28.03.2013 Views

HEADER FONT: Arial 20 Bold - State Employee Information Center ...

HEADER FONT: Arial 20 Bold - State Employee Information Center ...

HEADER FONT: Arial 20 Bold - State Employee Information Center ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Department of Administrative Services<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational<br />

Part “A”<br />

For First-Time Managers and Supervisors<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

2


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Department of Administrative Services<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

“The purpose of the Management<br />

Development Series is to continuously<br />

develop state managers by providing<br />

them a solid management foundation and<br />

ongoing opportunities to develop skills<br />

for success in leading and managing<br />

Oregon state government.”<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Department of Administrative Services<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

155 Cottage Street NE, U-30<br />

Salem, Oregon 97301-3967<br />

(503) 378-3040<br />

http://statetraining.das.state.or.us/<br />

3


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Welcome to the<br />

Management Development Series<br />

The Oregon Department of Administrative Services is pleased to announce the redesigned<br />

Management Development Series (MDS) for state managers and supervisors. MDS was<br />

created to provide state managers - at all levels - a solid management foundation and<br />

ongoing opportunities to develop skills for success in leading and managing Oregon state<br />

government. Through a series of courses, programs, self-directed and online learning, case<br />

studies, learning partnerships and mentoring, seminars, workshops and more, managers can<br />

select their appropriate level of series programs and improve their management and<br />

leadership skills. The Series levels include:<br />

Developmental Series: For employees exploring and on track to become managers.<br />

Foundational Series: For first time managers and supervisors.<br />

New-to-<strong>State</strong> Series: For experienced managers new to Oregon state government.<br />

Mid-level Series: For experienced mid-level managers.<br />

Senior/Executive Series: For senior and executive managers.<br />

Specialized Series: Elective and specialized offerings for all levels of managers.<br />

To register or learn more about the new Management Development Series,<br />

visit our website at http://www.statetraining.das.state.or.us/<br />

(Click on “Professional Development Courses”)<br />

or call Kathryn Duncan, (503) 378-3040 at<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

For computer technical or end user training contact:<br />

Rhea Rodriguez (503) 378-5393<br />

4


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

“I cannot teach anybody<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

anything,<br />

I can only make them<br />

think.”<br />

Socrates<br />

5


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Table of Contents<br />

Part A:<br />

Day 1: Orientation, Leadership and Management<br />

Section 1: Oregon Government<br />

How Oregon government is “Oregonized”<br />

Section 2: Minding Mapping<br />

A very cool creativity tool<br />

Section 3: Managers and Leaders<br />

What’s the difference?<br />

Section 4: Strength Deployment Inventory (SDI)<br />

What is your leadership style?<br />

Section 5: Situational Leadership Overview<br />

What is your management style?<br />

Day 2: Performance, Quality and Systems Thinking<br />

Section 6: Setting Expectations<br />

Letting them know what’s expected.<br />

Section 7: Documenting Performance<br />

Tracking performance.<br />

Section 8: Measuring Performance<br />

The basics of how to measure performance.<br />

Section 9: Recognizing Performance<br />

How to recognize good performance in a customized way.<br />

Section 10: Training and Developing <strong>Employee</strong>s (IDPs)<br />

Workforce development is an investment in the future.<br />

Day 3: Coaching, Problem Solving and Team Building<br />

Section 11: Coaching Skills for Managers<br />

How managers affect employee performance.<br />

Section 12: The Transition from Peer to Manager<br />

The view from the other side.<br />

Section 13: Problem Solving and Decision Making<br />

Facilitating groups through problem solving.<br />

Section 14: Team Building<br />

How to change a group into a team.<br />

Section 15: Cascades Survival Activity<br />

A test of teamwork under stress.<br />

6


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Part B:<br />

Day 4: Practical Supervisory Skills<br />

Section 16: Recruiting, Interviewing and Selecting <strong>Employee</strong>s<br />

A great process leads to great hires.<br />

Section 17: Position Descriptions<br />

How you do them and why they are important.<br />

Section 18: Performance Appraisals<br />

Changing from an event to an ongoing process.<br />

Section 19: Delegation Skills<br />

Dividing up the work.<br />

Section <strong>20</strong>: Building Trust<br />

Trust is the currency management operates on.<br />

Day 5: HR, The Legal Context and Diversity<br />

Section 21: The Respectful Workplace<br />

Harassment and Wrongful Discrimination<br />

Section 22: Managing Diversity<br />

Respect<br />

Section 23: Managing in a Union Environment<br />

Labor relations in state government.<br />

Section 24: Ethics in the Public Sector<br />

Very important rules that must be followed.<br />

Day 6: Sustainability, Facilitation and Customer Service<br />

Section 25: Sustainability<br />

One of the Governor’s main priorities.<br />

Section 26: Facilitation Skills for Managers<br />

How groups work.<br />

Section 27: Customer Service in the Public Sector<br />

It is different in the public sector.<br />

Section 28: Resources in <strong>State</strong> Government<br />

Where the good stuff is hidden.<br />

7


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Course Outcomes<br />

Objective 1: Manage staff respectfully and effectively.<br />

• Understand performance management.<br />

• How to coach individuals and teams.<br />

• Understand/apply effective management and leadership tools/principles.<br />

• Transitioning from a peer to a manager.<br />

• How to manage and lead through change.<br />

• How to manage in today’s diverse work environment.<br />

• How to hire the best and manage through trial service.<br />

• Understand Human Resources (HR) federal and state policies affecting employees.<br />

Objective 2: Effectively problem-solve and make sound business decisions.<br />

• Understand the different types of decisions managers make.<br />

• Applying ethics in decision-making.<br />

• How to manage the consequences of decisions (risk management).<br />

• Understand, practice and apply a problem-solving model.<br />

Objective 3: Communicate successfully in the business environment.<br />

• Understand the importance of effective communication in state government.<br />

• How to establish proper written and oral communication protocols within their agency and work group.<br />

Objective 4: Collaborate and build productive work partnerships.<br />

• Understand the value and effectiveness of collaboration for state managers.<br />

• The customer as a collaborative relationship.<br />

• How to manage collaboratively in a union environment.<br />

• Understand and apply the collaboration skills needed by state managers.<br />

Objective 5: Locate and use available resources to find answers.<br />

• Understand and identify the different types and options of resources available.<br />

• How to locate, interpret and apply appropriate resources.<br />

Objective 6: Complete an Individual Development Plan (IDP).<br />

• Understand the value and importance of an Individual Development Plan (IDP) for management (and<br />

employee) development.<br />

• How to create SMART goals for an IDP (and setting work goals).<br />

• Create an IDP as the basis for professional development.<br />

8


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

MDS Foundational Learning Objectives:<br />

You will learn:<br />

1. About how Oregon state government is organized.<br />

2. Several great creativity tools to use in your job.<br />

3. The difference between the roles of manager and leader.<br />

4. About your leadership style and how to work with the other leadership<br />

styles.<br />

5. How to influence others by assessing their readiness to perform tasks<br />

and applying appropriate leadership styles.<br />

6. How to set performance expectations for staff.<br />

7. How to document performance.<br />

8. How to delegate without feeling guilty.<br />

9. The ins and outs of performance appraisals.<br />

10. How to recognize and reward performance.<br />

11. The basics of the performance measurement process.<br />

12. How to use your leadership skills to positively affect employee<br />

performance.<br />

13. The ins and outs of position descriptions.<br />

14. The IDP (Individual Development Plans) process.<br />

15. Basic facilitation skills for managers.<br />

16. How to facilitate group problem solving and decision making.<br />

17. Learn and use tools for assessing key factors for team performance<br />

and satisfaction.<br />

18. Learn trust building techniques to use with your team.<br />

19. Policy, rights, roles, responsibilities, guidelines, and tools for<br />

contributing to a respectful, harassment-free workplace.<br />

<strong>20</strong>. The basics of managing in a union environment.<br />

21. Examine and apply the ethics laws in Oregon.<br />

22. Strategies to manage the transition from peer to manager.<br />

23. How to integrate sustainability as a strategy.<br />

24. How to recruit, interview and select great employees.<br />

25. How customer service is different in the public sector.<br />

26. Where the resources are hidden in state government.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

9


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

My Action Work list <br />

(Things to do when I go back to my work site)<br />

1. ______________________________________Completed ____<br />

______________________________________<br />

2. ______________________________________ Completed ____<br />

______________________________________<br />

3. ______________________________________ Completed ____<br />

______________________________________<br />

4. ______________________________________Completed ____<br />

______________________________________<br />

5. _______________________________________Completed ____<br />

_______________________________________<br />

6. _______________________________________Completed ____<br />

_______________________________________<br />

7. _______________________________________Completed ____<br />

_______________________________________<br />

8. _______________________________________Completed ____<br />

_______________________________________<br />

9. _______________________________________Completed ____<br />

_______________________________________<br />

10. ______________________________________Completed ____<br />

______________________________________<br />

10


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Day 1<br />

11


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

12


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Section 1:<br />

How Oregon<br />

Government is<br />

“Oregonized”<br />

13


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

14


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

How Oregon Government is “Oregonized”<br />

Department of Administrative Services (DAS)<br />

Administers the governor’s programs and provides administrative and support services to<br />

state agencies.<br />

Check out the main DAS home page (http://www.oregon.gov/DAS/) for more information on<br />

the state’s budget, motor pool, state data center, parking, benefits, payroll, purchasing, and<br />

human resources.<br />

♦ <strong>State</strong>wide Training & Development. http://egov.oregon.gov/DAS/HR/training.shtml)<br />

♦ Budget & Management (BAM), http://egov.oregon.gov/DAS/BAM/<br />

Oregon <strong>State</strong> Library (OSL)<br />

Provides information services to state government employees, circulates library materials to<br />

print-disabled Oregonians, provides grants and assistance to help develop and improve local<br />

library services and fosters greater cooperation among all of Oregon’s libraries. Resources<br />

for state employees can be found @ http://library.state.or.us/<br />

Oregon <strong>State</strong> Archives (OSA)<br />

The Archives Division provides access to the permanently valuable records of Oregon<br />

government. They also house some of the state's oldest documents, including records of the<br />

provisional and territorial governments and the Oregon Constitution. They publish the biennial<br />

Oregon Blue Book, the complete source of information on Oregon's history and government<br />

and offers complete online public access to the Blue Book and Administrative Rules.<br />

http://arcweb.sos.state.or.us/<br />

Legislative Administration<br />

Disseminates a wide range of information to legislators, staff and the public. Provide guided<br />

tours and video presentations on the legislative process and <strong>State</strong> Capitol history. Links to<br />

the broadcast of the legislative session and other great information for state employees can<br />

be located on the web site, http://www.leg.state.or.us/comm/legadmin/legadminset.htm<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

15


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

PROGRAM AREAS<br />

The <strong>State</strong> is divided into the following Program Areas.<br />

Education<br />

Agencies and expenditures in this program area include support for all public educational activities from prekindergarten<br />

to post-secondary and life-long learning. The specific agencies in this program area are:<br />

Department of Community Colleges and Workforce Development - coordinates the efforts of 17<br />

community colleges statewide and maintains educational opportunities and workforce development<br />

capacity in the state. The agency administers federal Workforce Investment Act programs supporting local<br />

workforce investment boards and service providers.<br />

Department of Education - supports pre-kindergarten through 12th grade education. This includes<br />

support for school districts in the areas of school improvement, assessment, special education,<br />

professional/technical education, legal requirements, nutrition, and transportation.<br />

Department of Higher Education - is the state agency name for the educational institutions, governing<br />

board, central administration, support services, and public services that make up the Oregon University<br />

System. The institutions consist of the University of Oregon, Oregon <strong>State</strong> University, Portland <strong>State</strong><br />

University, the three regional universities (Eastern, Western, and Southern Oregon universities), and the<br />

Oregon Institute of Technology.<br />

Oregon Student Assistance Commission - helps Oregon students obtain post-secondary education by<br />

administering, evaluating, coordinating, and promoting financial aid programs. The Commission<br />

administers over 3<strong>20</strong> state-funded and privately-funded grant and scholarship programs.<br />

Teacher Standards and Practices Commission - works to ensure that every student in Oregon is taught<br />

by skilled and ethical educators. The agency establishes rules for licensing and issues licenses to<br />

educators. The Commission must approve college and university teacher education programs.<br />

Human Services<br />

The agencies within this program area provide for the health and safety of Oregon’s vulnerable and low-income<br />

citizens. These services include public assistance, protecting children who have been abused, health care,<br />

mental health as well as providing for the health and safety of Oregon’s seniors and people with disabilities.<br />

The specific agencies in this program area are:<br />

Commission for the Blind - is the administering agency of programs for the blind in Oregon. The agency<br />

provides vocational rehabilitation services, blind vendor management training and assistance, and<br />

employment experience through its work activity center and the Industries for the Blind.<br />

<strong>State</strong> Commission on Children and Families - provides a focal point for statewide partnerships to<br />

improve the quality of life for children and families in Oregon. They provide leadership and support the<br />

implementation of the local coordinated comprehensive plans for all children and family programs.<br />

Oregon Disabilities Commission - seeks to create an environment in the state of Oregon in which people<br />

with disabilities are active and equal participants.<br />

Department of Human Services - serves tens of thousands of Oregonians with a broad array of social<br />

services through over <strong>20</strong>0 programs. These services are delivered through a network of state offices,<br />

county and local governments, private non-profit entities, and health plans. The Department is responsible<br />

for services to Oregon’s low-income and vulnerable citizens. Those services include public assistance,<br />

protective services, public health, health care, mental health, vocational rehabilitation, long-term care for<br />

seniors and people with physical and/or other disabilities, and alcohol and other drug abuse treatment.<br />

Insurance Pool Governing Board - administers the Family Health Insurance Assistance Program<br />

(FHIAP). This program was approved by the 1997 Legislature and started in July 1998. It provides direct<br />

subsidies to working people below 185 percent of the Federal Poverty Level. These subsidies allow<br />

working people and their families to purchase private health insurance. The Board also provides technical<br />

assistance to small businesses that want to set up health insurance programs for their employees.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

16


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Long Term Care Ombudsman - investigates complaints made by, or on behalf of, long-term care facility<br />

residents; Monitors the implementation of federal, state, and local laws, rules, and policies that affect longterm<br />

care residents; Promotes quality long-term care; and Protects resident rights.<br />

Psychiatric Security Review Board - is in charge of people who have committed a crime and were found<br />

guilty except for insanity. These people are committed to the Oregon <strong>State</strong> Hospital, or are conditionally<br />

released to the community. The Board conducts hearings to decide the best place for these people.<br />

Public Safety<br />

Agencies within this program area are responsible for ensuring the public safety of Oregon’s people, property,<br />

and natural resources, through trained militia, law enforcement, prosecution, and incarceration of juvenile and<br />

adult offenders. Other major program objectives include legal representation of state agencies and consumer<br />

protection. The specific agencies in this program area are:<br />

Department of Corrections - manages adult and juvenile offenders sentenced to prison by the courts.<br />

DOC distributes funds to counties for management of offenders on parole, probation, post-prison<br />

supervision, or who have been sentenced to incarceration for one year or less.<br />

Oregon Criminal Justice Commission - was created by the 1995 Legislature when the Criminal Justice<br />

Council was abolished. The Commission’s primary duty is to develop a state criminal justice plan. The goal<br />

is a coordinated system that emphasizes public safety, offender accountability, crime reduction and<br />

prevention, and offender treatment and rehabilitation.<br />

District Attorneys and Their Deputies - prosecute criminal offenses and civil forfeitures, assist juvenile<br />

courts, advise and represent county officers, and enforce child support orders. The Oregon Constitution<br />

establishes district attorneys as state officers. Their duty is to ensure that the laws of the state are enforced<br />

and executed faithfully.<br />

Department of Justice - Under the leadership of the Attorney General, the Department of Justice (DOJ) is<br />

responsible for providing legal counsel to state officials and agencies.<br />

Oregon Military Department - federal responsibility is to provide combat-ready units and equipment to be<br />

deployed in support of national defense under the direction of the President. The Department’s state<br />

mission is to provide trained personnel and equipment to protect life and property in Oregon during natural<br />

disasters or civil unrest under the direction of the Governor.<br />

Oregon Office of Homeland Security - Governor Kulongoski signed Executive Order 04-05 in May <strong>20</strong>04<br />

officially creating the new Office as a cabinet level agency. The new Office brings together the primary<br />

elements of state government that are responsible for preventing, planning for, responding to, and<br />

recovering from disasters and acts of terrorism.<br />

<strong>State</strong> Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision - The Board sets parole release dates for offenders<br />

convicted of felonies prior to November 1, 1989, and determines when offenders sentenced as “dangerous<br />

offenders” should be released. It establishes conditions of parole and post-prison supervision for all<br />

offenders being released from prison, and sanctions offenders who violate these conditions. The Board<br />

also notifies eligible victims of hearings and releases and issues arrest warrants for parole violators.<br />

Department of <strong>State</strong> Police - is responsible for a wide variety of public safety programs and services. The<br />

Department of <strong>State</strong> Police consists of the following divisions; Patrol Services; Fish and Wildlife<br />

Enforcement; Criminal Investigation; Forensic Services; Human Resources Division; and the Office of<br />

<strong>Information</strong> Management.<br />

Department of Public Safety Standards and Training - is responsible for standards, certification and<br />

accreditation, and training of public safety personnel in law enforcement, corrections, parole and probation,<br />

telecommunications, firefighting, and private security. The Department determines whether candidates for<br />

election as sheriff meet statutory qualifications, licenses polygraph examiners, and provides specialized<br />

training to police officers regarding hate crimes and child abuse cases.<br />

Oregon Youth Authority - is the state’s juvenile corrections agency. It operates close-custody facilities,<br />

accountability camps, and work-study camps; manages the state’s juvenile parole and probation programs;<br />

contracts for foster care, residential treatment, and specialized treatment programs for adjudicated youth;<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

17


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

and distributes funds to county juvenile departments for diversion and basic services programs to keep<br />

youth from being committed to state institutions.<br />

Economic and Community Development<br />

Agencies in the Economic and Community Development Program Area aid businesses, communities, and<br />

people in providing economic and cultural enhancement throughout the state. Economic development activities<br />

include job creation, placement, and retention services; business recruitment and assistance; and workforce<br />

assistance and training. Agencies in this program area administer housing and infrastructure financing<br />

programs, and provide technical assistance to individuals, businesses, and communities. The program area also<br />

includes funding for programs that support community development activities such as the arts. The specific<br />

agencies in this program area are:<br />

Economic and Community Development Department – its mission is creation and retention of<br />

“sustained, quality jobs for all Oregonians at least cost<br />

Employment Department - mission is to support business and promote employment. To accomplish this<br />

mission, the agency currently performs the following services: Supports economic stability for Oregonians<br />

and communities during times of unemployment through the payment of unemployment benefits; Serves<br />

businesses by recruiting and referring the best qualified applicants to jobs, and provides resources to<br />

diverse job seekers in support of their employment needs; Develops and distributes workforce and<br />

economic information to; Provides access to child care; and Provides administrative hearings services to<br />

state agencies.<br />

Housing and Community Services Department - is Oregon’s low-income housing finance agency. The<br />

agency assists in the financing of both single-family homes and the new construction or rehabilitation of<br />

multi-family affordable housing developments. The agency also administers federal and state programs to<br />

alleviate homelessness and poverty.<br />

Department of Veterans' Affairs - serves Oregon veterans, their dependents, and survivors.<br />

Natural Resources<br />

The agencies within the Natural Resources Program Area manage Oregon’s natural resources for present and<br />

future generations while supporting a sound and sustainable economy. The specific agencies in this program<br />

area are:<br />

<strong>State</strong> Department of Agriculture - The Department of Agriculture ensures food safety and protects<br />

consumers. It also protects natural resources and promotes agriculture.<br />

Columbia River Gorge Commission - The Commission has been charged with protecting the scenic,<br />

cultural, recreational, and natural resources while encouraging compatible growth and economic<br />

development within the Scenic Area.<br />

Department of Energy - The mission of the Department is to ensure Oregon has an adequate supply of<br />

reliable and affordable energy and is safe from nuclear contamination, by helping Oregonians save energy,<br />

develop clean energy resources, promote renewable energy and clean up nuclear waste.<br />

Department of Environmental Quality - leads efforts to restore, enhance, and maintain the quality of<br />

Oregon’s air, water, and land. The agency administers the state’s pollution laws. It also manages several<br />

federally delegated programs.<br />

<strong>State</strong> Department of Fish and Wildlife - protects and enhances fish, wildlife, and their habitats. Its<br />

mission is to ensure fish and wildlife populations for present and future generations.<br />

<strong>State</strong> Forestry Department - includes the Protection from Fire, Administration, <strong>State</strong> Forest Lands,<br />

Forestry Assistance, and Forest Practices programs.<br />

<strong>State</strong> Department of Geology and Mineral Industries - gathers geologic data and maps the state’s<br />

geology. The agency also regulates surface mining.<br />

Department of Land Conservation and Development - implements Oregon’s land use planning goals.<br />

Rapid economic and population growth have challenged the goals. By aiding orderly development, the<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

18


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

agency supports less transportation congestion and air pollution. It also helps preserve the state’s natural<br />

resources and quality of life.<br />

Land Use Board of Appeals - hears appeals of state and local land use decisions.<br />

Division of <strong>State</strong> Lands - carries out <strong>State</strong> Land Board policy. The Board manages the Common School<br />

Fund (CSF). The Department’s goals are to produce income for the CSF and to manage and protect the<br />

land and water of the state. The Department also administers the state’s removal- fill law and wetlands<br />

programs.<br />

<strong>State</strong> Marine Board - promotes the safe and enjoyable use of Oregon’s waters. It does this by: Titling<br />

and registering boats; Registering outdoor outfitters and guides; Developing waterway management plans;<br />

Educating boaters on safe boating practices; Contracting with 32 county sheriffs and the Oregon <strong>State</strong><br />

Police for on-water patrols and safety services; and Awarding facility grants to state and local agencies for<br />

boating facility development and maintenance.<br />

<strong>State</strong> Parks and Recreation Department - provides and protects natural, scenic, cultural, historic, and<br />

recreational sites for the enjoyment and education of present and future generations. The system includes<br />

233 parks and over 94,000 acres of land.<br />

♦ Oregon <strong>State</strong> Fair and Exposition <strong>Center</strong> - conducts an annual state fair and operates its<br />

fairgrounds as a year-round fair and exposition center.<br />

Water Resources Department - administers laws governing surface and groundwater resources. The goal<br />

is to balance use of the state’s water among current and future generations of Oregonians.<br />

Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board - promotes and implements programs that restore, maintain,<br />

and enhance Oregon watersheds to protect the economic and social well being of the state and its citizens.<br />

Transportation<br />

This program area strives to ensure efficient and safe transportation to maximize the state’s economic<br />

competitiveness and livability. Program area agencies work with Oregon citizens, businesses, and local<br />

governments to select, develop, and implement projects that support these goals. The specific agencies in this<br />

program area are:<br />

Oregon Department of Aviation - mission is to advocate for the safe operation, growth, and improvement<br />

of aviation in Oregon. The Department plans development of airports, state airways, and aviation<br />

industries. In addition, the Department is responsible for operations and maintenance of 30 state-owned<br />

airports. The Department also assists communities in obtaining federal support for airport construction and<br />

maintenance; registers pilots, aircraft, and airports; and inspects and licenses about 100 public and 300<br />

private airports and heliports.<br />

Oregon Department of Transportation - The mission of the ODOT is to provide an efficient, safe<br />

transportation system that supports economic opportunity and livable communities for Oregonians. ODOT<br />

manages the following operations: Highway and bridge construction, preservation, operation, and<br />

maintenance; Support for other modes of transportation; Travel safety; Driver and Motor Vehicle services;<br />

and Commercial trucking services.<br />

Consumer and Business Services<br />

Consumer and Business Services agencies work to protect consumers and workers, and to promote a positive<br />

business climate in the state. The specific agencies in this program area are:<br />

<strong>State</strong> Board of Accountancy - protects the public by regulating the practice and performance of services<br />

provided by licensed accountants.<br />

<strong>State</strong> Board of Chiropractic Examiners - regulates chiropractors and chiropractic assistants through<br />

public protection, licensing, continuing education, examination, rulemaking, and practice guidelines.<br />

<strong>State</strong> Board of Clinical Social Workers - is to protect the citizens of Oregon by setting a strong standard<br />

of practice and ethics through the regulation of clinical social workers and clinical social worker associates.<br />

The Board is responsible for regulating social workers that choose to be licensed, though the Board does<br />

not regulate the practice of social work.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

19


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Construction Contractors Board - safeguards consumers’ rights related to contract improvements to real<br />

property. They also promote a fair, equitable, and competitive environment in the construction industry.<br />

Department of Consumer and Business Services - administers programs that protect consumers and<br />

workers. This is done while promoting a positive business climate in the state. DCBS has the following<br />

major programs:<br />

o The Workers’ Compensation Board hears and settles cases relating to workers’ compensation claims<br />

and workplace safety.<br />

o The Workers’ Compensation Division supervises and enforces workers’ compensation insurance laws.<br />

o The Oregon Occupational Safety and Health Division helps make sure that the workplace is safe.<br />

o The Insurance Division helps make sure that insurance companies are financially sound.<br />

o The Finance and Corporate Securities Division assures financial institutions are safe and sound while<br />

promoting a favorable business climate for financial services.<br />

o The Building Codes Division regulates building construction.<br />

o The Oregon Medical Insurance Pool increases Oregonians’ access to health care coverage.<br />

o The Office of Minority, Women, and Emerging Small Business helps the disadvantaged, women and<br />

minority-owned firms, and emerging small businesses.<br />

Board of Licensed Professional Counselors and Therapists - oversees use of the titles “Licensed<br />

Professional Counselor,” and “Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist.” Interns are also regulated.<br />

Licensure is voluntary. While the agency does not regulate the general practice of counseling and family<br />

therapy, it regulates the use of the titles and the practice of its licensees.<br />

Oregon Health Licensing Office - licenses and regulates individuals and businesses that operate under<br />

the jurisdiction of 10 boards, or advisory councils, or programs. The agency manages the following<br />

professions:<br />

• Athletic Training<br />

• Cosmetology<br />

• Denture Technology<br />

• Direct Entry Midwifery<br />

• Respiratory Therapy<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

• Environmental Health<br />

• Electrology<br />

• Permanent Color Technology and Tattoo<br />

• Hearing Aids<br />

• Body Piercing<br />

Health-Related Licensing Boards - Dentistry, Dietitians, Mortuary and Cemetery Board, Naturopathic<br />

Examiners, Nursing Home Administrators, Occupational Therapy Licensing Board, Pharmacy, Radiology<br />

Technology, Speech-Language Pathology & Audiology, and Veterinary Medical Examining Board.<br />

Oregon Board of Investigators - licenses investigators and provisional investigators; sets and enforces<br />

standards of professional education, competency, and practice; investigates and enforces alleged<br />

violations of its statutes and rules; and imposes penalties.<br />

Bureau of Labor and Industries - promotes the development of a highly skilled, competitive workforce in<br />

Oregon through partnerships with government, labor, business, and education; protects the rights of<br />

workers and citizens to equal, nondiscriminatory treatment; encourages and enforces compliance with state<br />

laws relating to wages, hours, terms, and conditions of employment; and advocates policies that balance<br />

the demands of the workplace and employers with the protections of workers and their families.<br />

Board of Medical Examiners for the <strong>State</strong> of Oregon - protects the public by regulating the practice of<br />

medicine in a manner that promotes quality care. It does this through licensing, investigation, examination,<br />

continuing education, and discipline. The Board regulates medical doctors, doctors of osteopathy,<br />

podiatrists, licensed acupuncturists, and physician assistants.<br />

<strong>State</strong> Board of Nursing - protects the public’s health, safety, and well-being through the regulation of<br />

nursing practice and nursing education. The Board actively licenses Registered Nurses, Licensed Practical<br />

Nurses, Nurse Practitioners, Registered Nurse Anesthetists, Clinical Nurse Specialists, and Nursing<br />

Assistants Aides.<br />

<strong>State</strong> Board of Psychologist Examiners - responsible for ensuring the competence and ethical practice<br />

of psychologists practicing in Oregon. It provides sanctions against those psychologists who violate the<br />

Board’s rules and standards of professional conduct.<br />

<strong>20</strong>


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Public Utility Commission of Oregon - works to ensure that safe and reliable utility services are provided<br />

to consumers at just and reasonable rates through regulation and promoting the development of<br />

competitive markets. It does this by regulating investor-owned electricity and natural gas companies, as<br />

well as certain telephone and water companies.<br />

Real Estate Agency – its mission is to provide quality protection for consumers of real estate, escrow, and<br />

land development services, balanced with a professional environment conducive to a healthy real estate<br />

market. The Real Estate Agency licenses and regulates almost <strong>20</strong>,000 real estate brokers and property<br />

managers.<br />

<strong>State</strong> Board of Tax Practitioners - is a consumer protection agency that regulates providers of tax<br />

services. It works to ensure that services are provided in a competent and ethical manner. The Board<br />

oversees people who are paid to prepare, advise, or assist in preparing personal income tax returns. The<br />

Board reviews and investigates complaints about tax preparers.<br />

Administration<br />

The Administration Program Area includes statewide elected officials, commissions, and state agencies. They<br />

provide policy direction and core central services to agencies. The specific agencies in this program area are:<br />

Oregon Department of Administrative Services - is the central administrative agency for Oregon state<br />

government. It delivers those support services to state agencies that can most effectively and efficiently be<br />

provided by a central government agency. In addition, DAS provides management oversight and direction<br />

on behalf of the Governor.<br />

Employment Relations Board - works to resolve disputes concerning labor relations for an estimated<br />

3,000 different employers and 250,000 employees in public and private employment in the state.<br />

Oregon Government Standards and Practices Commission - interprets and applies government<br />

standards and practices laws as well as public meetings laws; reviews public official and lobbyist conduct<br />

for all citizens of the state; provides training to state and local governments on government standards and<br />

practices, and public meetings laws.<br />

Office of the Governor - provides leadership and direction to state agencies that are in the Executive<br />

Branch. It makes sure agencies comply with the law. The Office includes: Program area policy advisors;<br />

Affirmative Action program; Minority, Women, and Emerging Small Business (MWESB) advocacy;<br />

Executive Appointments; Citizens’ Representative Office; Extradition services for all law enforcement<br />

agencies; Economic Revitalization Team; and the Rural Policy Office.<br />

Oregon Advocacy Commissions Office - provides administrative support to the following four advocacy<br />

commissions: The Commission on Asian Affairs promotes equality for Asian Americans who live in Oregon;<br />

The Commission on Black Affairs promotes equality for African-Americans who live in Oregon; The<br />

Commission on Hispanic Affairs promotes equality for Oregon’s Hispanic community; and The Commission<br />

for Women promotes equality for women through education and communication with policymakers at all<br />

levels of government and the private sector.<br />

Oregon <strong>State</strong> Library - provides research and reference assistance to state government. Circulates<br />

library materials in cassette and braille to Oregonians who are blind or have disabilities that prevent them<br />

from reading printed materials. Provides grants and assistance to help develop and improve local library<br />

services.<br />

Oregon Liquor Control Commission - works to effectively regulate the sale, distribution, and responsible<br />

use of alcoholic beverages in order to protect Oregon's public health, safety, and community livability.<br />

Public <strong>Employee</strong>s Retirement System - is responsible for administering retirement programs for public<br />

employees, including state, school, and local government workers. The agency’s mission statement is as<br />

follows: We are a well-respected organization that serves our members by enabling informed retirement<br />

and health benefit decisions and delivering retirement and health benefits, effectively and efficiently.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

21


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Oregon Racing Commission - licenses race meets and participants. It regulates live and simulcast horse<br />

and greyhound races. It also regulates off-track betting sites and multi-jurisdiction totalized operations,<br />

known as hubs. These hubs allow subscribers to place race bets over the telephone or the Internet.<br />

Department of Revenue - major duties are to collect taxes pursuant to the state’s tax laws. The agency:<br />

administers the state income tax program; helps counties assess and collect property taxes; collects and<br />

distributes taxes and fees for other state agencies and local governments; and operates three tax relief<br />

programs for low-income, elderly persons who rent or own their homes, and low-income, disabled<br />

individuals who own their homes.<br />

Secretary of <strong>State</strong> - The Secretary of <strong>State</strong> is an elected, constitutional office. Its duties include: Interpret,<br />

apply, and enforce election laws; Publish the Voters’ Pamphlet; Audit state agencies’ financial operations<br />

and program performance; Publish the state’s administrative rules; Store and preserve public records;<br />

Make the records accessible to the citizens of Oregon; and Provide registration and other services to<br />

Oregon businesses.<br />

Treasurer of <strong>State</strong> - is an elected, constitutional office. The office is responsible for the sound<br />

management of state money and assets. The Treasury is a multi-billion dollar cash and investment<br />

management center. It is the “bank” for the <strong>State</strong> of Oregon.<br />

Legislative Branch<br />

The Legislative Branch includes the Legislative Assembly (Legislature) and five other supporting agencies. The<br />

Legislature represents the public and provides a forum for the debate of Oregon’s public policy. The five<br />

supporting agencies provide administrative services and specialized analysis. The specific agencies in this<br />

program area are:<br />

Commission on Indian Services - gathers information relating to programs available to Indians. The<br />

Commission assesses Indian needs and concerns through consultation and public hearings. The agency<br />

also networks with state, regional, and national Indian organizations in sharing information and addressing<br />

Indian issues.<br />

Legislative Administration Committee - provides general support to the Legislature. It also provides nonpartisan<br />

services to the public, legislative members, and government agencies.<br />

Legislative Assembly - represents and informs the public, provides a forum for expression of the public<br />

will, enacts laws, establishes and oversees the state’s policies and priorities, and reflects these policies in a<br />

balanced state budget.<br />

Legislative Counsel Committee - provides legal and publication services to the Legislative Assembly and<br />

other agencies of state government. The agency drafts measures and amendments for legislators,<br />

legislative committees, and state agencies. It provides legal advice to legislators and legislative committees<br />

and reviews state agency rules for legal sufficiency. It prepares indices and tables for legislative<br />

publications. The agency edits, publishes, sells, and distributes Oregon Revised Statutes, official bound<br />

session laws, and other print and electronic publications.<br />

Legislative Fiscal Officer - a permanent, non-partisan legislative service agency. It provides research,<br />

analysis, and evaluation of state expenditures, financial affairs, program administration, and agency<br />

organization. LFO also provides fiscal impact statements on legislative measures. Committees staffed by<br />

LFO include the Joint Committee on Ways and Means (during session), the Emergency Board (during the<br />

interim), the Joint Legislative Audit Committee, the Joint Legislative Committee on <strong>Information</strong><br />

Management and Technology, the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, and such other financial<br />

committees as Legislative Leadership may appoint.<br />

Legislative Revenue Officer - non-partisan analysis to the Oregon Legislature on tax policy and school<br />

finance issues. The agency staffs the House Revenue and Senate Revenue committees. Research for<br />

other members and committees is provided upon request.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

22


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Judicial Branch<br />

The mission of the Judicial Branch is to: provide fair and accessible justice services; protect the rights of<br />

individuals; preserve community welfare; inspire public confidence. The specific agencies in this program area<br />

are:<br />

Council on Court Procedures - reviews Oregon’s Rules of Civil Procedure. The Council proposes<br />

changes to the rules as needed and reports to the Legislature on the proposed changes. The Council is not<br />

under Executive Branch control.<br />

Oregon Judicial Department – in 1983 the Legislature created a unified, state-funded court system with<br />

general jurisdiction trial courts (circuit courts) located in all 36 counties of the state. The Chief Justice of<br />

the Supreme Court is the administrative head of the Department with authority over the unified state court<br />

system operations, programs, and functions. The Chief Justice appoints the <strong>State</strong> Court Administrator who<br />

is responsible for assisting in administration and coordination. At the local judicial district level, the Chief<br />

Justice appoints presiding judges who also appoint trial court administrators to assist in administering the<br />

daily operations of the individual courts.<br />

Commission on Judicial Fitness and Disability - complaints filed against Oregon judges. The<br />

Commission may recommend the Oregon Supreme Court discipline a judge for misconduct and may<br />

censure, suspend, or remove a judge from the bench. The Commission is not under Executive Branch<br />

control.<br />

Public Defense Services Commission - consists of three divisions: the Legal Services Division, which<br />

provides direct legal services for representation on criminal appeals; the Public Defense Services Account,<br />

which contains funding used to pay the expenses for trial-level representation and appellate cases not<br />

handled by the Legal Services Division; and the Contract and Business Services Division, which<br />

administers the Public Defense Services Account, negotiates contracts and pays bills for trial-level<br />

representation and appellate cases not handled by the Legal Services Division.<br />

Source: Governor’s Recommended Budget 07-09<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

23


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Legislative Structure<br />

The Legislative Assembly consists of the Senate and the House of Representatives.<br />

The Legislature consists of 30 Senators and 60 Representatives.<br />

Term of Office<br />

Representatives are elected for two-year terms.<br />

Senators are elected for four- year terms.<br />

Elections are held in even-numbered years.<br />

Schedule<br />

Regular sessions commence on the second Monday in January of each odd-numbered year.<br />

Special sessions may be called by either the Governor or by a majority of both houses.<br />

The length of the session depends primarily upon the amount of business to be acted upon by the<br />

Legislature. Usually, the session lasts more than 150 calendar days.<br />

Organization of the Legislative Assembly<br />

The leader of the Senate is the President of the Senate, and the leader of the House is the Speaker of the<br />

House.<br />

Other leadership positions include President Pro Tempore, Speaker Pro Tempore, Majority Leaders, and<br />

Minority Leaders.<br />

Committees<br />

The Senate and the House have from 11 to 16 standing committees, ranging from five to eleven members<br />

each. These committees usually cover areas such as children and families, business, education, general<br />

government, human services, judiciary, legislative rules and reorganization, natural resources, revenue and<br />

school finance, and ways and means (appropriations).<br />

The presiding officer designates the chair and vice-chair of each committee and the committee members.<br />

The committee system divides up the work of the Legislature. Bills are assigned after the first reading to a<br />

specific committee by the presiding officer. In acting on a bill, the committee does one of the following:<br />

holds the bill without taking any action on it, holds the bill but substitutes and reports out another related bill<br />

(“gut and stuff”), or reports the bill out of committee to the floor of the Senate or House. A bill may be<br />

removed from committee by a majority vote in the Senate and the affirmative vote of 31 members in the<br />

House.<br />

Most of the work of the Legislature is done in committee where the public has the opportunity to testify in<br />

favor of or in opposition to a bill.<br />

Contact for <strong>Information</strong>: Legislative <strong>Information</strong>, (503) 986-1388<br />

Source: <strong>State</strong> Manager’s Handbook <strong>20</strong>07<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

24


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Legislative Bills<br />

A bill is a proposed law. All statutes, except those initiated by the people (initiatives), must be enacted through a<br />

bill.<br />

Steps in Enacting a Bill<br />

Agency submits a proposal (idea for a law) to the Department of Administrative Services (DAS) for the<br />

Governor’s approval.<br />

Approved proposals are sent to Legislative Counsel for drafting.<br />

Read in the chamber of origin.<br />

Assigned to committee.<br />

Hearings held.<br />

If committee takes action, it is read a second time.<br />

Bill is then given third reading which is followed by debate and voting.<br />

If bill passes, it is sent to the other chamber.<br />

Other chamber then goes through the same process as outlined above. If changes are made, it must return<br />

to the first chamber for approval of changes.<br />

Bill is then signed.<br />

Goes to the Governor:<br />

“Signed”.<br />

Bill becomes law without the Governor’s signature.<br />

“Vetoed”.<br />

Introduction of Bills<br />

Bills may be introduced by the Governor or state agencies through pre-session filing or through a member,<br />

committee, or as set forth in the Senate and House Rules. Agency bills must have the Governor’s approval<br />

before they are introduced.<br />

One or more members of either House or members of both Houses may introduce bills.<br />

Revenue measures must originate in the House.<br />

When Laws Become Effective<br />

In 1999, the Legislative Assembly adopted ORS 171.022, which reads, "Except as otherwise provided in the<br />

Act, an Act of the Legislative Assembly takes effect on January 1 of the year after passage of the Act."<br />

Relevant Materials Available: The “Oregon Legislative Guide” (information on the legislative process, current<br />

leadership, profiles of individual legislators, and legislative terms) is available from Legislative Administration;<br />

they can be contacted at (503) 986-1180.<br />

Source: <strong>State</strong> Manager’s Handbook <strong>20</strong>07<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

25


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Funding Sources<br />

The state uses money from four sources to pay for services. The sources are grouped as General Fund, Other<br />

Funds, Lottery Funds, and Federal Funds. The following is a brief discussion of each source. (Note: Property<br />

taxes are not a source that funds the state budget. There is no state property tax. Property taxes are local. They<br />

are the main source of funding for cities, counties, and some special districts.)<br />

General Fund<br />

The General Fund is the money in the budget that the Legislature can apply anywhere it is needed. It comes<br />

largely from both corporate and personal income taxes. The rest comes from the insurance premium tax,<br />

cigarette tax, liquor tax, other minor sources, and the Fund’s investment earnings.<br />

Other Funds<br />

Other Funds are mostly moneys dedicated to certain purposes. They include some taxes, chiefly those related<br />

to highway use, employment, and forests. They include state licensing fees. Other Funds also include the<br />

state’s business-like incomes. Examples include tuition and other fees for services, inmate workforce products,<br />

and many funds related to loans or bonds. Lottery proceeds are counted as Other Funds.<br />

Federal Funds<br />

The federal government limits the state’s choices about where and how Federal Funds may be used. Federal<br />

funding comes with conditions, such as requiring the state to keep certain service levels or to provide matching<br />

funds.<br />

Lottery Funds<br />

Technically, net lottery proceeds are part of Other Funds. It is stated in the Oregon Constitution that 18 percent<br />

of the proceeds go to the Education Stability Fund and 15 percent of the proceeds are to fund parks and salmon<br />

and restoration activities (by voter mandate). The remaining proceeds are designated for education and<br />

economic development with specific recipients being determined by the Legislature.<br />

Steps in Oregon’s Budget Process<br />

1. Budget developed by the agency. (January through September, even-numbered years)<br />

2. Budget analyzed by DAS BAM. (August through November, even-numbered years)<br />

3. Review and decision by Governor. (October through November, even-numbered years)<br />

4. Governor’s recommended budget produced. (December, even-numbered years)<br />

5. BAM prepares and files appropriations bills with the Legislature. (December, even-numbered years)<br />

6. Legislature reviews and adopts budget. (January through June, odd-numbered years)<br />

• Agency present’s Governor’s recommended budget.<br />

• Joint Committee on Ways & Means acts and full Legislature approves.<br />

• Legislatively adopted budget produced<br />

7. Budget execution. (July, odd-numbered year through June 30 of next odd-numbered year)<br />

• Funds are allotted.<br />

• Agencies keep track of expenditures.<br />

• Interim adjustments.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

26


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Budget Process<br />

Overview<br />

Budgeting is an essential process in every large organization, public and private. It is especially important to the<br />

state. The budgeting process brings all the state’s branches and interested citizens together in a public forum to<br />

deal with state policy and planning. Budgeting is the wise allocation of limited state resources.<br />

Goals include producing a balanced budget and controlling state spending. But, the main goal of state budgeting<br />

is to make good policy decisions and convert them, economically and effectively, into needed results.<br />

Benchmarks<br />

The Oregon Benchmarks are important to the budget development process. The Oregon Progress Board has<br />

developed the Oregon Benchmarks to track how Oregon is doing in achieving the Oregon Shines goals.<br />

They range from economic measures such as per capita income, to social measures like infant mortality, to<br />

environmental measures like water quality. The Progress Board is required to report to the Legislature every two<br />

years on progress toward achieving the goals.<br />

Contact for <strong>Information</strong>: Progress Board, (503) 378-3<strong>20</strong>1<br />

Website for Additional <strong>Information</strong>: http://www.econ.state.or.us/opb<br />

Budget Cycles<br />

Agency Request Budget<br />

Governor’s Recommended Budget<br />

Legislatively Adopted Budget<br />

Agencies begin budget preparation for the following biennium in the early months of even-numbered years and<br />

submit agency request budgets to the Department of Administrative Services (DAS) Budget and Management<br />

Division (BAM) in August or September. The Governor reviews these requests and compiles a Governor’s<br />

recommended budget for submission to the Legislature, which convenes in early January of odd-numbered<br />

years. Legislative review of the budget concludes with approval of the legislatively adopted budget.<br />

Agencies Execute the Approved Budget over the Biennium<br />

Changes in the legislatively adopted budget may be made in the interim by:<br />

The Joint Legislative Emergency Board.<br />

Special legislative sessions.<br />

Limited changes may be approved administratively by DAS.<br />

Source: <strong>State</strong> Manager’s Handbook <strong>20</strong>07<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

27


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Rules & Laws<br />

Oregon Revised Statutes<br />

The 17 volumes of statute text contain, with some exceptions, the statute laws of Oregon of a general, public<br />

and permanent nature in effect on January 1, <strong>20</strong>06 (the normal effective date of the Acts passed by the <strong>20</strong>05<br />

regular session of the Seventy-third Legislative Assembly). Exceptions arise because not all laws take effect on<br />

or before the usual effective date. They are organized as follows:<br />

1) Volume 1 contains the remedial code, dealing with court structure and organization and remedies (ORS<br />

chapters 1 to 55) and the Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure.<br />

2) Volumes 2 and 3 contain the commercial and civil codes, dealing with corporations and other private legal<br />

entities, commercial transactions and relationships between individuals (ORS chapters 56 to 130).<br />

3) Volume 4 contains the penal code, dealing with criminal procedure, crimes generally and punishment (ORS<br />

chapters 131 to 170).<br />

4) Volumes 5 through 17 contain the political code, dealing with the structure and organization of state and<br />

local government and with the services rendered and the regulation exercised by government (ORS<br />

chapters 171 to 838).<br />

Oregon Administrative Rules<br />

Definition<br />

“Any agency directive, standard, regulation, or statement of general applicability that<br />

implements, interprets or prescribes law or policy or describes the procedure or practice<br />

requirements of any agency”<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

28


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Government Articles Clipping Service: <strong>State</strong> Library<br />

(Sign up at bottom of page)<br />

NEACT TO DISCUSS CONCERNS (East Oregonian)<br />

http://www.eastoregonian.com/main.asp?SectionID=13&SubSectionID=48&ArticleID=71406<br />

&TM=62801.29<br />

An overview of Oregon Senate Bill 566, directing the Oregon Transportation<br />

Commission to develop a list of projects to help reduce traffic congestion,<br />

improve freight mobility and enhance travel safety, will be given during an<br />

upcoming meeting of the North East Area Commission on Transportation.<br />

The meeting will be held from 9 a.m. to noon Jan. 15 at the Oregon Department of<br />

Transportation Region 5 Office, 3012 Island Ave., La Grande.<br />

_______________________________________<br />

'FOOD INSECURITY' HITS LOCAL RESIDENTS (East Oregonian)<br />

http://www.eastoregonian.com/main.asp?SectionID=13&SubSectionID=48&ArticleID=71354<br />

&TM=62801.29<br />

-Oregonians face hunger, especially in rural areas-<br />

Sue is one Oregonian who knows the pain of choosing between health care, gas for<br />

her car or eating a square meal. Each month, as she faces her pile of bills, the<br />

Pendleton mother is seized with a familiar feeling.<br />

_________________________________________<br />

SPRING CHINOOK RUN FOR <strong>20</strong>08 LARGEST SINCE <strong>20</strong>02 (East Oregonian)<br />

http://www.eastoregonian.com/main.asp?SectionID=13&SubSectionID=48&ArticleID=71322<br />

&TM=62801.29<br />

Spring chinook on the Columbia River could be running thick this year. Columbia<br />

River fishery officials forecast 269,300 fish will return to the mouth of the<br />

Columbia this year, the largest return since <strong>20</strong>02 and the third highest in more<br />

than 25 years.<br />

_________________________________________<br />

REVERSE THE BAN ON HUNTING WITH DOGS -- OPINION (East Oregonian)<br />

http://www.eastoregonian.com/main.asp?SectionID=14&SubSectionID=50&ArticleID=71397<br />

&TM=63392.47<br />

-Editorial from The Baker City Herald, Dec. 28-<br />

It's time to let Oregon voters reconsider their stance on hunters using dogs to<br />

track and tree cougars.<br />

Two times a majority of voters opposed that practice.<br />

_________________________________________<br />

ODOT KEEPS EASTERN OREGON INFORMED -- OPINION (East Oregonian)<br />

http://www.eastoregonian.com/main.asp?SectionID=14&SubSectionID=50&ArticleID=71352<br />

&TM=63392.47<br />

During Friday's high winds in Eastern Oregon, Tom Strandberg, the Oregon<br />

Department of Transportation's Region 5 public affairs officer, sent out multiple<br />

e-mails advising news agencies of the conditions on Interstate 84 from Highway <strong>20</strong>7<br />

to La Grande.<br />

Strandberg's diligence in informing the public of road conditions should be<br />

commended.<br />

_________________________________________<br />

<strong>State</strong> Library eClips<br />

http://library.state.or.us/services/awareness/eClips


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

30


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Section 2:<br />

Mind Mapping<br />

The way your brain works…<br />

31


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

32


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Mind map<br />

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia<br />

A hand-drawn mind map<br />

A mind map is a diagram used to represent words, ideas, tasks or other items linked to and<br />

arranged radially around a central key word or idea. It is used to generate, visualize, structure<br />

and classify ideas, and as an aid in study, organization, problem solving, decision making,<br />

and writing.<br />

It is an image-centered diagram that represents semantic or other connections between<br />

portions of information. By presenting these connections in a radial, non-linear graphical<br />

manner, it encourages a brainstorming approach to any given organizational task, eliminating<br />

the hurdle of initially establishing an intrinsically appropriate or relevant conceptual framework<br />

to work within.<br />

A mind map is similar to a semantic network or cognitive map but there are no formal<br />

restrictions on the kinds of links used.<br />

The elements are arranged intuitively according to the importance of the concepts and they<br />

are organized into groupings, branches, or areas. The uniform graphic formulation of the<br />

semantic structure of information on the method of gathering knowledge, may aid recall of<br />

existing memories.<br />

Contents<br />

• 1 Origins<br />

• 2 Uses of mind maps<br />

• 3 Mind map guidelines<br />

• 4 Scholarly research on mind maps in learning<br />

• 5 Tools<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

33


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

• 6 Mind mapping in contrast with concept mapping<br />

• 7 Trademarks<br />

• 8 See also<br />

• 9 References<br />

• 10 External links<br />

Origins<br />

Mind maps (or similar concepts) have been used for centuries, for learning, brainstorming,<br />

memory, visual thinking, and problem solving by educators, engineers, psychologists and<br />

people in general. Some of the earliest examples of mind maps were developed by Porphyry<br />

of Tyros, a noted thinker of the 3rd century as he graphically visualised the concept<br />

categories of Aristotle. Ramon Llull also used these structures of the mind map form.<br />

The semantic network was developed as a theory to understand human learning, and<br />

developed into mind maps by Dr. Allan Collins, and the noted researcher M. Ross Quillian<br />

during the early 1960s. As such, due to his commitment and published research, and his<br />

work with learning, creativity, and graphical thinking, Dr. Allan Collins can be considered the<br />

father of the modern mind map.<br />

People have been using image-centered radial graphic organization techniques referred to<br />

variably as mental or generic mind maps for centuries in areas such as engineering,<br />

psychology, and education, although the claim to the origin of the mind map has been made<br />

by a British popular psychology author, Tony Buzan. He claimed the idea was inspired by<br />

Alfred Korzybski's general semantics as popularized in science fiction novels, such as those<br />

of Robert A. Heinlein and A. E. van Vogt. He argues that 'traditional' outlines rely on the<br />

reader to scan left to right and top to bottom, whilst what actually happens is that the brain<br />

will scan the entire page in a non-linear fashion. He also uses popular assumptions about the<br />

cerebral hemispheres in order to promote the exclusive use of mind mapping over other<br />

forms of note making.<br />

The mind map continues to be used in various forms, and for various applications including<br />

learning and education (where it is often taught as 'Webs' or 'Webbing'), planning and in<br />

engineering diagramming.<br />

When compared with the earlier original concept map (which was developed by learning<br />

experts in the 1960s) the structure of a mind map is a similar, but simplified, radial by having<br />

one central key word.<br />

Uses of mind maps<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

34


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Rough mindmap notes taken during a course session<br />

Mind maps have many applications in personal, family, educational, and business situations,<br />

including notetaking, brainstorming (wherein ideas are inserted into the map radially around<br />

the center node, without the implicit prioritization that comes from hierarchy or sequential<br />

arrangements, and wherein grouping and organizing is reserved for later stages),<br />

summarizing, revising and general clarifying of thoughts. For example, one could listen to a<br />

lecture and take down notes using mind maps for the most important points or keywords.<br />

One can also use mind maps as a mnemonic technique or to sort out a complicated idea.<br />

Mind maps are also promoted as a way to collaborate in colour pen creativity sessions.<br />

Mindmaps can be drawn by hand, either as 'rough notes', for example, during a lecture or<br />

meeting, or can be more sophisticated in quality. Examples of both are illustrated. There are<br />

also a number of software packages available for producing mind maps (see below).<br />

The best-selling fiction paperback (August <strong>20</strong>07) in the UK , "The Naming of the Dead" by Ian<br />

Rankin, features a detective, Inspector Rebus who uses mind maps to solve crimes.<br />

Mind map guidelines<br />

Mind map of mind map guidelines<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

35


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Tony Buzan suggests using the following foundation structures for Mind Mapping:<br />

1. Start in the center with an image of the topic, using at least 3 colors.<br />

2. Use images, symbols, codes, and dimensions throughout your Mind Map.<br />

3. Select key words and print using upper or lower case letters.<br />

4. Each word/image must be alone and sitting on its own line.<br />

5. The lines must be connected, starting from the central image. The central lines are<br />

thicker, organic and flowing, becoming thinner as they radiate out from the centre.<br />

6. Make the lines the same length as the word/image.<br />

7. Use colors – your own code – throughout the Mind Map.<br />

8. Develop your own personal style of Mind Mapping.<br />

9. Use emphasis and show associations in your Mind Map.<br />

10. Keep the Mind Map clear by using radial hierarchy, numerical order or outlines to<br />

embrace your branches. [1]<br />

An idea map is similar to a mind map but does not adhere to the above guidelines. Rules are<br />

constantly broken based on the purpose and application of the Map.<br />

Scholarly research on mind maps in learning<br />

Buzan claims that the mind map is a vastly superior note taking method because it does not<br />

lead to the alleged "semi-hypnotic trance" state induced by the other note forms. He also<br />

claims that the mind map utilizes the full range of left and right human cortical skills, balances<br />

the brain, taps into the alleged 99% of your unused mental potential, as well as intuition<br />

(which he calls "superlogic"). However, scholarly research suggests that such claims may<br />

actually be marketing hype based on misconceptions about the brain and the cerebral<br />

hemispheres. Hemispheric specialization theory has been identified as pseudoscientific when<br />

applied to mind mapping.<br />

There are benefits to be gained by applying a wide range of graphic organizers, and it follows<br />

that the mind map, specifically, is not equally suited to all learning tasks.<br />

Scholarly research by Farrand, Hussain, and Hennessy (<strong>20</strong>02) found that the mind map<br />

technique had a limited but significant impact on recall only, in undergraduate students (a<br />

10% increase over baseline for a 600-word text only) as compared to preferred study<br />

methods (a −6% increase over baseline). This improvement was only robust after a week for<br />

those in the mind map group, and there was a significant decrease in motivation compared to<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

36


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

the subjects' preferred methods of note taking. They suggested that learners preferred to use<br />

other methods because using a mind map was an unfamiliar technique, and its status as a<br />

"memory enhancing" technique engendered reluctance to apply it. [4] Pressley, VanEtten,<br />

Yokoi, Freebern, and VanMeter (1998) found that learners tended to learn far better by<br />

focusing on the content of learning material rather than worrying over any one particular form<br />

of note taking.<br />

Tools<br />

Mind mapping software can be used effectively to organize large amounts of information,<br />

combining spatial organization, dynamic hierarchical structuring and node folding.<br />

Mind Mapping Software<br />

There are many pieces of proprietary software (in alphabetical order) that allow the creation<br />

of mind maps.<br />

• ConceptDraw MINDMAP is Mind Mapping, Brainstorming and Project Planning<br />

software that works both on Windows and Mac OS X<br />

• HeadCase. First to comply with Buzan's Mind Mapping Laws and create "hand-drawn"<br />

Mind Maps. Windows-only.<br />

• Inspiration is a cross-platform Mac OS X, Windows and Palm visual learning<br />

application which recently (version 8) introduced true mind-mapping support.<br />

• MindManager, a product of Mindjet, is proprietary mind-mapping software running on<br />

both Microsoft Windows and Mac OS X. It integrates with Microsoft Office.<br />

• MindMapper, by SimTech Systems, is a full-featured visual thinking and mind<br />

mapping tool for Microsoft Windows with interoperability with Microsoft Office.<br />

• NovaMind is a proprietary mind-map application for Mac OS X and Microsoft<br />

Windows. Features include flexible branch shapes, a branch proposal system,<br />

integrated screenplay support, and OPML export<br />

• XMIND is a brainstorming helper and a productivity tool that allows placement of mind<br />

maps and fishbone charts into Word/PDF/Powerpoint documents.<br />

• FreeMind (Open Source and free for Windows, Mac and Linux)<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

37


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

38


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Advantages of Mind Maps<br />

Disadvantages of traditional linear notes:<br />

• Energy and time are wasted writing down superfluous words.<br />

• Other information may be missed while noting down one idea.<br />

• Takes longer to read and review.<br />

• Associations and connections between key words and ideas not readily<br />

apparent.<br />

• Attention wanders easily.<br />

• Lack of color and other visual qualities handicap memory.<br />

• Traditional notes aid forgetting, not memory.<br />

Mind maps work the way the brain works -- which is not in nice neat lines.<br />

Memory is naturally associative, not linear. Any idea probably has thousands of<br />

links in your mind. Mind maps allow associations and links to be recorded and<br />

reinforced.<br />

The mind remembers key words and images, not sentences -- try recalling just<br />

one sentence from memory. Mind maps use just key words and key images,<br />

allowing a lot more information to be put on a page.<br />

Because mind maps are more visual and depict associations between key<br />

words, they are much easier to recall than linear notes. (For example, although<br />

you may not have studied it in depth, see how much of the Home Mind Map of<br />

this site you can recall in your mind's eye.)<br />

Starting from the center of the page rather than top-left corner allows you to<br />

work out in all directions. The organization of a mind map reflects the way your<br />

own brain organizes ideas.<br />

Mind maps are easy to review. Regular review reinforces memory. Best is to<br />

try reviewing in your imagination first, then go back and check on those areas<br />

that were hazy.<br />

We remember what stands out (where were you when John Lennon was shot?).<br />

Visual quality of mind maps allows you to make key points to stand out easily.<br />

39


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Uses of Mind Maps<br />

Notes:<br />

Whenever information is being taken in, mind maps help organize it into a form<br />

that is easily assimilated by the brain and easily remembered. They can be<br />

used for noting anything -- books, lectures, meetings, interviews, phone<br />

conversations.<br />

Recall:<br />

Whenever information is being retrieved from memory, mind maps allow ideas<br />

to be quickly noted as they occur, in an organized manner. There's no need to<br />

form sentences and write them out in full. They serve as quick and efficient<br />

means of review and so keep recall at a high level.<br />

Creativity:<br />

Whenever you want to encourage creativity, mind maps liberate the mind from<br />

linear thinking, allowing new ideas to flow more rapidly. Think of every item in a<br />

mind map as the center of another mind map.<br />

Problem solving:<br />

Whenever you are confronted by a problem -- professional or personal -- mind<br />

maps help you see all the issues and how they relate to each other. They also<br />

help others quickly get an overview of how you see different aspects of the<br />

situation, and their relative importance.<br />

Planning:<br />

Whenever you are planning something, mind maps help you get all the relevant<br />

information down in one place and organize it easily. They can be used for<br />

planning any piece of writing from a letter to a screenplay to a book (I use a<br />

master map for the whole book, and a detailed sub-map for each chapter), or for<br />

planning a meeting, a day or a vacation.<br />

Presentations:<br />

Whenever I speak I prepare a mind map for myself of the topic and its flow.<br />

This not only helps me organize the ideas coherently; the visual nature of the<br />

map means that I can read the whole thing in my head as I talk, without ever<br />

having to look at a sheet of paper.<br />

40


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

How to Mind Map<br />

• Use just key words, or wherever possible images.<br />

• Start from the center of the page and work out.<br />

• Make the center a clear and strong visual image that depicts the general<br />

theme of the map.<br />

• Create sub-centers for sub-themes.<br />

• Put key words on lines. This reinforces structure of notes.<br />

• Print rather than write in script. It makes them more readable and<br />

memorable. Lower case is more visually distinctive (and better<br />

remembered) than upper case.<br />

• Use color to depict themes, associations and to make things stand out.<br />

• Anything that stands out on the page will stand out in your mind.<br />

• Think three-dimensionally.<br />

• Use arrows, icons or other visual aids to show links between different<br />

elements.<br />

• Don't get stuck in one area. If you dry up in one area go to another<br />

branch.<br />

• Put ideas down as they occur, wherever they fit. Don't judge or hold back.<br />

• Break boundaries. If you run out of space, don't start a new sheet; paste<br />

more paper onto the map. (Break the 8x11 mentality.)<br />

• Be creative. Creativity aids memory.<br />

• Get involved. Have fun.<br />

41


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

42


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

43


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

44


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Section 3:<br />

Role of the Manager<br />

Now what?<br />

“The essence of the transition to management<br />

is moving from the success of self<br />

to the success of others.”<br />

Anonymous<br />

45


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

46


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

What’s the Difference?<br />

What are the characteristics that differentiate the manager role from the leader role?<br />

Brainstorm at your table those tasks and qualities that are different in these two roles.<br />

Managers vs. Leaders<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

47


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

The 10 Roles of a Manager<br />

1. Figurehead: ______________________________________________<br />

2. Leader: ______________________________________________<br />

3. Liaison: ______________________________________________<br />

4. Monitor: ______________________________________________<br />

5. Disseminator: ___________________________________________<br />

6. Spokesperson: __________________________________________<br />

7. Entrepreneur: ____________________________________________<br />

8. Disturbance Handler: _____________________________________<br />

9. Resource Allocator: ______________________________________<br />

10. Negotiator: ______________________________________________<br />

Source: Henry Mintzberg<br />

Interpersonal Roles<br />

Figurehead<br />

Leader<br />

Liaison<br />

MANAGER<br />

<strong>Information</strong>al Roles<br />

Monitor<br />

Disseminator<br />

Spokesperson<br />

Decisional Roles<br />

Entrepreneur<br />

DIsturbance<br />

Handler<br />

Resource<br />

Allocator<br />

Negotiator<br />

48


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Interpersonal Roles<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

The Roles of a Manager<br />

Roles that relate to your relationships with others are considered interpersonal roles. They<br />

arise directly from your formal position and authority.<br />

• Figurehead.<br />

Managers are the heads of their own divisions, departments, sections, and this means<br />

they must routinely perform certain ceremonial duties. For example, they may be<br />

required to conduct tours of their facilities, speak to service clubs and civic<br />

organizations, and attend employee retirement dinners.<br />

• Leader.<br />

Managers are expected to create and maintain a positive and productive work<br />

environment for themselves and their employees. They play this role by attempting to<br />

improve employees’ performance, reduce conflict, provide feedback on performance,<br />

and encourage their employee’s development.<br />

• Liaison.<br />

Managers interact with many other people besides their superiors and team members.<br />

These people include peer-level managers and employees in other departments, staff<br />

specialists, and external parties such as customers, suppliers, and representatives of<br />

government agencies.<br />

<strong>Information</strong>al Roles<br />

Managers often have more information than their employees, which is partly because of their<br />

network of contracts inside and outside the organization. <strong>Information</strong>al roles relate to using<br />

and disseminating information.<br />

• Monitor.<br />

Managers must constantly monitor the work environment to know what’s going on.<br />

They collect information both by asking questions and by taking note of unsolicited<br />

information that comes to them through formal means (such as meetings, memos, and<br />

reports) and informal means (the grapevine, rumor, and other unofficial sources).<br />

• Disseminator.<br />

Managers act as disseminators when they relay information to their employees that<br />

the employees may not receive by other means.<br />

49


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

• Spokesperson.<br />

Managers are expected to speak for their work unit to people outside the work group.<br />

These people may include higher managers, peers in other departments, and various<br />

parties outside the organization.<br />

Decisional Roles<br />

Part of a manager’s job is making choices. Managers may make decisions themselves<br />

(sometimes with input from others) or influence the decisions of others in the following roles.<br />

• Entrepreneur.<br />

Managers play an entrepreneur’s role when they are exposed to new ideas and<br />

techniques that could improve their work group’s productivity or efficiency. The<br />

entrepreneurial role requires managers to initiate activities that will encourage their<br />

employees to use these new ideas and techniques to maximum advantage.<br />

• Disturbance Handler.<br />

When equipment breakdowns, strikes, scheduling problems, and other unpleasant<br />

surprises occur, managers are expected to develop effective solutions and keep their<br />

work groups moving forward.<br />

• Resource Allocator.<br />

Managers typically are responsible for deciding how scarce resources such as money,<br />

materials, time, and equipment will be distributed among their work group.<br />

• Negotiator.<br />

Managers of ten spend a good part of their time negotiation contracts with suppliers<br />

and bargaining with their peers for limited resources. This negotiator role demands<br />

that they have both the information and the authority to play it successfully.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

50


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Section 4:<br />

Strength Deployment<br />

Inventory<br />

Who are you, really?<br />

51


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

52


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

It’s Not Random<br />

Strength Deployment Inventory (SDI)<br />

The Strength Deployment Inventory (SDI) provides insight into what motivates a person’s<br />

behavior. You will learn that:<br />

- Our behavior is not random.<br />

- We may behave differently under different conditions.<br />

- Our strengths, if overdone, may actually become weaknesses.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

The Different SDI Types<br />

REDS<br />

Basic Value System: Concern for task accomplishment; achievement.<br />

Preferred Style: Directive; competing for authority.<br />

BLUES<br />

Basic Value System Concern for protection, growth, welfare of others.<br />

Preferred Style: Responsive; helpful; friendly; don’t be a burden.<br />

GREENS<br />

Basic Value System: Concern for self-dependence; meaningful order; logic.<br />

Preferred Style: Being objective; in control of emotions; cautious; thorough.<br />

HUBS (“The Glue”)<br />

Basic Value System Concern for group welfare; group membership; inclusivity.<br />

Preferred Style: Open-minded; adaptable; flexible to needs of the group.<br />

Source: Strength Deployment Inventory. Personal Strengths Publishing, 1996<br />

53


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Strength Deployment Inventory (SDI)<br />

Strengths and Excesses<br />

RED (Assertive-Directive)<br />

Strengths of When overdone, can be<br />

this type: perceived as:<br />

Self-confident Arrogant<br />

Enterprising Opportunistic<br />

Ambitious Ruthless<br />

Organizing Controlling<br />

Persuasive Pressuring<br />

Forceful Dictatorial<br />

Quick to act Rash<br />

Imaginative Dreamer<br />

Competitive Combative<br />

Proud Conceited<br />

<strong>Bold</strong> Brash<br />

BLUE (Altruistic-Nurturing)<br />

Strengths of When overdone, can be<br />

this type: perceived as:<br />

Trusting Gullible<br />

Optimistic Impractical<br />

Loyal Slavish<br />

Idealistic Wishful<br />

Helpful Self-denying<br />

Modest Self-effacing<br />

Devoted Self-sacrificing<br />

Caring Smothering<br />

Supporting Submissive<br />

Accepting Passive<br />

Polite Deferential<br />

Undemanding Masochistic<br />

54


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Strength Deployment Inventory (SDI)<br />

Strengths and Excesses (continued)<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

GREEN (Analytic-Autonomizing)<br />

Strengths of When overdone, can be<br />

this type: perceived as:<br />

Practical Suspicious<br />

Economical Unimaginative<br />

Reserved Stingy<br />

Methodical Cold<br />

Analytic Rigid<br />

Cautious Nit-picking<br />

Orderly Unbending<br />

Fair Compulsive<br />

Preserving Unfeeling<br />

Conserving Stubborn<br />

Thorough Obsessive<br />

HUB (Flexible-Cohering)<br />

Strengths of When overdone, can be<br />

this type: perceived as:<br />

Flexible Inconsistent<br />

Open to change Wishy-washy<br />

Socializer Unable to be alone<br />

Experimenter Aimless<br />

Curious Nosy<br />

Adaptable Spineless<br />

Tolerant Uncaring<br />

Open to compromise Unprincipled<br />

Looks for options No clear focus<br />

Socially sensitive Deferent to others<br />

Team player Other-dependent<br />

Mediator Lacks conviction<br />

55


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Christine<br />

34<br />

13<br />

John<br />

18<br />

29<br />

Kent<br />

55<br />

31<br />

34<br />

52<br />

37<br />

13<br />

23<br />

15<br />

32<br />

35<br />

45<br />

58<br />

22<br />

54<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

A Typical Team Group Score<br />

Sample Group Result Brian<br />

Kent<br />

Hannah<br />

Tracy<br />

Brian<br />

John<br />

Christine<br />

25<br />

41<br />

50<br />

9<br />

Tracy<br />

41 31<br />

42 16<br />

Hannah<br />

54<br />

46<br />

35<br />

36<br />

25<br />

50<br />

28<br />

42<br />

11<br />

18<br />

56


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

My Staff<br />

57


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Let’s Take a Vacation!<br />

• Plan a roundtrip vacation from Portland, Oregon to Moosehead, Maine.<br />

• You and your group are only planning on spending one night in Moosehead<br />

(with relatives).<br />

• You have 2 weeks of vacation time to explore and enjoy the rest of your trip.<br />

• Money is not a concern.<br />

• Plan (and draw) your vacation on the flipchart.<br />

• Use the strengths of your SDI profile to plan a great trip.<br />

You have 10 minutes to plan – happy vacation!<br />

58


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Teams and Leadership Styles<br />

• The more similarity between individual types on a team, the sooner the team members<br />

will come to understand each other, the more different the types, the slower the<br />

understanding.<br />

• Groups with very similar members will reach decisions more quickly but may make<br />

more errors because not all view points are represented. Groups with many different<br />

types will reach decisions more slowly (and painfully) but may reach better decisions<br />

because more viewpoints are included.<br />

• Team members may often choose tasks that fit the gifts of their type.<br />

• Leadership roles may shift as the tasks to be done require the skills of different types<br />

on the team.<br />

• Team members who are very different may have trouble understanding each other,<br />

leading to more conflict.<br />

• The person who is the only representative of a certain type (e.g., the only green…)<br />

may be seen as “different” from the other team members and possibly excluded.<br />

• Team members who come to appreciate and work with different may help to diffuse<br />

conflict.<br />

• Teams that are “one-sided” (i.e., have few types) will succeed if (a) team members use<br />

different types outside the team as resources, or (b) they make an effort to use their<br />

own less-preferred preferences as the tasks require.<br />

• “Reds” may dominate discussions, and perhaps decision making, unless they make a<br />

special effort to involve other types. The other types may need to make a special<br />

effort to be involved.<br />

• “Hubs” may be more concerned with harmony and “teamness”. “Greens” may be<br />

more concerned with truth and task. “Blues” may be more concerned with<br />

relationships between team members.<br />

• Good decisions will be made when the basic facts and realities have been taken into<br />

account, when new possibilities have been opened up, when inconsistencies have<br />

been analyzed, and when important values have been considered.<br />

59


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

60


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Section 5:<br />

Situational<br />

Leadership Overview<br />

What’s your management style?<br />

“Leadership is the ability to decide what is to be done<br />

and then to get others to want to do it.” Dwight D. Eisenhower<br />

61


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

62


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

High<br />

SUPPORT:<br />

Praise, Listen, Facilitate, Feedback<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Flexible Leadership Styles<br />

Supportive Style<br />

(3)<br />

- Facilitate employee decisions.<br />

- Share ideas and solutions.<br />

- Let employee find own answers.<br />

Delegating Style<br />

(4)<br />

- Let employee solve problems and<br />

implement their own answers.<br />

- Get out of the way!<br />

Leader’s Style<br />

Coaching Style<br />

(2)<br />

- Explain your decisions.<br />

- Provide opportunity to clarify.<br />

- Involve the employee.<br />

Directive Style<br />

(1)<br />

- Provide specific instruction.<br />

- Closely supervise.<br />

Low DIRECTION:<br />

High<br />

Structure, Control, Supervise, Correct<br />

(4)<br />

High<br />

(3)<br />

<strong>Employee</strong>’s Readiness Level<br />

Are they Able? Willing? Confident?<br />

Source: Adapted from Situational Leadership. Ken Blanchard and Paul Hersey, 1999.<br />

(2)<br />

(1)<br />

Low<br />

63


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Performance Management<br />

Flexible Leadership Approaches:<br />

What Would YOU Do?<br />

Directions: Review the following situations with your group. Using the flexible leadership model, do<br />

the following:<br />

1. Discuss the employee’s level of ability (competence) and motivation (confidence) to perform the<br />

task assigned. Where are they on the employee readiness level?<br />

2. Based on your assessment, choose the best leadership style and manager action to address the<br />

situation.<br />

1. An employee has been asked to write a report concerning the acquisition of some new<br />

equipment for the division. She usually can be given an assignment and complete it on<br />

time with encouragement from this leader. The report is now overdue. You would<br />

a. Tell the subordinate when the report was due, remind her of what is wanted in<br />

the report, and check on the subordinate’s progress daily.<br />

b. Give the subordinate more time to complete the assignment.<br />

c. Tell the subordinate what is expected, and direct her to complete it as soon as<br />

possible, but discuss with her why the report was late.<br />

d. Talk to the subordinate and encourage her to complete the report.<br />

2. You are in charge of an interdepartmental task force that has been working hard to<br />

complete its division-wide report. A new member has joined the task force. He must<br />

complete some cost figures on his department for the task force meeting next week, but<br />

he knows nothing about the task force’s requirements or the format of the report. The<br />

new task force member is excited and enthused about learning more concerning his role<br />

on the task force. You would …<br />

a. Tell him exactly what is needed in this report and closely monitor his progress.<br />

b. Ask the new member is there is anything that can be done to help him, and<br />

support his excitement about being a new task force member.<br />

c. Specify the report format and information requirements, but incorporate any<br />

ideas or suggestions he may have.<br />

d. Welcome him to the team and put him in contact with other taskforce members<br />

who could help him get ready to present the cost figures.<br />

64


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

3. A highly productive and efficient woman on your staff has asked for help on a project.<br />

She is accustomed to working effectively on her own. Recently, work problems have<br />

developed that she feels she can’t solve by herself. You would …<br />

a. Analyze the problems and outline methods to solve them.<br />

b. Continue to allow her to figure out an appropriate solution independently.<br />

c. Work with her in problem-solving, but determine and implement an appropriate<br />

solution.<br />

d. Discuss the problems with her and encourage her to implement any solutions.<br />

4. One of your employees is reluctant to take on a new assignment. The employee has<br />

had little experience in the area you want her to work. She has done a good job with the<br />

other tasks you have given her. You would …<br />

a. Explain to the employee what must be done and how to do it, but listen to why<br />

she is reluctant to do the task.<br />

b. Give the employee the new assignment and let her determine the best way to<br />

do it.<br />

c. Encourage the employee to try the new job and facilitate her efforts through<br />

mutual problem solving.<br />

d. Tell her exactly what must be done to successfully complete the assignment<br />

and frequently monitor the results.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

65


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Flexible Leadership Worksheet<br />

Flexing Your Leadership Style<br />

1. Think about and select one of your employees with whom you believe you have<br />

sometimes had difficulties with matching the right leadership style. (You don’t need<br />

to write the name.)<br />

2. Describe a typical situation where you’ve noticed the problem.<br />

3. What leadership style were you using with them on that particular task?<br />

(Directive/Coaching/Supportive/Delegating)<br />

4. Answer the following questions about the employee:<br />

(4)<br />

♦ Are they ABLE to do the job? How able?<br />

♦ Are they WILLING to do the job? How willing?<br />

♦ Decide where they are at on the employee readiness level:<br />

High<br />

(3)<br />

<strong>Employee</strong>’s Readiness Level<br />

Are they Able? Willing? Confident?<br />

5. What leadership style does their readiness level indicate?<br />

6. What might you change about how you are leading them? What new things could<br />

you do?<br />

(2)<br />

(1)<br />

Low<br />

66


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

My Staff<br />

67


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Situational Leadership® Style Flexing Techniques<br />

Task<br />

1. Make a decision<br />

that impacts<br />

your team.<br />

2. Make plans for<br />

the annual<br />

family vacation.<br />

3. Read a<br />

storybook to a<br />

child.<br />

4. Take your dog,<br />

Fido, for a walk.<br />

S1<br />

Telling<br />

Tell the team all the<br />

details—who, what,<br />

when, where, and<br />

how. Inform them<br />

of their roles and<br />

responsibilities.<br />

Tell your family the<br />

plan. Tell them<br />

where you will all<br />

go, when you will<br />

all go, and what<br />

you will all do.<br />

Inform them of your<br />

expectation that<br />

they will all have<br />

fun.<br />

Read the storybook<br />

from the front cover<br />

to the back cover.<br />

Decide when and<br />

where. Put the<br />

leash on. Review<br />

commands, i.e.,<br />

“heal,” etc. before<br />

starting. Set the<br />

pace.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

S2<br />

Selling<br />

Tell all the<br />

details, as well as<br />

your reason for<br />

the decision.<br />

Provide an<br />

opportunity for<br />

questions.<br />

Tell the family<br />

about the plan<br />

you landed on.<br />

Explain why you<br />

decided on this<br />

particular plan.<br />

Solicit and<br />

answer<br />

questions. Praise<br />

them as they<br />

excitedly fall in<br />

line with the plan.<br />

Read the<br />

storybook.<br />

Explain the<br />

morals of the<br />

story as you go.<br />

Ensure the child<br />

understands both<br />

the story and the<br />

morals of the<br />

story.<br />

Tell Fido the<br />

when and where.<br />

Explain your<br />

reasons. Ask if<br />

he has any<br />

questions. Lead<br />

and set the pace.<br />

Praise Fido as he<br />

walks at your<br />

side.<br />

S3<br />

Participating<br />

Explain to the<br />

team that a<br />

decision needs to<br />

be made. Gather<br />

them around, sit<br />

down, and work<br />

through it together.<br />

Hold a family<br />

meeting to discuss<br />

family members’<br />

preferences.<br />

Solicit everyone’s<br />

input, and offer<br />

your input. Reach<br />

consensus.<br />

Express your<br />

confidence and<br />

support for the<br />

plan.<br />

Take turns<br />

reading—you read<br />

a page and then<br />

the child reads a<br />

page. Ask what<br />

the child thinks the<br />

morals of the story<br />

are. Reinforce the<br />

child’s reading and<br />

thinking.<br />

Ask Fido what he<br />

thinks of the idea.<br />

Mutually decide<br />

the when and<br />

where. Encourage<br />

Fido to set the<br />

pace.<br />

S4<br />

Delegating<br />

Delegate the<br />

decision to the<br />

team.<br />

Tell the family<br />

that you have set<br />

aside $7,999.99<br />

for this year’s<br />

vacation. Let<br />

them figure out<br />

the plan. Advise<br />

them that you will<br />

support it as long<br />

as it’s within the<br />

budget.<br />

Give the<br />

storybook to the<br />

child to read.<br />

Ask for a book<br />

report.<br />

Put the leash on<br />

Fido, open the<br />

door, and let him<br />

take it from there.<br />

The only<br />

requirement is to<br />

be back home in<br />

time for dinner.<br />

68


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Task<br />

5. Assemble a<br />

new toy,<br />

gadget, or<br />

piece of<br />

equipment.<br />

6. Provide travel<br />

directions to<br />

your spouse for<br />

a one-day road<br />

trip he/she is<br />

taking.<br />

(Accurately<br />

assessing<br />

readiness is<br />

always key, but<br />

you really want<br />

to make sure<br />

you have it right<br />

on this task.)<br />

S1<br />

Telling<br />

Read and follow the<br />

assembly<br />

instructions step by<br />

step.<br />

Print up a<br />

Mapquest®<br />

itinerary and review<br />

each leg in detail<br />

with your spouse.<br />

Provide a compass<br />

and instruction on<br />

how to use it, in<br />

case of an<br />

emergency.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

S2<br />

Selling<br />

Read and follow<br />

the assembly<br />

instructions.<br />

Convince<br />

yourself the effort<br />

is worth it. Praise<br />

yourself as you<br />

make progress.<br />

Review all the<br />

details of getting<br />

from “Point A” to<br />

“Point B” for the<br />

route you’ve<br />

decided on.<br />

Explain why this<br />

route is the best<br />

one. Clarify any<br />

questions.<br />

S3<br />

Participating<br />

Meet with your<br />

multiple<br />

personalities to<br />

discuss the<br />

project. Reach<br />

consensus on a<br />

plan. Encourage<br />

those personalities<br />

who are insecure<br />

and/or frustrated.<br />

Ask what route<br />

preferences your<br />

spouse has. Offer<br />

routes you are<br />

aware of.<br />

Encourage your<br />

spouse to select a<br />

route that supports<br />

a successful and<br />

fun trip.<br />

S4<br />

Delegating<br />

Delegate the<br />

project to your<br />

“superstar”<br />

assembler<br />

personality. Be<br />

available for<br />

assistance.<br />

Check in with<br />

your assembler<br />

personality every<br />

once in awhile.<br />

Ask your spouse<br />

what his/her<br />

destination is and<br />

what the time of<br />

return is. Offer<br />

your wishes for a<br />

good trip.<br />

69


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

70


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

DAY 2<br />

71


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

72


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Managing<br />

Performance<br />

The success of others.<br />

“A leader is a coach, not a judge.” W. Edwards Deming<br />

73


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

74


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Worth Noting:<br />

“When things go wrong,<br />

most of the time it’s with the<br />

what (90%),<br />

NOT the<br />

who (10%).”<br />

Dr. W. Edwards Deming<br />

75


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

It’s a System:<br />

Setting Expectations<br />

Measuring Performance<br />

Documenting Performance<br />

Recognizing Performance<br />

Developing People<br />

Appraising Performance<br />

Coaching is the Key<br />

76


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

“People will forget<br />

what you say.<br />

People will forget<br />

what you did.<br />

But people never forget<br />

how you made them<br />

feel.”<br />

Significance “Blue” Johnson<br />

Pioneer Woman Settler<br />

1843<br />

77


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Managing <strong>Employee</strong> Performance<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

A Simple Test<br />

Answer the following simple statements for employees in private and public sector<br />

across the U.S.<br />

_____% of workers have no idea of their supervisor’s<br />

performance expectations.<br />

_____% of workers and managers admit they could be<br />

significantly more effective in their jobs.<br />

_____% of workers want better communication and<br />

performance feedback from managers.<br />

_____% of workers say they have never had a meaningful<br />

discussion with their manager about performance.<br />

_____% of workers say they would not receive any reward for<br />

productivity increases.<br />

Adapted from: The Performance Measurement, Management, and Appraisal Sourcebook, Shaw, Schneier, Beatty, Baird.<br />

Human Resource Development Press, Inc., 1995.<br />

78


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Section 6:<br />

Performance<br />

Expectations<br />

79


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

80


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

81


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

HOMEWORK DIRECTIONS:<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

What Do You Value?<br />

1. CHOOSE YOUR VALUES. Scan the list below and put a CIRCLE () around the three to<br />

five values that are most important to you. These are key values that you want your<br />

employees (and yourself) to demonstrate daily.<br />

2. CHOOSE YOUR WORKPLACE VALUES. Next, put a CHECK () by the three to five<br />

values that you believe are the most important values of your agency or workplace. Are<br />

they compatible with your values? If not, why?<br />

3. SHARE. Be sure to share your values with your employees (and manager) so they<br />

understand clearly what is most important to you as their manager.<br />

Integrity Independence Teamwork<br />

Performance Excellence Quality<br />

People are Our Strength Cooperation Collaboration<br />

Customer Service Continuous Improvement Respect<br />

Ethical Conduct Partnership Innovation<br />

Diversity <strong>Employee</strong> Involvement Creativity<br />

Empowerment Communication Leadership<br />

Stewardship Safety Health<br />

Expertise Humor and Work Enjoyment Family Life<br />

Other: _______________________________<br />

Other: _______________________________<br />

Other: _______________________________<br />

Other: _______________________________<br />

Other: _______________________________<br />

82


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

HOMEWORK DIRECTIONS:<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Setting YOUR Expectations<br />

1. CHOOSE YOUR EXPECTATIONS. Use the list on the following pages to develop<br />

YOUR statement of employee expectations. This list is comprehensive, but you do not<br />

need to include everything on the list. Shop through; check the ones most important to<br />

you, keying on those that most reflect your agency values and your own core values.<br />

2. WRITE A MEMO. After you’ve chosen your expectations, draft a memo to all your<br />

employees listing your expectations. Remember to use good memo-writing protocols.<br />

Provide a space at the bottom of the memo to allow the employee to sign the sheet in<br />

acknowledgement of the memo (the employee is NOT signing that they agree to abide<br />

by all the expectations, just that they’ve seen and received the memo).<br />

3. HOLD A MEETING. Then hold a team meeting with your employees to discuss, clarify<br />

and even modify your expectations based on their input and feedback.<br />

.<br />

Self-Management Expectations:<br />

Punctuality and regular work attendance.<br />

Efficient, effective use of work time, equipment and resources.<br />

Following rules and procedures.<br />

Working in a safe manner.<br />

Proper use and maintenance of equipment.<br />

Seeking and assuming additional responsibilities as appropriate.<br />

Exhibiting integrity and honesty.<br />

Treating others with respect and dignity.<br />

Giving and accepting constructive feedback.<br />

Working effectively in a diverse work environment.<br />

Focusing on the situation, issue or behavior rather than on the person.<br />

83


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Work Processes and Results Expectations:<br />

Providing products and services that consistently meet or exceed the needs and<br />

expectations of customers.<br />

Using customer satisfaction as a key measure of quality.<br />

Using appropriate problem solving methods to improve processes.<br />

Collecting and evaluating relevant information to make decisions.<br />

Using good judgment.<br />

Setting and adhering to priorities.<br />

Meeting productivity standards, deadlines and work schedules.<br />

Accurate and timely work with minimal supervision.<br />

Achieving results.<br />

Pursuing efficiency and economy in the use of resources.<br />

Informing supervisor or appropriate others of problems, identifying issues and alternative<br />

solutions.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

<strong>Employee</strong> Development Expectations:<br />

Participating in opportunities to enhance knowledge and skills that are identified and<br />

offered by the organization or the evaluator.<br />

Self-initiative in developing or upgrading knowledge and skills.<br />

Applying new knowledge or skills acquired from developmental opportunities.<br />

Helping others learn new systems, processes, or programs.<br />

Learning to use technology effectively, as appropriate for the job.<br />

Teamwork Expectations:<br />

Supporting and focusing on the vision, mission, and goals of the organization and team.<br />

Understanding the benefits of teamwork.<br />

Cooperating with and offering assistance to others.<br />

Recognizing the contribution of others.<br />

Viewing the success of the organization and team as more important than individual<br />

achievements.<br />

Contributing to the development, cohesion and productivity of the team.<br />

Appropriately sharing information internally and externally.<br />

Supporting teamwork and cooperation through open and honest communication.<br />

Contribute to a positive team environment.<br />

84


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Innovation and Change Expectations:<br />

Being creative and innovative when contributing to organizational and individual<br />

objectives.<br />

Receptivity to new ideas and adaptability to new situations.<br />

Avoiding being overly defensive; willingness to explore different options.<br />

Taking calculated risks.<br />

Seeking and acting upon opportunities to improve, streamline, re-invent work processes.<br />

Helping other to overcome resistance to change.<br />

Communication Expectations:<br />

Participating in meetings in an active, cooperative, and courteous manner.<br />

Orally communicating effectively on a one-on-one basis and in small groups.<br />

Making effective oral presentations before groups.<br />

Writing clearly and succinctly.<br />

Avoiding “bureaucratese” whenever possible in written and oral communications.<br />

Demonstrating understanding and empathy with the listener or reader.<br />

Being responsive and timely to e-mails, telephone messages, and mail.<br />

Customer Service Expectations:<br />

Understanding and being responsive to customers’ objectives and needs.<br />

Sensitivity to public attitudes and concerns.<br />

Being accessible, timely, and responsive in dealing with customers.<br />

Handling customer inquiries and complaints promptly, courteously, and nonbureaucratically.<br />

When possible, going the extra mile to satisfy customer needs and expectations.<br />

Supervisory Expectations:<br />

Clearly communicating mission and goals of the organization to staff.<br />

Providing regular ongoing feedback to staff.<br />

Facilitating, coaching, and supporting staff’s efforts to succeed.<br />

Providing meaningful recognition of staff success.<br />

Supporting diversity in the workplace.<br />

Setting clear direction and following through.<br />

Making effective employee selection and promotion decisions.<br />

85


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Other Expectations:<br />

(List other expectations you may want to include specific to your team.)<br />

____________________________________________________________<br />

____________________________________________________________<br />

____________________________________________________________<br />

____________________________________________________________<br />

____________________________________________________________<br />

____________________________________________________________<br />

____________________________________________________________<br />

____________________________________________________________<br />

____________________________________________________________<br />

____________________________________________________________<br />

____________________________________________________________<br />

____________________________________________________________<br />

____________________________________________________________<br />

86


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

What Do <strong>Employee</strong>s<br />

Expect of Managers?<br />

A recent study asked hundreds of employees about the qualities they most respected in a<br />

manager. Here are the ones the employees identified as the most important.<br />

1. Keeps up-to-date on situations that affect future prospects.<br />

2. Maintains a positive attitude.<br />

3. Has sound oral and written communications skills.<br />

4. Explains actions and decisions that affect employees.<br />

5. Doesn’t play favorites.<br />

6. Delegates authority and creates depth in management by allowing employees to do<br />

some of his or her job.<br />

7. Is specific when giving instructions about delegated assignments.<br />

8. Provides incentives to improve staff job knowledge and efficiency.<br />

9. Cross-trains employees so they can cover each other’s absences.<br />

10. Gives praise for work well done.<br />

11. Is aware of problems that employees are having with each other.<br />

12. Asks questions frequently, and is a concerned and active listener.<br />

13. Organizes work schedules and assignments effectively.<br />

14. Displays a professional attitude toward the work and employees.<br />

15. Shows a human side; doesn’t act like “the boss” all the time.<br />

16. Works with lower-level employees to understand what they do.<br />

17. Takes time to listen to new ideas.<br />

18. Pay attention to broader problems; avoids nit-picking.<br />

19. Keeps people informed about changes.<br />

<strong>20</strong>. Discusses problems with subordinates as soon as possible instead of letting things<br />

reach a boiling point.<br />

21. Expresses feelings honestly.<br />

22. Attempts to know each employee as an individual.<br />

23. Uses new strategies that will make the organization more productive.<br />

24. Shows confidence in subordinates.<br />

Source: Joseph T. Straub. The Rookie Manager. American Management Association, <strong>20</strong>00.<br />

.<br />

87


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

88


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Section 7:<br />

Documenting<br />

Performance<br />

89


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

90


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Official Personnel File<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Documenting Performance<br />

Keeping Good Records and the Records Straight<br />

Disclosable to:<br />

Mandatory documents Public <strong>Employee</strong><br />

• PD 100 application for employment,<br />

including attachments (resume, for example) x x<br />

• Application for current position x x<br />

• Personnel actions x x<br />

• Performance appraisals x x<br />

• Any employee contracts x x<br />

• Oaths of Office x x<br />

• Letters of commendation or recommendation x x<br />

• Summary of service prior to 1946 x x<br />

• Summary list of training completed x x<br />

• Notice of disciplinary action x<br />

• Notice of layoff x x<br />

• Documentation of resignation x x<br />

• Position description x x<br />

Site File<br />

• Contains copies of Official Personnel File documents.<br />

• Disclosure requirements same as official personnel file.<br />

• Kept at work site (IE. branch office) for convenience of agency.<br />

• A Site File is optional -- check with your agency human resources office as to<br />

whether site files are used in your agency.<br />

91


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Supervisor (or “Drop”) File<br />

• Kept by the supervisor to track personnel and performance issues.<br />

• Includes both positive and negative comments.<br />

• May be used for performance reviews, coaching, recognition, progressive<br />

discipline, etc.<br />

• Should contain only factual information, not judgments, opinions, etc.<br />

• Check with your agency human resources office for agency policy on<br />

supervisor files.<br />

Disclosable to:<br />

Mandatory documents Public <strong>Employee</strong><br />

May include:<br />

• Position description x x<br />

• Performance plans or goals x x<br />

• Work progress reports x x<br />

• Recent performance appraisal x x<br />

• Letters of commendation or recommendation x x<br />

• Copy of personnel actions forms x x<br />

• Notice of disciplinary action x<br />

• Grievance working papers x<br />

• Notes on personnel and performance issues x x<br />

Medical Record<br />

• Medical records shall not reside in the official personnel file, but in a confidential<br />

file which is physically separate from the official personnel file as prescribed by the<br />

Americans with Disabilities Act.<br />

• May be disclosed only in very limited circumstances.<br />

May include:<br />

• Any documents describing disability or medical condition<br />

• Family medical leave records<br />

• Disability status<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

92


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Disclosure of Files (To the <strong>Employee</strong> and the Public)<br />

• With reasonable notice, an employee can review his or her own official personnel file,<br />

site file, or supervisor’s file.<br />

• Address, telephone number, social security number and disability status must be<br />

stricken from any document that is being disclosed.<br />

• Managers should refer all requests from the public for disclosure of records to their<br />

agency human resources office.<br />

<strong>Information</strong> Reflecting Critically on an <strong>Employee</strong><br />

• May not be placed in the employee's personnel file unless the employee is notified.<br />

• The employee is entitled to prepare a written explanation, which must be kept in the<br />

personnel file as long as the critical information is kept.<br />

• Any information that has not been previously shared with the employee usually<br />

cannot be relied on in disciplinary action.<br />

References: <strong>Employee</strong> Personnel Records; HRSD policy 10.011.01<br />

Public Disclosure; Administrative Rule 105-10-016<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

93


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

94


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Section 8:<br />

Measuring<br />

Performance For<br />

Process<br />

Improvement<br />

What gets measured, gets done.<br />

95


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

96


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

The World of Measuring Performance<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

What is Performance Measurement?<br />

• From Oregon Progress Board….<br />

Performance measure:<br />

An outcome or output or efficiency measure that indicates how well an<br />

agency or other entity is carrying out its mission and achieving its goals.<br />

Internal performance measure<br />

A performance measures that is within an agency for management purposes.<br />

Internal measures cascade down from higher, externally reported measures.<br />

They are more numerous, more detailed, and possibly more “output”<br />

oriented. These measures are most useful for agency managers to improve<br />

their operations, and to hold staff accountable.<br />

97


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Measures 101<br />

• Measure indicates what is to be measure and should be a unit of<br />

measurement<br />

Miles per gallon<br />

Documents per hour<br />

Errors per transaction<br />

• Measurement is expressed as a combination of the numerical value and the<br />

measure<br />

24 miles per gallon<br />

105 documents per hour<br />

17 errors per transaction<br />

• Measures can be identified as an input, output, or outcome (see glossary for<br />

definitions)<br />

• Measures can be captured at both the operational and strategic level<br />

• Performance measures are a tool used to communicate information about<br />

process performance<br />

98


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Why some measure and other’s don’t<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Brainstorm<br />

Why some measure Why some resist measuring<br />

“You cannot manage what you cannot measure”<br />

99


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Measurement Levels<br />

There are two major levels of measures: operational and strategic. An<br />

organization needs to use both measurement levels in order to successfully<br />

balance the day-to-day operations with long-term planning.<br />

Operational: The operational level includes measures that are day-to-day<br />

in nature and reflect data from the past and present.<br />

Strategic: The strategic level has a focus on the long-term with goals, and<br />

it includes measures that show success towards those goals.<br />

Operational<br />

Strategic<br />

.<br />

What level do we (in public sector) do most often measure?<br />

100


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Your Measures<br />

Most Agencies have a mission and measures that they report to the legislature. Often we<br />

have a hard time seeing how our program fits in. While it is always important to link your<br />

program purpose and measures up to the Agency’s, you still need to manage your own<br />

processes. You need to have measures that are directly applicable to what you do on a dayto-day<br />

basis.<br />

Are you using measures currently in your job? ____ Yes ____No ____ Maybe<br />

What kind of measures are you using?<br />

Using the following process we will help you create a measurement system to help you in<br />

managing your day to day operations.<br />

Creating a “Operational” Measurement System<br />

Step 1. Identify or pick the “right” measures...Using data<br />

Step 2. Collect data<br />

Step 3. Display data<br />

Step 4. Analyze data<br />

Step 5. Draw conclusions and make recommendations from the data<br />

101


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Step 1. Identifying or picking the “right” measures...Using data<br />

In order to determine or identify the right measures you need to know a<br />

few things first, such as:<br />

1) What is the purpose of your unit/division, in other words…Why does<br />

it exist?<br />

2) What services or products do your customers/clients/stakeholder receive<br />

– that allows you to carry out this purpose?<br />

3) What measures or data are you currently collecting?<br />

Next:<br />

4) Based on the data or information you have, can you determine how well<br />

to you deliver or produce these services or products. If not you may need<br />

to select some new measures.<br />

Commonly used measurement categories are:<br />

• Timeliness<br />

• Accuracy<br />

• Efficiency (cost effective)<br />

• Effectiveness<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

102


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Planning an Conference<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Identifying Data<br />

1) What is the purpose of your unit/division, in other words…Why does it exist?<br />

2) What services or products do your customers/clients/stakeholder will receive – that allow<br />

you to carryout this purpose?<br />

3) What measures are you currently collecting?<br />

Determine the following:<br />

EXERCISE<br />

A. How will you know that the service or product is timely? List ways would you be<br />

able to measure this:<br />

B. How will you know that the service or product is accurate? List ways would you be<br />

able to measure this:<br />

C. How will you know that the service or product is efficient? List ways you would be<br />

able to measure this:<br />

D. How will you know the service or product is effective? List ways you would you be<br />

able to measure this:<br />

Which of the measures you listed, which will give you the most valuable information?<br />

103


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Measures Criteria<br />

Using criteria to assess the effectiveness of your data measures is important in order to<br />

ensure that you have the information you need to make accurate decisions. The following<br />

criteria will help you in determining the effectiveness of data:<br />

Criteria Description<br />

Specific • Clear and focused to avoid misinterpretation<br />

• Optimal number of measures (Not too many/Not too few)<br />

Measurable • Quantifiable with a number, percentage, or ratio (avoid yes/no measures)<br />

• Able to establish clear targets or goals<br />

Attainable • Achievable and practical (in terms of data collection, current operations, and<br />

within any organizational constraints)<br />

Reliable • Accurate – does the system from which the data being collected have a<br />

reasonable degree of accuracy?<br />

• Based on reliable and logical research methods<br />

• Consistent- do any of the measures contradict each other?<br />

Timely • To be collected within a reasonable timeframe<br />

Supports the<br />

Mission & Key<br />

Performance<br />

Measures<br />

Avoids<br />

Confidentiality<br />

Issues<br />

• Gives an indication of whether or not the mission is being reached<br />

• Is linked to factors needed for success<br />

• Should be based around needs of stakeholders<br />

• Ensure that confidentiality is upheld (some measures are appropriate to<br />

report)<br />

Cost Effective • Cost only as much as the organization can justify spending<br />

Balanced • Key areas of the organization, including financial, customer, process, and<br />

workforce learning/growth measures<br />

• Key types of measures including inputs, outputs, efficiency, and quality<br />

measures<br />

• Key program areas<br />

• Able to reflect past, present, and future performance<br />

• Flows from the top down to all levels of employees in the organization<br />

104


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Step 2. Collecting data<br />

Before collecting data, one must have a data collection strategy. A data collection us a series<br />

of question asked to focus us very specifically on the data and how we are to go about<br />

collecting it. You may need to modify question slightly to fit your particular situation.<br />

Reasons to design a data collection strategy:<br />

• To assure that all the necessary data is collected<br />

• To assure the accuracy of the data collected<br />

• To assure efficiency of the data collection effort<br />

• To make the effort economical<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Things to Think About…<br />

DATA COLLECTION STRATEGY<br />

1. What do we want to learn by collecting data?<br />

2. What data do we need?<br />

3. Where in the process will the data be collected?<br />

4. W ill sampling be required? If so, what type?<br />

5. How much (many) data will be collected?<br />

6. When will the data collection begin and end?<br />

7. How will the data be recorded?<br />

8. How will the data be displayed?<br />

9. Who will collect the data?<br />

10. How will the people involved be trained on the data collection plan?<br />

105


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Data Sources<br />

Type of Source DESCRIPTION Data Source Examples<br />

Tracking Methods An automatic or manual method of<br />

collecting and storing numeric counts<br />

of product or service features<br />

Database<br />

Tally sheet<br />

Checklist<br />

External Reviews Direct observations of site by subject<br />

matter expert<br />

Financial<br />

<strong>State</strong>ments<br />

Interviews/Focus<br />

groups<br />

Surveys/<br />

Questionnaires<br />

Reports that describe financial costs<br />

and income in the form of dollar<br />

amounts<br />

One-on-one or small group information<br />

gathering<br />

<strong>Information</strong> gathering through a<br />

standard form<br />

Form<br />

Timesheet<br />

Regulatory inspection<br />

Independent evaluation<br />

Secret Shopper<br />

Budget report<br />

Annual report<br />

Financial <strong>State</strong>ments<br />

Meetings<br />

One-On-One Interviews<br />

Small group input sessions<br />

Customer feedback survey<br />

Telephone survey<br />

Web polls<br />

106


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Check Sheet<br />

Why use it?<br />

Allows a team to systematically record and compile data from historical<br />

sources, observations as they happen, so that patterns and trends can be<br />

clearly detected and shown.<br />

What does it do?<br />

• Compiles easy-to-understand data from a simple, efficient process that can be applied to<br />

any key performance area.<br />

• Builds, with each observation, a clear picture of “the facts” as opposed to the opinions of<br />

each team member.<br />

• Forces agreement on the definition of each condition or event (every person has to be<br />

looking for and recording the same thing)<br />

• Makes patterns in the data become obvious quickly<br />

Steps to create check sheet:<br />

1. Agree on the definition of the events or conditions being observed<br />

2. Decide who will collect the data; over what period; and from what sources<br />

3. Design a check sheet that form that is clear, complete and easy to use. A<br />

complete Check Sheet, illustrated below, include the following:<br />

Source <strong>Information</strong> Content <strong>Information</strong><br />

a. Name of project<br />

f. Column with event name or descriptor<br />

b. Location of data collection (if needed) g. Column with collection days/dates<br />

c. Name of person recording the data (if it h. Totals for each column<br />

applies)<br />

d. Date(s)<br />

e. Other important identifiers<br />

i. Totals for each row<br />

4. Collect the data consistently and accurately<br />

107


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Collecting Data<br />

• You are the manager of the M&M Color Distribution center<br />

• Your division’s mission: To ensure everyone has opportunity to “equally” enjoy the<br />

M&M color of their choice.<br />

• Your service (or product): To produce colored M&Ms and package them.<br />

• Chosen data: Count and track the M&Ms by color per bag over a 4 to 5 week span<br />

• What are your assumptions about the M&Ms<br />

Name<br />

(week 1)<br />

(week 2)<br />

(week 3)<br />

(week 4)<br />

(week 5)<br />

Totals<br />

Individual Observations:<br />

EXERCISE<br />

Colors Total<br />

Blue Red Yellow Orange Green Brown<br />

108


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Step 3. Displaying Data<br />

Displaying data helps us to see what the “raw” data numbers we collected are “doing”.<br />

It converts data to an image we can more easily interpret. It helps us to more easily<br />

communicate our information to others in a more efficient manner.<br />

Common tools to display data:<br />

• Check sheet<br />

• Control charts (run chart)<br />

• Histograms<br />

• Bar charts<br />

• Pie charts<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Bar Chart<br />

(Pareto<br />

Chart)<br />

Brown<br />

35%<br />

Orange<br />

17%<br />

Pie Chart<br />

Green<br />

18%<br />

Yellow<br />

10%<br />

Red<br />

<strong>20</strong>%<br />

109


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Description<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Pareto Chart (Bar Chart)<br />

A Pareto chart is a bar graph. The length of the bars represents frequency of occurrence or<br />

cost (money, time). Therefore, the chart visually shows which situations are more significant.<br />

When to Use<br />

• When analyzing data by groups, to reveal unnoticed patterns<br />

• When trying to focus on the most significant problem or cause<br />

• When communicating with others about your data<br />

• When relating cause and effect, by comparing a Pareto chart classified<br />

by causes with one classified by effects<br />

• When evaluating improvement, by comparing before and after data<br />

Procedure<br />

1. Decide what categories you will use to group items.<br />

2. Decide what period of time the chart will include.<br />

3. Decide what measurement to use—frequency, percent, cost, time,<br />

quantity.<br />

4. Determine the appropriate number scale for your chart. Mark the scale on your<br />

chart.<br />

5. Construct and label bars for each category. Place the tallest at the top or far left,<br />

then the next tallest, and so on. If there are many categories with small<br />

measurements, they can be grouped as “other.”<br />

110


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

<strong>20</strong>%<br />

10%<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

EXERCISE<br />

M&M Color Distribution Bar Chart<br />

• Convert your “raw” data for the color totals into percentages and create a bar chart of your<br />

findings.<br />

0<br />

Colors<br />

(Hint: list colors from highest to lowest amounts)<br />

What does chart show?<br />

_______________________________________________________________<br />

_______________________________________________________________<br />

_______________________________________________________________<br />

_______________________________________________________________<br />

What could you use this information for?<br />

_______________________________________________________________<br />

_______________________________________________________________<br />

_______________________________________________________________<br />

_______________________________________________________________<br />

111


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Step 4. Analyzing data<br />

The purpose of analyzing data is to record your data (or numbers) in order to<br />

pull out a meaningful information. In order draw conclusions and report your<br />

findings, you need to spend time “playing” with the numbers in ways that bring<br />

the “not-so-obvious” out.<br />

Typical ways to analyze data:<br />

1) Display your data (use charts listed in step 3)<br />

2) Identify the mean, mode, and median of your data<br />

• Mean (the average) = Most often used form of analysis used. The<br />

mean is the sum of all data divided by the total number (n) of sampled<br />

data. Easy to use. However, because the highs and lows of the data<br />

are pulled in the mean is often not an accurate reflection of what is<br />

going on.<br />

Example: For the data points (3,5,4,7,5) the mean is 4.8<br />

• Mode = The most frequently occurring value(s).<br />

Example: For the data points (3,5,4,7,5) the mode is 5<br />

• Median = When your data is listed in rank order, lowest to highest, the<br />

median is the middle number<br />

Example: For the data points of (3,5,4,7,5) the median is 5<br />

3) Try converting your data into percentages for a different view<br />

4) Record trends and patterns<br />

5) Record any variances (are there data that are outside the norm?)<br />

6) Summarize and create a list of your findings (observations)<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

112


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Calculating/Analyzing Data<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

When collecting data for reporting, there are several ways to calculate<br />

the data for display. It is important to be aware of these different<br />

methods of calculation so that you can choose those that optimally<br />

display the performance you are measuring.<br />

Here are some common ways data is calculated:<br />

Count: The total number of a product, service, feature, etc.<br />

Examples:<br />

• # of new jobs created to replace jobs lost<br />

• # of people contacted for outreach about assisted living<br />

• Total # of documented crime incidents<br />

• Total amount of revenue received<br />

Mean: The average amount of a product, service, feature, etc that occurs for a given set of<br />

time or amount. This value is generally calculated by dividing the sum of a set of measures<br />

by the number of measures.<br />

Examples:<br />

• Average # of days it takes to replace jobs<br />

• Average number people who visit historical sites per week<br />

• Average value of property that is lost or stolen<br />

Percentage: The part of the whole displayed in hundredths. This value is generally<br />

calculated by dividing the count of one product/service feature by the total.<br />

Examples:<br />

• % of customers “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with the quality of services<br />

• % of orders that are processed the same day received<br />

• % of increase for program services<br />

• % of the city population that get a preventable disease<br />

Ratio: The relative values between two factors. This value is generally calculated by dividing<br />

the count of one product/service feature by the count of another.<br />

Examples:<br />

• Ratio of substantiated child abuse referrals to total population<br />

• Ratio of crimes that result in an arrest versus those that do not<br />

113


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Why use it?<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Run Chart (Line Chart)<br />

Allows a team to study observed data (a performance measure of a process) for<br />

trends or patterns over a specific period of time.<br />

What does it do?<br />

• Monitors the performance of one or more processes over time to detect trends, shifts, or<br />

cycles<br />

• Allows a team to compare performance before and after implementation of a change or<br />

solution to measure impact<br />

• Focuses attention on truly vital changes in the process<br />

• Tracks useful information for predicting trends<br />

Steps to create run chart:<br />

1. Decide on the performance measure<br />

2. Gather data (can be collected through a check sheet)<br />

3. Generally collect 25 to 30 data points to detect meaningful patterns<br />

4. Create a graph with a vertical line (y axis) and a horizontal line (x axis)<br />

• On the vertical line (y axis), draw the scale related to the variable you are<br />

measuring. Arrange the y axis to cover the full range of the measurements and<br />

then some (1 ½ time the range of the data)<br />

• On the horizontal line (x axis) draw the time or sequence scale<br />

5. Plot the data<br />

• Look at the data collected. If there are no obvious trends, calculate the average or<br />

arithmetic mean (The average is the sum of the values divided by the number of<br />

data points)<br />

• Draw a horizontal line across the chart to mark the average for the data points<br />

6. Interpret the data<br />

114


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Analyzing Data<br />

Purpose of Data The data you have been given measures the number of training given for the last<br />

three years.<br />

Problem Service demand for training is increasing. According to other data sources, you<br />

are receiving twice as many requests for training as compared to the past three<br />

years.<br />

Data provided You receive the following data at your desk and you are asked to develop a run<br />

chart, find out if there is a trend, and describe what that trend means.<br />

Month and Year Number of trainings<br />

provided<br />

EXERCISE<br />

Plot your data on the trend chart provided to you.<br />

Reminder: Calculate and plot the average data point<br />

Month and Year Number of trainings<br />

provided<br />

Jan, <strong>20</strong>02 7 April, <strong>20</strong>03 4<br />

Feb, <strong>20</strong>02 9 May, <strong>20</strong>03 11<br />

March, <strong>20</strong>02 9 June, <strong>20</strong>03 17<br />

April, <strong>20</strong>02 6 Jan, <strong>20</strong>04 8<br />

May, <strong>20</strong>02 7 Feb, <strong>20</strong>04 7<br />

June, <strong>20</strong>02 19 March, <strong>20</strong>04 15<br />

Jan, <strong>20</strong>03 4 April, <strong>20</strong>04 5<br />

Feb, <strong>20</strong>03 11 May, <strong>20</strong>04 8<br />

March, <strong>20</strong>03 9 June, <strong>20</strong>04 17<br />

115


40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

<strong>20</strong><br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Number of Trainings Provided<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

<strong>20</strong>02, <strong>20</strong>03, <strong>20</strong>04<br />

Month Jan Feb Mar April May June Jan Feb Mar April May June Jan Feb Mar April May June<br />

Year <strong>20</strong>02 <strong>20</strong>03 <strong>20</strong>04<br />

What trends did you see?<br />

_______________________________________________________________<br />

_______________________________________________________________<br />

_______________________________________________________________<br />

_______________________________________________________________<br />

What could you use this information for?<br />

_______________________________________________________________<br />

_______________________________________________________________<br />

_______________________________________________________________<br />

_______________________________________________________________<br />

116


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Step 5 Drawing conclusions and making recommendations from<br />

the data<br />

Once you have presented all your quantitative and qualitative data, and graphed your<br />

summary results, your next step is to analyze and interpret the information and draw<br />

conclusions from all of it. Study your results and observations, look for patterns and see if you<br />

can explain what they mean. Below is an outline to follow in your analysis:<br />

1. Describe your data, but do not rewrite every number recorded in your graph or table!<br />

Simply summarize what the data says or shows. Comparisons, differences and<br />

relationships should be discussed.<br />

2. Describe patterns or trends. These will be most obvious by studying your graph.<br />

What do you think they indicate? If you do not see patterns or if your results are not as<br />

you expected, be sure to explain this also.<br />

3. Describe problems or errors made or significant outliers. Data collection doesn’t<br />

always turn out exactly how we imagine it to. Sometimes there are problems or<br />

uncontrollable factors that influenced the results, be sure to explain them. Additionally,<br />

if the data shows events outside of the typical or normal range, make sure to note<br />

them.<br />

4. Say what it all means, draw conclusions. This is where you interpret your results<br />

and explain their significance. Try to explain why you have the patterns. Be sure your<br />

statements are supported by the facts presented in your data observations. If you have<br />

inconsistencies, be sure to discuss them also.<br />

5. Provide recommendations or use the result to support your business case for<br />

change<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

117


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Measurement System Process<br />

Five key steps involved in measurement system process:<br />

Develop measures collaboratively<br />

Decide on who should be involved in developing measures<br />

Gain sponsorship of main stakeholders<br />

Decide on the best method for developing measures collaboratively (work<br />

together/consensus)<br />

1) Create and develop measures in an appropriate format<br />

Identify success factors of the organization (based on the mission, strategic goals and<br />

objectives for the organization, as well as core work processes and customer<br />

expectations.)<br />

Identify measures that best reflect success factors<br />

Decide on the best format for displaying measures<br />

Input measures into the designated format<br />

2) Identify and design data collection mechanisms<br />

Decide what would be the best data collection mechanism to capture data<br />

Determine if current mechanisms exist or if new mechanisms have to be developed<br />

For current mechanisms, ensure it will capture the data exactly as you want it to<br />

For new mechanisms, create a system that will accurately capture the data you want<br />

3) Collect data<br />

Check the accuracy of the data collected<br />

Transfer data into the measures format<br />

4) Developing and Reporting Conclusions<br />

Describe your data<br />

Describe patterns or trends<br />

Describe problems or errors made or significant outliers<br />

Say what it all means, draw conclusions.<br />

Provide recommendations<br />

5) Use data to make improvements, build business case, and roll-up into Agency’s key<br />

performance measures<br />

Interpret your data to assess where improvements are needed<br />

Use internal or external benchmarking (examples) to find best practices<br />

Communicate results, plans, and measures to stakeholders<br />

Cascade & connect measures to strengthen efforts at all levels of the organization<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

118


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Maintenance of Measures System*<br />

The following components should be checked each year to ensure that the<br />

measurement system is maintained and aligned:<br />

Strategic Plan Revisions: If the strategic plan has been revised, check<br />

the measures system to ensure alignment.<br />

New Key Process: If a new key process has been added to the<br />

operations, check to see if a new measure needs to be added.<br />

Stakeholder Needs: Check to make sure that stakeholder needs are still<br />

being met with current measurement system.<br />

Management/<strong>Employee</strong> Involvement: Ensure that management and<br />

employees are still in support of the measurements and the measurement<br />

system.<br />

Accountability: Check to make sure that each measure still has an owner<br />

and that data is being collected and managed.<br />

System: Assess whether or not the system and current measures are<br />

meeting the organizational needs. Revise, if necessary.<br />

Communication: Determine whether or not your current communications<br />

are reaching the intended audience so that measurements are being used<br />

(to interpret work effectiveness and make improvements), as well as are not<br />

being used incorrectly.<br />

*US Department of Energy & Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education<br />

(<strong>20</strong>01). Performance-Based Management: A Six-Volume Compilation of<br />

Techniques and Tools for Implementing the Government Performance and<br />

Results Act of 1993. Retrieved from http://www.orau.gov/pbm.<br />

119


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

1<strong>20</strong>


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

121


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

122


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Section 9:<br />

Rewarding<br />

Performance<br />

123


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

124


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Never Let Good Work Go Unnoticed …<br />

The Pat on the Back Paradox:<br />

How Can Managers “Motivate” <strong>Employee</strong>s?<br />

Numerous studies have found that out of many possible incentive choices for “a<br />

job well done,” the following are consistently the top four chosen as those most<br />

desired by employees:<br />

1. A verbal congratulation from their immediate manager.<br />

2. A personal congratulatory note from their immediate manager.<br />

3. A public recognition of their performance.<br />

4. A personal “morale-building” meeting between the manager and the worker.<br />

How do YOUR employees like to receive recognition?<br />

____________________________________________________________________<br />

____________________________________________________________________<br />

____________________________________________________________________<br />

____________________________________________________________________<br />

____________________________________________________________________<br />

____________________________________________________________________<br />

____________________________________________________________________<br />

____________________________________________________________________<br />

Adapted from: “The Motivational Impact of Non-financial <strong>Employee</strong> Appreciation Practices” Graham and Unruh,<br />

1990. “The Pat on the Back Paradox and Human Adjustment to Economic Incentives,” Erev, Haruvy, Perry.<br />

<strong>20</strong>01.<br />

Never let good work go unnoticed …<br />

125


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Keys To <strong>Employee</strong> Happiness<br />

At Work<br />

• Do I know what is expected of me at work?<br />

• Do I have the materials and equipment I need to do my work right?<br />

• At work, do I have the opportunity to do what I do best everyday?<br />

• In the last seven days, have I received recognition or praise for good work?<br />

• Does my supervisor, or someone at work, seem to care about me as a<br />

person?<br />

• Is there someone at work who encourages my development?<br />

• At work, do my opinions seem to count?<br />

• Does the mission/purpose of my company make me feel like my work is<br />

important?<br />

• Are my co-workers committed to quality work?<br />

• Do I have a best friend at work?<br />

• In the last six months, have I talked with someone about my progress?<br />

• At work, have I had opportunities to learn and grow?<br />

From: First, Break all the Rules. What the World’s Greatest Managers Do Differently, Buckingham and<br />

Coffman, 1999<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

126


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Oregon <strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

Things a Manager Needs to Know<br />

About:<br />

1. <strong>Employee</strong>s want recognition from their<br />

supervisor more than anything else<br />

2. Most recognition “programs” fail<br />

3. Give personal recognition once a week<br />

4. Customize it, based on what they like<br />

5. Know the state policy on recognition<br />

6. Say specifically what they did and how it<br />

supported the mission, results, goals<br />

7. Give material recognition; it lasts<br />

8. With “programs,” customized recognition works<br />

best<br />

9. “Programs” should be sunsetted (6 mos.)<br />

10. It’s as simple as saying, “Good job!”<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

127


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Never let good work go unnoticed …<br />

Customized Recognition<br />

We all have different preferences for what we like as “recognition” for our good work<br />

performance. Some of us prefer public accolades and others prefer a private “thank you.”<br />

We really vary considerably in our differences. Recognition needs to be customized to the<br />

individual for it to achieve the best results.<br />

Research has shown that recognition and attention from the manager is the number one<br />

thing that employees list as preferred recognition.<br />

Here is a way to customize recognition for each employee:<br />

Recognition Postcards<br />

1. In a meeting with each of your team members, bring up the subject of employee<br />

recognition. Let them know your values around making sure people who perform well<br />

get recognized.<br />

2. Explain that everyone is different about what kinds of recognition they prefer. Explain<br />

that you are going to ask them to let you know what kinds of recognition they prefer.<br />

3. On an index card, ask them to list what kinds of recognition really feels good to them.<br />

Ask them to list their ideas for three levels of recognition: 1) Big Stuff, 2) Medium Stuff<br />

and 3) Small Stuff.<br />

4. Help them with the choices. This can vary significantly by agency. Putting together a<br />

sheet of possibilities would be a good start. Sometimes it is hard to come up with ideas.<br />

5. This could be done as a group activity.<br />

6. Just bringing up the subject of recognition and talking about it with staff can be a huge<br />

positive with staff. It sends a great message.<br />

The recognition postcard is kept in the employee’s drop file. When you decide recognition is<br />

in order, you have it right there as a reminder of the best way to recognize that person. No<br />

more guessing!<br />

128


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Key Steps:<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Never let good work go unnoticed …<br />

The Power of Encouragement<br />

1. Look for opportunities for sincere praise.<br />

2. Catch people doing things right.<br />

3. Keep encouragement “pure”.<br />

4. Focus on specific information.<br />

5. Be a compliment messenger.<br />

6. Praise in multiple directions.<br />

Key Thoughts:<br />

• An environment rich in recognition makes dealing with conflict easier.<br />

• Praising good work increases the likelihood of it being repeated.<br />

• Don’t mix praise and correction.<br />

• Feed the rumor mill with good stories.<br />

• Praise upwards, downwards and laterally. The whole organization benefits.<br />

Adapted from training materials from Glaser and Associates 1998<br />

129


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

“The power<br />

of praise and<br />

encouragement<br />

is vast."<br />

Jon-Luc<br />

Intergalactic Traveler<br />

<strong>20</strong>10<br />

130


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Section 10:<br />

Individual<br />

Development Plans<br />

(IDP)<br />

Your plan for future success.<br />

131


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

132


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

DAS Management Development Series<br />

Management Practices<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Inventory<br />

Taking Stock and Looking Ahead …<br />

This is a self-evaluation of some important management practices.<br />

You are asked to assess your present skill level in several categories.<br />

Think about other managers you interact with. What level of skill do they<br />

display in these areas? Use them as a guide to rank yourself.<br />

The purpose of this inventory is to locate areas where your present skill<br />

level is significantly lower than it should be for a manager. This<br />

information will be an important resource in developing your MDP, the<br />

Management Development Plan. It will help focus your development<br />

efforts on the places that will get you the best results.<br />

Here are the ranking criteria:<br />

1 – Very little or not at all<br />

2 – Some experience<br />

3 – I am at an adequate level in this area<br />

4 – Above average skills<br />

5 – I have excellent skills in this area<br />

133


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Communication<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Management Competencies Inventory<br />

1. Displays effective written and verbal communication skills. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

2. Communicates effectively within their organization. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

3. Keeps management appropriately informed. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

4. Understands own and other’s communication styles. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

Collaboration<br />

5. Collaborates and negotiates effectively with others. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

6. Works effectively with internal and external organizations. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

7. Maintains effective labor/management relations. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

8 Manages and resolves conflict effectively. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

9. Facilitates meetings and work groups effectively. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

Organizational/Business Practices<br />

10. Manages risk appropriately (safety, financial, HR). 1 2 3 4 5<br />

11. Understands and applies budgeting and cost control principles. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

12. Understands and applies legal context of supervision. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

13. Understands and correctly applies organizational policies. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

14. Makes practical use of performance measurement. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

15. Understands structure and systems of state government. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

16. Effectively uses available resources to find answers. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

17. Continuously improves team and business processes. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

18. Makes effective use of information technologies. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

134


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Performance Management<br />

19. Appropriately applies HR policies and processes. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

<strong>20</strong>. Develops staff and self to full potential. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

21. Monitors, coaches, supports and rewards performance. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

22. Builds and maintains team and commitment to goals. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

23. Fosters a climate where diversity is valued and utilized. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

24. Applies disciplinary policies consistently and fairly. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

Leadership<br />

25. Role models mission, ethics and values. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

26. Delegates work and authority appropriately. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

27. Applies strategic thinking/planning and anticipates issues. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

28. Effectively manages change. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

29. Understands and adapts leadership style to situation. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

30. Effectively transitions from peer to manager role 1 2 3 4 5<br />

Accomplishment Orientation<br />

31. Applies problem solving and makes sound decisions. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

32. Determines customer needs and resolves issues. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

33. Manages time and projects effectively and efficiently. 1 2 3 4 5<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

135


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

STEP 1 – PRIORITIZE<br />

DEVELOPMENTAL AREAS<br />

Review the results of your Management Practices Inventory selfassessment.<br />

What are your greatest strengths as a manager?<br />

What are the knowledge or skill areas that you would like to<br />

prioritize for development?<br />

1. Management Strengths:<br />

_____________________________________________<br />

_____________________________________________<br />

_____________________________________________<br />

2. Priority Areas for Development:<br />

_____________________________________________<br />

_____________________________________________<br />

_____________________________________________<br />

136


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

WHY IDP?<br />

It promotes<br />

the growth and success<br />

of all staff and managers.<br />

“As a manager, you are responsible for ensuring that employees receive all<br />

necessary training to do their jobs. This includes developing or updating a<br />

written training plan for each employee each year. Sometimes agencies lack<br />

sufficient funds to send their employees to training. There are many resources<br />

within the state system to help your agency find affordable training for your staff.<br />

Your agency training or human resource (HR) office will be able to assist you in<br />

this area.”<br />

DAS <strong>State</strong> Management Handbook<br />

Also, it’s policy . . .<br />

<strong>State</strong> of Oregon, Department of Administrative Services, policy 50.035.01, Performance<br />

Management Process requires an “individual employee development plan” for every<br />

employee.<br />

137


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Development -<br />

A Collaborative Process<br />

When managers offer: <strong>Employee</strong>s give:<br />

Goals<br />

Measurement<br />

Feedback<br />

Coaching<br />

Recognition<br />

Goals<br />

Measurement<br />

No Feedback<br />

No Coaching<br />

No Recognition<br />

No Goals<br />

No Measurement<br />

No Feedback<br />

No Coaching<br />

No Recognition<br />

Source: Martin-Richard Group<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

100%<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

138


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

STEP 2 – CHOOSE<br />

AVENUES OF DEVELOPMENT<br />

For each of the priority areas you identified, list ways<br />

that you could develop yourself. Suggestions: on-thejob<br />

training, class(es), cross-training, job rotation,<br />

committee work, self-study, mentorship, etc.)<br />

__________________________________________________________<br />

__________________________________________________________<br />

__________________________________________________________<br />

__________________________________________________________<br />

__________________________________________________________<br />

__________________________________________________________<br />

__________________________________________________________<br />

__________________________________________________________<br />

__________________________________________________________<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

139


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

S.M.A.R.T. GOALS<br />

Pick up a pen and a piece of paper and jot down the goals you want to reach. Look at each<br />

goal and evaluate it. Make any changes necessary to ensure it meets the criteria for SMART<br />

goals:<br />

S = Specific<br />

M = Measurable<br />

A = Attainable<br />

R = Realistic<br />

T = Timely<br />

Specific<br />

Goals should be straightforward and emphasize what you want to happen. Specifics help<br />

us to focus our efforts and clearly define what we are going to do.<br />

Specific is the What, Why, and How of the SMART model.<br />

WHAT are you going to do? Use action words such as direct, organize, coordinate, lead,<br />

develop, plan, build etc.<br />

WHY is this important to do at this time? What do you want to ultimately accomplish?<br />

HOW are you going to do it? (By...)<br />

Ensure the goals you set are very specific, clear and easy. Instead of setting a goal to<br />

lose weight or be healthier, set a specific goal to lose 2cm off your waistline or to walk 5 miles<br />

at an aerobically challenging pace.<br />

Measurable<br />

If you can't measure it, you can't manage it. In the broadest sense, the whole goal<br />

statement is a measure for the project; if the goal is accomplished, then it is a success.<br />

However, there are usually several short-term or small measurements that can be built into<br />

the goal.<br />

Choose a goal with measurable progress, so you can see the change occur. How will<br />

you see when you reach your goal? Be specific! "I want to read 3 chapter books of 100 pages<br />

on my own before my birthday" shows the specific target to be measure. "I want to be a good<br />

reader" is not as measurable.<br />

Establish concrete criteria for measuring progress toward the attainment of each goal<br />

you set. When you measure your progress, you stay on track, reach your target dates, and<br />

experience the exhilaration of achievement that spurs you on to continued effort required to<br />

reach your goals.<br />

140


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Attainable<br />

When you identify goals that are most important to you, you begin to figure out ways you<br />

can make them come true. You develop that attitudes, abilities, skills, and financial capacity<br />

to reach them. Your begin seeing previously overlooked opportunities to bring yourself<br />

closer to the achievement of your goals.<br />

Goals you set which are too far out of your reach, you probably won't commit to doing.<br />

Although you may start with the best of intentions, the knowledge that it's too much for you<br />

means your subconscious will keep reminding you of this fact and will stop you from even<br />

giving it your best.<br />

A goal needs to stretch you slightly so you feel you can do it and it will need a real<br />

commitment from you. For instance, if you aim to lose <strong>20</strong>lbs in one week, we all know that<br />

isn't achievable. But setting a goal to loose 1lb and when you've achieved that, aiming to lose<br />

a further 1lb, will keep it achievable for you.<br />

The feeling of success which this brings helps you to remain motivated.<br />

Realistic<br />

This is not a synonym for "easy." Realistic, in this case, means "do-able." It means<br />

that the learning curve is not a vertical slope; that the skills needed to do the work are<br />

available; that the project fits with the overall strategy and goals of the organization. A<br />

realistic project may push the skills and knowledge of the people working on it but it shouldn't<br />

break them.<br />

Devise a plan or a way of getting there which makes the goal realistic. The goal needs to<br />

be realistic for you and where you are at the moment. A goal of never again eating sweets,<br />

cakes, crisps and chocolate may not be realistic for someone who really enjoys these foods.<br />

For instance, it may be more realistic to set a goal of eating a piece of fruit each day<br />

instead of one sweet item. You can then choose to work towards reducing the amount of<br />

sweet products gradually as and when this feels realistic for you.<br />

Be sure to set goals that you can attain with some effort! Too difficult and you set the<br />

stage for failure, but too low sends the message that you aren't very capable. Set the bar<br />

high enough for a satisfying achievement!<br />

Timely<br />

Set a timeframe for the goal: for next week, in three months, by fifth grade. Putting an end<br />

point on your goal gives you a clear target to work towards.<br />

If you don't set a time, the commitment is too vague. It tends not to happen because you<br />

feel you can start at any time. Without a time limit, there's no urgency to start taking action<br />

now.<br />

Time must be measurable, attainable and realistic.<br />

141


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

GOT GOAL PROBLEMS?<br />

Review each statement and do a self-evaluation:<br />

Selecting and Defining Goals:<br />

1. You established too many goals.<br />

2. Your expectations are defined in vague or immeasurable terms.<br />

3. Your target dates are set too far in the future.<br />

4. Accountability is not clearly assigned for results.<br />

5. The recipient’s view of the goals does not match your view of the goals.<br />

Negotiating Expectations:<br />

1. When your staff insists, “it can’t be done,” you ease the goals or give<br />

them more time.<br />

2. You accept goal trade-offs. (“Sure, boss, I can accomplish goal A, but<br />

you’ll have to forget about goal B.”).<br />

3. You accept vague agreement. (“Sure, boss, I’ll give it a try.”).<br />

4. You signal that the goal should be achieved “if possible” (versus saying<br />

“it must be achieved”).<br />

5. You are offering inducements to get people to do what they should be<br />

doing anyhow.<br />

Making Sure Goals are actually achieved:<br />

1. You don’t insist on written work plans that state how people will achieve<br />

their goals.<br />

2. You do not review progress regularly. Mainly you do it when you get<br />

near the deadline or when you feel something is going wrong.<br />

3. Your people don’t really believe that there are significant consequences<br />

for success or failure.<br />

4. You do not forcefully confront people when projects go astray.<br />

142


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

GOAL #1:<br />

Area of Development:<br />

Measure of Success to Achieve Goal:<br />

Development Strategy<br />

Training/College Courses<br />

Job Rotation<br />

Mentoring<br />

Coaching<br />

Self-Directed Learning<br />

Conferences<br />

Special Task Force/Project<br />

Degree/Certification Program<br />

<strong>Information</strong>al Interviews<br />

Professional Associations<br />

Job Shadowing/Site Visits<br />

Other<br />

GOAL #2:<br />

Area of Development:<br />

Measure of Success to Achieve Goal:<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Step 4 - WRITE YOUR IDP<br />

Description<br />

(list course, identify mentor, describe opportunity etc.)<br />

143


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Development Strategy<br />

Training/College Courses<br />

Job Rotation<br />

Mentoring<br />

Coaching<br />

Self-Directed Learning<br />

Conferences<br />

Special Task Force/Project<br />

Degree/Certification Program<br />

<strong>Information</strong>al Interviews<br />

Professional Associations<br />

Job Shadowing/Site Visits<br />

Other<br />

GOAL #3:<br />

Area of Development:<br />

Measure of Success to Achieve Goal:<br />

Development Strategy<br />

Training/College Courses<br />

Job Rotation<br />

Mentoring<br />

Coaching<br />

Self-Directed Learning<br />

Conferences<br />

Special Task Force/Project<br />

Degree/Certification Program<br />

<strong>Information</strong>al Interviews<br />

Professional Associations<br />

Job Shadowing/Site Visits<br />

Other<br />

2 to 5 Year career goal:<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Description<br />

(list course, identify mentor, describe opportunity etc.)<br />

Description<br />

(list course, identify mentor, describe opportunity etc.)<br />

<strong>Employee</strong> Signature __________________________________ Date ________________<br />

Supervisor Signature __________________________________ Date ________________<br />

144


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

On the Web<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

RESOURCES FOR<br />

MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT<br />

• Department web sites - Visit your internal training web site if your<br />

department has one. These sites list department-sponsored training and<br />

links to external training/development opportunities for managers.<br />

• DAS <strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services web site – The DAS<br />

web site is growing all the time. Future plans include extensive links to<br />

resources in staff development, management development, performance<br />

management, and more: http://www.dashr.state.or.us/<br />

• BOLI (<strong>State</strong> Bureau of Labor and Industries) – BOLI offers many excellent<br />

seminars, and can provide them on-site at low cost:<br />

http://www.boli/technical/taseminar.html<br />

• Internet search words – “management, leadership, ASTD (American<br />

Society for Training and Development), ISPI (International Society for<br />

Performance Improvement), management competencies,” etc.<br />

• Higher education – Don’t forget to research web sites for institutions of<br />

higher education, such as universities, for your local community college, etc.<br />

In Person<br />

• Department training sections – Your agency’s training people will have<br />

information about how to access resources for management and leadership<br />

development, such as Leadership Oregon, Pacific Program, Certificate of<br />

Public Management, and programs offered through external sources.<br />

145


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

146


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Day 3<br />

147


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

148


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Section 11:<br />

Coaching Skills for<br />

Managers<br />

149


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

150


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

“Never assume that your team is self<br />

motivated.”<br />

Coaching is selling the idea of<br />

working hard.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

151


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Never let good work go unnoticed.<br />

8 When you see it, say it.<br />

8 Be specific in your praise.<br />

Never let poor work go unnoticed.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Video Guide: The Practical Coach<br />

Coaching Performance<br />

8 Make it private and make it positive. Show that you care.<br />

8 Let the learner choose their own path, if possible.<br />

8 Make sure you’re in a positive frame of mind.<br />

8 Ask good questions, but if they don’t have an answer, suggest practical help.<br />

When things get personal. (IE. body odor, personal habits)<br />

8 Prepare the team member.<br />

8 Don’t beat around the bush – be gentle but direct.<br />

8 Beware of defensive sidetracks.<br />

The Two-Minute Challenge (Conversation): When an employee is on a dead-end<br />

road, follow these steps. Don’t skip ANY of the steps:<br />

1. <strong>State</strong> what you observed – no judgments, no opinions. Only the facts of what you’ve<br />

observed.<br />

2. Wait for a response.<br />

3. Remind them of the goal/standard and the impact of their behavior.<br />

4. Ask them for a specific solution.<br />

5. Agree together on the solution.<br />

6. Document your discussion.<br />

7. Follow up – never let good (or poor) work go unnoticed.<br />

Coaching =<br />

Letting people know<br />

that what they do<br />

matters to you.<br />

Source: The Practical Coach: Encouraging, Correcting and Challenging Your Team (Video). Media Partners<br />

Corporation, 1997<br />

152


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

♦ Make it private.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Never Let Poor Work Go Unnoticed …<br />

The Two-Minute Challenge<br />

Tips for a Successful Conversation<br />

♦ Speak with honesty, integrity and good intent.<br />

♦ Use “I” statements to describe behavior (“I’ve noticed that …” “I’ve observed<br />

over the last few weeks that …”).<br />

♦ Use the word “sometimes” because no behavior is “always” or “never.”<br />

♦ Provide specific examples; be sure you have documentation of the behavior<br />

(when, what, how often, specific instances, etc.).<br />

♦ Try to address only ONE problem at a time.<br />

♦ Use good body language to help keep the tension down.<br />

♦ Prepare for their “worst case” responses so you don’t get sidetracked. How<br />

will you respond? What will you do to keep on track?<br />

♦ Be cautious if you suspect a mental health issue. Seek assistance from your<br />

Human Resources Office (HR) or <strong>Employee</strong> Assistance Program (EAP).<br />

♦ Keep your manager advised of your coaching, as needed.<br />

♦ _______________________________________________________<br />

♦ _______________________________________________________<br />

♦ _______________________________________________________<br />

♦ _______________________________________________________<br />

153


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Definitions:<br />

Coaching: A directive process conducted by a manager to<br />

train and orient an employee to the realities of the workplace and to<br />

help the employee remove barriers to optimum work performance.<br />

• Coaching deals with raising the performance bar.<br />

• Coaching is task-centered, linking individual effectiveness to<br />

organizational performance.<br />

Counseling: A supportive process conducted by a manager<br />

to help an employee define and work through personal problems or<br />

organizational changes that affect job performance.<br />

Mentoring: A supportive process that deals with<br />

organizational, career or personal transitions. It is possibilitycentered<br />

and focuses on options and exploration<br />

154


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Levels of Coaching:<br />

Level One: To improve substandard performance.<br />

The manager should use a directive approach to set standards and<br />

review expectations if an employee does not know what to do or how<br />

to perform a particular task to standard.<br />

Level Two: To maintain standard performance.<br />

The manager uses a variety of reinforcement and reward strategies to<br />

keep employees interested / satisfied enough to come to work, as well<br />

as meet most of the demands and standards of the job.<br />

Level Three: Developmental coaching to exceed<br />

performance and develop new skill sets.<br />

The manager or team leader assesses the employee’s development<br />

needs and provides customized opportunities both on and off the job<br />

to those who are already meeting job expectations.<br />

155


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Work Situations That May Require Coaching<br />

1. Orientation of new employee.<br />

2. Teaching a new job skill.<br />

3. <strong>Employee</strong> not meeting commitments.<br />

4. <strong>Employee</strong> production is low.<br />

5. Interpersonal problems with peers.<br />

6. Interpersonal problems with customers.<br />

7. <strong>Employee</strong> needs help setting priorities.<br />

8. <strong>Employee</strong> exercising poor judgment.<br />

9. <strong>Employee</strong> needs reinforcement of good performance.<br />

10. <strong>Employee</strong> wants to become peak performer.<br />

11. <strong>Employee</strong> preparing for challenging work assignment.<br />

12. <strong>Employee</strong> not meeting deadlines.<br />

13. <strong>Employee</strong> is disruptive.<br />

14. <strong>Employee</strong> not contributing to team cohesion.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

156


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Coaching Pitfalls to Avoid<br />

1. Manager does not yet understand what the real problem is.<br />

2. Manager is unclear about what he/she expects.<br />

3. Manager does not have documentation as back-up.<br />

4. Manager exhibits personal bias toward employee or problem.<br />

5. Manager is inflexible about possible solutions.<br />

6. Manager loses control due to employee’s hostile reaction.<br />

7. Manager becomes defensive and hostile when questioned.<br />

8. Manager does not solicit the employee’s suggestions.<br />

9. Manager does not listen to the employee’s view.<br />

10. Manager fails to document ongoing performance problems.<br />

11. Manager fails to hold the employee accountable.<br />

12. Manager fails to reinforce improved performance.<br />

157


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Successful Coaching Session<br />

1. Put the employee at ease by being warm and friendly.<br />

2. Let them know the reason for the discussion.<br />

3. Describe the performance problem or area that needs improvement.<br />

4. Describe the impact of the problem on you, the employee, the unit, and<br />

the agency.<br />

5. Seek the employee’s opinion on ways to improve.<br />

6. Ask open-ended questions to draw out the employees ideas.<br />

7. Let them know you respect their ability to solve problems and develop<br />

solutions.<br />

8. Offer suggestions where appropriate and build on the employee’s ideas<br />

when possible.<br />

9. Agree on appropriate actions.<br />

10. Schedule a follow-up meeting for further feedback.<br />

158


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

One-Month Coaching Check up<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

How are you doing?<br />

1. Do my team members feel free to ask me questions when they don’t<br />

understand something?<br />

2. Does each of my team members know exactly what I expect of them in their<br />

daily tasks to be successful?<br />

3. Have I noticed great work in each of my team members in some way<br />

today?<br />

4. Have I clearly communicated my vision of success to my team? Do they<br />

see it posted anywhere in the workplace?<br />

5. Do I have a difficult time challenging or offering feedback to team members<br />

positively without put-downs or criticism?<br />

6. Have I jumped in too quickly to challenge someone before checking my<br />

attitude?<br />

7. Do I set aside one-on-one time with my team members on a regular basis.<br />

8. Have I been using the Two Minute Challenge with my team members?<br />

9. Have I created small wins for my team?<br />

159


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Personal Habits (Body Odor….)<br />

“There are times when<br />

___________________<br />

is too<br />

___________________<br />

for some of our<br />

___________________.”<br />

(Fill in the blanks)<br />

160


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Facts and Impacts<br />

An <strong>Employee</strong> Issue From Back at Work:<br />

Think about your management situation back at work. Focus<br />

in on a performance management issue you need to do<br />

something about. If you are not currently supervising, use<br />

your current or a former work situation and pick an issue from<br />

there.<br />

1. Describe the facts of the situation:<br />

2. Describe the impacts of this performance issue: (To your<br />

team, productivity, morale, your mental health etc.)<br />

161


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Never Let Poor Work Go Unnoticed …<br />

The Two-Minute Challenge<br />

Script for YOUR Conversation<br />

When an employee is on a dead-end road, follow these steps. Don’t skip ANY of the<br />

steps. Now let’s script out YOUR two-minute challenge:<br />

1. <strong>State</strong> what you observed – no judgments, no opinions. Do not “set up” the employee.<br />

Only the facts of what you’ve observed. “I’ve observed that …” Keep this short and to the<br />

point.<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

2. Wait for a response – and LISTEN. Give them a chance to respond. What might they<br />

say? How might they respond? Prepare for it! “So, why is this happening?”<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

3. Remind them of the goal or standard and the impact of their behavior. Try to help them<br />

understand the significance of the problem.<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

4. Ask them for a specific solution. If the employee is involved in developing solutions, they<br />

will be more willing to actually implement the solution. “What do you think we can do to<br />

change this?”<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

162


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

5. Agree together on the solution. Be sure your ideas are included, too.<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

6. Document your discussion. Remember, if you don’t document it, then it never happened.<br />

“Let’s write these ideas down …”<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

7. Follow up – never let good (or poor) work go unnoticed. Be sure to set a meeting<br />

date/time to follow-up together and check on progress.<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

Source: The Practical Coach: Encouraging, Correcting and Challenging Your Team (Video). Media Partners<br />

Corporation, 1997<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Beware of “side tracks” !!!<br />

They are just attempts to “hijack” the conversation and change<br />

the subject. You “bite” = You lose.<br />

163


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

PSI Feedback<br />

P … ositive: Do this first. Describe all of the positive things<br />

you saw the employee do. (No BUTS!)<br />

S … elf Evaluation: The employee evaluates how well they<br />

did starting with the positive and then moving to the areas that<br />

they need to improve in.<br />

I … mprovement: After listening to the employee’s selfevaluation,<br />

describe further improvement the employee could<br />

make, but is not aware of.<br />

Why is this a better feedback method?<br />

1. It starts with the positive only. When people are receiving feedback, they<br />

are vulnerable and need support. After hearing that they have done at<br />

least some things right, they are in a better place to hear where they need<br />

to improve.<br />

2. It has the employee self-assess their performance. They need to develop<br />

this skill. The manager listens to hear how well they can evaluate their<br />

own performance.<br />

3. In the self evaluation step, the employee states areas that need<br />

improvement. If they say it here, you just need to concur in the next step.<br />

Knowing that the employee is now self-aware of the problem is a major<br />

step forward.<br />

4. In the improvement step, bring up any improvement areas the employee<br />

missed. Frequently, the employee has covered all improvement areas in<br />

the previous step.<br />

5. Then the next step is to ask the employee for their ideas or suggestions<br />

for further improvement.<br />

164


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Performance Management:<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Prevention Strategies<br />

• Effective Selection Process<br />

• Comprehensive Orientation<br />

• Documentation of Performance<br />

• Necessary Training<br />

• Accurate Job Descriptions<br />

• Mutually Agreed upon Goals<br />

• Situational Leadership<br />

• Regular Feedback and Dialogue<br />

• Incentives and Consequences<br />

• Encouragement and Reinforcement<br />

• Continuous Performance Appraisal System<br />

Management that Cares!<br />

165


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Performance Management:<br />

1. Intensive Coaching<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Intervention Strategies<br />

2. Providing Remedial Training<br />

3. Counseling and Dialogue<br />

4. Work Flow Analysis<br />

5. Work Environment Analysis<br />

6. <strong>Employee</strong> Assistance Program<br />

7. Work Planning<br />

8. Progressive Discipline<br />

9. Flexible Leadership<br />

10. Consulting with HRD<br />

11. Performance Goals Mutually Agreed to<br />

12. Rewritten Job Descriptions<br />

13. Cast a Wider Net for Performance Feedback (360 degrees)<br />

14. Change the Manager<br />

166


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Section 12:<br />

Transitioning from<br />

Peer to Manager<br />

It’s a swamp out there.<br />

167


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

168


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

“Professional Island”<br />

On Professional Island,<br />

you are safe, respected and comfortable.<br />

You are an expert at what you do, and<br />

other people recognize that.<br />

You are responsible for you own work, and<br />

have a lot of control over<br />

your own world.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

169


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

THE SWAMP!<br />

Alligators!<br />

Snakes!<br />

The “swamp” is a metaphor for your journey between Professional<br />

Island and Manager Island. Just when you thought you were<br />

swimming well, you discover that there are alligators all around<br />

you. The alligators are things such as self doubt, inexperience<br />

and pride. Now what? You can stay here<br />

in the swamp with the alligators, but<br />

if you do, what might<br />

happen?<br />

Many<br />

managers<br />

never make<br />

it out of the swamp. They get<br />

stuck halfway between their old role of a technical / professional and their<br />

new role of manager. They can’t decide which one they are. They sink<br />

deeper and deeper into the muck and eventually get eaten by the alligators.<br />

Others get scared and swim straight back to Professional Island. So, what<br />

do you need to know and do to avoid this fate? The best decision is to<br />

make a 100% commitment to your new career choice as a manager. You<br />

should swim straight to Manager Island and focus all of your energies on<br />

learning how to be a great manager.<br />

170


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

“Manager Island”<br />

You made it!<br />

It is now time to focus on becoming a great<br />

manager.<br />

171


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Transitional Issues for Managers<br />

Internal Promotions<br />

There are a unique set of issues and problems that arise when an employee is promoted and<br />

now will be supervising staff who are their former peers. Some of these transitions can be<br />

fairly tough. Relationships are changing and that is never easy. Just because you now have<br />

the title of “manager” does not mean you are automatically respected. How this transition is<br />

handled is critically important for the success of the manager involved.<br />

Many organizations have policies discouraging promoting team members into situations<br />

where they are now managing former peers. This is universally recognized as a difficult<br />

situation. With the unique types of jobs we have in public employment (sometimes the only<br />

employer in specific areas), we do not have the option to not do it. We would be severely<br />

limiting career paths, in addition to eliminating management candidates with special<br />

backgrounds that are not easy to recruit.<br />

The Issues<br />

We have been researching and talking to managers about what they see as the most<br />

problematic areas surrounding this issue. Here’s a summary of what they report:<br />

1. Respect Issues<br />

This area is characterized as “not being taken seriously as the manager.” You can<br />

attempt to demand respect, but that usually will cause a whole new set of problems.<br />

This issue can range in impact from blatant to subtle and can be extremely disconcerting<br />

to a new manager. Having your every decision challenged and having to defend<br />

yourself all the time is draining. How does a new manager deal with staff not treating<br />

them respectfully?<br />

2. Relationship issues with upper management.<br />

There are several problems that occur here. Upper management is used to seeing you<br />

in your former role and may continue to treat you as if you were still in that role. They<br />

may expect that you will continue to provide the same services. You can end up having<br />

your workload include both the new and old jobs. How does a new manager redefine<br />

the relationship with upper management?<br />

A second issue occurs when unhappy staff decide to go around you and complain about<br />

your decisions to your manager. If your upper management encourages this behavior<br />

by getting involved, it can make managing a difficult proposition. What should a new<br />

manager do when this happens?<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

172


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

3. Relationship issues with peers who are “friends.”<br />

Who thought having friends could be a problem? It can be. The other employees tend<br />

to assume your friends will now become your favorites and get special treatment. Your<br />

friends may expect special treatment or may be confused about how to work with you.<br />

How should a manager deal with their friendships now that they manage these friends?<br />

4. Incomplete Transitions<br />

Sometime you can get stuck in between two jobs. This is a fairly common occurrence.<br />

You were likely promoted because you were highly competent and you handled some of<br />

the difficult technical areas with ease. There may be a vacuum created with your<br />

promotion and no one trained to take your place. Many managers continue to do those<br />

duties, even though they are no longer in the position. This can cause all sorts of<br />

problems. How should a new manager deal with the duties of their former position?<br />

5. Boundary Issues<br />

What are the rules? Everything has changed and everyone is affected. How do you<br />

smoothly move from the “old rules” to new ones?<br />

6. “Silver Medalist” issues<br />

Sometimes other team members competed for the managerial position which you were<br />

promoted into. This is a really difficult situation for the both of you. The other person<br />

feels bad and you feel bad for them. Sometimes there is anger and resentment. How<br />

does everyone get through this successfully?<br />

7. Performance Management Issues<br />

This is where the “rubber meets the road.” The first time you confront a performance<br />

issue with a former peer you both truly feel the impact of your new role. What is the best<br />

way to handle this?<br />

8. Trust Issues<br />

As peers, there were things you could share with each other that are just no longer<br />

appropriate. You know things about staff because you were recently a member of the<br />

team. They will have concerns about how you will use the information. They know<br />

things about you that will cause you concern. What is the best approach to these<br />

situations?<br />

All of these issues involve changing relationships. Skillfully transitioning those relationships<br />

is the key to getting through the “swamp” and back onto “dry land.”<br />

Which of these issues is a pressing one for you? Look through them and pick several that<br />

are of interest to you. We are going to form some discussion groups around those issues<br />

which are of interest to class members.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

173


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Best Thinking on<br />

Peer-to-Manager Issues<br />

1. Be patient - Transitions are seldom a quick process. Things take time.<br />

2. Be a manager - Be the best manager you can be. There is no better<br />

strategy than showing up every day and doing your best to be a great<br />

manager. You will earn people’s respect. It may take time, but you will<br />

get there.<br />

3. Be caring - Take the “silver medalists” (peers who applied but didn’t get<br />

the job) to lunch. They are usually important team members with<br />

important skills. Let them know that if they had finished first, you would<br />

have supported them 100 percent. Let them know that you value their<br />

contributions. And last, but not least, let them know that you understand<br />

it is not easy to not get a job. You are communicating that you care<br />

about them as a person. Resist the urge to not talk about it and hope it<br />

goes away.<br />

4. Be assertive - Sit down on a regular basis with upper management and let<br />

them know how it is really going. Let them know what you need. That is<br />

something managers respect in each other.<br />

5. Be committed - Becoming a manager is usually a complete career<br />

change. Make a full commitment to your new career. Consciously leave<br />

your old one behind. Work with your staff to develop the skills to replace<br />

yours in your old job right away. Your moving up should be seen by<br />

other staff as an opportunity for staff to gain the skills that come with<br />

your old job. They see it as a career opportunity.<br />

6. Be strategic - If you have a group of staff who are giving you problems,<br />

don’t try to take them on all at the same time. They out number you!<br />

Meet with them individually and you’ll be in a much stronger position.<br />

7. Be courageous - When staff act in unacceptable ways, do not engage<br />

in “ostrich” management and hope it will go away on its own. If<br />

somebody takes a shot at you in a meeting, ask to meet with them<br />

privately and let them know it was inappropriate.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

174


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

8. Be a communicator - Don’t keep staff guessing. If you want to make<br />

changes, get the new information and process out there, involve staff<br />

and then make the change. If you don’t, they will assume you are not<br />

making any changes and will default to the old rules or they’ll try to fill in<br />

the blanks, potentially causing more problems.<br />

9. Be urgent - The first 90 days are your “honeymoon” period. Do not<br />

waste them. Staff expects some change because you are the new<br />

manager. Later, changes will be more difficult.<br />

10. Be willing to accept help - Find yourself a mentor who has been<br />

through the transition. Call them and talk about what you are<br />

experiencing. Let them help you figure it out. Don’t try to go it alone.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

175


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

176


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Section 13:<br />

Problem Solving and<br />

Decision Making<br />

“We cannot solve problems<br />

with the level of thinking<br />

that was used to create them.”<br />

Albert Einstein<br />

177


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

178


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

What We Wanted To Do<br />

A Story of Problem-Solving Solutions<br />

What we wanted to do was spill boiling oil onto the heads of our enemies as they attempted<br />

to bang down the gates of our village, but, as everyone now knows, we had some problems,<br />

primarily technical problems, that prevented us from doing what we wanted to do the way we<br />

had hoped to do it. What we’re asking for today is another chance.<br />

From its inception I have been intimately involved in the boiling-oil project-research,<br />

development, physical deployment. I also happened to be team leader on the roof last month<br />

when we had occasion to try the system during the Visigoth attack, about which so much has<br />

been written.<br />

First, the very concept of oil on the roof upset many of our villagers. Granted, it is exotic, but<br />

all great ideas seem strange at first. When our re-searchers realized we could position a<br />

cauldron two hundred feet directly above our main portals, they began to see the possibilities<br />

of the greatest strategic defense system in the history of mankind.<br />

I want to emphasize that we were committed to this program-and we remain committed. But<br />

at every turn we’ve met problems that our researchers could not-despite their intelligence and<br />

intuition-have foreseen. For instance: how were we to get a 1,900-pound brass cauldron<br />

onto the roof? In the end, the cauldron was raised to the roof by means of a customdesigned<br />

net and petard under less than ideal conditions: the Retrogoths and the Niligoths<br />

plundered our village almost incessantly during the cauldron’s four-month ascent.<br />

The cauldron’s arrival on the roof was quite a moment. I remember it well. We stood by that<br />

gleaming symbol of our impending safety, a bright brass (and a few lesser metals) beacon to<br />

the world that we were not going to take it anymore. The wind carried up to us the cries of<br />

villagers being carried away by either the Maxigoths or the Minigoths, it was hard to tell. But<br />

there we stood, and as I felt the wind in my hair and watched the sporadic procession of<br />

home furnishings being carried out of our violated gates, I knew we were perched on the<br />

edge of a new epoch.<br />

Well, there was some excitement; we began at once. We started a fire under the cauldron<br />

and knew we would all soon be safe. At that point I made a mistake, which I now readily<br />

admit. In the utter ebullience of the moment I called down-I did not “scream maniacally,” as<br />

was reported-I called down that it would not be long, and I probably shouldn’t have, because<br />

it may have led some of our citizenry to lower their guard. It was a mistake. I admit it. There<br />

were, as we<br />

found out almost immediately, still some bugs to be worked out of the program. For instance,<br />

there had never been a fire on top of the entry tower before, and yes, as everyone is aware,<br />

we had to spend more time than we really wanted containing the blaze, fueled as it was by<br />

179


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

the fresh high winds and the tower’s wooden shingles. I hasten to add that the damage was<br />

moderate, as moderate as a four-hour fire could be.<br />

But throughout this relentless series of setbacks, pitfalls, and rooftop fires, there has been a<br />

hard core of us absolutely dedicated to doing what we wanted to do-to splash scalding oil<br />

onto intruders as they pried or battered yet again at our old damaged gates. To us a little fire<br />

on the rooftop was of no consequence, a fribble, a tiny obstacle to be stepped over with an<br />

easy stride. And so the next day, the first quiet day we’d had in this village in months, that<br />

same sooty cadre stood in the warm ashes high above the entry steps and tried again. We<br />

knew-as we know right now-that our enemies are manifold and voracious and generally rude<br />

and persistent, and we wanted to be ready.<br />

But tell me this: where does one find out how soon before an enemy attack to put the oil on to<br />

boil? Does anyone know? Let me assure you, it is not in any book! We were vigilant. We<br />

squinted at the horizon all day long. And when we first saw the dust in the foothills we fired<br />

our cauldron, using wood that had been elevated through the night in woven baskets. Even<br />

speaking about in here today, I can feel the excitement stirring in my heart. The orange<br />

flames licked the sides of the brass container hungrily, as if in concert with our own desperate<br />

desire for security and revenge. In the distance I could see the phalanx of Visigoths<br />

marching toward us like a warship through a sea of dust, and in my soul I pitied them and the<br />

end toward which they so steadfastly hastened. They seemed the very incarnation of<br />

mistake, their dreams of a day abusing our friends and families and of petty larceny and lewd<br />

public behavior about to be extinguished in one gorgeous wash of searing oil! I was beside<br />

myself.<br />

It is important to know now that everyone on the roof that day exhibited orderly and<br />

methodical behavior. There was no wild screaming or cursing or even the kind of sarcastic<br />

chuckling you might expect in those about to enjoy a well-deserved and long-delayed victory.<br />

The problems of the day were not attributable to inappropriate deportment. My staff was<br />

good. It was when the Visigoths had approached closed enough that we could see their cruel<br />

eyes and we could read their savage and misspelled tattoos that I realized our error. At that<br />

time I put my hand on the smooth side of our beautiful cauldron and found in only vaguely<br />

warm. Luke warm. Tepid. We had not known then what we now know: we need to put the<br />

oil on sooner.<br />

It was my decision and my decision alone to do what we did, and that was to pour the warm<br />

oil on our enemies as they milled about the front gates, hammering at it with their truncheons.<br />

Now, this is where my report diverges from so many of the popular accounts. We have heard<br />

it said that the warm oil served as a stimulant to the attack that followed, the attack I alluded<br />

to earlier in which the criminal activity seemed even more animated than usual in the minds<br />

of some of our townspeople. Let me say first: I was an eyewitness. I gave the order to pour<br />

the oil and I witnessed its descent. I am happy and proud to report that the oil hit its target<br />

with an accuracy and completeness I could have only dreamed of. We got them all. There<br />

was oil everywhere. We got them all. There was oil everywhere. We soaked them, we<br />

coated them, we covered them in a lustrous layer of oil.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

180


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Unfortunately, as everyone knows, it was only warm. Their immediate reaction was also<br />

what I had hoped for: surprise and panic. This, however, lasted about one second. Then<br />

several of them looked up into my face and began waving their fists in what I could only take<br />

as a tribute. And then, yes, they did become quite agitated anew, recommencing their<br />

assault on the weary planks of our patchwork gates.<br />

As to the attack that followed: it was no different in magnitude or intensity than any of the<br />

dozens we suffer every year. It may have seemed more odd or extreme, since the<br />

perpetrators were greasy and thereby more offensive, and they did take every stick of<br />

furniture left in the village, including the pews from the church every chair in the great hall,<br />

and four milking stools, the last four, from the dairy.<br />

But I, for one, am simply tired of hearing about the slippery stain on the village steps. Yes,<br />

there is a bit of a mess, and yes, some of it seems to be permanent. My team removed what<br />

they could with salt and talc all this week. All I’ll say now is watch your step as you come and<br />

go; in my mind it’s a small inconvenience to pay for a perfect weapons system.<br />

So we’ve had our trial run. We gathered a lot of data. And you all know we’ll be ready next<br />

time. We are going to get to do what we wanted to do. We will vex and repel our enemies<br />

with boiling oil. In the meantime, who needs furniture! We have a project! We need the<br />

determination not to lose the dream and we need a lot of firewood. They will come again.<br />

You know it and I know it, and let’s simply commit ourselves to making sure that the oil, when<br />

it falls, is very hot.<br />

Source: From a story by Ron Carlson in the Fall 1993 issue of Witness, published by Oakland Community<br />

College, in Farmington Hills, Michigan. Carlson’s story “A Mote on the Type” appeared in the October 1993<br />

issue of Harper’s Magazine.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

181


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

The Problem:<br />

“Long Lines”<br />

Instructions: You will receive a description of the problem that you are to solve using the STP<br />

Problem Solving Method. There is an STP worksheet on the following pages. We will walk<br />

through the worksheet one step at a time and will present a specific tool or give some<br />

background information at each step. This process works best if you do not jump ahead.<br />

“The Problem”<br />

You are the management team at a social services branch office somewhere in the <strong>State</strong> of<br />

Oregon. You are meeting to work on a problem that has gradually been getting worse over<br />

time. It has now reached the point of near crisis. Last week it was nearly out of control.<br />

Each morning clients come to your office. They have come upon hard times in their lives and<br />

are applying for services and benefits that they desperately need. Your office procedure has<br />

been to tell them to come early and get in line. In the past, the lines only got long<br />

occasionally and it was not a big problem.<br />

The branch has chosen to do intake only in the early morning. The workers do their<br />

casework during the rest of the day. The receptionists work fast and get the clients connected<br />

with one of the social workers; the line gradually gets worked down. This system used to<br />

work fine. Lately it appears to be totally broken. The local economy continues to worsen and<br />

there are more needy folks than ever. The lines have gotten longer almost every day.<br />

Sometimes they stretch down the street. Neighboring businesses are complaining about the<br />

noise, trash and behavior of some of the clients.<br />

Because the word is out about the long lines, clients are now arriving at 6:00 AM. After sitting<br />

on cold cement for two hours, they are not in the best of moods. When the office finally<br />

opens its doors in the morning, the line surges forward and those at the end of the line may<br />

wait several hours standing in a line that hardly moves. They are understandably cranky and<br />

take it out on the staff. The staff, in turn, become cranky. This situation is having a very<br />

negative impact on the team atmosphere in the branch.<br />

The people at your table volunteered to work on a problem-solving team to solve the problem<br />

and design a new system to replace the existing one.<br />

As we go through the work of solving this problem, we will be learning and practicing a<br />

problem-solving model called “STP.” We will stop periodically to learn a part of the tool,<br />

which we will then apply to the problem we are working on. We will also stop to review the<br />

responses which each of the problem-solving teams have come up with.<br />

182


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Situation:<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

A Problem Solving Model<br />

STP+<br />

• Gather the facts.<br />

• Clearly describe and write the problem (Current <strong>State</strong>).<br />

• Assess and write the impact (Impact <strong>State</strong>ment).<br />

Target:<br />

• Describe and write the desired end results (Preferred <strong>State</strong>).<br />

• Clearly understand and frame the context and interests involved.<br />

• Analyze the forces involved.<br />

• Determine the root causes of the problem.<br />

• Combine the Current <strong>State</strong>, Impact and Preferred <strong>State</strong> into a single Focus<br />

<strong>State</strong>ment.<br />

Proposal:<br />

• Brainstorm and explore all possible solutions (Mind mapping).<br />

• Consider and assess interests, context and root causes.<br />

• Select the best solution(s).<br />

+ Plan and Implement:<br />

• Assess potential risks.<br />

• Test and adjust solution(s) with stakeholders.<br />

• Write and implement an action plan.<br />

• Evaluate progress regularly.<br />

183


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

A Problem-Solving Model<br />

STP+<br />

Situation<br />

• Gather the facts. What’s going on? Where does it happen? When does it occur?<br />

How often? What do we know about it? What don’t we know?<br />

• Clearly describe and write the problem (Current <strong>State</strong>). (See and use the worksheet<br />

on Problem <strong>State</strong>ment). Don’t list symptoms, causes or solutions. Write a statement,<br />

not a question. Example: The data entry backlog is excessive. (Not: We need another<br />

typist; We need new computers; We need to get rid of Larry.)<br />

• Assess and write the impact (Impact <strong>State</strong>ment). Who or what is affected? How are<br />

they affected? Is it a real problem? What is it costing us?<br />

184


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Target<br />

• Describe and write the desired end results (Preferred <strong>State</strong>). What is it that you<br />

want to happen? What is the goal? What will it look like when it’s solved?<br />

• Clearly understand and frame the context and interests involved. List the<br />

stakeholders and their interests. How will they be affected? What political<br />

considerations are involved?<br />

• Analyze the forces involved (Force Field Analysis). What are the drivers to solving<br />

this problem? What are the restraining forces?<br />

• Determine the root causes of the problem (5 Whys). Look beyond the symptoms.<br />

What is the root cause of this problem? What do we really need to fix to resolve this<br />

problem?<br />

185


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Proposal<br />

• Brainstorm and explore all possible solutions (Mind mapping). Generate as many<br />

solutions at you can. Use brainstorming rules (No judging, etc.).<br />

• Consider and assess interests, context and root cause(s). (PMI) Review all the<br />

possible solutions, addressing the consequences of implementation, begin to prioritize<br />

and select out the potential courses of action.<br />

• Select the best solution(s) (Decision Matrix). Decide on the best solutions to address<br />

the problem. Prioritize and list solutions.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

186


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

+ Plan<br />

• Assess potential risks. Who will be affected by the solution(s)? Are the solutions<br />

ethical? Whose commitment do we need?<br />

• Test and adjust solutions with stakeholders. Ensure that the solutions will meet with<br />

approval from those affected.<br />

• Write and implement an action plan.<br />

• Evaluate progress regularly.<br />

187


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Definition of a Stakeholder<br />

A stakeholder is defined as “any person, group, or organization that can place<br />

a claim on an organization’s attention, resources, or output or is affected by that<br />

output. Examples of a government’s stakeholders include citizens, taxpayers,<br />

service recipients, the governing body, employees, unions, interest groups,<br />

political parties, the financial community, businesses and other governments.”<br />

Attention to stakeholder concerns is crucial: the key to success for public<br />

and nonprofit organization (and communities) is the satisfaction of key<br />

stakeholders. A stakeholder analysis is a way for an organization’s decision<br />

makers and planning team to immerse themselves in the politics surrounding an<br />

organization. When stakeholders are not involved in building the strategic<br />

architecture, they fill in by creating their own and measure your organization’s<br />

performance by the ones they create. Ignore key stakeholders at your own<br />

peril.<br />

“A stakeholder analysis forces team members to place themselves in the<br />

shoes of others – especially outsiders – and to make a rather dispassionate<br />

assessment of the organization’s performance fro the outsiders’ points of view.”<br />

188


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Steps in Doing a Stakeholder Analysis:<br />

Step One: Identify exactly who the organization’s stakeholders<br />

are.<br />

Step Two: Specify the criteria the stakeholders use to assess the<br />

organization’s performance.<br />

Step Three: Make a judgment about how well the organization<br />

performs against the stakeholders’ criteria.<br />

Step Four: Discuss how the various stakeholder groups influence<br />

the organization.<br />

Step Five: Discuss what the organization needs from each of the<br />

stakeholder groups.<br />

Step Six: Rank stakeholders according to their importance to the<br />

organization.<br />

Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organization, Bryson<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

189


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

A Stakeholder Map for Government<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

GOVERNMENT<br />

190


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Mapping the Right Business Decision<br />

PMI (Plus-Minus-Interesting) is a perception scanning and mapping tool, which allows you to<br />

take a broad look at a proposed course of action. Start by listing all the PLUS (or positive)<br />

points you can think of. Then list all the MINUS (or negative) points. Finally, list all the<br />

INTERESTING points or thoughts that don’t fit into either of the first two categories. Now<br />

take a highlighter and mark the 3 to 5 most salient points to you. Congratulations, you have<br />

now made a decision map.<br />

Sample:<br />

Decision: Should all cars be painted yellow?<br />

PLUS<br />

• Easier to see on the roads … people are safer<br />

• Easier to see at night … people are safer<br />

• No problem in deciding which color you want<br />

• No waiting to get the color you want<br />

• Easier for the manufacturer<br />

• It might take the “macho” element out of car ownership<br />

• Cars would tend to become transport items<br />

• In collisions the paint rubbed off on to your car is the same<br />

MINUS<br />

• Boring<br />

• Difficult to recognize your car<br />

• Easier to steal cars<br />

• The abundance of yellow might tire the eyes<br />

• Accident witnesses would have a harder time<br />

• Restriction of your freedom to choose<br />

• Some paint companies might go out of business<br />

• Car sales would decline and people would lose jobs<br />

INTERESTING<br />

• Interesting to see if different shades of yellow arose<br />

• Interesting to see if people appreciated the safety factor<br />

• Interesting to see whether attitudes towards cars changed<br />

• Interesting to see if trim acquired a different color<br />

• Interesting to see if this were enforceable<br />

• Interesting to see who would support the suggestion<br />

Adapted from deBono’s Thinking Course. Edward deBono, 1994.<br />

191


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Root Cause: 5 Whys<br />

<strong>20</strong> percent of an iceberg is visible above the waterline (the perceived<br />

problem). The real danger is the 80 percent that is not readily seen (the root<br />

cause problem).<br />

(The Jefferson Memorial, Washington DC)<br />

A Story for the Birds<br />

192


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Section 14:<br />

Team Development<br />

Collaborating and Building Productive Work Partnerships<br />

193


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

194


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

2 + 2 = 5*<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

* Mathematical<br />

Expression for<br />

TEAMWORK<br />

195


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

PURPOSE:<br />

Purpose and Goals of Team Building<br />

The purpose of team building is to improve a team’s performance and<br />

satisfaction by looking at its process and resolving conflicts. Team building<br />

aims at improving the problem solving ability of its members by working through<br />

issues (task and interpersonal) that impede its functioning.<br />

GOALS: Team building goals include the following:<br />

1. A better understanding of the team’s purpose and role in the total functioning<br />

of the organization.<br />

2. A better understanding of each team member’s role in the work group.<br />

3. Increased communication among team members about issues that affect the<br />

efficiency of the group.<br />

4. Greater support among group members.<br />

5. A clearer understanding of group process – the behavior and dynamics of<br />

any group that works closely together.<br />

6. More effective ways of working through problems inherent to the team – at<br />

both task and interpersonal levels.<br />

7. The ability to use conflict in a positive rather than a destructive way.<br />

8. Greater collaboration among team members and the reduction of competition<br />

that is costly to individuals and the group.<br />

9. A sense of interdependence among group members.<br />

The final goal of team building, then, is a more cohesive, mutually supportive,<br />

and trusting group that will have high expectations for task accomplishment and<br />

will, at the same time, respect individual differences in values, personalities,<br />

skills and idiosyncratic behavior.<br />

From University Associates Publishers Inc<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

196


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Definition of a team<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Why Teams?<br />

A small number of people with diverse and complementary skills, working<br />

together to achieve a common performance goal for which they hold themselves<br />

mutually accountable, and for which they are held accountable as a group.<br />

Alternate definition<br />

A group of people who need each other to accomplish a goal.<br />

A team in not a group of people with an assignment who have been told to<br />

become a team.<br />

What makes teams successful?<br />

Teams work only when they have a compelling performance challenge –<br />

something that really needs to be done for the organization’s success.<br />

The performance challenge must require the combined background, skills,<br />

abilities and viewpoints of more that one person. If the task can be<br />

accomplished by a single person, assigning it to a team will slow performance<br />

down.<br />

“There are no problems we cannot solve together,<br />

and very few that we can solve by ourselves.”<br />

Lyndon B. Johnson<br />

197


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Things to Think About…<br />

Japanese workers submit an average of 27<br />

formal improvement suggestions each<br />

year.<br />

U.S. workers submit an average of one<br />

formal suggestion every 37 years.<br />

What do you think<br />

explains this difference?<br />

198


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Groups versus Teams<br />

Groups Teams<br />

Members think they are grouped<br />

together of administrative purposes<br />

only. Individuals work independently;<br />

sometimes at cross purposes with<br />

others.<br />

Members tend to focus on themselves<br />

because they are not sufficiently<br />

involved in planning the unit’s<br />

objectives. They approach their jobs<br />

simply as a hired hand.<br />

Members are told what to do rather<br />

than being asked what the best<br />

approach would be. Suggestions are<br />

not encouraged.<br />

Members distrust the motives of<br />

colleagues because they do not<br />

understand the role of other members.<br />

Expressions of opinion or<br />

disagreement are considered divisive<br />

or non-supportive.<br />

Members are so cautious about what<br />

they say that real understanding is not<br />

possible. Game playing may occur and<br />

communications traps be set the catch<br />

the unwary.<br />

Members may receive good training<br />

but are limited in applying it to the job<br />

by the supervisor or other group<br />

members.<br />

Members find themselves in conflict<br />

situations which they do not know how<br />

to resolve. Their supervisor may put<br />

off intervention until serious damage is<br />

done.<br />

Members may or may not participate in<br />

decisions affecting the team.<br />

Conformity often appears more<br />

important than positive results.<br />

Members recognize their interdependence<br />

and understand both personal and team<br />

goals are best accomplished with mutual<br />

support. Time is not wasted struggling over<br />

“turf” or attempting personal gain at the<br />

expense of others.<br />

Members feel a sense of ownership for<br />

their jobs and unit because they are<br />

committed to goals they helped establish.<br />

Members contribute to the organization’s<br />

success by applying their unique talent and<br />

knowledge to team objectives.<br />

Members work in a climate of trust and are<br />

encouraged to openly express ideas,<br />

opinions, disagreements and feelings.<br />

Questions are welcomed.<br />

Members practice open and honest<br />

communication. They make an effort to<br />

understand each other’s point of view.<br />

Members are encouraged to develop skills<br />

and apply what they learn on the job. They<br />

receive the support of the team.<br />

Members recognize conflict is a normal<br />

aspect of human interaction but they view<br />

such situations as an opportunity for new<br />

ideas and creativity. They work to resolve<br />

conflict quickly and constructively.<br />

Members participate in decisions affecting<br />

the team but understand their leader must<br />

make a final ruling whenever the team can’t<br />

decide, or an emergency exists. Positive<br />

results, not conformity, are the goal.<br />

From Robert Maddux, Team Building: An Exercise in Leadership, Crisp Publications<br />

199


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Traditional<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Traditional Work Groups<br />

Versus<br />

Empowered Work Teams<br />

STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES<br />

Secure expectations Lack of creativity<br />

Own assigned tasks No conflict resolution<br />

Decisions made quicker Low feedback<br />

Centralized Communication No risk taking<br />

Teams<br />

STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES<br />

Empowerment of employees Lack of leadership<br />

Higher self esteem Slow process<br />

Risk taking Time consuming<br />

Creativity Conflict can escalate<br />

<strong>20</strong>0


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Continuum of Participation in Team Decisions<br />

Leader-<strong>Center</strong>ed > > > > > > >< < < < < < Team-<strong>Center</strong>ed<br />

(Traditional) (Empowered)<br />

Area of freedom and Area of freedom and<br />

Authority for the Team authority for the Team<br />

Leader. Members.<br />

Decision-Making Levels<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7<br />

Team Leader Team Leader Team Leader Team Leader Team Leader Team Leader Team Leader<br />

makes “sells” makes presents presents defines limits; permits team<br />

decision and decision. decision, tentative problem, gets asks team to to function<br />

announces it. presents decision suggestions, make within limits<br />

ideas, and subject to makes decision . defined by<br />

invites change. decision. organizational<br />

questions. constraints.<br />

High Empowerment and Participation<br />

OWN:<br />

Self-Management Level<br />

The team is directly responsible for all aspects of planning, directing, problem solving,<br />

decision-making, and implementing solutions. The team addresses problems relating<br />

to performance of their work as well as competitive, organizational, and<br />

customer-related Issues. Continuous improvement becomes the norm.<br />

DECIDE<br />

Shared-Management Level<br />

The team shares selected management responsibilities due to an “absentee” manager<br />

(e.g. at another site; managing multiple groups; on an extended assignment, leave or<br />

travel)<br />

RECOMMEND<br />

Participative Management Level<br />

The team recommends to management possible solutions to problems they encounter<br />

in their work area. Management retains decision-making authority. There is limited<br />

autonomy.<br />

IDENTIFY<br />

Directive Management Level<br />

Decisions from above are carried out by the team. The team has little to no<br />

opportunities to provide input. The team is asked to identify problems in their work<br />

area. Any solutions developed or actions taken are solely the responsibility of<br />

management.<br />

Low Empowerment and Participation<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

<strong>20</strong>1


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Checklist for Getting Started with Project Teams<br />

Step 1: Determine the PURPOSE of the team.<br />

What project will the team address?<br />

What perceived need led to the selection of this project?<br />

Step 2: Determine what DELIVERABLES the team is expected to provide.<br />

What are the goals, objectives or desired outcomes of this project?<br />

What changes are expected to result from this project?<br />

Is there target date for completion?<br />

How will the team evaluate its progress and success?<br />

Step 3: Determine the SCOPE of the team.<br />

What will the team not study?<br />

What range of issues or opportunities is the team expected to make?<br />

Step 4: Determine the SUPPORT the team will have.<br />

What decision making authority will the team have?<br />

Will the team need financial resources? What budget limitations exist? Can the team request<br />

additional financial support? From whom?<br />

What departments or divisions will provide support?<br />

What in-house or external specialists may be needed to provide support on technical matters?<br />

What authority will the team have to call in co-workers or outside experts, request equipment or<br />

information normally inaccessible to them and make changes to the process?<br />

What training will team members need?<br />

What other resources will this team need?<br />

Step 5: Determine team MEMBERSHIP and ROLES.<br />

Who is the team sponsor and what is his/her role?<br />

Who is the Team Leader and what is his/her role?<br />

Who are the team members? What work areas or technical specialties must be represented for<br />

the team to fulfill its charter?<br />

Step 6: Determine the team LOGISTICS.<br />

How will team member’ regular day-to-day work get done while they are involved in the project?<br />

Where will team meetings be held?<br />

How often will the team meet?<br />

What are the team “ground rules”?<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

<strong>20</strong>2


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

The Legislative Mandate:<br />

240.850<br />

Policy on work environments; duties of state agencies.<br />

“It is the policy of the <strong>State</strong> of Oregon to encourage<br />

cooperative, participatory work environments and<br />

team-based management practices in ALL state<br />

agencies.”<br />

To that end, when feasible and appropriate, state agencies shall:<br />

1. Delegate responsibility for decision-making and service delivery to<br />

the lowest possible level;<br />

2. Involve all workers, especially front line workers, in the<br />

development and design of processes and program improvements;<br />

3. Simplify and eliminate internal administrative rules and policies<br />

that unduly impede the attainment of the agency’s mission and<br />

delivery of services;<br />

4. Eliminate layers of organizational hierarchies;<br />

5. Envision state government as a high performance organization in<br />

which training and technology are viewed as an investment in the<br />

workforce; and<br />

6. Promote continuous improvement of state services through the<br />

involvement of all workers in process design and performancebased<br />

outcome development.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

<strong>20</strong>3


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

STAGES OF GROUP DEVELOPMENT<br />

Forming Storming Norming Performing<br />

Willingness<br />

Competence<br />

Major Issues: Major Issues: Major Issues: Major Issues:<br />

Expectations Power Roles Performance<br />

Purpose Relevance Tasks Results<br />

Belonging Conflict Outcomes Endings<br />

Facilitator Role: Facilitator Role: Facilitator Role: Facilitator<br />

Role:<br />

Define purpose Encourage open- Encourage goal Identify group<br />

ness setting successes<br />

Model behavior Check on feelings Keep group Encourage assessment<br />

and wants moving on task<br />

Include everyone Avoid defensiveness Encourage group Let go and<br />

Leadership and let the<br />

responsibility group do it<br />

Clarify expectations Remind group of<br />

common purpose<br />

Provide structure<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

<strong>20</strong>4


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

STAGES OF GROUP DEVELOPMENT<br />

Peter P. Fay and Austin G. Doyle<br />

Changes in team leadership or the creation of new teams often results in losses of<br />

productivity due to the tendency of all groups to go through some predictable stages of<br />

growth and regression. Some typical dysfunctional behaviors of team members, team<br />

leaders, and the team as a whole when groups are in transition are shown in Figure l. An<br />

awareness of the stages of group development is important, particularly for managers and<br />

organization-development practitioners who must lead teams during times of transition.<br />

TUCKMAN’S MODEL OF GROUP DEVELOPMENT<br />

Several models of group development are available in the literature. Tuckman (1965)<br />

summarized the results of over fifty studies into the following four-stage model, upon which<br />

this article is based:<br />

Stage I, Form, characterized by testing and dependence;<br />

Stage II, Storm, characterized by intra-team conflict;<br />

Stage III, Norm, characterized by the development of team cohesion; and<br />

Stage IV, Perform, characterized by functional role relatedness.<br />

Stage I: Form<br />

During Stage I, team members discover what behaviors are acceptable to the group. For<br />

newly established groups, this stage is the transition from individual to member status. For<br />

teams with new leadership, mission, or members, this stage is a period of testing behavior<br />

and dependence on formal or informal group leadership for guidance in a newly unstructured<br />

environment. This stage is also characterized by the following:<br />

Attempts to identify tasks in terms of relevant parameters and to decide how the<br />

group will accomplish the tasks;<br />

Decisions on the type of information needed and how it will be used;<br />

Hesitant participation;<br />

Tests of behavioral expectations and ways to handle behavioral problems;<br />

Feelings of initial attachment to the team;<br />

Intellectualizing;<br />

Discussion of symptoms or problems peripheral to the task;<br />

Complaints about the organizational environment.<br />

Suspicion, fear, and anxiety about the new situation; and<br />

Originally published in The 1982 Annual for Facilitators, Trainers, and Consultants by J.W. Pfeiffer & L.D.<br />

Goodstein (Eds.), San Diego, CA: Pfeiffer & Company.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

<strong>20</strong>5


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Minimal work accomplishment.<br />

Stage II: Storm<br />

During Stage II, team members become hostile or overzealous as a way to express their<br />

individuality and resist group formation. Members recognize the extent of the task demands<br />

and respond emotionally to the perceived requirements for self-change and self-denial.<br />

Other characteristics of this stage include:<br />

Infighting, defensiveness, and competition;<br />

Establishment of unachievable goals;<br />

Disunity, increased tension, and jealousy;<br />

Resistance to the task demands because they are perceived to interfere with<br />

personal needs;<br />

Polarization of group members;<br />

Sharp fluctuations of relationships and reversals of feelings;<br />

Concern over excessive work;<br />

Establishment of pecking orders; and<br />

Minimal work accomplishment.<br />

Stage III: Norm<br />

During Stage III, members accept the team, team norms, their own roles, and idiosyncrasies<br />

of fellow members. Emotional conflict is reduced by patching up previously conflicting<br />

relationships. Other characteristics of this stage include:<br />

An attempt to achieve maximum harmony by avoiding conflict;<br />

A high level of intimacy characterized by confiding in each other, sharing personal<br />

problems, and discussing team dynamics;<br />

A new ability to express emotions constructively;<br />

A sense of team cohesiveness with a common spirit and goals;<br />

The establishment and maintenance of team boundaries; and<br />

Moderate work accomplishment.<br />

Stage IV: Perform<br />

Now that the team has established its interpersonal norms, it becomes an entity capable of<br />

diagnosing and solving problems and making decisions. Stage IV is not always reached by<br />

management teams. Other characteristics of this stage include:<br />

Members experience insight into personal and interpersonal processes;<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

<strong>20</strong>6


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Constructive self-change is undertaken; and<br />

A great deal of work is accomplished.<br />

BY TEAM MEMBERS BY TEAM LEADER BY TEAM AS A WHOLE<br />

Evident anxiety regarding<br />

future<br />

Attempts to blend into<br />

woodwork<br />

Career reassessment Inaccurate assessments of<br />

staff<br />

Rejoicing/mourning loss of<br />

old leader<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Attempts to take charge Gain/loss in esteem identity<br />

Seemingly random changes Competitive behavior<br />

Realignment of turf<br />

Negative stereotyping Drops in level of candor<br />

Temporary confusion Nepotism Confusion over group’s<br />

purpose/priorities<br />

Sabotage High expectations/frustration Work suspension<br />

Distrust/blaming Stress reactions Excessive meetings/<br />

presentations<br />

Testing of new leader Formation of new coalitions<br />

Panic Shelving of innovative plans<br />

Jockeying for position Change of reward systems<br />

Stress reactions Overuse of grapevine<br />

Figure 1. Some Typical Dysfunctional Behaviors of Teams in Transition, Based on Tuckman (1965)<br />

IMPLICATIONS FOR GROUP MEMBERSHIP<br />

Because the form, storm, and norm stages result in minimal output, it is tempting to try to<br />

rush through or short circuit these stages and to hope the group can thereby achieve peak<br />

productivity. Although seductive, this idea is dysfunctional. Just as individuals go through<br />

predictable stages of growth depending on age, experience, maturity, and other factors,<br />

teams go through predictable stages, the duration of which depends on factors such as<br />

individual and team maturity, task complexity, leadership, organizational climate, and<br />

external climate.<br />

Groups can fixate at various stages. Some (like some people) are never fully functioning.<br />

Given that the stages are inevitable, one way to help reduce the time needed for a new or<br />

changing team to be fully productive while minimizing the tension, fear, or anxiety common in<br />

the form and storm stages is to share rumors, concerns, and expectations about the group.<br />

Members of the team can contract with one another that there will be no “surprises,” and<br />

therefore an atmosphere of trust can be achieved earlier (norm stage), allowing for<br />

interpersonal issues to be put aside in favor of task issues and for the team to move on to<br />

perform.<br />

<strong>20</strong>7


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

REFERENCE<br />

Tuckman, B.W. (1965). Development sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin,<br />

63(6).<br />

RELATED READINGS<br />

Jones, J.E. (1973). A model of group development. In J.E. Jones & J.W. Pfeiffer (Eds.), The<br />

1973 annual handbook for group facilitators. San Diego, CA: Pfeiffer & Company.<br />

Schutz, W.G. (1966). The interpersonal underworld. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior<br />

Books.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

<strong>20</strong>8


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Characteristics of Each Stage of Team Development:<br />

Style of Team<br />

Leader<br />

Purpose and<br />

Goal Clarity<br />

Decision<br />

Making<br />

Roles and<br />

Responsi-<br />

bilities<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Forming Storming Norming Performing<br />

Leader needs to<br />

be directive in<br />

providing<br />

structure for the<br />

team and<br />

clarifying<br />

expectations<br />

about how the<br />

team process will<br />

be initiated.<br />

Members are<br />

discovering<br />

relevant<br />

parameters of the<br />

purpose and<br />

goals. There is<br />

little agreement or<br />

commitment to<br />

team mission.<br />

Directed by the<br />

designated<br />

leader, although<br />

the process is<br />

sometimes<br />

dominated by the<br />

most vocal<br />

members.<br />

Individuals are<br />

not clear about<br />

roles. They<br />

privately hold<br />

opinions, but do<br />

not publicly state<br />

them.<br />

Leader coaches<br />

the group by<br />

helping them<br />

focus on goals<br />

and expectations,<br />

managing<br />

process and<br />

conflict,<br />

generating ideas,<br />

and explaining<br />

decisions.<br />

Options are<br />

generated and<br />

challenged as the<br />

group stretches<br />

parameters.<br />

There is<br />

increased clarity,<br />

yet some<br />

misconceptions<br />

linger.<br />

Decisions are<br />

hard to make;<br />

deadlocks are<br />

common.<br />

Process is<br />

usually<br />

dominated by<br />

power plays and<br />

fast and loud<br />

talkers.<br />

Compromise is<br />

the fall back<br />

tactic.<br />

Roles and<br />

responsibilities<br />

emerge and<br />

become clearer.<br />

Members jockey<br />

for roles and<br />

power.<br />

Leader acts<br />

primarily as a<br />

facilitator providing<br />

encouragement,<br />

helping to build<br />

consensus, and<br />

giving feedback.<br />

Agreement from<br />

most; genuine<br />

commitment is<br />

forming. The<br />

group is moving<br />

toward unity.<br />

Major decisions<br />

are made by<br />

consensus,<br />

differences are<br />

negotiated, and<br />

some decisions<br />

are delegated to<br />

individuals or<br />

smaller groups.<br />

Roles are clarified<br />

and accepted.<br />

There is open<br />

discussion about<br />

how to make the<br />

group perform<br />

tasks and work<br />

toward goals.<br />

Leader still<br />

facilitates team<br />

process, but tasks<br />

and objectives are<br />

delegated. Leader<br />

oversees and<br />

identifies when the<br />

group is moving to<br />

a different stage.<br />

The whole team<br />

shares a<br />

commitment to<br />

overarching goals;<br />

a tangible vision for<br />

the team is<br />

accepted.<br />

Team makes<br />

decisions within<br />

agreed upon<br />

criteria; major<br />

decisions still made<br />

by consensus.<br />

Group members<br />

are willing to<br />

challenge the<br />

nature of<br />

relationships within<br />

the group and<br />

adopt changes as<br />

needed.<br />

<strong>20</strong>9


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Roles and<br />

Responsi-<br />

bilities<br />

Attention to<br />

Team Process<br />

Reaction to<br />

Leadership<br />

Within Team<br />

Individuals are<br />

not clear about<br />

roles. They<br />

privately hold<br />

opinions, but do<br />

not publicly state<br />

them.<br />

Process is<br />

usually ignored;<br />

it is noticed but<br />

avoided.<br />

Members test the<br />

waters and look<br />

for guidance<br />

from the<br />

designated<br />

leader.<br />

Team members<br />

take a tentative,<br />

wait and see<br />

approach. They<br />

watch from a<br />

distance and<br />

remain<br />

dependent on a<br />

fixed hierarchy of<br />

responsibility.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Roles and<br />

responsibilities<br />

emerge and<br />

become clearer.<br />

Members jockey<br />

for roles and<br />

power.<br />

Team work<br />

doesn't seem<br />

justified for the<br />

effort required.<br />

Cliques form.<br />

Team members<br />

challenge the<br />

leader. Factions<br />

and cliques<br />

emerge. Power<br />

struggles and<br />

polarization often<br />

occur.<br />

Roles are clarified<br />

and accepted.<br />

There is open<br />

discussion about<br />

how to make the<br />

group perform<br />

tasks and work<br />

toward goals.<br />

Members generate<br />

team norms and<br />

develop mutual<br />

respect. However,<br />

can be sidetracked<br />

by process<br />

discussions and<br />

waste time<br />

focusing on<br />

unimportant issues.<br />

General support for<br />

the leadership.<br />

Leadership is<br />

shared among the<br />

group.<br />

Group members<br />

are willing to<br />

challenge the<br />

nature of<br />

relationships within<br />

the group and<br />

adopt changes as<br />

needed.<br />

Members are<br />

autonomous; not<br />

dependent on<br />

designated leaders.<br />

Everyone shares<br />

responsibility for<br />

initiating and<br />

discussing team<br />

process as needed.<br />

Discussions are<br />

open; disagreements<br />

do not lead<br />

to fear of rejection.<br />

Members feel<br />

highly supported.<br />

Leaders offer interpersonal<br />

support<br />

as well as<br />

guidance.<br />

210


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Issues in Team Effectiveness<br />

There are certain issues that are important to us as human beings when we<br />

work with other people. In order for a group to work effectively together, these<br />

concerns need to be addressed:<br />

1. Identity Who are we? Who am I as part of this team?<br />

2. Acceptance Am I, and is everybody else, accepted in the<br />

team?<br />

3. Goals What are we supposed to do?<br />

4. Power Who’s in charge? What am in charge of?<br />

5. Authority What decision-making power do we have?<br />

6. Structure How are we organized? Who plays what<br />

role?<br />

7. Norms What are the ground rules here?<br />

8. Standards What is “good enough” and what is<br />

“excellence” for our team?<br />

9. Connections What is the trust level?<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

211


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Maintenance<br />

How are we doing as a group?<br />

Relationships and team building<br />

15%<br />

15%<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Task/Process<br />

How do we approach the work?<br />

The structure and process.<br />

70%<br />

Content<br />

The actual work you<br />

are engaged in.<br />

212


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

Things a Manager Needs to Know<br />

About:<br />

1. Don’t have one if you don’t need one<br />

2. Have a meeting to plan, solve problems, or<br />

make decisions<br />

3. Send the agenda ahead of time<br />

4. Create and follow ground rules<br />

5. Know the meeting purpose: is it informational<br />

or task-oriented?<br />

6. Focus on content, group maintenance<br />

and process<br />

7. Ensure balanced discussion<br />

8. Record minutes, assignments and timelines<br />

9. Follow up on assignments<br />

10. Do a self-critique of the meeting at the end.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

213


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

The Most Successful Teams<br />

Have a Balance Between:<br />

Technical Interpersonal<br />

Goals and Objectives Personal Values<br />

Roles and Responsibilities Personal Issues<br />

Barrier Identification Personal Differences<br />

Decision Making Conflict Resolution<br />

Feedback Mechanisms Cultural Differences<br />

When teams are having difficulties working together,<br />

the source of the problem is usually either of a<br />

technical or interpersonal nature. Decide the source of<br />

the team building issue and initiate strategies to correct.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

214


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Team Tools: Team Building Blocks<br />

• Clarity in Team Goals<br />

A team works best when everyone understands its purpose.<br />

• Clearly Defined Roles<br />

Teams operate more efficiently if group members know who is responsible for what<br />

issues and tasks.<br />

• Clear, Open Communications<br />

Good discussions depend on how well information is passed between team members.<br />

• Beneficial Team Behaviors<br />

Teams should encourage all members to use the skills and practices that make<br />

discussions and meetings more effective. Teams should respect differences of group<br />

members.<br />

• Well-Defined Decision Procedures<br />

A team should always be aware of the different ways it reaches decisions.<br />

• Balanced Participation<br />

A team benefits from the contributions of all team members.<br />

• Established Ground Rules<br />

Teams need to discuss and set group norms early on.<br />

• Awareness of Group Process and Content<br />

All team members should be aware of how the team is functioning.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

215


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Beneficial Team Behaviors<br />

How skilled are your team members in these areas?<br />

1. Testing assumptions and inferences.<br />

2. Sharing all relevant information.<br />

3. Focusing on interests, not positions.<br />

4. Being specific … using examples. For example, I mean …<br />

5. Agreeing on what important words mean.<br />

6. Explaining the reasons behind one’s statements, questions and actions.<br />

7. Disagreeing openly with any member of the group.<br />

8. Making statements, then inviting questions and comments.<br />

9. Jointly designing ways to test disagreements and solutions.<br />

10. Discussing “undiscussable” issues.<br />

11. Keeping the discussion focused.<br />

12. Not taking cheap shots or otherwise distracting the group.<br />

13. Participating in all phases of the process.<br />

14. Exchanging only relevant information outside the group.<br />

15. Helping each other follow the ground rules.<br />

16. Doing self critiques at the end of the process.<br />

216


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

RATING THE EFFECTIVENESS<br />

OF YOUR TEAM<br />

Rate your team on the team effectiveness factors listed below. A score of “1” is high (or very<br />

effective) and a score of “5” is low (or not very effective). Check only one box for each<br />

factor.<br />

Factor<br />

1 - Mission/Goal Clarity and Conflict<br />

2 - Role Clarity and Conflict<br />

3 - Communication and Feedback<br />

4 - Participation and Influence<br />

5 - Recognition and Cooperation<br />

6 - Support and Cohesiveness<br />

7 - Trust and Conflict<br />

8 - Structure and Procedure<br />

9 - Meeting Effectiveness<br />

10 - Experimentation and Evaluation<br />

11 - Energy<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

217


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

TEAM EFFECTIVENESS FACTORS<br />

1. Mission/Goal Clarity and Conflict. To what extent are the team’s mission and goals<br />

understood and committed to by everyone on the team?<br />

1 - Very clear. Team mission and goals are clear. Energy expended by all toward their<br />

achievement. Priorities are derived from the mission and goals.<br />

5 - Not at all clear. Team mission and goals are not clear. Team members appear to<br />

be working at cross purposes or pulling in different directions. Conflicts occur about what the<br />

team should be doing.<br />

2. Role Clarity and Conflict. To what extent are job responsibilities and expectations<br />

spelled out and adhered to, and in conflict with one another?<br />

1 - People are clear about what they should be doing on the job, and they are<br />

respectful of each others’ jobs. It all seems to fit together. Respective job responsibilities are<br />

openly discussed and questions are clarified. Conflicting job responsibilities are openly<br />

discussed and resolved.<br />

5 - People are in doubt about whose job responsibility is whose. Discussions are not<br />

held about how we can work together to do the best job. People make conflicting demands<br />

on each other. People seem to have too many irons in the fire with too little time to<br />

accomplish anything well.<br />

3. Communication and Feedback. To what extent is communication and feedback<br />

between team members clear, open, and frequent?<br />

1 - Communication is frequent. Feedback flows through all levels. Communications<br />

are open and participatory between members.<br />

5 - Communication is infrequent. Little feedback is given. Communications between<br />

members are closed and guarded.<br />

4. Participation and Influence. To what extent do team members participate in making<br />

the decisions which affect their jobs and each other?<br />

1 - All team members freely express themselves in discussions about the job.<br />

Everyone participates. Members encourage and are encouraged to participate. No one is<br />

discounted. All member resources are fully recognized and utilized.<br />

5 - Only a few people seem to influence the important decisions. Some people are<br />

reluctant to participate in discussions. They are discounted and their suggestions seem to<br />

die. All member resources are not recognized and/or utilized.<br />

5. Recognition and Cooperation. To what extent do team members cooperate with<br />

each other as well as make their own unique contributions to the team?<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

218


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

1 - Everyone is aware of the strengths which each member brings to the team. Our<br />

work is characterized by a high degree of cooperation. People are encouraged to make their<br />

unique contributions.<br />

5 - There is little cooperation among team members. People are often taken for<br />

granted. Some people’s ideas and suggestions are discounted by others.<br />

6. Support and Cohesiveness. To what extent do team members feel a part of the<br />

team?<br />

1 - People work together well and support each other. People are encouraged to be<br />

responsible for doing their part. Team members are respected for their competence. When<br />

the going gets tough, people pull together.<br />

5 - There is little mutual respect and cooperation between team members. Everyone is<br />

out for themselves. A lot of energy is expended on covering up mistakes.<br />

7. Trust and Conflict. To what extent do team members trust each other, and work with<br />

each other to resolve differences and conflicts?<br />

1 - There is a high degree of trust among members, and conflict is dealt with openly<br />

and directly. Differing points of view are discussed until agreements are reached that make<br />

sense to all parties involved. Whenever possible a consensus is arrived at. People are<br />

comfortable saying things and know confidentiality will be respected.<br />

5 - There is little trust among members, and conflict is ignored or passed over.<br />

Conflicts are never dealt with directly. If a conflict arises one person usually makes a<br />

decision not to discuss it any further. People are afraid to speak out, and they do not feel<br />

confidentiality will be respected.<br />

8. Structure and Procedure. To what extent are there structures and processes to guide<br />

team functioning?<br />

1 - There are effective procedures to guide team functioning. Team members support<br />

these procedures and regulate themselves. The team has well-established and agreed-on<br />

approaches to problem solving and decision making. People are clear about who makes<br />

what decisions and when/how they are made.<br />

5 - There is little control, and there is a lack of procedures to guide team functioning.<br />

The team has no agreed-on approaches to problem solving and decision making. There is<br />

confusion about who makes what decisions and when/how they are made.<br />

9. Meeting Effectiveness. To what extent are team meetings focused on relevant issues<br />

and effective in contributing to sound decisions?<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

219


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

1 - Meeting goals and issues are clearly stated. Decisions made in team meetings are<br />

effectively carried out by members. People leave meetings with a clear idea of what their<br />

respective responsibilities are.<br />

5 - The reasons for holding meetings are unclear. The same issues seem to come up<br />

over and over. It seems that nothing really gets done in our meetings. There is little or no<br />

follow-up.<br />

10. Experimentation and Evaluation. To what extent does the team try different ways of<br />

doing things, and evaluate how it does things?<br />

1 - The team experiments with different ways of doing things and is creative in its<br />

approaches. The team often evaluates its functioning and process.<br />

5 - The team is rigid and does not experiment with how things are done. The team<br />

never evaluates its functioning or process.<br />

11. Energy. To what extent do team members feel a sense of accomplishment and<br />

satisfaction?<br />

1 - There is a good feeling of accomplishment and satisfaction and time well spent.<br />

People devote themselves to getting the job done with a minimum of hassle. People know<br />

their jobs and work together efficiently to get them done.<br />

5 - There is a sense of wasted time and energy with little sense of accomplishment and<br />

satisfaction. Many things done seem like unnecessary expenditures of time and energy that<br />

could be done more efficiently. People do not feel their energy is being efficiently utilized.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

2<strong>20</strong>


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Summary<br />

To be effective, teams must:<br />

• Have a clear understanding of their purpose and role.<br />

• Understand how their performance as a team can lead to achievement of<br />

their purpose.<br />

• See how their team purpose is important to the goals of the organization.<br />

• Maintain momentum toward accomplishment of the group’s goals.<br />

Strategies:<br />

• Have everyone on the team express their understanding of the team’s<br />

purpose. Clarify differences and agree on a common purpose.<br />

• Develop a vision of what the team is striving for, and a mission or purpose<br />

statement that embodies the vision.<br />

• Where appropriate, have an organizational representative outline the<br />

purpose, role, and parameters of the group.<br />

• Have the team identify concrete tasks and actions that will lead to<br />

achievement of the team’s purpose. Identify timelines and “champions”<br />

for each task.<br />

• Analyze how each of the team’s goals supports the purpose of the larger<br />

organization. Communicate the team’s goals in this context to other<br />

teams, decision-makers, and customers.<br />

• Set specific performance goals and timelines for each meeting of the<br />

team.<br />

221


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

222


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Section 15:<br />

Cascades Survival<br />

Activity<br />

223


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

224


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Managers’ Toolbox<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

and<br />

Bibliography<br />

Tools for effective work groups:<br />

the right tool for the job…<br />

225


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Quick Reference Guide<br />

For The Manager’s Toolbox<br />

If you need to … Then try this tool …<br />

Quick and thorough brainstorming Mind mapping<br />

Set mutually agreed-upon team expectations Moral Agreement<br />

Turning the negatives into positives Double Reversal<br />

Establish group behavior and norms Start-Stop-Continue<br />

Weigh the pro’s and con’s of an issue PMI Tool<br />

The first step in problem solving Problem Focus <strong>State</strong>ment<br />

Discover the root cause(s) of a problem Five Why’s<br />

Select the best decision or solution Decision Matrix<br />

Gain a pulse of consensus among a group Five Finger Consensus<br />

Help a group prioritize ideas, solutions, etc. Dot Voting<br />

Turn plans into reality; get it done Action Planning Tool<br />

Identify driving forces and restraining forces Force Field Analysis<br />

An icebreaker to learn more about each other Uncommon Commonalities<br />

Brainstorm/organize random information into a plan Affinity Clustering<br />

Organize group thinking; no matter the group size Open Space Technology<br />

Structure a focused conversation ORID Discussion Method<br />

226


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Tool: Mind mapping<br />

Quick and Thorough Brainstorming<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Manager’s Toolbox<br />

What: A flexible and effective creativity and problem solving technique. Mind<br />

mapping is a whole-brain approach to outlining, note taking, and generating and<br />

organizing ideas.<br />

When: For any process or topic requiring quick gathering of information and<br />

organization.<br />

Why: To gather and sort information fast.<br />

Process:<br />

• Write the central focus idea or image in the center of the page.<br />

• Draw “spokes” from the center outward and write a main idea or major thought on each<br />

spoke. Use as many spokes as needed.<br />

• Use key words, images or symbols to represent ideas. Be creative. Use colors. Go fast<br />

with high energy; just write whatever comes to mind. Turn off your idea censor. All<br />

ideas are good and get captured.<br />

• Use as few words as possible for each idea (one or two words is best).<br />

• Draw branches off the main spokes to represent connected ideas.<br />

• When all ideas are exhausted and on your mind map, next move to organizing the spokes<br />

and branches in a linear, logical fashion.<br />

Mind mapping can be used for:<br />

• Writing: Prevent writer’s block and get all of your ideas into play.<br />

• Project Management and Strategic Planning: Lay out all of the pieces of the project/plan<br />

and then organize.<br />

• Brainstorming: Great for brainstorming individually or in small groups.<br />

• Meetings: List and develop topics or activities for successful meetings.<br />

• Time Management: Lay out your day, week, month or year.<br />

• Note Taking: Organize your class or book notes in an easy-to-remember format.<br />

Source: Adapted from work by Tony Buzan and Joyce Wycoff.<br />

227


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Tool: “Moral” Agreement<br />

Establish mutually agreed-upon team expectations<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Manager’s Toolbox<br />

What: A technique to help establish mutually agreed-upon expectations for a work<br />

team.<br />

When: To gain commitment from all team members to abide by and be held<br />

accountable for the established expectations.<br />

Why: To improve team performance and behaviors.<br />

Process:<br />

1. Set-Up a Meeting. Set aside some uncluttered time to have an in depth dialogue<br />

with your team members; include this process at a group meeting with flipcharts<br />

available.<br />

2. List Manager Expectations. Ask your team: “What should you expect of me as<br />

the manager of this team?” Write down all their ideas – remember this is a<br />

brainstorm and all ideas get acknowledged and written down. You’ll have the chance<br />

to clarify and respond to their ideas in a moment.<br />

3. Clarify. Then clarify and/or respond to their expectations. You must feel<br />

comfortable and willing to abide by all the expectations they listed. If some of<br />

their ideas are too far “out there” for you, then explain why you can’t abide by<br />

them and change or remove them from the list.<br />

4. List Team <strong>Employee</strong> Expectations. Next ask them: “Now that we have list of<br />

expectations for me as the manager, what should I expect from you as team<br />

members?” Again, acknowledge and write down all their brainstorm ideas.<br />

5. Clarify. Then clarify and/or respond to their expectations of themselves. If some<br />

expectations or behaviors that you feel strongly about are missing, add them to the<br />

list. Modify or delete those ideas that all may not agree on.<br />

228


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

6. Gain Commitment. Now give them the punch line: “Okay, I’ll make an agreement<br />

with you all today. I’m willing to work to meet all the expectations you’ve listed for<br />

me – and you can hold me accountable to them -- IF you’ll commit to working to<br />

meet all the expectations you’ve listed for yourselves – and I can hold you<br />

accountable to them.” Ask if anyone is NOT willing to agree to these expectations,<br />

voice their concerns now. LISTEN and discuss until all are willing to agree to the<br />

expectations.<br />

7. Sign It. Then sign and date the list of manager expectations on the flipchart.<br />

Have the team members each come up and sign the employee expectations list.<br />

8. Implement Accountability. You now have a “moral agreement” for the team. You<br />

can use this to begin to hold employees accountable for performance or behaviors<br />

that are outside the now-established expectations. CAUTION: <strong>Employee</strong>s can also<br />

hold you accountable to follow-through on what you’ve agreed to. Role modeling the<br />

expected performance and behaviors on your part is critical to success.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

229


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

“Double Reversal” Ground Rules:<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Manager’s Toolbox<br />

This is a facilitation technique which starts in reverse. You will be using it to generate a sound list of<br />

ground rules to guide your team, but it could be used in many other ways.<br />

You start by asking the group to brainstorm a list of ideas which are exact opposite of what you<br />

are really trying to do.<br />

For example, you could ask your task force to brainstorm a list of ways the participants could<br />

behave in order to make the task force fail and not achieve its goals.<br />

The question to ask is : What ordinary things could we do or how could we behave in a way that<br />

would make this task force fail? Make sure they give you realistic stuff. This will surprise the<br />

group and they may have a little fun with it. Expect answers like: have side conversations, not<br />

listen, not participate etc. Write these up on a flip chart as they come up. Goose the group and<br />

make it fun. After they get 7 or 8 ideas… you can stop. Ask them to take a good look at the list<br />

and decide if we operated like that…. Would the class fail and flounder? Is the kind of stuff that<br />

messes up task forces and makes them not work?<br />

The answer should be a resounding yes.<br />

Now we are going to go through each of the ideas the class generated and reverse them into a<br />

positive behavior to create our ground rules. It is important that ground rules be written in a<br />

positive way whenever possible.<br />

For example:<br />

Don’t participate becomes “Participate with enthusiasm”.<br />

Don’t listen becomes “Give others your full attention”.<br />

As a task force leader there are some additional ground rules you might want to sneak in on: cell<br />

phones / beepers, side bar conversations, starting and ending on time, participating and ending on<br />

time. This is known as “facilitator’s prerogative”.<br />

After you finish reversing polarities on the original list, ask the group: If we followed these set<br />

of ground rules, would the group stand a much greater chance of succeeding? Would the meeting<br />

environment be more productive? They should answer yes…<br />

230


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Now ask them for their commitment to follow all of the ground rules. You will see general<br />

consensus, heads nodding etc. This is not enough. Now ask it in reverse. Is there anyone who cannot<br />

commit to following the ground rules? It is not very likely that anyone will ever raise an objection.<br />

This is another reversal technique.<br />

Now summarize the group decision…. “OK… we have developed a focused group of ground rules to<br />

guide our class and everyone has committed to following them. Nobody raised any objections to<br />

them. All members of the class are now deputized and are expected to help each other follow the<br />

rules we set.<br />

How does this process get you a better set of groundrules that are focused on real issues that may<br />

come up? Because they are focused on the most likely problems that may cause failure. Most of<br />

the time when we brainstorm ground rules we get the same ideas and they are rarely relevant to<br />

the problems the group may face…. And so they end up being ignored.<br />

Why is the commitment process so important? Why does the group leader need to be so explicit?<br />

Make the class chew on this one and figure it out.<br />

Ground rules need to be posted and checked at the end of meetings. This is a valuable technique to<br />

directly address problem behaviors you may have with your team and get them turned around. If<br />

you take the last five minutes of session to check ground rules ………What did we do well and where<br />

do we need improvement? This checking at the end of session increases the likelihood of the ground<br />

rules being followed by about 500 per cent. No kidding.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

231


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Tool: Start-Stop-Continue Model<br />

Establishing Group Behavior and Norms<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Manager’s Toolbox<br />

What: This tool is useful for helping individuals give and receive feedback related to<br />

team effectiveness.<br />

When: Beneficial in dealing with conflict, interpersonal issues, and performance<br />

problems. This can be used for a team or between two individuals.<br />

Why: To focus the team in new directions of acceptable behavior and norms.<br />

Process:<br />

1. Review team principles (ground rules) for giving and receiving feedback. Being able to give<br />

and receive helpful feedback is an important part of this exercise.<br />

2. Complete the stop, start, continue sheets. Each individual should complete a stop, start,<br />

continue sheet for the team answering the following three questions: (1) What does this<br />

team currently do that I would like to see stopped? (2) What would I like this team to<br />

start doing in the future? (3) What is this team currently doing that I would like to see<br />

continued?<br />

3. Share the stop, start, continue sheets together. This can be done by having people first<br />

pair up one-on-one, then in small groups, then as a whole. Capture the best ideas from the<br />

small groups on a flipchart.<br />

Example:<br />

Stop Start Continue<br />

Checking up on each other<br />

so much<br />

Interrupting each other<br />

during discussions<br />

Feeling comfortable sharing<br />

problems/issues you’re<br />

facing-let’s start sharing<br />

more with each other<br />

Trying to delegate more<br />

responsibilities<br />

Being supportive of each<br />

other and helping bring<br />

issues before the group<br />

Honest, caring feedback<br />

Providing challenging work<br />

assignments<br />

232


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Tool: PMI Tool (Plus-Minus-Interesting)<br />

Weigh the pro’s and con’s<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Manager’s Toolbox<br />

What: A perception scanning and mapping tool which allows you to take a broad look at a<br />

proposed course of action.<br />

When: To get a full view of the benefits and consequences of a decision.<br />

Why: Gives the full picture; leaves no gaps.<br />

Process:<br />

1. Start by listing each of the PLUS (or positive) points you can think of.<br />

2. Next list all the MINUS (or negative) points.<br />

3. Finally, list all the INTERESTING points or thoughts that don’t fit into either of the first<br />

two categories.<br />

4. Now take a highlighter and mark the three to five most salient points to you.<br />

Congratulations, you have now made a decision map.<br />

Sample Decision: Should all cars be painted yellow?<br />

PLUS<br />

• Easier to see on the roads … people are safer.<br />

• No problem in deciding which color you wanted.<br />

• No waiting to get the color you wanted.<br />

• In collisions the paint rubbed off on to your car is the same.<br />

MINUS<br />

• Boring.<br />

• Difficult to recognize your car.<br />

• The abundance of yellow might tire the eyes.<br />

• Accident witnesses would have a harder time.<br />

• Some paint companies might go out of business.<br />

• Car sales would decline and people would lose jobs.<br />

INTERESTING<br />

• Interesting to see if different shades of yellow arose.<br />

• Interesting to see if people appreciated the safety factor.<br />

• Interesting to see whether attitudes towards cars changed.<br />

• Interesting to see if this were enforceable.<br />

• Interesting to see who would support the suggestion.<br />

233


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Tool: Problem Focus <strong>State</strong>ment<br />

The First Step in Problem-Solving<br />

“A problem well stated is a problem half solved.” Charles F. Kettering<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Manager’s Toolbox<br />

What: A technique to focus in on the problem to be solved.<br />

When: To help get a clear picture of the current state, impact, and desired state.<br />

Why: To clarify a problem before tackling the issue.<br />

Process:<br />

1. Write out a “Current <strong>State</strong>” which answers the question: “What’s the problem?”<br />

This should be a statement of what it looks like now; just the facts; no judgments<br />

or opinions; no solutions yet.<br />

2. Write out an “Impact <strong>State</strong>ment” which answers the question: “So what?” This<br />

should be a statement describing what it (the problem) is causing; who is impacted<br />

by it; how are they impacted.<br />

3. Write out a “Preferred <strong>State</strong>” which answers the question: “What’s the most<br />

desired state when this is fixed?” When it’s fixed, how it will look; how good will it<br />

be. Describe “nirvana” when it’s fixed.<br />

234


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Tool: Five Why’s<br />

Discovering Root Cause<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Manager’s Toolbox<br />

"If you don't ask the right questions, you don't get the right answers. A question asked<br />

in the right way often points to its own answer. Asking questions is the ABC of<br />

diagnosis. Only the inquiring mind solves problems." Edward Hodnett<br />

What: A technique used to peel away layers of problem symptoms and discover the<br />

root cause of a problem.<br />

When: To determine the relationship between different root causes of a problem.<br />

This is one of the simplest tools; easy to complete without statistical analysis.<br />

Why: This is a favorite technique of a three year old child: “But why?” “But why?”<br />

“But why?” It may drive you CRAZY, but it’s very effective in helping the child<br />

understand the problem better.<br />

Process:<br />

1. Write down the specific problem. Writing the issue helps you formalize the<br />

problem and describe it completely. It also helps a team focus on the same<br />

problem.<br />

2. Ask “Why” the problem happens and write the answer down below the problem.<br />

3. If the answer you just provided doesn't identify the root cause of the problem<br />

that you wrote down in Step 1, ask “Why” again and write that answer down.<br />

4. Loop back to Step 3 until the team is in agreement that the problem's root cause is<br />

identified. Again, this may take fewer or more times than “Five Whys.”<br />

235


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Tool: Decision Matrix<br />

Choosing the Best Decision<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Manager’s Toolbox<br />

What: A technique for evaluating a list of ideas against a set of guidelines by using a rating<br />

scale.<br />

When: If a group is divided and needs factual information to reach agreement.<br />

Why: To help a group weigh possible options against specific guidelines, such as time and<br />

cost.<br />

Process:<br />

1. Determine the guidelines that options must meet. Time and cost are the most common<br />

guidelines; however, each situation can have its own set. To determine guidelines for a<br />

particular situation, ask yourself these kinds of questions: Is cost a factor? Time? Ease<br />

of use? Customer acceptability? Accuracy?<br />

2. List the three to five most important guidelines across the top of a chart. Assign a<br />

numerical rating scale to each guideline. Use the same scale (e.g. 1-10) for each guideline<br />

and ensure that all scales run the same way.<br />

Sample: How to get the word out on a new marketing plan.<br />

OPTIONS 1=high cost<br />

5=low cost<br />

KEY GUIDELINES<br />

Cost Time to<br />

Implement<br />

5= short time<br />

required<br />

1=long time required<br />

Customer<br />

Acceptability<br />

1= low acceptability<br />

5= highly acceptable<br />

TOTAL<br />

Newsletter* 4 5 4 13<br />

Poster 3 3 2 8<br />

Radio Ad 2 2 3 7<br />

Video 1 1 4 6<br />

Memo 5 5 1 11<br />

* Newsletter is best choice with the highest score.<br />

Other options: Instead of ranking on a 1-10 scale, you could rank each item against one another.<br />

Or, if one guideline is more important than the others, it could be weighted (e.g. a factor of two<br />

for the cost item).<br />

236


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Tool: Five Finger Consensus<br />

Collaborative Consensus Building<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Manager’s Toolbox<br />

What: A technique that allows a group to quickly indicate how they feel about a<br />

proposal by holding up one to five fingers.<br />

When: To see if your group has reached consensus.<br />

Why: Allows a group to know the level of support from all members for a proposal.<br />

Process:<br />

1. When it is time to see if a group is at consensus, ask for a five finger consensus.<br />

All group members hold up their appropriate number of fingers to indicate their<br />

level of agreement or consensus. The number of fingers indicate:<br />

Five fingers: They love the proposal and enthusiastically support it.<br />

Four fingers: They like the proposal and support it.<br />

Three fingers: They sufficiently favor the proposal and won’t become an<br />

obstacle to carrying it out.<br />

Two fingers: They really don’t like it and likely can’t support it.<br />

One finger: They hate the proposal and won’t support it.<br />

2. The facilitator then looks around and checks each person’s hand.<br />

3. If everyone in the group shows a five, four or three, you have consensus.<br />

4. If any members show only one or two fingers, ask them what they would need to be<br />

a five, four or three.<br />

5. All members of the group are responsible to hear what the ones and twos need and<br />

add to the original proposal in an attempt to gain consensus.<br />

237


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Tool: Dot Voting<br />

Determining Group Priorities<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Manager’s Toolbox<br />

What: A technique to identify those items which are a priority for group members<br />

out of a list of items.<br />

When: Useful when you wish to narrow a list to a few, high priority items.<br />

Why: Colored dots give a quick and highly visual picture of where people’s priorities<br />

lie.<br />

Process:<br />

1. Before you vote, check with members to clarify items and combine those that are<br />

the same. Don’t take too long for this process, however, and don’t let the group<br />

over combine and dilute the meaning of an item.<br />

2. The more dots you give each person, the longer the sorting process. To do a onetime<br />

sort, give everyone three to four dots. You can refine the list by having<br />

everyone vote a second time with a different color dot on the priorities identified<br />

in the first sort.<br />

238


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Tool: Force Field Analysis<br />

To identify the promoting and restraining forces of an issue<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Manager’s Toolbox<br />

What: A technique that helps identify and visualize the relationships between the<br />

significant forces that influence a problem or goal.<br />

When: To identify improvement opportunities.<br />

Why: To identify key factors (forces) that promotes or hinders the solution to a<br />

problem or the achievement of a goal.<br />

Process:<br />

1. Define the objective. Identify the problem or goal to be analyzed.<br />

2. List the forces. List the factors that promote or hinder achievement of your goal.<br />

Use two lists: one for promoting forces and one for inhibiting forces.<br />

3. Prioritize. Prioritize the forces on each list according to their relative impact on<br />

the problem or goal.<br />

4. Implement. Minimize or weaken the inhibiting forces and maximize or strengthen<br />

the promoting ones.<br />

Example:<br />

Goal: Quit Smoking<br />

Promoting Forces Inhibiting Forces<br />

Better health Habitual behavior<br />

Save money Addiction<br />

Food tastes better Gain weight<br />

Cleaner teeth Don’t like the dentist anyway<br />

239


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Tool: Uncommon Commonalities<br />

An Icebreaker and an Energizer<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Manager’s Toolbox<br />

What: A great way to get people to become more familiar with each other, build some<br />

trust and get ready to work together.<br />

When: With large or small groups; highly interactive and energizing.<br />

Why: Builds quick trust and camaraderie within groups.<br />

Process:<br />

1. Groups should be sized between four and six people. More or less becomes either<br />

too hard or too easy. Make sure everyone has introduced themselves, agency, job<br />

etc.<br />

2. Explain the goal of the activity. We want the table groups to find some unusual/<br />

uncommon things that you all share in common. An example would be that you have<br />

all bungee jumped. It would not be “uncommon” to list trips to Disneyland, pizza,<br />

chocolate, camping or high stress jobs. All the groups are competing to come up<br />

with the most unusual thing in common they can. There may be prizes for the<br />

winning team.<br />

3. Ask each group to select a note taker to record their work. Give them 10 minutes<br />

to do their best.<br />

4. Have them prioritize and select their most unusual commonality. Have the groups<br />

each share with the bigger group their entry in the most usual commonality<br />

sweepstakes.<br />

5. List the entries on a flip chart as they are reported out. Then have the entire<br />

group vote by raised hands on which one they think is most unusual.<br />

6. Option. Use their entries to create a team name for each table. For example: The<br />

Cactus-eaters, The Skydivers, etc.<br />

240


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Tool: Affinity Clustering<br />

A Creativity Tool<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Manager’s Toolbox<br />

This is a brainstorming tool which allows you think creatively and chaotically and then<br />

organize the information. It is great to use for planning projects and strategic planning.<br />

It works well in groups and allows everyone a chance to actively participate.<br />

What: A technique used to brainstorm all of the pieces of a project or a plan and<br />

then organize the information in a useful way.<br />

When: At the beginning of projects and plans. This technique gets projects and plans<br />

off to a robust start.<br />

Why: It really gets everyone’s thinking up on the wall and then gives you a way to<br />

organize that thinking. You can use this with small groups or large groups<br />

(several hundred people!). One of its best features is that no matter the size<br />

of the group, everyone can participate and make a meaningful contribution.<br />

Process:<br />

1. Secure an adequately sized room with an accessible large blank wall.<br />

2. Supplies: You will need a generous supply of “half-sheets.” These are colored<br />

pieces of 8½” by 11” paper cut in half. The color of the paper can be used to livenup<br />

and organize the process. You will also need “repositionable” tape (the blue tape<br />

used for masking in painting) and a supply of marker pens.<br />

Activity:<br />

3. Introduce the activity as a method to brainstorm and organize ideas for the<br />

project or plan that you are working on.<br />

4. Hand out the “half-sheets” of paper and marker pens. Explain that each participant<br />

will be writing their ideas on the half-sheets.<br />

241


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

The Rules for Writing on the half-sheets:<br />

1) Write BIG<br />

2) Try to keep to three to five words<br />

3) Write legibly<br />

4) One idea per half-sheet<br />

5. Give participants several minutes to individually brainstorm and write the ideas<br />

that pop into their heads on the half-sheets.<br />

6. After they have been able to come up with at least several ideas each, have them<br />

share their ideas in small groups. As they share, have them eliminate duplicate<br />

ideas and sort for the ideas that represent the group’s best thinking.<br />

7. After about 10 minutes, we are ready to move to having the small groups share<br />

their best thinking with the whole group. Ask the groups to sort their pile of ideas<br />

for different aspects that you give them. For example: please pass forward the<br />

idea you think has the most promise. On the next round it could be their wildest<br />

idea. Each time they look at their ideas in a new way keeps them in the creative<br />

mood.<br />

8. After they sort out the idea that best represents what you asked for, have them<br />

hand the idea forward. Read the idea out loud to the class and then tape it up<br />

randomly on the wall. Eliminate duplicates with the group’s permission.<br />

9. Get all of the best ideas up on the wall. There will be a huge conglomeration of<br />

ideas. Ask the small groups to donate one of their members to form an organizing<br />

team. Take the organizing team aside and explain the goal is to group all the ideas<br />

by similarity (affinity). They will usually group into somewhere between four and<br />

six groups of ideas. They will be able to do this in an amazing short period of time<br />

(under 10 minutes). An additional thing you can do is ask another group to come up<br />

and sort the groups by priority, putting the highest priority items at the top and<br />

the lower ones at the bottom.<br />

10. At the end of the activity, you will have a large number of good ideas, grouped by<br />

affinity and sorted for priority. This is a great start for any plan or project and<br />

everybody contributed!<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

242


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Tool: Open Space Technology<br />

A Participatory and Free Spirited Technique<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Manager’s Toolbox<br />

“Open Space” is a simple and elegant method of organizing group thinking. To the stakeholders, it offers<br />

the opportunity to work on the issues that they care about instead of being forced to work on issues<br />

decided by someone else, which is usually the case at planning events. It can be used with small or very<br />

large groups.<br />

What: A technique used to organize group thinking and focus it on action. It has very simple<br />

rules and does not require elaborate facilitation.<br />

When: When you want to do a less structured planning process with people who are<br />

comfortable working in that kind of environment.<br />

Why: People work best and hardest when they can work on the subjects they care about<br />

and have passion for. At most planning events, you end up assigned frequently to work<br />

on issues that would not be your first choice, if you were allowed to have one.<br />

Process: Open Space is based on a set of four Principles and one Law.<br />

1 st Principle: Whoever comes are the right people.<br />

Open space works with those who are interested and ready to commit themselves. Only those that are<br />

present can contribute. Attendance is principally open as much as possible.<br />

2 nd Principle: Whatever happens is the only thing that could have.<br />

This principle gives the base for sustainable involvement of stakeholders. Those issues for which people<br />

have a passion and in which they would engage themselves are discussed, not less, not more. In Open<br />

Space, everything that happens has a meaning.<br />

3 rd Principle: Whenever it starts is the right time.<br />

4 th Principle: When it’s over, it’s over. (When it’s not over, it’s not over)<br />

These principles describe an obvious and well-known fact: it is not possible to force processes. If people<br />

are committed to making a change, they will take the process in their hand. Although time and space are<br />

predefined in an Open Space event, clocks play a minor role in setting the pace.<br />

The Law of Two Feet<br />

The only law that guides Open Space requires that whenever a participant feels that he/she is neither<br />

contributing nor learning, he/she is encouraged to use their capacity to move to another place of interest.<br />

Thus the Law of Two Feet creates a process of cross fertilization between different focus groups.<br />

243


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Tool: ORID Discussion Method<br />

A Structure for Focused Conversations<br />

THE OBJECTIVE LEVEL IN A NUTSHELL:<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Manager’s Toolbox<br />

Focus of the questions: Data, the “facts” about the topic, external reality.<br />

What it does for the group: Ensures that everyone deals with the same body of data and<br />

all the aspects.<br />

Questions are in relation to: The senses: what is seen and heard and touched etc.<br />

Key questions: What objects do you see? What words or phrases stand<br />

out? What happened?<br />

Traps and pitfalls: Asking closed questions, or questions not specific enough; no<br />

clear focus; ignoring objective questions because “they are<br />

too trivial.”<br />

If this level is omitted: There will be no shared image of what the group is<br />

discussing; the various comments will seem unrelated.<br />

THE REFLECTIVE LEVEL IN A NUTSHELL:<br />

Focus of the questions: Internal relationship to the data.<br />

What it does for the group: Reveals its initial responses.<br />

Questions are in relation to: Feelings, moods, emotional tones, memories or associations.<br />

Key questions: What does it remind you of? How does it make you feel?<br />

Where were you surprised? Where delighted? Where did<br />

you struggle?<br />

244


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Traps and pitfalls: Limiting the discussion to an either/ or survey of likes and<br />

dislikes.<br />

If this level is omitted: The world of intuition, memory, emotion and imagination is<br />

ignored.<br />

THE INTERPRETIVE LEVEL IN A NUTSHELL:<br />

Focus of the questions: The life meaning of the topic.<br />

What it does for the group: Draws out the significance from the data for the group.<br />

Questions are in relation to: Layers of meaning, purpose, significance, implications,<br />

“story,” and values, considering alternatives and options.<br />

Key questions: What is happening here? What is this all about? What does<br />

all this mean for us? How will this affect our work? What<br />

are we learning from this? What is the insight?<br />

Traps and pitfalls: Abusing the data by inserting precooked meaning;<br />

intellectualizing, abstracting; judging responses as right or<br />

wrong.<br />

If this level is omitted: Group gets no chance to make sense out of the first two<br />

levels. No higher-order thinking goes into decision making.<br />

THE DECISIONAL LEVEL IN A NUTSHELL:<br />

Focus of the questions: Resolution, implications, new directions.<br />

What it does for the group: Makes the conversation relevant for the future.<br />

Questions are in relation to: Consensus, implementation, action.<br />

Key questions: What is our response? What decision is called for? What<br />

are the next steps?<br />

Traps and pitfalls: Forcing a decision when group is not ready or avoiding pushing<br />

group for decision.<br />

If this level is omitted: The responses from the first three levels are not applied or<br />

tested in real life.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

245


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

GLOSSARY<br />

These are terms commonly used in strategic planning and performance measurement.<br />

Accountability Monitoring, measuring and evaluating the performance and progress of policies,<br />

plans, and programs.<br />

Action Plan A detailed description of how goals will be implemented.<br />

Assessment<br />

Phase<br />

Defines where we are now. Identifies major issues and priorities affecting the County.<br />

Assesses problems and opportunities. Prepares the organization to begin<br />

development of strategic plan.<br />

Baseline A level of previous or current performance that can be used to set improvement goals<br />

and provide a basis for assessing future progress.<br />

Benchmark A measurement or standard that serves as a point of reference by which other<br />

practices, processes, products or services can be measured.<br />

Benchmarking The process of rating an organization’s practices, processes, and products against<br />

the best and then emulating them. It involves seeking out best-in-class performers<br />

inside or outside of the organization, studying them to determine why they are the<br />

best at what they do, and applying what is learned.<br />

Consensus The collective opinion of a group on the discussion of an issue. It means that<br />

everyone is willing to accept the decision as a good decision, even if it is not his or<br />

her first choice.<br />

Continuous<br />

Improvement<br />

Refers to the philosophy whereby every system or process within the organization is<br />

subject to continual improvement. Continuous improvement, in turn, requires that “If it<br />

ain't broke, it can be made better.”<br />

Cultural A change in the values, standards and daily conduct within an organization.<br />

Change<br />

Customer Anyone who receives or consumes goods or services. This includes internal<br />

customers who consume or receive goods and services produced within the<br />

organization.<br />

Customer<br />

Focus<br />

An organization that makes decisions and takes actions after determining impacts on<br />

the customer. The needs of the customer drive the organization.<br />

Cycle Time The interval required to complete a task, or function, starting from the beginning of the<br />

first step until the completion of the last.<br />

Data Facts which must be gathered and analyzed for information.<br />

Data<br />

Management<br />

The process by which the reliability, timeliness and accessibility of an organization's<br />

database is assured.<br />

Deployment The systematic process of introducing an activity or process to all applicable areas of<br />

an organization.<br />

246


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Development<br />

Phase<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Glossary (cont.)<br />

Actual development of a strategic plan, based on Countywide assessment. Includes<br />

the development of a comprehensive focus and direction with measurable objectives<br />

and evaluation criteria. Outcomes include the development of multi-year work plans.<br />

Diversity The characteristic of a workforce which is a result of individual differences between its<br />

members. Specific differences may include: gender, minorities, or individual<br />

disabilities.<br />

Effectiveness Meeting agreed-upon requirements for supplier inputs and customer outputs.<br />

Efficiency Minimizing time and/or other resources spent on activities that do not add value.<br />

<strong>Employee</strong><br />

Involvement<br />

A practice within an organization whereby employees regularly participate in making<br />

decisions on how their work is done, which includes making suggestions for<br />

improvement, planning, goal setting, and monitoring performance.<br />

Empowerment A condition whereby employees have the authority to make decisions and take action<br />

on their own without constant approval.<br />

Environmental<br />

Scan<br />

An analysis of key internal and external elements or forces that influence the<br />

conditions under which an organization functions.<br />

Evaluation The systemic review of the missions, goals, objectives, action plans, performance<br />

measures, and operations of an organization or program.<br />

External Scan<br />

External<br />

Variables<br />

Data collection and analysis of external forces and trends that influence the conditions<br />

under which the County functions. Includes evaluation of external threats and<br />

opportunities.<br />

Factors not controlled through the policy or program that may have independent and<br />

significant effects on outcomes such as economic downturns, population shifts,<br />

technological advances, cultural differences or changes.<br />

Facilitator A person knowledgeable in process improvement, problem solving and group<br />

dynamics who assists teams and team leaders. Facilitators assist with the process<br />

and are not subject matter experts of the content being facilitated.<br />

Goals<br />

Implementation<br />

Phase<br />

The general end purposes toward which effort is directed, the end result.<br />

The implementation of workplans and monitoring of results and outcomes. Includes<br />

evaluation and adjusting of the strategic plan.<br />

Indicator The actual data that feed into judging progress on outcomes.<br />

Inputs<br />

The resources needed to provide a particular product or service. Inputs include labor<br />

hours, materials and equipment.<br />

Internal Scan Data collection and analysis of internal systems and processes. Includes evaluation of<br />

internal strengths and weaknesses.<br />

Leadership The skills and abilities to help people do a better job through coaching, facilitating,<br />

and by creating environments that support the aim of the organization.<br />

247


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Glossary (cont.)<br />

Measurement The act or process of measuring in order to compare results with requirements. A<br />

quantitative estimate of performance.<br />

Mission/<br />

Purpose<br />

“<strong>State</strong>ment”<br />

The purpose and focus of an organization. The mission is generally defined in terms<br />

or products and services of an organization. Often summed up as a statement that<br />

explains an organization’s existence. A short, comprehensive statement of purpose.<br />

The mission identifies what the organization does (or should do) and for whom it does<br />

it.<br />

Objective An expanded and more detailed clarification of an organizational unit’s mission and<br />

goals. Specific and measurable targets for accomplishment of a goal.<br />

Organizational<br />

Culture<br />

Outcome<br />

Measure<br />

A set of shared assumptions, beliefs and practices about people and work that<br />

defines the nature of the workplace and leads to common work habits and interaction<br />

patterns. Includes shared attitudes and values.<br />

A measure of the effectiveness and efficiency of an activity in relation to mission and<br />

goals.<br />

Outputs Things and information which are the end result of an activity (product, reports,<br />

services, information, etc.)<br />

Partnering The establishment of a relationship between two parties characterized by teamwork<br />

and mutual trust, allowing both parties to focus on the needs of a mutual customer or<br />

client/constituent. Partners share risks as well as benefits. Partnering arrangements<br />

can be with labor, management, employees, suppliers, government, and educational<br />

institutions.<br />

Performance<br />

Accountability<br />

A means of judging policies and programs by measuring their progress toward<br />

achieving agreed upon performance targets. Performance accountability systems<br />

define performance measures (including outcomes), measure performance, and<br />

report results.<br />

Performance A goal or benchmark against which actual performance is measured.<br />

Standard<br />

Prevention A future-oriented, proactive, approach to quality management, which achieves quality<br />

improvement through corrective action on a process.<br />

Principles Core values and philosophies describing how an organization conducts itself in<br />

carrying out its mission.<br />

Problem An opportunity for improvement of an undesirable condition, often manifested by<br />

symptoms, created by root causes, which must be systematically identified and<br />

eliminated or altered to control the problem.<br />

Procedures Step-by-step “ how to” tasks which are necessary to conduct a process and meet<br />

standards; a method or manner of proceeding.<br />

248


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Glossary (cont.)<br />

Process A systematic and defined method of doing something. A process generally involves a<br />

number of steps or operations.<br />

Quality Tools Instruments used to perform a task or to display collected data. For example; graphs,<br />

charts, diagrams, questionnaires, etc. The seven simple tools include: flow charting,<br />

cause and effect diagrams, Pareto analysis, control charts, run charts, histograms<br />

and scatter diagrams.<br />

Quality Values The principles and beliefs that guide an organization and its people toward the<br />

accomplishment of its vision, mission and quality goals.<br />

Recognition Appreciation or acknowledgment of a job well done and/or continuous improvement.<br />

Root Cause The prime cause of a problem. The root cause(s) must be eliminated or modified to<br />

assure quality by significantly reducing the problem.<br />

Stakeholders Individuals or groups that have a vested interest or expect certain levels of<br />

performance or compliance from the organization. Stakeholders do not necessarily<br />

use the products or receive the services of a program.<br />

Strategic<br />

Issues<br />

Concerns of critical importance to the organization. These issues enable focusing on<br />

the highest priority goals for the organization as a whole.<br />

Strategic Plan A practical action-oriented guide based upon an examination of internal and external<br />

factors, which directs goal setting and resource allocation to achieve meaningful<br />

results over time.<br />

Strategic<br />

Planning<br />

Process<br />

The process of developing a strategic plan. Typically consists of 4 phases:<br />

Assessment, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation.<br />

Strategy A strategy is a series of planned and sequenced tasks, which together allow for<br />

achievement of the critical success factor. Strategies must be clearly stated,<br />

observable.<br />

System A set of well-defined and well-designed processes for meeting the organization's<br />

quality and performance requirements.<br />

Total Quality<br />

Management<br />

An organizational philosophy that emphasizes (1) customer focus (2) employee<br />

involvement (3) continuous improvement (4) measurement.<br />

Value Added Activities or work essential to ensure a product or service meets the needs of the<br />

customer. Non-Value added are activities or work that do not directly contribute to<br />

the product or service meeting the needs of the customer. Such non-value added<br />

activities could include storage, transportation, review, appraisal, inspection, rework,<br />

etc.<br />

Variation Periodic or sporadic changes or deviations within a process.<br />

Vision A clear, positive, inspirational statement, describing what the organization is striving<br />

to be in the future, expressed in simple specific terms.<br />

249


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Resource Books<br />

For Public Sector Managers<br />

Books on Questions and Answers for Managers/Supervisors<br />

Successful Manager’s Handbook<br />

Personnel Decisions, <strong>20</strong>01 Personnel<br />

Decisions International ISBN-0-938529-<strong>20</strong>-X<br />

Supervisor’s Portable Answer Book George<br />

Fuller 1990 Prentice Hall<br />

ISBN 0-13-876590-1<br />

Act on It! Solving 101 of the Toughest<br />

Management Challenges Sam Deep and<br />

Lyle Sussman <strong>20</strong>00 Perseus Publishing<br />

ISBN 0-7382-0245-2<br />

Quick Solutions to 500 People Problems<br />

Managers Face and How to Solve Them<br />

Thomas L. Quick 1987 John Wiley and<br />

Sons ISBN 0-471-85228-7<br />

The Manager’s Troubleshooter Carr and<br />

Albrecht 1996 Prentice Hall ISBN 0-13-<br />

240300-5<br />

Managing Negative People S. Michael<br />

Kravitz 1995 Crisp Publications ISBN 1-<br />

56052-306-9<br />

Motivating at Work Twyla Dell<br />

1993 Crisp Publications ISBN 1-56052-<strong>20</strong>1-1<br />

Handling Difficult <strong>Employee</strong>s Marty<br />

Brounstein 1993 Crisp Publications ISBN<br />

1-56052-179-1<br />

Office Management Manning and Haddock<br />

1990 Crisp Publications ISBN 1-56052-<br />

005-1<br />

Mind mapping: Your Personal Guide to<br />

Exploring Creativity and Problem Solving<br />

Joyce Wycoff, 1991 Berkley Books<br />

ISBN 0-425-12780-X<br />

The Mind Map Book Tony Buzan, 1993<br />

Plume; ISBN 0-525-93904-0<br />

Authoritative guide to best practices in<br />

management (690 pages).<br />

Question and answer format. Hundreds of<br />

questions answered. (336 Pages)<br />

Written in the ACT format. A is for analyzing<br />

the situation, C is for choosing your response<br />

and T if for tracking the outcomes. Neat<br />

book (228 Pages).<br />

How to solve 500 people problems -<br />

sensitively, diplomatically and authoritatively.<br />

(377 Pages)<br />

Pinpointing the causes and cures of 125<br />

tough day-to-day problems managers face.<br />

(462 Pages)<br />

Written the Crisp 50 minute book format.<br />

Designed to be self directed study.<br />

(72 Pages)<br />

Written the Crisp 50 minute book format.<br />

Designed to be self directed study.<br />

(97 Pages)<br />

Books on Mind Mapping<br />

Concise collection of some good general<br />

information on planning. (149 Pages)<br />

Concise collection of some good general<br />

information on planning. (83 Pages)<br />

Basic explanation of mind mapping and a<br />

good starter book for those new to the<br />

technique.<br />

Advanced book on mind mapping by the<br />

developer of the technique.<br />

Mapping Inner Space Nancy Margulies This book teaches you how to visually map<br />

250


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>20</strong>02 Zephyr Press ISBN 1-56976-138-8 project. (159 Pages)<br />

Leadership and the One Minute Manager<br />

Ken Blanchard 1985 William Morrow and<br />

Co. ISBN0-688-03969-3<br />

Essential Manager’s Manual Robert Heller/<br />

Tim Hindle 1998<br />

DK Publishing ISBN 0-7894-3519-5<br />

Managing People is Like Herding Cats<br />

Warren Bennis<br />

1999 Publishers Press ISBN 1-890009-10-<br />

5<br />

First Break All The Rules Buckingham and<br />

Coffman 1999 Simon & Schuster ISBN 0-<br />

684-85286-1<br />

The Guru Guide Boyett 1998 John Wiley &<br />

Sons ISBN 0-471-18242-7<br />

25 Essential Lessons for <strong>Employee</strong><br />

Management Dennis L. DeMey <strong>20</strong>01 Facts<br />

on Demand Press ISBN 1-889150-25-8<br />

The One Minute Manager Blanchard and<br />

Johnson 1982<br />

A Berkley Book ISBN 0-425-06265-1<br />

Management – Tasks, Responsibilities,<br />

Practices Peter F. Drucker 1974 Harper &<br />

Row ISBN 0-06-091<strong>20</strong>7-3<br />

Delegating for Results Robert Maddux 1990<br />

Crisp Publications ISBN 1-56052-008-6<br />

The New Supervisor Elwood Chapman<br />

1992 Crisp Publications ISBN 1-56052-1<strong>20</strong>-<br />

1<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Books on Situational Leadership<br />

Books on Managing People<br />

This book explains how Situational<br />

Leadership works in the well known style of<br />

the One Minute Manager. (111 Pages)<br />

Very thick book with short 2 page pieces on<br />

a great variety of management related<br />

subjects. (864 pages)<br />

Full of good thinking on management and<br />

leadership by one of today’s leading<br />

business authors. (236 Pages)<br />

What the world’s greatest managers do<br />

differently… based on in depth interviews by<br />

Gallup of 80,000 managers. (267 Pages)<br />

The best ideas of the top management<br />

thinkers, Covey, Drucker, Bennis and more,<br />

all summarized in one book. (384 Pages)<br />

Very practical advice on how to manage<br />

successfully. (307 Pages)<br />

The classic little book on management.<br />

(110 Pages)<br />

The classic management book by Peter<br />

Drucker. (840 Pages)<br />

Written the Crisp 50 minute book format.<br />

Designed to be self directed study.<br />

(71 Pages)<br />

Written the Crisp 50 minute book format.<br />

Designed to be self directed study.<br />

(68 Pages)<br />

251


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

101 Sample Write-Ups for Documenting<br />

<strong>Employee</strong> Performance Problems Paul<br />

Falcone 1999 Amacon ISBN 0-8144-7977-<br />

4<br />

Discipline Without Punishment Dick Grote<br />

Amacon 1995 ISBN 0-8144-0276-3<br />

The Leadership Challenge Kouzes and<br />

Posner 1995 Jossey-Bass<br />

ISBN 0-7879-0110-5<br />

Leadership Without Easy Answers Ronald<br />

A. Heifetz 1999 The Belknap Press<br />

ISBN 0-674-51858-6<br />

The Complete Idiots Guide to Leadership<br />

Andrew J. Dubrin 1998 CWL Publishing<br />

ISBN 0-02-861946-3<br />

Get Everyone in Your Boat Rowing in the<br />

Same Direction Bob Boylan 1995 Adams<br />

Media Corp. ISBN 1-55850-547-4<br />

10 Minute Guide to: Leadership Andrew J.<br />

Dubrin 1997 / Alpha Books<br />

ISBN: 0-02-861406-2<br />

The Motivating Leader Lewis Losoncy<br />

1985 Prentice Hall ISBN 0-13-603838-7<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Books on <strong>Employee</strong> Discipline<br />

Books on Leadership<br />

A guide to progressive discipline and<br />

termination. Hundreds of sample letters of<br />

discipline and they are all on an included<br />

floppy disk. (368 Pages)<br />

A new approach to employee discipline.<br />

(243 Pages)<br />

This is a book used by Leadership Oregon.<br />

Revised many times. A really well done<br />

leadership book. (405 Pages)<br />

A respected book aimed at top leadership in<br />

organizations. (348 Pages)<br />

In the typical “Idiots Guide” format, this book<br />

summarizes a wide range of leadership<br />

thinking.<br />

Five leadership principles to follow so that<br />

others will follow you. Very easy and<br />

worthwhile reading. (177 Pages)<br />

Concise collection of some good general<br />

information on leadership.<br />

(134 Pages)<br />

Dozens of practical, uplifting approaches to<br />

help you build responsible motivated<br />

employees. (<strong>20</strong>9 Pages)<br />

Well known leadership and management<br />

First Things First Stephen Covey 1994<br />

Simon & Schuster ISBN 0-671-86441-6 writer/thinker. (371 Pages)<br />

The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People A holistic, integrated, principle-centered<br />

Stephen Covey 1989 Simon & Schuster approach for solving personal and<br />

ISBN 0-671-70863-5<br />

professional problems. (358 Pages)<br />

Thriving on Chaos Tom Peters 1987<br />

Harper & Row ISBN 0-06-097184-3<br />

Tom Peters on leadership. (708 Pages)<br />

A Passion for Excellence Tom Peters 1985 Tom Peters on leadership. (575 Pages)<br />

In Search of Excellence Tom Peters 1988 Tom Peters on leadership. The original<br />

Warner Books ISBN 0-44-638507-7 management guru book.<br />

252


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Who Moved My Cheese Spencer Johnson<br />

M.D. 1999 G.P. Putnam’s Sons<br />

Managing Transitions – Making the Most of<br />

Change William Bridges 1991 Perseus<br />

Books ISBN 0-<strong>20</strong>1-55073-3<br />

Why Change Doesn’t Work: Why Initiatives<br />

Go Wrong and How to Try Again and<br />

Succeed Harvey Robbins 1996 Petersons<br />

Pacesetter Books ISBN 1-56079-944-7<br />

Teaching the Elephant to Dance James A.<br />

Belasco 1990 A Plume Book ISBN 0-452-<br />

26629-7<br />

Managing Change at Work Scott and Jaffe<br />

1995 Crisp Publications<br />

ISBN 1-56052-299-2<br />

The Basics of Performance Measurement<br />

Jerry Harbour<br />

1997 Productivity Books<br />

ISBN 0-527-76328-4<br />

Measuring Up Jonathan Walters 1998<br />

Governing Books ISBN 1-56802-458-4<br />

Designing Feedback – Performance<br />

Measures for Continuous Improvement Carl<br />

Thor 1998 Crisp Publications<br />

ISBN 1-56052-468-5<br />

The Performance Appraisal Question and<br />

Answer Book <strong>20</strong>02 Dick Grote Amacon<br />

Books ISBN 0-8144-7151-X<br />

Powerful Performance Appraisals Karen<br />

McKirchy 1998 Career Press<br />

ISBN1-56414-367-8<br />

Manager’s Portfolio of Model Performance<br />

Evaluations Brandon Toropov <strong>20</strong>01<br />

Prentice Hall ISBN 0-13-091030-9<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Books on Managing Change<br />

The #1 best seller. An enlightening simple<br />

story about change. (95 Pages)<br />

This book concentrates on understanding the<br />

impact of change on people and how they<br />

transition. (128 Pages)<br />

Straight talk on why most change efforts do<br />

not succeed. (230 Pages)<br />

What you need to do to get an organization<br />

ready to change. (276 Pages)<br />

Written the Crisp 50 minute book format.<br />

Designed to be self directed study.<br />

(81 Pages)<br />

Books on Performance Measurement<br />

A short, concise introduction to the subject of<br />

performance measurement. (71 Pages)<br />

Governing Magazines guide to performance<br />

measurement in the public sector. Funny<br />

too. (179 Pages)<br />

A nice basic book on performance<br />

measurement. (91 Pages)<br />

Books on Performance Appraisal<br />

This book addresses the most commonly<br />

asked questions about the dreaded<br />

performance appraisal process. (238 Pages)<br />

How to set expectations and work together to<br />

improve performance. (127 Pages)<br />

Ready-to-use performance appraisal<br />

covering all kinds of employee performance.<br />

CD-ROM included. (431 Pages)<br />

253


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Effective Phrases for Performance<br />

Appraisals James E. Neal <strong>20</strong>00 Neal<br />

Publications ISBN 1-882423-09-7<br />

10 Minute Guide to: Performance Appraisals.<br />

Dale Furtwengler <strong>20</strong>00 Macmillan USA<br />

Inc ISBN: 0-02-863967-7<br />

Coaching for Development Marianne Minor<br />

1995 Crisp Publications<br />

ISBN 1-56052-319-0<br />

Coaching and Counseling Marianne Minor<br />

<strong>20</strong>02 Crisp Publications<br />

ISBN 1-56052-655-6<br />

Performance Consulting Robinson and<br />

Robinson 1995 Berrett-Koehler Publishers<br />

ISBN1-881052-84-2<br />

Tips for Teams A Ready Reference for<br />

Solving Common Team Problems<br />

Belgard/Fisher/Rayner 1995<br />

R.R. Donnelly & Sons ISBN 0-07-021224-4<br />

The Team Handbook Peter Scholtes 1994<br />

Joiner Associates ISBN 0-9622264-0-8<br />

Team Building William G. Dyer 1995<br />

Addison-Wesley Pub.<br />

ISBN 0-<strong>20</strong>1-62882-1<br />

Best Team Skills 50 Key Skills for Unlimited<br />

Team Achievement Dr. Lewis Losoncy<br />

1997 St Lucie Press ISBN 1-57444-085-3<br />

10 Minute Guide to: Teams and Teamwork<br />

John A. Woods 1997 / Alpha Books<br />

ISBN: 0-02861739-8<br />

Team Leaders Problem Solver Clay Carr<br />

1996 Prentice Hall ISBN 0-13-409962-1<br />

Teambuilding Robert Maddux 1992 Crisp<br />

Publications ISBN 1-56052-118-X<br />

The Big Book of Team Building Games<br />

Newstrom and Scannell 1998 McGraw Hill<br />

ISBN 0-07-046513-4<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Just a book with great phrases to use in<br />

performance appraisals. Very helpful.<br />

(<strong>20</strong>5 Pages)<br />

Concise collection of some good general<br />

information on performance appraisals.<br />

(158 Pages)<br />

Books on Performance Improvement<br />

Written the Crisp 50 minute book format.<br />

Designed to be self directed study.<br />

(75 Pages)<br />

Written the Crisp 50 minute book format.<br />

Designed to be self directed study.<br />

(88 Pages)<br />

Books on Teambuilding<br />

Performance consulting is a new concept.<br />

(349 Pages)<br />

Hundreds of solutions to problems teams<br />

encounter in a Tip Format (416 of them).<br />

Other sections on resources for working with<br />

teams. (229 Pages)<br />

This is a comprehensive, easy-to-use guide<br />

on how to use project teams to improve<br />

quality.<br />

How to build self direction into your work<br />

teams and pitfalls these efforts run into.<br />

(154 Pages)<br />

50 skills to encourage team development for<br />

managers to use. (139 Pages)<br />

Concise collection of some good general<br />

information on building teams in the<br />

workplace. (152 Pages)<br />

Solutions, techniques and strategies for<br />

problems in getting teams to function well.<br />

(442 Pages)<br />

Written the Crisp 50 minute book format.<br />

Designed to be self directed study.<br />

(77 Pages)<br />

A collection of icebreaker, experiential<br />

learning activities and energizers to build<br />

your team. (238 Pages)<br />

254


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Succeeding as a Self Managed Team<br />

Chang and Curtin 1994<br />

Chang Publications ISBN 1-883553-<strong>20</strong>-2<br />

Smart Moves Sam Deep and Lyle Sussman<br />

1990 Addison-Wesley ISBN 0-<strong>20</strong>1-51812-0<br />

Smart Moves for People in Charge Sam<br />

Deep and Lyle Sussman 1995 Addison-<br />

Wesley ISBN 0-<strong>20</strong>1-48328-9<br />

The Supervisors Big Book of Lists George<br />

T. Fuller 1994 Prentice Hall ISBN 0-13-<br />

122771-8<br />

What to Say to Get What You Want. Sam<br />

Deep & Lyle Sussman 1992 Addison-<br />

Wesley Books ISBN 0-<strong>20</strong>1-57712-7<br />

People Skills Robert Bolton 1979 Simon<br />

and Shuster ISBN 0-671-62248-X<br />

Communicating at Work Alessandra and<br />

Hunsaker 1993 Simon and Schuster<br />

ISBN 0-671-78855-8<br />

Facilitator’s Guide to Participatory Decision-<br />

Making Sam Kaner 1998 New Society<br />

Publishers ISBN 0-86571-347-2<br />

Winning Through Participation Laura J.<br />

Spencer 1989 Kendall/Hunt Publishing<br />

ISBN 0-8403-6196-3<br />

The Skilled Facilitator – Practical Wisdom for<br />

Developing Effective Groups Roger M.<br />

Schwarz 1994 Jossey-Bass<br />

ISBN 1-55542-638-7<br />

The Art of Focused Conversation – 100 ways<br />

to Access Group Wisdom in the Workplace<br />

Brian Stanfield <strong>20</strong>00 New Society<br />

Publishers ISBN0-86571-416-9<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Books of Lists of Good Ideas<br />

A guide to developing self directed work<br />

teams. (102 Pages)<br />

This is a book of lists for managers.<br />

Subjects covered are communication,<br />

supervision, writing, quality, meetings and<br />

more. Good for ideas. (247 Pages)<br />

130 more lists of things to think about before<br />

beginning projects. Teambuilding, customer<br />

service, and presenting in public.<br />

(295 Pages)<br />

Books on Communication<br />

Books on Facilitation<br />

A mixture of advice and lists for helping<br />

managers through a wide variety of issues.<br />

(269 Pages)<br />

“Strong words for 44 challenging types of<br />

bosses, employees, coworkers, and<br />

customers. Good advice for difficult<br />

communications. (316 Pages)<br />

A classic that is still popular. A collection of<br />

good stuff on communication. (300 Pages)<br />

“Improve your speaking, listening,<br />

presentation, and correspondence skills to<br />

get more done at work. (270 Pages)<br />

A versatile facilitation book. Good basic stuff<br />

and also advanced skills. Useful for coalition<br />

building. (255 Pages)<br />

A book that outlines the well known<br />

Technology of Participation facilitation model<br />

for planning etc. (185 Pages)<br />

A book for serious facilitators. (310 Pages)<br />

An effective method for facilitating<br />

conversations on a wide variety of subjects.<br />

(222 Pages)<br />

255


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Facilitation Skills for Team Leaders Hackett<br />

and Martin 1993 Crisp Publications<br />

ISBN1-56052-199-6<br />

Six Thinking Hats Edward DeBono 1985<br />

Little, Brown and Co. ISBN 85-81445<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Written the Crisp 50 minute book format.<br />

Designed to be self directed study. (91<br />

Pages)<br />

How to facilitate groups thinking together.<br />

(<strong>20</strong>7 Pages)<br />

Books on Strategic Planning and Goal Setting<br />

Organizational Vision, Values and Mission<br />

Scott, Jaffe & Tobe 1993 Crisp Publications<br />

ISBN1-56052-210-0<br />

Strategic Thinking and the New Science T.<br />

Irene Sanders 1998 The Free Press<br />

ISBN 0-684-84268-8<br />

Leadership and the New Science Margaret<br />

Wheatley 1999 Berret-Koehler Pub.<br />

ISBN 1-57675-055-8<br />

Strategic Planning for Public and NonProfit<br />

Organizations John M. Bryson 1995<br />

Jossey-Bass ISBN 0-7879-0141-5<br />

10 Minute Guide to: Planning Edwin E.<br />

Bobrow 1998 / Alpha Books<br />

ISBN: 0-02-861818-1<br />

Goal and Goal Setting Larrie Rouillard 1993<br />

Crisp Publications ISBN1-56052-183-X<br />

The Big Book of Presentation Games<br />

Scannell and Newstrom 1998 McGraw Hill<br />

ISBN 0-07-046501-0<br />

Make Presentations with Confidence Vivian<br />

Buchan 1991 Barrons ISBN 0-81<strong>20</strong>-4588-2<br />

Rapid Problem Solving with Post-It Notes<br />

David Straker 1997 Fisher Books<br />

ISBN 1-55561-142-7<br />

Creative Problem Solving Donald Noone<br />

1998 Barron’s ISBN 0-7641-0403-9<br />

Systematic Problem-Solving and Decision-<br />

Making Sandy Pokras 1989 Crisp<br />

Publications ISBN 0-931961-63-7<br />

Written the Crisp 50 minute book format.<br />

Designed to be self directed study.<br />

(101 Pages)<br />

Planning in the midst of chaos, complexity<br />

and change. A new model of strategic<br />

thinking.<br />

Books on Presenting in Public<br />

Books on Problem Solving<br />

Discovering order in a chaotic world.<br />

Systems thinking. (197 Pages)<br />

A very complete book for those seriously into<br />

strategic planning for organizations. Bryson<br />

presents at the Pacific Program. (325 Pages)<br />

Concise collection of some good general<br />

information on planning. (149 Pages)<br />

Written the Crisp 50 minute book format.<br />

Designed to be self directed study.<br />

(83 Pages)<br />

Attention getting exercises, stunts, and other<br />

energizers for livening up boring<br />

presentations. (211 Pages)<br />

A short quick method for organizing your<br />

presentation to make it effective.<br />

(121 Pages)<br />

Using post-it notes to do problem solving and<br />

planning. (156 Pages)<br />

Problem solving with an emphasis on<br />

creativity. (167 Pages)<br />

Written the Crisp 50 minute book format.<br />

Designed to be self directed study.<br />

(103 Pages)<br />

256


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

Behavior-Based Interviewing Terry Fitzwater<br />

<strong>20</strong>00 Crisp Publications<br />

ISBN 1-56052-583-5<br />

Emotional Intelligence Works Kravitz and<br />

Schubert <strong>20</strong>00 Crisp Publications<br />

ISBN 1-56052-584-3<br />

The Fifth Discipline Peter Senge 1994 A<br />

Currency Book ISBN 0-385-26095-4<br />

The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook Peter Senge<br />

1994 A Currency Book ISBN0-385-47256-0<br />

The Story Factor Annette Simmons <strong>20</strong>01<br />

Perseus Pub.<br />

Customer Service for Dummies Leland and<br />

Bailey 1995 IDG Books<br />

ISBN1-56884-391-7<br />

Quantum Learning Bobbi DePorter 1992<br />

Dell ISBN 0-440-50427-9<br />

Productivity Power Jim Temme 1993<br />

SkillPath Publications ISBN 1-878542-31-1<br />

E-Writing Dianna Booher <strong>20</strong>01 Pocket<br />

Books ISBN 0-7434-1258-3<br />

Writing Skills – Success in <strong>20</strong> Minutes a day<br />

Judith Olson 1998 Learning Express<br />

ISBN1-57685-128-1<br />

Reasoning Skills – Success in <strong>20</strong> minutes a<br />

Day Elizabeth Chesla 1998 Learning<br />

Express ISBN 1-57685-116-8<br />

To Do, Doing, Done! G. Lynn Snead and<br />

Joyce Wycoff. Simon and Schuster ISBN 0-<br />

684-81887-6<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Miscellaneous Books<br />

Compiled by DAS <strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services.<br />

Written the Crisp 50 minute book format.<br />

Designed to be self directed study.<br />

(112 Pages)<br />

Written the Crisp 50 minute book format.<br />

Designed to be self directed study.<br />

(107 Pages)<br />

Senge’s concept of a "learning organization"<br />

that uses "systems thinking." (424 Pages)<br />

The field book for The Fifth Discipline to help<br />

you create the learning organization.<br />

(589 Pages)<br />

This book explains the skill of storytelling and<br />

its use in persuasion, influence and<br />

inspiration. (253 Pages)<br />

Written in the typical “Dummies” format. This<br />

is a good summary of material on customer<br />

service.<br />

A book on how people learn and how to do it<br />

better.<br />

250 Great ideas for being more productive.<br />

A book about how to use E-Mail more<br />

effectively.<br />

Improving your writing skills.<br />

Improving your reasoning skills.<br />

A creative approach to managing projects<br />

and effectively finishing what matters most.<br />

257


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

COMMUNICATIONS<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

ACTION VERB LIST<br />

Acts as liaison Corresponds Instructs Negotiates Refers<br />

Advises Counsels Interprets Notifies Sells<br />

Advocates Demonstrates Interviews Presents Trains<br />

Arbitrates Displays Lectures Promotes Translates<br />

Authors Edits Markets Publicizes Writes<br />

Comments Guides Mediates Publishes<br />

Consults Informs Moderates Recommends<br />

ADMINISTRATION<br />

Administers Determines Implements Orders Regulates<br />

Appoints Directs Initiates Organizes Represents<br />

Arranges Dispatches Institutes Overhauls Revamps<br />

Completes Dispenses Issues Oversees Reviews<br />

Conducts Distributes Launches Prescribes Routes<br />

Consolidates Eliminates Manages Presides Selects<br />

Contracts Executes Motivates Provides Supervises<br />

Controls Finds Obtains Recruits Supplies<br />

Coordinates Governs Offers Rectifies Terminates<br />

Delegates Heads Opens Refers<br />

PLANNING and DEVELOPMENT<br />

Broadens Develops Drafts Initiates Plans<br />

Creates Devises Estimates Invents Prepares<br />

Designs Discovers Improves Modifies Produces<br />

Proposes<br />

ANALYSIS<br />

Amplifies Computes Evaluates Identifies Solves<br />

Analyzes Detects Examines Investigates Studies<br />

Calculates Diagnoses Forecasts Programs Systemizes<br />

Compiles Disapproves Formulates Researches Tests<br />

FINANCIAL/RECORDS MANAGEMENT<br />

Audits Collects Invests Minimizes Records<br />

Allocates Condenses Inventories Monitors Schedules<br />

Balances Documents Lists Processes Tallies<br />

Catalogues Expedites Logs Procures Traces<br />

Charts Guarantees Maximizes Purchases Updates<br />

Classifies<br />

258


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

MANUAL<br />

Assembles Delivers Modernizes Repairs Rewires<br />

Builds Installs Navigates Replaces Trims<br />

Constructs Maintains Operates Restores<br />

GENERAL<br />

Accomplishes Contributes Increases Provides Strengthens<br />

Achieves Delivers Initiates Serves Transforms<br />

Assists Expands Originates Services Utilizes<br />

Completes Handles Performs<br />

CREATIVE BEHAVIORS<br />

Alters Generalizes Rearranges Reorders Rewrites<br />

Asks Listens Recombines Rephrases Simplifies<br />

Changes Modifies Reconstructs Restates Synthesizes<br />

Creates Paraphrases Regroups Restructures Systematizes<br />

Designs Predicts Renames Retells Varies<br />

Develops Questions Reorganizes Revises<br />

PROBLEM SOLVING BEHAVIORS<br />

Analyzes Criticizes Evaluates Infers Translates<br />

Appraises Decides Explains Interprets<br />

Combines Deduces Formulates Plans<br />

Compares Derives Generalizes Relates<br />

Concludes Determines Generates Structures<br />

Contrasts Diagnoses Induces Substitutes<br />

GENERAL DISCRIMINATIVE BEHAVIORS<br />

Chooses Differentiates Indicates Omits Recognizes<br />

Collects Discriminates Isolates Orders Selects<br />

Defines Distinguishes Lists Picks Separates<br />

Describes Estimates Locates Places<br />

Detects Identifies Matches Points<br />

LABORATORY AND CLINICAL BEHAVIORS<br />

Applies Demonstrates Lengthens Reports Transfers<br />

Calibrates Dissects Limits Replaces Uses<br />

Computes Feeds Manipulates Resets Weighs<br />

Conducts Grows Operates Sets<br />

Connects Increases Plants Specifies<br />

Converts Inserts Prepares Straightens<br />

Decreases Keeps Removes Times<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

259


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

General Action Verb Table<br />

Achieves Designs Installs Responds Transcribes<br />

Acts Detects Institutes Restores Transfers<br />

Adapts Determines Interprets Retrieves Translates<br />

Addresses Develops Interviews Reviews Treats<br />

Administers Devises Invents Risks Tutors<br />

Advises Diagnoses Inventories Provides Types<br />

Allocates Directs Investigates Publicizes Undertakes<br />

Analyzes Discovers Judges Purchases Unifies<br />

Arbitrates Displays Lectures Raises Unites<br />

Arraigns Dissects Leads Realizes Updates<br />

Ascertains Distributes Logs Receives Utilizes<br />

Assembles Edits Maintains Recommends Weighs<br />

Assesses Establishes Manages Reconciles Writes<br />

Attains Estimates Manipulates Records<br />

Audits Evaluates Mediates Recruits<br />

Budgets Examines Mentors Reduces<br />

Builds Expands Models Refers<br />

Charts Expedites Monitors Relates<br />

Checks Experiments Motivates Renders<br />

Classifies Explains Negotiates Repairs<br />

Coaches Extracts Observes Reports<br />

Collects Files Obtains Represents<br />

Communicates Finances Operates Reschedules<br />

Creates Fixes Orders Researches<br />

Compiles Formulates Organizes Resolves<br />

Completes Founds Oversees Schedules<br />

Composes Gains Overlooks Selects<br />

Computes Gathers Performs Serves<br />

Conducts Generates Photographs Shapes<br />

Conserves Guides Pilots Shows<br />

Consolidates Handles Plans Sells<br />

Constitutes Heads Predicts Solves<br />

Constructs Hypothesizes Prepares Studies<br />

Consults Identifies Prescribes Summarizes<br />

Controls Implements Presents Supervises<br />

Co-opts Improves Processes Supplies<br />

Coordinates Improvises Produces Surveys<br />

Counsels Increases Programs Synthesizes<br />

Defines Influences Projects Targets<br />

Delegates Informs Promotes Teaches<br />

Delineates Inspects Proofreads Tests<br />

Delivers Inspires Protects Trains<br />

260


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

The Real Story of Life<br />

Author Unknown<br />

In a tiny coastal Mexican village, a boat comes into port. An American who is nearby<br />

compliments the Mexican fisherman on the quality of his catch and asks how long it took<br />

him.<br />

“Not very long,” answers the fisherman.<br />

“But then, why didn’t you stay out longer and catch more fish?” asks the American.<br />

The Mexican explains that these few fish are sufficient to meet his family’s needs.<br />

The American then asks, “But what do you do with the rest of your time?”<br />

“I sleep late, play with my children, and take a siesta. In the evening I go into the<br />

village to see my friends, play the guitar, and sing a few songs. I have a full life.”<br />

The American interrupts, “Listen, I have an MBA from Harvard and I can help you. You<br />

should start by fishing longer every day and then you can sell the extra fish you catch.<br />

With the extra revenue, you can buy a bigger boat. With the extra money a larger boat<br />

brings in, you can buy a second one and a third one – until you have an entire fishing<br />

fleet. Then you can open your own processing plant.”<br />

“And after that?”<br />

“When the business gets really good you can start selling stock and make millions!”<br />

“Millions? Really? And after that?”<br />

“After that you’ll be able to retire, live in a tiny village near the coast, sleep late, play<br />

with your children, catch a few fish, take siestas, and spend your evenings playing the<br />

guitar and singing with your friends.”<br />

261


<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Management Development Series<br />

Foundational Course<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training and Development Services<br />

version v9.0, <strong>20</strong>08<br />

Thank You!<br />

Thank you for participating in the Management Development Series.<br />

We hope your experience will prove useful to you in your career as a manager<br />

with the <strong>State</strong> of Oregon.<br />

If you have any questions about our services, please contact us at:<br />

<strong>State</strong> of Oregon<br />

Department of Administrative Services<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide Training, Development and Recruitment Services<br />

155 Cottage Street NE, U-30<br />

Salem, Oregon 97301-3967<br />

(503) 378-3040<br />

http://statetraining.das.state.or.us/<br />

262

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!