03.04.2013 Views

Free PDF - American Journal of Archaeology

Free PDF - American Journal of Archaeology

Free PDF - American Journal of Archaeology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

110.1 (January 2006)<br />

<strong>American</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Archaeology</strong> Online Book Review<br />

copyright © 2006 by the archaeological institute <strong>of</strong> america<br />

AJA<br />

Online PublicatiOns: bOOk Reviews<br />

Swedish Excavations at Sinda, Cyprus:<br />

Excavations Conducted by Arne<br />

Furumark 1947–1948<br />

by aRne FuRumaRk and chaRles m. adelman, with cOntRibutiOns by Paul<br />

ÅstRöm, nils-GustaF GeJwall, and hans henninG vOn deR Osten (skRath<br />

4O, 50; acta instituti atheniensis ReGni sueciae, seRies in 4O, 50). PP. 238, FiGs.<br />

42, Pls. 61, tables 24. Paul ÅstRöms FöRlaG, sävedalen 2003. $88. issn 0586-<br />

0539; isbn 91-7916-046-8 (PaPeR).<br />

Furumark’s excavations at the Late Bronze<br />

Age fortified town <strong>of</strong> Sinda, some 20 miles<br />

east <strong>of</strong> Nicosia, were conducted more than 50<br />

years ago. Despite lack <strong>of</strong> publication and the<br />

relatively small area uncovered, the site has<br />

since played an important role in discussions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 12th century B.C. in Cyprus. A brief summary<br />

report appeared in the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Journal</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Archaeology</strong> in 1948, and a longer account<br />

appeared in Swedish in 1952. These and a more<br />

substantial unpublished report written by Furumark<br />

in 1951 formed the basis <strong>of</strong> Adelman’s<br />

volume. Collaboration between Adelman and<br />

Furumark began as long ago as 1977, but the<br />

project remained unfinished on the latter’s<br />

death in 1982. The current volume was completed<br />

in 1998 but was subject to further delays<br />

before its final publication with a summary and<br />

conclusions by Paul Åström in 2003.<br />

Adelman’s preface is both a moving tribute<br />

to Furumark and a candid account <strong>of</strong> the many<br />

difficulties faced during this long period <strong>of</strong><br />

gestation. These included torn plans, plans<br />

and sections without indication <strong>of</strong> strata, uncatalogued<br />

and fading negatives, incomplete<br />

or nonexistent artifact descriptions, missing<br />

architectural documentation, and incomprehensible<br />

field notes. These problems were<br />

compounded by the destruction <strong>of</strong> the site<br />

by local villagers in 1951 and the loss <strong>of</strong> finds<br />

housed in the Famagusta Museum during the<br />

Turkish invasion <strong>of</strong> 1974. There are lessons here<br />

for all field archaeologists.<br />

A great deal, <strong>of</strong> course, has changed since<br />

the excavations at Sinda. Furumark’s ceramic<br />

terminology in particular is out <strong>of</strong> date, and<br />

his chronology and historical interpretation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the site have been repeatedly challenged.<br />

While some ceramic categories are updated in<br />

brackets (e.g., Quasi-Mycenaean Linear Ware<br />

[= Painted Wheel-Made III]), for the most part<br />

Adelman’s text and the extensive find catalogues<br />

maintain the original terminology. Points <strong>of</strong><br />

departure between Furumark’s account <strong>of</strong> the<br />

excavations and the final report are, however,<br />

clearly defined, and Adelman’s own stratigraphic<br />

interpretations, rendered necessary in<br />

particular in the description <strong>of</strong> the South Area,<br />

are presented with due warning regarding<br />

their accuracy. For the most part the text reads<br />

smoothly, in line with Adelman’s stated desire<br />

to present the site as much as possible “in the<br />

style and with the feeling <strong>of</strong> Furumark.”<br />

Part 1 <strong>of</strong> the volume begins with a description<br />

<strong>of</strong> the excavations. These were conducted<br />

in three areas (Northwest Area, Gate Area,<br />

South Area). While some pre- and post-Late<br />

Bronze Age remains were found, the three<br />

main periods <strong>of</strong> occupation (Sinda I–III) were<br />

dated by Furumark to Late Cypriot IIC(2),<br />

IIIA(1), and IIIA(2). Both Sinda I and Sinda II<br />

ended in episodes <strong>of</strong> destruction. These were<br />

attributed by Furumark, respectively, to the<br />

arrival <strong>of</strong> Greek settlers (ca. 1230) and the Sea<br />

Peoples (ca. 1190), with Sinda III representing<br />

a partial reoccupation prior to final abandonment<br />

in ca. 1150 B.C. The Gate Area produced<br />

remains <strong>of</strong> a city gate with wheel tracks, a<br />

gate house, and a tower or bastion. Of note is<br />

a substantial deposit <strong>of</strong> votive stone sculpture


<strong>American</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Archaeology</strong> Online Book Review<br />

<strong>of</strong> Cypro-Archaic and Cypro-Classical date,<br />

laid in the late fourth century B.C. as filling<br />

for a road that passed through the ruined<br />

gateway. In the South Area, where greater soil<br />

depth provided better preservation, an area <strong>of</strong><br />

housing was found. The process <strong>of</strong> excavation<br />

is well illustrated by text photographs. Sections<br />

and plans are included as inserts in a pocket<br />

in the back cover, and synoptic tables provide<br />

a schematic presentation <strong>of</strong> strata and find<br />

distribution.<br />

In part 2 Adelman provides a brief treatment<br />

<strong>of</strong> the history and significance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

site. He notes the need for a reassessment <strong>of</strong><br />

the Sinda material in light <strong>of</strong> recent ceramic<br />

studies but unfortunately makes no attempt<br />

to do so. Addressing the question <strong>of</strong> who<br />

built Sinda and why, it is suggested that the<br />

settlement controlled the only crossing <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Pedieos River on the copper route from Idalion<br />

and Athienou to Enkomi, perhaps exacting<br />

tolls from travelers and traders. Adelman suggests<br />

that the site was surrounded by a double<br />

wall, with the remains excavated by Furumark<br />

belonging to the inner system. Difficulties in<br />

distinguishing catastrophe material from prefloor<br />

fills are noted but not considered overly<br />

problematic, and life at Sinda is conventionally<br />

described as lively and prosperous, the inhabitants<br />

engaged in agriculture, food production,<br />

craft activities, and bull worship.<br />

It is left, indeed, to Paul Åström to take up<br />

the challenge <strong>of</strong> reviewing Sinda and its two<br />

destruction levels in the light <strong>of</strong> more recent<br />

discoveries and within the highly contested<br />

context <strong>of</strong> the history and chronology <strong>of</strong> Late<br />

Cypriot III. Åström suggests a lowering <strong>of</strong> the<br />

dates proposed by Furumark in line with a<br />

lowering <strong>of</strong> the end <strong>of</strong> Mycenaean IIIB. Thus,<br />

Period I, which produced Mycenaean IIIB<br />

pottery, ends ca. 1190/1180 B.C., Period II in<br />

ca. 1150/1140, and Period III in ca. 1110/1100<br />

B.C. This lowered chronology raises the possibility<br />

that the first destruction at Sinda was<br />

brought about by the Sea Peoples and not,<br />

as Furumark proposed, by Greek settlers.<br />

Åström’s own view is that both destructions<br />

were caused by pirates and adventurers consisting<br />

<strong>of</strong> Mycenaeans and groups from other<br />

areas, or possibly by conflict between Cypriots<br />

themselves. Whatever the case, this final<br />

publication <strong>of</strong> Sinda will no doubt give rise<br />

to renewed debate about events in Cyprus in<br />

the 12th century and, as Åström notes, further<br />

fuel discussion <strong>of</strong> the radical low chronology<br />

proposed by some scholars for Palestine via<br />

<strong>of</strong>t-noted links between Sinda Mycenaean<br />

IIIC1b and Philistine pottery.<br />

Part III contains extensive find catalogues<br />

with summary indexes and a listing <strong>of</strong> all<br />

classes <strong>of</strong> material with accompanying highquality<br />

black-and-white illustrations and line<br />

drawings. While some items (e.g., a stamp<br />

seal) are discussed in detail, most appear only<br />

as catalogue entries with typological attribution<br />

and some comparanda. Contextual data<br />

and Furumark’s views on ceramic style and<br />

chronology are reported where relevant. Sherd<br />

counts by ware and stratigraphic context and<br />

other distributional and statistical data are<br />

further presented in part IV and an appendix.<br />

The animal remains are reported by Gejvall,<br />

translated from a Swedish original <strong>of</strong> 1951.<br />

Adelman is to be commended for taking<br />

on an extremely difficult task and achieving<br />

a fine result for which scholars <strong>of</strong> the Cypriot<br />

Bronze Age have cause to be grateful. The<br />

volume lacks a contemporary reading <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ceramic evidence and were it not for the important<br />

contribution by Åström would also<br />

be missing a serious analysis <strong>of</strong> the historical<br />

significance <strong>of</strong> Sinda. It is clear, however, that<br />

Adelman’s main objective was to retrieve and<br />

present the basic stratigraphic, architectural,<br />

and artifactual data, and he has done this in<br />

full and painstaking detail. In making the primary<br />

data available to other scholars, he has<br />

acquitted the primary obligation <strong>of</strong> the original<br />

excavator and ably fulfilled the demands<br />

and responsibilities <strong>of</strong> a collaborative task for<br />

which few <strong>of</strong> us would have had either the<br />

courage or patience.<br />

ARCHAEOLOGy PROGRAM<br />

LA TROBE UNIVERSITy<br />

BUNDOORA, VICTORIA 3083<br />

AUSTRALIA<br />

Jennifer M. Webb

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!