06.04.2013 Views

Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Mechanics: Foundations and ...

Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Mechanics: Foundations and ...

Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Mechanics: Foundations and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

F<strong>in</strong>ally, let us see what happens if we sumover the f g at xed fng. Each occupied<br />

bond hiji imposes a constra<strong>in</strong>t that the sp<strong>in</strong>s i <strong>and</strong> j mustbe<strong>in</strong>the same state,<br />

but otherwise the sp<strong>in</strong>s are unconstra<strong>in</strong>ed. We therefore group the sites <strong>in</strong>to connected<br />

clusters (two sites are <strong>in</strong> the same cluster if they can be jo<strong>in</strong>ed by apath of occupied<br />

bonds) then all the sp<strong>in</strong>s with<strong>in</strong> a cluster mustbe<strong>in</strong>the samestate (all q values are<br />

equally probable), <strong>and</strong> dist<strong>in</strong>ct clusters are <strong>in</strong>dependent. It follows that<br />

Z = X<br />

fng<br />

0<br />

@ Y<br />

hiji: nij=1<br />

pij<br />

1 0<br />

A @ Y<br />

hiji: nij=0<br />

1<br />

(1 ; pij) A q C(n) (6.7)<br />

where C(n) isthe number of connected clusters (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g one-siteclusters) <strong>in</strong> the graph<br />

whose edges are the bonds hav<strong>in</strong>g nij =1. The correspond<strong>in</strong>g probability distribution,<br />

RC(n) = Z ;1<br />

0<br />

@ Y<br />

hiji: nij=1<br />

pij<br />

1 0<br />

A @ Y<br />

hiji: nij=0<br />

1<br />

(1 ; pij) A q C(n) (6.8)<br />

is called the r<strong>and</strong>om-cluster model with parameter q. This is a generalized bondpercolation<br />

model, with non-local correlations com<strong>in</strong>g fromthe factor q C(n) forq =1<br />

it reduces to ord<strong>in</strong>ary bond percolation. Note, by the way, that <strong>in</strong>the r<strong>and</strong>om-cluster<br />

model (unlike the Potts <strong>and</strong>FKSWmodels), q is merely a parameter it can take any<br />

positiverealvalue, not just 2 3:::.Sother<strong>and</strong>om-cluster model de nes, <strong>in</strong> some sense,<br />

an analytic cont<strong>in</strong>uation of the Potts model to non-<strong>in</strong>teger q ord<strong>in</strong>ary bond percolation<br />

corresponds to the \one-state Potts model".<br />

We have already veri ed the follow<strong>in</strong>g factsabout the FKSWmodel:<br />

a) ZP otts = ZFKSW = ZRC.<br />

b) The marg<strong>in</strong>al distribution of FKSW on the Potts variables f g (<strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g out<br />

the fng) is precisely the Potts model Potts( ).<br />

c) The marg<strong>in</strong>al distribution of FKSW on the bondoccupation variables fng (<strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

outthe f g) is precisely the r<strong>and</strong>om-cluster model RC(n).<br />

The conditional distributions of FKSW are also simple:<br />

d) The conditional distribution of the fng given the f g is as follows: <strong>in</strong>dependently<br />

for each bond hiji, onesets nij = 0 <strong>in</strong> case i 6= j, <strong>and</strong>sets nij =0 1with<br />

probability 1; pijpij, respectively,<strong>in</strong>case i = j.<br />

e) The conditional distribution of the f g given the fng is as follows: <strong>in</strong>dependently<br />

for each connected cluster, one sets all the sp<strong>in</strong>s i <strong>in</strong> the cluster to thesamevalue,<br />

chosen equiprobably from f1 2:::qg.<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!