05.04.2013 Views

Failure Analysis of Boiler Damages.pdf - Sme-gtz.org.vn

Failure Analysis of Boiler Damages.pdf - Sme-gtz.org.vn

Failure Analysis of Boiler Damages.pdf - Sme-gtz.org.vn

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TÜV Industrie Service GmbH<br />

TÜV SÜD Group<br />

Westendstrasse 199<br />

80686 München<br />

Germany<br />

Deposition or Scaling may also lead to<br />

Page 2<br />

• Localised concentration <strong>of</strong> impurities within or underneath <strong>of</strong> deposits at heated<br />

surfaces<br />

• ”On Load Corrosion” with acidic or alkaline attack Photo 10 – 12.<br />

Attention:<br />

– Scaling appears first at spots with high heat transfer and high steam production<br />

– Even non corrosive deposits e.g. Photo 13 - 20<br />

- iron oxides may lead to porous, thermal critical scale,<br />

- silicates as Ca-, Mg, Al-silicates to over-heating<br />

– <strong>Boiler</strong> operation according to the BFW and BW requirements for some years lead<br />

mostly<br />

to some deposits <strong>of</strong> iron oxide, which should be preventively removed<br />

Causes and Risks:<br />

∗ Insufficient on-line quality control <strong>of</strong> make-up water, condensate return or BFW<br />

∗ Measurement <strong>of</strong> “Acid Conductivity” amplifies detection <strong>of</strong> ingress <strong>of</strong> impurities like<br />

cooling<br />

water and some process media but do not indicate ingress <strong>of</strong> free caustics!<br />

∗ Lack in Inspection <strong>of</strong> not safety related components like heat exchangers and<br />

condensers<br />

∗ Preventive cleaning during operation or at shut down must be done according to the<br />

specifications<br />

Corrosion on boiler steel (carbon or low alloyed steel) can be mainly avoided, if the BFW<br />

and BW requirements were kept. Deviations may leads to<br />

• Dissolution <strong>of</strong> the important protective layer, material attack and loss in form <strong>of</strong><br />

- Uniform or General Corrosion or - more dangerous - to<br />

- Localised Corrosion (Pitting, On-load corrosion, etc.) Figs. 2 - 4<br />

• Crack formation in specific cases<br />

Attention:<br />

– Uniform or General Corrosion isn’t problem if the material loss is less than 0.1 mm/year<br />

(is easy to achieve with normal protective iron oxide layer)<br />

– Localised corrosion during operation underneath <strong>of</strong> deposits and within heated gaps as<br />

well<br />

as during stand still in form <strong>of</strong> oxygen corrosion (pitting formation)<br />

– Crack formation due to high concentration <strong>of</strong> free caustics in presence <strong>of</strong> high tensile<br />

stress (Caustic SCC) Photos 3 - 6<br />

Causes and Risks:<br />

∗ Insufficient BFW and BW composition, which do not meet the requirements <strong>of</strong> the boiler<br />

manufacturer or approved standards<br />

∗ Inadequate preservation during shut down<br />

∗ Localised concentration <strong>of</strong> acidic acting impurities e. g. cooling water or sea water<br />

ingress<br />

∗ Localised concentration <strong>of</strong> caustic acting impurities or free caustic underneath deposits<br />

within heated gaps or at heated phase boundaries<br />

TÜV SÜD Industry Services IS-ATW1-MUC, <strong>Boiler</strong> <strong>Failure</strong> 2005/11 - Page 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!