north american native orchid journal - at The Culture Sheet
north american native orchid journal - at The Culture Sheet
north american native orchid journal - at The Culture Sheet
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
NORTH AMERICAN<br />
NATIVE ORCHID JOURNAL<br />
Volume 16(1) 2010<br />
IN THIS ISSUE:<br />
GROWING CYPRIPEDIUMS IN CONTAINERS<br />
TRANSPLANT METHODS FOR THE ENDANGERED ORCHID<br />
SPIRANTHES PARKSII<br />
PROPAGATION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF THE NATIVE ORCHIDS OF<br />
THE U.S. ……<br />
and more………….
<strong>The</strong> North American N<strong>at</strong>ive Orchid Journal (ISSN 1084-7332) is a public<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
devoted to promoting interest and knowledge of the <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> <strong>orchid</strong>s of North<br />
America. A limited number of the print version of each issue of the Journal<br />
are available upon request and electronic versions are available to all<br />
interested persons or institutions free of charge. <strong>The</strong> Journal welcomes<br />
articles of any n<strong>at</strong>ure th<strong>at</strong> deal with <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> or introduced <strong>orchid</strong>s th<strong>at</strong> are<br />
found growing wild in North America, primarily <strong>north</strong> of Mexico, although<br />
articles of general interest concerning Mexican species will always be<br />
welcome.
NORTH AMERICAN<br />
NATIVE ORCHID JOURNAL<br />
Volume 16 (1) 2010<br />
CONTENTS<br />
NOTES FROM THE EDITOR<br />
1<br />
LOOKING FORWARD<br />
3<br />
GROWING CYPRIPEDIUMS IN CONTAINERS<br />
Doug Martin, Ph.D.<br />
4<br />
PRELIMINARY RESULTS FOR FIELD ESTABLISHMENT TECHNIQUES OF<br />
CALOPOGON TUBEROSUS<br />
Philip J. Kauth, Michael E. Kane & Timothy R. Johnson<br />
12<br />
A PRACTICAL AND INTEGRATED APPROACH TO NATIVE ORCHID<br />
CONSERVATION AND PROPAGATION AT THE ATLANTA BOTANICAL<br />
GARDEN<br />
M<strong>at</strong>t Richards & Jenny Cruse Sanders, Ph.D.<br />
25<br />
AN UNDERGRADUATE’S FIRST ADVENTURE INTO FIELD RESEARCH:<br />
AN EPIPHYTIC ORCHID SURVEY IN SOUTHERN FLORIDA<br />
Emily Massey<br />
31<br />
TRANSPLANT METHODS FOR THE ENDANGERED ORCHID<br />
SPIRANTHES PARKSII CORRELL<br />
J. Ryan Hammons, Fred E. Smeins & William E. Rogers<br />
38<br />
PROPAGATION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF THE NATIVE ORCHIDS OF<br />
THE UNITED STATES (INCLUDING SELECTED POSSESIONS), CANADA,<br />
ST. PIERRE ET MIQUELON, AND GREENLAND<br />
Scott Stewart, Ph.D. & Aaron Hicks<br />
47
SHOULD WE OR SHOULDN'T WE?<br />
ETHICS AND ORCHIDS<br />
<strong>The</strong> Slow Empiricist<br />
67<br />
RECENT ORCHID LITERATURE OF INTEREST<br />
69<br />
BOOK REVIEWS<br />
72<br />
ASYMBIOTIC TECHNIQUE OF ORCHID SEED GERMINATION<br />
Second revised edition<br />
MICROPROPAGATION OF ORCHIDS,<br />
Volumes 1 & 2 (2nd Edition)<br />
Unless otherwise credited, all graphics were prepared by the authors of the respective papers. <strong>The</strong> opinions<br />
expressed in the Journal are those of the authors. Scientific articles may be subject to peer review and<br />
popular articles will be examined for both accuracy and scientific content.<br />
Volume 16(1): 1-81 issued January 15, 2010.<br />
Copyright 2010 by the North American N<strong>at</strong>ive Orchid Journal<br />
Cover: Calopogon tuberosus var. tuberosus by Stan Folsom
NOTES FROM THE EDITORS<br />
<strong>The</strong> first issue of the North American N<strong>at</strong>ive Orchid Journal for 2010 is<br />
a special issue th<strong>at</strong> is focused on <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> <strong>orchid</strong> propag<strong>at</strong>ion, cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion, and<br />
reintroduction. <strong>The</strong> idea for this special issue was borne from convers<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
among Lawrence Zettler, Aaron Hicks, and the Associ<strong>at</strong>e Editor about the<br />
need to offer Journal readers an in-depth review of current trends in <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong><br />
<strong>orchid</strong> propag<strong>at</strong>ion and cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion work. Recognizing the integr<strong>at</strong>ion of<br />
<strong>orchid</strong> reintroduction with propag<strong>at</strong>ion and cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion work, the Associ<strong>at</strong>e<br />
Editor has included all three topics in this issue.<br />
This issue presents articles by academic and popular authors about<br />
<strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> <strong>orchid</strong> propag<strong>at</strong>ion, cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion, and reintroduction. Doug Martin<br />
begins the special issue with detailed advice about cultiv<strong>at</strong>ing Cypripedium<br />
species in containers, followed by Philip Kauth et al. presenting preliminary<br />
research results from a Calopogon tuberosus reintroduction study. <strong>The</strong> special<br />
issue continues with M<strong>at</strong>t Richards and Jenny Cruise Sanders of the Atlanta<br />
Botanical Garden discussing practical and integr<strong>at</strong>ed approaches to <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong><br />
<strong>orchid</strong> propag<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>at</strong> the Garden. Next, Emily Massey presents her personal<br />
story of <strong>orchid</strong> field research and reintroduction in southwestern Florida,<br />
followed by Ryan Hammons et al.‖s present<strong>at</strong>ion of transloc<strong>at</strong>ion work with<br />
the Federally endangered Spiranthes parksii. <strong>The</strong> issue concludes with a<br />
comprehensive upd<strong>at</strong>e by Scott Stewart and Aaron Hicks on the propag<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
and conserv<strong>at</strong>ion st<strong>at</strong>us of <strong>orchid</strong> species <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> to the United St<strong>at</strong>es, Canada,<br />
Greenland, Puerto Rico, and selected possessions. This collection of authors<br />
and articles represents a diverse cross section of the cutting edge of <strong>orchid</strong><br />
propag<strong>at</strong>ion, cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion, and reintroduction.<br />
<strong>The</strong> editors wish to thank all the authors and reviewers who made this<br />
special issue possible.<br />
1
<strong>The</strong> electronic form<strong>at</strong> continues to be well received and we now reach<br />
more than 1800 readers. Back issues from volume 3 (1997) to present are now<br />
available online and you may read the current and back issues <strong>at</strong>:<br />
http://wiki.terr<strong>orchid</strong>.org/tow:<strong>journal</strong>s<br />
<strong>The</strong> current upd<strong>at</strong>e of the North American Personal Checklist is also<br />
available <strong>at</strong> th<strong>at</strong> website. <strong>The</strong> checklist will be upd<strong>at</strong>ed as needed with new<br />
taxa noted.<br />
Paul Martin Brown, Editor<br />
na<strong>orchid</strong>@aol.com<br />
10896 SW 90 th Terrace, Ocala, FL 34481<br />
36 Avenue F, Acton, Maine 04001 (June- early October)<br />
Scott L. Stewart, Ph.D. Associ<strong>at</strong>e Editor<br />
slstewar@gmail.com<br />
Kankakee Community College<br />
Horticulture & Agriculture Programs<br />
100 College Drive<br />
Kankakee, Illinois 60901<br />
2
LOOKING FORWARD<br />
Future issues scheduled for 2010 of the<br />
North American N<strong>at</strong>ive Orchid Journal<br />
will fe<strong>at</strong>ure such topics as<br />
new taxa in Mesadenus and Corallorhiza,<br />
a very special paper on evolutionary classific<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
by Richard B<strong>at</strong>eman from Kew<br />
a new Series<br />
HERE AND THERE<br />
species found in North America and elsewhere<br />
Cypripedium cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion and hybrids<br />
and much more!<br />
3
Martin: GROWING CYPRIPEDIUMS IN CONTAINERS<br />
GROWING CYPRIPEDIUMS IN CONTAINERS<br />
Doug Martin, Ph.D.<br />
Cypripediums are generally considered hard to grow. However, like all plants, they are<br />
adapted to grow under a particular set of conditions in their n<strong>at</strong>ural environment. If the grower can<br />
provide those conditions, the plants will practically grow themselves. Over the years I‖ve developed<br />
methods, most adapted from other growers, which allow me to provide the conditions needed by<br />
many cypripediums. While I still have a lot to learn, particularly about growing seedlings and the<br />
more demanding species, my system seems to work well for the easier growing species and for<br />
hybrids. Not counting seedlings, I now have about two dozen plants of six species and seven hybrids.<br />
I‖ve only lost two m<strong>at</strong>ure plants in the last four years, both Cypripedium candidum, one of the more<br />
demanding species. In this article I‖ll describe cypripediums‖ basic cultural requirements and how I<br />
meet them.<br />
Fig. 1. One of my standard growing containers for<br />
cypripediums with a single plant of C. parviflorum var.<br />
makasin th<strong>at</strong> I have grown from seed.<br />
GROWING CONDITIONS<br />
While cypripediums can be grown in garden<br />
beds, I prefer to grow mine in containers. This gives<br />
me the ability to experiment with growing conditions.<br />
I can move them to different loc<strong>at</strong>ions in the yard<br />
with different light levels, and I can easily change the<br />
growing medium.<br />
Containers: For most <strong>orchid</strong> growers, growing in<br />
containers means using regular flower pots. However,<br />
in the wild cypripedium roots spread out in a circle<br />
from the crown of the plant, as much as two to three<br />
feet in all directions. <strong>The</strong>y also stay shallow, growing<br />
in only the top one to two inches of moist, well<br />
aer<strong>at</strong>ed soil (Stoutamire, 1991). To accommod<strong>at</strong>e this<br />
growth habit as much as possible, I use plastic storage<br />
containers th<strong>at</strong> are about 16 in. × 10 in. and 7 in. deep<br />
(41 × 25 × 18 cm), with one blooming-sized plant per<br />
container ( Fig. 1). I‖d like to use larger containers, but<br />
they quickly become too heavy and hard to move.<br />
4
Martin: GROWING CYPRIPEDIUMS IN CONTAINERS<br />
Although cypripediums can be grown and flowered in regular flower pots, the ones I‖ve seen<br />
don‖t seem to grow as large, or have flowers as large, as plants in the wild or in garden beds. I suspect<br />
th<strong>at</strong> the roots simply don‖t have room to spread. It‖s sort of a cypripedium bonsai. I think th<strong>at</strong> giving<br />
the roots extra room should result in a larger<br />
plant. My largest plant of C. reginae seems to<br />
support this theory, with three inch flowers on<br />
top of two foot tall stalks (Fig. 2).<br />
Fig. 2. C. reginae flowering in one of my standard<br />
containers. <strong>The</strong> flowers are three inches across and the<br />
stems are two feet tall.<br />
5<br />
Cypripediums need consistent moisture <strong>at</strong><br />
their roots. To help accommod<strong>at</strong>e this<br />
requirement, my containers mimic the artificial<br />
bogs used to grow other North American <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong><br />
<strong>orchid</strong>s. I leave the bottoms of the containers<br />
solid and drill holes in the sides about four to five<br />
inches (10 to 16 cm) below the surface of the<br />
medium. <strong>The</strong> area below the holes acts as a<br />
reservoir and helps to maintain the consistent<br />
moisture level th<strong>at</strong> the roots need. It is not<br />
necessary to grow them this way, but it gives me<br />
a margin of error in w<strong>at</strong>ering.<br />
Medium: Because cypripediums need air as well as<br />
consistent moisture <strong>at</strong> the roots, I use w<strong>at</strong>er<br />
retentive growing media th<strong>at</strong> are open, airy, and<br />
free draining. For most cypripediums the<br />
medium should be neutral to slightly acidic. Most<br />
of the mixes I use are 75-80% inert m<strong>at</strong>erial:<br />
gravel, sand, perlite, Turface, or pumice. <strong>The</strong><br />
sand and gravel should be quartz, because too<br />
much limestone in the mix will make it too<br />
alkaline. <strong>The</strong> remainder of my growing media is organic m<strong>at</strong>erial. Some cypripedium growers use<br />
pe<strong>at</strong> or chopped tree leaves, but I prefer coir–finely chopped coconut husk fibers. It is moisture<br />
retentive like pe<strong>at</strong>, but isn‖t acidic. I add a handful of ground oyster shells to each container to buffer<br />
the pH of the medium. Two mixes th<strong>at</strong> I‖ve used with good results are:<br />
Medium 1: three parts perlite; one part gravel; one part coir.<br />
Medium 2: four parts perlite; one part coir.<br />
W<strong>at</strong>er: One of the most important consider<strong>at</strong>ions when growing cypripediums is th<strong>at</strong> they require<br />
consistent moisture <strong>at</strong> their roots. <strong>The</strong> medium should never be allowed to dry out. Cypripediums<br />
are sensitive to w<strong>at</strong>er quality, so they should only receive w<strong>at</strong>er low in dissolved solids such as rain,<br />
distilled or RO w<strong>at</strong>er.
Martin: GROWING CYPRIPEDIUMS IN CONTAINERS<br />
Fertilizer: Cypripediums are adapted to grow in nutrient-poor soils. <strong>The</strong>y are light feeders and do not<br />
require much fertilizer. In a mostly inorganic medium like I use, they do better with frequent<br />
applic<strong>at</strong>ions of dilute fertilizer. Any good quality fertilizer will do. I use the Michigan St<strong>at</strong>e fertilizer<br />
<strong>at</strong> about 25 parts per million of nitrogen. I w<strong>at</strong>er with it every other week and use it as a foliar spray<br />
on altern<strong>at</strong>e weeks. I fertilize my cypripediums from the time the leaves unfold in the spring until<br />
early September.<br />
Light: Most cypripediums grow in light shade in open forests or under shrubs. <strong>The</strong>y like morning<br />
sun, but must be protected from direct sun during mid-day. I grow mine on the south sides of<br />
deciduous trees where they are in shade after about nine or ten o‖clock in the morning. <strong>The</strong>y get<br />
about 1,800 foot-candles in mid-day. Some like a bit more light, and I move these away from the tree<br />
trunk to where the shade is thinner.<br />
Cypripediums can also be grown indoors under lights. As a light source, I prefer the new T-5<br />
fluorescent bulbs. Regular fluorescent bulbs only produce enough light if they are positioned very<br />
close to the plants. <strong>The</strong>y are only adequ<strong>at</strong>e for seedlings and small plants. High pressure sodium and<br />
metal halide lights produce plenty of light but also a lot of he<strong>at</strong>; the T-5s fall in the middle, with<br />
plenty of light but not too much he<strong>at</strong>.<br />
Temper<strong>at</strong>ure: While some cypripediums are <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> to <strong>north</strong>ern areas and require cool temper<strong>at</strong>ures<br />
year round, I find th<strong>at</strong> several species and most of the hybrids grow well in my yard in the Kansas<br />
City area. Our summer temper<strong>at</strong>ures are often in the 90°s F (mid 30°s C) and even over 100F (38°<br />
C). In winter, cypripediums require a cold rest period <strong>at</strong> near freezing temper<strong>at</strong>ures. <strong>The</strong> Kansas City<br />
area has these conditions from November through March.<br />
I grow all of my seedlings, as well as the cooler growing Asian species, Cypripedium<br />
macranthos, in a basement lightroom where the temper<strong>at</strong>ure stays between 72° F (22° C) to 81° F<br />
(27°C). I grow tropical <strong>orchid</strong>s in the lightroom during the winter. When the we<strong>at</strong>her gets warm in<br />
May, the tropicals go outside and the cypripediums go inside. <strong>The</strong> C. macranthos plants were<br />
decreasing in size every year when I tried to grow them outside with my other cypripediums. Since I<br />
started keeping them in the basement, they are making a comeback.<br />
Humidity: Like all <strong>orchid</strong>s, cypripediums prefer humidity above 50%. However, there does seem to<br />
be some flexibility. My plants often experience humidity levels of about 25% or less outside during<br />
the summer, without any noticeable neg<strong>at</strong>ive effects.<br />
Potting: Cypripediums should be potted with the roots spread out and the growth buds <strong>at</strong> or just<br />
above the surface of the medium (Fig. 3). To accomplish this, I fill the container with medium to<br />
about three inches below the top. <strong>The</strong>n I mound the medium in the center so th<strong>at</strong> it slopes gently<br />
down toward the edges. I place the plant on the mound, spread the roots out evenly and add medium<br />
until the growth buds are just covered and the surface is level throughout. <strong>The</strong>n I w<strong>at</strong>er the plant and<br />
add more medium where it washes down.<br />
6
Martin: GROWING CYPRIPEDIUMS IN CONTAINERS<br />
Fig. 3. Growth buds of C. parviflorum var. makasin showing the proper<br />
depth for potting.<br />
7<br />
Pests: Deer and rabbits like to e<strong>at</strong><br />
cypripediums, and squirrels like<br />
to dig in the medium. Since we<br />
have a lot of all three, I keep my<br />
cypripediums in cages made<br />
from 1 × 2 in. (2.5 × 5.0 cm)<br />
boards covered with chicken<br />
wire on the sides and top. Four<br />
of the cypripedium containers<br />
fit nicely in a 48 × 18 in. (120 ×<br />
45 cm) cage. Most of my cages<br />
are two feet (60 cm) tall, but the<br />
taller C. reginae need one three<br />
feet (90 cm) tall.<br />
Slugs and snails can be a problem, especially if the container is in contact with the ground<br />
overnight. <strong>The</strong>se pests can devour an entire seedling or e<strong>at</strong> through the stem of a blooming sized<br />
plant overnight. Because my plants are kept on raised pl<strong>at</strong>forms during the growing season, I only<br />
worry about slugs and snails in the spring when I uncover containers th<strong>at</strong> have been buried for the<br />
winter. I tre<strong>at</strong> with slug pellets containing metaldehyde as part of the move to the growing area.<br />
C<strong>at</strong>erpillars also can reduce a small plant to a leafless stalk seemingly overnight. I check my plants<br />
regularly for signs of c<strong>at</strong>erpillar damage. I tre<strong>at</strong> with a dust designed for c<strong>at</strong>erpillars on roses and<br />
flowering plants.<br />
GROWTH CYCLE<br />
Cypripediums are hardy perennial plants with four distinct seasons in their growth cycle.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y are dormant during the winter and require a cold rest period. In the spring they break<br />
dormancy and grow rapidly, reaching full size and flowering in three to eight weeks, depending on<br />
the species. In the l<strong>at</strong>e spring and the summer they grow roots, store food and produce the growth<br />
buds for the following year. In the fall, the stems and leaves wither and die back to the surface of the<br />
medium in prepar<strong>at</strong>ion for winter dormancy. I tre<strong>at</strong> my plants differently during each of these<br />
seasons and will discuss each in turn.<br />
Winter Care: Cypripediums are dormant in winter so their needs are simple. <strong>The</strong>y need to be kept<br />
cold <strong>at</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ures near, but not below, freezing for three to four months. <strong>The</strong>y must not dry out,<br />
and they must be protected from temper<strong>at</strong>ure extremes; either very low temper<strong>at</strong>ures th<strong>at</strong> could<br />
freeze the plant solid, or mid-winter warm spells. If the plants warm up, they may break dormancy<br />
and start to grow. <strong>The</strong> new growths are very tender and will likely be killed when cold temper<strong>at</strong>ures<br />
return. <strong>The</strong> plants should be prepared for winter after the stems have withered and temper<strong>at</strong>ures
Martin: GROWING CYPRIPEDIUMS IN CONTAINERS<br />
have gotten cold, but before any hard freezes. Here in Kansas City I prepare my cypripediums for<br />
winter <strong>at</strong> the end of November.<br />
I prefer to store my plants underground for the winter. I put the containers in a hole deep<br />
enough th<strong>at</strong> the surface of the medium is three<br />
to four inches below grade level, then cover<br />
them with five or six inches of mulch (Fig. 4).<br />
N<strong>at</strong>ure maintains the temper<strong>at</strong>ure and moisture<br />
for me. In colder areas, or where the risk of<br />
mid-winter warm spells is gre<strong>at</strong>er than here in<br />
the Kansas City area, it may be necessary to dig<br />
deeper and/or use a thicker layer of mulch. It is<br />
important th<strong>at</strong> the hole drains well. I use<br />
inexpensive cypress mulch from the local<br />
hardware store, but some growers use chopped<br />
leaves. I‖ve found th<strong>at</strong> whole leaves pack down<br />
and cause the plants to rot.<br />
Alter<strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong>ly, cypripediums can be<br />
stored in an unhe<strong>at</strong>ed garage, basement or<br />
enclosed porch where the temper<strong>at</strong>ure stays<br />
Fig. 4. Cypripedium containers being buried for the winter. I<br />
cover the containers with four to five inches of mulch.<br />
near freezing. Mulching the surface of the medium will help maintain the moisture level and protect<br />
the growth buds from light freezes. I‖ve stored other hardy <strong>orchid</strong>s this way and will have to start<br />
doing it with my cypripediums because I‖ve run out of places to dig holes in my yard.<br />
Some growers put their plants, pots and all, in plastic bags and store them in a refriger<strong>at</strong>or,<br />
not the freezer, through the winter. <strong>The</strong> medium should be just barely moist. I‖ve discovered the<br />
hard way th<strong>at</strong> if the medium is too wet, the plants will rot.<br />
Spring Care: I move my plants from their winter storage to the growing area when the danger of frost<br />
is low, but when the daytime temper<strong>at</strong>ures are still cool, preferably in the 50°s F (10° to 15° C). <strong>The</strong><br />
new shoots are very sensitive to frosts and even a light one will damage the developing leaves and<br />
flower buds. A freeze can kill the entire shoot. However, if the daytime temper<strong>at</strong>ures are too high,<br />
the new shoots expand too rapidly and produce a weak plant.<br />
Based on Kansas City we<strong>at</strong>her, about to first of April I remove the winter mulch, tre<strong>at</strong> for<br />
slugs and snails, and move my cypripediums to their growing area. Once the containers are in their<br />
growing area, the medium warms up and the plants break dormancy. <strong>The</strong> growth buds formed the<br />
previous year expand and grow to their full size quite quickly. I cover my plants or move them into<br />
the garage if a frost is expected. I also cover them or move them into the garage if strong thunder<br />
storms or tornadoes are forecast. <strong>The</strong> only other care necessary <strong>at</strong> this time is to fertilize and to w<strong>at</strong>er<br />
if it doesn‖t rain. If the plant is m<strong>at</strong>ure, it will bloom now. This all happens in three to eight weeks,<br />
depending on the species. Now is the time when I find out how well I grew my plants last year!<br />
8
Martin: GROWING CYPRIPEDIUMS IN CONTAINERS<br />
Summer Care: Summer is when cypripediums grow into larger and stronger plants, but you won‖t see<br />
the results until the following year. Cypripediums initi<strong>at</strong>e new roots <strong>at</strong> the base of the new shoot<br />
shortly after flowering. During the summer and into the fall these new roots and the roots from the<br />
previous two years elong<strong>at</strong>e, and the plants store energy in the rhizomes and produce the growth<br />
buds for next year. <strong>The</strong> entire above-ground portion of the plant for the next growing season -<br />
shoots, leaves and flowers - develops within these growth buds (Fig. 5). <strong>The</strong> care a cypripedium<br />
receives during summer will determine how strong a plant and how many flowers, if any, it will<br />
produce the next year.<br />
During summer, I continue<br />
w<strong>at</strong>ering and fertilizing as in the spring.<br />
<strong>The</strong> one cultural challenge in the summer is<br />
th<strong>at</strong> cypripediums prefer to have their roots<br />
cool. I mulch the surface of the medium to<br />
protect it and the roots from being he<strong>at</strong>ed<br />
by the sun. Of course, this also helps to<br />
keep the medium from drying out. I use<br />
the same mulch used in the winter, and I<br />
am careful not to let the mulch touch the<br />
stem of the plant as this can cause it to rot.<br />
<strong>The</strong> container can also be set into a<br />
shallow, well draining hole in the ground<br />
to keep the roots cooler. I w<strong>at</strong>ch for<br />
Fig. 5. C. parviflorum var. makasin growth buds are well<br />
developed by early August. <strong>The</strong>y will continue to grow thicker<br />
over the next one to two months as the roots lengthen and the<br />
plant stores energy in the tubers.<br />
9<br />
c<strong>at</strong>erpillars, slugs and snails, and use an<br />
appropri<strong>at</strong>e tre<strong>at</strong>ment immedi<strong>at</strong>ely if I see<br />
signs of these pests.<br />
Fall Care: In fall, the cypripediums stop<br />
growing and all above-ground growth dies back. I stop fertilizing about the beginning of September. I<br />
keep the medium moist and wait for the plants to go dormant, signaled by the leaves turning brown.<br />
I do any necessary repotting and dividing in l<strong>at</strong>e fall before I put the plants in the ground for the<br />
winter. I move my cypripediums to their winter quarters sometime between the first frost and the<br />
first hard freeze.<br />
New Plants: Cypripedium suppliers ship bare-root dormant plants in either the fall or spring. I prefer<br />
to receive them in the fall because spring shipments arrive l<strong>at</strong>e in my spring growing season. Most<br />
suppliers are loc<strong>at</strong>ed further <strong>north</strong> than I am, and by the time they can safely ship plants, the we<strong>at</strong>her<br />
in my area has already warmed up. When I receive plants in the fall, I seal the bare-root plants in<br />
plastic food storage containers with a few drops of w<strong>at</strong>er. I then seal the containers in a plastic bag<br />
and put them in the refriger<strong>at</strong>or until spring. Of course, another option is to pot the plants and put<br />
them with your other cypripediums for the winter.
Martin: GROWING CYPRIPEDIUMS IN CONTAINERS<br />
RECOMMENDED SPECIES AND HYBRIDS<br />
<strong>The</strong> genus Cypripedium has 45 species and is quite diverse. Not surprisingly, some are less<br />
demanding in their requirements. Below is a list of some of those species th<strong>at</strong> are considered among<br />
the easiest to grow and th<strong>at</strong> I‖ve had success with. Except as noted, I grow these as described above.<br />
C. parviflorum: <strong>The</strong> three varieties of the North American yellow lady‖s-slipper are considered to be<br />
among the easiest of the species to grow. <strong>The</strong> two varieties I have, makasin and pubescens have both<br />
grown well for me.<br />
C. kentuckiense: <strong>The</strong> largest species in the genus, it grows n<strong>at</strong>urally in sandy stream banks.<br />
Consequently, I use a medium of 50% sand, 30% gravel and 20% pe<strong>at</strong>. However, I would expect it to<br />
grow well in either of my standard mixes.<br />
C. reginae: This species likes a little more light than others, so I grow it where it gets more morning<br />
sun. It grows n<strong>at</strong>urally in more bog-like<br />
conditions than other species. I grow<br />
mine in a mix of three parts Perlite, one<br />
part gravel and two parts ―black pe<strong>at</strong>‖,<br />
which is partially composted pe<strong>at</strong> moss.<br />
Fig. 6. C. Hilda (C. ×ventricosum × macranthos), one of the<br />
many cypripedium hybrids th<strong>at</strong> are available from commercial growers.<br />
10<br />
C. formosanum: This is often considered<br />
the easiest species to grow. It has r<strong>at</strong>her<br />
long rhizomes and the new growths can<br />
be several inches away from the previous<br />
year‖s, so it requires a large container.<br />
Also, it is prone to breaking dormancy<br />
during a mid-winter thaw, so extra<br />
protection may be needed in winter.<br />
C. macranthos: This species grows well if<br />
protected from temper<strong>at</strong>ures above 80°F<br />
(27°C). I grow these in my basement<br />
lightroom during the hot part of the<br />
summer.<br />
Hybrids: In recent years a number of<br />
cypripedium hybrids have become<br />
available (Fig. 6). Like most <strong>orchid</strong>s,<br />
cypripedium hybrids are easier to grow<br />
than the species and are a good choice for<br />
the beginning grower.
SOURCES OF CYPRIPEDIUMS<br />
Martin: GROWING CYPRIPEDIUMS IN CONTAINERS<br />
Like their tropical cousins, many cypripedium popul<strong>at</strong>ions in the wild have been decim<strong>at</strong>ed by<br />
over-collection. Please purchase only artificially propag<strong>at</strong>ed cypripediums to help reduce the demand<br />
for wild-collected plants. Wild cypripediums have delic<strong>at</strong>e roots th<strong>at</strong> are usually damaged when plants<br />
are collected. Most die within two to three years after being removed from the wild. Cypripediums<br />
require several years to grow to blooming size and reputable growers price them accordingly. M<strong>at</strong>ure<br />
plants sold <strong>at</strong> bargain prices are almost certainly wild-collected. Many artificially propag<strong>at</strong>ed<br />
cypripediums are available from reputable nurseries and commercial <strong>orchid</strong> growers. Some<br />
companies th<strong>at</strong> I‖ve found to have consistently high quality plants are:<br />
Cyp Haven: http://www.c-we.com/cyp.haven/<br />
Hillside Nursery: http://hillsidenursery.biz/<br />
Itasca Lady Slipper Farm: http://www.ladyslipperfarm.com/<br />
Vermont Lady Slipper Company: http://www.vtladyslipper.com/<br />
Wild Orchid Company: http://www.wild<strong>orchid</strong>company.com/<br />
Spangle Creek Labs: http://www.spanglecreeklabs.com/<br />
SOURCES OF MORE INFORMATION ON GROWING CYPRIPEDIUMS<br />
Most of the suppliers listed above provide cultural inform<strong>at</strong>ion on their websites.<br />
Holger Perner has an excellent chapter on cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion in <strong>The</strong> Genus Cypripedium, by Phillip Cribb.<br />
Timber Press, Oregon. 1997.<br />
<strong>The</strong> cypripedium forum: http://www.cypripedium.de/forum/<br />
Doug Martin, 15523 Johnson Dr., Shawnee, KS 66217 bethdougm@kc.rr.com<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Stoutamire, W.P. 1991. Central growth cycle of Cypripedium candidum Muhl. root systems in an Ohio Prairie.<br />
Lindleyana 6(4): 235-40.<br />
11
Kauth et al.: PRELIMINARY RESULTS FOR FIELD ESTABLISHMENT TECHNIQUES OF CALOPOGON TUBEROSUS<br />
Calopogon tuberosus var. tuberosus<br />
common grass-pink<br />
12
Kauth et al.: PRELIMINARY RESULTS FOR FIELD ESTABLISHMENT TECHNIQUES OF CALOPOGON TUBEROSUS<br />
PRELIMINARY RESULTS FOR FIELD ESTABLISHMENT TECHNIQUES<br />
OF CALOPOGON TUBEROSUS<br />
Philip J. Kauth*, Michael E. Kane & Timothy R. Johnson<br />
Abstract<br />
Worldwide habit<strong>at</strong> loss has led to interest in propag<strong>at</strong>ion and reintroduction of <strong>orchid</strong>s. However,<br />
scientific investig<strong>at</strong>ion regarding successful field establishment remains poorly understood. Previous research has<br />
indic<strong>at</strong>ed th<strong>at</strong> using dormant storage organs and planting seedlings in areas of reduced competition increased<br />
survival of several <strong>orchid</strong> species. Here we describe methods for establishing Calopogon tuberosus, a North<br />
American terrestrial <strong>orchid</strong>, on the Florida Panther N<strong>at</strong>ional Wildlife Refuge. Compar<strong>at</strong>ive effects of planting<br />
seedlings and corms on survival and shoot growth were studied. In addition, seedling survival in burned and<br />
unburned plots was studied. While propagule type did not influence survival, d<strong>at</strong>e of planting did. A higher<br />
percentage of propagules survived when planted in February 2009 during the early growing season. While more<br />
seedlings were actively growing in the burned plot during April 2009, seedlings in the unburned plot produced<br />
more shoots. <strong>The</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a from this study are being used to develop management plans not only for C. tuberosus, but<br />
also other terrestrial <strong>orchid</strong>s.<br />
Introduction<br />
<strong>The</strong> worldwide loss of <strong>orchid</strong> taxa has led to an abundance of research focused on their<br />
conserv<strong>at</strong>ion, ecology, and reintroduction (Ramsay and Dixon, 2003). Unfortun<strong>at</strong>ely, few<br />
reports exist th<strong>at</strong> detail management methods for both <strong>orchid</strong> popul<strong>at</strong>ions and their habit<strong>at</strong><br />
(Stewart, 2007). Successful establishment of plants into current or former habit<strong>at</strong>s is often the<br />
culmin<strong>at</strong>ion and goal of <strong>orchid</strong> conserv<strong>at</strong>ion research (B<strong>at</strong>ty et al. 2006a). Establishing <strong>orchid</strong>s<br />
in the field is challenging because complex ecological requirements of individual taxa are not<br />
well-understood (Scade et al., 2006).<br />
Successful field establishment of terrestrial <strong>orchid</strong>s has been previously <strong>at</strong>tempted, but<br />
only for a few species (McKendrick, 1995; Ramsay and Stewart, 1998; Stewart et al., 2003;<br />
B<strong>at</strong>ty et al., 2006b; Scade et al., 2006; Yam<strong>at</strong>o and Iwase, 2008), and few studies have<br />
documented field establishment of North American species (Stewart, 2007). Long-term<br />
survival of field-transplanted <strong>orchid</strong>s is often very low, in part because efficient methods for<br />
establishing <strong>orchid</strong>s are lacking (B<strong>at</strong>ty et al., 2006a). <strong>The</strong> influence of abiotic and biotic factors<br />
on successful field establishment of <strong>orchid</strong>s has not been studied in detail (Scade et al., 2006).<br />
However, field establishment of <strong>orchid</strong>s could be an important tool for both conserving<br />
<strong>orchid</strong>s and furthering our knowledge of <strong>orchid</strong> ecology (McKendrick, 1995).<br />
13
Kauth et al.: PRELIMINARY RESULTS FOR FIELD ESTABLISHMENT TECHNIQUES OF CALOPOGON TUBEROSUS<br />
A major obstacle to field establishment is initial survival of propagules. Only a few<br />
articles highlight techniques for increasing survival of <strong>orchid</strong> seedlings under in situ conditions<br />
(B<strong>at</strong>ty et al., 2006b; Scade et al., 2006; Smith et al., 2009). B<strong>at</strong>ty et al. (2006b) reported higher<br />
survival of several Australian <strong>orchid</strong> species when dormant tubers were reintroduced r<strong>at</strong>her<br />
than seedlings. Observ<strong>at</strong>ions th<strong>at</strong> <strong>The</strong>lymitra manginiorum seedlings established more readily<br />
than tubers indic<strong>at</strong>e th<strong>at</strong> field performance of different propagules is species-specific (Smith et<br />
al., 2009). Competition may also be an important factor to consider for successful<br />
establishment (McKendrick, 1995). Dense coverage by <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> species increased survival of field<br />
transplanted <strong>orchid</strong> species (McKendrick, 1995; Scade et al., 2006; Yam<strong>at</strong>o and Iwase, 2008),<br />
but areas of gre<strong>at</strong>est veget<strong>at</strong>ion coverage, including weedy species, impeded total survival<br />
(McKendrick, 1995).<br />
Calopogon tuberosus var. tuberosus (Linnaeus) Britton, Sterns & Poggenberg, common<br />
grass-pink, is a corm-forming terrestrial <strong>orchid</strong> species found throughout eastern North<br />
America from south Florida to Newfoundland, Canada. Calopogon tuberosus is a fairly<br />
common <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> <strong>orchid</strong> and is an excellent candid<strong>at</strong>e to examine field establishment methods<br />
because: 1) seeds germin<strong>at</strong>e readily in vitro, 2) seedlings can be produced in several months<br />
(Whitlow, 1996; Kauth et al., 2006; Kauth et al., 2008), and 3) it is a corm-forming species.<br />
Because this species produces corms, the role of propagule type on successful field<br />
establishment can be studied.<br />
<strong>The</strong> objectives of this study were to: 1) Establish Calopogon tuberosus seedlings <strong>at</strong> the<br />
FPNWR; 2) Compare survival of seedlings and corms of C. tuberosus; 3) Compare survival<br />
and growth of seedlings in burned and unburned areas; and 4) Recommend management<br />
practices for establishing terrestrial <strong>orchid</strong>s <strong>at</strong> the FPNWR. <strong>The</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a gener<strong>at</strong>ed will be used to<br />
recommend management practices for the successful conserv<strong>at</strong>ion of this species and other<br />
terrestrial <strong>orchid</strong>s worldwide.<br />
M<strong>at</strong>erials and Methods<br />
Field Site<br />
<strong>The</strong> Florida Panther N<strong>at</strong>ional Wildlife Refuge (FPNWR) is loc<strong>at</strong>ed in Collier Co.,<br />
Florida and consists of 26,400 acres within the Big Cypress Basin (U.S. Fish and Wildlife<br />
Service 2009). <strong>The</strong> FPNWR was established in 1989 to protect the Florida panther and the<br />
mosaic of habit<strong>at</strong>s loc<strong>at</strong>ed throughout. As a n<strong>at</strong>ional wildlife refuge, the FPNWR actively<br />
manages the area with invasive plant removal, prescribed burning, <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> plant propag<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />
and restor<strong>at</strong>ion activities.<br />
<strong>The</strong> FPNWR is divided into 50 fire-management units. Calopogon tuberosus is currently<br />
found in units containing wet prairies (Fig. 1). <strong>The</strong>se grass and sedge domin<strong>at</strong>ed communities<br />
<strong>at</strong> the FPNWR are found between pine fl<strong>at</strong>woods domin<strong>at</strong>ed by Pinus elliotii (Davis, 1943;<br />
Duever et al., 1986). <strong>The</strong> largest popul<strong>at</strong>ion of C. tuberosus is found in a wet prairie where<br />
14
Kauth et al.: PRELIMINARY RESULTS FOR FIELD ESTABLISHMENT TECHNIQUES OF CALOPOGON TUBEROSUS<br />
several hundred plants flower from March through May with peak flowering in mid April.<br />
All field plots were established in this area.<br />
Fig. 1. Field transloc<strong>at</strong>ion study <strong>at</strong> the Florida Panther N<strong>at</strong>ional Wildlife Refuge. A)<br />
Burned (left) and unburned (right) areas in February 2009. B) Burned (background) and<br />
unburned (foreground) areas. Yellow flags mark one of the transects. C) Transects and<br />
quadr<strong>at</strong>s in the burned area. D) Transect and quadr<strong>at</strong>s in the unburned area in April 2008.<br />
E) Close-up of a quadr<strong>at</strong>.<br />
Seed Source and Prepar<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
Seeds from the FPNWR were collected from m<strong>at</strong>ure yellowing capsules in June 2006<br />
and 2007 before capsule dehiscence. Two capsules were collected from <strong>at</strong> least three plants.<br />
Seed capsules were stored over desiccant in labor<strong>at</strong>ory conditions <strong>at</strong> 23° C for 2 weeks. Seeds<br />
were subsequently removed from the capsules and placed in glass scintill<strong>at</strong>ion vials over silicagel<br />
desiccant, and stored in darkness <strong>at</strong> -11° C until use. In all experiments, seeds were surface<br />
sterilized in sterile scintill<strong>at</strong>ion vials for 3 min in a solution of 5 mL absolute ethanol, 5 mL<br />
6% NaOCl, and 90 mL sterile dd w<strong>at</strong>er. Seeds were rinsed with sterile dd w<strong>at</strong>er after surface<br />
steriliz<strong>at</strong>ion. Solutions were removed with sterile Pasteur pipettes. Seeds were transferred<br />
onto the germin<strong>at</strong>ion medium with a 10µL sterile inocul<strong>at</strong>ing loop.<br />
15<br />
B
Kauth et al.: PRELIMINARY RESULTS FOR FIELD ESTABLISHMENT TECHNIQUES OF CALOPOGON TUBEROSUS<br />
Fig. 2. Monthly temper<strong>at</strong>ures recorded <strong>at</strong> the field transplant site in the Florida<br />
Panther N<strong>at</strong>ional Wildlife Refuge from April 2008-March 2009. Average<br />
temper<strong>at</strong>ures represent the mean daily high or low over the entire month. D<strong>at</strong>a<br />
were collected with a HOBO H8 Pro series we<strong>at</strong>her st<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />
Establishment<br />
Planting occurred in successive years in April 2008 and February 2009. For the 2008<br />
planting, differences in survival of field transplanted seedlings and corms were examined. For<br />
the 2009 planting, the response of planting seedlings in a burned versus unburned area was<br />
studied (Fig. 1A, B, C). For all experiments square quadr<strong>at</strong>s 30 cm × 30 cm were constructed<br />
from PVC piping (1.5 cm diameter). Each quadr<strong>at</strong> (Fig. 1E) was divided into 16 sections ca.<br />
7.5 cm × 7.5 cm by using 14 gauge co<strong>at</strong>ed electrical copper wire. A HOBO H8 Pro we<strong>at</strong>her<br />
st<strong>at</strong>ion (www.microdaq.com, Ltd., Contoocook, NH) was placed <strong>at</strong> the site to record daily<br />
temper<strong>at</strong>ures and rel<strong>at</strong>ive humidity (Fig. 2).<br />
Comparison of propagule type on field survival<br />
Seeds were germin<strong>at</strong>ed asymbiotically in vitro beginning March 2007 on P723 medium<br />
supplemented with 1% activ<strong>at</strong>ed charcoal (PhytoTechnology Labor<strong>at</strong>ories, Shawnee Mission,<br />
KS). 40 mL of medium was dispensed into square 100 × 15 mm Petri pl<strong>at</strong>es (Integrid Petri<br />
Dish, Becton Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ). <strong>Culture</strong>s were wrapped in a<br />
single layer of Nescofilm (Karlan Research Products, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) and placed under<br />
16
Kauth et al.: PRELIMINARY RESULTS FOR FIELD ESTABLISHMENT TECHNIQUES OF CALOPOGON TUBEROSUS<br />
a 12 h photoperiod <strong>at</strong> 25° C. After 8 weeks culture (May 2007), seedlings were transferred to<br />
PhytoTech <strong>Culture</strong> Boxes (PhytoTechnology Labor<strong>at</strong>ories, Shawnee Mission, KS) containing<br />
100 mL P723 medium. After an additional 30 weeks culture, corms were chilled <strong>at</strong> 10°C in<br />
darkness from October 2007 to January 2008. This was accomplished by removing the shoots<br />
and roots from the seedlings, and transferring corms to fresh P723 medium in PhytoTech<br />
<strong>Culture</strong> Boxes. After the chilling period, corms were again transferred to fresh P723 medium<br />
in PhytoTech <strong>Culture</strong> Boxes for an additional 12 weeks under a 12 h photoperiod. Seedlings<br />
were subsequently moved to greenhouse conditions April 2008. Seedlings were planted in 9cell<br />
pack trays (Model #IKN0809, Hummert Intern<strong>at</strong>ional, Earth City, MO) containing<br />
Fafard 2 soilless potting mix (Conrad Fafard, Inc., Agawam, MA). Seedlings were covered<br />
with clear vinyl humidity domes to prevent desicc<strong>at</strong>ion, and placed under 50% shade cloth<br />
and a n<strong>at</strong>ural photoperiod. Average light levels were 300 µmol m-2 s-1 measured <strong>at</strong> 12 noon,<br />
and average temper<strong>at</strong>ures ranged from 21.6 ± 2° C to 29.3 ± 3° C. After one week humidity<br />
domes were removed and seedlings were w<strong>at</strong>ered as needed.<br />
Three 10 m transects (Fig. 1D) were establish April 23, 2008. Each transect contained<br />
four quadr<strong>at</strong>s 2.5 m apart. A randomized block design was used to plant propagules. Corms<br />
and seedlings were assigned randomly to a quadr<strong>at</strong> and quadr<strong>at</strong> section. Sixteen propagules<br />
were used in each quadr<strong>at</strong> (8 seedlings and 8 corms per quadr<strong>at</strong>). A total of 192 propagules<br />
were planted. Propagules were irrig<strong>at</strong>ed with distilled w<strong>at</strong>er upon initial planting. D<strong>at</strong>a were<br />
collected on 20 May 2008, 9 July 2008, 27 February 2009, and 23 April 2009.<br />
Seedling survival in a burned and unburned field plot<br />
Seeds were germin<strong>at</strong>ed in vitro starting January 2008 on BM-1 Terrestrial Orchid<br />
Medium (PhytoTechnology Labor<strong>at</strong>ories, Shawnee Mission, KS) supplemented with 1%<br />
activ<strong>at</strong>ed charcoal. 40 mL of medium was dispensed into square 100 × 15 mm Petri pl<strong>at</strong>es.<br />
<strong>Culture</strong>s were placed under a 12 h photoperiod <strong>at</strong> 25°C. After 8 weeks culture (March 2008),<br />
seedlings were transferred to PhytoTech <strong>Culture</strong> Boxes containing 100 mL BM-1 medium.<br />
After an additional 30 weeks culture, corms were transferred to new PhytoTech <strong>Culture</strong><br />
Boxes containing 100 mL BM-1 medium and chilled <strong>at</strong> 10°C from October 2008 to December<br />
2008. Seedlings were moved to greenhouse conditions December 2008 until ready for field<br />
establishment February 2009. Greenhouse transfer procedures were similar to those<br />
previously described. Average light levels were 253 µmol m-2 s-1 measured <strong>at</strong> 12 noon, and<br />
average temper<strong>at</strong>ures ranged from 20.8 ± 2.3°C to 28.8 ± 2.8°C.<br />
In January 2009, the wet prairie was burned except the area where Calopogon tuberosus<br />
field plots were previously established in 2008. This presented a unique opportunity to<br />
compare the effects of planting seedlings in the burned and unburned areas. Two 10 m<br />
transects were established in both the burned area and unburned area. Three quadr<strong>at</strong>s were<br />
alloc<strong>at</strong>ed to each transect. Sixteen seedlings were planted in each quadr<strong>at</strong> for a total of 48<br />
seedlings per transect and 192 seedlings for the experiment.<br />
17
Kauth et al.: PRELIMINARY RESULTS FOR FIELD ESTABLISHMENT TECHNIQUES OF CALOPOGON TUBEROSUS<br />
D<strong>at</strong>a Collection and St<strong>at</strong>istical Analysis<br />
For both experiments, survival of all seedlings was recorded. Two different c<strong>at</strong>egories<br />
were classified in determining propagule survival. Percentage of actively growing green shoots<br />
was recorded. Percentage of emergent shoots was recorded when shoots were present, but not<br />
necessarily actively growing (i.e. shoots were yellow and brown due to senescence). Seedling<br />
leaf measurements were recorded before the February 2009 experiment, and again in April<br />
2009. Shoot emergence d<strong>at</strong>a were analyzed using proc glimmix, logistic regression, and leastsquare<br />
means in SAS v9.1.<br />
Results<br />
Comparison of Propagule Type on Field Survival<br />
Propagule type (F = 0.50, p = 0.48) did not influence survival, but d<strong>at</strong>e (time of d<strong>at</strong>a<br />
recorded) was significant (F = 20.4, p < 0.0001). At the initial d<strong>at</strong>a collection in May 2008, a<br />
higher proportion of seedlings (43.8%) had actively growing shoots compared to corms<br />
(32.3%) (Fig. 3). After 1 month of field establishment, less than 50% of all propagules had<br />
actively growing shoots regardless of tre<strong>at</strong>ment. In July 2008, n<strong>at</strong>ural leaf senescence had<br />
occurred so th<strong>at</strong> no shoots were actively growing. A higher proportion of emergent shoots<br />
were observed on seedlings (22.9%) compared to corms (12.5%).<br />
Fig. 3. Survival of Calopogon tuberosus propagules <strong>at</strong> the Florida Panther N<strong>at</strong>ional Wildlife<br />
Refuge. Histobars represent the mean response of three separ<strong>at</strong>e transects each with four<br />
quadr<strong>at</strong>s containing 16 propagules. A total of 96 propagules were planted per tre<strong>at</strong>ment for a<br />
total of 192 propagules.<br />
18
Kauth et al.: PRELIMINARY RESULTS FOR FIELD ESTABLISHMENT TECHNIQUES OF CALOPOGON TUBEROSUS<br />
Fig. 4. Survival of Calopogon tuberosus seedlings in a burned and unburned plot <strong>at</strong> the<br />
Florida Panther N<strong>at</strong>ional Wildlife Refuge. A) Percentage of plants with actively growing<br />
shoots marked by the presence of a growing green shoot. B) Percentage of plants with either<br />
have actively growing shoots or previously emerged shoots th<strong>at</strong> senesced. Histobars<br />
represent the mean of two transects with three quadr<strong>at</strong>s containing 16 seedlings. Ninety-six<br />
seedlings were planted in each tre<strong>at</strong>ment for a total of 192 total seedlings.<br />
19
Kauth et al.: PRELIMINARY RESULTS FOR FIELD ESTABLISHMENT TECHNIQUES OF CALOPOGON TUBEROSUS<br />
D<strong>at</strong>a collected during February 2009 occurred during the early growing season in<br />
south Florida. <strong>The</strong> number of green shoots was higher on corms (12.5%) compared to<br />
seedlings (10.4%), but this difference was not significant (Fig. 3). In April 2009, no significant<br />
difference was observed between the survival of corms (6.25%) and seedlings (8.33%), and the<br />
presence of shoots further declined. At this time, one seedling in the early flowering stage<br />
established from a corm propagule was observed No shoots were observed in June 2009.<br />
Percent of total survivorship of all combined propagules were as follows: 38.0% (May 2008),<br />
18.9% (July 2008), 11.4% (February 2009), and 7.3% (April 2009).<br />
Seedling Survival in a Burned and Unburned Field Plot<br />
Burning significantly influenced percent of emerged shoots (F = 48.7, p < 0.0001),<br />
while the unburned plot influenced the percentage of actively growing shoots (F = 4.32, p =<br />
0.04). Two months after field establishment, the number of actively growing shoots declined<br />
in both plots. Three percent and 11% of actively growing shoots were observed in the burned<br />
and unburned areas, respectively (Fig. 4B). However, senesced shoots were visible on seedlings<br />
in the burned plot, but none in the unburned plot (Fig. 4A). Total survivorship was 7.3%<br />
when combining all d<strong>at</strong>a. Of the actively growing shoots, shoot lengths were recorded in<br />
April 2009 (Table 1). Shoot lengths on all seedlings with actively growing shoots in the<br />
burned plot increased, while three of the eleven recorded leaf measurements in the unburned<br />
plot decreased (Table 1).<br />
Tre<strong>at</strong>ment Transect Quadr<strong>at</strong> # Seedling # Height<br />
Height<br />
(Feb 2009)<br />
(April 2009)<br />
Unburned 1 1 14 85 28<br />
1 2 3 25 66<br />
1 3 3 100 75<br />
1 3 6 60 90<br />
1 3 13 90 108<br />
2 1 14 70 92<br />
2 2 4 62 220<br />
2 2 9 76 35<br />
2 2 10 63 72<br />
2 3 5 85 125<br />
2 3 12 26 102<br />
Burned 1 1 13 52 91<br />
1 2 14 10 165<br />
2 1 3 95 140<br />
Table 1. Shoot lengths recorded for actively growing Calopogon tuberosus seedlings in February and April 2009.<br />
All measurements are in mm. Seedlings were measured in February under greenhouse conditions prior to<br />
transplant, and the April d<strong>at</strong>a collection was on seedlings after field transplant on the Florida Panther N<strong>at</strong>ional<br />
Wildlife Refuge.<br />
20
Kauth et al.: PRELIMINARY RESULTS FOR FIELD ESTABLISHMENT TECHNIQUES OF CALOPOGON TUBEROSUS<br />
Discussion<br />
This is the first study of the field establishment of Calopogon tuberosus, and one of the<br />
only scientifically documented <strong>orchid</strong> field establishment studies in North America (Stewart<br />
et al., 2003; Zettler et al., 2007). However, conclusive results were not obtained due to the<br />
short-term n<strong>at</strong>ure of the study, and more results are likely after several years of monitoring.<br />
Absence of an actively growing shoot did not indic<strong>at</strong>e propagule de<strong>at</strong>h since corms may have<br />
been present bene<strong>at</strong>h the soil surface. <strong>The</strong>ir presence bene<strong>at</strong>h the soil was not confirmed in<br />
order to minimize soil disturbance. In addition, shoots on field-transplanted seedlings may<br />
have senesced n<strong>at</strong>urally because senescence n<strong>at</strong>urally occurs in l<strong>at</strong>e May through early June.<br />
Field establishment of <strong>orchid</strong>s may depend on propagule type such as seedlings or<br />
storage organs. Dormant storage organs, depending on species, were found to successfully<br />
survive initial field establishment compared to seedlings (Debeljak et al. 2002; B<strong>at</strong>ty et al.<br />
2006b). Dormant storage organs may be able to survive drought conditions better than<br />
seedlings (B<strong>at</strong>ty et al. 2006b); however, results are species specific. Caladenia arenicola and<br />
Diuris magnifica established more readily in the field when dormant tubers were planted<br />
r<strong>at</strong>her than seedlings, but <strong>The</strong>lymitra manginiorum established more readily from seedlings<br />
(B<strong>at</strong>ty et al., 2006a). However, no C. arenicola propagules and only 10% of D. magnifica tubers<br />
survived into the third growing season. 70% and 35% of T. manginiorum seedlings and tubers,<br />
respectively, survived into the third growing season (B<strong>at</strong>ty et al., 2006a). Likewise, Smith et al.<br />
(2009) found th<strong>at</strong> 2-3 year old plants (35%) established more readily in the field compared to<br />
tubers (11%) after 4 years.<br />
In this study, no st<strong>at</strong>istical differences in shoot emergence were observed between<br />
corms (6.25%) and seedlings (8.33%) after the first year. <strong>The</strong> low r<strong>at</strong>es of shoot emergence<br />
may have been caused by propagule de<strong>at</strong>h or dormancy of corms. Terrestrial <strong>orchid</strong>s can<br />
remain dormant for several years (Kery and Gregg 2004) thus long-term monitoring is<br />
necessary to observe propagule survival. Throughout 2008-2009, south Florida experienced<br />
drought conditions th<strong>at</strong> may have contributed to propagule de<strong>at</strong>h. <strong>The</strong> juvenile st<strong>at</strong>e of the<br />
propagules (1 year old) may have resulted in poor field establishment as well. Tuber size<br />
influenced the survival of several Australian <strong>orchid</strong>s with larger tubers increasing survival<br />
compared to smaller tubers (B<strong>at</strong>ty et al., 2006a; Smith et al., 2009). Likewise, larger Calopogon<br />
tuberosus corms or more m<strong>at</strong>ure plants may have increased survival in the present study due to<br />
gre<strong>at</strong>er storage reserves th<strong>at</strong> tubers can utilize to sustain drought conditions and initi<strong>at</strong>e<br />
growth (B<strong>at</strong>ty et al., 2006a).<br />
<strong>The</strong> influence of competition, shading, and weed coverage influences the establishment<br />
of <strong>orchid</strong>s in the field (McKendrick, 1995; Scade et al., 2006). This is the first report<br />
comparing field establishment of an <strong>orchid</strong> in a burned and unburned are in North America.<br />
<strong>The</strong> effects of establishing <strong>orchid</strong>s in burned plots have apparently not been studied, but<br />
smoke was shown to be effective <strong>at</strong> promoting germin<strong>at</strong>ion of several Australian plant species<br />
21
Kauth et al.: PRELIMINARY RESULTS FOR FIELD ESTABLISHMENT TECHNIQUES OF CALOPOGON TUBEROSUS<br />
(Flem<strong>at</strong>ti et al., 2004). Although this study investig<strong>at</strong>ed seed germin<strong>at</strong>ion, the study could<br />
explain a higher percentage of actively growing shoots in the burned plot. <strong>The</strong> effects of<br />
smoke on emergence of Calopogon tuberosus shoots may warrant investig<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />
<strong>The</strong> influence of competition on plant establishment has also been examined. In the<br />
present study, more actively growing shoots of Calopogon tuberosus were observed on<br />
seedlings in the unburned area during April 2009. Shoots on the seedlings in the burned area<br />
were brown and senesced with the exception of three plants. <strong>The</strong> surrounding <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> grasses<br />
in the unburned area likely shaded the seedlings providing increased survivorship and soil<br />
moisture. Seedlings in the unburned area did not receive any level of shading and likely caused<br />
seedling desicc<strong>at</strong>ion. Shading led to increased survival of several other terrestrial <strong>orchid</strong>s<br />
(McKendrick, 1995, 1996; Scade et al., 2006; Yam<strong>at</strong>o and Iwase, 2008), but areas of dense shade<br />
and competition can lead decreased seedling survivorship (McKendrick, 1995; Yam<strong>at</strong>o and<br />
Iwase, 2008). Fire is a necessary n<strong>at</strong>ural disturbance in many ecosystems (Duncan et al., 2008)<br />
including wet-prairies in south Florida. Competition with weeds and invasive species during<br />
field establishment often reduces the successful field establishment of seedlings (Moyes et al.<br />
2005). N<strong>at</strong>ive perennials were established readily in a burned grassland and dolomite glade<br />
areas. In addition, reduced weedy species, and prevented forest succession (Moyes et al., 2005;<br />
Duncan et al., 2008).<br />
While the results of this study are preliminary due to the short-term monitoring of the<br />
plots, the techniques employed can be applied to other <strong>orchid</strong> species worldwide. More<br />
definitive results may be observed after another growing season when seedlings in the burned<br />
area may re-emerge. Due to the drought conditions the past 2 years in south Florida,<br />
additional irrig<strong>at</strong>ion may have improved propagule survival. In addition, using symbiotically<br />
grown seedlings or inocul<strong>at</strong>ing soil with mycorrhizal fungi may have improved seedling<br />
survival as well (B<strong>at</strong>ty et al., 2006a; Scade et al., 2006; Smith et al., 2009).<br />
Conclusions<br />
Based on the success of research with other terrestrial <strong>orchid</strong>s, the following should<br />
also be considered to successfully establish Calopogon tuberosus seedlings in the field: 1) Using<br />
more m<strong>at</strong>ure seedlings to younger seedlings may provide sufficient carbohydr<strong>at</strong>e reserves to<br />
survive initial planting. 2) When planting dormant corms, larger corms should be planted. 3)<br />
Propagules should be planted <strong>at</strong> the beginning of the growing season. 4) Due to frequent<br />
drought conditions, the effects of supplemental irrig<strong>at</strong>ion could be studied. 5) Plots should be<br />
monitored for several years to observe successful field establishment.<br />
Philip J. Kauth*, Michael E. Kane, Timothy R. Johnson<br />
Plant Restor<strong>at</strong>ion, Conserv<strong>at</strong>ion, and Propag<strong>at</strong>ion Biotechnology Program, Environmental Horticulture<br />
Department, University of Florida , PO Box 110675, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.<br />
*Corresponding author: email pkauth@ufl.edu<br />
22
Kauth et al.: PRELIMINARY RESULTS FOR FIELD ESTABLISHMENT TECHNIQUES OF CALOPOGON TUBEROSUS<br />
Liter<strong>at</strong>ure Cited<br />
B<strong>at</strong>ty, A.L., M.C. Brundrett, K.W. Dixon, and K. Sivasithamparam. 2006a. New methods to improve symbiotic<br />
propag<strong>at</strong>ion of temper<strong>at</strong>e terrestrial <strong>orchid</strong> seedlings from axenic culture to soil. Australian Journal of<br />
Botany 54: 367-74.<br />
B<strong>at</strong>ty, A.L., M.C. Brundrett, K.W. Dixon, and K. Sivasithamparam. 2006b. In situ seed germin<strong>at</strong>ion and<br />
propag<strong>at</strong>ion of terrestrial <strong>orchid</strong> seedlings for establishment <strong>at</strong> field sites. Australian Journal of Botany 54:<br />
375-81.<br />
Davis, J.H. 1943. <strong>The</strong> N<strong>at</strong>ural Fe<strong>at</strong>ures of Southern Florida. <strong>The</strong> Florida Geological Survey, Tallahassee, FL.311.<br />
Debeljak, N., M. Regvar, K.W. Dixon, and K. Sivasithamparam. 2002. Induction of tuberis<strong>at</strong>ion in vitro with<br />
jasmonic acid and sucrose in an Australian terrestrial <strong>orchid</strong>, Pterostylis sanguinea. Plant Growth<br />
Regul<strong>at</strong>ion 36: 253-60.<br />
Duever, M.J., J.E. Carlson, J.F. Meeder, L.C. Duever, L.H. Gunderson, L.A. Riopelle, T.R. Alexander, R.L.<br />
Myers, and D.P. Spangler. 1986. <strong>The</strong> Big Cypress N<strong>at</strong>ional Preserve. N<strong>at</strong>ional Audubon Society, New<br />
York.<br />
Duncan, R.S., C.B. Anderson, H.N. Sellers, and E.E. Robbins. 2008. <strong>The</strong> effect of fire reintroduction on endemic<br />
and rare plants of a southeastern glade ecosystem. Restor<strong>at</strong>ion Ecology 16: 39-49.<br />
Flem<strong>at</strong>ti, G.R., E.L. Ghisalberti, K.W. Dixon, and R.D. Trengove. 2004. A compound from smoke th<strong>at</strong><br />
promotes seed germin<strong>at</strong>ion. Science 305: 977<br />
Kauth, P. J., W.A. Vendrame, and M.E. Kane. 2006. In vitro seed culture and seedlings development of<br />
Calopogon tuberosus. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ <strong>Culture</strong> 85: 91-102.<br />
Kauth, P. J., M.E. Kane, W.A. Vendrame, and C. Reinhardt-Adams. 2008. Asymbiotic germin<strong>at</strong>ion response to<br />
photoperiod and nutritional media in six popul<strong>at</strong>ions of Calopogon tuberosus var. tuberosus<br />
(Orchidaceae): evidence for ecotypic differenti<strong>at</strong>ion. Annals of Botany 102: 783-93.<br />
Kery, M., and K. Gregg. 2004. Demographic analysis of dormancy and survival in the terrestrial <strong>orchid</strong><br />
Cypripedium reginae. Journal of Ecology 92: 686-95.<br />
McKendrick, S.L. 1995. <strong>The</strong> effects of herbivory and veget<strong>at</strong>ion on labor<strong>at</strong>ory-raised Dactylorhiza praetermissa<br />
(Orchidaceae) planted into grassland in Southern England. Biological Conserv<strong>at</strong>ion 73: 215-20.<br />
McKendrick, S.L. 1996. <strong>The</strong> effects of shade on seedlings of Orchis morio and Dactylorhiza fuchsii in chalk and<br />
clay soil. New Phytologist 134: 343-52.<br />
Moyes, A.B., M.S. Witter, and J.A. Gamon. 2005. Restor<strong>at</strong>ion of <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> perennials in a California annual<br />
grassland after prescribed spring burning and solariz<strong>at</strong>ion. Restor<strong>at</strong>ion Ecology 13: 659-66.<br />
Ramsay, M.M. and J. Stewart. 1998. Re-establishment of the lady's slipper <strong>orchid</strong> (Cypripedium calceolus L.) in<br />
Britain. Botanical Journal of the Linnaean Society 126: 173-81.<br />
Ramsay, M.M. and K.W. Dixon. 2003. Propag<strong>at</strong>ion science, recovery, and transloc<strong>at</strong>ion or terrestrial <strong>orchid</strong>s. In<br />
K. W. Dixon, S. P. Kell, R. L. Barrett, and P. J. Cribb [eds.], Orchid Conserv<strong>at</strong>ion. N<strong>at</strong>ural History<br />
Public<strong>at</strong>ions (Borneo), Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia.<br />
Scade, A., M.C. Brundrett, A.L. B<strong>at</strong>ty, K.W. Dixon, and K. Sivasithamparam. 2006. Survival of transplanted<br />
terrestrial <strong>orchid</strong> seedlings in urban bushland habit<strong>at</strong>s with high or low weed cover. Australian Journal<br />
of Botany 54: 383-89.<br />
Smith, Z. F., E.A. James, M.J. McDonnell, and C.B. McLean. 2009. Planting conditions improve transloc<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
success of the endangered terrestrial <strong>orchid</strong> Diuris fragrantissima (Orchidaceae). Australian Journal of<br />
Botany 57: 200-209.<br />
Stewart, S.L. 2007. Integr<strong>at</strong>ed conserv<strong>at</strong>ion of Florida Orchidaceae in the genera Habenaria and Spiranthes: model<br />
<strong>orchid</strong> conserv<strong>at</strong>ion systems for the Americas. PhD Dissert<strong>at</strong>ion, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL,<br />
USA.<br />
Stewart, S.L., L.W. Zettler, J. Minso, and P.M. Brown. 2003. Symbiotic germin<strong>at</strong>ion and reintroduction of<br />
Spiranthes brevilabris Lindley, an endangered <strong>orchid</strong> <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> to Florida. Selbyana 24: 64-70.<br />
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2009. Florida panther n<strong>at</strong>ional wildlife refuge fact sheet.<br />
http://www.fws.gov/southeast/pubs/facts/flpcon.pdf. Last accessed 7 October, 2009.<br />
23
Kauth et al.: PRELIMINARY RESULTS FOR FIELD ESTABLISHMENT TECHNIQUES OF CALOPOGON TUBEROSUS<br />
Whitlow, C.E. 1996. Mass production of Calopogon tuberosus, pp.5-10. In C. Allen [ed.], North American N<strong>at</strong>ive<br />
Terrestrial Orchids: propag<strong>at</strong>ion and production. North American N<strong>at</strong>ive Terrestrial Orchid Conference,<br />
Germantown, Maryland.<br />
Yam<strong>at</strong>o, M. and K. Iwase. 2008. Introduction of asymbiotically propag<strong>at</strong>ed seedlings of Cephalanthera falc<strong>at</strong>a<br />
(Orchidaceae) into n<strong>at</strong>ural habit<strong>at</strong> and investig<strong>at</strong>ion of colonized mycorrhizal fungi. Ecological Research<br />
23: 329-37.<br />
Zettler L.W., S.B. Poulter, K.I. McDonald, and S.L. Stewart. 2007. Conserv<strong>at</strong>ion-driven propag<strong>at</strong>ion of an<br />
epiphytic <strong>orchid</strong> (Epidendrum nocturnum) with a mycorrhizal fungus. HortScience 42: 135-39.<br />
24
Richards & Sanders: A PRACTICAL AND INTEGRATED APPROACH TO NATIVE ORCHID CONSERVATION AND<br />
PROPAGATION AT THE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN<br />
A PRACTICAL AND INTEGRATED APPROACH TO NATIVE ORCHID<br />
CONSERVATION AND PROPAGATION AT THE<br />
ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN<br />
M<strong>at</strong>t Richards & Jenny Cruse Sanders Ph.D.<br />
In recent years interest has grown in the propag<strong>at</strong>ion of rare <strong>orchid</strong>s <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> to North<br />
America. For the Atlanta Botanical Garden it stems originally from the need to reproduce<br />
valuable collections held in public trust for display and educ<strong>at</strong>ion interests in the Fuqua<br />
Orchid Center (Fig. 1). Now the focus has grown to include work on propag<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong>s<br />
specifically for conserv<strong>at</strong>ion purposes. <strong>The</strong>se effective methods of propag<strong>at</strong>ion and production<br />
have not always been a result of scientific research backed by st<strong>at</strong>istical analysis, but still have<br />
contributed gre<strong>at</strong>ly to our ongoing commitment to sustain and improve in situ <strong>orchid</strong><br />
popul<strong>at</strong>ions in the Southeastern United St<strong>at</strong>es (Fig. 2). As the program continues to grow, the<br />
Garden maintains its project driven approach to assist in the protection of habit<strong>at</strong> as well as to<br />
produce plants suitable for conserv<strong>at</strong>ion work while developing a balance between scientific<br />
research, practical propag<strong>at</strong>ion and ensuing horticultural practices.<br />
For decades, the Garden‖s conserv<strong>at</strong>ion program has been forged by following through<br />
project driven goals and objectives. Work has been focused on forming rel<strong>at</strong>ionships between<br />
priv<strong>at</strong>e-landowners, federal, st<strong>at</strong>e, and local agencies. Needs are defined to outline the<br />
roadmap towards reaching each particular goal. <strong>The</strong> Georgia Plant Conserv<strong>at</strong>ion Alliance was<br />
formed in 2005 and is inclusive of many levels of contributors in the <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> plant conserv<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
community. As a founding member, the Garden has united with other botanical gardens,<br />
institutions, universities, individuals, governmental and non-governmental agencies to provide<br />
a service to the broad scheme of plant conserv<strong>at</strong>ion (Fig. 3). Through this alliance, many of<br />
the collabor<strong>at</strong>ors have been able to facilit<strong>at</strong>e rare plant conserv<strong>at</strong>ion without the obstacles<br />
presented by having a formal organiz<strong>at</strong>ion. All parties involved with each specific project have<br />
identified their particular talents, resources, and capabilities they can contribute to the overall<br />
project. <strong>The</strong>se services may include diplom<strong>at</strong>ic rel<strong>at</strong>ions, propag<strong>at</strong>ion and production, on the<br />
ground labor, or motiv<strong>at</strong>ing an army of dedic<strong>at</strong>ed volunteers to see the project through. <strong>The</strong><br />
Atlanta Botanical Garden has found its niche in rare plant propag<strong>at</strong>ion and horticultural<br />
excellence (Fig. 4). All participants contribute in some way or another, and all of the work is<br />
25
Richards & Sanders: A PRACTICAL AND INTEGRATED APPROACH TO NATIVE ORCHID CONSERVATION AND<br />
PROPAGATION AT THE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN<br />
done in close collabor<strong>at</strong>ion in large part due to the coordin<strong>at</strong>ion efforts carried out by the<br />
GPCA Conserv<strong>at</strong>ion Coordin<strong>at</strong>or, Jennifer Ceska <strong>at</strong> the St<strong>at</strong>e Botanical Garden of Georgia.<br />
Orchids in Georgia continue to require field surveys to assess the current st<strong>at</strong>us of st<strong>at</strong>e<br />
element occurrence records. We also <strong>at</strong>tempt to identify suitable habit<strong>at</strong> and additional<br />
popul<strong>at</strong>ions of <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> species. <strong>The</strong> Georgia Orchid Initi<strong>at</strong>ive through the Atlanta Botanical<br />
Garden ultim<strong>at</strong>ely aims to resurvey all <strong>orchid</strong> species known to occur in st<strong>at</strong>e and c<strong>at</strong>alog<br />
localities with GPS and GIS technologies. Through tissue culture, field surveys, horticultural<br />
experiments, and ex situ propag<strong>at</strong>ion, the <strong>orchid</strong> research team is taking an integr<strong>at</strong>ed and<br />
collabor<strong>at</strong>ive approach to better understand the geography, n<strong>at</strong>ural history and reproductive<br />
biology of <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> <strong>orchid</strong>s. This initi<strong>at</strong>ive hopes to provide an increased understanding of the<br />
biology and geographic distribution of <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> terrestrial <strong>orchid</strong>s in Georgia (Fig. 5).<br />
<strong>The</strong> Garden often works with the GADNR (Georgia Department of N<strong>at</strong>ural<br />
Resources) to identify the needs for <strong>orchid</strong> surveys and species recovery in the st<strong>at</strong>e. We have<br />
decided it would make most sense to concentr<strong>at</strong>e our efforts using the st<strong>at</strong>e ranks, surveying<br />
the element occurrence records first of S1, S2 and S3 species, and then move through the list<br />
to S5 respectively. In addition, peripheral habit<strong>at</strong> is identified using s<strong>at</strong>ellite imagery, soil<br />
maps, GIS technologies, and ground reports to better assess the st<strong>at</strong>us of the species. Once<br />
popul<strong>at</strong>ions have been loc<strong>at</strong>ed, we begin work on assessing the habit<strong>at</strong> thre<strong>at</strong>s, and potential<br />
management str<strong>at</strong>egies (if any) (Fig. 6). For some of these <strong>orchid</strong> popul<strong>at</strong>ions there is a need to<br />
safeguard popul<strong>at</strong>ions through propag<strong>at</strong>ion and ex situ collections, especially those included in<br />
the S1/S2 G1/G2 rarity st<strong>at</strong>us. This propag<strong>at</strong>ed m<strong>at</strong>erial is grown in an organized and indexed<br />
manner so th<strong>at</strong> it may be used responsibly to augment popul<strong>at</strong>ions or for future<br />
reintroduction into conserv<strong>at</strong>ion lands (if deemed necessary and appropri<strong>at</strong>e). One example<br />
would be th<strong>at</strong> of Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera chapmanii (Chapman’s fringed <strong>orchid</strong>) (Fig. 7). Known<br />
historically from parts of south Georgia, the species had not been documented in the st<strong>at</strong>e for<br />
nearly a century. In September of 2009 a GPCA member, Dr. Richard Carter of Valdosta<br />
St<strong>at</strong>e University confirmed extant popul<strong>at</strong>ions of the species he had seen earlier in 2006. Soon<br />
after the discovery was documented, seed was collected from two popul<strong>at</strong>ions for in vitro<br />
propag<strong>at</strong>ion. At the time of this writing, stage-3 germin<strong>at</strong>ion had been achieved (Fig. 8). With<br />
some good horticulture and a bit of luck, the future of this popul<strong>at</strong>ion of rare <strong>orchid</strong>s is better<br />
protected. <strong>The</strong> need to propag<strong>at</strong>e the species was prioritized by assessment of habit<strong>at</strong>. <strong>The</strong><br />
habit<strong>at</strong> was surveyed by members of the GPCA and considered to be in extreme danger of<br />
alter<strong>at</strong>ion, subject to road improvements, herbicide applic<strong>at</strong>ions, and timber activities.<br />
Measures will soon be taken to develop further conserv<strong>at</strong>ion str<strong>at</strong>egies.<br />
Additionally, Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera integrilabia (monkey-face <strong>orchid</strong>) occurs in a handful of<br />
counties in the St<strong>at</strong>e of Georgia. We have worked together with the GADNR to survey<br />
extant popul<strong>at</strong>ions, additional habit<strong>at</strong> on conserv<strong>at</strong>ion lands, and any new 'undiscovered<br />
26
Richards & Sanders: A PRACTICAL AND INTEGRATED APPROACH TO NATIVE ORCHID CONSERVATION AND<br />
PROPAGATION AT THE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN<br />
popul<strong>at</strong>ions' of the species. Since 2007, surveys have been active for the species. Meanwhile,<br />
propag<strong>at</strong>ion has been ongoing, safeguarding popul<strong>at</strong>ions on priv<strong>at</strong>e land in ex situ collections<br />
produced from seed with the hope of augmenting these popul<strong>at</strong>ions one day (Fig. 9).<br />
Although one of the rarest <strong>orchid</strong>s in North America, it is oddly very easily propag<strong>at</strong>ed from<br />
seed. <strong>The</strong> seed is sterilized using 90 ml RO w<strong>at</strong>er, 10 ml Clorox, and .01 ml Tween 20 shaking<br />
vigorously for 10 minutes. <strong>The</strong> seed is poured into a sterile filter and rinsed several times using<br />
sterile RO w<strong>at</strong>er. <strong>The</strong> seed is allowed to air dry within a laminar flow hood, and then<br />
sprinkled onto sterile media. This species is easily germin<strong>at</strong>ed on ½-strength P668 from<br />
PhytoTech Labs. After approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 5 months, the seedlings are transferred to ¾-strength<br />
P668. Although it will germin<strong>at</strong>e and grow on various other media, the cost and simplicity of<br />
this procedure effectively produces reproductive plant m<strong>at</strong>erial in a short amount of time (Fig.<br />
10). <strong>The</strong> process is typically adapted to the n<strong>at</strong>ural bio-rhythm of the species. <strong>The</strong> seed is<br />
harvested and sown <strong>at</strong> the time it would n<strong>at</strong>urally fall to the ground. It is placed in dark<br />
cabinets after sowing, and then into cold storage during the winter months. During this time,<br />
the seedlings continue to develop. <strong>The</strong> ensuing spring allows the seedlings to emerge into<br />
photosynthetic growth under artificial lighting while still in sterile culture. Soon after the<br />
emergence of the first shoot, the plants are transferred onto fresh media and allowed more<br />
space to grow. When the plants are large enough to be transferred into pots and soilless media<br />
in our greenhouses, they are typically overwintered in vitro and potted up immedi<strong>at</strong>ely<br />
following 120 days <strong>at</strong> ca. 38 F. By following the n<strong>at</strong>ural biorhythm of the plant, it becomes<br />
easier to transition them between growing stages and eventually back into their <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> habit<strong>at</strong>.<br />
This method would typically allow for outplanting <strong>at</strong> the time the species goes dormant.<br />
<strong>The</strong> propag<strong>at</strong>ion of our <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> <strong>orchid</strong>s has been well documented in the past and it is<br />
common to find available scientific and popular articles regarding propag<strong>at</strong>ion of many of our<br />
<strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong>s. <strong>The</strong>re are also many books th<strong>at</strong> have been published on the subject of <strong>orchid</strong><br />
propag<strong>at</strong>ion. <strong>The</strong> Garden approaches each species independently, researches wh<strong>at</strong> has been<br />
done by others in the past with the species and then develops a plan to tackle the first obstacle<br />
of germin<strong>at</strong>ion. We sow our <strong>orchid</strong>s using various methods, some are green capsule, some are<br />
dry seed, some are sterilized in different fashions, and many different media are used. Since<br />
2002, records have been kept defining the work done with each <strong>orchid</strong> species. Although<br />
much of this remains unpublished, the d<strong>at</strong>abase is a critical tool used daily in the Tissue<br />
<strong>Culture</strong> Lab. We can refer back many years to varying tre<strong>at</strong>ments and procedures used <strong>at</strong><br />
propag<strong>at</strong>ing hundreds of species. With this inform<strong>at</strong>ion available, our staff can better develop<br />
an experiment th<strong>at</strong> could eventually lead to successful propag<strong>at</strong>ion. Generally speaking, we<br />
sow most seed on several different media, and develop a plan to simul<strong>at</strong>e n<strong>at</strong>ural bio-rhythm<br />
of the plant to wh<strong>at</strong> extent is possible. Once germin<strong>at</strong>ion has been achieved, we will select<br />
several repl<strong>at</strong>e media for trial. Once the best media for repl<strong>at</strong>ing is determined through<br />
observ<strong>at</strong>ion and analysis of growth, the plants are transferred to quickly produce healthy<br />
plants suitable for transfer to ex vitro culture. Again, each species is tre<strong>at</strong>ed independently and<br />
27
Richards & Sanders: A PRACTICAL AND INTEGRATED APPROACH TO NATIVE ORCHID CONSERVATION AND<br />
PROPAGATION AT THE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN<br />
our talented and experienced staff develops the appropri<strong>at</strong>e soil amendments to achieve<br />
desired growth and continues to refine the protocol for each species during greenhouse<br />
culture.<br />
Orchids are one of the most charism<strong>at</strong>ic groups of plants, and yet few people are aware<br />
th<strong>at</strong> so many species of <strong>orchid</strong>s are <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> to Georgia. At the Atlanta Botanical Garden we<br />
reach a large audience with approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 350,000 visitors per year, and we can inform this<br />
audience about <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> <strong>orchid</strong> species (Fig. 11). In 2007 we educ<strong>at</strong>ed more than 14,500 students<br />
through educ<strong>at</strong>ional programs (tours, outreach, afterschool, camps) developed for<br />
kindergarten through eighth grade, and 4971 adults through tours, lectures, training programs<br />
and family programming. Inform<strong>at</strong>ion learned through the Georgia Orchid Initi<strong>at</strong>ive will be<br />
made available to teachers as a resource for teaching about <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> plant species. Display<br />
plantings and interpretive signage will also be developed in the conserv<strong>at</strong>ion garden, the<br />
children‖s garden, and the garden discovery carts will inform visitors about our research on<br />
<strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> <strong>orchid</strong>s in Georgia and North America (Fig. 12).<br />
M<strong>at</strong>t Richards & Jenny Cruse Sanders Ph.D., Atlanta Botanical Garden, 1345 Piedmont Ave NE,<br />
Atlanta, Georgia 30309 mrichards@<strong>at</strong>lantabotanicalgarden.org; jsanders@altantabotanicalgarden.org<br />
www.<strong>at</strong>lantabotanicalgarden.org<br />
www.<strong>at</strong>lantabotanicalgarden.org/site/conserv<strong>at</strong>ion/<strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong>_plants<br />
www.uga.edu/gpca/<br />
<strong>The</strong> Atlanta Botanical Garden (Garden) has served the Southeastern region as both a horticultural resource and a<br />
place of enjoyment since 1976. <strong>The</strong> Garden has two facilities under its stewardship – 30 acres in the heart of<br />
Midtown Atlanta and 185 acres in Gainesville, Georgia (Smithgall Woodland Garden). Ranked as one of the top<br />
ten botanical gardens in the United St<strong>at</strong>es, the Garden develops and maintains plant collections for display,<br />
educ<strong>at</strong>ion, research, conserv<strong>at</strong>ion, and enjoyment. <strong>The</strong> Garden offers stunning garden displays and exceptional<br />
educ<strong>at</strong>ion programs for people of all ages. Many of its collections of rare and endangered plant species cannot be<br />
seen anywhere else in the world, and its conserv<strong>at</strong>ion work, both n<strong>at</strong>ionally and intern<strong>at</strong>ionally, is critical to<br />
preserving our n<strong>at</strong>ural heritage.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Fuqua Orchid Center opened to the public in 2002 providing an exciting opportunity to further develop<br />
and display its already distinguished <strong>orchid</strong> collection. <strong>The</strong> display glasshouses maximize and augment the<br />
existing tropical lowland <strong>orchid</strong> collections and provide specialized facilities for new collections of <strong>orchid</strong>s th<strong>at</strong><br />
grow <strong>at</strong> high elev<strong>at</strong>ions. Back-up greenhouse facilities for <strong>orchid</strong> care and a Tissue <strong>Culture</strong> Lab for plant<br />
propag<strong>at</strong>ion are also included in this center as are greenhouse facilities to propag<strong>at</strong>e, and safeguard rare indexed<br />
plant popul<strong>at</strong>ions of the southeastern United St<strong>at</strong>es for conserv<strong>at</strong>ion purposes. Outdoors, and adjacent to the<br />
Fuqua Orchid Center is the Conserv<strong>at</strong>ion Garden th<strong>at</strong> highlights <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> bog habit<strong>at</strong>s of the southeastern United<br />
St<strong>at</strong>es including coastal plain, c<strong>at</strong>aract, and mountain bogs. For more inform<strong>at</strong>ion on programs, hours of<br />
oper<strong>at</strong>ion, events, and classes, please visit www.<strong>at</strong>lantabotanicalgarden.org.<br />
28
Richards & Sanders: A PRACTICAL AND INTEGRATED APPROACH TO NATIVE ORCHID CONSERVATION AND<br />
PROPAGATION AT THE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN<br />
Fig. 1 (left) Atlanta Botanical Garden Conserv<strong>at</strong>ion Garden D. Lentz<br />
Fig. 2 (right) Cypripedium kentuckiense (ivory-lipped lady‖s-slipper) out-planting S. Larson<br />
Fig. 3 (left) GPCA members <strong>at</strong> 2009 fall meeting Okefenokee Swamp. J. Ceska<br />
Fig. 4 (right) ABG Conserv<strong>at</strong>ion Greenhouse facility. M. Richards<br />
Fig. 5 (left) New<br />
popul<strong>at</strong>ion of<br />
Listera smallii<br />
(Small‖s twayblade)<br />
discovered in 2008.<br />
B. Wilson<br />
Fig. 6 (right) Survey<br />
of Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera spp.<br />
emerging after l<strong>at</strong>e<br />
winter burn in a coastal plain bog. L. Kruse<br />
29
Richards & Sanders: A PRACTICAL AND INTEGRATED APPROACH TO NATIVE ORCHID CONSERVATION AND<br />
PROPAGATION AT THE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN<br />
Fig. 7 (left)<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera<br />
chapmanii<br />
R. Carter.<br />
Fig. 8 (right)<br />
Stage 3<br />
germin<strong>at</strong>ion of<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera<br />
chapmanii<br />
M. Richards<br />
Fig. 9 (left) Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera<br />
integrilabia growing in vitro<br />
R. Gagliardo<br />
Fig. 10 (right) Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera<br />
integrilabia produced from<br />
seed flowering in the<br />
conserv<strong>at</strong>ion greenhouse.<br />
M. Wenzel<br />
Fig. 11 (left)<br />
Visitors reading an<br />
interpretive display of<br />
Epipactis gigantea (stream<br />
<strong>orchid</strong>), a Flagship Species<br />
for the North American<br />
Region Orchid Specialist<br />
Group. M. Richards<br />
Fig. 12 (right) Hybrid<br />
swarm of Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera<br />
grown from seed <strong>at</strong> ABG<br />
on display in the Fuqua<br />
Orchid Center. M. Richards<br />
30
Massey: AN UNDERGRADUATE‖S FIRST ADVENTURE INTO FIELD RESEARCH:<br />
AN EPIPHYTIC ORCHID SURVEY IN SOUTHERN FLORIDA<br />
AN UNDERGRADUATE’S FIRST ADVENTURE INTO FIELD<br />
RESEARCH:<br />
AN EPIPHYTIC ORCHID SURVEY IN SOUTHERN FLORIDA<br />
Emily Massey<br />
My interest in <strong>orchid</strong>s began when I was an undergradu<strong>at</strong>e student <strong>at</strong> Illinois College<br />
(IC), a small liberal arts institution loc<strong>at</strong>ed in Jacksonville, Illinois. <strong>The</strong>re, I worked with Dr.<br />
Lawrence Zettler in the Orchid Recovery Program. This program focuses on the propag<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />
study, and reintroduction of thre<strong>at</strong>ened and endangered <strong>orchid</strong> species. While <strong>at</strong> IC, I<br />
particip<strong>at</strong>ed in a number of studies with several different <strong>orchid</strong>s. <strong>The</strong>se projects included two<br />
studies involving symbiotic seed germin<strong>at</strong>ion. In the first study, we examined crossing effects<br />
on seed viability, germin<strong>at</strong>ion, and protocorm growth in Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera leucophaea (Nuttall)<br />
Lindley, the eastern prairie fringe <strong>orchid</strong>. Seed germin<strong>at</strong>ion, propag<strong>at</strong>ion, and reintroduction<br />
of Epidendrum nocturnum Jacquin, the night-fragrant epidendrum was examined in our<br />
second study (Massey et al., 2007). I also particip<strong>at</strong>ed in a study to asymbiotically propag<strong>at</strong>e<br />
several epiphytic south Florida <strong>orchid</strong>s such as E. amphistomum A. Richard, the dingyflowered<br />
star <strong>orchid</strong>; E. rigidum Jacquin, the rigid epidendrum; Polystachya concreta (Jaquin)<br />
Garay & Sweet, the yellow helmet <strong>orchid</strong>; Prosthechea<br />
cochle<strong>at</strong>a (Linnaeus) W.E. Higgins var. triandra (Ames), the<br />
Florida clamshell <strong>orchid</strong>; and Vanilla phaeantha<br />
Reichenbach f., the oblong-leaved vanilla <strong>orchid</strong>.<br />
Fig. 1 Image of me and the two<br />
other students (William Kutosky,<br />
and Kris McDonald) reintroducing<br />
E. nocturnum <strong>at</strong> the Florida Panther<br />
N<strong>at</strong>ional Wildlife Refuge in 2005<br />
S.L. Stewart<br />
All of these studies were conducted in the<br />
labor<strong>at</strong>ory, except for the reintroduction of Epidendrum<br />
nocturnum, which is an endangered Florida epiphyte with<br />
night fragrant flowers th<strong>at</strong> are believed to be pollin<strong>at</strong>ed by a<br />
species of hawkmoth. Although I liked lab work, it was this<br />
study th<strong>at</strong> introduced me to field research and it was one of<br />
the best experiences I had while working with Dr. Zettler.<br />
<strong>The</strong> project took place in the fall of 2005 <strong>at</strong> the Florida<br />
Panther N<strong>at</strong>ional Wildlife Refuge (FPNWR). <strong>The</strong> FPNWR<br />
is loc<strong>at</strong>ed 20 miles east of Naples in Collier County,<br />
Florida and was established as a safe haven for the<br />
diminishing Florida panther popul<strong>at</strong>ion and other<br />
thre<strong>at</strong>ened and endangered animal and plant species.<br />
31
Massey: AN UNDERGRADUATE‖S FIRST ADVENTURE INTO FIELD RESEARCH:<br />
AN EPIPHYTIC ORCHID SURVEY IN SOUTHERN FLORIDA<br />
For about a week, two of my lab m<strong>at</strong>es and I visited the refuge to reintroduce<br />
Epidendrum nocturnum seedlings propag<strong>at</strong>ed in our lab. At the time of the reintroduction, the<br />
cool, murky w<strong>at</strong>er <strong>at</strong> most sites was waist and chest deep for my 5‖2‖‖ st<strong>at</strong>ure (Fig. 1). You<br />
definitely had to be careful where you were walking, or I should say feel around where you<br />
were stepping, because you sure could not see through the w<strong>at</strong>er bene<strong>at</strong>h your feet. This was<br />
due to the presence of tannins th<strong>at</strong> darken the w<strong>at</strong>er into a coffee-like brew. This was a very<br />
Fig. 2. One of the many swamp buggies in the fleet.<br />
intimid<strong>at</strong>ing project and I was a little apprehensive <strong>at</strong> first. We were venturing out into the<br />
wilderness, with the possibility of running into an allig<strong>at</strong>or or worse, and we were on foot.<br />
However, the longer we worked, the less this seemed to m<strong>at</strong>ter. I may have had to wring out<br />
my clothes every night of the trip, but this field research experience was one of the most<br />
memorable moments of my life. I had many other new experiences as well. I got to take my<br />
first spin in a swamp buggy, which is basically a very large, open-air vehicle resembling a<br />
monster truck without a top (Fig. 2).<br />
Another new experience and probably one of the more amusing moments of this<br />
excursion took place when a local news reporter and cameraman came out to the refuge to<br />
capture our efforts. <strong>The</strong> cameraman must have known wh<strong>at</strong> he was getting into because he<br />
showed up wearing boots and worn clothing. Perhaps the reporter should have consulted<br />
with him before he dressed th<strong>at</strong> morning because he wore shiny dress shoes, khaki pants, a<br />
very ne<strong>at</strong> button down shirt, and a tie. Needless to say the reporter was a bit out of his<br />
element, but he was a good sport about it. With a smile, he waded out into the swampy w<strong>at</strong>er<br />
after a few minor wardrobe adjustments (i.e., rolled up his pant legs a good three or four<br />
inches and donned a pair of borrowed boots) to film a portion of the piece.<br />
32
3<br />
Massey: AN UNDERGRADUATE‖S FIRST ADVENTURE INTO FIELD RESEARCH:<br />
AN EPIPHYTIC ORCHID SURVEY IN SOUTHERN FLORIDA<br />
We eventually reintroduced 43 Epidendrum nocturnum seedlings back into the wild.<br />
Unfortun<strong>at</strong>ely, this part of Florida had just been damaged by Hurricane Wilma. This stripped<br />
many of the trees‖ upper canopy, exposing the seedlings to higher light levels and fewer than<br />
10% of our reintroduced seedlings remained one year l<strong>at</strong>er. Another issue was th<strong>at</strong> we had<br />
little idea of wh<strong>at</strong> trees to affix these seedlings and wh<strong>at</strong> microhabit<strong>at</strong> conditions they needed<br />
(i.e., epiphytic associ<strong>at</strong>es,<br />
loc<strong>at</strong>ion on the<br />
tree, and the light levels<br />
required). <strong>The</strong> loc<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
we selected for these<br />
plants were based on<br />
observ<strong>at</strong>ions made by<br />
the staff <strong>at</strong> the refuge<br />
and students performing<br />
research on site. <strong>The</strong><br />
FPNWR is home to<br />
about 27 <strong>orchid</strong> species<br />
in 17 genera with many<br />
of these species being<br />
thre<strong>at</strong>ened or endangered.<br />
It is possible th<strong>at</strong> the<br />
Fig. 3. Image of one transect <strong>at</strong> the study site.<br />
33<br />
survival of many of<br />
these species hinges on<br />
the habit<strong>at</strong> (i.e., tree<br />
species in the area), the microhabit<strong>at</strong> (i.e., substr<strong>at</strong>e of establishment and epiphytic associ<strong>at</strong>es),<br />
and other factors (i.e., light level to which they are exposed). However, little to no d<strong>at</strong>a has<br />
been collected on the <strong>orchid</strong> microhabit<strong>at</strong>s of these species <strong>at</strong> the refuge.<br />
This leads us to the study <strong>at</strong> hand. My project surveyed an area of the FPNWR for<br />
epiphytic <strong>orchid</strong>s and the mircohabit<strong>at</strong>s associ<strong>at</strong>ed with them. <strong>The</strong> site was classified as a<br />
slough transitioning to a floodplain swamp and was believed to consist mainly of pop ash<br />
(Fraxinus caroliniana), pond apple (Annona glabra), and baldcypress (Taxodium distichum) for<br />
epiphytic <strong>orchid</strong>s and c<strong>at</strong>alogued the microhabit<strong>at</strong>s associ<strong>at</strong>ed with them. Some of the species<br />
I surveyed were <strong>orchid</strong>s th<strong>at</strong> I had worked with in the Orchid Recovery Program back in<br />
Illinois. Again, I was working in some of the same sites I had visited two years ago, but the<br />
terrain was slightly different. For one, the <strong>at</strong>mosphere was very different. <strong>The</strong> cooler fall<br />
we<strong>at</strong>her had been replaced by the hot and very humid summer months. <strong>The</strong> site was no<br />
longer flooded and I could see where I was stepping most of the time. Despite this, I still<br />
encountered some obstacles. About once a week, I experienced tiny paper cuts on my exposed<br />
arms and legs, cuts th<strong>at</strong> were the direct result of the very tall and sharp saw-grass (Cladium<br />
jamaicense), which in some spots was taller than me. <strong>The</strong> saw-grass was also an area of concern<br />
because allig<strong>at</strong>ors often find this habit<strong>at</strong> to be conducive for nest building. I encountered
Massey: AN UNDERGRADUATE‖S FIRST ADVENTURE INTO FIELD RESEARCH:<br />
AN EPIPHYTIC ORCHID SURVEY IN SOUTHERN FLORIDA<br />
many more mosquitoes than I had in the fall and began each day by spraying myself with bug<br />
spray. Fortun<strong>at</strong>ely the only animals I came across were deer and a couple of harmless snakes.<br />
<strong>The</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a were collected in June and July of 2007 by another student, Cabrina<br />
Hamilton, and me. D<strong>at</strong>a were collected for this project along 30 transects, 140 m long and 10<br />
m apart for a total area sampled of 42,000 m 2 (Fig. 3). An <strong>orchid</strong> was counted in the survey if<br />
it was within 1 meter from the ground (Fig. 4). A midday light measurement was also<br />
collected for each plant using a Sper Scientific, Broad Range LUX/FC meter (840022) and<br />
recorded in Lux. Some other d<strong>at</strong>a collected consisted of the phorophyte (i.e., a plant on which<br />
epiphytes grow) for each <strong>orchid</strong>, the substr<strong>at</strong>e on which the <strong>orchid</strong> was established (i.e., moss,<br />
bark of host tree, lichens, or a combin<strong>at</strong>ion of any two), the diameter of the part of the tree<br />
closest to the <strong>orchid</strong> was measured in centimeters, and the orient<strong>at</strong>ion of the <strong>orchid</strong> in regards<br />
to substr<strong>at</strong>e tilt (i.e., loc<strong>at</strong>ed on the trunk, an angled or a horizontal limb, or on a fallen tree)<br />
along with the directionality of the <strong>orchid</strong> (i.e., facing N, E, W, S, NE, NW, SE, and SW).<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>orchid</strong>‖s epiphytic associ<strong>at</strong>es were measured (i.e., vascular plants like bromeliads and ferns<br />
and non-vascular organisms like lichens and mosses). We also subjectively determined the<br />
percentage of the area in the microhabit<strong>at</strong> they comprised and estim<strong>at</strong>ed the number of<br />
species present.<br />
5 6 7<br />
Figs. 4-7. M<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>orchid</strong>s sampled <strong>at</strong> the survey site. Campylocentrum pachyrrhizum is an example of a<br />
leafless <strong>orchid</strong> [5], Prosthechea cochle<strong>at</strong>a var. triandra an <strong>orchid</strong> with leaves and visible pseudobulbs [6],<br />
and Epidendrum amphistomum an <strong>orchid</strong> with leaves and no visible pseudobulbs [7].<br />
34<br />
4
8<br />
Massey: AN UNDERGRADUATE‖S FIRST ADVENTURE INTO FIELD RESEARCH:<br />
AN EPIPHYTIC ORCHID SURVEY IN SOUTHERN FLORIDA<br />
Figs. 8, 9. M<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>orchid</strong>s in flower during the study: Epidendrum amphistomum [8] and Polystachya concreta [9].<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>orchid</strong>s themselves were divided into three c<strong>at</strong>egories based on their<br />
morphological differences: leafless (Fig. 5) (i.e., Campylocentrum pachyrrhizum (Reichenbach<br />
f.) Rolfe, crooked-spur <strong>orchid</strong>; ribbon <strong>orchid</strong> and Harrisella porrecta (Reichenbach f.)<br />
Fawcett & Rendle, the leafless harrisella), <strong>orchid</strong>s with leaves and visible pseudobulbs (Fig. 6)<br />
(i.e., Encyclia tampensis (Lindley) Small, the Florida butterfly <strong>orchid</strong>; P. concreta; and P.<br />
cochle<strong>at</strong>a var. triandra), and <strong>orchid</strong>s with leaves and no visible pseudobulbs (Fig. 7) (i.e.,<br />
7<br />
6 Epidendrum amphistomum, E. nocturnum, and<br />
8<br />
E. rigidum). <strong>The</strong>y were further subdivided<br />
9<br />
into<br />
their stages of development. <strong>The</strong> plants without leaves were separ<strong>at</strong>ed by the number of green<br />
roots: seedlings (>3 green roots), juveniles (3-5 green roots), and m<strong>at</strong>ure plants (with<br />
flowering or fruiting bodies or >5 green roots). <strong>The</strong> plants with leaves were separ<strong>at</strong>ed into<br />
seedling (plant ≤0.5 cm), juvenile (plant ≥0.5 cm and ≤10 cm), and m<strong>at</strong>ure (flowering or<br />
fruiting bodies or plant ≥10 cm) plants. <strong>The</strong> number of green roots (leafless <strong>orchid</strong>s) and the<br />
number<br />
5<br />
of green leaves were counted (<strong>orchid</strong>s with leaves). If a plant was in flower or fruiting,<br />
7<br />
then we also counted the number of flowers and capsules. During the study the only <strong>orchid</strong>s<br />
in flower were E. amphistomum (Fig. 8) and P. concreta (Fig. 9) and the only <strong>orchid</strong> seen in<br />
fruit was E. amphistomum.<br />
We sampled 419 <strong>orchid</strong>s in total with a majority of the <strong>orchid</strong>s surveyed being<br />
juveniles with fewer m<strong>at</strong>ure plants and seedlings. Of the m<strong>at</strong>ure plants, E. amphistomum were<br />
fruiting (2) and flowering (7). Polystachya concreta was also in flower (1). Most of the <strong>orchid</strong>s<br />
surveyed were found on pop ash (Fraxinus caroliniana) (371) with 100%, 89%, and 88% of<br />
them being leafless, leaves with pseudobulbs, and leaves without pseudobulbs respectively.<br />
Leafless <strong>orchid</strong>s were observed on trunks or branches
Massey: AN UNDERGRADUATE‖S FIRST ADVENTURE INTO FIELD RESEARCH:<br />
AN EPIPHYTIC ORCHID SURVEY IN SOUTHERN FLORIDA<br />
associ<strong>at</strong>es consisted of mosses and ferns (e.g., resurrection fern, Pleopeltis spp.), as well as<br />
bromeliads, vines and occasionally lichens (Massey et. al., 2008).<br />
Taken together, it appears the <strong>orchid</strong>s <strong>at</strong> this site are established on moss or a<br />
combin<strong>at</strong>ion of moss and bark of the phorophyte, which is largely pop ash (F. caroliniana)<br />
with all of the seedlings being established on moss. <strong>The</strong>se <strong>orchid</strong>s were often facing in a<br />
<strong>north</strong>erly or <strong>north</strong>easterly direction and either on branches or trunks tilted <strong>at</strong> an angle or<br />
vertical for the <strong>orchid</strong>s with leaves and horizontal for the leafless <strong>orchid</strong>s.<br />
Currently, the Orchid Recovery Program <strong>at</strong> Illinois College is propag<strong>at</strong>ing many of<br />
the <strong>orchid</strong> species surveyed in this study with the hopes of reintroducing them. Despite the<br />
thoroughness of this study, more research is needed before we can give <strong>orchid</strong>s reintroduced<br />
in this area a fighting chance. For instance, the d<strong>at</strong>a in this study seem to indic<strong>at</strong>e th<strong>at</strong> the<br />
epiphytic <strong>orchid</strong>s grow prominently on pop ash (F. caroliniana). We are unsure if this result is<br />
due to there being more trees of this species in the area or if there is a physical (i.e., bark<br />
texture, moisture capabilities, or the arrangement of the canopy cover) or chemical associ<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
between the <strong>orchid</strong>s surveyed and this species of tree. A future study could survey the trees in<br />
this area or analyze the bark of all of the species of trees indic<strong>at</strong>ed in this study to better<br />
understand this rel<strong>at</strong>ionship. Also it seemed th<strong>at</strong> despite the <strong>orchid</strong>s growing in close<br />
proximity to lichens few of them were established on or very close to lichens. Perhaps there is<br />
a reason for this dissoci<strong>at</strong>ion. I suggest further studying of the orient<strong>at</strong>ion and tilt for these<br />
and other <strong>orchid</strong> species and more d<strong>at</strong>a collection of the phorophytes and branch diameter,<br />
especially for the <strong>orchid</strong>s with leaves. In addition to these factors, studies regarding the stage<br />
of the <strong>orchid</strong> best suited for reintroduction should be assessed. Our d<strong>at</strong>a indic<strong>at</strong>e th<strong>at</strong> juveniles<br />
(i.e., plant ≥0.5 cm and ≤10 cm) were highly abundant <strong>at</strong> the site so perhaps plants should<br />
only be reintroduced if they are <strong>at</strong> a juvenile or m<strong>at</strong>ure plant stage.<br />
Further study of these thre<strong>at</strong>ened and endangered <strong>orchid</strong>s is needed. Many of these<br />
species are in danger of being poached, having their habit<strong>at</strong>s destroyed by humans and<br />
hurricanes, and having their territory encroached upon by exotic species. Hopefully, this<br />
study will promote future research aimed <strong>at</strong> improving the survival of both Florida <strong>orchid</strong>s<br />
and other thre<strong>at</strong>ened and endangered species through reintroduction or better protection and<br />
management of their habit<strong>at</strong>s.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
Many people were influential from the conception of this study to completion of this manuscript.<br />
Cabrina Hamilton for her aid in d<strong>at</strong>a collection, Dr. Lawrence Zettler for asking me to join his lab and fostering<br />
my love of research, Larry Richardson and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for allowing me to come and work<br />
on the Florida Panther Refuge, Dr. Scott Stewart for helping with the form<strong>at</strong>ion of the study, Illinois College<br />
and the Charles and Dorothy Frank Scholarship for funding my study, Dr. Elizabeth Rellinger for her all of her<br />
p<strong>at</strong>ience in helping me with st<strong>at</strong>istical analysis, the refuge staff for their assistance during the survey, and for<br />
everyone who spent their precious time reviewing this article. I kindly thank all of them for their support.<br />
36
Massey: AN UNDERGRADUATE‖S FIRST ADVENTURE INTO FIELD RESEARCH:<br />
AN EPIPHYTIC ORCHID SURVEY IN SOUTHERN FLORIDA<br />
Emily Massey, Department of Environmental Horticulture, University of Florida, PO Box 110675,<br />
Gainesville, FL, 32611. emassey@ufl.edu<br />
As for my future plans, this study was a gre<strong>at</strong> experience and while I still enjoy labor<strong>at</strong>ory work, it really<br />
sparked my interest in field research too. Currently, I am a gradu<strong>at</strong>e student enrolled <strong>at</strong> the University of Florida<br />
earning my Master‖s degree in Environmental Horticulture. My proposed project examines w<strong>at</strong>er rel<strong>at</strong>ionships,<br />
specifically the affects of stress, and growth in two tree species. Although this is not based in ecological<br />
restor<strong>at</strong>ion, this study will provide a good basis for future research. Eventually I plan on returning to more<br />
ecologically based projects and securing a research position.<br />
Liter<strong>at</strong>ure Cited:<br />
Massey, E.E., K. Hamilton, S.L. Stewart, L.W. Richardson, and L.W. Zettler. 2008. Substr<strong>at</strong>e preferences of<br />
epiphytic <strong>orchid</strong>s (seedlings, juveniles, m<strong>at</strong>ure plants) within the Florida Panther N<strong>at</strong>ional Wildlife<br />
Refuge. Illinois St<strong>at</strong>e Academy of Science 101: 62-63.<br />
Massey, E.E. and L.W. Zettler. 2007. An expanded role for in vitro symbiotic seed germin<strong>at</strong>ion as a conserv<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
tool: Two case studies in North America (Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera leucophaea and Epidendrum nocturnum).<br />
Lankesteriana 7(1-2): 303-08.<br />
37
Hammons, Smeins & Rogers: TRANSPLANT METHODS FOR SPIRANTHES PARKSII<br />
Spiranthes parksii Navasota Ladies’-tresses<br />
Grimes County, Texas<br />
38
Hammons, Smeins & Rogers: TRANSPLANT METHODS FOR SPIRANTHES PARKSII<br />
TRANSPLANT METHODS FOR THE ENDANGERED ORCHID<br />
SPIRANTHES PARKSII CORRELL<br />
J Ryan Hammons, Fred E. Smeins & William E. Rogers<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Spiranthes parksii (Navasota ladies‖ tresses) is an endangered terrestrial <strong>orchid</strong> endemic to the Post Oak<br />
Savanna ecosystem in central-east Texas. Methods of whole plant transplant<strong>at</strong>ion are needed to conserve<br />
individuals th<strong>at</strong> will be destroyed by development activities. A soil-intact and a bare-root method were evalu<strong>at</strong>ed.<br />
Spiranthes parksii and its congener, S. cernua can be distinguished when in flower, but are indistinguishable from<br />
one another based on morphology of their leaf rosettes. Unknown leaf rosettes of S. parksii or S. cernua were<br />
transplanted into areas where S. parksii and S. cernua were known to co-occur. Compared to percent production<br />
of leaf rosette and flower production of undisturbed individuals on-site, transplanted individuals by both<br />
methods have been successful.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Spiranthes parksii, Navasota ladies’-tresses, is an endangered <strong>orchid</strong> endemic to centraleast<br />
Texas within the Post Oak Savanna Ecoregion where it co-occurs with its congener S.<br />
cernua which has a broad distribution across eastern North America (Pelch<strong>at</strong>, 2005; Brown,<br />
2008). Spiranthes parksii has also been found further east in the Pineywoods Ecoregion,<br />
however, veget<strong>at</strong>ion documented <strong>at</strong> these occurrences was similar to the Post Oak Savanna,<br />
and not typical of the Pineywoods (Bridges & Orzell, 1989). <strong>The</strong> Post Oak Savanna Ecoregion<br />
is domin<strong>at</strong>ed by <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> bunchgrasses and forbs with sc<strong>at</strong>tered clumps of trees and shrubs,<br />
primarily post oak (Quercus stell<strong>at</strong>a) (TPWD, 2009). Other common woody species are<br />
blackjack oak (Quercus marilandica), black hickory (Carya texana), American beautyberry<br />
(Callicarpa <strong>american</strong>a), yaupon (Ilex vomitoria), farkleberry (Vaccinium arboreum), winged<br />
elm (Ulmus al<strong>at</strong>a), eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana), and w<strong>at</strong>er oak (Quercus nigra)<br />
(Brezanson, 2009). Common grass species are little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium), other<br />
bluestems (Andropogon spp.), Indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans), purpletop (Tridens flavus),<br />
curly threeawn (Aristida desmantha), and longleaf spikegrass (Chasmanthium sessilifloraum).<br />
This system was originally maintained as a savanna by frequent fires and grazing by bison,<br />
and with their absence, tree/shrub species increase and grasses/forbs decrease (TPWD, 2009).<br />
Within the Post Oak Savanna, Spiranthes parksii typically occurs on sparsely veget<strong>at</strong>ed areas<br />
along the upper reaches of ephemeral and intermittent drainages. Individuals are also found<br />
away from drainages along game/livestock trails and/or in small herbaceous openings <strong>at</strong> a<br />
tree/shrub dripline where a herbaceous p<strong>at</strong>ch meets a tree/shrub community (Hammons,<br />
2008; USFWS, 2009). Spiranthes cernua, nodding ladies’-tresses, also occurs in these habit<strong>at</strong>s.<br />
39
Hammons, Smeins & Rogers: TRANSPLANT METHODS FOR SPIRANTHES PARKSII<br />
A solid waste landfill is needed for Bryan/College St<strong>at</strong>ion, Texas and surrounding<br />
areas. During construction, an estim<strong>at</strong>ed 379 Spiranthes parksii plants will be destroyed. In<br />
order to meet mitig<strong>at</strong>ion requirements, the United St<strong>at</strong>es Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)<br />
Biological Opinion required 57 hectares of deed restricted areas be purchased around the<br />
landfill footprint to protect and conserve S. parksii plants th<strong>at</strong> occurred in those areas and to<br />
serve as recipient sites for transplanted individuals. As well, the Biological Opinion permits<br />
research to develop procedures for successful transplant<strong>at</strong>ion of <strong>at</strong>-risk plants to protected<br />
areas. It is our goal to explore soil-intact and bare-root methods of transplant<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />
METHODS<br />
Both Spiranthes parksii and S. cernua are perennial and produce a leafless inflorescence<br />
during mid-fall (Oct.-Nov.). A basal rosette of leaves is produced between November and<br />
April, which is followed by a dormant underground stage until the next flowering season.<br />
Identific<strong>at</strong>ion of the two species is apparent during flowering; however, they cannot be<br />
differenti<strong>at</strong>ed during the leaf rosette stage of growth.<br />
All transplant<strong>at</strong>ions occurred <strong>at</strong> the end of leaf rosette growth to minimize disturbance<br />
during the growing period. Additionally, transplant<strong>at</strong>ion occurred when soil moisture was <strong>at</strong><br />
field capacity. All were placed in deed restricted areas where other Spiranthes parksii/S. cernua<br />
flowering individuals were previously documented. Plant loc<strong>at</strong>ions were marked in the field<br />
with survey flags and GPS positions so they could be re-visited to monitor survival.<br />
Additionally, several hundred undisturbed S. parksii/S. cernua leaf rosettes were marked in the<br />
same area to monitor survival compared with transplants. All transplanted individuals and<br />
between 22 and 540 undisturbed leaf rosettes were monitored for flowering and leaf rosette<br />
production each year after transplant<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />
Root Tuber Distribution and Bare-Root Transplant<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
Based on size and length of rosette leaves, six small and four large individuals were<br />
excav<strong>at</strong>ed in spring 2007. Length of each leaf and root tuber was measured, and each were<br />
summed to give total leaf length and total root tuber length to 1) determine if leaf size and<br />
root tuber size are correl<strong>at</strong>ed, and 2) determine the size and extent of root tubers so th<strong>at</strong> root<br />
tubers would not be damaged during transplant<strong>at</strong>ion. For this study, a root tuber constitutes<br />
any underground structure growing from the bud zone. Soil was removed from the root<br />
tubers, individuals were wrapped in a wet paper towel and transplanted to deed restricted<br />
areas within two hours following excav<strong>at</strong>ion (Fig. 1).<br />
In spring 2008, an additional cohort of 57 Spiranthes cernua/S. parksii leaf rosettes and<br />
two known S. parksii were re-loc<strong>at</strong>ed and transplanted. In spring 2009, 14 known S. parksii<br />
individuals were transplanted. Of these, six had
Hammons, Smeins & Rogers: TRANSPLANT METHODS FOR SPIRANTHES PARKSII<br />
Soil-intact Transplant<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
In spring 2007, a 20 cm diameter PVC pipe was used to excav<strong>at</strong>e individuals while<br />
keeping the soil intact around root tubers. <strong>The</strong> PVC pipe was cut into 15 cm lengths and<br />
beveled <strong>at</strong> the bottom so it could be hammered into the soil around a leaf rosette. A shovel<br />
was then placed underne<strong>at</strong>h the PVC pipe so th<strong>at</strong> soil within the PVC pipe could be<br />
excav<strong>at</strong>ed. After excav<strong>at</strong>ion, plants were transplanted to deed restricted areas within<br />
approxim<strong>at</strong>ely two hours. A hole was carefully dug in the deed restricted areas to fit the<br />
diameter and depth of the transplant inside the PVC pipe. After placing the transplant and<br />
PVC pipe in the pre dug hole, the PVC pipe was removed and soil was fed into the cracks<br />
around the transplant to fill any large air spaces (Fig. 2).<br />
Fig. 1. Methodology for bare-root transplant<strong>at</strong>ion. a) shovel buried deep bene<strong>at</strong>h plant and soil slightly raised, b)<br />
individual carefully taken out of soil with most soil removed so measurements could be taken, c) root tubers<br />
wrapped in a wet paper towel, and d) stored for transport to deed restricted areas.<br />
RESULTS<br />
Root Tuber Demographics and Bare-Root Transplant<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
For the 10 bare-root transplants in spring 2007, total leaf length for the small<br />
individuals ranged from 5 to 11 cm, while total leaf length for the large individuals ranged<br />
from 22 to 32 cm. <strong>The</strong> number of root tubers per individual ranged from 2 to 8. Total leaf<br />
length and total root tuber length were positively correl<strong>at</strong>ed (R 2 = 0.84; p= .000). <strong>The</strong><br />
maximum depth of a root tuber from the base of the stem was 9 cm, while the maximum<br />
l<strong>at</strong>eral distance was 8 cm. Root tubers were found to be both exhausted and not exhausted in<br />
S. parksii/S. cernua individuals, as noted by Wells et al. (1991; Fig. 3).<br />
41
Hammons, Smeins & Rogers: TRANSPLANT METHODS FOR SPIRANTHES PARKSII<br />
Fig. 2. Methodology for soil-intact transplant<strong>at</strong>ion. a) PVC section centered around plant and hammered into<br />
ground, b) shovel slid underne<strong>at</strong>h PVC section to be lifted out, c) transplants placed for transport<strong>at</strong>ion, and d)<br />
hole dug to fit PVC, transplant placed in pre-dug hole, PVC removed, and soil fed into cracks where PVC was to<br />
rid of any air spaces.<br />
Fig. 3. Spiranthes rosette individual th<strong>at</strong> does not have remnants of an exhausted root tuber (left) and one with<br />
two exhausted root tubers (right).<br />
With the exception of leaf rosette production in 2008, subsequent production of the 10<br />
bare-root transplants have had a higher percent production than undisturbed Spiranthes<br />
cernua/S. parksii individuals also originally found in spring 2007 (Fig 4). Individual plants<br />
42
Hammons, Smeins & Rogers: TRANSPLANT METHODS FOR SPIRANTHES PARKSII<br />
show no consistent p<strong>at</strong>tern. One individual remained dormant for 2 flowering and 2 leaf<br />
rosette stages, but emerged as a leaf rosette in fall 2009. Another has formed a flowering stalk<br />
and leaf rosette for all stages of growth monitored thus far. However, none flowered as S.<br />
parksii.<br />
Soil-Intact Transplants – Spring 2007<br />
Flower and leaf rosette production of soil-intact transplants has been similar to<br />
undisturbed Spiranthes parksii/S. cernua leaf rosettes on site, and has surpassed percent<br />
production of undisturbed individuals (Fig. 4). <strong>The</strong>se plants have also exhibited considerable<br />
variability. Some have remained dormant for as many as four growing seasons before<br />
emerging as a flowering stalk or leaf rosette. Five flowered as S. parksii, of which two have<br />
flowered all three consecutive years. Other individuals have flowered as S. cernua or remain<br />
unknown as to the species due to herbivory before identific<strong>at</strong>ion could be confirmed.<br />
Fig. 4. Percent production of S. parksii/S. cernua transplanted and undisturbed leaf rosettes (spring 2007) each<br />
growing season post-transplant<strong>at</strong>ion. Numbers in bars represent the number of individuals observed each<br />
growing season.<br />
Bare-Root Transplants – Spring 2008<br />
Percent leaf rosette and flower production of these transplants have been consistently lower<br />
than undisturbed leaf rosettes on site (Fig. 5). However, one individual flowered as Spiranthes<br />
parksii in 2008, and other individuals are still producing veget<strong>at</strong>ively including one of the<br />
known S. parksii. Sixteen appeared to be destroyed by feral hogs during winter of 2008 after<br />
transplant<strong>at</strong>ion. Despite this disturbance, three individuals transplanted the area emerged as<br />
leaf rosettes in 2009.<br />
43
Hammons, Smeins & Rogers: TRANSPLANT METHODS FOR SPIRANTHES PARKSII<br />
Fig. 5. Percent production of S. parksii/S. cernua transplants and undisturbed leaf rosettes each growing season<br />
post-transplant<strong>at</strong>ion. Numbers in or above bars represent the number of individuals observed each growing<br />
season.<br />
Spiranthes parksii Bare-Root Transplants – Spring 2009<br />
Four of the 14 (28%) flowered and four (28%) produced a rosette of leaves in fall 2009<br />
following transplant<strong>at</strong>ion. One of the six which had
Hammons, Smeins & Rogers: TRANSPLANT METHODS FOR SPIRANTHES PARKSII<br />
Pileri (1998) noted th<strong>at</strong> after excav<strong>at</strong>ing five Spiranthes cernua plants to analyze the<br />
root tubers for mycorrhizal infection, all but one plant th<strong>at</strong> was destroyed by a small mammal<br />
survived transplant<strong>at</strong>ion by reappearing the next year. She also noted th<strong>at</strong> they were better<br />
able to survive when transplanted during the veget<strong>at</strong>ive or early reproductive phases.<br />
However, others believe, or have found, th<strong>at</strong> bare-root transplanting of terrestrial <strong>orchid</strong>s is<br />
unsuccessful (Ferry, 2008; Steinauer, 2008). In this study, S. cernua (spring 2007) and S. parksii<br />
(spring 2008 and spring 2009) responded positively to bare-root transplant<strong>at</strong>ion. <strong>The</strong> three S.<br />
cernua th<strong>at</strong> flowered after bare-root transplant<strong>at</strong>ion in spring 2007 were of the larger leaf<br />
rosettes. <strong>The</strong> success of these could be due to large underground root tubers which could be<br />
used to offset the effects of disturbance caused by transplant<strong>at</strong>ion. As well, m<strong>at</strong>ure S. parksii<br />
transplanted in spring 2009 could also be using underground reserves to offset the effects of<br />
transplant<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />
Previous efforts of soil-intact transplant<strong>at</strong>ion of Spiranthes parksii using 15 cm diameter<br />
irrig<strong>at</strong>ion pipe <strong>at</strong> the TMPA Gibbons Creek Lignite Mine conserv<strong>at</strong>ion areas yielded positive<br />
results (Parker 2006). However, quantit<strong>at</strong>ive d<strong>at</strong>a and long-term observ<strong>at</strong>ions were not made.<br />
Efforts of soil-intact transplanting in other terrestrial <strong>orchid</strong>s have been unsuccessful, as with<br />
Isotria medeoloides (Brumbeck, 1996). In this study, both Spiranthes parksii and S. cernua<br />
responded well to this method. In fact, compared to undisturbed leaf rosettes <strong>at</strong> the study site,<br />
percent production of soil-intact transplants have been gre<strong>at</strong>er in the last three growing<br />
seasons. This might be due to placement of transplants since they were placed in areas of ideal<br />
habit<strong>at</strong> of S. parksii/S. cernua. Undisturbed leaf rosettes may be persisting in areas which have<br />
become unfavorable for flowering due to woody encroachment. However, quantit<strong>at</strong>ive d<strong>at</strong>a<br />
would need to be collected to verify this.<br />
While all transplants were placed in areas where Spiranthes parksii/S. cernua occurred,<br />
placement could possibly be influencing post-production since microhabit<strong>at</strong>s vary gre<strong>at</strong>ly<br />
within a savanna p<strong>at</strong>chwork. Additionally, initial size of leaf rosettes prior to transplant<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
could affect post-production. However, detailed analysis of microhabit<strong>at</strong>s and plant sizes<br />
would need to be conducted to pursue these hypotheses.<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
While both methods of transplant<strong>at</strong>ion have yielded positive post-production in<br />
individuals, if given the time and labor, the soil-intact method would be preferred. Not only<br />
has this method yielded higher survival, but the intact soil may contain tubers of plants other<br />
than the target individual. Upon digging up one Spiranthes parksii for bare-root transplanting<br />
in spring 2009, another individual was found dormant as a root tuber. This was also seen<br />
when taking soil samples around individual plants. Upon returning to the labor<strong>at</strong>ory to sieve<br />
soil samples, a Spiranthes spp. root tuber was found.<br />
Comparison of transplanted individuals to undisturbed plants of the same species is<br />
critical in giving accur<strong>at</strong>e results of success or failure. If given only the results of transplanted<br />
individuals in this study, one might conclude individuals are dying due to transplant<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />
45
Hammons, Smeins & Rogers: TRANSPLANT METHODS FOR SPIRANTHES PARKSII<br />
However, transplanted and undisturbed individuals have both declined and/or fluctu<strong>at</strong>ed in<br />
subsequent production after transplanting was initi<strong>at</strong>ed. Long-term monitoring of these<br />
individuals is crucial to clarify life history characteristics and environmental variables th<strong>at</strong><br />
influence the persistence of undisturbed and transplanted individuals.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
We would like to thank the Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency (BVSWMA) for funding and HDR,<br />
Inc. for assistance with this research. Individuals to thank are Linda Langlitz, Josh Grace, Martha Ariza, and<br />
Trey Witcher for their assistance in transplanting and monitoring of individual plants.<br />
J Ryan Hammons, Fred E. Smeins & William E. Rogers<br />
Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Texas A&M University, College St<strong>at</strong>ion, Tex.<br />
ryanhammons2000@yahoo.com<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Brown, P.M. & S.N. Folsom. 2008. Field Guide to the Wild Orchids of Texas. Gainesville: University Press of<br />
Florida.<br />
Bezanson, D. 2000. N<strong>at</strong>ural Veget<strong>at</strong>ion Types of Texas and <strong>The</strong>ir Represent<strong>at</strong>ion in Conserv<strong>at</strong>ion Areas. <strong>The</strong><br />
University of Texas <strong>at</strong> Austin. http://www.abisw.org/bezanson/<br />
Bridges, E.L. and S.L. Orzell. 1989. Additions of Noteworthy Vascular Plant Collections from Texas and<br />
Louisiana, with Historical, Ecological and Geographical Notes. Phytologia 66: 12-69.<br />
Brumback, W.E. and C.W. Fyler. 1996. Small Whorled Pogonia (Isotria medeoloides) Transplant Project. In Falk,<br />
D.A., C.I. Millar, and M. Olwell. 1996. Restoring Diversity: Str<strong>at</strong>egies for Reintroduction of Endangered<br />
Plants. Washington, D.C.: Island Press,<br />
Ferry, R.J. 2008. Reloc<strong>at</strong>ing Terrestrial Orchid Plants. North American N<strong>at</strong>ive Orchid Journal 14: 179-82.<br />
Hammons, J.R. 2008. Demographic, Life Cycle, Habit<strong>at</strong> Characteriz<strong>at</strong>ion and Transplant Methods for the<br />
endangered <strong>orchid</strong>, Spiranthes parksii Correll. M.S. <strong>The</strong>sis, Department of Rangeland Ecology and<br />
Management, Texas A&M University, College St<strong>at</strong>ion, Texas.<br />
Parker, K.M. 2006. Personal communic<strong>at</strong>ion. Texas Ecological Services, College St<strong>at</strong>ion, Texas.<br />
Pelch<strong>at</strong>, C. 2005. Spiranthes parksii Correll – Navasota Ladies‖ Tresses. McAllen Intern<strong>at</strong>ional Orchid Society<br />
Journal 6: 9-15.<br />
Pileri, V.S. 1998. Root morphology, distribution of mycorrhizae, and nutrient st<strong>at</strong>us of the terrestrial <strong>orchid</strong><br />
Spiranthes cernua. M.S. <strong>The</strong>sis, Department of Biology, University of Nebraska <strong>at</strong> Omaha, Omaha,<br />
Nebraska.<br />
Steinauer, G. 2008. Transplanting a Rare Orchid. Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Annual Report of the<br />
Wildlife Conserv<strong>at</strong>ion Fund.<br />
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. Accessed 2009. Post Oak Savanna and Blackland Prairie Wildlife<br />
Management. http://www.tpwd.st<strong>at</strong>e.tx.us/landw<strong>at</strong>er/land/habit<strong>at</strong>s/post_oak/<br />
United St<strong>at</strong>es Fish and Wildlife Service. 2009. Navasota Ladies‖-Tresses (Spiranthes parksii) 5-Year Review:<br />
Summary and Evalu<strong>at</strong>ion. Austin Ecological Services Field Office, Austin, Tex.<br />
46
Stewart & Hicks: PROPAGATION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF NATIVE ORCHIDS<br />
PROPAGATION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF THE NATIVE<br />
ORCHIDS OF THE UNITED STATES (INCLUDING SELECTED<br />
POSSESIONS), CANADA, ST. PIERRE ET MIQUELON,<br />
AND GREENLAND<br />
Scott Stewart, Ph.D. & Aaron Hicks<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Conserv<strong>at</strong>ion of biodiversity has become a primary biological, economic, and<br />
humanistic concern as the global community faces the sixth gre<strong>at</strong> extinction event in the<br />
Earth's history (Canadell and Noble, 2001). <strong>The</strong> implement<strong>at</strong>ion of conserv<strong>at</strong>ion efforts must<br />
begin with careful planning, otherwise we risk the Johnny Appleseed effect of biodiversity<br />
conserv<strong>at</strong>ion—we sc<strong>at</strong>ter our efforts into the wind and whichever efforts result in fruitful<br />
conserv<strong>at</strong>ion we consider successful and all others we consider unproductive. This naive<br />
approach to the conserv<strong>at</strong>ion of biodiversity runs the risk of missing important biotic<br />
components of global biodiversity.<br />
This paper is an <strong>at</strong>tempt to g<strong>at</strong>her verifiable propag<strong>at</strong>ion, cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion, and conserv<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
st<strong>at</strong>us inform<strong>at</strong>ion on the <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> <strong>orchid</strong>s of the United St<strong>at</strong>es, Canada, and associ<strong>at</strong>ed foreign<br />
lands in one document th<strong>at</strong> may be used to guide future <strong>orchid</strong> conserv<strong>at</strong>ion efforts in these<br />
regions. We have chosen to include all <strong>orchid</strong> species and varieties considered <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> to the<br />
United St<strong>at</strong>es, Canada, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, Saint Pierre et Miquelon<br />
islands, and Greenland. Species and varieties considered as introduced, exotic, escaped from<br />
cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion, and waifs have been excluded. Color and growth forms have also been excluded as<br />
their taxonomic st<strong>at</strong>us and genetic stability are often controversial. All propag<strong>at</strong>ion and<br />
conserv<strong>at</strong>ion d<strong>at</strong>a has been verified through scientific public<strong>at</strong>ions and personal<br />
communic<strong>at</strong>ions with experts in <strong>orchid</strong> propag<strong>at</strong>ion, cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion, and conserv<strong>at</strong>ion. In general,<br />
the most recent taxonomic checklist proposed by Brown (2009) has been used throughout.<br />
<strong>The</strong> current work represents the first effort to g<strong>at</strong>her such a volume of specific inform<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
for such a large number of species and widespread geographic area, and should be considered a<br />
working draft. <strong>The</strong> authors invite comments and additional verifiable d<strong>at</strong>a from readers.<br />
47
Stewart & Hicks: PROPAGATION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF NATIVE ORCHIDS<br />
GEOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS<br />
Although n<strong>at</strong>ional boundaries are political r<strong>at</strong>her than biological, a brief analysis may<br />
be enlightening with respect to the conserv<strong>at</strong>ion of <strong>orchid</strong> species. From a financial<br />
standpoint, the geographic areas reported here encompass a significant proportion of global<br />
productivity (Table 1).<br />
Table 1—Gross domestic products of major regions in current work. D<strong>at</strong>a summarized from World Bank,<br />
World Development Indic<strong>at</strong>ors, and CIA World Factbook.<br />
Country Gross Domestic Product (US $ billions)<br />
United St<strong>at</strong>es 14200 (2008)<br />
Canada 1400 (2008)<br />
Puerto Rico 67.9 (2001)<br />
US Virgin Islands 2 (1993)<br />
Guam 2.5 (2005 est.)<br />
Total 15672<br />
With approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 410 taxa, this comes out to about $38.3 billion in average<br />
domestic productivity per species in the geographic regions surveyed. A conserv<strong>at</strong>ive figure<br />
for the number of species globally is approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 24,000 taxa, with the regions surveyed<br />
here making up only 1.7% of the total. With global productivity calcul<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>at</strong> $60.6 trillion in<br />
2008 (World Bank), a figure of $2.52 billion in productivity per species is reached, a<br />
substantially smaller figure. To paraphrase the Intern<strong>at</strong>ional Union for Conserv<strong>at</strong>ion of<br />
N<strong>at</strong>ure (IUCN), if <strong>orchid</strong> growers cannot pull a plant back from the brink of extinction, wh<strong>at</strong><br />
hope is there for other plant families? To extend this st<strong>at</strong>ement, if economic powerhouses<br />
with all their resources<br />
cannot preserve their<br />
own species—which are<br />
rel<strong>at</strong>ively few in number<br />
when compared to the<br />
global diversity—wh<strong>at</strong><br />
hope is there for other<br />
<strong>orchid</strong>s?<br />
Hawaii<br />
Despite the abunance<br />
of hybrids and<br />
introduced species, the<br />
true <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> <strong>orchid</strong> taxa of<br />
Hawaii are limited to<br />
three species, one of<br />
which (Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera holochila,<br />
puahala-a-kane;<br />
Fig. 1) is listed as<br />
Fig. 1. Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera holochila (puahala-a-kane) in n<strong>at</strong>ural habit<strong>at</strong> in Hawaii.<br />
L. Zettler<br />
48
Stewart & Hicks: PROPAGATION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF NATIVE ORCHIDS<br />
thre<strong>at</strong>ened under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. <strong>The</strong>re has been some propag<strong>at</strong>ion work<br />
with this species—symbiotic germin<strong>at</strong>ion efforts using mycobionts isol<strong>at</strong>ed from local<br />
Hawaiian popul<strong>at</strong>ions were unsuccessful while symbiotic efforts using non-Hawaiian<br />
mycobionts have been successful, and there was no desire to introduce non-<strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> mycobionts<br />
from outside the islands. <strong>The</strong>re has been reasonable success in propag<strong>at</strong>ing the species using<br />
asymbiotic methods (McDonald et al., 2006; L. Zettler, personal communic<strong>at</strong>ion).<br />
Guam<br />
Of the species <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> to Guam, only a small number have been successfully propag<strong>at</strong>ed<br />
and brought into horticultural cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion. Little is known of the plants of the island,<br />
although the genera represented should be considered generally straightforward in asymbiotic<br />
culture systems. It seems likely they would present few difficulties in terms of artificial<br />
propag<strong>at</strong>ion. Nothing is known of the n<strong>at</strong>ural mycobionts or symbiotic culture requirements<br />
of the <strong>orchid</strong>s of Guam.<br />
Western United St<strong>at</strong>es and Canada<br />
Fig. 2. Cypripedium californicum (California lady‖s-slipper) photographed in southern Oregon, U.S.A.<br />
S.L. Stewart<br />
This region presents myriad n<strong>at</strong>ural biomes: ranging from desert, to Pacific rain forest,<br />
to true Arctic environments in the <strong>north</strong>ernmost portions of Alaska. Several species <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> to<br />
this region are showy (Cypripedium californicum, California lady's-slipper; Fig. 2) and<br />
warrant additional propag<strong>at</strong>ion effort. Even in the arid desert st<strong>at</strong>es <strong>orchid</strong>s are surprisingly<br />
well-represented, found in all but three and ten counties of Arizona and New Mexico<br />
respectively (Coleman, 2002).<br />
49
Stewart & Hicks: PROPAGATION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF NATIVE ORCHIDS<br />
Federally protected species of interest in this region include Piperia yadonii (Yadon's<br />
piperia), which has eluded <strong>at</strong>tempts <strong>at</strong> cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion, although there has been some recent<br />
interest in the ecology and propag<strong>at</strong>ion of the species (George et al., 2009; Sharma et al., 2007;<br />
R. Buck, personal communic<strong>at</strong>ion). A locally endemic species, Spiranthes delitescens (Canelo<br />
Hills ladies'-tresses), has proven to be remarkably easy to grow in culture (Hicks, 2007),<br />
producing large numbers of plants from friable callus when stressed in sterile tissue culture.<br />
Seedlings have flowered in cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>at</strong> University of Arizona. A total of four popul<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
are known, although a fifth has been reported (M. Falk, personal communic<strong>at</strong>ion).<br />
Another species of interest in the region is Spiranthes infernalis (Ash Meadows ladies'tresses),<br />
known from a cluster of popul<strong>at</strong>ions over an area of approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 28 acres in Nye<br />
County, Nevada. Estim<strong>at</strong>es as to its total popul<strong>at</strong>ion numbers vary, but the species‖ global<br />
popul<strong>at</strong>ion is estim<strong>at</strong>ed in the low one thousands, possibly as low as 1107 (Morefield, 2001).<br />
<strong>The</strong>re has reportedly been an effort to propag<strong>at</strong>e the species <strong>at</strong> Royal Botanic Gardens <strong>at</strong> Kew.<br />
Central United St<strong>at</strong>es and Canada<br />
With the change of the American prairie, Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera leucophaea (eastern prairie<br />
fringed <strong>orchid</strong>; Fig. 3) has dwindled in numbers and is currently listed as Federally<br />
thre<strong>at</strong>ened. Asymbiotic efforts to propag<strong>at</strong>e the species have met with limited success<br />
(Stoutamire, 1996); however, symbiotic<br />
propag<strong>at</strong>ion efforts have been highly successful<br />
(Stewart, 2000; Zettler, 1999; Zettler et al., 2005;<br />
Zettler et al., 2001). Also afforded Federally<br />
thre<strong>at</strong>ened st<strong>at</strong>us, P. praeclara has been the subject<br />
of extensive asymbiotic and symbiotic<br />
propag<strong>at</strong>ion efforts. Asymbiotic efforts with P.<br />
praeclara have been met with reasonable success<br />
after lengthy culture periods and multiple cold<br />
tre<strong>at</strong>ments of in vitro seed (From and Read,<br />
1998). Sharma et al. (2003) reported the successful<br />
symbiotic propag<strong>at</strong>ion of the species.<br />
Also <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> to this region is the Federally<br />
thre<strong>at</strong>ened Texas endemic Spiranthes parksii<br />
(Navasota ladies’-tresses). <strong>The</strong>re has been some<br />
success in propag<strong>at</strong>ing this species from seed by<br />
researchers <strong>at</strong> the Atlanta Botanical Garden.<br />
Wilson (web page) reports the species has proven<br />
to be remarkably easy to cultiv<strong>at</strong>e using<br />
asymbiotic techniques. Additional asymbiotic and<br />
symbiotic propag<strong>at</strong>ion efforts are currently<br />
underway (R. Hammons, personal communic<strong>at</strong>ion).<br />
50<br />
Fig. 3. Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera leucophaea (eastern prairie fringed<br />
<strong>orchid</strong>) photographed in southern Wisconsin, U.S.A.<br />
P. M. Brown.
Stewart & Hicks: PROPAGATION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF NATIVE ORCHIDS<br />
Eastern United St<strong>at</strong>es and Canada, excluding Florida<br />
<strong>The</strong> eastern United St<strong>at</strong>es are home to a number of Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera species th<strong>at</strong> are st<strong>at</strong>elisted<br />
as endangered, in many cases. Many of these species have proven to be resistant to<br />
traditional propag<strong>at</strong>ion techniques, and success has been sporadic to nonexistent. Similar to P.<br />
leucophaea, many species have been severely impacted by a variety of anthropogenic factors<br />
such as urbaniz<strong>at</strong>ion, agriculture, and fire suppression.<br />
In addition to the many Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera species of this region, Isotria medeoloides (small<br />
whorled pogonia), known from the eastern United St<strong>at</strong>es, is listed as Federally thre<strong>at</strong>ened,<br />
and had been the focus of many ecological and horticultural studies. <strong>The</strong> species has resisted<br />
numerous <strong>at</strong>tempts <strong>at</strong> artificial propag<strong>at</strong>ion; however, new efforts by the Smithsonian<br />
Environmental Research Center and the U.S. Park Service are planned (J. O'Neill, personal<br />
communic<strong>at</strong>ion).<br />
Florida<br />
Fig. 4. Dendrophylax lindenii (ghost <strong>orchid</strong>)<br />
photographed in southwestern Florida, U.S.A.<br />
S. L. Stewart<br />
51<br />
With more than a hundred species<br />
known from Florida alone, it is practical to<br />
tre<strong>at</strong> the st<strong>at</strong>e as a separ<strong>at</strong>e entity for<br />
conserv<strong>at</strong>ion purposes. In addition to the<br />
intrinsic diversity present in Florida is the<br />
urban development the st<strong>at</strong>e has undergone,<br />
in conjunction with the influx of invasive<br />
species th<strong>at</strong> further thre<strong>at</strong>ens the st<strong>at</strong>e's<br />
<strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> species. Perhaps of gre<strong>at</strong>est interest is<br />
the leafless Dendrophylax lindenii (ghost<br />
<strong>orchid</strong>; Fig. 4), which is an endangered<br />
species under st<strong>at</strong>e law. However, the plant<br />
has proven to be remarkably easy to grow in<br />
vitro, provided seeds can be reliably<br />
produced. Unfortun<strong>at</strong>ely, mortality is high<br />
amongst deflasked plantlets and growth is<br />
slow; it seems likely there is some aspect of<br />
the species' cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion th<strong>at</strong> remains cryptic<br />
such th<strong>at</strong> it may eventually be brought into<br />
cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion—although this is a theme th<strong>at</strong> has<br />
been repe<strong>at</strong>ed for many decades without<br />
realiz<strong>at</strong>ion (Correll, 1978).<br />
Afforded similar st<strong>at</strong>e-level protection<br />
is Cyrtopodium punct<strong>at</strong>um (cigar <strong>orchid</strong>),<br />
which forms large (to 1.5 meter), robust<br />
plants whose popul<strong>at</strong>ions have been<br />
decim<strong>at</strong>ed by poaching and habit<strong>at</strong>
Stewart & Hicks: PROPAGATION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF NATIVE ORCHIDS<br />
alter<strong>at</strong>ion. However, the species forms large capsules producing similarly large quantities of<br />
seeds th<strong>at</strong> germin<strong>at</strong>e and grow on a variety of media with no special requirements in<br />
asymbiotic culture. From a mechanical standpoint, the roots are not like those of most<br />
<strong>orchid</strong>s, forming tangled m<strong>at</strong>s in vitro, resulting in damage when deflasked. From this, it may<br />
be best to plant seedlings in individual tubes. Considerable research effort has been focused on<br />
the asymbiotic propag<strong>at</strong>ion, reproductive biology, and potential for reintroduction of the<br />
cigar <strong>orchid</strong> (Dutra, 2008; Dutra et al., 2009a,b). Preliminary symbiotic germin<strong>at</strong>ion and<br />
reintroduction of the species has been successful (Stewart and Richardson, 2008; S. Stewart,<br />
unpublished d<strong>at</strong>a).<br />
Another st<strong>at</strong>e-listed endangered species is Basiphyllaea corallicola (Carter's <strong>orchid</strong>),<br />
which is easy to propag<strong>at</strong>e asymbiotically, forming new pseudobulbs with fresh shoots every<br />
few months. Similarly protected, both Epidendrum nocturnum (night-fragrant epidendrum)<br />
and Macradenia lutescens (Trinidad macradenia) offer no difficulties in vitro. A symbiotic<br />
propag<strong>at</strong>ion protocol has even been developed for E. nocturnum (Zettler et al., 2007) and<br />
preliminary reintroductions have taken place (Stewart, 2008). Another species whose numbers<br />
have declined to the point where it has been listed as endangered by the st<strong>at</strong>e is Tolumnia<br />
bahamensis (Florida's dancing lady); germin<strong>at</strong>ion is straightforward, while subsequent culture<br />
is made difficult by the usual cultural quirks within the Oncidiinae in th<strong>at</strong> differenti<strong>at</strong>ion is<br />
slow, resulting in large clusters of protocorms without roots. <strong>The</strong>se problems usually resolve<br />
with subsequent repl<strong>at</strong>ing, resulting in large numbers of plants th<strong>at</strong> eventually form stout<br />
seedlings with good roots. Mortality is high when deflasked. Bletia purpurea (pine-pink) is<br />
another Floridian species whose popul<strong>at</strong>ions face decline as urbaniz<strong>at</strong>ion in southern Florida<br />
increases. <strong>The</strong> germin<strong>at</strong>ion, in vitro culture, and transfer to the greenhouse of the species is<br />
quite easy (Dutra et al., 2008); however, the species is rarely seen in the commercial<br />
marketplace.<br />
Although not afforded protection, Eulophia alta (wild coco) is a strong grower in<br />
sterile flask, although others have noted th<strong>at</strong> it germin<strong>at</strong>es and grows quite readily from seed<br />
sown directly in rich earth. Johnson et al. (2007) presented a side-by-side comparison of<br />
asymbiotic versus symbiotic germin<strong>at</strong>ion this species, demonstr<strong>at</strong>ing preliminary evidence of<br />
an advantage during symbiotic germin<strong>at</strong>ion and subsequent in vitro seedling development.<br />
Several other Florida <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> species are considered endangered, and lack active<br />
conserv<strong>at</strong>ion efforts, such as Beloglottis costaricensis (Costa Rican ladies'-tresses),<br />
Bulbophyllum pachyrachis (r<strong>at</strong>-tail <strong>orchid</strong>), Cyclopogon cranichoides (speckled ladies'-tresses),<br />
Epidendrum amphistomum (dingy-flowered star <strong>orchid</strong>), Ionopsis utricularioides (delic<strong>at</strong>e<br />
ionopsis), Liparis el<strong>at</strong>a (tall twayblade), Mesadenus lucayanus (copper ladies'-tresses),<br />
Polystachya concreta (pale-flowered polystachya), Vanilla barbell<strong>at</strong>a (worm-vine), and Vanilla<br />
mexicana (thin-leaved vanilla), among others. <strong>The</strong> St<strong>at</strong>e of Florida affords some 54 taxa<br />
endangered st<strong>at</strong>us, 16 more are protected as thre<strong>at</strong>ened, and two more—Encyclia tampensis<br />
(Florida butterfly <strong>orchid</strong>) and Epidendrum magnoliae var. magnoliae (green-fly <strong>orchid</strong>; syn.<br />
Epidendrum conopseum)—are protected as commercially exploited.<br />
52
Stewart & Hicks: PROPAGATION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF NATIVE ORCHIDS<br />
A number of Florida <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> <strong>orchid</strong>s are also found throughout the Gre<strong>at</strong>er and Lesser<br />
Antilles—including Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Cuba is not tre<strong>at</strong>ed in this<br />
paper. While the degree of this wider geographic distribution can be seen in comparing the<br />
<strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> <strong>orchid</strong> flora of Florida to th<strong>at</strong> of Puerto Rico, other islands in the Antilles may also<br />
possess some species known from Florida. For example, Dendrophylax lindenii, Cyrtopodium<br />
punct<strong>at</strong>um, Eulophia alta, and Bletia purpurea are all known from Cuba and Florida (Llamacho<br />
and Larramendi, 2005).<br />
Puerto Rico<br />
Much of the primary forest of Puerto Rico was removed early in the 20th century and<br />
it is difficult to st<strong>at</strong>e with certainty th<strong>at</strong> any species of <strong>orchid</strong> were lost. However, two<br />
endemic species—Lepanthes caritensis (Carite babyroot <strong>orchid</strong>) and the Federally endangered<br />
Lepanthes eltoroensis (Luquillo Mountain babyroot <strong>orchid</strong>)—are known only from very<br />
small popul<strong>at</strong>ions (Tremblay et al., 1998) and a third Puerto Rican <strong>orchid</strong>, Cranichis ricartii<br />
(Puerto Rico helmet <strong>orchid</strong>), is Federally endangered and may be extirp<strong>at</strong>ed. Rel<strong>at</strong>ively little<br />
is known about the propag<strong>at</strong>ion of most <strong>orchid</strong>s found in Puerto Rico.<br />
U.S. Virgin Islands<br />
Twenty-six <strong>orchid</strong> species are known from the U.S. Virgin Islands, all of which are<br />
also found in Puerto Rico (Ackerman, 1995). St. Thomas is the most species-rich with 23<br />
species, followed by St. John (13 species), and St. Croix (9 species). Taken as a whole, 29<br />
species are known from both the U.S. and British Virgin Islands. Only Eulophia alta and<br />
Erythrodes hirtella (false helmet <strong>orchid</strong>) are known from the British Virgin Islands and not<br />
from the U.S. Virgin Islands. Ackerman (1995) commented th<strong>at</strong> additional species may have<br />
been present in both the U.S. And British Virgin Islands <strong>at</strong> one time, but rapid urbaniz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
on the popul<strong>at</strong>ed islands may have caused some species to become extirp<strong>at</strong>ed from the islands.<br />
As in Puerto Rico and Florida, the U.S. Virgin Islands also have a number of exotic <strong>orchid</strong>s<br />
th<strong>at</strong> have escaped cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion and become established on various islands, including<br />
Sp<strong>at</strong>hoglottis plic<strong>at</strong>a (Philippine ground <strong>orchid</strong>; St. Thomas), Vanilla mexicana (Mexican<br />
vanilla; St. Croix), and V. planifolia (commercial vanilla; St. Croix, St. John, and St.<br />
Thomas).<br />
HORTICULTURAL NOTES<br />
Several of the genera of interest here remain recalcitrant to existing propag<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
techniques. Genera such as Corallorhiza remain cryptic in their in vitro cultural needs,<br />
although Jay O'Neill (personal communic<strong>at</strong>ion) notes th<strong>at</strong> sporadic germin<strong>at</strong>ion on<br />
commercial media has occurred, while semi-wild field plantings have been met with good<br />
success, including one recruit growing to flower. <strong>The</strong> reliance of mycotropic interactions for<br />
the seed germin<strong>at</strong>ion and plant development of saprophytic terrestrial genera (i.e.,<br />
Corallorhiza, Hexalectris) may be the root cause for their difficulty in in vitro propag<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />
<strong>The</strong> genus Cypripedium is by far the most successful in terms of propag<strong>at</strong>ion and<br />
commercializ<strong>at</strong>ion, with a number of species being made available for sale on a regular basis.<br />
In fact, the majority of the North American species are available through a number of<br />
53
Stewart & Hicks: PROPAGATION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF NATIVE ORCHIDS<br />
reputable companies as m<strong>at</strong>ure plants, and it is expected th<strong>at</strong> this market has considerable<br />
potential for gardeners th<strong>at</strong> would like to engage in the horticultural cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion of these<br />
species. Several species have been presented as candid<strong>at</strong>es for commercial propag<strong>at</strong>ion; prices<br />
and availability have improved<br />
over the past several years. <strong>The</strong><br />
genus is desirable and<br />
conspicuous, making it an ideal<br />
subject for commercializ<strong>at</strong>ion in<br />
order to potentially reduce the<br />
collection of plants from the<br />
wild.<br />
Fig. 5. Calypso bulbosa var. occidentalis (western fairy-slipper)<br />
photographed in southern Oregon, U.S.A.<br />
S.L. Stewart<br />
54<br />
Cyrtopodium punct<strong>at</strong>um is<br />
perhaps one of the most<br />
underrepresented species with<br />
respect to propag<strong>at</strong>ion. It is so<br />
fecund and such a strong grower<br />
th<strong>at</strong> it would seem to be an ideal<br />
candid<strong>at</strong>e for commercial<br />
exploit<strong>at</strong>ion in its <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> st<strong>at</strong>e of<br />
Florida. <strong>The</strong> decim<strong>at</strong>ion of wild<br />
popul<strong>at</strong>ions of the species<br />
implies its desirability could<br />
prove useful to nurseries th<strong>at</strong> are<br />
willing to produce specimens for<br />
local growers. Similarly,<br />
Eulophia alta, Epidendrum<br />
nocturnum, and Encyclia tampensis<br />
are readily propag<strong>at</strong>ed;<br />
Eulophia alta could probably be<br />
introduced into popular culture<br />
much in the same way as the<br />
other two have. Occasionally<br />
available from commercial<br />
vendors, Epipactis gigantea<br />
(stream <strong>orchid</strong>) is an ideal<br />
candid<strong>at</strong>e for western gardens.<br />
Both Calypso bulbosa var. <strong>american</strong>a (eastern fairy-slipper) and C. bulbosa var.<br />
occidentalis (western fairy-slipper; Fig. 5) are diminutive, but showy, <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> <strong>orchid</strong>s with<br />
tremendous horticultural potential. <strong>The</strong> species has frustr<strong>at</strong>ed many individuals <strong>at</strong>tempting in<br />
vitro propag<strong>at</strong>ion with sporadic germin<strong>at</strong>ion and limited subsequent growth. Ashmore (1999)<br />
has reported the successful in vitro asymbiotic propag<strong>at</strong>ion and ex vitro cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion of both<br />
Calypso varieties, and numerous man-made Calypso hybrids. <strong>The</strong> scaling-up of such work
Stewart & Hicks: PROPAGATION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF NATIVE ORCHIDS<br />
would be required before Calypso would be regularly available to gardeners; however, such<br />
propag<strong>at</strong>ion, hybridiz<strong>at</strong>ion, and horticultural selection work are important first-steps toward<br />
commercializ<strong>at</strong>ion of these showy <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> <strong>orchid</strong>s.<br />
<strong>The</strong> genus Goodyera has been popular for many years as a plant for culture in terraria;<br />
other allied members of the genus have been available as jewel <strong>orchid</strong>s in the trade for years,<br />
with few—if any—from artificial propag<strong>at</strong>ion. Propag<strong>at</strong>ion of jewel <strong>orchid</strong>s for the purposes<br />
of horticulture is most commonly by division. It seems likely most, if not all, of the <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong><br />
Goodyera species in the horticultural trade have been wild-collected. It would be desirable to<br />
provide for this genus in artificial propag<strong>at</strong>ion as well.<br />
<strong>The</strong> genus Habenaria is almost unknown with respect to commercial asymbiotic seed<br />
propag<strong>at</strong>ion, as with members of the genus Listera, Malaxis, Hexalectris, Piperia, Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera,<br />
and Spiranthes. <strong>The</strong>re is little to say about this otherwise unrel<strong>at</strong>ed group other than to say<br />
th<strong>at</strong> new techniques, media, and mycobionts will have to be developed to master this group of<br />
plants. <strong>The</strong> exception would be the genus Spiranthes, which has proven to be prolific in sterile<br />
culture for the most part. <strong>The</strong> propag<strong>at</strong>ion of Habenaria species has received considerable<br />
<strong>at</strong>tention in recent years, particularly as a part of habit<strong>at</strong> or integr<strong>at</strong>ed conserv<strong>at</strong>ion efforts in<br />
Florida (Stewart, 2007; Stewart and Kane, 2006a, b; Stewart and Zettler, 2002).<br />
Tropical epiphytic genera, including Bulbophyllum, Dendrobium, Encyclia,<br />
Epidendrum, Lepanthes, Maxillaria, Oncidium, Pleurothallis, and so forth, have a better<br />
outlook than terrestrial species, if for no better reason conventional commercial <strong>orchid</strong><br />
propag<strong>at</strong>ion labor<strong>at</strong>ories are better suited to the propag<strong>at</strong>ion of these plants, many of which<br />
can be produced in large numbers if the economic incentives are present, and fresh, clean<br />
m<strong>at</strong>erial can be produced.<br />
CONCLUDING REMARKS<br />
In total, there are six species afforded Federal protection as endangered species, the<br />
highest level of protection: Cranichis ricartii, Lepanthes eltoroensis, Piperia yadonii, Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera<br />
holochila, Spiranthes delitescens, and Spiranthes parksii. Three species—Isotria medeoloides,<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera praeclara, and P. leucophaea—are considered Federally thre<strong>at</strong>ened. Of these, only<br />
four—Spiranthes delitescens, S. parksii, Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera praeclara, and P. leucophaea—have been<br />
artificially produced in substantial quantities. Several other species are limited to small<br />
colonies in single geographic areas (Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera pallida, Spiranthes infernalis), exist as<br />
exceedingly small popul<strong>at</strong>ions (Lepanthes caritensis), have cryptic germin<strong>at</strong>ion requirements<br />
(Calypso bulbosa, Isotria medeoloides, Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera spp.), are achlorophyllous (Corallorhiza spp.),<br />
or survive transfer from sterile tissue culture rarely or not <strong>at</strong> all (Dendrophylax lindenii, some<br />
Cypripedium spp.). Indeed, listing or upgrading some species from thre<strong>at</strong>ened to endangered<br />
st<strong>at</strong>us is probably merited, although from a conserv<strong>at</strong>ion perspective this makes <strong>at</strong>tempts to<br />
propag<strong>at</strong>e these species markedly more difficult.<br />
While most species th<strong>at</strong> have been targeted in propag<strong>at</strong>ion efforts have been brought<br />
into cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion, a few remain refractory to existing techniques—or the m<strong>at</strong>erial provided for<br />
55
Stewart & Hicks: PROPAGATION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF NATIVE ORCHIDS<br />
propag<strong>at</strong>ion has been so scant th<strong>at</strong> insufficient experiments could be run. A few, such as<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera species, have sporadic success th<strong>at</strong> is reminiscent of th<strong>at</strong> with Paphiopedilum<br />
species; if this is the case, perhaps we will see enhanced germin<strong>at</strong>ion with subsequent<br />
gener<strong>at</strong>ions, with each passage through sterile flask (or symbiotic culture) selecting those seeds<br />
th<strong>at</strong> are likely to germin<strong>at</strong>e under such conditions. It is our hope th<strong>at</strong>, given the resources of<br />
the geographic region discussed here, all species could eventually be propag<strong>at</strong>ed and made<br />
available for culture in public and priv<strong>at</strong>e gardens, or reintroduction if the need arises.<br />
Asymbiotic and symbiotic propag<strong>at</strong>ion st<strong>at</strong>us and current conserv<strong>at</strong>ion st<strong>at</strong>us for<br />
species found within the geographic region of the United St<strong>at</strong>es, Canada, Puerto Rico, the<br />
U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, Greenland, and Saint Pierre et Miquelon is found in Table 2.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
<strong>The</strong> authors would like to thank the numerous individuals who contributed personal<br />
communic<strong>at</strong>ions and inform<strong>at</strong>ion for this paper. Paul Martin Brown was instrumental during<br />
editing and revision of this work.<br />
Scott Stewart, Ph.D., Director, Horticulture & Agriculture Programs, Kankakee Community College,<br />
Kankakee, IL 60901 sstewart@kcc.edu<br />
Aaron Hicks, <strong>The</strong> Orchid Seedbank Project, P.O. Box 7042, Chandler, AZ 85246, ahicks51@cox.net<br />
REFERENCES FOR TEXT<br />
Ashmore, S. 1999. Calypso bulbosa—hybridiz<strong>at</strong>ion and cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion. North American N<strong>at</strong>ive Orchid Journal 5:27-32.<br />
Buck, R. 2006. Personal communic<strong>at</strong>ion with A. Hicks.<br />
Brown, P.M. 2009. Personal checklist of the wild <strong>orchid</strong>s of North American, <strong>north</strong> of Mexico. North American<br />
N<strong>at</strong>ive Orchid Journal Special Public<strong>at</strong>ion #4.<br />
Canadell, J. and I. Noble. 2001. Challenges of a changing earth. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:664-66.<br />
Coleman, R. 2002. <strong>The</strong> Wild Orchids of Arizona and New Mexico. Ithaca, N.Y.: Comstock Books. Cornell<br />
University Press.<br />
Correll, D.S. 1978. N<strong>at</strong>ive Orchids of North America North of Mexico. Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press,<br />
Dutra, D. 2008. Reproductive biology and asymbiotic seed germin<strong>at</strong>ion of Cyrtopodium punct<strong>at</strong>um: an<br />
endangered Florida <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> <strong>orchid</strong>. Masters <strong>The</strong>sis, University of Florida.<br />
Dutra, D., M.E. Kane, and L. Richardson. 2009a. Asymbiotic seed germin<strong>at</strong>ion and in vitro seedling<br />
development of Cyrtopodium punct<strong>at</strong>um: a propag<strong>at</strong>ion protocol for an endangered Florida <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong><br />
<strong>orchid</strong>. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ <strong>Culture</strong> 96:235-43.<br />
Dutra, D., M.E. Kane, C. Reinhardt Adams and L. Richardson. 2009b. Reproductive biology of Cyrtopodium<br />
punct<strong>at</strong>um in situ: implic<strong>at</strong>ions for conserv<strong>at</strong>ion of an endangered <strong>orchid</strong>. Plant Species Biology 24:92-103.<br />
Dutra, D., T.R. Johnson, P.J. Kauth, S.L. Stewart, M.E. Kane, and L. Richardson. 2008. Asymbiotic seed<br />
germin<strong>at</strong>ion, in vitro development, and greenhouse acclim<strong>at</strong>iz<strong>at</strong>ion of the thre<strong>at</strong>ened terrestrial <strong>orchid</strong><br />
Bletia purpurea. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ <strong>Culture</strong> 94:11-21.<br />
Falk, M. 2008. Personal communic<strong>at</strong>ion with A. Hicks.<br />
From, M. and P. Read. 1998. Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera praeclara: str<strong>at</strong>egies for conserv<strong>at</strong>ion and propag<strong>at</strong>ion. North American<br />
N<strong>at</strong>ive Orchid Journal 4:299-312.<br />
George, S., J. Sharma, and V.L. Yadon. 2009. Genetic diversity of the endangered and narrow endemic Piperia<br />
yadonii (Orchidaceae) assessed with ISSR polymorphisms. American Journal of Botany 96:2022-30.<br />
Hammons, R. 2009. Personal communic<strong>at</strong>ion with S. Stewart.<br />
Hicks, A. 2007. On the germin<strong>at</strong>ion and subsequent culture of Spiranthes delitescens Sheviak in sterile culture.<br />
Orchid Digest 71:158-60.<br />
56
Stewart & Hicks: PROPAGATION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF NATIVE ORCHIDS<br />
Johnson, T.R., S.L. Stewart, D. Dutra, M.E. Kane, L. Richardson. 2007. Asymbiotic and symbiotic seed<br />
germin<strong>at</strong>ion of Eulophia alta (Orchidaceae)—preliminary evidence for the symbiotic culture advantage.<br />
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ <strong>Culture</strong> 90: 313-23.<br />
Llamacho, J.A. and J.A. Larramendi. 2005. <strong>The</strong> Orchids of Cuba. Lleida: Spain.Greta Editores,<br />
McDonald, K., S. Hopkins, S. Perlman, and L.W. Zettler. 2006. <strong>The</strong> st<strong>at</strong>us and propag<strong>at</strong>ion of the Federally<br />
endangered Hawaiian endemic, Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera holochila (Orchidaceae). Southeastern Biology 53:209.<br />
Morefield, J.D. 2001. Nevada Rare Plant Atlas. Nevada N<strong>at</strong>ural Heritage Program, Carson City, Nevada.<br />
O'Neill, J. 2008. Personal communic<strong>at</strong>ion with A. Hicks.<br />
Sharma, J., M.L. Ishida, and V.L. Yadon. 2007. Mycorrhizal diversity of an endemic terrestrial <strong>orchid</strong>.<br />
Lankesteriana 7: 215-18.<br />
Sharma, J., L.W. Zettler, J.W. Van Sambeek, M.R. Ellersieck, and C.J. Starbuck. 2003. Symbiotic seed<br />
germin<strong>at</strong>ion and mycorrhizae of the Federally thre<strong>at</strong>ened Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera praeclara (Orchidaceae). American<br />
Midland N<strong>at</strong>uralist 149: 104-20.<br />
Stewart, S.L. 2000. Symbiotic seed germin<strong>at</strong>ion of the Federally thre<strong>at</strong>ened eastern prairie fringed <strong>orchid</strong>,<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera leucophaea (Nuttall) Lindley, and three Habenaria species from Florida. North American<br />
N<strong>at</strong>ive Orchid Journal 6: 180-92.<br />
Stewart, S.L. 2007. Integr<strong>at</strong>ed conserv<strong>at</strong>ion of Florida Orchidaceae in the genera Habenaria and Spiranthes: model<br />
<strong>orchid</strong> conserv<strong>at</strong>ion systems for the Americas. Ph.D. Dissert<strong>at</strong>ion, University of Florida.<br />
Stewart, S.L. 2008. Orchid reintroduction in the United St<strong>at</strong>es: a mini-review. North American N<strong>at</strong>ive Orchid<br />
Journal 14: 54-59.<br />
Stewart, S.L. and L.W. Richardson. 2008. Orchid flora of the Florida Panther N<strong>at</strong>ional Wildlife Refuge. North<br />
American N<strong>at</strong>ive Orchid Journal 14: 70-104.<br />
Stewart, S.L. and M.E. Kane. 2006a. Asymbiotic seed germin<strong>at</strong>ion and in vitro seedling development of<br />
Habenaria macrocer<strong>at</strong>itis (Orchidaceae), a rare Florida terrestrial <strong>orchid</strong>. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ<br />
<strong>Culture</strong> 86: 147-58.<br />
Stewart, S.L. and M.E. Kane. 2006b. Symbiotic seed germin<strong>at</strong>ion of Habenaria macrocer<strong>at</strong>itis (Orchidaceae), a<br />
rare Florida terrestrial <strong>orchid</strong>. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ <strong>Culture</strong> 86: 159-67.<br />
Stewart, S.L. and L.W. Zettler. 2002. Symbiotic germin<strong>at</strong>ion of three semi-aqu<strong>at</strong>ic rein <strong>orchid</strong>s (Habenaria repens,<br />
H. quinqueseta, H. macrocer<strong>at</strong>itis) from Florida. Aqu<strong>at</strong>ic Botany 72: 25-35.<br />
Stoutamire, W. 1996. Seeds and seedlings of Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera leucophaea (Orchidaceae). In: C. Allen (Ed.), North<br />
American N<strong>at</strong>ive Terrestrial Orchids, Propag<strong>at</strong>ion and Production. North American N<strong>at</strong>ive Terrestrial<br />
Orchid Conference, Germantown, Maryland, pp. 55-61.<br />
Tremblay R.L., J.K. Zimmerman, L. Lebrón, P. Hayman, I. Sastre, F. Axelrod, and J. Alers-Garcia. 1998. Host<br />
specificity and low reproductive success in the rare endemic Puerto Rican <strong>orchid</strong> Lepanthes caritensis.<br />
Biological Conserv<strong>at</strong>ion 85: 297-304.<br />
Wilson, H.D. Spiranthes parksii—endangered <strong>orchid</strong> of the Texas post oak savannah.<br />
http://botany.csdl.tamu.edu/FLORA/hdwsp/sp_pro.htm, accessed 6 December 2009.<br />
Zettler, L. 2009. Personal communic<strong>at</strong>ion with S.L. Stewart and A. Hicks.<br />
Zettler, LW. 1999. A report on the use of fungi to germin<strong>at</strong>e seeds of Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera integra, P. leucophaea, Spiranthes<br />
ovalis var. erostell<strong>at</strong>a, and Encyclia tampensis. North American N<strong>at</strong>ive Orchid Journal 5: 232-47.<br />
Zettler, L.W., S.B. Poulter, K.I. McDonald, and S.L. Stewart. 2007. Conserv<strong>at</strong>ion-driven propag<strong>at</strong>ion of an<br />
epiphytic <strong>orchid</strong> (Epidendrum nocturnum) with a mycorrhizal fungus. HortScience 42: 135-39.<br />
Zettler, L.W., K.A. Piskin, S.L. Stewart, J.J. Hartsock, M.L. Bowles, and T.J. Bell. 2005. Protocorm mycobionts<br />
of the Federally thre<strong>at</strong>ened eastern prairie fringed <strong>orchid</strong>, Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera leucophaea (Nutt.) Lindley, and a<br />
technqiue to prompt leaf elong<strong>at</strong>ion in seedlings. Studies in Mycology 53: 163-71.<br />
Zettler, L.W., S.L. Stewart, M.L. Bowles, and K.A. Jacobs. 2001. Mycorrhizal fungi and cold-assisted symbiotic<br />
germin<strong>at</strong>ion of the Federally thre<strong>at</strong>ened eastern prairie fringed <strong>orchid</strong>, Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera leucophaea (Nuttall)<br />
Lindley. American Midland N<strong>at</strong>uralist 145: 168-75.<br />
57
Stewart & Hicks: PROPAGATION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF NATIVE ORCHIDS<br />
Table 2—Propag<strong>at</strong>ion and conserv<strong>at</strong>ion st<strong>at</strong>uses for <strong>orchid</strong>s species <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> to survey regions. Geographic range<br />
key: US=United St<strong>at</strong>es (including Alaska), HI=Hawaii, CAN=Canada, SPM=St. Pierre et Miquelon,<br />
G=Greenland, PR=Puerto Rico, VI=U.S. Virgin Islands, and GU=Guam. Propag<strong>at</strong>ion st<strong>at</strong>us key: 1=available<br />
commercially on a regular basis, 2=has been available commercially in recent past, 3=is routinely maintained in<br />
labor<strong>at</strong>ory culture, 4=has been produced experimentally in labor<strong>at</strong>ory culture, 5=experimental culture has had<br />
limited success, and 6=experimental culture has been unsuccessful. Conserv<strong>at</strong>ion st<strong>at</strong>us key: F=Federally<br />
protected as endangered, f=Federally protected as thre<strong>at</strong>ened, S=st<strong>at</strong>e protected as endangered, s=st<strong>at</strong>e protected<br />
as thre<strong>at</strong>ened, o=st<strong>at</strong>e protected by other design<strong>at</strong>ion. Propag<strong>at</strong>ion d<strong>at</strong>a from botanic gardens have been capped<br />
<strong>at</strong> ―3‖ as their role generally does not involve the production of plants for commercial ventures; nd = no d<strong>at</strong>a.<br />
Taxa<br />
Geographic Range In vitro<br />
Propag<strong>at</strong>ion -<br />
Asymbiotic<br />
58<br />
In vitro<br />
Propag<strong>at</strong>ion -<br />
Symbiotic<br />
Conserv<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
St<strong>at</strong>us<br />
Amerorchis rotundifolia US, CAN,G nd nd S, s 11<br />
Anoectochilus sandvicensis HI nd nd nd 22<br />
Reference(s)<br />
Aplectrum hyemale US, CAN 2,5 4 S,s,o 3,11,14,23,24<br />
Arethusa bulbosa US, CAN, SPM nd nd S, s, o 11<br />
Basiphyllaea corallicola US, PR 3, 4 nd S 2, 11, 23<br />
Beloglottis costaricensis US nd nd S 11<br />
Bletia p<strong>at</strong>ula US, PR 4, 5 nd nd 11, 14, 23<br />
Bletia purpurea US 2, 4 6 S 2, 6, 11, 24<br />
Brachionidium ciliol<strong>at</strong>um PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Brachionidium sherringii PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Brassavola cucull<strong>at</strong>a PR, VI 2, 3 nd nd 2, 8, 11, 24<br />
Brassavola nodosa PR 1, 2, 3 nd nd 1, 2, 11, 23, 24<br />
Brassia caud<strong>at</strong>a US 3 nd S 11, 24<br />
Broughtonia domingensis PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Bulbophyllum guamense GU 2 nd nd 9, 20, 23<br />
Bulbophyllum longiflorum GU 3 nd nd 9, 20<br />
Bulbophyllum pachyrhachis US nd nd nd 18<br />
Bulbophyllum profusum GU 6 nd nd 9, 20, 23<br />
Calanthe triplic<strong>at</strong>a GU 3 nd nd 9, 20, 24<br />
Calopogon barb<strong>at</strong>us US 3 nd nd 11, 24<br />
Calopogon multiflorus US 3, 6 nd S 11, 14<br />
Calopogon oklahomensis US 3 nd nd 11, 24<br />
Calopogon pallidus US 3 nd nd 11, 24<br />
Calopogon tuberosus var. simpsonii US 3, 4 5 S, o 6, 11<br />
Calopogon tuberosus var. tuberosus US, CAN, SPM 1, 3, 5 5 S, o 1, 2, 6, 11, 13, 14, 24<br />
Calopogon × fowleri US nd nd nd 19<br />
Calopogon × goethensis US nd nd nd 19<br />
Calopogon × obscurus US nd nd nd 19<br />
Calopogon × simulans US nd nd nd 19<br />
Calopogon × vulgaris US nd nd nd 19<br />
Calypso bulbosa var. <strong>american</strong>a US, CAN 4 nd S, s, o 11, 23<br />
Calypso bulbosa var. occidentalis US, CAN 4 nd S, s 11, 14<br />
Campylocentrum micranthum PR 6 nd nd 2, 11<br />
Campylocentrum pachyrrhizum US, PR 6 nd S 11, 23<br />
Campylocentrum pygmaeum PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Cephalanthera austiniae US, CAN nd nd nd 11, 18<br />
Cleistesiopsis bifaria US 5, 6 nd nd 11, 14, 19, 24<br />
Cleistesiopsis divaric<strong>at</strong>a US 3 nd nd 11, 19, 24<br />
Cleistesiopsis oricamporum US nd nd nd 19<br />
Cleistesiopsis × ochlockoneensis US nd nd nd 19
Stewart & Hicks: PROPAGATION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF NATIVE ORCHIDS<br />
Taxa Range Asymbiotic Symbiotic St<strong>at</strong>us Reference(s)<br />
Cochleanthes flabelliformis PR 4, 6 nd nd 11, 23, 24<br />
Coeloglossum viride var. virescens US, CAN nd nd nd 18<br />
Coeloglossum viride var. viride US, CAN nd nd nd 18, 19<br />
Coelogyne guamensis GU nd nd nd 9, 20<br />
Comparettia falc<strong>at</strong>a PR 3, 5 nd nd 2, 11, 23<br />
Corallorhiza bentleyi US nd nd nd 11<br />
Corallorhiza macul<strong>at</strong>a var. macul<strong>at</strong>a US, CAN, SPM nd 6 o 11, 22<br />
Corallorhiza macul<strong>at</strong>a var. mexicana US nd nd nd 18, 19<br />
Corallorhiza macul<strong>at</strong>a var. occidentalis US, CAN nd nd nd 11<br />
Corallorhiza macul<strong>at</strong>a var. ozettensis US nd nd nd 11<br />
Corallorhiza mertensiana US, CAN nd nd nd 11<br />
Corallorhiza odontorhiza var. odontorhiza US, CAN 5 4 S, s, o 3, 11<br />
Corallorhiza odontorhiza var. pringlei US, CAN nd nd nd 11<br />
Corallorhiza stri<strong>at</strong>a var. stri<strong>at</strong>a US, CAN nd nd S, o 11<br />
Corallorhiza stri<strong>at</strong>a var. vreelandii US, CAN nd nd nd 11<br />
Corallorhiza trifida US, CAN, SPM, G nd nd S, s, o 11<br />
Corallorhiza wisteriana US nd nd S, o 11<br />
Corymborkis forcipigera PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Corymborkis ver<strong>at</strong>rifolia GU nd nd nd 9<br />
Cranichis muscosa US, PR 3 nd S 11, 24<br />
Cranichis ricartii PR nd nd F, S 11<br />
Cranichis tenuis PR nd nd nd 8<br />
Cyclopogon cranichoides US, PR 6 nd nd 11, 23<br />
Cyclopogon el<strong>at</strong>us US, PR, VI 6 nd S 8, 11, 23<br />
Cyclopogon miradorense PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Cypripedium acaule US, CAN, SPM 1, 2, 3 4 S, o 1, 5, 11, 16, 24<br />
Cypripedium arietinum US, CAN 1, 2 nd S, s, o 5, 11, 16<br />
Cypripedium californicum US 1, 5 nd nd 1, 5, 11, 14<br />
Cypripedium candidum US, CAN 1, 3, 5 nd S, s, o 1, 5, 11, 14<br />
Cypripedium fascicul<strong>at</strong>um US 2, 6 nd o 5, 11, 14<br />
Cypripedium gutt<strong>at</strong>um US, CAN 1 nd nd 5, 11, 14<br />
Cypripedium kentuckiense US 1, 3, 5 nd S, o 5, 11, 13, 14, 15,16, 17, 24<br />
Cypripedium montanum US, CAN 1, 5 nd nd 11, 14, 16<br />
Cypripedium parviflorum var. makasin US, CAN 1, 4 nd S, o 1, 5, 11<br />
Cypripedium parviflorum var. parviflorum US 1, 3, 6 nd S, s, o 11, 14, 15, 17, 24<br />
Cypripedium parviflorum var. pubescens US, CAN, SPM 1, 3, 6 nd S, s, o 1, 5, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 24<br />
Cypripedium passerinum US, CAN 1 nd nd 11, 16<br />
Cypripedium reginae US, CAN 1, 4, 5 nd S, s, o 1, 5, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17<br />
Cypripedium y<strong>at</strong>ebeanum US 1 nd nd 5, 11<br />
Cypripedium × alaskanum US 1 nd nd 11, 16<br />
Cypripedium × andrewsii nm. andrewsii US, CAN 1, 3 nd nd 1, 11, 15, 16<br />
Cypripedium × andrewsii nm. landonii US, CAN nd nd nd 11<br />
Cypripedium × columbianum US, CAN nd nd nd 11<br />
Cypripedium × herae US, CAN nd nd nd 19<br />
Cyrtopodium macrobulbon US 6 nd nd 2, 11, 18, 19<br />
Cyrtopodium punct<strong>at</strong>um US, PR 1, 3, 4 4 S 2, 6, 11, 14, 24<br />
Dactylorhiza arist<strong>at</strong>a var. arist<strong>at</strong>a US 5 nd nd 11, 14<br />
Dactylorhiza arist<strong>at</strong>a var. kodiakensis US nd nd nd 11<br />
Dactylorhiza praetermissa var. praetermissa CAN 1 nd nd 16, 18, 19<br />
Deiregyne confusa US nd nd nd 11<br />
Dendrobium guamense GU nd nd nd 9, 20<br />
Dendrobium phillippense GU nd nd nd 9, 20<br />
59
Stewart & Hicks: PROPAGATION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF NATIVE ORCHIDS<br />
Taxa Range Asymbiotic Symbiotic St<strong>at</strong>us Reference(s)<br />
Dendrobium scopa GU nd nd nd 9, 20<br />
Dendrophylax lindenii US 1, 3 5 S 2, 6, 11, 12, 24<br />
Dendrophylax porrectus US, PR nd nd nd 18, 19<br />
Dichaea hystricina PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Dichaea l<strong>at</strong>ifolia PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Dichaea pendul<strong>at</strong>a PR 3 nd nd 1, 8<br />
Dichromanthus cinnabarinus US nd nd nd 11<br />
Dichromanthus michuacanus US nd nd nd 19<br />
Didymoplexis fimbri<strong>at</strong>a GU 6 nd nd 9, 20, 23<br />
Dilomilis montana PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Domingoa haem<strong>at</strong>ochila PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Elleanthus cordidactylus PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Eltroplectris calcar<strong>at</strong>a US, PR 2, 6 nd S 2, 11, 23<br />
Encyclia gravida PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Encyclia isochila PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Encyclia pygmaea US, PR nd nd S 11<br />
Encyclia rufa US 3, 4 nd nd 2, 11, 23<br />
Encyclia tampensis US 1, 3 4 o 2, 11, 22, 24<br />
Epidendrum acunae US nd nd S 11<br />
Epidendrum anceps PR, VI 2, 3 nd nd 8, 11, 23, 24<br />
Epidendrum amphistomum US, PR, VI 3 nd S 11, 18, 22, 24<br />
Epidendrum antillanum PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Epidendrum boricuarum PR nd nd S 11<br />
Epidendrum ciliare PR, VI 2, 3 nd nd 8, 11, 23, 24<br />
Epidendrum floridense US 3, 6 nd nd 11, 23, 24<br />
Epidendrum jamaicense PR 6 nd nd 11, 23<br />
Epidendrum magnoliae var. magnoliae US 3 4 o 11, 22, 24<br />
Epidendrum magnoliae var. mexicanum US 3 nd nd 11, 24<br />
Epidendrum miserrimum PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Epidendrum mutelianum PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Epidendrum nocturnum US, PR 1, 3, 4 3, 4 S 2, 6, 11, 22, 24<br />
Epidendrum ramosum PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Epidendrum rigidum US, PR 3, 4 nd S 11, 22, 24<br />
Epidendrum secundum PR 1 nd nd 11, 23<br />
Epidendrum strobiliferum US nd nd S 11<br />
Epidendrum tridens PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Epidendrum vincentinum PR nd nd nd 8<br />
Epipactis gigantea US, CAN 1, 4 nd o 2, 11, 16, 24<br />
Eria rostriflora GU nd nd nd 9, 20<br />
Erythrodes hirtella PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Erythrodes plantaginea PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Eulophia alta US, PR 2, 4, 5 4 nd 1, 2, 6, 11, 14, 24<br />
Eulophia macgregorii GU nd nd nd 9, 20<br />
Eulophia pulchra GU nd nd nd 9, 20<br />
Eurystyles ananassocomos PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Galeandra bicarin<strong>at</strong>a US nd nd S 11<br />
Galearis spectabilis US, CAN 5, 6 6 S, s, o 1, 3, 11, 22, 24<br />
Geodorum densiflorum GU nd nd nd 9, 20<br />
Goodyera oblongifolia US, CAN 1 nd S, o 11, 16<br />
Goodyera pubescens US, CAN 4, 5, 6 4 S, o 2, 3, 11, 14, 22, 24<br />
Goodyera repens US, CAN, SPM 6 nd S, o 11, 14<br />
Goodyera tessel<strong>at</strong>a US, CAN 6 nd S, s, o 11, 23<br />
60
Stewart & Hicks: PROPAGATION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF NATIVE ORCHIDS<br />
Taxa Range Asymbiotic Symbiotic St<strong>at</strong>us Reference(s)<br />
Govenia floridana US 6 6 S 6, 11, 24<br />
Govenia utricul<strong>at</strong>a PR nd nd S 11<br />
Gymnadeniopsis clavell<strong>at</strong>a var. clavell<strong>at</strong>a US 3 4, 5 nd 18, 19, 22, 24<br />
G. clavell<strong>at</strong>a var. ophioglossoides US nd nd nd 18, 19<br />
Gymnadeniopsis integra US 5 5 S, s 11, 22, 24<br />
Gymnadeniopsis nivea US 5 nd S, s 11, 24<br />
Habenaria al<strong>at</strong>a PR, VI nd nd nd 8, 11<br />
Habenaria amalfitana PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Habenaria distans US, PR 5 5 S 6, 11<br />
Habenaria eustachya PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Habenaria macrocer<strong>at</strong>itis US 2, 4 4 nd 6, 11, 23<br />
Habenaria monorrhiza PR, VI 6 nd nd 8, 11, 23<br />
Habenaria odontopetala PR 2, 3 3 nd 6, 11, 23<br />
Habenaria quinqueseta US 3 3 nd 6, 11, 24 ×<br />
Habenaria repens US, PR 2, 3 4 nd 6, 11, 14, 24<br />
Hapalorchis line<strong>at</strong>us PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Helleriella punctul<strong>at</strong>a PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Heterotaxis sessilis US nd nd nd 19<br />
Hexalectris spic<strong>at</strong>a var. arizonica US nd nd nd 18, 19<br />
Hexalectris spic<strong>at</strong>a var. spic<strong>at</strong>a US 3 nd S, s, o 11, 24<br />
Hexalectris grandiflora US nd nd nd 11<br />
Hexalectris nitida US nd nd S 11<br />
Hexalectris revoluta var. colemanii US nd nd nd 19<br />
Hexalectris revoluta var. revoluta US nd nd nd 19<br />
Hexalectris warnockii US nd nd o 11<br />
Ionopsis s<strong>at</strong>yrioides PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Ionopsis utricularioides US, PR, VI 4 nd S 8, 11, 23, 24<br />
Isochilus linearis PR 2, 6 nd nd 2, 11, 23<br />
Isotria medeoloides US, CAN 6 6 f, S, s, o 3, 11, 22<br />
Isotria verticill<strong>at</strong>a US, CAN 6 nd S, s, o 11, 14, 24<br />
Jacquiniella globosa PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Jacquiniella teretifolia PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Koellensteinia graminea PR 6 nd nd 11, 23<br />
Leochilus puertoricensis PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Lepanthes caritensis PR 6 nd nd 2, 11<br />
Lepanthes dodiana PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Lepanthes eltoroensis PR nd nd F, S 11<br />
Lepanthes rubipetala PR nd nd nd 8<br />
Lepanthes rupestris PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Lepanthes sanguinea PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Lepanthes selenitepala PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Lepanthes veleziana var. retusicolumna PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Lepanthes veleziana var. veleziana PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Lepanthes woodburyana PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Lepanthopsis melanantha US, PR 5, 6 nd S 11, 23, 24<br />
Liparis el<strong>at</strong>a US, PR, VI 5 nd S 8, 11, 24<br />
Liparis guamensis GU nd nd nd 9, 20<br />
Liparis hawaiensis HI nd 6 nd 22<br />
Liparis liliifolia US, CAN 3 4 S, s 3, 11, 24<br />
Liparis loeselii US, CAN 4 nd S, s, o 11, 23<br />
Liparis saundersiana PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Liparis vexillifera PR nd nd nd 11<br />
61
Stewart & Hicks: PROPAGATION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF NATIVE ORCHIDS<br />
Taxa Range Asymbiotic Symbiotic St<strong>at</strong>us Reference(s)<br />
Liparis × jonesii US nd nd nd 11<br />
Listera auricul<strong>at</strong>a US, CAN nd nd S, s 11<br />
Listera australis US, CAN nd nd S, s, o 11<br />
Listera banksiana US, CAN nd nd nd 11<br />
Listera borealis US, CAN 6 nd o 11, 23<br />
Listera convallarioides US, CAN, SPM nd nd S, s, o 11<br />
Listera cord<strong>at</strong>a var. cord<strong>at</strong>a US, CAN, SPM nd nd S, s, o 11<br />
Listera cord<strong>at</strong>a var. nephrophylla US, CAN nd nd nd 11<br />
Listera smallii US 6 nd S, s, o 11, 24<br />
Listera ×veltmanii US, CAN nd nd nd 11<br />
Luisia teretifolia GU 6 nd nd 9, 20, 23<br />
Lycaste barringtoniae PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Macradenia lutescens US 2 nd S 2, 11<br />
Malaxis abieticola US nd nd nd 21<br />
Malaxis bayardii US, CAN nd nd S, o 11<br />
Malaxis brachypoda US, CAN nd nd S, s, o 11<br />
Malaxis corymbosa US nd nd o 11<br />
Malaxis diphyllos US, CAN nd nd nd 11<br />
Malaxis major PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Malaxis massonii PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Malaxis paludosa US, CAN nd nd S 11<br />
Malaxis porphyrea US nd nd nd 11<br />
Malaxis soulei US nd nd o 11<br />
Malaxis spic<strong>at</strong>a PR, US nd nd nd 11<br />
Malaxis unifolia US, CAN, SPM 5 nd S, s, o 11, 24<br />
Malaxis wendtii US nd nd nd 11<br />
Maxillaria acutifolia PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Maxillaria coccinea PR 3 nd nd 2, 11<br />
Maxillaria parviflora US, PR nd nd S 11<br />
Mesadenus lucayanus US, PR, VI nd nd S 11<br />
Microthelys rubrocallosa US nd nd nd 19<br />
NervillIa pl<strong>at</strong>ychila GU nd nd nd 9, 20<br />
Nervillia aragoana GU nd nd nd 9, 20<br />
Nervillia jacksoniae GU nd nd nd 9, 20<br />
Nidema ottonis PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Oncidium altissimum PR, VI nd nd nd 8, 11<br />
Oncidium floridanum US 5 5 S 6, 11, 24<br />
Oncidium meirax PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Pelexia adn<strong>at</strong>a US, PR 5 nd S 11, 14<br />
Phre<strong>at</strong>ia minutiflora GU nd nd nd 9<br />
Phre<strong>at</strong>ia thompsonii GU nd nd nd 9, 20<br />
Piperia candida US, CAN nd 6 nd 6, 11<br />
Piperia colemanii US nd nd nd 11<br />
Piperia cooperi US nd nd nd 11<br />
Piperia elegans subsp. decurt<strong>at</strong>a US nd nd nd 11<br />
Piperia elegans subsp. elegans US, CAN nd 5 nd 6, 11<br />
Piperia elong<strong>at</strong>a US, CAN nd 5 nd 6, 11<br />
Piperia leptopetala US nd nd nd 11<br />
Piperia michaelii US nd nd nd 11<br />
Piperia transversa US, CAN nd 6 nd 6, 11<br />
Piperia unalascensis US, CAN nd 5 nd 6, 11<br />
Piperia yadonii US nd nd F 11<br />
62
Stewart & Hicks: PROPAGATION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF NATIVE ORCHIDS<br />
Taxa Range Asymbiotic Symbiotic St<strong>at</strong>us Reference(s)<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera aquilonis US, CAN nd nd nd<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera blephariglottis US, CAN, SPM 3, 5 nd S, s, o 11, 14, 18, 24<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera brevifolia US nd nd nd 11<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera chapmanii US 2, 5 nd nd 11, 23, 24<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera chorisiana US, CAN nd nd s 11<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera ciliaris US, CAN 2, 3, 5 5 S, s 1, 11, 14, 22, 23, 24<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera conspicua US 3 nd nd 18, 24<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera convallariifolia US nd nd nd 21<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera crist<strong>at</strong>a US 5 4, 5 S, s, o 11, 22, 24<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera dil<strong>at</strong><strong>at</strong>a var. albiflora US, CAN nd nd nd 18<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera dil<strong>at</strong><strong>at</strong>a var. dil<strong>at</strong><strong>at</strong>a US, CAN, SPM 5, 6 nd S, s, o 1, 11, 14, 24<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera dil<strong>at</strong><strong>at</strong>a var. leucostachys US, CAN nd nd nd 11<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera flava var. flava US, CAN 5 nd S, s, o 11, 24<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera flava var. herbiola US, CAN nd nd S, s, o 11<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera grandiflora US, CAN, SPM 6 nd S, s, o 11, 24<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera holochila HI 4, 5 6 F 22<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera hookeri US, CAN 5 nd S, s, o 11, 24<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera huronensis US, CAN nd nd o 11<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera hyperborea G nd nd nd 25<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera integrilabia US 3, 5 4 S, s 11, 14, 22, 24<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera lacera US, CAN, SPM 3, 6 3 o 11, 24<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera leucophaea US, CAN 3, 5 3 f, S, s, o 6, 11, 14, 22, 24<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera limosa US nd nd o 11<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera macrophylla US, CAN nd nd s 11<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera obtus<strong>at</strong>a subsp. obtus<strong>at</strong>a US, CAN, SPM nd nd o 11<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera obtus<strong>at</strong>a subsp. oligantha US nd nd nd 11<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera orbicul<strong>at</strong>a CAN, SPM, US nd nd S, s, o 11<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera pallida US nd nd nd 11<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera peramoena US 4 nd S, s 11, 23, 24<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera praeclara US, CAN 3, 6 3 f 1, 11, 14<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera psycodes US, CAN, SPM 4, 6 nd S, s, o 1, 11, 14, 24<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera purpurascens US nd nd nd 11<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera shriveri US nd nd nd 19<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera sparsiflora US nd nd o 11, 18<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera stricta US, CAN nd nd o 11<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera tescamnis US nd nd nd 19<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera tipuloides var. behringiana US nd nd nd 11<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera yosemitensis US nd nd nd 19<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera zothecina US nd nd nd 11<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera × andrewsii US, CAN nd nd nd 11<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera × apalachicola US 5 6 nd 6<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera × beckneri US nd nd nd 19<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera × bicolor US 3 nd nd 19, 24<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera × canbyi US nd nd nd 19<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera × channellii US nd nd nd 19<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera × correllii US nd nd nd 19<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera × enigma US, CAN nd nd nd 19<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera × estesii US nd nd nd 11<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera × evansiana US nd nd nd 19<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera × folsomii US nd nd nd 19<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera × hollandiae CAN nd nd nd 19<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera × keenanii US nd nd nd 19<br />
63
Stewart & Hicks: PROPAGATION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF NATIVE ORCHIDS<br />
Taxa Range Asymbiotic Symbiotic St<strong>at</strong>us Reference(s)<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera × kelleyi US nd nd nd 19<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera × lassenii US nd nd nd 11<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera × lueri US 3 nd nd 19, 24<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera × osceola US 5 6 nd 19, 24<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera × reznicekii CAN nd nd nd 19<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera × smithii US nd nd nd 19<br />
×Pl<strong>at</strong>anthopsis vossii US nd nd nd 19<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>ythelys sagreana US nd nd nd 18<br />
Pl<strong>at</strong>ythelys querceticola US nd nd nd 11<br />
Pleurothallis appendicul<strong>at</strong>a PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Pleurothallis arist<strong>at</strong>a PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Pleurothallis domingensis PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Pleurothallis gelida US, PR 4, 6 nd S 11, 23, 24<br />
Pleurothallis obov<strong>at</strong>a PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Pleurothallis pruinosa PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Pleurothallis pubescens PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Pleurothallis racemiflora PR 5 nd nd 2, 11<br />
Pleurothallis ruscifolia PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Pleurothallis wilsonii PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Pogonia ophioglossoides US, CAN, SPM 2, 3 nd S, s, o 11, 23, 24<br />
Polystachya concreta US, PR, VI 2, 3 nd S 2, 8, 11, 23<br />
Polystachya foliosa PR, VI 2, 3 nd nd 2, 8, 11, 23<br />
Ponthieva brittoniae US nd nd S 11<br />
Ponthieva racemosa US, PR, VI 5, 6 nd S 6, 8, 11, 24<br />
Ponthieva ventricosa PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Prescottia oligantha US, PR, VI 5 nd nd 8, 14<br />
Prescottia stachyodes PR, VI nd nd nd 8<br />
Prescottia pellucid PR nd nd nd 8<br />
Prosthechea boothiana var. erythronioides US 3 nd nd 19, 24<br />
Prosthechea cochle<strong>at</strong>a var. triandra US, PR, VI 1 4 nd 6, 8, 19<br />
Prosthechea pygmaea US, PR nd nd S 11<br />
Pseudorchis straminea CAN nd nd nd 11<br />
Psilochilus macrophyllus PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Psychilis kraenzlinii PR 4 nd nd 11, 23<br />
Psychilis krugii PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Psychilis macconnelliae PR, VI nd nd nd 8<br />
Psychilis monensis PR 6 nd nd 8, 23<br />
Pteroglossaspis ecrist<strong>at</strong>a US 3 nd nd 18, 24<br />
Pteroglossaspis pottsii US 5 nd nd 19, 24<br />
Rhynchophre<strong>at</strong>ia micrantha GU nd nd nd 9<br />
Sacoila lanceol<strong>at</strong>a US, PR, VI 2, 3, 4, 5 6 nd 1, 8, 24<br />
Sacoila paludicola US nd nd nd 18, 19<br />
Sacoila squamulosa US nd nd nd 18, 19<br />
Scaphyglottis modesta PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Schiedella arizonica US nd nd nd 18, 19<br />
Spiranthes amesiana US nd nd nd 11<br />
Spiranthes brevilabris US 4 3, 4 S 6, 11<br />
Spiranthes casei var. novaescotiae CAN nd nd nd 18<br />
Spiranthes casei var. casei US, CAN nd nd nd 18<br />
Spiranthes cernua US, CAN 2, 3, 5 4 nd 1, 2, 6, 14, 19, 24<br />
Spiranthes delitescens US 3 4 F 2<br />
Spiranthes diluvialis US, CAN 6 nd nd 18, 23<br />
64
Stewart & Hicks: PROPAGATION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF NATIVE ORCHIDS<br />
Taxa Range Asymbiotic Symbiotic St<strong>at</strong>us Reference(s)<br />
Spiranthes e<strong>at</strong>onii US nd nd nd 11<br />
Spiranthes floridana US 4 6 nd 6, 11<br />
Spiranthes infernalis US nd nd nd 11<br />
Spiranthes lacera var. gracilis US, CAN 4, 6 nd nd 14, 24<br />
Spiranthes lacera var. lacera US, CAN nd nd nd 18<br />
Spiranthes longilabris US nd 3, 4 s 11, 22<br />
Spiranthes lucida US, CAN nd nd S, s, o 11<br />
Spiranthes magnicamporum US, CAN 2, 3, 5 4 S, s, o 1, 11, 14, 24<br />
Spiranthes ochroleuca US, CAN nd nd S, s, o 11<br />
Spiranthes odor<strong>at</strong>a US 1, 3, 4 4 S, o 1, 6, 11, 24<br />
Spiranthes ovalis var. erostell<strong>at</strong>a US, CAN 3 4 nd 18, 22, 24<br />
Spiranthes ovalis var. ovalis US nd nd nd 18<br />
Spiranthes parksii US 4, 5 nd F, S 11, 24<br />
Spiranthes praecox US 5 nd nd 11<br />
Spiranthes romanzoffiana US, CAN, SPM 5 nd S, s, o 2, 11, 14<br />
Spiranthes stell<strong>at</strong>a US nd nd nd 19<br />
Spiranthes sylv<strong>at</strong>ica US 5 nd nd 18<br />
Spiranthes torta US, PR, VI nd nd nd 8, 18<br />
Spiranthes tuberosa US 6 5 S, s, o 6, 11, 23<br />
Spiranthes vernalis US 2, 3 4 S, s, o 1, 11, 24<br />
Spiranthes × borealis US, CAN nd nd nd 11<br />
Spiranthes × eamesii US nd nd nd 19<br />
Spiranthes × folsomii US nd nd nd 19<br />
Spiranthes × intermedia US nd nd nd 11<br />
Spiranthes × itchetuckneensis US nd nd nd 11<br />
Spiranthes × meridionalis US nd nd nd 11<br />
Spiranthes × simpsonii US, CAN nd nd nd 11<br />
Stelis perpusilliflora PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Stelis pygmaea PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Stenorrhynchos speciosum PR 4 nd nd 11, 24<br />
Taeniphyllum marianense GU nd nd nd 9, 20<br />
Tetramicra canalicul<strong>at</strong>a PR, VI 2, 3 nd nd 2, 8, 11, 23<br />
Tipularia discolor US 3, 5, 6 nd S, s, o 3, 11, 14, 24<br />
Tolumnia bahamensis US 1, 3 4 S 2, 11, 24<br />
Tolumnia prionochila PR, VI 2 nd nd 8, 11, 23<br />
Tolumnia varieg<strong>at</strong>a PR, VI 1, 3 4 nd 8, 11, 24<br />
Trichocentrum carthagenense US nd nd nd 18<br />
Trichocentrum macul<strong>at</strong>um US nd nd S 11<br />
Trichosalpinx dura PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Triphora amazonica PR nd nd S 11<br />
Triphora craigheadii US nd nd S 11<br />
Triphora gentianoides US 4 nd nd 11, 24<br />
Triphora hassleriana PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Triphora l<strong>at</strong>ifolia US nd nd S 11<br />
Triphora rickettii US 6 nd nd 11, 23<br />
Triphora surinamensis PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Triphora trianthophoros var. texensis US nd nd nd 18<br />
Triphora trianthophoros var. trianthophoros US 3 nd nd 18, 24<br />
Tropidia polystachya US, PR 6 nd S 11, 24<br />
Vanilla barbell<strong>at</strong>a US, PR, VI nd nd S 8, 11<br />
Vanilla clavicul<strong>at</strong>a PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Vanilla dilloniana PR, US nd nd S 11<br />
65
Stewart & Hicks: PROPAGATION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF NATIVE ORCHIDS<br />
Taxa Range Asymbiotic Symbiotic St<strong>at</strong>us Reference(s)<br />
Vanilla mexicana US, PR, VI nd nd S 8, 11<br />
Vanilla phaeantha US nd nd S 11<br />
Vanilla poitaei PR nd nd nd 11<br />
Wullschlaegelia aphylla PR Nd nd nd 11<br />
Zeuxine fritzii GU Nd nd nd 11, 20<br />
References for Table 2:<br />
1. From, M. 2009. Personal communic<strong>at</strong>ion with A. Hicks.<br />
2. Hicks, A. 2009. Personal communic<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />
3. O'Neil, J. 2009. Personal communic<strong>at</strong>ion with A. Hicks.<br />
4. Sheviak, C. 2009. Personal communic<strong>at</strong>ion with A. Hicks.<br />
5. Steele, W. 2009. Personal communic<strong>at</strong>ion with A. Hicks.<br />
6. Stewart, S. 2009. Personal communic<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />
7. Whitten, M. 2009. Personal communic<strong>at</strong>ion with A. Hicks.<br />
8. Ackerman, J.D. 1995. An <strong>orchid</strong> flora of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. New York Botanical Garden Press.<br />
9. Raulerson, L. 2006. Checklist of plants of the Mariana Islands. University of Guam Herbarium Contribution 37: 1-69.<br />
10. Stone, B.C. 1970. Flora of Guam. University of Guam Press.<br />
11. USDA PLANTS D<strong>at</strong>abase: http://plants.usda.gov/.<br />
12. Hermann, P. 2009. Personal communic<strong>at</strong>ion with A. Hicks.<br />
13. Whitlow, C. 2009. Personal communic<strong>at</strong>ion with A. Hicks.<br />
14. Stoutamire, W. 2009. Personal communic<strong>at</strong>ion with A. Hicks.<br />
15. Vermont Ladyslipper web page: http://www.vtladyslipper.com/.<br />
16. Fraser's Thimble Farms web page: http://www.thimblefarms.com/.<br />
17. Zielinski, R. 2009. Personal communic<strong>at</strong>ion with A. Hicks.<br />
18. Brown, P.M. & S.N. Folsom. 2003. <strong>The</strong> Wild Orchids of North America, <strong>north</strong> of Mexico. University Press of Florida.<br />
19. Brown, P.M. 2009. Personal checklist of the wild <strong>orchid</strong>s of North America, <strong>north</strong> of Mexico.<br />
20. Raulerson, L. and A.F. Rinehardt. 1992. Ferns and Orchids of the Mariana Islands. American Printing Corpor<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />
21. Flora of North America web page: http://www.fna.org/.<br />
22. Zettler, L. 2009. Personal communic<strong>at</strong>ion with S. Stewart.<br />
23. Meyers, T. 2009. Personal communic<strong>at</strong>ion with A. Hicks.<br />
24. Richards, M. 2009. Personal communic<strong>at</strong>ion with A. Hicks.<br />
25. Brown, P.M. 2009. Personal communic<strong>at</strong>ion with S. Stewart.<br />
66
Empiricist: SHOULD WE OR SHOULDN'T WE?<br />
SHOULD WE OR SHOULDN'T WE? ETHICS AND ORCHIDS<br />
<strong>The</strong> Slow Empiricist<br />
I've written about how the <strong>orchid</strong> enthusiast likes to play with cre<strong>at</strong>ing a new and<br />
better specimen th<strong>at</strong> meets some criteria of esthetics th<strong>at</strong> the <strong>orchid</strong> world deems desirable. I<br />
have opted for leaving the <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong>s as they are and enjoying them for their unique and<br />
irreplaceable beauty.<br />
Does th<strong>at</strong> stance mean th<strong>at</strong> I am opposed to the idea of reintroducing a <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> <strong>orchid</strong><br />
to a habit<strong>at</strong> th<strong>at</strong> once contained these plants? Not necessarily. If the plants were lost to the<br />
area because of man's interference such as clearing the land and building on the site, as Disney<br />
World in Florida did, when it obliter<strong>at</strong>ed thousands of yellow fringeless <strong>orchid</strong>s to put in a<br />
parking lot, then I feel th<strong>at</strong> it is perfectly acceptable to reintroduce the plants to the area if<br />
possible.<br />
<strong>The</strong> 'if possible' raises interesting philosophical and ethical questions. How ethical is it<br />
to play with these <strong>orchid</strong>s and take the chance th<strong>at</strong> you can introduce them to a spot if you<br />
fail? I remember a few years ago an <strong>at</strong>tempt was made to plant seedlings of an <strong>orchid</strong> along a<br />
likely spot in Goethe St<strong>at</strong>e Forest in Dunnellon, Florida. Many of the plantlets did not<br />
survive. <strong>The</strong> plants th<strong>at</strong> were reintroduced in areas where there were other plants did well and<br />
are still surviving after seven years or so. <strong>The</strong> ones th<strong>at</strong> failed were put in likely habit<strong>at</strong> but<br />
something was missing and they declined and disappeared. More work was needed to make<br />
such an <strong>at</strong>tempt possible. Like all experiments, how ethical is it to let living things, even<br />
plants, open to the possibility of failure and their ultim<strong>at</strong>e demise?<br />
<strong>The</strong>n there is the possibility of the reintroduced plants taking over the area. If the<br />
yellow fringeless <strong>orchid</strong>s mentioned above were put back in an area adjacent to the Disney lot<br />
th<strong>at</strong> had other <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> species in it and the reintroduced plants really took and flourished like<br />
they had before the bulldozers obliter<strong>at</strong>ed them would they annihil<strong>at</strong>e the other <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong>s in the<br />
area? Would this be acceptable if the annihil<strong>at</strong>ed species weren't <strong>orchid</strong>s?<br />
Although it might seem farfetched, suppose the reintroduced <strong>orchid</strong>s could hybridize<br />
with other <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> <strong>orchid</strong>s growing nearby and produce stunning new crosses or even a new<br />
species. It would be exciting and probably very valuable in the long run and I'm not sure of<br />
the consequences such an occurrence would make.<br />
67
Empiricist: SHOULD WE OR SHOULDN'T WE?<br />
I have never been unhappy about introduced species such as the Epipactis helleborine,<br />
the broad leaved helleborine, coming into the United St<strong>at</strong>es and colonizing areas because it<br />
doesn't drown out the competition. Or <strong>at</strong> least so far it hasn't. Another <strong>orchid</strong> from overseas<br />
is Zeuxine, the lawn <strong>orchid</strong>, th<strong>at</strong> has popul<strong>at</strong>ed Florida from <strong>north</strong> to south and isn't invasive.<br />
It isn't like the Brazilian pepper th<strong>at</strong> has overgrown south Florida pushing out desirable<br />
species in its relentless search for new places to grow. Does this mean we could take a <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong><br />
of say Western Asia and introduce it successfully here in the U.S. and feel justified if it takes<br />
off like the Brazilian pepper?<br />
Being able to introduce <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> species into the landscape does raise some concerns for<br />
fragile habit<strong>at</strong>s if it becomes common practice for <strong>orchid</strong>s to be propag<strong>at</strong>ed by anyone,<br />
especially if they prolifer<strong>at</strong>e wherever they are introduced. Are am<strong>at</strong>eur gardeners well<br />
enough schooled to be able to go to a local nursery and buy <strong>orchid</strong>s th<strong>at</strong> have been proven to<br />
survive in an area and put them willy-nilly wherever they want?<br />
I am especially wary of those individuals who profess to want to improve a species<br />
and start th<strong>at</strong> process of refining the <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> <strong>orchid</strong> to produce a 'superior' plant. But, of<br />
course, I don't care for all the hybridizing th<strong>at</strong> goes on amongst the <strong>orchid</strong> hobbyists. I know<br />
this is highly unlikely in my time but who really knows<br />
wh<strong>at</strong> man's meddling might produce?<br />
So should we or shouldn't we? I say let's proceed<br />
with caution and keep in mind all the possibilities of<br />
our actions. We could be cre<strong>at</strong>ing a monster th<strong>at</strong> will<br />
comeback to haunt us or we could be cre<strong>at</strong>ing a blessing<br />
in repopul<strong>at</strong>ing an area with species th<strong>at</strong> should never<br />
have been obliter<strong>at</strong>ed in the first place.<br />
Your Slow Empiricist<br />
Spiranthes brevilabris, short-lipped ladies‖-tresses<br />
Goethe St<strong>at</strong>e Forest, Levy Co., Florida<br />
P.M. Brown<br />
68
RECENT ORCHID LITERATURE OF INTEREST<br />
RECENT ORCHID LITERATURE OF INTEREST<br />
From: 2009. American Journal of Botany 96: 2022-30.<br />
Genetic diversity of the endangered and narrow endemic Piperia yadonii<br />
(Orchidaceae) assessed with ISSR polymorphisms<br />
Sheeja George, Jyotsna Sharma, and Vern L. Yadon<br />
Abstract: Highly endangered plants th<strong>at</strong> are also narrow endemics are generally found<br />
to be genetically depauper<strong>at</strong>e and thus are exceedingly susceptible to ecological and<br />
anthropological thre<strong>at</strong>s th<strong>at</strong> can lead to their extinction. Piperia yadonii is restricted to<br />
a single California county within a biodiversity hotspot. We used nine primers to<br />
gener<strong>at</strong>e intersimple sequence repe<strong>at</strong> (ISSR) d<strong>at</strong>a to assess its genetic diversity and<br />
structure. Within each popul<strong>at</strong>ion, 99% of the loci were polymorphic, expected<br />
heterozygosity was low, and a majority of the loci were shared with few other<br />
popul<strong>at</strong>ions. Forty percent of the total vari<strong>at</strong>ion could be <strong>at</strong>tributed to popul<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
differenti<strong>at</strong>ion while the rest (60%) resides within popul<strong>at</strong>ions, and the genetic<br />
distances between popul<strong>at</strong>ions were independent of the corresponding geographical<br />
distances. High divergence among popul<strong>at</strong>ions is likely due to fragment<strong>at</strong>ion and<br />
limited gene flow. Each popul<strong>at</strong>ion contains several priv<strong>at</strong>e loci, and ideally, each<br />
should be protected to preserve the overall diversity of the species. Because P. yadonii<br />
currently retains a modest amount of genetic vari<strong>at</strong>ion among individuals within<br />
popul<strong>at</strong>ions, preserving and expanding the habit<strong>at</strong> <strong>at</strong> each site to allow n<strong>at</strong>ural<br />
expansion of popul<strong>at</strong>ions would be additional str<strong>at</strong>egies for its conserv<strong>at</strong>ion before<br />
popul<strong>at</strong>ions become too small to persist n<strong>at</strong>urally.<br />
From: 2009. Annals of Botany 104(3): 543-56<br />
Terrestrial <strong>orchid</strong> conserv<strong>at</strong>ion in the age of extinction<br />
Nigel D. Swarts and Kingsley W. Dixon<br />
Background: Conserv<strong>at</strong>ion through reserves alone is now considered unlikely to<br />
achieve protection of plant species necessary to mitig<strong>at</strong>e direct losses of habit<strong>at</strong> and the<br />
pervasive impact of global clim<strong>at</strong>e change. Assisted transloc<strong>at</strong>ion/migr<strong>at</strong>ion represents<br />
new challenges in the face of clim<strong>at</strong>e change; species, particularly <strong>orchid</strong>s, will need<br />
artificial assistance to migr<strong>at</strong>e from hostile environments, across ecological barriers<br />
(alien<strong>at</strong>ed lands such as farmlands and built infrastructure) to new clim<strong>at</strong>ically buffered<br />
sites. <strong>The</strong> technology and science to underpin assisted migr<strong>at</strong>ion concepts are in their<br />
infancy for plants in general, and <strong>orchid</strong>s, with their high degree of rarity, represent a<br />
particularly challenging group for which these principles need to be developed. It is<br />
likely th<strong>at</strong> <strong>orchid</strong>s, more than any other plant family, will be in the front-line of<br />
species to suffer large-scale extinction events as a result of clim<strong>at</strong>e change.<br />
69
RECENT ORCHID LITERATURE OF INTEREST<br />
Scope: <strong>The</strong> South West Australian Floristic Region (SWAFR) is the only global<br />
biodiversity hotspot in Australia and represents an ideal test-bed for development of<br />
<strong>orchid</strong> conserv<strong>at</strong>ion principles. Orchids comprise 6 % of all thre<strong>at</strong>ened vascular plants<br />
in the SWAFR, with 76 out of the 407 species known for the region having a high<br />
level of conserv<strong>at</strong>ion risk. <strong>The</strong> situ<strong>at</strong>ion in the SWAFR is a portent of the global crisis<br />
in terrestrial <strong>orchid</strong> conserv<strong>at</strong>ion, and it is a region where innov<strong>at</strong>ive conserv<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
solutions will be required if the impending wave of extinction is to be averted. Major<br />
thre<strong>at</strong>ening processes are varied, and include land clearance, salinity, burning, weed<br />
encroachment, disease and pests. This is compounded by highly specialized pollin<strong>at</strong>ors<br />
(locally endemic <strong>n<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> invertebr<strong>at</strong>es) and, in the most thre<strong>at</strong>ened groups such as<br />
hammer <strong>orchid</strong>s (Drakaea) and spider <strong>orchid</strong>s (Caladenia), high levels of mycorrhizal<br />
specializ<strong>at</strong>ion. Management and development of effective conserv<strong>at</strong>ion str<strong>at</strong>egies for<br />
SWAFR <strong>orchid</strong>s require a wide range of integr<strong>at</strong>ed scientific approaches to mitig<strong>at</strong>e<br />
impacts th<strong>at</strong> directly influence ecological traits critical for survival.<br />
Conclusions: In response to thre<strong>at</strong>s to <strong>orchid</strong> species, integr<strong>at</strong>ed conserv<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
approaches have been adopted (including ex situ and transloc<strong>at</strong>ion principles) in the<br />
SWAFR with the result th<strong>at</strong> a significant, multidisciplinary approach is under<br />
development to facilit<strong>at</strong>e conserv<strong>at</strong>ion of some of the most thre<strong>at</strong>ened taxa and build<br />
expertise to carry out assisted migr<strong>at</strong>ion to new sites. Here the past two decades of<br />
<strong>orchid</strong> conserv<strong>at</strong>ion research in the SWAFR and the role of research-based approaches<br />
for managing effective <strong>orchid</strong> conserv<strong>at</strong>ion in a global biodiversity hotspot are<br />
reviewed.<br />
From: 2009. Botanica Helvetica 119: 69-76.<br />
M<strong>at</strong>hem<strong>at</strong>ical inference of the underground clonal growth of Epipactis helleborine<br />
(L.) Crantz (Orchidaceae, Neottieae)<br />
Anna Jakubska-Busse, Malgorz<strong>at</strong>a Dudkiewicz, Pawel Jankowsi, and Radoslaw Sikora<br />
Abstract: Epipactis helleborine (L.) Crantz (Orchidaceae, Neottieae) can spread by<br />
sexual or veget<strong>at</strong>ive propag<strong>at</strong>ion. <strong>The</strong> choice of str<strong>at</strong>egy likely depends on the<br />
environmental conditions. <strong>The</strong> rhizome is the organ of veget<strong>at</strong>ive reproduction; hence,<br />
it is crucial to understand its development. Unfortun<strong>at</strong>ely, it is hardly possible to<br />
investig<strong>at</strong>e rhizome morphology directly, since E. helleborine is a protected species in<br />
most European countries. <strong>The</strong> goal of our investig<strong>at</strong>ion was to infer the growth<br />
p<strong>at</strong>terns of underground parts of an <strong>orchid</strong> popul<strong>at</strong>ion from long-term annual<br />
observ<strong>at</strong>ions of its aboveground shoots. We implemented the Minimum Spanning Tree<br />
method to determine a likely set of underground connections between shoots and to<br />
simul<strong>at</strong>e the annual growth of new rhizomes. Furthermore, we modeled the sp<strong>at</strong>ial<br />
distribution of shoots with a density kernel estim<strong>at</strong>or to compare the density gradients<br />
with the direction of growth of the rhizomes. Observed shoot numbers fluctu<strong>at</strong>ed<br />
between 72 and 183 from year to year. Our results suggest th<strong>at</strong> (1) veget<strong>at</strong>ive<br />
reproduction prevails in the studied popul<strong>at</strong>ion, (2) the popul<strong>at</strong>ion consists of about a<br />
dozen clones with a diameter of up to 6 m, (3) rhizomes produce up to five new shoots<br />
<strong>at</strong> one branch end per year, (4) rhizomes develop in the direction of decreasing<br />
70
RECENT ORCHID LITERATURE OF INTEREST<br />
popul<strong>at</strong>ion density, and (5) nodes of rhizomes may produce new offshoots after up to<br />
7 years of dormancy.<br />
From: 2008. Floriculture, Ornamental and Plant Biotechnology 5: 375-91.<br />
Techniques and applic<strong>at</strong>ions of in vitro <strong>orchid</strong> seed germin<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
Philip J. Kauth, Daniela Dutra, Timothy R. Johnson, Scott L. Stewart, Michael E.<br />
Kane, and Wagner Vendrame<br />
Abstract: In n<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>orchid</strong> seeds germin<strong>at</strong>e only following infection by mycorrhizal<br />
fungi th<strong>at</strong> provide the developing embryo with w<strong>at</strong>er, carbohydr<strong>at</strong>es, minerals, and<br />
vitamins. Orchid seeds were first germin<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>at</strong> the base of wild-collected potted<br />
<strong>orchid</strong>s, but germin<strong>at</strong>ion was unreliable and seedling mortality r<strong>at</strong>es were high. In<br />
vitro germin<strong>at</strong>ion techniques, which were developed in the early 1900s, have resulted<br />
in more reliable germin<strong>at</strong>ion and propag<strong>at</strong>ion of many <strong>orchid</strong> taxa. <strong>The</strong> earliest in<br />
vitro <strong>orchid</strong> seed germin<strong>at</strong>ion techniques utilized mycorrhizal fungi found in n<strong>at</strong>ure to<br />
simul<strong>at</strong>e germin<strong>at</strong>ion and seedling development. In 1922 Lewis Knudson germin<strong>at</strong>ed<br />
<strong>orchid</strong> seeds in vitro by sowing seeds on sterile nutrient medium amended with<br />
sucrose. This technique is known as asymbiotic seed germin<strong>at</strong>ion since no fungal<br />
mycobiont is used to promote germin<strong>at</strong>ion. For both symbiotic and asymbiotic <strong>orchid</strong><br />
seed germin<strong>at</strong>ion, many conditions must be address such as photoperiod, temper<strong>at</strong>ure,<br />
and mineral nutrition. In the case of symbiotic germin<strong>at</strong>ion, another important factor<br />
is fungal comp<strong>at</strong>ibility. In recent years, the limit<strong>at</strong>ions th<strong>at</strong> seed dormancy poses to the<br />
germin<strong>at</strong>ion of <strong>orchid</strong> seed have also been examined. In this chapter techniques and<br />
applic<strong>at</strong>ions of asymbiotic and symbiotic seed germin<strong>at</strong>ion will be discussed in rel<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
to photoperiod, temper<strong>at</strong>ure, nutrition, seed dormancy, and fungal mycobionts.<br />
71
BOOK REVIEWS<br />
ASYMBIOTIC TECHNIQUE OF ORCHID SEED GERMINATION<br />
SECOND REVISED EDITION<br />
Aaron J. Hicks, Chapter 7 by Scott Stewart, PhD.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Orchid Seedbank Project.<br />
2009. Raven Roost Books. 185 pp.<br />
ISBN 0-9673049-3-8 $54.00<br />
http://www.ravenroostbooks.com/?page=shop/flypage&<br />
product_id=1464&keyword=Hicks&searchby=author&o<br />
ffset=0&fs=1&CLSN_513=1259942277513a4de039774047<br />
3a50e1<br />
Liter<strong>at</strong>ure on <strong>orchid</strong> seed germin<strong>at</strong>ion is abundant<br />
but sc<strong>at</strong>tered throughout scientific public<strong>at</strong>ions not readily<br />
available to the general public. Several books have been<br />
published th<strong>at</strong> describe basic instructions for <strong>orchid</strong> seed<br />
sowing including Orchids from Seed by P.A. Thompson, Home Orchid Growing by R.T.<br />
Northern, and Growing Orchids from Seed by P. Se<strong>at</strong>on and M. Ramsay. In writing Asymbiotic<br />
Technique of Orchid Seed Germin<strong>at</strong>ion, Mr. Hicks hoped to provide a manual th<strong>at</strong> will “clarify<br />
the entire flasking process for all readers.” <strong>The</strong>re is no doubt th<strong>at</strong> Mr. Hicks wanted to cre<strong>at</strong>e<br />
a comprehensive guide involving as much inform<strong>at</strong>ion on <strong>orchid</strong> seed germin<strong>at</strong>ion as possible.<br />
In doing so, I believe the book actually provided too much unnecessary inform<strong>at</strong>ion th<strong>at</strong><br />
could potentially leave some confused and overwhelmed.<br />
Upon receiving the book, I was impressed with its quality. <strong>The</strong> black and white and<br />
glossy cover caught my eye immedi<strong>at</strong>ely, and the scanning electron microscopy image of the<br />
<strong>orchid</strong> seeds was an excellent choice. <strong>The</strong> paper used in the book‖s production was good<br />
quality. I was also impressed with the figures and diagrams throughout the book. I was<br />
especially pleased th<strong>at</strong> many figures were in color, which enhanced the overall quality of the<br />
book. Mr. Hicks also did a good job <strong>at</strong> providing a list of companies th<strong>at</strong> sell tissue culture<br />
equipment and supplies.<br />
I was pleased with many aspects of the book. <strong>The</strong> section in Chapter 3 on pollin<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
was well written and useful, and the figures were an excellent addition. Likewise the sections<br />
on harvesting and storing <strong>orchid</strong> seed were welcomed because many hobbyists have questions<br />
concerning these topics. Mr. Hicks also does a thorough job describing aseptic sowing areas,<br />
and includes inform<strong>at</strong>ion for constructing a glove box. In Chapter 4 the techniques for sowing<br />
<strong>orchid</strong> seed were described quite thoroughly. I was pleased th<strong>at</strong> Mr. Hicks included<br />
descriptions of using both loose, m<strong>at</strong>ure seed and green capsules. Mr. Hicks gives the readers<br />
several options to surface sterilize seed, and provides two excellent figures th<strong>at</strong> helped to<br />
clarify the text. Appendix I, which was the most useful section of the book, outlined the<br />
actual flasking technique th<strong>at</strong> was easy-to-follow.<br />
72
Dr. Stewart‖s contribution on symbiotic germin<strong>at</strong>ion was a welcomed edition since<br />
this technique is popular for conserv<strong>at</strong>ion purposes. In addition, no other book to my<br />
knowledge provides steps outlining symbiotic germin<strong>at</strong>ion. Dr. Stewart provided thorough<br />
background and history on the <strong>orchid</strong> seed/fungal rel<strong>at</strong>ionship. <strong>The</strong> glossary <strong>at</strong> the end of the<br />
chapter is a necessary addition for those not familiar with the scientific terms. Although the<br />
highly scientific writing may be daunting for the hobbyist, this chapter would be a necessary<br />
edition to any <strong>orchid</strong> seed scientist‖s library.<br />
I found th<strong>at</strong> much of the inform<strong>at</strong>ion presented was unnecessary. Rel<strong>at</strong>ed inform<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />
such as th<strong>at</strong> regarding the green capsule technique, was sc<strong>at</strong>tered throughout the book making<br />
it difficult to read <strong>at</strong> times. Chapter 6 on advanced techniques could be absorbed into other<br />
chapters. Mr. Hicks devotes several pages in Chapter 6 to media modific<strong>at</strong>ions, which I<br />
believe could be included in the media section in Chapter 3. Having an entire chapter solely<br />
devoted to media would have been a welcomed revision. Also, the section in Chapter 6 on<br />
osmotic strength and phenolics could have been edited out. I also did not find the section in<br />
Chapter 6 on new directions in seed disinfection useful since Mr. Hicks already described<br />
several techniques in Chapter 4. Th<strong>at</strong> being said, I also felt th<strong>at</strong> there were too many<br />
techniques discussed for disinfecting seeds, many of which would not be used. I was very<br />
puzzled why Mr. Hicks even mentioned using chlorine gas as a steriliz<strong>at</strong>ion technique<br />
considering this is incredibly dangerous. Presenting two or three useful techniques would<br />
make the text less confusing. I also would have recommended combining Chapters 1 and 2<br />
and increasing the inform<strong>at</strong>ion on the unique biology and an<strong>at</strong>omy of <strong>orchid</strong> seeds.<br />
Overall I thought the book was a good <strong>at</strong>tempt <strong>at</strong> providing a comprehensive guide to<br />
<strong>orchid</strong> seed germin<strong>at</strong>ion. However, the book could have been simpler with less inform<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />
Mr. Hicks even st<strong>at</strong>es in Appendix I th<strong>at</strong> much of the inform<strong>at</strong>ion is of little or no practical<br />
value for the beginner. I agree with his st<strong>at</strong>ement. I would recommend the book to hobbyists<br />
and growers who want a book with enormous amounts of inform<strong>at</strong>ion on the subject.<br />
Philip Kauth, Ph.D.<br />
Plant Restor<strong>at</strong>ion, Conserv<strong>at</strong>ion, and Propag<strong>at</strong>ion Biotechnology Program, Environmental Horticulture<br />
Department, University of Florida , PO Box 110675, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. pkauth@ufl.edu<br />
73
MICROPROPAGATION OF ORCHIDS, VOLUMES 1 & 2 (2ND<br />
EDITION)<br />
Joseph Arditti.<br />
2008. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Hoboken. Hardcover.<br />
Vol. I (pages 1–756), Vol. II (pages 757–1523). $475<br />
http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-<br />
1405160888.html<br />
More than 30 years ago, the first volume of Joseph<br />
Arditti, PhD‖s, Orchid Biology, Reviews and Perspectives series<br />
was published. In the initial volume, an appendix was added<br />
th<strong>at</strong> served as a manual to growing <strong>orchid</strong>s via clonal<br />
propag<strong>at</strong>ion and tissue culture — a rel<strong>at</strong>ively new and<br />
exciting branch of <strong>orchid</strong> biology <strong>at</strong> th<strong>at</strong> time. Largely<br />
because of the appendix, demand for the first volume of Orchid Biology continued, even after<br />
going out of print in 1990. Consequently, Arditti and fellow colleague Robert Ernst, PhD,<br />
embarked on a mission to expand the appendix and publish it as a separ<strong>at</strong>e book,<br />
Micropropag<strong>at</strong>ion of Orchids. Published in 1993, the initial volume of Micropropag<strong>at</strong>ion of<br />
Orchids combined the Orchid Biology appendix with more recent procedures and methods<br />
leading up to 1990. Wh<strong>at</strong> resulted was a massive (682 page), inform<strong>at</strong>ive book th<strong>at</strong> also<br />
remained in demand after its printing. Although Arditti officially retired in 2001, he was<br />
compelled to write a second edition of Micropropag<strong>at</strong>ion of Orchids, largely because of a wealth<br />
of new public<strong>at</strong>ions on the subject th<strong>at</strong> surfaced between 1990 and 2000. Hence, the 2nd<br />
edition of Micropropag<strong>at</strong>ion of Orchids was subsequently born.<br />
As predicted, the 2nd edition is even more massive than the first, encompassing two<br />
volumes. Both are housed by a handsome, durable sleeve th<strong>at</strong> measures 10½ inches (26 cm) in<br />
height, 3½ inches (9 cm) in width and 8 inches (20 cm) in depth.<br />
Volume I encompasses the set‖s first three chapters. In typical fashion, Chapter 1 is a<br />
historical account of <strong>orchid</strong> micropropag<strong>at</strong>ion, complete with inform<strong>at</strong>ive text, black-andwhite<br />
portraits of noteworthy specialists and other select images. <strong>The</strong> chapter concludes with<br />
some predictions and potential breakthroughs th<strong>at</strong> lie ahead. Those who have read the first<br />
Micropropag<strong>at</strong>ion of Orchids will find th<strong>at</strong> Chapters 2 and 4 have been revised and rewritten.<br />
In Chapter 2 (General Outline of Techniques and Procedures), new inform<strong>at</strong>ion was added<br />
th<strong>at</strong> should be useful to many readers, ranging from the educ<strong>at</strong>ed beginner to the seasoned<br />
specialist. Many of the chapter‖s 74 pages contain various tables and figures th<strong>at</strong> nicely<br />
supplement the text. Among the topics addressed include media components, plant growth<br />
regul<strong>at</strong>ors, pH, stock solutions, media prepar<strong>at</strong>ion, sterile technique and culture conditions<br />
(e.g., illumin<strong>at</strong>ion), among others. Given th<strong>at</strong> the author was unaware of published<br />
inform<strong>at</strong>ion on the techniques aimed <strong>at</strong> how to deal with/handle internal culture<br />
contamin<strong>at</strong>ion, the second edition of Micropropag<strong>at</strong>ion of Orchids, like the first, does not<br />
address the issue. However, Chapter 2 does provide a section on anticontaminants<br />
(antibiotics) and their use. <strong>The</strong> remaining 600-plus pages of Volume I are dedic<strong>at</strong>ed to Chapter<br />
74
3, Methods for Specific Genera. In this chapter, 59 genera of terrestrial and epiphytic <strong>orchid</strong>s<br />
alike are addressed, beginning with Acampe and ending with Lycaste. Well-known genera such<br />
as C<strong>at</strong>tleya, Dendrobium and Encyclia are discussed along with the mixed company of lesserknown<br />
examples, as well as hybrid-derived genera. For each, tables outlining various media<br />
are provided. Unfortun<strong>at</strong>ely but understandably, the font size of each table is extremely small<br />
(about like reading the label of a pinned insect specimen in an entomology collection). Those<br />
who have bifocals will be well-served.<br />
In Volume II, Chapter 3 continues to march through an additional 52 genera,<br />
beginning with Malaxis and ending with Zygopetalum. Taken together, a total of 111 genera<br />
are outlined by this huge chapter spanning both volumes. In Chapter 4, the author provides a<br />
brief summary of some broad generaliz<strong>at</strong>ions about <strong>orchid</strong> tissue culture th<strong>at</strong> many readers<br />
should appreci<strong>at</strong>e, given the often unpredictable n<strong>at</strong>ure of the practice, and the suffoc<strong>at</strong>ing<br />
wealth of new inform<strong>at</strong>ion. Volume II nears completion with a succulent references section<br />
th<strong>at</strong> consumes 76 pages. A few of the newer references are accompanied by links to the<br />
Internet.<br />
<strong>The</strong> book concludes with a series of eight useful appendices: 1) General Inform<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
on Supplies, Equipment, Terms, and Reagents; 2) Sources of Supplies and Equipment; 3) Sites<br />
of Interest on the World Wide Web; 4) Light; 5) Formulary; 6) various units and other values<br />
used in micropropag<strong>at</strong>ion; 7) Additional Inform<strong>at</strong>ion; and 8) Plant Preserv<strong>at</strong>ive Mixture. A<br />
glossary and index aptly follow.<br />
Aside from being an excellent resource like its predecessor, I especially liked the<br />
various historical insets th<strong>at</strong> were str<strong>at</strong>egically dispersed throughout Chapter 3 (e.g., Origin of<br />
the term protocorm, page 254; use of vanilla by Aztec Emperor Montezuma, page 1291). This<br />
approach was both inform<strong>at</strong>ive and captiv<strong>at</strong>ing, and served as a reminder of why we go to<br />
such extremes in our quest to propag<strong>at</strong>e these plants.<br />
In closing, Micropropag<strong>at</strong>ion of Orchids, 2nd edition, does not c<strong>at</strong>er to those interested<br />
in rel<strong>at</strong>ed fields of study (e.g., bioengineering, cytogenetics, molecular biology, seed<br />
germin<strong>at</strong>ion), as the author had intended. Instead, the book lives up to its billing as a useful<br />
resource strictly dedic<strong>at</strong>ed to micropropag<strong>at</strong>ion. As Arditti st<strong>at</strong>es in the book‖s preface, new<br />
methods will undoubtedly surface in the coming years, but this edition of Micropropag<strong>at</strong>ion of<br />
Orchids will be his last tre<strong>at</strong>ment. Secure a copy for your personal library before it is out of<br />
print once and for all.<br />
Lawrence W. Zettler, Ph.D.<br />
Illinois College, Jacksonville, Illinois. lwzettle@.ic.edu<br />
This review previously appeared in ORCHIDS magazine from the American Orchid Society and is reprinted by<br />
permission.<br />
75
FROM THE SWAMPS OF SOUTH FLORIDA TO THE WILDS OF<br />
NORTHERN ALASKA….<br />
TO WINDSWEPT NEWFOUNDLAND AND THE BIG BEND OF<br />
WEST TEXAS<br />
WILD ORCHIDS….<br />
from the University Press of Florida<br />
by Paul Martin Brown & Stan Folsom<br />
Ordering inform<strong>at</strong>ion from University Press of Florida www.upf.com or 1-800-226-3822<br />
or for signed and inscribed copies from the authors <strong>at</strong> na<strong>orchid</strong>@aol.com<br />
77
N<strong>at</strong>ive <strong>orchid</strong>s are increasingly thre<strong>at</strong>ened by pressure from popul<strong>at</strong>ion growth and development but,<br />
nonetheless, still present a welcome surprise to observant hikers in every st<strong>at</strong>e and province. Compiled<br />
and illustr<strong>at</strong>ed by long-time <strong>orchid</strong> specialist Paul Martin Brown, this pocket guide to the woodland and<br />
bog rein <strong>orchid</strong>s forms part of a series th<strong>at</strong> will cover all the wild <strong>orchid</strong>s of the continental United St<strong>at</strong>es<br />
and Canada. Brown provides a description, general distributional inform<strong>at</strong>ion, time of flowering, and<br />
habit<strong>at</strong> requirements for each species as well as a complete list of hybrids and the many different growth<br />
and color forms th<strong>at</strong> can make identifying <strong>orchid</strong>s so challenging.<br />
Lady's-slippers in Your Pocket<br />
A Guide to the N<strong>at</strong>ive Lady's-slipper Orchids, Cypripedium, of the United St<strong>at</strong>es and Canada<br />
34 color photos, 2008 $9.95, 1-58729-655-1, 978-1-58729-655-0<br />
Ladies'-tresses in Your Pocket<br />
A Guide to the N<strong>at</strong>ive Ladies'-tresses Orchids, Spiranthes, of the United St<strong>at</strong>es and Canada<br />
30 color photos, 2008 $9.95, 1-58729-656-X, 978-1-58729-656-7<br />
Grass-pinks and Companion Orchids in Your Pocket<br />
A Guide to the N<strong>at</strong>ive Calopogon, Bletia, Arethusa, Pogonia, Cleistes, Eulophia, Pteroglossaspis, and Gymnadeniopsis<br />
Species of the Continental United St<strong>at</strong>es and Canada<br />
43 color photos, 3 drawings, 2008 $9.95, 1-58729-700-0, 978-1-58729-700-7<br />
Twayblades and Adder’s-mouth Orchids in Your Pocket<br />
A Guide to the N<strong>at</strong>ive Liparis, Listera, and Malaxis Species of the Continental United St<strong>at</strong>es and Canada<br />
49 color photos, 3 drawings, 2008 $9.95, 1-58729-702-7, 978-1-58729-702-1<br />
Fringed Orchids in Your Pocket<br />
A Guide to N<strong>at</strong>ive Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera Species of the Continental United St<strong>at</strong>es and Canada<br />
47 color photos, 3 drawings, 2009 $9.95, 1-58729-812-0, 978-1-58729-812-7<br />
Woodland and Bog Rein Orchids in Your Pocket<br />
A Guide to N<strong>at</strong>ive Pl<strong>at</strong>anthera Species of the Continental United St<strong>at</strong>es and Canada<br />
50 color photos, 3 drawings, spring 2010 $9.95, 1-58729-8627, 978-1-58729-862-2<br />
Each lamin<strong>at</strong>ed guide is 16 3/4 x 16 7/8 inches and folds to 4 1/8 x 9 inches.<br />
OR FROM THE AUTHORS AT NAORCHID@AOL.COM<br />
78
79<br />
79
Genera Orchidacearum<br />
<strong>The</strong> six volumes of Genera Orchidacearum will provide a complete, robust classific<strong>at</strong>ion of the <strong>orchid</strong>s,<br />
descriptions of individual species, and cultiv<strong>at</strong>ional inform<strong>at</strong>ion. <strong>The</strong><br />
series, superbly illustr<strong>at</strong>ed with color photographs and line drawings<br />
of all the genera, will be an indispensable reference tool for scientists<br />
and for <strong>orchid</strong> breeders, collectors and enthusiasts. Order from<br />
http://www.oup.com/us/c<strong>at</strong>alog/general/subject/GeneralScience/?<br />
view=usa&ci=9780198507130<br />
NOW AVAILABLE!<br />
Genera Orchidacearum<br />
Volume 5<br />
Epidendroideae (Part 2)<br />
Alec M. Pridgeon, Phillip Cribb, Mark W. Chase, Finn N.<br />
Rasmussen<br />
$195.00 Hardback, Nov 2009<br />
ISBN13: 9780198507130 ISBN10: 0198507135<br />
<strong>The</strong> first reference work of the world's <strong>orchid</strong> genera th<strong>at</strong> reelects<br />
their long evolutionary history, this fifth volume tre<strong>at</strong>s 186 genera of the largest subfamily, Epidendroideae.<br />
Genera Orchidacearum<br />
Volume 4:<br />
Epidendroideae (Part 1)<br />
Alec M. Pridgeon, Phillip Cribb, Mark W. Chase, Finn N. Rasmussen<br />
$329.00 Hardback, May 2006<br />
ISBN13: 9780198507123I SBN10: 0198507127<br />
This fourth volume in the series tre<strong>at</strong>s the first 210 genera of the largest<br />
subfamily of Orchidaceae, Epidendroideae<br />
80
Genera Orchidacearum<br />
Volume 3:<br />
Orchidoideae (Part 2), Vanilloideae<br />
Alec M. Pridgeon, Phillip J. Cribb, Mark W. Chase, Finn N.<br />
Rasmussen<br />
$195.00 Hardback, Jul 2003<br />
ISBN13: 9780198507116 ISBN10: 0198507119<br />
This third volume describes the remaining 105 genera of subfamily<br />
Orchidoideae and all 15 genera of subfamily Vanilloideae.<br />
Genera Orchidacearum<br />
Volume 2<br />
Orchidoideae (Part 1)<br />
Alec M. Pridgeon, Phillip J. Cribb, Mark W. Chase, Finn N. Rasmussen<br />
$300.00 Hardback, Mar 2001<br />
ISBN13: 9780198507109 ISBN10: 0198507100<br />
Genera Orchidacearum<br />
Volume 1:<br />
General Introduction, Apostasioideae, Cypripedioideae<br />
Alec M. Pridgeon, Phillip J. Cribb, Mark W. Chase, Finn Rasmussen<br />
$250.00 Hardback, Nov 1999<br />
ISBN13: 9780198505136 ISBN10: 0198505132<br />
Genera Orchidacearum, Volume 6<br />
in prepar<strong>at</strong>ion - due 2010<br />
81