06.04.2013 Views

VII. JOHN CALVIN ON THE SALVATION OF - The Works of F. N. Lee

VII. JOHN CALVIN ON THE SALVATION OF - The Works of F. N. Lee

VII. JOHN CALVIN ON THE SALVATION OF - The Works of F. N. Lee

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

they are exempt from the wrath <strong>of</strong> God.... Christ does not summon infants as accursed to the<br />

tribunal <strong>of</strong> God, but only denounces judgment on the contumacious [post-infantile persons]<br />

who reject the teachings <strong>of</strong> the Gospel which they have heard."<br />

For argument' s sake, concludes Calvin, let us for a moment "here reason after the manner <strong>of</strong><br />

Servetus." But then, "would there not be a plausible complaint against God...that He is<br />

cruel?" For then God, though "gratuitously condoning the crimes <strong>of</strong> His [adult or mature]<br />

enemies - had [then, in that case,] not rescued from death His own most ' innocent' images" -<br />

namely human infants!<br />

Calvin condemns Castellio on the subject <strong>of</strong> infant damnation<br />

To Calvin, the imputed guilt <strong>of</strong> Adam' s original sin lies at the root <strong>of</strong> all subsequent human<br />

sins (also in and <strong>of</strong> babies and even in the unborn). Thus, babies do not become sinners only<br />

when they start to sin overtly. <strong>The</strong>y finally start to sin overtly, precisely because they are<br />

sinners stained with the guilt <strong>of</strong> Adam’s sin ever since their conception onward.<br />

Against the heretic Castellio, John Calvin proclaims: 360 "I detest this blasphemy [which denies<br />

the transmitted guilt <strong>of</strong> original sin] - wherever it is publically exposed.... You [Castellio]<br />

deny that it is lawful and right in God to condemn any mortals, unless it be on account <strong>of</strong> sin<br />

committed" by them themselves, personally.<br />

Castellio had apparently alleged that Calvin had a warped view <strong>of</strong> God. To John Calvin,<br />

insisted Castellio, it must necessarily be that God ' casts innocent babes just taken from the<br />

wombs <strong>of</strong> their mothers under guilt <strong>of</strong> original death.'<br />

"Well now!" retorted John Calvin. "Numberless mortals are taken out <strong>of</strong> life - while yet<br />

perfect infants. You [Castellio] had better then commence your virulent war against God<br />

Himself, Who [supposedly] ' casts innocent babes just taken from the wombs <strong>of</strong> their mothers<br />

under the guilt <strong>of</strong> original death.' "<br />

Continued John Calvin to Castellio: "<strong>The</strong>n spit out your gall against a [false] god who is<br />

supposed to rip innocent babes from their mothers' breasts and cast them into everlasting<br />

death! He who does not detest such blasphemy - may curse me as much as he likes!" 361<br />

Also the Synod <strong>of</strong> Dordt would later uphold Calvin against Castellio<br />

Significantly, some fifty years after Calvin, also the Dutch Arminians would attempt to<br />

misuse quotations from that great Reformer - against the Dutch Calvinists. But the<br />

Calvinistic Synod <strong>of</strong> Dordt - as we shall later show (see at our notes 377-380 below) - would<br />

then thoroughly refute that Arminian falsification <strong>of</strong> Calvin' s own views.<br />

In point <strong>of</strong> fact - as Calvin himself clearly taught elsewhere - such outcast infants are first<br />

born again (prior to their pre-baptismal early deaths). Consequently, Castellio would be<br />

quite wrong to assume that such infants had not priorly been imputed with Adam' s guilt.<br />

- 121 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!