28.03.2013 Views

DEVELOPMENT OF PLEA BARGAINING IN THE ADMINISTRATION ...

DEVELOPMENT OF PLEA BARGAINING IN THE ADMINISTRATION ...

DEVELOPMENT OF PLEA BARGAINING IN THE ADMINISTRATION ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

78<br />

NIALS Journal of Law and Development<br />

Indian System of Plea Bargaining<br />

The operation of plea bargaining in India is somehow<br />

different from the American system. It is a recent<br />

development in the Indian criminal justice system as it can be<br />

traced to the Criminal Law (Amendment Act) 2005, which<br />

introduced Chapter XXI (A). On 5 th July 2006, plea bargain<br />

came into force in the Indian Criminal Justice System. The<br />

amendment to the Indian Criminal Code incorporating in a<br />

loose form the US practice of plea bargain requires that the<br />

accused pay compensation as part of the deal under which he<br />

will be imprisoned for no more than half the minimum<br />

sentence he is liable to serve. 73<br />

Unlike the American system of plea bargaining which is<br />

initiated by the prosecutor, the accused person initiates it<br />

under the Indian system. In this process, the accused person<br />

files an application for plea bargaining. A feature of the<br />

Indian plea bargaining is that the accused person has to file<br />

the aforesaid application any time before the commencement<br />

of the trial. An affidavit in support of the application is<br />

necessary. The applicant/accused must depose to the fact that<br />

he has “voluntarily opted for plea bargaining and that he had<br />

not previously been convicted on the same charge. Notice is<br />

then required to be given to the prosecutor or complainant<br />

the same results. Those who pleaded guilty received shorter sentence than<br />

those who were convicted at trial. In 1980, the complete abolition of plea<br />

bargaining was brought to an end. Analogous to complete ban is ban of<br />

plea bargain after indictment but before the grand jury returns felony<br />

indictment. In New York when it was introduced in 1992, critics decided it<br />

on the ground that there would be catastrophic backlog of cases, jail<br />

overcrowding and a violation of a federal order that limits the number of<br />

prisoners in city jails.<br />

73. The Times of India 6 July 2006, sourced from<br />

www.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articlesshow/1706071.cms.on<br />

September 2, 2008, cited from Alubo A.O. loc cit. See also Ghosh, S.S.:<br />

“Plea Bargaining – An Analysis of the Concept”,<br />

available@http://www.legalservianduia.com/articles/pleabar.wml.<br />

accessed on June 10, 2008, cited by Alubo A.O. ibid.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!