POST MASTER GENERAL & ORS. V. MR. MAC-CAJETAN AGBASI
POST MASTER GENERAL & ORS. V. MR. MAC-CAJETAN AGBASI
POST MASTER GENERAL & ORS. V. MR. MAC-CAJETAN AGBASI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Trial before court 2."<br />
On that date the case came up before P.F.<br />
Olayiwola, J, in the absence of the appellants. The<br />
new Trial judge adjourned the matter to 29/4/99<br />
and ordered that fresh hearing notice be served on<br />
the appellants. Then after several adjournments<br />
the trial judge P.F. Olayiwola, J. ordered on<br />
27/7/99 thus:<br />
Court: Having listened to Mr. Okoli-Akirika counsel<br />
in support of this motion I am of the opinion that<br />
the plaintiff should be granted leave to prove his<br />
case before this honourable court. The Plaintiff is<br />
therefore hereby granted leave to lead evidence<br />
and prove his claim before this honourable court.<br />
This case is therefore adjourned to 24th September<br />
1999 for hearing.<br />
On that day, the Trial court proceeded to hear the<br />
evidence of the respondence in the absence of the<br />
Appellants and their counsel. There is nothing on<br />
the face of the Trial court's record at pages 48-50<br />
to show that the Appellants were served with the<br />
hearing notice against the 24/9/99. from that date,<br />
the case was adjourned to 08/10/99 fro<br />
respondents counsel address and thereafter to<br />
30/11/99 for judgment.<br />
It was submitted by the Appellants' counsel that<br />
proceeding to taking evidence and delivering<br />
judgment by the trial judge in the absence of the<br />
appellants with out satisfying himself that they<br />
were duly served with hearing notice as ordered on<br />
13/04/99, is a clear violation of their right to fair<br />
hearing.<br />
18