1938 - The Vasculum
1938 - The Vasculum
1938 - The Vasculum
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
7<br />
<strong>The</strong>" close time," and the variations thereto mentioned above, do<br />
not apply to Game-birds-partridge, pheasant, bustard, grouse and<br />
blackgame, as the close time for each is already legislated for under the<br />
Game -Acts: but they do apply to other wild birds which are objects of<br />
"sport" and are for some purposes included under the Game Acts, such as<br />
wild-duck, teal, wigeon, woodcock, snipe, etc. <strong>The</strong> prohibitions against the<br />
killing or taking of wild birds during close time or any other period<br />
mentioned above, do not apply "to any owner or occupier of any land or his<br />
authorised agent on such land," except in the case of certain species, about<br />
1oo in number out of a possible 375 or so, which are named in a Schedule<br />
attached to the Act of 1880 and a few subsequent additions thereto. An<br />
examination of the Schedule shows that these species have been selected<br />
mainly on account of their rarity (oriole, chough, etc.), their usefulness<br />
(peewit, owl, etc.). their beauty (kingfisher, goldfinch, etc.), their value as<br />
game-birds (duck, woodcock, snipe, etc.); or for sentimental reasons<br />
(cuckoo, lark, nightingale, etc.); but judging from the names of the species<br />
which have not been put upon the Schedule, it is quite evident that a<br />
haphazard selection would have been equally logical. Fortunately a special<br />
provision of the Act gives power to the Secretary of State, at the request of a<br />
Council, to issue an Order giving other birds this special protection against<br />
"the owner or occupier of any land or his authorised agent on such land" "<br />
as if such species were included under the Schedule of the Act." This<br />
provision has rarely been taken advantage of by any of our local Councils,<br />
as will be seen later. One of the drawbacks is that each additional bird so<br />
protected must be named in the Order, so a further long list of names is<br />
involved. From the above it will be seen that" landowners, farmers, fruitgrowers,<br />
gardeners and shooting tenants, together with their authorised<br />
agents, gamekeepers, etc., are permitted to kill or take any species of wild<br />
bird, that they may consider to be harmful to their particular interests,<br />
subject to its not being named on the Schedule to the Act or added to the<br />
Schedule by the Order for the County. This may lead to absurd anomalies,<br />
<strong>The</strong> kestrel,