04.04.2013 Views

World Bank Document - Africa Infrastructure Knowledge Program

World Bank Document - Africa Infrastructure Knowledge Program

World Bank Document - Africa Infrastructure Knowledge Program

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

308 <strong>Africa</strong>’s Transport <strong>Infrastructure</strong><br />

even more will have to be spent on maintenance.) Because maintenance<br />

standards are lower under the pragmatic scenario, and because infrastructure<br />

networks and capacity are not expanded as far, spending for maintenance<br />

drops sharply in the pragmatic scenario but still dwarfs investment in<br />

improvements, upgrades, and extensions of infrastructure.<br />

The proportion of transport expenditure allocated to maintenance has<br />

never come close to the 40 to 50 percent share shown here to be needed,<br />

despite the establishment of road maintenance funds in many of the<br />

countries included in this analysis. This persistent underspending on<br />

maintenance suggests that the road networks of many countries in the<br />

region may become unsustainable—unless a more judicious mix of<br />

investments can be found and followed.<br />

The Asian Development <strong>Bank</strong> (ADB 2006) estimated the road network<br />

size that can be sustained by public sources. After reviewing current<br />

network size and quality, as well as actual maintenance spending, the<br />

ADB study found a negative relationship between network quality and<br />

network replacement value as a share of GDP. When the replacement<br />

value exceeds about 40 percent of current GDP, quality declines rapidly.<br />

Using this finding, the study concluded that the road network density and<br />

standards of several countries in the sample, particularly large countries<br />

with low GDP, were greater than their economies could sustain. The foregoing<br />

analysis supports that conclusion.<br />

Notes<br />

1. This chapter is based on Carruthers, Krishnamani, and Murray (2009).<br />

2. However, the capacity of the facilities may be less than would normally be<br />

considered acceptable for main trunk routes in an industrialized country; see<br />

the section below on category of infrastructure.<br />

3. The infrastructure elements included in the database are detailed in the individual<br />

country maps appearing in the country annex to Carruthers,<br />

Krishnamani, and Murray (2009).<br />

4. In Uganda, no city but the capital has a population exceeding this threshold;<br />

in Ghana, there is only one other (Kumasi). Meanwhile, in Nigeria, there are<br />

26 and in South <strong>Africa</strong>, over 30.<br />

5. The alternative of extending the base scenario to provide connectivity to areas<br />

representing 80 percent of the potential value of output (that is, the value of<br />

output if the most lucrative possible crops were grown) was also considered but<br />

not adopted, as the cost would have been prohibitive for all countries involved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!