10.04.2013 Views

Callan Park 'your plan'

Callan Park 'your plan'

Callan Park 'your plan'

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

[<br />

r,<br />

r.<br />

r1.:..-...;., CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN - APPENDICES<br />

_<br />

r.<br />

[<br />

[<br />

(<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

C<br />

APPENDIX A: HERITAGE REPORT<br />

APPENDIX B: TRAFFIC REPORT<br />

APPENDIX C: SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT<br />

APPENDIX D: ESD ASSESSMENT<br />

APPENDIX E: CONTAMINATION REPORT<br />

APPENDIX F: BUILDING AREA AUDIT<br />

APPENDIX G: COPIES OF RELEVANT LEGISLATION<br />

APPENDIX H: MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING<br />

APPENDIX I: COMMUNITY REFERENCE PANEL<br />

MEETING MINUTES<br />

.....J<br />

.....J<br />

W<br />

(J)<br />

(J)<br />

«<br />

I


[<br />

r L<br />

c r<br />

L<br />

C<br />

[<br />

D<br />

C<br />

[<br />

[<br />

C<br />

[<br />

C<br />

o<br />

C<br />

C<br />

[<br />

C<br />

C<br />

[


CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN· APPENDICES<br />

APPENDIX A: HERITAGE REPORT<br />

.....J<br />

.....J<br />

W<br />

en<br />

en<br />

« I


[<br />

[<br />

c [<br />

[<br />

[<br />

o o<br />

[<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c oc<br />

c<br />

c<br />

[<br />

c<br />

[


c<br />

c<br />

o<br />

c<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o oo<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

c<br />

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />

HERITAGE ASSESSMENT<br />

<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> (aka Rozelle Hospital) is a site of exceptional cultural and natural heritage significance.<br />

It contains the remains of three highly significant phases of historical development: Three<br />

Gentlemen's Estates from the eariy 1800s were located on the site, as was the largest purpose built<br />

asylum in New South Wales, <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, and the later Broughton Hall Clinic where self admission<br />

mental health treatment was pioneered. The site has remained an institution for mental health care<br />

for over 150 years, and has been the location of the care of returned service men since World War I.<br />

The architecturai and aesthetic qualities of the buildings and landscape setting are of exceptional<br />

significance. The diversity of buildings includes not only important architectural items, but also<br />

material evidence of changing philosophies of patient care. <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is highly significant as a<br />

resource for understanding the historical development of mental health care in Australia.<br />

This Heritage Assessment, prepared by Tanner Architects as part of the Land Use Planning process<br />

and with reference to the endorsed Rozelle Hospital Conservation Management Plan 2002 (CMP),<br />

includes the following components:<br />

Articulation of the cultural heritage parameters, development opportunities and constraints for<br />

the site as set out in the endorsed Conservation Management Plan;<br />

Exploration of the apparent conflicts between the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Act and the CMP; and<br />

Assessment of the heritage impacts of the Draft Land Use Plan on the cultural and natural<br />

significance of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />

The proposed Land Use Plan has been reviewed in light of the Conservation Policy within the<br />

endorsed CMP. The Draft Land Use Plan generally respects the cultural significance of the site as a<br />

whole and the significant elements within it. It will be critical in the implementation of the Master Plan<br />

that:<br />

the detailed planning and design of new buildings, in particular across the Central Slope,<br />

respects the significant landscape setting and views of the site and allows for a reasonable<br />

curtilage to the Kirkbride Block and the Broughton Hall Group;<br />

adequate resources are available for the immediate conservation and future maintenance of<br />

all the buildings and landscapes of the site; and<br />

the whole site is under a management structure which understands and respects the<br />

significance of the whole site.<br />

Additional work with respect to the heritage considerations of the site will be required prior to the<br />

preparation of the Development Application for the Master Plan for submission to Leichhardt Council<br />

and the Heritage Council of NSW:<br />

1. Amend the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Act 2002 to allow for:<br />

removal and non-replacement of "non-contributory" buildings; and<br />

- the increase in the total floor area on the site in accordance with the endorsed CMP and<br />

the Draft Land Use Plan.<br />

2. Review and revise the Conservation Policy section of the endorsed Rozelle Hospital<br />

Conservation Management Plan 2002 to include the specific requirements of the NSW<br />

Government, Leichhardt Council and The University of Sydney, for re-endorsement by the<br />

Heritage Council of NSW;<br />

3. Review and revise the CMP Adaptability Study to address the specific needs of the University<br />

of Sydney and the various NGOs who will occupy the significant buildings to ensure that the<br />

CMP principles for the adaptive re-use of the buildings and site are met for each building;<br />

4. Prepare a condition audit of the buildings and landscapes of exceptional, high and moderate<br />

significance and complete a schedule of essential repairs and maintenance of these elements<br />

for accurate pricing and future allocation of resources; and<br />

TANNER ARCHITECTS<br />

iSSUE D - 27 NOVEMBER 2007<br />

F:\pro\arc\76\7615\lransfer\1 03·dient\outlFinal for SHFA WebsIte 29'11'07\Appendix'IAppendixA1- Heritage Assessmenl.doc<br />

PAGE 1


5.<br />

CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />

HERITAGE ASSESSMENT<br />

Prepare a model for the Management of the whole <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> site in order to prevent ad hoc<br />

intervention of individual buildings and to establish a maintenance program for all the buildings<br />

and landscapes across the site.<br />

TANNER ARCHITECTS ISSUE D - 27 NOVEMBER 2007<br />

F:\pro\arc\76\7615\lransfer\1 03-client\out\Fina! for SHFA Website 29'11 '07\Appendix\Appendix A1- Heritage Assessmenl.doc<br />

PAGE 2<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

o<br />

c<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

c<br />

[<br />

[


c<br />

c<br />

o c<br />

c<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

D<br />

o<br />

o<br />

D<br />

D<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

c<br />

2 INTRODUCTION<br />

CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />

HERITAGE ASSESSMENT<br />

<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> (aka Rozelle Hospital) is a site of exceptional cultural and natural heritage significance.<br />

It contains the remains of three highly significant phases of historical development: Three<br />

Gentlemen's Estates from the early 1800s were located on the site, as was the largest purpose built<br />

asylum in New South Wales, <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, and the iater Broughton Hall Clinic where seif admission<br />

mental health treatment was pioneered. The site has remained an institution for mental health care<br />

for over 150 years, and has been the location of the care of returned service men since World War I.<br />

The architectural and aesthetic qualities of the buildings and landscape setting are of exceptional<br />

significance. The diversity of buildings includes not only important architectural items, but also<br />

material evidence of changing philosophies of patient care. <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is highly significant as a<br />

resource for understanding the historical development of mental health care in Australia.<br />

The <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> site is currently occupied by a group of users, including the Department of Health<br />

who operate the Broughton Hall Clinic from the site. The Kirkbride Block has been extensively<br />

conserved and adaptively reused by the University of Sydney for the College of the Arts. The 1870s<br />

estate house, Garry Owen, has been extensively conserved and is occupied by the Writers Centre.<br />

The Department of Health plans to relocate its activities to another Hospital site, thus vacating the<br />

Broughton Hall group and associated buildings.<br />

The Rozelle Hospital Conservation Management Plan dated 2002 was endorsed by the Heritage<br />

Council of NSW in March 2002.<br />

In 2002 in response to vigorous debate on the future of the site the NSW Government passed the<br />

<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> (Special Provisions) Act to protect <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> as an open space and heritage resource.<br />

The <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> (Special PrOVisions) Act 2002 establishes the range of permissible uses that may be<br />

carried out at <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and confirms State Environmental Planning Policy 56 as the relevant<br />

planning instrument with the Minister for Planning, being the consent authority for any master plan<br />

and Leichhardt Council as the development consent authority.<br />

With the transfer of mental health facilities to Concord, <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> wili lose the activity and tenure of<br />

its primary user. The site and its assets could then become vulnerable to deterioration. Accordingly<br />

the NSW Government has sought to identify an alternative primary user.<br />

On 28 June 2007 a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was entered into by the<br />

Minister for Planning, the University of Sydney and Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority. The MOU<br />

identifies <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> as a State asset of community and heritage significance.<br />

The MOU acknowledges the current presence of the University of Sydney on the site through its<br />

lease of the Kirkbride Block for its College for the Arts. The MOU seeks to explore opportunities to<br />

grant a 99 year lease to the University of Sydney to develop a coherent campus environment at<br />

nominal rent and for use for higher education purposes.<br />

A Land Use Plan for <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is being prepared in accordance with the provisions of the MOU.<br />

This Heritage Assessment is integral to the preparation of the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan.<br />

Tanner Architects, the authors of the 2002 Conservation Management Plan, have been engaged as<br />

part of the Master Plan Team to provide advice regarding the conservation of the heritage<br />

significance <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, induding:<br />

• Providing a clear articulation of the cultural heritage values of the site in order that they may be<br />

understood, protected and enhanced as an integral component of the Master Plan; and<br />

• Working with the team to develop a Master Plan for the development of the site including the<br />

provision of new buildings to cater for the University's growth whilst respecting the existing<br />

cultural heritage and historic site planning.<br />

This Heritage Assessment includes the following components:<br />

1. Articulation of the cultural heritage parameters, development opportunities and constraints for<br />

the site as set out in the endorsed Conservation Management Plan (CMP);<br />

2. Exploration of the apparent conflicts between the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Act and the CMP, in relation to:<br />

TANNER ARCHITECTS<br />

ISSUE D - 27 NOVEMBER 2007<br />

F:\pro\arc\76\7615\lransfer\1 03·


3.<br />

CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />

HERITAGE ASSESSMENT<br />

the replacement of buildings and the maximising of floor area within the heritage<br />

context; and<br />

the implications of the cultural heritage parameters, development opportunities and<br />

constraints.<br />

Assess the heritage impacts of the Draft Land Use Plan on the cultural and natural<br />

significance of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />

TANNER ARCHITECTS ISSUE D - 27 NOVEMBER 2007 PAGE 4<br />

F:\pro\arc\76\7615\transfer\1O:klienl\out\Final for SHFA Website 29'11 '07\Appendix\Appendix A1- Heritage Assessment.doc<br />

[<br />

c<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

o<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

C<br />

D<br />

D<br />

[


c<br />

o<br />

o<br />

c<br />

c<br />

o<br />

D<br />

o o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

c TANNER<br />

CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />

HERITAGE ASSESSMENT<br />

3 THE ROZELLE HOSPITAL CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 2002<br />

2.1 Summary Statement of Significance for the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Site<br />

(Extract from the Rozelle Hospital Conservation Management Plan 2002, Section 4)<br />

The Rozelle Hospital site, created as one unit in 1976, comprises two major mental health facilities,<br />

each of which was developed utilising an existing mansion house set within expansive landscaping.<br />

As a whole, and as two component parts, Rozelle Hospital can demonstrate it has heritage<br />

significance to the people of New South Wales:<br />

The Rozelle Hospital site contains the fabric of two grand Victorian gentlemen's estates, and is able<br />

to demonstrate the pastoral character of this period. The original relationship between Garry Owen<br />

House (later <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>) and Broughton Hall has been retained and their grounds are still<br />

interpretable and intact. These grounds became the sites of the mental health institutions that<br />

adopted their respective names.<br />

Rozelle Hospital demonstrates two major changes in mental health care in NSW. It contains original<br />

architecture and landscaping of both hospitals. The buildings associated with the former <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />

mental hospitai are of exceptional significance, in particular the Kirkbride Block:<br />

The Kirkbride complex has a unique place in the history ofmental hospitals in New South Wales.<br />

It is the only mental hospital which fully represented the ideal and classic 'moral therapy' style of<br />

institution. In the twentieth century it became one ofthe major examples ofthe modern custodial<br />

institutions. Although now seen as inappropriate for a modern mental health care system, it<br />

stands as a significant reminder, undoubtedly the most significant in New South Wales, oftwo<br />

major developments in the history ofmental health care.<br />

Assessment in Conservation Plan for the Kirkbride Block <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> (State Projects, NSW Public Works,<br />

May 1993, Volume 2: 102.)<br />

The Broughton Hall Psychiatric Clinic, also unique in the history of mental health care in NSW, is still<br />

in operation. While most of its facilities are outdated for contemporary patient care its fabric reflects<br />

the institution's pioneering methods in voluntary patient care. The Clinic's buildings, while not all of<br />

high significance are consistent in character and material, and are grouped around a unique inter war<br />

garden of outstanding aesthetic quality. The garden's links with the earlier Keep period and use in<br />

patient care make it a landscape of exceptional significance.<br />

Its landscaped spaces and landmark buildings have contributed visually and socially to the local area<br />

for over 100 years. The foreshore areas of the site are significant as rare open space elements.<br />

<strong>Callan</strong> Point is considered to be the most important Aboriginal archaeological site remaining on the<br />

southern shores of Sydney Harbour. <strong>Callan</strong> Point also contains rare examples of pre-European<br />

vegetation and unique European rock carvings.<br />

The site as a whole has very high levels of social significance and has special associations for the<br />

iocal and broader community both as an open space resource and for its cultural and aesthetic value.<br />

ARCHITECTS ISSUE D - 27 NOVEMBER 2007 PAGE 5<br />

F:\pro\arc\76\7615\ttansfer\103-client\out\Final for SHFA Website 29'11'Oll.Appendix\Appendix A1- Heritage Assessment.doc


CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />

HERITAGE ASSESSMENT<br />

CMP 2002 Figure 4.3 Aerial Photograph with Significance ofBuildings and Landscape Indicated<br />

(Source: UDAS).<br />

TANNER ARCHITECTS ISSUE 0 - 27 NOVEMBER 2007 PAGE 6<br />

F:\pro\an:\76\7615Uransfe1\103.dieoI\ouI\Fnal for $HFA Website 29'11'07\AppeodilMppendix A1- Heritage Assessment.doc<br />

[<br />

[<br />

c<br />

o<br />

[<br />

LJ


[<br />

c<br />

c [J<br />

c o<br />

D<br />

C<br />

o<br />

o c<br />

o<br />

o<br />

C<br />

D<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

D<br />

C<br />

2.2 Conservation Policy<br />

Adaptive Re-Use of the Buildings<br />

CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />

(Extracts from Rozelle Hospital Conservation Management Plan 2002, Section 5)<br />

Management of the Site<br />

HERITAGE ASSESSMENT<br />

The future management of the site will playa considerable roie in assuring the conservation of the<br />

buildings and the landscape setting. It is therefore neoessary to establish the parameters and<br />

principies which need to be met in this regard. Prior to, or in association with resolving the adaptive<br />

reuse options for the site, the management structure should be formalised in order to prevent ad hoc<br />

intervention of individual buildings and to establish a maintenance program for the buildings and<br />

landscape.<br />

Issues which need to be addressed in the management of the site include:<br />

• effective and consistent conservation of buildings and landscape across whole site (resources<br />

and skills);<br />

• careful control of vehicular access and car parking across the site;<br />

• selection of appropriate tenants/occupants whose needs can be accommodated without<br />

adverse impact on fabric, spaces or setting;<br />

• balance of the individual needs of all tenants/occupants and the desire for public access to the<br />

site;<br />

• encourage cooperation between managers of all components of the site to ensure that overall<br />

management objectives are consistent between managing agencies; and<br />

• ensure that areas/precincts to be managed are created on logical spatial units, which maintain<br />

the integrity of the landscape design of the site.<br />

If more diverse occupants, or a number of occupants, are anticipated on the site then a strategic and<br />

financial planning exercise will be needed to manage the process.<br />

The preferred new uses for the buildings of the Rozelle Hospital are uses which enhance the<br />

appreciation of the place and ensure the conservation of the significant buildings and landscape<br />

features.<br />

Future uses for the Rozelle Hospital site may be considered compatible if the following criteria are<br />

met:<br />

• The cultural significance of the buildings and their extant interior spaces and detail are not<br />

compromised.<br />

• The integral relationship between the significant landscape setting, individual gardens and<br />

bUildings is not compromised but enhanced and conserved.<br />

• The proposed new use is sympathetic to the original use and does not detract from that use or<br />

the cultural significance of the buildings and landscape setting.<br />

• Significant fabric and spaces are not to be damaged, destroyed or altered.<br />

• The nature of the new use would not result in an unacceptable level of wear and tear on<br />

significant fabric.<br />

• The relationship of the buildings and landscape setting to is not obscured.<br />

• The proposed use does not lead to major traffic generation on the site.<br />

• <strong>Park</strong>ing and vehicular access associated with the use can be managed discreteiy on the site.<br />

• The modern services reqUired (eg. fire safety provisions, lift, air conditioning, toilets, etc) for a<br />

potential new use will not cause damage, destroy or compromise the buildings or any interior<br />

spaces of significance.<br />

TANNER ARCHITECTS<br />

ISSUE D - 27 NOVEMBER 2007<br />

F:\pro\arc\76\7615\lransfer\103-clientloul\Final for SHFA Website 29'11 '07\Appendix\Appendix A1· Herilage Assessmenl.doc<br />

PAGE 7


CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />

HERITAGE ASSESSMENT<br />

• The fixtures or fittings required as part of the new use would not damage or compromise the<br />

significant fabric or spaces.<br />

• Proposed uses which achieve relatively more of the stated outcomes of the conservation<br />

policies are preferred to those which necessitate greater change and intrusion.<br />

• The types of occupants should be selected on the basis that they "fit" the bUilding's extant<br />

spaces; the reverse approach wherein the fabric of the building is altered and/or demolished to<br />

suit the requirements of the occupants is unacceptable.<br />

General constraints in relation to fabric and spaces of heritage significance (refer to CMP Section 4.7<br />

and Appendix A Inventory of Zones and Items):<br />

• Retain original configuration of spaces and fabric which refiects historicaily significant uses of<br />

the buildings and elements.<br />

• New service areas and services should be in areas which do not impact on significant spaces<br />

or fabric.<br />

• New buiidings in the area of significant buildings and landscape, unless otherwise<br />

recommended, to be designed according to the guiding conservation principles, refer to CMP<br />

Section 5.8.<br />

Inappropriate uses could lead to confusion or adverse impact on the cultural significance of the place:<br />

• Inappropriate uses can confuse the historic associations of the place.<br />

• Uses of the place which do not take advantage of the interpretative potential of the place<br />

related to its cultural significance.<br />

• The lack of use, and the consequent lack of maintenance can be as equally damaging as the<br />

introduction of an incompatible use.<br />

Most of the buildings on the site have the potential for adaptive reuse, as is currently demonstrated<br />

by the successful occupation of the Kirkbride Block by the University of Sydney. Some are more<br />

readily adaptable than others.<br />

Compatibility of Educational (School, University, Training College) Use<br />

If in the future the site is not occupied and maintained for hospital or administrative uses by the<br />

Department of Health, another major institution, such as an educational institution, could readily<br />

adapt the site for appropriate re-use without impacting on the cultural significance of the place. The<br />

conservation of the majority of the buildings of the Kirkbride Block for use by the University of Sydney<br />

- Sydney College of the Arts is an excellent example of adaptive reuse of former hospital sites to<br />

educational use. The Rydalmere Psychiatric Hospital has also been conserved and adapted for use<br />

as the Parramatta Campus of the University ofWestern Sydney.<br />

The existing buildings provide a wide variety of spaces which could readily be adapted to<br />

accommodate some of the requirements of an educational facility eg general classrooms and offices.<br />

However, the specialist facilities required by an educational facility, eg the larger seminar rooms and<br />

lecture halls, library, sports facilities would best be accommodated in new buildings.<br />

The gardens within the Broughton Hall precinct require intensive maintenance and protection from<br />

adverse wear and tear. Care must be exercised in the selection of a use for this group to ensure that<br />

the significance of these gardens is appreciated. There are opportunities adjacent to the Broughton<br />

Hall Group for the construction of new buildings which could provide the specialist facilities to support<br />

the new uses of the existing buildings.<br />

Access to the ovals and the waterfront for educational co-curricular activities is desirable. However,<br />

this may be in conflict with the management policies of the local council if the foreshore land is taken<br />

up by the local council for public use.<br />

<strong>Park</strong>ing (if provided on-site) should be located in strategic positions to minimise negative impact on<br />

the landscaped setting of the site.<br />

TANNER ARCHITECTS<br />

ISSUE D - 27 NOVEMBER 2007<br />

F:\pro\arc\76\7615\transfer\103.dienl\oul\Final for SHFA Website 29'11'07\AppendhMppendix A1- Heritage Assessmenl.doc<br />

PAGE 8<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[


[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[j<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />

HERITAGE ASSESSMENT<br />

The conversion of part of the old gate house for a childcare centre illustrates the possible adaptability<br />

of the smaller buildings for small scale educational use. The placement of the Writer's Centre in<br />

Garry Owen is another example of this.<br />

The University of Sydney has demonstrated experience and commitment to heritage restoration as<br />

demonstrated at Kirkbride and the Darlington Campus. The University of Sydney has indicated that it<br />

has sufficient funds for the necessary adaptive re-uselrestoration works at <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />

Whilst a variety of different adaptive reuse options may be feasible within individual buildings, the<br />

character of individual zones within the site must be carefully considered when introducing new uses.<br />

Each of the potential new uses have particular needs relating to such issues as car parking, required<br />

building area and public access, and these factors will greatly impact on the overall site layout and<br />

relationships within the site.<br />

General Conservation Policies<br />

The overall purpose of these Conservation Policies is to preserve and enhance the cultural<br />

significance of the whole site - its bUildings and its associated cultural landscape, and to ensure its<br />

maintenance into the future.<br />

The conservation of this site can best be achieved by:<br />

• The conservation and adaptation of the significant buildings.<br />

• The conservation of the setting of significant buildings and the associated individual<br />

landscapes and the overall cultural landscape.<br />

• The accommodation of a use or uses which will enhance public appreciation of the cultural<br />

significance of the place and ensure the conservation of significant buildings and landscape<br />

setting and features.<br />

• The strict control of development within the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> site by the NSW Department of Health<br />

(or potential new site management) to ensure an understanding of the significance of the<br />

place.<br />

• The control of any permissible development within identified Zones 1, 2, 6 and 7 to safeguard<br />

the conservation of the sile.<br />

• The control of the significant garden and foreshore selling and public access ways to ensure<br />

the cultural iandscape of the site and the Iron Cove area is retained and conserved.<br />

• The intervention of significant fabric should be reduced to minimise the loss of cultural<br />

significance. Where detrimental intervention is unavoidable it should occur only in areas of<br />

lower significance and the work should be readily reversible wherever possible.<br />

• The implementation of fire safety measures to comply with the intent of the Building Code of<br />

Australia and NSW Building RegUlations.<br />

• The implementation of a regular maintenance programme and management team.<br />

• No demolition or removal of items (apart from actions required to ensure pUblic safety) should<br />

be undertaken before the details of the conservation works specific to each building or area<br />

have been determined.<br />

• Photographic recording prior to and during demolition of any element or structure is required.<br />

• All archival material relating to the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> site should be retained at an appropriate<br />

repository and be made available to the public with secure access.<br />

Site Conservation Guidelines<br />

Significant items within the site contribute to the place as a whole and also require a specific setting.<br />

The development of precincts In this document is a tool to assist in defining areas of specific<br />

characteristics within the site to develop appropriate conservation guidelines, and should not be<br />

viewed as an opportunity to subdivide the site. Some portions of the site are identified as available<br />

for redevelopment, but only on the basis that their scale and character does not compromise the<br />

special qualities of the whole site.<br />

TANNER ARCHITECTS<br />

ISSUE 0 - 27 NOVEMBER 2007<br />

F:\pro\arc\76\7615\lransfel\1 03-client\out\Final for SHFA Website 29'11 'O'l\Appendix\Appendix A1- Heritage Assessmenl.doc<br />

PAGE 9


CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />

HERITAGE ASSESSMENT<br />

Provision of open space in accordance with the historical context will be important for the setting of<br />

the significant buildings on the site. In addition, the archaeoiogicai research potential of the site is an<br />

important feature and its assessment, investigation and control, particularly in areas of new<br />

development, will need consideration.<br />

The main objectives for the conservation and adaptive reuse of the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> site are to:<br />

• conserve and maintain the exceptional built and landscape quality of the site;<br />

• conserve and restore the landscape setting and public presentation, the open space and<br />

sloping grounds leading to Iron Cove, the historic landscape gardens, the remnant native<br />

plants, and the rock carvings and Aboriginal sites on the foreshore;<br />

• allow adaptive reuse and sensitive new development associated with the significant buildings<br />

to improve the opportunities for continued use;<br />

• implement effective management structures;<br />

• select the right tenants/occupants who can maintain the buildings and landscape while not<br />

detracting from their significance;<br />

• allow specific areas of new development in discrete areas in order to facilitate the conservation<br />

of the significant buildings and landscape.<br />

Conservation works are required in the short term to the following zones:<br />

• Broughton Hall;<br />

• Elements of the Kirkbride Block;<br />

• Convalescent Cottages;<br />

• Gardeners Cottage, and other cottages from the original Barnet scheme;<br />

• Stone gates and wall;<br />

• Various significant landscape elements;<br />

Potential areas for sensitive new deveiopment associated with the significant bUildings -alterations<br />

and additions and new buildings provided any change is designed and planned following the<br />

guidelines of this document:<br />

• The Broughton Hall Precinct (Zone 7) where presentation to Broughton Hall gardens, foreshore<br />

and views are protected;<br />

• The Manning Street Precinct (Zone 2) where the significant landscape elements are preserved.<br />

• The Central Slope Precinct (Zone 5) when the open landscape character is not compromised.<br />

Potential areas for substantial redevelopment, following the guidelines of this document:<br />

• The NSW Ambulance and Hospital Administration Precinct (Zone 6).<br />

Ultimately, an overall conservation and maintenance program which respects the cultural significance<br />

of individual buildings, their precincts and the landscape setting is expected. New development<br />

opportunities are limited on the site and therefore the carefui adaptive reuse of the existing buildings,<br />

the removal of intrusive elements and the selection of appropriate tenants must be a priority.<br />

The CMP 2002 section 5.8 contains detailed development controls for the various Zones within the<br />

<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> site. These are reproduced in the Appendix to this report.<br />

TANNER ARCH/TECTS<br />

ISSUE 0 - 27 NOVEMBER 2007<br />

F:\pro\arc\76\7615\!ransfer\103·


c c<br />

o<br />

c<br />

o<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o o<br />

u<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />

HERITAGE ASSESSMENT<br />

4 THE CALLAN PARK (SPECIAL PROVISIONS) ACT 2002 AND THE CONSERVATION<br />

MANAGEMENT PLAN 2002<br />

3.1 The <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> (Special Provisions) Act<br />

Key sections of the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Act are reproduced below to enable comparison with the 2002<br />

Conservation Management Plan policies:<br />

Section 4 - Objects<br />

The objects of this Act are:<br />

(a) to ensure that the whole of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> remains in public ownership and subject to public<br />

control, and<br />

(b) to ensure the preservation of the areas of open space at <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> that were in existence<br />

immediately before the commencement of this Act, and that extend to and include the<br />

foreshore of Iron Cove on the Parramatta River. and<br />

(c) to allow public access to that open space. including that foreshore. for public recreational<br />

purposes of both an active and a passive nature, and<br />

(d) to preserve the heritage significance of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, including its historic bUildings. gardens<br />

and other landscape features, and<br />

(e) to impose appropriate controls on the future development of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />

Section 5 - <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> not to be sold or otherwise disposed of<br />

(1) The sale, transfer, lease or other alienation, and any mortgage or other encumbrance, of<br />

<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, or any part of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, is prohibited. except as provided by this Act.<br />

(2) The Governor may, by proclamation. vest <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> for an estate in fee simple in a statutory<br />

body representing the Crown that is subject to the direction and control of the Minister.<br />

Section 7 - Development at <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> restricted<br />

(1) The provisions of environmental planning instruments that apply to <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> are the<br />

provisions of those Instruments that so applied immediately before the commencement of this<br />

Act, subject to this section.<br />

(2) The consent authority for development applications relating to land within <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is the<br />

council of the local government area within which the land is situated. despite any other Act or<br />

any environmental planning instrument.<br />

(3) Development may be carried out at <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, with development consent, for the purpose of<br />

health facilities and educational or community facilities, but development for the purpose of<br />

retirement villages is prohibited at <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />

(4) State Environmental Planning Policy No 5-Housing for Older People or People with a Disability<br />

does not apply to <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />

(5) Buildings must not be erected at <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> outside the footprints or building envelopes of the<br />

bUildings that existed immediately before the commencement of this Act. However. this<br />

subsection does not prevent the erection of temporary structures.<br />

(6) Consent must not be granted for any development at <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> if the development would<br />

result in:<br />

(a) less open space at <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> than existed immediately before the commencement of<br />

this Act, or<br />

(b) an increase in the total floor area of all buildings that existed at <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> immediately<br />

before the commencement of this Act.<br />

(7) Development at <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> must not adversely affect the Broughton Hall Garden. Charles<br />

Moore Garden or Kirkbride Garden.<br />

TANNER ARCHITECTS<br />

ISSUE D - 27 NOVEMBER 2007<br />

F:\pro\arc\76\7615\transfer\1 03-client\oul\Final for SHFA Website 29'11 '07\AppendixlAppendix A1- Heritage Assessment.doc<br />

PAGE 11


c<br />

[<br />

o<br />

o co<br />

c<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o oo<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o o<br />

o<br />

c<br />

CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />

HERITAGE ASSESSMENT<br />

5 ASSESSMENT OF THE HERITAGE IMPACTS OF THE DRAFT LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />

The Draft Land Use Plan has been reviewed in light of the Conservation Policy within the endorsed<br />

CMP and the assessed impacts are set out in the table below. :<br />

General Site Conservation Policies Draft Land Use Plan Compliance Comments<br />

1. Preserve the cultural significance of the The significant bUildings and landscapes will be<br />

buildings and site as a cultural landscape conserved and the significant buildings will be<br />

incl uding the foreshore open space by adapted to new uses. The specific adaptability<br />

adaptively re-using the existing significant of these buildings will be determined at the next<br />

heritage buildings and preserving the phase in the project.<br />

significant landscape elements.<br />

The Kirkbride Block demonstrates the<br />

adaptability of the site for educational use.<br />

2. Introduce new uses and development that The re-use of the site by the University of<br />

are appropriate to the cultural significance of Sydney provides a compatible and viable new<br />

the place and ensure the conservation of<br />

significant buildings and landscape and<br />

use.<br />

archaeology.<br />

TANNER ARCHITECTS<br />

ISSUE D - 27 NOVEMBER 2007<br />

F:\pro\arc\76\7615\lransfer\103-client\out\Final for SHFA Website 29'11 '07\AppendixlAppendix A1- Heritage Assessmenl.doc<br />

The re-use of the Broughton Hall Group by<br />

various NGOs provides potential viable new<br />

uses requiring ongoing government funding.<br />

3. Maintain open space adjacent to the The waterfront portion of the site will be<br />

waterfront maintained and enhanced for public access.<br />

Intrusive buildings will be removed to achieve<br />

an enlarged area of open space accessible to<br />

the public.<br />

4. Maintain an adequate setting for the former The majority of the new development will occur<br />

<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Mental Hospital and Broughton in Zone 5 - Central Slope Precinct, which is to<br />

Hall Psychiatric Clinic, and the various remain as a predominantiy open landscape<br />

individual significant buildings within the site,<br />

at close quarters and from a distance as<br />

area.<br />

major landmarks in the landscape setting.<br />

New development should not encroach upon<br />

the significant open landscape features or be<br />

visually intrusive within the zone.<br />

Any new development should be screened to<br />

allow landscape to dominate.<br />

5. Maintain the major views of the site and its The majority of the new development will occur<br />

significant buildings from both within and in Zone 5 - Central Slope Precinct, which is to<br />

outside the site. remain as a predominantly open landscape<br />

area.<br />

New development should not impact the<br />

significant views.<br />

6. Adapt, replace or remove non-contributory The non-contributory buildings are nominated<br />

bUildings from with the site for removal. The adaptability of these buildings<br />

will be determined at the next phase in the<br />

project.<br />

7. Ensure all significant aboriginal sites are The aboriginal sites of <strong>Callan</strong> Point will be<br />

protected and managed within an managed in accordance with the<br />

appropriate setting. recommendations of the <strong>Callan</strong> Point CMP<br />

1998 and the <strong>Callan</strong> Point Engravings and<br />

Landscape 2000 by John Clegg, Department of<br />

Archaeology, University of Sydney.<br />

PAGE 13


General Site Conservation Policies Draft Land Use Plan Compliance Comments<br />

8. Institute a management structure to co· This will be part of the next phase of the project.<br />

ordinate the long term conservation and It is critical that the with the sub·division and<br />

maintenance of the whole site excising of various parts of the site to different<br />

organisations with differing leasing<br />

arrangements that an overarching management<br />

structure is put in place to ensure that the whole<br />

site is managed as one.<br />

9. Implement a conservation programme for all The impiementation of a conservation<br />

significant buildings and landscapes. programme is imperative to the re·use of the<br />

buildings and landscape of the site.<br />

10.Ensure that sufficient funds are available for The buildings of the Kirkbride Block have been<br />

the maintenance of all the significant maintained by the University of Sydney during<br />

buildings and iandscapes in the short, its tenure.<br />

medium and long term.<br />

However, the use of the Broughton Hall<br />

Precinct by the various NGOs will require<br />

financial commitment by the NSW Government<br />

for the urgent conservation works to the<br />

buildings and the gardens and for the future<br />

maintenance.<br />

11.Ensure that the historic development of the The location of the major new development in<br />

site is not obscured by new development. Zone 5 - Centrai Slope Precinct has the<br />

potential to obscure an understanding of the<br />

historic development. New development should<br />

be carefully controlled to ensure it does not<br />

dominate the open iandscape of this area.<br />

TANNER ARCHITECTS<br />

CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />

ISSUE D• 27 NOVEMBER 2007<br />

F:\pro\arc\76\7615\lransfer\103-cllentlout\Rnal for SHFA Website 29'11'07\Appendix\Appendix A1- Heritage Assessmenl.doc<br />

HERITAGE ASSESSMENT<br />

PAGE 14<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

C<br />

[,<br />

L<br />

['<br />

C<br />

C<br />

[<br />

[<br />

o<br />

c<br />

o<br />

c


[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

o<br />

[<br />

[<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

o<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

o<br />

c


c<br />

c<br />

o<br />

o o<br />

o oo<br />

o<br />

o ooc<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

TANNER ARCHITECTS<br />

CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />

APPENDIX<br />

CMP SECTION 5.8<br />

SITE CONSERVATION GUIDELINES<br />

ISSUE D - 7 NOVEMBER 2007<br />

F:\pro\arc\76\7615\transfer\1 03-client\outlFinal for SHFA Website 29'11'07\Appendix\Appendix A1- Heritage Assessmenl.doc<br />

HERITAGE ASSESSMENT


ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />

Some species eg: Syzigium jambos, Eleaocarpus obovatus, Syzygium moorei are unusual in<br />

cultivation and it would be ideal to propagate new specimens for use either as replacement<br />

plantings or for planting in sympathetic adaptive new design. .<br />

I Management<br />

Policy 5.21 A landscape management structure for the whole site should be<br />

established Which ensures the conservation and maintenance ofthe<br />

existing landscape and provides guidelines for the creation ofnew<br />

landscaped areas and gardens.<br />

It is important that the area encompassing the entire Rozelle Hospital site be considered in future<br />

site works and that the integrity of the whole site be maintained while recognising that discrete<br />

areas, particularly the Broughton Hall gardens and the Kirkbride Entrance Gardens will have<br />

specific management and maintenance requirements.<br />

The Rozelle Hospital site contains cultural and natural landscape elements of such importance<br />

that it should have a Landscape Management Plan prepared, incorporating landscape restorationl<br />

reconstruction plans for specific areas, as an integral part of any future management program. It<br />

should take into account surviving early layout and fabric (both built and vegetative).<br />

Policy 5.22 The landscape management structure should be implemented that:<br />

• recognises and values the significance ofthe site's landscape as a<br />

primary resource with the buildings as elements within that<br />

landscape;<br />

• outlines the responsibility at each level ofmanagement ofeach of<br />

the precincts and the overall site;<br />

• provides clear guidelines for each precinct and tenancy area.<br />

Policy 5.23 Adequate funds should be committed at each level ofmanagement to<br />

the conservation ofthe landscaped areas and gardens.<br />

I Specific Landscape Policies for Zones<br />

Refer to Section 5.8 for Site Conservation Guidelines relating to conservation of existing and<br />

development of new built elements.<br />

Zone 1 - The Waterfront and <strong>Callan</strong> Point Precinct (Refer Figure 5.2)<br />

Policy 5.24 Use the 1998 'Draft Plan ofManagement for <strong>Callan</strong> Point' to guide all<br />

landscape conservation actions on <strong>Callan</strong> Point. Adopt the<br />

'Management Action Plan' outline in '<strong>Callan</strong> Point Aboriginal Heritage',<br />

M. Dallas 2000 for treatment ofAboriginal sites.<br />

Policy 5.25 Explore the potential ofcreating vegetation corridor links with other<br />

foreshore and suburban areas.<br />

Policy 5.26 Conserve Norfolk Island Hibiscus waterfront plantings and formalise car<br />

parking areas to avoid further compaction to the root areas ofthe trees.<br />

Policy 5.27 Remove, or do not replace as individual trees in poplaravenue planting<br />

senesce, to allow a more informal transition between the Kirkbride zone<br />

and <strong>Callan</strong> Point.<br />

The original design intent was for a picturesque composition near the main bUildings with an<br />

informal transition to the rocky foreshore area. Late nineteenth century photographs indicate this<br />

TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 142<br />

S:\D0C\2002\Rozelle Hospllal\CMP\5 Conservation.doc<br />

[<br />

c<br />

c [<br />

[<br />

C<br />

o<br />

[<br />

[<br />

n<br />

L<br />

c<br />

c[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

C<br />

[<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C


u<br />

o ooIJ<br />

o oo<br />

o o<br />

o oo<br />

c<br />

o<br />

o D<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />

to consist of scattered remnant eucalypts. Extensive mid-twentieth century avenue plantings have<br />

obscured this intent.<br />

Policy 5.28 Maintain Sydney Harbour Bridge Memorial and integrate into any new<br />

landscape design .<br />

Policy 5.29 Generally maintain an open landscape and modify steep embankments<br />

to landfill to allow access to the foreshore as opportunity arises.<br />

At the western end of the zone extensive land filling has resulted in a grassed playing field with a<br />

steep embankment without a connection to the foreshore, or,.<br />

Policy 5.30 Undertake repair to canal as necessary. Consider replanting trees along<br />

the line ofthe canal as evident in the 1930 aerial photograph (lIIus.3.36).<br />

TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 143<br />

S:\DOC\2002\Rozelle Hospilal\CMP\5 Conservatlon.doc


c<br />

o c<br />

o ooooooooooo<br />

o oo<br />

o o<br />

Zone 2 - Manning Street Precinct<br />

ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />

Policy 5.31 Link future management ofthe Nurses Home garden to the<br />

management ofthe 1930s Nurses Home building. Investigate the<br />

structural integrity ofthe elements ofthe garden attached to the Nurses<br />

Home and repair or remove as necessary. Remove self-seeded trees.<br />

The garden attached to the Nurses home was a discrete unit within the 19 th century landscape<br />

design. In the event of future replacement of the former Nurses Home record the garden prior to<br />

removal. Incorporate the major trees of some significance into a revised landscape plan for the<br />

area. Any future landscape plan should respect the significance of the 1870s-80s planning for the<br />

site as a whole.<br />

If the former 1930s Nurses Home is retained, repair the major elements of the garden and remove<br />

overgrown vegetation.<br />

Policy 5.32 Investigate a less visually intrusive means offencing the substation or<br />

possible relocation ofthe fence. Rep/ace the poplar avenue nearthe<br />

electricity sub-station with vegetation that will screen the substation, by<br />

either extending the area devoted to bush regeneration or by planting<br />

Pori Jackson Figs.<br />

Substation is not located on Rozelle Hospital site. While it is highly intrusive in the setting, at<br />

present its relocation is not anticipated. While it remains the planting of a vegetative screen<br />

seems the best solution.<br />

Policy 5.33 Conserve early asylum walling and seek arboricultural advice on the<br />

maintenance ofthe Moreton Bay Fig (Ficus macrophylla) boundary<br />

plantation.<br />

Policy 5.34 Restore the ability to read the Manning Street Alignment (Zone 2) and<br />

the Kirkbride Entrance Garden (Zone 3) as one unit. Restore late<br />

nineteenth century character to the Manning street Alignment (Zone 2)<br />

with Nurses Home garden as a discrete unit within the zone.<br />

The area enclosed by the walling and boundary plantations was an integral component of the<br />

Manning/Barnet concept for the site. Through time this unit has been fragmented by the<br />

construction of buildings, car parks and the roadway. Ideally planning for the area should restore<br />

the legibility of the original design concepts. The more recent treatment and poor maintenance of<br />

drainage of the iower part of the zone - formerly open and picturesque gradually giving way to<br />

remnant natural vegetation - has obscured its meaning.<br />

TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTO FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 145<br />

S:\D0C\2002\Rozeile Hospital\CMP\5 Conservation.doc


c<br />

o o<br />

o oc<br />

o o<br />

o ooo<br />

o c<br />

o<br />

D<br />

o<br />

o oo<br />

ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />

Zone 3 - Kirkbride Entrance Garden and Embankment to King George <strong>Park</strong> Precinct<br />

Policy 5.35<br />

Policy 5.36<br />

Policy 5.37<br />

Policy 5.38<br />

Policy 5.39<br />

Investigate the alignment ofthe former entrance drive and remove<br />

intrusive planting to allow the alignment to be interpreted.<br />

Instate a road surface and gutter treatment for the main entrance drive<br />

which is less visually intrusive and sympathetic to the ul h century<br />

character ofthe zone.<br />

Seek arboricultural advice as to the health and best management ofthe<br />

boundary plantation.<br />

Conserve the War Memorial and reinstate the original colour scheme<br />

based on paint scraping samples. Remove garden beds on eitherside<br />

ofmemorial to restore a park-like character.<br />

Conserve the structural elements ofthe sunken garden and reinstate<br />

planting to the beds. Remove young Silky Oak in garden bed. Consider<br />

secondaryplantings ofWashingtonia robusta palms to reflect the<br />

current formation.<br />

This section of the garden was a focus during the use of the site as a psychiatric hospital but its<br />

meaning has been diminished. Secondary plantings would eventually replace the current palms<br />

when they senesee. The upper circular bed surrounding the sunken garden is currently planted<br />

with a mixture of species. Conserve the Dracaena draco and popular 19'h century plants ego<br />

Eupatorium megalophyllum. Consider using the current evidence of Tecomaria capensis to<br />

establish a hedge along the upper side of the sunken garden. Planting in the former flower beds<br />

of the sunken garden could be a massed planting of eg: Iresines which would be relatively low<br />

maintenance but allow the flower beds to be interpreted.<br />

Policy 5.40 Continue a bush regeneration program for the lower slopes toward King<br />

George Oval. Formalise funding for the program.<br />

Appropriate funding may come from the sale of large self-seeded Canary Island Palms (Phoenix<br />

canariensis) in this area and the adjacent Ridgetop, Kirkbride Block Platform and Embankment to<br />

King George <strong>Park</strong> Precinct (Zone 4). Currently the bush regeneration program has been relying<br />

heavily on volunteer labour and on funding via small grants. A regular source of funding would<br />

allow for a more structured program of management.<br />

Policy 5.41 In the former 19'h century pleasure ground/entrance garden implement a<br />

program ofreplacement planting with trees favoured by Charles Moore<br />

and Joseph Maiden- preferably conifers, araucarias, Australian<br />

rainforest species and palms. .<br />

TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTO FINALISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 147<br />

S;\DOC\2002\RozelJe Hospllal\CMP\5 Conservation.doc


c<br />

o ooo<br />

o<br />

o [J<br />

o oooo<br />

o ooooo<br />

o<br />

ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />

Zone 4 - Ridgetop, Kirkbride Block Platform and Convalescent Cottages Precinct<br />

Policy 5.42 Replace unsympathetic lighting and seating on the Kirkbride platform.<br />

When opportune reconstruct garden beds in a gardenesque scheme of<br />

alternate circular and rectangular beds in accordance with documentary<br />

evidence.<br />

Policy 5.43 Interpret the former cricket oval area through appropriate fencing,<br />

structures and planting based on archival evidence including the<br />

removal ofintrusive buildings.<br />

Planting around the cricket ground was originally peppercorns, brushbox and pines. Refer to<br />

DPWS Heritage Study (1991) Plates 16.17.<br />

Policy 5.44 New planting and management ofthe landscape associated with the<br />

Kirkbride Block should follow the policies and recommendations as set<br />

out in the Kirkbride Block Conservation Management Plan 1993.<br />

Policy 5.45 Remove 1970s fill overthe late tfjh centuryprofile ofthe platform in<br />

front of the convalescent cottages. Selectively remove or prune Hills<br />

Figs (Ficus microcarpa var hillii) and native trees and shrubs to allow<br />

views to Iron· Cove to be recovered.<br />

Policy 5.46 Investigate growing conditions ofboundary plantation and implement a<br />

tree replacement policy ofPort Jackson Figs (Ficus rubiginosa)<br />

Policy 5.47 Maintain an open landscape character with views betweenlthrough tree<br />

groups to the majorbuildings.<br />

Policy 5.48 Reconstruct the former garden layout to the front ofGarry Owen based<br />

on archival evidence.<br />

Policy 5.49 Selectively remove Brush Box planting along Central Avenue to restore<br />

views to Iron Cove or do not replace trees blocking viewlines to Iron<br />

Cove when they die.<br />

Some original viewlines from Kirkbride toward Iron Cove have become blocked as vegetation has<br />

matured. Judicious removal of individual trees would allow these views to be recovered.<br />

TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 149<br />

S:\OOC\2002\Rozelle Hospital\CMP\5 Conservation.doc


c ooooooooooooooooooo<br />

5.8 SITE CONSERVATION GUIDELINES<br />

ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />

Significant items within the site contribute to the place as a whole and also require a specific<br />

setting. The development of precincts in this document is a tool to assist in defining areas of<br />

specific characteristics within the site to develop appropriate conservation guidelines, and should<br />

not be viewed as an opportunity to subdivide the site. Some portions of the site are identified as<br />

available for redevelopment, but only on the basis that their scale and character does not<br />

compromise the special qualities of the whole site.<br />

Provision of open space in accordance with the historical context will be important for the setting<br />

of the significant bUildings on the site. In addition, the archaeological research potential of the site<br />

is an important feature and its assessment, investigation and control, particularly in areas of new<br />

development, will need consideration. This section of the document is primarily concerned with<br />

architectural and landscape controls but the follOWing conservation objectives will obViously have<br />

an influence on the development of plann ing controls:<br />

1. Conservation and effective use ofthe significant buildings and landscapes, i.e. viable<br />

uses for the site in terms of ongoing funding for maintenance and occupation.<br />

2. Maintenance of an adequate setting for the former <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Mentai Hospital and<br />

Broughton Hall Psychiatric Clinic, and the various individual significant buildings<br />

within the site, at close quarters and from a distance as major landmarks in the<br />

landscape selling.<br />

3. Maintenance of the major views of the site and its significant buildings from both<br />

within and outside the site.<br />

4. Maintenance of the significant vegetation and landscape elements on the site.<br />

5. Investigation of the archaeological potential, related to the hospital use on the site,<br />

European use and Aboriginal use.<br />

5.8.1 General Guidelines for Conservation and New Development<br />

Refer to Figure 5.1 for Site Plan indicating general conservation policies related to individual<br />

building elements.<br />

The general principles for conservation works related to buildings of cultural significance follow:<br />

Conservation works related to buildings of CUltural significance<br />

Objective The primary objective of the guidelines in these areas is to maintain the<br />

integrity of the identified significant bUildings and elements identified in the<br />

assessment of significance and their setting and to enhance appreciation of<br />

the cultural significance of the site.<br />

Conservation works and adaptation with appropriate sensitive new<br />

development can be undertaken where it enhances public appreciation and it<br />

does not detract from or impact on that identified significance.<br />

Conservation and Conservation and adaptation works shouid occur:<br />

adaptation<br />

• Conservation, renovation or alteration of the existing buildings including<br />

adaptation to suit appropriate new uses;<br />

• demolition of extensions to buildings or items which are not considered<br />

to be essential and detract from the cultural significance;<br />

• introduction of new services to improve the amenity and to comply with<br />

the Building Code of Australia;<br />

• construction of new facilities or extensions to existing buildings may be<br />

permitted which are related to the use of the significant buildings. Such<br />

additional accommodation must be subiect to rigorous design controls;<br />

TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 155<br />

S:\DOC\2002\Rozeile Hospftal\CMP\5 Conservallon.doc


ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />

0 conservation and maintenance of the existing significant landscaped<br />

setting;<br />

0 supplementation of the existing planting to support the significant<br />

landscaped setting (refer to landscape policies above)<br />

General Guidelines for minor development adjacent to buildings or within landscapes of<br />

cultural significance<br />

Objective The objective of the gUidelines in these areas is to ensure that new<br />

development respects the significance and setting of the Rozelle Hospital<br />

Site, including specific buildings, elements and items in the site.<br />

New development opportunities are limited within the site and should be<br />

undertaken as a measure which has a considered outcome of protecting and<br />

enhancing the appreciation of cultural significance on the site.<br />

New development is allowable in areas where it will improve the amenity and<br />

the public presentation of the site and where it considers the cultural<br />

significance of the site. New development should be the subject of rigorous<br />

design, planning, conservation consultation and archaeological investigation.<br />

New Development New development may be permitted which relates to:<br />

0 conservation, restoration, alteration or renovation of the existing<br />

building/s including adaptation to suit new uses;<br />

0 demolition of buildings and demolition of extensions to buildings or<br />

items which are not considered of heritage significance.<br />

0 construction of new facilities and extensions to existing buildings<br />

which are related to the use of the site and significant buildings or<br />

the re- presentation of the site.<br />

0 construction of new buildings in locations which have no impact on<br />

the cultural significance of the site or individual bUildings and may<br />

facilitate the conservation of the site and its significance.<br />

Height New buildings or extensions should be lower than the immediately adjacent<br />

significant buildings. In areas where there are no immediately adjacent<br />

significant buildings the height of new buildings should respect the<br />

significance of the area.<br />

Bulk Any new buildings or extensions to existing buildings are to be subsidiary in<br />

bulk and scale to the major existing buildings. New structures must not be of<br />

such a scale as to dominate the existing structures or detract from their<br />

setting.<br />

Views Major identified views to, or from, the significant buildings are to be<br />

respected and not obstructed when considering the proposals for minor new<br />

development.<br />

Building Style The style of new structures must complement the existing significant<br />

bUildings. Design of structures may be in the language of the existing<br />

buildings but should not be attempts to produce replicas. The design of new<br />

structures should not conflict with the design of existing structures.<br />

Materials and New materials should respect the eXisting materials of the significant<br />

Colours buildings.<br />

TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 156 [ ...<br />

S:\DOC\2002\Rozelie Hospllal\CMP\5 ConservaUon.doc<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

C<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

C<br />

C<br />

[<br />

c<br />

c [<br />

c<br />

c<br />

o


o<br />

o<br />

o ooooooo<br />

o<br />

o o<br />

o<br />

o ooooo<br />

ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />

General Guidelines for minor development adjacent to buildings or within landscapes of<br />

cultural significance (cont'd)<br />

Design Details Experienced personnel with suitable architectural skills must be employed.<br />

A combination of heritage conservation and design skills will be essential:<br />

• All alterations and additions to the existing buildings, and all new<br />

construction must in no way diminish the established heritage<br />

significance.<br />

• A protective view cone and protected landscape elements are to be<br />

designed to ensure that the vistas to and from the site are retained for<br />

posterity.<br />

• The location and design of new bUildings should ensure that the views to<br />

and from the significant buildings and grounds to Iron Cove are<br />

preserved.<br />

Site Treatment There is to be no evident site excavation or change in levels of land<br />

associated with buildings of exceptional and high significance. Landscaping<br />

is to be carried out in conformity with the proposals in the landscape plan<br />

and the landscape policies in this Conservation Management Plan.<br />

Access Existing access points to the site from Balmain Road and Glover Street are<br />

to remain. New access points will require detailed planning consideration,<br />

especially where they may potentially impact on the cultural significance of<br />

the site.<br />

Car parking Car parking is to be permitted in association with the use of most buildings,<br />

however parking should be provided in discrete areas where it is not visible<br />

from any of the major view points of the significant buildings and their<br />

grounds. All parking areas are to be landscaped.<br />

General Guidelines for new development<br />

Design Guidelines The design of new buildings in areas designated capable of re-development<br />

(Location,<br />

should respect the adjacent significant buildings and site.<br />

Footprint, Height, New buildings should be complementary in bulk and scale to the significant<br />

Bulk, Style, buildings on the site. New structures must not be of such a scale as to<br />

Materials and dominate the significant bUildings or detract from their setting.<br />

Colours)<br />

The style of new structures must complement the existing significant<br />

buildings. Design of structures may be in the language of the existing<br />

buildings but should not be attempts to produce replicas. Materials for new<br />

bUildings should respect the materials of the existing significant buildings.<br />

Refer to individual precinct plans for preferred location and footprints of new<br />

buildings.<br />

Views Major and identified views to, and from the significant buildings and site<br />

should be considered in the preparation of development proposals.<br />

Site Treatment! Site excavation for development may be permitted in limited areas to achieve<br />

Landscaping less obtrusive bUildings and to allow buildings to follow site contours.<br />

Landscaping is to be carried out in conformity with the proposals in the<br />

Landscape Management Plan.<br />

Historic New building and development works might impact on archaeological<br />

Archaeology remains - the likelihood of this should be assessed during initial planning of<br />

the works.<br />

TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 157<br />

S:\OOC\2002\RozeJle HospJtal\CMP\5 Conservation.doc


ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />

The following section provides detailed site guidelines for conservation and new development<br />

relating to the Study Zones.<br />

5.8.2 Detailed guidelines for Conservation and New Development<br />

Zone 1 - Waterfront and <strong>Callan</strong> Point Precinct - Refer Figures 5.2 and 5.9.<br />

Planning Considerations:<br />

Principies •<br />

Access<br />

Use<br />

Landscape Considerations:<br />

Vegetation:<br />

Small scale new development to support the public recreation<br />

use of the zone allowable.<br />

• Sensitive low scale development that does not interrupt<br />

significant views and axis lines.<br />

• Replace Sports Pavilion, Building 91, with less visually intrusive<br />

facility.<br />

•<br />

Conserve pavilion Building 92A and adaptively reuse.<br />

• Maintain open space to foreshore.<br />

• Retain important views to significant landscape and buildings.<br />

• Regain Wharf Road axis to waterfront.<br />

• Remove intrusive and non-contributory elements.<br />

From Glover Street, Wharf Road and Waterfront Drive.<br />

Recreational facilities.<br />

Refer Landscape Conservation Guidelines<br />

• Explore creating vegetation corridor links with other foreshore<br />

areas.<br />

•<br />

Use recommendations in 1998 <strong>Callan</strong> Point Draft Plan of<br />

Management to guide all treatment of native vegetation In the<br />

zone.<br />

• Use recommendations In 2000 <strong>Callan</strong> Point Aboriginal Heritage<br />

report to gUide treatment of Aboriginal elements on the site.<br />

•<br />

•<br />

Historic Features: •<br />

Development:<br />

Historic Archaeology:<br />

•<br />

•<br />

Conserve Norfolk Island Hibiscus waterfront plantings.<br />

Remove poplar avenue.<br />

Maintain Sydney Harbour Bridge War Memorial and enhance<br />

landscape setling.<br />

Generally maintain open landscape and modify steep<br />

embankments to land fill.<br />

Repair canal as necessary.<br />

Formalise car parking areas to avoid damaging vegetation and rock<br />

engravings.<br />

Develop adequate policies for the conservation of the European<br />

rock engravings.<br />

TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 158 D.<br />

S:\DOC\2002\RozeJle Hospllal\CMP\5 Conservatlon.doc<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

C<br />

o C<br />

c<br />

c c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

o<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c c<br />

c


Zone 2 • Manning Street Precinct - Refer Figures 5.3 and 5.10.<br />

Planning Considerations:<br />

ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />

Principles: • New development is allowable if its design respects significant<br />

landscape elements and significant buildings.<br />

• Zone 2 is considered suitable for strictly controlled low scale<br />

development because of its discrete location away from<br />

central areas of site and significant areas of open landscape.<br />

• New development must respect the natural topography of the<br />

area and the landscaping that characterises the zone.<br />

• Conserve R7, possibly adapt for residential use. R1 to<br />

continue as Child Care centre. If use changes remove<br />

intrusive additions.<br />

• Conserve, recycle replace or remove Gatehouse as<br />

practicable.<br />

• Conserve and repair main gates.<br />

Access: • From Manning Street. It is possible to make openings in the<br />

boundary wall for access. An opening for access purposes<br />

already exists. However the wall must remain generally intact<br />

and readable as a high boundary wall.<br />

Use:<br />

• From Balmain Road. Existing access to this zone from<br />

Balmain Road to be improved and impact upon the design of<br />

the Kirkbride Entrance Garden reduced.<br />

Residential, Aged Care facilities, Hospital purposes. Continuation<br />

of child care facility. Commercial, Educational/Institutional.<br />

Building Setbacks: • Buildings to be setback from boundary wall at Manning Street,<br />

and from the significant stone cottages in the zone.<br />

• BUildings to be set back considerably, and visually isolated<br />

from Balmain Road<br />

Architectural Considerations:<br />

• New development not to encroach upon the significant<br />

landscape features or be Visually intrusive upon the adjacent<br />

Kirkbride entrance garden.<br />

• Landscaped belt to screen areas of new development.<br />

Planning: • It is conceived that new development in this area would be<br />

undertaken in conjunction with the removal of intrusive<br />

elements and the conservation of the landscape.<br />

• It would be essential for Buildings 93 and 93A to be removed<br />

before any new development in this area occurs. New<br />

development must be designed in conversation with the<br />

significant small scale cottages in the zone.<br />

Height: • Heights should generally be lower than the overall height of<br />

BUilding 93. The natural topography of the area may be used<br />

to allow a variety of heights. However, in general the built<br />

form must be low in scale.<br />

c [,<br />

[<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 160 C·<br />

S:\O0C\2002\Rozelle Hospllal\CMP\5 Conservatlon.doc<br />

c<br />

c cc<br />

c<br />

o c<br />

[<br />

o oo


c oc<br />

o<br />

o oooo[l.J<br />

o ooo<br />

o ooooo<br />

ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />

Built Form and Materials: • Built forms should acknowledge the natural topography.<br />

• Finishes should sit comfortably with the surrounds including<br />

the small stone cottages in the zone.<br />

Landscape Considerations:<br />

Vegetation:<br />

Refer Landscape Conservation Guidelines.<br />

• Conserve elements of 19th Century Nurses Home garden.<br />

• Incorporate major trees of some significance into revised<br />

landscape plan for area.<br />

•<br />

Maintain Moreton Bay Fig boundary plantation.<br />

• Screen sub-station, or fence with less visually intrusive<br />

element.<br />

Historic Features: • Conserve early asylum walling.<br />

• Restore the ability to read Zone 2 and 3 as one unit.<br />

Historic Archaeology: • Assess any impacts on R1 - Original Gate Lodge (1878), and<br />

R7 - Attendants' Cottage (1879).<br />

TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 161<br />

S:\DOC\2002\Rozelie Hospltal\CMP\5 Conservallon.doc


c (J<br />

o o<br />

o o<br />

o<br />

o o<br />

o o<br />

o o<br />

o o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o nJ<br />

ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />

Zone 3 - Kirkbride Entrance Garden and Embankment to King George <strong>Park</strong> Precinct _<br />

Refer Figures 5.4 and 5.11 .<br />

Planning Considerations:<br />

Principles: • No new development is permitted in this zone. Removal of<br />

intrusive elements is desirable.<br />

• Retain important views between Kirkbride Block to<br />

landscaped elements.<br />

Landscape Considerations:<br />

Vegetation: Refer Landscape Conservation Guidelines.<br />

• Remove intrusive planting to allow original entrance garden<br />

layout to be interpreted.<br />

• Implement program of replacement plantings with trees<br />

favoured by Charles Moore and Joseph Maiden.<br />

• Seek advice as to best management to maintain health of<br />

boundary plantation.<br />

• Continue bush regeneration program for lower slopes toward<br />

King George Oval.<br />

Historic Features: • Conserve War Memorial and reinstate original colour scheme.<br />

• Conserve sunken garden.<br />

Development:<br />

Historic Archaeology:<br />

Re-instate road treatment sympathetic to the 19 th century<br />

character of the zone.<br />

Monitor works in order to record details of the original estates'<br />

carriageways and pathways.<br />

TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 163<br />

S:\DOC\2002\Rozelle Hospltal\CMP\5 ConservaUon.doc


Figure 5.11<br />

R_ Buildings to be removed<br />

No new development is permitted in Zone 3.<br />

Removal of intrusive elements is desirable.<br />

Retain important views between Kirkbride<br />

Block to landscaped elements.<br />

Guidelines for Conservation Works and Development: Zone 3 - Kirkbride<br />

Entrance Garden and Embankment to King George <strong>Park</strong> Precinct.<br />

Refer Figure 5.4.<br />

TANNER &ASSOCIATES PTY LTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 164<br />

$:\OOC\2002\RozeUe Hosplfal\CMP\5 ConservaUon.doc<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

c<br />

[<br />

c c<br />

[<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c [


o<br />

o oo<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o oo<br />

o o<br />

o oo<br />

o ooo<br />

o o<br />

ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />

Zone 4 • Ridgetop, Kirkbride Block Platform and Convalescent Cottages Precinct - Refer<br />

Figures 5.5 and 5.12.<br />

Planning Considerations:<br />

Principles: • This zone requires detailed conservation maintenance work in<br />

particular to Kirkbride buildings and Convalescent Cottages.<br />

Conservation works required include the removal of intrusive<br />

elements and restoration of significant fabric.<br />

• The only allowable development is minor additions that<br />

facilitate the adaptive reuse of the significant bUildings. Any<br />

new addition must not negatively impact upon the significant<br />

buildings or landscape.<br />

• Conserve and adapt significant elements.<br />

• Opportunities to remove intrusive elements should be<br />

investigated.<br />

• Cricket ground area should be restored as open space.<br />

Agricultural character to rear of Garry Owen House should<br />

also be restored by the removal of intrusive elements and the<br />

restoration of significant buildings.<br />

•<br />

One bomb shelter to remain on site at minimum.<br />

Access: Historic roads to be maintained as main access points.<br />

Use: Existing use by the University of Sydney of the Kirkbride Block is<br />

satisfactory and should be maintained. The use of Garry Owen<br />

by the Writers Centre is also satisfactory. Other such tenants<br />

should be found for the Convalescent Cottages once they have<br />

been conserved or in conjunction with conservation. Educational,<br />

Cultural, Institutional, Community.<br />

Landscape Considerations:<br />

Vegetation: Refer Landscape Conservation Guidelines<br />

• Reconstruct gardenesque planting on Kirkbride platform.<br />

• New plantings in Kirkbride Block area should follow that set<br />

out in 1993 Kirkbride Block Conservation Management Plan.<br />

• Selectively remove Brush Box planting along Central Avenue<br />

to restore views to Iron Cove.<br />

Historic Features: • Interpret the historic cricket oval area through appropriate<br />

fencing and planting based on photographic and documentary<br />

evidence.<br />

• Remove fill obscuring 19 th century profile of Convalescent<br />

Cottage platform. Remove or prune trees to reinstate cottage<br />

views.<br />

• Maintain an open landscape character with views<br />

between/through trees groups to major buildings<br />

•<br />

Reconstruct, based on evidence, garden layout to the front of<br />

GarryOwen.<br />

Development: Replace unsympathetic lighting and seating on Kirkbride Platform.<br />

Historic Archaeology: New building and development works might impact on<br />

archaeological remains - the likelihood of this should be assessed<br />

during initial planning of the works.<br />

TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 165<br />

S:\D0C\2002\Rozelle Hospilal\CMP\5 Conservation.doc


o o<br />

o o<br />

o o<br />

o no<br />

o<br />

o oo<br />

o<br />

o o<br />

o<br />

o oo<br />

Zone 5 • Central Slope Precinct - Refer Figures 5.6 and 5.13.<br />

Planning Considerations:<br />

ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />

Principles: • Development within restricted areas is possible within this<br />

zone.<br />

• Zone to be reinstated as an open parkland. Intrusive<br />

elements to be removed. Any new development must be<br />

located on perimeters of zone, must preserve views and<br />

have regard for the significance of the area as open space.<br />

• New development is most suitable in the approximate<br />

location of BUildings 30 and 105 on Wharf Road.<br />

• Building 42 should be reactivated for horticuitural use.<br />

• Building R6 and building 103 to be conserved.<br />

Access: Wharf Road is the most appropriate access point.<br />

Use: <strong>Park</strong>land, Aged Care facilities, or Hospital purposes, Community<br />

use, Educational, Institutional, Residential<br />

Building Setbacks: • New development to be aligned to Wharf Road.<br />

Architectural Considerations:<br />

• New development not to encroach upon the significant open<br />

landscape features or be visually intrusive within the zone.<br />

• Any new development should be screened to allow<br />

landscape to dominate.<br />

Planning: • It is conceived that new development in this area would be<br />

undertaken in conjunction with the removal of intrusive<br />

elements and the conservation of the landscape<br />

• It would be essential that the large intrusive buildings in this<br />

zone be removed before any new development in this area<br />

occurs. New development must be designed to relate to the<br />

significant small scale cottages in the zone and the open<br />

landscape.<br />

Built Form and Materials: • Built forms should acknowledge the natural topography of<br />

the site. No major excavation into the site.<br />

Landscape Considerations:.<br />

• Finishes should sit comfortably with the surrounds.<br />

Vegetation: • Refer Landscape Conservation Guidelines.<br />

• As time allows, remove avenue and row planting which are<br />

Intrusive in the 19'h century open grazed landscape and<br />

replace with clumps of trees.<br />

Historic Features: • Maintain an open landscape character with views<br />

between/through trees groups to major buildings.<br />

Historic Archaeology: • Assess any impacts on R6 - Gardeners' Cottage (1879),<br />

and R8 - Farm Attendants' Cottage (pre-1903).<br />

TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 167<br />

S:\DOC\2002\Rozelle Hospilal\CMP\5 Conservation.doc


Zone 7 - Broughton Hall Precinct - Refer Figures 5.8 and 5.15.<br />

Planning Considerations:<br />

ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />

Principles: • Development in restricted areas possible within this zone.<br />

• Buildings located north of BUilding 18 are of low or neutral<br />

significance and are capable of being adapted or redeveloped<br />

in the perimeter configuration.<br />

• Remove intrusive elements.<br />

•<br />

Conserve Broughton Hall. Further investigation of the<br />

extremely poor condition of this building is required<br />

Access: Glover Street and Wharf Road are the most appropriate access<br />

points.<br />

Use:<br />

Adaptive reuse of existing buildings and sensitive new development<br />

for Aged Care facilities, or other Hospital purposes, Educational,<br />

Institutional, Commercial, Residential Community uses.<br />

BUilding Setbacks: • Set backs to follow that of other Broughton Hall group buildings<br />

on Glover Street. Set backs from Wharf Road to allow visual<br />

access to and from significant Broughton Hall buildings and Iron<br />

Cove.<br />

Architectural Considerations:<br />

•<br />

Development should not encroach upon the significant<br />

landscape area of the Broughton Hall gardens.<br />

Planning: • Sensitively planned development, is possible, to replace<br />

building 19, 20, 23 and 24 and to complete enclosure of<br />

gardens.<br />

• New development should not encroach upon the significant<br />

landscape features or be visually intrusive to the rest of the site.<br />

•<br />

•<br />

Development should follow the linear configuration of the<br />

Broughton Hall group along Glover Street. Development on the<br />

area occupied by building 24 to be planned to be<br />

complimentary to the Broughton Hall group.<br />

Significant views, internally and externally, to be maintained.<br />

It would be essential that the intrusive buildings in this zone be<br />

removed before any new development in this area occurs. Intrusive<br />

buildings in the established gardens should also be removed.<br />

Height: The scale of any new development must be complimentary to<br />

significant buildings and landscape.<br />

Built Form and Materials: • Built form to follow topography of site.<br />

• Finishes should sit comfortably with the surrounds.<br />

TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTYLTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 171<br />

S:\D0C\2002\RozeJ1e HOSpilal\CMP\5 Conservatron.doc<br />

[<br />

[<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

[<br />

C<br />

c<br />

[<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

o<br />

o<br />

c<br />

o ooo


[<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

o<br />

D<br />

C<br />

[<br />

[<br />

o<br />

c<br />

o<br />

c<br />

c<br />

o<br />

c [J<br />

c


[<br />

[<br />

c [<br />

c<br />

c<br />

o<br />

D<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

[<br />

o o<br />

c<br />

c<br />

o []<br />

o


o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

c<br />

o o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o o<br />

o<br />

o o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Sydney Harbour<br />

Foreshore Authority<br />

<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use<br />

Plan<br />

Transport Assessment


[<br />

D<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

[<br />

[<br />

o<br />

o<br />

c<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o


[<br />

c<br />

o c<br />

c<br />

o o<br />

o<br />

[<br />

[<br />

c<br />

o<br />

c<br />

o<br />

D<br />

C<br />

o C<br />

o<br />

D


o<br />

o<br />

o o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o oo<br />

o<br />

o oo<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o J:\B6789<br />

ARUP<br />

Job title<br />

Document title<br />

Document ref<br />

<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan<br />

Transport Assessment<br />

Revision Date Filename <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Transport Assessment 281107.doc<br />

Issue 28/11/07 Description Issue<br />

Prepared by Checked by Approved by<br />

Name John Hanlon Andrew Hulse Andrew Hulse<br />

Signature<br />

Filename<br />

Description<br />

Name<br />

Signature<br />

Filename<br />

Description<br />

Name<br />

Signature<br />

Filename<br />

Description<br />

Name<br />

Signature<br />

- CALLAN PARK MASTERPLAN\CALLAN PARK TRANSPORT<br />

ASSESSMENT 281107.DOC<br />

Prepared by Checked by Approved by<br />

Prepared by Checked by Approved by<br />

Prepared by Checked by Approved by<br />

Document Verification<br />

Job number<br />

86789<br />

File reference<br />

Page 1of 1<br />

Issue Document Verification with Document D<br />

A",p<br />

Issue 28 November 2007


o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o [<br />

o<br />

D<br />

C<br />

[<br />

[,<br />

[<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

C


C<br />

C<br />

Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan<br />

Transport Assessment<br />

Contents<br />

Executive Summary<br />

Page<br />

1 INTRODUCTION 1<br />

2 REVIEW OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 2<br />

2.1 Road Network 2<br />

2.2 Public Transport 2<br />

2.3 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities 3<br />

2.4 <strong>Park</strong>ing 3<br />

2.5 <strong>Park</strong>ing Demand 3<br />

2.6 Traffic Generation 4<br />

3 TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT OF LAND USE PLAN 5<br />

3.1 Trip Generation 5<br />

3.2 Traffic Generation 6<br />

3.3 Public Transport Demand 6<br />

3.4 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities 6<br />

3.5 <strong>Park</strong>ing Demand 6<br />

3.6 Vehicular Access 7<br />

3.7 Traffic Impact 7<br />

4 SUMMARY 9<br />

Tables<br />

Table 1<br />

Table 2<br />

Table 3<br />

Table 4<br />

Table 5<br />

Table 6<br />

Table 7<br />

Figures<br />

Figure 1<br />

Figure 2<br />

Appendices<br />

Appendix A<br />

<strong>Park</strong>ing Controls<br />

MDT Traffic Flows<br />

Existing <strong>Park</strong>ing Supply<br />

Typical Weekday <strong>Park</strong>ing Occupancy<br />

Existing Traffic Generation<br />

Proposed Land Use<br />

Forecast Peak Hour Traffic Generation<br />

Forecast Peak <strong>Park</strong>ing Demand<br />

Site Location<br />

<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Precincts<br />

J:\B6789 - CALLAN PARK MASTERPlAN\CAllAN PARK TRANSPORT<br />

ASSESSMENT 281107.DOC<br />

AN.<br />

Issue 28 November 2007


Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan<br />

Transport Assessment<br />

Executive Summary<br />

Arup was commissioned by Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority (SHFA) to prepare a transport<br />

assessment for the 2007 <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan. The purpose of this transport assessment is [<br />

to:<br />

o Develop an understanding of the existing usage patterns on the site generated by the hospital<br />

uses and the existing University of Sydney uses.<br />

o Describe the transport components of the land use plan.<br />

o Assess the potential University expansion to be introduced onto the site and compare it with the<br />

existing situation.<br />

<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is conveniently located close to bus and light rail services. Bus stops are located on<br />

Balmain Road and Victoria Road, with services to the City and other locations. Lilyfield Light Rail<br />

Station is 600m from the site and the light rail provides services to Central Station.<br />

The Rozelle area is served by a dense although often congested road network. Significant delays<br />

occur on the main arterial routes, namely Victoria Road and City West Link, at peak periods.<br />

However, <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is a large site with multiple access points to the wider road network, allowing<br />

traffic to be distributed.<br />

The land use plan includes:<br />

o retention of the Wharf Road and <strong>Park</strong> Drive access points<br />

o signalisation of the existing Cottage Way intersection with Balmain Road<br />

o an increase in total parking provision to accommodate the university uses<br />

o retention of a network of walking paths across the site<br />

An assessment of the transport impact of the land use plan revealed:<br />

o The site would continue to be well-served by walking and cycling facilities.<br />

o The site would be well-served by public transport services and a significant increase in the<br />

number of services would not be required because the majority of trips would be in the CDunterpeak<br />

direction.<br />

o A significant proportion of trips to the site, particularly by university students, would be by noncar<br />

modes.<br />

o Up to one-fifth of students would reside on-site and these students would not contribute to<br />

external trips in the peak hours.<br />

o An additional controlled pedestrian crossing of Balmain Road would be provided, improving<br />

pedestrian accessibility for the wider community.<br />

o Trip generation of the university component would be relatively low in terms of peak hour trips<br />

per unit area floor space, primarily due to the dispersed nature of arrival and departure patterns.<br />

o The increased traffic generation of the site would be relatively low in the context of current traffic<br />

flows in the area. The road network would be able to accommodate this traffic increase without<br />

a significant impact on road network performance.<br />

In summary, based on the traffic forecasts contained in this assessment, the land use plan would<br />

result in only a small increase in site traffic generation compared to current generation. The net<br />

increase in traffic would be relatively low in the context of current traffic flows in the area. The wider<br />

road network would be able to accommodate this traffic increase without a significant impact on road<br />

network performance, although it is recognised that delays would continue to occur, particularly at<br />

peak periods.<br />

J:\86789· CALlAN PARK MASTERPlAN\CALlAN PARK TRANSPORT<br />

ASSESSMENT 281107.00C<br />

Pagei<br />

A",.<br />

Issue 28 November 2007


Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority<br />

2 REVIEW OF EXISTING CONDITIONS<br />

2.1 Road Network<br />

The main roads serving the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> area are:<br />

o Victoria Road to the northeast (State road)<br />

<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan<br />

Transport Assessment<br />

o Perry Street - Balmain Road - Darling Street forming the southern boundary of<br />

the site (Regional road)<br />

o City West Link to the south (State road)<br />

Vehicular access to the site is generally restricted to the south because of the presence of<br />

Iron Cove to the north.<br />

The main <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> access points are:<br />

o Wharf Road at Perry Street (signals)<br />

o <strong>Park</strong> Drive at Balmain Road opposite Cecily Street (signals)<br />

o Cottage Way (NSW Ambulance Service) at Balmain Road opposite The<br />

Boulevarde (priority)<br />

o Glover Street<br />

2.1.1 Traffic Flows<br />

Traffic data for main roads in the Vicinity of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> are presented in Table 1.<br />

Table 1 AADT Traffic Flows<br />

AADT 2005 AADT<br />

Balmain Road, West of Cecily St (Rozelle) 17,759<br />

Victoria Road, At Iron Cove Bridge (Rozelle) 78,145<br />

City-West Link Road, West Of The Crescent (Lilyfield) 54,058<br />

Source: RTA, 2006<br />

AADT - Annual Average Daily Traffic<br />

The road network in the Rozelle area typically operates with significant delays due to the<br />

intense land use, low capacity road network (narrow streets, turn restrictions, on-street<br />

parking etc), proximity to the City, and high level of through traffic. Victoria Road and City<br />

West Link are major urban arterials operating at capacity in the peak direction, i.e. towards<br />

the city in AM peak and from the city in PM peak. However, delays in the Rozelle area also<br />

regularly occur outside traditional weekday peak hours.<br />

2.2 Public Transport<br />

The <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> site is served by both bus and light rail.<br />

2.2.1 Buses<br />

A range of bus routes service the site:<br />

o Buses to and from the City (Victoria Road only): Bus numbers 500, 501, 504, 506,<br />

507,510,515, 518, and 520 from the city stop on Victoria Road, Rozelle 400m<br />

from the eastern boundary of the site.<br />

o Buses to and from the City (Balmain Road): Bus number 440 also leaves from<br />

Circular Quay in the city and travels via travels along Parramatta Road past the<br />

main Sydney University campus, then along Balmain Road.<br />

J:\86789· CALLAN PARK MASTERPLAMCALLAN PARK TRANSPORT<br />

ASSESSMENT 281107.DOC<br />

Page 2<br />

Aru,<br />

Issue 28 November 2007 [


[ Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan<br />

Transport Assessment<br />

[<br />

c<br />

• Buses to Balmain from Rozelle: Bus numbers 440 and 445 travel along Balmain<br />

Road.<br />

2.2.2 Light Rail<br />

Lilyfield light rail station is 600m from the southern boundary of the site and can be<br />

accessed via walking along Grove Street. The light rail provides transport to Darling<br />

Harbour and Central Railway Station. Travel time to Central is approximately 23 minutes,<br />

with a frequency of 15 minute peak/off-peak.<br />

2.3 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities<br />

The Rozelle area is served by a dense road network which provides for good walking and<br />

cycling accessibility. <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> can be accessed by a number of streets to the east, south<br />

and west of the site.<br />

There are currently two controlled pedestrian crossing points on Balmain Road between<br />

Glover Street and Manning Street. The crossing points are approximately 800m apart,<br />

however, contributing to a significant length of Balmain Road that does not have any<br />

controlled crossing.<br />

The Bay Run is a popular walking and cycling path around Iron Cove and passes through<br />

the northern portion of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />

2.4 <strong>Park</strong>ing<br />

The existing parking supply of the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> site is summarised in Table 2 below. The<br />

values shown are approximate only based on a cursory site inspection rather than a detailed<br />

inventory survey.<br />

TabIe 2 E" XISlin(I <strong>Park</strong>' In(l SUDDIV<br />

Land Use Approximate No.<br />

of <strong>Park</strong>ing Bays<br />

Sydney College of the Arts 186<br />

Rozelle HospitaliNGOs - W of Wharf Road 156<br />

Rozelle Hospital/NGOs - E of Wharf Road 99<br />

The Writers Centre 25<br />

SIDS/Nurses Home 26<br />

NSW Ambulance HQ 195<br />

Total 687<br />

Source: Arup, 16/10/2007<br />

Notes: - Includes some informal parking areas, such as grassed verges, that appear to be<br />

commonly used for parking<br />

- Excludes Rozelle Child Care Centre<br />

The Sydney College of the Arts has a 100 space student car park that can be used for a<br />

nominal fee (via an annual parking sticker). There are also a number of small staff/visitor<br />

parking areas.<br />

In addition to the formalised parking areas within the site as listed in Table 2, significant<br />

parking demand is generated by the playing fields along the waterfront. Most parking<br />

demand is generated at weekends and is accommodated in a number of formal and<br />

informal parking areas.<br />

2.5 <strong>Park</strong>ing Demand<br />

The parking occupancy of the entire site was surveyed on a typical weekday (1 0.30am,<br />

Tuesday 16 October 2007) as summarised in Table 3.<br />

J:\86769 - CAllAN PARK MASTERPLAN\CAlLAN PARK TRANSPORT<br />

ASSESSMENT 281107.DOC<br />

Page 3<br />

AN.<br />

Issue 28 November 2007


Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan<br />

Transport Assessment<br />

Table 3 Tvnical WeekdaY <strong>Park</strong>inn OccuDancv<br />

Land Use Precinct <strong>Park</strong>ing Occupancy<br />

Number Occupied % of Available<br />

Sydney College of the Arts 107 58%<br />

Rozelle Hospital/NGOs - W of Wharf Road 134 86%<br />

Rozelle Hospital/NGOs - E of Wharf Road 74 75%<br />

The Writers Centre 17 68%<br />

SIDS/Nurses Home 14 54%<br />

NSW Ambulance HQ 154 79%<br />

Total 500 73%<br />

Source: Arup, 10.30am - 16/10/2007<br />

Based on the results of the parking survey and review of current land use, the peak parking<br />

demand for the site, usually in the afternoon around hospital shift changeover time, is<br />

estimated to be currently in the order of 600 cars.<br />

The demand for parking along the waterfront is quite Iowan most weekdays. On busy<br />

weekends, the demand for parking associated with the playing fields exceeds the available<br />

supply, resulting in vehicles being parked inappropriately on ecologically sensitive areas<br />

along the waterfront.<br />

2.6 Traffic Generation<br />

Traffic surveys to determine the existing weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic generation<br />

of the site were undertaken in November 2001 (Source: Transport and Traffic Planning<br />

Associates). There have been no major land use changes to the site since 2001 and<br />

therefore the data is believed to be representative of current conditions.<br />

Table 4 Existino Traffic Generation<br />

Location Vehicles Per Hour<br />

AM Peak PM Peak<br />

In Out Total In Out Total<br />

Main Entrance (opposite<br />

Cecily Street) 34 17 51 41 29 70<br />

Ambulance Entrances* 66 11 77 11 66 77<br />

Wharf Road 75 16 91 30 61 91<br />

Glover Street- 51 47 98 84 83 167<br />

Total 226 91 317 166 239 405<br />

Notes:<br />

• Ambulance Entrances were not surveyed in 2001 and the values included in the table are estimates<br />

based on current parking demand<br />

•• Glover Street values may contain some non-<strong>Callan</strong> park traffic<br />

The total traffic generation of the site is currently in the order of 300-400 vph, whilst Balmain<br />

Road currently carries 1500 vph. The impact of this current traffic generation is relatively<br />

low because it is distributed across four access points with numerous approach/departure<br />

routes.<br />

J:\86789· CALLAN PARK MASTERPLAMCALLAN PARK TRANSPORT<br />

ASSESSMENT 28' 107.DOC<br />

Page 4<br />

Aru,<br />

Issue 28 November 2007


Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan<br />

Transport Assessment<br />

3 TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT OF LAND USE PLAN<br />

3.1 Trip Generation<br />

The major components of the proposed future land use as contained in the land use plan<br />

are given in Table 5.<br />

Table 5 ProDosed Land Use<br />

Land Use GFA (m') Assumptions<br />

University 100,512 Total of 5000 students (600 residing on-site) and 400<br />

staff + NSW Wrile(s Centre<br />

Ambulance 6,802 No change to existing employee/visitor numbers<br />

NGOs 13,761 No overall change to existing employee/visitor<br />

numbers<br />

Nurses precinct 4,335 All nurses work off-site<br />

Playing fields - public access 4 fields<br />

Playing fields - university 2 fields<br />

The main traffic generator of the proposed land use as contained in the land use plan is the<br />

university. Trip generation rates of universities can vary considerably from one campus to<br />

another, due to such factors as:<br />

• proportion of students residing onsite<br />

• level of undergraduate versus post-graduate students<br />

• typical teaching hours<br />

• number of non-teaching staff such as administration, research, catering etc<br />

Furthermore, trip generation varies throughout the year due to teaching periods, exam<br />

periods and vacation periods.<br />

For the purposes of this assessment, a primarily undergraduate style campus has been<br />

assumed, with 5000 students and 400 staff. It has been assumed that 600 of these<br />

students reside on-site. The assessment is based on a typical teaching period - trip<br />

generation in non-teaching periods would generally be lower.<br />

In terms of peak hour trips per unit area floor space, universities generate considerably less<br />

trips than other land uses such as office, factory and residential. This is mainly because<br />

university trip generation is relatively spread out over a typical day, without a distinct<br />

concentration of trips during peak hours.<br />

The <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> site is well-served by public transport as well as being easily accessible by<br />

walking and cycling. For the purposes of this assessment, the following non-car mode split<br />

assumptions have been made (the remainder of trips are assumed to be by private vehicle<br />

either as driver or passenger):<br />

• Students - 15% live on site, 30% use bus/light rail/walk/cycle<br />

• University staff and others - 15% use bus/light rail/walk/cycle<br />

• Ambulance staff and visitors - 15% use bus/light rail/walk/cycle<br />

• NGO staff and visitors - 20% use busllight rail/walk/cycle<br />

• Nurses - 20% use busllight rail/walk/cycle<br />

J:\86789 - CALlAN PARK MASTERPLAMCALlAN PARK TRANSPORT<br />

ASSESSMENT 281107.DOC<br />

Page 5<br />

Arup<br />

Issue 28 November 2007


Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority<br />

3.2 Traffic Generation<br />

<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> land Use Plan<br />

Transport Assessment<br />

Based on the mode split assumptions described in Section 3.1, the forecast traffic<br />

generation is presented in Table 6. The values are strategic in nature primarily for the<br />

purposes of informing the land use plan process.<br />

Table 6 Forecast Peak Hour Traffic Generation<br />

Vehicles Per Hour<br />

AM Peak PM Peak<br />

In Out Total In Out Total<br />

290 120 410 200 290 490<br />

The forecast peak hour traffic generation represents an increase of no more than 30% on<br />

current traffic generation. As discussed in Section 3.1 the values presented in Table 6 are<br />

for typical teaching periods and the actual values may be lower for a significant proportion of<br />

the year.<br />

3.3 Public Transport Demand<br />

The land use plan scenario would increase the demand for public transport services. Based<br />

on the mode split assumptions described in Section 3.1, the peak hour demand increase<br />

may be in the order of:<br />

Bus<br />

Light Rail<br />

additional 100 trips/hour (or 500 trips/day)<br />

additional 50 trips/hour (or 250 trips/day)<br />

The majority of these additional public transport trips would be by students.<br />

The majority of trips made by public transport would be in the counter-peak direction<br />

therefore it is unlikely that additional services would be required to aocommodate the<br />

increased demand.<br />

It is likely that in addition to the existing bus and light rail services, a private shuttle bus<br />

would operate between the University of Sydney's Darlington and <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> campuses.<br />

In the long term, the existing Sydney Ferries network could be extended to include a stop at<br />

<strong>Callan</strong> Point. The light rail network could also be extended to include a loop along Balmain<br />

Road.<br />

3.4 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities<br />

<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> would continue to be served by a good network of walking and cycling routes.<br />

There would be multiple entry points from the east, south and west. The Rozelle area is<br />

served by a dense road network which provides for good walking and cycling accessibility.<br />

The recently updated Leichhardt Bike Plan includes Balmain Road as a strategic bike route,<br />

Glover Street as a local bike route and the Bay Run as a recreational route.<br />

The number of controlled crossing points along Balmain Road would be increased with the<br />

provision of signals at Cottage Way (see section 3.6) thus improVing pedestrian aocessibility<br />

for the local community.<br />

The land use plan would not impact on the Bay Run around Iron Cove which passes<br />

through the northern portion of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />

3.5 <strong>Park</strong>ing Demand<br />

The forecast parking demand for the main building elements of the land use plan are<br />

presented in Table 7. <strong>Park</strong>ing rates are based on traffic generation forecasts in Section 3.2,<br />

J:\66789 - CALlAN PARK MASTERPlAN\CALtAN PARK TRANSPORT<br />

ASSESSMENT 281107.DOC<br />

Page 6<br />

AN,<br />

Issue 28 November 2007<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

r


[<br />

[<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

[<br />

Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan<br />

Transport Assessment<br />

the current level of parking demand and applicable Leichhardt Council gUidelines<br />

(Leichhardt DCP - Part A, April 2003).<br />

Table 7 Forecast Peak <strong>Park</strong>inc Demand<br />

Land Use <strong>Park</strong>ing Rate Possible Number of Notes<br />

Bays Required<br />

University 1.2 bays per 1,210 (186 could Based on existing College of the<br />

100m' GFA possibly be retained Arts parking rate<br />

from Kirkbride campus)<br />

Ambulance 2.0 bays per 160 (retention of Based on existing parking demand<br />

100m' GFA existing)<br />

NGOs 1.5 bays per 80 (new bays in NGO Based on Leichhardt Council's<br />

100m' GFA precinct) minimum parking rate<br />

If parking was provided at the rate shown in Table 7 was supplied, this would represent<br />

approximately double the number of parking bays than is currently provided at the site.<br />

The land use plan contains up to six playing fields. Two of the fields would be primarily for<br />

university use. It is unlikely that peak parking demand for the playing fields would coincide<br />

with the peak parking demand from the university teaching operations. Therefore, the<br />

demand for playing field parking could be accommodated within the university parking<br />

supply described in Table 7.<br />

The four public playing fields would generally need to be self-sufficient in terms of<br />

accommodating parking demand. The peak parking demand is forecast to be in the order of<br />

300 vehicles, although demand can vary considerably, and this would occur a number of<br />

times throughout a typical weekend competition day. <strong>Park</strong>ing demand on weekdays and<br />

weeknights associated with training activities is likely to be substantially less than parking<br />

demand on competition weekends. Formal parking areas would be provided near the<br />

playing fields to minimise impact on ecologically sensitive areas along the waterfront.<br />

More detailed discussion regarding parking controls can be found in Appendix A.<br />

3.6 Vehicular Access<br />

The land use plan has three main vehicular access points:<br />

• Wharf Road at Perry Street (existing signals)<br />

• <strong>Park</strong> Drive at Balmain Road opposite Cecily Street (existing signals)<br />

• Cottage Way at Balmain Road opposite The Boulevarde (proposed signals)<br />

The proposed Cottage Way intersection at Balmain Road would essentially be signalisation<br />

of the eXisting Ambulance HQ driveway.<br />

Based on the forecast traffic generation and current traffic flows on Balmain Road, the three<br />

signalised intersections would provide adequate capacity to accommodate peak traffic flows<br />

generated by the site.<br />

Many of the existing internal roads on the site are circuitous and narrow. The future internal<br />

road network could involve a combination of retention of some existing roads and<br />

construction of new roads.<br />

3.7 Traffic Impact<br />

As stated in Section 3.2, the land use plan land use may result in a traffic increase of<br />

approximately only 100 vehicles per hour (vph) at peak periods. This traffic would be<br />

J:\86789 - CAlLAN PARK MASTERPLAMCAlLAN PARK TRANSPORT<br />

ASSESSMENT 281107.DOC<br />

Page 7<br />

ANp<br />

Issue 28 November 2007


Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan<br />

Transport Assessment<br />

spread out across a number of roads, such as Balmain Road, Perry Street, Victoria Road<br />

and City West Link and therefore the overall impact would be relatively minor.<br />

The performance of a road network in an urban area Is generally a function of the<br />

performance of key intersections. The most critical Intersection in the vicinity of the site is<br />

the Victoria Road I Darling Street intersection, which operates at capacity with significant<br />

delays. Traffic accessing the site from this direction would continue to be subject to<br />

significant delays at Victoria Road.<br />

The City West Link intersections generally operate at capacity, with short green time given<br />

to cross streets such as James Street, Norton Street, Balmain Road and Catherine Street.<br />

<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> traffic would continue to be subject to delays in entering or crossing City West<br />

Link.<br />

The land use plan would result in only a small increase in site traffic generation compared to<br />

current generation. The net increase in traffic would therefore be relatively low in the<br />

context of current traffic flows in the area. The wider road network would be able to<br />

accommodate this traffic increase without a significant impact on road network performance,<br />

although it is recognised that delays would continue to occur, particularly at peak periods.<br />

J:\86789· CALLAN PARK MASTERPLAN\CAlLAN PARK TRANSPORT<br />

ASSESSMENT 281107.DOC<br />

Page 8<br />

[<br />

[<br />

c [<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

c<br />

[<br />

ru<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

o<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c o<br />

o<br />

Arup<br />

Issue 28 November 2007


[ Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan<br />

Transport Assessment<br />

c<br />

c<br />

o<br />

4 SUMMARY<br />

This report has described the existing usage patterns on the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> site and the<br />

existing transport network serving the area.<br />

<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is conveniently located close to bus and light rail services. Bus stops are<br />

located on Balmain Road and Victoria Road, with services to the City and other locations.<br />

Lilyfield Light Rail Station is 800m from the site and the light rail provides services to Central<br />

Station.<br />

The Rozelle area is served by a dense although often congested road network. Significant<br />

delays occur on the main arterial routes, namely Victoria Road and City West Link, at peak<br />

periods. However, <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is a large site with multiple access points to the wider road<br />

network, allowing traffic to be distributed.<br />

The land use plan includes:<br />

• retention of the Wharf Road and <strong>Park</strong> Drive access points<br />

• signalisation of the existing Cottage Way intersection with Balmain Road opposite<br />

The Boulevarde<br />

• an increase In total parking provision to accommodate the university uses<br />

• retention of a network of walking paths across the site<br />

An assessment of the transport impact of the land use plan revealed:<br />

• The site would continue to be well-served by walking and cycling facilities.<br />

• The site would be well-served by public transport services and a significant<br />

increase in the number of services would not be required because the majority of<br />

trips would be in the counter-peak direction.<br />

• A significant proportion of trips to the site, particularly by university students,<br />

would be by non-car modes.<br />

• Up to one-fifth of students would reside on-site and these students would not<br />

contribute to external trips in the peak hours.<br />

• An additional controlled pedestrian crossing of Balmain Road would be provided,<br />

improving pedestrian accessibility for the wider community.<br />

• Trip generation of the university component would be relatively low in terms of<br />

peak hour trips per unit area fioor space, primarily due to the dispersed nature of<br />

arrival and departure patterns.<br />

• The increased traffic generation of the site would be relatively low in the context<br />

of current traffic fiows in the area. The road network would be able to<br />

accommodate this traffic increase without a significant impact on road network<br />

performance.<br />

In summary, based on the traffic forecasts contained in this assessment, the master plan<br />

would result in only a small increase in site traffic generation compared to current<br />

generation. The net increase in traffic would be relatively low in the context of current traffic<br />

fiows in the area. The wider road network would be able to accommodate this traffic<br />

increase without a significant impact on road network performance, although it is recognised<br />

that delays would continue to occur, particularly at peak periods.<br />

J:\86789 - CAlLAN PARK MASTERPlAN\CALlAN PARK TRANSPORT<br />

ASSESSMENT 281,07.DOC<br />

Page 9<br />

Aru,<br />

Issue 28 November 2007


[<br />

[<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c [<br />

c oc<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

o<br />

c ooc<br />

o c


0<br />

0 ,n<br />

U Appendix A<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

<strong>Park</strong>ing Controls


Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan<br />

Transport Assessment<br />

Section 3.5 of the this report discusses parking demand for the main areas of the site. The C<br />

following table further discusses parking in relation to eight precincts of the site (refer to<br />

Figure 2) and Leichhardt Council's DCP 2006. The DCP contains minimum and maximum [':'<br />

parking rates. Council states that, where possible, minimum rates should be adopted to ,<br />

(DCP Section 8.0):<br />

• Increase the choice ofavailable transport and reducing dependence on cars.<br />

• To make cycling a viable transport alternative.<br />

• To restrain employee off-street parking provisions to discourage car travel.<br />

• To improve the design and quality ofthe urban environment.<br />

Precinct Proposed <strong>Park</strong>ing Rate<br />

1. Waterfront Precinct Leichhardt DCP 2006 does not contain a parking rate for<br />

playing fields. <strong>Park</strong>ing rates for playing fields are generally<br />

calculated from first principles for each particular location.<br />

It is estimated that the peak parking demand for the 3<br />

formal ovals could be in the order of 300 vehicles<br />

2. Kirkbride Curtilage Precinct Retain current parking rate of 1.2 bays per 100m 2 GFA<br />

3. <strong>Park</strong>land Campus Precinct Provide parking at a similar rate to Precinct 2, I.e. 1.2 bays<br />

per 100m 2 GFA<br />

4. NGO Precinct Provide parking at 1.5 bays per 100m 2 GFA, which is the<br />

minimum rate specified for "Commercial Premises" in the<br />

Leichhardt DCP<br />

5. Church SVGlover St Precinct Provide parking at lower rate than Precincts 2 and 3, i.e.<br />

1.0 bays per 100m 2 GFA, to refiect the lower trip<br />

generation ofthe precinct<br />

6. Wharf Road Precinct Provide parking at 1.5 bays per 100m 2 GFA, which is the<br />

minimum rate specified for "Commercial Premises" in the<br />

Leichhardt DCP. The rate for this precinct is higher than<br />

for Precincts 2 and 3 due to the higher density of<br />

development<br />

7. NSW Ambulance Service Precinct Retain current parking rate of 2.0 bays per 100m 2 GFA,<br />

which is within the Leichhardt DCP range for "Commercial<br />

Premises" of 1.5 - 3.0<br />

8. Nurses Precinct Retain current parking rate of 0.5 bays per 100m 2 GFA<br />

J:\B6789 - CALLAN PARK MASTERPLAN\CALLAN PARK TRANSPORT<br />

ASSESSMENT 281107.DOC<br />

[<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c [<br />

[<br />

[<br />

c<br />

[<br />

[<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c c<br />

[<br />

c<br />

o<br />

PageA1 A'll'<br />

Issue 28 November 2007 c


[<br />

Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan<br />

Transport Assessment<br />

J:\86789 - CALLAN PARK MASTERPLAMCAlLAN PARK TRANSPORT<br />

ASSESSMENT 281107.DOC<br />

Page A2<br />

Arup<br />

Issue 28 November 2007


[<br />

[<br />

c [<br />

c [<br />

c<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[I<br />

[<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

D<br />

C<br />

C<br />

o<br />

C


CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN - APPENDICES<br />

APPENDIX C: SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT<br />

.....J<br />

.....J<br />

UJ<br />

(f)<br />

(f)<br />

« I


[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[;<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

c<br />

c rL<br />

c<br />

o<br />

o c


[<br />

[<br />

PROPERTY CONSULTING<br />

CALLAN PARK ECONOMIC<br />

AND SOCIAL IMPACT<br />

ASSESSMENT<br />

Prepared for<br />

The Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority<br />

November 2007


c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

[<br />

c<br />

c<br />

o o<br />

c<br />

[<br />

[<br />

o<br />

c<br />

o<br />

o oc<br />

o<br />

o c


C07155 - <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Ee anomie and Social Impact Assessment<br />

CONTENTS<br />

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARy 5<br />

1.1 Study Brie!.. 5<br />

1.2 Site Location and Description 5<br />

1.3 Proposed Land Use Plan 2007 6<br />

1.4 Key StUdy Findings 6<br />

1.5 Conclusion 9<br />

2. INTRODUCTION 10<br />

2.1 Study Brie!.. 10<br />

2.2 Study Background 10<br />

2.3 Proposed Land Use Plan 2007 11<br />

2.4 Site and Locality Description 12<br />

3. DEMOGRAPHICS 14<br />

3.1 Demographic Analysis 14<br />

3.2 Existing Site Uses 17<br />

4. ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS 20<br />

4.1 Education 20<br />

4.2 Expenditure 21<br />

4.3 Investment Stimulus 21<br />

4.4 Employment Generation - Operations 22<br />

4.5 Employment Generation - Construction 22<br />

4.6 Construction Multiplier Effects 23<br />

5. SOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS 25<br />

5.1 Open Space and Recreation I Sporting Areas 25<br />

5.2 Accessibility and Safety 26<br />

5.3 Education 27<br />

5.4 Ambulance Headquarters and NGOs. 28<br />

5.5 Protecting Heritage 29<br />

5.6 Sustainability 29<br />

6. CONCLUSiON 31<br />

Page 3


C07155 - Galan <strong>Park</strong> Ec onomic and Sooallmpact Assessment<br />

LIST OF FIGURES<br />

Figure 1- Aerial view of site 12<br />

Figure 2- Location plan of site in wider geographic context.. 13<br />

LIST OF TABLES<br />

Table 1 - Population Characteristics 15<br />

Table 2 - Dwelling and Household Types 16<br />

Table 3 - Employment and Income Characteristics 17<br />

Table 4 - Journey to Work - Jobs within <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> 2001 18<br />

Table 5 - Journey to Work - Remainder of Leichardt LGA 2001 19<br />

Table 6 - Construction Costs Multipliers 23<br />

Table 7 - Construction Employment Multipliers 24<br />

Page 4


C07155 - <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Economic and Social Impact Assessment<br />

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

1.1 Study Brief<br />

Hill PDA has been commissioned by the Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority (SHFA) to undertake a<br />

Social and Economic Impact Assessment of the proposed Land Use Plan for Cailan Parle Cailan <strong>Park</strong> is<br />

located within the Local Govemment Area (LGA) of Leichhardt and is a State significant community,<br />

heritage, landscape and cultural asset.<br />

Hiil PDA has worked with the Consultant Team (lead by Hasseil), SHFA and the University of Sydney to<br />

develop an appropriate Land Use Plan for the site. The Land Use Plan seeks to accommodate an [<br />

enhanced University of Sydney campus, whilst protecting and preserving the natural and built heritage of<br />

Cailan <strong>Park</strong>. The proposed Land Use Plan seeks to ensure that there is no net loss of open space, but<br />

rather the rationalisation of eXisting buildings on the site to create more accessible and usable open spaces 0<br />

for the local community and wider public. The Land Use Plan also seeks to accommodate the existing NSW<br />

Ambulance Service Headquarters and Non Government Organisations on the site to retain the social<br />

benefits they provide to the community.<br />

SHFA wiil be submitting the proposed Cailan <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan to the Minister for Planning for public<br />

exhibition. This Social and Economic Impact Assessment forms part of the suite of documents to be<br />

submitted with the Land Use Plan. It gives particular consideration to the social and economic matters on<br />

both a macro and a local scale.<br />

1.2 Site Location and Description<br />

Cailan <strong>Park</strong> is a 61Ha site bordered by Sydney Harbour to the north, Glover Street to the west, Balmain<br />

Road to the south and Manning Street to the east. The site is located within the suburb of Lilyfield which is<br />

located approximately 5km from Sydney CBD.<br />

The site presently comprises a mix of built structures inciuding buildings of State heritage significance, local<br />

significance and some that are intrusive or adversely affecting the built landscape character of the site.<br />

These buildings are occupied by a range of government and non government related uses including the<br />

University of Sydney Coilege of the Arts, the NSW Ambulance Headquarters and Training Facility, various<br />

Non Government Organisations (NGO's) and a NSW Health facility for Mental Health. The latter of which<br />

wiil be relocated in 2008 to form part of acomprehensive health facility at Concord.<br />

As of 2001, Journey to Work Data found that the existing uses on the site generated 595 jobs (6% of ail<br />

jobs within Leichhardt LGA). Of the 595 jobs, 70% were within the Health and Community Service Sector<br />

and 10% in Education.<br />

Page 5<br />

c


o<br />

o<br />

c<br />

c<br />

C07155 -CaDan Pa1< Economic and Sociallmpacl Assessment<br />

Of the 61 Ha, 47Ha of the site is presently provided as open space and recreational areas. These areas are<br />

regularly used by a range of sporting clubs and organisations (such as local soccer clubs) in addition to<br />

private recreational users.<br />

1.3 Proposed Land Use Plan 2007<br />

The proposed <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan 2007 includes:<br />

1. the refurbishment and reuse of existing Grade A and B Heritage Buildings (30,000sqm);<br />

2. the retention of the NSW Ambulance State Headquarters and training facility on site (6,800sqm);<br />

3. the retention of a Nurses Precinct (4,300sqm)<br />

4. the retention of existing Non Government Organisations on site (13,800sqm);<br />

5. the provision of 70,500sqm new build floorspace to accommodate the expansion of the University;<br />

6. enhanced landscaping and open spaces including provision of a 150sqm green corridor along the<br />

harbour foreshore and two new sporting ovals;<br />

7. improved access and egress points; and<br />

8. improved parking provision.<br />

From a social perspective, it is understood that the University must expand to the degree outlined above in<br />

order to provide a comprehensive and quality learning environment that includes a range of compatible<br />

disciplines. It would not be possible to achieve these objectives by utilising all of the existing buildings on<br />

the site. Furthermore, from an economic perspective the expansion of the University campus and<br />

associated new buildings will be necessary to ensure the viability of the development for the University.<br />

The viability of development will be particularly important in light of the University's commitment to funding<br />

the significant refurbishment and maintenance works required to protect the Heritage bUildings on the site.<br />

1.4 Key Study Findings<br />

Hill PDA's analysis of the proposed Land Use Plan has identified a number of key social and economic<br />

impacts. These impacts have been summarised and outlined below.<br />

Key Economic Impacts of the Proposed Land Use Plan<br />

1. The expansion of the University of Sydney Campus on the site will enhanc e opportunities for local<br />

and international students to learn and further their education. Enhanced education and learning<br />

has a positive influence on an individual's ability to earn and to find suitable employment Higher<br />

employment rates and incomes in lirn have positive spin off benefits to the local and wider<br />

economy through improved spending power, service demand and economic sustainability.<br />

Page 6


C07155 - <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Economic and Social Impact Assessment<br />

2. There is a clear positive correlation between improved education, learning and the economy. [t has<br />

been estimated by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) that just<br />

one add[tional year of education increases economic output by between 3% and 6%. Improved<br />

education achieves these benefits by raising productivity, innovation, competitiveness,<br />

technological progress by enhancing industries ability to forecast change.<br />

3. The proposed extended use of the site by the University of Sydney and enhanced connections<br />

between the site and local centres will support the growth and viability of local businesses by<br />

increasing local expenditure and demand for services.<br />

4. The proposed Land Use Plan will generate a net gain in full and I or part time employment on the<br />

site in the order of 100 - 300 jobs. These jobs will be suitable for a range of age groups and skills<br />

in accordance with the objectives of Leichhardt Council's 2020 Strategic Plan.<br />

5. The University of Sydney has estimated a construction value for the development of $300m plus.<br />

This will directly generate approximately 181 jobs in the construction industry for 10 years.<br />

6. Through the multip[ier effect, the proposed Land Use Plan will generate a further $271m activity in<br />

production induced effects and $289m in consumption induced effects. Total economic activity<br />

generated by the construction of the proposed development will therefore be approximately<br />

$560m.<br />

7. Through construction mu[tipliers the proposed Land Use Plan will indirectly generate in the order<br />

of 800 jobs in the construction industry over 10 years.<br />

8. The positive and prestigious image associated with the University and its occupation of the site, in<br />

addition to its significant investment is likely to generate additional investment and development<br />

interest in the local area and LGA. This will benefit the locality's vitality, viability and economic<br />

sustainability.<br />

Key Social Impacts of the Proposed Land Use Plan<br />

1. The expansion of the University of Sydney Campus and enhanced learning opportunities will have<br />

a number of social benefits including direct and indirect health benefits for students. A recent study<br />

by the OECD found that additional years of schooling substantially increased health, well being<br />

and health behaviours. These factors lead to an improvement in the quality of a person's life as<br />

well as preventing illness and enabling more efficient treatment. Each of these benefits has<br />

significant health related cost savings for Governments.<br />

2. The expansion of the University of Sydney Campus also has social benefits by improving civic and<br />

social engagement (CSE) and interaction. On an individual basis, education also enhances a<br />

person's ability to make choices and follow through on them. Education can also positively<br />

influence the 'context' in which people choose to live in and their opportunities to make choices<br />

Page 7


o<br />

[<br />

C07155 - <strong>Callan</strong> Pal< EcOflOOlic and Social Impact Assessment<br />

within these contexts'. A study by the OECD also identified other potential positive social impacts<br />

as a result of education including reduced levels of crime, anti social behaviour and poverty within<br />

communities.<br />

3. The proposed extended use of the site by the University of Sydney will provide a IMder range of<br />

education opportunities for local residents, residents of Sydney and wider NSW. A comprehensive<br />

and expanded University campus will also improve the quality of learning and the educational<br />

experience of students.<br />

4. When compared to NSW benchmarks for open space and various other inner Sydney LGA's,<br />

Leichhardt LGA has a relatively low proportion of open space per capita (1.65Ha). Without<br />

significant additional supply, this ratio will further decrease with the forecasted growth in<br />

population. <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is the largest of the six main recreational venues and open space areas in<br />

Leichhardt LGA. Accordingly the proposed retention and enhancement of open space by the Land<br />

Use Plan supports Leichhardt Council's objectives for open space provision.<br />

5. The proposed Land Use Plan will provide a range of active recreational facilities including two<br />

additional sporting fields along the foreshore and refurbishment of the existing sporting field. There<br />

is also potential for two additional sporting fields along the Balmain frontage of the site.<br />

6. The proposed Land Use Plan will provide a range of passive recreational spaces including a 150m<br />

wide open and green corridor along the foreshore that will link with other local open spaces.<br />

Combined these areas will create a network of open, unstnuctured spaces suitable to the<br />

recreation and leisure pursuits of older residents and families. Meeting the needs of this<br />

demographic is particularly important given their predominance in the local community.<br />

7. The proposed Land Use Plan will provide enhanced space for Non Government Organisations and<br />

in turn, support the ongoing provision of valuable community services.<br />

8. The proposed Land Use Plan will provide enhanced State Ambulance Headquarters and training<br />

facilities which will have flow on benefits across NSW through improved services and better skilled<br />

officers.<br />

9. The use of the site as a University is complementary to, and not restrictive of, public interaction<br />

and access to the site. kcordingly the proposed Land Use Plan will result in increased activity<br />

within and around the site by a range of University related and public users. This will result in a<br />

greater level of active surveillance and the improved safety / perception of safety through the day<br />

and evening.<br />

10. The proposed extended use of the site by the University will reduce the need for local students<br />

and university related employees to travel out of the area and thereby reduce dependence on<br />

, Understanding the Social Outcomes of Learning, OEC a 2007<br />

Page 8


C07155 - <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Ec anomic and Social Impact Assessment<br />

vehicles. The sites close proximity to a range of bus services and light rail will promote more<br />

sustainable modes of transport. This will in turn have environmental benefits.<br />

11. The proposed extended occupation of the site by the University and its prestigious image will<br />

create astrong positive identity for the locality.<br />

12. The proposal provides a socially responsible long term user for the site that seeks to preserve and<br />

enhance the heritage character of the buildings and their curtilage to the benefit of present and<br />

future generations.<br />

1.5 Conclusion<br />

Given that the proposed Land Use Plan will:<br />

• improve the vitality and character of the site and surrounding area;<br />

• enhance existing open space and the public's ability to regularly access and utilise these spaces;<br />

• generate new employment opportunities suited to a range of ages and skills;<br />

• support local businesses and the local economy;<br />

• provide improved educational opportunities for local, Sydney and NSW residents to the benefit of<br />

their social and economic well being;<br />

• have positive economic flow on effects to the wider economy; and<br />

• ensure a socially responsible primary occupier of the site who will seek to preserve and enhance<br />

the existing built and landscaped heritage of the site;<br />

the proposed <strong>Callan</strong> Fark Land Use Plan is supported and considered in acccrdance with Leichhardt<br />

Council's 2020 Strategic Plan objectives to develop a "social, environmental and economic legacy that<br />

benefits future generations". It is therefore considered that the Land Use Plan should be supported on<br />

social and economic grounds.<br />

Page 9<br />

[<br />

[


C07155 - <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Economic and Social Impact Assessment<br />

The objectives olthe act are to:<br />

(a) to ensure that the whole of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> remains in public ownership and subject to public control, and<br />

(b) to ensure the preservation of the areas of open space at <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> that were in existence<br />

immediately before the commencement of this Act, and that extend to and include the foreshore of<br />

Iron Cove on the Parramatta River, and<br />

(c) to allow public access to that open space, including that foreshore, for pUblic recreational purposes of<br />

both an active and a passive nature, and<br />

(d) to preserve the heritage significance of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, including its historic buildings, gardens and other<br />

landscape features, and<br />

(e) to impose appropriate controls on the future development of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>..<br />

The <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Act 2002, SEPP 56 and Leichhardt Council planning policies and objectives have each<br />

been given due consideration throughout the preparation of the proposed Land Use Plan.<br />

2.3 Proposed Land Use Plan 2007<br />

The proposed <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan 2007 includes:<br />

1. the refurbishment and reuse of existing Grade A and B Heritage Buildings (30,000sqm);<br />

2. the retention of the NSW Ambulance State Headquarters and training facility on site (6,800sqm);<br />

3. the retention of a Nurses Precinct (4,300sqm)<br />

4. the retention of existing Non Government Organisations on site (13,800sqm);<br />

5. the provision of 70,500sqm new build floorspace to accommodate the expansion of the University;<br />

6. enhanced landscaping and open spaces including provision of a 150sqm green corridor along the<br />

harbour foreshore and two new sporting ovals;<br />

7. improved access and egress points; and<br />

8. improved parking provision.<br />

From a social perspective, it is understood that the University must expand to the degree outlined above in<br />

order to provide a comprehensive and quality learning environment that includes a range of compatible<br />

disciplines. It would not be possible to achieve these objectives by utilising all of the existing buildings on<br />

the site. Furthermore, from an economic perspective the expansion of the University campus and<br />

associated new buildings will be necessary to ensure the viability of the development for the University.<br />

The viability of development will be particularly important in light of the University's commitment to funding<br />

the significant refurbishment and maintenance works required to protect the Heritage bUildings on the site.<br />

Page 11<br />

c


[<br />

c<br />

[<br />

C07155 - Galan P


C07155 - <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Ee anomie and Social Impact Assessment<br />

• Staff residences associated with NSW Health;<br />

• Sydney and South West Health Services;<br />

• We Help Ourselves (NGO);<br />

• Just Enough Faith (NGO);<br />

• Aftercare;<br />

• the Construction Industry Drug and Alcohol Foundation (NGO);<br />

• Sids and Kids (NGO); and<br />

• the Mental Health Coordination Council (NGO).<br />

Of the 61 Ha, 47ha of the site is presently provided as open space and recreational areas. These areas are<br />

regularly used by a range of sporting clubs and organisations (such as local soccer clubs) in addition to<br />

private recreational users.<br />

Figure 2· Location plan ofsite in wider geographic context<br />

•<br />

Source: Hill POA<br />

Page 13<br />

Rozelle<br />

[


C07155 - GaIIan Pail Ec onomic and Sociallmpaet Assessment<br />

3. DEMOGRAPHICS<br />

3.1 Demographic Analysis<br />

Leichhardt LGA contains a mix of residential, commercial and industrial uses and over the course of time<br />

has experienced increasing gentrification. This has amplified the popularity of centres within the LGA for<br />

tourist, heritage, and culture related uses as well as attracted increased residential development.<br />

Leichhardt LGA is strategically located adjacent to Sydney CBD as well as Sydney Harbour, and it has both<br />

a rich heritage and a diverse population.<br />

This section of the report describes and compares the demographic characteristics of the two suburbs on<br />

either side of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> (Lilyfield and Rozelle) in comparison to Leichhardt LGA and the Sydney<br />

Statistical Division (SD) in order to better understand any potential implications of the proposed Land Use<br />

Plan. This information is based on the ABS 2006 Census Data.<br />

Relevant general population characteristics to this study shown in the table below are as follows:<br />

• Lilyfield, Rozelle and Leichhardt LGA all have a smaller average household size ranging from 2.0­<br />

2.2 persons per household which contrasts to the Sydney SD's of 2.7;<br />

• Lilyfield, the suburb containing the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> site, has a higher median age (38 years) compared<br />

to Rozelle, Leichhardt and Sydney SD(35 - 36 years);<br />

• Leichhardt LGA has a significantly greater proportion of residents in the 30 - 44 age bracket (33%)<br />

compared to the Sydney SD (23%);<br />

• Lilyfield has a higher proportion of residents within the lower age groups compared to Rozelle and<br />

Leichhardt, however the Sydney SD has a significantly higher percentage than all three<br />

comparative areas; and<br />

• Lilyfield, Rozelle and Leichhardt all have a higher proportion of residents of European descent in<br />

comparison to the Sydney SD.<br />

Page 14


C07155 - <strong>Callan</strong> Pari< Ee anomie and Social Impact Assessment<br />

Table 1 - Population Characteristics<br />

Population and Dwellings<br />

Lelchhardt<br />

Rozelle Lilylield LGA Sydney SO<br />

Total Population 6,872 6,761 48,778 4,119,190<br />

Total Dwellings 3,438 3,136 24,060 1,643,675<br />

Occupied Private Dwellings 3,172 2,871 21,994 1,521,465<br />

Occupied Private Dwellings (%) 92.3% 91.5% 91.4% 92.6%<br />

Average Household Size 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.7<br />

Age Distribution<br />

0-14 13.6% 16.8% 14.4% 19.5%<br />

15-29 18.9% 15.0% 18.5% 21.2%<br />

30-44 37.7% 31.2% 33.4% 23.2%<br />

45-59 19.4% 19.9% 19.9% 19.3%<br />

60-74 7.8% 10.1% 9.6% 10.6%<br />

75+ 2.5% 6.9% 4.3% 6.1%<br />

Total 100.0% 100.0% 10lJ.O% 100.0%<br />

Median Age 35 38 36 35<br />

Place of Birth<br />

Australia & Oceania 65.4% 68.6% 67.4% 63.1%<br />

Europe 14.7% 14.2% 13.8% 8.9%<br />

North Africa and Middle East 0.4% 0.6% 0.5% 2.5%<br />

Asia 4.2% 3.2% 3.7% 10.6%<br />

Americas 1.4% 0.8% 1.2% 0.6%<br />

Sub-Saharan Africa 0.5% 0.5% 0.6% 0.7%<br />

Other 13.4% 12.2% 12.8% 13.7%<br />

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Source: ASS Census Data 2006<br />

In relation to Household Characteristics, the table below summarises the demographics of the comparative<br />

areas discussed above. The main findings are as follows:<br />

• Lilyfield. Rozelle and Leichhardt LGA all have a lower proportion of homes in ownership and being<br />

purchased than the Sydney SO as well as a lower proportion of homes being rented;<br />

• The Sydney SO has a significantly larger proportion of family households than the suburbs of<br />

Lilyfield. Rozelle and Leichhardt LGA<br />

• Lilyfield. Rozelle and Leichhardt have higher proportions of couples with no children; and<br />

• it therefore follows that Leichhardt LGA and suburbs have a greater proportion of lone person<br />

households than the Sydney SO.<br />

Page 15 o


[<br />

c<br />

COl155 - Gallan Pal< Ec anomie and Social Impact Assessment<br />

Table 2· Dwelling and Household Types<br />

Lelchhardt<br />

Rozelle Lilylleld LGA Sydney SO<br />

Home Ownership<br />

Owned or Bein9 Purchased 56.6% 60.4% 56.4% 65.0%<br />

Rented 41.6% 36.6% 41.3% 31.3%<br />

Other/Not Stated 1.8% 3.0% 2.4% 3.7%<br />

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Household Structure<br />

Family Households 62.2% 63.9% 60.8% 72.7%<br />

Lone Person Households 29.1% 30.2% 31.3% 23.1%<br />

Group Households 8.7% 5.9% 8.0% 4.2'1.<br />

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Family Type<br />

Couple family w. children 34.7% 43.6% 38.0% 49.3%<br />

Couple family w/o children 52.2% 38.3% 46.3% 33.2%<br />

One parent family 11.0% 15.6% 13.0% 15.6%<br />

Other family 2.1% 2.6% 2.7% 1.9%<br />

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Dwellln9 Type<br />

Separate house 31.2% 56.9% 35.4% 63.6%<br />

Townhouse 34.7% 22.8% 37.2% 11.8%<br />

Flat-Unit-Apartment 31.7% 20.0% 26.0% 23.9%<br />

Other dwelling 2.4% 0.4% 1.4% 06%<br />

Not stated 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%<br />

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Source: ASS Census Data 2006<br />

I!TfTIIIM<br />

CONSULTING<br />

The impact of the proximity of the CBO to the suburbs of Rozelle, Lilyfield and Leichhardt LGA is evident by<br />

the nature of the incomes of residents in these areas compared to the Sydney SO. Lilyfield has a higher<br />

median weekly household income than the Sydney SO at $1,431 compared to $1,154, though il is<br />

significantly lower than it's neighbouring suburb of Rozelle at $2,070 and Leichhardt LGA at $1,733.<br />

The Employment and Income Characteristics Table below also shows that Lilyfield has a greater proportion<br />

of low income earners (less than $799 per week) as opposed to Rozelle and Leichhardt, however Rozelle<br />

and Leichhardt have a significantly higher proportion of high income earners (I.e. $1,400 - $2,500+ per<br />

week) in comparison to Lilyfield.<br />

In terms of employment, Rozelle, Lilyfield and Leichhardl LGA all have a far higher proportion of residents<br />

employed in white collar professional jobs than the Sydney SO. Correspondingly their rates of<br />

unemployment are much lower than thai of the Sydney SO.<br />

Page 16


C07155 -<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Economic and Social Impact Assessment<br />

Table 3- Employment and Income Characteristics<br />

Rozelle Lilyfleld<br />

Leichhardl<br />

LGA SydneySD<br />

Labour Force<br />

Managers 22.2% 17.8% 19.3% 12.5%<br />

Professionals 38.8% 35.0% 38.6% 22.5%<br />

Community & Personal Services Wor1


c<br />

C07155 - Canan Pa1< Ec ooomic and Social Impact Assessment<br />

JTW data has been applied for the purpose of this Social and Economic Impact assessment to identify the<br />

nature of employment generating uses on the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> site as of 2001.<br />

In order to ac hieve this, !he JTW data was broken down into two sections. The first section being the <strong>Callan</strong><br />

<strong>Park</strong> travel zone (i.e. the subject site) and for comparison purposes the sum of all the remaining travel<br />

zones in the LGA.<br />

As of2001, 595 people were employed in the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> travel zone. Of these 595 jobs, 419 (or 70%)<br />

were employed in the Health and Community Service industry. The second highest employment bracket in<br />

<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> was Education at 10% of the total jobs in the area.<br />

In terms of the remainder of the LGA, there were a total of 10,353 jobs generated within the area as of<br />

2001. <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> therefore provided a significant proportion (6%) of jobs within the LGA.<br />

The highest employment generating industry in Leichhardt as of 2001 was found to be Business Services<br />

(23% of total employment). Health and Community Services was the second largest category (12%) with<br />

jobs in <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> once again contributing a significant proportion (34%) of these jobs. Of the 455<br />

Education related jobs in the LGA, <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> also provided 14% of the total.<br />

This information is illustrated in the following two tables.<br />

Table 4· Journey to Work· Jobs within <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> 2001<br />

Industry Type No. of Jobs %of Jobs<br />

Accommodation, Cafes and Restaurants 14 2.35%<br />

Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing 0 0.00%<br />

Communication Services 0 0.00%<br />

Construction 5 0.84%<br />

Cultural and Recreational Services 7 1.18%<br />

Education 62 10.42%<br />

Finance and Insurance 0 0.00%<br />

Government Administration and Defence 11 1.85%<br />

Health and Community Services 419 70.42%<br />

Manufacturing 8 1.34%<br />

Mining 0 0.00%<br />

Non-


C07155 - <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Economic and Social Impact Assessment<br />

Table 5· Journey to Work- Remainder of Leichardt LGA 2001<br />

Industry Type No. of Jobs %of Jobs<br />

Accommodation, Cafes and Restaurants 792 7.65%<br />

Agriculture, Forestry and Fishin9 20 0.19%<br />

Communication Services 130 1.26%<br />

Construction 693 6.69%<br />

Cultural and Recreational Services 501 4.84%<br />

Education 455 4.39%<br />

Finance and Insurance 36 0.35%<br />

Government Administration and Defence 200 1.93%<br />

Health and Community Services 1242 12.00%<br />

Manufacturing 839 8.10%<br />

Mining 47 0.45%<br />

Non-classifiable economic units 47 0.45%<br />

Not stated 35 0.34%<br />

Personal and Other Services 413 3.99%<br />

Property &Business Services 2432 23.49%<br />

Retail Trade 1142 11.03%<br />

Transport and Storage 511 4.94%<br />

Wholesale Trade 382 3.69%<br />

TOTAL 10353 100.00%<br />

Source. ASS Census Data 2001<br />

Page 1g [


c [<br />

C<br />

[<br />

c o<br />

C07155 - <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Ec anomie and Social Impact Assessment<br />

4. ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS<br />

4.1 Education<br />

Of the 30 countries that form part of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD),<br />

on average half of all young adults enter universities or similar institutions at some point in their lives. In the<br />

case of Australia over 45% of these students complete a first university degree. In fact between 1995 and<br />

2002 in Australia the number of students enrolling in tertiary and high level education has increased by<br />

over 20%'.<br />

The growth in popularity of higher education may be reflective of the benefits it can have to an individual's<br />

potential future earnings and ability to find employment Studies in the United States have found that<br />

people with tertiary qualifications earn as much as 86% more in salary than people with secondary only<br />

qualifications. Furthermore it was found that on average in OECD countries, men with a tertiary<br />

qualification are 5% more likely to find employment and women 15% more likely.<br />

On a macro economic level however there are significant benefits that stem from tertiary education. It is<br />

widely recognised that the world is globalising and placing greater demand on skills, knowledge and<br />

innovation. Improvements in education and knowledge are considered critical to enabling nations to<br />

"extract more returns from inputs of labour and capita!"J Improved education is fundamental to creating a<br />

"competitive, innovative, knowledge based economy better able to compete in world markets"'. As stated<br />

by one New Zealand Parliamentary Minister in respect to this point 'it's not entirely coincidental that I'm<br />

both the Minister of Finance and the Minister for Tertiary Education"'.<br />

The OECD recognises that "Improved education contributes to a Country's overall prosperity, helping to<br />

raise labour productivity and technological progress thereby boosting economic growth"'. In fact the OECD<br />

estimates that the impact of just one additional year of education increases economic output by between<br />

3% and 6%.<br />

The link between education and economic prosperity has also been recognised by the Australian Labour<br />

Party who has identified that "education is the economic platform on which our future economic prosperity<br />

will rest". Despite this Australia is the only OECD nation to have reduced public investment in tertiary<br />

education in the past 10 years. The Opposition Leader, Kevin Rudd therefore considers that<br />

2WNW.oecd.org<br />

J Han. Dr Michael Cullen 16/3/2007 - Massey University Speech<br />

4 The Australian Economy Needs an Education Revolution, Australian Labour Party<br />

5 Hon. Dr Michael Cullen 16/3/2007 -Massey University Speech<br />

6WNW.oecd.org<br />

Page 20


C07155 - callan <strong>Park</strong> Ec anomie and Social Impact Assessment<br />

"Australia needs nothing less than a revolution in education - a substantial and sustained increase in the<br />

quantity of our investment, and the quality of our education... this is required at every level of education<br />

from early childhood to mature age'. 7<br />

The proposed expansion of the University of Sydney and the creation of a high quality learning environment<br />

and campus will go a long way to addressing the issues raised above. A new high quality learning<br />

environment will enhance learning opportunities and raise the level of knowledge and skill within a Global<br />

City such as Sydney. This will have positive flow on benefits for individuals within the locality of the site,<br />

Sydney and across Australia in addition to benefits to the wider Australian economy.<br />

4.2 Expenditure<br />

By its very nature, a university campus generates activity and demand for services. 5,000 students<br />

(between 500 and 700 of which could be living on site) will generate significant additional retaii and service<br />

related expenditure. This will have many benefits for local businesses through increased demand for<br />

services and in turn a growth in trade. For example the local food industry will benefit such as cafes,<br />

convenience stores and supermarkets in addition to personal services such as hairdressers, travel agents<br />

and supplies i.e. stationary, print shops etc.<br />

The proposed Land Use Plan seeks to improve links between the site and activity centres such as Rozelle,<br />

Balmain, Orange Grove and Lilyfield to ensure that these areas benefit from this additional demand for<br />

services. This linking with businesses and additional investment I expenditure within the area supports the<br />

Councils 2020 Strategic Plan objectives for "thriving businesses and vital sustainable communities built<br />

through shared activities and interests'.<br />

4.3 Investment Stimulus<br />

Although difficult to quantify, development of the scale and nature proposed by the Land Use Plan is likely<br />

to create a significant stimulus for additional investment in the locality. This is particulariy the case for<br />

development reiating to an institution with the prestige associated with Sydney University.<br />

As a result of this investment it is likely that interest will be sparked in the area for a range of ancillary<br />

education uses such as high technology commercial uses, retaii, entertainment, housing and personal<br />

services. This will positively support the local economy and in turn have positi\!! economic multiplier<br />

effects.<br />

It is important to note however that given the time scales associated with this spin off investment and<br />

possible blurred links between the events, it is difficult to clearly quantify in economic terms the merits of<br />

the proposed Land Use Plan in this respect<br />

7 Kevin Rudd, hJstralian labour Party as quoted in The Australian January 23, 2007<br />

Page 21


c<br />

C07155 - <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Ee anomie and Social Impact Assessment<br />

4.4 Employment Generation· Operations<br />

The various uses on the site presently generate a wide range of employment opportunities. By way of<br />

example existing employment generating uses include the Sydney College of the Arts, the NSW<br />

Ambulance Headquarters various Non Government Organisations (We Help Ourselves, Just Enough Faith,<br />

Sids and Kids etc) and the NSW Health Staff associated with the mental health facilities.<br />

It is understood that all of the existing employers outl ined above will be retained on the site with the<br />

exception of the latter (NSW Health). The hospital's patients, staff and staff residences will be relocated to<br />

Concord Hospital as part of an integrated campus.<br />

Given that the existing hospital related jobs on the site will be transferred to facilities in Concord, the Land<br />

Use Plan will not result in the loss of jobs in this industry but rather their re-Iocation. It then follows that the<br />

expansion of a university campus on the site will generate a net increase of jobs in Sydney in the order of<br />

400 - 600 full and lor part time jobs upon completion and operation.<br />

Taking the 419 existing Health and Community jobs on the site and assuming that 70% of them relate to<br />

the Hospital (293), the proposed uplift in permanent employment as a resuit of the University would equate<br />

to between 107 and 307 jobs for the local area.<br />

In addition to teaching jobs, the University will also generate a range of ancillary retail and service related<br />

jobs. These jobs are well suited to a range of age groups and skill levels and will also assist in meeting the<br />

Council's objectives of providing employment options for young people in the LGA.8<br />

4.5 Employment Generation· Construction<br />

In addition to operational employment, the proposed Land Use Plan will generate employment in two<br />

further ways - through construction and through construction multipliers.<br />

It is estimated that one full time construction position for 12 months is created for every $165,247 of<br />

construction work undertaken. The proposed refurbishment of the existing heritage buildings and provision<br />

of new high specification institutional floorspace (excluding fit out costs) has been estimated by the<br />

University of Sydney to have aconstruction value in the order of $300m plus.<br />

Based on this estimated construction cost, approximately 181 jobs for a 10 year period will be directly<br />

generated by the proposed Land Use Plan in the construction industry.<br />

8 Leichhardt Council Social Plan 2004<br />

Page 22


u<br />

C07155 - CaDan PaI1< Ec onomic and Social Impact Assessmeot<br />

Table 7· Construction Employment Multipliers<br />

CONSTRUCTION<br />

Production Induced Effects<br />

Industrial<br />

MULTIPUER First Round Support Consumption<br />

EFFECT Initial Effects Effects Effects Induced Effects Total<br />

Employment No.<br />

per smillion<br />

adjusted to Sept 06<br />

dollars<br />

6.05 2.00 2.72 14.10 24.87<br />

Total employee<br />

years created 1,815 600 816 4,230 7,461<br />

Project timeframe 1 1 1 1 1<br />

Jobs oer annum 1 815 600 816 4230 7461<br />

Data Sources. Australian NatlOllai Accounts.input·Output Tables 1996·97 (5209.0), Pnce index of the Output of the Building industry- Producer<br />

Poce indexes (6427.0), CPI All Groups· RBA Bulletin (Table G2)<br />

As shown above, for every $1 million in construction cost, a total of 24.9 job years could be generated in<br />

the economy. Based on these calculations, the proposed Land Use Plan as a whole will indirectly generate<br />

in the order of 750 jobs in the construction industry per year over a ten year period. SHFAs calculations<br />

have identified that owing to the nature of the proposed works, the number of jobs is likely to be greater at<br />

around 800 per annum for 10 years.<br />

Note that the multiplier effects are national, and not necessarily local. The ABS notes that "Care is needed<br />

in interpreting multiplier effects; their theoretical basis produces estimates which somewhat overstate the<br />

actual impacts in terms of output and employment. Nevertheless, the estimates illustrate the high flow-on<br />

effects of construction activity to the rest of the economy. Clearly, through its multipliers, construction<br />

activity has a high impact on the economy.•<br />

Page 24


C07155 - <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Ec anomie and Social Impact Assessment<br />

5. SOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS<br />

5.1 Open Space and Recreation I Sporting Areas<br />

r!FrTDJm<br />

CONSULTING<br />

Leichhardt is an inner city LGA with a premium on open space. The Leichhardt Recreation and Open<br />

Space Needs Study (adopted December 2005) found that "when compared to other selected Sydney<br />

LGA's, the provision of open space on a per capita basis was low" across the LGA at an average of 1.65Ha<br />

per person.<br />

This measure of open space may be compared to standard benchmarks of 2.83ha per person in NSW, 4Ha<br />

per person in the ACT and 5Ha per person in Victoria. When compared to other inner Sydney LGA's such<br />

as North Sydney (2.60Ha per person), Waverley (1.80Ha per person), Strathfield (3.8Ha per person) and<br />

Canada Bay (3.87Ha per person) the low proportion of open space by population in Leichhardt LGA is<br />

further exemplified.<br />

The Council projected a population growth in the LGA of 7% (3,724 people) between 2001 and 2011.<br />

Accordingly without significant additional supply, the ratio of open space per capita will further decline. The<br />

Council therefore actively seeks to retain and protect all open space and recreational areas in the LGA.<br />

The Council's Recreation and Open Space Needs Study also identified the need to "advocate for the<br />

retention of open space areas within <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, and for the responsibility for their management to be<br />

transferred to the Councif, subject to suitable financial arrangements being negotiated between the Councif<br />

and the State Government prior to any transfer'. The same study goes on to state that this type of<br />

arrangement will be particularly important in "resolving current and future likely shorlages in open space for<br />

both passive recreational pursuits and sparling activities.•<br />

<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is one of the six main recreational venues and open space areas in Leichhardt LGA. The<br />

others facilities I areas include the Iron Cove Bay Run, the Dawn Fraser Pool, Leichhardt <strong>Park</strong> Aquatic<br />

Centre, Leichhardt <strong>Park</strong> I Oval and the Balmain and Leichhardt Rowing Clubs". In terms of both open<br />

space and size, <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is the largest comprehensive recreational space in the LGA providing over<br />

47ha of open space.<br />

The proposed Land Use Plan recognises the important role that <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> plays in providing accessible<br />

and usable open space within the LGA for the local community. Accordingly the Land Use Plan seeks to<br />

not only ensure that there will be no net loss of open space but rather its protection and enhancement. The<br />

relocation of existing bUildings with insignificant heritage value to more appropriate locations on the site will<br />

have the benefit of opening up spaces and creating more usable and attractive areas for a range of<br />

activities.<br />

9 Leichhardt Recreation and Open Space Needs Study, Strat Corp 2005<br />

Page 25 [


C07155 -<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Economic and Social Impact Assessment<br />

r.TtrIDIt<br />

CONSULTING<br />

the site will be improved. This will be a particularly important factor for an ageing community and for an<br />

increasing demographic of women actively undertaking external sporting and leisure activities.<br />

5.3 Education<br />

As discussed in Section 4, enhanced education can have a significant positive impact to an individual's<br />

wealth and a local, regional and national economy. Education does however also have significant social<br />

benefits. A study undertaken by the GECD'3 identified that there were in fact two main social benefits of<br />

improved education being:<br />

1. Health; and<br />

2. Civic and Social Engagement<br />

These benefits are explained in greater detail below.<br />

With respect to health, the GECD identifies that "the health benefits of learning are potentially extremely<br />

large"". There are three types of effect created as a result of improved learning as outlined below.<br />

• indirect effects on health i.e. via income;<br />

• direct effects such as changes in individual competencies and abilities and changes in attitudes to<br />

risk and changes in self efficacy and self esteem;<br />

• intergenrational effects ofeducated parents on the health of their children's.<br />

It was found that additional years of schooling substantially increased health, well being and health<br />

behaviours. These factors lead to an improvement in the quality of a person's life as well as preventing<br />

illness and enabling more efficient treatment. Each of these benefits has significant health related cost<br />

savings for Governments.<br />

Civic and Social Engagement<br />

Education also has social benefits by improving civic and social engagement (CSE) and interaction. As<br />

identified by the GECD study, this can manifest in a number of ways inciuding:<br />

• by shaping what people know - the content of education provides knowledge and experience that<br />

facilitates CSE;<br />

• by developing competencies that help people apply, contribute and develop their knowledge in CSE;<br />

13 Understanding the Social Outcomes of Learning, DECO 2007<br />

1( Understanding the Social Outcomes of Learning, OECD 2007<br />

15 Understanding the Social Outcomes of Learning, DECO 2007<br />

Page 27<br />

c<br />

c


c<br />

[<br />

n<br />

c<br />

C07155 - canan <strong>Park</strong> Ec onomic and Social Impact Assessment<br />

• by cultivating values, attitudes, beliefs and motivations that encourage CSE;<br />

r!TITIiiJI<br />

CONSULTING<br />

• by increasing social status - this applies to forms of CSE that are driven by the relative position of<br />

individuals in a social hierarchY".<br />

The OECD study also identified other potential positive impacts as a result of education including reduced<br />

levels of crime, anti social behaviour and poverty within communities.<br />

On an individual basis, education also enhances a person's ability to make choices and follow through on<br />

them. Education can also positively influence the 'context' in which people choose to live in and their<br />

opportunities to make choices within these contexts.<br />

Whilst the social benefits of education are often visibility apparent, they are difficult to quantify particularly<br />

in economic terms. A Dutch study" has attempted to do this by assessing the impact of education to an<br />

individual's quality of life. The study results suggested that for every additional year of education the health<br />

state of men improved by 0.6% and of women by 0.3%.<br />

A UK stUdy" found that for adult women, the improvement resulting from a rise in education from no<br />

qualifications to a basic qualification, reduced the risk of depression at age 42 from 26% to 22%, saving an<br />

estimated £200m annually.<br />

In light of the studies and discussion above, it is evident that further education can not only have a positive<br />

impact on ones income potential and the wider economy but can also enhance ones ability to make<br />

choices, maintain their health and the health of their children. The multipliers of these benefits are vast and<br />

it would be difficult to quantify in economic terms. Despite this however it is reasonable to assert that


C07155 - <strong>Callan</strong> Parl< Economic and Social Impact Assessment<br />

I!mDII1<br />

CONSULTING<br />

The proposed Land Use Plan has sought to ensure that the existing Ambulance Headquarters, nurses<br />

facilities and NGO's can continue to operate from the site and support residents of the locality and wider<br />

Sydney I NSW. To achieve this in the order of 24,900sqm has been allocated to both groups and 5 -15<br />

year leases are being negotiated.<br />

Furthermore, depending on the nature of the University campus to be located on the site, there may be<br />

beneficial synergies created between the education focus of the University and the social and training<br />

services of the Ambulance Headquarters, Nurses facilities and NGOs.<br />

In light of the above, the proposed Land Use Plan will not have an adverse social impact through the loss<br />

of these uses but rather create the opportunity for a net positive social impact as a result of potential<br />

synergies of use and training and improved facilities.<br />

5.5 Protecting Heritage<br />

Leichhardt Councils 2020 Strategic Plan (2007) aims to create 'a community where people care and have a<br />

connection with each other, the local neighbourhood and its heritage.' As outlined above the proposed<br />

Land Use Plan will enhance interaction between the existing local community and the University community<br />

through shared open spaces and recreational facilities. The eXisting heritage buildings will also contribute<br />

to this synergy by creating attractive places and reminders of the historic importance of the site.<br />

From a social point of view, the retention of the Grade A and B Heritage bUildings on the site will not only<br />

benefit today's local community but future generations. The Schedule 1 State Significant buildings and<br />

landscaped areas are vulnerable however to deterioration. It is therefore vital to ensure that any future<br />

occupier of the site is willing and financially able to investment in the protection and refurbishment of these<br />

buildings to the benefit of all.<br />

The University is a socially responsible occupier for the site committed to spending $5m to $10m per<br />

annum to maintain the buildings and a $30m restoration cost for the Kirkbride Building. The active use and<br />

protection of the sites significant heritage buildings will ensure their retention for future generations. This is<br />

a positive social impact of the proposed Land Use Plan.<br />

5.6 Sustainability<br />

The site is located approximately 800m from the Lilyfield light rail station that provides access to Central<br />

Railway Station and Darling Harbour. It is also well served by a number of bus routes to and from the City,<br />

the main Sydney University Campus and Balmain.<br />

Accordingly the proposed development is well sited to provide sustainable alternatives for university<br />

students and employees to private car use. The site is also located within a higher density area and<br />

therefore provides a local educational facility for existing and future local residents without the need to<br />

tra\el.<br />

Page 29<br />

[


o CQ7155<br />

[<br />

o<br />

c<br />

o<br />

-Canan <strong>Park</strong> Economic and Social Impact Assessment<br />

By improving the local provision of education and employment, the proposal will capture some travel that is<br />

generated from the area to other university campuses or jobs, It will allow residents of Leichhardt to reduce<br />

travel to these locations, thereby reducing travel times, traffic congestion and associated costs with motor<br />

vehicle travel.<br />

Page 30


C07155 - CaDan <strong>Park</strong> Economic and Social Impact Assessment<br />

6. CONCLUSION<br />

Given that the proposed Land Use Plan will:<br />

• improve the vitality and character of the site and surrounding area;<br />

I!TrTIiJim<br />

CONSULTING<br />

• enhance existing open space and the public's ability to regularly access and utilise these spaces;<br />

• generate new employment opportunities suited to a range of ages and skills;<br />

• support local businesses and the local economy;<br />

• provide improved educational opportunities for local, Sydney and NSW residents to the benefit of<br />

their social and economic well being;<br />

• have positive economic flow on effects to the wider economy; and<br />

• ensure a socially responsible primary occupier of the site who will seek to preserve and enhance<br />

the existing built and landscaped heritage of the site;<br />

the proposed <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan is supported and considered in accordance with Leichhardt<br />

Council's 2020 Strategic Plan objectives to develop a "social, environmental and economic legacy that<br />

benefits future generations". It is therefore considered that the Land Use Plan should be supported on<br />

social and economic grounds.<br />

Page 31 [


c<br />

C07155 - Canan Pal'< Ecooomic and Social Impact Assessment<br />

DISCLAIMER<br />

This report is for the confidential use only of the party to whom it is addressed (the client) for the specific<br />

purposes to which it refers. We disclaim any responsibility to any third party acting upon or using the whole<br />

or part of its contents or reference thereto that may be published in any document, statement or circular or<br />

in any communication with third parties without prior written approval of the form and content in which it will<br />

appear.<br />

This report and its attached appendices are based on estimates, assumptions and information sourced and<br />

referenced by Hill PDA and its sub consultants. We present these estimates and assumptions as a basis<br />

for the reader's interpretation and analysis. With respect to forecasts we do not present them as results that<br />

will actually be achieved. We rely upon the interpretation of the reader to judge for themselves the<br />

likelihood of whether these projections can be achieved or not.<br />

As is customary, in a report of this nature, while all possible care has been taken by the authors to prepare<br />

the attached financial models from the best information available at the time of writing, no responsibility can<br />

be undertaken for errors or inaccuracies that may have occurred both with the programming or the financial<br />

projections and their assumptions.<br />

This report does not constitute a valuation of any property or interest in property. In preparing this report we<br />

have relied upon information concerning the subject property and/or proposed development provided by the<br />

client and we have not independently verified this information excepted where noted in this report.<br />

Page 32


c<br />

c<br />

o<br />

o c<br />

c<br />

o<br />

o<br />

[<br />

[<br />

c<br />

c<br />

[<br />

c<br />

o<br />

c<br />

[<br />

c<br />

o<br />

o


[<br />

Q<br />

r CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN - APPENDICES<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

APPENDIX D: ESD ASSESSMENT<br />

.....J<br />

.....J<br />

W<br />

(J)<br />

(J)<br />

« I


c<br />

c c<br />

c<br />

o<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c o<br />

c<br />

o ooooooo


<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan· ESO Notes<br />

28 November 2007<br />

1.1 Introduction<br />

ARUP<br />

86789/JPH<br />

Page 1 of 2<br />

The design for the future form of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> would follow an integrated design approach to<br />

achieve an innovative and ecologically sustainable development, which will provide a healthy<br />

workplace and learning experience and reduce the ecological impact and operating costs of the<br />

development.<br />

The following is a discussion on sustainable rating tools that can be used in the design of the<br />

new development as well as various sustainable options that can be explored with the view of<br />

incorporating them into a detailed design.<br />

1.2 Rating Tools<br />

1.2.1 Rated Sustainable Performance<br />

The GreenStar rating scheme, a voluntary holistic sustainable design rating tool set up and<br />

managed by the Green Building Council of Australia, is being used to guide the design process.<br />

This rating scheme addresses a wide spectrum of environmental performance measures<br />

dealing with social, economic and environmental issues. Currently the rating tool for educational<br />

facilities is in the pilot phase with a possible official release date sometime in 2008.<br />

A 4 star building would be seen as best practise with a 5 star building Australian excellence and<br />

a 6 star building being seen as world leadership. Within this framework the university can<br />

choose a level of building sustainability that balances their sustainable objectives with financial<br />

constraints.<br />

2 Sustainable Initiatives<br />

The design of the new buildings should focus on the following 5 key impacts;<br />

2.1 Site<br />

• Reduce site impacts by encouraging alternative transport, minimising stormwater, and<br />

minimising negative impacts such as reflected glare.<br />

• Low levels of on-site car parking encourages alternative modes of transport.<br />

• Bike spaces and lockers encourages bicycle use.<br />

2.2 Energy Efficiency and Atmosphere Conservation<br />

Generally, energy efficiency initiatives that will be put in place include:<br />

• Natural ventilation or mix mode ventilation strategies for building cooling where appropriate.<br />

• An energy efficient fayade with low thermal load transmission.<br />

• Energy efficient chillers and air handling units with variable volume control.<br />

• Ability to turn functional areas off when not in use.<br />

• Energy sub metering and energy end use reporting.<br />

• Incorporating new building services systems which are significantly more energy efficient<br />

than the existing building services systems.<br />

• Building management control system to optimise bUilding performance.<br />

J:\86789· CALLAN PARK MA$TERPLAN\OQ06ESO NOTE.OOC CAfUP fO.13<br />

Rev 0.2. 1 May 2003


<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan· ESO Notes<br />

28 November 2007<br />

• Exposed thermal mass to maximise potential for night flush.<br />

• A focus on commission and handover.<br />

2.3 Materials and Resources<br />

ARUpr<br />

86789/JPHr<br />

Page 2 of 2<br />

• Minimise negative impacts of materials by reusing existing structure and fa


u<br />

[<br />

CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN - APPENDICES<br />

APPENDIX E: CONTAMINATION REPORT<br />

.....J<br />

.....J<br />

UJ<br />

C/)<br />

C/)<br />


c<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

D<br />

o<br />

o<br />

c<br />

c [,<br />

[<br />

o<br />

o o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o o<br />

c


[<br />

[<br />

C<br />

Prepared for:<br />

Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority<br />

PO BoxN408<br />

Grosvenor Place<br />

Sydney NSW 1220<br />

Management of Contamination in the<br />

Proposed Development of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />

HLA-Envirosciences Pty Limited (HLA ENSR)<br />

25 October 2007<br />

Document No.: S4095301_RPT<strong>Callan</strong><strong>Park</strong>_250ct07<br />

IIMerged<br />

• ....nh ENSR<br />

in 2007<br />

ENSR AECOM


[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

o<br />

c<br />

o<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

o<br />

c<br />

o C<br />

D<br />

o<br />

C<br />

o<br />

D<br />

C


"This page has been left blank intentionally"<br />

ENSR IAECOM<br />

Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the distribution page of this document.<br />

October 2007 Management of Contamination in the Proposed<br />

Development of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />

Commercial in Confidence S4095301_Rptcallanpark_250ctD7<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

o<br />

[<br />

o<br />

D<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

o<br />

c<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o


o<br />

o ooo<br />

o o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

ooooooooo<br />

CONTENTS<br />

Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the distribution page of this document.<br />

Management of Contamination in the Proposed October 2007<br />

Development of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />

S4095301_Rptcallanpark_250ct07<br />

ENSR IAECOM<br />

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1<br />

1.1 Background 1<br />

1.2 Contamination matters required to be addressed at the Master Plan stage .. 1<br />

1.3 Reports referred to 2<br />

2.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF THE SiTE 3<br />

2.1 Potential development of the Site 3<br />

2.2 Environmental criteria applicable to the development.. 3<br />

2.2.1 Protection of human health 3<br />

2.2.2 Protection of the environment 4<br />

3.0 ASSESSMENT OF CONTAMINATION ON THE SiTE 5<br />

3.1' Stage 1 assessment 5<br />

3.1.1 Objective 5<br />

3.1.2 Scope of work 5<br />

3.1.3 Potentialiy contaminating activities on the Site 5<br />

3.1.4 Potential constraints posed by contamination 5<br />

3.2 Stage 2 assessment 8<br />

3.2.1 Objectives 8<br />

3.2.2 Scope of work 8<br />

3.2.3 Suitability of sampling locations 9<br />

3.2.4 Suitability of field methods 10<br />

3.2.5 Suitability of chemicais of potential concern 10<br />

3.2.6 SUitability of laboratory methods 12<br />

3.3 Results of investigation 12<br />

3.3.1 Development Areas 12<br />

3.3.2 Non-Development Areas 12<br />

4.0 EES REPORT 15<br />

4.1 Purpose of the EES report 15<br />

4.2 Objective , 15<br />

4.3 Key environmental issues 15<br />

4.4 Remedial options for fill rnaterials 16<br />

5.0 CONCLUSION 19<br />

5.1 Preliminary investigation 19<br />

5.2 Requirement for additional assessment 19<br />

5.2.1 Environmental assessment 19<br />

5.2.2 Hazardous materials survey 19<br />

5.3 Management of contamination issues 20<br />

5.3.1 Fill materials 20<br />

5.3.2 Groundwater 20<br />

5.3.3 Underground storage tanks 20<br />

5.3.4 Buildings 20<br />

Commercial in Confidence


5.4<br />

Appendices<br />

ENSR IAECOM<br />

Management of the Site 21<br />

Appendix A : Figures from Coffey Report<br />

Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the distribution page of this document.<br />

October 2007 Management of Contamination in the Proposed<br />

Development of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />

Commercial in Confidence S4095301_Rptcallanpark_250cto7<br />

c<br />

c<br />

c<br />

o<br />

o o<br />

o<br />

D<br />

c<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o oo<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o


c<br />

o<br />

c<br />

o o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o ooo<br />

o<br />

o o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o o<br />

o<br />

1.0 Introduction<br />

1.1 Background<br />

In June 2007, the Minister for Planning, Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority and the University of<br />

Sydney entered into a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding that "... seeks to explore<br />

opportunities to grant a 99 year lease to the University of Sydney to develop a coherent campus<br />

environment ... for use for higher education purposes".<br />

It is understood that the proposed Master Plan applies to the whole of the Site, which is described to<br />

have an area of 61 ha within the area generally bounded by Glover Street, Balmain Road, Manning<br />

Street and Iron Cove, as shown in Figure 1 (Appendix A).<br />

In 2002, the author of this report (Dr Bill Ryall), then employed by Contamination Management Pty<br />

Limited, provided advice to Leichhardt Council relating to the management of contamination at the Site<br />

as identified in the Master Plan prepared at that time. The proposed Master Plan principles allow for<br />

different development options for the Site. Proposed options will have significant impacts for the<br />

management of the contamination at the Site and although extent of contamination remains to be .!<br />

quantified, it is considered that contamination issues can be addressed during the development of the/!<br />

Site.<br />

1.2 Contamination matters required to be addressed at the Master Plan<br />

stage<br />

For the purposes of master planning, contamination issues that have potential to significantly impact on<br />

the proposed development are required to be identified and their impact assessed. These issues relate<br />

to contamination that (i) could prevent the redevelopment being undertaken and/or (ii) could result in<br />

major impact on the redevelopment program in terms of necessary remedial works giving rise to:<br />

Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the distribution page of this document.<br />

Management of Contamination in the Proposed October 2007<br />

Development of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />

• Unacceptable environmental impacts resulting, for example, if significant remediation<br />

was required adjacent to sensitive waterways or if large volumes of volatile<br />

compounds were required to be remediated;<br />

S4095301..Rptcallanpark_250cI07<br />

ENSR IAECOM<br />

HLA ENSR was engaged by the Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority ("SHFA") to provide advice<br />

relating to the management of contamination of soil and groundwater at the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Hospital site<br />

(the "Site"), situated at Rozelle. The advice was required as part of the master planning process that is<br />

being undertaken as part of the development proposal in accordance with the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Act (Special<br />

Provisions) 2002.<br />

The advice is based on reports relating to the assessment of contamination on the Site reported by<br />

Coffey Geosciences Pty Ltd ("Coffey") in 2000 and 2002 on behalf of the NSW Health Department as<br />

part of the preparation of a Master Plan for the redevelopment proposed for the Site at that time.<br />

SUbsequently, in 2002 Environmental & Earth Sciences ("EES") assessed the significance of<br />

contamination identified on the Site by review of the Coffey reports for Landcom, who at that time were<br />

considering developing the Site.<br />

The Master Plan will comply with the requirements of State Environmental Planning Policy No. 56<br />

(SEPP 56) "Sydney Harbour Foreshores and Tributaries" that requires, amongst other things, an<br />

explanation of and a proposal for "remediation of the site". In the context of SEPP 56, "remediation"<br />

relates to the processes of identification of nature and extent of contamination on the Site and<br />

subsequent remedial works that are undertaken to ensure protection of (i) the health of users of the site<br />

and (ii) the environment.<br />

Commercial in Confidence


ENSR IAECOM<br />

• Unacceptable social impacts resulting, for example, from excessive generation of<br />

noise, dust, vibration, vehicle movements and excavation of large quantities of<br />

asbestos containing materials and the like; and<br />

• Time and cost escalations caused by the identification of unexpected major<br />

contamination.<br />

r However, at the master planning stage, it is not required that contamination be quantified according to<br />

guidelines endorsed by NSW EPA (part of the Department of Environment and Climate Change<br />

ii' (DECC)). Detailed environmental assessment and quantification of contamination are generally<br />

undertaken at a later time, commonly prior to seeking specific development consent or as a condition of<br />

a specific development consent.<br />

1.3 Reports referred to<br />

In preparing this advice, the following reports provided by SHFA have been referred to:<br />

• "Rozelle Hospital, Stage 1 Preliminary Geotechnical and Contamination Study.<br />

Issues Paper on Geotechnical & Environmental Constraints" by Coffey dated 30<br />

August 2000;<br />

• "Rozelle Hospital, Preliminary Contamination Assessment," by Coffey dated 14<br />

March 2002; and<br />

• "Review ofcontamination and geotechnical conditions at Rozelle hospital site" by<br />

EES dated 29 August 2002.<br />

Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the distribution page of this document.<br />

October 2007 2 Management of Contamination in the Proposed<br />

Development of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />

Commercial in Confidence S409S301_Rptcallanpark_250ct07<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

[<br />

D<br />

C<br />

o [<br />

[<br />

D<br />

C<br />

C<br />

6<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

c<br />

c<br />

o<br />

[


ENSR IAECOM<br />

With respect to the current Master Plan, the relevant environmental criteria for parts of the Site are as<br />

follows:<br />

• College of Arts and the Development Area - reference to HIL F levels is appropriate.<br />

These levels for most chemicals of potential concern are five times less sensitive<br />

than the HIL A levels;<br />

•<br />

Playing fields and open space purposes - reference to HIL E levels is appropriate.<br />

These levels for most chemicals of potential concern are two times less sensitive<br />

than the HIL A levels; and<br />

• Parts of the Site that may be developed for accommodation purposes - reference to<br />

HIL D levels may be appropriate if occupiers have minimal access to the soil. These<br />

leveis for most chemicals of potential concern are four times less sensitive than the<br />

HIL A levels.<br />

Environmental criteria for petroleum hydrocarbons have been set by NSW EPA at 65 mg/kg for light<br />

petroleum hydrocarbons and 1000 mg/kg for medium and heavy petroleum hydrocarbons, although it is<br />

noted that NSW DEC (2006) Guidelines for the NSWSite Auditor Scheme (Z'd Edition) endorses much<br />

higher levels for medium and heavy petroleum hydrocarbons if speciation into aromatic and aliphatic<br />

fractions is reported by the laboratory.<br />

2.2.2<br />

Protection of the environment<br />

With respect to the protection of the environment, NSW EPA (2006) Guidelines for the NSWSite Auditor<br />

Scheme (Z'd Edition) endorses guidelines to protect the healthy growth of plants, termed<br />

phytotoxicological investigation levels.<br />

With respect to protection of groundwater and receiving waters, NSW EPA has endorsed so-called<br />

"trigger levels" listed in ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh<br />

and Marine Water Quality.<br />

Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the distribution page of this document.<br />

October 2007 4 Management of Contamination in the Proposed<br />

Development of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />

Commercial in Confidence S4095301_Rptcalianpark_250cto7<br />

o<br />

c<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o


o o<br />

o o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

c<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

3.0 Assessment of contamination on the Site<br />

3.1 Stage 1 assessment<br />

3.1.1 Objective<br />

3.1.2 Scope of work<br />

The following scope of work was undertaken by Coffey to achieve the objective:<br />

Coffey summarised the results of the investigation in Table 2 of their report and referred to the most<br />

significant potential contamination identified on the Hospital site as "Primary potential contamination<br />

constraints", which are discussed below.<br />

3.1.4 Potential constraints posed by contamination<br />

Uncontrolled filling<br />

Uncontrolled filling was identified in "major" areas in four parts of the Site, as identified on Coffey's<br />

Figure 2 (in AppendiX A). However, as discussed below, fill materiais were identified on all parts of the<br />

Site investigated by Coffey and had been placed over the natural soil and bedrock to form the present<br />

levels across the Site.<br />

Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the distribution page of this document.<br />

Management of Contamination in the Proposed<br />

Development of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />

• a review of existing information relating to the Site;<br />

• a limited inspection of the Site;<br />

• recommendation of a scope of work for a second stage of investigation to<br />

characterise the risks identified.<br />

3.1.3 Potentially contaminating activities on the Site<br />

The Site was confirmed to have a complex history of industrial uses that extended over a period of some<br />

150 years. In addition to its principal use as a hospital, ancillary activities carried out on the Site included<br />

operation of boilers, various types of workshops, storage of dangerous goods such as fuel and<br />

pesticides, bowling greens, a goif course and disposal of waste into landfills on the Site. At least one<br />

part of the Site was identified as having been a quarry that was at some later time filled with waste<br />

materials and which could be ciassified as a landfill.<br />

84095301_Rptcallanpark_250ct07<br />

5<br />

ENSR /AECOM<br />

The objective of the Stage 1 assessment undertaken by Coffey was stated "... to prepare an issues<br />

paper identifying primary constraints imposed by site geotechnical and potential contamination<br />

conditions".<br />

• a review of historicai aeriai photographs to observe the development of the Site and<br />

the surrounding area over the last 50 to 60 years;<br />

• interviews with personnel who had long association with the Site;<br />

• a review of records, if any, heid by Leichhardt Council relating to contamination at the<br />

Site;<br />

• assessment of potential risks that could present constraint to development of the<br />

Site;<br />

• preparation of an issues papers discussing potential risks and their potential impacts;<br />

and<br />

October 2007<br />

Commercial in Confidence


o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

ENSR IAECOM<br />

was formerly cultivated (Figure 2). The chemicals of potential concern in these areas were listed as<br />

heavy metals, OCPs and herbicides.<br />

Coffey concluded that contamination from the application and storage of pesticides and herbicides was<br />

likely to be localised and that any contamination from these activities were not likely to present a<br />

significant constraint to redevelopment of the Site. Whilst this conclusion may be valid, if waste<br />

pesticides or pesticide containers were disposed in the major filled parts of the Site, contamination of<br />

groundwater may have resulted. As discussed below, the assessment of groundwater quality and<br />

remediation of groundwater that is identified to be contaminated is a significant matter that is required to<br />

be assessed.<br />

Remainder of the site<br />

Coffey also considered the "Remainder of the site", i.e. the bulk of the Site not addressed by the specific<br />

activities listed above, had a "low to high" risk of contamination from unspecified chemicals of potential<br />

concern "due to the age of the site, the possibility of other potentially contaminating activities having<br />

occurred on the site cannot be ruled out". Coffey concluded that the presence of contamination from<br />

these unidentified sources was "not likely to present a significant constraint to redevelopment of the<br />

site U<br />

,<br />

Opinion on potential contaminants<br />

It is considered that Coffey's Stage 1 investigation identified most of the likely contamination issues that<br />

could impact on the development of the Site. However, it is considered that two important issues that<br />

have potential to impact significantly on the redevelopment of the Site, being the presence of asbestos<br />

and the potentiai for groundwater contamination, were not addressed in appropriate detail, as discussed<br />

below.<br />

Asbestos<br />

Coffey's reports identified asbestos as a substance of concern on the Site as a weathering product from<br />

asbestos cement roofs and other asbestos cement building materials, however, on other hospital sites<br />

within the Sydney region, it has been found that asbestos containing materials were commonly disposed<br />

in filled areas on these sites. The removal of asbestos from filling during development of these hospital<br />

sites and other former industrial sites has presented major environmental and commercial issues during<br />

development of these sites.<br />

On such hospital sites within the Sydney region, asbestos has been identified as:<br />

• bonded asbestos materials, which were commonly used as roofing and wall<br />

materials ("fibro"), pipes (gutters, down pipes and sub-surface pipes), floor tiles<br />

("Iino") and in electrical equipment (eg. power distribution boards); and<br />

• friable asbestos, which was commonly used as lagging for insulating boilers, service<br />

pipes and ducts. In addition, this substance was used as spray-on insulation within<br />

buildings.<br />

The use of asbestos and asbestos containing materials on the Site and any programs in which asbestos<br />

containing materials were removed from buildings on the Site are required to be documented thoroughly<br />

at the development application stage. It is also critical that that the fate of the asbestos waste be<br />

documented. Given the practices on other hospital sites, there is a high probability that these materials<br />

could have been disposed on the Site, particularly since a number of areas of major filling have been<br />

identified.<br />

Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the distribution page of this document.<br />

Management of Contamination in the Proposed<br />

Development of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />

7 October 2007<br />

S4095301_Rptcalianpark_250ct07<br />

Commercial in Confidence


ENSR AECOM<br />

The presence of asbestos fibres in fill materials presents a major cost and time constraint in remediating<br />

filling containing this material because of the emotive nature of the community and other land users<br />

response to asbestos and the hazardous nature of the fibres that may be liberated during building<br />

demolition and earthworks programs.<br />

However, the Coffey reports did not identify significant quantities of asbestos in fill materials intersected<br />

in bores across the Site and no asbestos was identified in the ten samples of the fill materials from the<br />

Development Area analysed by Coffey. Consequently, asbestos in fill materials may not present a<br />

significant issue at the Site, however, this cannot be stated with any certainty at this time.<br />

Groundwater contamination<br />

It is highly likely that the several major filled areas on the Site could have impacted the quality of<br />

groundwater discharging into Iron Cove. The remediation of contaminated groundwater may present a<br />

major constraint to development of these areas.<br />

In addition, because the Site falls towards Iron Cove, contamination of groundwater discharging into Iron<br />

Cove could be a result of the presence of contaminants in fill materials in parts of the Hospital site<br />

remote from Iron Cove. The requirement to remediate groundwater, therefore, may impact development<br />

of any contaminated partls of the Site that may be contributing contamination to groundwater. For these<br />

reasons, it is considered that an appropriate level of investigation of the quality of groundwater should<br />

have been undertaken by Coffey.<br />

It is noted that Coffey recommended that investigation of groundwater contamination be undertaken in<br />

the short term in a subsequent investigation on the Lower Glover Street Oval, but it is considered that<br />

the quality of groundwater in the filled areas adjacent to Iron Cove should have been subject to at least a<br />

preliminary assessment by Coffey. It is considered that this assessment can be undertaken at an early<br />

stage during the development of the Site.<br />

3.2 Stage 2 assessment<br />

3.2.1 Objectives<br />

The objectives of the second stage of assessment undertaken by Coffey were stated to:<br />

• Further assess the primary constraints posed by contamination conditions within the<br />

Development Areas by undertaking limited soil sampling and testing; and<br />

• Make a preliminary assessment of the nature of contamination in the Non­<br />

Development Area by undertaking limited soil sampling and testing.<br />

Opinion relating to objectives<br />

It is considered that the scope of the Stage 2 assessment was inadequate given the number and nature<br />

of the potentially contaminating activities identified in the Stage 1 assessment and given the<br />

uncertainties that related to use of the site, particularly the disposal of waste, the disposal of ash<br />

containing carcinogenic PAHs, the probable use of asbestos and the high probability of groundwater<br />

being contaminated.<br />

3.2.2 Scope ofwork<br />

Coffey undertook the following scope of work:<br />

• Collection of samples of fill materials and soil from locations across the Site;<br />

• Chemical analysis in a commercial laboratory for chemicals of potential concern; and<br />

Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the distribution page of this document.<br />

October 2007 8 Management of Contamination in the Proposed<br />

Development of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />

Commercial in Confidence S4095301_Rptcallanpark_250ct07<br />

C<br />

D<br />

o<br />

C<br />

o<br />

D<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

c<br />

o<br />

o<br />

c<br />

o<br />

D<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!