10.04.2013 Views

6 - California State Assembly Chief Clerk - legislative Document ...

6 - California State Assembly Chief Clerk - legislative Document ...

6 - California State Assembly Chief Clerk - legislative Document ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8128<br />

ASSEMBLY JOURNAL Oct. 1, 2004<br />

Veto Message—<strong>Assembly</strong> Bill No. 2849<br />

Governor’s Office, Sacramento<br />

September 10, 2004<br />

To the Members of the <strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Assembly</strong>:<br />

I am returning <strong>Assembly</strong> Bill 2849 without my signature.<br />

I find no compelling reason for increasing the membership of the<br />

<strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong> University Board of Trustees specifically to appoint a<br />

non-faculty union employee. Under current law, the Governor is<br />

authorized to appoint 16 at-large members to the Board, one of whom<br />

may be a non-faculty employee. Therefore, this bill is unnecessary.<br />

For these reasons, I am unable to sign this bill.<br />

Sincerely,<br />

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER<br />

Veto Message—<strong>Assembly</strong> Bill No. 1846<br />

Governor’s Office, Sacramento<br />

September 10, 2004<br />

To the Members of the <strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Assembly</strong>:<br />

I am returning <strong>Assembly</strong> Bill 1846 without my signature.<br />

This bill would only create more confusion of governance in the<br />

existing education system, if the Office of the Superintendent of Public<br />

Instruction (SPI) is the authority for provisions related to the No Child<br />

Left Behind (NCLB) Act and the <strong>State</strong> Board of Education (SBE) is the<br />

authority for all other federal programs. In addition, this bill would<br />

undermine the authority of the SBE.<br />

Moreover, <strong>California</strong> has already submitted applications for various<br />

programs and received funding under the NCLB Act. This bill may<br />

force <strong>California</strong> to revise and resubmit current applications in order to<br />

meet the provisions of this bill, potentially jeopardizing receipt of<br />

federal funding.<br />

This shift in authority proposed by the bill would also limit statewide<br />

public input. Although the SPI is an elected official, I believe it is<br />

important for education stakeholders—parents, students, teachers,<br />

administrators, and community members—to have an official venue for<br />

public testimony. The SBE holds public hearings on various K–12<br />

education issues throughout the state for issues to be appropriately<br />

heard and considered.<br />

For these reasons, I am unable to support this bill.<br />

Sincerely,<br />

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER<br />

Veto Message—<strong>Assembly</strong> Bill No. 2373<br />

Governor’s Office, Sacramento<br />

September 10, 2004<br />

To the Members of the <strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Assembly</strong>:<br />

I am returning <strong>Assembly</strong> Bill No. 2373 without my signature.<br />

The Quality Education Commission (QEC) is charged with<br />

evaluating education financing models for the state to consider. It is<br />

inappropriate to bias the deliberations of the QEC, by directing it to<br />

consider specific approaches and proposals.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!