03.04.2013 Views

THE ROLE OF INDIGENOUS VOLUNTARY ASSOCIATIONS IN ...

THE ROLE OF INDIGENOUS VOLUNTARY ASSOCIATIONS IN ...

THE ROLE OF INDIGENOUS VOLUNTARY ASSOCIATIONS IN ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY<br />

REGIONAL AND LOCAL DEVELOPMENT<br />

STUDIES (RLDS)<br />

<strong>THE</strong> <strong>ROLE</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong><strong>IN</strong>DIGENOUS</strong> <strong>VOLUNTARY</strong> <strong>ASSOCIATIONS</strong> <strong>IN</strong> COMMUNITY<br />

BASED HIV/AIDS <strong>IN</strong>TERVENTION ACTIVITIES<br />

(<strong>THE</strong> CASE <strong>OF</strong> IDDIRS <strong>IN</strong> ADDIS ABABA)<br />

ADVISOR - ALULA PANKHRUST (PHD.)<br />

Prepared by - Wubalem Negash<br />

June 2003


Addis Ababa University<br />

Research and Graduate program Office<br />

Regional and Local Development<br />

<strong>THE</strong> <strong>ROLE</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>VOLUNTARY</strong> ASSOCIATION <strong>IN</strong> COMMUNITY BASED<br />

HIV/AIDS <strong>IN</strong>TERVENTION ACTIVITIES<br />

(<strong>THE</strong> CASE <strong>OF</strong> IDDIRS <strong>IN</strong> ADDIS ABABA)<br />

A thesis submitted to the research and graduate program office Addis<br />

Ababa University, Regional and Local Development Studies in partial<br />

fulfillment of the requirement of Degree of Masters in Regional and<br />

June, 2003<br />

Local Development Studies<br />

Advisor- Alula Pankhurst (PHD)<br />

Prepared by – Wubalem Negash


ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY<br />

RESEARCH AND GRADUATE PROGRAM <strong>OF</strong>FICE<br />

REGIONAL AND LOCAL DEVELOPMENT STUDIES (RLDS)<br />

<strong>THE</strong> <strong>ROLE</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong><strong>IN</strong>DIGENOUS</strong> <strong>VOLUNTARY</strong> <strong>ASSOCIATIONS</strong> <strong>IN</strong><br />

COMMUNITY BASED HIV/AIDS <strong>IN</strong>TERVENTION ACTIVITIES<br />

(<strong>THE</strong> CASE <strong>OF</strong> IDDIRS <strong>IN</strong> ADDIS ABABA)<br />

A <strong>THE</strong>SIS SUBMITTED TO <strong>THE</strong> RESEARCH AND GRADUATE PROGRAM<br />

<strong>OF</strong>FICE ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY, REGIONAL AND LOCAL DEVELOPMENT<br />

STUDIES (RLDS) <strong>IN</strong> PARTIAL FULFILLMENT <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> REQUIREMENT <strong>OF</strong> DEGREE <strong>OF</strong><br />

MASTERS <strong>OF</strong> ARTS <strong>IN</strong> REGIONAL AND LOCAL DEVELOPMENT STUDIES<br />

APPROVED BY BOARD <strong>OF</strong> EXAM<strong>IN</strong>ERS<br />

Board of examiners Signature Date<br />

1. Tegegn G/Egziabher (PHD.) __________________________ _________________<br />

(Chairman)<br />

2. Alula Pankhurst (PHD.) __________________________ _________________<br />

(Advisor)<br />

3. Hirut Terefe (PHD.) _________________________ _________________<br />

(Internal examiner)<br />

4.Damen Haile Mariam (PHD.) ________________________ _________________<br />

(External examiner)


DEDICATION<br />

THIS RESEARCH PAPER IS DEDICATED TO MY LATE<br />

FA<strong>THE</strong>R ATO NEGASH CHERU, WHO HAS GIVEN ME<br />

<strong>IN</strong>SPIRATION, COURAGE AND ENDLESS LOVE<br />

THROUGH OUT MY LIFE.


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />

I would like to give due appreciation for the contribution of different<br />

individuals and organizations for their invaluable support, encouragement<br />

and advise during my entire academic life and while I was undertaking this<br />

thesis. Above all I thank the almighty God for giving me strength and<br />

courage to go through the hardships and accomplish this much in my<br />

academic studies and other aspects of life.<br />

My thesis advisor, Dr. Alula Pankhurst, provides me his invaluable support<br />

and guidance starting from title identification until the finalization of the<br />

research. His comments, inspirations and his patience to correct each draft I<br />

prepare in every section of research undertaking makes this paper as<br />

technically presentable.<br />

My thanks also dedicates for Ato belay Hagos for his patience, valuable<br />

comments and inputs in my thesis. I am also extremely indebted for my<br />

professors in department of Sociology and Social Administration for their<br />

support and inspiration they put in both in my undergraduate and<br />

postgraduate studies.<br />

I am also extremely grateful for those personnel who were working in my<br />

sample NGO for providing me extensive information their comments and<br />

their encouragement while I was conducting data collection. W/o Kassech<br />

Abegaz (From ACORD Ethiopia); Dr. Kidmealem Lulseged, Ato Megerssa<br />

Fida and Ato Genene Bekele (CARE Ethiopia); Sister Enkutatash Bekele<br />

(from CBISDO); Sister Tibebe Maco, W/t Huluhagersh Eshete and W/t<br />

Nafkot W/stadik (from HAPCSO); Ato Yared Dagefu, Ato Dawit Adnew and<br />

Ato Leggesse Annore (from MJATD) and lastly but not least at all, Ato Mesfin<br />

(from ProPride Merkato) are those who deserve my thanks. I am even more<br />

thankful for every Iddir leader for their responses to my interviews and their<br />

advise to my studies.<br />

My many thanks also goes to Ato Aydefer Negash, My brother and my best<br />

friend, for his love, care and encouragement throughout my life in general<br />

ii


and during my post graduate life in particular. Similar appreciation also goes<br />

to my mother w/o Etalemahu Belihu, and my brothers Ato Gezaheghn<br />

Negash and Engineer Asnake Negas for their support and encouragement.<br />

Lastly, but not least in any ways, I am thankful for all my friends, colleagues<br />

and class mates for their moral support and motivation in my studies and<br />

accomplishment of this thesis.<br />

iii


Abstract<br />

Aberrations<br />

Local terms<br />

List of tables, diagrams and graphs<br />

Table of contents Page<br />

number<br />

PART ONE, <strong>IN</strong>TRODUCTION, METHODOLOGY, RESEARCH DESIGN<br />

AND PR<strong>OF</strong>ILE <strong>OF</strong> SELECTED NGOs<br />

CHAPTER ONE<br />

1. <strong>IN</strong>TRODUCTION<br />

………………………………………..………………....………….1<br />

1.1 BACK GROUND……………………………….……..………………..…….……1<br />

1.2 STATEMENT <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> PROBLEM ………………....…………….……….…..3<br />

1.3 SIGNIFICANCE <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> PROBLEM………………...…………………….….4<br />

1.4 OBJECTIVES <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> STUDY …………………….....……..…………….….6<br />

1.4.1 GENERAL OBJECTIVE……………….…………………….…6<br />

1.4.2 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE……………………….….………….…6<br />

1.5 RESEARCH QUESTIONS…………………………….………..….………….…6<br />

1.6 <strong>THE</strong> STUDY AREA………………………………………………...……………..7<br />

1.7 ORGANIZATION <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> PAPER ………………………………..…..……….9<br />

2. CHAPTER TWO : RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY<br />

2.1 METHODOLOGY.………………………………………………<br />

……….10<br />

2.1.1 METHODS <strong>OF</strong> SAMPL<strong>IN</strong>G<br />

……………………..…….10<br />

2.1.2 METHODS <strong>OF</strong> DATA COLLECTION And<br />

Instrument<br />

Design……………………………………………………<br />

…11<br />

iv


2.2 RESEARCH<br />

2.1.3 METHOD <strong>OF</strong> DATA ANALYSIS<br />

……………….….…..12<br />

2.1.4 FACTORS CONSIDERED<br />

……….……………………..13<br />

DESIGN………………………………………………….....13<br />

2.2.1 SELECTION <strong>OF</strong> SAMPLE<br />

NGOS……………..……....13<br />

2.2.2 SELECTION <strong>OF</strong> SAMPLE<br />

IDDIRS..…………………..15<br />

2.2.3 SELECTION <strong>OF</strong> GOS <strong>IN</strong><br />

2.3 SCOPE <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> STUDY<br />

SAMPLE………..…………..16<br />

…………………………………………….…..16<br />

2.4 LIMITATION <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> STUDY<br />

…………………………………………..17<br />

2.5 PR<strong>OF</strong>ILE <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> SELECTED COMMUNITY BASED<br />

HIV/AIDS <strong>IN</strong>TERVENTION IMPLEMENT<strong>IN</strong>G<br />

NGOS………………………………………………………………..……<br />

….17<br />

PART TWO: CONCEPTUAL AND <strong>THE</strong>ORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND REVIEW<br />

<strong>OF</strong> RELATED LITERATURE<br />

3. CHAPTER THREE<br />

CONCEPTS, DEF<strong>IN</strong>ITIONS AND <strong>THE</strong>ORETICAL FRAME WORK<br />

3.1 DEVELOPMENT, POVERTY AND HIV/AIDS……….………...…….………..25<br />

3.1.1 DEVELOPMENT APPROACHES AND <strong>THE</strong> CONCEPT <strong>OF</strong><br />

POVERTY ………………………………………………………….25<br />

3.1.2 POVERTY, HIV/AIDS AND DEVELOPMENT ……………...26<br />

3.2 <strong>THE</strong> CONCEPT <strong>OF</strong> COMMUNITY AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT<br />

…….…………………………………………………………………….……………..29<br />

v


3.3 <strong>THE</strong> CONCEPT <strong>OF</strong> COMMUNITY BASED ORGANIZATIONS<br />

……………………………………………………………………………..………….29<br />

3.4 CONCEPTUALIZATION <strong>OF</strong> CIVIL SOCIETY<br />

ORGANIZATIONS………………….….………………………………………l…..30<br />

3.5 <strong>THE</strong> CIVIL SOCIETY APPROACH ………………………………………….…..31<br />

3.6 RATIONALE FOR A COMMUNITY BASED HIV/AIDS <strong>IN</strong>TERVENTION<br />

…………………………………………………………………………………….……33<br />

CHAPTER FOUR - REVIEW <strong>OF</strong> RELATED LITERATURE<br />

4. LITERATURE REVIEW ON <strong><strong>IN</strong>DIGENOUS</strong> <strong>ASSOCIATIONS</strong><br />

4.1 <strong>THE</strong> CONCEPT <strong>OF</strong> <strong>VOLUNTARY</strong> <strong>ASSOCIATIONS</strong> AND IDDIR …………..36<br />

4.1.1 <strong>THE</strong> RANGE <strong>OF</strong> <strong>VOLUNTARY</strong> <strong>ASSOCIATIONS</strong> <strong>IN</strong> ETHIOPIA ...36<br />

4.1.2 DEF<strong>IN</strong><strong>IN</strong>G IDDIR<br />

…………………………………………………...…...37<br />

IDDIR ...36<br />

4.1.3. IDDIR AS A POPULAR FORM <strong>OF</strong> <strong><strong>IN</strong>DIGENOUS</strong> <strong>VOLUNTARY</strong><br />

ASSOCIATION………………………………………………….……….38<br />

4.1.4 FACTORS THAT LEAD TO DEVELOPMENT <strong>OF</strong><br />

4.1.5 IDDIR AND<br />

DEVELOPMENT……………………………..…..40<br />

4.2 LITERATURE ON HIV/AIDS AND IDDIR<br />

…………………………….…..…………41<br />

4.2.1 SPREAD <strong>OF</strong> HIV/AIDS <strong>IN</strong> ETHIOPIA<br />

……………….………..……………41<br />

4 2.2 TRANSMISSION <strong>OF</strong><br />

HIV/AIDS………………………..………………………..42<br />

4.2.3 AIDS REPORTS <strong>IN</strong><br />

ETHIOPIA……………………………………………..…….43<br />

4 2.4 IMPACTS <strong>OF</strong> AIDS <strong>IN</strong><br />

ETHIOPIA……………………………..…………………44<br />

4.2.5. <strong>THE</strong> THREAT <strong>OF</strong> HIV/AIDS EPIDEMIC ON IDDIRS<br />

………..……….……47<br />

4.2.6 MAJOR STRATEGIES <strong>OF</strong> COMBAT<strong>IN</strong>G<br />

HIV/AIDS...………..……………...49<br />

vi


PART THREE: ANALYSIS, DISCUSSION, SYN<strong>THE</strong>SIS <strong>OF</strong> F<strong>IN</strong>D<strong>IN</strong>GS AND<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

5. CHAPTER FIVE ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION <strong>OF</strong> F<strong>IN</strong>D<strong>IN</strong>GS<br />

5.1 EFFORTS <strong>OF</strong> SELECTED NGO <strong>IN</strong> HIV/AIDS <strong>IN</strong>TERVENTION<br />

WITH<br />

IDDIR…………………………………………………………………………………<br />

……….52<br />

5.1.1 <strong>THE</strong> ACTIVITIES <strong>OF</strong> HAPCSO<br />

………………………..……………52<br />

5.1.1.1 REASON FOR <strong>IN</strong>VOLV<strong>IN</strong>G IDDIRS<br />

…………...…………….53<br />

5.1.1.2 ACTIVITIES <strong>OF</strong> PARTNER<br />

IDDIRS………………………….53<br />

5.1.1.3.DEGREE <strong>OF</strong> <strong>IN</strong>VOLVEMENT <strong>OF</strong> PARTNER IDDIRS<br />

…………………<br />

……………………………………………………………55<br />

5.1.1.4 DURATION <strong>OF</strong> IDDIR <strong>IN</strong>VOLVEMENT<br />

………………………………………………………………………..……..<br />

58<br />

5.1.1.5 BY LAWS<br />

REVISION……………….……………………………………..60<br />

5.1.2 <strong>THE</strong> ACTIVITIES <strong>OF</strong> CARE; ETHIOPIA URBAN HIV/AIDS PREVENTION<br />

AND CONTROL<br />

PROJECT…..…………………………………….….…………60<br />

5.1.2.1 REASON FOR <strong>IN</strong>VOLV<strong>IN</strong>G IDDIRS<br />

………………………………...………….60<br />

5.1.2.2.<strong>IN</strong>VOLVEMENT <strong>OF</strong> PARTNER IDDIR <strong>IN</strong> IEC AND<br />

BCC……………………61<br />

5.1.2.3.PROVISION <strong>OF</strong> CARE AND SUPPORT FOR AIDS VICTIMS<br />

……………..62<br />

5.1.3 <strong>THE</strong> ACTIVITIES <strong>OF</strong><br />

ACORD………………………………………………………………63<br />

5.1.3.1.CAPACITY BUILD<strong>IN</strong>G ACTIVITIES <strong>OF</strong><br />

ACORD……………..……………..65<br />

vii


5.1.4 <strong>THE</strong> ACTIVITIES <strong>OF</strong><br />

MJATD……………….………………….………………..66<br />

5.1.5<strong>THE</strong> ACTIVITIES <strong>OF</strong> <strong>OF</strong> PRO- PRIDE MERKATO<br />

PROGRAM………..……68<br />

5.1.6 <strong>THE</strong> CASE <strong>OF</strong><br />

CBISDO……………………………………………………………68<br />

5.2 <strong>THE</strong> EFFORT <strong>OF</strong> SELECTED IDDIRS <strong>IN</strong> HIV/AIDS<br />

……………83<br />

<strong>IN</strong>TERVENTION……………...……71<br />

5.2.1 <strong>IN</strong>VOLVEMENT <strong>OF</strong> IDDIRS <strong>IN</strong> NON BURIAL<br />

ACTIVITIES………………..…71<br />

5.2.2 ACCESS <strong>OF</strong> IDDIRS TO EXTERNAL ASSISTANCE FOR NON BURIAL<br />

UNDERTAK<strong>IN</strong>GS……………………………………………………………………………..<br />

73<br />

5.2.3 <strong>THE</strong> SITUATION <strong>OF</strong> IDDIR CAPITAL, EXPENDITURE ON<br />

DEVELOPMENT, EXPENDITURE ON BURIAL ACTIVITIES AND DEATH<br />

RATES <strong>IN</strong> SELECTED IDDIRS<br />

………………………………………………………………………………………….75<br />

5.2.4. ANTI HIV/AIDS ACTIVITIES <strong>OF</strong> IDDIRS<br />

………………………………………83<br />

5.2.4.1 DURATION <strong>OF</strong> IDDIRS' ANTI HIV/AIDS ACTIVITIES<br />

5.2.4.2 REASONS FOR IDDIRS' <strong>IN</strong>VOLVEMENT AND SOURCES <strong>OF</strong><br />

<strong>IN</strong>ITIATION………………………………………………………..83<br />

5.2.4.3 REVISION <strong>OF</strong> IDDIR BYLAWS<br />

………………………………………..86<br />

5.2.5 MAJOR ANTI HIV/AIDS STRATEGIES UNDERTAK<strong>IN</strong>G BY<br />

IDDIRS…………………………………………………………………………….….<br />

88<br />

BCC………………………………….….88<br />

5.2.5.1 <strong>IN</strong>VOLVEMENT <strong>IN</strong> IEC AND<br />

5.2.5.1.1. IMPLEMENTERS <strong>OF</strong> ADVOCACY SESSIONS<br />

…………..….….90<br />

5.2.5.1.2 . PARTICIPATION <strong>OF</strong> HEALTH <strong>OF</strong>FICIALS AND PLWA <strong>IN</strong><br />

ADVOCACY<br />

SESSION……………….……………………………………..………91<br />

5.2.5.2. <strong>IN</strong>VOLVEMENT <strong>IN</strong> PROVISION <strong>OF</strong> CARE AND<br />

SUPPORT………93<br />

viii


…….…………………94<br />

5.2.5.2.1 K<strong>IN</strong>D <strong>OF</strong> SUPPORT FOR AIDS PATIENTS<br />

………………………..93<br />

5.2.5.2.2 K<strong>IN</strong>D <strong>OF</strong> SUPPORT FOR AIDS ORPHANS<br />

5.2.5 MAJOR PROBLEMS FACED BY IDDIRS<br />

……………………...………97<br />

...98<br />

5.2.6 FACTORS H<strong>IN</strong>DER <strong>IN</strong>VOLVEMENT <strong>OF</strong> NON <strong>IN</strong>VOLVED IDDIR<br />

5.3 EFFORTS <strong>OF</strong> GOVERNMENT BODIES TO <strong>IN</strong>VOLVE IDDIRS <strong>IN</strong> HIV/AIDS<br />

<strong>IN</strong>TERVENTION<br />

………………………………………………………………………………..100<br />

5.3.1 ACTIVITIES <strong>OF</strong> ADDIS ABABA<br />

HAPCO………..……………………………….100<br />

5.3.1.1. MAJOR <strong>ROLE</strong>S <strong>OF</strong> ADDIS ABABA<br />

HAPCO……………..………..101<br />

5.3.1.2 SOURCE <strong>OF</strong> FUND FOR ADDIS ABABA<br />

AHPCO…………………105<br />

5.3.2 <strong>THE</strong> ACTIVITIES <strong>OF</strong> WEREDA 5 ANTI HIV/AIDS COUNCIL<br />

COORD<strong>IN</strong>ATION <strong>OF</strong>FICE <strong>IN</strong> <strong>IN</strong>VOLV<strong>IN</strong>G IDDIR <strong>IN</strong> ANTI HIV/AIDS<br />

ACTIVITIES………………………………………………..……………….………1<br />

07<br />

5.3.2.1 FORMATION <strong>OF</strong> ANTI HIV/AIDS IDDIR COUNCIL AT WEREDA<br />

LEVEL………………………………………………………………………………..<br />

108<br />

5.3.2.2 FORMATION ANTI HIV/AIDS IDDIR COUNCIL AT KEBELE<br />

LEVEL.….……………………………………………………………………………<br />

108<br />

CHAPTER SIX ; SUMMARY, CONCLUSION SYN<strong>THE</strong>SIS <strong>OF</strong> F<strong>IN</strong>D<strong>IN</strong>GS AND<br />

RECOMMENDATION………………………………………………………………………………..………1<br />

11<br />

6. 1SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION<br />

…………………………………………………………..…115<br />

6.2 SYN<strong>THE</strong>SIS <strong>OF</strong> F<strong>IN</strong>D<strong>IN</strong>GS<br />

……………………………………………………………….…117<br />

6.3 RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

……………………………………………………………………….120<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ANNEXES<br />

ix


LOCAL TERMS<br />

Gigge- A rural gathering meant for provision of assistance in agricultural labor<br />

for families in need.<br />

Iddir - A form of indigenous voluntary association meant for burial, mourning<br />

activities as well as related social security activities.<br />

Iqub - A kind of traditional Rotating Savings and Credit Association (ROSCA),<br />

found in Ethiopia.<br />

Kebele- Smallest local administrative unit in the Ethiopian urban structure of<br />

Kifle-ketema - Sub-city unit, according to the recent urban re-structuring of<br />

Addis Ababa.<br />

Sefer- Small village or villages<br />

Sembete - Religious association among Orthodox Christians meant to feast on<br />

Sundays for religious as well as social purposes.<br />

Teskar - Feast giving ceremony meant for religious dedication of the death of<br />

some one, among Orthodox Christians<br />

Tsewwa - Kind of religious association among Orthodox Christians to feast on<br />

days of Saints as well as for social purposes.<br />

Wereda - Local administrative unit larger than Kebele<br />

Ye-Iddir Dagna- Chairperson of Iddir<br />

Ye-Iddir Tehafy- Secretary of Iddir<br />

Ye-Iddir Sebsaby- Person in charge of chairing the activities of Iddir<br />

Ye-Iddir Genzeb-yaszh - Cashier of Iddir<br />

x


ABBREVIATIONS<br />

ACORD- Agency for Cooperation in Research and Development<br />

AIDS- Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome<br />

BCC- Behavioral Change and Communication<br />

CBISDO- Community Based Integrated Sustainable Development<br />

Organization<br />

CBO- Community Based Organizations<br />

CDC- Center for Disease Control<br />

CSOs- Civil Society Organizations<br />

ECR- Expanded Comprehensive Response<br />

EMSAP- Ethiopian Multi Sectoral AIDS Project<br />

GOs- Government Organizations<br />

HBC- Home Based Care<br />

HAPCO- -HIV/AIDS Prevention and Control Office<br />

HAPCSO- Hiwot AIDS Prevention Control and Support Organization<br />

HIV- Human Immune Deficiency Virus<br />

IEC- Information Education and Communication<br />

MJATD- Marry Joy Aid Through Development<br />

MOH- Ministry of Health<br />

MOYCS- Ministry of Youth and Culture and Sport<br />

NACS- National AIDS Council Secretariat<br />

NGO- Non-Governmental Organization<br />

PLWA- People Living With AIDS<br />

ROSCA- Rotating Saving and Credit Association<br />

STD- Sexually Transmitted Disease<br />

STI- Sexually Transmitted Infections<br />

UNICEF- United Nations Children Emergency Fund<br />

VCT- Voluntary Counseling and Testing<br />

WB- World Bank<br />

WFP- World Food Program<br />

YMCA- Young Male Christian Association<br />

xi


Abstract<br />

The purpose of this research is to assess the role played by Iddir in coping with the<br />

HIV/AIDS epidemic in Addis Ababa, and hence to assess the role of non governmental<br />

organizations and governmental organizations in promoting active participation of Iddirs<br />

in the national HIV/AIDS intervention. In this thesis Iddir is considered as the major<br />

community based organization that can ensure the mobilization of every section of the<br />

community in anti HIV/AIDS activities. The activities of governmental organizations and<br />

non-governmental organizations are assessed with regard to their activities in involving<br />

Iddir in HIV/AIDS intervention activities.<br />

Increased mortality rate among majority of Iddirs resulting in increased expenditure on<br />

burial and related activities progressively deplete the financial resources of Iddirs. This<br />

situation in its turn result in limited involvement of Iddirs in poverty reduction and<br />

development activities. In some cases the very livelihood of Iddirs to survive is in<br />

jeopardy. So, involving Iddirs in anti HIV/AIDS activities is timely and reasonable<br />

considering the threat of the epidemic and the role Iddirs could play in mobilizing the<br />

community in such undertakings.<br />

Community based HIV/AIDS intervention that is undertaken in involving Iddirs in anti<br />

HIV/AIDS activities is in its infancy. Few efforts are being made to involve Iddirs in anti<br />

HIV/AIDS activities by certain NGOs and GOs. Very few NGOs are currently working in<br />

the areas of HIV/AIDS interventions with partner Iddirs. The existing attempts are<br />

recently adopted in which very few Iddirs took part. The existing activities of involved<br />

Iddirs are mainly reliant on the technical and financial assistance obtained from NGOs<br />

and GOs. The actives of NGO range from capacity building for local community based<br />

organizations like Iddirs, to provision of IEC, and care and support for AIDS patients and<br />

AIDS orphans. The role of partner NGOs are considerable in initiating the local Iddirs in<br />

taking part in HIV/AIDS interventions, as well as enhancing their role in these activities.<br />

Partner NGOs implement projects, which obviously are limited in resources, time and<br />

area. The sustainability of many of these activities is limited. The activities of GOs include<br />

formation of Iddirs council and facilitate capacity building activities for the local Iddirs in<br />

anti HIV/AIDS activities.<br />

There is large amount of financial resources availed at the national level, which is meant<br />

to enhance the financial capacity of CBOs in their anti HIV/AIDS activities. However,<br />

Iddirs rarely prepared projects proposals to use the EMSAP fund.. Limited technical<br />

capacity of Iddirs is the major factor that hinders the success of such attempts<br />

xii


undertaken by government organization and non-government organization. Certain<br />

suggestions about further improvement in partnership, capacity building and networking<br />

are recommended to improve the situation of identified problems.<br />

xiii


1. <strong>IN</strong>TRODUCTION<br />

1.1. BACKGROUND<br />

CHAPTER ONE<br />

Globally, the HIV/AIDS epidemic is becoming the foremost development crisis<br />

that threatens the demographic, social, economic as well as political stability of<br />

various nations. Developing countries are the major ones to be affected by<br />

different aspects of the AIDS epidemic. Africa is identified as the continent most<br />

affected by HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS, 2001).<br />

In most Sub-Saharan African countries adults and children are infected to a<br />

wide extent by the HIV/AIDS epidemic. The rate at which the infection spreads is<br />

accelerating. East Africa was once the highest infected region but now those in<br />

the southern part of the continent exceed the rates. South Africa has the largest<br />

number of people living with HIV/AIDS in Africa (UNAIDS, 2000).<br />

In African countries AIDS is not only a health problem but rather it also affects<br />

the political and economic sector. AIDS is impeding development and<br />

threatening political stability. It affects every aspect of development and major<br />

economic sectors. It has adverse impacts on population, education, health,<br />

agriculture, economy and business (UNAIDS, 2001).<br />

The latest report produced by Ministry of Health, (2002) showed that the current<br />

estimate for the adult prevalence rate of HIV infection is 6.6 per cent. The report<br />

also indicated that currently there are 15,202 reported AIDS cases; an estimate


of 219,400 AIDS cases and 2.2 million people are living with HIV in the country<br />

during the report year (MOH, 2002).<br />

The national adult HIV/AIDS prevalence rate in the year 2002 was 6.6 which is<br />

less than the prevalence rate for the year 2000, which was 7.3 percent. This<br />

change in prevalence was indicated not to show an actual decline in the<br />

HIV/AIDS epidemic in Ethiopia. However, it was rather the result of a<br />

reclassification of Estie, one of the rural sites into urban center (Ministry of<br />

Health, 2002).<br />

An effective national response to the HIV/AIDS epidemic can contribute to<br />

poverty reduction and to the overall development efforts. According to the<br />

Ministry of Health, the rate of spread of the epidemic is such that, the number of<br />

PLWA will increase to 2.6 million and 2.9 million in the years 2006 and 2010<br />

respectively. Moreover, the prevalence rate is expected to reach 7 percent in the<br />

year 2004. The number of AIDS cases will increase to 322,310 in the year 2014.<br />

Such projections indicate how fast the spread of the epidemic is and how serious<br />

the impact is on the overall development activities.<br />

In Ethiopia, AIDS is eroding progress made in areas of education, access to<br />

health care and economic development. Hospital bed occupancy rate for HIV<br />

cases is increasing. The health sector, military sector and mobile work force<br />

seem to be significantly affected by the HIV/AIDS epidemic (Ministry of Health,<br />

2002).


One out of every 11 people living in Ethiopia is an HIV/AIDS victim. The<br />

epidemic has also an impact on the country's capability to reduce poverty. HIV is<br />

the largest killer disease that affects the most productive age group in the<br />

country and is therefore, becoming the foremost threat to socio economic<br />

development. If it remains unchecked, HIV/AIDS will retard growth, weaken<br />

human capital, discourage investment, aggravate poverty and inequality and<br />

leave the next generation increasingly vulnerable to further socio-economic<br />

impacts of the epidemic (National AIDS Council, 2001).<br />

Therefore, it is suggested that there is a need to mobilize the efforts of the<br />

government and non-government organizations, community based organizations<br />

other stakeholders of the national development in providing care and support to<br />

people affected and infected by HIV/AIDS.<br />

1.2. STATEMENT <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> PROBLEM<br />

As it is indicated in an extensive research on the role of Iddir in poverty<br />

alleviation, change and development, the threat of HIV/AIDS is identified as one<br />

of major factors that limit the participation of Iddirs in development activities.<br />

The HIV/AIDS epidemic is identified as a major threat for the very existence of<br />

Iddirs as one of grass root social institutions. An increased number of<br />

expenditure on deaths expenses for members resulted at one time they could not<br />

pay for their members " … recently, due to the killer disease HIV/AIDS some<br />

leaders of Iddirs have the fear that it may deplete their financial resources".<br />

Therefore, it is indicated that certain Iddirs in Addis Ababa are at the margin of


disintegration due to high death rates and related financial depletion (Shiferaw,<br />

2002).<br />

Similarly according to survey made by Damen and Pankhurst (2003) increments<br />

in deaths have been experienced in most of Iddirs. In recent situation of<br />

increased mortality assumed to be caused by HIV/AIDS, Iddirs have been<br />

adversely affected in various ways. In the fist place, they have been losing<br />

members, and in addition, increased means greater strain in member in financial<br />

resources. Such stress lead to decreased in membership since majority may not<br />

be able to meet contribution. Eventually it is possible some Iddirs would dissolve.<br />

Therefore, Iddirs are expected to play major role in coping with epidemic along<br />

with efforts made by formal sector. There is no question that Iddirs could be<br />

successful mechanism in involving in the community in multi-sectoral efforts for<br />

the prevention and control of HIV/AIDS (Damen and Pankhurst, 2003).<br />

The participation of Iddirs in coping with HIV/AIDS in Ethiopia is at its infancy.<br />

Considering Iddirs have acquired experience in developmental and community<br />

mobilization activities, there are certain beginnings to involve Iddirs in anti<br />

HIV/AIDS interventions as well. According to PACT Ethiopia (2000), there were<br />

11 NGOs implementing community-based activities, which are undertaken<br />

jointly with Iddirs. The assessment made by PACT showed that there are certain<br />

beginnings to involve Iddirs in HIV/AIDS intervention (Pact Ethiopia, 2000).<br />

Similarly, Damen and Kloos (2003) indicated that Iddirs are taking part in<br />

HIV/AIDS intervention activities along with efforts made by Kebeles, anti


HIV/AIDS clubs, associations of people living with AIDS, non governmental<br />

organizations and similar grass root organizations.<br />

The participation of Iddir in anti HIV/AIDS is suggested as one of potentially<br />

essential for the successful national anti HIV/AIDS intervention. So undertaking<br />

research in the role of Iddirs in coping with HIV/AIDS is timely and reasonable to<br />

assess the impact of HIV/AIDS on the livelihood of Iddirs and the extent of their<br />

involvement in anti HIV/AIDS activities. The major rational of conducting this<br />

study is to assess the impact of AIDS on Iddirs and recommend the better<br />

situation in coping with the impact of HIV/AIDS.<br />

1.3. SIGNIFICANCE <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> STUDY<br />

A successful national response to HIV/AIDS requires coordinated engagements<br />

of government organizations, non-governmental organizations, as well as<br />

community-based organizations fully and efficiently. Such an effort, in turn, has<br />

to be based on concrete empirical research in order to design realistic strategies<br />

to contain the pandemic and support people living with HIV/AIDS.<br />

Different studies tried to show the medical, epidemiological as well as the<br />

economic impact of HIV/AIDS on the overall development of the country. Only a<br />

few studies have attempted so far to show the social and socio-cultural impact of<br />

the HIV/AIDS epidemic. More importantly, little attention is given to the study of<br />

the role of Community Based Organizations (CBOs) to cope with the adverse<br />

impacts of the HIV/AIDS epidemic.


Some studies (Dejene, 1993; Getenet , 1999; Shiferaw, 2002) have dealt with the<br />

role of Iddirs in overall development activities and related linkages that exist<br />

between poverty reduction and participation of the local community at the grass<br />

root level. However, the role and responses of such indigenous voluntary<br />

associations to cope with the HIV/AIDS epidemics seem to be rarely studied.<br />

Only a few researches (Pankhurst and Damen, 2003) tried to assess certain<br />

beginnings made in involving the grass root community in HIV intervention in<br />

Addis Ababa.<br />

The major purpose of this study is to assess and the role of Iddirs and thus, fill<br />

the research gap concerning the role of community participation in anti<br />

HIV/AIDS activities.<br />

Therefore, this study aims at assessing community-based initiatives undertaken<br />

to cope with the HIV/AIDS epidemic and the role of community based<br />

organizations in anti HIV/AIDS activities and with particular emphasis on the<br />

contribution of Iddirs. In addition, the experience of studying the role of Iddirs<br />

might initiate further efforts in employing participatory approaches in anti<br />

HIV/AIDS activities by involving grass root community based organizations.<br />

Accordingly, the role and the responses of Iddirs for successful anti HIV/AIDS<br />

intervention is the focus of investigation in this study with the above-mentioned<br />

importance and significance.<br />

1.4. OBJECTIVES <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> STUDY


1.4.1. GENERAL OBJECTIVE<br />

The general objective of this study is to assess roles played by Iddirs in coping<br />

with the HIV/IDS epidemic and undertaking anti HIV/AIDS activities in Addis<br />

Ababa.<br />

1.4.2. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES<br />

• Assess the magnitude of impact of HIV/AIDS epidemic on the livelihood<br />

of Iddirs.<br />

• Examine the role of NGOs and GOs and local administrative units like<br />

Kebele and weredas to involve Iddirs in anti HIV/AIDS interventions.<br />

• To assess and examine the extent of partnership that exists between<br />

NGOs and GOs with partner Iddirs.<br />

• Examine the major problems faced by Iddirs, NGOs as well as<br />

government bodies to involve actively in community based HIV/AIDS<br />

intervention.<br />

• Assess the degree of involvement of Iddirs and implementer NGOs in<br />

anti HIV/AIDS components and activities.<br />

1.5. RESEARCH QUESTIONS<br />

In order to investigate specific objectives of the research, the following research<br />

questions were formulated.


1. What is the situation of impacts of HIV/AIDS on the overall activities of<br />

Iddirs?<br />

2. What is the extent of partnership between Iddir, NGOs and GOs as well as<br />

local administrators to ensure sustainable community based anti HIV/AIDS<br />

activities?<br />

3. What are the roles of NGO, community leaders, local administrators and<br />

government bodies in anti HIV/AIDS activities undertaken by Iddirs?<br />

4. What are the major anti HIV/AIDS strategy components and activities widely<br />

undertaken by the Iddir in coping with the HIV/AIDS epidemic?<br />

What are the major problems faced in involving Iddirs in HIV/AIDS<br />

intervention?<br />

1.6. <strong>THE</strong> STUDY AREA<br />

Addis Ababa as the primate city, which is characterized by a concentration of<br />

economic, social and related facilities, which seem to be disproportional to the<br />

rest of other urban centers found in the country. This has resulted in a high rate<br />

of rural-urban migration and congested settlement in the city, which in turn<br />

resulted in ever increasing population pressure in the city.<br />

The population size of Addis Ababa is estimated to be 3 million people, with the<br />

increase rate of 3 per cent per year. This constitutes 5 percent of the total<br />

population size of the country (CSA, 1999).


Currently the urban structure of the Addis Ababa City Government is<br />

restructured into 10 sub cities (Kifle Ketemas) and 184 smallest local<br />

administration sections (kebeles).<br />

Addis Ababa belongs to the major urban centers in the country reported to have<br />

a high prevalence of HIV/AIDS. The average prevalence rate for HIV/AIDS for<br />

urban centers is reported to be 13.7 per cent. The major urban centers with the<br />

highest HIV prevalence are Bahir Dar, Jijiga, Nazareth and Addis Ababa with a<br />

corresponding prevalent rate of 23.4, 19.0, 18.7, and 15.6, respectively (Ministry<br />

of Health, 2002).<br />

Iddirs are the major indigenous associations in which majority of residents are<br />

members and which play role in one-way or another. Iddirs are the major<br />

associations, which govern social integrity of residents of Addis Ababa. There are<br />

more than 2000 Iddirs legally registered by the Addis Ababa Municipality. This<br />

figure only indicates the quantity of registered Iddirs found in the Addis Ababa<br />

(Municipality of Addis Ababa, 2002).<br />

The study population included non-governmental organizations, which are<br />

working closely with Iddirs in the area of HIV/AIDS intervention, Iddirs which<br />

are actively working in the area of HIV/AIDS intervention with partner NGOs or<br />

with out the help of NGOs or governmental organization. Moreover, the study<br />

population includes the government office, which is directly related to HIV/AIDS<br />

in the study area that is Addis Ababa HIV/AIDS Prevention and Control Office<br />

(Addis Ababa HAPCO).


1.7. ORGANIZATION <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> PAPER<br />

The paper contains three main parts and six chapters. The first part contains<br />

two chapters: chapter one that presents the introduction, and chapter two that<br />

contains the methodology, research design and profile of selected NGOs. Part two<br />

contains two chapters; that is chapter three and chapter four. Chapter three<br />

discusses concepts, definitions and theoretical framework. Chapter four presents<br />

a review of related literature. Part three also contains two chapters, chapter five<br />

and chapter six. Chapter five is considered about findings, analysis and<br />

discussion. Chapter six is the last chapter that contains the conclusions,<br />

synthesis of findings and recommendations.


CHAPTER TWO<br />

2. METHODOLOGY, RESEARCH DESIGN AND PR<strong>OF</strong>ILES <strong>OF</strong><br />

2.1. METHODOLOGY<br />

2.1.1. METHODS <strong>OF</strong> SAMPL<strong>IN</strong>G<br />

IMPLEMENTER NGOs<br />

Two kinds of techniques of sampling were employed in the research.<br />

1. Multistage cluster sampling that involves the initial sampling of groups of<br />

elements or clusters, which was also followed by selection of elements within<br />

each of the selected clusters. This sampling design is used when it is either<br />

impossible or impractical to obtain complete list of elements comprising the<br />

target population.<br />

Multi stage cluster sampling technique is employed to select samples of<br />

Implementer NGOs. The range of clusters include in the sample unit are those<br />

NGOs which are implementing community base development activities and those<br />

NGOs which are involved in anti HIV/AIDS activities with Iddirs. Similarly,<br />

NGOs whose main component activities are HIV/AIDS intervention are obtained<br />

from the first list. Finally, NGOs who implement community based HIV/AIDS<br />

intervention and who are currently working closely with Iddir were selected.<br />

2. Cluster sampling is the most widely used sampling method in survey<br />

method. It involves successive random sampling of units or sets and subsets.<br />

Cluster sampling is generally used when the elements of the entire population<br />

are difficult to list (Brown, 1983). Similarly, cluster sampling technique is


employed because the list of each Iddir who are involved in anti HIV/AIDS was<br />

no obtained. Selected samples are drawn from group of partners lists from each<br />

implementer NGOs. The list is obtained from the records of Iddir based<br />

HIV/AIDS intervention implementer NGOs.<br />

2.1.2. METHODS <strong>OF</strong> DATA COLLECTION AND <strong>IN</strong>STRUMENT DESIGN<br />

Both primary and secondary data were used in the research undertaking. The<br />

following are the major data collection methods employed:<br />

Primary data collection methods like self-administered questionnaire, structured<br />

interviews and unstructured interview were employed.<br />

Three different instruments were used to collect the primary data from each<br />

group of samples.<br />

I. Structured interview guides- were employed to conduct interviews with<br />

the leaders of Iddirs. In this regard Iddir leaders refers to officials who are<br />

currently actively engaged in leadership. (Ye Iddir Dagnas, Ye Iddir<br />

Sebsabi, Ye Iddir Genzeb Yazsh, Ye Iddir Teshafy) are among the officials<br />

who were included in the interviews. 61 interview sessions were conducted<br />

with the leaders of selected Iddirs. The author and assistant data collectors<br />

took part in collection of the primary data.<br />

II. Semi structure questionnaires- were administered for program officials of<br />

implementer NGOs. Project coordinators, administrators and project<br />

officers participated in completing questionnaires. Representatives of six


NGOs completed the distributed questionnaires. Six questionnaires were<br />

used for respective implementer non-governmental organizations.<br />

III. Unstructured interview guides- were used to collect primary data from<br />

government officials namely MOH and Addis Ababa City Government AIDS<br />

Prevention and Control Office (Addis Ababa HAPCO). Three interview<br />

sessions were conducted with the officials of Adds Ababa HAPCO and<br />

wereda 5 anti HIV/AIDS council coordination office.<br />

Secondary data collection methods are used like books, journals, published and<br />

unpublished materials are assessed.<br />

Document analysis- the reports and documents of Iddirs were analyses. Records<br />

of Iddirs with regard to their capital, number of death, amount of spending on<br />

burial and development etc, are included in document analysis.<br />

2.1.3. METHODS <strong>OF</strong> DATA ANALYSIS<br />

The purpose of data analysis is to reduce data in to intelligible and interpretable<br />

form so that the relation of research problems can be studied and tested.<br />

Interpretation takes the result of analysis, makes inferences pertinent to the<br />

research relations studied and draws conclusion about these relations (Kerlinger,<br />

1973).<br />

Frequency distribution is the major quantitative method of data analysis.<br />

Percentage and graphs are employed in frequency distribution. Triangulation a<br />

major technique that is used in validate the qualities of that data. Triangulation


is a method used verifying the data using different kind of data in which multiple<br />

data collection methods are involved. So, primary data obtained from Iddirs,<br />

NGOs and government bodies are triangulated in such a way the role of Iddirs is<br />

crosschecked in detail. Methods used were structured interviews, unstructured<br />

interviews, observation and questionnaires.<br />

2.1.4. FACTORS CONSIDERED<br />

Dependent factors<br />

Effect of HIV/AIDS on Iddirs<br />

Initiating factors for Iddirs to undertake HIV/ADS intervention<br />

The degree of involvement of Iddir and NGOs in anti HIV/AIDS<br />

Role of government bodies promoting the community based HIV/AIDS<br />

intervention<br />

Capacity of Iddir to HIV/AIDS intervention<br />

Independent Factors<br />

Number of AIDS deaths<br />

Number of AIDS orphans<br />

Amount of spending on burial ceremonies<br />

Number of PLWHA in Iddir<br />

Amount Iddir capital<br />

Situation of human resources in leadership


Initiation and teaching from NGOs and government bodies<br />

Public advocacy and mass awareness programs<br />

Capacity of Iddirs in capital, manpower, material and information,<br />

communication and networking<br />

Availability of training and capacity building<br />

Availability of financial, technical and material manpower assistance<br />

The availability of assistance in networking and technical help<br />

Role of umbrella Iddir associations in HIV/AIDS council on zonal level in<br />

promoting their role<br />

Size of assistance given from international donor organizations obtained at<br />

regional level.<br />

2.2. RESEARCH DESIGN<br />

2.2.1.SELECTION <strong>OF</strong> SAMPLE NGOs<br />

According to the recent report made by CRDA, there are more than 200 NGOs<br />

working in anti HIV/AIDS and poverty reduction activities in Addis Ababa. 3<br />

percent of the total number of NGOs working in the study areas are included in<br />

the sample. Six NGOs who are closely working with Iddir in HIV/AIDS are<br />

included in the survey using multistage cluster sampling. The list of NGOs<br />

implementing community-based intervention is used as primary cluster from<br />

which the second group is drawn. NGOs who are working with Iddirs in the area<br />

of HIV/AIDS are selected at the second stage. The criteria for selection is entirely<br />

based on the degree of their involvement in each of anti HIV/AIDS strategies with<br />

partner Iddir which are selected according to table 2.1 below. The table


summarizes the selection of Implementer NGOs. Table 2.1 Criteria of selection of NGOs<br />

in sample<br />

Strategies<br />

Information Education<br />

and Communication<br />

Name of partner NGOs<br />

HAPCSO CARE MJATD ACORD CBISDO Pro<br />

-<br />

pride<br />

Behavioral change and - - -<br />

Communication<br />

Voluntary Counseling and<br />

Testing<br />

- - - - -<br />

Care and Support - -<br />

Capacity building - - <br />

Number of currently<br />

active Partner Iddirs<br />

Total number of Partner<br />

Iddirs selected in the<br />

sample<br />

41 21 50 43 13 20<br />

17 14 7 10 5 8<br />

Percentage of Selected 41 % 67% 14% 32% 38% 40%<br />

sample<br />

NGOs<br />

from partner<br />

Source: Compiled from profiles of NGOs Keys: ( -) not involved ( )-Involved<br />

Total<br />

Therefore, a larger number of sample Iddirs are drawn from implementer NGO<br />

that involved in most of anti HIV/AIDS strategies. So, the process of selection of<br />

NGOs and their partner Iddirs follow different stages and the selection is entirely<br />

depend on the degree of their involvement in anti HIV/AIDS activities.<br />

2.2.2. SELECTION <strong>OF</strong> SAMLPE IDDIRS<br />

According to the response of Addis Ababa City Government Association, Meeting<br />

and Iddir licensing Bureau, there are more than 2300 registered Iddirs in Addis<br />

Ababa during the beginning of 2003. The amount of selected Iddirs in the<br />

research sample is 64, which is 2.8 percent of the total amount of Iddirs found in<br />

Addis Ababa.<br />

61


Sample units are selected for the partner Iddirs working with selected NGOs.<br />

Selected Iddir are identified on the basis of their involvement in anti HIV/ AIDS<br />

activities with partner NGOs or on their own without help of any NGO or<br />

government organization. The criteria for the selection of Iddirs are entirely based<br />

on the degree of involvement of Iddirs in anti HIV/AIDS activities. The selected<br />

Iddirs are summarized in table 2.2.<br />

Table 2.2 Selection of Iddirs in sample<br />

Number of Iddirs<br />

included<br />

Currently actively<br />

involved in all of anti<br />

HIV/AIDS strategies<br />

Source: Compiled from responses of Iddirs<br />

Degree of involvement<br />

Currently<br />

involved<br />

inmost of<br />

anti<br />

HIV/AIDS<br />

strategies<br />

Once actively<br />

involved but<br />

currently<br />

discontinued<br />

31 17 13 61<br />

2.2.3.SELECTION <strong>OF</strong> GOVERNMENT <strong>OF</strong>FICE <strong>IN</strong> SAMPLE<br />

Total number<br />

of selected<br />

Iddirs<br />

Two department from the government bodies was approached. These are Addis<br />

Ababa City Government HIV/AIDS Prevention and Control Office (Addis Ababa<br />

HAPCO) and respective sampled wereda in which the activities of the office seem<br />

to be model for the rest of wereda found in the study area.<br />

So the study tried to look at the role of Iddirs in HIV/AIDS intervention activities<br />

from three different direction activities from three different directions; that is<br />

from government bodies, implementer NGOs and partner Iddirs. Information that


gathered from three different directions was used in analysis of the finding.<br />

Summary of the sampling composition can be summarized in table 2.3.<br />

Table 2.3 Summary of Sampling compositions<br />

Number of Number of Type of<br />

samples taken interviews instrument used<br />

Implementer NGOs 6 6 Semi structure<br />

Iddir 61 61<br />

questionnaire<br />

Structured<br />

Interview guide<br />

Government<br />

2 3 Unstructured<br />

Organization<br />

interview guide<br />

Source: Compiled from sample frame<br />

2.3. SCOPE <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> STUDY<br />

The research examines the role of community-based initiatives in HIV/AIDS<br />

interventions in Addis Ababa City Administration. The survey is a cross sectional<br />

survey which entirely depended on data collected during the time of data<br />

collection (April and May, 2003). The case of Iddirs is taken as the proxy for the<br />

indigenous community based organizations. Other kinds of indigenous<br />

community based associations like that of Iqub, Mahiber, Tsewa and Gigge and<br />

etc. are not included in the scope of the research.<br />

2.4. LIMITATIONS <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> STUDY<br />

Time, financial and resource limitations were the major shortcomings faced<br />

while conducting the research.<br />

Recent attempts in restructuring of bureaus of Addis Ababa City Government<br />

cause disorganization of information, which were held at wereda level in to


different kifle- ketema. Moreover, lack of stabilized personnel at each desk<br />

coupled with poor documentation were major limitations that impeded<br />

obtaining further information about the work and achievements of AAHAPCO.<br />

Hence, model weredas were identified, as an indicator for the involvement of<br />

the office in wereda level.<br />

Resistance from Iddirs about disclosing the size of their capital was also<br />

another limitation. Iddirs were asked to give information about the size of<br />

capital and other detailed information for the last ten years. Poor<br />

documentation coupled with unwillingness to provide information about their<br />

capital was the major limitation to obtain full information about the overall<br />

situation of respondent Iddirs.<br />

2.5. PR<strong>OF</strong>ILE <strong>OF</strong> SELECTED NGOs<br />

Implementer NGOs are selected according to their involvement with Iddirs in anti<br />

HIV/AIDS interventions. Hence, six implementer non-governmental<br />

organizations were selected for the sake of explaining their activities working<br />

with partner Iddirs in the areas of HIV/AIDS intervention activities. This section<br />

is about the general profile of the implementers NGOs who are undertaking<br />

community based HIV/AIDS intervention.<br />

The following table shows the general profile of selected NGOs.


Table 2.4 General profile of NGOs<br />

Details<br />

Name of NGO<br />

HAPCSO CARE ACORD MJATD Pro-<br />

Pride<br />

Number of Kebele 9 14 8 3 4 6<br />

Number of Wereda 1 1 2 1 1 2<br />

Name of Sub cities<br />

(Kifle Ketema )<br />

Number of<br />

currently active<br />

Partner Iddirs<br />

Number of<br />

currently non<br />

active Iddir<br />

Lafto<br />

Nefas Silk<br />

Yeka, Arada<br />

and Cherkos<br />

Yeka<br />

and<br />

Akaky<br />

Kolfe<br />

Keranio<br />

Addis<br />

Ketema<br />

41 21 50 43 20 0<br />

0 10 0 0 0 13<br />

Sources: Compiled from responses of each NGO<br />

CBIS<br />

DO<br />

Lideta<br />

NB. The above table contains both wereda description and the name of Kifle-<br />

Ketema to clarify the confusion about the former and the recent restructuring of<br />

the urban administration of Addis Ababa in to ten sub cities.<br />

1. Hiwot AIDS prevention, Control, and Support Organization (HAPCSO)-<br />

HAPCSO is a local non-governmental organization. The project was established<br />

in Dec, 1999 with project duration of three years. The project area is nine kebele


found in wereda 23, which is restructured in Lafto-Nefas-Silk Kifle-Ketema<br />

according to the new urban structure. Seventeen partner Iddirs who were<br />

working with HAPCSO are included in the sample frame. Partner Iddirs are<br />

identified to be working in the areas of Information, Education, and<br />

Communication, Behavioral change and Communication, care and support, as<br />

well as capacity building with close supervision and collaboration of HAPCSO.<br />

HAPCSO is working closely with 41 Iddirs in major HIV/AIDS intervention<br />

strategies.<br />

The major aim of the project is to :<br />

♦ Implement Home based care for AIDS patients<br />

♦ Enhance the collective capacity of the community to provide care and<br />

support<br />

♦ Awareness creation<br />

The major activities carried out by the HAPCSO includes:<br />

♦ Increase mass sensitization<br />

♦ Promote safe sex<br />

♦ STI treatment and counseling<br />

♦ Provision of counseling for PLWA and families<br />

♦ Income generation activities<br />

Twelve staff members and fifteen community leaders as well as ninety volunteers<br />

are involved in the day to day activities of the project. The budget allocation of<br />

the project is indicated in the table below.<br />

Table 2.5 Budget allocation in HAPCSO


Budget<br />

Project Year<br />

2000 2001 2002 2003<br />

Total<br />

(ETB) 185000 836000 841600 1104000 2,966,600<br />

Source: Compiled from the response of HAPCSO<br />

2. CARE: Ethiopia, Urban HIV/AIDS prevention and care project<br />

CARE Ethiopia is an international non-governmental donor and implementers<br />

non governmental organization. Urban HIV/AIDS Prevention project is one of the<br />

projects undetaken by the CARE Ethiopia. Urban HIV/AIDS prevention and care<br />

projects is implemented in 14 kebeles found in the former wereda 15, which is<br />

now restructured in to three different Kifle-ketema that is Arada Kifle ketema,<br />

Yeka Kifle ketema and Cherkos Kifle ketema . The project was established in<br />

April, 2001 with a project duration of three years. The project is found in one of<br />

the areas with high prevalence rate of HIV/AIDS infection.<br />

The overall goal of the project is to reduce the incidence of HIV/AIDS infection<br />

among the target population and reduced the impact of HIV/AIDS on PLWA ands<br />

AIDS orphans.<br />

The specific activities undertaken by the project are:<br />

♦ Behavioral change and Communication<br />

♦ Providing accessible and affordable quality of Voluntary Counseling and<br />

Testing<br />

♦ Building the capacity of the local NGOs and community based<br />

organizations in providing care and support for PLWA and affected families


The project is working actively with 31 partner Iddirs. Partner Iddirs are active<br />

participants in the activities of the project. From the total partner iddirs, eleven<br />

are working with the project as potential partners preparing their own project<br />

proposal in the areas of care and support provision to AIDS orphans and PLWA.<br />

All of the eleven partner Iddirs are secured the grant according to the project<br />

agreement between partner Iddir and the Urban HIV/AIDS Prevention and Care<br />

project. Fourteen selected partner Iddirs are included as respondent for the<br />

research based on the degree of commitment Iddirs showed in implementation of<br />

the project.


Table 2.6 Budget allocation in CARE<br />

Budget<br />

Project Year<br />

2001 2002 2003<br />

Total<br />

(ETB) 1,324,936 1,393,520 1,981,704 4,700,168<br />

Source: Compiled from the response of CARE, urban HIV/AIDS Prevention and Control Project<br />

3. Agency for Cooperation in Research and Development (ACORD), Addis<br />

Ababa CBO support program<br />

The Agency for Cooperation in Research and Development is an international<br />

non-governmental organization. The Addis Ababa CBO support program is<br />

implemented in<br />

2 kebele found in wereda 12 and 6 kebele found in wereda 27. The project was<br />

established in 1997 for the project duration of 5 years. The project period is<br />

extended for the two years with the remaining budget from the previous project<br />

years.<br />

The overall objective of the project is to support and increase the role of<br />

community based organizations in their involvement in development activities.<br />

ACORD is working closely with partner Iddirs in capacity building, awareness<br />

raising and saving and credit programs. There are 50 partner Iddirs working with<br />

the project in different schemes of development. The specific activities are to<br />

increase recognition of CBO in development through the following :<br />

♦ Promote the policy and legal framework for the involvement of CBO in<br />

development


♦ Establish networks, cooperation and linkages between community based<br />

organizations and NGOs as well as government<br />

♦ Contribute to the alleviation of urban poverty using CBOs as<br />

intermediaries<br />

The human resources of the project constitutes 10 staff members. The<br />

involvement of community leaders and volunteers is not seen in the day to day<br />

activities of the project. The following table shows the amount of budget allocated<br />

for the specified project period.<br />

Table 2.7 Budget allocation in ACORD<br />

Budget<br />

Project Year<br />

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />

(ETB) 1,100,000 1,730,000 1,400,000 930,00<br />

Source: Compiled from the response of ACORD<br />

4. Mary Joy Aid Through Development (MJATD)<br />

0<br />

Total<br />

320,000 5,480,000<br />

Mary Joy Aid Through Development (MJATD) is a local non governmental<br />

organization working closely with Iddirs and the community at large in three<br />

kebele found in former wereda 25 which is restructured as Kolfe-Keranio Kifle-<br />

Ketema. The project duration is from 2000 to 2005 with a 4 years project period.<br />

The major goal of the project is to the contribute to alleviate the socio-economic<br />

impacts of HIV/AIDS through effective HIV/AIDS prevention and control<br />

strategies.It emphasis on improving the socio-economic status of those affected


and infected by HIV/AIDS. It targets street children, commercial sex workers,<br />

and widow women as the target group for the project as the most vulnerable<br />

group for the infection of HIV/AIDS. Currently working with 41 partner Iddirs in<br />

development schemes like poverty reduction of the project.


5. Pro Pride Merkato program<br />

Pro Pride Merkato is a local non governmental organization aimed at empowering<br />

the community to reduce the level of poverty at the household as well as the<br />

community level at large. Program is based in the project area 4 Kebele found in<br />

Addis Ketam Kifle Ketema. The project duration is 3 years ( from 1999 to 2003).<br />

The overall objective of the project is to reduce the level of poverty of household<br />

and community level through income generation schemes.<br />

Specific activities are :<br />

♦ Promote income generation at individual and household levels<br />

through a contingency livelihood approach<br />

♦ Improve income of poor household through micro enterprise<br />

development and improve the capacity of petty traders.<br />

There are 4 staff members and 63 community leaders and 3 volunteers actively<br />

engaged in the day to day activity of the projects. The project is working with<br />

twenty Iddirs in promoting the capacity of the community in reducing the level of<br />

poverty among the community in the livelihood improvement sector of the<br />

project. The area of involvement for the partner Iddirs are capacity building, net<br />

working, community based development institution.<br />

The allocation of budget for the project can be summarized as follows<br />

Table 2.8 Budget allocation in Pro Pride<br />

Project period Total


Project<br />

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003<br />

Budget 959,323 1010973 579290 503066 165705 3,218,35<br />

Sources: Complied from the responses of Pro Pride .<br />

6. Community Based Integrated Sustainable Development (CBISDO)<br />

Community based Integrated Sustainable Development is a community based<br />

program that is implemented in 4 kebeles found in wereda 3 and 2 kebeles found<br />

in wereda 4. The project area is restructures in Lideta kifle Ketema. The overall<br />

objective of the project is mitigate the pandemic of HIV/AIDS through mass<br />

health education, support to AIDS patients and bringing behavioral change<br />

about the risky behaviors.<br />

Table 2.9 Budget allocation in CBSIDO<br />

Project<br />

Project period<br />

2000 2001 2002 2003<br />

Total<br />

Budget 82688 86822 91163 95721 356394<br />

Sources: Complied from the responses of CBISDO<br />

The project duration is not specified because it is community based program.<br />

CBISDO provide VCT service for the local community at reasonable fees in an<br />

IHA clinic, which is found in the most affected part of the city. CBISDO used to<br />

work with thirteen Iddirs in during 2001 and 2002. However the effort is<br />

7


discontinued due to various reason both in the side of Iddirs and implementers<br />

NGOs.


PART TWO: CONCEPTUAL AND<br />

<strong>THE</strong>ORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND REVIEW<br />

<strong>OF</strong> RELATED LITERATURE


CHAPTER THREE<br />

3. CONCEPTS, DEF<strong>IN</strong>ITIONS AND <strong>THE</strong>ORETICAL FRAMEWORKS<br />

3.1. Development, Poverty and HIV/AIDS: - Concepts and<br />

Frameworks<br />

3.1.1. Development approaches and the concept of poverty<br />

Development is often described as the process of change from less desirable to<br />

more desirable state of being. There are two major approaches in conceptualizing<br />

development. These are economic well being and GNP per capita approach and<br />

human needs approach.<br />

Economic well-being and GNP per capita approach is the dominant approach<br />

employed in defining the concept of development. The argument states economic<br />

change precedes any other form of change. According to economic development<br />

approach all that defines the state of development is the economic growth in<br />

(Todaro, 1994).<br />

The human needs approach gives credit for the realization of human's potential.<br />

As Conyers suggested, " Development is conceived as the state of human well<br />

being rather than the state of national economy". Dudley Seers is the major<br />

proponent of this approach and suggested that " …the realization of the potential<br />

of human personality ... is a universally acceptable aim " of development process<br />

(Seers,1994)


Todaro (1994) has defined the concept development some what inclusive manner<br />

from the two prominent development approaches. According to Todaro,<br />

development is defined as the process that is:<br />

"… Concerned as a multidimensional process involving major changes in<br />

social structure, popular attitudes, and national institutions, as well as<br />

the acceleration of economic growth, with the reduction of inequality and<br />

the eradication of poverty".<br />

The absence of such factors that defines the process of development can generally be referred as<br />

poverty. Webster (1995) suggests that the state poverty must be seen as the deprivation of basic<br />

capabilities rather than merely as lowness of income. Poverty can be considered as the<br />

deprivation of opportunities like education, physical and emotional well being, and cultural<br />

opportunities. The author furthers defining the concept as "… the income below a level that<br />

would sustain a physical and emotional life allowing the individual to take a advantage of<br />

opportunities available given his or her talents and interests".<br />

3.1.2. POVERTY, HIV/AIDS AND DEVELOPMENT<br />

HIV is an acronym given for Human Immuno Deficiency Virus. It is a virus that<br />

causes Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). HIV attacks and<br />

progressively weakens or even destroys certain types of white blood cells that are<br />

essential to the body's immune system, which is the biological ability of the<br />

human body to fight infections The infected person is susceptible to a number of<br />

opportunistic infections, such as tuberculosis and pneumonia. (Ministry of<br />

Health, 2000).


According to the World Bank and UNAIDS report (2001), the general linkage<br />

between HIV/AIDS and poverty could be considered as a two-way causal<br />

relation. The linkage is mentioned in the sense that HIV/AIDS can be seen as a<br />

cause of poverty and poverty, at the same time, is a major contributor to<br />

deteriorated impacts of HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS/WORLD BANK, 2001).<br />

The causal relation is, on the one hand, considered in terms of HIV/AIDS being a<br />

cause of deepening of poverty. Intermediate variables are involved in such a<br />

causal relation. These variables include lost productivity, increased health care<br />

expenditure, increased dependency ratio, increased number of orphans with poor<br />

living conditions, lower school enrolment, reduced national income and fewer<br />

national resources for HIV/AIDS control etc.<br />

On the other hand, poverty and income inequalities are considered to contribute<br />

to the aggravated vulnerability and risk behavior in relation to HIV/AIDS. This<br />

relation can be explained through intermediary variables like, lack of access to<br />

prevent interventions, lack of access to affordable care, and lower education<br />

status and lower awareness level (UNAIDS/WORLD BANK, 2001) (see diagram 1).<br />

Although HIV/AIDS is not caused by poverty, but rather it intensifies the poverty<br />

crisis. Inadequate nutrition, low access to health care, lack of education and<br />

inadequate economic activities, these all contribute to the spread of epidemic and<br />

shorten the life span of those infected. The HIV/AIDS crisis intensifies poverty,<br />

reduces household assets, per capita food consumption and child school<br />

enrollment (UNAIDS, 2001).


The strong causal relation between poverty and HIV/AIDS is widely seen in most<br />

developing countries. In Africa the poverty situation is aggravated as it is twined<br />

with prevailing impacts of HIV/AIDS on the socio economic development of the<br />

continent. The fact that poverty is closely associated with multiple impacts of<br />

HIV/AIDS on the community suggests the need to readdress development<br />

paradigm in African context with regard to HIV/AIDS intervention (UNAIDS,<br />

2001).<br />

Diagram 1: - The linkage between HIV/AIDS and poverty<br />

- Lost productivity<br />

- Increased health care<br />

expenditure<br />

- Increased dependency ratio<br />

- Increased AIDS orphans<br />

Source: (UNAIDS/ WB, 2001)<br />

HIV/AIDS<br />

-High risk of infection<br />

-Lack of access to prevent<br />

intervention<br />

-Lack of access to affordable<br />

cares<br />

-Lower health facilities<br />

POVERTY


3.2. <strong>THE</strong> CONCEPT <strong>OF</strong> COMMUNITY AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT<br />

One can find a number of definitions given to the term 'community'. UNAIDS<br />

(1999) has adopted a very broad definition. Community is " … a group of people<br />

who have something in common and will act together in their common interest "<br />

(UNAIDS, 1999).<br />

Allan, (1997) has similarly given definition for the term in a detailed<br />

manner. In modern societies individuals maintain membership in a<br />

range of communities based on geography, occupation, social contacts<br />

or leisure interest (Allan, 1997). Community is defined as<br />

" … a specific group of people usually living in a common<br />

geographical area who shares a common culture, are arranged<br />

in social structure and exhibits some awareness of their identity<br />

as a group".<br />

Young, (1999) refers to community development as an approach that involves<br />

placing individual member of the community in the center of a development<br />

process. It also involves helping community members to realize their own<br />

potential for further development activities based on self-initiation. The<br />

community development approach emphases the participation of people from<br />

below, encourage a bottom-up approach and fosters self-reliance on the available<br />

community resources (Young, 1999).


3.3. <strong>THE</strong> CONCEPT <strong>OF</strong> COMMUNITY BASED ORGANIZATIONS (CBOS)<br />

The Provincial law in Quebec (Jalberth, 2000) defines community organization as<br />

" … a legal person, duly constituted as a non profit corporation,<br />

whose affairs are administered as a board of directors, made up<br />

in majority from the consumers of the service provided or members<br />

of the community it serves as whose activities are related to the<br />

fields of health and social services" (Jalberth, Pinault, Zuniga,<br />

2000).<br />

Community based organizations can be defined as part of an independent<br />

movement working towards social change. The overall purpose of community<br />

based organizations is to promote the social development, quality of life and<br />

welfare of those they serve. Their mission is not limited to identifying and serving<br />

needs, but to help change social structures; influences political decisions and<br />

identify alternatives that better respond to the needs of the society. The<br />

peculiarity of community based organizations is that they are arranged in a<br />

"bottom-up" approach (Jalberth, Pinault, Zuniga, 2000).<br />

Community based organizations can also be referred as local organizations which<br />

could be viable vehicles for community involvement and participation in project<br />

design and implementation, when appropriate and timely guidance and<br />

encouragement is provided (Shiferaw, 2002).<br />

3.4. CONCEPTUALIZ<strong>IN</strong>G CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS (CSOS)


There is a wide range of categories, which comprise what is commonly referred to<br />

as civil society organizations. The concept of civil society organization is debated<br />

in terms of two opposing arguments. One approach claims that the total frame<br />

work of civil society organization include both formal and informal organization;<br />

and the other view that argues conceptualization of civil society organization is<br />

impossible outside the formal organization framework.<br />

Dessalegn, (2002) is one among those who argues in terms of the view that civil<br />

society organizations can not be conceptualized outside the framework of formal<br />

organization. Accordingly, the range of civil society institutions include NGO,<br />

advocacy organization, professional associations, cooperatives, trade union,<br />

religious organizations and independent press (Dessalegn, 2002).<br />

Hence, according to Dessalegn, (2002) the conceptualization of civil society<br />

organization excludes informal (or traditional) organizations that are common<br />

both in rural and urban areas and ethnic based self-help and development.<br />

There is lack of evidence, as to what extent these organizations contribute to the<br />

public interest during the last decades. This is the major rationale that has been<br />

provided to justify his argument for exclusion of informal organizations from the<br />

definition of civil society organization.<br />

Shiferaw, (2002) on the other hand, argued that the concept of civil society<br />

organizations might comprise both formal and informal organizations. According<br />

to Shiferaw, the range of civil society might include NGOs at international,<br />

national and local level; church organizations, grass roots and peoples


organizations. This category consist of residential area based associations,<br />

professional associations, burial associations, producers' and consumer's<br />

associations, credit associations trade unions, gender and age based<br />

organizations and various interest groups (Shiferaw, 2002).<br />

3.5. <strong>THE</strong> CIVIL SOCIETY APPROACH<br />

The civil society approach is a recently growing development paradigm, which<br />

favors the partnership of local communities, NGOs and other development<br />

agencies with indigenous associations and institutions often referred to as<br />

community based organizations (CBOs). The principal aim of the civil society<br />

approach is prioritizing the local needs and involving the local community in<br />

planning, decision making, implementation of development activities (Pankhurst,<br />

2001).<br />

The major rationale for the civil society approach is that it ensures active<br />

involvement of grass root community members from planning, to decision<br />

making, to implementation and evaluation of development projects. It also can<br />

address the needs of the local community. Active participation of local<br />

communities in civil society approach enables communities to take over projects<br />

and contribute to sustainable community development (Pankhurst, A. 2001).<br />

Through the civil society approach, it is believed that the poorest can be reached<br />

more effectively, at lower cost and in more innovative ways for effect equitable,<br />

fair and sustainable development. The civil society approach enables tactful


mobilization of internal and external resources to alleviate poverty, and to<br />

promote change and development (Sietz 1995, Rooy, 1998 in Shiferaw, 2002).<br />

This approach also mobilizes the community more effectively in its bottom- up<br />

development to address mass poverty (Dejene, 1998).<br />

The civil society approach enables citizens to play a major role in their local<br />

development programs. The role of community based organizations are those<br />

either represent the community members in particular, or can reach them more<br />

reliably than the existing government and market approach (Sietz 1995, Rooy,<br />

1998, in Shiferaw, 2002).<br />

There are a number of arguments to show the reason why civil society<br />

organizations could or should be involved in development activities (Pankhurst<br />

(2001), Sietz (1998), Shiferaw (2002) etc.). Pankhurst (2001) has given three<br />

reasons as to why civil society organizations should be involved in development<br />

activities (Pankhurst 2001).<br />

1. Civil society organizations are based on local autonomy and indigenous<br />

ways<br />

2. Civil society organizations have greater legitimacy than institutions set up<br />

external agencies<br />

Civil society organizations provide on-going sustainable structures<br />

3.6. RATIONALE FOR A COMMUNITY-BASED HIV/AIDS <strong>IN</strong>TERVENTION


The urgency of HIV/AIDS and its impacts call for a concentrated effort to utilize<br />

community resources that have been largely neglected by many governments for<br />

health development in the past. In view of the problem of HIV/AIDS, the benefit<br />

community involvement at the grass root level can be immense in all these<br />

dimensions (Damen and Kloos, 2003).<br />

The situation of deepening poverty crisis and recurrent famine condition in north<br />

east Africa require that poverty alleviation programs need to be integrated with<br />

HIV/AIDS prevention and control programs at the community level. HIV/AIDS<br />

seems to be strongly related to the situation of poverty in Ethiopia, as it is so in<br />

any other sub-Saharan African countries (Damen and Kloos, 2003).<br />

A community-based response to HIV/AIDS implies the involvement of people<br />

where they live, in their homes, their neighborhoods and their work place in the<br />

fight against HIV/AIDS. Community projects are as diverse as the people and<br />

culture that make up these communities. Some of the forms of the community-<br />

based responses to HIV/AIDS intervention projects have been identified as "home<br />

grown" and self-sufficient. Some times they can might get assistance from<br />

external agencies like religion centers, medical institutions, and in neighborhood<br />

meeting places (UNAIDS, 2000).<br />

Many of the community-based programs assisting those affected by HIV/AIDS<br />

are developed and run by community based organizations. Community based<br />

organizations generally can be considered as being democratic, represent in the<br />

interest of their members and to be accountable to them (UNAIDS 1999).


In such regard, community based responses take the form of both formal and<br />

informal organizational groupings that are related to community based<br />

organizations. Informal set up, on one hand, include social support group,<br />

saving clubs and self help groups and informal self-help groups. These<br />

traditional or informal groups are said to be effective in HIV/AIDS interventions.<br />

"Traditional indigenous groups are a major sources of support<br />

in community that are experienced the impact of AIDS<br />

epidemic" (UNAIDS 1999).<br />

Formal community initiatives on the other hand, include formal community-<br />

based organizations and AIDS support organizations which rely on external<br />

assistance (UNAIDS 1999).<br />

Similarly, Damen and Kloos (2003) suggested that traditional and indigenous<br />

community based institutions are considered to be the most prominent and the<br />

most effective instruments for the HIV/AIDS prevention and control because<br />

utilizing informal indigenous institutions have multiple importance. Hence, grass<br />

root organizations, both formal and informal, should become the major advocates<br />

and vehicles for community involvement in prevention and control of HIV/AIDS.<br />

This is because indigenous local associations have the track record of winning<br />

the confidence of communities and serve community members during times of<br />

crisis (Damen and Helmut, 2003).


The major importance of focusing on Iddir is that these associations win the<br />

trust of the community in social, cultural and economic activities of the<br />

community. More importantly these associations have served community<br />

members as coping mechanisms during times of economic as well as social<br />

crisis. Moreover, each and every individual family in Addis Ababa obtained the<br />

membership of one or more Iddirs (Helmut and Damen, 2003).<br />

Hence, community based organizations can be considered as one among the<br />

most important mechanisms for the successful implementation of multi- sectoral<br />

response to HIV/AIDS epidemic as they are strategically placed to facilitate the<br />

involvement of the community at the grass roots level (Pankhurst and Damen,<br />

2003).


CHAPTER FOUR<br />

4. REVIEW <strong>OF</strong> RELATED LITERATURE<br />

4.1. LITERATURE ON <strong><strong>IN</strong>DIGENOUS</strong> <strong>VOLUNTARY</strong> <strong>ASSOCIATIONS</strong> AND<br />

IDDIRS<br />

4.1.1. <strong>THE</strong> RANGE <strong>OF</strong> <strong>VOLUNTARY</strong> <strong>ASSOCIATIONS</strong> <strong>IN</strong> ETHIOPIA<br />

Voluntary associations helped the rural migrants to the urban way of life in an<br />

adaptive process since they provide them with new basis for organization, which<br />

is all the more important because urban centers lack of social integration in<br />

comparison to rural areas (Tessema, 1995). Ottaway stressed on the term<br />

'voluntary' that refers to the state of making decision undertaken by people about<br />

joining an organization upon their own free will considering the advantage of<br />

being a member of specific organization (Ottaway, 1976).<br />

Various studies (Fecadu 1973, Ottaway 1976, Salole 1986, Pankhurst 2001) has<br />

indicated the range of indigenous voluntary associations in Ethiopia.<br />

Fecadu (1973) has identified voluntary associations to be classified in to<br />

traditional and modern typologies. Traditional voluntary associations include<br />

Iddir, Iqqub, regional and ethnic associations, whereas modern associations may<br />

include organizations like sport clubs, professional associations like YMCA and<br />

so on (Fecadu, 1973).<br />

Similarly, Pankhurst, (2001) has indicated the range of indigenous voluntary<br />

organizations or associations that exist in contemporary Ethiopian context.


These indigenous associations include Iddir burial associations, Iqqub credit and<br />

saving association, Mahiber social or religious association, Debo, Wenfel etc<br />

agriculture, labor, migrant associations. The author also indicated that these<br />

voluntary association exist all over the country, though there could be name<br />

difference among different localities or ethnic group (Pankhurst, 2001).<br />

Salole (1986) argued that voluntary associations in Ethiopia has evolved from<br />

traditional and rural form of rotating and saving credit associations, mutual<br />

help organizations, burial and other associations. These are associations which<br />

exists widely throughout rural Ethiopia (Salole, 1986).<br />

4.1.2. DEF<strong>IN</strong><strong>IN</strong>G IDDIR<br />

Iddir is a kind of mutual aid or/ and voluntary association commonly found in<br />

Ethiopia. It is an association originally formed by families who live in the same<br />

neighborhood or vicinity for the primary and expressed reasons of reciprocal aid<br />

in financial and service in times of burial or news of the death of close relatives.<br />

Fecadu (1972) further gives the following definition of the concept:<br />

" Iddir … is a poly-ethnic mutual aid voluntary association which is<br />

formed by families who live in same neighborhood or vicinity (Sefer) for<br />

the primary and expressed reasons of reciprocal aid in finance and<br />

service in times of burial or news of death of close relative "(Fecadu,<br />

1672).


The functions are to contribute some amount of money to cover the cost of<br />

funeral, to assist families in the event of death, illness, in employment or<br />

imprisonment of their bread winners and to help in case of loss due to fire<br />

(Levine, 1965).<br />

Shiferaw has adopted another definition. Iddir can also be defined as:<br />

"an association established to deal with mutual support of its<br />

members for all kinds of their felt needs with basically incorporated<br />

burial service and mourning ceremony at the incident of death among<br />

members and their families or relatives" (Shiferaw, 2002).<br />

4.1.3. IDDIR AS A POPULAR FORM <strong>OF</strong> <strong><strong>IN</strong>DIGENOUS</strong> <strong>VOLUNTARY</strong><br />

ASSOCIATION<br />

In Ethiopia, the most important voluntary associations are identified to be Iddir<br />

and Iqub. Iqub are indigenous credit institutions that is usually organized with<br />

the purpose of raising funds for member of the association in need of money. The<br />

prior aim of establishing Iqub is the desire to save some money for certain<br />

specified purpose. Iddir was originally a funeral society, which is progressively<br />

changing in scope and orientation over the years. Providing aid in time of death<br />

and sickness has become a less important function, while development activities<br />

such as taking hand in building street or community development activities like<br />

schools, and above all providing security along with local authorities is assumed<br />

to be more central role (Ottaway, 1976).


A comparison of the different types of indigenous association and institution in<br />

Ethiopia noted that Iddir are the most widespread type and prevalent in both<br />

rural and urban setting (Pankhurst, 1998). Levine, considers Iddir as probably<br />

the oldest and most widely diffused form of the modern association in Ethiopia,<br />

which is sometimes referred to, as is a form of welfare institution (Levine, 1965).


4.1.4. FACTORS THAT LEAD TO DEVELOPMENT <strong>OF</strong> IDDIR<br />

Iddir is also considered as a result of increased rate of urbanization, social<br />

disintegration and urban crisis that occurred in the capital and neighboring<br />

cities during the Italian occupation. This argument claimed that rapid<br />

urbanization and change of social settings during the Italian occupation might be<br />

the reason for the emergence of Iddir in Addis Ababa (Mekuria, 1973 Alemayhu<br />

1968, Ottaway 1976).<br />

In such regard, Mekuria has stressed on the role of rapid urbanization during<br />

the Italian occupation, which can be considered as a period of crisis and<br />

turmoil, leading to disintegration, and accelerated rate of urbanization. Mekuria<br />

claimed that it is not convincing to accept the argument that Iddir originated<br />

during Italian occupation since there had already been other mutual aid<br />

associations like Debo, Wenfel etc where by farmers help each other during<br />

plowing, harvesting , building houses or looking after their herds (Mekuria,<br />

1973).<br />

Moreover, Pankhurst argued that the monetization and formalization had a<br />

major role in the development of Iddir in urban centers of Ethiopia as the<br />

popular voluntary association (Pankhurst, 2001).<br />

Many Iddirs drew their members from the same ethnic group or people coming<br />

from the same locality. Having planted its roots in the urban society the<br />

association remained for some years, as a means of procuring substantial


assistance mainly during the time of death. However, it begun to take another<br />

shape during the 1950's among factory workers. During those days, workers<br />

had no unions that were legally recognized. They used the Iddir for discussion of<br />

their problem with factory management until the first enunciation a of labor<br />

policy in Ethiopia came with the civil code proclamation in 1960.<br />

4.1.5. IDDIR AND DEVELOPMENT<br />

The principal aim of Iddir is "…to meet death expenses and to avoid a pauper's<br />

funeral as well as to provide a certain measures of social security when financial<br />

crisis has occured in a certain household" (Pankhurst and Endrias, 1658).<br />

Alemayehu, (1968) suggested that cultural settings of Ethiopian society gave rise<br />

to Iddirs in many urban centers. The author put this in his own words:<br />

"…that Iddir came from the emphasis the Ethiopian community give for<br />

the large crowd during funeral and the implication of the social<br />

integration the bereaved individual has with the community."<br />

Tessemma (1995) has indicated that Iddir has played an important role in<br />

community development. The role of Iddir in community development activities is<br />

described to include functions like planning, executing and administering<br />

community affairs, contributing of money, labor and material towards the<br />

consolidation of development and cooperating with police to challenge the ever<br />

increasing rate of crime (Tessemma, 1995).


The function of Iddir are not limited to the provision of insurance and<br />

psychological support to its members; Iddirs are often involved in community<br />

development program such as construction of roads or schools, and installation<br />

of public utilities. The Iddir is considered as an excellent vehicle for the state to<br />

gain direct access to urban population. Similar findings indicate the role of Iddir<br />

further more from burial activities to complex development and poverty<br />

alleviation activities (Fecadu, 1975 Shiferaw, 2001 Getenet, 1999 ).<br />

Functions of Iddir seem to pass through an evolutionary process. During 1960's<br />

meredaja mahibers (kind of Self-help associations) were popular in Addis Ababa.<br />

The majority of these associations were based on development of regions where<br />

members came from. (Mekuria, 1976). Thus, Iddir slowly changed to the poly-<br />

ethnic organization preoccupied with development tasks as well as with mutual<br />

aid, particularly in Addis Ababa. Certain studies carried out afterwards showed<br />

that the original purpose of Iddir was funeral activities and assistance during the<br />

time of emergency.<br />

In addition, the function and aim of Iddir include the provision of local security<br />

measures as well as certain community development function such as the<br />

construction of school, bridges, feeder roads and clinics and important<br />

socializing functions for the new migrants to the city. Iddir serve as important in<br />

social control, ensuring the conformity of members to the accepted norms of the<br />

community (Tessema, 1995).


4.2. LITERATURE ON HIV AND AIDS AND IDDIR<br />

4.2.1. SPREAD <strong>OF</strong> HIV/AIDS <strong>IN</strong> ETHIOPIA<br />

The first HIV/AIDS cases were probably started to be reported in Ethiopia during<br />

early 1980's. Compared to other countries in the Great Lakes the region of Africa,<br />

the epidemic moved into Ethiopia sometimes later (Khodakevich, 1990).<br />

The first sero positive cases in Ethiopia were reported in 1986 among hospital<br />

patients two years after since the first evidence of the existence of HIV in the<br />

country, in 1984 According to the report of Ministry of Health, the increase in<br />

the adult prevalence rate for HIV infection was very rapid between 1984 and<br />

1994. A moderate rate of increase was seen during period between 1994 and<br />

2004. The prevalence rate is expected to level off at a rate of 7% starting from the<br />

year 2004 (Ministry of Health, 2002).<br />

Once the epidemic started it began to spread rapidly along the main trading<br />

roads connecting the city of Ethiopia. The HIV/AIDS epidemic exploded quickly<br />

in Addis Ababa and adult prevalence increased rapidly in a relatively brief period<br />

of time following the first AIDS cases in 1986.<br />

4.2.2. TRANSMISSION MECHANISM <strong>OF</strong> HIV/AIDS <strong>IN</strong> ETHIOPIA<br />

The major transmission mechanism for the rapid spread of HIV infection in<br />

Ethiopia are identified as follows (Ministry of Health, 2000).<br />

♦ Heterosexual intercourse and multiple sexual partnership- which is identified<br />

as the major means of transmission


♦ Unsafe blood transfusion with unscreened blood. In Ethiopia most blood is<br />

screened for HIV for transfusion.<br />

♦ Unsafe injection - HIV is transmitted by injection with the same needle used<br />

to inject many people with out sterilizing. More over, illegal medical practices<br />

and harmful traditional practices are indicated to be potential means of<br />

transmission.<br />

Prenatal transmission - An infected mother may transmit the disease during<br />

pregnancy, delivery or breast feeding and sharing needle used for injection.<br />

mother - to - child transmission seem to affect 30-40 per cent of babies born<br />

to HIV/AIDS positive mothers (Ministry of Health, 2002).<br />

4.2.3. AIDS REPORTS <strong>IN</strong> ETHIOPIA<br />

Ethiopian Ministry of Health used the sentinel surveillance method to collect and<br />

analyze up to date data to detect the prevalence of HIV in the population.<br />

Sentinel surveillance is a globally accepted method for obtaining data in<br />

HIV/AIDS detection. It involves in a regular testing of selected groups for<br />

presence of antibodies for HIV/AIDS in order to monitor trends in the infection.<br />

The process constitutes systematic collection, analysis, interpretation and<br />

dissemination of sero prevalence. The sentinel surveillance data are collected


from health facilities that regularly provide antenatal service to pregnant<br />

mothers. (Ministry of Health, 2002).<br />

The existence of better health service and facilities in Addis Ababa has played a<br />

significant role in carrying out research programs to understand the magnitude<br />

of HIV prevalence in the city. The data that has been used for estimating the<br />

extent of HIV/AIDS infection in Addis Ababa was carried out at four sentinel site,<br />

Kazanchis, Teklehaimanot, Gullele and Higher 23 (MOH, 2001).<br />

The Ethiopian Ministry of Health has revealed the reported AIDS cases, actual<br />

AIDS cases, people living with AIDS and the rate of prevalence at national level.<br />

The following table shows these between 1996 and 2002 (Ministry of Health,<br />

1996, 1998, 2000, and 2002). The following table shows that situation of<br />

reported AIDS cases, actual AIDS cases and people living with HIV/AIDS in the<br />

last seven years.


Table 4.1 AIDS reports in Ethiopia<br />

1996 1998 2000 2002<br />

Reported AIDS cases 19,433 51,781 83,487 107,575<br />

Actual AIDS cases 350,000 400,000 400,000 219,400<br />

People Living with HIV 1.7 million 2.5 million 2.6 million 2.2 million<br />

(Source: Ministry of Health, 1996, 1998, 2000, and 2002)<br />

The above table shows that reported AIDS cases seem to be minimum in number<br />

that the number of People Living with HIV/AIDS take the larger in number<br />

during the report years. It also indicates there is a steady increase in the<br />

national adult prevalence rate of HIV/AIDS.<br />

The prevalence rate of HIV/AIDS were reported for the last four editions of<br />

Ministry of Health. The adult prevalence rate was reports to be 0.00 per cent ,<br />

2.7 per cent, 6.2 per cent, 7.1 per cent, 7.3 per cent and 6.6 per cent in the<br />

report years of 1984, 1989, 1993, 1997, 2000, and 2002. The rapid increase in<br />

prevalence rate can be derived form the above reports. The adult prevalence rate<br />

for the year 2002 in Ethiopia is 6.6 per cent which is less than the prevalence<br />

rate reported in 2000 that is 7.3. The change is not resulted in decline in the<br />

adult prevalence of HIV/AIDS epidemic. Rather the it is the result of more<br />

extensive surveillance data and re-classification of Estie as an urban site<br />

(Ministry of Health, 2002).<br />

4.2.4. IMPACTS <strong>OF</strong> HIV/AIDS <strong>IN</strong> ETHIOPIA


Demographic, economic and social impacts of HIV/AIDS are identified to be the<br />

major impacts in Ethiopia.


1. Demographic and Health impacts<br />

The major demographic and health care impacts of HIV/AIDS in Ethiopia are<br />

identifies as follows (Ministry of Health, 2002).<br />

♦ Increase in AIDS caused deaths<br />

♦ Increased infant mortality, and child survival<br />

♦ Fall in life expectancy at birth and as older ages. The fall of life expectancy is<br />

indicated that it was projected life expectancies are 45, 53,55, 59 in years of<br />

1989, 2001, 2007, 2014 respectively. However, due to the impacts of<br />

HIV/AIDS the life expectancy falls to 46 and 53 in the years of 2001 and 2014<br />

respectively, in stead of being 50 and 59 as it was projected with out the<br />

impacts of HIV/AIDS (Ministry of Health, 2002).<br />

♦ Decrease in population size due to increased AIDS deaths<br />

♦ Orphans and Vulnerable children<br />

♦ HIV/AIDS and TB- increased rate of infection in TB is exhibited due to<br />

impacts of HIV/AIDS<br />

2. Economic Impacts of HIV/AIDS<br />

♦ Other economic sectors that are severely affect by HIV/AIDS include non<br />

agricultural and industrial sectors. Certainly, Health care and insurance are<br />

likely to be significantly affected. Those sectors with mobile workers like<br />

military, transport workers, extension service and banking are adversely<br />

affected.


♦ The agricultural sector that is the major economic sector in Ethiopian<br />

economy is severely affected by the loss of productive manpower usually in<br />

their peak productive and reproductive age.<br />

♦ The impact of HIV/AIDS in industry sector can be explained in loss of workers<br />

and productive labor force due to increased AIDS deaths, lost in work days<br />

due to sickness, lost work days due to funeral leave and increased health care<br />

costs fir AIDS patients.<br />

♦ It also affects the health sector through increased numbers of patients<br />

seeking medical care and expensive expenditure on the medical costs for AIDS<br />

patients. In 1994 health care costs in Ethiopia are increased significantly as<br />

the result of AIDS. It is also predicted that hospital bed occupancy will<br />

increase 28% as the result of AIDS (Abdulhamid, 1994).<br />

♦ Macro economic impacts also can be identified as AIDS deaths leading to<br />

directly to a reduced in numbers of workers available; shortage of worker<br />

leading to higher domestic production costs. Increased spending in foreign<br />

exchange for import of drugs. Lower government revenue and reduced private<br />

savings can cause reduction in savings and capital accumulation. Reduced<br />

worker productivity and investment lead to fewer jobs in formal sector<br />

training (Bollinger, Stover, Seyoum, 1999).<br />

3. Social Impacts of HIV/AIDS<br />

The major social costs of HIV/AID in Ethiopia are manifested as follows (Ministry<br />

of Health, 2002):


♦ Increase in number of orphans putting pressure at the family level with<br />

increased burden of caring for orphans Extended family is the pressured in<br />

taking care of the orphans and dependents of those people who lost their<br />

breadwinner due to AIDS<br />

♦ The structure of family is changed to be headed by orphan children as young<br />

as 10 and 12 years old.<br />

♦ Orphans lost the necessary financial, material and emotional support they<br />

need for schooling.<br />

♦ Increased Vulnerability in women economical wellbeing as they lost their<br />

husbands usually their breadwinners.<br />

♦ Death of member of family resulting permanent loss of income through<br />

treatment, funeral, mourning and Teskar; widows resorting to commercial sex in<br />

order to support their family and orphan children joining street life or<br />

commercial sex.<br />

♦ Breakdown of social institutions<br />

♦ Increased funeral costs<br />

4.2.5. <strong>THE</strong> THREAT <strong>OF</strong> HIV/AIDS EPIDEMIC ON IDDIR<br />

As the number of death related to HIV/AIDS increases among certain<br />

communities, the existing local strategies are increasingly under pressure and<br />

these is need to design policies and programs that are capable of providing<br />

support when existing strategies became inadequate (UNAIDS, 1999). Certain<br />

researches (Damen, and Kloos 2003 and Damen and Pankhurst 2002) tried to


indicate the shortage of data on the impact of HIV/AIDS on the day to day life of<br />

Iddir.<br />

Since Iddir are established to contribute money for time of death of members or<br />

of their household members, increased mortality would create financial strains.<br />

Current increase in mortally caused by HIV/AIDS may endanger the very<br />

existence of these grass root institutions. Therefor, Iddir are expected to play<br />

major role in coping with the epidemic along with efforts made by formal sector<br />

(Damen, 2003).<br />

Similarly, Pankhurst, (2003) argued that anti HIV/AIDS responses are important<br />

since Iddir are directly endangered by increased deaths rate, probably caused by<br />

AIDS. This situation may deplete the resources of Iddir or even threaten the<br />

viability of these institutions. Dissemination of information about the danger of<br />

HIV/AIDS is possible considering Iddirs' central focus on death. Moreover, these<br />

are the only grass roots associations, which exist throughout the country. These<br />

are certain attempts of involving Iddirs in joining hands for fight against<br />

HIV/AIDS in Zone 3 and 5 in Addis Ababa, Dire Dawa, Nazareth and Akaky<br />

(ACORD, 2002).<br />

Certain research indicate that Iddir have been severely affected by the epidemic.<br />

The fact that Iddir contribute money during the time of death and misfortune,<br />

makes the existing resources of these institutions vulnerable to financial strains<br />

as mortality increases among members (Pankrust and Damen, 2003). HIV/AIDS<br />

epidemics make an increase in mortality rate among the most productive and


eproductive sections of the community, which makes the very existence of Iddir<br />

as the major community based organization vulnerable in the near future.<br />

HIV/AIDS may endanger the basic structure of the society (Pankhurst and<br />

Damen, 2003).<br />

"… recently, due to the killer disease HIV/AIDS some leaders have the<br />

fear that it may deplete their financial resources". Certain Iddirs in Addis<br />

Ababa are at the margin of disintegration due to high death rates and<br />

related financial depletion (Shiferaw, 2002).<br />

Certain Iddir are currently engaged in the fight against HIV/AIDS. This is a an of<br />

research and important area since Iddir are directly affected by increasing death<br />

rates, which are depleting their resources and even threatening the viability of<br />

some Iddirs. Given their central concern with death Iddir are obvious vehicles for<br />

dissemination of information about the danger of HIV/AIDS. So they can be<br />

identified as the clear stakeholders in coping with the HIV/AIDS epidemics<br />

(ACORD, 2002).<br />

4.2.6. MAJOR STRATEGIES <strong>OF</strong> COMBAT<strong>IN</strong>G HIV/AIDS<br />

There are different strategies of HIV/AID intervention indicated by the Ethiopian<br />

Ministry of Health policy on the HIV/AIDS, which was adopted in 1998.<br />

(Ethiopian Ministry of Health, 1998)<br />

1. Information Education and Communication (IEC) refers provision of IEC<br />

materials to all government ministries and institutions, NGOs, mass


organizations, religious organizations, professional associations and the<br />

community at large. This larger coverage of IEC material distribution is meant for<br />

provision of adequate attention to the problem of HIV/AIDS and Sexually<br />

Transmitted Infections treatment and control.<br />

Moreover, intensive and sustainable IEC activities through all possible media,<br />

material and methods taking in to account culture and belief of the community<br />

are also advocated for prevention and control of HIV/AIDS. Participation of<br />

people living with HIV/AIDS in education to the public as well as psycho-social<br />

support to each other is to be encouraged and adequate preparedness and<br />

consent. Community meetings are identified as the most important sources of<br />

information on AIDS by both women and men.<br />

2. Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) prevention and control<br />

Comprehensive management of STD patients includes risk reduction, education<br />

and counseling education on treatment compliance, condom distribution,<br />

notification and treatment of patients. Improved quality of STD health care<br />

service through training development and promotion of standardized treatment<br />

guidelines and ensuring the availability of effective STD drugs.<br />

3. HIV Testing and screening -to encourage the provision of testing screening<br />

on a voluntary basis. Availability of screening facilities in as many public health<br />

care facilities as possible.


4. Sterilization and dis-infection Provision of adequate sterilization and dis-<br />

infection procedure to ensure adequate sterilization and dis-infection service.<br />

Moreover, provision of training for health care workers about universal<br />

sterilization and dis-infection.<br />

5. Medical care and psychological support- the participation of government,<br />

non governmental organizations, religious organizations, bilateral, multilateral<br />

agencies, private sectors, community based institutions and the community at<br />

large that includes mobilization to support people living with HIV/AIDS and<br />

affected families. Psychological, economic and medical support to PLWA and<br />

affected members that incorporates families and social network at large.<br />

6. Home based Care - According to the Ministry of Health guidelines on<br />

community home based care , which was adopted in 2001, home based care is<br />

defined as<br />

" a program that through regular visit offer health care service to support<br />

the care process in the home environment of the person with HIV infection.<br />

Home visits may be the only service provided or that may be part of an<br />

intended program which offers the patient and his families service in home,<br />

hospital and community".<br />

It is underlined that for the functional and sustainable community home based<br />

care, there is need for gaining the confidence and involvement of the families and<br />

the community where the service is being implemented. The principal aim is to


involve the community, patients and families an community home based care<br />

program. It ranges from medical to psychological and other material support.<br />

The overall context of conducting community home based care for AIDS patients<br />

is described as follows (Ethiopian Ministry of Health, 2001)<br />

• The existing formal health service cannot cope with the demand, given the<br />

severity and prevalence of the epidemics<br />

• The socio- cultural structure in Ethiopia is conducive for such service.<br />

The practice of unified families, extended families, system and culture of<br />

adoption of children by the nearest of kin and others provide greatest<br />

opportunities. Traditional associations such as Iddir can be optimally<br />

utilized.


PART THREE:<br />

ANALYSIS<br />

DISCUSSION, CONCLUSION<br />

SYN<strong>THE</strong>SIS <strong>OF</strong> F<strong>IN</strong>D<strong>IN</strong>GS AND<br />

RECOMMENDATIONS


CHAPTER FIVE<br />

5. RESEARCH F<strong>IN</strong>D<strong>IN</strong>GS ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSIONS<br />

<strong>IN</strong>TRODUCTION<br />

This chapter contains research finding and analysis that is organized into three<br />

main parts. The analysis of research is made by data obtained from three<br />

different directions. The first group taken was the efforts of implementer NGOs in<br />

involving Iddirs in their anti HIV/AIDS intervention activities. The second relates<br />

to group effort of selected partner Iddirs towards their anti HIV/AIDS activities.<br />

The third group is the efforts of government offices to promote the role of Iddirs<br />

in anti HIV/AIDS activities. The case of individual implementer Iddirs, individual<br />

NGO as well as the case of government offices are also included in each part of<br />

this chapter.<br />

5.1. EFFORTS <strong>OF</strong> SELECTED NGO <strong>IN</strong> <strong>IN</strong>VOLV<strong>IN</strong>G IDDIRS <strong>IN</strong> HIV/AIDS<br />

<strong>IN</strong>TERVENTION<br />

5.1.1. <strong>THE</strong> ACTIVITIES <strong>OF</strong> HIWOT AIDS PREVENTION CONTROL AND<br />

SUPPORT ORGANIZATION (HAPCSO)<br />

Hiwot AIDS Prevention Control and Support Organization is currently engaged in<br />

working with 41 Iddirs concerning HIV/AIDS intervention. HIV/AIDS<br />

intervention strategies like IEC, BCC, VCT and care and support are actively<br />

engaged in with most of beneficiary Iddirs. 30 Iddirs are currently engaged in<br />

more than one activity. The remaining 11 Iddirs only took part as participants in<br />

the sensitization and advocacy program.


5.1.1.1. REASON FOR <strong>IN</strong>VOLV<strong>IN</strong>G IDDIR <strong>IN</strong> HIV/AIDS <strong>IN</strong>TERVENTION<br />

Hiwot AIDS Prevention Control and Support Organization (HAPCSO) can be<br />

taken as one of the actively engaging Iddirs in anti HIV/AIDS activities. The<br />

major reason why HAPCSO took Iddirs as partner community based<br />

organizations according to the coordinator of the organization, because " Iddirs<br />

are the nearest associations to reach each individual and they are also a good<br />

way of obtaining community cooperation " (Semi structure questionnaire<br />

administered to project coordinator). The major potentials of Iddirs are identified<br />

as "to be respected by members of community and have manpower resources<br />

that can be mobilized on a voluntary basis."<br />

The total number of 41 partner Iddirs take part in one or more of the major<br />

components of their anti HIV/AIDS strategy, these are in IEC, BCC care and<br />

support, capacity building. Different kinds of support for Iddirs are provided to<br />

enhance the capacity of partner Iddirs. Capacity building and technical<br />

assistance are the major kinds of support which are provided on a uniform basis<br />

throughout the project period. Various trainings are provided for Iddir leaders in<br />

order to enhance the capacity of Iddir leadership in different technical and<br />

administrative issues. Peer educator training is the major kind of training


scheme, which ensures the progressive engagement of Iddirs in major anti<br />

HIV/AIDS strategies.<br />

5.1.1.2. ACTIVITIES <strong>OF</strong> PARTNER IDDIRS<br />

The total number of partner Iddirs working with HAPCSO being 41, 30 selected<br />

are actively involved in much of the activities as is indicated in Table 6.1. The<br />

table shows the summary of actively involved Iddirs with each component of the<br />

anti HIV/AIDS strategy. Cases of 30 selected partner Iddirs working with<br />

HAPCSO are summarized below with their strategies of intervention and the<br />

degree of involvement.<br />

Table 5.1.The case of 30 partner Iddirs working with HAPCSO<br />

trategies Involved<br />

Iddirs<br />

Non involved<br />

Iddir<br />

Total<br />

IEC 30 0 9119<br />

number of<br />

beneficiaries<br />

Condom Distribution 3 27 Not known<br />

Provision of support for AIDS orphans 12 18 37<br />

Provision of support for PLWA 14 16 22<br />

Encouragement in VCT service 0 30 0<br />

Fund raising for AIDS Victims 23 7 -<br />

Home Based Care 10 20 11<br />

Income generation for AIDS victims 0 30 0<br />

Source: Compiled from responses of HAPCSO<br />

From table 5.1 we can infer that large numbers of beneficiaries are addressed in the<br />

Education Information and Communication (IEC) in only 30 selected Iddirs, who are<br />

identified as active partners of HAPCSO. The involvement of partner Iddirs is in IEC,


Fund raising for AIDS victims, support for AIDS orphans and support for PLWHA,<br />

and Home based care. IEC sessions are conducted during Iddir meetings and the<br />

number of attendants includes the entire members of Iddirs. Minimum involvement<br />

is indicated in condom distribution, while no involvement is reported in income<br />

generation activities for AIDS victims and Voluntary Counseling and Testing (VCT).<br />

From the total number of 23 partner Iddirs who are involved in fund raising for AIDS<br />

victims, 16 contribute 1 ETB per month, in addition to monthly contribution, to be<br />

used for assistance of AIDS victims. Two Iddirs allocated a budget from the Iddir<br />

capital for the same cause. Five Iddirs allocated one third of their budget for care<br />

and support to be obtained for AIDS victims. So one can understand that partner<br />

Iddirs working with HAPCSO are playing a major role in most of anti HIV/AIDS<br />

strategies like IEC, Care and support for AIDS victims as well as home based care for<br />

AIDS patients.<br />

5.1.1.3. DEGREE <strong>OF</strong> <strong>IN</strong>VOLVEMENT FOR PARTNER IDDIRS<br />

HAPCO has been working with partner Iddirs in mobilizing the community through<br />

local Iddirs in the area of HIV/AIDS intervention activities. Iddirs are taken as the<br />

major vehicles to reach the community in providing preventive and supportive<br />

services against HIV/AIDS. The degree of involvement of Iddir leaders and Iddir<br />

members in each of anti HIV/AIDS activities were assessed and evaluated from the<br />

actively engaged 30 partner Iddirs working with HAPCSO.<br />

The rate of leveling degree of involvement can be operationally defined as follows:


♦ Fully actively involved - Involved as initiates as well as implements the anti<br />

HIV/AIDS activities<br />

♦ Actively involved in most cases - Involved in major activities however the<br />

initiation is taken by partner NGOs<br />

♦ Starting to become actively involved - Involved in recently and their<br />

participation is active<br />

♦ Not yet involved, but participate - Involved as only participators of anti<br />

HIV/AIDS activities.<br />

♦ Not involved at all - Involved in none of the activities and no participation at<br />

all.


Table 5.2 Degree of involvement of Iddir members and leaders<br />

Anti HIV/AIDS<br />

strategies<br />

Degree of involvement of Iddir leaders in each of the strategies<br />

Fully actively<br />

involved<br />

Actively<br />

involved in<br />

most<br />

cases<br />

Starting to be<br />

actively<br />

involved<br />

Not yet actively<br />

involved but<br />

participate<br />

IEC 14 (47%) 9(30%) 3(10%) 4(13%) -<br />

not<br />

involved at<br />

Condom Distribution 1 (3%) - 2(7%) 27(90%)<br />

AIDS orphan support 10 (33%) - 2(7%) - 18(60%)<br />

PLWA support 7 (23%) 8(27%) 2(7%) 1(3%) 12(40%)<br />

Encouragement for<br />

VCT service<br />

Fund raising for AIDS<br />

Victims<br />

Home Based Care<br />

(HBC)<br />

Income generation for<br />

AIDS victims<br />

- - - - 30(100%)<br />

11 (37%) 8(27%) 2(7%) 2(7%) 7(23%)<br />

6 (20%) 2(7%) 1(3%) 2(7%) 19(63%)<br />

- - - - 30(100%)<br />

Source: Compiled from responses of implementer HAPCSO<br />

As it is indicated in table 5.2, the degree of involvement of Iddirs leaders and<br />

respective members is rated in five degrees. It is indicated that the degree of<br />

involvement of Iddir leader is similar to that of members. The level of<br />

participation of leader and members are indicated to be fully actively involved in<br />

conducting information and education communication. 47 percent of the total<br />

selected 30 partners Iddirs are indicated as fully actively involved in IEC<br />

activities. 30 percent are identified as not yet actively but participate. The<br />

remaining 10 percent are starting to be actively involved in IEC.<br />

all


Condom distribution is the activity in which most of selected partner Iddirs are<br />

least involved. Only three Iddirs are involved. The degree of involvement of Iddirs<br />

leaders and members is also identified as minimum in the majority of partner<br />

Iddirs. 6.6 percent are identified to be involved in the degree of involvement not<br />

yet actively involved but participating. Only 3.4 percent (only one Iddir) is<br />

reported to be fully actively involved in condom distribution.<br />

From the total number of 12 involved Iddirs in provision of support for AIDS<br />

orphans 10 responded that their leaders and members are involved fully actively.<br />

This group constitutes 33 percent of the total respondents. Seven percent of<br />

respondents are starting to be involved in provision of support and care for AIDS<br />

orphans. The remaining 60 percent are not involved at all.<br />

With the regard to the provision of care and support for people living with<br />

HIV/AID, 27 percent of the total respondents are identified as involved actively in<br />

most cases. And 23 are fully actively involved in support to PLWA. 40 percent are<br />

not involved at all in provision of care and support. The remaining 7 and 3 are<br />

starting to be involved and not involved, but participate in provision of care and<br />

support for PLWA.<br />

Fund raising refers to the contribution of certain amount of money, which is<br />

undertaken by Iddir members meant to support the infected and affected people<br />

by HIV/AIDS. This is activity, which is similar to the inherent purpose of Iddirs,<br />

it varies only with the purpose being helping affected and infected individual.<br />

Fundraising is the second most widely employed strategy among respondents, in


which 37 percent are involved fully actively. 27 percent are involved actively in<br />

most case. 23 percent are not involved at all. The totals of 7 and 7 percent are<br />

starting to be involved and not yet involved but participate. Some Iddirs started<br />

to allocate a certain amount of budget for such purpose.<br />

Home based care is recommended especially for the internal dynamism and<br />

experience of Iddir in addressing the people at grass root level. According to the<br />

Ministry of Health, the traditional associations like Iddir can be optimally utilized<br />

for such undertaking that that need gaining the confidence and involvement of<br />

families and community at all level. (MOH, 2001). The effort of HAPCSO with<br />

regard to home based care indicated that 20 percent of respondents are fully and<br />

actively involved in home based care. Seven percent of respondents are involved<br />

in most cases in provision of home based care for AIDS patients. Three percent<br />

are participants, but not involved at all: 63 percent are involved in none of the<br />

home based activities.<br />

Income generation activities for the victims of AIDS as well as Voluntary<br />

Counseling and Testing are strategies in which no partner Iddir are involved. The<br />

involvement of Iddirs in VCT only ranges in encouragement and psychological<br />

help to use voluntary counseling and testing.<br />

IEC is the major activity in which the majority of partner Iddirs are widely<br />

involved. Fund raising and money contributions are the second most important<br />

category in which the second largest involvement of respondents are identified as<br />

involved.


5.1.1.4. DURATION <strong>OF</strong> IDDIR <strong>IN</strong>VOLVEMENT<br />

Community based HIV/AIDS intervention that is undertaken with the<br />

participation of Iddir is said to has started recently. The duration is seen to be a<br />

recently introduced activity for most respondents. The duration of involvement<br />

for each of the activities can be also illustrated in the following table.


Table 5.3 duration of involvement<br />

Strategies<br />

1-3<br />

months<br />

Duration of the involvement<br />

4-6 moths 7-<br />

9months<br />

10-12<br />

months<br />

IEC - 1 7 19 3<br />

Condom Distribution - - 1 2 -<br />

AIDS orphan support - - 3 7 2<br />

PLWA support 2 4 3 3 2<br />

Encouragement for VCT<br />

service<br />

Fund raising for AIDS<br />

Victims<br />

- - - - -<br />

14 4 2 1 2<br />

Home Based Care 7 - 3 - -<br />

Income generation for AIDS<br />

victims<br />

Source; Compiled from responses of implementer HAPCSO<br />

- - - - -<br />

13-15<br />

months<br />

HAPCSO has been working with partner Iddir in IEC for less than 15 month only,<br />

3 Iddir have been involved in IEC for 13-15 months. Nineteen Iddirs were<br />

involved in anti HIV/AIDS activities for only 12 months.<br />

The majority of Iddirs were involved in fundraising activities for AIDS victims for<br />

less than 3 months. HAPCSO has been encouraging partner Iddirs for a long<br />

period of time to contribute to certain amount of money for same purpose, but<br />

the actual activity has been started recently. The same holds true for home<br />

based care for HIV/AIDS patients. Home based care has been the major<br />

component of the HAPCSO involvement. But the involvement of Iddir in home<br />

based care only started recently.


5.1.1.5. REVISION <strong>OF</strong> IDDIRS' BYLAWS<br />

The selected Iddir are encouraged to make some revision on their bylaws with the<br />

regard to their activities of HIV/AIDS intervention. Accordingly, bylaws of partner<br />

Iddir incorporate a separate article that discusses the need for their involvement<br />

in HIV/AIDS intervention and to help those who are infected and affected by the<br />

epidemic. The bylaws also include the advocacy sessions to be held each month<br />

to raise awareness of members of Iddirs about the prevalence of HIV/AIDS.<br />

5.1.2. <strong>THE</strong> ACTIVITIES <strong>OF</strong> CARE ETHIOPIA; URBAN HIV/AIDS<br />

PREVENTION AND CONTROL PROJECT<br />

The CARE Ethiopia urban HIV/AIDS prevention and control project aims at<br />

promoting different HIV/AIDS intervention activities. The major aims include<br />

Behavioral Change and Communication (BCC); provision of accessible and<br />

affordable quality of Voluntary Counseling and Testing (VCT); building the<br />

capacity of local NGOs and community based organization (CBO) in providing<br />

care and support for PLWA and affected families.<br />

5.1.2.1. REASONS FOR <strong>IN</strong>VOLV<strong>IN</strong>G IDDIRS<br />

The involvement of Iddirs is justified as follows: " Since Iddirs are working closely<br />

with the community, it is believed that they know members of community who<br />

are affected by HIV/AIDS very well and the kind of intervention required to<br />

address the problem" (Semi structure questionnaire administered to officials to


CARE). According to the reply of officials, the major potentials of involving Iddir<br />

in the AIDS intervention programs are identified as follows<br />

Iddirs can mobilize the community easily<br />

They are respected and recognized among members of the community<br />

They are committed to support of members PLWA or AIDS orphans<br />

They are willing to participate actively in BCC and IEC<br />

The CARE project is working with local Iddirs in different HIV/AIDS intervention<br />

activities. 19 Iddirs were selected which were found in the project area to be<br />

potential partners during the first contact of the iddirs in the project. 36 peer<br />

educators were provided training, which were selected from 19 Iddir. Currently,<br />

there are 10 Iddir which are actively working in Behavioral Change and<br />

Communication (BCC). These are partner Iddirs who held discussion and<br />

advocacy sessions on monthly, quarterly and biannually bases. The dropouts<br />

Iddirs from the first selected ones indicated that the leaders of Iddir are less<br />

committed.<br />

5.1.2.2. <strong>IN</strong>VOLVEMENT <strong>OF</strong> PARTNER IDDIR <strong>IN</strong> IEC AND BCC<br />

The CARE project included 20 partner Iddirs actively involved in Behavioral<br />

Change and Communication (BCC). An additional 11 partner Iddirs are actively<br />

involved in care and support. A total of 31 partner Iddirs are currently actively<br />

involved in BCC and care and support. Mainly, the involvement of partner Iddirs<br />

is important in BCC and care and Support.


With regard to the activities of partner Iddirs in information education and<br />

communication 19 potentially active Iddirs were selected for the purpose of<br />

involving them in IEC and BCC activities. Accordingly, 36 individual<br />

representatives of Iddir were recruited for the peer educators training. During the<br />

first period of the training, 19 iddirs were involved in the activities of the project.<br />

Currently, there are 10 Iddirs which are actively working with the CARE project<br />

in behavioral change and communication, and communication and information<br />

education and communication. These are partner Iddirs who held the advocacy<br />

sessions in monthly, quarterly and biannually basis. The level of dropout is very<br />

high. Nine Iddirs are not working currently with the project. It was reported that<br />

the representatives of these Iddirs are not regularly attending the follow up<br />

programs because of their personal commitments. The case of ten currently<br />

involved Iddirs can be cited for the illustration of the efforts of CARE in involving<br />

Iddirs in IEC and BCC.<br />

The total of ten partner Iddirs are reported to have the degree of fully actively<br />

involved in IEC and BCC. The role of Iddir leaders' is a determinant for the<br />

success of the program in such a way that leaders are both initiators and<br />

implementers as they are respected and identified among the community<br />

members.<br />

5.1.2.3. PROVISION <strong>OF</strong> CARE AND SUPPORT FOR AIDS VICTIMS


Provision of care and support include activities of care for PLWA, AIDS orphans<br />

and home based care for AIDS patients. With regard to the provision of care and<br />

support activities of CARE project, a total number of 263 orphans and 46 PLWA<br />

were beneficiaries are identified as the Iddirs based AIDS. The assessment made<br />

by the CARE on the involvement of partner Iddirs in care and support programs<br />

can be easily indicated in the following table.


Table 5.4 The case of Partner Iddirs working with CARE in provision of care and support<br />

Support and care<br />

programs<br />

Provision of<br />

support for AIDS<br />

orphans<br />

Provision of<br />

support for PLWA<br />

Provision of Home<br />

based care for<br />

AIDS patients<br />

Number of<br />

Involved<br />

Partner<br />

Iddirs<br />

Number of total<br />

beneficiaries<br />

Degree of<br />

involvement of<br />

Iddir leader<br />

11 263 currently<br />

actively involved<br />

11 46 currently<br />

actively involved<br />

11 not known currently<br />

actively involved<br />

Degree of<br />

involvement of<br />

Iddir members<br />

currently actively<br />

involved<br />

currently actively<br />

involved<br />

currently actively<br />

involved<br />

Source: Compiled from responses obtained from CARE; Ethiopia Urban HIV/AIDS prevention and<br />

care project<br />

Table 5.4 shows the involvement of the active part of Iddirs in care and support<br />

program. A total of 11 partner Iddirs are currently engaged in provision of<br />

support for AIDS orphans and PLWA. The degree of involvement of partner Iddirs<br />

member and leaders is reported for those currently actively involved in provision<br />

of care and support. In such regard, partner Iddirs are required to submit their<br />

project proposal for the grant. Accordingly here are eleven partner Iddirs who<br />

have currently secured project funds from the CARE project in the area of<br />

provision of care and support for HIV/AIDS patients and orphans. These are<br />

designed to enhance the sustainability of iddirs involvement in HIV/AIDS<br />

intervention activities.<br />

5.1.3. ACTIVITIES <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> AGENCY FOR COOPERATION <strong>IN</strong> RESEARCH<br />

AND DEVELOPMENT (ACORD): ACORD ADDIS ABABA CBO<br />

SUPPORT PROGRAM


The overall objective of the project is to increase the role of Community Based<br />

Organizations (CBOs) in development. Moreover, it was indicated that increased<br />

recognition of CBOs in development can be reached through creation of an<br />

appropriate legal and policy environment for CBOs; and to establish linkages and<br />

cooperation between CBO and NGOs and government, to contribute to the<br />

alleviation of urban poverty by involving community based organization as<br />

intermediaries.<br />

The major components of the ACORD Addis Ababa CBO Support Program<br />

including the following:<br />

Advocacy<br />

Training and capacity building<br />

Joint projects in infrastructure (clinics, utilities like water toilets etc<br />

with partner Iddir)<br />

Savings and credit<br />

Additional cross sectional activities undertaken by the ACORD Addis Ababa CBO<br />

support Program are identified as HIV/AIDS intervention and gender. HIV/AIDS<br />

is identified as not the major component of the ACORD Addis Ababa CBO<br />

Support Program but the extended experience that is obtained in strengthening<br />

the role of community based organizations in development and recent advocacy<br />

program make it appropriate for the research.<br />

The involvement of Iddirs in the program is not limited to HIV/AIDS but also<br />

involves community development work in credit and saving and other related


works. Iddirs are identified to have potentials as it is indicated in the work of<br />

ACORD; Addis Ababa CBO support Program for the following reasons:<br />

They are close to members and have rich experience in the assistance<br />

for members<br />

They are victims of the effects of HIV/AIDS in depletion of their human<br />

and financial resources.<br />

5.1.3.1. CAPACITY BUILD<strong>IN</strong>G EFFORTS <strong>OF</strong> ACORD<br />

The number of partner Iddirs working with ACORD Addis Ababa CBO support<br />

program are identified as 50 Iddirs which are actively involved in Information<br />

Education and Communication. The emphasis and role of the ACORD Addis<br />

Ababa CBO support Program is building the capacity of Iddirs. Different<br />

trainings were provided to enhance the capacity of the partner Iddirs to involve<br />

themselves in HIV/AIDS intervention activities and other development activities.<br />

The following table shows the capacity building training provided for the leaders<br />

as well as the members of partner Iddirs.<br />

Table 5.5 Capacity building activities undertaken by ACORD<br />

Type of training Number of participant<br />

Iddirs<br />

Training workshop 42 93<br />

Net working work shop 54 109<br />

Peer educator training 7 49<br />

Experience sharing visit 14 22<br />

Sources: Complied from the responses of ACORD<br />

Number of individual<br />

participants leaders and<br />

members


The involvement of Iddir in the activities of ACORD is more about the capacity<br />

building activities. Table 5.25 shows the number and kinds of capacity building<br />

trainings that were given for Iddir leaders and members. Through such capacity<br />

building workshops and training ACORD is enhancing the abilities of partner<br />

Iddir to become involved in different development activities. HIV/AIDS<br />

intervention is one of the activities in which partner Iddirs are involved.<br />

5.1.4. ACTIVITIES <strong>OF</strong> MARY JOY AID THROUGH DEVELOPMENT<br />

(MJATD) <strong>IN</strong> <strong>IN</strong>VOLV<strong>IN</strong>G IDDIR <strong>IN</strong> HIV/AIDS <strong>IN</strong>TERVENTION<br />

The overall objective of the project is to reduce the socio-economic impact of<br />

HIV/AIDS through establishing effective preventive and control strategies.<br />

Moreover, it was indicated that the specifies objectives of the project are to bring<br />

improvement in the socio economic status of those infected by HIV/AIDS as well<br />

as groups vulnerable to being infected (street children, commercial sex workers,<br />

widows).<br />

MJATD started working with Iddirs in 2000. The role of Iddirs in HIV/AID<br />

intervention activities increases with the advocacy and sensitization program<br />

provided for each of beneficiary Iddirs starting from 2000. A total number of 41<br />

took part in support of members, conducting awareness and advocacy sessions<br />

along with their principal aim of conducting burial activities. A community<br />

worker in MJATD, Ato Leggese Annore, described some of the experiences of his<br />

own Iddir as follows.


The case of a partner Iddir working with MJATD<br />

"In my Iddir, the experience that initiated us to take part in HIV/AIDS intervention<br />

was very tragic. One incident actually initiated the Iddir leaders to take it<br />

seriously. It happen during 2000.<br />

There was an old lady who happened to be a member of our Iddir. She paid<br />

monthly contributions from a small amount of income she got by begging. She lived<br />

on her own no one was there living with her. She got sick once and never<br />

recovered again from the disease. No one knew what was the cause of her illness.<br />

No one took the initiative to help her or to consult her during the time of her Illness.<br />

Finally, she passed away in her little tent. Neighbors and Iddir members give hand<br />

to took her body out and bury it. She had a share of sum of money. We use some<br />

of the money for burial activities. We have to give her share of money to some one<br />

closer to her. No one was there. Finally, we found some one who is a distant<br />

relative of the deceased, and we gave the money to that individual. The next<br />

morning we had a meeting, the incident with the old lady's death touched our<br />

heart. We realize then what is all about the role of Iddir should be taking care of<br />

members while they are alive and give support and care while our members are in<br />

need. So we revised our activities and decided to give support and care for<br />

members who are victims of HIV/AIDS.<br />

MJATD gives assistance for local Iddirs who are working closely with the project.<br />

Training and technical support are the major components of assistance provided<br />

to Iddirs working with MJATD. The provision of assistance is done in a


diminishing manner that shows that gradual decrease as the project duration<br />

increases from 2000 to 2005. This shows quite remarkable indication of the<br />

sustainability of the activities performed by the MJATD with close relation to<br />

Iddirs.<br />

MJATD took the initiative and an active implementer role in Information<br />

Education and Communication and care and support along with partner Iddirs.<br />

37 partner Iddirs are involved in Information Education and Communication<br />

with 8825 individual beneficiaries of the project. However, the involvement of<br />

members and leaders is identified as minimal in care and support as well as IEC<br />

and BCC. Two partner Iddirs are actively involved in support for PLWA with eight<br />

individual beneficiaries that are identified according the current assessment<br />

made by MJATD. It is also indicated that the involvement of MJATD in support<br />

for PLWA and fund raising for AIDS victims recently started in 2003.<br />

5.1.5. ACTIVITIES <strong>OF</strong> PRO PRIDE MERKATO PROGRAM <strong>IN</strong> <strong>IN</strong>VOLV<strong>IN</strong>G<br />

IDDIRS <strong>IN</strong> HIV/AIDS <strong>IN</strong>TERVENTION<br />

The project area is located in Addis Ketema Kifle Ketema (kebele 03, 04, 05, and<br />

12). The project has three years duration. The major objective of the project is<br />

poverty reduction at the household and community level through income<br />

generation schemes. Micro enterprise development is the major means of<br />

enhancing the capacity of the community at individual and as well as household


level. The involvement of Iddirs is more cross sectional than in various strategies<br />

of the project.<br />

Iddirs are mainly involved in the livelihood improvement sector in order to bring<br />

about sustainable development through real community participation and<br />

resources allocation. Partners' involvement in HIV/AIDS issues is related to cross<br />

sectional approach. In this regard a total of 20 partner Iddirs were identified, of<br />

which 9 are involved in capacity building, 7 are involved in networking and 4 are<br />

involved in community based development.<br />

Certain efforts were made to work with Iddirs in HIV/AIDS intervention activities.<br />

However, these were discontinued due to various factors from both sides as<br />

leaders of partner Iddirs did not have the required commitment. Moreover,<br />

leaders of partner Iddirs did not have the necessary involvement and<br />

commitment for the HIV/AIDS intervention activities done in collaboration with<br />

Pro pride. Therefore, the human resources were scarce for them to keep on<br />

working with Iddirs.


5.1.6.ACTIVITIES <strong>OF</strong> COMMUNITY BASED <strong>IN</strong>TEGRATED SUSTA<strong>IN</strong>ABLE<br />

<strong>IN</strong><br />

DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION (CBISDO) <strong>IN</strong> <strong>IN</strong>VOLV<strong>IN</strong>G IDDIRS<br />

HIV/AIDS <strong>IN</strong>TERVENTION<br />

CBISDO is a community-based program actively working in Tekle Haimanot area<br />

Wereda 3 and wereda 4. Six kebele are included in the program areas for<br />

CBISDO that is wereda 3 in kebeles 41, 42, 30, 43 and wereda 4 in kebele 40<br />

and Kebele 29. The overall objective of the organization is to mitigate the AIDS<br />

pandemic through mass health education, provision of support for AIDS<br />

patients and to bring behavioral change among the community concerning risks<br />

of vulnerabilities.<br />

CBISDO has involved the local community through involving Iddirs in IEC and<br />

BCC. Ten Iddirs were engaged as beneficiaries for IEC and three Iddirs were<br />

involved in care and support for PLWA and AIDS orphans. Their effort in<br />

involving Iddirs discontinued and currently Iddirs are not active partners in most<br />

of the activities done in the organization. CBISDO reported that the level of<br />

involvement of these Iddirs was so minimal, much what was than expected.<br />

The discontinuance of the attempt is identified due to resistance from the Iddirs<br />

to be actively engaged in activities and failure to manage the program from the<br />

side of the organization. The reason for failure of this attempt can be seen from<br />

two different directions. From the Iddirs side, there was strong resistance to


incorporate with the NGO. More over there were problem in obtaining fully<br />

committed Iddir leader among partner Iddirs. From the CBISDO side the activity<br />

is launched with out consulting the local community and Iddirs leaders. Proper<br />

planning and well suited experience in working with Iddirs was lacking. So, the<br />

failure can be taken as a major lesson for further involvement.<br />

5.1.6.1. ACTIVITIES <strong>OF</strong> PARTNER IDDIRS WORK<strong>IN</strong>G WITH CBISDO<br />

An assessment was made on the activities of Iddirs in each of the HIV/AIDS<br />

intervention strategies. Six partners Iddirs were included in the assessment and<br />

the following table shows those overall findings.<br />

Table 5.6 Activities of partner Iddirs working with CBISDO<br />

Strategies Currently<br />

actively Involved<br />

partner Iddirs<br />

Once involved but<br />

currently non<br />

active partner<br />

Iddir<br />

IEC 0 6 0<br />

Condom Distribution 0 0 6<br />

AIDS orphan support 0 2 4<br />

PLWA support 0 0 6<br />

Encouragement for VCT service 0 0 6<br />

Fund raising for AIDS Victims 0 0 6<br />

Home Based Care 0 1 5<br />

Income generation for AIDS victims 0 0 6<br />

Source: Compiled from responses of implementer CBISDO<br />

Number of<br />

Iddirs Non<br />

involved at all<br />

Table 5.6 shows the case of 6 partner Iddirs which were selected and identified<br />

as having once been working together with CBISDO. Partner iddirs are referred<br />

as involved in anti HIV/AID activities. There is no partner Iddir that is currently


actively involved in HIV/AIDS intervention activities with the organization. All the<br />

selected number of Iddirs were once involved in Information Education and<br />

communication. Only a few were found to be engaged in support and care<br />

program. The number of Iddirs, which were once active but currently<br />

discontinued, the efforts are 2 and 1 in activities support for PLWHA and home<br />

based care respectively. The role of Iddir members and Iddir leaders were very<br />

limited. The entire initiation and implementation were taken by the active<br />

involvement of the implementer NGO, CBISDO. However the level of participation<br />

from Iddirs was not achieved. This is the reason why the program was<br />

discontinued.<br />

5.2. EFFORTS <strong>OF</strong> SELECTED IDDIR <strong>IN</strong> HIV/AIDS <strong>IN</strong>TERVENTION<br />

ACTIVITIES<br />

5.2.1. <strong>IN</strong>VOLVEMENT <strong>OF</strong> IDDIRS <strong>IN</strong> NON BURIAL ACTIVITIES<br />

Iddirs perform diverse activities in addition to their principal function that is<br />

covering funeral costs. Iddirs are actively involved in different community<br />

development activities. Kebele and local administrators took the initiative to<br />

involve Iddirs in community development activities like fund raising for<br />

construction of feeder roads, fund raising for local school, clinic water pump or<br />

environmental protection activities. Related social support activities like support<br />

for the disadvantaged, old aged and orphans are also performed by Iddirs. The<br />

response of interviewed Iddir leaders with regards to the involvement of their


Iddir in non-burial activities that are related to community development is<br />

summarized in the following table.<br />

Table 5.7 Involvement of Iddir in community development and burial activities<br />

Name of partner NGO<br />

Degree of<br />

involvement HAPCSO ACORD CARE CBISDO MJATD Pro Pride<br />

Total<br />

(%)<br />

Involved 12 9 6 4 7 4 42<br />

(69%)<br />

Non involved 5 1 8 1 0 4 19<br />

(31%)<br />

Total number 17 10 14 5 7 8 61<br />

(100%)<br />

Source: Compiled from response of Iddir Leaders<br />

The above table shows that the majority of respondents Iddirs are involved in<br />

non-burial activities. 69 percent of total respondent Iddirs are involved in<br />

development activities (The involvement of Iddirs in development can be further<br />

elaborated in the following table) and the remaining 31 percent are involved only<br />

in burial activities.<br />

Table 5.8 Types of community development activities<br />

Involvement of Iddir in development<br />

Number of Iddirs<br />

Only in burial activities 19<br />

Road, Water School and other social utilities<br />

39<br />

Provision of support for the elderly 9<br />

Provision of support for disadvantaged 6<br />

Provision of support for orphans 13<br />

Church construction<br />

Sovereign call from kebele during Ethio- Eritrean war 8<br />

Environment 3<br />

Saving and credit activities 6<br />

10


HIV/AIDS advocacy and care and support 61<br />

Source: Compiled from response of Iddir Leaders<br />

Table 5.8 summarized then activities of Iddirs with regard to their involvement in<br />

community development activities. Iddirs' role in construction of feeder roads , may<br />

range fund raising for the construction for water pumps, public toilets church<br />

construction and other social utilities established for the local community. Moreover,<br />

Iddirs have been the major vehicle to channel local resources, financial, manual and<br />

technical, for sovereignty call during Ethio - Eritrean war.<br />

Iddirs also responded that they are involved in provision of orphans, old aged people<br />

and disadvantaged. Iddir undertake these support program through the best suited<br />

community support program, and raising and contributing money for the use of<br />

support provision. 10 Iddirs responded that they are involved in construction of local<br />

church. These Iddirs are involved in fund raising activities for construction of<br />

'Balewold church' that is located in the nearby area.<br />

Saving and credit activities are also reported to be an area of involvement for 6 Iddir<br />

interviewed. These respondents are partners Iddir, which are working with ACORD.<br />

It is indicated in the previous section that ACORD promotes the role of Iddir in<br />

development through capacity building and saving and credit activities.<br />

5.2.1.1. ACCESS <strong>OF</strong> IDDIR TO <strong>THE</strong> EXTERNAL ASSISTANCE FOR NON<br />

BURIAL ACTIVITIES<br />

The very reason why Iddirs are established is to take care of burial activities. The<br />

findings that were compiled from the responses of 61 Iddir leaders shows that Iddirs


are also involved in non-burial activities like the establishment of public utilities like<br />

toilet, feeder roads, construction of churches, fund raising for local school and<br />

clinics etc.<br />

The principal function of Iddir is to undertake burial ceremonies and help can be<br />

seen along with external assistance given to Iddir. NGOs, umbrella Iddir<br />

associations, Private organization and kebele are identified as giving some sort of<br />

assistance. Certain kinds of assistance were found to be provided for these Iddirs to<br />

engage in local community development activities.<br />

Table 5.9 Access of Iddir to external assistance<br />

Access to<br />

Name of partner Iddir<br />

Perc<br />

assistance HAPCSO ACORD CARE CBISDO MJATD Pro Pride Total ent<br />

(%)<br />

Not assistance 8 2 9 5 - 8 32 52.4<br />

5<br />

Partner NGO 6 4 2 - 2 - 14 22.9<br />

5<br />

Wereda and 1 2 3 - 3 -<br />

14.7<br />

Kebele (Local<br />

authorities)<br />

9 5<br />

Umbrella Iddir 2 2 - - 2 - 6 9.83<br />

Private org - - - - -<br />

0<br />

0<br />

Total 17 10 14 5 7 8 61 100


Source; Compiled from response of Iddir leaders<br />

The majority of respondent Iddirs are not provided any kind of assistance at all. This<br />

accounts for 52 percent of the total number of sample. This shows that the majority<br />

of respondent Iddirs are involved in community development by their own capacity<br />

and potential. The remaining 48 percent obtain different kind of assistance in<br />

financial, technical, administrative and net working. Partner NGOs are found to give<br />

assistance to 23 percent of total respondent Iddirs. Local authorities like kebele and<br />

Wereda administrations provide administrative and networking assistance to 15<br />

percent of total respondent Iddirs. Umbrella Iddir organizations like Tesfa<br />

Mahiberawina limat Akef mahiber is the one who give different kind of assistance to<br />

member Iddirs. Networking the efforts of individual Iddirs found in the association<br />

and financial resources is the major assistance given to member Iddirs. Tesfa<br />

Mahiberawina limat Akef mahiber was founded in 2000, and it is actively engaged in<br />

networking the efforts of member Iddir in helping elderly people, orphans<br />

disadvantaged and AIDS victims.<br />

Table 5.10 Provision of assistance given for Iddirs<br />

Kind of assistance<br />

Name of partner NGOs<br />

Total (%)<br />

HAPCSO ACORD CARE CBISDO MJATD Pro<br />

Pride<br />

No assistance 8 2 9 5 - 8 32 (52)<br />

Financial 4 - 1 - - - 5 (8)<br />

Technical and<br />

capacity building<br />

3 8 1 - 3 - 15 (25)<br />

Administrative - - 3 - 2 - 5 (8)<br />

Networking 2 - - - 2 - 4 (7)


Total 17 10 14 5 7 8 61 (100)<br />

Source: Compiled from response of Iddir Leaders<br />

The majority of Iddirs are provided with technical and capacity building assistance<br />

like training and workshops. ACORD gives its partner Iddirs training, workshops<br />

and capacity building seminars, which constitute 25 percent of total respondent<br />

Iddirs. The major objective of ACORD Addis Ababa CBO support program is to<br />

enhance the activities and participation of community based organizations like<br />

Iddirs in development.<br />

Table 6.10 indicates the same finding. The majority of respondents Iddirs that are<br />

partners of ACORD are likely to obtain technical and capacity building assistance.<br />

Financial and administrative assistance accounts for 8 and 8 percent of total<br />

respondent Iddirs.<br />

5.2.2. <strong>THE</strong> SITUATION <strong>OF</strong> IDDIR CAPITAL, EXPENDITURE ON BURIAL<br />

ACTIVITIES, EXPENDITURE ON DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES AND<br />

DEATH RATE <strong>IN</strong> SELECTED IDDIR<br />

Nine Iddirs, which were willing to provide full information about considered factor for<br />

last ten years, were included in the situational assessment. Factors that were<br />

considered for the situational assessment include Iddir capital, death rate and<br />

expenditure on development as well as burial activities. Iddirs are often resistant to<br />

disclose amount of their capital. Their fear has come from confiscation of their<br />

property against their will by governments bodies during Derg Era. Their resistance<br />

also came from lack of information about the interest of government in involving<br />

Iddirs in different development activities. They replied that they still don’t have trust


about activities of government in involving Iddirs in development. Respondent Iddirs<br />

leader repeatedly underline that" if we disclose about the situation of our capital no<br />

one knows what is going to happen in the future. There is a rumor that government<br />

has intention in bringing our money together to set up bank. Such tendencies forces us<br />

to be close about information about our capital". Thus, there was serious limitation in<br />

obtaining data about the situation of Iddir capital, their spending on development,<br />

burial activities and death rates for the last ten years.<br />

Respondent Iddir leaders were also asked about the situation of AIDS deaths, PLWA<br />

and AIDS orphan very few provide data only for the last two years. This is because<br />

that there is wide spread poor documentation among majority of respondents.<br />

Moreover, the information about the situation of AIDS deaths and PLWA are more<br />

secretly kept that only concerns health officials and the patient. Community leaders<br />

and Iddir leaders are less likely to know such things. Very few identified limited<br />

number of AIDS patients and suspected AIDS patients, but these are not complete<br />

data to make analysis. But the amount of capital and deaths rated as well as their<br />

spending on burial activities may indicated the extent of AIDS and AIDS caused<br />

deaths on the livelihood of Iddirs. The following assessments are derived from the<br />

raw data obtained from selected nine Iddir that were included in the study.<br />

Table 5.11Number of deaths among respondent Iddirs<br />

Iddir<br />

Code<br />

Number of deaths in during years 1986-1994 EC.<br />

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002<br />

001 3 12 18 22 20 29 32 28 30<br />

002 96 85 80 96 120 145 108 55 48<br />

004 7 6 8 7 9 11 8 13 10


006 4 10 8 6 6 15 15 25 19<br />

007 4 4 4 4 16 17 17 20 12<br />

008 4 6 8 7 9 11 8 13 10<br />

009 8 12 12 14 16 15 17 19 20<br />

Source: Compiled from the responses of Iddirs leaders<br />

Table 5.11 shows there is an increasing in trend the number of deaths occur<br />

among the majority of respondent Iddirs. Iddir were coded in 001, 002, 004, 006,<br />

007, 008 and 009nominally since Iddir leaders are very careful to disclose<br />

information about the situation of their capital and related issues. According to<br />

their response the above table summarizes the situation of deaths that occur<br />

during the last ten years.<br />

The trend of steady increase is seen in most of respondent Iddirs. Most of rises in<br />

number of deaths occur between years of 1997 and 1999. The increment ranges<br />

from continuous change in numbers of deaths that cumulatively resulted in a<br />

large number of deaths through the last ten years.<br />

.<br />

As it is indicated in the table 1.1 there is an increasing trend in number of<br />

deaths that occur among the majority of Iddirs. Increase in death rates usually<br />

resulted in increased spending in burial activities and related undertakings. This<br />

is because of the very nature of Iddirs related to take care of deaths. The<br />

principal aim of Iddir is "… to meet death expenses and to avoid a paupers'<br />

funeral as well as to provide a certain measure of social security when financial<br />

crisis has occurred in certain household" (Pankhurst and Endrias, 1658).<br />

Similarly, respondent Iddirs are asked about the situation of their expenditure<br />

on burial activities and related undertakings. The findings of the assessment


about the situation of deaths in seven selected Iddirs can be summarized in the<br />

graphs indicated in Annex. The following table (5.12) summarizes the response of<br />

Iddirs with the regard top their expenditure on burial activities during the last<br />

ten years.<br />

Table 5.12 Iddirs' expenditure on burial activities<br />

Iddir<br />

Code<br />

Percentage of Iddir expenditure on burial activities from the capital in<br />

the last ten years (in %)<br />

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002<br />

001 80 37 36 36 40 43 47 43 47<br />

002 80 86 33 43 65 57 44 25 23<br />

004 48 72 44 - 67 133 - 87 102<br />

006 35 88 70 40 40 53 77 97 94<br />

007 45 40 42 38 40 60 56 54 41<br />

008 51 50 52 43 49 61 48 84 69<br />

009 60 48 55 51 50 48 68 71 50<br />

Source: Compiled from the responses of Iddirs leaders<br />

Table 5.12 shows the situation of Iddirs expenditure on burial activities in<br />

selected seven Iddirs as it is seen during the last ten years. According to the<br />

responses of Iddir leaders, Iddirs expenditure on burial activities constitute<br />

larger amount of their spending through out the last ten years. This might be<br />

explained by the very nature of Iddirs is to undertake deaths expenses among


members. Majority of expenditures made on burial activities ranges more than<br />

half of their existing capital during the reporting year.<br />

In some cases burial expenditures exceeds the total amount of capital that is<br />

available. Respondent Iddir coded as 004 have shown burial expenditures are<br />

more than capital available during years of 1999 and 2002. Iddirs coded as 009<br />

has burial expenditure more than or around the amount of half of Iddir capital.<br />

There is also an increasing trend in the burial expenditure among the majority of<br />

respondent Iddirs. Iddirs coded as 004, 001, 006, and 008 shows steady increase<br />

in their expenditure on burial and related activities. Iddir coded as 002 shows an<br />

increase in burial expenditure during 1998 and 1999. Similarly, such seasonal<br />

increase is seen in Iddirs coded as 007 and 009 during the years of 1999 and<br />

2000. Certain increase in burial expenditure can be explained in increased rate<br />

of numbers in deaths that occur among respondent Iddirs.<br />

Such increased spending on burial activities unable these institutions involve in<br />

non burial activities that has merit for community development. In some cases it<br />

is seen these Iddirs unable to cover their burial expenditure since their capital is<br />

less that what they are supposed to spend on burial activities. Iddir 004 is a good<br />

example for such conditions.<br />

The following table (Table 5.13) shows the Iddir expenditure on non-burial<br />

community development activities.


Table 5.13 Iddirs' expenditure on development activities<br />

Iddir<br />

Code<br />

Percentage of Iddir expenditure on development (Non burial)activities<br />

from the capital in the last ten years ( in %)<br />

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002<br />

001 - - - - - - - - -<br />

002 0.67 0.72 0.62 0.73 0.72 0.89 0.78 16.47 2.8<br />

004 19 10 6.6 - 8.5 - - 0.7 -<br />

006 - - - - - - 7.8 5.9 -<br />

007 - - - - - 2.4 3.5 - -<br />

008 - - - - - - 6 12 6<br />

009 1.1 - - 1.1 3 11 - 0.9 -<br />

Source: Compiled from the responses of Iddirs leaders<br />

Table 5.13 shows that most of respondent Iddirs failed to report their<br />

expenditure on non-burial activities for the last ten years. Only some reported<br />

their spending for limited period of time. Non reported non-burial expenditure<br />

indicated that respondent Iddirs are not involved in non-burial activities or their<br />

spending is not documented. Non-burial activities include in fund raising for<br />

construction of feeder road, local school and local health canter as well as other<br />

social facilities like water. Summarized assessment made on the situation of<br />

Iddirs' expenditure on burial activities can be seen in graphs indicated in annex.<br />

Only Iddir coded as 002 reported their expenditure on non-burial activities. It<br />

indicated that their expenditure on non-burial activities is less than 1% of their<br />

capital available during most of the report year. Only during 2001 and 2002 they<br />

spend 16.47 and 2.8 percent of their capital on non-burial activities respectively.<br />

The remaining respondent Iddirs reported their expenditure on non-burial


activities for the limited years. Those reported expenditures on non burial<br />

activities are very limited amount compared to expenditures made on burial<br />

activities. The minimum spending on non- burial activities can be explained with<br />

the regard to increased deaths among Iddirs that consumes most of Iddirs<br />

resources to be spend on burial activities and related undertakings. These<br />

situations preoccupied further involvement of iddirs in non-burial activities and<br />

forced iddirs to relay on only on burial activities. That in turn resulted in limited<br />

involvement of Iddirs, which are identified as potential vehicles for active<br />

participation of the community at the grass root level in various development<br />

activities, in development activities. In some cases the very survival of these<br />

institutions is in danger due to increased deaths, which directly affect their<br />

capital and human resources.<br />

Similarly, table 1.3 shows there is limited left for Iddirs to spend on non burial<br />

activities, as it is shown in table 1.2 that their expenditure on burial actives is<br />

increasingly growing derived from increased deaths.<br />

The following table (Table 5.14) can clearly make comparison between Iddirs'<br />

expenditure on burial and non-burial activities. From the table one can consider<br />

that there is only very limited expenditure made by Iddirs on non-burial<br />

activities. Much of Iddir expenditures are made on burial activities and these are<br />

showing increasing trend that is assumed to be caused by increase in deaths.<br />

See table 5.14.


Table 5.14 Comparison of Iddir expenditure on burial and non burial activities<br />

Iddir<br />

Percentage of Iddir expenditure on development (Non burial) activities from the<br />

capital in the last ten years ( in %)<br />

Code 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002<br />

001 80<br />

002 80<br />

004 48<br />

006 35<br />

007 45<br />

008 51<br />

009 60<br />

-<br />

0.67<br />

19<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

1.1<br />

37<br />

86<br />

72<br />

88<br />

40<br />

50<br />

48<br />

-<br />

0.72<br />

10<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

36<br />

33<br />

44<br />

70<br />

42<br />

52<br />

55<br />

-<br />

0.62<br />

6.6<br />

36<br />

43<br />

-<br />

-<br />

0.73<br />

-<br />

40<br />

65<br />

67<br />

-<br />

0.72<br />

8.5<br />

43<br />

57<br />

133<br />

Source: Compiled from the responses of Iddirs leaders<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

40<br />

38<br />

43<br />

51<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

1.1<br />

Keys: - Bold - Expenditure on burial activities<br />

Unbold -Expenditure on non-burial activities<br />

40<br />

40<br />

49<br />

50<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

3<br />

53<br />

60<br />

61<br />

48<br />

-<br />

0.89<br />

-<br />

-<br />

2.4<br />

-<br />

11<br />

47<br />

44<br />

-<br />

77<br />

56<br />

48<br />

68<br />

-<br />

0.78<br />

-<br />

7.8<br />

3.5<br />

6<br />

-<br />

43<br />

25<br />

87<br />

97<br />

54<br />

71<br />

-<br />

16.47<br />

0.7<br />

5.9<br />

-<br />

84<br />

12<br />

0.9<br />

47<br />

23<br />

102<br />

94<br />

41<br />

69<br />

50<br />

-<br />

2.8<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

6<br />

-


5.2.3. IDDIRS AND <strong>THE</strong>IR ANTI HIV/AIDS ACTIVITIES<br />

5.2.3.1. DURATION <strong>OF</strong> IDDIRS HIV/AIDS <strong>IN</strong>TERVENTION<br />

ACTIVITIES<br />

The emphasis on the community based HIV/AIDS intervention began recently.<br />

Findings of the study shows that 1999 is the year when interviewed Iddirs started<br />

anti HIV/AIDS activities. The following table shows the year of establishment of<br />

HIV/AIDS intervention activities among Iddirs interviewed in the research.<br />

Table 5.15 Duration of establishment for anti HIV activity among respondent Iddir<br />

Name of partner NGO<br />

Year HAPCSO ACORD CARE CBISDO MJATD Pro<br />

Pride<br />

Total (%)<br />

1999 - - - - - 2 2 (3%)<br />

2000 5 3 3 1 - 2 14(23 %)<br />

2001 5 7 5 - 1 2 20(33%)<br />

2002 7 - 6 4 6 2 25(41%)<br />

Total 17 10 14 5 7 8 61(100%)<br />

Source: Compiled from response of Iddir leaders<br />

Most HIV/AIDS intervention attempts started in 2002. 41% of the total number of<br />

respondent Iddirs started to engage in HIV/AIDS intervention activities recently in<br />

2002. 33 percent of the total interviewed Iddirs responded that they started to<br />

engage in HIV/AIDS intervention activities in 2001. 23 percent and 3 percent started<br />

their activities in 2000 and 1999 respectively. One can learn that these attempts are<br />

recently introduced compared to the first incidence of the epidemic in Ethiopia in<br />

1986. However, there are indications that shows that certain kinds of sensitization<br />

workshops have been given before their involvement in anti HIV/AIDS activities.


5.2.3.2. REASONS FOR AND SOURCES <strong>OF</strong> <strong>IN</strong>ITIATION<br />

Various reasons were given as a source of initiation for anti HIV/AIDS intervention<br />

undertaken by Iddirs. Increased AIDS deaths and AIDS orphans, initiation and<br />

sensitization from the partner NGO, initiation from kebele other local administrators.<br />

The following table shows the responses of interviewed Iddirs with regard to the<br />

sources of their motivation to be involved in anti HIV/AIDS activities, as it is<br />

observed in their Iddir.<br />

Table 5.16 Reasons for anti HIV/AIDS activity<br />

Reasons for Iddirs<br />

taking part in<br />

HIV/AIDS<br />

intervention<br />

AIDS deaths and<br />

Orphans<br />

Name of partner NGO<br />

HAPCSO ACORD CARE CBISDO MJATD Pro<br />

Pride<br />

Total(%)<br />

6 4 6 1 4 3 24 (39%)<br />

Public advocacy 3 2 1 - - - 6 (10%)<br />

Initiation from 8 2 5 1 3 4 23 (38%)<br />

partner NGOs<br />

Initiation from local<br />

authorities: Wereda<br />

and Kebele<br />

- 2 2 3 - 1 8 (13%)<br />

Total 17 10 14 5 7 8 61<br />

(100%)<br />

Source: Compiled from responses of Iddir leaders<br />

Reasons for taking part in HIV/AIDS includes for both internal and external<br />

reasons. Internal reasons include increased number of deaths and orphaned<br />

children among Iddir members. External reason includes those initiations<br />

coming from outside bodies like public, partner NGOs, local authorities and<br />

other bodies.<br />

The incidence of increased AIDS deaths and AIDS orphans seem to be the major<br />

reason for the majority of respondent Iddirs to take part in HIV/AIDS


intervention activities. A certain number of respondents indicated that there is a<br />

depletion of their capital due to the increased number of deaths that forced<br />

Iddirs to spend much of their capital on burial activities and contributions made<br />

for the members of Iddir who lost members of families. 39 percent of total<br />

number of respondent Iddirs reported that increased number of AIDS deaths and<br />

AIDS orphans forced them to take part in HIV/AIDS intervention activities.<br />

Awareness raising and sensitization workshops that are conducted by partner<br />

NGOs seem to be reason for some Iddirs to take part in HIV/AIDS intervention<br />

activities and seem to help 37 percent of total number of respondent Iddirs.<br />

Kebele and wereda authorities seem to be source of motivation for 13 percent of<br />

total respondent Iddirs to be involved in anti HIV/AIDS activities. Public<br />

awareness and mass advocacy programs, which are undertaken in different<br />

forms, seem to be also motivate 10 percent of the total number of interviewed<br />

Iddirs to take part in anti HIV/AIDS activities. Table 5.17 below indicates the<br />

sources of the first initiation for Iddirs to involve in anti HIV/AIDS activities.<br />

Table 5.17 Source of the motivation for Iddirs in HIV/AIDS intervention<br />

Sources of initiation<br />

Name of partner NGO<br />

HAPCSO ACORD CARE CBISDO MJATD Pro<br />

Pride<br />

Total<br />

Iddir members 1 8 6 - - 2 17 (28%)<br />

Partner NGOs 16 2 5 5 7 6 41 (67 %)<br />

Kebele and local<br />

administration<br />

- - 1 - - 1 (2%)<br />

Wereda HIV<br />

secretariat<br />

- - 2 - - 2 (3%)<br />

Total 17 10 14 5 7 8 61 (100%)<br />

Source: Compiled from responses of Iddir leaders


Partner NGOs took the major initiation in involving Iddirs in anti HIV/AIDS<br />

activities for the majority of respondent Iddirs. 67 per cent of total number of<br />

respondents responded that partner NGOs took the lead in initiating them in anti<br />

HIV/AIDS intervention activities. HAPCSO took initiation in 94 percent of<br />

selected partner Iddirs selected in the study. The same holds with partner Iddirs<br />

who are working with Marry Joy Aid Through Development (MJATD). All<br />

respondents from MJATD reported that the initiation came from partner NGO<br />

working with them.<br />

Iddir members and leaders taking initiatives may coupled with the internal<br />

reasons for Iddir that is increased number of AIDS deaths and AIDS orphans.<br />

Iddir members were identified to be sources of initiation for 28 percent of<br />

respondent Iddirs. The majority of initiations that come from Iddir members<br />

belong to partner Iddirs who are working with ACORD. This might be seen with<br />

regard to the emphasis that ACORD gives for the capacity building and technical<br />

assistance for partner Iddirs. in such regard ACORD has been providing different<br />

capacity building and training that helps iddirs to take up such activities by their<br />

own. The initiation that comes from Iddir members refers to initiation that<br />

comes from internal reasons. Usually Iddir leaders took the major role in doing<br />

so.<br />

5.2.3.3. REVISION <strong>OF</strong> PARTNER IDDIRS' BYLAWS


The principal role of Iddir being burial and related activities, most of interviewed<br />

Iddirs adapted their bylaws long time ago. HIV/AIDS intervention activities are<br />

indicated as recently introduced. The concern of Iddir's bylaws with regard to anti<br />

HIV/AIDS activities needs the revision concerning newly introduced activities.<br />

Revision of Iddir's bylaws in necessary for their function is entirely not related to the<br />

HIV/AIDS intervention activities. The involvement of Iddirs in anti HIV/AIDS<br />

activities is not one of their principal function, so certain kind of revision need to be<br />

made let them incorporate additional activities.<br />

Table 5.18 shows the responses of interviewed Iddirs about the revision made on the<br />

content of their Bylaws.


Table 5.18 Revision of Iddirs Bylaws<br />

Level of<br />

revision<br />

made on<br />

Iddir<br />

bylaws<br />

Name of partner NGO<br />

HAPCSO ACORD CARE CBISD<br />

O<br />

MJATD Pro<br />

Pride<br />

Total (%)<br />

Revised 12 1 7 - 4 2 26 (42%)<br />

Not revised 4 4 4 5 1 6 24(39%)<br />

on the<br />

process of<br />

being<br />

revised<br />

1 5 3 - 2 - 11(18%)<br />

Total 17 10 14 5 7 8 61(100%)<br />

Source: Compiled from responses of Iddir leaders<br />

Potentially large number of respondent Iddirs seem to have made revisions in the<br />

content of their bylaws concerning the need for them to do some thing about<br />

HIV/AIDS and to support and help their member while they are alive. 43 percent of<br />

the total respondent Iddirs revised their bylaws. HAPCSO took the lion's share from<br />

partner Iddir whose made revisions on bylaws to take part in HIV/AIDS intervention<br />

activities. Partner Iddirs, with revised bylaws, who are working with CARE also seem<br />

to be half of the sample taken from partner NGOs.<br />

18 percent of total respondent Iddirs are in the process of revising their bylaws with<br />

regard to their anti HIV/AIDS activities. These are referred to waiting for the general<br />

assembly to make the revised document official. Some others are drafting the<br />

revisions to be official during the general assembly meeting to be held annually or<br />

biannually. The remaining 39 percent of the total respondent Iddirs reported that<br />

their bylaws are not revised. There seems to be a clear trend to update the content of<br />

bylaws of Iddir due to their involvement in different development activities. CBISDO


has discontinued efforts in working with partner Iddirs. So, all of partner Iddirs<br />

working with CBISDO reported that they didn't revise their bylaws. The same holds<br />

true for the majority of partner Iddir working with Pro-Pride. These attempts are<br />

discontinued and their involvement is mainly on poverty reduction.<br />

So we can summarize that revision of bylaws intensifies, as the commitment of Iddir<br />

becomes strongly. That can be justified in that HAPCSO and CARE are working<br />

intensively so that the majority of their partners made revisions of their bylaws to<br />

incorporate certain articles indicating their HIV/AIDS activities. These revisions were<br />

made to undertake both prevention and care and support activities.<br />

5.2.4. MAJOR ANTI HIV/AIDS STRATEGY UNDERTAKEN BY IDDIRS<br />

5.2.4.1. <strong>IN</strong>VOLVEMENT <strong>IN</strong> IEC AND BCC<br />

Information Education and Communication (IEC), Behavioral Change and<br />

Communication (BCC), Care and Support, and Voluntary Counseling and Testing<br />

(VCT) are the major HIV/AIDS intervention strategies identified as being used in<br />

most implementer NGOs. The following table contains the response of interviewed<br />

Iddirs about their involvement in the major anti HIV/AIDS intervention activities.<br />

Table 5.19 Strategies of HIV /AIDS intervention<br />

HIV/AIDS<br />

intervention<br />

strategies<br />

Name of partner NGO<br />

HAPCSO ACORD CARE CBISDO MJATD Pro<br />

Pride<br />

Total (%)<br />

IEC and BCC 10 5 4 5 4 5 33(54%)<br />

VCT - - - - - - -<br />

IEC and Care<br />

and support<br />

IEC, BCC, Care<br />

and support(All)<br />

5 4 4 - 3 3 19(31%)<br />

2 1 6 - - - 9(15%)


Total 17 10 14 5 7 8 61<br />

(100%)<br />

Source: Compiled from responses of Iddir leaders<br />

IEC and BCC are the main anti HIV/AIDS strategies that the majority of respondent<br />

Iddirs are currently involved in. 54 percent of total respondent Iddirs reported that<br />

they are involved in Information Education and Communication. 31 percent of the<br />

total interviewed Iddirs are involved in provision of care and support. The remaining<br />

15 percent are involved in IEC, BCC and care and support.<br />

The involvement of Iddirs is identified to be significant in IEC and BCC. Advocacy,<br />

mass sensitization and awareness raising seems to be the major strategy used in<br />

Iddirs as a major anti HIV/AIDS intervention with the regard to IEC. These Iddirs are<br />

reported to hold advocacy sessions during Iddir meetings, mourning ceremonies and<br />

other different situations depending on their access to such services and assistance<br />

from partner NGO. The role of Iddir leaders is undeniable for these sessions<br />

undertaken among the Iddir member and local community in some cases. Table 5.20<br />

shows the activities of Iddirs in IEC and BCC.<br />

Table 5.20 Involvement of Iddir in IEC<br />

situation of IEC<br />

Name of partner NGO<br />

sessions<br />

Unplanned, held<br />

occasionally on meetings<br />

HAPCSO ACORD CARE CBISDO MJATD Pro<br />

Pride<br />

Total<br />

7 4 4 4 5 8 32(52%<br />

)<br />

Held monthly - - 2 - 1 - 3(4%)<br />

Only during general<br />

assembly meetings<br />

5 4 - 1 1 - 11(18%<br />

)<br />

Planned 5 2 8 - - - 15<br />

(25%)<br />

Total 17 10 14 5 7 8 61<br />

Source: Compiled from responses of Iddir leaders


According to the Central Static Authority, Iddir meetings are said to be the major<br />

means of information and communication about HIV/AIDS (CSA, 2001). Similarly,<br />

responses of interviewed Iddirs show that Iddir meetings are major forums for IEC<br />

sessions to be held to raise the awareness of Iddir members. The majority of<br />

respondent Iddirs held advocacy sessions during occasional meetings in which the<br />

teaching about HIV/AIDS is part of the major discussions. These might be during<br />

funeral ceremonies and other similar gatherings. 52 percent of total respondent<br />

Iddirs held advocacy sessions unplanned occasionally. This includes during monthly<br />

meetings, during mourning ceremonies and other similar occasions, which bring the<br />

majority members together. 25 percent of respondent Iddirs held their advocacy<br />

sessions according to well planned schedule. Partner Iddir working with CARE<br />

seems to hold advocacy sessions in a planned schedule. 5 percent of total<br />

respondent Iddirs held monthly advocacy sessions. This can be seen along with the<br />

role of capacity building sessions and continuous follow up by the partner NGO. 18<br />

percent held advocacy sessions only during general assembly meetings. This is often<br />

held biannually and/or annually in some cases. The trend of conducting advocacy<br />

sessions in an unplanned occasional manner is also observed among the majority of<br />

respondent Iddirs.<br />

5.2.4.1.1. IMPLEMENTERS <strong>OF</strong> ADVOCACY SESSIONS<br />

Active implementers of IEC sessions held among Iddirs may include Iddir leaders,<br />

volunteers, health officials from partner NGOs and local administrators. The table<br />

5.21 shows active implementers of advocacy sessions held by Iddirs.


Table 5.21 Implementers of the advocacy session held in iddirs<br />

Active<br />

implementers of<br />

Advocacy<br />

Name of partner NGO<br />

HAPCSO ACORD CARE CBISDO MJATD Pro<br />

Pride<br />

Total<br />

Iddir leaders 7 8 12 - 1 1 29<br />

(47%<br />

Health officials from 9 1 2 5 6 7 30(4<br />

partner NGO<br />

9%)<br />

Employed personnel - 1 - - - - 1(2%<br />

)<br />

Volunteers 1 - - - - - 1(2%<br />

Kebele<br />

administrators<br />

- - - - - -<br />

)<br />

0<br />

Total 17 10 14 5 7 8 61(1<br />

00%)<br />

Source: Compiled from responses of Iddir leaders<br />

The role of health workers from the partner NGOs seems considerable in<br />

conducting the advocacy sessions during Iddir meetings. 49 percent of the total<br />

respondent Iddirs stated that the active implementers of advocacy sessions are<br />

health care workers and officials from the partner NGO. The next largest group<br />

that conducts IEC sessions in Iddir meetings is Iddir leaders. Iddir leaders are<br />

respected and recognized member of the society. They take an active role in<br />

teaching about AIDS during Iddir meetings. 47 percent of the total respondent<br />

Iddirs reported that Iddir leaders are the active implementers of discussions and<br />

teachings about AIDS. Employed personnel and volunteers are involved in only<br />

one Iddir. Partner Iddirs working with ACORD and CARE are the major ones<br />

whose Iddir leaders are active implementers of advocacy sessions. Volunteer and<br />

employed personnel took active roles in implementing advocacy session in 2 and<br />

2 percent of the total respondent Iddirs respectively.<br />

)


5.2.4.1.2. PARTICIPATION <strong>OF</strong> HEALTH PERSONNEL AND PLWA <strong>IN</strong><br />

ADVOCACY SESSIONS<br />

The participation of qualified health personnel and PLWA to provide teachings and<br />

share their experience with the Iddir members was said to be determined the quality<br />

and technical capacity of the advocacy session. The response of interviewed Iddirs<br />

concerning the participation of qualified personnel.<br />

Table 5.22 Participation of health official and PLWA in advocacy sessions during Iddir Meetings<br />

Level of<br />

Name of partner NGO<br />

participation HAPCSO ACORD CARE CBISDO MJATD Pro<br />

Pride<br />

Total<br />

No participation 1 5 9 0 0 0 15(25%<br />

of health officials<br />

)<br />

Attendance of 16 5 5 5 7 8 46(75%<br />

health officials<br />

)<br />

Sub total 17 10 14 5 7 8 61<br />

No participation 8 6 11 5 6 5 41(67%<br />

of PLWHA<br />

)<br />

Attendance of 9 4 3 - 1 3 20(32%<br />

PLWA<br />

)<br />

Sub Total 17 10 14 5 7 8 61<br />

Source: Compiled from response of Iddir leaders<br />

The participation of health officials is reported in 75 percent of total respondent<br />

Iddirs while 25 percent reported there is no participation of health officials in<br />

advocacy session. One can recall that technical assistance also seems to play greater<br />

role in engaging the health officials available for advocacy in Iddir meetings. Partner<br />

Iddirs working with Pro Pride, MJATD and HAPCSO the participation of health<br />

officials during advocacy session held at the time of Iddirs meeting. These include<br />

professionals working with partner Iddir. Some Iddir invite health officials by their<br />

own to take part in their advocacy sessions.


Participation of PLWA is reported to be available for 33 percent of respondent Iddirs.<br />

The remaining 67 percent held their sessions without the participation of PLWA to<br />

share their life experience and advice with the community. Similarly with the<br />

participation of health officials, the involvement of PLWA during the advocacy<br />

sessions depends on the assistance of partner NGOs. HAPCSO takes the lion's share<br />

in involving PLWA to take part in iddirs meetings to held advocacy sessions.<br />

Similarly, ACORD, CARE and Pro-Pride follow the same effort in involving PLWA<br />

during advocacy sessions held during Iddirs meetings and separate sessions<br />

Table 5.23 Beneficiaries of the advocacy held in Iddir<br />

Active<br />

implementers of<br />

Advocacy<br />

Iddir members<br />

only<br />

Name of partner NGO<br />

HAPCSO ACORD CARE CBISDO MJATD Pro<br />

Pride<br />

Total<br />

17 8 12 4 7 8 56(92%)<br />

Non members - - 1 1 - - 2(3%)<br />

Local Community - 2 1 - - - 3(5%)<br />

Total 17 10 14 5 7 8 61(100%)<br />

Source; Compiled from response of Iddir leaders<br />

Iddir members are the prior beneficiaries of IEC session held in Iddir meetings. 92<br />

percent of respondent Iddirs reported that Iddir members are beneficiaries of the IEC<br />

sessions. 5 percent of respondents include the non-members and 5 percent the local<br />

community as the beneficiaries of the advocacy sessions.


5.2.4.2. <strong>IN</strong>VOLVEMENT <strong>OF</strong> IDDIR <strong>IN</strong> PROVISION <strong>OF</strong> CARE AND SUPPORT<br />

Care and support programs are one of the major strategies that are included in<br />

the anti HIV/AIDS intervention. The involvement of Iddirs in care and support<br />

programs can be rated in terms of activities performed concerning AIDS patients,<br />

People living with HIV and AIDS and AIDS orphans, and home based care. The<br />

following section describes the involvement of interview Iddirs for care and<br />

support programs<br />

5.2.4.2.1. K<strong>IN</strong>DS <strong>OF</strong> SUPPORT GIVEN TO AIDS PATIENTS<br />

The kind of support provided by Iddirs for HIV/AIDS patients may range from<br />

covering medical assistance, allowing some amount of money for the patient to be<br />

used for living expenses while they are alive, to covering the living expenses. The<br />

following table shows the summary of the responses of interviewed Iddirs with regard<br />

to the kind of care provided for AIDS patients.<br />

Table 5.24 kinds of assistance for AIDS patients<br />

AIDS cases<br />

No assistance b/c<br />

no one known<br />

cover Medical<br />

expenses<br />

Allow money while<br />

the patient is alive<br />

Cover living<br />

expenses<br />

Name of partner NGO<br />

HAPCSO ACORD CARE CBISDO MJATD Pro Pride<br />

Total<br />

12 9 6 5 6 5 43(70%)<br />

1 1 1 - - - 3(5%)<br />

4 - 6 - 1 3 14(23%)<br />

- - 1 - - - 1(1%)<br />

Total 17 10 14 5 7 8 61(100%<br />

)<br />

Source: Compiled from responses of Iddir leaders


Table 5.24 shows that 70 percent of respondent Iddirs are not involved in<br />

provision of care and support programs due to the reason that no one knows the<br />

magnitude of AIDS cases in the Iddir. 22 percent reported that they provide the<br />

AIDS patient some amount money from the deposit meant for the purpose of<br />

burial for purposes of medical and living expenses. Five percent reported they<br />

cover medical expenses in supporting the patient. Two percent reported that they<br />

cover living expenses for AIDS patients.<br />

5.2.4.2.2. K<strong>IN</strong>DS <strong>OF</strong> SUPPORT PROVIDED TO AIDS ORPHANS<br />

AIDS orphans support refers to support provided for orphans who lost their<br />

parents by the for community. Hence AIDS orphans are not clearly identified.<br />

Suspected AIDS cases take the form of death reported by opportunistic disease,<br />

or successive deaths of couples. Similarly to the kind of support provided for<br />

PLWA and the kind of assistance given for AIDS orphans may take different<br />

forms which included covering school fees uniforms, covering house rent, and<br />

guaranteeing them replacement membership rights instead of their parents.<br />

Table 5.25 Kind of assistance given to AIDS orphans<br />

kinds of care<br />

Name of partner NGO<br />

Total<br />

HAPCSO ACORD CARE CBISDO MJATD Pro<br />

Pride<br />

Not involved in Orphan<br />

support<br />

13 3 5 3 6 8 38(62%)<br />

Covering school fee and<br />

uniforms<br />

1 4 3 - 1 - 9(15%)<br />

Covering house rent - - - - - - -<br />

Withdraw from monthly<br />

contribution<br />

2 - - 2 - - 4(7%)<br />

Access to medical care - 3 4 - - - 7(11%)<br />

Replacement 1 - 2 - - - 3(5%)<br />

Total 17 10 14 5 7 8 61(100%)<br />

Number of identified<br />

beneficiaries<br />

7 55 167 15 6 - -


Source: Compiled from responses of Iddir leaders<br />

Lack of known AIDS cases also causes no involvement of the majority of Iddirs in<br />

support and care for AIDS orphans. 62 percent reported that they are not<br />

involved in orphan support. Lack of financial resources is the major reason for<br />

the majority of respondent not to become involved in provision of support for<br />

AIDS orphans. Involvement of Iddir in provision of support for AIDS orphan is<br />

reported in 38 percent of respondent Iddirs.<br />

15 percent of total respondent Iddirs are involved in covering school fees and<br />

uniforms. 11 percent are identified as being involved in accessing medical<br />

support for AIDS orphans. Medical care is not the function of Iddirs so the<br />

patient is referred to the medical center with the help of the Iddir members.<br />

Dispensation from the monthly contribution is identified to be another form of<br />

care provide for AIDS orphans by 7 percent of the total respondent Iddirs. Five<br />

percent provide replacement as a means of ensuring the social wellbeing of the<br />

orphans.<br />

Table 5.26 below summaries the responses of interviewed Iddirs with the regard<br />

to their involvement in Home Based Care (HBC).<br />

Table 5.26 Involvement of respondent Iddirs in Home based care<br />

Home based<br />

Name of partner NGO<br />

care HAPCSO ACORD CARE CBISDO MJAT<br />

D<br />

Not involved<br />

in Orphan<br />

support<br />

♦ number of<br />

Involved<br />

Iddirs<br />

13<br />

4<br />

Pro Pride<br />

Total<br />

13 9 7 6 5 53<br />

(87%)<br />

1<br />

1<br />

-<br />

2<br />

-<br />

8<br />

(13%)


♦ Total<br />

number of<br />

beneficiari<br />

es<br />

5 3 2 0 4 0<br />

Source: Compiled from responses of Iddir leaders<br />

Table 5.26 above shows that the majority of respondent Iddirs reported that they<br />

are not involved in provision of Home Based Care for AIDS patients. 87 percent<br />

are identified as not involved in such undertakings at all. The remaining 13<br />

percent of total respondents, are involved in provision of care and support for<br />

AIDS patients. The total number of beneficiary AIDS patients is 14 patients. This<br />

might be taken as the major beginning to involve Iddirs in the provision of home<br />

based care and support for AIDS patients.<br />

To sum up the activities of respondent iddirs in provision of care and support for<br />

infected and affected people, their activities in supporting AIDS patients and<br />

AIDS orphans needs to be considered. The involvement of respondents in the<br />

provision of care and support for people infected and affected by HIV/AIDS that<br />

is PLWA, AIDS orphans and Home Based Care is summarized in the table 5.247.<br />

Table 5.27 summary of activities in provision of care and support<br />

Care and support activity<br />

Provision of care for AIDS<br />

patient<br />

♦ non Involved<br />

♦ involved<br />

♦ Beneficiary<br />

Provision of support for AIDS<br />

orphans<br />

♦ non Involved<br />

♦ involved<br />

♦ Beneficiary<br />

Name of partner NGO<br />

HAPCSO ACORD CARE CBISDO MJATD Pro<br />

Pride<br />

14<br />

3<br />

7<br />

14<br />

3<br />

7<br />

5<br />

5<br />

25<br />

3<br />

7<br />

55<br />

12<br />

2<br />

6<br />

5<br />

9<br />

167<br />

5<br />

-<br />

-<br />

3<br />

2<br />

15<br />

5<br />

2<br />

3<br />

6<br />

1<br />

6<br />

4<br />

4<br />

8<br />

8<br />

-<br />

-


Provision of home based care<br />

♦ Non involved<br />

♦ involved<br />

♦ Beneficiaries<br />

13<br />

4<br />

5<br />

Source: Compiled from response of Iddir leaders<br />

9<br />

1<br />

2<br />

The comparison made on the involvement of Iddir in different care and support<br />

activities, as is summarized in the table above. The biggest group belongs to Iddir<br />

involved in provision of care and support for AIDS orphan. 36 percent or<br />

respondents are involved in support for AIDS orphans. The remaining 64 percent<br />

are not involved in such undertaking at all.<br />

The largest group is Iddirs who are involved in provision of care and support for<br />

AIDS patients. It accounts for 26 percent of the total respondent Iddirs. Iddirs,<br />

which are involved in provision of, care and support for AIDS patients are<br />

identified to be 13 percent of the total respondent Iddirs. According to the<br />

responses of the interviewed Iddir the involvement of Iddir ranges from provision<br />

of care and support for AIDS orphans, AIDS patient to home based care. There is<br />

a significant beginning in involvement of Iddir in home based care for AIDS<br />

patients. However, these activities are in their infant stage and needs further<br />

improvement and commitment.<br />

5.2.5. MAJOR PROBLEMS FACED BY IDDIRS <strong>IN</strong>VOLVED <strong>IN</strong> HIV/AIDS<br />

<strong>IN</strong>TERVENTION<br />

Considering that community based HIV/AIDS intervention has only recently<br />

been initiated and only a few Iddirs are taking part in such undertakings, certain<br />

13<br />

1<br />

3<br />

5<br />

-<br />

-<br />

7<br />

-<br />

-<br />

6<br />

2<br />

4


problems that are faced by such activities need to be considered. Lack of<br />

awareness, resistance from Iddir members, absence of bylaws and lack of<br />

financial and technical capacity are identified as the major problems faced by<br />

respondent Iddirs. The responses of interviewed Iddirs are summarized in table<br />

2.28 below.<br />

Table 5.28 Problems faced by Iddirs<br />

Problems<br />

Name of partner NGO<br />

HAPCSO CARE ACORD MJATD CBISDO Pro<br />

pride<br />

Lack of awareness 8 3 9 5 3 2 30 (49%)<br />

Resistance form members 7 7 1 2 1 6 24 (39%)<br />

Total<br />

Absence of bylaws to allow 1 - - - - - 1 (2%)<br />

Lack of finance 1 4 - - 1 - 6 (10%)<br />

Total 17 14 10 7 5 8 61<br />

Source: Compiled from responses of Iddir leaders<br />

(100%)<br />

Lack of awareness is the major problem faced by the majority of respondent<br />

Iddirs. Due to lack of education, awareness and information about the<br />

prevalence of HIV/AIDS is reported to be low. That causes a major problem in<br />

the anti HIV/AIDS work undertaken by respondent Iddirs. For 49 percent of<br />

respondents lack of awareness is the major problem for anti HIV/AIDS<br />

intervention undertaken in respondent Iddir. Resistance that comes from Iddir<br />

members to discuss about AIDS accounts for 39 percent of the respondents.<br />

Respondents also indicated that ". We are already exposed to the problem, we<br />

heard about AIDS over the radio and other means. It is a loss of time and our<br />

purpose is not to undertake anti HIV/AIDS activities" However, it is also


indicated that through repeated endeavor to insist the teachings and advocacy<br />

sessions.<br />

10 percent of respondent Iddirs indicated that lack of money, financial shortages<br />

and related limitations are the major problems faced in their anti HIV/AID<br />

undertakings. Financial problems are identified to be acute in the activities of<br />

Iddir in provision of care and support for HIV/AIDS victims. Only 2 percent<br />

mentioned absence of modified bylaws, which can allow the full involvement of<br />

Iddirs with regard to HIV/AIDS interventions.<br />

5.2.6. FACTORS THAT H<strong>IN</strong>DER NON <strong>IN</strong>VOLVED IDDIRS <strong>IN</strong> HIV/AIDS<br />

ACTIVITIES<br />

Non involved Iddirs include respondent Iddirs who are not involved in any of the<br />

HIV/AIDS intervention activities. This study group is considered as a control<br />

indicator group for the extent of motivation and the activities carried out by<br />

involved Iddirs.<br />

Respondents were asked for the rate of mortality among members. They reported<br />

that there is a steady increase in mortality rates, which occurs mainly among the<br />

youngsters. The situation is depleting the livelihood of these Iddir causing<br />

increment in a monthly contribution made to overcome the shortage of finance.<br />

However, there is no knowledge with regard to causes of deaths. There is only<br />

suspicion of deaths which are caused by opportunistic diseases. Similarly there<br />

are a number of orphan children.


The efforts of Iddirs are not involved in any kind of intervention activities, while<br />

the problem is of such magnitude. The principal aim of their function is to take<br />

care of burial and mourning activities. Even though, the problem of AIDS is<br />

serious their ability to extend their involvement depends on the kind of<br />

assistance that need to be given for them. External financial, technical as well as<br />

capacity building support is missing. Absence of such activities leaves these<br />

Iddirs non-involved in such undertakings by their own capacity.<br />

Leaders of these Iddirs reported that they don’t have time for non-burial<br />

activities. According to a respondent, he explained that " We are business men,<br />

we have businesses to run, a family to lead and other social commitments. We<br />

run out of time to go further than burial activities. So, we are less committed to<br />

such activities." The commitment of Iddirs leaders is assumed to be a<br />

determinant for the success of their activities with the regard to anti HIV/AIDS<br />

activities as well as other development activities.<br />

One of the respondents summarized his view that " The role of our Iddir is not<br />

different from other Iddirs. Much emphasis is given for burial undertakings. If we<br />

are supposed to be involved in any kind of development activities the Iddir<br />

members will be suspicious of us to channel the financial resource to<br />

government bodies. Such things are experienced in the past so, no such<br />

attempts are needed to be done in such kind of situation"(Interview with the<br />

leaders of non involved Iddir).


Therefore, the major problem that was underlined by the respondents is lack of<br />

technical knowledge to run more complex and far reaching development<br />

activities. Lack of access to external assistance, commitment of leaders and<br />

resistance of members for non-burial activities and fear of embezzlement and<br />

confiscation from the government side are identified to be the major reasons why<br />

these non-involved Iddirs are not taking any kind of active involvement with the<br />

regard to HIV/ADS interventions.<br />

5.3. EFFORTS <strong>OF</strong> GOVERNMENT BODIES <strong>IN</strong> <strong>IN</strong>VOLV<strong>IN</strong>G IDDIRS <strong>IN</strong><br />

ANTI<br />

HIV/AIDS ACTIVITIES<br />

5.3.1. ACTIVITIES <strong>OF</strong> ADDIS ABABA CITY GOVERNMENT HIV / AIDS<br />

PREVENTION AND CONTROL <strong>OF</strong>FICE (ADDIS ABABA HAPCO)<br />

Addis Ababa HAPCO is a government body, established under Addis Ababa City<br />

Municipality. The project was started in 2000. The office is responsible for<br />

coordinating government organizations, NGOs and CBOs as well as private<br />

organization to network their efforts at a regional level in Addis Ababa.<br />

Addis Ababa HAPCO is directly responsible to the National AIDS Council<br />

Secretariat (NACS), which channels the emergency fund and financial donations<br />

to wereda offices. The major financial resource allocated to the project is from<br />

the Ethiopian Multi-Sectoral AIDS project (EMSAP), donated by the World Bank/


IDA. NACS plays the role of donor organization by channeling the international<br />

funds to regional offices.<br />

Community based HIV/AIDS interventions that are undertaken at Addis Ababa<br />

HAPCO are mainly concentrated at regional, wereda and kebele levels (See the<br />

organizational chart annex). These locality based organizations are identified as a<br />

major stake holders in the community based HIV/AIDS intervention activity<br />

undertaken by Addis Ababa HAPCO.<br />

Representatives of community based organizations are included in anti<br />

HIV/AIDS councils at wereda, kebele and regional level. The range of community<br />

based organizations that are included wereda level AIDS council incorporates<br />

anti HIV/AIDS clubs, reproductive and health clubs, Addis Ababa Youth and<br />

Women's associations (at kebele, wereda and regional level), Iddirs and Iddirs<br />

councils at Zonal, wereda and kebele level and Iddir umbrella organizations. The<br />

office also provides capacity building training for these community based<br />

organizations to enhance their contribution in the HIV/AIDS intervention<br />

activities. Addis Ababa HAPCO organizes wereda AIDS councils wereda at each<br />

(28 wereda according to the former urban structure) found in Addis Ababa. The<br />

council is formed to be include representatives from different sections of the<br />

society.<br />

5.3.1.1. MAJOR <strong>ROLE</strong>S <strong>OF</strong> ADDIS ABABA HAPCO <strong>IN</strong> <strong>IN</strong>VOLV<strong>IN</strong>G IDDIRS<br />

AND O<strong>THE</strong>R COMMUNITY BASED ORGANIZATIONS


According to the responses of officials Addis Ababa HAPCO has undertaken<br />

different activities in ensuring the involvement of Iddirs as well as other<br />

community based organizations in HIV/AIDS intervention. The major activities of<br />

Addis Ababa HAPCO can be summarized as follows:<br />

Encouraging CBOs to prepare their project proposals so that they can become<br />

beneficiaries of emergency funds allocated from NACS from each wereda<br />

HIV/AIDS secretariat office (See table 5.29). There is a project fund that is<br />

allocated at wereda level to fund the project documents of these potential<br />

stakeholders. Project documents less than the financial amount of USD1000 are<br />

provided funds at the wereda AIDS council coordination office. If the amount<br />

exceeds USD 1000 the project document will be sent to the main office and the<br />

project review board will decide on the provision and sustainability of these<br />

project documents. EMSAP is availed at wereda level.<br />

Provision of grants for projects prepared at wereda level, which is more than USD<br />

1000, and projects that are prepared above the wereda level. This includes zonal<br />

and regional level. There is a projects revision board established to identify<br />

fundable projects, which usually come from grass root level at each level.<br />

Facilitating the capacity building activities for members and leaders of CBOs.<br />

Training's in TOT, skill training, peer education training for potential and active<br />

participants CBOs. Moreover, technical, financial as well as material assistance<br />

are provided to enhance the capacity of CBO found in Addis Ababa including<br />

financial support provided to beneficiary community based organizations.


Facilitation and advocacy for networking the efforts of community based<br />

organization found in Addis Ababa. In such regard 6 councils were established<br />

composed of the representatives of Iddirs found in kebele level. The same is done<br />

for anti HIV/AIDS clubs and Individual Iddirs. The office also allocates a budget for<br />

the networking activity for partner CBOs working with AAHAPCO. Distribution of<br />

posters, IEC materials, booklets and related publications for potential community<br />

based organizations that is anti HIV/AIDS clubs, Youth and Women Associations<br />

Iddirs etc. Table below 5.29 shows the range of projects implemented by the<br />

community based organizations from the EMSAP project.<br />

Table 5.29 Project fund provided by Addis Ababa HAPCO for beneficiary community based<br />

organizations<br />

Name of project holder Type of<br />

Organization<br />

Amount of Fund<br />

1 Ethiopian anti AIDS Women Association Association 361,006.15<br />

2 Addis Ababa youth Association Association 306,460<br />

3 Amanuel Self help Iddir Iddir 173,740<br />

4 Tesfa Mahiberwi Lemat Akef Iddr Iddir Association 68,250<br />

5 Eshet for Youth unity Association Association 22,282<br />

6 Wereda 4, women Association Association 8,075<br />

7 Wereda 6 Women Association Wereda Association 8,075<br />

8 Wegen Lewegen anti AIDS club Anti AIDS club 7,530<br />

9 Wereda 14 youth Association Wereda Association 7,840<br />

10 Wereda 21 Association Wereda Association 5,794<br />

11 Wereda 19 Youth Association Wereda Association 4,677<br />

12 Wereda 5 youth Association, Wereda Association 3,760<br />

13 Tesfa Meskot help Association Association 2,785<br />

14 Organization for hope of window anti AID<br />

club<br />

Anti AIDS club 2,785<br />

15 Wereda 14 youth Association Wereda Association 2,391<br />

16 Wereda 21 youth Association Wereda Association 1,594<br />

17 Tsedey anti AIDS club Anti AIDS club 1,520<br />

Total amount 988,564<br />

Source: Compiled from the response of Addis Ababa HAPCO


The major beneficiaries who received larger amounts of money from the Addis<br />

Ababa HAPCO EMSAP project fund are identified as associations that are<br />

organized at a wereda level. Only two Iddirs are identified to have prepared their<br />

project document and requested project fund from Addis Ababa HAPCO. However<br />

the beginning of being involved in national HIV/AIDS intervention at such a level<br />

needs to be further encouraged and promoted. According to table 5.29, Addis<br />

Ababa Youth Association and Addis Ababa Women's Associations are the major<br />

stakeholders who managed to obtain a larger amount of fund from the EMSAP<br />

project. These associations are inclusive in membership and they are also<br />

organized at regional, wereda, and kebele level. The situation of wereda level<br />

allocation of the HAPCO project can be summarized as follows.<br />

Financial autonomy that is given for wereda HIV/AIDS Council coordination<br />

offices seems to help quite a large number of beneficiary Weredas to take part in<br />

anti HIV/AIDS activities. From the total of 28 weredas found all over Addis<br />

Ababa there are 16 Weredas which benefited from the emergency fund that is<br />

available at Wereda level.<br />

Addis Ababa HAPCO implements such activities in 16 weredas of Addis Ababa.<br />

The first selected pilot wereda were weredas 5, 7, 15, 19, and 20. An additional<br />

eleven weredas were included in the project after the pilot was finalized. These<br />

16 weredas are provided the funds accordingly (See table 5.30). Table 5.29 shows<br />

the project funds availed for potential community based organizations found in<br />

Addis Ababa who manage to prepare project document.


Table 5.30 summarises the amount of funds allocated to each wereda to promote<br />

HIV/AIDS intervention activities at a grass roots level.<br />

Table 5.30 Number of financial allocations for weredas in Addis Ababa City<br />

Government made by Addis Ababa HAPCO<br />

Name of Beneficiary Wereda Amount of fund<br />

1 Wereda 5 103,740<br />

2 Wereda 7 111,720<br />

3 Wereda 20 109,200<br />

4 Wereda 15 111,720<br />

5 Wereda 19 67,200<br />

6 Wereda 14 55,640<br />

7 Wereda 2 38,520<br />

8 Wereda 4 51,360<br />

9 Wereda 1 29,804<br />

10 Wereda 6 51,360<br />

11 Wereda 16 77,040<br />

12 Wereda 17 55,640<br />

13 Wereda 18 55,640<br />

14 Wereda 23 38,520<br />

15 Wereda 27 34,240<br />

16 Wereda 21 67,200<br />

Total 1,058,544<br />

Source: Compiled from the response of Addis Ababa<br />

HAPCO Keys:- ٱ Pilot wereda<br />

ٱ Not pilot wereda<br />

Pilot weredas received project funds twice since the start of the project. The<br />

remaining eleven weredas only got the fund once. It is also indicated that that<br />

the provision of emergency funds for weredas was discontinued by the<br />

restructuring activities. only activities that were carried out by the collaboration


of NGOs like Family Health international (FHI) are continuing the<br />

implementation of activities.<br />

5.3.1.2. Sources of fund for the Addis Ababa HAPCO<br />

Addis Ababa HAPCO as a government organization has a budget allocated from<br />

the Addis Ababa City Administration. Moreover, different international<br />

organizations take part in assisting the office with financial donations as well as<br />

technical assistance.<br />

The following organizations provide financial donations to the office<br />

♦ United Nations Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF)<br />

♦ Center for Disease Control (CDC)- for establishment standardized VCT center<br />

at Zewditu Hospital and Abenet Health Center as well as a training center for<br />

health care workers in Voluntary Counseling and Testing service.<br />

♦ Family Health International (FHI)- which is conducting a program called<br />

"Expanded Comprehensive response" in Addis-ketema Kifle-Ketema to provide<br />

comprehensive intervention in provision of care and support for affected and<br />

infected people by HIV/AIDS. The grant is for provision of training and<br />

capacity building, material provision and construction of compounds for the<br />

same purpose in Addis Ababa.


♦ World Food organization (WFP)- An agreement has been signed for the<br />

donation made for AIDS victims and disadvantaged people for the same<br />

cause. The donation will be made according to the agreement i.e 30,000-<br />

40,000 quintal of wheat and edible oil to be provided for people who are<br />

victims of AIDS.<br />

♦ CARE Ethiopia - mainly provisions of technical assistance in building the<br />

capacity of partner Iddirs working in Addis Ababa. Table 5.31below<br />

summarizes the sources of finance of Addis Ababa HAPCO and the major<br />

activities budgeted accordingly.


Table 5.31 Major activities and sources of capital budget for Addis Ababa HAPCO<br />

Activities<br />

HIV/AIDS<br />

surveillance<br />

VCT center at<br />

Zewditu General<br />

Hospital<br />

VCT center and<br />

other facilities<br />

Government IDA Center for<br />

Sources of finance Total<br />

Disease<br />

Control<br />

UNICE<br />

F<br />

World<br />

Food<br />

Progra<br />

461283.66 461283.66<br />

756000 756000.00<br />

1100000 1370140.30 82514 2552654.30<br />

Office facilities 650000 285693.39 9356693.39<br />

Human resources 400000 605333.24 17160 1022493.24<br />

VCT, IEC and care<br />

and support<br />

Sopport for PLWA<br />

and AIDS orphans<br />

1073924 11041466.34 1768156.60 808000 145854 30754400.94<br />

560000 560000<br />

Total 1633924 13652750 4785324 808000 245528 45463526<br />

Source: compiled from responses of Addis Ababa HAPCO<br />

5.3.2. <strong>THE</strong> ACTIVITIES <strong>OF</strong> WEREDA 5 ANTI AIDS COUNCIL<br />

COORD<strong>IN</strong>ATION<br />

<strong>OF</strong>FICE <strong>IN</strong> <strong>IN</strong>VOLV<strong>IN</strong>G IDDIR <strong>IN</strong> HIV/AIDS <strong>IN</strong>TERVENTION<br />

Wereda 5 is restructured into Addis Ketema Kifle Ketema according to the<br />

recent urban re organizations. It used to be one of the Wereda Offices of Addis<br />

Ababa HAPCO. Wereda 5 is identified as the major sample Wereda that can be<br />

considered where major activities are undertaken. The efforts of wereda 5 anti<br />

AID council coordination Office with the regard to involving Iddirs in the anti<br />

m


HIV/AIDS intervention includes the establishment of Iddir councils in anti<br />

HIV/AIDS activities both at the wereda and kebele level.<br />

5.3.2.1. FORMATION <strong>OF</strong> ANTI HIV/AIDS IDDIRS COUNCIL AT WEREDA<br />

LEVEL<br />

This is undertaken by listing all active Iddirs found in the wereda and providing<br />

them with the capacity building and sensitization workshops. 19 Iddirs were<br />

provided with such training. The council of Iddir in anti HIV/AIDS activities was<br />

established in 2002. 13 kebeles found in the wereda were represented and<br />

respective Iddir representatives were participants in the council membership.<br />

The efforts of Addis Ababa HAPCO, wereda 5 anti HIV/AIDS council coordination<br />

office took the initiative as well as implementer role. A workshop was conducted<br />

during the formation of the council and the leaders of representatives of Iddirs<br />

were included in the training.<br />

However the, efforts of council were not as fruitful as it was expected by the<br />

initiators. The reasons that were indicated are:<br />

♦ Council members lack necessary capacity to run the council due to lack of<br />

technical knowhow and low level of educational capacity.<br />

♦ Election of council members was entirely based on the participation of Iddir<br />

representatives during the first sensitization workshop. No other evaluation<br />

was made to make sure the capacity of leaders was sufficient.<br />

♦ Lack of financial resources in the office that is allocated to the coordination of<br />

Iddirs leaders.


5.3.2.2. FORMATION <strong>OF</strong> ANTI HIV/AIDS IDDIRS COUNCIL AT A KEBELE<br />

LEVEL<br />

Kebele anti HIV/AIDS Iddirs councils were successfully made in kebele 19<br />

wereda 5. Eleven Iddirs that are found in the kebele were included in the<br />

formation of the Iddir council. The formation of Iddirs council was entirely on<br />

voluntary basis and it was initiated by the members of Iddirs in the kebele. The<br />

role of wereda 5 anti HIV/AIDS council coordination office was to encourage<br />

their activities and the provision of certain kinds of assistance to the council.<br />

Capacity building activities for the stakeholders of the community based<br />

HIV/AIDS in the wereda. The following table summarized the capacity building<br />

training that were conducted by the office in order to enhance the capacity of<br />

Iddirs in the HIV/AIDS intervention.<br />

Table 5.32 Capacity building activities of wereda 5 anti HIV/AIDS Council Coordination Office<br />

# kind of capacity<br />

building activities<br />

Facilitator Number of<br />

participant<br />

1 Workshop Wereda 5 anti<br />

AIDS council<br />

2 2 days workshop Wereda 5 anti<br />

AIDS council<br />

3 2 days workshop Family Health<br />

International<br />

and Wereda 5<br />

anti AIDS<br />

council<br />

4 5 days workshop Family Health<br />

International<br />

and Wereda5<br />

anti AIDS<br />

council<br />

5 2 days workshop Family Health<br />

International<br />

Iddirs<br />

purpose Date<br />

87 role of Iddir<br />

in HIV/AIDS<br />

prevention<br />

87 Project<br />

preparation<br />

21Iddirs 5<br />

anti<br />

HIV/AIDS, 7<br />

sex workers,<br />

1 PLWA<br />

association<br />

20 Iddirs 5<br />

anti HIV<br />

PLWA<br />

associations<br />

and planning<br />

ECR concept<br />

integrated<br />

approach in<br />

HIV/AIDS<br />

intervention<br />

proposal<br />

writing and<br />

financial<br />

management<br />

200 Iddirs Care and<br />

support ,<br />

Nov, 2002<br />

Nov, 2002<br />

Nov, 2002<br />

Dec 2002<br />

May, 2003


and Wereda5<br />

anti AIDS<br />

council<br />

Home based<br />

care<br />

Source: compiled from responses of wereda 5 anti HIV/AIDS council coordination office<br />

The Wereda office conducts capacity building training with the collaboration of<br />

FHI and the regional Addis Ababa HAPCO. Such capacity building activities are<br />

meant to increase the capacity of Iddir leaders in the activities of anti HIV/AIDS<br />

interventions. 87 Iddirs were participants for 2 workshops that were held for the<br />

aim of sensitization about AIDS and the technical knowledge including project<br />

preparation and proposal writing. FHI also took part in enhancing the capacity of<br />

Iddirs in workshops about provision of care and support for infected and affected<br />

individuals.


CHAPTER SIX<br />

6. SUMMARY, CONCLUSION, SYN<strong>THE</strong>SIS <strong>OF</strong> RESEARCH<br />

F<strong>IN</strong>D<strong>IN</strong>GS AND RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

This chapter presents a summary of the major findings of the research.<br />

Summaries of the major components of research findings are included in the fist<br />

part of the chapter. Syntheses of the research findings are included in the second<br />

section of the chapter that presents the combined results of research findings.<br />

Certain suggestions are also forwarded to improve the situation of identified<br />

problems. Recommendations are indicated in the third section of the chapter.<br />

6.1. SUMMARIES AND CONCLUSION<br />

The two-way causal relations between poverty and AIDS are clearly seen in the<br />

major findings of the research. AIDS deaths seem to deplete financial and human<br />

resource of Iddirs and resulted in increased amounts of monthly contribution; as<br />

a result increments in monthly contribution seem to put more pressure on the<br />

lives of each members and livelihood of iddirs as an institution. Therefore, the<br />

involvement of Iddirs in further development activities is put in jeopardy. The<br />

minimum participation of Iddir in community development activities due to<br />

preoccupation of impacts of AIDS may further cause deepening of poverty.<br />

AIDS being the major threat to development, poverty reduction cannot be<br />

conceptualized outside the frame of AIDS intervention activities. Hence poverty<br />

reduction and development activities need to be coupled with HIV/AIDS<br />

intervention activities. According to the civil society approach partnership


etween NGOs, Government organizations and Community Based Organizations<br />

as well as local communities determines the qualities of development activities,<br />

hence its success.<br />

The urgency of AIDS calls for the involvement of all stakeholders in the national<br />

anti HIV/AIDS activities. Community based HIV/AIDS interventions require for<br />

the active involvement of community based organization at the grass root level.<br />

Community based HIV/AIDS interventions become possible with the involvement<br />

of people where they live, in their homes, their neighborhood and their work<br />

place. Iddirs are very important vehicles in addressing people where they live and<br />

where they work. Being one of the popular and efficient forms of indigenous<br />

voluntary association Iddirs enable the involvement of the community at the<br />

grassroots level and full mobilization of each section of the community towards<br />

HIV/AIDS intervention.<br />

Iddirs are identified as the major partners for NGOs and government<br />

organizations in HIV/AIDS interventions given their representative nature for<br />

each section of the society. Moreover, Iddirs are one of those institutions, which<br />

are directly affected due to their basic nature which is related to death and<br />

burial. They are thus severely affected by the high prevalence of HIV/AIDS due to<br />

increased death rates and resulting AIDS orphans. However, there are financial<br />

as well as technical limitations in technical and managerial capacities of partner<br />

iddirs.


The research findings indicated that though Iddirs are said to be originally burial<br />

associations their role is progressively changing through time. There is an<br />

increasing trend in the involvement of Iddirs in community development<br />

activities like fund raising for local schools, clinics, and construction of feeder<br />

roads and related undertakings. Such involvement enables them to obtain<br />

improved experience to be involved in non-burial activities like anti HIV/AIDS<br />

work. Involvement of Iddirs in AIDS intervention activities is mainly motivated by<br />

both internal and external factors. An increased number of AIDS deaths and<br />

PLWA and AIDS orphans, and commitment of leaders are identified as internal<br />

factors that drive Iddirs to take part in anti HIV/AIDS activities. External factors<br />

include initiations that came from NGOs, local authorities, and public advocacy.<br />

Technical and financial assistance from NGOs as well as local authorities is very<br />

crucial for active involvement of Iddirs in HIV/AIDS intervention activities.<br />

Anti HIV/AIDS efforts of Iddirs in Information Education and Communication<br />

involves conducting advocacy session during Iddirs meetings. Partner NGOs<br />

played a major role in providing technical assistance and accessing health<br />

officials as well as PLWA during the advocacy session held during Iddir meetings,<br />

which mainly improve the qualities of advocacy sessions carried out with Iddir.<br />

Quite a few attempts are being made by Iddirs to become involved in provision of<br />

care and support. However, these efforts are limited due to shortage of financial<br />

and technical resources which restrict for further involvement of Iddirs in care<br />

and support.


Major problems faced by Iddirs with regard to HIV/AIDS intervention activities<br />

are limited human financial and technical resources. Inadequate awareness and<br />

limited access to capacity building training are also major shortcomings, which<br />

are also evidenced in the findings of the research. The cases of non-involved<br />

Iddirs indicated that lack of external assistance from NGOs, umbrella<br />

organization or GOs local authorities is the major problem in that hinder them<br />

from becoming involved in anti HIV/AIDS activities. Limited technical knowledge,<br />

financial assistance from NGO as well as government bodies and lack of<br />

commitment also resulted in non involvement of Iddirs in anti AIDS activities.<br />

The research findings also identified that NGOs took the major role in initiating<br />

Iddirs to take part in HIV/AIDS interventions in conducting advocacy sessions<br />

during Iddirs meetings, make some revisions in the bylaws concerning their anti<br />

HIV/AIDS activities. Capacity building activities also promote the activities of<br />

Iddirs in anti HIV/AIDS activities. A few attempts are being made to establish<br />

Iddirs councils by implementers NGOs in enhancing the involvement of Iddirs in<br />

anti HIV/AIDS activities. Moreover, government organizations' establishment of<br />

anti AIDS Council at kebele and wereda level representing every section of the<br />

society has been a major part of activities undertaken by Addis Ababa HAPCO.<br />

Such activities in establishment of the Iddirs Anti AIDS Council are being made<br />

with the regard to cultural, social and organizational structures of Iddirs.<br />

However, limited technical capacity of Iddirs being unable to produce projects<br />

proposals with sufficient quality is the major problem that inhibits Addis Ababa


HAPCO from utilizing the EMSAP funds for as much community based<br />

organization as it could.<br />

However, these efforts undertaken in establishment of Iddirs Councils are very<br />

few and are recently started. Partner NGOs also encourage Iddirs to be involved<br />

in provision of support and care for AIDS patients, PLWA, AIDS orphans as well<br />

as provision of home based care. Limited technical capacity of Iddirs to be<br />

working as potential partners with NGOs as well as NGOs is identified as a major<br />

problem.<br />

Government organizations also promote various attempts with regard to<br />

involving Iddirs in anti HIV/AIDS activities. Addis Ababa HAPCO is the major<br />

government agency working with regard to prevention and control of HIV/AIDS<br />

in Addis Ababa. The activities of Addis Ababa HAPCO focus on the provision of<br />

technical and financial support for community based organizations like youth<br />

and women associations.<br />

6.2. SYN<strong>THE</strong>SIS <strong>OF</strong> RESEARCH F<strong>IN</strong>D<strong>IN</strong>GS<br />

Effects of AIDS on the livelihood of Iddirs are explained in relation to impacts<br />

resulting in the cause deepening of poverty. Increased mortality rates among<br />

Iddir members with resulting increased monthly contribution; increased financial<br />

spending on burials contributes to lesser involvement in development activities<br />

due to shortage of finances. Increased number of PLWA and AIDS orphans


among Iddir members will cause increased spending in health care and support<br />

for affected and infected people. This situation in turn causes lesser capacity for<br />

Iddirs to focus on development activities. These situation in one or another<br />

results in lesser involvement of community based organizations in development<br />

activities and hence, may lead to deepening of poverty situation (See diagram<br />

6.1).


Diagram 6.1 the impact of HIV/AIDS on the livelihood of Iddirs<br />

Increased<br />

mortality in Iddirs<br />

-Increased spending on burial<br />

-Increased monthly<br />

contribution from members<br />

-Loss of members<br />

-Increased number of replaced<br />

orphan members in Iddir<br />

-Increased amount of time<br />

spent in burial<br />

-Withdrawal from membership<br />

-Large amount of spending on<br />

Iddir from member's income<br />

HIV/AIDS<br />

Increased PLWA<br />

-Increased spending on<br />

health facilities<br />

-Additional burden for Iddir<br />

leaders to look for PLWA<br />

-Allocations of capital to<br />

take care PLWA<br />

Increased AIDS<br />

orphans<br />

-Lesser role played by Iddir in development<br />

- Pre-occupation of Iddir activity on survival issues<br />

Deepening of poverty<br />

-Involvements of elderly<br />

peoples & care takers<br />

-Allocation of budget<br />

for orphan support<br />

-Orphans take replaced<br />

membership


Diagram 6.2 Poverty as a cause for deteriorated impact of AIDS<br />

- Lack of access of<br />

educational information<br />

POVERTY<br />

- Lack of technical<br />

capacities of Iddirs<br />

Lack of awareness -No attempts to cope the<br />

problem Iddir<br />

- Lack of manpower<br />

Stigmatization<br />

Minimum involvement of Iddir in HIV intervention<br />

Deterioration of impacts HIV/ AIDS on Iddirs<br />

- Lack of involvement in<br />

development<br />

- Emphasis only burial<br />

activities


The involvement of Iddir in HIV/AIDS intervention activities is considered with<br />

regard to both internal and external factors. Internal factors are those factors<br />

involved within the activities of the activities of Iddir, such as increased number<br />

of deaths, orphans and commitment of Iddirs leaders. External initiations comes<br />

from NGOs, GOS international donor organizations as well as other community<br />

based organizations (See diagram 6.2)<br />

Diagram 6.3 - Involvement of Iddir in anti HIV/AIDS activities


Diagram 6.3 the Involvement of Iddirs in Anti HIV/AIDS activities.<br />

External initiative factors<br />

- Public advocacy<br />

- Initiation from NGO<br />

- Initiation from NGO wereda<br />

HIV/AIDS secretariat or<br />

kebele<br />

- Experience sharing from other<br />

Iddirs<br />

- Initiation from umbrella Iddirs<br />

Government efforts<br />

- Policy formation<br />

- Network the work of different actors in<br />

community based HIV<br />

Assistance provision<br />

- Training, workshops and<br />

seminars<br />

- Financial grant allocation<br />

from kebele HIV/AIDS<br />

secretariat or<br />

Involvement of Iddirs n HIV/AIDS<br />

intervention.<br />

- IEC<br />

- Condom distribution<br />

- Support for PLWA<br />

- Support for AIDS orphans<br />

- Home based care<br />

- Income generation for AIDS victims<br />

- Voluntary counseling and testing<br />

- Fund raising for AIDS victims<br />

Internal factors<br />

- Increased AIDS deaths<br />

- Increased AIDS orphans- Decreased capital of Iddir<br />

- Increased monthly contribution<br />

- Awareness of Iddir leaders<br />

Role of<br />

international<br />

donors<br />

- Strength the<br />

capacity of local<br />

NGO's<br />

- Allocate grant<br />

for AHAPCO<br />

- Promote public<br />

awareness<br />

- Promote the


6.3. RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

Certain beginnings Iddirs anti HIV/AIDS activities is something that<br />

need to be strengthen both in quality and quantity. Involved Iddirs have<br />

benefit pf dressing the need of the community t the grass root level and<br />

ensure the participation of community at every level. Iddirs closeness to<br />

the community and the trust and commitment of the community to work<br />

with Iddirs in such activities should be cultivated to the maximum level.<br />

However, such activities are done with limited technical, human and<br />

financial capacity of Iddirs NGOs and GOs helped the effort of Iddirs in<br />

anti HIV/AIDS activities to participate in anti HIV/AIDS activities. Their<br />

effort ranges from provision of motivation to local Iddirs in anti HIV/IDS<br />

activities to capacity building and formation of Iddirs councils at kebele<br />

and wereda level. nevertheless, such limited involvement of very few<br />

Iddirs mainly depend on the assistance from NGOs and GOs.<br />

Sustainability of these activities by the effort of Iddirs only is too limited.<br />

Certain suggestions are made on the basis of identified problems. These<br />

were limited financial and technical capacity of Iddirs to become<br />

competent partners for the major stakeholders like non governmental<br />

organizations and governmental organizations. Suggestions are made on<br />

the areas of partnership, networking and capacity building and<br />

empowerment of the capacity of the Iddirs and anti AIDS Iddir councils.


The details regarding these suggested recommendations may be<br />

indicated as follows:<br />

♦ Iddir played a significant role mobilizing the community to take part in<br />

HIV/AIDS intervention activities. However, there are still limitations in<br />

financial, technical and manpower resources of involved iddirs in<br />

HIV/AIDS intervention. Promotion of the capacity building activities of<br />

Iddirs need to be considered for the sake of successful community based<br />

HIV/AIDS interventions. Further empowerment activities needs to be<br />

strengthened in order to enhance the technical capacity and manpower<br />

resources of Iddir both in terms of members and leadership.<br />

♦ Partnership of the major stakeholders in HIV/AIDS interventions is<br />

something to be improved for the sake of successful national response<br />

for HIV/AIDS. Iddirs need coordinated assistance and capacity building<br />

and networking with the efforts of non governmental as well as<br />

governmental bodies and other community based organizations and<br />

umbrella Iddirs association.<br />

♦ Successful HIV/AIDS interventions need multi-sectoral partnership of<br />

each stakeholder in fighting AIDS together. The efforts of Iddir cannot<br />

be seen alone, without considering efforts of GO, NGO, and other<br />

CBOs. Partnership of the major stakeholders i.e. government<br />

organizations, non-government organizations as well as community<br />

based organizations needs to be strengthened in their efforts towards<br />

the HIV/AIDS interventions.


♦ Iddirs are one of the wide range of community based organizations.<br />

The efforts of individual Iddir need to be channeled along with efforts of<br />

other Iddirs. The role of umbrella Iddirs associations played a major role<br />

in channeling the effort of member Iddirs into further organized effort.<br />

However the umbrella organizations effort is in its infancy. There a need<br />

to further strengthen the capacity of umbrella Iddirs associations and<br />

further efforts should be done in involvement of more anti AIDS Iddir<br />

councils.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Alemayehu Seifu 1968. "Eder in Addis Ababa: A Sociological Study",<br />

Ethiopia Observer12 (1): 8-33.<br />

Annania Admasu (2002) "Coping with AIDS: the Social dimension of the<br />

epidemic in Selected area of Addis Ababa", MA thesis in Social<br />

Anthropology, Addis Ababa University (Unpublished).<br />

Andrew Webster, 1990, Introduction to the sociology of development,<br />

second edition , London<br />

City Administration Health Bureau ,1999, "HIV/AIDS in Addis Ababa,<br />

background, projects, implementation and interventions",<br />

Addis Ababa.<br />

Central Statistics Authority, 2001, Ethiopia, Demographic and health<br />

survey 2000, ORC Macro, Calverton, Maryland<br />

Damen Hailemariam and Helmut kloos, 2003, Community based<br />

organizations and agents and poverty reduction program in<br />

HIV/AIDS Prevention control in Ethiopia: a preliminary survey,<br />

Addis Ababa University.


Dan Allan, T, 1997, Concepts, Definitions and models for community<br />

based HIV/AIDS prevention Research in Canada, University of<br />

Toronto, Toronto.<br />

Debrework Zewdie, Lev Khodkevich, 1999, Global AIDS situation and<br />

Projections to the year 2000, Addis Ababa, The Ethiopian<br />

journal of Health Development HIV infection and AIDS in<br />

Ethiopia, V4, No. 2<br />

Fecadu Gedamu, 1972, Ethnic Association in Ethiopia and maintenance<br />

of urban/rural relationship, with special relation to the<br />

Almgena-Walamo Road construction Association, PHD thesis,<br />

university of London(unpublished).<br />

Fekadu Gedamu 1974 ‘Urbanisation, polyethnic group voluntary<br />

associations and national integration in Ethiopia’ Ethiopian<br />

Journal of Development Research 1: 71-80<br />

Felcity Young, 1999, Tool box for building strong and healthy<br />

Community organization working in HIV/AIDS and sexual<br />

health, (Part one), South Africa Department of Health, South<br />

Africa<br />

Fred N. Kerlinger, 1973, Foundation of behavioral research,<br />

second Edition, Newyork.<br />

Getinet Assefa 1999, "A Study on Indigenous Institutions and Local<br />

Development Initiatives. Case studies from selected Gurage<br />

Areas of Ethiopia", MA thesis, Addis Ababa University, School<br />

of Graduate Studies, Regional and Local Development<br />

Studies(unpublished).<br />

Gerry Salole, 1986, "Ikub, Iddir, and Meredaja Mahiber as potentional<br />

development tools in Addis Ababa", Sumposium on the century<br />

of Addis Ababa.<br />

----- 2000. "Report of Research on CBOs umbrella organization", ACORD<br />

- Ethiopia, Addis Ababa CBOs Support Program.


Hunter, Susan. 2002, Reshaping societies HIV/AIDS and social change,<br />

Hudson Run publishers<br />

Jalbert, Y. Lyse P. Richardo Z. "Self evaluation guide for community<br />

organization", SIDA Epilson,<br />

Kebebew Daka 1978 “The cooperative movement in Ethiopia”,<br />

Department of Applied Sociology, Addis Ababa University.<br />

Kloos, Helmut and Damen Haile Mariam 2003. “Selected community<br />

organizations and agents and poverty reduction programs in<br />

HIV/AIDS prevention and control in Ethiopia” Northeast<br />

African Studies (forthcoming).<br />

Koehn E. and Koehn P. 1975 “Eder as a vehicle for urban development<br />

in Addis Ababa”. In Marcus H, ed. Proceedings of the First<br />

United States Conference of Ethiopian Studies, East Lansing:<br />

African Studies Center, Michigan State University.<br />

Lankester, T. 2002, "Setting up community health program ; a practical<br />

manual for use in developing countries", London, Macmillan<br />

publishers.<br />

Levine, Donald 1965 "Wax and Gold; Tradition and Innovation in<br />

Ethiopian Culture. "Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.<br />

Mekuria Bulcha, 1973 "Eder; its roles in development and social change<br />

in Addis Ababa". Senior essay in social work. Addis Ababa<br />

University.<br />

Michael, Todaro, 1994, Economic development, Fifth editions<br />

NewYork , longman<br />

Ministry of Health (1996) AIDS in Ethiopia, Background projections<br />

Impacts interventions, Addis Ababa: Epidemiological and AIDS<br />

Department Ministry of Health (Second Edition).<br />

Ministry of Health (1998) "AIDS in Ethiopia, Background, projections,<br />

Impacts, interventions", Addis Ababa; Epidemiological and<br />

AIDS Department Ministry of Health(Second Edition)


Ministry of Health (2000) "AIDS in Ethiopia, Back ground, projections,<br />

Impacts, interventions",: Addis Ababa: Disease prevention and<br />

control Department , Ministry of Health (Third Edition).<br />

Ministry of Health( 2002) "AIDS in Ethiopia", Ministry of Health,; Addis<br />

Ababa Disease prevention and control, Ministry of Health<br />

(Fourth Edition).<br />

Ministry of Health, Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, National<br />

AIDS Control Program, 1999, Addis Ababa.<br />

Ministry of Health, 1998, Policy on HIV/AIDS of the Federal Democratic<br />

Republic of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopian Federal<br />

Democratic Republic<br />

Ministry of Health, 2001, Guideline on community home based care for<br />

AIDS patient in Ethiopia, Addis Ababa: Disease Prevention and<br />

Control department HIV/AIDS and other STD Prevention and<br />

Control Team<br />

National AIDS Council, 2001, Strategic framework for the National<br />

Response to HIV/AIDS in Ethiopia (2001-2005), Addis Ababa.<br />

Meillassoux C. 1968. Urbanization of an African Community Voluntary<br />

Associations in Bamako, Seattle; University of Washington<br />

Press, 1968.


Ottaway, Marina, (ed.) 1976. " Urbanization in Ethiopia: A Text with<br />

Integrated Readings", Department of Sociology and Anthropology,<br />

Addis Ababa University.<br />

Pact Ethiopia, 2000," Assessment study of HIV/AIDS implementing<br />

organizations", Ethiopia , Addis Ababa(Unpublished).<br />

Pankhurst, A (2002) Iddir Umbrella Organizations, in ACORD, voice of Iddirs,<br />

Addis Ababa<br />

________1998. The role of indigenous associations in development: their past<br />

involvement in and potentials for development with particular<br />

emphasis on burial, credit, migrant and religious/social<br />

associations. Paper presented to the ESSSWA Workshop “The role<br />

of indigenous associations and institutions in Development”.<br />

-----2001" The Role and Space for burial associations to participate in the<br />

Development of Ethiopia". Paper presented at the workshop on the<br />

Role of local associations in development organized by ACORD<br />

Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, 21 December.<br />

Pankhurst Alula and Damen Haile Mariam, 2003, “The Iddir in Ethiopia:<br />

historical development, social function and potential role in<br />

HIV/AIDS prevention and control” Northeast African Studies<br />

(forthcoming).<br />

Pankhurst Richard and Endreas Eshete 1958 ‘Self-help in Ethiopia’<br />

Ethiopia Observer vol2No.11 Page 354-364<br />

Shiferaw Tesfaye 2002. "Civil society organizations in poverty alleviation,<br />

change and development: the role of iddirs in collaboration with<br />

government organizations: the cases of Akaki, Nazareth and Kolfe<br />

area of Addis Ababa (1996-2002)". MA thesis in Social<br />

Anthropology, Addis Ababa University.<br />

Sheerdhar J, 2002, "Broadening the front: NGO response to HIV and AIDS in<br />

India".<br />

UNAIDS, 199, Evaluation of National AIDS program a methods package<br />

prevention of HIV/AIDS infection, Switzerland


UNAIDS, 2001, AIDS in Africa A crisis of leadership Breifing on the starategy<br />

to stop the spread of HIV/AIDS in Africa, The Hunger Project ,<br />

Switzerland.<br />

UNAIDS/ WORLD bank, 2001, AIDS, poverty reduction and debt relief, A<br />

toolkit for main Streaming HIV AIDS program in to Development<br />

instrument, UNAIDS/WORLD BANK, Switzerland.<br />

UNAIDS, 2002, Report on global HIV/AIDS Epidemics, Switzerland<br />

USAIDS, 1999, A review of household and community responses to the<br />

HIV/AIDS epidemic in the rural areas, Switzerland<br />

Teigist Lemma Dessalegn; (2000). "Economic Analysis of Social Networks:<br />

Empirical study on Selected Women Iddir in Addis Ababa" MA<br />

thesis, School of Graduate Studies, Addis Ababa University.<br />

Tim Allen, and Alan Thomas, (editors), 1992, Poverty and Development in<br />

1990s, New York Oxford University Press<br />

Young, Fellcity. 1999, Tool box for building strong and healthy community<br />

organizations working in HIV/AIDS and sexual health (part one) ,<br />

Department of Health


ANNEX ANNEX I<br />

I<br />

ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY<br />

SCHOOL <strong>OF</strong> GRADUATE STUDIES<br />

REGIONAL AND LOCAL DEVELOPMENT STUDIES (RLDS)<br />

Unstructured questionnaire prepared for organizations implementing community<br />

based HIV/AIDS intervention activities with Iddirs<br />

Recall! The project refers to the anti HIV/AIDS project implemented by your organization with local<br />

community organizations (Iddirs)<br />

1. What is the name of your organization/project?<br />

(Specify)________________________________________________________________<br />

_<br />

2. What is the target area of the project?<br />

_____________________________________<br />

3. What is target population of the project?<br />

___________________________________


4. What is the project duration?<br />

______________________________________________<br />

5. What is the date of establishment of the project?<br />

(Specify)__________________<br />

6. What comprises the human resources of the project? ( specify in the table<br />

below)<br />

Staff members<br />

Community leaders<br />

Volunteers<br />

Others (Specify)<br />

Number of<br />

personnel<br />

Level of Qualification<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9<br />

Keys- (1)BA and above (2)Diploma (3)High school (4)High school incomplete<br />

(5)Elementary complete (6)Elementary incomplete (7)Illiterate<br />

8. What is the total amount of budget allocated to the project for each<br />

project year?<br />

Year Amount of budget Remark<br />

(Please use the space provided (Remark) for additional information)<br />

9. What is the over all goal of the project? (Specify)<br />

____________________________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

____________________<br />

10. What are the specific objectives of the project? (Specify)


_________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________<br />

11. What are major and specific problems that initiate the project?<br />

(Specify)<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________<br />

12. Why does your organization use Iddirs as major partner for anti<br />

HIV/AIDS intervention program? (Specify)<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________<br />

13. What are the major potentials of Iddirs to be a major tool for HIV/AIDS<br />

intervention program (As it is observed in your project)? (Specify).<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________<br />

14. What major strategies are currently used in the project? (Specify in<br />

table provided).<br />

Strategies Number of Iddirs<br />

involved<br />

Information Education<br />

and Communication<br />

(IEC)<br />

Behavioral Change and<br />

Communication (BCC)<br />

Voluntary Counseling<br />

and Testing (VCT)<br />

Care and Support (CS)<br />

Other<br />

Remark


Strategies<br />

15. What is the level of partnership of your organization with Iddirs, duties<br />

Information<br />

Education and<br />

Communication<br />

(IEC)<br />

and responsibilities of each partner? (Specify)<br />

Behavioral Change<br />

and<br />

communication<br />

(BCC)<br />

Voluntary<br />

counseling and<br />

Testing (VCT)<br />

Care and Support<br />

(CS)<br />

Other<br />

Duties and responsibilities of each partner<br />

NGO Iddir<br />

1* 2* 3* 4* 5* 1** 2** 3** 4** 5**<br />

Keys- (1*) Non involved (2*) Passive implementers (3*) Only donor (4*)Active<br />

implementers (5*)Initiator and Active partner (1**) involvement at all (2**) Non<br />

involved (3**) Passive beneficiary (4**)Active implementers and beneficiary 5**) Initiator<br />

and active partner<br />

16. What kind of support is provided for partner Iddirs to implement<br />

HIV/ADS intervention activity in each strategy? (Please specify in the<br />

table)<br />

Activities<br />

Support provided in each project period(Phase)<br />

Phase I Phase II Phase III Phase IV Phase V Phase VI


Information,<br />

Education and<br />

communication<br />

Condom distribution<br />

Support for AIDS<br />

orphans<br />

Support for PLWHA<br />

Voluntary counseling<br />

and Testing<br />

Home based care for<br />

victims<br />

Income generation for<br />

AIDS victims<br />

Fund raising for AIDS<br />

victims<br />

Others<br />

17. How is it planned to ensure the sustainability of the project and<br />

empower the local Iddirs' capacities to take over the project? (Attach your<br />

plan if possible separately)<br />

____________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

___________<br />

18. What are the major outcomes of Iddir based HIV/AIDS intervention?<br />

(Specify in the space provided)<br />

♦ Information and<br />

Communication_______________________________________________________<br />

♦ Behavioral change and<br />

Change___________________________________________________________<br />

♦ Voluntary counseling and testing<br />

_______________________________________________________<br />

♦ Care and<br />

Support_______________________________________________________________________<br />

♦ Other<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________


19. What are the major problems that limit the role of Iddir in anti HIV/AIDS<br />

activities (As it is observed in your project)? (Specify)<br />

____________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

____________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

____________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

____________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________<br />

20. What other preconditions should be considered to involve Iddirs<br />

actively in HIV/AIDS intervention activities?(As it is observed in your<br />

project)<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________<br />

21. Please provide your general observation and additional comment on<br />

the Iddir based HIV/AIDS intervention as it is observed in your project?<br />

_________________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________________<br />

______________________________<br />

Date__________________________________________________<br />

_<br />

Name of<br />

respondent___________________________________<br />

Position in the organization<br />

__________________________


Addis Ababa University<br />

Regional and Local development Studies<br />

To be filled by representatives of community based HIV intervention activities implemented<br />

with Iddir(For each Iddir involved )<br />

Activities<br />

1. Information Education<br />

and Communication<br />

2. Condom distribution<br />

3. Support for AIDS<br />

orphans<br />

4. Support for PLWHA<br />

5. Voluntary Counseling<br />

and Testing<br />

6. Fund raising for AIDS<br />

victims<br />

7. Home based care and<br />

support<br />

8. Income generation<br />

activities for AIDS<br />

orphans and care takers<br />

9. Psychological support<br />

10. Others( specify)<br />

Kind of<br />

support<br />

provide<br />

d for<br />

Iddir<br />

Duratio<br />

n for<br />

involve<br />

ment<br />

# of<br />

benefici<br />

aries<br />

Iddir leader's<br />

involvement<br />

Iddir members<br />

involvement<br />

1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5<br />

Keys- (1) Fully actively involved (2) Actively involved in most cases (3) Starting to actively engaged (4) Not<br />

yet active but participate (5) Not involved at all


ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY<br />

SCHOOL <strong>OF</strong> GRADUATE STUDIES<br />

REGIONAL AND LOCAL DEVELOPMENT STUDIES (RLDS)<br />

Structured interview guide for Iddir Leaders<br />

1. The involvement of the Iddir in non burial development activities<br />

A. Involved ___________________<br />

B. Non involved_______________<br />

2. Kind of development activities carried out by the Iddir ___<br />

3. Assistance the Iddir get from other bodies for development activities<br />

A. Assistance provided _____________________<br />

B. Assistance not provided _________________<br />

4. What is the alliance organization<br />

5. Kind of assistance<br />

A. NGO________________________________<br />

B. Kebele and Wereda HIV prevention Office______________<br />

C. Iddir umbrella organization ____________________________<br />

D. Private organization ___________________________________<br />

E. Omit__________________________________________________<br />

A. Financial assistance ___________________________________<br />

B. Technical advice,_______________________________________<br />

C. training and capacity building __________________________<br />

D. Net working ____________________________________________<br />

E. Administrative __________________________________________<br />

6. Financial sources for development activities carried out by the Iddir<br />

A. Monthly contribution of members __________________________<br />

B. Grant from NGO____________________________________________<br />

C. Income generation<br />

activities___________________________________<br />

7. Involvement of Iddir in anti HIV activities<br />

A. Currently actively involved in anti HIV activities<br />

_______________


B. Once it has been involved but now discontinued<br />

_______________<br />

C. Non involved at all<br />

__________________________________________<br />

8. Date of establishment of the anti HIV activities<br />

____________________________<br />

9. Concern of the Iddir By-laws for anti HIV AIDS activities<br />

A. It is revised _____________________________________<br />

B. It is not revised _________________________________<br />

C. On the process of being revised __________________<br />

10. Reason that initiate the anti HIV activity<br />

A. AIDS deaths ______________________________________<br />

B. AIDS orphans ______________________________________<br />

C. Public advocacy______________________________________<br />

D. Initiation from NGO___________________________________<br />

E. Kebele and wereda level initiation ____________________<br />

11. The sources of initiation for anti HIV activity<br />

A. Iddir members and leaders ___________________________<br />

B. Partner NGOs________________________________________<br />

C. Kebele and local administrators ______________________<br />

D. Wereda HIV secretariat ______________________________<br />

12. Sources of money for anti HIV activities<br />

A. Monthly contribution _________________________________<br />

B. Grant from NGO______________________________________<br />

C. From Wereda HIV secretariat ___________________________<br />

D. We don’t need money, we do the job voluntarily __________<br />

E. Kebele __________________________________________________<br />

13. Human resources of the anti HIV activities<br />

A. AIDS clubs ____________________________________________


B. AIDS committee_______________________________________<br />

C. Iddir leaders __________________________________________<br />

D. Qualified employed personnel __________________________<br />

E. NGO personnel_________________________________________<br />

14. Strategies of anti HIV activities<br />

A. Information Education and communication_____________<br />

B. Behavioral change and communication _________________<br />

C. Voluntary counseling and testing ______________________<br />

D. Care and support ______________________________________<br />

E. Other _________________________________________________<br />

15. Active implementers of the advocacy<br />

A. Iddir leaders __________________________________________<br />

B. Health officials ________________________________________<br />

C. Employed personnel___________________________________<br />

D. Voluntary personnel___________________________________<br />

E. Kebele administrative _________________________________<br />

16. Time table of the advocacy program<br />

A. Unplanned occasionally________________________________<br />

B. Monthly ______________________________________________<br />

C. During assembly meetings _____________________________<br />

D. Planned _____________________________________<br />

17. Frequency of the advocacy______________________<br />

18. Beneficiaries of the advocacy program<br />

A. Iddir members only ___________________________________<br />

B. Also non members _____________________________________<br />

C. Local community _______________________________________<br />

19. Participation of qualified health officials in advocacy I n the Iddir<br />

A. No attendance ____________________________________<br />

B. Number of attendance ____________________________


20. Participation of HIV+ in the Iddir<br />

C. No attendance ______________________________________<br />

D. Number of attendance ________________________<br />

21. Means of awareness creation in the Iddir<br />

A. Integrated method in participatory education and entertainment<br />

________<br />

B. Discussion only _________________________________________________<br />

22. Availability of teaching materials and<br />

A. Yes _________________<br />

B. No___________________<br />

23. Dealt with other questioner<br />

24. Known HIV+ cases<br />

A. Yes ____________<br />

B. No one exposed himself _________________<br />

25. Kind of support for AIDS patient<br />

A. No assistance b/c no one is known___________________<br />

B. Cover medical expenses ______________________________<br />

C. Allow some money to use while he is alive______________<br />

D. Food donation _______________________________________<br />

E. Give Social support ______________________________<br />

F. Cover living expenses , like food, clothing and<br />

shelter_________<br />

26. Number of assisted AIDS patient________________________<br />

27. Number of beneficiaries in home based care ____________<br />

28. Kind of support for AIDS orphans<br />

A. Cover school fees and uniforms __________________<br />

B. Cover house rent _________________________________<br />

C. Withdraw from monthly contribution_______________ _<br />

D. Provide medical assistance _________________________<br />

E. Exempt from payment _____________________________<br />

F. Replacement ______________________________________<br />

29. Number of assisted AIDS orphans _________________________________


30. Assistance given for implementers Iddir<br />

A. Assistance availed _________________<br />

B. Not assisted_________________________<br />

31. Kind of assistant giving organization<br />

A. ACORD__________<br />

B. CBISDO__________<br />

C. Hiwot ____________<br />

D. CARE_____________<br />

E. Marry Joy _________<br />

F. Umberalla organization ____________<br />

G. AAHPCO or wereda level __________<br />

32. Kind of assistance<br />

A. Financial ____________________<br />

B. Technical know how , capacity building and training<br />

__________<br />

C. Material assistance _____________________________<br />

D. man power assistance __________________________<br />

E. Net working_____________________________________<br />

33. Problem faced during the project<br />

Thank you<br />

A. Lack of awareness to brake the silence _____________________<br />

B. Resistance from the Iddir members to accept the teaching<br />

due to cultural<br />

problem_________________________________________<br />

C. No problem -_____________________________________________<br />

D. Lack of By-laws that allow the activity____________________<br />

E. Lack of money ___________________________________________


Annex II<br />

The Situation of Iddir capital, Spending on burial activities , development activities,<br />

for the last ten years compiled for nine indicator Iddirs<br />

Code 001 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994<br />

capital 4000 34400 55000 68600 77200 79800 79200 75200 76200<br />

Kebir 3200 13000 20000 25000 31000 34200 37600 32600 36000<br />

Number<br />

of Death<br />

3 12 18 22 20 29 32 28 30<br />

Number of<br />

death<br />

news<br />

1 5<br />

15 20 26 28 23 30<br />

code 002 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994<br />

capital 59836.21 55209.68 43237.65 54726.65 55117.32 45444.08 51656.95 69146.68 76649.16<br />

Kebir 48454.45 47725.75 14408.35 23752.24 36058.4 26088.08 22723.35 17593.15 17481<br />

Lemat 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1139 2160<br />

Number<br />

of Death<br />

Number of<br />

death<br />

news<br />

96 85 80 96 120 145 108 55 48<br />

Code003 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994<br />

cap 1250 4200 6200 7900 10002 11400 18300 14600 28300<br />

Kebr<br />

Lemat<br />

400<br />

Number of<br />

Death<br />

1 1 1 2 - - - -<br />

Number of -<br />

death<br />

news<br />

- - - - - - - -<br />

AIDS<br />

death<br />

1 - - - - - - 2<br />

AIDS orph - - - - - - - 2<br />

Replace - - - - - - - 2


code004 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994<br />

capital 12160.92 17124.72 27664.07 73193 32758 19055.33 19055 25221.63 25144.5<br />

Kebr 5865 12340 12220 22120 25440 22150 25675<br />

Lemat 2364 1837.45 191.65 2800 196<br />

Number<br />

of Death<br />

7 10 9 21 19 23 21<br />

Number of -<br />

death<br />

news<br />

- - - - - - -<br />

AIDS<br />

death<br />

- - - - - - - - -<br />

Suspect - - - - - - - - -<br />

AIDS<br />

orphan<br />

- - - - - - - - -<br />

Replace - - - - - - - - -<br />

code005 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994<br />

cap - - - - - - - 18000 20000<br />

Kebr - - - - - - - 13000 17000<br />

Lemat - - - - - - - 3000 4000<br />

Number of -<br />

Death<br />

- - - - - - 6<br />

Number of -<br />

news<br />

- - - - - - - -<br />

AIDS<br />

death<br />

- - - - - - - - -<br />

AIDS<br />

orphans<br />

- - - - - - - 4 -<br />

Replace - - - - - - - 1 -<br />

code006 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994<br />

cap 14724 14724 14724 19632 19632 38490 30600 40088 31050<br />

Kebir 5200 13000 10400 7800 7800 20310 23500 37500 29340<br />

Lemat 2400 2400<br />

Number<br />

of Death<br />

4 10 8 6 6 15 15 25 19<br />

suspected - - - - - - - 10<br />

PLWA - - - - - - - -<br />

AIDS orph - - - - - - - -<br />

Replace - - - - - - - -


code007 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994<br />

cap 1000 1500 1900 2100 9079.8 12218.78 16933.44 28245.05 38.376.3<br />

7<br />

Kebir 450 600 800 800 3648 7315 9500 15120 15800<br />

Lemat 300 600<br />

Number of<br />

Death<br />

4 4 4 4 16 17 17 20 17<br />

Suspected<br />

PLWA<br />

AIDS<br />

orphan<br />

Replace<br />

4<br />

code008 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994<br />

capital 11258.5 15800 17600 18180 19343 19896.2 16725.37 18250.04 17500<br />

Kebir 5802 8000 9100 7800 9509 12252.75 8056 15342 12100<br />

Lemat - - - - - - 1000 2000 1000<br />

Number<br />

of Death<br />

4 6 8 7 9 11 8 13 10<br />

suspect - - - - - - - - -<br />

PLWA - - - - - - - - -<br />

AIDS<br />

Orphans<br />

- - - - - - - - -<br />

Replace - - - - - - - - -<br />

code009 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994<br />

capital 25380 27420 30460 35650 42240 46570 32440 32323 48620<br />

Kebir 15320 13240 16780 18348 21342 22418 22231 23215 24310<br />

Lemat 300 - - 400 1350 5400 - 300 -<br />

Number of<br />

Death<br />

8 12 12 14 16 15 17 19 20<br />

suspect - - - - - - - -<br />

PLWA - - - - - - - -<br />

AIDS<br />

orphans<br />

- - - - - - - -<br />

Replace - - - - 1990 - - -<br />

Keys: -<br />

Code: - Contextual code given for respondent Iddirs<br />

Capital: - Iddir capital<br />

Kebir- Expenditure on burial activities<br />

Lemat: - Expenditure on development activities<br />

Replace: - Number of orphans who got replacement membership


disease<br />

Suspect: - number of people suspected to die of AIDS or opportunistic<br />

Declaration<br />

I declare that this thesis is my original work and has not been presented for<br />

a degree in any university and all the sources of material used for the thesis<br />

are duly acknowledged.<br />

Name- Wubalem Negash<br />

Signature- _________________________<br />

Date- ______________________________<br />

Place - Addis Ababa University<br />

This has been submitted for examination with my approval as a university<br />

advisor .<br />

Alula Pankhurst (PH.D)____________________________________________

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!