07.04.2013 Views

FASTI ROMANI ROME AND CONSTANTINOPLE

FASTI ROMANI ROME AND CONSTANTINOPLE

FASTI ROMANI ROME AND CONSTANTINOPLE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

798 <strong>FASTI</strong><br />

atque anxientate discessimus. Nam cum ad beati Petri<br />

basilicam in Ormisda fundutam Augusto mense nuper præterito<br />

[conf.a.551] fugissemus, nullum latere confidimus quia, cum in<br />

eadem ecclesia a comitatu prætoris cum multitudine armatorum<br />

militum veniente-traheremur, tenuimus, et siper nos etiam ipsa<br />

altaris mensa ceciderat nisi clericorum nostrum fuisset manibus<br />

sustentata.-p.1311 A Dum<br />

A.D. 1 CONSULS 2 EVENTS<br />

Chosroes after the return of Isdegunas from CP. (conf.a.551) send reinforcements to<br />

Mermeroes in Colchis: Procop. Goth.IV.17 p.614 A. Mermeroes in this campaign<br />

effects nothing: p.614 CD.<br />

Death of Menas: Malal. XVIII p.230 in August of the 15 th indiction the patriarch of<br />

CP Menas passes way and Eutyxhius became patriarch. Aug.552. Theophanes p.193<br />

A B agrees in the year: Justiniani at the Justinian 25 th year, in September of the 15 th<br />

indiction [Sept. A.D.551] inauguration (founding) etc. [conf. Malal. XVIII p.230]-at<br />

that year –Menas passed away and Eutuchius replaced him-at that day. Niceph.<br />

P.414 C Anthimus- 3 months. He was deposed by the synod convened by Menas the<br />

presbyter against Severus-16 years and 6 months. Menas presided from march 13<br />

A.D. 536 to Aug. 552 16 y 5 m . Theophanes p.193 C remarks it must be included the<br />

year of Anthimus into patriarch Menas (time) to complete 16 years. This was<br />

necessary to Theophanes because he had placed Anthimus and Menas below their real<br />

time: conf.a.536.4. Evagrius IV.36 mistakes the order of succession: when Antimus<br />

was deposed (ejected) Epiphanius succeeds as a bishop. After Epiphanius Menas<br />

(succeeds). He has the same error at IV.II. Conf. Valesium ad IV.11 p.104 BC.<br />

Evagrius IV.37 rightly proceeds after Menas Eutuchius.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!