05.04.2013 Views

A review of leguminous fertility-building crops, with particular ...

A review of leguminous fertility-building crops, with particular ...

A review of leguminous fertility-building crops, with particular ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A <strong>review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>leguminous</strong> <strong>fertility</strong>-<strong>building</strong> <strong>crops</strong>, Defra project OF0316 2. Rotational aspects<br />

2.2. Disease implications <strong>of</strong> <strong>fertility</strong>-<strong>building</strong> <strong>crops</strong><br />

Consideration <strong>of</strong> disease interactions and implications <strong>with</strong> <strong>fertility</strong>-<strong>building</strong> <strong>crops</strong> needs to<br />

include:<br />

• Diseases affecting the <strong>fertility</strong>-<strong>building</strong> <strong>crops</strong> directly.<br />

• Diseases affecting <strong>fertility</strong>-<strong>building</strong> <strong>crops</strong> which will also affect other <strong>crops</strong> in rotation.<br />

• Consequences <strong>of</strong> incorporation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>fertility</strong>-<strong>building</strong> crop into soil: suppressive or<br />

antagonistic effects on soil- or air-borne pathogens.<br />

• Poor performance <strong>of</strong> the <strong>fertility</strong>-<strong>building</strong> crop has implications on the subsequent cash<br />

crop.<br />

Two types <strong>of</strong> cropping are considered:<br />

• Mono-cropping where specific <strong>fertility</strong>-<strong>building</strong> <strong>crops</strong> are grown exclusively for a period<br />

<strong>of</strong> time.<br />

• Bi-cropping or companion cropping systems where the <strong>fertility</strong>-<strong>building</strong> crop is grown<br />

<strong>with</strong> another arable or vegetable crop (but not necessarily completely synchronous <strong>with</strong><br />

it). In these systems, <strong>fertility</strong>-<strong>building</strong> <strong>crops</strong> are grown usually as an understorey <strong>with</strong><br />

arable or vegetable <strong>crops</strong>. Many <strong>of</strong> the principles applied to mono<strong>crops</strong> will still be<br />

valid, but there may be other direct benefits from the ‘physical’ presence <strong>of</strong> foliage <strong>of</strong> the<br />

companion crop, which interferes <strong>with</strong> disease activity.<br />

2.2.1. Diseases affecting the <strong>fertility</strong>-<strong>building</strong> <strong>crops</strong> directly.<br />

Diseases <strong>of</strong> forage and grass <strong>crops</strong> have been documented (O’Rourke, 1976) and, in some<br />

circumstances, specific problems may lead to failure or impaired productivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>fertility</strong><strong>building</strong><br />

<strong>crops</strong>. However, disease resistant cultivars are <strong>of</strong>ten available and can be used to<br />

overcome problems or reduce risks <strong>of</strong> problems. Local knowledge <strong>of</strong> diseases in the <strong>crops</strong><br />

selected for <strong>fertility</strong>-<strong>building</strong> is important, as is the potential for disease spread from related<br />

crop species nearby. For example, stubble turnips are very prone to dark leaf spot<br />

(Alternaria brassicae), which is common in other forage and vegetable brassicas and oilseed<br />

rape.<br />

2.2.2. Diseases transfer from <strong>fertility</strong>-<strong>building</strong> <strong>crops</strong><br />

The legacy <strong>of</strong> disease problems left by <strong>fertility</strong>-<strong>building</strong> <strong>crops</strong> is <strong>of</strong> major concern to<br />

growers. The extent <strong>of</strong> problems will be influenced strongly by previous cropping and<br />

its legacy <strong>of</strong> the soil pathogen population on the field or farm. Thus, farms <strong>with</strong> a<br />

history <strong>of</strong> legume cropping are likely to carry high populations <strong>of</strong> pathogens affecting<br />

legumes, whilst few legume pathogens may be present where legumes have not been<br />

grown for many years. Very intensive legume cropping may leave high soil populations<br />

<strong>of</strong> fungal pathogens which will only decline slowly.<br />

Root and foot rot pathogens (e,g Fusarium spp., Pythium spp., Phoma medicaginis) are<br />

economically important in arable and vegetable cropping, <strong>with</strong> field evidence indicating that<br />

there are interactions between different legume types such as Pisum, Phaseolus and Vicia<br />

spp.. The intensity <strong>of</strong> total legume types and the intensity <strong>of</strong> total legume cropping<br />

influences disease severity (Biddle, 1984). Ideally, there should be at least a five-year<br />

interval between legume <strong>crops</strong> (Biddle, 1984). The influence <strong>of</strong> forage legume cropping on<br />

the disease risk to subsequent legume <strong>crops</strong> requires further investigation.<br />

Written by S Cuttle, M Shepherd & G Goodlass Page 28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!