The Effects of Distance Education on K-12 Student Outcomes: A ...
The Effects of Distance Education on K-12 Student Outcomes: A ...
The Effects of Distance Education on K-12 Student Outcomes: A ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Effects</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Distance</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Educati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> K-<strong>12</strong> <strong>Student</strong> <strong>Outcomes</strong>: A Meta-Analysis<br />
Beginning in the 1930s, radio was used simultaneously to bring courses to school students and to<br />
help teachers learn progressive Deweyan methods <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> teaching (Bianchi 2002), in what might<br />
have been am<strong>on</strong>g the earliest pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al development school models. From that point <strong>on</strong>,<br />
televisi<strong>on</strong>, audio and videoc<strong>on</strong>ferencing, the Internet, and other technologies have been adapted<br />
for the needs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> young learners.<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Distance</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Educati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> in the K-<strong>12</strong> C<strong>on</strong>text<br />
Am<strong>on</strong>g the benefits <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> distance educati<strong>on</strong> for school-age children are increases in enrollment or<br />
time in school as educati<strong>on</strong> programs reach underserved regi<strong>on</strong>s, broader educati<strong>on</strong>al opportunity<br />
for students who are unable to attend traditi<strong>on</strong>al schools, access to resources and instructors not<br />
locally available, and increases in student-teacher communicati<strong>on</strong>. <strong>Student</strong>s in virtual schools<br />
showed greater improvement that their c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al school counterparts in critical thinking,<br />
researching, using computers, learning independently, problem-solving, creative thinking,<br />
decisi<strong>on</strong>-making, and time management (Barker & Wendel 2001). Academic advantages over<br />
traditi<strong>on</strong>al classroom instructi<strong>on</strong> were dem<strong>on</strong>strated by students in Mexico’s Telesecundaria<br />
program, who were “substantially more likely than other groups to pass a final 9 th grade<br />
examinati<strong>on</strong>” administered by the state (Calder<strong>on</strong>i, 1998, p. 6); by students taking a chemistry by<br />
satellite course (Dees 1994); and by students learning reading and math via interactive radio<br />
instructi<strong>on</strong> (Yasin & Luberisse 1998).<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Distance</str<strong>on</strong>g> educati<strong>on</strong> is not the most effective choice in all situati<strong>on</strong>s. <strong>Student</strong>s may feel isolated,<br />
parents may have c<strong>on</strong>cerns about children’s social development, students with language<br />
difficulties may experience a disadvantage in a text-heavy <strong>on</strong>line envir<strong>on</strong>ment, and subjects<br />
requiring physical dem<strong>on</strong>strati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> skill such as music, physical educati<strong>on</strong>, or foreign language<br />
may not be practical in a technology-mediated setting. For example, B<strong>on</strong>d (2002) found that<br />
distance between tutor and learner in an <strong>on</strong>line instrumental music program has negative effects<br />
<strong>on</strong> performance quality, student engagement, and development and refinement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> skills and<br />
knowledge. While distance learning was viewed as beneficial for providing the opportunity for<br />
elementary school students to learn a foreign language, C<strong>on</strong>zemius and Sandrock (2003) report<br />
that “the optimal learning situati<strong>on</strong> still involves the physical presence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a teacher” (p. 47).<br />
Virtual school students show less improvement than those in c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al schools in listening<br />
and speaking skills (Barker & Wendel 2001). Highly technical subjects have also proven to be<br />
difficult to teach well <strong>on</strong>line. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Alberta Online C<strong>on</strong>sortium evaluated student performance <strong>on</strong><br />
end-<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>-year exams am<strong>on</strong>g virtual school students across the province, and found that virtual<br />
school student scores in mathematics at grades 3, 6, 9, and <strong>12</strong>, and the sciences at grades 6 and 9<br />
lagged significantly behind scores <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> n<strong>on</strong>-virtual school students (Schollie 2001).<br />
Given instructi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> equal quality, groups <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> students learning <strong>on</strong>line generally achieve at levels<br />
equal to their peers in classrooms (Kearsley 2000). Equality between the delivery systems has<br />
been well documented over decades for adult learners, and while much less research exists<br />
focusing <strong>on</strong> K-<strong>12</strong> learners, the results tend to agree. “Evidence to date c<strong>on</strong>vincingly<br />
dem<strong>on</strong>strates that , when used appropriately, electr<strong>on</strong>ically delivered educati<strong>on</strong>—‘e-learning’—<br />
3 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 32