The Holy Land in Transit: Colonialism and the Quest ... - Epistemology
The Holy Land in Transit: Colonialism and the Quest ... - Epistemology
The Holy Land in Transit: Colonialism and the Quest ... - Epistemology
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
114 <strong>The</strong> American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences 25:2<br />
framework <strong>and</strong> “constructed <strong>the</strong>mselves as bearers of enlightenment to a<br />
heretofore savage l<strong>and</strong>” (p. 113). Not assail<strong>in</strong>g Israeli <strong>and</strong> American denizens,<br />
Salaita primarily <strong>in</strong>terrogates “<strong>the</strong> notion that one people’s scriptural<br />
prophecies override <strong>the</strong> rights of ano<strong>the</strong>r people’s very existence” (p. 44).<br />
With colonialism at <strong>the</strong> near-center of Palest<strong>in</strong>ian <strong>and</strong> Native American<br />
literatures, accord<strong>in</strong>g to Salaita, encoded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir contemporary fiction is a<br />
form of resistance to settler encroachment <strong>and</strong> chicanery often dubbed<br />
“terrorism.” Br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g toge<strong>the</strong>r authors that have never had personal or critical<br />
contact – although often allud<strong>in</strong>g to one ano<strong>the</strong>r – he unites groups<br />
with common histories <strong>and</strong> deconstructs <strong>the</strong> “<strong>the</strong>ology of div<strong>in</strong>e progress”<br />
(p. 113) that has dehumanized <strong>in</strong>digenous peoples. An <strong>in</strong>sightful analysis<br />
of how politics <strong>in</strong>fluences literary production, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Holy</strong> <strong>L<strong>and</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Transit</strong><br />
focuses on <strong>the</strong> works of four Palest<strong>in</strong>ian <strong>and</strong> Anish<strong>in</strong>aabe (Ojibwe/<br />
Chippewa) novelists who resist, challenge, <strong>and</strong> even ridicule colonialism:<br />
Gerald Vizenor <strong>and</strong> W<strong>in</strong>ona LaDuke of <strong>the</strong> White Earth Anish<strong>in</strong>aabe<br />
Nation, Palest<strong>in</strong>ian-Israeli Emile Habiby, <strong>and</strong> Palest<strong>in</strong>ian-<strong>in</strong>-exile Liyana<br />
Badr.<br />
Not only are Palest<strong>in</strong>ian-Zionist <strong>and</strong> Anish<strong>in</strong>aabe-American encounters<br />
remarkably similar, but also both bodies of literature face parallel issues of<br />
au<strong>the</strong>nticity <strong>and</strong> questions as to what constitutes serv<strong>in</strong>g community <strong>and</strong><br />
nation. Likewise, Salaita is m<strong>in</strong>dful of his own scholarship’s utility. As<br />
Arabs <strong>and</strong> Natives rema<strong>in</strong> little understood <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> American consciousness,<br />
he builds solidarity by <strong>in</strong>form<strong>in</strong>g Arab Americans of domestic <strong>in</strong>digenous<br />
issues <strong>and</strong> Native Americans of related foreign affairs. As his anti-dogmatic<br />
scholarship is ultimately concerned with redress, <strong>the</strong> author reaches out to<br />
activists <strong>and</strong> non-specialist general readers as well.<br />
After firmly establish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> critical <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical framework <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
first three chapters, chapter 4 probes colonial <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>digenous <strong>in</strong>terplay <strong>in</strong><br />
LaDuke’s Last St<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g Woman. Chapter 5 juxtaposes Israel’s Kahan Commission<br />
Report, produced after <strong>the</strong> Sabra <strong>and</strong> Shatila massacres, with Badr’s<br />
A Balcony over <strong>the</strong> Fakihani, while chapter 6 compares <strong>the</strong> trickster narratives<br />
of Vizenor <strong>and</strong> Habiby. Salaita concludes with a powerful personal<br />
narrative, “Dreamcatchers on <strong>the</strong> Last Frontier,” <strong>in</strong> which he recounts his<br />
summer sojourn <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Shatila refugee camp. <strong>The</strong>re, he noted <strong>the</strong> myriad<br />
ways <strong>in</strong> which Palest<strong>in</strong>ian refugees express <strong>the</strong>ir common liberation struggle<br />
with <strong>the</strong> dispossessed H<strong>in</strong>di Ahmar (“Red Indians”) of <strong>the</strong> New World.<br />
Liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> “<strong>the</strong>ir own version of a reservation” (p. 179), Salaita underscores<br />
how <strong>the</strong> Palest<strong>in</strong>ians of Shatila venerate Native Americans, even to <strong>the</strong> extent<br />
of appropriat<strong>in</strong>g Native symbols.