Code of Ethics Guidelines - APEGBC
Code of Ethics Guidelines - APEGBC
Code of Ethics Guidelines - APEGBC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
APPENDIX C CODE OF ETHICS GUIDELINES<br />
(o) Members may promote and advertise their work or abilities provided<br />
that:<br />
• the advertising preserves the public interest by reporting accurate<br />
and factual information which neither exaggerates nor misleads,<br />
• the advertising does not impair the dignity <strong>of</strong> the members or their<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essions, and<br />
• the statements do not convey criticism <strong>of</strong> other members directly or<br />
indirectly.<br />
(p) Members should endeavour to provide prospective engineering or<br />
geoscience employees with complete information on working conditions<br />
and proposed status <strong>of</strong> employment and, after employment, keep them<br />
informed <strong>of</strong> any changes in such conditions or status.<br />
Principle 8: present clearly to employers and clients the possible consequences if<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional decisions or judgments are overruled or disregarded.<br />
Commentary:<br />
Members may occasionally find themselves in a situation where their<br />
recommendation is being questioned by their employer, client, or another<br />
expert.<br />
When the disagreement is between two members, the duty <strong>of</strong> the individual<br />
who bears pr<strong>of</strong>essional responsibility for the recommendation is to ensure that<br />
the facts and recommendations are correct and that the information and<br />
assumptions are laid out simply and lucidly. This should be done both in<br />
writing and by personal contact for contentious issues. If the senior member<br />
chooses to overrule the other member’s recommendation, in full knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />
its basis, the senior member consciously takes responsibility.<br />
A member has continuing obligations although his or her recommendations<br />
may be overruled by others.<br />
When members find themselves in a situation where their recommendation is<br />
being questioned by a non-member, an additional element <strong>of</strong> difficulty is<br />
introduced. The non-member may lack the technical sophistication to<br />
appreciate both the rationale <strong>of</strong> the recommendation and the potential<br />
consequences <strong>of</strong> failure to accept the recommendation. In such instances the<br />
member should make all reasonable efforts to ensure that an appropriate<br />
decision is made. The member remains the last line <strong>of</strong> defence for the public<br />
welfare.<br />
ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND GEOSCIENTISTS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA