Deliverable No. 189 Indicator value database for Ephemeroptera ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 8. List of Ephemeroptera species from Italy and Southern Europe for which CNR-IRSA datasets are being arranged for autoecological data analysis at the micro-habitat scale. Family Genus Species Author(s) Acentrella sinaica Bogoescu, 1931 alpinus (Pictet, 1843) buceratus Eaton, 1870 cyrneus Thomas & Gazagnes, 1984 fuscatus (Linnaeus, 1761) Baetis liebenauae Keffermüller, 1974 melanonyx (Pictet, 1843) Baetidae muticus niger (Linnaeus, 1758) (Linnaeus, 1761) rhodani (Pictet, 1843) Centroptilum luteolum (Müller, 1776) Cloeon dipterum simile (Linnaeus, 1761) Eaton, 1870 bifidum (Bengtsson, 1912) Procloeon pennulatum (Eaton, 1870) pulchrum (Eaton, 1885) Caenidae Caenis luctuosa macrura-martae (Burmeister, 1839) Serratella Ephemerellidae Torleya ignita major (Poda, 1761) (Klapàlek, 1905) Ephemeridae Ephemera danica Müller, 1764 belfiorei Haybach & Thomas, 2001 helveticus Eaton, 1885 Ecdyonurus picteti (Meyer-Dur, 1864) venosus (Fabricius, 1775) Heptageniidae zelleri calabra (Eaton, 1885) Belfiore, 1995 Electrogena lateralis (Curtis, 1834) lunaris Belfiore & Scillitani, 1997 Epeorus sylvicola (Pictet, 1865) Rhithrogena semicolorata (Curtis, 1834) confusa Sartori & Jacob, 1986 Habroleptoides umbratilis (Eaton, 1884) Leptophlebidae Habrophlebia pauliana eldae consiglioi (Grandi, 1959) Jacob & Sartori, 1984 Biancheri, 1959 Choroterpes picteti (Eaton, 1871) Oligoneuriidae Oligoneuriella rhenana (Imhoff, 1852) 20
4.1 Micro-habitat scale preference for flow and substrate types for selected Ephemeroptera species: examples During the AQEM-STAR projects data regarding flow types (Padmore, 1997; Raven et al., 1998) and substrate types (AQEM consortium, 2002) were collected using standard protocols (Hering et al., 2004; Furse et al., 2006), enhanced for the definition of micro-habitat preferences (Buffagni et al., 2001). The definition of these environmental parameters, as recorded with the AQEM sampling protocol, are presented in Tables 9 and 10. Table 9. Flow types definitions and codes (modified from EA, 2003). Flow type Code Definitions Free fall FF Water falls vertically, clearly separated from the substrate at back or below. Generally associated with natural cascades. Chute CH Low, curving flow with substantial water contact ‘hugging’ the substrate. Where multiple chutes occur over individual boulders or bedrock outcrops, a ‘stepped’ profile is created. Broken standing waves Unbroken standing waves BW Water appears to be trying to flow upstream, against the mainstream. A white water tumbling wave must be present for the wave to be described as broken. Mostly associated with rapids, but may occasionally occur within riffles. UW ‘Babbling’ water with a disturbed ‘dragon-back’ surface. The crest faces upstream without breaking, but sometimes white water may occur as crest. Mostly associated with riffles, but may also occur within a rapid. Chaotic flow CF A chaotic mixture of three of faster flow types (e.g. FF, CH, BW e UW), and where no one of them is clearly predominant. Rippled RP Water surface with distinct, symmetrical, small ripples that are generally only a centimetre or so high and moving downstream. Beware: in windy conditions "smooth" flow type (see next for definition) can appears, superficially analyzing, as "rippled". Upwelling UP This flow type is marked by an appearance of bubbling or boiling water, coming in surface from deep portions of river. This appearance depends by strong upward flows movements disturbing surface. They are typically found on the outside of tight meander bends, behind inchannel structures (e.g. bridge abutments) or below waterfalls, cascade weirs and sluices. This flow types is often combined with rivers pools; sometimes produces lateral bank erosion on meander bends. Smooth SM Laminar flow where water movement does not produce a disturbed surface. If in doubt, put a ranging rod into the water and you will artificially produce disturbed surface movement either side of the rod. No perceptible flow Mostly associated with glides. NP No water movement is observed. It's possible to observe in reaches with regulated flow (i.e. above dams) or associated with natural structure preset in channel, as big block. In these cases the risk is to confound this flow type with the flow type "smooth". If in doubt put a ranging rod into water and observe surface movement of water. If the flow type is "not perceptible", no movement is observed. Dry flow DR When a channel is dry, either naturally or due to anthropic activities. The species preferences for these environmental parameters are here summarized by means of box&whiskers graphs. The species abundances were considered as number of individual for squared meter. Two examples, for a wide distribution and for an endemic species, are respectively presented. 21
Page 1 and 2: Project no. GOCE-CT-2003-505540 Pro
Page 3 and 4: 1 Introduction This preliminary (Ph
Page 5 and 6: Table 1. On line resources consulte
Page 7 and 8: Figure 1. Preview of the main bibli
Page 9 and 10: 3 Autoecological matrix compilation
Page 11 and 12: 3.1.1 Data supply for different geo
Page 13 and 14: Family Genus Species Author Paper r
Page 15 and 16: Table 5. The Caenidae family taxali
Page 17 and 18: Table 7. Amount of information (num
Page 19: • Indicator Species Analysis (Duf
Page 23 and 24: Baetis cyrneus Thomas & Gazagnes, 1
Page 25 and 26: As far as the substrate micro-habit
Page 27 and 28: Buffagni A., Belfiore C. 1994. Rece
Page 29 and 30: Annex 1 References considered in th
Page 31 and 32: [40] Alba-Tercedor J. 1983. A new s
Page 33 and 34: [86] Aro JE. 1910. Piirteitä päiv
Page 35 and 36: [134] Balthasar V. 1937. Arthroplei
Page 37 and 38: [176] Beketov MA. 2004. Novye svede
Page 39 and 40: [221] Belfiore C. 1994. Taxonomic C
Page 41 and 42: [271] Biancheri E., 1956. Una nuova
Page 43 and 44: [314] Braasch D, Soldán T. 1979. N
Page 45 and 46: [368] Brackenbury J. 2004. Kinemati
Page 47 and 48: [414] Buffagni A, Crosa G, Cotta Ra
Page 49 and 50: [455] Canivet V, Chambon P, Gibert
Page 51 and 52: [496] Collins JM. 1971. The Ephemer
Page 53 and 54: [539] Dedecker AP, Van Melckebeke K
Page 55 and 56: [584] Demoulin G. 1955. A propos de
Page 57 and 58: [629] Demoulin G. 1968. Deuxième c
Page 59 and 60: [674] Dolisy D, Dohet A. 2003. The
Page 61 and 62: [721] Elliott JM, Humpesch UH. 1983
Page 63 and 64: [768] Fenoglio S, Bo T, Battegazzor
Page 65 and 66: [811] Füreder L, Vacha C, Amprosi
Page 67 and 68: [858] Gaston KJ. 1991. The Magnitud
Page 69 and 70: [902] Gillies MT. 1954. The adult s
Page 71 and 72:
[948] Gonzalez-del-Tanago M, Garcia
Page 73 and 74:
[993] Guerold F, Vein D, Jaquemin G
Page 75 and 76:
[1043] Handlirsch A. 1925. Systemat
Page 77 and 78:
[1087] Hefti D, Tomka I. 1988. Cont
Page 79 and 80:
[1128] Huhta A, Muotka T, Juntunen
Page 81 and 82:
[1173] Jacob U, Sartori M. 1984. Di
Page 83 and 84:
[1218] Jażdżewska T. 1995. Compar
Page 85 and 86:
[1260] Kaiser H. 1979. Nachweis von
Page 87 and 88:
[1303] Khrennikov BB. 1978. 3.3 [Be
Page 89 and 90:
[1348] Kluge NJu. 1979. {A new spec
Page 91 and 92:
[1389] Kluge NJu. 1997. Ephemeropte
Page 93 and 94:
[1432] Kowalik RA, Ormerod SJ. 2006
Page 95 and 96:
[1476] Landa V, Soldán T. 1985. Ph
Page 97 and 98:
[1517] Lekve K, Stenseth NC, Gjøs
Page 99 and 100:
[1562] Liess A, Hillebrand H. 2005.
Page 101 and 102:
[1609] Malmqvist B, Hoffsten P-O. 1
Page 103 and 104:
[1652] Martynov AV. 1924. [On the i
Page 105 and 106:
[1696] Mol AWM. 1985. Enkele intere
Page 107 and 108:
[1737] Müller-Liebenau I. 1980. A
Page 109 and 110:
[1790] Navás L. 1924. Insectos de
Page 111 and 112:
[1844] Novikova EA. 1991. A new sub
Page 113 and 114:
[1886] Paulian R. 1947. Un Prosopis
Page 115 and 116:
[1927] Pupilli E, Puig MA. 2003. Ef
Page 117 and 118:
[1974] Roser B. 1979. Die Invertebr
Page 119 and 120:
[2017] Salas M, Dudgeon D. 2003. Li
Page 121 and 122:
[2056] Sartori M, Sowa R. 1992. New
Page 123 and 124:
[2100] Schoenemund E. 1929. Habrole
Page 125 and 126:
[2144] Sinitshenkova ND. 1991. [New
Page 127 and 128:
[2186] Soldán T. 1979. Spermatogen
Page 129 and 130:
[2227] Sowa R. 1971. Note sur les d
Page 131 and 132:
[2266] Statzner B, Gore JA, Resh VH
Page 133 and 134:
[2309] Studemann D, Tomka I. 1989.
Page 135 and 136:
[2351] Thomas A, Dakki M. 1978. Eph
Page 137 and 138:
[2394] Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Sykes
Page 139 and 140:
[2437] Tshernova OA. 1938. [Novoe s
Page 141 and 142:
[2484] Ulmer G. 1920. Über die Nym
Page 143 and 144:
[2531] Verneaux J. 1973. Cours d'ea
Page 145 and 146:
[2576] Wendling K, Erpelding G. 198
Page 147 and 148:
[2620] Zalessky GM. 1946. A new may
show all

Deliverable No. 189 Indicator value database for Ephemeroptera ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?