<strong>the</strong> neosentiMentalist aRGuMent aGainst MoRal RationalisM: soMe CRitiCal oBseRVations massimo reichlin università Vita-Salute San raffaele, milano REFERENCES Berker, S. (2009), ”The Normative Insignificance of Neuroscience”, Philosophy and Public affairs, 37, 2009, pp. 293-329; greene, J. (2003), ”From neural ‘is’ to <strong>moral</strong> ‘ought’: What are <strong>the</strong> <strong>moral</strong> Implicatiåons of Neuroscientific <strong>moral</strong> Psychology?”, nature reviews neuroscience, 4, 2003, pp. 847-850; greene, J. (2008), ”<strong>the</strong> secret Joke of Kant’s soul”, in W. sinnott-armstrong (ed.), <strong>moral</strong> Psychology. Volume 3: emotion, Brain disorders, and development, mit Press, cambridge, mass., pp. 35-79, 2008; greene, J. et al. (2001), ”an fmri investigation of emotional engagement in <strong>moral</strong> Judgment”, Science, 293, 2001, pp. 2105-2108; Greene, J. et al. (2004), ”The Neural Basis of Cognitive Conflict and Control in <strong>moral</strong> Judgment”, neuron, 44, 2004, pp. 389-400; greene, J. et al. (2008), ”cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian <strong>moral</strong> Judgment”, Cognition, 7, 2008, pp. 1144-1154; haidt, J. (2001), ”<strong>the</strong> emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to <strong>moral</strong> Judgment”, Psychological review, 108, 2001, pp. 814-834; haidt, J. and Joseph, c. (2004), ”intuitive ethics: how innately Prepared intuitions generate culturally Variable Virtues”, daedalus, 133, 2004, pp. 55-66; Joyce, r. (2008), ”What neuroscience can (and cannot) contribute to metaethics”, in W. sinnott-armstrong (ed.), <strong>moral</strong> Psychology. Volume 3: emotion, Brain disorders, and development, mit Press, cambridge, mass., 2008, pp. 371-394; Kennett, J. and Fine, c. (2008), ”internalism and <strong>the</strong> evidence from Psychopaths and ‘acquired sociopaths’”, in W. sinnott-armstrong (ed.), <strong>moral</strong> Psychology. Volume 3: emotion, Brain disorders, and development, mit Press, cambridge, mass., 2008, pp. 173-190; Korsgaard, c. (1996), ”skepticism about Practical reason”, in Creating <strong>the</strong> Kingdom of ends, cambridge university Press, cambridge, 1996, pp. 311-334; nichols, s. (2002a), ”norms with Feeling: towards a Psychological account of <strong>moral</strong> Judgment”, Cognition, 84, 2002, pp. 221-236; nichols, s. (2002b), ”on <strong>the</strong> genealogy of norms: a case for <strong>the</strong> role of emotion in cultural evolution”, Philosophy of Science, 69, 2002, pp. 234-255; nichols, s. (2002c), ”is it irrational to Be im<strong>moral</strong>? how Psychopaths threaten <strong>moral</strong> <strong>rationalism</strong>”, The monist, 85, 2002, pp. 285-304; nichols, s. (2004), Sentimental rules. On <strong>the</strong> natural foundations of <strong>moral</strong> Judgment, oxford university Press, oxford, 2004; 174
<strong>the</strong> neosentiMentalist aRGuMent aGainst MoRal RationalisM: soMe CRitiCal oBseRVations massimo reichlin università Vita-Salute San raffaele, milano nichols, s. (2008), ”sentimentalism naturalized”, in W. sinnott-armstrong (ed.), <strong>moral</strong> Psychology. Volume 2: The Cognitive Science of <strong>moral</strong>ity: intuition and diversity, mit Press, cambridge, mass., 2008, pp. 255-274; roskies, a. (2003), ”are ethical Judgments intrinsically motivational? lessons from ‘acquired sociopathy’”, Philosophical Psychology, 16, 2003, pp. 51-66; roskies, a. (2008), ”internalism and <strong>the</strong> evidence from Pathology”, in W. sinnott-armstrong (ed.), <strong>moral</strong> Psychology, Volume 3: The neuroscience of <strong>moral</strong>ity: emotion, Brain disorders, and development, mit Press, cambridge, mass., 2008, pp. 191-206; singer, P. (2005), ”ethics and intuitions”, The Journal of ethics, 9, 2005, pp. 331-352; smith, m. (2004), The <strong>moral</strong> Problem, Basil Blackwell, oxford, 2004; smith, m. (2008), ”<strong>the</strong> truth about internalism”, in W. sinnott-armstrong (ed.), <strong>moral</strong> Psychology, Volume 3: The neuroscience of <strong>moral</strong>ity: emotion, Brain disorders, and development, mit Press, cambridge, mass., 2008, pp. 207-215. 175
Change language