04.04.2013 Views

AISHnet Survey - Academy for International School Heads

AISHnet Survey - Academy for International School Heads

AISHnet Survey - Academy for International School Heads

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Can a Lecture Be Experiential?<br />

While in graduate school, I had an interesting conversation with Dr. Jasper Hunt my<br />

professor at Minnesota State University, Mankato. We were filling out conference proposal<br />

<strong>for</strong>ms <strong>for</strong> an experiential education conference. He commented about the "check box" on<br />

the application <strong>for</strong>m requesting us to identify which portion of the presentation would be<br />

experiential and which portion would be lecture based. Jasper shared that he felt this was<br />

counter productive to defining a quality presentation. He argued that a good lecture CAN<br />

be experiential.<br />

I have reflected many times on that comment when attending (or delivering) a lecture or<br />

lesson. Recently this topic came up in my work with both classroom teachers and<br />

corporate trainers who struggle with the need to cover a great deal of curricular content in<br />

a short time while in a structured classroom or boardroom setting. These educators<br />

struggle to balance their need to cover the content and their desire to teach more<br />

experientially in order to engage learners and create lasting lessons.<br />

This past summer I attended two different keynote lectures at educational conferences<br />

that were very engaging and created lasting impressions with me. I reflected on that<br />

conversation with Jasper and wondered: What was it that made those lectures engaging?<br />

Would they be considered “experiential”?<br />

When I compared the presenters’ actions with the principles of experiential education, I<br />

found the educators did incorporate many tenets of experiential education and brainfriendly<br />

teaching strategies. And they did so in what might not usually be considered an<br />

experiential <strong>for</strong>mat <strong>for</strong> teaching: a giant lecture hall and a power point presentation.<br />

Here is what I noticed:<br />

Emotional Engagement:<br />

When the speaker is knowledgeable and passionate about their subject it comes through<br />

regardless of the <strong>for</strong>mat of their lesson. This kind of energy is contagious and can’t help<br />

but initiate some sense of relevancy and buy in from audience members. When Dr. Hunt<br />

lectured on the subject of experiential education philosophy or ethics, his interest and<br />

passion around the subject were obvious and infectious. I remember being drawn in by his<br />

enthusiasm and class time flying by.<br />

Recently I worked with a group of high school teachers who are trying to teach more<br />

experientially in an atmosphere with a strong emphasis on test scores. I challenged them<br />

to reflect on what it was that first ignited their passion around the subject area. If they<br />

are in touch with that passion and find a way to communicate it, they will find a<br />

way to stimulate some of that same passion in their students.<br />

Relevancy and transference to real life:<br />

The speakers infused personal stories that the audience could relate to, both about<br />

themselves and others. They also asked audience members to reflect on a related personal<br />

experience of their own.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!