26.03.2013 Views

Queer Keanu: Race, Sexuality and the Politics of - Whoa is (Not) Me

Queer Keanu: Race, Sexuality and the Politics of - Whoa is (Not) Me

Queer Keanu: Race, Sexuality and the Politics of - Whoa is (Not) Me

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

o<strong>the</strong>r “natural” categories as race. She explains by saying, “In effect, one way that gender<br />

gets naturalized <strong>is</strong> through being constructed as an inner psychic or physical necessity.<br />

An yet, it <strong>is</strong> always a surface sign, a signification on <strong>and</strong> with <strong>the</strong> public body that<br />

produces th<strong>is</strong> illusion <strong>of</strong> inner depth, necessity or essence that <strong>is</strong> somehow magically,<br />

causally expressed” (Imitation, 28).<br />

The accusation that Reeves <strong>is</strong> all surface beauty with no depth assumes that <strong>the</strong>re<br />

should be an essential self that reveals itself to <strong>the</strong> perceptive viewer. Where <strong>is</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

au<strong>the</strong>ntic core that lies beneath or behind <strong>the</strong> image? DeAngel<strong>is</strong> describes Reeves star<br />

appeal saying, “Star <strong>and</strong> fan d<strong>is</strong>course <strong>of</strong>ten attribute <strong>the</strong> mystery <strong>and</strong> fascination <strong>of</strong><br />

Reeves’s persona to its opacity, its propensity to change unexpectedly, <strong>and</strong> its ability to<br />

exceed any single image or description” (192). Just as Reeves’ star persona puts into<br />

question <strong>the</strong> notion <strong>of</strong> an unchanging, generative, identity, h<strong>is</strong> on­screen presence also<br />

res<strong>is</strong>ts reading. Ra<strong>the</strong>r than providing a “window into <strong>the</strong> soul, “ Reeves’ acting <strong>is</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

describes as soul­less, a description perfectly in keeping with a post­Enlightenment<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> individual <strong>and</strong> identity.<br />

Reeves <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Politics</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Closet<br />

By destabilizing sexuality <strong>and</strong> race, <strong>the</strong>n, Reeves also destabilizes subjectivity.<br />

The resulting freedom from <strong>the</strong> dictates <strong>of</strong> an essential identity would seem to empower<br />

Reeves, to give him control over such seemingly intractable “problems” <strong>of</strong> race <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!