Reading in the Elementary Classroom Chapter Two: Passage ...
Reading in the Elementary Classroom Chapter Two: Passage ...
Reading in the Elementary Classroom Chapter Two: Passage ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
F = facilitate<br />
A = activate<br />
D = dialogue<br />
S = strategies<br />
Facilitate (a special thanks to Marie Hseu, M.A. <strong>in</strong> progress, and Michelle Jackson, M.A., for additions to this section)<br />
The “F” of <strong>the</strong> FADS approach stands for “facilitate.” Facilitate students read<strong>in</strong>g a lot.<br />
The more students read, <strong>the</strong> better readers <strong>the</strong>y become (Krashen, 1996). Much literature<br />
exists suggest<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> time students spend <strong>in</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g or read<strong>in</strong>g activities greatly impacts<br />
read<strong>in</strong>g comprehension and academic success (Applebee, 1998; Foertsch, 1992; McEady-<br />
Gillead, 1989; Meyer, 1992).<br />
Brekke (1987) conducted a study of students <strong>in</strong> different regions of <strong>the</strong> country that<br />
compared <strong>the</strong> amount of time spent read<strong>in</strong>g at different grade levels <strong>in</strong> 1961 with <strong>the</strong> amount<br />
of time spent read<strong>in</strong>g at those same grade levels <strong>in</strong> 1985. Brekke found an average <strong>in</strong>crease<br />
of 31 m<strong>in</strong>utes per week allotted for formal, basal read<strong>in</strong>g; and an average of 32 m<strong>in</strong>utes per<br />
week allotted for o<strong>the</strong>r read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1985 as compared to 1961. Indeed, it appeared that<br />
elementary schools were do<strong>in</strong>g more content and free read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1985 than <strong>in</strong> 1961. This<br />
emphasis may reflect, <strong>in</strong> part, overall <strong>in</strong>creased national attention to read<strong>in</strong>g competency and<br />
literacy over time which has carried <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> new century with literacy leadership at national<br />
and state levels. As Brekke observed, “If more time devoted to read<strong>in</strong>g may be assumed to<br />
have a bear<strong>in</strong>g on how well students read, <strong>the</strong> changes which have occurred may start to be<br />
reflected soon <strong>in</strong> improved read<strong>in</strong>g achievement” (p. 3).<br />
A study by Foertsch (1992) supported Brekke’s suggestion that <strong>the</strong> amount of time<br />
spent <strong>in</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g was related to student read<strong>in</strong>g achievement. Foertsch focused on <strong>the</strong><br />
results of <strong>the</strong> NAEP to determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> factors that <strong>in</strong>fluenced <strong>the</strong> literacy achievements of<br />
American students <strong>in</strong> grades 4, 8, and 12 <strong>in</strong> 1988 and 1990. The study measured <strong>the</strong><br />
students’ average read<strong>in</strong>g performance on a scale of 0 to 500 and allowed for direct<br />
comparison across <strong>the</strong> grades and among <strong>the</strong> subgroups. The amount of read<strong>in</strong>g students<br />
did <strong>in</strong> and out of <strong>the</strong> classroom was positively correlated with <strong>the</strong> students’ achievement.<br />
© June Hetzel, Ph.D., 2000 <strong>Chapter</strong> <strong>Two</strong>: <strong>Passage</strong> Comprehension 13