03.04.2013 Views

Intonation Patterns in Nepali Feedback Units

Intonation Patterns in Nepali Feedback Units

Intonation Patterns in Nepali Feedback Units

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.2. <strong>Feedback</strong> elicit<strong>in</strong>g units<br />

The behavior and types of feedback elicit<strong>in</strong>g units<br />

(EFB) are similar to GFB, where EFBs elicit feedback<br />

from the <strong>in</strong>terlocutor and GFBs provide feedback to<br />

the <strong>in</strong>terlocutor.<br />

EFBs <strong>in</strong> <strong>Nepali</strong> exist as s<strong>in</strong>gle words and phrasal<br />

forms. The EFBs have a ris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tonation pattern<br />

except for kyaa 'is it? . Thus, ris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tonation is<br />

typical for <strong>Nepali</strong> EFB units. As <strong>in</strong>dicated above,<br />

EFBs <strong>in</strong> <strong>Nepali</strong> can be classified similarly to what has<br />

been suggested above for GFBs. However, this seems<br />

unnecessary s<strong>in</strong>ce all the EFbs have same <strong>in</strong>tonation<br />

pattern, i.e., ris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tonation. Therefore, all the <strong>Nepali</strong><br />

EFBs have been presented <strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle table together<br />

with their emotional/attitud<strong>in</strong>al functions. Table 13<br />

below shows the examples found.<br />

Table 13. <strong>Nepali</strong> EFB units and <strong>in</strong>tonation pattern<br />

FB unit FB function Int.<br />

la 'ok?' EFB, Acceptance, Accept R<br />

hai 'please' EFB, Acceptance, Accept R<br />

hazur 'pardon' EFB, Basic, CPU R<br />

ho 'is it?' EFB, Additional, Attitude, Certa<strong>in</strong> R<br />

pakkaa<br />

'sure?'<br />

EFB, Additional, Attitude, Certa<strong>in</strong> R<br />

ni 'is it?' EFB, Additional, Attitude, Certa<strong>in</strong> R<br />

kyaa ho EFB, Additional, Attitude, Certa<strong>in</strong> R<br />

Thyaakkai<br />

'exactly'<br />

EFB, Additional, Attitude, Intersted R<br />

ni 'is it?' EFB, Additional, Attitude, Certa<strong>in</strong> R<br />

aN ho 'O is EFB, Additional, Attitude, Certa<strong>in</strong> R<br />

it?'<br />

Thik cha 'ok?' EFB, Acceptance, Accept R<br />

kaaN 'where' EFB, Basic, CP R<br />

kyaa 'is it?' EFB, Additional, Attitude, Certa<strong>in</strong> F<br />

e ho 'O is it?' EFB, Additional, Attitude, Interested R<br />

ho ra 'is it?' EFB, Additional, Emotion, surprised R<br />

haaN 'pardon' EFB, Basic, CPU R<br />

aru 'any EFB, Additional, Attitude, Interested R<br />

other?'<br />

haN 'ok?' EFB, Acceptance, Accept R<br />

hagi EFB, Acceptance, Accept R<br />

4. Multiple functions of the FB units<br />

As has been discussed above, <strong>Nepali</strong> FBs have<br />

multiple functions. In some cases, their <strong>in</strong>tonation<br />

pattern changes as they take on different function, but<br />

this is not always true. Many of the FB units have<br />

multiple functions <strong>in</strong> the same <strong>in</strong>tonation pattern.<br />

However, this needs more detailed and <strong>in</strong> depth studies<br />

for a better description of FB units <strong>in</strong> <strong>Nepali</strong>. Some of<br />

the FB units with multiple functions are presented <strong>in</strong><br />

Table 14. However, the list is not exhaustive.<br />

Table 14. <strong>Nepali</strong> FB units with multiple<br />

mean<strong>in</strong>g/function and <strong>in</strong>tonation patterns<br />

FB Unit Function Int<br />

hazur 'mm' GFB Basic, CPU F<br />

hazur 'hello' GFB Basic, CPU R<br />

hazur 'pardon' EFB Basic, CPU R<br />

aN 'mm' GFB Basic, CPU F<br />

aN 'mm' GFB Additional, Attitude, Interested F<br />

aN 'no' GFB Acceptance, Non-accept F<br />

la 'ok?' EFB, Acceptance, Accept F<br />

la 'ok' GFB Acceptance, Accept F<br />

Apart from the complexities regard<strong>in</strong>g the function<br />

of the feedback units <strong>in</strong> <strong>Nepali</strong> mentioned above, we<br />

can see that some units can function as GFB and EFB<br />

at the same time, e.g. the FB unit hazur, mean<strong>in</strong>g<br />

'pardon' is a GFB with a basic CPU function which can<br />

modify its function as follows: hazur <strong>in</strong>forms the<br />

<strong>in</strong>terlocutor that s/he has established contact and that<br />

someth<strong>in</strong>g has been said but that it cannot be perceived<br />

or that it has been perceived it but cannot be<br />

understood. In this way, hazur (pardon) becomes an<br />

EFB <strong>in</strong>form<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>terlocutor that the speaker is<br />

ask<strong>in</strong>g for the <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> the preced<strong>in</strong>g utterance<br />

that s/he could not grasp.<br />

5. Conclusion<br />

Our study shows that <strong>Nepali</strong> feedback units can be<br />

used for basic feedback and acceptance as well as for<br />

additional emotions and attitudes. The basic feedback<br />

CP units, <strong>in</strong> general, have a ris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tonation pattern<br />

whereas basic CPU feedback units generally have<br />

fall<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tonation pattern. The exceptions to these<br />

patterns, that we have found, make functional sense<br />

and can be described. <strong>Feedback</strong> giv<strong>in</strong>g units with an<br />

accept<strong>in</strong>g function have a general tendency to have an<br />

fall<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tonation pattern whereas feedback giv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

units with an non-accept<strong>in</strong>g function have a ris<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>tonation pattern.<br />

<strong>Feedback</strong> express<strong>in</strong>g certa<strong>in</strong>ty or uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty has a<br />

fall<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tonation pattern, with some expla<strong>in</strong>able<br />

exceptions. FB units express<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terest and un-<strong>in</strong>terest<br />

have fall<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tonation. However, if a FB unit<br />

functions as a turn holder, often with a simultaneous<br />

OCM function, it has a ris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tonation. <strong>Units</strong><br />

express<strong>in</strong>g agreement and disagreement have fall<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>tonation. GFB units express<strong>in</strong>g satisfaction, surprise<br />

and anger also have fall<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tonation. GFB units<br />

express<strong>in</strong>g surprise and GFB units express<strong>in</strong>g anger<br />

both have fall<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tonation. However, units with<br />

surprise have ris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tonation when they are also turn<br />

holders.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!