By: Linda A. Smith Samantha Healy Vardaman Melissa A. Snow
By: Linda A. Smith Samantha Healy Vardaman Melissa A. Snow
By: Linda A. Smith Samantha Healy Vardaman Melissa A. Snow
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The National Report on Domestic Minor Sex Trafficking: America’s Prostituted Children 11<br />
Scope of the problem.<br />
The Number of Youth who fi t the Defi nition of a Domestic Minor Sex Traffi cking Victim<br />
Starting in October 2006, Shared Hope International embarked on a study seeking to assess the scope of<br />
domestic minor sex traffi cking, the identifi cation of victims, and how these victims were gaining access<br />
to services. The assessments took place in ten U.S. locations and were funded through a grant from the<br />
U.S. Department of Justice, Offi ce of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance. The study was<br />
concluded in September 2008 with ten location-specifi c assessments released. The assessments strived to<br />
determine credible numbers of minors who qualify as domestic minor sex traffi cking victims, whether<br />
or not they are or were identifi ed as such, especially prostituted children. Subsequent assessments have<br />
been undertaken in other locations in the U.S adding further evidence that domestic minor sex traffi cking<br />
is widespread. However, an accurate count of the number of victims of domestic minor sex traffi cking<br />
was not available — the lack of tracking, the common misidentifi cation, the frequent plea agreements or<br />
declined prosecutions, and the stove-piped communications among and within law enforcement, juvenile<br />
justice, and service providers prevented the capture of the complete picture.<br />
The inability to obtain a true count of the numbers of victims of child sex traffi cking stymies advocates in<br />
pursuing funding and policy improvements to protect the children. Unfortunately, due to a uniform lack<br />
of awareness, identifi cation measures, and tracking protocol found in all locations, the numbers collected<br />
do not refl ect the true numbers of domestic minor sex traffi cking victims in each location. Rather, the<br />
numbers demonstrate with certainty that domestic minor sex traffi cking is occurring and in suffi ciently<br />
sizable numbers to merit the public’s and the community leadership’s prioritization in fi ghting the crime of<br />
domestic minor sex traffi cking.<br />
Table 1: Number of Suspected Child Sex Traffi cking Victims by Location<br />
Research Site State<br />
Number of suspected<br />
DMST Victims<br />
Dallas Texas 150 2007<br />
Time Period<br />
San Antonio/Bexar County Texas 3-4 2005-2008<br />
Fort Worth/Tarrant County Texas 29 2000-2008<br />
Las Vegas Nevada 5,122 1994-2007<br />
Independence/Kansas City area Missouri 227 2000-2008<br />
Baton Rouge/New Orleans area Louisiana 105 2000-2007<br />
Saipan/Rota/Tinian 1 2008<br />
Salt Lake City Utah 83 1996-2008<br />
Buffalo/Erie County New York 74-84 2000-2008<br />
Clearwater/Tampa Bay area Florida 36 2000-2008<br />
*Due to a lack of formal tracking protocols between agencies, some DMST victims may be duplicated within a city<br />
and some may have not been included in this count. These numbers were obtained through an interview process in<br />
addition to offi cial government records when available.