10.04.2013 Views

Pharmacology and therapeutics, clinical trial - Dermage

Pharmacology and therapeutics, clinical trial - Dermage

Pharmacology and therapeutics, clinical trial - Dermage

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Haddad et al. Skin whitening complex <strong>and</strong> hydroquinone in melasma treatment<br />

Table 1 (a) Evaluation of correlation<br />

level between the observers’ opinions;<br />

(b) Concordance level between the 2<br />

observers by kappea method<br />

Table 2 Evaluation of improvement<br />

obtained with each active agent (no<br />

significant statistical differences)<br />

(a) Observer 1 vs. observer 2<br />

(b) Symmetric measures<br />

The two groups were evaluated separately. Group 1 (HQ<br />

vs. placebo) presented an improvement of 76.9% <strong>and</strong> group<br />

2 (SWC vs. placebo) showed an improvement of 66.7%;<br />

however, according to Fisher’s test, this difference was not<br />

statistically significant (P = 0.673) (Table 2).<br />

The incidence of side-effects was greater among the patients<br />

in group 1, with 25% of patients reporting an itchy eruption,<br />

although this finding was not statistically significant in relation<br />

to group 2, in which there were no complaints of side-effects.<br />

There was a similarity between the two groups in terms<br />

of compliance to treatment (88% of the patients followed<br />

the treatment correctly) <strong>and</strong> satisfaction with treatment (84%<br />

classified the treatment as excellent or good <strong>and</strong> 16% as<br />

poor).<br />

<strong>Pharmacology</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>therapeutics</strong>, <strong>clinical</strong> <strong>trial</strong><br />

The patients’ satisfaction levels with treatment were 66.7%<br />

<strong>and</strong> 69.2%, respectively, in groups 1 <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

When questioned about intolerance to the sunscreen, none<br />

of the patients (0%) complained.<br />

Discussion<br />

Observer 2<br />

Both Right Left Ind Total<br />

Observer 1 Both Count 1 1<br />

% of total<br />

4.0%<br />

4.0%<br />

Right Count 1<br />

10<br />

4 15<br />

% of total 4.0%<br />

40.0%<br />

16.0% 60.0%<br />

Left Count 6 1 7<br />

% of total 24.0% 4.0% 28.0%<br />

Ind Count 2 2<br />

% of total 8.0% 8.0%<br />

Respectively Count<br />

% of total<br />

1<br />

4.0%<br />

11<br />

44.0%<br />

6<br />

24.0%<br />

7<br />

28.0%<br />

25<br />

100.0%<br />

Value Asymp. std. error* Approx. T† Approx. significance<br />

Measure of agreement kappa 0.566 0.126 4.509 0.000<br />

N of valid cases 25<br />

*Not assuming the null hypothesis.<br />

†Using the asymptotic st<strong>and</strong>ard error assuming the null hypothesis.<br />

No improvement Improvement Total<br />

Group 1<br />

Hydroquinone Count 3 10 13<br />

% within group 23.1% 76.9% 100.0%<br />

Group 2<br />

Skin whitening complex Count 4 8 12<br />

% within group 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%<br />

Total Count 7 18 25<br />

% within group 28.0% 72.0% 100.0%<br />

P = 0.673 (Fisher’s exact test).<br />

LR = 1.154 (0.701–1.900), not significant.<br />

Due to its refractory <strong>and</strong> recurrent nature, melasma is difficult<br />

to treat. This is confirmed by the enormous variety of options<br />

for treatment, which range from the isolated use of retinoic acid,<br />

3<br />

with a 68% improvement within 24 weeks, through com-<br />

4<br />

binations of the Kligman triad with 75% improvement,<br />

<strong>and</strong> including unsuccessful attempts with lasers, such as the<br />

5<br />

Q-switched ruby equipment. In this context, the improvement<br />

© 2003 The International Society of Dermatology International Journal of Dermatology 2003, 42,<br />

153–156<br />

155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!