1938 - The Vasculum
1938 - The Vasculum
1938 - The Vasculum
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5<br />
<strong>The</strong> reason for this general ignorance is easily found. <strong>The</strong> Acts are<br />
so involved, the Orders are so illogical and cumbersome, that they are hard<br />
to' understand, impossible to remember and difficult to administer.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are in all seven Wild Birds Protection Acts, besides one or<br />
two other Acts relating to wild birds and a number of Game Acts which<br />
apply to certain species only. Upon these Acts the Wild Birds Protection<br />
Orders are based and their form and substance must comply with the varied<br />
requirements of the Acts. <strong>The</strong> seven Acts, which were passed at intervals<br />
between 1880 and 1908, display all the faults of piecemeal and illconsidered<br />
legislation, and the Orders reflect these faults. <strong>The</strong> Orders do not<br />
in themselves set forth the terms of the Acts or the penalties to be suffered<br />
from the breaking of them. In law every person is supposed to know the<br />
laws of the country and ignorance is no excuse for breaking them. So the<br />
public is only informed in the Orders what variations in the laws are<br />
decreed in the area covered by the Order. Each County Council or County<br />
Borough Council frames its own Order, subject to the approval of a<br />
Secretary of State, so no two Orders are likely to be identical. This latitude<br />
was doubtless allowed in order that local circumstances should be fully<br />
considered in drawing up an Order; but it has resulted in a most confusing<br />
lack of uniformity. A man walking from Birtley to Gosforth, for instance,<br />
passes under the jurisdiction of four different courts, each one administering<br />
a different Order: how is he to remember the terms of each?<br />
But the lack of uniformity is not the worst feature of the Orders.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y have, many of them, been drawn up by people without sufficient<br />
knowledge of the distribution and habits of birds to enable them to judge as<br />
to which species should be protected and which should not, which should be<br />
given an extended "close time" and which should be protected all the year<br />
round. As the specially protected species have to be named upon the Order<br />
and as birds are known by different names in different parts of the country,<br />
many of the birds have to be mentioned two or three times under different<br />
names in the same Order. Long lists are therefore a necessity and very<br />
often, owing to ignorance, these