01 apteryx australis - University of Texas Libraries
01 apteryx australis - University of Texas Libraries
01 apteryx australis - University of Texas Libraries
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
PREFACE.<br />
The advantage <strong>of</strong> attention to any object <strong>of</strong>Natural History, however unattractive, ifit<br />
be not a recognizable or previously known specimen, is exemplified in the fragment <strong>of</strong><br />
bone (Plate, p. 73) which is the foundation <strong>of</strong> the present work.<br />
It was brought for sale to the College <strong>of</strong> Surgeons in 1839 by an individual who<br />
stated that he had obtained itinNew Zealand from a native, who told him that it was<br />
the bone <strong>of</strong> a great Eagle ; and for this specimen he asked the sum <strong>of</strong> ten guineas.<br />
Iassured him that he had been misinformed ; that the specimen had not the structure<br />
<strong>of</strong> a bone <strong>of</strong> such a bird <strong>of</strong> flight; that it was a marrow-bone, like those brought to<br />
table wrapped ina napkin.<br />
To further questions as to its locality the vendor replied by showing, amongst other<br />
evidences, a jadestone weapon peculiar to the New-Zealanders, which he had also<br />
brought from the island, and still seemed to attach so much value to the unpromising<br />
fragment, thatIconsented, being at the time specially engaged, to try to make out the<br />
bone ifhe would leave it with me and call for it the next day.<br />
As soon asIwas at leisureItook the bone to the skeleton <strong>of</strong> the ox, expecting to<br />
verify my first surmise ; but, with some resemblance to the shaft <strong>of</strong> the thigh-bone,<br />
there were precluding differences. From the ox's humerus, which also affords the tavern<br />
delicacy, the discrepancy <strong>of</strong> shape was more marked. Still, led by the thickness <strong>of</strong> the<br />
wall <strong>of</strong> the marrow-cavity,Iproceeded to compare the bone with similar-sized portions<br />
<strong>of</strong> the skeletons <strong>of</strong> the various quadrupeds which might have been introduced and<br />
have left their remains inNew Zealand ;but itwas clearly unconformable with any such<br />
portions.<br />
In the course <strong>of</strong> these comparisons Inoted certain obscure superficial markings on<br />
the bone, which recalled to mind similar ones whichIhad observed on the surface<br />
<strong>of</strong> the long bones in some large birds. Thereupon Iproceeded with it to the skeleton<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Ostrich. " The bone " tallied in point <strong>of</strong> size with the shaft <strong>of</strong> the thigh-bone<br />
in that bird, but was markedly different in shape. There were, however, the same<br />
superficial reticulate impressions on the Ostrich's femur which had caught my attention<br />
in the exhaustive comparison previously made with the mammalian bones.<br />
In short, stimulated to more minute and extended examinations, Iarrived at the conviction<br />
that the specimen had come from a bird, that it was the shaft <strong>of</strong> a thigh-bone,<br />
and that it must have formed part <strong>of</strong> the skeleton <strong>of</strong> a bird as large as, if not larger<br />
than, the full-sized male Ostrich, with this more striking difference, that whereas<br />
a2