04.04.2013 Views

AISHnet Survey - Academy for International School Heads

AISHnet Survey - Academy for International School Heads

AISHnet Survey - Academy for International School Heads

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1:1 Laptops in the Classroom—Where Are We Now?<br />

22/3/11 4:28 PM<br />

The article asserts that indeed, the success of a 1:1 laptop program rests in the preparation and teaching<br />

strategies of the teacher in the classroom, pulling together findings from a variety of sources, including The<br />

Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, published by the Boston College Lynch <strong>School</strong> of<br />

Education, January 2010 special edition devoted to the 1:1 laptop issue.<br />

Researchers Damien Bebell and Laura O’Dwyer assert that the downfall of 1:1 laptop programs is the<br />

assumption that simply giving a student a laptop is the magic bullet because there is little focus on the<br />

education process.<br />

“[The program] refers to the level at which technology is available to students and teachers; by definition, it<br />

says nothing about actual educational practices,” they write in “Educational Outcomes and Research from<br />

1:1 Computing Programs.”<br />

Bebell, with Rachel Kay, conducted a study of five Western Massachusetts public and private middle<br />

schools that participated in the Berkshire Wireless Learning Initiative. What they found was that the 1:1<br />

laptop program had positive educational effects, but educational practices changed as well. Teachers had<br />

to change their methods of instruction.<br />

“One of the central project outcomes of the study was the documentation of fundamental changes in<br />

teaching, particularly teaching strategies, curriculum delivery, and classroom management,” write Bebell and<br />

Kay. “Without question, the 1:1 program had major impacts across many aspects of teaching <strong>for</strong> the<br />

majority of teacher participants.”<br />

In the Philadelphia area, Lower Merion High <strong>School</strong> has been conducting a 1:1 program, while nearby<br />

Harriton High <strong>School</strong> is three-years in. In January, the Lower Merion <strong>School</strong> District’s Supervisor of<br />

Instruction Technology told the <strong>School</strong> Board that education delivery and practices in those schools were<br />

allowing students to reach new levels of learning.”<br />

As reported by the Ardmore-Merion-Wynnewood Patch Hilt noted that the district uses a method called<br />

SAMR (Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, and Redefinition), which firsts asks teachers to substitute<br />

technology <strong>for</strong> resources or established instructional practices. The goal, though, is to next use the<br />

technology to augment lessons to provide additional advantages and then modify lessons based on the<br />

advanced technology available through the program. Ultimately, 1:1 computing should redefine educational<br />

practices. Teachers become the moderators and facilitators of a wider world of learning.<br />

Lower Merion Spanish Teacher Allison Mellett and Biology teacher Elliott Burch have embraced 1:1<br />

computing <strong>for</strong> their classes. Burch, <strong>for</strong> example, asked students to demonstrate animal behaviors by<br />

producing claymation movies using their laptops’ built-in cameras and iMovie software rather than write<br />

written reports. Mellet has a virtual classroom model—students download class assignments and upload<br />

their completed work. Her classroom is completely paperless.<br />

The concept is in line with the 21st Century <strong>School</strong>s concept, which is the hot topic in education re<strong>for</strong>m<br />

right now.<br />

A teacher at the Wichern-Schule in Hamburg, Germany, Torsten Otto agrees that it is up to the teacher and<br />

his/her practices <strong>for</strong> the 1:1 computing model to fulfill its promise.<br />

“In our 1-to-1 program … we put a big emphasis on project-based learning; otherwise, the laptop is no<br />

more than an expensive notepad. Research needs to show the effects of this different style of teaching in<br />

terms of student engagement, motivation, and so-called 21st-century skills,” Otto said in the e<strong>School</strong> News<br />

story.<br />

In Lower Merion, four students lauded the program at the <strong>School</strong> Board meeting. Harriton Senior Daniel<br />

Carp said “ I keep everything I need <strong>for</strong> school on my computer. I can connect with students and teachers,<br />

and any pressing question I might have can be answered with a quick e-mail.”<br />

But a survey of parents and students show that not everyone is enamored with 1:1 computing and the<br />

laptop program. The Merionite, Lower Merion student newspaper, conducted a student survey that showed<br />

http://isminc.com/index.php?view=article&catid=1005%3Avol-9-no-6…ent&print=1&layout=default&page=&option=com_content&Itemid=1218<br />

Page 2 of 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!