28.03.2013 Views

THE SHARK-MONSTER IN OLMEC ICONOGRAPHY - Imaginary Year

THE SHARK-MONSTER IN OLMEC ICONOGRAPHY - Imaginary Year

THE SHARK-MONSTER IN OLMEC ICONOGRAPHY - Imaginary Year

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PHILIP J. ARNOLD III, “The Shark-Monster in Olmec Iconography”<br />

Mesoamerican Voices, 2 (2005)<br />

below. First I address the rarer instances<br />

in which the provenience of relevant Olmec<br />

material is well established. This exercise<br />

underscores the apparent sacred nature of<br />

the shark-monster in Olmec thought. I<br />

then investigate several images in which the<br />

shark-monster interacts with human figures.<br />

These representations imply a<br />

Mesoamerican world-creation event in<br />

which a deity or mythic hero subdues the<br />

shark-supernatural, ultimately resulting in<br />

the formation of the world’s surface. Finally,<br />

I explore the association of the sharkmonster<br />

and ritual regalia. One set of examples<br />

involves scepters and batons tipped<br />

with a shark’s tooth. The second group of<br />

examples includes headdresses in which<br />

shark imagery plays a central role. In these<br />

cases the ruler appropriates the shark-supernatural<br />

imagery to exemplify and reinforce<br />

his position as axis mundi.<br />

Shark Imagery from Known<br />

Contexts<br />

In a series of studies dating to the<br />

1970s, Peter David Joralemon (1971, 1976)<br />

tentatively identified a suite of<br />

supernaturals that occurred in Olmec iconography.<br />

Among these representations<br />

was “God VIII,” one of four images that also<br />

appeared on the Las Limas figure. This<br />

sculpture, uncovered by children in the<br />

small village of Las Limas, Veracruz in 1965,<br />

consists of a seated, cross-legged individual<br />

holding a smaller individual across his lap<br />

(de la Fuente 1996; Joralemon 1996a). The<br />

God VIII profile is located on the left knee<br />

of the Las Limas figure (Figure 5). 6 Its<br />

defining characteristics are simple, but<br />

should now be familiar: a reduced lower<br />

10<br />

jaw, a single large tooth emerging from the<br />

upper gum, and an unfilled crescent that<br />

serves as the eye. Although this image is<br />

still occasionally characterized simply as a<br />

“Death God” (e.g., de la Fuente 1996:170),<br />

most scholars now accept it as the sharkmonster<br />

(Joralemon 1996a:55; Coe<br />

1989:76; Grove 2000:279-280).<br />

The presence of the shark supernatural<br />

on the Las Limas figure bespeaks the<br />

central relevance of this entity to coastal<br />

Olmec ideology. This importance is echoed<br />

in additional Gulf lowlands contexts.<br />

For example, a shark-monster effigy occurs<br />

within the spectacular jade cache from<br />

Cerro de las Mesas (Drucker 1955:Figure<br />

4, Plate 40c). This cache was discovered<br />

when excavations trenched Mound 1 at the<br />

site (Drucker 1943, 1955). Although this<br />

offering dates to the Classic Period, it contained<br />

many greenstone artifacts that appear<br />

to be Olmec in origin. The inclusion<br />

of the shark supernatural in this offering,<br />

as well as the presence of shark-monsters<br />

on Cerro de las Mesas stelae (see below),<br />

indicates the powerful longitudinal impact<br />

of this water beast along the Gulf lowlands.<br />

It should not be surprising, however,<br />

that shark remains per se are rare; as mostly<br />

cartilaginous creatures, sharks have few<br />

parts that will survive the ravages of time.<br />

Shark teeth, therefore, are the most common<br />

direct evidence for this fish in archaeological<br />

contexts (e.g., de Borhegyi 1961). 7<br />

Excavations at La Venta produced shark<br />

teeth in a highly ritualized context. During<br />

the 1942 field season, workers explored<br />

the area known as Complex A, located to<br />

the north of the great Mound C-1 (Drucker<br />

1952). A trench placed in Mound A-2 revealed<br />

a closed “tomb” constructed entirely

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!