05.04.2013 Views

1 - Front Cover.p65 - ProQuest

1 - Front Cover.p65 - ProQuest

1 - Front Cover.p65 - ProQuest

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Reel 8 Missouri<br />

Reel 8<br />

Missouri cont.<br />

1849<br />

0002 (Accession # 21184901). St. Louis County, Missouri. Fleming Calvert claims that the<br />

captain of the steamboat Timoleon transported Calvert’s mulatto slave Carter from St. Louis to<br />

“a Town in the State of Illinois” on 30 September 1849 without Calvert’s consent. Carter, who<br />

was worth $1,000, “hath been wholly lost and [is] of no value to said Plaintiff.” The petitioner<br />

asks for compensation for Carter’s value. Representatives for the steamboat company argued<br />

that Carter was “permitted and suffered to go at large upon the hiring of his own time or to act<br />

and deal as a free person.” Testimony in the court record furthers this line of inquiry, alleging<br />

that Carter was born free because his mother’s former owner transported her from South<br />

Carolina to Illinois where she lived from 1812 to 1818.<br />

0027 (Accession # 21184902). McDonald County, Missouri. Silvia, a woman of color, maintains<br />

that she is a free woman “held in slavery against her will” by Joel Kirby and William B. Holmes.<br />

She claims that she was “taken unlawfully” by Kirby in 1834 to “the territory ceded by France ...<br />

under the name of Louisiana.” She attests that she was neither guilty nor convicted of any crime<br />

before or during the year he detained her. Through violation of an act of Congress, she claims<br />

that “she became free & now is a free woman & entitled to Judgement of liberation.” Silvia asks<br />

for permission to sue for her freedom as a poor person.<br />

0045 (Accession # 21184903). Jefferson County, Missouri. Martha S. Huskey seeks a divorce<br />

from Silas Huskey, her husband of fifteen years. She complains that Silas sold most of his<br />

property, including two tracts of land and a slave girl, in April 1848 and “went to parts unknown<br />

in company with Elizabeth Nash,” his paramour. Before his departure, he “was very harsh and<br />

tyrannical towards complainant”; he returned the following summer, only to recommence his<br />

abusive behavior. He convinced her to relinquish her dower, lied to her about his intentions to<br />

reconcile with her, and openly cohabited with Nash. He finally deserted her permanently,<br />

leaving her on a piece of worthless land with only $3.75 and a slave named Thomas with which<br />

to support herself and five children. Noting that Thomas has since “run off,” the petitioner seeks<br />

a divorce and asks that the court order the sheriff to take charge of Thomas “and apply the hire<br />

thereof to the support of complainant & family during the pendency of this Suit.” In addition, the<br />

petitioner requests an injunction to prevent Silas from selling Thomas and “the few articles of<br />

personal property” she has left.<br />

0054 (Accession # 21184904). Jefferson County, Missouri. Amanda C. Cooly, administratrix of<br />

the estate of the late Lawson Cooley, asks the court to approve the hire of a slave in the estate.<br />

She reports that she hired out Loyd in October 1849 for a two-month period “at and for the price<br />

and sum of Twelve Dollars.” She explains that she “thought it proper to pursue this course”<br />

because the court would not convene in time to condone her plan by order.<br />

0063 (Accession # 21184905). St. Louis County, Missouri. Nelly Duty, a slave emancipated by<br />

the will of the late Milton Duty, represents that John F. Darby, administrator of said estate,<br />

illegally holds her in slavery. Citing that she is “a poor person wholly without property,” Nelly<br />

asks permission to bring her suit for freedom as a poor person. She also asks for reasonable<br />

liberty to attend court and her counsel and “that she be not removed out of the jurisdiction of the<br />

court nor subjected to any severity on account of her application for her freedom.”<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!