POST MASTER GENERAL & ORS. V. MR. MAC-CAJETAN AGBASI
POST MASTER GENERAL & ORS. V. MR. MAC-CAJETAN AGBASI
POST MASTER GENERAL & ORS. V. MR. MAC-CAJETAN AGBASI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
leave to amend grounds 1,2,3, 4, 6 and 7 of the<br />
original grounds filed on 28/10/2002 along with the<br />
notice of appeal.<br />
It is instructive that both parties have filed and<br />
exchanged the brief of argument thereof. The<br />
Appellants brief dated t0/0212005 and filed on the<br />
same date hers raised a total of six issues for<br />
determination, to wit:<br />
1. Whether the failure of the learned trial judge to<br />
consider and pronounce upon exhibit I containing<br />
the terms and conditions of the contract occasioned<br />
a miscarriage of justice.<br />
2. Whether the learned trial judge properly<br />
evaluated the evidence before him and was right<br />
in the conclusion reached thereby.<br />
3. Whether the learned trial judge rightly placed<br />
the onus on the defendants to prove that they<br />
delivered the parcel to the addressee,<br />
4. Whether the judgment of the trial court which is<br />
based on the provisions of the Nigerian postal<br />
service Department Act CAP 322, which was no<br />
longer in force at the time of 5 commencement of<br />
the action and judgment is valid.<br />
5. Whether the learned trial judge was right when<br />
he failed to apply well known principles of law to<br />
the proved and accepted facts.<br />
6. Whether in the circumstances of this case, the<br />
trial which was conducted in the absence of the<br />
defendants when there was no proof of service of<br />
hearing notice as ordered was proper and can be<br />
allowed to stand.<br />
On the part thereof the Respondent filed his brief<br />
14