quite considerably. 

The run-off can be extremely heavy and causes the ditch behind our boundary to fill up and overflow. 

Boundaries - what sort is envisaged, what height and who would maintain? 

Hedges - at present all maintained - who would do this. 

Arable Land - fields are used by farmers. 

Allotments - have the authories considered this? 

Traffic - the cul-de-sac is not a suitable access point. 

How are employment numbers calculated? 

Change Sought: More information required before the authority can reach satisfactory plans for all concerned. 

14004 Mrs M Brown [4122] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the proposed devlopment of the Esgyryn site. 

I purchased my house for the uninterupted views of the countryside knowing that the government has a policy of not developing greenfield sites. 

I feel that the development will have a very negative effect on the enjoyment I get from my garden and will have a significant negative impact on the current 

value of my home. 

The idea of bulldozing some of our most precious agricultural land to erect a mixed housing, business area and eyesore is environmental vandalism. 


14002 Mrs R Storey [4121] 1 Object 







13999 Mrs L Storey [4120] 1 Object 







550


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Esgyryn, Llandudno Junction 


14043 Cllr R Meirion Hughes [4147] 1 Object 


Contrary to PPW 9.2.9. This greenfield site should not be selected when alternative policies could be used at the Former Hotpoint site to achieve the required 

jobs growth. 

In terms of sustainability, the site is not accessible to key services. 

Pressure from WAG to include Esgyryn to reaslise a premium capital receipt. 

Significant housing growth already disporportionate for a community of this size. 

Severe environmental and landscape impact concerns. 

I support the goal in the LDP of reducing out-commuting/out-migration. 

Change Sought: Withdrawal of site for development in tandem with a tightening of policy for the former Hotpoint factory to ensure a minimum of 300 jobs per hectare. Redraw 

settlement boundary to exclude site. 

Failing that, identify site only as a contingency for high value prestigious employment, subject to completion of a thorough Landsacpe Quality Assessment. 

14143 Mr C M Worstencroft [4269] 

1 Object 

Summary I object on the following grounds: 

This is an area of outstanding beauty and habitat for wildlife. 

There has already been two large developments built recently. 

There is employment land opposite the Welsh Assembly buildings and a large industrial estate on the outskirts of Mochdre that is largely un-occupied. 


13923 Mr & Mrs B Tranter [4089] 1 Object 

Summary We object on the following grounds: 

Pendyffryn is heavily congested already with cars parked bumper to bumper. 

There are many empty and unsold properties up here. 

Loss of green environment. 

We all want to protect and enjoy the natural beauty. 

Extra housing will put a greater strain on road safety. 

The gren spaces are rapidly being depleted. 


14424 Mrs F E Hughes [4435] 1 Object 


This is the last bit of open countryside that is easy to access from residential areas. 

We are going to need this land in the future for producing food so we don't have to import so much from the other side of the world. 

There is already plenty of development. 

These houses would not be for local people, local people need jobs. 

You should use the old Hotpoint factory for more quality jobs and not just car showrooms. 

You cannot continue to take more countryside - where will it end? 


13973 W J Hughes [4110] 1 Object 

Summary If we are to loose this beautiful green land, the building of industrial units and creating a high amount of quality jobs for local people should be of more benefit 

than housing 

Llandudno Junction already has many housing esttes being built on greenfield land. 

Affordable Housing - can young people afford the 20% deposit required - not without quality permanent jobs. 

Also, if the site were developed where would the access be. Access from Pendyffryn or Narrow Lane would be impossible without improvements to the 

existing highway network - but is there room? 

Change Sought: Delete the housing allocation and create quality jobs for local people. 

14419 Mr & Mrs D T Holland [4434] 1 Object 

Summary We object as follows: 

There is very little greenfield land left in this area, development would have a huge impact on the environment e.g. loss of hedgerows, wildlife and flora. 

A build up of traffic/noise on unsuitable roads i.e. Narrow Lane. 

There seems to be enough housing developments at present. More housing doesn't necessarily create jobs. 

Why create more industrial units when there are areas that remain empty i.e. The old Hotpoint site. 

More brownfield sites should be used for industry and greenfield land should be left for the community to enjoy. 


551


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Social Club/Youth Club, Llandudno Junction 



Summary The site flooded during the June 1993 event. Following this event our predecessors carried out a flood alleviation scheme and although the flood alleviation 

scheme does provide an acceptable standard of protection from flooding it doesn't completely remove the flood risk. The scheme was constructed to a 1 in 

200 year level in 1995, however, reconsideration of present day risk may show that this level of protection is not the case now. 

Change Sought: Once again climate change allowances for the lifetime of the development should be included in assessment of the flood risk and flood mitigation measures 

should be considered. These may take the form of maintaining a flood route through the site and SuDS techniques in the surface water disposal. 

13499 Mrs Thelma Hey [3867] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the amount of new housing proposed for Llandudno Junction. 

Planning permission has already been granted for 420 houses. Where are these new people going to find jobs? 

If you must build at all it should be only to create jobs and only if it would lead to at least 2000 well paid jobs. 

Change Sought: Remove the housing allocation at Social Club/Youth Club, Llandudno Junction. 

552


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Plas Penrhyn, Penrhyn Bay 


14383 Llandudno Town Council (Ms Tessa Wildermoth MSc) [555] 1 Support 

Summary It was resolved that the Town Council had no objection to the inclusion of this site 

22396 Mr James Wigzell [5172] 1 Object 


Hit local economy - tourism attraction 

Hit environment - rare birds, flora and fauna 

Precedent set if development takes place 

Prime agricultural land 

Brown sites available although not as attractive to builders as more expensive and often needing to be cleared 

We should only be building for local use and not become suburbs of Chester 

Traffic congestion 


22398 Mr Maurice Wigzell [5173] 1 Object 




















553


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Plas yn Dre, Llandudno 





Summary Only one site for 40 flats identified in the main resort town of Llandudno. Plan depends on 629 windfall houses and purchase of empty dwellings which are not 

guaranteed. 

Propose allocation of contingency sites to ensure completion of housing target. 




Summary The officer comment for this site states that "the EA have modelled climate change scenarios to show that the flood risk for this site can be managed and 

therefore development will be acceptable." This is not correct - we have not done any modelling work in this area. The Llandudno Inundation modelling was 

undertaken by HR Wallingford under contract from Conwy CBC. 

Change Sought: The above modelling work shows that the site is acceptable for development using current day scenarios, however the effects of sea level rises associated 

with climate change will need to be considered for the lifetime of developments. The report considers a 50 year sea level rise for Llandudno. We suggest that 

100 years would be more appropriate for residential dwellings. 

554


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Bodlondeb, Conwy 



Summary Cultural Heritage - It is questioned whether the housing provision within the Essential Setting of the World Heritage Site and within the historic landscape 

designation (to the north of the castle and town walls, south of Twthill Farm) sits comfortably within the Strategic Policies for the Cultural Heritage or with the 

WO Circulars 60/96 and 61/96 Planning and the Historic Environment: Archaeology and Historic Buildings and Conservation Areas. Other candidate sites 

have been dismissed for these reasons. 

Change Sought: Review the allocation. 

13477 Katie Trent [3852] 1 Object 

Summary CR12 

This site was not on the 2009 LDP as residental allocation, why is it appearing now? It is a green field site next to the local nature reserve. It feels 

inappropriate for such a large development on the outskirts of a historic town. 

SR43 

Again another green field site. 

Change Sought: Removal of the site CR12 & SR43 from the development proposals. 

13494 Dr T A Rowell [3863] 12 Object 

Summary We are residents living in the Cadnant Park, Conwy and are extremely concerned about aspects of the Plan which we consider to be unsound. 

Site (CR12) is within, or close to several statutory/non-statutory designations: 

1. World Heritage Site 

2. Essential Setting of the World Heritage Site 

3. Landscape of Outstanding Historic Interest 

4. National Park 

5. Local Nature Reserve 

6. Listed Buildings 

7. Site of Special Scientific Interest 

8. Biodiversity Areas 

9. Green Flag Award 

10. Outstanding Quality Landscape Character (LANDMAP) 

The allocation of site (CR12) is contrary to national/local guidance and is inconsistent with the approach to site selection. 

Change Sought: Remove the housing allocation at Bodlondeb, Conwy. 

14432 Ms Sara Allardice [3901] 1 Object 


The LDP does not have regard to: 

The World Heritage Site Management Plan 

The Urban Green Space Habitat Management Plan 

Planning Policy Wales 

Tourism Action Plan 

The plan includes a vision, objectives and policies that all aim to protect and promote historic assets, open green spaces, biodiversity and dtourism. The 

allocation of this site to housing and employmenet runs contrary to its own policies and, as such, the allocation does not flow logically from the strategy. 

The assessment and allocation of Site CR12 has not been properly executed and should therefore be removed from the LDP. 


14427 Mrs Elizabeth Mair Pattinson [1167] 1 Object 


The council made a compulsory purchase of the estate to ensure its preservation as an open space for all times. 

The landscape quality of the Bodlondeb and Benarth headlands, the twin sentinels surrounding the World Hertiage Site and Conwy Castle and Walls have 

always been considered an asset to Conwy. 

The setting has always been of immense importance to the castle and the walls both of which are the jewel in the crown of the rich tapestry. 

It should be listed as a historical or heritage park. 


14070 MR FRANK YOUD [3896] 1 Object 

Summary I submit that, if this open space, valuable to maintaining a buffer between the Bodlondeb woods, and Bodlondeb itself, has any sort of houses and/or offices 

built there, it will change the rural atmosphere of this delightful road and leafy environment for ever. This is not the type of development for Conwy, or 

Deganwy. For example, there is ample room on the old Hotpoint site in Llandudno Junction for commercial developments. And as far as housing needs are 

concerned, the two new estates in Junction are excellent, especially the one on the brown site. 


13470 mrs jess smith [3842] 1 Object 

Summary The proposed housing would be on land which is undeveloped (which contradicts the council's aim to use previously developed land). In addition, the green 

fields backing onto bonlondeb woods are a wonderful green corridor into the historic town of conwy which would be ruined if made into another housing 

estate. The documents speak of protecting the unique natural environment and this site is just that, seen from the castle walls, this green space is an asset 

and should be protected and not destroyed. 

Change Sought: I would like a more suitable site for housing development to be found. 

14516 Conwy Civic Society (Dr Michael Senior) [4481] 1 Object 

Summary Whilst we have to take the pragmatic view that some development of Conwy's housing and commercial life is essential to the town's future, it is regrettable 

that this particular land has been selected for such use. As a continuation from Bodlondeb park land, it forms a good visual break between the Conwy Morfa 

built development and the town of Conwy itself on the western approach into town. However it is clear that should such allocation be a requirement under the 

LDP, there are serious limitations within the existing settlement boundary to find an alternative site. 


555


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Bodlondeb, Conwy 


14417 Mr Geoff Byrne [4433] 1 Object 


Land should remain in agricultural use. 

There are many empty buildings. 

The proposed access point is unsuitable. 

The approach to Conwy after has to operate as a reserve road when problems occur on the A55. 

The amount of traffic generated would be unsuitable, contravene the covenants, agreements and trust deeds. 

The River Conwy is already experiencing problems with clearance of sewage. 

The serious silting of the River Conwy. 

The only winners will be the developers not the people of Conwy. 

Change Sought: This site should be kept as an agricultural site and introduce a facility such as a Community Mixed Farm which would be attractive to visitors and accessible 

by foot. 

556


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Adjacent to Glanafon, Llanfairfechan 


14423 Cyngor Tref Llanfairfechan Town Council (Mrs Einir Shepherd) [2076] 1 Support 

Summary Whilst it is noted by members of the Town Council that future housing provision does need to be consdered and safeguarded, there are no objections to the 

land at Glanafon being considered for residenetial devlopment as this land is within the settlement limits and on previously devloped land which is not sited 

within a prominent location. 

13418 Mrs Vanesa L Dye [3809] 1 Object 

Summary As a resident of Llanfairfechan I am concerned about the potential impact of 250 additional houses. 

This will put further pressure on already congested main roads making access for parking particularly difficult. Other concerns I have centre of how the local 

Health centre/doctors surgery will cope with the influx of patients. Furthermore there will be a need to extend education, policing and fire resources. 

I am also worried about the use of Green Belt land for 2 of the proposed sites. Once green belt land becomes available for building there are no longer any 

boundaries. 

Change Sought: Remove the housing allocation adjacent to Glanafon, Llanfairfechan. 


Summary Remove this allocated housing site from the list of housing sites within the plan as it is uncertain whether the site is deliverable within the plan period due to 

the Agricultural Tenancy Claim. 

The site is not available now and is unlikely to become available within the plan period. 

This site area also includes a number of good specimen trees and these should be protected. 

Change Sought: Policy HOU/1 Section 1A - Remove this allocated housing site from the list of Urban Development Strategy Area sites within the plan. 

14086 Mr Lloyd Jones [4169] 1 Object 


The town is already struggling to cope with rapid growth and building yet more houses would destroy its unique character. 

Traffic increase. 

Destruction of the coastline's beauty. 

Lack of jobs. 

Eradication of the Welsh language. 

Plenty of empty homes. 



Summary Remove this allocated housing site from the list of sites within the plan as it is uncertain whether the site is deliverable within the plan period due to the 

Agricultural Tenancy Claim. 

This site is not available now and is unlikely to become available within the plan period. 

This site area also includes a number of good specimen trees and these should be protected. 

An alternative housing site is available in the village. 


557


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, West of Penmaen Park, Llanfairfechan 


19173 Mrs P Phillips [4516] 1 Support 

Summary We support the allocation of site 384: Land West of Penmaen Park, Llanfairfechan. 

With reference to the Key Issues Impacting on the Plan Area site 384 assists in: 

Overcoming the high levels of constrained land as the site is sustainably located within the settlement of Llanfaifechan. 

Accommodates a sustained housing growth and promotes a balanced age structure. 

Contributes to the provision of affordable housing. 

20007 Dorothy Coldwell [5151] 117 Object 

Summary We residents of Llanfairfechan, totally deplore any proposal to include the attractive green field sites at Penmean Park and Aber Road in the LDP. There is 

absolutely no need for 345 new dwellings in Llanfairfechan and these 2 prominent areas of high landscape value must be preserved. 


20009 Cllr G Shepard [5152] 58 Object 

Summary We, residents of Penmaen Park and Penmaenmawr Road, totally condemn any proposal to include this area of outstanding landscape value in the LDP. This 

high quality agricultural land, together with numerous mature oak trees, provides an attractive and important backdrop at the entrance to Llanfairfechan. Any 

plans to develop this land would be sacrilege and destroy the rural character of Llanfairfechan. 


13352 Mr W Roger Williams [3770] 1 Object 

Summary I wish to raise an objection to the inclusion of this parcel of land: 

Llanfairfechan already has sufficient housing to accommodate its needs. 

There will be added pressure upon the infrastructure, social amenities, school and drainage system. 

The lovely views would be completely spoilt by an unslightly estate. 

There is an inadequate supply of employment in Llanfairfechan. 

Change Sought: Remove the allocation at West of Penamen Park, Llanfairfechan. 






boundaries. 

Change Sought: Remove the housing allocation at West of Penmaen Park, Llanfairfechan. 

14156 Mrs Ellen Jarvis [3891] 1 Object 


Approaches to the village would be spoilt and traffic would be increased dramatically at peak times. 

The loss of the Penmaen Park field would reflect badly on the village. Penmaen Park is appreciated by many locals and visitors to the area. 

The loss of the field adjoining Caefynnon Road would also be detrimental to the village. 

Already there are many houses which have been on the market for sale for a considerable period of time. There is certainly no demand from the residents of 

Llanfairfechan to justify so many houses being built. 


14422 Cyngor Tref Llanfairfechan Town Council (Mrs Einir Shepherd) [2076] 1 Object 

Summary This particular site is located immediately adjacent to the entrance to Llanfairfechan, the significance of the site as green open space should be taken into 

consideration. 

Not only is the loss of open space regrettable but it is also considered that any form of development on this land will be constrained by the nature and 

topography of the land itself and asks the questions whether a significant number of dwellings can be achieved within the site or not, should it even be 

considered as land designated as suitable for devlopment at all? 

Change Sought: This greenfield land should not be developed where other sources of housing provision can be considered on existing brownfield land within the town. 


Summary Remove this allocated housing site from the list of allocated housing sites within the plan as it is uncertain whether the site is deliverable within the plan period 

due to proposed improvements to J15 of the A55. The site is not available now as detailed within the site assessment sheet. 

This site area also includes an area of woodland and provides high tide feeding area for Curlews during winter month. Both of these should be protected. 

Change Sought: Policy HOU/1 Section 1A - Remove this allocated housing site from the list of Urban Development Strategy Area sites within the plan and allocate the site for 

Highway Improvement Works. 

14380 Mrs Sarah Owen [4424] 1 Object 

Summary This site is located within the built up area, the significance of the site as green open space should be taken into consideration. It is considered that the loss of 

this area of open space will result in the significant loss of landscape features (mature established trees/rural character) that separate and define the existing 

clusters of urban development within this particular area of town. Any form of development on this land will be constrained by the nature and topography of 

the land itself and asks the question whether a significant number of dwellings can be achieved within the site. 



Summary Remove this allocated housing site from the list of sites within the plan as it is uncertain whether the site is deliverable within the plan period due to proposed 

improvements to J15 off the A55. The site is not available now as detailed within the site assessment sheet. 

Allocate the site for Highway Improvement Works. 

This site area also includes an area of woodland and provides high tide feeding area for Curlews during winter montohs. Both of these should be protected. 

An alternative site is available in the village. 


558


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, West of Penmaen Park, Llanfairfechan 


14154 Mr Andrew Jarvis [4276] 1 Object 



The loss of the Penmaen Park field would reflect badly on the village. Penmaen Park is appreciated by many locals and visitors 

to the area. 














559


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Opposite Bryn Y Neuadd, Llanfairfechan 


20008 Dorothy Coldwell [5151] 117 Object 

Summary We, residents of Llanfairfechan, totally deplore any proposal to include the attractive green field sites at Penmaen Park and Aber Road in the LDP. There is 

absolutely no need for 345 new dwellings in Llanfairfechan and these 2 prominent areas of high landscape value must be preserved. 



Summary Protection of good quality agricultural land. Remove this allocated housing site from the list of housing sites within the plan as it uses up good quality Grade 

3A agricultural land contrary to the Council's own policies. Alternative lower quality land is available on the periphary of the village. 

Change Sought: Policy HOU/1 Section 1A - Removal of this allocated housing site from the list of Urban Development Strategy Area sites within the plan as it uses up good 

quality Grade 3A agricultural land contrary to the Council's own policies. 






boundaries. 

Change Sought: Remove the housing allocation opposite Bryn y Neuadd, Llanfairfechan 

14421 Cyngor Tref Llanfairfechan Town Council (Mrs Einir Shepherd) [2076] 1 Object 

Summary Proposed residential development on this site has been refused twice in the past few years on the grounds that the site is located within part of a field which is 

separated from the built settlement. 

We consider that there will be significant loss of landscape features within this area of open countryside which is objected to on visual amenity gounds and 

there are concerns on the impact that any residential devloppment on this site will have on the setting of the adjoining Conservation Area. 

Change Sought: This greenfield site should not be developed where other sources of housing provision can be considered on existing brownfield land within the town itself. 

14157 Mrs Ellen Jarvis [3891] 1 Object 









Summary Remove this allocated housing site from the list of housing within the plan as this site would be ideal for the development of a new school for the village and 

would satisfy the requirements of the School Modernisation Report - BP24. Including this site as an allocated housing site will remove the potential for the site 

to be used for the new school. 

Allocating the site for the new school - this would also improve parking and highway concerns associated with parents dropping off and collecting children 

from the school in the middle of the village. 

Change Sought: Policy HOU/1 Section 1A - Remove this allocated Housing site from the list of Urban Devlopment Strategy Area sites within the plan and allocate the site for a 

new school. 

14381 Mrs Sarah Owen [4424] 1 Object 

Summary Proposed residential development on this site has been refused twice in the past few years by Conwy CBC (application reference 0/32335) on the grounds 

that the site is located within part of a field which is separated from the built settlement of Llanfairfechan by woodland and trees and would create a precedent 

for urban sprawl being injurious to the visual amenity of the open countryside and lead to the removal of strategic landscape features which may be harmful to 

nature conservation and to the setting of the nearby Conservation Area. 


14155 Mr Andrew Jarvis [4276] 1 Object 


















Summary Remove this allocated housing site from the list of sites within the plan as it uses up good quality agricultural land contrary to the Council's own policies. It also 

impacts negatively on the setting of the nearby Church and trees on the site. An alternative site is available in the village. 

Allocate the site for a new school. Allocating the site for the new school would improve parking and higway concerns associated with parents dropping off and 

collecting children from the school in the middle of the village. 

Change Sought: Delete site/allocate site for new school. 

560


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Cwm Road, Penmaenmawr 


20024 Mr & Mrs Griffiths [5154] 11 Object 

Summary We object to the above proposal on the grounds that the development would have an unacceptable adverse impact: i) on residential amenity; ii) From traffic 

generated; iii) On environment conditions arising from noise, lighting, vibration, odour, noxious emissions or dust; iv) on ecological and wildlife interests and 

landscape character; v) On flooding and flood risk; vi) On quality of ground or surface water; vii) On essential community facilities. 


20022 Mr Mark Tharme [5153] 18 Object 





22325 Mr Paul Woods [5158] 4 Object 





22326 Mr Gethin Roberts [5159] 11 Object 





22327 Bethan Edwards [5160] 17 Object 





22328 Mr Peter McCarthy [5161] 3 Object 





22329 Einir Rowlands [5162] 17 Object 





22330 Gemma Roberts [5163] 1 Object 





22331 D Evans [5164] 12 Object 










20028 Pat Williams [5155] 20 Object 






Summary The proposal at Cwm Road is the one that has been least thought of as access here would be a problem in addition to the existing infrastructure within 

Penmaenmawr not being able to cope with an increase in traffic. 


22332 J Hughes [5165] 12 Object 





20015 Cllr. Ken Stevens [3800] 199 Object 

Summary We are of the opinion that the above Greenfield site is unsuitable for development on the following ground; Policy DP/4, A. effecting existing residential 

amenity, B. from traffic generated (approx 120 extra vehicles), and H, on the best and mose versatile agricultural land. 

Change Sought: Replace site 26 with site 135. 

561




13478 Mrs J Raybould [3853] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the proposed build of 60 houses on Cwm Road, Penmaenmawr. 

This will mean at least 120 more vehicles. The roads around Penmaenmawr are arleady struglling to cope with the existing volume of traffic. The queues to 

gain access to the A55 at the roundabout get longer and longer. People take risks to get out, especially during the summer, when the caravan parks are full. 

Frustration results in accients! 

I therefore urge you to consider the dangers to existing residents in Penmaenmawr. 

Change Sought: Remove the housing allocation at Cwm Road, Penmaenmawr. 

13520 Ms Linda Roberts [3890] 1 Object 

Summary I wish to object to the field between merton park and cwm road being included in this plan it is the only bit of green between these already big housing areas. 

The increase in traffic along the picturesque graiglwyd road would be very dangerous for the ysgol pencae children. so many houses are up for sale and 

empty would it not be better to use these than build more which is not the green option. We have few free spaces left as it is, the parc moel lys area together 

with merton park and greystone park is already overcrowded. 



Summary I have complained for some time regarding the proposed housing allocation on the field behind Y Berllan, Pant yr Afron, Penmaenmawr. My feeling has 

always been that the allocation should be taken out of the LDP Plan because of the lack of adequate access roads to the proposed site and the extra traffic 

that 60 homes would put onto Graiglwyd Road. 

Penmaenmawr already has existing planning permission for some 70 flats and 30 houses which have not been built due to the current economic climate. 


14138 Mr & Mrs Brian & Janet Springthorpe [3885] 1 Object 

Summary Such large scale growth is unsustainable and would put a huge strain on local facilities such as the Llys Medig Medical Centre and local schools. 

Infrastructure such as waste management, highway maintenance, access, roads and drainage systems are already under pressure and an additional 60 new 

homes will only make these problems worse. 

Change Sought: We would like the Council to consider: 

(a) Removing the proposal to build a further 60 dwellings in Penmaenmawr 

(b) An alternative site to the Cwm Lane development, namely the secondary proposed site (if absolutely necessary) in Conwy Rd. 

(c) Bringing into occupation the many empty and semi derelict properties in Conwy county 

13426 Dr John Good [3814] 1 Object 

Summary This comment relates to new housing consultation site No. 480 in Penmaenmawr between Cwm Road and Merton Park. I do not object in principle to new 

housing in the area but am concerned about two thing: 1)access to this proposed site; if from the top of Cwm Road it would greatly increase the amount of 

traffic along narrow and unimprovable Graiglwyd Road and down Cwm Road, which runs alongside our boundary. Access might be possible from the bottom 

of Cwm Road. 2) there should be a broader mix of housing types and values. 

Change Sought: Access from Graiglwyd Road should be ruled out. The mix of house types should be broadened to encourage development of a more integrated community. 

There should be good barriers between the exisitng houses bordering the site and the new houses to provide an acceptable elvel of privacy for existing and 

new householders. 

13518 Mr & Mrs Colin & Dorothy Cook [3884] 1 Object 

Summary We object to the further use of green space instead of brown space. We also note that the roads in the vicinity are filled with traffic already. Merton Park Hill 

and Merton Park to Bryn Helyg are known to us to be difficult to negotiate because of the parked cars and vision on accessing Merton Park Hill. If we are to 

have more traffic, the roads will not be able to cope. We would also query the ability of the sewers to cope with extra capacity. 


13516 Ms Judith Mardula [3882] 1 Object 

Summary I with to strongly object to the proposal to build 60 houses on Cwm Road, Penmaenmawr. 

This is a residential area, with children and elderly, and people who are disabled, there are already too many cars parked and making the roads dangerous. 

This will very negatively affect the quality of living for residents in this area. 

Change Sought: Remove the contingency housing allocation on Cwm Road, Penmaenmawr. 

13515 Ms Daphne Crabb [3881] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the proposal to build 60 houses on Cwm Road, Penmaenmawr. 

Merton park Hill is very busy and dangerous because some of the housing has no off-road parking. thismakes visibility awkward. The hill is also the main 

access to Pencae Primary School so at the beginning and end of the day it is even busier. With another 120 or more vehicles using the hill id won't be long 

before a serious accident takes place. 

There are bats, hares, rabbits, buzzards and herons visiting the site. The field has wild flowers and mushrooms growing in it. 


13454 Mr Leslie Jones [3829] 1 Object 

Summary I wish to register my objection to the plan to build up to 60 houses on the site at Cwm Road, Penmaenmawr. 

This development will bring many extra cars and vans etc to an area that is at the moment struggling to cope with the existing volume of traffic. Pen Cae 

School will be far more dangerous for the children to access with the expected influx of vehicles. there is also the problem with sewage, as the existing 

system is working at maximum capacity at the moment and will not be able to cope with the extra load. 

Change Sought: Delete the housing allocation at Cwm Road, Penmaenmawr. 

13455 Miss K Williams [3830] 1 Object 

Summary I am writing to express my concerns over the plans to build 60 houses in Cwm Road, Penmaenmawr. Here are my concerns: 

Firstly, as a mother to a toddler, I thoroughly enjoy taking my son to the edge of that field to feed the horses. 

Secondly, during the snowy days the local children often use that field for sledging. 

Thirdly I am concerened about all the extra cars that will be around the area and where they will park. 

I am also concerned about who will be living in these houses that will be so near to my family. 

Change Sought: Remove the housing allocation at Cwm Road, Penmaenmawr 

562



Rep No Name 

People Type 

13456 Mr Nick Davies [3831] 

1 Object 

Summary We object to the proposed development of 60 houses to be located in the field between Merton Park, Cwm Road and 

behind 22-36 Y Berllan. 

We further object to there being any housing development whatsoever in this area. 

With an already adequate housing stock within the locale, we see no benefit to increasing this provision which will serve only to damage our precious rural 

landscape whilst also increasing vehicular congestion. 


13434 Mrs P A Williams [3821] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the proposed site for sixty dwellings on Cwm Road, Penmaenmawr: 

The Y Berllan is very conjested now by parked cars on either side of the road. 

Winter time is a problem with snow and ice causing many problems on a continuous hill. 

Eight houses look directly onto this field with peaceful views. 

There is access to a public footpath to the village, this is only access to single traffic. There is also a public footpath which many ramblers and local people 

use. 

Graiglwyd Road is very narrow and winding with no footpaths. 

Change Sought: Remove the housing allocation at Cym Road, Penmaenmawr. 

14173 Ms Angela Turley [4285] 3 Object 


Lack of community involvement 

The access is not defined and the road network is substandard. 

Flooding is an issue as this site whenever there is heavy rainfall. 

The local sewerage works already has problems with hydraulic overload. 

The proposed affordable housing corrupts and dilutes the current social mix. 

The site is prime agricultural land and impacts on a High Quality Landscape Area. 

The site is part of the green wedge. 

It would errode the aim of protecting the Welsh language. 

The local school, doctors and community facilities would not be able to cope. 

Change Sought: Delete site and reduce housing figure. 

14177 Ms Rebecca Turley [4287] 1 Object 












14175 Mr Paul Turley [4286] 1 Object 












14118 Ms L Davies [4239] 1 Object 

Summary I would like to object strongly to the proposed plans to build 60 houses in the field between merton park, cwm road and behind 22- 36 y berllan. 

Penmaenmawr is a beuitifull village with lovely green fields. We need to keep it a village or it will lose all its charm, and become a town with little fields. 

I have lived in Penmaenmawr 37 years and care about the community, and worry what will hapen in the future if houses get built everywhere. There are plenty 

of houses for sale in the village. Please think about the future. 


13944 J W Harvey [4101] 1 Object 

Summary I consider that Merton Park Road is already a dangerous road with it's steep hill and bends. It is often reduced to single lane with the raodside parked vehicles. 

If the proposed development results in increased traffic, particularly heavy vehicles during the construction stage, then you will have created a real traffic 

hazard. 


14008 Dr & Mrs RJD & V Evans [4124] 1 Object 


Limited vehicular access - Merton Park and Craiglwyd Road are already dangerously overloaded. Access to the development site by emergency vehicles 

would also be extremely difficult. 

Drainage difficulty - The area above the site is wet and has drainage problems. 

Primary school places - additional primary shcool places would be difficult to find. 

Employment opportunities - The scarcity of jobs in Penmaenmawr means the residents would have to travel to work. There is no evidence of a housing need 

for additional people. 


563






Lack of suitable road infrastructure. 

Access issues. 

120 more cars would cause grave safeety issues for people and property. 

The primary shcool is situated in this area and the safety of parents and children would be compromised. 

Traffic congestion. 

Access from Merton Park would destroy the safety and transquility for the residents and decrease the value of their properties. 

Access from Y Berllan would endanger children and the elderly. 


14171 Mr Mathew Turley [4284] 1 Object 











Change Sought: Delete site and reduce the housing figures. 

14152 Ms Cheryl Wild [4274] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the LDP planning proposal for 60 houses being built between Merton park , cam road and behind 22-36 y berllan, our village does not have the 

resources to cope and will increase the traffic dramatically on roads that are narrow and some without footpaths near schools, this is dangerous for our 

children,elderly and infirm, and an accident waiting to happen 


14119 Mr Keith Ashby [4240] 1 Object 


Access and Egress - One only has to stand at the end of Fernbrook Road for an hour to witness many near misses on the road, which has no footpath. 

The roads are narrow, and increased traffic would exacerbate the problem. 

Drainage - The area has several watercourses running through it. 

To interfere with these established watercourses could seriously impact on properties lower down when they establish new routes. 

Pipistrelle Bats - The area is a haunt for Pipistrelle Bats, and we believe that to build on such areas is ILLEGAL!! 


13988 J Godman [4116] 1 Object 


This is a small town with a village atmosphere and community. 

The roads were not built to sustain about an extra 120 cars. 

Having adjusted to the dog kennels, aids respite centre and fisheries I think it is preposterous to think we would welcome this idea. 

Please don't make us into another Wrexham or Puelas estate as we don't even have our own police station. 

Why not help young people buy the older properties instead of destroying our little patch of countryside. 


14142 W Jones [4268] 1 Object 

Summary I wish to object on the following grounds: 

The access from the north is via an unsuitable road layout. 

The estate will need access from the south for emergency purposes and this road has dangerous bends and a gradient of 1 in 6. 

You are targeting greenfield sites which contravenes your Sustainable Development Principles. 

Change Sought: Target the brownfield sites at 

Tan y Berllan - derelict building 

Old weighbridge site 

Old garage site near Bron Eryri Public House 

Old quarry offices 

Red Gables Hotel 

14220 Mr & Miss Mason & Selby [4362] 1 Object 

Summary We strongly object to the above plan on the following grounds: 

1) It is a GREEN FIELD SITE on the edge of Snowdonia National Park. This is a beautiful field of great environmental value. 

2) There are many Brown Field sites in and around Penmaenmawr that could be utilized. 

3) Access is poor - there have been accidents in the past and the road system is already overstretched. 

4) It would place impossible strain on the Victorian sewage system which was never designed for such volumes of housing. 


13893 Mr & Mrs FJ & AE Smith [4066] 1 Object 

Summary We wish to register our objection to the proposed housing development by Cwm Road. The reason for our objection is based on the inadequate and 

unsuitable road access to and from the site. These access roads and the surrounding roads leading into and out of the village and to the local school are 

already hazardous becuase of their narrowness, blind corners at junctions and the volume of traffic arleady being carried. 


13894 Mr & Mrs D & L Wyke [4067] 1 Object 

Summary We wish to register an objection to the proposed housing development at Cwm Road. This objection is based on the limited and narrow access available to 

the site from either Graiglwyd Road or from Y Berllan. 

One further point - opposite the southern end of Cwm Road, that is the Graiglwyd Road end, are two roads, one leading to the Thornley Leisure caravan park 

and the other leading to the Trout Fishery. Neither of these two developments is shown clearly on your published maps. 


564




14217 Mr Leighton Davies [4360] 1 Object 


There is limited access to all adjacent roads, the excessive volume of traffic though the village is unsafe, the volume of traffic currently using the roads past 

the school is unacceptable for a rural village. Travelers have currently queue for 5-10 minutes to gain access to the roundabout and the have to take 

unacceptable risks to get onto the roundabout, with the proposal of the additional houses with the occupants having 1-2 cars per household this will 

exacerbate an already problematic procedure putting peoples lives at risk. 


14216 Mr Rae Davies [4359] 1 Object 







14109 Ms Christine Corner [4188] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the inclusion of this site. 


14213 B L Davies [4357] 1 Object 


Loss of view. My mother is housebound and her bed jis downstairs and this is her only enjoyment. 

There is no park and the children play here. 

There are many palces in Penmaenmawr that these houses can be built without destroying the beautiful view of the back of Penmaenmawr, like between 

Penmaenmawr and Dwygyfylchi. 


13897 Mrs Jackie Lee [4070] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the proposed site on the following grounds: 

Access to this are is already congested with the roads struggling to cope with the existing volume of traffic. 

The trees running adjacent to the planning line, separating the field from Merton Park also house a bat colony which is a protected species. 

There are many properties for sale in Penmaenmawr affordable to first time buyers, further developments are not necessary. 


14218 Rev & Mrs David & Carol Halstead [4361] 1 Object 


1. The first is access. There would have to be significant alteration to the junction with the site and Y Berllan. The roads on the current estate are not wide 

enough to take through traffic. 

2. The second is the impact on the physical environment. One of the key features and attractions of Penmaenmawr is its proximity to the sea and the 

mountains. Cym Rd, currently a track, is an environmental asset which provides immediate pedestrian access to the country side and hills almost from the 

centre of town. 

Change Sought: Delete site and use site 135 and 153. 



Can the local school cope with more children. 

The roads to Ysgol Pencae are very dangerous with the volume of traffic at present. 

Can the doctor's surgery cope. 

Accessing the A55 is often difficult and the access is poor. 


14215 Mrs Julie Davies [4358] 1 Object 







13892 Mrs M Evans [4065] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the proposal: 

1. Congestion on the roads, as two access sites would be needed for the development. Our roads are already busy and we find it difficult to even park outside 

our homes. 

2. There is a concern for the risk of flooding as a lot of houses in the area are liable to flooding. 

3. 60 houses would be an eyesore to the beautiful fields and mountains of Penmaenmawr. 

The community of Penmaenmawr were not informed of this plan. 


14098 Ms Rachel Dagtekin [4180] 1 Object 


This will create a lot of noise for my self and many other people living in this area. 

I will see nothing but sixty houses and this will cause more noise and traffic pollution 

There is limited access to the road already, there is no where to park for people visiting. 

I also hear that you are wanting to built more houses in dewgifylchi, i personally feel that this is unacceptable and unfair on the local people that live in the 

village. 


14092 Ms Paula Chester [4172] 1 Object 

Summary I would like to object to the Local development plan for Penmaenamwr, Conwy My objection is to the possible plans to develop an area in Penmaenmawr for 

housing. 'Option 1' ( area locally known as "Bumpy lane" ) will have various /major access issues which have not yet been addressed by the LDP. As well as 

my objection on the basis of appropriate road access I would also like to express my concerns regarding the short consultation period. More time and 

discussions need to be given to the proposals 


565




14095 Mrs M E Roberts [4174] 1 Object 

Summary I wish to object a follows: 

It is not clear where the access road would be and the extra traffic would be using roads that are already struggling to cope there is also the problem of all this 

extra traffic needing to go onto the expressway roundabout to the a55 at peak times. an alternate site which could be used plas mawr parc as it is now only 

used as a dog toilet and a place for drug dealing but we would still need improvement to the roundabout 


14096 Mr Alun Roberts [4175] 1 Object 


Access to the site which can only be from y berllan or merton park and craiglwyd road as these roads are already verry busy and a further 120 + cars up and 

down would be a further hazard to local residents and children coming and going to school 

Our community would suffer from a major increase in population ie doctors etc. 

We would also need better access to the a55 than the current roundabout's with increased traffic than we have now as cars are already queing at peak times. 


14097 

Summary 

Mrs Pamela Good [4179] 

I object as follows: 

1 Object 

1. This is one of the most inaccessible sites in the whole of Penmaenmawr. 

2. Possible access issues. 

3. Traffic issues. 

4. There are some Brownfield sites in the village which have unimpeded access to the main road & are a complete eyesore in the village. Why can't these be 

used? 

5. The whole project, in my opinion, has not given residents sufficient time or information to digest the proposals & has not been well advertised in the press 

until a very late stage. 




Access and Infrastructure 

Land selected and volume of homes 

Lack of identified need for new homes 


14225 Mr Jamie Parks [4367] 20 Object 


Adversely affect neighbouring properties and their communities. 

Highways access issues. 

Subject to flooding. 

Would de-value all the surrounding properties. 

Parking issues. 

Lack of access for emergency vehicles due to parked cars. 

Represents overdevelopment of a small site in a sensitive area. 

Serious consequences for wildlife. 

Development would be overlooking the existing houses. 


14108 Ms Hilary Davies [4187] 1 Object 

Summary There are many grounds for the objection but two of the most important are a) access and b) removing a green field site when there are many derelict 

houses and brown field sites in the village. 

I would also like to object to the lack of consultation on the LDP. We only have a very few days to formulate our objections and communication on this 

important issue has been noticable by its absence. 

I understand that there may be grounds to object because correct procedures have not been followed in this event. 


14179 Mr & Mrs AR & JA Smee [4288] 1 Object 


Access via Y Berllan would be inappropriate due to the narrow access, access via Graiglwyd Road would be dangerous in view of the volume of traffic 

arleady using Merton Park Hill. 

Another concern is the volume of vehicles using the roundbout leading onto the A55 at Dwygyfylchi, this is already a very hazardous juntion and with a huge 

increase in vehicles the problem would be exacerbated. 


14110 Mr Nigel Shepherd [4189] 1 Object 

Summary Oustide the Settlement Boundary, constitutes loss of existing greenfield land. 

Will add load to an already problematic sewage system 

There is an increasing risk of flooding. 

There is no sound plan for additional employment. 

No justification has been made for this housing need in the settlement. 

Impacts on a High Quality Landscape Area, Open Countryside, and on Views and Local Character. 

Conwy Council has not consulted residents or Town. 

The LDP is flawed in that it contains planning policies aspiring to high ideals which it claims to meet, but these are expounded as generalisations which are 

then often contradicted. 

Change Sought: The community must be consulted and their views considered 

The evidence base must be revised to reflect changes in the economy 

The Wales Satial Plan should be adhered to 

open spaces policy regarding area per head of population must be provided for 

Affordable housing should not be focussed in high densities within communities 

566




14224 Ms Sian Taylor [4366] 1 Object 












14214 Penmaenmawr Town Council (Cllr Lesley Cockings) [4201] 1 Object 


Local amenities cannot cope. 

Traffic issues. 

The effect on the Welsh language. 

Environmental reasons. 

Why not use brownfield sites for building. 

LDP has not convinced me there is a need for more housing in Penmaenmawr. 

Oustanding quality landscape. 

The field is ona slope and liable to flooding. 

Community facilities not being able to cope. 

Lack of public consultation. 

The response from the public meeting. 

My bungalow has this field as a backdrop. 

Landscape Conservation Areas. 

Highways issues. 

Penmaenmawr does not want to become a dormitory town for people just to sleep in. 


14221 Mr & Mrs WH & JJ Gadd [4363] 1 Object 

Summary The added pressure this will put on Fernbrook Road will be unimaginable. 

There are no footpaths to access Pencae School. 

At the public meeting this week it was stated that the Highways Department have no objection to this development obviously no one from that department has 

ever used Fernbrook Road at that time on a school day. 

Please could you take this point into consideration when making your final decision. 

Should the development go ahead surely it would be sensible to make provision for footpaths in both Fernbrook Road and Craigllwyd Roads. 


Should the development go ahead surely it would be sensible to make provision for footpaths in both Fernbrook Road and Craigllwyd Roads. 

14222 Mrs Sheila Parks [4364] 1 Object 












14107 Mr Andrew Dainty [4186] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the building of new homes between mertonpark and cwm rd and behind 22-36 y berllan in penmaenmawr, as it will increase the volume of traffic in 

and out of our village dramatically. These very narrow roads off which a number have no footpaths would be subject to a huge increase in traffic and as a 

farther and outdoor enthusiast I feel your proposal would put the residents of this small village at a serious risk. If this a serious proposal your first plan should 

be with the highways and not the residents of penmaenmawr. 


14223 Mr Colin Powell [4365] 1 Object 












14103 Mr & Mrs Geoffrey & Glenys Roberts [4185] 1 Object 


The infrastructure of the village can barely cope as it is. 

The sewerage system will not be able to cope. 

We never see any police walking through Pen. 

You cannot get an appointment now at the Doctors. 

We are not opposed to affordable housing for young people but you are turning Pen into a dumping ground for dysfunctional misfits. 


567


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Dinerth Hall Farm, Rhos on Sea 


14106 Mr & Mrs John & Pearl Bray [2054] 1 Object 


Dinerth Hall is a working farm 

Roads leading to/from the proposed development. 

Compatibility with adjacent properties. 

Disruption casued by building work, both nose and dust is unacceptable. 


13531 Mr David Roberts [3897] 1 Object 

Summary 90 dwellings could mean 90+ cars. Adjoining roads are narrow and in poor condition, and in some places are down to single-file due to overspill parking from 

Llandrillo College. 

Also, Dinarth Hall is a working farm with all the noise etc, connected to farm work. 

The dwellings will be two-bedroom houses. The properties round the land are all bungalows, and as a result the privacy of our properties will be lost. 

We also feel that the drainage system for the whole area needs to be reviewed as there is already raw sewage contamination in an open ditch running across 

this farm land. 

Change Sought: Cancel the proposed housing development entirely. 

13918 Dr Crawford Thomas [4084] 1 Object 

Summary There has already been a steady increase in traffic as the College has expanded. If you insist on revising the boundaries to the Green Wedge 4 please do a 

minimum of two things: 

Make Marston Road a 20mph zone with at least three smooth speed bumps to decrease the possibility of a serious accident due to even further traffic. 

Properly sort out the sewage and drainage (not the water supply as you state in the LDP proposal) system. The sewage and drainage system in our road is 

appalling and has caused problems in outflow on the farmland below already. 

Change Sought: Delete site and replace with a more appropriate Brownfield site (2 alternatives suggested) or make Marston Road a 20mph zone and sort out the sewage and 

drainage system. 

568


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Dinerth Road, Rhos on Sea 


19378 Welsh Assembly Government (Mr Richard Baker) [4554] 1 Support 

Summary We fully support this allocation which recognises the contribution that the Dinerth Road site can make in terms of housing delivery within the Rhos-on-Sea 

area over the Plan period. 

However, we reserve the right continue to rely upon the details contained within our report submitted to the Deposit Plan should the site be removed as an 

allocation at any future stage. 


Summary Whilst the site is suitable for housing development, the density of housing proposed would put a considerable and adverse strain on local infrastructure, 

particularly roads. 

Change Sought: Reduce the density of housing proposed 


Summary We note that the actual limit of the site has been reduced so that the part which was in the C1 flood zone has been removed. Once again, adding an 

allowance for climate change could shift the flood outline so that part of the site will still be affected as the effects of climate change are felt. 

Change Sought: This aspect should be considered so that the site outline can be amended again if necessary before allocating the site. 

13535 mr alan hughes [3902] 1 Object 

Summary object to 70 houses proposed on the government building site as it will be totally out of character. 

Change Sought: reduce the amount of housing by half 

propose bungalows to match the surrounding area 

13925 Mr & Mrs Dixon [4090] 1 Object 


This will fundamentally change the character of this quiet residential area. 

The surrounding properties are bungalows and semi-detached houses and a development of 70 properties will be out of character. 

The infrastructure would not be able to cope, local roads are already congested. 

The biodiversity and green development of Bryn Euryn would also be impacted. 

Change Sought: Re-evaluate the proposal for this site to include a mix of bungalows and quality two storey houses and have large green open spaces and ample room for 

residents to design their own gardens. 

14159 Miss Judith Harris [4277] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the change from employment to housing on the following grounds: 

There are no well paid quality jobs. 

Ther is no point in providing houses for young people who cannot find work. Only by providing well paid quality jobs can the area become vibrant and 

economically healthy. 

The proposed stocking area for the houses is far too high. 

This area would be an ideal site for a Medical Centre complete with parking. 

Change Sought: Use the area for employment purposes and not houses. 

13919 

Summary 


14016 

Summary 

Mr & Mrs Jones [4085] 

I object to the above mentioned site on the following grounds: 

Princess Avenue and the surrounding areas are bungalows. This site is not going to be in keeping with the area if 70 dwellings are to be built. 

Privacy and neighbours overlooking each other. 

Access is a grave concern. 

The present economic climate which has a stagnant housing market swamped with properties that local people cannot afford. 

There are a high number of unemployed people with not enough employment opportunities. 

You should up grade the lower end of the market properties and get rid of the bedsits. 

Delete site. 

Mr Bryan Hurst [4127] 

I consider the proposed developmenet of 70 homes on the site to be too high a density in relation to the site itself and the locality. 

It would add to theproblems of Dinerth Road, Llanduldno Road and Tan-y-Bryn Road. These roads already have major problems. 

No mention has been made of a childrens play area for the proposed site. The nearest is at the lowe end of Church Road, too far for children living on the 

proposed site to make use of. 

Change Sought: I am not against the development of the site but would like the density to be reduced. 

1 Object 

1 Object 


Summary The housing areas surrounding the site are far less dense than the proposed. 

Adding 70 dwellings on the existing Government Buildngs site would more than double the dwellings/hectare in the area, contrary to para. 4.1.3.3 which says 

that new buildings should 'enhance their surroundings without harming local amenity'. 

70 dwellings on this site is not compatible with the area, and would probably have road safety implications. 

Change Sought: Reduce the quantity of housing to fit the surrounding area. 

14065 Mr & Mrs Cliff & Syliva Hughes [4157] 1 Object 


1) The density of the new dwellings would be out of character with the surrounding area. 

2) The proposed new dwellings will result in an increase in traffic on the surrounding roads with the resultant increase in noise and pollution. 

3) The density of the new dwellings will be damaging to the biodiversity and appearance of the site with the presumed removal of mature trees and green 

spaces to enable the development to take place. 

Change Sought: Proposals for new dwellings on this site should be of a lower number, around 40, with vehicle access restricted to the existing entrance to the site from 

Dinerth Road. 

Any new dwellings should be in keeping with the existing properties around the site in appearance and type. 

The existing mature trees and green spaces should be taken into account in any development to ensure that the biodiversity and appearance of the site is 

enhanced, not damaged. 

569


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Lawson Road, Colwyn Bay 



Summary Mae y safle hwn yn faes parcio pwysig yn nghanol Bae Colwyn ac ni ddylech ystyriad eu gau. Mae'r dre wedi colli drost 150 o lecynnau parcio yn ddiweddar 

ac mae wir angen amddiffyn pob maes parcio yn y dre. 

Change Sought: Diddymu'r safle or rhestr safleoedd tai strwythurol. 

570


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Douglas Road, Colwyn Bay 



Summary Mae y safle hwn yn faes parcio pwysig yn nghanol Bae Colwyn ac ni ddylech ystyriad eu gau. Mae'r dre wedi colli drost 150 o lecynnau parcio yn ddiweddar 

ac mae wir angen amddiffyn pob maes parcio yn y dre er mwyn hybu busnesau yn y dref. 

Change Sought: Diddymu'r safle or rhestr safleoedd tai strwythurol. 

14111 Bay of Colwyn Town Council (Mrs Tina Earley) [123] 1 Object 

Summary Reference needs to be made to the importance of identifying, allocating and providing alternative parking provision for the town centre, prior to the release of 

brownfield sites 489 & 491 for redevelopment, due to the detrimental impact that a loss of parking provision would have on the regeneration of the town. 

Change Sought: Reference needs to be made to the importance of identifying, allocating and providing alternative parking provision for the town centre, prior to the release of 


13349 Mr Norman Jones [190] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the proposal to develop Lansdowne Road and Douglas Road Car Parks in Colwyn Bay. 

Parking for residents, workers, visitors etc is extremely scarce and the car parks serve an essential service. 

A centrally situated large scale car park would not be an adequate alternative. 

This proposal would further damage the town's regeneration. 

Change Sought: Remove the allocation at Douglas Road, Colwyn Bay 

571


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Lansdowne Road, Colwyn Bay 


14112 Bay of Colwyn Town Council (Mrs Tina Earley) [123] 1 Object 

Summary Reference needs to be made to the importance of identifying, allocating and providing alternative parking provision for the town centre, prior to the release of 


Change Sought: Reference needs to be made to the importance of identifying, allocating and providing alternative parking provision for the town centre, prior to the release of 


13517 Mr & Mrs J T Eynon [3883] 1 Object 

Summary We strongly object to the proposed building of dwelling on Lansdowne Road car park. 

Firstly where are people going to park, this is a very busy car park during the week with workers, visitors and shoppers. 

Secondly why do we need more dwellings when there are hundres of empty flats and houses in the area. Most of the flats around this area seem to be used 

by drug addicts, DHS and drop outs. Wehy does Colwyn Bay have to house all these people. 

Thirdly it is going to cause more problems with traffic in town and anti social behaviour. 

Change Sought: Remove the housing allocation in Lansdowne Road, Colwyn Bay. 

13348 

Summary 


Mr Norman Jones [190] 

I object to the proposal to develop Lansdowne Road and Douglas Road Car Parks in Colwyn Bay. 

Parking for residents, workers, visitors etc is extremely scarce and the car parks serve an essential service. 

A centrally situated large scale car park would not be an adequate alternative. 

This proposal would further damage the town's regeneration. 

Remove the allocation at Lansdowne Road 

1 Object 

572


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Bryn Hyfryd/Ffordd Tan Yr Ysgol, Llanrwst 


13567 Mr David Gwynfor Davies [3913] 1 Support 

Summary Safle 287- Bryn Hyfryd, Ffordd Tan yr Ysgol, Llanrwst. 

Fel perchennog y llain hwn o dir ac yn ategol i'm gohebiaeth blaenorol- credwn fod cynnwys y tir hwn yn cyd fynd a strategaethau a pholisiau y Cynllun 

Datblygu Lleol (a'r profion cadernid). Rydym yn awyddus ac yn fodlon iddo gael ei gynnwys fel safle ar gyfer datblygiad tai ac felly yn cefnogi ei gynnwys yn y 

Cynllun datblygu. 


Summary Further assessment of the flood risk at this site will be required prior to allocation. As stated in your Background Paper, the current situation will have been 

improved by connection to the Afon Bach flood alleviation scheme. However, the site is not just at risk from the Afon Bach but is also affected by surface 

water ponding and from tributary no. 3, which is the ordinary watercourse which flows through the Ysgol Nant Conwy site. 

Change Sought: We would advise the extent of the risk should be investigated prior to inclusion as an allocation. 

13486 Dr D Brian Chambers [3858] 1 Object 

Summary Objections 

1. The present land is green belt and building there will detract from the rural nature of Llanrwst 

2. The access road, School Bank Road, is already very busy, with pedestrian path on only one side. This road will become busier once the new surgery is 

operational and will be dangerous for the school children and elderly from the care home. 

3.additional housing will not encourage young people or families to stay in Llanrwst. What needs to be addressed is the creation of more higher paid jobs (i.e, 

not just supermarket or low paid seasonal jobs) 

Change Sought: Do not build houses which are not needed. 

14085 Llanrwst Town Council (Ms Gwenda M Jones) [2168] 1 Object 

Summary The 3 main issues with this site are 

a. Traffic using the road 

b. Lack of Pavements 

c. Flooding 

Change Sought: Revise housing figure for Llanrwst. 

573


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, North West of Llanrwst, Llanrwst 


14541 A W Jones Building Contractors (Mr Aled Jones) [2173] 1 Object 

Summary The site suffers from a number of fundamental problems that affect its suitability as an allocated housing site and therefore the allcation is unsound and the 

site should be removed from the plan and replaced by my clients land off Tros yr Afon or downgraded to a contingency housing allocation. 

Change Sought: A new housing allocation at Tros yr Afon and the development boundary extended. 

Either remove site 462, reduce its yield to a more realistic level of 10 or change its allocation to a Contingency Housing Allocation. 


Summary The town council believe that this would be one large site with the site at Cawleys' Yard. 

There are 3 main issues with this site are 

a.Access, 

b.Flooding and 

c.Health Hazard 

Change Sought: Revise the housing figure for Llanrwst 

13357 Mrs L Twist [3775] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the proposed building of 55 houses in Parry/Llanddoged Roads. 

Both of these roads are quite narrow and many of the houses have no garage resulting in cars parked in the road. 

There are already many low cost houses for sale and the shortage of jobs is the main reason for young people leaving. 

This suggested plan would really detract from the pleasant green edges of Llanrwst. 

Change Sought: Remove the allocated housing at North West of Llanrwst. 

14391 The Llanrwst Resident Group (Mr Rhys Davies) [4445] 1 Object 

Summary The Llanrwst Residents Group object on the following grounds: 

1. Ecology and Biodiversity 

2. Flood Risk 

3. Access 

4. Loss of open space and Impact on Amenity Value 

5. Drainage 

6. Landscape Impact 

7. Contamination 

The alternative site is identified as Fron Ganol, School Bank Road, Llanrwst (site reference 260). The site is close to local schools and services which makes 

the site suitable for residential development. The site is within easy walking distance to the centre of Llanrwst with School Bank Road providing a direct, level 

and safe pedestrian route to Denbigh Street. 

Change Sought: It is therefore considered in light of the above that proposed housing allocation reference 460 should be removed from the deposit LDP and the alternative 

site at Fron Ganol, School Bank Road (site reference 260) included as a housing allocation. 

14153 Mr & Mrs J & S Hamilton [4275] 1 Object 


The current value of our home would be affected. 

The access proposed is opposite our property where the road gets narrow. Traffic flow on the road is busy enough with cars parked on the road. 

Health and Safety issue with the abattoir. 

Social housing would be better situated closer to the centre of town near to the existing social housing estate on School Bank Road. 


14426 Mr & Mrs Rudge [4436] 72 Object 

Summary We do not need and do not want these houses for people from oustide the area. There is no work in the area for yound people to buy 'affordable homes'. 

There are access issues, Parry Road is already busy particularly when the cattle market is held. 

Llanddoged Road is a nice quiet area with highest value houses in Llanrwst. 

We propose that these houses are built on School Bank Road where there are already 2 and 3 bed semis and a shorter distance to schools, medical, surgery 

and shops. 

Change Sought: Delete site and build on School Bank Road. 

574


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Off the A470, Llanrwst 



Summary The town council believe that this would be one large site with Parry Road site. 

There are 3 main issues with this site are 

a.Access, 

b.Flooding and 

c.Health Hazard 


575


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, East of Llanrwst, Llanrwst 

Rep No Name 

14266 

Summary 


14308 

Summary 


14283 

Summary 


14272 

Summary 


14271 

Summary 


14267 

Summary 


14301 

Summary 


14263 

Summary 


14259 

Summary 


13496 

Summary 

Mr Noel Parry [436] 

Objections on the following grounds: 

Landscape, Highways, Density, flooding and drainage, protected species and the viability of incorporating Affordable Housing. 

Deletion of site 

J Curran [4227] 




Emyr Jones [4202] 




Mr David Braslier [488] 




Mrs Roberta Thomas [482] 




Mr George Kennith Williams [449] 




E.M Owen [4220] 




Eluned Jones [172] 




Mrs Sian Williams [164] 




Mrs Angela Kewin [3864] 

I object to the inclusion of the above site. The proposal is inconceived. 

Landscape - the site is surrounded by a number of mature trees. 

Highway- the proposed access is off a highway that has a minimum width of 3 metres and no pavements. 

Density - the proposed density is far in excess of the surrounding houses. 

Flooding and Drainage - the site is subject to flooding. 

Protected Species - the site is occupied by bats and great crested newts. 

Affordable Housing - the high abnormal costs of developing the site would reduce the viabiity of incorporating affordable housing. 

Change Sought: Delete the housing allocation at site 456, East of Llanrwst and replace with a more suitable alternative. 

14269 

Summary 


14303 

Summary 


14270 

Summary 


Mrs and Mr Pope [467] 




Ellis Hughes [4222] 




Mr Gerwyn Jones [470] 




People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

13429 Mrs Gwyneth Williams [3817] 1 Object 

Summary I write to express by objection to the possibility of forming an access to the above proposed development on Town Hill which runs parallel to Abergele Road 

for the following reasons: 

1. Town Hill is a single track land which becomes even narrower on the upper end. There is often congestion on the land in its present form with no passing 

areas. 

2. The current draining of rainwater is very unadequate as water flows like a stream down the hill during heavy rain. 

For these reasons I firmly believe the lane is totally inadequate for any further volume of traffic. 

Change Sought: Do not allow the access point for this site to be from Town Hill. 

576




13497 Mr Charles Kewin [3866] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the inclusion of the above site. The proposal is inconceived. 

Landscape - the site is surrounded by a number of mature trees. 

Highway- the proposed access is off a highway that has a minimum width of 3 metres and no pavements. 

Density - the proposed density is far in excess of the surrounding houses. 

Flooding and Drainage - the site is subject to flooding. 

Protected Species - the site is occupied by bats and great crested newts. 

Affordable Housing - the high abnormal costs of developing the site would reduce the viabiity of incorporating affordable housing. 

Change Sought: Remove the housing allocation at site 456 East of Llanrwst. 

14258 Mr and Mrs Ronald Johnstone [162] 1 Object 

Summary Objections on the following grounds: 



14265 Mr Robert Dean [427] 1 Object 




14302 Eileen Owen [4221] 1 Object 




14299 Glenda Jones [4218] 1 Object 




14307 S Mullender [4226] 1 Object 




14261 Mrs Jennifer Jones [167] 1 Object 




14262 Mr Richard Newstead [170] 1 Object 




14306 Ms R Lloyd-Oates [4225] 1 Object 




14257 Mr Rod Evans [26] 1 Object 




14305 M.L Jones [4224] 1 Object 




14298 Dafydd Huw Jones [4217] 1 Object 




14300 Arthur Owen [4219] 1 Object 




13487 Dr D Brian Chambers [3858] 1 Object 

Summary Objections 

1. Using this land for building will detract from the rural nature of Llanrwst 

2. The proposed access using Town Hill is not feasible. The road is only one car wide at the top of the hill with no public passing places. Also in winter the 

road floods and is impassable in snowy or icy weather. The bottom of Town Hill needs to be free of congestion because of the location of the fire station and 

doctors' surgery. 

3. More jobs not houses are required in Llanrwst. 

Change Sought: Do not build houses which are not needed and blight the rural landscape. 

14540 A W Jones Building Contractors (Mr Aled Jones) [2173] 1 Object 

Summary The site suffers from a number of fundamental problems that affect its suitability as an allocated housing site and therefore the allcation is unsound and dthe 

site should be removed from the plan and replaced by my clients land off Tros yr Afon. 

Change Sought: A new housing allocation at Tros yr Afon and the development boundary extended. 

Either remove site 456 or reduce its yield to a more realistic level of 12. 

577





Summary Between Town Hill and Llangernyw Road 

The main issue with this site is the exit and entrance to the site 


14260 Mr and Mrs Colin Lovegrove [166] 1 Object 




14304 Ielian Gwilym Edwards [4223] 1 Object 




14285 Eleri Allsup [4204] 1 Object 




14264 Mrs Eileen James [173] 1 Object 




13887 Mr Graham Williams [3894] 1 Object 

Summary My objections are: 

Access to the site is difficult. any access via Town Hill would significantly increase the traffic on what is already an unsatisfactory road. Poor drainage and 

lack of maintenance means that the road regulary turns inito a river or ice rink during the winter. In addition, the volume of traffic is already too high.The field 

does not have adequate drainage and is regularly flooded by surface water after high rainfall. 

The density of the housing is too high for the sloped nature of the site and character of adjoining properites. 

Change Sought: Delete the site. The development boundary for Llanrwst should be drawn back so that the land falls outside of the development boundary. 

14284 

Summary 


14268 

Summary 


14297 

Summary 


14349 

Summary 


14351 

Summary 


14296 

Summary 


14352 

Summary 


14350 

Summary 


14361 

Summary 


14367 

Summary 


14366 

Summary 


A Allsup [4203] 




Mr Alun Roberts [466] 




Mr Dafydd Huw Jones [4216] 








Occupier . [4298] 




Mr & Mrs R Williams [4215] 




E Meyner [4299] 




Mr Aled Hughes [4297] 




Mr Stephen Mullender [4308] 




Mr Derek Hirst [4316] 




Mrs Margaret Hirst [4313] 




1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

578



Rep No Name 

14365 

Summary 


14364 

Summary 


14348 

Summary 


14360 

Summary 


14362 

Summary 


14353 

Summary 


14359 

Summary 


14358 

Summary 


14357 

Summary 


14356 

Summary 


14355 

Summary 


14354 

Summary 


14363 

Summary 


14318 

Summary 


14282 

Summary 


14310 

Summary 


14311 

Summary 


Mrs Janice Evans [4312] 




Miss Sarah Jones [4311] 




S Ben [4295] 




Mrs Nicola Mullender [4307] 




Mrs Hazel Jones [4309] 




Mr A P Goosey [4300] 




Mr Benjamin Mullender [4306] 




M B Johnstone [4305] 




S L Lovegrove [4304] 




Mrs S J Carter [4303] 




Mrs G Roberts [4302] 




P Williams [4301] 




Mr Bryan Jones [4310] 




Louise Jones [4241] 




Wendy Roberts [4200] 




S I Jones [4230] 




M W Jones [4231] 




People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

579



Rep No Name 

14312 

Summary 


14313 

Summary 


14315 

Summary 


14292 

Summary 


14317 

Summary 


14279 

Summary 


14286 

Summary 


14287 

Summary 


14288 

Summary 


14289 

Summary 


14290 

Summary 


14291 

Summary 


14347 

Summary 


14104 

Summary 


14064 

Summary 


14309 

Summary 


Anna-Marie Jones [4232] 




Josephine Jones [4233] 




Rosslyn Morgan [4236] 




W Owen [4211] 




B S Stone [4238] 




Mr Philip D Smith [4197] 








Mr Barry Owen [4206] 




Amy Williams [4207] 




Dilys Owen [4208] 




I S Allsup [4209] 








D Thomas [4294] 




Mr Adam Garth Jones [4183] 




Mrs F.B Edwards [4154] 




A Owen [4229] 




People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

13891 Mr Richard West [4064] 1 Object 

Summary Access to the proposed site from Town Hill is off a highway which has minimum width of 3 metres and no pavements. Access from Town Hill to School Bank 

Road is substandard i.e. to a junction that has 5 roads entering it. The proposed development would further increase traffic and danger at this already 

substandard juntion. 

There is already an increased number of vehicles on Town Hill and further traffic would only increase danger to an unacceptable level. 

Change Sought: Rethink the proposed plan for access to this possible devlopment and come up with a less insidious way of accessing the site. 

580



Rep No Name 

13890 

Summary 


13889 

Summary 

Mr Peter Alan Thomas [4063] 

I object on the following grounds: 

Landscape 

Highways issues 

Density 

Flooding and drainage 

Affordable Housing 

Delete site. 

Ms Lesley B Birch [4062] 




Density 



I propose the following alternative sites: 

The RAF centre in Llandogedd Road. 

The Livestock Market next to the RAF site could be moved out of town. 

The abatoir could be moved to the Industrial Estate. 

The now empty Dolanog, previously a home for the elderly. 

Change Sought: Delete site and replace with an alternative. 

13888 

Summary 


14281 

Summary 


14102 

Summary 


14280 

Summary 


Mrs Eleanor Hughes [4061] 




Density 



Delete site 





Dr J E A Wenrick [4182] 




V Jones [4198] 




People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

14273 Ms Kate Wade [4191] 1 Object 




14274 

Summary 


Ms Katharine Jones [4192] 




1 Object 

14275 Mrs Auriel Jones [4193] 1 Object 




14276 

Summary 


Ms Tracey Longespe [4194] 




1 Object 

14277 Mr Richard Longespe [4195] 1 Object 




14278 

Summary 


14316 

Summary 


14101 

Summary 


Mr Edgar Jones [4196] 




E Midgley [4237] 




Miss S.A Bretag [4181] 




1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

581



Rep No Name 

14314 

Summary 


14331 

Summary 


14332 

Summary 


14333 

Summary 


14334 

Summary 


14335 

Summary 


14336 

Summary 


14330 

Summary 


14338 

Summary 


14337 

Summary 


14340 

Summary 


14341 

Summary 


S M Jones [4235] 




M E Jones [4255] 




D E Jackson [4256] 




G Thomas [4257] 




J A Carter [4258] 




Bryan Parry [4259] 




Mrs W Hughes [4260] 




Brian F Spence [4254] 




H P Jones [4262] 




Ms J Evans [4261] 




D H Jones [4264] 




E H Jackson [4265] 




People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

14542 Mr & Mrs Peter & Joyce Melling [4485] 1 Object 

Summary The site suffers from a number of fundamental problems that affect its suitability as an allocated housing site and therefore the allcation is unsound and the 

site should be removed from the plan and replaced by the land off Tros yr Afon with a predicte4d yield of 10-12 dwellings. 

Change Sought: Site 456 be removed from the Poposals Map and the devlopment boundary for Llanrwst be drawn back so that this land falls outside of the development 

boundary. 

A new houisng allocation at land off Tros Yr Afon and the development boundary be extended to include this proposed housing allocation. 

14342 

Summary 


14343 

Summary 


14345 

Summary 


14346 

Summary 


M Evans [4289] 




Mr G Marshall [4290] 




T Owen [4292] 




N J Pylltak [4293] 




1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

582



Rep No Name 

14293 

Summary 


14321 

Summary 


14294 

Summary 


14295 

Summary 


14339 

Summary 


14329 

Summary 


14320 

Summary 


14319 

Summary 


14322 

Summary 


14323 

Summary 


14326 

Summary 


14325 

Summary 


14328 

Summary 


14327 

Summary 


14324 

Summary 


W Thomas [4212] 




Przybylko Agnieszka [4245] 








Gerwyn Roberts [4214] 




Mr I L James [4263] 




C E Lloyd [4253] 




I Evans [4243] 




R E Kearsley [4242] 




N P Edwards [4246] 




D E Jones [4247] 




R W Roberts [4250] 




Barbara Kearsley [4249] 




Mr John R Jones [4252] 




Gwenda Roberts [4251] 




Eleri Wyn Jones [4248] 




People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

583


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Top Llan Road, Glan Conwy 



Summary The increased allocation serves to make the Plan even more unsound in relation to all our previously made detailed objections. 

Additional Objections: 

The Plan is not founded on robust and credible evidence not only ini relation to Glan Conwy but in relation to the whole County of Conwy. 

The Revised Deposit LDP has not been prepared in accordance with the DA & CIS 


584


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Pencoed Road, Llanddulas 


14139 Mrs Dawn Holley [2070] 1 Object 


Very close to the C Section of the quarry which houses contaiminated soils and asbestos. This only has a temporary cap. 

Badger setts close to the site. 

Plenty of houses being built at present causing noise and dust etc. 


Noise and light pollution. 

Public right of way between the two fields. 


22462 Mrs Joan Winn [2052] 1 Object 

Summary I am still concerned about the points raised in my letter of 24th June 2009 and that green sites are to be used by the LDP especially those proposed in the 

Llanddulas and Llysfaen areas. 


585


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, South of the Mill, Llanddulas 


14140 Mrs Dawn Holley [2070] 1 Object 


Very close to the C Section of the quarry which houses contaiminated soils and asbestos. This only has a temporary cap. 

Badger setts close to the site. 

Plenty of houses being built at present causing noise and dust etc. 


Noise and light pollution. 

Public right of way between the two fields. 


586


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Ty Mawr, Llysfaen 


19362 Cymdeithas Moch Daear Clwyd/Clwyd Badger Group (O Fitzmaurice, B.Sc) [4553] 1 Object 

Summary We contacted you regarding a planning application when it was first submitted in 2006. However, the badger community that used the area proposed for 

development for foraging has expanded since then. A recent survey by our Sett Recorder revealed one new sett to the south of the site and the setts already 

registered in our lists were flourishing. 

If this site is developed the setts that depend on the area for foraging will suffer. They can't go to the south east or the west because there are existing setts 

there and they would be repulsed by the existing badger family. 

Change Sought: Delete the housing allocation. 










13789 

Summary 


22323 

Summary 



This is overdevelopment and does not have regard to village facilities. 

There has already been substantial development in Llysfaen in the last 15 years. 

The village has limited infrastructure and narrow roads and the scale of proposed development is contrary to the strategy of the plan. 

Do no let over development spoil Llysfen, a Tier 1 village. 

Delete site. 

Cyngor Cymuned Llysfaen Community Council (Mr Gwyndaf Morris) [2079] 

We object as follows: 

Overdevelopment of Tier 1 Main Village 

Substantial erosion of the green buffer zone 

It will infringe on the SSSI on the Marian 

The site is on a steep slope 

The infrastructure in inadequate 

Very close to a working quarry 

Badger setts have been found. 

Overdevelopment with regard to village facilities, shops, schools, access to doctor, main gas ends at Peulwys. 

Drainage is inadquate for the extra load on the sewers. 

Issues with Radon Gas from underlying limestone rock. 

Delete site. 

13490 SIAN STEPHENSON [3859] 

Summary Road links to the village are poor. 

There are parking problems. 

This site will be accessed from a narrow road following a blind bend posing a further danger to pedestrians and road users. 

Inadequate facilities in village to cope with more residents. 

The village is losing it's character and becoming an urban sprall. 

Further loss of green spaces makes us all poorer. 

Change Sought: No more housing development in the village. 

13792 

Summary 



Erosion of green buffer zone. 

Massive overdevelopment for this area. 

Lack of infrastructure. 

Drainage problems (a huge issue historically). 

Delete site. 

1 Object 

342 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 


Summary At a public meeting at Llysfaen on 12 April, 2011,attended by some 300 people, it was clear that there was considerable opposition to the scale of the 

proposed development of this site. 

Housing development of the density proposed density would detrimentally affect the character of the village. 

The plan does not take account of or show how necessary infrastructure to serve a significantly enlarged population will be delivered. 

The County Council has not consulted adequately on the proposals; it has failed to explain very complex processes to lay members of the public. 

Change Sought: Reduce the density of the development proposed 

14402 Mr Andrew Richards [1998] 1 Object 


1. Settlement growth 

2. Access 

3. Ownership. 

The village has already taken substantial amounts of housing growth in recent years and the proposed allocation plus commitments will achieve an 

unsustainable and inapproporate growth rate for a main village. 


13785 Mrs M Elias [2617] 1 Object 

Summary There is overdevlopment in this part of the community area. 

This overdevelopment does not have regard to village facilities. 

Question: When does a village cease to become a village. 

Answer: When the powers that be decide that another 255 houses are "needed". 


587




14042 Mr Elfyn Davies [4146] 1 Object 

Summary Surface water will drain down on to the existing houses below new site and cause floodig. Over development of this part of the community area. Surrounding 

a very historic farm building. 


14038 Mrs Joan Marian Davies [4145] 1 Object 

Summary The area is already over developed. Further building on the green field below Ty Mawr could cause flooding by surface water, in the rainy weather, of the 

already built houses below. 


13917 Mrs Joan Wood [4083] 1 Object 

Summary Deletion of site. 

Land surrounding Ty Mawr farm is over developed. 

Diminishing greenbelt land. 

Lack of facilities in are e.g. schools, shops and roads. 

Adjacent fields are a designated wildlife site also sets of badgers in the area (marian canol) 

LDP is not sound with site site included. 


14034 Mr David Malcolm Walters [4144] 1 Object 

Summary Rural area with narrow roads which would be a danger to predestrians and motorists with the added congestion the 250 houses would bring. 

The additional children that would have to be accommodated in the local school would be far in exxess of what is possible. This is again over development of 

Llysfaen, which has had its fair share of building. 

The development would bring in new people, so where are the jobs to give to these new residents when local people struggle to find work. 


14015 Miss Sarah Graham [4126] 1 Object 

Summary Over development of this part of the community area. 

Substantial erosion of green buffer zone. 

Over development having regard to village facilities. 


14028 Miss Leah Towlson [4142] 1 Object 

Summary Llysfaen is a small village with insufficient facilities to cope with more housing. New houses have been built over recent years that has resulted in busier 

roads, where many have no pavements. Over crowding in Ysgol Cynfran which was over crowded 20 years ago when I attended as a pupil. Green space is 

now at a premium in the village. 


14025 Mr William Graham [4131] 1 Object 





14053 Mr Glynn Jones [4150] 1 Object 

Summary Over development of the community area. 

Substantial erosion of green buffer zone. Over development having regard to village facilities. 


13565 Miss Gilllian Owen [3915] 1 Object 

Summary Having loked at the plans for the other villages in the surrounding areas with similar population I am disgusted that the council thinks it is acceptable to bulid 

300 plus houses in the VILLAGE. This would change the whole feel of LLysfaen and change it from a small friendly village into a town. 

Change Sought: No houses in LLysfaen. 

13914 Mr Charles Wood [4081] 1 Object 

Summary Deletion of Site. 

Land surrounding Ty Mawr is over developed. 

As a result the Greenbelt is disapprearing. 

Lack of facilities in the area e.g. schools etc. 

Adjacent field is a wildlife site protected grasses and badger sets on the proposed site. 

LDP would not be sound with this site included. 


14010 Miss Elizabeth Graham [4123] 1 Object 


Substantial arosion of green field zone. 



14031 Mrs Norah Wyn Walters [4143] 1 Object 


The additional children that would have to be accommodated in the local school and would be felt in exess of what is possible. 

Rural area with narrow roads which would be a danger to pedestrians & motorist with added congestion the 250 houses would bring. 

The development would bring in new people so where are the jobs to give these new residents. 


13835 Mr Derek Rushton [4041] 1 Object 

Summary Your proposal is not sound as the roads are not capable of taking much more traffic; the school is full; the people of Llysfaen do not want it as the local 

meeting two weeks ago clearly showed. 

This is overdevlopment on a greenfield site in a village. Not on. 



Summary There are enough houses there already. 

Loss of green belt and more homes will spoil the village community. There are not enough facilities in the village. 


588




13838 Mrs Helen Rushton [4042] 1 Object 

Summary This area has already been overdeveloped and the feeling from the meeting held in the church hall, the people who live already in that part of the village do 

not want it. 

The village has already limited infrastructure and narrow roads, and the site in question will bring more cars onto the main road, which will bring more dangers 

to the children living there. 


13848 Mr David Boothroyd [4047] 1 Object 

Summary Area will be overdeveloped and the green buffer zone will be gone. Marian Canol will be spoiled. 

We already have a big quarry to the rear and the green at the front has protected grass and active badger setts. 

This is a village - not an overspill area. 

Too big a proportion of Conwy allocation is aimed at our village. 

The LDP is not sound with this site included. 


13861 Mr David Meakin [4053] 1 Object 

Summary Allocations amount to overdevelopment of village. Already substantial development of core of the village in last 15 years. 

Large proportion of overall housng allocation in the plan is focussed in Llysafen, a Tier 1 village. 

Village has limited infrastructure and narrow roads. 

Scale of development proposed in a Tier 1 village is contrary to the strategy of the plan. 

Overdevelpment of this part of the community area. 


Overdevelopment having regard to village facilities. 


13858 Mrs Jennifer Meakin [4052] 1 Object 

Summary Allocations amount to overdevelopment of village. Already substantial development of core of the village in last 15 years. 

Large proportion of overall housng allocation in the plan is focussed in Llysafen, a Tier 1 village. 



Overdevelpment of this part of the community area. 




13855 Miss Jo-Ann Christy [4051] 1 Object 

Summary This site adjoins the Marian, a site of special interest which has already been identified by the Council to be protected. Development of this land would cause 

substantial erosion of the green buffer zone. 

Overdevelopment of this part of the community area. 

Overdevelopment having regard to village facilities and available employment. 

See attached sheet. 


13850 Mrs Hazel Boothroyd [4048] 1 Object 

Summary We want to live in a green village not an overspill area of houses ruining our village. We enjoy our green fields and watching the wild life, badgers, buzzards, 

lambs, sheep and all kinds of bird life.We have a quarry to the rear of the cottages and further along a landfill site. Why does Llysfaen have to take everyone's 

rubbish anymore? Why us taking everything thrown at us? 



13825 Mrs Shirley Jones [4037] 1 Object 

Summary Overdevelopment of site 

Very poor infrastructure 

Not local people 

Highway not capable to take it 


13851 Mr Raymond Strevens [4049] 1 Object 

Summary The site was deemed unsuitable for such in 1998. Furthermore, this site is adjacent to an area of scientific interest which would be destroyed. This includes a 

couple of badger setts. 

Water drainage to cause floods at my home. 

Doctors/Dentists/Schools/Council Infrastructure/service can not cope witih influx of people. 

Further degradation of local customs/language and behaviour. 

Why should we have displaced settlers from England? 

Are policy authority happy with further duties during times of cutbacks when officers are due to be greatly reduced. 

This revising of schools, council emloyees is relevant to providing services to more inhabitants at Ty Mawr. 


13852 Mr Thomas Lehart [4050] 1 Object 

Summary I'm worried about the safeety of my children and other due to a build up in traffic that will be caused by the new houses going up. 

How come if the houses were not allowed up in 1997 why all of a suddeni s it safe now. 

Sewerage systems will need to be fitted on the new houses and the whole of the estate will need to be changed. That is not sanitary. 

There is no gas there. 


13828 Mr Emlyn Jones [4038] 1 Object 

Summary It amounts to overdevelopment of village. 

Poor infrastructure. 

Narrow roads. 

Village life ends. 



Summary Substantial erosion of green buffer zone. 




589




13786 Miss Helen Stevens [4024] 1 Object 

Summary Will completely destroy the Marian. 

Road safety for the children on Peulwys Estate. Schools closing due to moderisation. It was deemed unsuitable in 1997 so why is it suitable now? 

The estate will flood/need new sewerage system. Destroy wildlife. Our rural area is slowly disappearing. 


13818 Mrs Jacquelyn Jackson [4030] 1 Object 

Summary What we need is old aged Pensioner bungalows not houses. We don't need them, why spoil everything, you people should sit and look around where we live 

and don't spoil any green fields what so ever. 


13772 

Summary 


13777 

Summary 


13779 

Summary 


13604 

Summary 


13769 

Summary 


13609 

Summary 


13766 

Summary 


14467 

Summary 


14414 

Summary 


13798 

Summary 


Mrs Margaret Wan [4020] 

Our water supply pipes run accross the proposed development site and our water meter is sited by the hedgerow near the Council Estate. 

Lack of infrastructure, bus service, shops, school, doctors, police, gas service, sewage system. 

Disturbance of wildlife in particularly badgers. 

The areas will be grossly overdeveloped. 

Will redifine the character of the village and disturb the views. 

There are about four more pieces of grassland around our area, if this site goes ahead the owners of the grassland will probably follow suit. 

Rock blasting from the quarry. 

I like star-watching and the night sky will be havily polluted 

Delete site. 

Mr Griffith Melvyn Evans [4021] 

I feel that this is another overdevlopment of the area, it would take away that green belt buffer zone, between Llysfaen and Old Colwyn. 

Any housing development should be beneficial to the area of its proposal, I don't think this is. 

Delete site. 

Mrs Deborah Stevens [4022] 

Destroy the Marian. 

Poor Roads, No gas, not suitable for building on in 1998 so why is it now? 


Mr Ian Walters [3938] 

Already over developed. 

Erosion of green space. 

Insufficient infrastructure. 


Delete site. 

Mr Barry Greenhalgh [4019] 

Our water supply pipes run accross the proposed development site and our water meter is sited by the hedgerow near the Council Estate. 

Lack of infrastructure, bus service, shops, school, doctors, police, gas service, sewage system. 

Disturbance of wildlife in particularly badgers. 

The areas will be grossly overdeveloped. 

Will redifine the character of the village and disturb the views. 

There are about four more pieces of grassland around our area, if this site goes ahead the owners of the grassland will probably follow suit. 

Rock blasting from the quarry, we can feel tremors where we are. 

Delete site. 

Mr Alan Jones [3940] 

School is not big enough to accomodate more children. 

The existing road network is already udner pressure from existing residents and could not cope with extra usage from more houses being built. 

Pentregwyddel Road is too narrow for extra volume of traffic. 

The poposed site would have a huge impact on the historic centre of the village resulting in the character of the village being lost. 

Finally Llysfaen already has its share of affordable housing and other sites throughout the County should be sought. 

Delete site. 

Mrs Leslie Lewis [4018] 



Overdevlopment having regard to village facilities. 

Delete site. 

Mr Chris Jones [4453] 

There aren't enough facilities for the youngsters, more anti-soscial behavour, more kids drinking on the streets. 

There will also be more traffic on the estate which in turn could make an unsafe environment for our kids and more parking problems. 

Delete site. 

Mr & Mrs Fred & Pauline Sumners [4431] 

We object on the following grounds: 

1. Important Historic Village. 

2. Unsuitable road structure and many roads have no pavements. 

3. Water table not able to support more houses. 

4. School access is not good. 

5. Site unstable due to working quarry, ground moves when blasting. 

6. Many new modern houses unsold. 

7. Nothing here to attract young people, work/enterntainment 

8. Local people cannot afford to buy, we would be surrounded by commuters or famililes that no other council desires to have. 

Delete site. 

Mr Keith Norman [4026] 

Drainage problems, also lack of proper infrastructure. 

Erosion of green buffer zone. 

Overdevelopment for this area. 

Delete site. 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

590




14399 Ms Bethan Jones [4427] 1 Object 



2. Access 

3. Ownership. 




13612 

Summary 


13594 

Summary 


Mrs Susan Jones [3941] 

School is not big enough to accomodate more children. 





Delete Site 

Mr Alexander Gray [3934] 

No more houses are needed in Llysfaen not enough room in schools. 

Delete site. 

1 Object 

1 Object 

13782 Mrs Patricia Evans [4023] 1 Object 

Summary I think it would be a big mistake to think of building any more houses on this site, there are already far too many as it is. Why do you always want to cram 

more houses here when there aren't the facilities to cope with them. 


13753 

Summary 


13746 

Summary 


13737 

Summary 


13754 

Summary 


14012 

Summary 


13734 

Summary 


13718 

Summary 


Mis Karen Telfer [4013] 

Loss of open space between historic buildings 

Roads not suitable for increased traffic 

Llysfaen is already overdeveloped 

Damage to countryside, wildlife 

Delete site 

1 Object 

Mrs Lynn Arthur [4009] 


1 Object 

Over-development of this part of the community area. Loss of green spaces. these green spaces make Llysfaen what it is. There are already problems with 

drainage on Peulwys and this would make the problems worse. 


Mrs Margaret Irene Hodgkinson [4004] 

Overdevelopment of this part of the community area 

Substantial erosion of greeen buffer zone 

Overdevlopment having regard to village facilities 

Delete site 

Ms Janice Sladen [4011] 

My concerns for the developments are: 

Drainage has been a problem for Peulwys as far as flooding in the past. 

The green areas are a bonus and used by families and the wider community. 

The development could not be sustained by current facilities provided. 


Mrs Susan Graham [3935] 

Over development of this part of the community area. 


Over development having regards to village facilities. 


Mr Anthony Gordon Hodgkinson [4003] 

Overdevelopment of this part of the community area 

Substantial erosion of greeen buffer zone 

Overdevlopment having regard to village facilities 

Delete site 

Mrs Patricia Towlson [3995] 

We have enough estates already in the village so do not need any more. 

Delete site 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

13662 Mr David Dullinghan [3964] 1 Object 

Summary Land surrounding Ty Mawr farm is over developed - leading to the destruction of the green belt - borders SSI site. 

Infrastructure problems i.e. sewage/mains 

Lack of facilities i.e. health clinics, shcool shops - road unable to carry increased traffic. 


13793 

Summary 


Mr Gareth Edward Humphries [4025] 

Deletion of site. 

1 Object 

Overcrowding in our community school. Families with bad reputations will be dumped on the estate. More anti-social behaviour plus more problems with 

Alcohol and drugs 


591




13731 Mrs Gwyneth Taylor [4002] 1 Object 

Summary Too much overdevlopment in Llysfaen over the last 30 years 

Further development will destroy the village status 

Filling in the open spaces around Listed Buildngs at the heart of the vilalge will destroy the character of the village 

Narrow roads and few footpaths, already dangerous and congested 

Quarry causes structural damage from blasting 

Building work could disturb lethal radon gas in the limestone area 

No mains gas and water, sewage and electricity services are already under pressure 

Serious threat to wildlife incuding badgers, bats and butterflies 

Inadequate bus service with comes to a halt in the winter weather 


13728 Mr John Taylor [4001] 1 Object 

Summary Since the narrowing of the road at Berth-y-Glyd, congestion has increased and the extra traffic generated by these houses would make it a lot worse. 

There would be a widespread loss of wildlife. 

Extra pressure on our already limited resources. 


13760 Mrs Lisa Jones [4014] 1 Object 

Summary Overdevelopment of this part of the community area. 




13755 Miss Michelle Burgess [4015] 1 Object 


Over development of this area and loss of greenary where my children enjoy walking, it defeats the object of nature walking if I need to drive to take my 

children to participate in this pastime. Also have already had flooding issues with the layout of my garden, how will the drains cope with even more water? 


13773 Mr Robert Redhead [4016] 1 Object 


The site would constitute over development. 

Would be a sustantial erosion of the green buffer the infrastructure is unsufficient. The site is in close proximity to a working quarry. Badger setts have been 

found on the area adjecent to the site. 

13763 Mr Michael Lewis [4017] 1 Object 

Summary Overdevelopment of this part of the community area. 




14396 Ms Eleanor Carpenter [4426] 1 Object 



2. Access 

3. Ownership. 




13618 Mrs Denise Parry [3943] 1 Object 

Summary Over development of this part of the village/community. 

Massive erosion of green buffer zone. 

Village facilities over-stretched as is now. 


13811 Mrs Jacqueline Phillips [4033] 1 Object 

Summary The existing highways provision locally is already under pressure from existing residents. 

Dolwen/Pentregwyddel Roads not suitable for walking. Access/egress on these routes would cause additional congestion. 

The proposed site would have a detrimental effect on the historic centre of the village and its environs. 

There is enough social/affordable housing already. Village bordered by two estates. 

LPG gas is expensive to run. 

The local school will not accommodate increased numbers. Already use a protacabin due to overflow and any extra buildings would reduce recreational 

facilities. 

Number of village shops not sufficient to cater for extra demand. 


13685 

Summary 


13817 

Summary 


13615 

Summary 


Ms Catherine Jones [3975] 

Loss of open space between buildngs at the historic centre of the village 


The allocation amounts to overdevelopment 

Delete site 

Mrs Janet Jones [4035] 




Delete site. 

Mr Ian Parry [3942] 

Over development of this part of the village/community area. 

Massive erosion of green buffer zone. 

Village facilities over stretched as is now. 

Delete site. 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

592




13808 Mr David Davies [4032] 1 Object 

Summary Overdevelopment having regard to village facilities. 

Substantial erosionof green buffer zone. 


Area will be prone to water run-off and flooding of lower level properties. 

Detrimental effect on the Welsh language in the community. 


13814 Mrs Jennifer Gardiner [4034] 1 Object 

Summary There is already enough social housing in this area and further development would increase pressure on the existing facilities and amenities. 

The roads leading up to the proposed site are not maintained to a satisfactory standard and outside Canol Marian there are permament potholes in the road 

due to increased use. Further development would only add to the problems. 

As we only have propane gas in the village people on low incomes would find it very expensive to run. 


593


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Ysgol Cynfran, Llysfaen 


19576 Miss Gwennan Williams [4579] 1 Object 

Summary Dileu safle 160 oherwydd: 

Prawf CE1 - gor-ddatblygiad o'r pentref; mae canran uchel o dai yn y CDLl wedi'u penodi yn Llysfaen, pentref Lefel 1; nid yw'r isadeileddau yn Llysfaen yn 

ddigonol I'r cynlluniau a gynigir; nid yw meant y datblygiad yn addas i bentref Lefel 1. 

Prawf CE2 - mae'r mynediad yn anaddas gan ei fod yn gyfagos I'r ysgol; graddiant y tir yn anaddas I ddatblygu; mae'r safle wedi'I ynysu o Ffordd Dolwen; 

mae'n safle tir glas; does dim llwybr troed ar y lân rhwng y safle a chanol hanesyddol Llysfaen. 

Change Sought: Dileu y safle o'r cynllun 

Remove the site from the scheme 











Summary Totally unsuitable access proposed adjacent to school. 

No footpath connection between historic centre of the village and the proposed allocation. 

Greenfield site outside the existing settlement. 


13523 Ms Sarah Anderson [3861] 1 Object 

Summary The proposed development would mean a huge increase of private and utility vehicles. Llysfaen is a village and was not designed to accommodate 

substantial amounts of increased traffic and cater in particular for heavy utility vehicles. The current school site access is on a blind, narrow bend and it would 

be highly dangerous to increase traffic flow here. it is unclear from the LDP site plan exactly where access to this site would be. New housing developments 

will increase the use of Mynydd Marian, the local nature reserve, which already has damage from the local population usage. 

Change Sought: Site to be deleted from the proposed LDP. 

13882 Mr John Nesbitt [3895] 1 Object 

Summary I object on the grounds of: 

Insufficient notification. 

Privacy and overlooking. 

Recent development has raised occurrences of crime related matters in the area. 

There is no reason to build new houses when there are numerous empty properties. 

Amenities in the village would not sustain the large increase proposed. 

Safety and build integrity should the land above the mine be used. Blasting from the quarry has physically shaken houses in the area. 


13468 Mr David Rushton [3841] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the housing allocation at Ysgol Cynfran, Llysfaen. 

Every single home next to the field will suffer loss of privacy because they are lower than the field. 

There is no need to build on greenfield sites, there are plenty of brownfield sites available. 

These houses will not be used by the younger generation but people from Liverpool who want to come and live cheaply by the sea. 

The fields should be used as a tourist attraction. 

Change Sought: Remove the housing allocation at Ysgol Cynfran, Llysfaen. 

13791 Mrs C Norman [2616] 1 Object 

Summary Llysfaen village has narrow roads making this proposal dangerous for school children. 

The development is too large for the Tier 1 village contrary to development and strategy of the plan. 

Overdevelopment of the already developed village which has had considerable development over the last 15 years. 

Limited infrastructure within the village. 

Totally unsuitable lack of provision for footpath and proposed allocation. 


13459 Mr Martin Thomas [3834] 1 Object 

Summary We are a village and we don't need any more housing estates in Llysfaen. We need to stop and try and keep some green areas for our children and 

grandchildren. We have a lot of wildlife up here. Also our drains are definately not built for more houses. There are lots of empty properties above the shops 

in Old Colwyn and Colwyn Bay. 


13480 Mrs Brynhilde Thompson [3854] 1 Object 

Summary 1. Allocation amounts to over-development of village. 

2. Unsuitable access proposed adjacent to school. 

3. Site not suitble for development having regard to access and gradient. 

4. Site isolated from Dolwen Road. 

5. Already substantial development in Dolwen Road in past 10 years. 



13788 Mr D Elias [2618] 1 Object 

Summary Totally unsuitable access proposed adjacent to the school. 

There would be extra traffic on Dolwen Road, whichis unfit and constricted. There is a blind bend, it is narrow and there is no pavement. 

I believe this is a greenfield site outside the existing settlement. 


594




14180 Mrs Virginia Owen [2127] 1 Object 


Housing Allocations, Natural Heritage and Infrastructure regarding local residents and the roads. 



Summary Overwhelming local opposition; advers impact on village character and infrastructure; inadequate consultation 


13608 Mr Alan Jones [3940] 1 Object 

Summary School is not big enough to accomodate more children. 






13503 CEMEX UK Operations Ltd. (Mr Shaun Denny) [636] 1 Object 

Summary We are concerned that the draft framework has identified land to the south of the buffer zone as suitable for housing. 

Whilst this land lies outside the buffer zone and would not experience blast vibration in excess of that stipulated by the planning permissions relating to the 

operation of Raynes Quarry it is possible that the occupants of dwellings may perceive vibration resulting from quarry operations. This in turn may result in 

complaints being made to the MPA with regard to the quarry's operations despite operations being fully compliant with planning requirements. 


13488 SIAN STEPHENSON [3859] 1 Object 

Summary This site is too close to the school, access will be difficult and will pose a danger to children travelling to and from school. 

Road links to the village are poor. 


This site will be accessed from a narrow road following a blind bend posing a further danger to pedestrians and road users. 




Change Sought: No further housing development in Llysfaen, we have had enough. New housing does not meet local need it just encourages migration from other areas. We 

can't just keep buliding until not an acre of green land is left, the population increase needs to be addressed through immigration control and changes the 

benefit system in the UK. 

14055 Ms Jennifer Hotston [3939] 1 Object 

Summary The site would lead to over development of village, where there has already been substantial development in the past 10 years. Unsuitable access proposed 

adjacent to school where the lane is narrow with a hazardous bend, very dangerous. Allocation amounts to over development of village which has a limited 

infrastructure and narrow roads. 


13603 Mr Ian Walters [3938] 1 Object 

Summary Totally unsuitable being close to a school. 

No footpath connections. 

Not suitable for development. 

Greenfield site outside existing settlement. 

Village has limited and narrow roads. 



13525 Mr. Alan Blight [3892] 1 Object 

Summary The proposed development would mean a huge increase of private and utility vehicles. Llysfaen is a village and was not designed to accommodate 

substantial amounts of increased traffic and cater in particular for heavy utility vehicles. The current school site access is on a blind, narrow bend and it would 

be highly dangerous to increase traffic flow here. it is unclear from the LDP site plan exactly where access to this site would be. New housing developments 

will increase the use of Mynydd Marian, the local nature reserve, which already has damage from the local population usage. 


Site to be deleted from the proposed LDP. 



Overdevelopment of a Tier 1 Main Village 

The village school area is already congested, the land may be required for future extension of school buildings and play area 

The road infrastructure is inadequate and will not cope with an extra 70 vehicles 

Quality of access roads are poor or undeliverable access altogether 


14049 Mr Christopher Pullen [1038] 1 Object 

Summary The proposal represents an over development within the village. The site is unsuitable by virtue of proximity to the school and will require access through the 

school access road. Village infrastructure, facilities and highways are inadequate to support this development. 

LDP is unsound. 





2. Access 

3. Ownership. 




595




13723 Mrs Marlene Wilson [3999] 1 Object 

Summary Community Safety - according to the Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation developed by WAG Llysfaen is number 54 out of more than 1900 areas. This is 

already an area of high unemployment and low wages. 

Demands that will be placed on the Sewerage System 

Water supply is erratic. 

Amount of development the village has already suffered 

Pressure that will be placed on school 

Local roads are in a bad state of repair 

There are no footpaths 

Access road alongside school posing danger for children 

Heavy construction traffic will cause more disruption 


13691 Ms Margaret Keppie [3978] 1 Object 

Summary Over the years Llysfaen has already had a great number of houses built in estates. 

Access road will cross or come out over a public path behind school. 

Road infrastructure is not good enough for the extra cars which the estate would generate. They are narrow and already there is congestion at certain times 

of the day. 

Lack of pavements and poor street lighting making road safety an issue. 

These are historic pasture lands and part of the greenbelt - areas of green have been diminished over the years. 

Llysfaen is a village not a town and should remain so. 



Summary Inadequate access to school site 

Road already congested 

Village too overdeveloped as it is now 

Lack of footpaths and narrow roads are hazardous enough without adding extra traffic these houses will bring 

Danger of release of radon gas due to limestone 

Wildlife that inhabits this area will be destroyed 

Loss of open spaces 

Will rob Llysfaen of village status 

Peace and quiet of village will be lost 

No mains gas 

Water, electric and sewerage already at limits 


13649 Mr John Hodgson [3958] 1 Object 

Summary Consideration has not been taken to the existing houses surrounding the fields you want to build on. Every house will be overlooked and this is not acceptable. 

Buildings in this area are all on septic tanks, any new houses will probably have to do the same as the normal sewers and drains will not take any more usage. 

If these houses go ahead where will the children go to school, maybe you are thinking about an extra one or two cabins and then the children can play out on 

the public footpath or will you need this for something else. 


13974 Mr Alan Foulkes [4109] 1 Object 


The allocation amounts to over development of the village. 

The site is accessed from Dolwen Road and adjacent to Cynfran Primary School and this access will be hazardous. 

The site is isolated as the land immediately adjacent to the school is not included. 

There are no footpaths from the site to the historic core of the village. 

Development of the site will result is significant over looking. 


13622 Mr Neal Jones [3945] 1 Object 

Summary Dolwen Road is dangerous enough at school times and the new houses will make this lethal. Also the road hasn't got pavements all the way up it. 

Also we are losing our green areas, we are a village not a town. This is by the historical centre of the village and will ruin it. 

We don't even have mains gas. 


13666 Mrs Barbara Boardman [3966] 1 Object 

Summary Allocation amounts to overdevelopment of village 

Unsuitable access proposed adjacent to school 

Site not suitable for development having regard to access and gradient and overlooking village 

Site is isolated from Dolwen Road 

Already substantial development in village in last 10 years 

Loss of green space in village 


13684 Ms Catherine Jones [3975] 1 Object 

Summary Loss of open space between buildings at the historic centre of the village 




13725 Mr David Wilson [4000] 1 Object 









Access road alongside school posing danger for children 

Heavy construction traffic will cause more disruption 


596




13939 Mr David Foulkes [4098] 1 Object 


The allocation amount to over development of the village. 

The site is accessed from Dolwen Road adjacent to Cynfran Primary School and this access will be hazardous. 



Development of the site will result in significant over looking. 


13721 Mr Ernest Edwards Jones [3998] 1 Object 

Summary Development would ruin village centre 

No roads or pavement for safe access 

No jobs or transport facilities in village to support a large development 


13668 Mrs Dilys Cassy [3967] 1 Object 

Summary Spoiling the wild life 

Roads not suitable for more traffic 

Local school is already crowded 




Site opposite existing school. 

There are no footpaths to the planned site and existing roads will be unable to cope with futher traffic. Greenfield site in the centre of the village which has 

historic connections. 

LDP is not sound with this site included 


13720 Mr Ben Knowles [3997] 1 Object 

Summary No suitable roads 

No footpaths 

Visual impact on village 

Village will have no true feel without green spaces 

Housing volume too large for a village this size 


13670 Mrs Sian Price [3968] 1 Object 

Summary Overdevelopment 

Road too narrow for extra traffic 

Wildlife disturbed 

Landfill site nearby (fault line) 

School may not accommodate extra influx of people 


13717 Mrs Patricia Towlson [3995] 1 Object 

Summary Problems occuring woul be - draiange, access, parking, the school - enough is enough, we are a village and would like it to stay this way. 


13693 Mr Dez Walters [3982] 1 Object 

Summary Access road will cross public pathway and also safety of exit and closeness to school. 

Road infrastructure is not good enough to accommodate extra vehicles the estate will generate. They are only country lanes and there is congestion already 

in certain areas. 

Lack of pavements and poor street lighting making the safety issue even worse. 

This is a village not a town and we need it to remain that way. We do not need to loose any more of our green belt area. 

The infrastructure of amenities is inadequate i.e. gas, main sewerage for any new development. 


13979 Mr Wayne Trow [4111] 1 Object 

Summary I do not agree to this LDP as being 'Sound'. 

The development plans have not considered the locals and the lack of ammenities we have to offer at present. The government cannot provide safe access 

in and out of Llysfaen for predestrians as it is. We have part walkways on our main road in and out of the village. This development will cause bad access 

around our school causing danger to our children. It would clear out our footpaths and historic connections. 


13733 Mr Anthony Gordon Hodgkinson [4003] 1 Object 

Summary Unsuitable access proposed adjacent to school 

Site is not suitable for development having regard to gradient and access 

Site isolated from Dolwe road as immediately adjacent site not allocated 

No footpath connections between historic centre of village and proposed allocation 

Greenfield site outside the existing settlement 

Allocation amount to overdevelopment of village, already substantial development of core of village in last 15 years 

Large proportion of housing in plan is focussed on Llysfaen a Tier 1 village 

Village has limited infrastructure 

Scale of development proposed in contrary to strategy of plan 


13624 Mr Raymond Dutfield-Cooke [3946] 1 Object 

Summary We are losing all our green site areas. 

The roads cannot handle all the extra traffic the new homes will cause. 

The historic centre of the village is here and it has listed buildings and does not need new houses. 

We are a village not a town. 


13743 Mr Daniel Sullivan [4007] 1 Object 

Summary Increase in volume of traffic on small village. 

Also overcrowding of an area that doesn't have facilities and amenities to cope with the change in area. 


597




13597 Mrs Susan Graham [3935] 1 Object 

Summary Allocations amount to over development of the village, already substantial development of core of village in last 15 years. 

Large proportion of overall housing allocation in the plan is focussed in Llysfaen, a tier 1 village. 


Scale of development proposed in tier 1 village is contrary to strategy of plan. 

Change Sought: Delete the site. 

13741 Ms Judith Anne Sullivan [4006] 1 Object 

Summary More housing would mean we are no longer living in a village 


13657 Mr Anthony Mark A Hughes [3962] 1 Object 

Summary Allocation amounts to over development of village. 

Unsuitable access proposed adjacent to school. 

Site not suitable for development having regard to access, gradient and overlooking. 

Site isolated from Dolwen Road. 

Already substantial development in village in past 10 years. 




Summary this development would cause Llysfaen to loose its village status by introducing more social housing to the area. 

The local amenities that are currently here are't big enough to cope with the new demand that would be required. 


13736 Mrs Margaret Irene Hodgkinson [4004] 1 Object 



Site isolated from Dolwe road as immediately adjacent site not allocated 

No footpath connections between historic centre of village and proposed allocation 







13614 Mr Ian Parry [3942] 1 Object 

Summary Allocations amount to overdevelopment of the village already substantial development of core of village in last 15 years. 

Large proportion of overall housing in the village plan is focused in Llysfaen, a tier 1 village. 

Village has limited infrastructure and dangerous narrow roads. 

Scale of develoment in Tier 1 Village to the strategy of the plan. 


13664 Mr Peter Boardman [3965] 1 Object 



Site not suitable for development having regard to access and gradient and overlooking village 



Loss of green space in village 


13659 Mrs Helen Hughes [3963] 1 Object 








13715 Mr Roger Simonds [3994] 1 Object 

Summary Access will be adjacent to the school entrance, the roads are very narrow around this area and are totally unsuitable. 



13689 Mr Hugh Keane [3977] 1 Object 

Summary Llysfaen bearing a disproportionate allocation of new housing, far more than adjacent villages and urban areas 

Settlement limits should not be altered without consultation 

Site access proposed is very close to the village school 

Local infrastructure inadequate 

Green site which warrants protection from development 

I dispute WAG population increases and employment projections 

Many empty properties in the Colwyn Area 

Several suitable infill sites rejected by CCBC, the norm appears to be large developments 

Would destroy open aspect which is close to the original village centre 

Brownfield sites are available, these should be the first source of building land 


13687 Mrs Kathleen Muriel Keane [3976] 1 Object 

Summary Overdevelopment and crowding of village estate 

Access adjacent to school is completely unacceptable and dangerous onto Dolwen Road with no footpatsh and blind bends plus school traffic 

Green site that requires protection from development 

This site is outside existing settlement limits 


598




13599 Mrs Carole Whittaker [3936] 1 Object 

Summary Greenfield site outside the existing settlement. 

No footpath connections between historic centre of village and proposed allocation. 

Site isolated from Dolwen Road as immediately adjacent site not allocated. 

Site not suitable for development having regard to gradient and weill create substantial overlooking. 

Totally unsuitable access proposed adjacent to school. 


13962 Mrs Pam Foulkes [4103] 1 Object 






Development of the site will result is significant overlooking. 



Summary Site opposite existing school. 

No footpaths to the planned sites - existing road unable to cope with increased traffic. 

Greenfield site in centre of village which has important historic connections. 



Summary Too much overdevlopment in Llysfaen over the last 30 years 


Filling in the open spaces around Listed Buildngs at the heart of the vilalge will destroy the character of the village 








13673 Mr David Mancini [3970] 1 Object 

Summary Site not suitable for development having regard to access, gradient and overlooking. 


13937 Mrs Christine Foulkes [4097] 1 Object 



The site is accessed from Dolwen Road adjacent to Cynfran Primary School and this access will be hazardous. 



Development of the site will result in significant overlooking. 



Summary The school is too small for any more intake. There is no access for cars and gradient will create problems. 

I consider that Llysfaen can not have any more houses built and remain a village. 


17635 Prof & Dr Del & Ann Williams & Parry-Williams [4498] 1 Object 

Summary The proposed allocation does not comply with the strategy of the plan, which seeks to provide 85% of future development in the UDS Area. The scale of 

development in this Tier 1 village is contrary to that strategy. 

It does not satisfy the council's sequential assessment. This is a greenfield site outside the confines of the existing settlement. the identified capacity of the 

stie will result in a density of development which is unrealistic and would provide a form and type of development inappropriate and out of context. 

There are significant identifiable problems relating to access, resulting in increased danger. 


13601 Mr Paul Whittaker [3937] 1 Object 

Summary Totally unsuitable access adjacent to school. 

No footpath access between historic centre of village and proposed allocation. 


Village is already over developed. 

Narrow roads and limited access. 


13705 Mr Philip Capper [3989] 1 Object 


No footpath connection 

School full up at present with portacabins in playground 

Road unsuitable outside school due to parking immediately before 9 a.m and after 3.00 p.m. weekdays 

Proportion of intended development of Tier 1 village re overall housing allocation with limited infrastructure for more school places 

Greenfield site outside existing settlement 





2. Access 

3. Ownership. 




599




13703 Mrs Eleri Capper [3988] 1 Object 

Summary Totally unsuitable access proposed adjacent to school 

No footpath connection between historic centre of village and proposed allocation 

School full up at present with portacabins in playground 

Road unsuitable outside school due to parking immediately before 9 a.m and after 3.00 p.m. weekdays 

Proportion of intended development of Tier 1 village re overall housing allocation with limited infrastructure for more school places 

Greenfield site outside existing settlement 




Site not suitable for development having regard to gradiant and will create substantial over looking. 

No footpath connection between historic centre of village and proposed allocation. 



Large proportion in Tier 1 Village is contrary to strategy of the plan. 

Change Sought: Deletion of plan 

14057 Mr Richard Owen [4153] 1 Object 


Housing Allocations, Natural Heritage and Infrastructure regarding local residents and the roads. 



Summary Allocation amounts to over development of village. Loss of open space in village centre. Insuitable access proposed adjacent to school. Site not suitable for 

development having regard to access, gradient and over looking. Site isolated from Dolwen Road. Already substantial development in village in past 10 years. 



14046 Mrs Ellen Pready [4148] 1 Object 

Summary Unsuitable access proposed adjacent to school. 

Site not suitable for development having regard to access - gradient and over looking. Site isolated from Dolwen Road. 

Already substantial development in village in the past 10 years. Allocation amounts to over development of village. The LDP is not sound with this site 

included. 


13680 Mr Kenneth Shelley MBE [3972] 1 Object 

Summary Location amounts to overdevlopment of village. 

Site not suitable for development having regard to access and gradient. 



Summary This site overlooks Gamar Road, Gadlas Road and Glyndwr Road. Too near to Cynfran School as there will be double the traffic and most dangerous for 

children. Site not suitable having regard to gradient and access to Pentregwyddel Road. 


13886 Mrs Amanda Catterall [4060] 1 Object 

Summary A development of this size in the historical centre of the village will forever change its character, take away the last remaining open green areas, and spoil the 

village. I also doubt that any houses built will be within the financial reach of local people, and that they will be acquired by social housing providers for people 

from outside Conwy. Llysfaen has had more than its fair share of development in recent years, including private housing, social housing and the controversial 

nearby landfill site, and the council should seek to find an alternative site. 



Summary Any houses built on this field, which has been used as grazing land for countless years, will upset the balance of the Tier 1 village of Llysfaen. It will create 

substantial overlooking of Cynfran, Gadlas & Glyndwr Roads. The houses in these roads where built before the 2nd world war to the plan of the model aucher 

estate & where never intended to be 'built up'. 



Summary Close to the primary school which could not sustain the increased level of children that a new development would bring. 

The roads surrounding the school are far to narrow to accommodate the extra traffic the development would bring. 

The houses that would be built would not be for locals, but for incomers which as we have had in the past on other sites leads to social problems. 

There has been historically a religious site on the rectory field & Church for over a thousand years and development of this land would negate all the history 

and ruin the village. 


19574 Dr Nia Williams [4578] 1 Object 

Summary Gwrthwynebu oherwydd : 

Gorddatblygu'r pentref 

Canran uchel o dai wedi'u dyrannu ar gyfer Llysfaen 

Isadeiledd annigonol 

Mynediad anaddas 

Anaddas ar gyfer datblygiad oherwydd y llethr 

Wedi ei ynysu o Ffordd Dolwen 

Safle tir glas 

Dim llwybr troed rhwng y safle a chanol hanesyddol y pentref. 



13699 Mr Stephen Thompson [3985] 1 Object 



Site not suitable for development having regard to access and gradient 





600




13697 Mr Michael Roberts [3984] 1 Object 


Site not suitable for develpment having regard to gradient and will create substantial overlooking. 






Summary the road surrouding the propsed site are far to narrow to accommodate the extra traffic. 

A public footpath runs alongside & behind the school which would have to be crossed to build a new road for access/exit site. There are no amenities ie. 

mains, drainage and gas etc. 

The school (local) not capable of accommodating any extra children. 



Summary Llysfaen has unsufficient facilities for a small village. New houses have been built over recent years that have resulted in busier roads and over crowding in 

the local school. Ysgol Cynfran was undersized over 20 years ago when I attended when it was first built. Green space is now at a premium in the village. 

Many of the roads don't have pavements making it unsafe to walk along. 


13611 Mrs Susan Jones [3941] 1 Object 






Change Sought: Delete Site 


Summary Allocations amount to over development of the village. Already substantial development of core of village in the last 15years. 

Large proportion of overall housing allocation in plan is focused in Llysfaen a Tier 1 village. 

Site is isolated from Dolwen Road as immediately adjacent the site is not allowed. 



13701 Mrs Joan Morris [3987] 1 Object 

Summary The proposed development is too close to the school. 

The access would lead to increased traffic on Dolwen Road which would put the children attending the school in danger. 

The school could not accommodate anymore pupils. 


14412 Mr & Mrs Fred & Pauline Sumners [4431] 1 Object 











13981 Mrs Sara Trow [4114] 1 Object 

Summary I believe the over development of the village is causing an over populated village, which now is lacking in amenities. This will cause unsuitable access to and 

from school, which is a hazard for our children who make their own way each day. The lack of pavement is a great concern at present along with the 

traditional narrow roads. 




Site isolated from Dolwen Road immediately adjacent site not allocated. 

Large proportion of overall of housing allocation in the plan is focused in Llysfaen a Tier 1 village. 


Site not suitable for development having regard to gradiant and will create substantial over looking. 



13713 Mrs Dilys Simonds [3993] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the possibility of housing near the school. Access to these houses would be adjacent to the school, we already have problems with parking. Site is 

isolated from Dolwen Road as immediately adjacent site is not allocated. 




Site opposite an existing school with no footpath access from the site. 

The existing road will be unable to cope with the extra traffic. 

It is a Greenfield site at the centre of a historic site in the middle of the village. 

LDP is not sound with this site included. 


13992 Mr Glen Winterbottom [4117] 1 Object 

Summary Regarding the development of the site (site 160 Map3) this is most unsuitable as this access proposed is adjacent to the school. This area has very narrow 

roads with no pavement aid, the school already has problems with the parking by parents collecting children. No way can this area cope with extra cars 

(which more houses would bring). I object to this land being built on as I feel that the safety of the children come first, and should be deleted from the LDP. 


601




14416 Mr John Whittaker [4432] 1 Object 

Summary Access proposed adjacent to school is totally unsuitable. 


No footpath connection between centre of village and proposed allocation. 

Site not suitable for development having regard to gradient and will create substantial overlooking. 



13910 Mrs Frances Jean Del-Prete [4080] 1 Object 


We have already had excess development in the village. This will cause over development of the village particularly the historic centre. 

Poor pedestrian access to the site due to existing restrictions. 

Services will be unable to cope with the huge extra volume, traffic management will become impossible. 

The school is already at capacity and the dangers before and after school will be chaotic. 

There are also many houses up for sale in and around the village. Over a few years prices have been coming down but they are still not low enough for young 

people. 


13711 Mr Peter Foster [3992] 1 Object 

Summary Site not suitable for development having regard to access and safety. 

Already substantial development in village in past ten years. 





2. Access 

3. Ownership. 





Summary The allocation amounts to overdevelopment of the village. 

Development of land at the rear of the school will mean insufficient land to develop the school to meet an increase in demand. 

Increased pollution from increased car usage in the very area where the young children play and take exercise. 

Increased traffic threatens the safety of those same children attending school. 

Llysfaen has limited infrastructure and narrow roads. 



13707 Mr David Morris [3990] 1 Object 

Summary The proposed development is too close to the village school. 

The access would lead to increased traffic on Dolwen Road, which would be dangerous to children attending the school. 

The school could not accommodate any more pupils. 

There are signs of badger activity on this site. 


14005 Mrs Joyce Winterbottom [4119] 1 Object 

Summary I object to this development of this site as the safety of the children of the school ehich will be adjacent to the proposed access, is being comprised. These 

houseswill undoubtably bring extra vehicles to this area, which already has narrow roads and no pavements. Over the past 10 Years there has been 

substantial development in the village and think that this allocation of extra houses amounts to over development of this village. With the extra pressure which 

will be places on the infrastructure this plan should be scrapped. 



Summary Allocations amount to overdevelopmenet of the village. Already substantial development of village in last 15 years. 

Large proportion of overall housing allocation in the plan is focussed in Llysfaen, a Tier 1 village. 










Summary Allocations amount to overdevelopmenet of the village. Already substantial development of village in last 15 years. 

Large proportion of overall housing allocation in the plan is focussed in Llysfaen, a Tier 1 village. 









13849 Mrs Hazel Boothroyd [4048] 1 Object 

Summary The proposed site is far too near the school with very busy road, no footpath. Where will the new pupils go. The public transport isn't always reliable and when 

it snows the roads etc comes to a stand still with our neighbours having to take children home in his 4 x 4. 

The hill where the houses are to be built is too steep which will cause staring into other houses like 70é new houses. 



602




13695 Mrs Francis Roberts [3983] 1 Object 


Site not suitable for develpment having regard to gradient and will create substantial overlooking. 





13907 Mrs Carys Chester [4078] 1 Object 


The allocation amouts to over development of the village. 


The site is isolated as the land immediately adjacent to the school in not included. 




13620 Miss Sam Evans [3944] 1 Object 

Summary Dolwen Road is dangerous enough as school times and it would be ridiculously dangerous if new houses were built. 

Also there has recently already been a vast amount of new houses. We are loosing green areas and we are a village not a town and the roads have no 

pavements. 

Don't have mains gas and the new houses will ruin the historical village. 


13675 Mrs Lesley Mancini [3971] 1 Object 



13884 Mr Ian Catterall [4059] 1 Object 






13709 Mrs Vivienne Morgan [3991] 1 Object 

Summary Village centre and surrounding area must not be developed as it will destroy its historical context. 

The village has been developed a lot in recent years and many of the lanes which will have to be used in the context of development and residential use can 

not be more than single track. This is already causing hazards (to pedestrians and vehicle users) as most have no pavements either. 


13765 Mrs Leslie Lewis [4018] 1 Object 

Summary Allocation amounts to overdevlopment of village. 







13778 Mrs Deborah Stevens [4022] 1 Object 

Summary It is not wise to increase traffic so near to a school the roads are narrow and totally unsafe it will be to late when a child is killed. 




I think the houses shouldn't be built at all danger to the families in Llysfaen, also the roads can't take the traffic. Why should you be allowed to take our Green 

Fields and spoil everything? what will happen they will be left empty and the council will put families from everywhere. We don't need houses at all. 


13775 Mr Griffith Melvyn Evans [4021] 1 Object 

Summary A totally unstuiable access proposed adjacent to school This site is totally uinsuitable for development, not only the unsuitable access proposed adjacent 

tothe school, it would also create substantial overlooking. 

Llysafen (village) lack the suficient roads and school to accommodate such number proposed. 

It astounds me that such a building project could be proposed when we can't even get natural gas supplied here. 


13771 Mrs Margaret Wan [4020] 1 Object 

Summary Lack of infrastructure in area e.g. very narow roads, lack of police, only an hourly bus service, no mains gas service, sewage etc. 

Very close proximity to the rock blasting quarry, very loud blasting nosie and bad tremors. 

New houses will look out of character to the villager's stone built houses/cottages. New houses will look cramped up and make the village like a big housing 

estate instead of a nice little village. 

It is unfair that the council not allowing the proposed land owner to sell the plot to the public first. 



13805 Ms Sara Molinari [4031] 1 Object 

Summary Site not suitable for development having regard to access, gradient and overlooking. 


Already substantial development in village over past 10 years. 

Allocation amounts to overdevelopment of village. 



13832 Mr Gwilyn Keith Jones [4040] 1 Object 

Summary This site is not suitable for any development having regard to gradient and access onto Pentregwyddel Road. 

Any buildings on this site would mean loss of open space between the historic buildings at the centre of the village, site is sensitive given setting of church, 

church house and rectory. 


603




13651 Mrs Francis Parry [3959] 1 Object 

Summary Allocation amounts to over development in village. 


Site not suitable for development having regard to access graduating overlooking. 

Site is isolated from Dolwen Road. 

LDP is not sound with site. 

Too many houses in village already. 



Summary The roads are not able to take the traffic that will be increased. 

The school already has a portacabin if there is an increase in numbers of children this will lead to more portacabins. 

Llysfaen has a real history, the church dates back to 777 ad and the village hall is a grade 2 listed buildlings. This would be ruined if this development took 

place. 

The infrastructure is not in place (gas, water, roads). 

Fault lines that run throurhg some parts of the proposed plan. 

You would kill Llysfaen as a village. 

These are not houses for local people. 



Summary This site is my main concern as I live directly next to the field. We brought our house over 20 years to live in the quiet and peaceful village. 

Over the years I have seen the development of more and more houses in the village. The facilities in the village consist of only one shop, there are only buses 

every 30 minutes. 

The school is already to its capacity and the access proposed adjacent to the school will bring total chaos. 

This site is totally unsuitable due to gradient and will bring substantial overlooking which will reduce the house prices. 


13647 Mrs Margaret Hodgson [3957] 1 Object 

Summary RL Davies and the school and other buildings on Dolwen Road are still on septic tanks. 

The above plus the old rectory and coach house all have their main entrances onto Dolwen Road, this is already an accident zone. 

No pavements along Dolwen Road until you get to the school. 

The fields and buildings in this area make it into a lovely village and I want to make sure we keep this status not a small township. 


13842 Mr David Durrans [4044] 1 Object 

Summary The allocation amounts to overdevelopment of our village. 

The site access from Dolwen Road adjacent to school which is hazardous. 


There are no footpaths, the roads are too small to cope with the extra cars. 

The school is full so all the children will have to travel to school. 

Llysfaen is a village not a town. 

Wronge type of houses. 



Summary Allocation amounts to overdevlopment of village. 















Site is unsuitable due to access by narrow roads with no pavement, added traffic would be a serious risk to safety. Site is isolated from Dolwen Road as 

immediately adjesent site which is unallocated. There is no footpath connection between the site and rest of village historic centre. Risk of overlooking of 

some school pay grounds. Infrastructures, No mains gas, energy deficency post 2016, Reliance on LPG and or solid fuel for heating. 


13641 Mr Andrew Gallagher [3954] 1 Object 

Summary Allocation amounts to over development of the village. 

Village has limited infrastructure, narrow roads and lack of footpaths. 





Summary Allocations amount to development of the village already substantial devlopment of village in last 15 yeras. 

Large proportion of overall housing in the village plan is focused in Llysfaen, a tier 1 village. 

Village has very limited infrastructure and dangerous narrow roads. 

Scale of development proposed in tier 1 village to the strategy of the plan. 


13636 Mr Peter Graham Jones [3952] 1 Object 

Summary Site not suitable from Dolwen Road as immediately adjacent site not allocated. 


Totally unsuitable for access proposed adjacent school. 



604




13628 Miss Karen Thomas [3948] 1 Object 

Summary We have had too many houses built in Llylsfaen already so are losing all the green areas. We are a village not a town. Our roads cannot handle all the extra 

traffic these houses will cause. We don't have pavements on a lot of the roads in Llysfaen, in the winter the slightest bit of snow and the people who live here 

already struggle on the roads. The land is the historic centre of the village, has listed buildings and does not need any new houses. 


13653 Miss Debra Barker [3960] 1 Object 

Summary Allocation amounts to over devlopment in village. 




Already substantial development in village. 



13830 Mrs Margaret Olwen Jones [4039] 1 Object 

Summary I am opposed to any buildings on this site regarding ecological issues with evidence of badger foraging trails from rectory land and feeding area for bats. 

This site is sensitive given setting of church which is a listed building. 


13800 Mrs Catherine Trow [4028] 1 Object 

Summary Over development of village. 

Unsuitable access proposed by school. 

No Footpaths, roads to narrow. 


13847 Mr David Boothroyd [4047] 1 Object 

Summary Too near school - which would then struggle to cope with influx of pupils and would not be able to expand. 

Hill too steep - privacy problem. 

Road to narrow - no footpath on bad bend on Fforth y Llan 


13797 Mr Gary Trow [4027] 1 Object 

Summary Totally unsuitable access proposed by school entrance. 

Over development of village. 

Narrow road, wtih no footpaths. 

Loss of open space between historic building at the centre of the village. 


13645 Mrs Joan Partington [3956] 1 Object 

Summary Our village is far too small for more houses to be built. 

Local school is at present at capacity. 

Local amenities are limited. 

Public transport is already very poor. 

Roads are already far too narrow to accommodate more traffic. 

We want our village to stay a village not turn into a small town. 


13802 Mr Arfon Edwards [4029] 1 Object 




Summary Access to Dolwen Road very dangerous as road is not up to grade. 

Building is not in keeping with historical buildings. 

Will affect footpath to and from historical buildings at centre of village. 

Taking greenfields. 


13796 Mr Keith Norman [4026] 1 Object 

Summary Already the area around the entrance to the school is dangerous for children and vehicles. Creating more houses creates more vehicles/people using the 

road outside the school. 

More development is contrary to development and strategy of the plan for this tier 1 village. 

Limited infrastructure within the village. 


13643 Mr Leonard Parry [3955] 1 Object 

Summary Village has limited infrastructure and narrow roads. 

Loss of open space between historic buildings at centre of village. 

DLP is not sound with this site included. 




13634 Mr Neil Thomas [3951] 1 Object 

Summary We are losing all our green areas, we are a village not a town. Our roads cannot handle all the extra traffic, it is dangerous enough by the school and the road 

is blocked. Also this is the historic centre of the village and has listed buildings it does not need new builds ruining it. 

In the winter the slightest bit of snow and people struggle to get up and down. There are no pavements on some of the roads so extra traffic will cause more 

danger. 



Summary This is a greenfield site and should not be built on. Local horse owners and farmer still use it for grazing. It will also ruin any privacy and peace and quiet; 

which is why I bought the house; also reduction in value. The roads in Llysfaen throughout are not capable of taking much more traffic and also the proposed 

access would be downright dangerous. The school is also past capacity already. 

I am totally against this proposal. 

Always paid by council tax and always will but will I be subsidising the new tennants? 


605





Summary Very close to school, could put the children in danger. 

Would have to cross footpath. 

Disrupt lives. 

End Llysfaen as a village. 

Social problems would increase as they did with last lot of development, absentee landlords. 

School not big enough for a big intake, more portacavins. 

Roads could not take the traffic. 

Building on faults, gas release. 

No amenities, mains gas, drainage, water. 



Summary The houses proposed on Cynfran school site should not go ahead as the school is already full and wouldn't be able to accommodate many more children. 

Again all these proposed houses would be a drain on all amenities that we have and we still haven't got gas in Llysfaen. 


13605 Mr Alexander Gray [3934] 1 Object 

Summary Keep current green open space. 

School over croweded already. 

Better places to build. 

All the aobve express by concerns as to why no houses should be built in Llysfaen. 


13630 Mr Kevin Cooke [3949] 1 Object 


is blocked. Also in winter the slightest bit of snow and people struggle to get up and down. There are no pavements on some of the roads so extra traffic will 

cause more danger. Also this is the historic centre of the village and has listed buildings it does not need new builds around it ruining it. 


13626 Mrs Anne Thomas [3947] 1 Object 

Summary We are a village and we have a duty to start a plan for keeping green areas for our future generation. 

We live in a beautiful country area with lots of wild life and we have already had our share of new housing on both sides of the village and we really can't take 

any more. The traffic is already bad and we have no pavements so please do not go building any more estates up here and spoiling our village. 









facilities. 




Summary The village has limited infrastructure and narrow roads. 







Summary The road to the school is narrow and congested between 8:00-9:15; 11:45 - 12:00 and 2:45-3:30 as the children are being dropped off at the school gates. 

More housing in this area would mean more traffic and the potential danger of a serious accident. 

The housing proposal for LLysfaen is far more excessive than on other surrounding areas. 

The access road to the site is very close to the brow of the hill. 

THE LDP IS NOT SOUND WITH THIS SITE. 

Change Sought: No new housing in Llysfaen. There has been enough development in this VILLAGE over the last 10 years. 

13655 

Summary 


13748 

Summary 


13844 

Summary 


Mrs Helen Jones [3961] 

Totally unsuitable access proposal adjacent to school. 


Site is allocated from Dolwen Road as immediately adjacent site not allocated. 

No footpath connection between historic centre of village and propsoed allocation. 


Delete site. 

Mr Chris Reeves [4010] 


Site not suitable for development having regard to access, gradient and overlooking 

Site isolated from Dowlen Road 

Already substantial development in village in past ten years 

Allocation amounts to overdevelopment of village 

The LDP is not sound with this site included 

Delete site 

Ms Patricia Garrity [4045] 


Site not suitable for development having reagard to access, gradient and overlooking. 


Already substantial devlopment in village in past 10 years. 



Delete site 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

606




13750 Mrs Karen Reeves [4012] 1 Object 


Site unsuitable for development regarding access, gradient and overlooking 

Site isolated from Dolwen Road 

Already substantial development in village over last 10 years 

Allocation amounts to overdevlopment of village 




Summary More additional housng is not required in this part of the Llysafen area. 


13816 Mrs Janet Jones [4035] 1 Object 







13768 Mr Barry Greenhalgh [4019] 1 Object 








13632 Mrs Sharon Thomas [3950] 1 Object 




danger. 


13752 Mis Karen Telfer [4013] 1 Object 

Summary Loss of open space between historic buildings 



Damage to countryside and wildlife 



Summary Allocation amounts over overdevlopment of village. 

Loss of open space in village centre. 


Site not suitable having regard to access, gradient and overlooking. 


Already substantial development in village in past ten years. 




Summary The proposed site would cause pressure on the existing roads. The traffic has already increased in the last 10 years and the local roads are now very 

dangerous and congested. 

The village will loose its village atmosphere and character. 

The shops consists of 1 general store, 1 chinese take-out and 1 post office which I believe has been under threat of closure in recent years. 

Another development would be of significant detriment to the existing residents. 


13846 Mrs Gaynor Foulkes [4046] 1 Object 

Summary The allocation amounts to overdevelopment of the village. 

The site is accessed from Dolwen Road adjacent to school and the access will be hazardous. 





607


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Adjacent to former Rectory, Llysfaen 


19575 Dr Nia Williams [4578] 1 Object 

Summary Gwrthwynebu oherwydd : 

Gorddatblygu'r pentref 

Canran uchel o dai wedi'u dyrannu ar gyfer Llysfaen 

Isadeiledd annigonol 

Mynediad anaddas 

Anaddas ar gyfer datblygiad oherwydd y llethr 

Wedi ei ynysu o Ffordd Dolwen 

Safle tir glas 

Dim llwybr troed rhwng y safle a chanol hanesyddol y pentref. 

Tystiolaeth bod moch daear ac ystlumod yn yr ardal 



19577 Miss Gwennan Williams [4579] 1 Object 

Summary Dileu safle 87 oherwydd: 

Prawf CE1 - gor-ddatblygiad o'r pentref; mae canran uchel o dai yn y CDLl wedi'u penodi yn Llysfaen, pentref Lefel 1; nid yw'r isadeileddau yn Llysfaen yn 

ddigonol I'r cynlluniau a gynigir; nid yw meant y datblygiad yn addas i bentref Lefel 1. 

Prawf CE2 - fe gollir y caeau agored ynghlwm âó'r adeiladau hanesyddol yn Llysfaen; mae'r safle yn sensitive yng nghyswllt yr Eglwys, Church House, 

Hen Reithordy; llethr y cae a diffyg addasrwydd myediad I Ffordd Pentregwyddel; mae'n safle tir glas; mae'r caeau yn ardal bwyta a chrwydro I foch daear ac 

ystlumod. 












13606 Ms Jennifer Hotston [3939] 1 Object 

Summary Over development of the village would ensue with this development. 

Limited infrastructure in village and narrow, twisting roads making it dangerous for drivers and pedestrians. 


Change Sought: Deletionof site, LDP is not sound with this site included. 

13460 Mr Martin Thomas [3834] 1 Object 

Summary We are a village not a town and we've had enough new houses built up here already and our roads are not built for more traffic (especially by the school). The 

land behind the village hall has always been known to me as Glebe land owned by the village and was never meant for building on. It is the historic centre of 

our village and should be left alone. 

Change Sought: Remove the housing allocation Adjacent to the former Rectory, Llysfaen. 

13881 Mr John Nesbitt [3895] 1 Object 

Summary I object on the grounds of: 

Insufficient notification. 

Privacy and overlooking. 

Recent development has raised occurrences of crime related matters in the area. 

There is no reason to build new houses when there are numerous empty properties. 

Amenities in the village would not sustain the large increase proposed. 

Safety and build integrity should the land above the mine be used. Blasting from the quarry has physically shaken houses in the area. 



Summary Loss of open space between the historic buildings e.g. medieval church which is a listed building and the graveyard in the centre of the village. 

Overdevlopment in such areas as this nearly always result in vandalism. 

Site is not suitable for development having regard to gradient and access onto Pentregwyddel Road. 

There are ecological issues in this area. 

This site is too sensitive given the setting of the chuch, church house and rectory. Has any consideration been given for when there is a funeral taking place, 

unrestricted space is needed for the funeral cortege. 





2. Access 

3. Ownership. 




13489 SIAN STEPHENSON [3859] 1 Object 

Summary Huge development in the centre of the village which is completely inappropriate. 

Road links to the village are poor. 





Change Sought: No more housing development in the village, it is a village not a town but is becoming the size of one. 

608




13524 Mr. Alan Blight [3892] 1 Object 

Summary Llysfaen village has absorbed a significant number of new dwellings in the past 20 years. The current road infrastructure could not cope with the proposed 

new housing on the land in front of the Old Rectory. Pentregwyddel Rd is unsuitable and dangerous due to the gradient, narrowing and blind bends. Also it is 

impossible for 'heavy' vehicles to pass one another. There are badger trails crossing Pentregwyddel Rd. The school is almost at full capacity now. 


13502 CEMEX UK Operations Ltd. (Mr Shaun Denny) [636] 1 Object 

Summary We are concerned that the draft framework has identified land to the south of the buffer zone as suitable for housing. 

Whilst this land lies outside the buffer zone and would not experience blast vibration in excess of that stipulated by the planning permissions relating to the 

operation of Raynes Quarry it is possible that the occupants of dwellings may perceive vibration resulting from quarry operations. This in turn may result in 

complaints being made to the MPA with regard to the quarry's operations despite operations being fully compliant with planning requirements. 

Change Sought: Remove the housing allocation adjacent to the former Rectory, Llysfaen. 

14181 Mrs Virginia Owen [2127] 1 Object 

Summary Development of the green open spaces would have a detirmental effect on the character of the village. It is imperative that the green open spaces are 

protected for the future generations. 

Objection on the following grounds : Natural Heritage. Housing Allocations and Infrastructure regarding current residents and roads. 


13522 Ms Sarah Anderson [3861] 1 Object 

Summary Llysfaen village has absorbed a significant number of new dwellings in the past 20 years. The current road infrastructure could not cope with the proposed 

new housing on the land in front of the Old Rectory. Pentregwyddel Rd is unsuitable and dangerous due to the gradient, narrowing and blind bends. Also it is 

impossible for 'heavy' vehicles to pass one another. There are badger trails crossing Pentregwyddel Rd. The school is almost at full capacity now. 



Summary LLYSFAEN COMMUNITY COUNCIL 

Good afternon 

Further to our discussion at your Offices in Cstle Sreet earlier this afternoon, theabove Community Council wishes to nominate the Daniel Office Works Site, 

off Clobryn Road, Llysfaen, as an alternative LDP site in Llysfaen, replacing the Rectory Field site. 

Regards 

Gwyndaf 

Clerk & ResponsibleFinance Officer 

Change Sought: Delete site and replace with Daniel Office Works Site, off Clobryn Road, Llysfaen. 

13469 Mr David Rushton [3841] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the housing allocation adjacent to the former Rectory, Llysfaen. 

Every single home next to the field will suffer loss of privacy because they are lower than the field. 

There is no need to build on greenfield sites, there are plenty of brownfield sites available. 

These houses will not be used by the younger generation but people from Liverpool who want to come and live cheaply by the sea. 

The fields should be used as a tourist attraction. 


14047 Mr Christopher Pullen [1038] 1 Object 

Summary Represents a loss of important open space and adversely affects the setting of listed buildings St Cynfrans Church (Grade 2*) and Church House (Grade 2). 

This represents over development of a significant area of the village. 

The site is unsuitable by reasons of surface profile and access. 

Infrastructure and facilities are unsufficient to support further development. 

LDP is not sound. 


13479 Mrs Brynhilde Thompson [3854] 1 Object 

Summary 1. Allocation amounts to over-development of village. 

2. Loss of open space between historic buildings at centre of village. 

3. Site not suitable for development having regard to access and gradient. 

4. Village has limited infrastructure and narrow roads. 

5. Over-development having regard to village facilities. 



13790 Mrs C Norman [2616] 1 Object 

Summary Loss of open space between the historic and listed buildings at the heart and traditional centre of the village. 

This is a site unsuitable due to access onto Pentregwyddel Road, its gradient is also steep making this unsuitable. 

It's a greenfield site outside the existing settlement. 

Obvious evidence of badger trails from the rectory land and a natural feeding and flight area for bats. 

Loss of parking when funerals/weddings at nearby church. 



Summary Overwhelming local opposition; adverse impact upon village character and infrastructure; inadequate consultation 


609






Overdevelopment of Tier 1 Main Village 

Badgers and wildlife will be disturbed 

The area releases Raydon Gas 

It is ancient pastureland 

Adjacent and part of the Historic centre of the village amongst listed buildings 

Ancient rights of way 

Congestion caused by extra vehicles 

Highway infrastructure is not adequate 

The school area is already congested 

Close to a working quarry 

Will not enhance the local character of buildings, hertiage and open space 

Lack of employment opportunities 

Loss of open space 


13602 Mr Ian Walters [3938] 1 Object 

Summary Loss of open space in centre of village. 

Access onto Pentegwddel Road unsuitable. 

Ecological issues regarding badgers. 


Village has limited and narrow roads. 



13787 Mr D Elias [2618] 1 Object 

Summary The proposed development at the Rectory gardens would change the actual look and feel of the village. 

Site is not suitable for development having regard to gradient and access onto Pentregwyddel Road. 

Site is too sensitive given setting of the church and would cause loss of open space between the historic buildings at the centre of the village. 


13644 Mrs Joan Partington [3956] 1 Object 

Summary Our village is far too small for more houses to be built. 

Local school is at present at capacity. 

Local amenities are limited. 

Public transport is already very poor. 

Roads are already far too narrow to accommodate more traffic. 

We want our village to stay a village not turn into a small town. 




Historic part of the village normally classed as centre with the Church and village hall at the heart. 

Development we know is not for local people, but will be allocated to incomers which has happended in the past with other site & brings with other social 

problems. 

Devaluation of houses already occupied by Local people. 

The village hall is well used fro various activities which would be affected by building of new housing estate on its doorstep. 


13801 Mr Arfon Edwards [4029] 1 Object 




Summary I think the houses shouldn't be built at all there is a danger to families, the roads are not fit to take the traffic. Why should you be allowed to take our Green 

Fieldsfor houses. We don't need them, they will be left empty as there is no work or money in Wales and the Council will buy them and put people from all 

over. 



Summary Llysfaen is a small village with insufficient facilities to cope with more housing. New houses have been built over recent years that have resulted in busier 

roads. Over crowding in Ysgol Cynfran which was over crowded 20 years ago when I attended as a pupil. Green space is now at a premium in the village. 









facilities. 




Summary In July 1994, the inhabitants of Llysfaen where assured by the Colwyn Borough Council that the individual identity of Llysfaen as a village was to be retained. 

It was no longer to be regarded for planning purposes, as a 'sub-area' of Colwyn Bay. 

The building of houses on the Rectory field will upset the tranquility of the area containing the listed buildings of the Church, Village Hall & Rectory. This has 

been used for grazing for countless generations. 


610




13650 Mrs Francis Parry [3959] 1 Object 

Summary Village has limited access and narrow roads. 

Loss of open space between historic buildings in centre of village. 


Over development regarding village facilities. 

Road far too busy already can not take any more traffic. 

Over development in village in last 10 years. 



Summary Loss of open space between the historic building at the centre of the village. 


Ecological issues with evidence of badger foraging trails from rectory land and feeding area for bats. 

Site not suitable for development having regard to gradiant and access onto Pentregwyddel Road. 

Allocation amount to over development of the village. Already substantial development of core of village in last 15 years. 


13936 Mrs Christine Foulkes [4097] 1 Object 


The allocation amount to over development of the village. The has been sustantial development in the past 10 years. 

Loss of open space between buildings at historic centre of village. Openess of site is important to the village. 

Village has narrow roads and limited infrastructure. 

Site not suitable for development having regard to gradiant of the site and access onto Pentregwyddel Road. 

There is evidence of badger trails and bats on the site. 


13938 Mr David Foulkes [4098] 1 Object 


The allocation amount to over development of the villagge there has been substantial development in the last 10 years. 

Loss of open space between buildings at historic centre village. Openess of site is important to the village. 







Roads surrounding proposed site are inadequate for increased traffic. 

A new access/exit road to the site would have to cross a public footpath, regularly used by school children and the road would be close to the school. 

No amenities i.e. mains drainage or gas etc. 

Historically classed as village centre with the church and village hall at the heart. 

Llysfaen has had more that its share of development and any additional building would ruin the feel of Llysfaen as a village. 


13959 Mrs Pam Foulkes [4103] 1 Object 


The allocation amounts to over development of the village. There has been substantial development in the past 10 years. 

Loss of open space between building at historic centre of village. Openess of site is important to the village. The village has narrow roads and limited 

infrastructure. 

Site is not suitable for development having regard to gradiant of the site and access onto Pentregwyddel Road. 



17636 Prof & Dr Del & Ann Williams & Parry-Williams [4498] 1 Object 

Summary The allocation does not comply with the strategy of the plan which seeks to provide 85% of future devlopment in the UDS area. The scale of development 

proposed in this Tier 1 village is contrary to that strategy. 

The allocation of this site will adversely impact on the historic core of Llysfaen and the setting of the Church, Church House and other listed structures. It is 

also contrary to planning advice in National Planning Policy Wales. 

There are significant other objections to the allocation of this site on the grounds of its physical character, highway constraints and nature conservation 

interests. 


14020 Mrs Barbara Burns [4128] 1 Object 


Over development in the past 20 years. Poor local infrastructure ie. sewers, water, footpaths and roads. Much increased road traffic and parking, loss of 

greenfield site between listed buildings (church) rectory & village centre. 

Development proposed in Tier 1 village, contrary to plan strategy. 


13648 Mr John Hodgson [3958] 1 Object 

Summary I do not think you have thought about the closeness of the quarry, the blasting from the quarry is getting worse, there is already a fault on Gamar Road, 

Some of the land around the village hall belongs to the village, and no-one from the village hall has said you purchased the land. 

The upheaval these houses would cause when being built would cause much disruption to our village, wagons, dust, no proper roads. The children at the 

school would suffer the most. The idea of any houses in Llysfaen should be forgotten. There are plenty of empty houses around. 



Summary Village has narrow roads, especially near to old rectory and Pentregwyddel Road. 

Site to near to Historic buidlings such as the Church, Church hall and old rectory. Llysfaen is still traditionaly a Welsh village and is not suitable for a large 

influx of English speaking city dwellers, the Welsh language is very dear to us and must not be lost. 


611





Summary The additional pressure of further development in this area would put local ammenities under great strain. The village school has problems now without 

further children needing places. The roads are totally unsuitable for additional traffic and the local shops only consist of 1 post office, 1 chinese take-out and 

one general store. 

As for employment - there is nothing. 


13698 Mr Stephen Thompson [3985] 1 Object 

Summary Allocation amounts to overdevelopment of site 

Loss of open space between historic buildings at centre of village 


Village has limited infrastructure and narrow lanes 

Over development having regard to village facilities 



13686 Mrs Kathleen Muriel Keane [3976] 1 Object 

Summary This allocation amounts to overdevelopment of village 

Loss of our village green open space between historic buildings so we shall lose the whole character of our village centre 

Sensitive site between listed church, chuch house and old rectory 

Site unsuitable as regards gradient and access onto Pentregwyddel Road 

This is a greenfield site outside the existing settlement limits 

Infrastructure and narrow roads unable to cope 

Evidence of badger foraging and bats feeding on site 

Evidence reported of 2 fault lines from Raynes Quarry close to site 


14044 Mrs Ellen Pready [4148] 1 Object 



Loss of open space between historical buildings at centre of village. 

Village has limited infrastructure and narrow roads. LDP in not sound with thue site included. 


13682 Mrs Venita Shelley [3974] 1 Object 

Summary Allocation amounts to overdevlopent of village. 


13799 Mrs Catherine Trow [4028] 1 Object 

Summary Allocation amounts to over development in the village. 

Poor roads with no footpaths to village. 

Site not suitable for development having regard to access 

Loss of green open space between historic building at the centre of the village. 



Summary Loss of open space between the historic buildings at the centre of the village. 

Site is sensitive given setting of Church, Church Hall and Rectory. 

Greenfield site outside the existing settlement. Ecological issues with evidence of badger foraging trails from rectory land and feeding area for bats. 


13633 Mr Neil Thomas [3951] 1 Object 




danger. 



Summary The village of Llysfean has had more than enough development. 

Roads would become very dangerous, as very narrow. 

This is right by the historic part of Llysafen, this would be killed off. 

Building on fault lines. 

Footpath crossed. 

School already has portacabins. 

No amenities, mains gas, main drainage, water. 




Site not suitable for development having regard to gradient and access onto Pentregwyddel Road. 




13972 Mr Alan Foulkes [4109] 1 Object 

Summary Deletion of site 




The site is not suitable for development having regard to gradiant of the site and access on to Pentregwyddel Road. 



612




13690 Ms Margaret Keppie [3978] 1 Object 

Summary This area is seen as the centre of the village with the historic buildngs of the church, church hall, rectory etc. The development of new houes so close would 

irrevocably change the whole character. Llysfaen is a village with a village. 

The surrounding roads are too narrow with one way traffic only at certain points and there are no pavements - road safety issues. 

No mains gas 

Fault lines runs under the field so quarry blasting will cause building problems. 

Open spaces in village should now be maintained as many others have already seen housing development. 


13906 Mrs Carys Chester [4078] 1 Object 








13747 Mr Chris Reeves [4010] 1 Object 

Summary Overdevelopment having regard to village facilities 

Loss of open space between historical buildings at centre of village 

Village has limited infratructure and narrow roads 



14001 Mrs Joyce Winterbottom [4119] 1 Object 

Summary I feel that building on this site will mean the loss of the open space between historic building (i.e. Village church, village hall and rectory), and will create over 

development of this area. The infrastructure and the narrow roads (with no pavements) will put extra pressure on the village facilities. I object strongly to this 

development, and feel that this site should be deleted from the LDP. 


13977 Mr Wayne Trow [4111] 1 Object 

Summary I do not believe this development to be 'sound' as we build more we are not taking into consideration the welfare of our families and the lack of road (narrow 

roads) and paths ie. the danger this will cause with an overpopulated village. There are plenty of empty houses in Llysfaen which could house many people in 

them if the money was spent on them (ie. repossessions etc) 


14022 Mrs Jaqueline Bentouri [4130] 1 Object 


Local infrastructure inadequate, roads, drains, water much over development recently. More vehicle traffic in village increased parking. More development in 

Tier 1 village is contrary to the planning strategy. Loss of argicultural land and open views overcrowding at school and traffic conjestion. 


13989 Mr Glen Winterbottom [4117] 1 Object 

Summary I Object to this plan, as this will load to over development of the village. The village infrastructure is limited with narrow roads and adding more houses would 

cause more stress on these facilities. Also I fell this village has already seen a substantial number of houses built over the last 10 years. This site in the LDP 

should be deleted. 


13683 Ms Catherine Jones [3975] 1 Object 

Summary Loss of open space between buildngs at the historic centre of the village 

Roads not suitable for heavy traffic 



13631 Mrs Sharon Thomas [3950] 1 Object 




danger. 


13692 Mr Dez Walters [3982] 1 Object 

Summary The surrounding roads are too narrow already with one way traffic at times, no pavements etc which leads to safety issues. 

This area of Llysfaen is regarded as the centre with historic buildings, sites, church, church houe, rectory etc and this would change the whole character. 

No amenities i.e. gas, mains sewers etc. 

This site is on a natural fault line which would lead to problems in the future from quarry blasting, some houses arleady have problems. 

We do not want to loose what little still remains of the green belt and village life. 




Loss of open space in the historic part of the village. 


Ecological issues. Evidence of badger and bats in the proposed site. 





Loss of open spacein the historic part of the village. 


Ecological issues, evidence of badgers and bats. 



613




13613 Mr Ian Parry [3942] 1 Object 

Summary Allocation amounts to overdevelopment of village. 

Loss of open space between historic buildings at the centre of the village. 






Summary I live behind this site, one of the main reasons I bought the property was because it wasn't overlooked. I grew up in a village and wanted to continue living in 

one when I was older. If more houses were to be built in this village it would completely change the look and feel of it. Llysfaen has a strong community link, 

this was clearly shown at the public meeting over 300 people attended when news of the plan to develop in this area was made public. No one in the village 

wants the additional housing. 

Change Sought: 1) Roads are not suitable for the increased traffic more houses will bring. They are rural, narrow country roads with no footpaths. 

2) It is the historical centre of the village and should remain so. The village green is an important aspect of village life. 

3) The surrounding properties are listed buildings and should not be overshadowed by MORE houses. 

4) There has been enough housing development in LLysfaen over the last 10 years. 

13909 

THE LDP IS NOT SOUND WITH THIS SITE. 

Mrs Frances Jean Del-Prete [4080] 1 Object 

Summary Drastic over development of the village and other new housing areas denoted in the LDP. 

Access onto already narrow and crowded roads particularly Pentregwyddel Road. 

The listed village wall would disappear into the development. 

The existing services would be unable to cope with the increase in volume. 

The existing school is already up to capacity and would be unable to accommodate more children without large extension. 



Summary You would kill the feel of Llysfaen as a village, this is its historical heart, right by the church and village hall. 

Traffic would be a nightmare, the safety of the children at the school would be put at risk (no footpaths). 

Not local people. 

We have been told in the past no more development. 

Not the infrastructure in place for the plan. 

Fault lines throughout parts of the ground, release of radon gas. 

Cross public footpath. 

Use your brown sites. 


13610 Mrs Susan Jones [3941] 1 Object 






Change Sought: Delete Site 

14021 Mr Robert Burns [4129] 1 Object 


Over development in the last 15 years. Local infrastructure Inadequate limited drainage, footpaths and water. 

Plan countrary to Tier 1 village strategy, much increased vehicle traffic. Loss of open space from village centre to listed historic buildings on sensitive site. 

Greenfield site outside of existing development area wildlife badgers sets. 


13980 Mrs Sara Trow [4114] 1 Object 

Summary The loss of open space between our historic landmarks is a major concern of building on this site. This is going to cause over population in the village to 

which we are not equipped for. 


13619 Miss Sam Evans [3944] 1 Object 

Summary We do not want to loose any more green areas. 

We don't need the extra problems i.e. traffic. 

The new houses recently built have ruined the nice views that people had. 

More social problems such as higher crime, burglary etc. have already increased due to extra houses being built. 

Rectory fields is a historic centre of the village. 

No mains gas, too expensive for social housing tenants. 


13688 Mr Hugh Keane [3977] 1 Object 

Summary Llysfaen bearing a disproportionate allocation of new housing proposals, since 1993 161 given consent 

Settlement boundary should not be amended without consultation 

Strongly dispute WAG population increase 

Substantial amount of empty properties in Colwyn area 

Numerous small sites submitted and rejected, these include infil and are feasable 

Overdevelopment in village 

Access unsuitable 

Current open amenity of green field, bordered by historic buildings 

Whole aspect of village centre would be destroyed. 

Large green areas to be preserved 

There is an indication that severe ground shaking due to quarty blasting. This is caused by a reported fault line close this this site 


13646 Mrs Margaret Hodgson [3957] 1 Object 

Summary I did not know that the rectory fields had been sold to Conwy Council as building land. The village hall stands on these fields with land surrounding it, land that 

is used for grazing sheep. 

The hall chuch and post office are all part of the old village of Llysfaen and I want our village to stay a village. 

Geological fault running up Gamer Road off Cynfran Road into the field has been for a long time. I think everything should be left alone so there will not be 

any serious outcome to the houses surrounding this area already here. 


614





Summary The village has limited infrastructure and narrow roads. 

Scale of development proposed in Tier 1 village is contrary to the strategy of the plan. 

Already substantial development of core of village in the last 15 years. 

Loss of open space between the historic buildings at the centre of the village. 





Allocation amount to over development of the village. Already substantial development in core of village in last 15 years. Village has limited infrastructure and 

narrow roads. 



14056 Mr Richard Owen [4153] 1 Object 

Summary Development of the green open spaces would have a detirmental effect on the character of the village. It is imperative that the green open spaces are 

protected for the future generations. 

Objection on the following grounds : Natural Heritage. Housing Allocations and Infrastructure regarding current residents and roads. 


13696 Mr Michael Roberts [3984] 1 Object 

Summary Loss of open space between historic buildings at centre of village. 

Site is sensitive given setting of church, church house and rectory. 






Summary Llysfaen is being unfairly targeted in the tier 1 village allocation. 

Limited infrastructure and narrow roads. 

Llysfaen has a good village comunity and more homes will spoil it. 

We have badgers which are a protected species and they use the fields for foraging. 

The centre of the village is a sensitive site for historic buildings. 


13694 Mrs Francis Roberts [3983] 1 Object 









Site not suitable for development having regard to gradiant and access into Pentregwyddel Road. 


Ecological issues with evidence of badger foragaing trails from rectory and feeding area for bats. 

Village has limited infrastructure narrow roads. 

Village allocations to amount to over development. Already substantial development of core of village in last 15 years. 


13595 Mr Alexander Gray [3934] 1 Object 

Summary Access to said houses will be insufficient 

Housing should not outweigh green open space 

Schools will not cope with new residents 

Llysfaen should remain a village and should not increase population. 

All of the above express my concerns as to why no more houses should be built in Llysfaen. 


13629 Mr Kevin Cooke [3949] 1 Object 

Summary We are losing all our green areas, we are a village not a town. Our roads cannot handle all the extra traffic, it is dangerous enough by the school. Also in 

winter the slightest bit of snow and people struggle. There are no pavements on some of the roads, extra traffic will cause more danger. This is the historic 

centre of the village and has listed buildings it does not need new builds ruining it. 

We don't have mains gas so I don't know how you think they are going to be affordable houses, also the drains will not cope. 


13815 Mrs Janet Jones [4035] 1 Object 








Summary Allocation amounts to over development of the village. 

Loss of open space between historic buildngs in centre of village. 



Ecological issues with evidence of badger trails from rectory land and feeding area for bats. 


615





Summary Access to Pentregwyddel Road is very dangerous to site. 

Buildings not in keeping with historical buildings. 

Taking of green fields. 

Will affect badger trails and bats feeding. 


13598 Mrs Carole Whittaker [3936] 1 Object 

Summary Ecological issues with evidence of badger foraging trails from rectory land and feeding area for bats. 


Site not suitable for development having regard to gradient and access onto Pentregwyddel Road 


Loss of open space between the historic buildings at the centre of the village. 



Summary Loss of open space between historic buildings at the centre of the village. 

Site is sensitive given settings of church, church house and rectory. 



Ecological issues - evidence of badger foraging trails from rectory land and feeding area for bats. 



Summary No footpaths 

Narrow roads 

Lack of facilities 

Too much development already over last 30 years 

Too much focus on Llysfaen 

Will destroy character of village 

Accident risk already too high 

Loss of open spaces 

Whole village built on limestone too much disturbance could lead to increase in radon gas emmisions 

Extra traffic will damage further the already crumbling roads 

Too close to quarry, fault lines already exist 

Loss of wildlife 


13724 Mr David Wilson [4000] 1 Object 








Pentregwyddel Road is narrow, difficult and dangerous 

Site is the historic heart of the village. Buildings are listed. Further archaeology would be destroyed. 





This allocation is over development due to last 15 years of extra houses in the main village it is removal of 'the village green' 

It is close to a working quarry - the roads are narrow especially access to site of Pentre Gwyddern. The infrastructure is inadequate, and planning was 

rejected in 1997 at appeal on planning grounds. Loss of open space between the historic buildings in the centre of the village. This is also a green field site 

outside the existing settlement. 


13804 Ms Sara Molinari [4031] 1 Object 


Overdevelopment and having regard to village facilities. 

Loss of open space between historical buildings at centre of village. 







Site not suitable for devlopment having regard to access and gradient. 





13722 Mrs Marlene Wilson [3999] 1 Object 








Pentregwyddel Road is narrow, difficult and dangerous 

Site is the historic heart of the village. Buildings are listed. Further archaeology would be destroyed. 



616




13671 Mr Emyr Price [3969] 1 Object 

Summary Overdevelopment for small community 

Roads shall not accommodate extra traffic 

Badger settlements nearby 

Landfill site, the said proposal of extra housing may be on fault line 

School shall not be able to accommodate more pupils 

Generally new houses will not be in keeping with historical value of this village 


13667 Mrs Dilys Cassy [3967] 1 Object 

Summary Loss of open space between buildings at centre of historic village 

Narrow roads 

Keep as a village 

Drains not suitable for more houses 

No natural gas, cost of living up here very expensive 


13621 Mr Neal Jones [3945] 1 Object 

Summary We are losing the green areas, we are a village not a town. Also the roads will not be able to cope with the extra traffic these houses will cause. 

The rectory fields is at the historic centre of the village by listed buildings and the new houses will ruin this. 


13764 Mrs Leslie Lewis [4018] 1 Object 



Site not suitable for devlopment having regard to access and gradient. 





13600 Mr Paul Whittaker [3937] 1 Object 

Summary Loss of space between historical buildngs at centre of village. 

Site is sensitive giving setting of church and church house and rectory. 

Site not suitable given limited access to Pentregweddel Road. 

Ecological issues with evidence of badger foraging trails from rectory land and bat feeding area. 

Limited infrastructure as narrow roads. 



Summary Loss of open space between historic buildings. Grade II listed buildings are a precious and finite asset and powerful reminders of the way of life of earlier 

generations. The richness of this country's architectural heritage plays an influential part in our sense of national and regional identity. 

The allocation amounts to overdevelopment of the village. 

The site is not suitable for development having regard to access and gradient. 


Please see attached sheet. 



13719 Mrs Brenda Gibb [3996] 1 Object 

Summary Site is totally unsuitable to mass development 

No footpaths or safe road access 

Will ruin centre of village 

No supporting structures in place to accommodate 

Transport, doctors, jobs, schools are all iln short supply in the area. 


13640 Mr Andrew Gallagher [3954] 1 Object 

Summary Loss of natural village feel and turning the general area in suburbia which will negate character of village. 

Considering the number of vacant houses in Conwy/Colwyn area there is no real need for further development in this context. 

The village is built on limestone with know radon readings. 

There is a sad lack of footpaths around this village tantamount to hazard development. 

There is no facility for mains gas owing to rock structure. 


13767 Mr Barry Greenhalgh [4019] 1 Object 








13681 Miss Julia Cowan [3973] 1 Object 



13669 Mrs Sian Price [3968] 1 Object 

Summary Over development 

Roads cannot accommodate extra traffic 

Wildlife disturbed 

Landfill close by (fault line may be under new proposed site) 

School cannot accommodate extra pupils 


617




13665 Mrs Barbara Boardman [3966] 1 Object 







Village has narrow roads and no pavements 


13627 Miss Karen Thomas [3948] 1 Object 

Summary We are living in a village not a town and don't want any more housing estates to ruin our green areas. The roads/sewers cannot handle more traffic, there are 

horses on the roads and don't need more cars. 

We don't have pavements on Pentregwyddlen or Clobryn Road or Dolwen Road so it is dangerous. 

Also the road by the school is bad enough when the school opens and closes and cannot cope with more cars it's dangerous. The historic centre of the village 

will be ruined. 


13623 Mr Raymond Dutfield-Cooke [3946] 1 Object 

Summary This is the historic centre of the village and does not need new houses amongst the listed buildings. 

Roads cannot handle the extra traffic this will cause, struggle to get up here in the snow. 

We don't even have mains gas. We are a village not a town and need to keep our green areas. 


13625 Mrs Anne Thomas [3947] 1 Object 

Summary Over the last few years we have had so many new houses built in Llysfaen. We are a village not a town and we cannot take any more housing estates up 

here. We have no pavements around the village and the roads are not built for more traffic. 


13742 Mr Daniel Sullivan [4007] 1 Object 

Summary Increase in volume of traffic into a small village. 

Also overcrowding of an area that doesn't have facilities and amenities to cope with the change in area. 



Summary More additional housing is not required in this part of the Llysfaen area. 


13654 Mrs Helen Jones [3961] 1 Object 



Site is sensitive and given setting of church, church house and rectory. 



13656 Mr Anthony Mark A Hughes [3962] 1 Object 





Over development having regard to the village facilities. 



13740 Ms Judith Anne Sullivan [4006] 1 Object 

Summary More housing would mean we are no longer living in a village 

Change Sought: See scanned representation 

13658 Mrs Helen Hughes [3963] 1 Object 





Over development having regard to the village facilities. 



13751 Mis Karen Telfer [4013] 1 Object 

Summary Loss of open space between historic buildings 



School cannot cope with bigger input 

Damage to countryside, open areas 



Summary This development would't make Llysfaen a small village as it's kown, social housing would overcrowd the area and also put a strain on the area which isn't 

required. 


13749 Mrs Karen Reeves [4012] 1 Object 

Summary Overdevelopment having regard to village facilities 

Loss of open space between historical buildings at centre of village 

Village has limited infrastructure and narrow roads 



618




13735 Mrs Margaret Irene Hodgkinson [4004] 1 Object 

Summary Loss of open space between historic buildings at the centre of the village 

Site is sensitive given setting of church, church house and rectory 



Ecological issues with evidence of badger foraging trails and feeding area for bats. 






13845 Mrs Gaynor Foulkes [4046] 1 Object 

Summary The allocation amounts to overdevelopment of the village. There has been substantial development in the past 10 years. 

Loss of open space between buildings at historic centre of village. Openness of site is important to the village. 


Site not suitable for development having regard to gradient of the site and access onto Pentregwyddel Road. 

There is evidence of badger trails and bats on the stie. 


13732 Mr Anthony Gordon Hodgkinson [4003] 1 Object 

Summary Los of open space between historic buildings at the centre of the village 

Site is sensitive given setting of church, church house and rectory 



Ecological issues with evidence of badger foraging trails and feeding area for bats. 






13843 Ms Patricia Garrity [4045] 1 Object 

Summary Overdevelopment having regard to village facilities. 

Loss of open space between historical buildings and centre of village. 

village has limited infrastructure and narrow roads. 



13596 Mrs Susan Graham [3935] 1 Object 

Summary Loss of open space between historic building at the centre of the village 

Site is sensitive given of church, church house, rectory 

Site not suitable for development having regard to gradient and access onto Pentregwyddel Road 


Ecological issues with evidence of badger foraging trails from rectory land and feeds area for bats. 



Summary Loss of open space which has historic value iwthin conwy. 


Ecological issues, evidence i.e. badger/bat/bird (RSPB) - SSI sites 

Further overpowering infrastructure roads - clinics - school - play areas for youngster. 


13841 Mr David Durrans [4044] 1 Object 

Summary The allocation amounts to overdevlopment of the village. There has been substantial development there over the past 10 years. 

Loss of open space between buildings at the historic centre of village. Openness of the site is important to the village. 

Narrow roads and limited infrastructure. 



Wrong type of house. 



Summary Too much overdevelopment in Llysfaen over the last 30 years 


Filling in the open spaces around Listed Buildngs at the heart of the village will destroy the character of the village 








13716 Mrs Patricia Towlson [3995] 1 Object 

Summary We objected to similar plans in 1993 - glad to say the plans were squashed. 

So many problems would occur eg. over crowding at the school - drainage - access would be dreadful. 

There would be a car (maybe 2) at every house and I am sure there would be traffic problems. 

This is a village and we all want it to remain so. 


13652 Miss Debra Barker [3960] 1 Object 







619







2. Access 

3. Ownership. 




14413 Mr & Mrs Fred & Pauline Sumners [4431] 1 Object 











13635 Mr Peter Graham Jones [3952] 1 Object 

Summary Loss of open space between the historic buildings at centre of village. 

Site not suitable for development having regard to gradient and access to Pentregwyddol Road. 





Summary Site not suitable for development having regard to gradient and access onto Pentregwyddel Road. 

Loss of open space between the historic buildngs at the centre of the village. 



Ecological issues with evidence of badger foraging trails from rectory land and feeding area for bats (see attached sheets). 



13831 Mr Gwilyn Keith Jones [4040] 1 Object 

Summary Totally unsuitable access proposed adjacent to school. The traffic and congestion during school terms are dangerous and hazzards, it's an accident waiting to 

happen. 


13883 Mr Ian Catterall [4059] 1 Object 






13885 Mrs Amanda Catterall [4060] 1 Object 






13794 Mr Keith Norman [4026] 1 Object 

Summary Loss of open space between several listed buildings essential to enhance and denote a village community. 

Steep access would be dangerous onto a single lane (Pentregwyddel Road). 

This greenfield site is outside the existing settlement. 

Possible archaeological site needs reply/investigation from CADW. 

Loss of essential parking when needed by church i.e. funerals/weddings. 


13679 Mr Kenneth Shelley MBE [3972] 1 Object 

Summary Loss of open space between historic store church and buildings at the centre of our village 

The site is not suitable for development having regard to access, gradient and narrow roads with no footpath. 



Summary I do not wish for any houses being built near our local church, it would totally spoil the outlook of our village. Also for the wild life in the area. 

It would also be far too dangerous to gain access onto Pentregwyddel Road. 


13704 Mr Philip Capper [3989] 1 Object 

Summary Loss of open space 

Sensitive area of site - re setting of church and church house 

Site not suitable for development re access on to Pentregwyddel Road 

Greenfield site - outside existing settlement 

Ecological site - badger site and bat site 

Unsuitable water pressure in village at present 

No tranposrt links when weather of snow etc. 

No footpath access 

No mains gas available 

Overdevelopment of village with limited infrastructure 

Scale of development contrary to strategy of plan 

Large proportion of overall allocation of housing focussed on Llysfaen 


620




13708 Mrs Vivienne Morgan [3991] 1 Object 

Summary Village centre must not be developed as it will destroy its historical context. 

The village has been developed a lot in recent years and many of the lanes which will have to be used in the context of development and residential use can 

not be more than single track. This is already causing hazards (to pedestrians and vehicle users) as most have no pavements either. 


13607 Mr Alan Jones [3940] 1 Object 







13663 Mr Peter Boardman [3965] 1 Object 







Village has narrow roads and no pavements 


13829 Mrs Margaret Olwen Jones [4039] 1 Object 

Summary There are no footpath connections between historic centre of village and proposed allocation. 

This stretch of road is a hazard. 

The roads are not wide enough for any further building, as the school itself is full to capacity and is dangerous. 


13702 Mrs Eleri Capper [3988] 1 Object 

Summary Loss of open space 

Sensitive area of site - re setting of church and church house 

Site not suitable for development re access on to Pentregwyddel Road 

Greenfield site - outside existing settlement 

Ecological site - badger site and bat site 

Unsuitable water pressure in village at present 

No tranposrt links when weather of snow etc. 

No footpath access 

No mains gas available 

Overdevelopment of village with limited infrastructure 

Scale of development contrary to strategy of plan 

Large proportion of overall allocation of housing focussed on Llysfaen 





2. Access 

3. Ownership. 




13795 Mr Gary Trow [4027] 1 Object 

Summary The allocation amounts to over development in the village. 

Loss of open space between historic building at the centre of the village. 

Poor roads with no footpath to the village. 

Village already has limited infrastructure without the development proposed. 


13700 Mrs Joan Morris [3987] 1 Object 

Summary I don't think it is suitable to have such a large development in the centre of Llysafen. 

The roads are too narrow for the increase in traffic that would be due to the increase in housing. 

The local school has already got enough pupils, a further increase in pupils would not be acceptable. 

Llysfaen is an ancient village and modern houses would ruin the appearance. 


13642 Mr Leonard Parry [3955] 1 Object 

Summary Location amounts to over development in village. 


Site not suitable for development having regard to access. 

LDP is not sound with this site. 

Too many houses already in village. 

Sewers do not deal with storm water as it is. 


13706 Mr David Morris [3990] 1 Object 

Summary Such a development in the centre of a village like Llysfaen would be a step too far for the community. 

The increased housing would also bring an increase in traffic, for which the roads are unsuitable. 

The local school cannot cope with a further increase of children. 

Modern houses sited in the centre of an ancient village will ruin its appearance forever. 


13710 Mr Peter Foster [3992] 1 Object 




621




13770 Mrs Margaret Wan [4020] 1 Object 








13714 Mr Roger Simonds [3994] 1 Object 

Summary Loss of open space between historic buildings and rectory. 

Site is sensitive given setting of church and church house. 


Ecological issues with evidence of badger trails from rectory land and feeding area for bats. 


13712 Mrs Dilys Simonds [3993] 1 Object 

Summary I feel that the extra housing included in the LDP will cause the village to be overdeveloped and put extra strain on the infrastructure which is limited in this 

area. Also the roads are very narrow and there are no pavements, with the extra vehicles that come with houses it will make the village an unsafe place to live 

in. 


13774 Mr Griffith Melvyn Evans [4021] 1 Object 

Summary Llysfaen was given village status about 10 years ago, this is a greenfield site and would be criminal to build on. The school cannot cope at the moment with 

population. We would be loosing our open space within the village. 

Serious safety problem with access onto Prentregwyddel Road. 

With the lack of work and jobs in the area would I be expected to subsidise these people through my council tax. 



Summary This proposal is bordering on the criminal. This is a very pretty area of the village which would be totally ruined by red bricked 'terracotta' roofed houses. 

Again the roads are not good enough for more building in Llysfaen village which will become a town if you carry on. School is full. Amenities limited. We do 

not want the Marian surrounded by housing. You gave us village status 10 years or so ago and now you want to take it back. Not on. 


13672 Mr David Mancini [3970] 1 Object 

Summary LDP is not sound with this site incuded. 


13674 Mrs Lesley Mancini [3971] 1 Object 




Summary This site is a sensitive area due to the locaiton of the church and the church hall. The development of houses would bring chaos to the roads, as even now 

when there is a funeral or events in the church hall, the road is full of parked cars and is very dangerous for other drivers passing by. 

I have also strong beliefs that the area is being used for badgers and other animals as part of their nightly foragings. By building on this site we will be loosing 

our 'village identity' and will become another part of Colwyn Bay. 


14415 Mr John Whittaker [4432] 1 Object 

Summary Evidence of badger trails, feeding area for bats. 


Site not suitable for development having regards to gradient and access onto Pentregwyddel Road. 

Loss of open space. 



13776 Mrs Deborah Stevens [4022] 1 Object 

Summary Spoiling our Heritage. Historic ground. You will completely destroy Llysfaen village. 



Summary Site not suitable for development having regard to gradient and access onto Pentregwyddel Road. 

Loss of open space between the historic buildngs at the centre of the village. 



Ecological issues with evidence of badger foraging trails from rectory land and feeding area for bats (see attached sheets). 



622


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Off Ysguborwen Road, Dwygyfylchi 




The case for housing need within the local settlements has not been made. 

The site is a Landscape Conservation Area, Green Barrier and represents development outside the existing settlement. 

It is prime agricultural land. 

Development will detract from its distinctive rural coastal character. 

Will add load to the already problematic sewage system. 

It forever destroys a greenfield site and green barrier and causes a precedent for further development of the green barrier and constitutes to the coalescence 

of Dwygyfylchi and Penmaenmawr. 

No proportional additional employment is planned. 

The residents of Town Council have not been consulted. 






































21656 A Owen [4737] 1 Object 












20576 P Owen [4738] 1 Object 
























623
























































































624
























































































625

















Summary New build housing is proposed upon areas designated as Green Wedge in the previous (2009) Deposit LDP (e.g. sites 56, 57). There has been no 

justification offered for the sudden change of status of this land from Green Wedge to land suitable for Housing. There has been wholly inadequate 

consultation on this change. Such a change runs contrary to policies within the LDP. 






























































626
























































































627
























































































628
























































































629
























































































630
























































































631
























































































632
























































































633
























































































634




20544 Hannah . [4719] 1 Object 




















































































635
























































































636
























































































637
























































































638
























































































639
























































































640
























































































641




20416 J Webb [4639] 1 Object 












20420 A Webb [4640] 1 Object 








































































642
























































































643
























































































644
























































































645
























































































646
























































































647
























































































648
























































































649
























































































650












































































651
































































20120 D Cope [4610] 1 Object 
























652
























































































653
















20972 C M Goss [4811] 1 Object 








































































654
























































































655




















































21160 C Cook [4904] 1 Object 




































656
























































































657
























































































658




























21712 C Owen [4810] 1 Object 
















































21088 A Owen [4875] 1 Object 












659
























































































660
























































































661
























































































662
























































































663








































21824 C Owen [4877] 1 Object 
















































664
























































































665
























































































666
























































































667
























































































668
























































































669
























































































670
























































































671
































































20996 N Goss [4836] 1 Object 
























672
















21112 D A Gay [4887] 1 Object 








































































673
























































































674
























































































675
























































































676
























































































677
































































21400 M Lunt [5016] 1 Object 
























678
























































































679




21336 C Duce [4978] 1 Object 




























































20252 C S F Daw [4995] 1 Object 
























680
























































































681
























































































682
































































22204 M Hall [5065] 1 Object 
























683




21468 J Hall [5064] 1 Object 








































































21428 B Owen [5028] 1 Object 












684




























22108 L Hill [5001] 1 Object 




























































685
















22088 A Wise [4968] 1 Object 
















































20272 K Hunt [5009] 1 Object 
























686
























































































687
























































































688
























































































689
























































































690




20260 G East [5006] 1 Object 




















































































691
























































































692
































































21988 K Shah [5139] 1 Object 
























693




21984 D Shah [5138] 1 Object 




















































































694
























































































695
































































22156 J Shah [5137] 1 Object 
























696
































































20372 S Shah [5136] 1 Object 
























697








































22120 S F Vick [5106] 1 Object 
















































698




















































21956 S Todd [5126] 1 Object 












20360 S Todd [5123] 1 Object 
























699
















22320 S J Dell [5075] 1 Object 












21492 R Dell [5074] 1 Object 




























































700
















22128 L Owen [5108] 1 Object 








































































701
























































































702
















22020 M Cox [5147] 1 Object 





































Summary I object to the housing allocation at Ysguborwen Road. 

The building of houses here will take away my light, privacy and stillness. This area is only small and has little access for the amount of traffic to 

accommodate the home owners. 

The existing houses which border the field are devastated to think that their properties will be depreciated. 

Apart from this the council will have to provide more transport, schools, waste/recycling, road maintenance and more employment. 

Change Sought: Remove the housing allocation at Ysgorborwen Road. 

13367 Mrs B Owen [3785] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the housing allocation at Ysguborwen Road. 

The green areas in Dwygyfylchi are there to support the environment and the space that is needed for such a small village. 

The school is full to capacity and there is very little work to be found in this area. 

A vast amount of houses means more problems with the small roads, schools, parking, pollution, cleansing/waste department and much more. 

Please take into consideration the village life and the maintenance problems that heavy traffic and more people can cause. 

Change Sought: Remove the housing allocation from Ysguborwen Road, Dwygyfylchi. 












703






The site is a Landscape Conservation Area. 

It is outside the Settlement Boundary 

Constitutes the loss of existing greenfield land. 

Impacts on Open Countryside and impacts on views. 

Causes coalescence with Penmaenmawr and causes a precedent for further development of green barrier. 

No justification has been made in the evidence base for this housing need in the settlement. 

Will add load to an already problematiac & overlaoded sewage system. 

There is an increasing risk of flooding impacting on communities and the environment. 









It forever destroys a greenfield site and green barrier and causes a precedent for further development of the green barrier and constitutes 

to the coalescence 






Summary I object to the proposals for Dwygyfylchi: 

Open Spaces 

The area of Dwygyfylchi has sparse areas of open space available for children's playing areas. 

Non Engagement/Lack of Consultation 

Windfall sites and rural exception sites unnecessarily upsets the local community. 

Employment 

No recognition has been put forward in relation to local job opportunities. 

Eductation 

The local shcool is not equipped for an inflow of new pupils. 

Housing Need 

There is no recognised need for so many new homes. 

Tourism 

Tourism is the main income in the area, the suggestion of 200 houses will have a massive impact on the natural beauty. 






































704

















Summary I object to the allocation at Ysguborwen Road, Dwygyfylchi. 

The boundary of this site is on a bus stop, it has very little access and is on the boundary of a main road which incorporates a bend. 

More houses will mean more traffic, more pollution, more congestion, more problems with road deterioration and definately more hazards. 

Children travelling to school use the cross road of Ysguborwen Road and more traffic will mean this area becomes a danger to children and elderly people. 

Change Sought: Remove the allocation at Ysguborwen Road, Dwygyfylchi 


























Summary I object to the proposal to build on the horse field behind Maes-y-Llan. I strongly object to greenbelt land being proposed. The fact that the facilities struggle 

with the people already living here would be made intolerable. Traffic coping is another problem, there are near misses every day and lack of parking. This 

doens't even cover increase in noise levels and people's privacy. The road above is known for flooding, this is damp ground. 

Wildlife would be disturbed and with the A55 so near this can hardly be the most suitable site. 

There is also a lack of employment. 


13896 Mr & Mrs T & J Barrett [4069] 1 Object 

Summary We object to the proposed plans for new houses on the green belt at Maes y Llan. 

Our reasons include access may be through the Maes Y Llan Road causing more traffic and congestion and taking away the green belt which was put in 

place to stop ubran sprawl by keeping land which is permanently open, attractive and enhances the area near our local homes in Maes y Llan. 


























705






The plan is based on flawed assumptions of an increase in population. The number of houses needed has been grossly overestimated by the Welsh 

Assembly. 

Traffic congestion, the roads and narrow and quite hazardous. 

Local Economy - we fear that the quaint village would be spoilt, leaving very few open aspects. The village is popular with tourists, the local economy relies 

and depends on it and this gives jobs to local people. 

Infrastructure - the local school cannot accommodate an increase in numbers. 















Summary I also hear that you are wanting to built more houses in dewgifylchi, i personally feel that this is unacceptable and unfair on the local people that live in the 

village. 


14368 Mrs R E Jones [4390] 1 Object 


Currently protected by landscape preservation order - designated as offical green barriers and providing a significant green wedge between local communities. 

Overdevelopment and the associated implications for increased traffic and noise pollution. 

Situated on the edge of the Snowdonia Nationsal Park, Dwygyfylchi is recognised as an area of outstanding local beauty and as such deserves our respect 

and protection. 















Summary I am writing to protest against the propsoed new housing development on the gounds that: 

a) It would be deterimental to the village. It would alter the character of the village. There would be a loss of amenities and an impact on social cohesion. The 

value of existing properties would go down. 

b) It is unnecessary. It has not been demonstrated that there is a need for more houses. There are several brownfield sites which could be used. 

More appropriate use could be made of the land i.e. market garden. I would support the suggested idea of allotments. 

Change Sought: Use the land for an alternative use i.e. Market Garden/Allotments 


Summary I strongly object to and protest against the proposed LDP for Dwygyfylchi and any others involving green belt, recreational and agricultural land (in short 

supply in this area and strongly in need of protection). 

Prime agricultual land 

Green wedge 

Access, water supply, sewage and flooding 

Road hazards and safety issues 

The peace, quiet and privacy of local residents would be seriously compromised. 
















Site 57 - I am led to believe the owner of this site has informed CBCC that this is not for sale. I understand that this site is therefore to be withdrawn. 

Site 56 - I understand this land was given to Penmaenmawr Town Council by a local farmer with the intention that it should house a village hall. I should like 

clarification how CBCC have taken ownership of this plot. 

Public consultation - lack of publicity, the time of year chosen with the closing date immediately following a bank holiday. 


706


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Adjacent to Vardre, Dwygyfylchi 








There is no established need for allotments, this is an attempt to fulfil needs elsewhere. 







































































707





































21110 D A Gay [4887] 1 Object 












































708

















































































709

















































































710

















































































711

















































































712

















































































713

















































































714
















































21822 C Owen [4877] 1 Object 

































715


























21086 A Owen [4875] 1 Object 























































716

















































































717

















































































718

















































































719





































21158 C Cook [4904] 1 Object 












































720















20118 D Cope [4610] 1 Object 


































































721

















































































722

















































































723






































Summary The housing and allotments allocation is totally inappropriate. Such developments would spoil the entrance to Dwygyfylchi as a gateway village to the 

Snowdonia National Park and would be detrimental to the tourism function of the village, which is its main source of locally derived income. Building on this 

land would obscure the view to the sea from the adjacent caravan and campsite and this would make it less attractive to visitors and so threaten its 

sustainability as a viable tourist location and business. Less visitors would also threaten local businesses such as the post office, local shops and public 

houses. 



































724

















































































725

















































































726

















































































727



























































20418 A Webb [4640] 1 Object 











20414 J Webb [4639] 1 Object 











728

















































































729

















































































730

















































































731

















































































732

















































































733

















































































734

















































































735

















































































736

















































































737

















































































738

















































































739

















































































740

















































































741





































20542 Hannah . [4719] 1 Object 












































742

















































































743
















































21654 A Owen [4737] 1 Object 

































744

















































































745


























21710 C Owen [4810] 1 Object 























































746

















































































747

















































































748
















































20994 N Goss [4836] 1 Object 

































749




20574 P Owen [4738] 1 Object 













































































750

















































































751

















































































752

















































































753

















































































754

















































































755

















































































756






































































20970 C M Goss [4811] 1 Object 











757

















































































758

















































































759

















































































760
















































20258 G East [5006] 1 Object 

































761




20358 S Todd [5123] 1 Object 

































22126 L Owen [5108] 1 Object 












































762

















































































763

















































































764






































































21398 M Lunt [5016] 1 Object 











765


























20270 K Hunt [5009] 1 Object 























































766

















































































767















21334 C Duce [4978] 1 Object 

































21986 K Shah [5139] 1 Object 

































768

















































































769



























































22086 A Wise [4968] 1 Object 






















770















22018 M Cox [5147] 1 Object 











21982 D Shah [5138] 1 Object 























































771


























20250 C S F Daw [4995] 1 Object 























































772


























21954 S Todd [5126] 1 Object 

































22106 L Hill [5001] 1 Object 






















773


























22154 J Shah [5137] 1 Object 

































20370 S Shah [5136] 1 Object 






















774

















































































775
















































22202 M Hall [5065] 1 Object 

































776






































































21466 J Hall [5064] 1 Object 











777

















































































778

















































































779

















































































780

















































































781

















































































782






































































21490 R Dell [5074] 1 Object 











783

















































































784




22318 S J Dell [5075] 1 Object 

































22118 S F Vick [5106] 1 Object 












































785



























































21426 B Owen [5028] 1 Object 






















786

















































Summary I write in reference to the LDP for the parcel of land adjacent to Vadre, Ysguborwen Road, Penmaenmawr. 

This is my land and I wish it to be removed from the LDP for Conwy. 

I also understand that there is a parcel of land adjacent to Tregarnedd, Treforris Road, Penmaenmawr in the LDP. this is also my land which I wish to have 

removed from the LDP. 

Change Sought: Remove the housing allocation at Ysguborwen Road, Dwygyfylchi. 























787


























14018 Mrs Carys Jones [31] 

1 Object 


Open Spaces 




Employment 


Eductation 


Housing Need 


Tourism 























of Dwygyfylchi and Penmaenmawr 


14437 

Summary 


20566 

Summary 

Mr Darrell Owens [574] 




No established need for allotmens in the local settlements. 





Delete site. 

Mr & Mrs Roger Garland [576] 








1 Object 

1 Object 




788






































Summary I also hear that you are wanting to built more houses in dewgifylchi, i personally feel that this is unacceptable and unfair on the local people that live in the 

village. 










Summary A very strong objection is that this land is currently part of the Green Wedge of land seperating the village of Dwygyfylchi and the town of Penmaenmawr. It is 

most important that this "wedge" is kept in its current format as both communities have different identities and it needs to be maintained at its current 

definition. 






Green wedge 











Change Sought: Find an alternative use for the land i.e. Market Garden/Allotments 












789



































The plan is based on flawed assumptions of an increase in population. The number of houses needed has been grossly overestimated by the Welsh 

Assembly. 

Traffic congestion, the roads and narrow and quite hazardous. 

Local Economy - we fear that the quaint village would be spoilt, leaving very few open aspects. The village is popular with tourists, the local economy relies 

and depends on it and this gives jobs to local people. 

Infrastructure - the local school cannot accommodate an increase in numbers. 


790


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, The Smithy, Llanfair TH 


14039 Mr and Mrs B.M and J Boatright [594] 1 Object 

Summary The site should be removed from the LDP because of poor access roads. Smithy Hill with a blind bend at the top and Church Street with no pavement for 

pedestrians (including infant and primary schoolchildren) already suffer congestion and dangerous conditions due to the narrow single lane, volume of traffic 

and size of the trucks and tractors plus trailers using the lane. The loss of soakaway and increase in run off water from development at this site would 

increase the risk and frequency of flooding. 


22538 Mr Roy Charlesworth [2005] 1 Object 


Smithy Hill/Church Street regularly gets congested with traffic. the increase in traffic from 15 dwellings would cause havoc and accidents. 

Church Street always floods when there is heavy rain due to water running down the hill, the drains cannot copy, building on the fields would massively 

reduce soak capacity and cause flooding. 

The increase in traffic through the village's thin roads would only cause more mayhem and inconvenience, it cannot cope with the current levels. 


791


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Off Heol Martin, Eglwysbach 

Rep No Name 

14435 Cyngor Cymuned Eglwys Bach (Mrs Einir Jones) [4441] 

Summary 1. Angen i'r 10 ty fod yn rhai fforddiadwy ac i bobl leol ac i gynnwys Amod 106. Mae digon o dai drud ar werth yn y pentref yn barod. 

2. Angen gwarchod y diwylliant a'r Iaith Gymraeg. 

3. Angen ystyried diogelwch y ffordd i mewn i'r pentref - mannau cul iawn i ddau gar basio ei gilydd ar hyn o bryd. 

4. Angen gwella system garthffosiaeth y pentref. 

People Type 

1 Support 

17604 

5. Angen rhoi ystyriaeth i unrhyw ddwr sy'n casglu ar y wyneb. 

mr colin perrin [759] 1 Object 

Summary The site opposite the Primary School at Eglwysbach should be allocated for a mixed use to include parking and vehicular drop off area for the school. 

The site is free from environmental constraints, incuding flood risk and ecology constraints. The allocated site has previously been subject to flood risk. 

The site can deliver and secure long term communitiy safety benefits through the provision of a safe drop-off and pick-up area for the village school. 

The village would benefit greatly with additional rural housing in a sustainable location through the allocation of this alternative site. 

Change Sought: Allocate site opposite Primary School at Eglwysbach for a mixed use site to include parking and vehiclular drop off area for the school. 


Summary We objected to allocation of this site and, as practically half the site is located within the C2 zone, according to TAN15, highly vulnerable development should 

not be permitted. We would maintain this objection. We note again that you intend only to allow that part of the site outside the C2 zone to be developed, 

but, as in the other sites, an allowance for climate change must be included and therefore it is likely that the developable area would be severely restricted. 

In the justification text on page 32, mitigation measures, including land raising have been proposed. 

Change Sought: Whilst raising the land may afford on-site protection, this could not be done without careful consideration of effects to third parties off site. If the site cannot 

be developed without raising the land, this must be investigated prior to allocation. 

13519 Miss Marion Pryor [3886] 1 Object 

Summary I object because: 

1. A proposal to build on here was refused by the Welsh Office in 1990, due to: 

a) it would have an adverse impact on the Welsh language and culture 

b) it would spoil the character of the village 

c) it is not in the middle of the village, it is on the edge, 

d) it would cause an increase in traffic 

e) the sewerage works could not cope 

2. The field regularly floods 

3. The school is at capacity 

4. There are no pavements and the local park is at the opposite end of the village. 

Change Sought: Remove the housing allocation at Heol Martin, Eglwysbach. 

14080 Mr Chris Davies [4168] 1 Object 

Summary A proposal to build on this land was refused by the Welsh Office in 1990, due to: 

a) it would have an adverse impact on the Welsh language and culture 

b) it would spoil the character of the village 

c) the field is on the edge of the village, 

d) it would cause a heavy increase in traffic, 

e) the sewerage works could not cope 

The field is close to a river which is known to flood. 

The village school is at capacity 

There are no pavements and the local park is at the opposite end of the village. 


19569 G Williams [4573] 1 Object 

Summary I propose the Land off Maes Llan as alternative site which I own. 

A previous planning application was refused as there were no plans to develop Eglwysbach area. 

I offer the land to be developed with a smaller number of houses that are of an affordable nature to pepople in the local commuity and out lying villages. 

Change Sought: Allocate the land off Maes Llan as an alternative. 

792


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, East of Aled View, Llansannan 

Rep No Name 

13452 Ms Olwen Davies [3827] 

Summary I wish to withdraw the proposed development plan at Aled View, Llansannan. 

It would not be worth my while to give up this land. 

Change Sought: Remove the site at Aled View, Llansannan from the Plan. 

People Type 

1 Object 

14074 Ms Elizabeth Bond [4163] 1 Object 

Summary I object for the following reasons: 

Other sites that are more suitable should be considered. 

Needs an implementation strategy. 

The proposed site is unfit for purpose. 

Will oversee the existing local houses. 

Would be detrimental to the charactistic view of the village. 

The public footpath would be disrupted. 

Road access is a single track road. 

Several properties have been on the market for a number of years . 

Amenities have to be improved first. 

Affordable housing is not populated by local people. 

Change Sought: The number of proposed dwellings seems excessive in comparison to the existing population, current housing demands and needs to be reconsidered with a 

phased approach that monitors the impact and outcomes of the new houses on the local community. 

793


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Tan Y Ffordd, Dolgarrog 


13366 Mr David Lea [3784] 1 Object 

Summary The land level that has been created is not natural on Tan y Ffordd, Dolgarrog. 

Change Sought: Remove the housing allocation on Tan y Ffordd, Dolgarrog. 


Summary Both of these sites are situated on a small strip of land between the road and the floodplain, with their western boundaries being adjacent to the floodplain 

boundary. The addition of climate change here would further reduce the area and would possibly remove the whole site, particularly in the case of the land off 

Gwydyr Road. 

Change Sought: The addition of climate change here would further reduce the area and would possibly remove the whole site, particularly in the case of the land off Gwydyr 

Road. 

14410 Mr John Williams [4430] 

1 Object 

Summary I wish to object to the above proposals in respect of the above for the following reasons: 

The land in question is part of open countryside green field site. 

Any development on the site would not be in keeping with the dwellings already in the immediate area. 

There is no need for additional housing in the village - there are always houses for sale. 

There is other land in the village more suitable for housing i.e. The old Aluminium Factory site, which has laid abandoned for some time since its demolition. 

Change Sought: Delete site. Use The old Aluminium Factory site. 

794


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Gwydr Road, Dolgarrog 



Summary Both of these sites are situated on a small strip of land between the road and the floodplain, with their western boundaries being adjacent to the floodplain 

boundary. The addition of climate change here would further reduce the area and would possibly remove the whole site, particularly in the case of the land off 

Gwydyr Road. 

Change Sought: The addition of climate change here would further reduce the area and would possibly remove the whole site, particularly in the case of the land off Gwydyr 

Road. 

14411 Mr John Williams [4430] 

1 Object 

Summary I wish to object to the above proposals in respect of the above for the following reasons: 

The land in question is part of open countryside green field site. 

Any development on the site would not be in keeping with the dwellings already in the immediate area. 

There is no need for additional housing in the village - there are always houses for sale. 

There is other land in the village more suitable for housing i.e. The old Aluminium Factory site, which has laid abandoned for some time since its demolition. 

Change Sought: Delete site. Use old Aluminium Factory instead. 

795


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Ffordd Llanelwy, Betws yn Rhos 


14539 Mr Bryn Jones [2097] 1 Object 

Summary The council have not considered the facts: 

There is a history of flooding on the site from the culvert which runs under the B5381. 

In the centre of the village there is a very bad junction where the minior road meets the B5381. This junction is totally lind to the eastern view and extremely 

dangerous. 

The allocation of less houses on this site, if any, and the allocation of part site 93 would be more suitable. 

The council have joined two fields which makes the site go much further north than we asked for. 

Change Sought: The allcation of part site 93, in the western side of the village would be more suitable. 

796


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Minafon, Betws yn Rhos 


19179 Jones and Fishwick Ltd [2003] 1 Object 

Summary The Council have acknowledged that the site is suitable for housingp rovision by allocating it for affordable housing. However, there is a substantialneed for 

additional open market housing as well as affordable housing during the plan period. No evidence has been presented by the Council to substantiate a 

strategy which allows only affordable housing in main villages. 

Change Sought: That the site curerntly allocated for 100% affordable housing in Minafon Farm be allocated for general purpose open market houisng with an appropriate 

proportion (50%) of affordable housing. 

797


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Dolwen Road, Old Colwyn 


19456 J G Temby [4560] 1 Object 

Summary I would like to put forward two alternative sites for development in the LPD. 

I believe these two sites can be assessed as sustainable against the Council's criteria and are more suitable for development than the Brooklands site. 

Change Sought: Allocate the two parcels of land on the attached plans. 

14430 Mr Andrew Jones [39] 1 Object 


Lack of public consultation, documents expensive and written in planning terminology, website confusing. 

The assessments of the sites are untrue, the land is outside the settlement and is not semi rural. 

The land is designated as 'special landscape value'. 

Bus services are inadequate. 

Sites are in open countryside. 

Plot 355 has a high pressure gas main running through it. 

The road leading to the sites has severe restrictions. 

Access to amenities is very poor. 

Have a variety of aminal species and plant life. 

The original size of Plot 355 has doubled. 

Unacceptable burden on infrastructure. 



Summary The site included in the original LDP did not meet the soundness tests as it is not in a green belt area, there is a main gas pipe running through the field 

(confirmed in writing to me by United Utilities who are unaware of the inclusion of this site in the original LDP/revised LDP) and there are serious highway 

issues which is the reason the site on the opposite side of the road was rejected from the original LDP. 



Summary We have made separate representations in relation to the housing land supply, needs and levels of growth suggest in the Plan. The conclusion of these 

representations is that without additional housing provision the plan is unsound and there is a considerable shortfall in housing land supply to meet the needs 

identified by the evidence. This site is currently identified as a contingecy site in the Plan. The Council, therefore, acknowledge that it is a suitable site for 

residential development and has the potential to contribute to housing supply during the plan period. 

Change Sought: The site at Dolwen Road, Old Colwyn by allocated for housing development. 



Traffic safety on dolwen Road on the section approaching the 30mph signs. 

How can this road possibly sustain an increase in traffic of this magnitude in such a dangerous place? We are only 2 cars - you are creating a problem with 

potentially 300+ cars. 

Further down the road is the entrance for Ysgol Bryn Elian and also Ysgol Ty Gwyn Jones, both of which already have serious traffic concerns on a daily 

basis. 


14060 mr david tomlinson [3905] 1 Object 

Summary My main objections are; 

These are green field sites. Surely there are brown field sites. 

Natural habitats with their own unique flora and fauna need to be protected for future generations. 

Has an environmental impact study been carried out ? 

2 sites have now been identified whereas there was only 1 site in the original. 

Building this many homes in a small area would destroy the character. 

Traffic on Dolwen rd would massively increase. 

Access to the proposed sites is poor. 

Local services eg schools , doctors , dentist etc would be put under added strain. 


798


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Opposite Bryn Rodyn, Old Colwyn 


19174 Mr H G Fetherstonhaugh [4519] 1 Support 

Summary We support the allocation of Site 344, Opposite Bryn Rodyn, Dolwen Road, Old Colwyn as a contingency site, but wish to take this opportunity to detail the 

deliverability of the site ahead of other sites. 

With reference to the Key Issues Impacting on the Plan Area site 344 assists in: 

Overcoming the high levels of constrained land as the site is sustainably located within the settlement of Old Colwyn. 

Accommodates a sustained housing growth and promotes a balanced age structure. 

Contributes to the provision of affordable housing. 

14169 Mr Alan Whitehead [631] 1 Object 

Summary This piece of land has been removed from the plan as buildng land but still remains as a contingency in the event of other land being unavailable. 

This we strongly disagree with because none of the reasons for complaint that were originally made have been changed in anyway. 


14431 Mr Andrew Jones [39] 1 Object 


Lack of public consultation, documents expensive and written in planning terminology, website confusing. 

The assessments of the sites are untrue, the land is outside the settlement and is not semi rural. 

The land is designated as 'special landscape value'. 

Bus services are inadequate. 

Sites are in open countryside. 

Plot 355 has a high pressure gas main running through it. 

The road leading to the sites has severe restrictions. 

Access to amenities is very poor. 

Have a variety of aminal species and plant life. 

The original size of Plot 355 has doubled. 

Unacceptable burden on infrastructure. 




Traffic safety on dolwen Road on the section approaching the 30mph signs. 

How can this road possibly sustain an increase in traffic of this magnitude in such a dangerous place? We are only 2 cars - you are creating a problem with 

potentially 300+ cars. 

Further down the road is the entrance for Ysgol Bryn Elian and also Ysgol Ty Gwyn Jones, both of which already have serious traffic concerns on a daily 

basis. 



Summary The site included in the original LDP did not meet the soundness tests as it is not in a green belt area, there is a main gas pipe running through the field 

(confirmed in writing to me by United Utilities who are unaware of the inclusion of this site in the original LDP/revised LDP) and there are serious highway 

issues which is the reason the site on the opposite side of the road was rejected from the original LDP. 


14061 mr david tomlinson [3905] 1 Object 

Summary My main objections are; 

These are green field sites. Surely there are brown field sites. 

Natural habitats with their own unique flora and fauna need to be protected for future generations. 

Has an environmental impact study been carried out ? 

2 sites have now been identified whereas there was only 1 site in the original. 

Building this many homes in a small area would destroy the character. 

Traffic on Dolwen rd would massively increase. 

Access to the proposed sites is poor. 

Local services eg schools , doctors , dentist etc would be put under added strain. 


799


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Henryd Road, Gyffin 


13483 Katie Trent [3852] 1 Object 

Summary CR12 

This site was not on the 2009 LDP as residental allocation, why is it appearing now? It is a green field site next to the local nature reserve. It feels 

inappropriate for such a large development on the outskirts of a historic town. 

SR43 

Again another green field site. 

Change Sought: Remove CR12 and SR43 from the plan. 

800


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Pentywyn Road 


19300 Bodysgallen Hall & Spa (Mr Matthew Johnson) [4548] 1 Object 

Summary It is contended that the development of this greenfield site for housing would be contrary to national planning policies, It is also contended that the proposed 

contingency allocation is not realistic and appropriate having regard to the alternatives. 

Change Sought: We request deletion of the contingency allocation from the plan. We are not suggesting a replacement since we contend that a review of the plan would be 

the best way of dealing with a situation in which the plan strategy is being compromised. 

14496 The National Trust (Mr Chris Lambart) [872] 1 Object 

Summary Weaknesses of the contingency allocation approach identified in the Sustainability Appraisal support our view that once a site is identified as a contingency 

allocation, development becomes inevitable 

Development would harm the setting of the grade I registered historic park and garden at Bodysgallen and could harm the setting of the World Heritage Site. 

It would also have landscape impacts. 

Development of this greenfield site for housing would be contrary to national planning policies. The proposed contingency allocation is not realistic and 

appropriate having regard to the alternatives. Timely plan review (now mandatory) removes the need for contingency allocations. 


the best way of dealing with a situation in which the plan strategy is being compromised 

14229 Mrs Linda Simcox [4371] 1 Object 

Summary I am writing to object to proposal to build on the land at the junction of pentywyn road and marl lane as feel it would be detrimental to the area as feel there 

are more than enough being built in the nearby vicinty already. 


14072 Cllr Mike Priestley [4162] 1 Object 

Summary I would like to strongly object to the above 2 sites being included on the reserve list of the LDP on the grounds of: 

Overdevelopment of the Marl Ward (We have permission for over 360 dwellings already) 

Highway issues of these 2 sites 

Drainage issues 

Loss of Green fields 

We have a deficit of green space in Llandudno Junction 

These sites are Part of our Historic landscape and need protecting 


14227 Mr Thomas Kendrick [4369] 1 Object 

Summary Reserve List in the LDP for New Homes 

Land at the junction Pentywyn Road/Marl Lane. Ref. SR46 

I am writing to object to the above being included in the reserve list for the following reasons: 

1 This land is part of the separation zone between communities - the Green Wedge 

2 Existing over-development in the area 

3 Severe traffic implications for Marl Lane and adjacent roads. Problems are already being encountered. 

4 Possible implications regarding the protection of historic landscapes. 

5 This land is agricultural land in current use for both grazing and arable purposes. 


14069 Mrs S Chandran [4161] 1 Object 

Summary My objections are for the following reasons: 

The area has already been subject to over development with building ongoing on two sites locally. The fields are an integral part of a beautiful historical 

landscape which housing would destroy. The fields currently provide a green wedge between communities. Also the implications for increased traffic along 

the already busy Pentywyn Road from the junction at Marl Lane would cause great concern. 


14068 Sanjay Verma [4160] 1 Object 


(1) This area is part of a separation zone between communities. 

(2)This land is a "Green wedge" 

(3)Traffic implications at the junction of Pentywyn Road and Marl Lane, which is a particularly awkward junction to negotiate when approaching the main road 

from Marl Lane. 

(4)Implication regarding the preservation of historic landscapes. 


14183 Mrs Fiona Richards [4317] 1 Object 


The land is part of a green wedge 

The land is part of a working farm 

The land is part of a historic landscape 

The area has already seen significant development 

The land is on a hillside which contains springs 

The roads are narrow and dangerous 

Constant road safety concerns 

Housing will irrevocably destroy the traditional open feel to this quiet long established residential area 


801



Rep No Name 

People Type 

14184 Mr Michael Richards [4318] 1 Object 











14067 R Brown [4159] 1 Object 


It provides a green wedge between housing. 

Area already extensively developed. 

Development will encroach on the rural/tourist character. 

The land is used for grazing. 

Limited job opportunities 

Often heavily clogged with traffic 

Access is concealed by a blind bend. 

More opprotunity for a serious accident. 

Danger of being spoiled by over-development of the surrounding area. 


14066 T Adamson [4158] 1 Object 


It provides a green wedge between housing. 

Area already extensively developed. 

Development will encroach on the rural/tourist character. 

The land is used for grazing. 

Limited job opportunities 

Often heavily clogged with traffic 

Access is concealed by a blind bend. 

More opprotunity for a serious accident. 

Danger of being spoiled by over-development of the surrounding area. 


14192 Mr Vernon E Horsfield [4331] 1 Object 

Summary For the following reasons I wish to register my complaint. 

1) The land is part of the community separation zone 'Green Wedge'. 

2) It would generate over development due to building in the area and spoil an area of natural beauty. 

3) Approach roads would not be capable of carrying a large increase in traffic volume - creating the necessity for further development. 

4) The area has its own historical interest which should not be interfered with. 

5) The area is in regular use for agricultural purposes of grazing and arable requirements. 


14185 Mr David Obbard [4319] 1 Object 

Summary Grounds for objection; 

1. Land is part of a separation zone and a green wedge between 2 communities 

2. Overdevelopment - building in the area already taking place Anwyl, McBride & Wimpey 

3. Traffic implications for Pentywyn Road & Marl Lane junction 

4. Implication regarding protection of historic landscape 

5. This land is part of a working farm 


14204 

Summary 


14211 

Summary 


14170 

Summary 


Ms Evans [4348] 


The field is part of the separation zone. 

There is too much development already. 

Traffic problems. 

The field is part of a working farm. 

Ther are lots of houses alrady for sale. 

Lack of employment. 

Delete site. 

Ms Hayley Halliwell [4355] 


Extensive large scape development over the past number of years. 

Historic, green field, agricultural land is in short supply. 

Would reduce the separation zone. 

Part of a working farm. 

Established properties will be devalued. 

Additional traffic. 

Delete site. 

P Ratcliffe [4283] 

I would like to register my opposition to the above agricultural land being incuded on the reserve list in the LDP for new homes. 

1. Loss of agricultural (grazing and crop) land. It is imperative that we retain agricultural land for local food production. 

2. Community Separation. It separates Llanrhos and Deganwy. 

3. Overdevelopment. We have had a lot of development causing traffic problems/congestion. 

Delete site. 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

802




14168 A M Axon [4282] 1 Object 

Summary I have to object to this as the view from the front of my property will be totally destroyed and the value of my property and the surrounding properties will drop. 

The land is part of a working farm and is used for grasing all year round, it is part of the separation zone - green wedge between communities. 

There has been considerable development in this area. 

There will soon be mo green areas left. 

Ther will be many traffic implications. 


14167 G K Fidler [4281] 1 Object 







14166 F Fidler [4280] 1 Object 







14206 Mrs Edna Halliwell [4350] 1 Object 









14207 Mr Stanley Halliwell [4351] 1 Object 









14145 S J Thorn [4270] 1 Object 


Marl has already contributed land to meet the local housing need. 

There aren't many green spaces left to enjoy. 

Part of our heritage and needs to be protected. 

Used for farming. 

Further development would be excessive and extreme. 

Roads not suitable and were not constructed for more traffic. 

The land opposite Marl Lane is prone to flooding. 


14208 Mr Gary Millward [4352] 1 Object 









14209 Ms Hayley Millward [4353] 1 Object 









14077 Ms Janet Williams [4165] 1 Object 

Summary O object as follows: 

The Marl area has been developed substantially over the past few years, and this already impacts on the local infrastructure, and has decreased considerably 

the area of Green Space in the area. 

The concept of further development, providing yet more new homes conflicts with the 'Empty Homes Strategy for Conwy' 2010. Should the potential use of 

empty housing stock not be exhausted before yet more homes are built to lie empty? 

The land is part of a working farm. 

Traffic volume increase implications, particularly for the Marl Lane and Pentywyn Road junctions. 


803



Rep No Name 

14117 

Summary 

Mr David Haynes [4234] 

I wish to state that I and my wife are strongly opposed to it for the following reasons:- 

1) The idyllic rural area would be totally destroyed and then would become grossly overpopulated. 

People Type 

1 Object 

2) With most of the 120 homes having 1 or even 2 cars, the already busy thoroughfares of Marl Lane and Pentwyn Road would become jammed with traffic 

and liable to traffic hold ups and more dangerous for all users, particularly the elderly and children. 


14075 Mr Alastair Deane [4164] 1 Object 

Summary I object on the following grounds. 

This land is of a separate zone giving green space between communities 

Over development in this area in recent years by Anwyl Wimpey & McBride builders 

Traffic implications for both Marl Lane and Pentywyn Road juction 

Historic landscapes will be lost forever 

This land is part of a working farm giving the local community the chance to see animals and crops on there door step. 

Drainage is a major concern to residents of Tan Refail 


14093 Mr & Mrs Denys & Krystyna Morgan [4173] 1 Object 


It seems to us that the Marl ward has already contributed more than enough of its precious, green recources, to current construction projects; and the areas 

form part of the last significant green zone separating Llandudno from neighbouring communities. 

The area in question is a working farm, the loss of which would also constitute a loss the community as a whole. It is also an extensive and important part of 

the natural drainage of the area. 

The Marl ward is still, just, semi rural. 


14212 Mr Jonathan Halliwell [4356] 1 Object 









14091 

Summary 

Mr & Mrs Inder & Miriam Verma [4171] 

We object as follows: 

1 Object 



(3)There is already over development in this area 




(6)Land is part of a working farm. 


14089 Mr Colin Halliwell [4170] 1 Object 


The Marl ward has already been the subject of extensive development. 


The proposed development would also considerably reduce the separation zone. 

The area is part of a working farm. 

This will place additional stress on the ability of the existing surface water drainage infrastructure. 

Existing established properties will be devalued. 

Additional traffic will be added to principal traffic routes that are already suffering from the over development. 


14226 Ms Helen Kendrick [4368] 1 Object 










14079 Dr S Chandran [4167] 1 Object 


This is a green separation zone between built up areas and I think new housing should first be sited on existing brownfield sites which already exist in the 

county before destroying green landscape which is unlikely to be of concern to builders/developers. 


804




14198 Mr Brian Gordon [4342] 1 Object 

Summary It should be noted thatthis land is part of separation zone between two communities.There are traffic implications for Marl lane area.There may be 

implications regarding historic landscapes.There is already over development in the area. 


14078 Ms Elsie D Brown [4166] 1 Object 


The land is part of the green separation zone between developments in the area. 

This has become so much more precious since the considerable over development. 

Considerable additional traffic now generated on Marl Lane and the difficult road junction access from Marl Lane onto Pentywyn Road. 

Finally, the land represents a last attachment to farming in the area. 

Takes no account of the already high levels of unemployment in the area and the lack of additional employment opportunities available. 


14186 Mr I F Roberts [4320] 1 Object 

Summary 1. Over development - already considerable building in the area and these have not all sold 

2. If more houses are built surely another primary school will be required due to the increase in numbers of children coming into the area. 

3. The land is part of the seperation zone 

4. There will be traffic implications for Marl Lane and Pentywyn Road junction, which is already a busy junction. 

5. The land is part of a farm (working) 

6. Or countryside is disppearing what will our children have to view in the future - a concrete jungle and no greenery 


14228 Mrs Louise Dorrington [4370] 1 Object 




1 This land is part of the separation zone between communities - the Green Wedge. 

2 Existing over-development in the area. 





14210 Ms Sheila Millward [4354] 1 Object 









13932 Christine & Becky Shaw [4095] 1 Object 


The fields in question are part of a working farm and is valuable grazing land and vitally important agricultural land. 

A great deal of overdevelopment has already taken place causing problems with access and traffic. 

The fields have been subject to flooding in heavy rain. 

There has to be a limit to the amount of houses that can be built in one area and green fields are essential to our quality of life. 


14194 Ms Kath Lomas [4336] 1 Object 

Summary I would like to object to the plans for120 new homes ref no sr46 I think we have got are fair share of new homes please leave some green spaces also it is 

farm land 


14510 Mr M Jones [4478] 1 Object 

Summary Please see valid reasons for objections below. 

This land is part of the separation zone- green wedge between communities. 

Over development- considerable building in the area already taking place/completed by Anwyl,Mcbride and Wimpey. 

Traffic implications for Marl Lane and Prentwyn Road Junctions. 

Implications regarding the protection of historical landscapes. 

This land is part of a working farm. 


13967 Mr Geoff Shotter [4106] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the proposed development plan on the following grounds: 

Overdevelopment of the Marl Ward, I feel we have already contributed land to meet the local housing needs in the area. 

Green spaces are an essential quality of life and seem to be rapidly disappearing in our ward. 


805




14512 Mr John Alwyn Jones [4479] 1 Object 

Summary Valid grounds for objection :- 

1 The land is part of the separation zone - green wedge between communities 

2 Over development - considerable building in the area already taking place/completed by Annwyl, Mcbride and Wimpey 

3 Traffic implications for Marl Lane and Pentywyn Road Junction 

4 Implications regarding the protection of historic landscapes 

5 This land is part of a working farm 


13926 Dr & Mrs Ian Turnbull [4091] 1 Object 

Summary At present the infrastructure supporing the Marl area is struggling tocope and any additional demands will overwhelm these services. 

The newtwork gas pressure in our area is well below the recommended levels and modern economic and eco-friendly central heating boilers are hampered. 

Many of us find that when the gas boiler comes on the fire does out. 

To a lesser extent it is true, much the same applies to water and sewage utlities. 


13928 Mr D H Gilroy [4092] 1 Object 


Llandudno is a beautiful and well-designed seaside resort and the jewel in the crown of North Wales. 

Three green-belt is an essential feature of the resort. 

The very narrowness of the green-belt makes it all the more precious. 

Actively farmed agricultural land. 

The Marl district has already suffered the loss of sizeable areas of green countryside. 

Marl Lane is a narrow country lane. 

It would benefit existing residents if employers used local workforce. 

The remaining greenfields in the Marl area deserve conservation. 


13929 Mrs Christine Gilroy [4093] 1 Object 


Llandudno is a beautiful and well-designed seaside resort and the jewel in the crown of North Wales. 

Three green-belt is an essential feature of the resort. 

The very narrowness of the green-belt makes it all the more precious. 

Actively farmed agricultural land. 

The Marl district has already suffered the loss of sizeable areas of green countryside. 

Marl Lane is a narrow country lane. 

It would benefit existing residents if employers used local workforce. 

The remaining greenfields in the Marl area deserve conservation. 


14201 Mrs M C Scott [4346] 1 Object 

Summary Re: Land at junction of Pentywyn Hill and Marl lane (Ref No. SR46 and Site 14) 

My objections are as follows: 

1. The land is part of the separation zone. 

2. Overdevelopment is already taking place and being completed by Anwyl, Macbridge and Wimpey. 

3. Traffic implications for Marl Lane and Pentywyn Road junction. 

4. This land is part of a working farm. 


13930 Mr & Mrs J & J Gravestock [4094] 1 Object 


Overdevelopment - Marl is already overdeveloped with housing and has already contributed land to meet the local housing need. 

Green fields - green spaces are essential to our quality of life and we are concerned that these are reapidly disappearing in Marl Ward. 

Heritage - these pieces of land are part of the heritage of Marl and need to be preserved. 


13920 Mr & Mrs Jones [4086] 1 Object 


The land is part of the separation zone greenwedge 


Overdevelopment - there is considerable building in our area already taking place 

Traffic implications for Marl Lane and Pentywyn Road 

Implications regarding the protectionof historic landscapes 

Changing the dynamic of Deganwy from idyllic rural village to large housing estate 

Extra pressure on local schools, hospitals and other services 


13934 Mr & Mrs H Gent [4096] 1 Object 

Summary We wish to object as follows: 

The land is part of the separation zone, greenwedge between communities. 

Overdevelopment - considerable building in the area already taking place/completed. 

Traffic implications for Marl Lane and Pentywyn Road junction. 


Implications regarding the protection of historic landscapes. 


13965 Cllr Susan Shotter [4105] 1 Object 





13963 Mr Michael Partridge [4104] 1 Object 





806




13940 Ms Jane Jones [4099] 1 Object 

Summary Marl Lane is already overdeveloped. This land is part of our heritage. 


14193 Mrs E Jacqueline Horsfield [4334] 1 Object 

Summary For the following reasons I wish to register my complaint. 

1) The land is part of the community separation zone 'Green Wedge'. 

2) It would generate over development due to building in the area and spoil an area of natural beauty. 

3) Approach roads would not be capable of carrying a large increase in traffic volume - creating the necessity for further development. 

4) The area has its own historical interest which should not be interfered with. 

5) The area is in regular use for agricultural purposes of grazing and arable requirements. 


13942 Ms Megan McKeown [4100] 1 Object 

Summary There has been far too much development in this area. Please do not spoil this nice area any further. 

Green fields are more important to the quality of our lives. 

There will be more demand on our water system as well as increased traffic and there are lots of children and old people here. 


14191 Mrs Jean Ann Haley [4329] 1 Object 

Summary (1) The Land is part of the Separation Zone 

(2) Over development - considerable building in the area already taking place and completed by Anwyl, Mcbride and Wimpey 

(3) Traffic implications for Marl Lane and Pentwyn junction 

(4) Implications regarding the protection of historic landscapes 

(5) This land is part of a working farm 

Please take these items very seriously before it is too late 


14182 Mr Keith Richards [3906] 1 Object 











14525 Mr Gina Armstrong [4482] 1 Object 

Summary I am writing as a resident of Pentywyn Heights to object to the proposed housing plans at the junction of Pentywyn Heights and Marl Lane. 

My grounds for objections are as follows: 

1. The land is part of the separation zone - green wedge between communities. 

2. Over development - considerable building in the area already taking place/completed by Anwyl, McBride and Wimpey. 


4. Implications regarding the protection of historic landscapes. 



14195 Mrs E E Sawyer [4337] 1 Object 

Summary We are much concerned re the plans to build houses on green belt land Marl Lane/Pentwyn Hill . This area is well built up and does not need more houses. It 

is a very busy road, more houses mean more cars, the junction at Marl Lane will become a hazard. Also there is a school farther down the hill and at school 

times will become Treacherous. Please consider carefully before you proceed with this plan. 


14054 Mr & Mrs Brian & M Elizabeth Cook [4152] 1 Object 

Summary We object for the following reasons:- 

This is a green wedge between two built up locality. 

There has already been excessive building and over-development causing traffic problems. 

Having regard to the known land values in the vicinity it is inconceivable that this land could ever be used for affordable housing within the currency of this 

LDP. 

The stated requirements for house building land is totally arbitrary and the likely need has not been adequately demonstrated. Moreover there are already 

large numbers of houses for sale or to rent. 

This is high class agricultural land with historic landscape value. 


14051 Mr Ifor Pugh Williams [4151] 1 Object 


Inadequate facilities for residents. 

Open play facilities for children and young people reamin as they were 30 years ago, in fast there has been a pro-rata reduction. 

Community facilities have been lost and not adequately replaced. 

Deganwy would benefit greatly by a reassessment of the traffic flows in the village. At present, there is no intention of most of the traffic using Deganwy to 

either visit or shop. By routing Llandudno bound traffic to the Esgyryn A470 route, Deganwy would revert to a far more pleasant environment for shoppers and 

visitors. 


807




14187 Ms Lucie Le Poidevin [4321] 1 Object 

Summary We wish to lodge an objection to this intention. 



(3)There is already over development in this area 




(7)Land is part of a working farm. 


14188 Cllr Helen Roberts [4322] 1 Object 


There has been rapid development of greenfields in the area. 

the infrastructure is not suitable. 

Further development will add more strain to existng services. 

Forms part of a separation zone, a green belt. 

Highways issues are a major concern. 

Is is currently used as agricultural land. 

The loss of historic landscape. It is possible that Conwy could lose its World Heritage status if development is allowed to expand at an ever increasing rate. 


14203 Mr & Mrs D & J Williams [4347] 1 Object 


a. The land is part of the separation zone. 

b. The area is being overdeveloped. 

c. Traffic implications. 

d. Protection of historic landscapes. 

e. This land is part of a working farm. 


14205 Mr S R Rogers [4349] 1 Object 


This field forms part of the separation zone. 

There has been considerable devlopment already. 

Highways problems. 

Protection of historic landscapes. 

This land is farm of a working farm. 

The whole system of reserve land must create uncertaintly with regards to the saleability and prices of adjacent properties. 

Lack of employment. 


14199 Mr J U Scott [4344] 1 Object 








13922 Mrs N E Rogers [4088] 1 Object 


The land is part of the separation zone, being a green wedge 

Overdevelopment - considerable building is taking place or has already been completed. 

The traffic implications for the junctionof Pentywyn Road and Marl Lane. 

Implications regarding the protectiono f historic landscapes. 



14196 Mr & Mrs S & G Hick & Love [4339] 1 Object 

Summary I strongly object to the proposed new housing in Marl, at the junction of Pentywyn Rd and Marl Lane. I am amazed that further development is being 

considered in an already over developed area. You will be aware Anwyl, McBride and Wimpey are already recenlty present in the area. The proposed area is 

part of a working farm and provides a separation zone - a green wedge between communities. 

I trust you will consider my objection on all three grounds and act accordingly by not allowing any further development to take place. 


13921 A E Meyrick [4087] 1 Object 


Dangerous traffic implications for access to theh land from Marl Lane and Pentywyn Road Junction. 

This land is part of a working farm and is also part of the greenwedge separation zone. 

Considerable building is already being undertaken and completed. 


14190 Mr David A Haley [4327] 1 Object 

Summary (1) The Land is part of the Separation Zone 

(2) Over development - considerable building in the area already taking place and completed by Anwyl, Mcbride and Wimpey 

(3) Traffic implications for Marl Lane and Pentwyn junction 

(4) Implications regarding the protection of historic landscapes 

(5) This land is part of a working farm 

Please take these items very seriously before it is too late 


808




14197 Ms Jane Doran [4340] 1 Object 

Summary I am writing to object to the above being included in the reserve list for the following reasons: 







13990 Mr & Mrs A & J Owens [4118] 1 Object 


1. We believe Marl is already overdeveloped with housing and has contributed sufficiently in the past. 

2. We believe this area is greenfields and building on these will affect quality of life in a semi rural area. 

3. We believe this area of land is part of the heritage of Marl and should be preserved in its ucrrent form. 


13978 Mr & Mrs TH & VL Griffith [4113] 1 Object 


a) The land is part of the seperation zone - green wedge between communities. 

b) Extensive building has alredy taken place and is indeed still ongoing. 

c) The land constitutes part of a working farm. 

d) The implication of traffic problems that would be created by 120 dwellings added to those that have already been caused would be horrendous. 


13975 Mrs Catherine Hughes [4112] 1 Object 

Summary I would like to object to thep lans to build 120 homes along with the land at the junction of Pentywyn road and the top of Marl Lane. 

There are far too many developments in this area, the increase in traffic will result in more wear and tear to the roads which the council cannot afford to repair 

properly. 

Greenfields are most important to our lives and nature. It is a well known fact that we need green areas to absorb the heavy rainfalls we now seem to get. 

More development will put further demands on hospitals and doctors. 


13971 Mrs Joyce Lewis [4108] 1 Object 

Summary I wish to object on the basis there has already been sufficient building in this area i.e. Victoria Drive and a vast loss of green fields and hegerows and trees. 

Also the increase of traffic up Marl Lane and Victoria Drive. 


13969 Ms Delyth Shotter [4107] 1 Object 

Summary See scanned representation. 


14062 Mr & Mrs K Griffiths [4155] 1 Object 

Summary W object as follows: 

We feel that the local area would not be able to cope with so many houses been built, Especially after the new housing estate at Victoria Avenue 

Service water drainage Would be overwhelmed, There are times that it cannot cope as the situation is now! 

The volume of traffic has increased since the new estate was built at Victoria Avenue, 

Local roads are not as safe as they used to be, It will only get worse if this development goes ahead 


14189 Mr S J Wright [4325] 1 Object 

Summary I WOULD LIKE TO OBJECT TO THE ABOVE PROPOSED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. REF.NO.SR46 . THE AREA IS OVER DEVELOPED 

DUE TO NEW HOUSING WIMPY AND MCBRIDE VICTORIA DRIVE 


809


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Nant-y-Gamar Road 


13399 Ms Margaret Butterworth [3797] 1 Support 

Summary Good for the council in granting the proposal for 65 houses on Bodafon fields. I live 200 yards from the proposed site and during the summer the fields are an 

eyesore. This proposal will make Craig-y-Don and bring the area much needed business. I cannot see what all the fuss is about unless the protesters are 

bothered that their houses may lose some value. 

22324 Bodafon Preservation Association (Mr J Williams) [5157] 1582 Object 

Summary This housing proposal which was not in the 2009 version of the plan has been inserted at a late stage without any reference in any documents to the 

landscape conservation status or the agricultural land classification of the site and without consultation with the community or the Town Council until 2011. 

The land take of prime farmland will reduce the viability of the farm which already relies heavily on diversified activities and the housing will add significantly to 

the already heavy traffic flows generated by Ysgol Gogarth and the mental health centre 'Roslin' both situated on Nant y Gamar. 


22609 Mr A J Reid [5207] 1 Object 

Summary The entire area of Bodafon farm land with its livestock and open land is the first thing that tourists see on approaching Llandudno along the coastal road from 

the east. Even if this parcel of land is not used in the current phase of housing development its identification on the plan assigns it a status of being potentially 

available for development. 

Change Sought: A more suitable zone for new housing could be the area in Mochdre located on the south side of the road leading from Colwyn Bay to the A55/A470 junction 

at the Black Cat. This area is close to the area of employment opportunity and has access to Colwyn Bay along the existing collector road. 

13504 Mr Michael J Nesbitt [3869] 

1 Object 

Summary I object to the contingency housing allocation at Nant-y-Gamar Road. 

It has not been prepared in accordance with the CIS and the LDP is therefore unsound. 


Green Wedge - this is the first step in merging Craig-y-Don with Craigside. 

Traffic Congestion - current heavy peak traffic at Ysgol Gogarth and the Health Authority. 

Quality Agricultural Land - protected from development by PPW 2.8(1) 

Farm Viability - the farm's viability has not been tested in accordance with TAN6W. 

Change Sought: Remove the contingency housing allocation at Nant-y-Gamar Road. 

13512 

Summary 

Ms Ruby Williams [3878] 

I object to the contingency housing allocation at Nant-y-Gamar Road. 








13513 

Summary 

Mrs & Mrs M & G Jarvis [3879] 









13514 

Summary 

Mr Ray Carhart [3880] 









13505 

Summary 

Mrs Amanda Caroline Nesbitt [3870] 









1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

810




19571 Dr K Cleaver [1334] 1 Object 

Summary We are disappointed to see that the proposals for extended Green Wedge 3 are subject to dilution before they have been ratified via the identification of 

housing site ref 116(SR85) as a contingency site. 

The reinstatement of the housing site as a contingent site is neither adequately explained nor justified and accordingly we object to the proposed identification 

of housing site ref 116 as a contingency site. 

Change Sought: Delete site and extend green wedge 3. 

13510 Mrs Carole Owen [3876] 1 Object 









13507 Ms Rosie Owen [3872] 1 Object 


















13905 Mr J Williams [237] 1 Object 

Summary I wish to register a strongobjection to the proposal. 

The site is a designated Landscape Conservation Area by Llandudno Local Plan and is also prime agricultlural land protected by local policies and WAG 

policies. 

In the 2009 version of the Plan the whole area was designated a green wedge. 

There has been no consultation with the community and the requirements of the delivery agreement have not been complied with for this site. 

Green Wedge 

Traffic Congestion 

Quality Agricultural Land 

Farm Viability 


13511 Ms Maria Martin Fontecha [3877] 1 Object 

















Change Sought: Remove the contingency housing at Nant-y-Gamar Road. 

811




13463 

Summary 

Dr JR Brooks [118] 

We object to the housing allocation on Nant-y-Gamar Road: 

Councils' policy that is would not be physically developed 

Runs contrary to PPW 2.8(1) which protects quality agricultulral land 

Green wedge status 

Farms viability is one of concern 


1 Object 

13506 Ms Rita Whittaker [3871] 1 Object 









13361 Mr & Mrs Michael & Linda Bentley [3779] 1 Object 

Summary I am writing to register the strong objection of both myself and my husband, Michael J Bentley, to the proposed development of Bodafon Fields. We think this 

land should be retained as a totally green area and no housing or other development should be allowed to go ahead. 


13458 Ms Eleri W Butterworth [3833] 1 Object 

Summary I wish to oppose most strongly to the proposal put forward for Nant-y-Gamar Road: 

1. The plan offends National Policy, is protected under Assembly Government Policy. 

2. CCBC Planning Department objected to any housing development on this site. 

3. The land quality was not mentioned in the LDP documents. 

4. Has a feasability study been carried out regarding traffic which is already at saturation point. 

5. The farms viabilty has not been tested and appears fragmented. 


13430 Mr & Mrs R Sheaf [3818] 2 Object 

Summary I strongly oppose the Plan's poposal to allocate 1.8 hectares of greenfield, prime farmland for housng at Nant Y Gamar Road because after due consideration 

the Planning Director's report in May 2006 stated that the Authority would resist any housing on Bodafon Fields. His conclusions still hold and if anything 

make this opposition more critical on the gounds of increased traffic density and congestion and loss of greenfield amenity. 


13431 Ms Joyce Audus-Williams [3819] 1 Object 

Summary I believe this plan to be flawed on one significant respect and the proposed allocation of 1.8 hectares of greenfield, prime farmland for housing constitutes the 

bases for my opposition to the LDP: 

Green Wedge 


Quality Agricultural land 


The late inclusion of the site impeded correct consultation. 

The LDP pays no regard to the strategy for tourism. 

Nesting Lapwings and rare twite. 

Hydraulic overload of the sewerage system. 

Land nearer the A470 would be more approporiate and limiting the area to 2.5 hectares would avoid encroaching upon green wedge and open countryside. 


13433 Mr & Mrs A A White [3820] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the planned development of Bodafon Fields. 

We have been coming to Llandudno for over 46 years because of the promenade not being commercialised, flat and safe for children and older people. The 

sight of the fields at the end of the bay is much commented on by visitors, it makes a wonderful backdrop to the bay. 

The council should be concentrating on the pier and the old pavillion. 

Also it is a disgrace that there are no toilet facilities by the beach and it is a long walk to find some. 


13364 Ms Pauline MacMullan [3782] 1 Object 

Summary Why are you building on Badafon Fields, it is the last green belt in Llandudno and agricultural land. Please reconsider. 


13363 Mr Arwel Hughes [3781] 1 Object 


This is protected land and the only protected green field area in the town. 

Given the surplus of unsold and empty properties in the area there is no need for further development for housing now or in the near future. The infrastructure 

including roads cannot cope with more people and traffic. 

The building on Bodafon fields and the devlopment of the golf driving range is eroding the capabiilty of this farm to operate viably. 


13377 Mr J Vout [3789] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the Bodafon fields being used as a football in which some will make money but the mass of people will loose out. 

We came to live here 22 years ago and we think Llandudno and its visitors would be the ones to loose what little is being left for enjoying in the town and 

promenade. 


812




13362 Mr I Glyn Jones [3780] 

1 Object 

Summary I object to the proposed contingency housing site allocation at Nant-y-Gamar Road. 

This area has been granted a green wedge status. Also, as Grade 3a quality agricultural land, is protected from development. 

National Policy PPW 2.8(1) protects high quality agricultural land from development. This site should be removed from Conwy LDP for perpetuity. 

Change Sought: Remove the housing contingency site allocation at Nant-y-Gamar Road. 

13378 Mr & Mrs R Forte [3790] 1 Object 

Summary We object to the contingency housing allocation on Nant-y-Gamar Road. 

This is yet another step towards loosing Bodafon Fields as prime agricultural land, green belt and wild life site. 

We are amazed that our counsellors have voted for this plan without being fully aware of the restriction on this land. 

Change Sought: Remove the contingency housing allocation on Nant-y-Gamar Road. 

13360 Mr Dennis Haggas [3778] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the proposed contingency housing allocation at Nant-y-Gamar Road. 

In addition to this land being within the proposed green wedge it is also designated as prime agricultural land protected under the National Assembly Policy 

Planning document. 

The LDP clearly states that before protected land is considered for development all other inferior quality land must be utilised first. 

The proposed development should be refused or withdrawn immediately and the proposed green wedge preserved. 


13476 Mr Malcolm Beaumont, MBE, DGA [3851] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the inclusion of 1.8 hectares of Bodafon Fields for housing development. 

Not only does it contravene the protection afforded prime agricultural land by the Welsh Assembly Government it also conflicts with the Planning Director's 

Report in May 2006 that other forms of inappropriate development on the Bodafon fields would be resisted. 

Bodafon Fields are recognised as a landscape conservation area and the field is classified as Grade 3A which should be protected from development, these 

facts do not appear to be mentioned in the LDP documents. 

This would set a precedent for future development of the field. 


13358 Mr & Mrs L Royds [3776] 1 Object 

Summary We object to the contingency housing allocation at Nant-y-Gamar Road. 

This site is designated as prime agricultural land protected under the National Assembly's Policy Planning Wales document. It states that land graded 1, 2 

and 3a is a scare resource and must be protected from development. 


13453 Mr Mark Grimsley [3828] 1 Object 

Summary This proposal to include Bodafon Fields in the LDP should be rejected for the following reasons: 

1. Serious traffic congestion 

2. The current demographic population in Llandudno remains static 

3. This site is Grade 3A arable land 

4. It would reduce the viability of the farm 

5. It is not a big enough site for development 

6. The need to redevelop brownfield sites should be top priority 

7. It would be a blot on the landscape 

8. It would give the green light to develop the rest of the field 

9. It would be of no benefit to the town 


13354 Mr & Ms Garrett & Finch [3772] 1 Object 


The National Assembly's Policy Planning Wales stated that land graded 1, 2 and 3a is scare and must be protected. There is no mention of the grade of the 

field and this should have been protected as green belt land. 

Llandudno is a tourist destination and the oases of green and calm is a welcome relief from the new retail park. 


13353 Mr W Derek Williams [3771] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the housing allocation on Nant-y-Gamar Road: 

Designated as prime agricultural land which is protected under the National Assembly for Wales: Planning Policy Wales document 

The site is part of the Green Wedge 

Planners are guided by TAN6 and there is no evidence that his guidance has been followed. 

Change Sought: Remove the housing allocation at Nant-y-Gamar Road 

13457 Mr Ken Pritchard [3832] 1 Object 

Summary I write to register my strong objections to the proposed developement of 65 houses on Nant-y-Gamar Road. 

1 This site is a Green Wedge. 

2 Nant y Gamar Road is already quite heavily congested due to vehicles from Ysgol Gogarth and Roslin. 

3 The land at Bodafon is designated as Prime Agricultural land. 

4 I understand that the viability of Bodafon Farm has not been subject to evaluation. 

5 This propoasl appears to be the start of merging Craig y Don with Craigside. 

This proposal should be urgently reviewed and the housing developement removed from the LDP. 


813




13435 Mr & Mrs J D Poole [3822] 1 Object 

Summary We object to the section of the new draft LDP to include a proposal to build 65 dwellings on 1.8 acres of Bodafon Fields. 

Bodafon Fields presents a wonderful backdrop to the Craig-y-Don portion of the Llandudno promenade on the approach to Llandudno. Visitors value this 

lovely approach to the town and as tourism represents a very large contribution to the areas income nothing should be allowed to depreciate this asset. 


14382 

Summary 


13432 

Summary 

Llandudno Town Council (Ms Tessa Wildermoth MSc) [555] 

It was resolved that the Town Council object to the inclusion of this site as a contingency site for housing development on the grounds that: 

1. GREEN WEDGE 

2. TRAFFIC CONGESTION 

3. QUALITY AGRICULTURE LAND 

4. FARM VIABILITY (TAN. W 6 2010) 

5. IMPACT ON FAUNA AND FLORA 

6. IMPACT ON TOURISM 

7. LACK OF ADDRESS OF LOCAL HOUSING NEED AND FAILURE TO DEVELOP BROWNFIELD SITES FIRST 

Delete site. 

Mr & Mrs J & P Waddington [3806] 

We oppose the proposal to build 65 houses on Bodafon Fields: 

1. This is likely to have a very negative effect on tourism which is the mainstay of Llandudno. 

2. Traffic congestion. 

3. Insufficient consideration seems to have been given to the following aspects: 

i) It is in a green wedge site 

ii) It is prime agricultural land 

iii) The viability of the farm has not been tested 

We fully appreciate the need for additional housing but surely it is possible to find other land which is more appropriate for development and consideration 

should be given to unoccupied dwellings. 


1 Object 

1 Object 

13416 Mrs Y Stewart [3807] 1 Object 

Summary I strongly oppose the Plan's proposal to allocate 1.8 hectares of greenfield, prime farmland for housing at Nant-y-Gamar Road for the following reasons: 




Green Wedge 

The proposal is unsound and unsustainable. Parcels of land on the urban periphery should be re-examined, especially land rejected in Phase 1. More open, 

less restricted, less sensitive land nearer the A470 with less congestion issues, easier access to town and countryside should be selected. 


13414 Mr Ray Khan [3804] 1 Object 

Summary I strongly oppose the Plan's proposal to allocate 1.8 hectares of greenfield, prime farmland for housing at Nant-y-Gamar, Llandudno because this 

unsustainable housing proposal is a first step in merging Craig-y-Don with Craigside, creating a precedent for future development contrary to the appeal 

inspector's stated conclusions in 1988 and the Planning Director's report in May 2006 that the Authority would resist any housing on Bodafon Fields. 


13413 Dr O P Galpin [3803] 1 Object 

Summary I wish to register my strong opposition to the proposed development of the building of 54 dwellings on 1.8 hectares of the prized Bodafon Fields. This is an 

area that should be protected strenuously, it should remain as it is, as a part of the overall experience for visitors and residents alike. 

The proposed development is an attempt to kill it off by "100 cuts", a slow erosion which will progressively destroy an invaluable feature of the town. 


13412 Mr & Mrs GC & EA Craven [3802] 1 Object 

Summary I would like to register my opposition to the proposed development of Bodafon Fields. As residents of St. Margarets Drive we believe there would be a 

detrimental effect on the safety of the residents due to increased traffic on an existing narrow road that leads directly to the proposed entrance to this 

development. 

This area of green belt should remain protected to maintain the natural beauty of the Llandudno Bay. 


13417 Dr M F Sukhon [3808] 1 Object 

Summary I strongly oppose the Plan's proposal to allocate 1.8 hectares of greenfield prime farmland for housing at Nant-y-Gamar for the following reasons: 


Green Wedge 



The proposal is unsound and unsustainable. Parcels of land on the urban periphery should be re-examined, especially land rejected in phase 1. More open, 

less restricted, less sensitive land nearer the A470 with less congestion issues, easier access to town and countryside should be selected. 


13374 Ms Sue Lofthouse [3788] 1 Object 


Llandudno is special because of it's natural beauty and the preservation of it's historical buildings and is one of the reasons people want to live here. 

The A55 makes it more accessible but there are problems along that access road without creating more traffic from more housing. 

We do not need to build on green land, we need to use what is arleady built and improve on that first for example The Clarence and The Tudno Castle hotels. 

They are no longer historical buildings but embarassments. 


814




13406 Mr & Mrs A Baker [3798] 1 Object 

Summary I strongly oppose the housing allocation at Nant-y-Gamar Road on the following grounds: 

Green Wedge 




It is essential to test the farm's viability in accordance with TAN6W 

The proposal is unsound and unsustainable. 

Change Sought: Remove the contingency housing allocation from Nant-y-Gamar Road. 

13356 Mrs Olva Roberts [3774] 1 Object 

Summary I am writing to register my objection to the proposed development of Bodafon Field. 

Change Sought: Remove the contingcency housing allocation at Nant-y-Gamar Road. 

13422 Mr Eric Moughtin [3810] 1 Object 

Summary I strongly oppose the Plan's proposal to allocate Green Wedge prime farmland for housing thus creating a precedent for future development contrary to the 

Appeal Inspector's stated conclusions in 1988 and the Planning Director's report in May 2006. 

My objection could be withdrawn if the housing site was deleted from the plan and the whole fields remained a Green Wedge for all future time. 

Bodafon Fields are essential in their present format for both the residents of Llandudno and for visiting tourists who are vital to the economy of the area. 


13397 Mr Arnold Zeumer [3795] 1 Object 

Summary Has thought been given to the impact of 65 dwelling on sewage, water, electricity, telephone, gas and traffic-all of these will have a great impact on an already 

overloaded infrastructure. 

The visual impact will be horrendous as well as increasing the risk of accidents and the disruption of a consolidated farm and the loss of one of the best "first 

views" of Llandudno. 


13409 mr robert fogg [559] 1 Object 

Summary I am requesting that the following areas are kept within the local development plan as rural open space areas free from development: 

1. Bodafon Fields, Llandudno 

2. Nant y Glyn Valley, Colwyn Bay 

3. Golf course and fields off Glan Y Mor Raod, main Llandudno Road and Glanwydden between Rhos on Sea and Penrhyn Bay. 

I understand there is a need to preserve these sites to protect the character of the coastal area of Conwy county and to create breaks between town 

developments. 

Change Sought: Remove the contingency housing allocation at Nant-y-Gamar Road, Llandudno. 

13396 Ms Jennifer Knowles [3794] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the development plans for Nant-y-Gamar Road for the following reasons: 

The fields are prime land and are the only protected land in Llandudno 

The building of 65 houses will increase the traffic enormously 

The fields provide a beautiful green wedge and magnificent scentery for tousists 

Already Mostyn Estates have started buildng a golf driving range, taking more land from the farm. 


13423 Mrs J Y Shepherd [3811] 1 Object 

Summary I wish to object to the development of Bodafon Fields on the following grounds: 

a: The fields are prime land site and protected land in Llandudno. 

b: The building of 65 houses will increase traffic, already very heavy at school times. 

c: Already there is development for the golf driving range, taking more land from the farm. 

d: The fields provide a beautiful green wedge between Craigside and Craig-y-Don and a magnificent entry into Llandudno for the tourists. 

I hope councillors will not approve this development. 


13424 Mrs Diane Evans [3812] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the plan to build housing on prime farmland at Nant-y-Gamar Road. 

This is green wedge and it was stated in 1988 and the Planning Director's report in 2006 that the authority would resist any housing on Bodafon Fields. 

No consideration or consultation has been given to protect this high quality agricultural land from development. 

The proposal is unsound and unsustainable. Parcels of land on the urban periphery should be re-examined especially land rejected in phase 1. 

Please give this matter serious consideration and delete the proposal to build houses from the Plan. 


13425 Ms Mildred Hunt [3813] 1 Object 

Summary I strongly object to the housing proposal to build on Bodafon Fields. 

Llandudno is a Victorian holiday resort not an urban overspill. Apart from traffic congestion, the Planninig Direcor's report states all housing on Bodafon 

Fields would be resisted. 

It is quality agricultural land and National Policy PPW28(1) protects such land. 

Visitors come to Llandudno for its uniqueness not to see housing estates where cattle and sheep once grazed. 

Change Sought: Remove the contingency housing allocation at Nant y Gamar Road. 

815




13411 Mr & Mrs P & R Wilkinson [3801] 1 Object 

Summary I strongly object to the Plan's proposal to allocate 1.8 hectares of greenfield, prime farmland 

for housing because: 

Green Wedge 




The proposal is unsound and unsustainable. The community was not consulted prior to the inclusion of this site. More open, less restricted, less sensitive 

land nearer the A470 with less congestion and easier access but limited to 2.5 hectares to avoid encroaching open countryside should be selected. 

My objection could be withdrawn if the housing site was deleted and the whole fields remained a green wedge for the plan period. 


13461 Mr Ralph Butterworth [3835] 1 Object 

Summary Exclusion of development as land has existing green wedge designation and is protected under National Assembly Policy Planning Wales document. 

CCBC own planning department objection 4 years ago to resist inappropriate development. 

Land quality not mentioned in LDP papers, scarce resource. 

Traffic flow problems. Current problems with Ysgol Gogarth would be multiplied. 

Viability test of farm should be undertaken as there appears a lot of fragmentation. 

Change Sought: Remove contingency housing allocation at Nant-y-Gamar Road. 

13474 Mrs M C Rowlands [3849] 1 Object 

Summary I oppose the proposal to allocate 1.8 hectares of prime green field farmland for housing at Nant y Gamar Road. 

There has been no consultation with the local community. 

We are concerned that it would lead to the loss of the farms viability. 

This is the first step in mergin Craigydon with Craigside. 

The land is protected under the National Assembly Policy Planning Wales document. 

Traffic on Nant y Gamar Road is very heavy. 

We would like the land rejected previously in phase 1 re-examined. Less sensitive land nearer the A470 with easier access to town and countryside. 

Change Sought: Remove the contingency housing allocation at Nant y Gamar Road. 

13465 Mr & Mrs EJ & PE Howe [3838] 1 Object 

Summary My wife and I object to the proposal to build houses on Bodafon Fields. 

Llandudno boasts a very beautiful bay which is enhanced by the green wedge of Bodafon Fields. Building houses on the fields would damage the beauty of 

the bay. 

The Inspector, on appeal in 1988, determined against the development of Bodafon Fields and this view was supported in 2006 when the Planning Director 

reported that the local authority would resist any housing on the fields. 


13467 Mr Leighton Downing [3840] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the housing allocation at Nant-y-Gamar Road: 

Green Wedge 




The proposal is unsound and unsustainable. Parcels of land on the urban periphery should be re-examined especially land rejected in phase 1. More open, 

less restricted, less sensitive land near the A470 with less congestion, easier access to town and countryside but limited to 2.5 hectares to avoid encroaching 

on open countryside should be selected. 


13464 Mrs D J Brooks [3837] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the housing allocation at Nant-y-Gamar Road: 

Quality agricultural land, contrary to Planning Policiy Wales 2.8(1) 

Traffic congestion on a narrow road. 

Removal of quality agricultural land from the farms diminishing stock already depleted by farm diversificaiton 


13482 Mr E M Rivers [3855] 1 Object 

Summary In the case of Bodafon Fields I would like to see an Events Park or showground with most of the area remaining green but landscaped with a bandstand and 

areas like the parks in Scarborough. It would be important to have one large pavilion for flower shows, motor shows etc. to give all year round employment. 

The people who object to any devlopment must remember Llandudno was built to attract tourists. 


13475 Mr D G Rowlands [3850] 1 Object 

Summary I oppose the proposal to allocate 1.8 hectares of prime green field farmland for housing at Nant y Gamar Road. 

There has been no consultation with the local community. 

We are concerned that it would lead to the loss of the farms viability. 

This is the first step in mergin Craigydon with Craigside. 

The land is protected under the National Assembly Policy Planning Wales document. 

Traffic on Nant y Gamar Road is very heavy. 

We would like the land rejected previously in phase 1 re-examined. Less sensitive land nearer the A470 with easier access to town and countryside. 


816




13485 Mr Fred Halstead [3857] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the proposed use of 1.8 hectares of greenfield prime farmland for housing at Nant-y-Gamar Road, Llandudno for the following reasons: 

This would be the first step in merging Craig-y-Don with Craigside. 

It would be contrary to the Appeal Inspectors conclusions and the Planning Director's report stating that the Authority would resist any housing on Bodafon 

Fields. 

It would increase vehicular movement adjacent to a school which caters for children with special needs and on the other side is the Health Authority Facility. 

This site empathises so ideally with its surroundings from the mountain tops to the bay. 


13415 Mrs H Sukhon [3805] 1 Object 

Summary I strongly oppose the Plan's poposal to allocate 1.8 hectares of greenfield prime farmland for housing at Nant-y-Gamar, Llandudno for the following reasons: 

The use of the site by lapwings and redwings in the winter and spring. 


Quality agricultural land 

Farm viabillity 

Green wedge 

The proposal in unsound and unsustainable. Parcels of land on the urban periphery should be re-examined, especially land rejected in Phase 1. More open, 

less restricted, less sensitive land nearer the A470 with less congestion issues and easier access to town and countryside should be selected. 


13359 

Summary 

Mr & Mrs Clive & Pauline Cheetham [3777] 

We strongly object to the contingency housing allocation at Nant-y-Gamar Road. 

All around Llandudno are derelict hotels and properties which could and should be utilised. 

Do not spoil the greenlands and farmlands. 


13351 Mr & Mrs GR Jones [3769] 

Summary We object to the allocation at Nant-y-Gamar Road, it is a lovely green area and a very welcome and up-lifting sight to visitors and residents. 

Change Sought: Remove the allocation at Nant-y-Gamar Road 

1 Object 

1 Object 

13462 Mrs & Ms FM & R Hughes [3836] 1 Object 

Summary We object to the housing allocation on Nant-Y-Gamar Road: 

Green Wedge 




The proposal is unsound and unsustainable. The community was not consulted prior to the inclusion of this site in the draft LDP. 

Parcels of land on the urban periphery should be re-examined especially land rejected in phase 1. More open, less restricted, less sensitive land nearer the 

A470 with less congestion, easier access to town and country but limited to 2.5 hectares to avoid encroaching on open countryside should be selected. 


14245 P W Marriott [4378] 1 Object 






A valuable amenity for both the people of Llandudno and the tourists. 

Was previously protected by Conwy District Plan 1982 and the Gwynedd Structure Plan. 


14249 Mrs Jean Edwards [4382] 1 Object 


Lack of Public Consultation 






13543 Cllr Gareth Roberts [3907] 1 Object 

Summary I oppose the inclusion of this land as a contingency site for housing. 

This land should remain part of the Green Wedge between Llandudno and Craigside, preventing a contiguous urban sprawl and defining the boundaries of 

the communities, respecting previous decisions of the Planning Inspectorate for Wales and Conwy CBC Planning Director. 

Traffic congestion would be futher exacerbated and rise to an unacceptable level. 

Farmland of this grade should be protected from development. 

The viability of the existing farm would be threatened, yet this does not appear to have been assessed under TANW6 as required. 

The site was included without consultation with the community. 

Change Sought: Remove this land as a contingency site for housing under the LDP for the entire period of the plan. 

817




13545 Mr Iwan Huws [3908] 1 Object 

Summary I strongly object to the inclusion of this land as a contingency site. 

The land should remain an important green wedge and discrete boundary between Craig y Don and Craigside. 

Traffic congestion would increase to an unacceptable level. 

The viability of the exisiting farm has not been tested in accordance with TAN6W. 

The farmland is of sufficiently high quality to be protected from development. 

Local community has not been consulted. 

Change Sought: Withdraw this site from the Revised Deposit LDP. 

14497 Cllr C R Jones [4456] 1 Object 


Traffic congestion from Gogarth School and the mental health centre. 

The area is widely used for tourism with touring caravans, event field, a Golf Range, Rare breed Farm, the whole area is classed as prime agricultural land. 

The area cannot cope with any more housing because the schools in the immediate area are full to capacity and the doctor's surgery is also struggling to 

cope. 

A site close to 153 Queens Road (near the Queens Road Roundabout) would, in my opinion, offer better value with less of an impact. 

Change Sought: If your Planning Dept is insistent on creating a site for contingence housing in the Craig-y-Don area then a site close to 153 Queens Road (near the Queens 

Road Roundabout) would, in my opinion, offer better value with less of an impact, has no agricultural land value and is easily accessible, no traffic problems 

and with services, drainage etc already nearby. 

14151 

Summary 


14256 

Summary 


14254 

Summary 


14252 

Summary 


14243 

Summary 


14250 

Summary 


14240 

Summary 


I would be grateful, therefore, if this suggested alternative site could be considered instead of the Bodafon Fields site for contingency housing in the Local 

Plan. 

Mrs Adele Bates [4273] 

I oppose the housing allocation at Nant-y-Gamar Road on the following grounds: 

Green Wedge 




1 Object 

It is essential to test the farm's viability in accordance with TAN6W 

The proposal is unsound and unsustainable. 

Delete site. 

Mrs S MacFarlane [4389] 






Delete site. 

Mrs L Burrows [4387] 





Delete site. 

P F Burrows [4385] 






Delete site. 

Mrs A de Figueiredo [4376] 








Delete site 

Mrs Eirlys Owen [4383] 







Delete site. 

Ms Susan Lewis [4373] 

I oppose the plans proposed on the following grounds: 

Green Wedge 

Would set a precedent for development of the remainder of the farm. 


Farm viability. 

Lack of consultation with the community. 

Delete site 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

818



Rep No Name 

14248 

Summary 


14247 

Summary 


14246 

Summary 


14253 

Summary 


14244 

Summary 


14242 

Summary 


14241 

Summary 


14251 

Summary 


13901 

Summary 


Mrs Sylvia Smith [4381] 




Delete site. 

Mrs Gwenda Wiltshire [4380] 








Delete site. 

Mr Jim Wiltshire [4379] 








Delete site. 

Mr & Mrs M & T Hughes [4386] 





Delete site. 

Mr & Mrs W R Jarvis [4377] 





Lack of community consultation. 

Delete site 

Mr Andrew Fox [4375] 


Green Wedge 





Delete site. 

Mrs Jennifer Khan [4374] 


Green Wedge 





Delete site. 

Ms Pauline Sethmenton [4384] 




Delete site. 

Ms Sarah Fox [4074] 








Delete site 

People Type 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

819




14255 Mr J MacFarlane [4388] 1 Object 







13913 Miss H Burrows [4082] 1 Object 




Officers are correct to point out that the sewer network, not to mention traffic movement along Nant-y-Gamar Road would also be negatively impacted by 

further development. 

A mere four years ago the most senior officer is on record as committing the authority to resisting any further residential development on this site. 


13908 Mr & Mrs G & E Bellamy [4079] 1 Object 

Summary I strongly object to developers destroying one of the best assets Llandudno has. For over sixty years Bodafon Fields has been filmed and recorded, every 

event has been included. To think that this could be destroyed by greedy developers covering the area with houses, hotels, a business park and apartments 

etc. 

These developers have no concern at all for one of the best assets of Llandudno. They have one purpose only, money making schemes for their own benefit. 

The inspector and the QC stated that the fields should remain a green wedge and not be destroyed by greedy developers. 


13904 Miss R Burrows [4077] 1 Object 




Officers are correct to point out that the sewer network, not to mention traffic movement along Nant-y-Gamar Road would also be negatively impacted by 

further development. 

A mere four years ago the most senior officer is on record as committing the authority to resisting any further residential development on this site. 


13903 Mr Ian D Finney [4076] 1 Object 






There has not been enough time for consultation. 

The sewerage system is overloaded. 

Detrimental effect on tourism. 


13902 P T Webster [4075] 1 Object 

Summary This housing proposal adds to the previous loss of part of Bodafon Fields for Gogarth School. The proposal is a further step towards merging Craig y Don 

with Craigside and creating a precedent for future development. The proposal is contrary to the Apeal Inspector's stated conclusions in 1988 and the Planning 

Director's report May 2006 that the Authority would resist any housing on Bodafon Fields. 

If in the future Bodafon Fields are developed for housing a feature that delineates Llandudo would be lost. 

Farming or other use, with enhancement of the landscape, would benefit the town. 











13899 Mrs Helen Jones [4072] 1 Object 

Summary I have always considered Llandudno as the Queen of Welsh resorts. It is a beautiful town relying on tourism as its only true industry. 

What makes Llandudno stand out from the crowd? Its beautiful promenade, the Great and Little Orme and its wedge of green fields. 

I am not even going to start listing the problems this proposed development would cause, only to ask for a bit of common sense to keep these fields green. 

We do not want to follow other resorts who are now regretting over-developing their areas of green fields. 


13898 Mr R G de Figueiredo [4071] 1 Object 









820




14141 Mr John Crowther [4267] 1 Object 





There has not been enough time for consultation. 

The sewerage system is overloaded. 

Detrimental effect on tourism. 


14148 Cllr Janet Finch-Saunders [4271] 1 Object 

Summary I oppose the plans proposed on the following grounds: 

Green Wedge 






821


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, The Woodland 


19298 Bodysgallen Hall & Spa (Mr Matthew Johnson) [4548] 1 Object 

Summary It is contended that the development of this greenfield site for housing would be contrary to national planning policies, It is also contended that the proposed 

contingency allocation is not realistic and appropriate having regard to the alternatives. 


the best way of dealing with a situation in which the plan strategy is being compromised. 

14495 The National Trust (Mr Chris Lambart) [872] 1 Object 

Summary Weaknesses of the contingency allocation approach identified in the Sustainability Appraisal support our view that once a site is identified as a contingency 

allocation, development becomes inevitable 

Development would harm the setting of the grade I registered historic park and garden at Bodysgallen and could harm the setting of the World Heritage Site. 

It would also have landscape and biodiversity impacts. 

Development of this greenfield site for housing would be contrary to national planning policies. The proposed contingency allocation is not realistic and 

appropriate having regard to the alternatives. Timely plan review (now mandatory) removes the need for contingency allocations. 


the best way of dealing with a situation in which the plan strategy is being compromised 

13933 Christine & Becky Shaw [4095] 1 Object 


The fields in question are part of a working farm and is valuable grazing land and vitally important agricultural land. 

A great deal of overdevelopment has already taken place causing problems with access and traffic. 

The fields have been subject to flooding in heavy rain. 

There has to be a limit to the amount of houses that can be built in one area and green fields are essential to our quality of life. 


14094 Mr & Mrs Denys & Krystyna Morgan [4173] 1 Object 


It seems to us that the Marl ward has already contributed more than enough of its precious, green recources, to current construction projects; and the areas 

form part of the last significant green zone separating Llandudno from neighbouring communities. 

The area in question is a working farm, the loss of which would also constitute a loss the community as a whole. It is also an extensive and important part of 

the natural drainage of the area. 

The Marl ward is still, just, semi rural. 


14090 Mr Colin Halliwell [4170] 1 Object 


The Marl ward has already been the subject of extensive development. 


The proposed development would also considerably reduce the separation zone. 

The area is part of a working farm. 

This will place additional stress on the ability of the existing surface water drainage infrastructure. 

Existing established properties will be devalued. 

Additional traffic will be added to principal traffic routes that are already suffering from the over development. 


14076 Mr Alastair Deane [4164] 1 Object 

Summary I object on the following grounds. 

This land is of a separate zone giving green space between communities 

Over development in this area in recent years by Anwyl Wimpey & McBride builders 

Traffic implications for both Marl Lane and Pentywyn Road juction 

Historic landscapes will be lost forever 

This land is part of a working farm giving the local community the chance to see animals and crops on there door step. 

Drainage is a major concern to residents of Tan Refail 


14073 Cllr Mike Priestley [4162] 1 Object 

Summary I would like to strongly object to the above 2 sites being included on the reserve list of the LDP on the grounds of: 

Overdevelopment of the Marl Ward (We have permission for over 360 dwellings already) 

Highway issues of these 2 sites 

Drainage issues 

Loss of Green fields 

We have a deficit of green space in Llandudno Junction 

These sites are Part of our Historic landscape and need protecting 


13941 Ms Jane Jones [4099] 1 Object 

Summary Marl Lane is already overdeveloped, this land is part of our heritage. 


14146 S J Thorn [4270] 1 Object 


Marl has already contributed land to meet the local housing need. 

There aren't many green spaces left to enjoy. 

Part of our heritage and needs to be protected. 

Used for farming. 

Further development would be excessive and extreme. 

Roads not suitable and were not constructed for more traffic. 

The land opposite Marl Lane is prone to flooding. 


822


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, The Woodland 


13935 Mr & Mrs H Gent [4096] 1 Object 

Summary We wish to object as follows: 

The land is part of the separation zone, greenwedge between communities. 

Overdevelopment - considerable building in the area already taking place/completed. 

Traffic implications for Marl Lane and Pentywyn Road junction. 


Implications regarding the protection of historic landscapes. 


13968 Mr Geoff Shotter [4106] 1 Object 





13931 Mr & Mrs J & J Gravestock [4094] 1 Object 


Overdevelopment - Marl is already overdeveloped with housing and has already contributed land to meet the local housing need. 

Green fields - green spaces are essential to our quality of life and we are concerned that these are reapidly disappearing in Marl Ward. 

Heritage - these pieces of land are part of the heritage of Marl and need to be preserved. 


13964 Mr Michael Partridge [4104] 1 Object 





13927 Dr & Mrs Ian Turnbull [4091] 1 Object 

Summary At present the infrastructure supporing the Marl area is struggling tocope and any additional demands will overwhelm these services. 

The newtwork gas pressure in our area is well below the recommended levels and modern economic and eco-friendly central heating boilers are hampered. 

Many of us find that when the gas boiler comes on the fire does out. 

To a lesser extent it is true, much the same applies to water and sewage utlities. 


13970 Ms Delyth Shotter [4107] 1 Object 





13976 Mrs Catherine Hughes [4112] 1 Object 

Summary I would like to object to thep lans to build 120 homes along with the land at the junction of Pentywyn road and the top of Marl Lane. 

There are far too many developments in this area, the increase in traffic will result in more wear and tear to the roads which the council cannot afford to repair 

properly. 

Greenfields are most important to our lives and nature. It is a well known fact that we need green areas to absorb the heavy rainfalls we now seem to get. 

More development will put further demands on hospitals and doctors. 


13991 Mr & Mrs A & J Owens [4118] 1 Object 


1. We believe Marl is already overdeveloped with housing and has contributed sufficiently in the past. 

2. We believe this area is greenfields and building on these will affect quality of life in a semi rural area. 

3. We believe this area of land is part of the heritage of Marl and should be preserved in its ucrrent form. 


13943 Ms Megan McKeown [4100] 1 Object 

Summary There has been far too much development in this area. Please do not spoil this nice area any further. 

Green fields are more important to the quality of our lives. 

There will be more demand on our water system as well as increased traffic and there are lots of children and old people here. 


14200 Mr J U Scott [4344] 1 Object 








13966 Cllr Susan Shotter [4105] 1 Object 





14202 Mrs M C Scott [4346] 1 Object 








823


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Adjacent to site 205/328 







boundaries. 

Change Sought: Remove the contingency housing allocation adjacent to site 205/328 

824


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Site D East of Llanrwst 



Summary Fel Perchennog y llain yma o dir, byddwn yn cefnogi ei gynnwys fel safle dynodedig i ddatblygu tai unai yn ychwanegol neu yn lle safleoedd sydd wedi eu 

clustnodi yn barod yn Llanrwst os iddynt gael eu gwrthwynebu. 

Mae'r safle yn ffinio a safle 287- 'Bryn Hyfryd' (sydd o dan ein perchnogaeth)ac wedi ei ddynodi ar gyfer datblygu tai yn y Cynllun. 

Byddai'r mynediad yn dod drwy'r safle hwnnw ac felly byddai ei gynnwys yn gam strategol wrth gynllunio datblygiad Llanrwst i'r dyfodol. 

14238 

Summary 


14232 

Summary 


14230 

Summary 


14234 

Summary 


14236 

Summary 




There will be a negative impact on residents in that area. 

Consideration needs to be taken that the residents at Hafan Gwydir are all elderly. 

Most of the residents are unaware of the possible developments which could take place directly behind their homes. 

The authority have not explored sufficiently other area in the town such as the old rugby field near Cae Person. 

Delete site. 

Mr Richard West [4064] 






Delete site. 

Ms Delia Roberts [4372] 






Delete site. 







Delete site. 







Delete site. 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

825


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Site E adjacent to Bryn Hyfryd 



Summary Fel Perchennog y llain yma o dir, byddwn yn cefnogi ei gynnwys fel safle dynodedig i ddatblygu tai unai yn ychwanegol neu yn lle safleoedd sydd wedi eu 

clustnodi yn barod yn Llanrwst os iddynt gael eu gwrthwynebu. 

Mae'r safle yn ffinio a safle 287- 'Bryn Hyfryd' (sydd o dan ein perchnogaeth)ac wedi ei ddynodi ar gyfer datblygu tai yn y Cynllun. 

Byddai'r mynediad yn dod drwy'r safle hwnnw ac felly byddai ei gynnwys yn gam strategol wrth gynllunio datblygiad Llanrwst i'r dyfodol. 

14237 

Summary 


14239 

Summary 


14231 

Summary 


14235 

Summary 


14233 

Summary 








Delete site. 







Delete site. 

Ms Delia Roberts [4372] 






Delete site. 







Delete site. 

Mr Richard West [4064] 






Delete site 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

1 Object 

826


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Conway Road 



Summary The recent additional Greenfield site on Conway Road is part of the green wedge that separates Penmaenmawr from Dwygyfylchi. Houses here would detract 

from the 'green entrance' to Penmaenmawr. 

Penmaenmawr already has existing planning permission for some 70 flats and 30 houses which have not been built due to the current economic climate. 

Change Sought: Remove the contingency housing allocation at Conway Road, Penmaenmawr. 

13473 Mr Nick Davies [3831] 1 Object 

Summary We object to the proposed development of 60 houses to be located in the field between Merton Park, Cwm Road and behind 22-36 Y Berllan. 

We further object to there being any housing development whatsoever in this area. 

With an already adequate housing stock within the locale, we see no benefit to increasing this provision which will serve only to damage our precious rural 

landscape whilst also increasing vehicular congestion. 

Change Sought: Remove all housing allocations in Penmaenmawr. 

14219 Rev & Mrs David & Carol Halstead [4361] 1 Object 

Summary Bring 135 Conwy Road site and site 153 forward from the reserve list and delete Cwm Road site. 

Change Sought: Bring 135 Conwy Road site and site 153 forward from the reserve list and delete Cwm Road site. 



Access and Infrastructure 

Land selected and volume of homes 

Lack of identified need for new homes 


827


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Off Derwen Lane 



Summary Council officers have indicated that this site is proposed for a car park to serve parents dropping off and collecting children from the adjoining schools. This 

site is not proposed for housing. 

Housing site should exclude proposed parking area. Proposed car park should be allocated for transport use. 

Change Sought: Omit small area of land allocated for housing off Derwen lane opposite Ysgol Creuddyn and replace with a transport/education allocation. See attached plan. 

22610 Mr A J Reid [5207] 1 Object 

Summary The two areas near the Creuddyn and Glanwydden school sites classified as contingency housing areas represent a creeping extension to Penrhyn Bay 

which itself is almost entirely residential. Facilities such as medical and schools are already at their limits. 

Change Sought: A more suitable zone for new housing could be the area in Mochdre located on the south side of the road leading from Colwyn Bay to the A55/A470 junction 

at the Black Cat. This area is close to the area of employment opportunity and has access to Colwyn Bay along the existing collector road. 

22397 Mr James Wigzell [5172] 1 Object 










22399 Mr Maurice Wigzell [5173] 1 Object 











Summary The Town Council welcome the sites removal from the LDP as a main site for housing development but object to its inclusion as a contingency site on the 

same grounds as the objection submitted in 2009: 

1. Any development does not protect the unique natural environment. 

2. The pressure on the wildlife habitat as the site is close to a site of special and scientific interest 

3. Increased traffic and increase in noise odour and noxious emissions 

4. The site is a working dairy farm and is prime agricultural land. 

5. The pressure on local services particularly schools. 


13481 Mr E M Rivers [3855] 1 Object 

Summary I would encourage the council not to allocate housng on the other side of Derwen Lane as it will intrude on the old landscape conservation area. 

Further intrusions into the Glanwydden valley will have a considerable impact on the wild life of the area. 

This area of North Wales depends on tourism for its livelihood. Can you encourage Mostyn Estates to be more imaginative about developing their lands for 

tourism and not just for housing. 

Change Sought: Remoe the contingency housing allocation at Derwen Lane. 











828


4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, North of Groesffordd 



Summary The site proposes 10 houses but developers have already made representation to extend this to 65. Access improvements would open up the site and made 

developers demands for 65 houses irresistible to CC. 


The site is located on long established playing fields 

Development will mean that we will become a small town with concomitant crime and antisocial problems. 



No additional employment is proposed. 

No consultation with residents or Town Council. 



































829


























21711 C Owen [4810] 1 Object 






















830
















































831
















































832
















































833
















































834
















































835
















































836
















































837
















































838
















































839















20119 D Cope [4610] 1 Object 

































840
















































841
















































842
















































843
















































844
















































845
















































846
















































847
















































848
















































849
















































850
















































851
















































852
















































853
















































854
















































855
















































856
















































857
















































858
















































859
















































860
















































861
















































862
















































863
















































864
















































865
















































866
















































867















21087 A Owen [4875] 1 Object 

































868
















































869















21823 C Owen [4877] 1 Object 

































870
















































871
















































872
















































873
















































874
















































875
















































876
















































877
















































878





































20543 Hannah . [4719] 1 Object 











879
















































880
















































881
















































882
















































883
















































884
















































885
















































886
















































887





































20971 C M Goss [4811] 1 Object 











888
















































889
















































890
















































891
















































892
















































893





































21159 C Cook [4904] 1 Object 











894
















































895
















































896


























20415 J Webb [4639] 1 Object 






















897


























20419 A Webb [4640] 1 Object 






















898
















































899
















































900
















































901
















































902
















































903
















































904
















































905
















































906
















































907















20995 N Goss [4836] 1 Object 

































908
















































909
















































910















21111 D A Gay [4887] 1 Object 

































911
















































912
















































913
















































914
















































915
















































916















21655 A Owen [4737] 1 Object 

































917


























20575 P Owen [4738] 1 Object 






















918
















































919
















































920
















































921




21987 K Shah [5139] 1 Object 






















21983 D Shah [5138] 1 Object 






















922
















































923
















































924
















































925
















































926





































20371 S Shah [5136] 1 Object 











927
















































928




22155 J Shah [5137] 1 Object 












































929
















































930


























22087 A Wise [4968] 1 Object 






















931
















































932
















































933


























22019 M Cox [5147] 1 Object 






















934
















































935
















































936















21335 C Duce [4978] 1 Object 











22203 M Hall [5065] 1 Object 






















937
















































938




21467 J Hall [5064] 1 Object 












































939




22319 S J Dell [5075] 1 Object 











21491 R Dell [5074] 1 Object 

































940





































21399 M Lunt [5016] 1 Object 











941
















































942
















































943
















































944
















































945





































20271 K Hunt [5009] 1 Object 











946
















































947


























22127 L Owen [5108] 1 Object 






















948


























22119 S F Vick [5106] 1 Object 






















949
















































950
















































951
















































952
















































953
















































954
















































955





































20251 C S F Daw [4995] 1 Object 











956
















































957
















































958
















































959
















































960





































21427 B Owen [5028] 1 Object 











961
















































962




20259 G East [5006] 1 Object 












































963


























20359 S Todd [5123] 1 Object 






















964
















































965
















































966




22107 L Hill [5001] 1 Object 












































967


























21955 S Todd [5126] 1 Object 






















968
















Summary The site proposes 10 houses but developers have already made representation to extend this to 65. Access improvements would open 

up the site and made 












Open Spaces 




Employment 


Eductation 


Housing Need 


Tourism 























969
















































970
















































971























































972


























14498 O Jones and Sons Ltd (Mr Gareth Jones) [4473] 1 Object 

Summary the site at adjacent to Vadre is not available for development, as such the site at Groesfford should be allocated as a main housing allocation in its place. this 

would address the shortfall in housing provision. 

the concerns expressed by the LPA in respect of access are misplaced, as it is clear that it can be provided with an entirely acceptable access. The site 

benefits from good access to public transport and to local services within walking or cycling distance of the site. 

BP/21 states that it performs well in the sequential tests and relates well to the existing settlement. 

Change Sought: The site should be taken forward as an allocated housing site in place of the allocation at Adjacent to Vadre. 























973























Summary The land to the north of Groesffordd (Site ref: 53), a petition of some 900 signatures was put in objecting to the use of this site in 2009. The rest of the field is 

currently a play field with nice, newly erected rugby posts in position for those who can kick a ball to use. This too must be maintained. 






Green wedge 





974


4.3.4 New B1, B2&B8 Employment Development, Policy EMP/2 NEW B1, B2 AND B8 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 


19228 Clifton House (Llandudno) Ltd [4541] 1 Support 

Summary We welcome and support Part 3 of the policy which allows employment development on non allocated sites within or adjacent to the main built-up areas of 

the County. 

13874 Dwr Cymru Welsh Water (Mr Rhidian Clement) [4058] 1 Support 

Summary We note the allocations identified within the Plan and we will work with your Authority and potential developers to fully support sustainable economic 

development. However, your Authority and potential developers should be aware that the obligation of a water and sewerage undertaker extend to 'domestic 

supplies only'. Therefore where an employment allocation may result in higher demands of water supply and/or trade effluent discharges, then early 

consultation with Dwr Cymru Welsh Water is required to enable matters to be addressed. 

19230 Clifton House (Llandudno) Ltd [4541] 1 Object 

Summary The site shown on the attached plan at Black Cat Corner should be allocated for employment development under Policy EMP/2 either as a substitute for one 

or more of the employment allocations made by the policy or in addition to them. 

Change Sought: Allocate the site at Glan Conwy Corner, Llandudno Junction. 

19225 Clifton House (Llandudno) Ltd [4541] 1 Object 

Summary Ther is significant overlap with Policy EMP/1 

The text says that employment constructed since 2007 should be taken into account, however the plan period runs from 2008. 

The Council has not sought to identify either the main forms of employment development for which there is likely to be a demand over the plan period. 

There are deliverability issues with some of the commited sites and not all are suitable for B1 office use. 

The rural allocations are disproportionate and unlikely to be taken up fully. 

There is no firm evidence about the deliverability of the contingency sites. 

Change Sought: The site at Black Cat Corner should be preferable to the Esgyrn Site. 

We consider that alternative and genuinely deliverable sites should be identified as contingency sites. These should be allocations under Poilcy EMP/2 and 

the policy should clearly specify the circumstances in which these can be released. 

22381 Mrs Searl [5170] 1 Object 

Summary Due regard has been paid to policies EMP/1 and EMP/2 and the requirement for 7.2 hectares of employment land (B1) on the site at Esgyryn. It is considered 

that the comments made throughout this submission on the level of over supply of employment land clearly lay out our objection to the level of employment 

land proposed and we would ask that due consideration be paid to the re-allocation of the land uses on site to a move appropriate mix, with additional 

residential provision in line with the plan included at Appendix 2. 

Change Sought: We would ask that due consideration be paid to the re-allocation of the land uses on Esgyryn to a move appropriate mix, with additional residential provision 

in line with the plan included at Appendix 2. 

19388 Mr Richard Waters [1041] 1 Object 

Summary This policy significantly overstates the land required for economic development purposes. 

The Abergele Business Park was granted planning permission under very questionable circumstances contrary to the local plan. Permission was granted on 

the understanding that it would create a thousand new high tech jobs. To date this site has achieved virtually nothing. 

Tir Llwyd has been in existence for approximately 30 years. To date it is probably half full. At Bodelwyddan and St Asaph there are several large employment 

sites empty. 

The events of the last 30 years do not support the over allocation of employment land. 

Change Sought: The Abergele Business Park (Science Park) should be retained as originally agreed, i.e. No housing development on the site. The site south east of Abergele 

should be deleted from the Plan. The definition of commuting needs to be re-examined. 








17628 Mr Gwyn Jones [1277] 1 Object 

Summary Ou client continues to object to the Plan on the basis that land at Towyn Way West has not been allocated for residential or other development and that the 

settlement boundary has not been appropriately amended. 

Whilst the site is situated within a flood risk zone, it is considered that the risk and consequences of flooding are likely to be accepetable and manageable. 

the land in part comprises previously developed land and is situated immediately adjacent to the settlement boundary. 

Change Sought: Allocate the land at Town Way West for residential or other development. 


Summary Our client objects to deletion of the previously proposed allocation of 27.9 hectares of land at and adjoining Tir Lwyd, Kinmel Bay for employment purposes. 

Our client considers that the land should continue to be included as an allocation for employment development. 

Change Sought: Reallocate the 27.9 acres of land at Tir Lwyd for employment purposes. 


Summary Our client wishes to object to the omission of the allocation of land at and adjoining Tir Lwyd, Kinmel Bay for emploment purposes. Our client considers that 

the land should continue to be included as an allocation for employment development. 

Change Sought: Allocate the land at and adjoining Tir Lwyd for employment purposes. 


Summary Llanfairfechan is clearly a location where additional employment develpment should be considered appropriate in terms of achieving a sustainble relationship 

between employment and residential areas. It is surprising that no employment allocations have been proposed for the settlement which is presently relatively 

poorly provided for in terms of employment opportunities. 

Representations have been submitted in relations to Policy HOU/1 which propose the allocation of Area B on the attached plan for residential development; 

this remains our preferred option. However, should this land not be allocated for housing development, then we consider that the site should be considered 

for employment development. 

Change Sought: If not allocated for housing then allocate Area B for employment. 

975


4.3.4 New B1, B2&B8 Employment Development, Policy EMP/2 NEW B1, B2 AND B8 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT, Esgyryn, Llandudno Junction 


13451 Mr & Mrs Brown [3824] 1 Object 

Summary We are concerned about the proposed development of Esgyryn Site mainly because of the possible effect on the wild life. 

There are mature oaks and hedges supporting a varied population of insects and birds. Also there are several bats to be seen feeding on insects flying above 

the hedges at certain times of the year. Winter visitors on the fields are Redwings and Fieldfares. 

Surely a better use of this greenfield land would be for food production. 

Change Sought: Remove the employment allocation at Esgyryn site. 

14000 Mrs L Storey [4120] 1 Object 







13924 Mr & Mrs B Tranter [4089] 1 Object 


Pendyffryn is heavily congested already with cars parked bumper to bumper. 

There are many empty and unsold properties up here. 

Loss of green environment. 

We all want to protect and enjoy the natural beauty. 

Extra housing will put a greater strain on road safety. 

The gren spaces are rapidly being depleted. 


14144 Mr C M Worstencroft [4269] 1 Object 


This is an area of outstanding beauty and habitat for wildlife. 

There has already been two large developments built recently. 

There is employment land opposite the Welsh Assembly buildings and a large industrial estate on the outskirts of Mochdre that is largely un-occupied. 


14045 Cllr R Meirion Hughes [4147] 1 Object 


Contrary to PPW 9.2.9. This greenfield site should not be selected when alternative policies could be used at the Former Hotpoint site to achieve the required 

jobs growth. 

In terms of sustainability, the site is not accessible to key services. 

Pressure from WAG to include Esgyryn to reaslise a premium capital receipt. 

Significant housing growth already disporportionate for a community of this size. 

Severe environmental and landscape impact concerns. 

I support the goal in the LDP of reducing out-commuting/out-migration. 

Change Sought: Withdrawal of site for development in tandem with a tightening of policy for the former Hotpoint factory to ensure a minimum of 300 jobs per hectare. Redraw 

settlement boundary to exclude site. 

Failing that, identify site only as a contingency for high value prestigious employment, subject to completion of a thorough Landsacpe Quality Assessment. 

13561 RIFW [3912] 1 Object 

Summary RIFW own land within the proposed Esgyryn allocation, and are willing to bring the site forward for development either in isolation or as part of a 

comprehensive scheme. The RIFW land is delieverable and capable of accommodating housing. In our view the proposals map is unclear as it appears as 

an "Empolyment Allocation" as opposed to a Mixed use allocation. 

Change Sought: The proposals map should be revised to include a Mixed use allocation 

14425 Mrs F E Hughes [4435] 1 Object 


This is the last bit of open countryside that is easy to access from residential areas. 

We are going to need this land in the future for producing food so we don't have to import so much from the other side of the world. 

There is already plenty of development. 

These houses would not be for local people, local people need jobs. 

You should use the old Hotpoint factory for more quality jobs and not just car showrooms. 

You cannot continue to take more countryside - where will it end? 


14003 Mrs R Storey [4121] 1 Object 







14420 Mr & Mrs D T Holland [4434] 1 Object 


There is very little greenfield land left in this area, development would have a huge impact on the environment e.g. loss of hedgerows, wildlife and flora. 

A build up of traffic/noise on unsuitable roads i.e. Narrow Lane. 

There seems to be enough housing developments at present. More housing doesn't necessarily create jobs. 

Why create more industrial units when there are areas that remain empty i.e. The old Hotpoint site. 

More brownfield sites should be used for industry and greenfield land should be left for the community to enjoy. 


14006 Mrs M Brown [4122] 1 Object 







976


4.3.4 New B1, B2&B8 Employment Development, Policy EMP/2 NEW B1, B2 AND B8 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT, Adjacent to Bodlondeb, Conwy 


14071 MR FRANK YOUD [3896] 1 Object 

Summary I submit that, if this open space, valuable to maintaining a buffer between the Bodlondeb woods, and Bodlondeb itself, has any sort of houses and/or offices 

built there, it will change the rural atmosphere of this delightful road and leafy environment for ever. This is not the type of development for Conwy, or 

Deganwy. For example, there is ample room on the old Hotpoint site in Llandudno Junction for commercial developments. And as far as housing needs are 

concerned, the two new estates in Junction are excellent, especially the one on the brown site. 


13495 Dr T A Rowell [3863] 12 Object 

Summary We are residents living in the Cadnant Park, Conwy and are extremely concerned about aspects of the Plan which we consider to be unsound. 

Site (CR12) is within, or close to several statutory/non-statutory designations: 

1. World Heritage Site 

2. Essential Setting of the World Heritage Site 

3. Landscape of Outstanding Historic Interest 

4. National Park 

5. Local Nature Reserve 

6. Listed Buildings 

7. Site of Special Scientific Interest 

8. Biodiversity Areas 

9. Green Flag Award 

10. Outstanding Quality Landscape Character (LANDMAP) 

The allocation of site (CR12) is contrary to national/local guidance and is inconsistent with the approach to site selection. 

Change Sought: Remove the employment allocation at Bodlondeb, Conwy 

14433 Ms Sara Allardice [3901] 1 Object 


The LDP does not have regard to: 

The World Heritage Site Management Plan 

The Urban Green Space Habitat Management Plan 

Planning Policy Wales 

Tourism Action Plan 

The plan includes a vision, objectives and policies that all aim to protect and promote historic assets, open green spaces, biodiversity and dtourism. The 

allocation of this site to housing and employmenet runs contrary to its own policies and, as such, the allocation does not flow logically from the strategy. 

The assessment and allocation of Site CR12 has not been properly executed and should therefore be removed from the LDP. 



Summary Cultural Heritage - It is questioned whether the housing provision within the Essential Setting of the World Heritage Site and within the historic landscape 

designation (to the north of the castle and town walls, south of Twthill Farm) sits comfortably within the Strategic Policies for the Cultural Heritage or with the 

WO Circulars 60/96 and 61/96 Planning and the Historic Environment: Archaeology and Historic Buildings and Conservation Areas. Other candidate sites 

have been dismissed for these reasons. 

Change Sought: Review the allocation. 

14428 Mrs Elizabeth Mair Pattinson [1167] 1 Object 


The council made a compulsory purchase of the estate to ensure its preservation as an open space for all times. 

The landscape quality of the Bodlondeb and Benarth headlands, the twin sentinels surrounding the World Hertiage Site and Conwy Castle and Walls have 

always been considered an asset to Conwy. 

The setting has always been of immense importance to the castle and the walls both of which are the jewel in the crown of the rich tapestry. 

It should be listed as a historical or heritage park. 


14418 Mr Geoff Byrne [4433] 1 Object 


Land should remain in agricultural use. 

There are many empty buildings. 

The proposed access point is unsuitable. 

The approach to Conwy after has to operate as a reserve road when problems occur on the A55. 

The amount of traffic generated would be unsuitable, contravene the covenants, agreements and trust deeds. 

The River Conwy is already experiencing problems with clearance of sewage. 

The serious silting of the River Conwy. 

The only winners will be the developers not the people of Conwy. 

Change Sought: This site should be kept as an agricultural site and introduce a facility such as a Community Mixed Farm which would be attractive to visitors and accessible 

by foot. 

14518 Conwy Civic Society (Dr Michael Senior) [4481] 1 Object 

Summary Whilst we have to take the pragmatic view that some development of Conwy's housing and commercial life is essential to the town's future, it is regrettable 

that this particular land has been selected for such use. As a continuation from Bodlondeb park land, it forms a good visual break between the Conwy Morfa 

built development and the town of Conwy itself on the western approach into town. However it is clear that should such allocation be a requirement under the 

LDP, there are serious limitations within the existing settlement boundary to find an alternative site. 


977


4.3.4 New B1, B2&B8 Employment Development, Policy EMP/2 NEW B1, B2 AND B8 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT, The Former Goods Yard, Llandudno 





Summary On page 36 and in the table on page 37, this site has been referred to as in zone C2. This is not correct as it is in zone C1. 

The Llandudno Inundation Modelling report (EX5227) has been referred to but it only considers 50 years of climate change whereas we recommend that 75 

years should now be considered for commercial use. Current day scenarios for this site indicate that the site may be liable to tidal flooding during events up 

to that of the 0.5% flood event. 

Change Sought: Current day scenarios for this site indicate that the site may be liable to tidal flooding during events up to that of the 0.5% flood event and may not be suitable 

for any new buildings unless further work is carried out to address/mitigate the flood risk on the site. Consideration of resulting off-site effects to third parties 

will also be required. 

978


4.3.4 New B1, B2&B8 Employment Development, Policy EMP/2 NEW B1, B2 AND B8 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT, Abergele South East 
















13560 RIFW [3912] 1 Object 

Summary In our view the proposal map is unclear. The map needs to specifically identify the fact that it is envisaged that the site will be brought for mixed use, which 

includes housing. Whilst the text of the plan makes reference to housing which RIFW welcome the actual proposals map appears to suggest that the site is 

an "Empolyment Allocation". RIFW are willing to bring their land at St George Road forward for development as part of a mixed use scheme. The site is 

deliverable and capable of accommodating a housing as part of a sustainable mix of uses. 

Change Sought: The matter can be addressed by including on the map a "mixed use" allocation, this would bring clarity to the matter. It should be clear that the allocation 

anticipates the deliver of 







979


4.3.4 New B1, B2&B8 Employment Development, Policy EMP/2 NEW B1, B2 AND B8 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT, Abergele Business Park 

































































980



































































981



































































982



































































983



































































984



































































985



































































986



































































987



































































988



































































989



































































990



































































991



































































992



































































993



































































994






















































Summary 

This site has planning permission for employment uses. One of the themes of the LDP is to create jobs. The removal of this previously developed land site 













995



































































996



































































997



































































998


































































999



































































1000





















































1001


4.3.4 New B1, B2&B8 Employment Development, Policy EMP/2 NEW B1, B2 AND B8 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT, Land at Orme View Filling Station, Dwygy 



Summary The allocation of Employment Land is totally inappropriate for Dwygyfylchi, which, as a gateway village to the Snowdonia National Park, has tourism as its 

main function. Whilst creation of employment in Conwy Borough is necessary, Dwygyfylchi is not the appropriate location for such development. Industrial 

estates are currently being constructed at Mochdre and East of Colwyn Bay and both are under-used so there is simply no reason for another industrial site in 

Dwygyfylchi. Such a development could seriously harm existing tourist related businesses and could destroy future tourism opportunities. 

Change Sought: Small, appropriate development on the footprint of the Little Chef site may be considered a good use of the existing site, but expanding such development to 

the surrounding fields is not appropriate. 


Summary The land earmarked for employment allotment is on virgin greenfield and access would be problematic. 

Change Sought: There is a need to actively seek existing brownfield sites for the developments to continue. 


Summary I am objecting on the grounds of 

a) this will be a serious blot on the landscape, ruining a beautiful view. 

b) this will be encroaching on green fields. 

c) this will be detrimental to wildlife / loss of habitat for wildlife. 

d)as there is no access to the site from the west, ie Anglesey or Bangor; it will mean unacceptable amounts of traffic through the village, the roads are 

certainly not up to this and it will be an accident waiting to happen. 

e)We live in close proximity to the proposed site and have NOT been consulted 


1002


4.3.4 New B1, B2&B8 Employment Development, Policy EMP/2 NEW B1, B2 AND B8 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT, Land at Memorial Hall, Dolgarrog 


14116 J & SL Lee & Jones [4228] 1 Object 

Summary We oppose the planning application to the old hall at the end of our street. 

The existing yard is noisey and messy with fires burning rubbish etc. This is not wanted near people's home including my own and the local school. 

We have no pavements on our road and the last thing we need are heavy skip lorries up and down the road were young children play. 

Keep it where it is, the site is fine away from the village houses. 

We strongly object to this proposed planning application. 


1003


4.3.4 New B1, B2&B8 Employment Development, Policy EMP/2 NEW B1, B2 AND B8 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT, Llandudno Triangle Field 



Summary The Town Council object on the grounds that we do not wish to see any further reduction of the green wedge area: 

1. The site forms part of the green wedge and creates a precedent for future development of the other fields in the area. 

2. There are concerns about surface water drainage in the area. 

3. Developing the site would extend the urban area of Llandudno and lead to the potential loss of the distinct character of Llanrhos. 

4. There are sufficient brown field sites already included in the LDP that are more suitable for this kind of development. 


14403 Llandudno Civic Trust (Mr John Lawson-Reay) [4429] 1 Object 


1. The site is on the most important and sensitive approach to town. Business or industrial activity would be both intrusive and inappropriate. 

2. Access to the site would be problematic as the only approach would have to be off either of the two very busy main roads. 

3. Its proximity to private housing would be very intrusive. 

4. The loss of farming land would reduce the viability of the farm which supports three families. 


13540 Cllr Gareth Roberts [3907] 1 Object 

Summary This parcel of land provides part of an open green space, currently attractive farmland, between the communities of Llandudno and Llanrhos acting as a 

green wedge between them and preventing the merger of the two into an unattractive contiguous urban development. 

Llandudno is an economically important tourist destination and its visual appeal, including that of its approaches, is a vital part of that attraction. 

I am not aware that the local community has been consulted. 

Change Sought: Delete this land from the Revised Deposit LDP as a site for any form of development. 

1004


4.3.4 New B1, B2&B8 Employment Development, Policy EMP/2 NEW B1, B2 AND B8 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT, Orme View Fillilng Station 



Summary The land earmarked for employment allotment is on virgin greenfield and access would be problematic. 

Change Sought: There is a need to actively seek existing brownfield sites for the developments to continue. 

1005


4.4.8 Tourism and Recreation Development, Policy TOU/7 TOURISM AND RECREATION DEVELOPMENT 


14439 Holland Arms Shooting Ground (Mr & Mrs Robert Elliott) [4443] 1 Object 

Summary The allocation of the former Holland Arms Shooting Ground for a tourist/leisure development can remediate the site in a positive manner which would be of 

economic benefit to the rural economy through the direct creation of rural jobs to replace those previously lost through the forced closure of the previous 

business. In addition there would be spin-off benefits which align with the LDP strategy through helping to safeguard the future of an important rural business, 

community facility at the Holland Arms Public House. 

Change Sought: Allocate the former Holland Arms Shooting Ground for a tourist/leisure development. 

1006


4.5.9 Allotments, Policy CFS/10 NEW ALLOTMENTS 

Rep No Name 

22544 

Summary 

Mr & Mrs Griffiths [5193] 

We would like the following points clarified regarding the allocation of allotments at Princes Green, Penrhyn Bay: 

There are currently trees on the boundary between our property and the Green, we would like to ensure these remain 

We will need access to the boundary fence from the Green's side to manage our fences 

People Type 

1 Comme 

Will the boundary fence be increased in height, as our property is set lower than the Green so we would like to avoid people looking down into our property 

22437 

Will you be able to confirm how close the allotments will be set to our boundary 

Countryside Council for Wales (Mr Richard Ninnes) [1948] 1 Support 

Summary CCW supports the policy in principle and considers it meets ToS C2. 

13986 Ms Mary Halliwell [4115] 1 Support 






13541 Cllr Gareth Roberts [3907] 1 Support 

Summary Re point 2: 

The local authority should be more even more proactive in assessing demand for allotments and should investigate further the provision of land suitable for 

allotments in and around Llandudno. 


Summary The community need for allotments is recognised in background paper 25. There is no provision within Abergele which is identified as an area of significant 

need within BP25 having the second highest requirement/demand in the County. 

Change Sought: Further consideration must be given to formal provision in the form of allocations to meet existing (and potential future) demand. 













































1007








































































1008




























































13466 Dr Carol A Furness [3839] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the proposed allotments on Princes Green as the green is not large enough to accommodate allotments. 

It is used by children playing and people walking dogs and is a valuable and much loved open space. 

Allotments would be visually intrusive and spoil the appearance of a neatly laid out green surrounded by dwellings. 

The land at the back of Penrhyn Bay, behind the Gloddaeth Housing Estate near to Creuddyn school wold be more suitable. There are more young families 

here as opposed to elderly people. The allotments could be near the school and schoolchildren could be involved. 

Change Sought: Remove the allotment allocation at Princes Green, Penrhyn Bay. 





1009




















13437 Mr & Mrs J R Lee [3823] 1 Object 

Summary The council has not considered the allocation of allotments on the Esgyryn site in Llandudno. There is a waiting list for prospective persons wishing to rent 

such areas in order to "grow you own", not forgetting the healthy exercise which comes out of it. 

Change Sought: The council should consider allocating some of the Esgyryn site for allotments. 

















































1010








































































1011
















13346 Ms Sonia Williams [3767] 1 Object 

Summary I object to the proposed allotments in Penrhyn Bay due to lack of suitable vehicular access, lack of toilet facilities and the fact that they would be directly 

overlooking the bedrooms of adjacent properties. 

Change Sought: Remove allocated allotments in Penrhyn Bay. 





















































1012








































































1013





















Summary The community need for allotments is recognised in background paper 25. There is no provision within Abergele and is identified as an area of significant 


Change Sought: Further consideration must therefore be given to formal provision in the form of allocations to meet existing (and potential future) demand. 

















































1014






































Change Sought: Further consideration must be given to formal provision in the form of allocations to meet existing (and potential future) demand for allotments. 






Summary Allotment allocation at Vardre, Dwygyflychi. 

Owner wants site withdrawn. 

A very strong objection is that this land is currently part of the Green Wedge of land seperating the village of Dwygyfylchi and the town of Penmaenmawr. It is 

most important that this "wedge" is kept in its current format as both communities have different identities and it needs to be maintained at its current 

definition. 

Change Sought: Delete allotment allocation at Vardre, Dwygyfylchi. 

























1015








































































1016
























































1017


4.5.10 Open Space, Policy CFS/13 NEW OPEN SPACE ALLOCATIONS 


22440 Countryside Council for Wales (Mr Richard Ninnes) [1948] 1 Support 

Summary CCW supports the policy and considers it meets ToS C2. 

1018

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?