27.03.2013 Views

Code of Ethics Guidelines - APEGBC

Code of Ethics Guidelines - APEGBC

Code of Ethics Guidelines - APEGBC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

APPENDIX C CODE OF ETHICS GUIDELINES<br />

(o) Members may promote and advertise their work or abilities provided<br />

that:<br />

• the advertising preserves the public interest by reporting accurate<br />

and factual information which neither exaggerates nor misleads,<br />

• the advertising does not impair the dignity <strong>of</strong> the members or their<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essions, and<br />

• the statements do not convey criticism <strong>of</strong> other members directly or<br />

indirectly.<br />

(p) Members should endeavour to provide prospective engineering or<br />

geoscience employees with complete information on working conditions<br />

and proposed status <strong>of</strong> employment and, after employment, keep them<br />

informed <strong>of</strong> any changes in such conditions or status.<br />

Principle 8: present clearly to employers and clients the possible consequences if<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional decisions or judgments are overruled or disregarded.<br />

Commentary:<br />

Members may occasionally find themselves in a situation where their<br />

recommendation is being questioned by their employer, client, or another<br />

expert.<br />

When the disagreement is between two members, the duty <strong>of</strong> the individual<br />

who bears pr<strong>of</strong>essional responsibility for the recommendation is to ensure that<br />

the facts and recommendations are correct and that the information and<br />

assumptions are laid out simply and lucidly. This should be done both in<br />

writing and by personal contact for contentious issues. If the senior member<br />

chooses to overrule the other member’s recommendation, in full knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />

its basis, the senior member consciously takes responsibility.<br />

A member has continuing obligations although his or her recommendations<br />

may be overruled by others.<br />

When members find themselves in a situation where their recommendation is<br />

being questioned by a non-member, an additional element <strong>of</strong> difficulty is<br />

introduced. The non-member may lack the technical sophistication to<br />

appreciate both the rationale <strong>of</strong> the recommendation and the potential<br />

consequences <strong>of</strong> failure to accept the recommendation. In such instances the<br />

member should make all reasonable efforts to ensure that an appropriate<br />

decision is made. The member remains the last line <strong>of</strong> defence for the public<br />

welfare.<br />

ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND GEOSCIENTISTS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!