23 pages Pdf - 4.92Mo - Charles HAMEL - Free
23 pages Pdf - 4.92Mo - Charles HAMEL - Free
23 pages Pdf - 4.92Mo - Charles HAMEL - Free
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Copyright <strong>Charles</strong> <strong>HAMEL</strong> 20 Avril 2011 Page 2 sur <strong>23</strong><br />
Release version 1.1 June 2011<br />
Lets us state some points.<br />
*** Most often the cylindrical diagram is<br />
easy to deduce once the coloured<br />
markers are in place, that despite the<br />
aberrant clockwise move that is shown<br />
on some of the flat diagrams that on a<br />
vertical cylinder translates into the<br />
aberrant BOTTOM-LEFT to TOP-RIGHT for<br />
ODD numbered HALF-PERIODS.<br />
( to know the meaning I attached to<br />
‘aberrant’ please read page 7 and<br />
beginning of page 8 of my .pdf on Pins<br />
notation at<br />
http:/charles.hamel.free.fr/knots-andcordages/PUBLICATIONS/KnotNotatio<br />
n-V1.pdf<br />
This aberration is corrected in all but<br />
one of the cylindrical diagrams and<br />
ODD numbered Half-Periods go from<br />
BOTTOM- RIGHT to TOP LEFT.<br />
*** I also dispense with what is, in my<br />
opinion at least, a formidably inefficient<br />
way of indicating the nature of the<br />
crossings which is more hinder than<br />
help for the knot-tyer and may have<br />
some usefulness only if used with a<br />
cord laid on a printed diagram.<br />
Ashley went for ‘proprietary<br />
formulation’ alas his utterly bizarre<br />
crossing ‘cryptography” :<br />
- is cumbersome, more hinder<br />
than help for the knot tyer<br />
- is quite error prone<br />
- does not allow the immediate<br />
perception of the “PATTERN”<br />
made by the crossings.<br />
All in all “ a work not really done and<br />
certainly not to be done” ( ni fait, ni à<br />
faire as goes the French expression to<br />
qualify a somewhat less than ideal job)<br />
A parté : immediate rejection without a carefully and<br />
honest open-mind critical evaluation (as for<br />
academic works) is bad but I do wonder for sure if<br />
parroted and medullar ( automated, by-passing the<br />
brain higher structures and functions) praise and<br />
admiration without same examination is not worse.<br />
Ashley’s work is a tremendous effort, irreplaceable,<br />
but is far from lacking in sore points !<br />
We begin with a “shock” treatment<br />
using #2218 first.<br />
After that first dive in cold water we<br />
take a more reasonable learning<br />
gradient : #2216, #2222, #2217,<br />
#2219 (#1391), #2<strong>23</strong>2<br />
Readers who prefer to<br />
avoid any possibility of<br />
brain sprain will best go<br />
directly to #2216, read<br />
till they are finished with<br />
#2217 then go back to<br />
#2218 and finish with<br />
#2219 , #2<strong>23</strong>2.