06.04.2013 Views

VII. JOHN CALVIN ON THE SALVATION OF - The Works of F. N. Lee

VII. JOHN CALVIN ON THE SALVATION OF - The Works of F. N. Lee

VII. JOHN CALVIN ON THE SALVATION OF - The Works of F. N. Lee

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

other blessings <strong>of</strong> earthly life. We now, then, understand the import <strong>of</strong> this comparison:<br />

' Thou [O Jonah] wouldest spare...the gourd; and should I not spare this great city?!' "<br />

Calvin now paraphrases God' s question: "' Should not I Who am God, in Whose hand are all<br />

things, Whose prerogative and Whose constant practice it is mercifully to bear with men -<br />

should not I spare them, though they were worthy <strong>of</strong> destruction? ... Should not I spare a<br />

great city?'<br />

Explains Calvin: "<strong>The</strong> matter here is not concerning a little plant - but a large number <strong>of</strong><br />

people. And, in the last place, it is a city ' in which there are [also] a hundred and twenty<br />

thousand [infant] human beings who known not how to distinguish between their right hand<br />

and the left' ....<br />

"What He adds -- [the fact] that they could not distinguish between the right hand and the left<br />

- is to be referred, I have no doubt, to their age.... This opinion has been almost universally<br />

received.... That city, we know, was not only like some great cities many <strong>of</strong> which are at this<br />

day in Europe. But it surpassed most <strong>of</strong> the principal cities at this day....<br />

"God," concludes Calvin, "intended to show that though there was the justest reason for<br />

destroying entirely the whole city - there were yet other reasons which justified the suspension<br />

<strong>of</strong> so dreadful a vengeance. For many infants were there - who had not, by their own<br />

transgressions, deserved such a destruction!"<br />

It is true that Calvin is here speaking about the temporal destruction <strong>of</strong> Nineveh and all its<br />

inhabitants - and not at all specifically about their everlasting punishment. Yet, a fortiori, this<br />

certainly still has implications even regarding hell - <strong>of</strong> which that temporal destruction would<br />

have been but a faint preview.<br />

Calvin on the safeness <strong>of</strong> trustful sucklings and babies at Isaiah 11:8f<br />

<strong>The</strong> Prophet Isaiah (at 11:8f) seems to have been predicting that when the New Testament<br />

triumphs, ' the unweaned baby shall play at the hole <strong>of</strong> the serpent, and the weaned child shall<br />

put his hand on the den <strong>of</strong> the cockatrice. <strong>The</strong>y shall not hurt nor destroy.... For the Earth<br />

shall be full <strong>of</strong> the knowledge <strong>of</strong> the Lord, as the waters cover the sea.'<br />

Here, Calvin comments 303 "that when men [alias human beings] have been brought into a state<br />

<strong>of</strong> favour with God, and have been cleansed from their depravity by the Spirit <strong>of</strong> regeneration,<br />

they will likewise be free from every hurtful disposition.... Since animals are permitted [at<br />

the moment] to do injury even to children, this shows that the whole race <strong>of</strong> Adam has been<br />

stained with pollution from the very womb."<br />

Yet, continues Calvin, "those men whom a concealed poison led to deeds <strong>of</strong> violence, will<br />

have their disposition changed and will do no harm even to little children.... ' For the Earth<br />

shall be filled with the knowledge <strong>of</strong> the Lord...as with waters that cover the sea' .... If this<br />

fullness <strong>of</strong> knowledge take possession <strong>of</strong> our minds, it will free us from all malice!"<br />

- 93 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!