Callan Park 'your plan'
Callan Park 'your plan'
Callan Park 'your plan'
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
[<br />
r,<br />
r.<br />
r1.:..-...;., CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN - APPENDICES<br />
_<br />
r.<br />
[<br />
[<br />
(<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
C<br />
APPENDIX A: HERITAGE REPORT<br />
APPENDIX B: TRAFFIC REPORT<br />
APPENDIX C: SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT<br />
APPENDIX D: ESD ASSESSMENT<br />
APPENDIX E: CONTAMINATION REPORT<br />
APPENDIX F: BUILDING AREA AUDIT<br />
APPENDIX G: COPIES OF RELEVANT LEGISLATION<br />
APPENDIX H: MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING<br />
APPENDIX I: COMMUNITY REFERENCE PANEL<br />
MEETING MINUTES<br />
.....J<br />
.....J<br />
W<br />
(J)<br />
(J)<br />
«<br />
I
[<br />
r L<br />
c r<br />
L<br />
C<br />
[<br />
D<br />
C<br />
[<br />
[<br />
C<br />
[<br />
C<br />
o<br />
C<br />
C<br />
[<br />
C<br />
C<br />
[
CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN· APPENDICES<br />
APPENDIX A: HERITAGE REPORT<br />
.....J<br />
.....J<br />
W<br />
en<br />
en<br />
« I
[<br />
[<br />
c [<br />
[<br />
[<br />
o o<br />
[<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c oc<br />
c<br />
c<br />
[<br />
c<br />
[
c<br />
c<br />
o<br />
c<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o oo<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
c<br />
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />
CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />
HERITAGE ASSESSMENT<br />
<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> (aka Rozelle Hospital) is a site of exceptional cultural and natural heritage significance.<br />
It contains the remains of three highly significant phases of historical development: Three<br />
Gentlemen's Estates from the eariy 1800s were located on the site, as was the largest purpose built<br />
asylum in New South Wales, <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, and the later Broughton Hall Clinic where self admission<br />
mental health treatment was pioneered. The site has remained an institution for mental health care<br />
for over 150 years, and has been the location of the care of returned service men since World War I.<br />
The architecturai and aesthetic qualities of the buildings and landscape setting are of exceptional<br />
significance. The diversity of buildings includes not only important architectural items, but also<br />
material evidence of changing philosophies of patient care. <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is highly significant as a<br />
resource for understanding the historical development of mental health care in Australia.<br />
This Heritage Assessment, prepared by Tanner Architects as part of the Land Use Planning process<br />
and with reference to the endorsed Rozelle Hospital Conservation Management Plan 2002 (CMP),<br />
includes the following components:<br />
Articulation of the cultural heritage parameters, development opportunities and constraints for<br />
the site as set out in the endorsed Conservation Management Plan;<br />
Exploration of the apparent conflicts between the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Act and the CMP; and<br />
Assessment of the heritage impacts of the Draft Land Use Plan on the cultural and natural<br />
significance of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />
The proposed Land Use Plan has been reviewed in light of the Conservation Policy within the<br />
endorsed CMP. The Draft Land Use Plan generally respects the cultural significance of the site as a<br />
whole and the significant elements within it. It will be critical in the implementation of the Master Plan<br />
that:<br />
the detailed planning and design of new buildings, in particular across the Central Slope,<br />
respects the significant landscape setting and views of the site and allows for a reasonable<br />
curtilage to the Kirkbride Block and the Broughton Hall Group;<br />
adequate resources are available for the immediate conservation and future maintenance of<br />
all the buildings and landscapes of the site; and<br />
the whole site is under a management structure which understands and respects the<br />
significance of the whole site.<br />
Additional work with respect to the heritage considerations of the site will be required prior to the<br />
preparation of the Development Application for the Master Plan for submission to Leichhardt Council<br />
and the Heritage Council of NSW:<br />
1. Amend the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Act 2002 to allow for:<br />
removal and non-replacement of "non-contributory" buildings; and<br />
- the increase in the total floor area on the site in accordance with the endorsed CMP and<br />
the Draft Land Use Plan.<br />
2. Review and revise the Conservation Policy section of the endorsed Rozelle Hospital<br />
Conservation Management Plan 2002 to include the specific requirements of the NSW<br />
Government, Leichhardt Council and The University of Sydney, for re-endorsement by the<br />
Heritage Council of NSW;<br />
3. Review and revise the CMP Adaptability Study to address the specific needs of the University<br />
of Sydney and the various NGOs who will occupy the significant buildings to ensure that the<br />
CMP principles for the adaptive re-use of the buildings and site are met for each building;<br />
4. Prepare a condition audit of the buildings and landscapes of exceptional, high and moderate<br />
significance and complete a schedule of essential repairs and maintenance of these elements<br />
for accurate pricing and future allocation of resources; and<br />
TANNER ARCHITECTS<br />
iSSUE D - 27 NOVEMBER 2007<br />
F:\pro\arc\76\7615\lransfer\1 03·dient\outlFinal for SHFA WebsIte 29'11'07\Appendix'IAppendixA1- Heritage Assessmenl.doc<br />
PAGE 1
5.<br />
CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />
HERITAGE ASSESSMENT<br />
Prepare a model for the Management of the whole <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> site in order to prevent ad hoc<br />
intervention of individual buildings and to establish a maintenance program for all the buildings<br />
and landscapes across the site.<br />
TANNER ARCHITECTS ISSUE D - 27 NOVEMBER 2007<br />
F:\pro\arc\76\7615\lransfer\1 03-client\out\Fina! for SHFA Website 29'11 '07\Appendix\Appendix A1- Heritage Assessmenl.doc<br />
PAGE 2<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
o<br />
c<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
c<br />
[<br />
[
c<br />
c<br />
o c<br />
c<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
D<br />
o<br />
o<br />
D<br />
D<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
c<br />
2 INTRODUCTION<br />
CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />
HERITAGE ASSESSMENT<br />
<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> (aka Rozelle Hospital) is a site of exceptional cultural and natural heritage significance.<br />
It contains the remains of three highly significant phases of historical development: Three<br />
Gentlemen's Estates from the early 1800s were located on the site, as was the largest purpose built<br />
asylum in New South Wales, <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, and the iater Broughton Hall Clinic where seif admission<br />
mental health treatment was pioneered. The site has remained an institution for mental health care<br />
for over 150 years, and has been the location of the care of returned service men since World War I.<br />
The architectural and aesthetic qualities of the buildings and landscape setting are of exceptional<br />
significance. The diversity of buildings includes not only important architectural items, but also<br />
material evidence of changing philosophies of patient care. <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is highly significant as a<br />
resource for understanding the historical development of mental health care in Australia.<br />
The <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> site is currently occupied by a group of users, including the Department of Health<br />
who operate the Broughton Hall Clinic from the site. The Kirkbride Block has been extensively<br />
conserved and adaptively reused by the University of Sydney for the College of the Arts. The 1870s<br />
estate house, Garry Owen, has been extensively conserved and is occupied by the Writers Centre.<br />
The Department of Health plans to relocate its activities to another Hospital site, thus vacating the<br />
Broughton Hall group and associated buildings.<br />
The Rozelle Hospital Conservation Management Plan dated 2002 was endorsed by the Heritage<br />
Council of NSW in March 2002.<br />
In 2002 in response to vigorous debate on the future of the site the NSW Government passed the<br />
<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> (Special Provisions) Act to protect <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> as an open space and heritage resource.<br />
The <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> (Special PrOVisions) Act 2002 establishes the range of permissible uses that may be<br />
carried out at <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and confirms State Environmental Planning Policy 56 as the relevant<br />
planning instrument with the Minister for Planning, being the consent authority for any master plan<br />
and Leichhardt Council as the development consent authority.<br />
With the transfer of mental health facilities to Concord, <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> wili lose the activity and tenure of<br />
its primary user. The site and its assets could then become vulnerable to deterioration. Accordingly<br />
the NSW Government has sought to identify an alternative primary user.<br />
On 28 June 2007 a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was entered into by the<br />
Minister for Planning, the University of Sydney and Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority. The MOU<br />
identifies <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> as a State asset of community and heritage significance.<br />
The MOU acknowledges the current presence of the University of Sydney on the site through its<br />
lease of the Kirkbride Block for its College for the Arts. The MOU seeks to explore opportunities to<br />
grant a 99 year lease to the University of Sydney to develop a coherent campus environment at<br />
nominal rent and for use for higher education purposes.<br />
A Land Use Plan for <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is being prepared in accordance with the provisions of the MOU.<br />
This Heritage Assessment is integral to the preparation of the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan.<br />
Tanner Architects, the authors of the 2002 Conservation Management Plan, have been engaged as<br />
part of the Master Plan Team to provide advice regarding the conservation of the heritage<br />
significance <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, induding:<br />
• Providing a clear articulation of the cultural heritage values of the site in order that they may be<br />
understood, protected and enhanced as an integral component of the Master Plan; and<br />
• Working with the team to develop a Master Plan for the development of the site including the<br />
provision of new buildings to cater for the University's growth whilst respecting the existing<br />
cultural heritage and historic site planning.<br />
This Heritage Assessment includes the following components:<br />
1. Articulation of the cultural heritage parameters, development opportunities and constraints for<br />
the site as set out in the endorsed Conservation Management Plan (CMP);<br />
2. Exploration of the apparent conflicts between the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Act and the CMP, in relation to:<br />
TANNER ARCHITECTS<br />
ISSUE D - 27 NOVEMBER 2007<br />
F:\pro\arc\76\7615\lransfer\1 03·
3.<br />
CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />
HERITAGE ASSESSMENT<br />
the replacement of buildings and the maximising of floor area within the heritage<br />
context; and<br />
the implications of the cultural heritage parameters, development opportunities and<br />
constraints.<br />
Assess the heritage impacts of the Draft Land Use Plan on the cultural and natural<br />
significance of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />
TANNER ARCHITECTS ISSUE D - 27 NOVEMBER 2007 PAGE 4<br />
F:\pro\arc\76\7615\transfer\1O:klienl\out\Final for SHFA Website 29'11 '07\Appendix\Appendix A1- Heritage Assessment.doc<br />
[<br />
c<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
o<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
C<br />
D<br />
D<br />
[
c<br />
o<br />
o<br />
c<br />
c<br />
o<br />
D<br />
o o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
c TANNER<br />
CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />
HERITAGE ASSESSMENT<br />
3 THE ROZELLE HOSPITAL CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 2002<br />
2.1 Summary Statement of Significance for the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Site<br />
(Extract from the Rozelle Hospital Conservation Management Plan 2002, Section 4)<br />
The Rozelle Hospital site, created as one unit in 1976, comprises two major mental health facilities,<br />
each of which was developed utilising an existing mansion house set within expansive landscaping.<br />
As a whole, and as two component parts, Rozelle Hospital can demonstrate it has heritage<br />
significance to the people of New South Wales:<br />
The Rozelle Hospital site contains the fabric of two grand Victorian gentlemen's estates, and is able<br />
to demonstrate the pastoral character of this period. The original relationship between Garry Owen<br />
House (later <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>) and Broughton Hall has been retained and their grounds are still<br />
interpretable and intact. These grounds became the sites of the mental health institutions that<br />
adopted their respective names.<br />
Rozelle Hospital demonstrates two major changes in mental health care in NSW. It contains original<br />
architecture and landscaping of both hospitals. The buildings associated with the former <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
mental hospitai are of exceptional significance, in particular the Kirkbride Block:<br />
The Kirkbride complex has a unique place in the history ofmental hospitals in New South Wales.<br />
It is the only mental hospital which fully represented the ideal and classic 'moral therapy' style of<br />
institution. In the twentieth century it became one ofthe major examples ofthe modern custodial<br />
institutions. Although now seen as inappropriate for a modern mental health care system, it<br />
stands as a significant reminder, undoubtedly the most significant in New South Wales, oftwo<br />
major developments in the history ofmental health care.<br />
Assessment in Conservation Plan for the Kirkbride Block <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> (State Projects, NSW Public Works,<br />
May 1993, Volume 2: 102.)<br />
The Broughton Hall Psychiatric Clinic, also unique in the history of mental health care in NSW, is still<br />
in operation. While most of its facilities are outdated for contemporary patient care its fabric reflects<br />
the institution's pioneering methods in voluntary patient care. The Clinic's buildings, while not all of<br />
high significance are consistent in character and material, and are grouped around a unique inter war<br />
garden of outstanding aesthetic quality. The garden's links with the earlier Keep period and use in<br />
patient care make it a landscape of exceptional significance.<br />
Its landscaped spaces and landmark buildings have contributed visually and socially to the local area<br />
for over 100 years. The foreshore areas of the site are significant as rare open space elements.<br />
<strong>Callan</strong> Point is considered to be the most important Aboriginal archaeological site remaining on the<br />
southern shores of Sydney Harbour. <strong>Callan</strong> Point also contains rare examples of pre-European<br />
vegetation and unique European rock carvings.<br />
The site as a whole has very high levels of social significance and has special associations for the<br />
iocal and broader community both as an open space resource and for its cultural and aesthetic value.<br />
ARCHITECTS ISSUE D - 27 NOVEMBER 2007 PAGE 5<br />
F:\pro\arc\76\7615\ttansfer\103-client\out\Final for SHFA Website 29'11'Oll.Appendix\Appendix A1- Heritage Assessment.doc
CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />
HERITAGE ASSESSMENT<br />
CMP 2002 Figure 4.3 Aerial Photograph with Significance ofBuildings and Landscape Indicated<br />
(Source: UDAS).<br />
TANNER ARCHITECTS ISSUE 0 - 27 NOVEMBER 2007 PAGE 6<br />
F:\pro\an:\76\7615Uransfe1\103.dieoI\ouI\Fnal for $HFA Website 29'11'07\AppeodilMppendix A1- Heritage Assessment.doc<br />
[<br />
[<br />
c<br />
o<br />
[<br />
LJ
[<br />
c<br />
c [J<br />
c o<br />
D<br />
C<br />
o<br />
o c<br />
o<br />
o<br />
C<br />
D<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
D<br />
C<br />
2.2 Conservation Policy<br />
Adaptive Re-Use of the Buildings<br />
CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />
(Extracts from Rozelle Hospital Conservation Management Plan 2002, Section 5)<br />
Management of the Site<br />
HERITAGE ASSESSMENT<br />
The future management of the site will playa considerable roie in assuring the conservation of the<br />
buildings and the landscape setting. It is therefore neoessary to establish the parameters and<br />
principies which need to be met in this regard. Prior to, or in association with resolving the adaptive<br />
reuse options for the site, the management structure should be formalised in order to prevent ad hoc<br />
intervention of individual buildings and to establish a maintenance program for the buildings and<br />
landscape.<br />
Issues which need to be addressed in the management of the site include:<br />
• effective and consistent conservation of buildings and landscape across whole site (resources<br />
and skills);<br />
• careful control of vehicular access and car parking across the site;<br />
• selection of appropriate tenants/occupants whose needs can be accommodated without<br />
adverse impact on fabric, spaces or setting;<br />
• balance of the individual needs of all tenants/occupants and the desire for public access to the<br />
site;<br />
• encourage cooperation between managers of all components of the site to ensure that overall<br />
management objectives are consistent between managing agencies; and<br />
• ensure that areas/precincts to be managed are created on logical spatial units, which maintain<br />
the integrity of the landscape design of the site.<br />
If more diverse occupants, or a number of occupants, are anticipated on the site then a strategic and<br />
financial planning exercise will be needed to manage the process.<br />
The preferred new uses for the buildings of the Rozelle Hospital are uses which enhance the<br />
appreciation of the place and ensure the conservation of the significant buildings and landscape<br />
features.<br />
Future uses for the Rozelle Hospital site may be considered compatible if the following criteria are<br />
met:<br />
• The cultural significance of the buildings and their extant interior spaces and detail are not<br />
compromised.<br />
• The integral relationship between the significant landscape setting, individual gardens and<br />
bUildings is not compromised but enhanced and conserved.<br />
• The proposed new use is sympathetic to the original use and does not detract from that use or<br />
the cultural significance of the buildings and landscape setting.<br />
• Significant fabric and spaces are not to be damaged, destroyed or altered.<br />
• The nature of the new use would not result in an unacceptable level of wear and tear on<br />
significant fabric.<br />
• The relationship of the buildings and landscape setting to is not obscured.<br />
• The proposed use does not lead to major traffic generation on the site.<br />
• <strong>Park</strong>ing and vehicular access associated with the use can be managed discreteiy on the site.<br />
• The modern services reqUired (eg. fire safety provisions, lift, air conditioning, toilets, etc) for a<br />
potential new use will not cause damage, destroy or compromise the buildings or any interior<br />
spaces of significance.<br />
TANNER ARCHITECTS<br />
ISSUE D - 27 NOVEMBER 2007<br />
F:\pro\arc\76\7615\lransfer\103-clientloul\Final for SHFA Website 29'11 '07\Appendix\Appendix A1· Herilage Assessmenl.doc<br />
PAGE 7
CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />
HERITAGE ASSESSMENT<br />
• The fixtures or fittings required as part of the new use would not damage or compromise the<br />
significant fabric or spaces.<br />
• Proposed uses which achieve relatively more of the stated outcomes of the conservation<br />
policies are preferred to those which necessitate greater change and intrusion.<br />
• The types of occupants should be selected on the basis that they "fit" the bUilding's extant<br />
spaces; the reverse approach wherein the fabric of the building is altered and/or demolished to<br />
suit the requirements of the occupants is unacceptable.<br />
General constraints in relation to fabric and spaces of heritage significance (refer to CMP Section 4.7<br />
and Appendix A Inventory of Zones and Items):<br />
• Retain original configuration of spaces and fabric which refiects historicaily significant uses of<br />
the buildings and elements.<br />
• New service areas and services should be in areas which do not impact on significant spaces<br />
or fabric.<br />
• New buiidings in the area of significant buildings and landscape, unless otherwise<br />
recommended, to be designed according to the guiding conservation principles, refer to CMP<br />
Section 5.8.<br />
Inappropriate uses could lead to confusion or adverse impact on the cultural significance of the place:<br />
• Inappropriate uses can confuse the historic associations of the place.<br />
• Uses of the place which do not take advantage of the interpretative potential of the place<br />
related to its cultural significance.<br />
• The lack of use, and the consequent lack of maintenance can be as equally damaging as the<br />
introduction of an incompatible use.<br />
Most of the buildings on the site have the potential for adaptive reuse, as is currently demonstrated<br />
by the successful occupation of the Kirkbride Block by the University of Sydney. Some are more<br />
readily adaptable than others.<br />
Compatibility of Educational (School, University, Training College) Use<br />
If in the future the site is not occupied and maintained for hospital or administrative uses by the<br />
Department of Health, another major institution, such as an educational institution, could readily<br />
adapt the site for appropriate re-use without impacting on the cultural significance of the place. The<br />
conservation of the majority of the buildings of the Kirkbride Block for use by the University of Sydney<br />
- Sydney College of the Arts is an excellent example of adaptive reuse of former hospital sites to<br />
educational use. The Rydalmere Psychiatric Hospital has also been conserved and adapted for use<br />
as the Parramatta Campus of the University ofWestern Sydney.<br />
The existing buildings provide a wide variety of spaces which could readily be adapted to<br />
accommodate some of the requirements of an educational facility eg general classrooms and offices.<br />
However, the specialist facilities required by an educational facility, eg the larger seminar rooms and<br />
lecture halls, library, sports facilities would best be accommodated in new buildings.<br />
The gardens within the Broughton Hall precinct require intensive maintenance and protection from<br />
adverse wear and tear. Care must be exercised in the selection of a use for this group to ensure that<br />
the significance of these gardens is appreciated. There are opportunities adjacent to the Broughton<br />
Hall Group for the construction of new buildings which could provide the specialist facilities to support<br />
the new uses of the existing buildings.<br />
Access to the ovals and the waterfront for educational co-curricular activities is desirable. However,<br />
this may be in conflict with the management policies of the local council if the foreshore land is taken<br />
up by the local council for public use.<br />
<strong>Park</strong>ing (if provided on-site) should be located in strategic positions to minimise negative impact on<br />
the landscaped setting of the site.<br />
TANNER ARCHITECTS<br />
ISSUE D - 27 NOVEMBER 2007<br />
F:\pro\arc\76\7615\transfer\103.dienl\oul\Final for SHFA Website 29'11'07\AppendhMppendix A1- Heritage Assessmenl.doc<br />
PAGE 8<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[j<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />
HERITAGE ASSESSMENT<br />
The conversion of part of the old gate house for a childcare centre illustrates the possible adaptability<br />
of the smaller buildings for small scale educational use. The placement of the Writer's Centre in<br />
Garry Owen is another example of this.<br />
The University of Sydney has demonstrated experience and commitment to heritage restoration as<br />
demonstrated at Kirkbride and the Darlington Campus. The University of Sydney has indicated that it<br />
has sufficient funds for the necessary adaptive re-uselrestoration works at <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />
Whilst a variety of different adaptive reuse options may be feasible within individual buildings, the<br />
character of individual zones within the site must be carefully considered when introducing new uses.<br />
Each of the potential new uses have particular needs relating to such issues as car parking, required<br />
building area and public access, and these factors will greatly impact on the overall site layout and<br />
relationships within the site.<br />
General Conservation Policies<br />
The overall purpose of these Conservation Policies is to preserve and enhance the cultural<br />
significance of the whole site - its bUildings and its associated cultural landscape, and to ensure its<br />
maintenance into the future.<br />
The conservation of this site can best be achieved by:<br />
• The conservation and adaptation of the significant buildings.<br />
• The conservation of the setting of significant buildings and the associated individual<br />
landscapes and the overall cultural landscape.<br />
• The accommodation of a use or uses which will enhance public appreciation of the cultural<br />
significance of the place and ensure the conservation of significant buildings and landscape<br />
setting and features.<br />
• The strict control of development within the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> site by the NSW Department of Health<br />
(or potential new site management) to ensure an understanding of the significance of the<br />
place.<br />
• The control of any permissible development within identified Zones 1, 2, 6 and 7 to safeguard<br />
the conservation of the sile.<br />
• The control of the significant garden and foreshore selling and public access ways to ensure<br />
the cultural iandscape of the site and the Iron Cove area is retained and conserved.<br />
• The intervention of significant fabric should be reduced to minimise the loss of cultural<br />
significance. Where detrimental intervention is unavoidable it should occur only in areas of<br />
lower significance and the work should be readily reversible wherever possible.<br />
• The implementation of fire safety measures to comply with the intent of the Building Code of<br />
Australia and NSW Building RegUlations.<br />
• The implementation of a regular maintenance programme and management team.<br />
• No demolition or removal of items (apart from actions required to ensure pUblic safety) should<br />
be undertaken before the details of the conservation works specific to each building or area<br />
have been determined.<br />
• Photographic recording prior to and during demolition of any element or structure is required.<br />
• All archival material relating to the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> site should be retained at an appropriate<br />
repository and be made available to the public with secure access.<br />
Site Conservation Guidelines<br />
Significant items within the site contribute to the place as a whole and also require a specific setting.<br />
The development of precincts In this document is a tool to assist in defining areas of specific<br />
characteristics within the site to develop appropriate conservation guidelines, and should not be<br />
viewed as an opportunity to subdivide the site. Some portions of the site are identified as available<br />
for redevelopment, but only on the basis that their scale and character does not compromise the<br />
special qualities of the whole site.<br />
TANNER ARCHITECTS<br />
ISSUE 0 - 27 NOVEMBER 2007<br />
F:\pro\arc\76\7615\lransfel\1 03-client\out\Final for SHFA Website 29'11 'O'l\Appendix\Appendix A1- Heritage Assessmenl.doc<br />
PAGE 9
CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />
HERITAGE ASSESSMENT<br />
Provision of open space in accordance with the historical context will be important for the setting of<br />
the significant buildings on the site. In addition, the archaeoiogicai research potential of the site is an<br />
important feature and its assessment, investigation and control, particularly in areas of new<br />
development, will need consideration.<br />
The main objectives for the conservation and adaptive reuse of the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> site are to:<br />
• conserve and maintain the exceptional built and landscape quality of the site;<br />
• conserve and restore the landscape setting and public presentation, the open space and<br />
sloping grounds leading to Iron Cove, the historic landscape gardens, the remnant native<br />
plants, and the rock carvings and Aboriginal sites on the foreshore;<br />
• allow adaptive reuse and sensitive new development associated with the significant buildings<br />
to improve the opportunities for continued use;<br />
• implement effective management structures;<br />
• select the right tenants/occupants who can maintain the buildings and landscape while not<br />
detracting from their significance;<br />
• allow specific areas of new development in discrete areas in order to facilitate the conservation<br />
of the significant buildings and landscape.<br />
Conservation works are required in the short term to the following zones:<br />
• Broughton Hall;<br />
• Elements of the Kirkbride Block;<br />
• Convalescent Cottages;<br />
• Gardeners Cottage, and other cottages from the original Barnet scheme;<br />
• Stone gates and wall;<br />
• Various significant landscape elements;<br />
Potential areas for sensitive new deveiopment associated with the significant bUildings -alterations<br />
and additions and new buildings provided any change is designed and planned following the<br />
guidelines of this document:<br />
• The Broughton Hall Precinct (Zone 7) where presentation to Broughton Hall gardens, foreshore<br />
and views are protected;<br />
• The Manning Street Precinct (Zone 2) where the significant landscape elements are preserved.<br />
• The Central Slope Precinct (Zone 5) when the open landscape character is not compromised.<br />
Potential areas for substantial redevelopment, following the guidelines of this document:<br />
• The NSW Ambulance and Hospital Administration Precinct (Zone 6).<br />
Ultimately, an overall conservation and maintenance program which respects the cultural significance<br />
of individual buildings, their precincts and the landscape setting is expected. New development<br />
opportunities are limited on the site and therefore the carefui adaptive reuse of the existing buildings,<br />
the removal of intrusive elements and the selection of appropriate tenants must be a priority.<br />
The CMP 2002 section 5.8 contains detailed development controls for the various Zones within the<br />
<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> site. These are reproduced in the Appendix to this report.<br />
TANNER ARCH/TECTS<br />
ISSUE 0 - 27 NOVEMBER 2007<br />
F:\pro\arc\76\7615\!ransfer\103·
c c<br />
o<br />
c<br />
o<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o o<br />
u<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />
HERITAGE ASSESSMENT<br />
4 THE CALLAN PARK (SPECIAL PROVISIONS) ACT 2002 AND THE CONSERVATION<br />
MANAGEMENT PLAN 2002<br />
3.1 The <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> (Special Provisions) Act<br />
Key sections of the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Act are reproduced below to enable comparison with the 2002<br />
Conservation Management Plan policies:<br />
Section 4 - Objects<br />
The objects of this Act are:<br />
(a) to ensure that the whole of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> remains in public ownership and subject to public<br />
control, and<br />
(b) to ensure the preservation of the areas of open space at <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> that were in existence<br />
immediately before the commencement of this Act, and that extend to and include the<br />
foreshore of Iron Cove on the Parramatta River. and<br />
(c) to allow public access to that open space. including that foreshore. for public recreational<br />
purposes of both an active and a passive nature, and<br />
(d) to preserve the heritage significance of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, including its historic bUildings. gardens<br />
and other landscape features, and<br />
(e) to impose appropriate controls on the future development of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />
Section 5 - <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> not to be sold or otherwise disposed of<br />
(1) The sale, transfer, lease or other alienation, and any mortgage or other encumbrance, of<br />
<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, or any part of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, is prohibited. except as provided by this Act.<br />
(2) The Governor may, by proclamation. vest <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> for an estate in fee simple in a statutory<br />
body representing the Crown that is subject to the direction and control of the Minister.<br />
Section 7 - Development at <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> restricted<br />
(1) The provisions of environmental planning instruments that apply to <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> are the<br />
provisions of those Instruments that so applied immediately before the commencement of this<br />
Act, subject to this section.<br />
(2) The consent authority for development applications relating to land within <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is the<br />
council of the local government area within which the land is situated. despite any other Act or<br />
any environmental planning instrument.<br />
(3) Development may be carried out at <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, with development consent, for the purpose of<br />
health facilities and educational or community facilities, but development for the purpose of<br />
retirement villages is prohibited at <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />
(4) State Environmental Planning Policy No 5-Housing for Older People or People with a Disability<br />
does not apply to <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />
(5) Buildings must not be erected at <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> outside the footprints or building envelopes of the<br />
bUildings that existed immediately before the commencement of this Act. However. this<br />
subsection does not prevent the erection of temporary structures.<br />
(6) Consent must not be granted for any development at <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> if the development would<br />
result in:<br />
(a) less open space at <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> than existed immediately before the commencement of<br />
this Act, or<br />
(b) an increase in the total floor area of all buildings that existed at <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> immediately<br />
before the commencement of this Act.<br />
(7) Development at <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> must not adversely affect the Broughton Hall Garden. Charles<br />
Moore Garden or Kirkbride Garden.<br />
TANNER ARCHITECTS<br />
ISSUE D - 27 NOVEMBER 2007<br />
F:\pro\arc\76\7615\transfer\1 03-client\oul\Final for SHFA Website 29'11 '07\AppendixlAppendix A1- Heritage Assessment.doc<br />
PAGE 11
c<br />
[<br />
o<br />
o co<br />
c<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o oo<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o o<br />
o<br />
c<br />
CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />
HERITAGE ASSESSMENT<br />
5 ASSESSMENT OF THE HERITAGE IMPACTS OF THE DRAFT LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />
The Draft Land Use Plan has been reviewed in light of the Conservation Policy within the endorsed<br />
CMP and the assessed impacts are set out in the table below. :<br />
General Site Conservation Policies Draft Land Use Plan Compliance Comments<br />
1. Preserve the cultural significance of the The significant bUildings and landscapes will be<br />
buildings and site as a cultural landscape conserved and the significant buildings will be<br />
incl uding the foreshore open space by adapted to new uses. The specific adaptability<br />
adaptively re-using the existing significant of these buildings will be determined at the next<br />
heritage buildings and preserving the phase in the project.<br />
significant landscape elements.<br />
The Kirkbride Block demonstrates the<br />
adaptability of the site for educational use.<br />
2. Introduce new uses and development that The re-use of the site by the University of<br />
are appropriate to the cultural significance of Sydney provides a compatible and viable new<br />
the place and ensure the conservation of<br />
significant buildings and landscape and<br />
use.<br />
archaeology.<br />
TANNER ARCHITECTS<br />
ISSUE D - 27 NOVEMBER 2007<br />
F:\pro\arc\76\7615\lransfer\103-client\out\Final for SHFA Website 29'11 '07\AppendixlAppendix A1- Heritage Assessmenl.doc<br />
The re-use of the Broughton Hall Group by<br />
various NGOs provides potential viable new<br />
uses requiring ongoing government funding.<br />
3. Maintain open space adjacent to the The waterfront portion of the site will be<br />
waterfront maintained and enhanced for public access.<br />
Intrusive buildings will be removed to achieve<br />
an enlarged area of open space accessible to<br />
the public.<br />
4. Maintain an adequate setting for the former The majority of the new development will occur<br />
<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Mental Hospital and Broughton in Zone 5 - Central Slope Precinct, which is to<br />
Hall Psychiatric Clinic, and the various remain as a predominantiy open landscape<br />
individual significant buildings within the site,<br />
at close quarters and from a distance as<br />
area.<br />
major landmarks in the landscape setting.<br />
New development should not encroach upon<br />
the significant open landscape features or be<br />
visually intrusive within the zone.<br />
Any new development should be screened to<br />
allow landscape to dominate.<br />
5. Maintain the major views of the site and its The majority of the new development will occur<br />
significant buildings from both within and in Zone 5 - Central Slope Precinct, which is to<br />
outside the site. remain as a predominantly open landscape<br />
area.<br />
New development should not impact the<br />
significant views.<br />
6. Adapt, replace or remove non-contributory The non-contributory buildings are nominated<br />
bUildings from with the site for removal. The adaptability of these buildings<br />
will be determined at the next phase in the<br />
project.<br />
7. Ensure all significant aboriginal sites are The aboriginal sites of <strong>Callan</strong> Point will be<br />
protected and managed within an managed in accordance with the<br />
appropriate setting. recommendations of the <strong>Callan</strong> Point CMP<br />
1998 and the <strong>Callan</strong> Point Engravings and<br />
Landscape 2000 by John Clegg, Department of<br />
Archaeology, University of Sydney.<br />
PAGE 13
General Site Conservation Policies Draft Land Use Plan Compliance Comments<br />
8. Institute a management structure to co· This will be part of the next phase of the project.<br />
ordinate the long term conservation and It is critical that the with the sub·division and<br />
maintenance of the whole site excising of various parts of the site to different<br />
organisations with differing leasing<br />
arrangements that an overarching management<br />
structure is put in place to ensure that the whole<br />
site is managed as one.<br />
9. Implement a conservation programme for all The impiementation of a conservation<br />
significant buildings and landscapes. programme is imperative to the re·use of the<br />
buildings and landscape of the site.<br />
10.Ensure that sufficient funds are available for The buildings of the Kirkbride Block have been<br />
the maintenance of all the significant maintained by the University of Sydney during<br />
buildings and iandscapes in the short, its tenure.<br />
medium and long term.<br />
However, the use of the Broughton Hall<br />
Precinct by the various NGOs will require<br />
financial commitment by the NSW Government<br />
for the urgent conservation works to the<br />
buildings and the gardens and for the future<br />
maintenance.<br />
11.Ensure that the historic development of the The location of the major new development in<br />
site is not obscured by new development. Zone 5 - Centrai Slope Precinct has the<br />
potential to obscure an understanding of the<br />
historic development. New development should<br />
be carefully controlled to ensure it does not<br />
dominate the open iandscape of this area.<br />
TANNER ARCHITECTS<br />
CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />
ISSUE D• 27 NOVEMBER 2007<br />
F:\pro\arc\76\7615\lransfer\103-cllentlout\Rnal for SHFA Website 29'11'07\Appendix\Appendix A1- Heritage Assessmenl.doc<br />
HERITAGE ASSESSMENT<br />
PAGE 14<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
C<br />
[,<br />
L<br />
['<br />
C<br />
C<br />
[<br />
[<br />
o<br />
c<br />
o<br />
c
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
o<br />
[<br />
[<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
o<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
o<br />
c
c<br />
c<br />
o<br />
o o<br />
o oo<br />
o<br />
o ooc<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
TANNER ARCHITECTS<br />
CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN 2007<br />
APPENDIX<br />
CMP SECTION 5.8<br />
SITE CONSERVATION GUIDELINES<br />
ISSUE D - 7 NOVEMBER 2007<br />
F:\pro\arc\76\7615\transfer\1 03-client\outlFinal for SHFA Website 29'11'07\Appendix\Appendix A1- Heritage Assessmenl.doc<br />
HERITAGE ASSESSMENT
ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />
CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />
Some species eg: Syzigium jambos, Eleaocarpus obovatus, Syzygium moorei are unusual in<br />
cultivation and it would be ideal to propagate new specimens for use either as replacement<br />
plantings or for planting in sympathetic adaptive new design. .<br />
I Management<br />
Policy 5.21 A landscape management structure for the whole site should be<br />
established Which ensures the conservation and maintenance ofthe<br />
existing landscape and provides guidelines for the creation ofnew<br />
landscaped areas and gardens.<br />
It is important that the area encompassing the entire Rozelle Hospital site be considered in future<br />
site works and that the integrity of the whole site be maintained while recognising that discrete<br />
areas, particularly the Broughton Hall gardens and the Kirkbride Entrance Gardens will have<br />
specific management and maintenance requirements.<br />
The Rozelle Hospital site contains cultural and natural landscape elements of such importance<br />
that it should have a Landscape Management Plan prepared, incorporating landscape restorationl<br />
reconstruction plans for specific areas, as an integral part of any future management program. It<br />
should take into account surviving early layout and fabric (both built and vegetative).<br />
Policy 5.22 The landscape management structure should be implemented that:<br />
• recognises and values the significance ofthe site's landscape as a<br />
primary resource with the buildings as elements within that<br />
landscape;<br />
• outlines the responsibility at each level ofmanagement ofeach of<br />
the precincts and the overall site;<br />
• provides clear guidelines for each precinct and tenancy area.<br />
Policy 5.23 Adequate funds should be committed at each level ofmanagement to<br />
the conservation ofthe landscaped areas and gardens.<br />
I Specific Landscape Policies for Zones<br />
Refer to Section 5.8 for Site Conservation Guidelines relating to conservation of existing and<br />
development of new built elements.<br />
Zone 1 - The Waterfront and <strong>Callan</strong> Point Precinct (Refer Figure 5.2)<br />
Policy 5.24 Use the 1998 'Draft Plan ofManagement for <strong>Callan</strong> Point' to guide all<br />
landscape conservation actions on <strong>Callan</strong> Point. Adopt the<br />
'Management Action Plan' outline in '<strong>Callan</strong> Point Aboriginal Heritage',<br />
M. Dallas 2000 for treatment ofAboriginal sites.<br />
Policy 5.25 Explore the potential ofcreating vegetation corridor links with other<br />
foreshore and suburban areas.<br />
Policy 5.26 Conserve Norfolk Island Hibiscus waterfront plantings and formalise car<br />
parking areas to avoid further compaction to the root areas ofthe trees.<br />
Policy 5.27 Remove, or do not replace as individual trees in poplaravenue planting<br />
senesce, to allow a more informal transition between the Kirkbride zone<br />
and <strong>Callan</strong> Point.<br />
The original design intent was for a picturesque composition near the main bUildings with an<br />
informal transition to the rocky foreshore area. Late nineteenth century photographs indicate this<br />
TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 142<br />
S:\D0C\2002\Rozelle Hospllal\CMP\5 Conservation.doc<br />
[<br />
c<br />
c [<br />
[<br />
C<br />
o<br />
[<br />
[<br />
n<br />
L<br />
c<br />
c[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
C<br />
[<br />
C<br />
C<br />
C
u<br />
o ooIJ<br />
o oo<br />
o o<br />
o oo<br />
c<br />
o<br />
o D<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />
CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />
to consist of scattered remnant eucalypts. Extensive mid-twentieth century avenue plantings have<br />
obscured this intent.<br />
Policy 5.28 Maintain Sydney Harbour Bridge Memorial and integrate into any new<br />
landscape design .<br />
Policy 5.29 Generally maintain an open landscape and modify steep embankments<br />
to landfill to allow access to the foreshore as opportunity arises.<br />
At the western end of the zone extensive land filling has resulted in a grassed playing field with a<br />
steep embankment without a connection to the foreshore, or,.<br />
Policy 5.30 Undertake repair to canal as necessary. Consider replanting trees along<br />
the line ofthe canal as evident in the 1930 aerial photograph (lIIus.3.36).<br />
TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 143<br />
S:\DOC\2002\Rozelle Hospilal\CMP\5 Conservatlon.doc
c<br />
o c<br />
o ooooooooooo<br />
o oo<br />
o o<br />
Zone 2 - Manning Street Precinct<br />
ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />
CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />
Policy 5.31 Link future management ofthe Nurses Home garden to the<br />
management ofthe 1930s Nurses Home building. Investigate the<br />
structural integrity ofthe elements ofthe garden attached to the Nurses<br />
Home and repair or remove as necessary. Remove self-seeded trees.<br />
The garden attached to the Nurses home was a discrete unit within the 19 th century landscape<br />
design. In the event of future replacement of the former Nurses Home record the garden prior to<br />
removal. Incorporate the major trees of some significance into a revised landscape plan for the<br />
area. Any future landscape plan should respect the significance of the 1870s-80s planning for the<br />
site as a whole.<br />
If the former 1930s Nurses Home is retained, repair the major elements of the garden and remove<br />
overgrown vegetation.<br />
Policy 5.32 Investigate a less visually intrusive means offencing the substation or<br />
possible relocation ofthe fence. Rep/ace the poplar avenue nearthe<br />
electricity sub-station with vegetation that will screen the substation, by<br />
either extending the area devoted to bush regeneration or by planting<br />
Pori Jackson Figs.<br />
Substation is not located on Rozelle Hospital site. While it is highly intrusive in the setting, at<br />
present its relocation is not anticipated. While it remains the planting of a vegetative screen<br />
seems the best solution.<br />
Policy 5.33 Conserve early asylum walling and seek arboricultural advice on the<br />
maintenance ofthe Moreton Bay Fig (Ficus macrophylla) boundary<br />
plantation.<br />
Policy 5.34 Restore the ability to read the Manning Street Alignment (Zone 2) and<br />
the Kirkbride Entrance Garden (Zone 3) as one unit. Restore late<br />
nineteenth century character to the Manning street Alignment (Zone 2)<br />
with Nurses Home garden as a discrete unit within the zone.<br />
The area enclosed by the walling and boundary plantations was an integral component of the<br />
Manning/Barnet concept for the site. Through time this unit has been fragmented by the<br />
construction of buildings, car parks and the roadway. Ideally planning for the area should restore<br />
the legibility of the original design concepts. The more recent treatment and poor maintenance of<br />
drainage of the iower part of the zone - formerly open and picturesque gradually giving way to<br />
remnant natural vegetation - has obscured its meaning.<br />
TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTO FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 145<br />
S:\D0C\2002\Rozeile Hospital\CMP\5 Conservation.doc
c<br />
o o<br />
o oc<br />
o o<br />
o ooo<br />
o c<br />
o<br />
D<br />
o<br />
o oo<br />
ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />
CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />
Zone 3 - Kirkbride Entrance Garden and Embankment to King George <strong>Park</strong> Precinct<br />
Policy 5.35<br />
Policy 5.36<br />
Policy 5.37<br />
Policy 5.38<br />
Policy 5.39<br />
Investigate the alignment ofthe former entrance drive and remove<br />
intrusive planting to allow the alignment to be interpreted.<br />
Instate a road surface and gutter treatment for the main entrance drive<br />
which is less visually intrusive and sympathetic to the ul h century<br />
character ofthe zone.<br />
Seek arboricultural advice as to the health and best management ofthe<br />
boundary plantation.<br />
Conserve the War Memorial and reinstate the original colour scheme<br />
based on paint scraping samples. Remove garden beds on eitherside<br />
ofmemorial to restore a park-like character.<br />
Conserve the structural elements ofthe sunken garden and reinstate<br />
planting to the beds. Remove young Silky Oak in garden bed. Consider<br />
secondaryplantings ofWashingtonia robusta palms to reflect the<br />
current formation.<br />
This section of the garden was a focus during the use of the site as a psychiatric hospital but its<br />
meaning has been diminished. Secondary plantings would eventually replace the current palms<br />
when they senesee. The upper circular bed surrounding the sunken garden is currently planted<br />
with a mixture of species. Conserve the Dracaena draco and popular 19'h century plants ego<br />
Eupatorium megalophyllum. Consider using the current evidence of Tecomaria capensis to<br />
establish a hedge along the upper side of the sunken garden. Planting in the former flower beds<br />
of the sunken garden could be a massed planting of eg: Iresines which would be relatively low<br />
maintenance but allow the flower beds to be interpreted.<br />
Policy 5.40 Continue a bush regeneration program for the lower slopes toward King<br />
George Oval. Formalise funding for the program.<br />
Appropriate funding may come from the sale of large self-seeded Canary Island Palms (Phoenix<br />
canariensis) in this area and the adjacent Ridgetop, Kirkbride Block Platform and Embankment to<br />
King George <strong>Park</strong> Precinct (Zone 4). Currently the bush regeneration program has been relying<br />
heavily on volunteer labour and on funding via small grants. A regular source of funding would<br />
allow for a more structured program of management.<br />
Policy 5.41 In the former 19'h century pleasure ground/entrance garden implement a<br />
program ofreplacement planting with trees favoured by Charles Moore<br />
and Joseph Maiden- preferably conifers, araucarias, Australian<br />
rainforest species and palms. .<br />
TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTO FINALISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 147<br />
S;\DOC\2002\RozelJe Hospllal\CMP\5 Conservation.doc
c<br />
o ooo<br />
o<br />
o [J<br />
o oooo<br />
o ooooo<br />
o<br />
ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />
CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />
Zone 4 - Ridgetop, Kirkbride Block Platform and Convalescent Cottages Precinct<br />
Policy 5.42 Replace unsympathetic lighting and seating on the Kirkbride platform.<br />
When opportune reconstruct garden beds in a gardenesque scheme of<br />
alternate circular and rectangular beds in accordance with documentary<br />
evidence.<br />
Policy 5.43 Interpret the former cricket oval area through appropriate fencing,<br />
structures and planting based on archival evidence including the<br />
removal ofintrusive buildings.<br />
Planting around the cricket ground was originally peppercorns, brushbox and pines. Refer to<br />
DPWS Heritage Study (1991) Plates 16.17.<br />
Policy 5.44 New planting and management ofthe landscape associated with the<br />
Kirkbride Block should follow the policies and recommendations as set<br />
out in the Kirkbride Block Conservation Management Plan 1993.<br />
Policy 5.45 Remove 1970s fill overthe late tfjh centuryprofile ofthe platform in<br />
front of the convalescent cottages. Selectively remove or prune Hills<br />
Figs (Ficus microcarpa var hillii) and native trees and shrubs to allow<br />
views to Iron· Cove to be recovered.<br />
Policy 5.46 Investigate growing conditions ofboundary plantation and implement a<br />
tree replacement policy ofPort Jackson Figs (Ficus rubiginosa)<br />
Policy 5.47 Maintain an open landscape character with views betweenlthrough tree<br />
groups to the majorbuildings.<br />
Policy 5.48 Reconstruct the former garden layout to the front ofGarry Owen based<br />
on archival evidence.<br />
Policy 5.49 Selectively remove Brush Box planting along Central Avenue to restore<br />
views to Iron Cove or do not replace trees blocking viewlines to Iron<br />
Cove when they die.<br />
Some original viewlines from Kirkbride toward Iron Cove have become blocked as vegetation has<br />
matured. Judicious removal of individual trees would allow these views to be recovered.<br />
TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 149<br />
S:\OOC\2002\Rozelle Hospital\CMP\5 Conservation.doc
c ooooooooooooooooooo<br />
5.8 SITE CONSERVATION GUIDELINES<br />
ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />
CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />
Significant items within the site contribute to the place as a whole and also require a specific<br />
setting. The development of precincts in this document is a tool to assist in defining areas of<br />
specific characteristics within the site to develop appropriate conservation guidelines, and should<br />
not be viewed as an opportunity to subdivide the site. Some portions of the site are identified as<br />
available for redevelopment, but only on the basis that their scale and character does not<br />
compromise the special qualities of the whole site.<br />
Provision of open space in accordance with the historical context will be important for the setting<br />
of the significant bUildings on the site. In addition, the archaeological research potential of the site<br />
is an important feature and its assessment, investigation and control, particularly in areas of new<br />
development, will need consideration. This section of the document is primarily concerned with<br />
architectural and landscape controls but the follOWing conservation objectives will obViously have<br />
an influence on the development of plann ing controls:<br />
1. Conservation and effective use ofthe significant buildings and landscapes, i.e. viable<br />
uses for the site in terms of ongoing funding for maintenance and occupation.<br />
2. Maintenance of an adequate setting for the former <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Mentai Hospital and<br />
Broughton Hall Psychiatric Clinic, and the various individual significant buildings<br />
within the site, at close quarters and from a distance as major landmarks in the<br />
landscape selling.<br />
3. Maintenance of the major views of the site and its significant buildings from both<br />
within and outside the site.<br />
4. Maintenance of the significant vegetation and landscape elements on the site.<br />
5. Investigation of the archaeological potential, related to the hospital use on the site,<br />
European use and Aboriginal use.<br />
5.8.1 General Guidelines for Conservation and New Development<br />
Refer to Figure 5.1 for Site Plan indicating general conservation policies related to individual<br />
building elements.<br />
The general principles for conservation works related to buildings of cultural significance follow:<br />
Conservation works related to buildings of CUltural significance<br />
Objective The primary objective of the guidelines in these areas is to maintain the<br />
integrity of the identified significant bUildings and elements identified in the<br />
assessment of significance and their setting and to enhance appreciation of<br />
the cultural significance of the site.<br />
Conservation works and adaptation with appropriate sensitive new<br />
development can be undertaken where it enhances public appreciation and it<br />
does not detract from or impact on that identified significance.<br />
Conservation and Conservation and adaptation works shouid occur:<br />
adaptation<br />
• Conservation, renovation or alteration of the existing buildings including<br />
adaptation to suit appropriate new uses;<br />
• demolition of extensions to buildings or items which are not considered<br />
to be essential and detract from the cultural significance;<br />
• introduction of new services to improve the amenity and to comply with<br />
the Building Code of Australia;<br />
• construction of new facilities or extensions to existing buildings may be<br />
permitted which are related to the use of the significant buildings. Such<br />
additional accommodation must be subiect to rigorous design controls;<br />
TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 155<br />
S:\DOC\2002\Rozeile Hospftal\CMP\5 Conservallon.doc
ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />
CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />
0 conservation and maintenance of the existing significant landscaped<br />
setting;<br />
0 supplementation of the existing planting to support the significant<br />
landscaped setting (refer to landscape policies above)<br />
General Guidelines for minor development adjacent to buildings or within landscapes of<br />
cultural significance<br />
Objective The objective of the gUidelines in these areas is to ensure that new<br />
development respects the significance and setting of the Rozelle Hospital<br />
Site, including specific buildings, elements and items in the site.<br />
New development opportunities are limited within the site and should be<br />
undertaken as a measure which has a considered outcome of protecting and<br />
enhancing the appreciation of cultural significance on the site.<br />
New development is allowable in areas where it will improve the amenity and<br />
the public presentation of the site and where it considers the cultural<br />
significance of the site. New development should be the subject of rigorous<br />
design, planning, conservation consultation and archaeological investigation.<br />
New Development New development may be permitted which relates to:<br />
0 conservation, restoration, alteration or renovation of the existing<br />
building/s including adaptation to suit new uses;<br />
0 demolition of buildings and demolition of extensions to buildings or<br />
items which are not considered of heritage significance.<br />
0 construction of new facilities and extensions to existing buildings<br />
which are related to the use of the site and significant buildings or<br />
the re- presentation of the site.<br />
0 construction of new buildings in locations which have no impact on<br />
the cultural significance of the site or individual bUildings and may<br />
facilitate the conservation of the site and its significance.<br />
Height New buildings or extensions should be lower than the immediately adjacent<br />
significant buildings. In areas where there are no immediately adjacent<br />
significant buildings the height of new buildings should respect the<br />
significance of the area.<br />
Bulk Any new buildings or extensions to existing buildings are to be subsidiary in<br />
bulk and scale to the major existing buildings. New structures must not be of<br />
such a scale as to dominate the existing structures or detract from their<br />
setting.<br />
Views Major identified views to, or from, the significant buildings are to be<br />
respected and not obstructed when considering the proposals for minor new<br />
development.<br />
Building Style The style of new structures must complement the existing significant<br />
bUildings. Design of structures may be in the language of the existing<br />
buildings but should not be attempts to produce replicas. The design of new<br />
structures should not conflict with the design of existing structures.<br />
Materials and New materials should respect the eXisting materials of the significant<br />
Colours buildings.<br />
TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 156 [ ...<br />
S:\DOC\2002\Rozelie Hospllal\CMP\5 ConservaUon.doc<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
C<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
C<br />
C<br />
[<br />
c<br />
c [<br />
c<br />
c<br />
o
o<br />
o<br />
o ooooooo<br />
o<br />
o o<br />
o<br />
o ooooo<br />
ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />
CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />
General Guidelines for minor development adjacent to buildings or within landscapes of<br />
cultural significance (cont'd)<br />
Design Details Experienced personnel with suitable architectural skills must be employed.<br />
A combination of heritage conservation and design skills will be essential:<br />
• All alterations and additions to the existing buildings, and all new<br />
construction must in no way diminish the established heritage<br />
significance.<br />
• A protective view cone and protected landscape elements are to be<br />
designed to ensure that the vistas to and from the site are retained for<br />
posterity.<br />
• The location and design of new bUildings should ensure that the views to<br />
and from the significant buildings and grounds to Iron Cove are<br />
preserved.<br />
Site Treatment There is to be no evident site excavation or change in levels of land<br />
associated with buildings of exceptional and high significance. Landscaping<br />
is to be carried out in conformity with the proposals in the landscape plan<br />
and the landscape policies in this Conservation Management Plan.<br />
Access Existing access points to the site from Balmain Road and Glover Street are<br />
to remain. New access points will require detailed planning consideration,<br />
especially where they may potentially impact on the cultural significance of<br />
the site.<br />
Car parking Car parking is to be permitted in association with the use of most buildings,<br />
however parking should be provided in discrete areas where it is not visible<br />
from any of the major view points of the significant buildings and their<br />
grounds. All parking areas are to be landscaped.<br />
General Guidelines for new development<br />
Design Guidelines The design of new buildings in areas designated capable of re-development<br />
(Location,<br />
should respect the adjacent significant buildings and site.<br />
Footprint, Height, New buildings should be complementary in bulk and scale to the significant<br />
Bulk, Style, buildings on the site. New structures must not be of such a scale as to<br />
Materials and dominate the significant bUildings or detract from their setting.<br />
Colours)<br />
The style of new structures must complement the existing significant<br />
buildings. Design of structures may be in the language of the existing<br />
buildings but should not be attempts to produce replicas. Materials for new<br />
bUildings should respect the materials of the existing significant buildings.<br />
Refer to individual precinct plans for preferred location and footprints of new<br />
buildings.<br />
Views Major and identified views to, and from the significant buildings and site<br />
should be considered in the preparation of development proposals.<br />
Site Treatment! Site excavation for development may be permitted in limited areas to achieve<br />
Landscaping less obtrusive bUildings and to allow buildings to follow site contours.<br />
Landscaping is to be carried out in conformity with the proposals in the<br />
Landscape Management Plan.<br />
Historic New building and development works might impact on archaeological<br />
Archaeology remains - the likelihood of this should be assessed during initial planning of<br />
the works.<br />
TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 157<br />
S:\OOC\2002\RozeJle HospJtal\CMP\5 Conservation.doc
ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />
CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />
The following section provides detailed site guidelines for conservation and new development<br />
relating to the Study Zones.<br />
5.8.2 Detailed guidelines for Conservation and New Development<br />
Zone 1 - Waterfront and <strong>Callan</strong> Point Precinct - Refer Figures 5.2 and 5.9.<br />
Planning Considerations:<br />
Principies •<br />
Access<br />
Use<br />
Landscape Considerations:<br />
Vegetation:<br />
Small scale new development to support the public recreation<br />
use of the zone allowable.<br />
• Sensitive low scale development that does not interrupt<br />
significant views and axis lines.<br />
• Replace Sports Pavilion, Building 91, with less visually intrusive<br />
facility.<br />
•<br />
Conserve pavilion Building 92A and adaptively reuse.<br />
• Maintain open space to foreshore.<br />
• Retain important views to significant landscape and buildings.<br />
• Regain Wharf Road axis to waterfront.<br />
• Remove intrusive and non-contributory elements.<br />
From Glover Street, Wharf Road and Waterfront Drive.<br />
Recreational facilities.<br />
Refer Landscape Conservation Guidelines<br />
• Explore creating vegetation corridor links with other foreshore<br />
areas.<br />
•<br />
Use recommendations in 1998 <strong>Callan</strong> Point Draft Plan of<br />
Management to guide all treatment of native vegetation In the<br />
zone.<br />
• Use recommendations In 2000 <strong>Callan</strong> Point Aboriginal Heritage<br />
report to gUide treatment of Aboriginal elements on the site.<br />
•<br />
•<br />
Historic Features: •<br />
Development:<br />
Historic Archaeology:<br />
•<br />
•<br />
Conserve Norfolk Island Hibiscus waterfront plantings.<br />
Remove poplar avenue.<br />
Maintain Sydney Harbour Bridge War Memorial and enhance<br />
landscape setling.<br />
Generally maintain open landscape and modify steep<br />
embankments to land fill.<br />
Repair canal as necessary.<br />
Formalise car parking areas to avoid damaging vegetation and rock<br />
engravings.<br />
Develop adequate policies for the conservation of the European<br />
rock engravings.<br />
TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 158 D.<br />
S:\DOC\2002\RozeJle Hospllal\CMP\5 Conservatlon.doc<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
C<br />
o C<br />
c<br />
c c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
o<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c c<br />
c
Zone 2 • Manning Street Precinct - Refer Figures 5.3 and 5.10.<br />
Planning Considerations:<br />
ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />
CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />
Principles: • New development is allowable if its design respects significant<br />
landscape elements and significant buildings.<br />
• Zone 2 is considered suitable for strictly controlled low scale<br />
development because of its discrete location away from<br />
central areas of site and significant areas of open landscape.<br />
• New development must respect the natural topography of the<br />
area and the landscaping that characterises the zone.<br />
• Conserve R7, possibly adapt for residential use. R1 to<br />
continue as Child Care centre. If use changes remove<br />
intrusive additions.<br />
• Conserve, recycle replace or remove Gatehouse as<br />
practicable.<br />
• Conserve and repair main gates.<br />
Access: • From Manning Street. It is possible to make openings in the<br />
boundary wall for access. An opening for access purposes<br />
already exists. However the wall must remain generally intact<br />
and readable as a high boundary wall.<br />
Use:<br />
• From Balmain Road. Existing access to this zone from<br />
Balmain Road to be improved and impact upon the design of<br />
the Kirkbride Entrance Garden reduced.<br />
Residential, Aged Care facilities, Hospital purposes. Continuation<br />
of child care facility. Commercial, Educational/Institutional.<br />
Building Setbacks: • Buildings to be setback from boundary wall at Manning Street,<br />
and from the significant stone cottages in the zone.<br />
• BUildings to be set back considerably, and visually isolated<br />
from Balmain Road<br />
Architectural Considerations:<br />
• New development not to encroach upon the significant<br />
landscape features or be Visually intrusive upon the adjacent<br />
Kirkbride entrance garden.<br />
• Landscaped belt to screen areas of new development.<br />
Planning: • It is conceived that new development in this area would be<br />
undertaken in conjunction with the removal of intrusive<br />
elements and the conservation of the landscape.<br />
• It would be essential for Buildings 93 and 93A to be removed<br />
before any new development in this area occurs. New<br />
development must be designed in conversation with the<br />
significant small scale cottages in the zone.<br />
Height: • Heights should generally be lower than the overall height of<br />
BUilding 93. The natural topography of the area may be used<br />
to allow a variety of heights. However, in general the built<br />
form must be low in scale.<br />
c [,<br />
[<br />
C<br />
C<br />
C<br />
C<br />
C<br />
TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 160 C·<br />
S:\O0C\2002\Rozelle Hospllal\CMP\5 Conservatlon.doc<br />
c<br />
c cc<br />
c<br />
o c<br />
[<br />
o oo
c oc<br />
o<br />
o oooo[l.J<br />
o ooo<br />
o ooooo<br />
ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />
CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />
Built Form and Materials: • Built forms should acknowledge the natural topography.<br />
• Finishes should sit comfortably with the surrounds including<br />
the small stone cottages in the zone.<br />
Landscape Considerations:<br />
Vegetation:<br />
Refer Landscape Conservation Guidelines.<br />
• Conserve elements of 19th Century Nurses Home garden.<br />
• Incorporate major trees of some significance into revised<br />
landscape plan for area.<br />
•<br />
Maintain Moreton Bay Fig boundary plantation.<br />
• Screen sub-station, or fence with less visually intrusive<br />
element.<br />
Historic Features: • Conserve early asylum walling.<br />
• Restore the ability to read Zone 2 and 3 as one unit.<br />
Historic Archaeology: • Assess any impacts on R1 - Original Gate Lodge (1878), and<br />
R7 - Attendants' Cottage (1879).<br />
TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 161<br />
S:\DOC\2002\Rozelie Hospltal\CMP\5 Conservallon.doc
c (J<br />
o o<br />
o o<br />
o<br />
o o<br />
o o<br />
o o<br />
o o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o nJ<br />
ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />
CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />
Zone 3 - Kirkbride Entrance Garden and Embankment to King George <strong>Park</strong> Precinct _<br />
Refer Figures 5.4 and 5.11 .<br />
Planning Considerations:<br />
Principles: • No new development is permitted in this zone. Removal of<br />
intrusive elements is desirable.<br />
• Retain important views between Kirkbride Block to<br />
landscaped elements.<br />
Landscape Considerations:<br />
Vegetation: Refer Landscape Conservation Guidelines.<br />
• Remove intrusive planting to allow original entrance garden<br />
layout to be interpreted.<br />
• Implement program of replacement plantings with trees<br />
favoured by Charles Moore and Joseph Maiden.<br />
• Seek advice as to best management to maintain health of<br />
boundary plantation.<br />
• Continue bush regeneration program for lower slopes toward<br />
King George Oval.<br />
Historic Features: • Conserve War Memorial and reinstate original colour scheme.<br />
• Conserve sunken garden.<br />
Development:<br />
Historic Archaeology:<br />
Re-instate road treatment sympathetic to the 19 th century<br />
character of the zone.<br />
Monitor works in order to record details of the original estates'<br />
carriageways and pathways.<br />
TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 163<br />
S:\DOC\2002\Rozelle Hospltal\CMP\5 ConservaUon.doc
Figure 5.11<br />
R_ Buildings to be removed<br />
No new development is permitted in Zone 3.<br />
Removal of intrusive elements is desirable.<br />
Retain important views between Kirkbride<br />
Block to landscaped elements.<br />
Guidelines for Conservation Works and Development: Zone 3 - Kirkbride<br />
Entrance Garden and Embankment to King George <strong>Park</strong> Precinct.<br />
Refer Figure 5.4.<br />
TANNER &ASSOCIATES PTY LTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 164<br />
$:\OOC\2002\RozeUe Hosplfal\CMP\5 ConservaUon.doc<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
c<br />
[<br />
c c<br />
[<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c [
o<br />
o oo<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o oo<br />
o o<br />
o oo<br />
o ooo<br />
o o<br />
ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />
CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />
Zone 4 • Ridgetop, Kirkbride Block Platform and Convalescent Cottages Precinct - Refer<br />
Figures 5.5 and 5.12.<br />
Planning Considerations:<br />
Principles: • This zone requires detailed conservation maintenance work in<br />
particular to Kirkbride buildings and Convalescent Cottages.<br />
Conservation works required include the removal of intrusive<br />
elements and restoration of significant fabric.<br />
• The only allowable development is minor additions that<br />
facilitate the adaptive reuse of the significant bUildings. Any<br />
new addition must not negatively impact upon the significant<br />
buildings or landscape.<br />
• Conserve and adapt significant elements.<br />
• Opportunities to remove intrusive elements should be<br />
investigated.<br />
• Cricket ground area should be restored as open space.<br />
Agricultural character to rear of Garry Owen House should<br />
also be restored by the removal of intrusive elements and the<br />
restoration of significant buildings.<br />
•<br />
One bomb shelter to remain on site at minimum.<br />
Access: Historic roads to be maintained as main access points.<br />
Use: Existing use by the University of Sydney of the Kirkbride Block is<br />
satisfactory and should be maintained. The use of Garry Owen<br />
by the Writers Centre is also satisfactory. Other such tenants<br />
should be found for the Convalescent Cottages once they have<br />
been conserved or in conjunction with conservation. Educational,<br />
Cultural, Institutional, Community.<br />
Landscape Considerations:<br />
Vegetation: Refer Landscape Conservation Guidelines<br />
• Reconstruct gardenesque planting on Kirkbride platform.<br />
• New plantings in Kirkbride Block area should follow that set<br />
out in 1993 Kirkbride Block Conservation Management Plan.<br />
• Selectively remove Brush Box planting along Central Avenue<br />
to restore views to Iron Cove.<br />
Historic Features: • Interpret the historic cricket oval area through appropriate<br />
fencing and planting based on photographic and documentary<br />
evidence.<br />
• Remove fill obscuring 19 th century profile of Convalescent<br />
Cottage platform. Remove or prune trees to reinstate cottage<br />
views.<br />
• Maintain an open landscape character with views<br />
between/through trees groups to major buildings<br />
•<br />
Reconstruct, based on evidence, garden layout to the front of<br />
GarryOwen.<br />
Development: Replace unsympathetic lighting and seating on Kirkbride Platform.<br />
Historic Archaeology: New building and development works might impact on<br />
archaeological remains - the likelihood of this should be assessed<br />
during initial planning of the works.<br />
TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 165<br />
S:\D0C\2002\Rozelle Hospilal\CMP\5 Conservation.doc
o o<br />
o o<br />
o o<br />
o no<br />
o<br />
o oo<br />
o<br />
o o<br />
o<br />
o oo<br />
Zone 5 • Central Slope Precinct - Refer Figures 5.6 and 5.13.<br />
Planning Considerations:<br />
ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />
CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />
Principles: • Development within restricted areas is possible within this<br />
zone.<br />
• Zone to be reinstated as an open parkland. Intrusive<br />
elements to be removed. Any new development must be<br />
located on perimeters of zone, must preserve views and<br />
have regard for the significance of the area as open space.<br />
• New development is most suitable in the approximate<br />
location of BUildings 30 and 105 on Wharf Road.<br />
• Building 42 should be reactivated for horticuitural use.<br />
• Building R6 and building 103 to be conserved.<br />
Access: Wharf Road is the most appropriate access point.<br />
Use: <strong>Park</strong>land, Aged Care facilities, or Hospital purposes, Community<br />
use, Educational, Institutional, Residential<br />
Building Setbacks: • New development to be aligned to Wharf Road.<br />
Architectural Considerations:<br />
• New development not to encroach upon the significant open<br />
landscape features or be visually intrusive within the zone.<br />
• Any new development should be screened to allow<br />
landscape to dominate.<br />
Planning: • It is conceived that new development in this area would be<br />
undertaken in conjunction with the removal of intrusive<br />
elements and the conservation of the landscape<br />
• It would be essential that the large intrusive buildings in this<br />
zone be removed before any new development in this area<br />
occurs. New development must be designed to relate to the<br />
significant small scale cottages in the zone and the open<br />
landscape.<br />
Built Form and Materials: • Built forms should acknowledge the natural topography of<br />
the site. No major excavation into the site.<br />
Landscape Considerations:.<br />
• Finishes should sit comfortably with the surrounds.<br />
Vegetation: • Refer Landscape Conservation Guidelines.<br />
• As time allows, remove avenue and row planting which are<br />
Intrusive in the 19'h century open grazed landscape and<br />
replace with clumps of trees.<br />
Historic Features: • Maintain an open landscape character with views<br />
between/through trees groups to major buildings.<br />
Historic Archaeology: • Assess any impacts on R6 - Gardeners' Cottage (1879),<br />
and R8 - Farm Attendants' Cottage (pre-1903).<br />
TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 167<br />
S:\DOC\2002\Rozelle Hospilal\CMP\5 Conservation.doc
Zone 7 - Broughton Hall Precinct - Refer Figures 5.8 and 5.15.<br />
Planning Considerations:<br />
ROZELLE HOSPITAL 000431<br />
CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />
Principles: • Development in restricted areas possible within this zone.<br />
• Buildings located north of BUilding 18 are of low or neutral<br />
significance and are capable of being adapted or redeveloped<br />
in the perimeter configuration.<br />
• Remove intrusive elements.<br />
•<br />
Conserve Broughton Hall. Further investigation of the<br />
extremely poor condition of this building is required<br />
Access: Glover Street and Wharf Road are the most appropriate access<br />
points.<br />
Use:<br />
Adaptive reuse of existing buildings and sensitive new development<br />
for Aged Care facilities, or other Hospital purposes, Educational,<br />
Institutional, Commercial, Residential Community uses.<br />
BUilding Setbacks: • Set backs to follow that of other Broughton Hall group buildings<br />
on Glover Street. Set backs from Wharf Road to allow visual<br />
access to and from significant Broughton Hall buildings and Iron<br />
Cove.<br />
Architectural Considerations:<br />
•<br />
Development should not encroach upon the significant<br />
landscape area of the Broughton Hall gardens.<br />
Planning: • Sensitively planned development, is possible, to replace<br />
building 19, 20, 23 and 24 and to complete enclosure of<br />
gardens.<br />
• New development should not encroach upon the significant<br />
landscape features or be visually intrusive to the rest of the site.<br />
•<br />
•<br />
Development should follow the linear configuration of the<br />
Broughton Hall group along Glover Street. Development on the<br />
area occupied by building 24 to be planned to be<br />
complimentary to the Broughton Hall group.<br />
Significant views, internally and externally, to be maintained.<br />
It would be essential that the intrusive buildings in this zone be<br />
removed before any new development in this area occurs. Intrusive<br />
buildings in the established gardens should also be removed.<br />
Height: The scale of any new development must be complimentary to<br />
significant buildings and landscape.<br />
Built Form and Materials: • Built form to follow topography of site.<br />
• Finishes should sit comfortably with the surrounds.<br />
TANNER & ASSOCIATES PTYLTD FINAL ISSUE JANUARY 2002 PAGE 171<br />
S:\D0C\2002\RozeJ1e HOSpilal\CMP\5 Conservatron.doc<br />
[<br />
[<br />
C<br />
C<br />
C<br />
C<br />
[<br />
C<br />
c<br />
[<br />
C<br />
C<br />
C<br />
o<br />
o<br />
c<br />
o ooo
[<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
o<br />
D<br />
C<br />
[<br />
[<br />
o<br />
c<br />
o<br />
c<br />
c<br />
o<br />
c [J<br />
c
[<br />
[<br />
c [<br />
c<br />
c<br />
o<br />
D<br />
C<br />
C<br />
C<br />
C<br />
[<br />
o o<br />
c<br />
c<br />
o []<br />
o
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
c<br />
o o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o o<br />
o<br />
o o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
Sydney Harbour<br />
Foreshore Authority<br />
<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use<br />
Plan<br />
Transport Assessment
[<br />
D<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
[<br />
[<br />
o<br />
o<br />
c<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o
[<br />
c<br />
o c<br />
c<br />
o o<br />
o<br />
[<br />
[<br />
c<br />
o<br />
c<br />
o<br />
D<br />
C<br />
o C<br />
o<br />
D
o<br />
o<br />
o o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o oo<br />
o<br />
o oo<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o J:\B6789<br />
ARUP<br />
Job title<br />
Document title<br />
Document ref<br />
<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan<br />
Transport Assessment<br />
Revision Date Filename <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Transport Assessment 281107.doc<br />
Issue 28/11/07 Description Issue<br />
Prepared by Checked by Approved by<br />
Name John Hanlon Andrew Hulse Andrew Hulse<br />
Signature<br />
Filename<br />
Description<br />
Name<br />
Signature<br />
Filename<br />
Description<br />
Name<br />
Signature<br />
Filename<br />
Description<br />
Name<br />
Signature<br />
- CALLAN PARK MASTERPLAN\CALLAN PARK TRANSPORT<br />
ASSESSMENT 281107.DOC<br />
Prepared by Checked by Approved by<br />
Prepared by Checked by Approved by<br />
Prepared by Checked by Approved by<br />
Document Verification<br />
Job number<br />
86789<br />
File reference<br />
Page 1of 1<br />
Issue Document Verification with Document D<br />
A",p<br />
Issue 28 November 2007
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o [<br />
o<br />
D<br />
C<br />
[<br />
[,<br />
[<br />
C<br />
C<br />
C<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
C
C<br />
C<br />
Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan<br />
Transport Assessment<br />
Contents<br />
Executive Summary<br />
Page<br />
1 INTRODUCTION 1<br />
2 REVIEW OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 2<br />
2.1 Road Network 2<br />
2.2 Public Transport 2<br />
2.3 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities 3<br />
2.4 <strong>Park</strong>ing 3<br />
2.5 <strong>Park</strong>ing Demand 3<br />
2.6 Traffic Generation 4<br />
3 TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT OF LAND USE PLAN 5<br />
3.1 Trip Generation 5<br />
3.2 Traffic Generation 6<br />
3.3 Public Transport Demand 6<br />
3.4 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities 6<br />
3.5 <strong>Park</strong>ing Demand 6<br />
3.6 Vehicular Access 7<br />
3.7 Traffic Impact 7<br />
4 SUMMARY 9<br />
Tables<br />
Table 1<br />
Table 2<br />
Table 3<br />
Table 4<br />
Table 5<br />
Table 6<br />
Table 7<br />
Figures<br />
Figure 1<br />
Figure 2<br />
Appendices<br />
Appendix A<br />
<strong>Park</strong>ing Controls<br />
MDT Traffic Flows<br />
Existing <strong>Park</strong>ing Supply<br />
Typical Weekday <strong>Park</strong>ing Occupancy<br />
Existing Traffic Generation<br />
Proposed Land Use<br />
Forecast Peak Hour Traffic Generation<br />
Forecast Peak <strong>Park</strong>ing Demand<br />
Site Location<br />
<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Precincts<br />
J:\B6789 - CALLAN PARK MASTERPlAN\CAllAN PARK TRANSPORT<br />
ASSESSMENT 281107.DOC<br />
AN.<br />
Issue 28 November 2007
Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan<br />
Transport Assessment<br />
Executive Summary<br />
Arup was commissioned by Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority (SHFA) to prepare a transport<br />
assessment for the 2007 <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan. The purpose of this transport assessment is [<br />
to:<br />
o Develop an understanding of the existing usage patterns on the site generated by the hospital<br />
uses and the existing University of Sydney uses.<br />
o Describe the transport components of the land use plan.<br />
o Assess the potential University expansion to be introduced onto the site and compare it with the<br />
existing situation.<br />
<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is conveniently located close to bus and light rail services. Bus stops are located on<br />
Balmain Road and Victoria Road, with services to the City and other locations. Lilyfield Light Rail<br />
Station is 600m from the site and the light rail provides services to Central Station.<br />
The Rozelle area is served by a dense although often congested road network. Significant delays<br />
occur on the main arterial routes, namely Victoria Road and City West Link, at peak periods.<br />
However, <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is a large site with multiple access points to the wider road network, allowing<br />
traffic to be distributed.<br />
The land use plan includes:<br />
o retention of the Wharf Road and <strong>Park</strong> Drive access points<br />
o signalisation of the existing Cottage Way intersection with Balmain Road<br />
o an increase in total parking provision to accommodate the university uses<br />
o retention of a network of walking paths across the site<br />
An assessment of the transport impact of the land use plan revealed:<br />
o The site would continue to be well-served by walking and cycling facilities.<br />
o The site would be well-served by public transport services and a significant increase in the<br />
number of services would not be required because the majority of trips would be in the CDunterpeak<br />
direction.<br />
o A significant proportion of trips to the site, particularly by university students, would be by noncar<br />
modes.<br />
o Up to one-fifth of students would reside on-site and these students would not contribute to<br />
external trips in the peak hours.<br />
o An additional controlled pedestrian crossing of Balmain Road would be provided, improving<br />
pedestrian accessibility for the wider community.<br />
o Trip generation of the university component would be relatively low in terms of peak hour trips<br />
per unit area floor space, primarily due to the dispersed nature of arrival and departure patterns.<br />
o The increased traffic generation of the site would be relatively low in the context of current traffic<br />
flows in the area. The road network would be able to accommodate this traffic increase without<br />
a significant impact on road network performance.<br />
In summary, based on the traffic forecasts contained in this assessment, the land use plan would<br />
result in only a small increase in site traffic generation compared to current generation. The net<br />
increase in traffic would be relatively low in the context of current traffic flows in the area. The wider<br />
road network would be able to accommodate this traffic increase without a significant impact on road<br />
network performance, although it is recognised that delays would continue to occur, particularly at<br />
peak periods.<br />
J:\86789· CALlAN PARK MASTERPlAN\CALlAN PARK TRANSPORT<br />
ASSESSMENT 281107.00C<br />
Pagei<br />
A",.<br />
Issue 28 November 2007
Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority<br />
2 REVIEW OF EXISTING CONDITIONS<br />
2.1 Road Network<br />
The main roads serving the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> area are:<br />
o Victoria Road to the northeast (State road)<br />
<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan<br />
Transport Assessment<br />
o Perry Street - Balmain Road - Darling Street forming the southern boundary of<br />
the site (Regional road)<br />
o City West Link to the south (State road)<br />
Vehicular access to the site is generally restricted to the south because of the presence of<br />
Iron Cove to the north.<br />
The main <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> access points are:<br />
o Wharf Road at Perry Street (signals)<br />
o <strong>Park</strong> Drive at Balmain Road opposite Cecily Street (signals)<br />
o Cottage Way (NSW Ambulance Service) at Balmain Road opposite The<br />
Boulevarde (priority)<br />
o Glover Street<br />
2.1.1 Traffic Flows<br />
Traffic data for main roads in the Vicinity of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> are presented in Table 1.<br />
Table 1 AADT Traffic Flows<br />
AADT 2005 AADT<br />
Balmain Road, West of Cecily St (Rozelle) 17,759<br />
Victoria Road, At Iron Cove Bridge (Rozelle) 78,145<br />
City-West Link Road, West Of The Crescent (Lilyfield) 54,058<br />
Source: RTA, 2006<br />
AADT - Annual Average Daily Traffic<br />
The road network in the Rozelle area typically operates with significant delays due to the<br />
intense land use, low capacity road network (narrow streets, turn restrictions, on-street<br />
parking etc), proximity to the City, and high level of through traffic. Victoria Road and City<br />
West Link are major urban arterials operating at capacity in the peak direction, i.e. towards<br />
the city in AM peak and from the city in PM peak. However, delays in the Rozelle area also<br />
regularly occur outside traditional weekday peak hours.<br />
2.2 Public Transport<br />
The <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> site is served by both bus and light rail.<br />
2.2.1 Buses<br />
A range of bus routes service the site:<br />
o Buses to and from the City (Victoria Road only): Bus numbers 500, 501, 504, 506,<br />
507,510,515, 518, and 520 from the city stop on Victoria Road, Rozelle 400m<br />
from the eastern boundary of the site.<br />
o Buses to and from the City (Balmain Road): Bus number 440 also leaves from<br />
Circular Quay in the city and travels via travels along Parramatta Road past the<br />
main Sydney University campus, then along Balmain Road.<br />
J:\86789· CALLAN PARK MASTERPLAMCALLAN PARK TRANSPORT<br />
ASSESSMENT 281107.DOC<br />
Page 2<br />
Aru,<br />
Issue 28 November 2007 [
[ Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan<br />
Transport Assessment<br />
[<br />
c<br />
• Buses to Balmain from Rozelle: Bus numbers 440 and 445 travel along Balmain<br />
Road.<br />
2.2.2 Light Rail<br />
Lilyfield light rail station is 600m from the southern boundary of the site and can be<br />
accessed via walking along Grove Street. The light rail provides transport to Darling<br />
Harbour and Central Railway Station. Travel time to Central is approximately 23 minutes,<br />
with a frequency of 15 minute peak/off-peak.<br />
2.3 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities<br />
The Rozelle area is served by a dense road network which provides for good walking and<br />
cycling accessibility. <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> can be accessed by a number of streets to the east, south<br />
and west of the site.<br />
There are currently two controlled pedestrian crossing points on Balmain Road between<br />
Glover Street and Manning Street. The crossing points are approximately 800m apart,<br />
however, contributing to a significant length of Balmain Road that does not have any<br />
controlled crossing.<br />
The Bay Run is a popular walking and cycling path around Iron Cove and passes through<br />
the northern portion of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />
2.4 <strong>Park</strong>ing<br />
The existing parking supply of the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> site is summarised in Table 2 below. The<br />
values shown are approximate only based on a cursory site inspection rather than a detailed<br />
inventory survey.<br />
TabIe 2 E" XISlin(I <strong>Park</strong>' In(l SUDDIV<br />
Land Use Approximate No.<br />
of <strong>Park</strong>ing Bays<br />
Sydney College of the Arts 186<br />
Rozelle HospitaliNGOs - W of Wharf Road 156<br />
Rozelle Hospital/NGOs - E of Wharf Road 99<br />
The Writers Centre 25<br />
SIDS/Nurses Home 26<br />
NSW Ambulance HQ 195<br />
Total 687<br />
Source: Arup, 16/10/2007<br />
Notes: - Includes some informal parking areas, such as grassed verges, that appear to be<br />
commonly used for parking<br />
- Excludes Rozelle Child Care Centre<br />
The Sydney College of the Arts has a 100 space student car park that can be used for a<br />
nominal fee (via an annual parking sticker). There are also a number of small staff/visitor<br />
parking areas.<br />
In addition to the formalised parking areas within the site as listed in Table 2, significant<br />
parking demand is generated by the playing fields along the waterfront. Most parking<br />
demand is generated at weekends and is accommodated in a number of formal and<br />
informal parking areas.<br />
2.5 <strong>Park</strong>ing Demand<br />
The parking occupancy of the entire site was surveyed on a typical weekday (1 0.30am,<br />
Tuesday 16 October 2007) as summarised in Table 3.<br />
J:\86769 - CAllAN PARK MASTERPLAN\CAlLAN PARK TRANSPORT<br />
ASSESSMENT 281107.DOC<br />
Page 3<br />
AN.<br />
Issue 28 November 2007
Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan<br />
Transport Assessment<br />
Table 3 Tvnical WeekdaY <strong>Park</strong>inn OccuDancv<br />
Land Use Precinct <strong>Park</strong>ing Occupancy<br />
Number Occupied % of Available<br />
Sydney College of the Arts 107 58%<br />
Rozelle Hospital/NGOs - W of Wharf Road 134 86%<br />
Rozelle Hospital/NGOs - E of Wharf Road 74 75%<br />
The Writers Centre 17 68%<br />
SIDS/Nurses Home 14 54%<br />
NSW Ambulance HQ 154 79%<br />
Total 500 73%<br />
Source: Arup, 10.30am - 16/10/2007<br />
Based on the results of the parking survey and review of current land use, the peak parking<br />
demand for the site, usually in the afternoon around hospital shift changeover time, is<br />
estimated to be currently in the order of 600 cars.<br />
The demand for parking along the waterfront is quite Iowan most weekdays. On busy<br />
weekends, the demand for parking associated with the playing fields exceeds the available<br />
supply, resulting in vehicles being parked inappropriately on ecologically sensitive areas<br />
along the waterfront.<br />
2.6 Traffic Generation<br />
Traffic surveys to determine the existing weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic generation<br />
of the site were undertaken in November 2001 (Source: Transport and Traffic Planning<br />
Associates). There have been no major land use changes to the site since 2001 and<br />
therefore the data is believed to be representative of current conditions.<br />
Table 4 Existino Traffic Generation<br />
Location Vehicles Per Hour<br />
AM Peak PM Peak<br />
In Out Total In Out Total<br />
Main Entrance (opposite<br />
Cecily Street) 34 17 51 41 29 70<br />
Ambulance Entrances* 66 11 77 11 66 77<br />
Wharf Road 75 16 91 30 61 91<br />
Glover Street- 51 47 98 84 83 167<br />
Total 226 91 317 166 239 405<br />
Notes:<br />
• Ambulance Entrances were not surveyed in 2001 and the values included in the table are estimates<br />
based on current parking demand<br />
•• Glover Street values may contain some non-<strong>Callan</strong> park traffic<br />
The total traffic generation of the site is currently in the order of 300-400 vph, whilst Balmain<br />
Road currently carries 1500 vph. The impact of this current traffic generation is relatively<br />
low because it is distributed across four access points with numerous approach/departure<br />
routes.<br />
J:\86789· CALLAN PARK MASTERPLAMCALLAN PARK TRANSPORT<br />
ASSESSMENT 28' 107.DOC<br />
Page 4<br />
Aru,<br />
Issue 28 November 2007
Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan<br />
Transport Assessment<br />
3 TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT OF LAND USE PLAN<br />
3.1 Trip Generation<br />
The major components of the proposed future land use as contained in the land use plan<br />
are given in Table 5.<br />
Table 5 ProDosed Land Use<br />
Land Use GFA (m') Assumptions<br />
University 100,512 Total of 5000 students (600 residing on-site) and 400<br />
staff + NSW Wrile(s Centre<br />
Ambulance 6,802 No change to existing employee/visitor numbers<br />
NGOs 13,761 No overall change to existing employee/visitor<br />
numbers<br />
Nurses precinct 4,335 All nurses work off-site<br />
Playing fields - public access 4 fields<br />
Playing fields - university 2 fields<br />
The main traffic generator of the proposed land use as contained in the land use plan is the<br />
university. Trip generation rates of universities can vary considerably from one campus to<br />
another, due to such factors as:<br />
• proportion of students residing onsite<br />
• level of undergraduate versus post-graduate students<br />
• typical teaching hours<br />
• number of non-teaching staff such as administration, research, catering etc<br />
Furthermore, trip generation varies throughout the year due to teaching periods, exam<br />
periods and vacation periods.<br />
For the purposes of this assessment, a primarily undergraduate style campus has been<br />
assumed, with 5000 students and 400 staff. It has been assumed that 600 of these<br />
students reside on-site. The assessment is based on a typical teaching period - trip<br />
generation in non-teaching periods would generally be lower.<br />
In terms of peak hour trips per unit area floor space, universities generate considerably less<br />
trips than other land uses such as office, factory and residential. This is mainly because<br />
university trip generation is relatively spread out over a typical day, without a distinct<br />
concentration of trips during peak hours.<br />
The <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> site is well-served by public transport as well as being easily accessible by<br />
walking and cycling. For the purposes of this assessment, the following non-car mode split<br />
assumptions have been made (the remainder of trips are assumed to be by private vehicle<br />
either as driver or passenger):<br />
• Students - 15% live on site, 30% use bus/light rail/walk/cycle<br />
• University staff and others - 15% use bus/light rail/walk/cycle<br />
• Ambulance staff and visitors - 15% use bus/light rail/walk/cycle<br />
• NGO staff and visitors - 20% use busllight rail/walk/cycle<br />
• Nurses - 20% use busllight rail/walk/cycle<br />
J:\86789 - CALlAN PARK MASTERPLAMCALlAN PARK TRANSPORT<br />
ASSESSMENT 281107.DOC<br />
Page 5<br />
Arup<br />
Issue 28 November 2007
Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority<br />
3.2 Traffic Generation<br />
<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> land Use Plan<br />
Transport Assessment<br />
Based on the mode split assumptions described in Section 3.1, the forecast traffic<br />
generation is presented in Table 6. The values are strategic in nature primarily for the<br />
purposes of informing the land use plan process.<br />
Table 6 Forecast Peak Hour Traffic Generation<br />
Vehicles Per Hour<br />
AM Peak PM Peak<br />
In Out Total In Out Total<br />
290 120 410 200 290 490<br />
The forecast peak hour traffic generation represents an increase of no more than 30% on<br />
current traffic generation. As discussed in Section 3.1 the values presented in Table 6 are<br />
for typical teaching periods and the actual values may be lower for a significant proportion of<br />
the year.<br />
3.3 Public Transport Demand<br />
The land use plan scenario would increase the demand for public transport services. Based<br />
on the mode split assumptions described in Section 3.1, the peak hour demand increase<br />
may be in the order of:<br />
Bus<br />
Light Rail<br />
additional 100 trips/hour (or 500 trips/day)<br />
additional 50 trips/hour (or 250 trips/day)<br />
The majority of these additional public transport trips would be by students.<br />
The majority of trips made by public transport would be in the counter-peak direction<br />
therefore it is unlikely that additional services would be required to aocommodate the<br />
increased demand.<br />
It is likely that in addition to the existing bus and light rail services, a private shuttle bus<br />
would operate between the University of Sydney's Darlington and <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> campuses.<br />
In the long term, the existing Sydney Ferries network could be extended to include a stop at<br />
<strong>Callan</strong> Point. The light rail network could also be extended to include a loop along Balmain<br />
Road.<br />
3.4 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities<br />
<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> would continue to be served by a good network of walking and cycling routes.<br />
There would be multiple entry points from the east, south and west. The Rozelle area is<br />
served by a dense road network which provides for good walking and cycling accessibility.<br />
The recently updated Leichhardt Bike Plan includes Balmain Road as a strategic bike route,<br />
Glover Street as a local bike route and the Bay Run as a recreational route.<br />
The number of controlled crossing points along Balmain Road would be increased with the<br />
provision of signals at Cottage Way (see section 3.6) thus improVing pedestrian aocessibility<br />
for the local community.<br />
The land use plan would not impact on the Bay Run around Iron Cove which passes<br />
through the northern portion of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />
3.5 <strong>Park</strong>ing Demand<br />
The forecast parking demand for the main building elements of the land use plan are<br />
presented in Table 7. <strong>Park</strong>ing rates are based on traffic generation forecasts in Section 3.2,<br />
J:\66789 - CALlAN PARK MASTERPlAN\CALtAN PARK TRANSPORT<br />
ASSESSMENT 281107.DOC<br />
Page 6<br />
AN,<br />
Issue 28 November 2007<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
r
[<br />
[<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
[<br />
Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan<br />
Transport Assessment<br />
the current level of parking demand and applicable Leichhardt Council gUidelines<br />
(Leichhardt DCP - Part A, April 2003).<br />
Table 7 Forecast Peak <strong>Park</strong>inc Demand<br />
Land Use <strong>Park</strong>ing Rate Possible Number of Notes<br />
Bays Required<br />
University 1.2 bays per 1,210 (186 could Based on existing College of the<br />
100m' GFA possibly be retained Arts parking rate<br />
from Kirkbride campus)<br />
Ambulance 2.0 bays per 160 (retention of Based on existing parking demand<br />
100m' GFA existing)<br />
NGOs 1.5 bays per 80 (new bays in NGO Based on Leichhardt Council's<br />
100m' GFA precinct) minimum parking rate<br />
If parking was provided at the rate shown in Table 7 was supplied, this would represent<br />
approximately double the number of parking bays than is currently provided at the site.<br />
The land use plan contains up to six playing fields. Two of the fields would be primarily for<br />
university use. It is unlikely that peak parking demand for the playing fields would coincide<br />
with the peak parking demand from the university teaching operations. Therefore, the<br />
demand for playing field parking could be accommodated within the university parking<br />
supply described in Table 7.<br />
The four public playing fields would generally need to be self-sufficient in terms of<br />
accommodating parking demand. The peak parking demand is forecast to be in the order of<br />
300 vehicles, although demand can vary considerably, and this would occur a number of<br />
times throughout a typical weekend competition day. <strong>Park</strong>ing demand on weekdays and<br />
weeknights associated with training activities is likely to be substantially less than parking<br />
demand on competition weekends. Formal parking areas would be provided near the<br />
playing fields to minimise impact on ecologically sensitive areas along the waterfront.<br />
More detailed discussion regarding parking controls can be found in Appendix A.<br />
3.6 Vehicular Access<br />
The land use plan has three main vehicular access points:<br />
• Wharf Road at Perry Street (existing signals)<br />
• <strong>Park</strong> Drive at Balmain Road opposite Cecily Street (existing signals)<br />
• Cottage Way at Balmain Road opposite The Boulevarde (proposed signals)<br />
The proposed Cottage Way intersection at Balmain Road would essentially be signalisation<br />
of the eXisting Ambulance HQ driveway.<br />
Based on the forecast traffic generation and current traffic flows on Balmain Road, the three<br />
signalised intersections would provide adequate capacity to accommodate peak traffic flows<br />
generated by the site.<br />
Many of the existing internal roads on the site are circuitous and narrow. The future internal<br />
road network could involve a combination of retention of some existing roads and<br />
construction of new roads.<br />
3.7 Traffic Impact<br />
As stated in Section 3.2, the land use plan land use may result in a traffic increase of<br />
approximately only 100 vehicles per hour (vph) at peak periods. This traffic would be<br />
J:\86789 - CAlLAN PARK MASTERPLAMCAlLAN PARK TRANSPORT<br />
ASSESSMENT 281107.DOC<br />
Page 7<br />
ANp<br />
Issue 28 November 2007
Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan<br />
Transport Assessment<br />
spread out across a number of roads, such as Balmain Road, Perry Street, Victoria Road<br />
and City West Link and therefore the overall impact would be relatively minor.<br />
The performance of a road network in an urban area Is generally a function of the<br />
performance of key intersections. The most critical Intersection in the vicinity of the site is<br />
the Victoria Road I Darling Street intersection, which operates at capacity with significant<br />
delays. Traffic accessing the site from this direction would continue to be subject to<br />
significant delays at Victoria Road.<br />
The City West Link intersections generally operate at capacity, with short green time given<br />
to cross streets such as James Street, Norton Street, Balmain Road and Catherine Street.<br />
<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> traffic would continue to be subject to delays in entering or crossing City West<br />
Link.<br />
The land use plan would result in only a small increase in site traffic generation compared to<br />
current generation. The net increase in traffic would therefore be relatively low in the<br />
context of current traffic flows in the area. The wider road network would be able to<br />
accommodate this traffic increase without a significant impact on road network performance,<br />
although it is recognised that delays would continue to occur, particularly at peak periods.<br />
J:\86789· CALLAN PARK MASTERPLAN\CAlLAN PARK TRANSPORT<br />
ASSESSMENT 281107.DOC<br />
Page 8<br />
[<br />
[<br />
c [<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
c<br />
[<br />
ru<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
o<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c o<br />
o<br />
Arup<br />
Issue 28 November 2007
[ Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan<br />
Transport Assessment<br />
c<br />
c<br />
o<br />
4 SUMMARY<br />
This report has described the existing usage patterns on the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> site and the<br />
existing transport network serving the area.<br />
<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is conveniently located close to bus and light rail services. Bus stops are<br />
located on Balmain Road and Victoria Road, with services to the City and other locations.<br />
Lilyfield Light Rail Station is 800m from the site and the light rail provides services to Central<br />
Station.<br />
The Rozelle area is served by a dense although often congested road network. Significant<br />
delays occur on the main arterial routes, namely Victoria Road and City West Link, at peak<br />
periods. However, <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is a large site with multiple access points to the wider road<br />
network, allowing traffic to be distributed.<br />
The land use plan includes:<br />
• retention of the Wharf Road and <strong>Park</strong> Drive access points<br />
• signalisation of the existing Cottage Way intersection with Balmain Road opposite<br />
The Boulevarde<br />
• an increase In total parking provision to accommodate the university uses<br />
• retention of a network of walking paths across the site<br />
An assessment of the transport impact of the land use plan revealed:<br />
• The site would continue to be well-served by walking and cycling facilities.<br />
• The site would be well-served by public transport services and a significant<br />
increase in the number of services would not be required because the majority of<br />
trips would be in the counter-peak direction.<br />
• A significant proportion of trips to the site, particularly by university students,<br />
would be by non-car modes.<br />
• Up to one-fifth of students would reside on-site and these students would not<br />
contribute to external trips in the peak hours.<br />
• An additional controlled pedestrian crossing of Balmain Road would be provided,<br />
improving pedestrian accessibility for the wider community.<br />
• Trip generation of the university component would be relatively low in terms of<br />
peak hour trips per unit area fioor space, primarily due to the dispersed nature of<br />
arrival and departure patterns.<br />
• The increased traffic generation of the site would be relatively low in the context<br />
of current traffic fiows in the area. The road network would be able to<br />
accommodate this traffic increase without a significant impact on road network<br />
performance.<br />
In summary, based on the traffic forecasts contained in this assessment, the master plan<br />
would result in only a small increase in site traffic generation compared to current<br />
generation. The net increase in traffic would be relatively low in the context of current traffic<br />
fiows in the area. The wider road network would be able to accommodate this traffic<br />
increase without a significant impact on road network performance, although it is recognised<br />
that delays would continue to occur, particularly at peak periods.<br />
J:\86789 - CAlLAN PARK MASTERPlAN\CALlAN PARK TRANSPORT<br />
ASSESSMENT 281,07.DOC<br />
Page 9<br />
Aru,<br />
Issue 28 November 2007
[<br />
[<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c [<br />
c oc<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
o<br />
c ooc<br />
o c
0<br />
0 ,n<br />
U Appendix A<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
<strong>Park</strong>ing Controls
Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan<br />
Transport Assessment<br />
Section 3.5 of the this report discusses parking demand for the main areas of the site. The C<br />
following table further discusses parking in relation to eight precincts of the site (refer to<br />
Figure 2) and Leichhardt Council's DCP 2006. The DCP contains minimum and maximum [':'<br />
parking rates. Council states that, where possible, minimum rates should be adopted to ,<br />
(DCP Section 8.0):<br />
• Increase the choice ofavailable transport and reducing dependence on cars.<br />
• To make cycling a viable transport alternative.<br />
• To restrain employee off-street parking provisions to discourage car travel.<br />
• To improve the design and quality ofthe urban environment.<br />
Precinct Proposed <strong>Park</strong>ing Rate<br />
1. Waterfront Precinct Leichhardt DCP 2006 does not contain a parking rate for<br />
playing fields. <strong>Park</strong>ing rates for playing fields are generally<br />
calculated from first principles for each particular location.<br />
It is estimated that the peak parking demand for the 3<br />
formal ovals could be in the order of 300 vehicles<br />
2. Kirkbride Curtilage Precinct Retain current parking rate of 1.2 bays per 100m 2 GFA<br />
3. <strong>Park</strong>land Campus Precinct Provide parking at a similar rate to Precinct 2, I.e. 1.2 bays<br />
per 100m 2 GFA<br />
4. NGO Precinct Provide parking at 1.5 bays per 100m 2 GFA, which is the<br />
minimum rate specified for "Commercial Premises" in the<br />
Leichhardt DCP<br />
5. Church SVGlover St Precinct Provide parking at lower rate than Precincts 2 and 3, i.e.<br />
1.0 bays per 100m 2 GFA, to refiect the lower trip<br />
generation ofthe precinct<br />
6. Wharf Road Precinct Provide parking at 1.5 bays per 100m 2 GFA, which is the<br />
minimum rate specified for "Commercial Premises" in the<br />
Leichhardt DCP. The rate for this precinct is higher than<br />
for Precincts 2 and 3 due to the higher density of<br />
development<br />
7. NSW Ambulance Service Precinct Retain current parking rate of 2.0 bays per 100m 2 GFA,<br />
which is within the Leichhardt DCP range for "Commercial<br />
Premises" of 1.5 - 3.0<br />
8. Nurses Precinct Retain current parking rate of 0.5 bays per 100m 2 GFA<br />
J:\B6789 - CALLAN PARK MASTERPLAN\CALLAN PARK TRANSPORT<br />
ASSESSMENT 281107.DOC<br />
[<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c [<br />
[<br />
[<br />
c<br />
[<br />
[<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c c<br />
[<br />
c<br />
o<br />
PageA1 A'll'<br />
Issue 28 November 2007 c
[<br />
Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan<br />
Transport Assessment<br />
J:\86789 - CALLAN PARK MASTERPLAMCAlLAN PARK TRANSPORT<br />
ASSESSMENT 281107.DOC<br />
Page A2<br />
Arup<br />
Issue 28 November 2007
[<br />
[<br />
c [<br />
c [<br />
c<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[I<br />
[<br />
C<br />
C<br />
C<br />
C<br />
D<br />
C<br />
C<br />
o<br />
C
CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN - APPENDICES<br />
APPENDIX C: SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT<br />
.....J<br />
.....J<br />
UJ<br />
(f)<br />
(f)<br />
« I
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[;<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
c<br />
c rL<br />
c<br />
o<br />
o c
[<br />
[<br />
PROPERTY CONSULTING<br />
CALLAN PARK ECONOMIC<br />
AND SOCIAL IMPACT<br />
ASSESSMENT<br />
Prepared for<br />
The Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority<br />
November 2007
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
[<br />
c<br />
c<br />
o o<br />
c<br />
[<br />
[<br />
o<br />
c<br />
o<br />
o oc<br />
o<br />
o c
C07155 - <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Ee anomie and Social Impact Assessment<br />
CONTENTS<br />
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARy 5<br />
1.1 Study Brie!.. 5<br />
1.2 Site Location and Description 5<br />
1.3 Proposed Land Use Plan 2007 6<br />
1.4 Key StUdy Findings 6<br />
1.5 Conclusion 9<br />
2. INTRODUCTION 10<br />
2.1 Study Brie!.. 10<br />
2.2 Study Background 10<br />
2.3 Proposed Land Use Plan 2007 11<br />
2.4 Site and Locality Description 12<br />
3. DEMOGRAPHICS 14<br />
3.1 Demographic Analysis 14<br />
3.2 Existing Site Uses 17<br />
4. ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS 20<br />
4.1 Education 20<br />
4.2 Expenditure 21<br />
4.3 Investment Stimulus 21<br />
4.4 Employment Generation - Operations 22<br />
4.5 Employment Generation - Construction 22<br />
4.6 Construction Multiplier Effects 23<br />
5. SOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS 25<br />
5.1 Open Space and Recreation I Sporting Areas 25<br />
5.2 Accessibility and Safety 26<br />
5.3 Education 27<br />
5.4 Ambulance Headquarters and NGOs. 28<br />
5.5 Protecting Heritage 29<br />
5.6 Sustainability 29<br />
6. CONCLUSiON 31<br />
Page 3
C07155 - Galan <strong>Park</strong> Ec onomic and Sooallmpact Assessment<br />
LIST OF FIGURES<br />
Figure 1- Aerial view of site 12<br />
Figure 2- Location plan of site in wider geographic context.. 13<br />
LIST OF TABLES<br />
Table 1 - Population Characteristics 15<br />
Table 2 - Dwelling and Household Types 16<br />
Table 3 - Employment and Income Characteristics 17<br />
Table 4 - Journey to Work - Jobs within <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> 2001 18<br />
Table 5 - Journey to Work - Remainder of Leichardt LGA 2001 19<br />
Table 6 - Construction Costs Multipliers 23<br />
Table 7 - Construction Employment Multipliers 24<br />
Page 4
C07155 - <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Economic and Social Impact Assessment<br />
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />
1.1 Study Brief<br />
Hill PDA has been commissioned by the Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority (SHFA) to undertake a<br />
Social and Economic Impact Assessment of the proposed Land Use Plan for Cailan Parle Cailan <strong>Park</strong> is<br />
located within the Local Govemment Area (LGA) of Leichhardt and is a State significant community,<br />
heritage, landscape and cultural asset.<br />
Hiil PDA has worked with the Consultant Team (lead by Hasseil), SHFA and the University of Sydney to<br />
develop an appropriate Land Use Plan for the site. The Land Use Plan seeks to accommodate an [<br />
enhanced University of Sydney campus, whilst protecting and preserving the natural and built heritage of<br />
Cailan <strong>Park</strong>. The proposed Land Use Plan seeks to ensure that there is no net loss of open space, but<br />
rather the rationalisation of eXisting buildings on the site to create more accessible and usable open spaces 0<br />
for the local community and wider public. The Land Use Plan also seeks to accommodate the existing NSW<br />
Ambulance Service Headquarters and Non Government Organisations on the site to retain the social<br />
benefits they provide to the community.<br />
SHFA wiil be submitting the proposed Cailan <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan to the Minister for Planning for public<br />
exhibition. This Social and Economic Impact Assessment forms part of the suite of documents to be<br />
submitted with the Land Use Plan. It gives particular consideration to the social and economic matters on<br />
both a macro and a local scale.<br />
1.2 Site Location and Description<br />
Cailan <strong>Park</strong> is a 61Ha site bordered by Sydney Harbour to the north, Glover Street to the west, Balmain<br />
Road to the south and Manning Street to the east. The site is located within the suburb of Lilyfield which is<br />
located approximately 5km from Sydney CBD.<br />
The site presently comprises a mix of built structures inciuding buildings of State heritage significance, local<br />
significance and some that are intrusive or adversely affecting the built landscape character of the site.<br />
These buildings are occupied by a range of government and non government related uses including the<br />
University of Sydney Coilege of the Arts, the NSW Ambulance Headquarters and Training Facility, various<br />
Non Government Organisations (NGO's) and a NSW Health facility for Mental Health. The latter of which<br />
wiil be relocated in 2008 to form part of acomprehensive health facility at Concord.<br />
As of 2001, Journey to Work Data found that the existing uses on the site generated 595 jobs (6% of ail<br />
jobs within Leichhardt LGA). Of the 595 jobs, 70% were within the Health and Community Service Sector<br />
and 10% in Education.<br />
Page 5<br />
c
o<br />
o<br />
c<br />
c<br />
C07155 -CaDan Pa1< Economic and Sociallmpacl Assessment<br />
Of the 61 Ha, 47Ha of the site is presently provided as open space and recreational areas. These areas are<br />
regularly used by a range of sporting clubs and organisations (such as local soccer clubs) in addition to<br />
private recreational users.<br />
1.3 Proposed Land Use Plan 2007<br />
The proposed <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan 2007 includes:<br />
1. the refurbishment and reuse of existing Grade A and B Heritage Buildings (30,000sqm);<br />
2. the retention of the NSW Ambulance State Headquarters and training facility on site (6,800sqm);<br />
3. the retention of a Nurses Precinct (4,300sqm)<br />
4. the retention of existing Non Government Organisations on site (13,800sqm);<br />
5. the provision of 70,500sqm new build floorspace to accommodate the expansion of the University;<br />
6. enhanced landscaping and open spaces including provision of a 150sqm green corridor along the<br />
harbour foreshore and two new sporting ovals;<br />
7. improved access and egress points; and<br />
8. improved parking provision.<br />
From a social perspective, it is understood that the University must expand to the degree outlined above in<br />
order to provide a comprehensive and quality learning environment that includes a range of compatible<br />
disciplines. It would not be possible to achieve these objectives by utilising all of the existing buildings on<br />
the site. Furthermore, from an economic perspective the expansion of the University campus and<br />
associated new buildings will be necessary to ensure the viability of the development for the University.<br />
The viability of development will be particularly important in light of the University's commitment to funding<br />
the significant refurbishment and maintenance works required to protect the Heritage bUildings on the site.<br />
1.4 Key Study Findings<br />
Hill PDA's analysis of the proposed Land Use Plan has identified a number of key social and economic<br />
impacts. These impacts have been summarised and outlined below.<br />
Key Economic Impacts of the Proposed Land Use Plan<br />
1. The expansion of the University of Sydney Campus on the site will enhanc e opportunities for local<br />
and international students to learn and further their education. Enhanced education and learning<br />
has a positive influence on an individual's ability to earn and to find suitable employment Higher<br />
employment rates and incomes in lirn have positive spin off benefits to the local and wider<br />
economy through improved spending power, service demand and economic sustainability.<br />
Page 6
C07155 - <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Economic and Social Impact Assessment<br />
2. There is a clear positive correlation between improved education, learning and the economy. [t has<br />
been estimated by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) that just<br />
one add[tional year of education increases economic output by between 3% and 6%. Improved<br />
education achieves these benefits by raising productivity, innovation, competitiveness,<br />
technological progress by enhancing industries ability to forecast change.<br />
3. The proposed extended use of the site by the University of Sydney and enhanced connections<br />
between the site and local centres will support the growth and viability of local businesses by<br />
increasing local expenditure and demand for services.<br />
4. The proposed Land Use Plan will generate a net gain in full and I or part time employment on the<br />
site in the order of 100 - 300 jobs. These jobs will be suitable for a range of age groups and skills<br />
in accordance with the objectives of Leichhardt Council's 2020 Strategic Plan.<br />
5. The University of Sydney has estimated a construction value for the development of $300m plus.<br />
This will directly generate approximately 181 jobs in the construction industry for 10 years.<br />
6. Through the multip[ier effect, the proposed Land Use Plan will generate a further $271m activity in<br />
production induced effects and $289m in consumption induced effects. Total economic activity<br />
generated by the construction of the proposed development will therefore be approximately<br />
$560m.<br />
7. Through construction mu[tipliers the proposed Land Use Plan will indirectly generate in the order<br />
of 800 jobs in the construction industry over 10 years.<br />
8. The positive and prestigious image associated with the University and its occupation of the site, in<br />
addition to its significant investment is likely to generate additional investment and development<br />
interest in the local area and LGA. This will benefit the locality's vitality, viability and economic<br />
sustainability.<br />
Key Social Impacts of the Proposed Land Use Plan<br />
1. The expansion of the University of Sydney Campus and enhanced learning opportunities will have<br />
a number of social benefits including direct and indirect health benefits for students. A recent study<br />
by the OECD found that additional years of schooling substantially increased health, well being<br />
and health behaviours. These factors lead to an improvement in the quality of a person's life as<br />
well as preventing illness and enabling more efficient treatment. Each of these benefits has<br />
significant health related cost savings for Governments.<br />
2. The expansion of the University of Sydney Campus also has social benefits by improving civic and<br />
social engagement (CSE) and interaction. On an individual basis, education also enhances a<br />
person's ability to make choices and follow through on them. Education can also positively<br />
influence the 'context' in which people choose to live in and their opportunities to make choices<br />
Page 7
o<br />
[<br />
C07155 - <strong>Callan</strong> Pal< EcOflOOlic and Social Impact Assessment<br />
within these contexts'. A study by the OECD also identified other potential positive social impacts<br />
as a result of education including reduced levels of crime, anti social behaviour and poverty within<br />
communities.<br />
3. The proposed extended use of the site by the University of Sydney will provide a IMder range of<br />
education opportunities for local residents, residents of Sydney and wider NSW. A comprehensive<br />
and expanded University campus will also improve the quality of learning and the educational<br />
experience of students.<br />
4. When compared to NSW benchmarks for open space and various other inner Sydney LGA's,<br />
Leichhardt LGA has a relatively low proportion of open space per capita (1.65Ha). Without<br />
significant additional supply, this ratio will further decrease with the forecasted growth in<br />
population. <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is the largest of the six main recreational venues and open space areas in<br />
Leichhardt LGA. Accordingly the proposed retention and enhancement of open space by the Land<br />
Use Plan supports Leichhardt Council's objectives for open space provision.<br />
5. The proposed Land Use Plan will provide a range of active recreational facilities including two<br />
additional sporting fields along the foreshore and refurbishment of the existing sporting field. There<br />
is also potential for two additional sporting fields along the Balmain frontage of the site.<br />
6. The proposed Land Use Plan will provide a range of passive recreational spaces including a 150m<br />
wide open and green corridor along the foreshore that will link with other local open spaces.<br />
Combined these areas will create a network of open, unstnuctured spaces suitable to the<br />
recreation and leisure pursuits of older residents and families. Meeting the needs of this<br />
demographic is particularly important given their predominance in the local community.<br />
7. The proposed Land Use Plan will provide enhanced space for Non Government Organisations and<br />
in turn, support the ongoing provision of valuable community services.<br />
8. The proposed Land Use Plan will provide enhanced State Ambulance Headquarters and training<br />
facilities which will have flow on benefits across NSW through improved services and better skilled<br />
officers.<br />
9. The use of the site as a University is complementary to, and not restrictive of, public interaction<br />
and access to the site. kcordingly the proposed Land Use Plan will result in increased activity<br />
within and around the site by a range of University related and public users. This will result in a<br />
greater level of active surveillance and the improved safety / perception of safety through the day<br />
and evening.<br />
10. The proposed extended use of the site by the University will reduce the need for local students<br />
and university related employees to travel out of the area and thereby reduce dependence on<br />
, Understanding the Social Outcomes of Learning, OEC a 2007<br />
Page 8
C07155 - <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Ec anomic and Social Impact Assessment<br />
vehicles. The sites close proximity to a range of bus services and light rail will promote more<br />
sustainable modes of transport. This will in turn have environmental benefits.<br />
11. The proposed extended occupation of the site by the University and its prestigious image will<br />
create astrong positive identity for the locality.<br />
12. The proposal provides a socially responsible long term user for the site that seeks to preserve and<br />
enhance the heritage character of the buildings and their curtilage to the benefit of present and<br />
future generations.<br />
1.5 Conclusion<br />
Given that the proposed Land Use Plan will:<br />
• improve the vitality and character of the site and surrounding area;<br />
• enhance existing open space and the public's ability to regularly access and utilise these spaces;<br />
• generate new employment opportunities suited to a range of ages and skills;<br />
• support local businesses and the local economy;<br />
• provide improved educational opportunities for local, Sydney and NSW residents to the benefit of<br />
their social and economic well being;<br />
• have positive economic flow on effects to the wider economy; and<br />
• ensure a socially responsible primary occupier of the site who will seek to preserve and enhance<br />
the existing built and landscaped heritage of the site;<br />
the proposed <strong>Callan</strong> Fark Land Use Plan is supported and considered in acccrdance with Leichhardt<br />
Council's 2020 Strategic Plan objectives to develop a "social, environmental and economic legacy that<br />
benefits future generations". It is therefore considered that the Land Use Plan should be supported on<br />
social and economic grounds.<br />
Page 9<br />
[<br />
[
C07155 - <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Economic and Social Impact Assessment<br />
The objectives olthe act are to:<br />
(a) to ensure that the whole of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> remains in public ownership and subject to public control, and<br />
(b) to ensure the preservation of the areas of open space at <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> that were in existence<br />
immediately before the commencement of this Act, and that extend to and include the foreshore of<br />
Iron Cove on the Parramatta River, and<br />
(c) to allow public access to that open space, including that foreshore, for pUblic recreational purposes of<br />
both an active and a passive nature, and<br />
(d) to preserve the heritage significance of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, including its historic buildings, gardens and other<br />
landscape features, and<br />
(e) to impose appropriate controls on the future development of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>..<br />
The <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Act 2002, SEPP 56 and Leichhardt Council planning policies and objectives have each<br />
been given due consideration throughout the preparation of the proposed Land Use Plan.<br />
2.3 Proposed Land Use Plan 2007<br />
The proposed <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan 2007 includes:<br />
1. the refurbishment and reuse of existing Grade A and B Heritage Buildings (30,000sqm);<br />
2. the retention of the NSW Ambulance State Headquarters and training facility on site (6,800sqm);<br />
3. the retention of a Nurses Precinct (4,300sqm)<br />
4. the retention of existing Non Government Organisations on site (13,800sqm);<br />
5. the provision of 70,500sqm new build floorspace to accommodate the expansion of the University;<br />
6. enhanced landscaping and open spaces including provision of a 150sqm green corridor along the<br />
harbour foreshore and two new sporting ovals;<br />
7. improved access and egress points; and<br />
8. improved parking provision.<br />
From a social perspective, it is understood that the University must expand to the degree outlined above in<br />
order to provide a comprehensive and quality learning environment that includes a range of compatible<br />
disciplines. It would not be possible to achieve these objectives by utilising all of the existing buildings on<br />
the site. Furthermore, from an economic perspective the expansion of the University campus and<br />
associated new buildings will be necessary to ensure the viability of the development for the University.<br />
The viability of development will be particularly important in light of the University's commitment to funding<br />
the significant refurbishment and maintenance works required to protect the Heritage bUildings on the site.<br />
Page 11<br />
c
[<br />
c<br />
[<br />
C07155 - Galan P
C07155 - <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Ee anomie and Social Impact Assessment<br />
• Staff residences associated with NSW Health;<br />
• Sydney and South West Health Services;<br />
• We Help Ourselves (NGO);<br />
• Just Enough Faith (NGO);<br />
• Aftercare;<br />
• the Construction Industry Drug and Alcohol Foundation (NGO);<br />
• Sids and Kids (NGO); and<br />
• the Mental Health Coordination Council (NGO).<br />
Of the 61 Ha, 47ha of the site is presently provided as open space and recreational areas. These areas are<br />
regularly used by a range of sporting clubs and organisations (such as local soccer clubs) in addition to<br />
private recreational users.<br />
Figure 2· Location plan ofsite in wider geographic context<br />
•<br />
Source: Hill POA<br />
Page 13<br />
Rozelle<br />
[
C07155 - GaIIan Pail Ec onomic and Sociallmpaet Assessment<br />
3. DEMOGRAPHICS<br />
3.1 Demographic Analysis<br />
Leichhardt LGA contains a mix of residential, commercial and industrial uses and over the course of time<br />
has experienced increasing gentrification. This has amplified the popularity of centres within the LGA for<br />
tourist, heritage, and culture related uses as well as attracted increased residential development.<br />
Leichhardt LGA is strategically located adjacent to Sydney CBD as well as Sydney Harbour, and it has both<br />
a rich heritage and a diverse population.<br />
This section of the report describes and compares the demographic characteristics of the two suburbs on<br />
either side of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> (Lilyfield and Rozelle) in comparison to Leichhardt LGA and the Sydney<br />
Statistical Division (SD) in order to better understand any potential implications of the proposed Land Use<br />
Plan. This information is based on the ABS 2006 Census Data.<br />
Relevant general population characteristics to this study shown in the table below are as follows:<br />
• Lilyfield, Rozelle and Leichhardt LGA all have a smaller average household size ranging from 2.0<br />
2.2 persons per household which contrasts to the Sydney SD's of 2.7;<br />
• Lilyfield, the suburb containing the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> site, has a higher median age (38 years) compared<br />
to Rozelle, Leichhardt and Sydney SD(35 - 36 years);<br />
• Leichhardt LGA has a significantly greater proportion of residents in the 30 - 44 age bracket (33%)<br />
compared to the Sydney SD (23%);<br />
• Lilyfield has a higher proportion of residents within the lower age groups compared to Rozelle and<br />
Leichhardt, however the Sydney SD has a significantly higher percentage than all three<br />
comparative areas; and<br />
• Lilyfield, Rozelle and Leichhardt all have a higher proportion of residents of European descent in<br />
comparison to the Sydney SD.<br />
Page 14
C07155 - <strong>Callan</strong> Pari< Ee anomie and Social Impact Assessment<br />
Table 1 - Population Characteristics<br />
Population and Dwellings<br />
Lelchhardt<br />
Rozelle Lilylield LGA Sydney SO<br />
Total Population 6,872 6,761 48,778 4,119,190<br />
Total Dwellings 3,438 3,136 24,060 1,643,675<br />
Occupied Private Dwellings 3,172 2,871 21,994 1,521,465<br />
Occupied Private Dwellings (%) 92.3% 91.5% 91.4% 92.6%<br />
Average Household Size 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.7<br />
Age Distribution<br />
0-14 13.6% 16.8% 14.4% 19.5%<br />
15-29 18.9% 15.0% 18.5% 21.2%<br />
30-44 37.7% 31.2% 33.4% 23.2%<br />
45-59 19.4% 19.9% 19.9% 19.3%<br />
60-74 7.8% 10.1% 9.6% 10.6%<br />
75+ 2.5% 6.9% 4.3% 6.1%<br />
Total 100.0% 100.0% 10lJ.O% 100.0%<br />
Median Age 35 38 36 35<br />
Place of Birth<br />
Australia & Oceania 65.4% 68.6% 67.4% 63.1%<br />
Europe 14.7% 14.2% 13.8% 8.9%<br />
North Africa and Middle East 0.4% 0.6% 0.5% 2.5%<br />
Asia 4.2% 3.2% 3.7% 10.6%<br />
Americas 1.4% 0.8% 1.2% 0.6%<br />
Sub-Saharan Africa 0.5% 0.5% 0.6% 0.7%<br />
Other 13.4% 12.2% 12.8% 13.7%<br />
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%<br />
Source: ASS Census Data 2006<br />
In relation to Household Characteristics, the table below summarises the demographics of the comparative<br />
areas discussed above. The main findings are as follows:<br />
• Lilyfield. Rozelle and Leichhardt LGA all have a lower proportion of homes in ownership and being<br />
purchased than the Sydney SO as well as a lower proportion of homes being rented;<br />
• The Sydney SO has a significantly larger proportion of family households than the suburbs of<br />
Lilyfield. Rozelle and Leichhardt LGA<br />
• Lilyfield. Rozelle and Leichhardt have higher proportions of couples with no children; and<br />
• it therefore follows that Leichhardt LGA and suburbs have a greater proportion of lone person<br />
households than the Sydney SO.<br />
Page 15 o
[<br />
c<br />
COl155 - Gallan Pal< Ec anomie and Social Impact Assessment<br />
Table 2· Dwelling and Household Types<br />
Lelchhardt<br />
Rozelle Lilylleld LGA Sydney SO<br />
Home Ownership<br />
Owned or Bein9 Purchased 56.6% 60.4% 56.4% 65.0%<br />
Rented 41.6% 36.6% 41.3% 31.3%<br />
Other/Not Stated 1.8% 3.0% 2.4% 3.7%<br />
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%<br />
Household Structure<br />
Family Households 62.2% 63.9% 60.8% 72.7%<br />
Lone Person Households 29.1% 30.2% 31.3% 23.1%<br />
Group Households 8.7% 5.9% 8.0% 4.2'1.<br />
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%<br />
Family Type<br />
Couple family w. children 34.7% 43.6% 38.0% 49.3%<br />
Couple family w/o children 52.2% 38.3% 46.3% 33.2%<br />
One parent family 11.0% 15.6% 13.0% 15.6%<br />
Other family 2.1% 2.6% 2.7% 1.9%<br />
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%<br />
Dwellln9 Type<br />
Separate house 31.2% 56.9% 35.4% 63.6%<br />
Townhouse 34.7% 22.8% 37.2% 11.8%<br />
Flat-Unit-Apartment 31.7% 20.0% 26.0% 23.9%<br />
Other dwelling 2.4% 0.4% 1.4% 06%<br />
Not stated 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%<br />
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%<br />
Source: ASS Census Data 2006<br />
I!TfTIIIM<br />
CONSULTING<br />
The impact of the proximity of the CBO to the suburbs of Rozelle, Lilyfield and Leichhardt LGA is evident by<br />
the nature of the incomes of residents in these areas compared to the Sydney SO. Lilyfield has a higher<br />
median weekly household income than the Sydney SO at $1,431 compared to $1,154, though il is<br />
significantly lower than it's neighbouring suburb of Rozelle at $2,070 and Leichhardt LGA at $1,733.<br />
The Employment and Income Characteristics Table below also shows that Lilyfield has a greater proportion<br />
of low income earners (less than $799 per week) as opposed to Rozelle and Leichhardt, however Rozelle<br />
and Leichhardt have a significantly higher proportion of high income earners (I.e. $1,400 - $2,500+ per<br />
week) in comparison to Lilyfield.<br />
In terms of employment, Rozelle, Lilyfield and Leichhardl LGA all have a far higher proportion of residents<br />
employed in white collar professional jobs than the Sydney SO. Correspondingly their rates of<br />
unemployment are much lower than thai of the Sydney SO.<br />
Page 16
C07155 -<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Economic and Social Impact Assessment<br />
Table 3- Employment and Income Characteristics<br />
Rozelle Lilyfleld<br />
Leichhardl<br />
LGA SydneySD<br />
Labour Force<br />
Managers 22.2% 17.8% 19.3% 12.5%<br />
Professionals 38.8% 35.0% 38.6% 22.5%<br />
Community & Personal Services Wor1
c<br />
C07155 - Canan Pa1< Ec ooomic and Social Impact Assessment<br />
JTW data has been applied for the purpose of this Social and Economic Impact assessment to identify the<br />
nature of employment generating uses on the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> site as of 2001.<br />
In order to ac hieve this, !he JTW data was broken down into two sections. The first section being the <strong>Callan</strong><br />
<strong>Park</strong> travel zone (i.e. the subject site) and for comparison purposes the sum of all the remaining travel<br />
zones in the LGA.<br />
As of2001, 595 people were employed in the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> travel zone. Of these 595 jobs, 419 (or 70%)<br />
were employed in the Health and Community Service industry. The second highest employment bracket in<br />
<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> was Education at 10% of the total jobs in the area.<br />
In terms of the remainder of the LGA, there were a total of 10,353 jobs generated within the area as of<br />
2001. <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> therefore provided a significant proportion (6%) of jobs within the LGA.<br />
The highest employment generating industry in Leichhardt as of 2001 was found to be Business Services<br />
(23% of total employment). Health and Community Services was the second largest category (12%) with<br />
jobs in <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> once again contributing a significant proportion (34%) of these jobs. Of the 455<br />
Education related jobs in the LGA, <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> also provided 14% of the total.<br />
This information is illustrated in the following two tables.<br />
Table 4· Journey to Work· Jobs within <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> 2001<br />
Industry Type No. of Jobs %of Jobs<br />
Accommodation, Cafes and Restaurants 14 2.35%<br />
Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing 0 0.00%<br />
Communication Services 0 0.00%<br />
Construction 5 0.84%<br />
Cultural and Recreational Services 7 1.18%<br />
Education 62 10.42%<br />
Finance and Insurance 0 0.00%<br />
Government Administration and Defence 11 1.85%<br />
Health and Community Services 419 70.42%<br />
Manufacturing 8 1.34%<br />
Mining 0 0.00%<br />
Non-
C07155 - <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Economic and Social Impact Assessment<br />
Table 5· Journey to Work- Remainder of Leichardt LGA 2001<br />
Industry Type No. of Jobs %of Jobs<br />
Accommodation, Cafes and Restaurants 792 7.65%<br />
Agriculture, Forestry and Fishin9 20 0.19%<br />
Communication Services 130 1.26%<br />
Construction 693 6.69%<br />
Cultural and Recreational Services 501 4.84%<br />
Education 455 4.39%<br />
Finance and Insurance 36 0.35%<br />
Government Administration and Defence 200 1.93%<br />
Health and Community Services 1242 12.00%<br />
Manufacturing 839 8.10%<br />
Mining 47 0.45%<br />
Non-classifiable economic units 47 0.45%<br />
Not stated 35 0.34%<br />
Personal and Other Services 413 3.99%<br />
Property &Business Services 2432 23.49%<br />
Retail Trade 1142 11.03%<br />
Transport and Storage 511 4.94%<br />
Wholesale Trade 382 3.69%<br />
TOTAL 10353 100.00%<br />
Source. ASS Census Data 2001<br />
Page 1g [
c [<br />
C<br />
[<br />
c o<br />
C07155 - <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Ec anomie and Social Impact Assessment<br />
4. ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS<br />
4.1 Education<br />
Of the 30 countries that form part of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD),<br />
on average half of all young adults enter universities or similar institutions at some point in their lives. In the<br />
case of Australia over 45% of these students complete a first university degree. In fact between 1995 and<br />
2002 in Australia the number of students enrolling in tertiary and high level education has increased by<br />
over 20%'.<br />
The growth in popularity of higher education may be reflective of the benefits it can have to an individual's<br />
potential future earnings and ability to find employment Studies in the United States have found that<br />
people with tertiary qualifications earn as much as 86% more in salary than people with secondary only<br />
qualifications. Furthermore it was found that on average in OECD countries, men with a tertiary<br />
qualification are 5% more likely to find employment and women 15% more likely.<br />
On a macro economic level however there are significant benefits that stem from tertiary education. It is<br />
widely recognised that the world is globalising and placing greater demand on skills, knowledge and<br />
innovation. Improvements in education and knowledge are considered critical to enabling nations to<br />
"extract more returns from inputs of labour and capita!"J Improved education is fundamental to creating a<br />
"competitive, innovative, knowledge based economy better able to compete in world markets"'. As stated<br />
by one New Zealand Parliamentary Minister in respect to this point 'it's not entirely coincidental that I'm<br />
both the Minister of Finance and the Minister for Tertiary Education"'.<br />
The OECD recognises that "Improved education contributes to a Country's overall prosperity, helping to<br />
raise labour productivity and technological progress thereby boosting economic growth"'. In fact the OECD<br />
estimates that the impact of just one additional year of education increases economic output by between<br />
3% and 6%.<br />
The link between education and economic prosperity has also been recognised by the Australian Labour<br />
Party who has identified that "education is the economic platform on which our future economic prosperity<br />
will rest". Despite this Australia is the only OECD nation to have reduced public investment in tertiary<br />
education in the past 10 years. The Opposition Leader, Kevin Rudd therefore considers that<br />
2WNW.oecd.org<br />
J Han. Dr Michael Cullen 16/3/2007 - Massey University Speech<br />
4 The Australian Economy Needs an Education Revolution, Australian Labour Party<br />
5 Hon. Dr Michael Cullen 16/3/2007 -Massey University Speech<br />
6WNW.oecd.org<br />
Page 20
C07155 - callan <strong>Park</strong> Ec anomie and Social Impact Assessment<br />
"Australia needs nothing less than a revolution in education - a substantial and sustained increase in the<br />
quantity of our investment, and the quality of our education... this is required at every level of education<br />
from early childhood to mature age'. 7<br />
The proposed expansion of the University of Sydney and the creation of a high quality learning environment<br />
and campus will go a long way to addressing the issues raised above. A new high quality learning<br />
environment will enhance learning opportunities and raise the level of knowledge and skill within a Global<br />
City such as Sydney. This will have positive flow on benefits for individuals within the locality of the site,<br />
Sydney and across Australia in addition to benefits to the wider Australian economy.<br />
4.2 Expenditure<br />
By its very nature, a university campus generates activity and demand for services. 5,000 students<br />
(between 500 and 700 of which could be living on site) will generate significant additional retaii and service<br />
related expenditure. This will have many benefits for local businesses through increased demand for<br />
services and in turn a growth in trade. For example the local food industry will benefit such as cafes,<br />
convenience stores and supermarkets in addition to personal services such as hairdressers, travel agents<br />
and supplies i.e. stationary, print shops etc.<br />
The proposed Land Use Plan seeks to improve links between the site and activity centres such as Rozelle,<br />
Balmain, Orange Grove and Lilyfield to ensure that these areas benefit from this additional demand for<br />
services. This linking with businesses and additional investment I expenditure within the area supports the<br />
Councils 2020 Strategic Plan objectives for "thriving businesses and vital sustainable communities built<br />
through shared activities and interests'.<br />
4.3 Investment Stimulus<br />
Although difficult to quantify, development of the scale and nature proposed by the Land Use Plan is likely<br />
to create a significant stimulus for additional investment in the locality. This is particulariy the case for<br />
development reiating to an institution with the prestige associated with Sydney University.<br />
As a result of this investment it is likely that interest will be sparked in the area for a range of ancillary<br />
education uses such as high technology commercial uses, retaii, entertainment, housing and personal<br />
services. This will positively support the local economy and in turn have positi\!! economic multiplier<br />
effects.<br />
It is important to note however that given the time scales associated with this spin off investment and<br />
possible blurred links between the events, it is difficult to clearly quantify in economic terms the merits of<br />
the proposed Land Use Plan in this respect<br />
7 Kevin Rudd, hJstralian labour Party as quoted in The Australian January 23, 2007<br />
Page 21
c<br />
C07155 - <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Ee anomie and Social Impact Assessment<br />
4.4 Employment Generation· Operations<br />
The various uses on the site presently generate a wide range of employment opportunities. By way of<br />
example existing employment generating uses include the Sydney College of the Arts, the NSW<br />
Ambulance Headquarters various Non Government Organisations (We Help Ourselves, Just Enough Faith,<br />
Sids and Kids etc) and the NSW Health Staff associated with the mental health facilities.<br />
It is understood that all of the existing employers outl ined above will be retained on the site with the<br />
exception of the latter (NSW Health). The hospital's patients, staff and staff residences will be relocated to<br />
Concord Hospital as part of an integrated campus.<br />
Given that the existing hospital related jobs on the site will be transferred to facilities in Concord, the Land<br />
Use Plan will not result in the loss of jobs in this industry but rather their re-Iocation. It then follows that the<br />
expansion of a university campus on the site will generate a net increase of jobs in Sydney in the order of<br />
400 - 600 full and lor part time jobs upon completion and operation.<br />
Taking the 419 existing Health and Community jobs on the site and assuming that 70% of them relate to<br />
the Hospital (293), the proposed uplift in permanent employment as a resuit of the University would equate<br />
to between 107 and 307 jobs for the local area.<br />
In addition to teaching jobs, the University will also generate a range of ancillary retail and service related<br />
jobs. These jobs are well suited to a range of age groups and skill levels and will also assist in meeting the<br />
Council's objectives of providing employment options for young people in the LGA.8<br />
4.5 Employment Generation· Construction<br />
In addition to operational employment, the proposed Land Use Plan will generate employment in two<br />
further ways - through construction and through construction multipliers.<br />
It is estimated that one full time construction position for 12 months is created for every $165,247 of<br />
construction work undertaken. The proposed refurbishment of the existing heritage buildings and provision<br />
of new high specification institutional floorspace (excluding fit out costs) has been estimated by the<br />
University of Sydney to have aconstruction value in the order of $300m plus.<br />
Based on this estimated construction cost, approximately 181 jobs for a 10 year period will be directly<br />
generated by the proposed Land Use Plan in the construction industry.<br />
8 Leichhardt Council Social Plan 2004<br />
Page 22
u<br />
C07155 - CaDan PaI1< Ec onomic and Social Impact Assessmeot<br />
Table 7· Construction Employment Multipliers<br />
CONSTRUCTION<br />
Production Induced Effects<br />
Industrial<br />
MULTIPUER First Round Support Consumption<br />
EFFECT Initial Effects Effects Effects Induced Effects Total<br />
Employment No.<br />
per smillion<br />
adjusted to Sept 06<br />
dollars<br />
6.05 2.00 2.72 14.10 24.87<br />
Total employee<br />
years created 1,815 600 816 4,230 7,461<br />
Project timeframe 1 1 1 1 1<br />
Jobs oer annum 1 815 600 816 4230 7461<br />
Data Sources. Australian NatlOllai Accounts.input·Output Tables 1996·97 (5209.0), Pnce index of the Output of the Building industry- Producer<br />
Poce indexes (6427.0), CPI All Groups· RBA Bulletin (Table G2)<br />
As shown above, for every $1 million in construction cost, a total of 24.9 job years could be generated in<br />
the economy. Based on these calculations, the proposed Land Use Plan as a whole will indirectly generate<br />
in the order of 750 jobs in the construction industry per year over a ten year period. SHFAs calculations<br />
have identified that owing to the nature of the proposed works, the number of jobs is likely to be greater at<br />
around 800 per annum for 10 years.<br />
Note that the multiplier effects are national, and not necessarily local. The ABS notes that "Care is needed<br />
in interpreting multiplier effects; their theoretical basis produces estimates which somewhat overstate the<br />
actual impacts in terms of output and employment. Nevertheless, the estimates illustrate the high flow-on<br />
effects of construction activity to the rest of the economy. Clearly, through its multipliers, construction<br />
activity has a high impact on the economy.•<br />
Page 24
C07155 - <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Ec anomie and Social Impact Assessment<br />
5. SOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS<br />
5.1 Open Space and Recreation I Sporting Areas<br />
r!FrTDJm<br />
CONSULTING<br />
Leichhardt is an inner city LGA with a premium on open space. The Leichhardt Recreation and Open<br />
Space Needs Study (adopted December 2005) found that "when compared to other selected Sydney<br />
LGA's, the provision of open space on a per capita basis was low" across the LGA at an average of 1.65Ha<br />
per person.<br />
This measure of open space may be compared to standard benchmarks of 2.83ha per person in NSW, 4Ha<br />
per person in the ACT and 5Ha per person in Victoria. When compared to other inner Sydney LGA's such<br />
as North Sydney (2.60Ha per person), Waverley (1.80Ha per person), Strathfield (3.8Ha per person) and<br />
Canada Bay (3.87Ha per person) the low proportion of open space by population in Leichhardt LGA is<br />
further exemplified.<br />
The Council projected a population growth in the LGA of 7% (3,724 people) between 2001 and 2011.<br />
Accordingly without significant additional supply, the ratio of open space per capita will further decline. The<br />
Council therefore actively seeks to retain and protect all open space and recreational areas in the LGA.<br />
The Council's Recreation and Open Space Needs Study also identified the need to "advocate for the<br />
retention of open space areas within <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, and for the responsibility for their management to be<br />
transferred to the Councif, subject to suitable financial arrangements being negotiated between the Councif<br />
and the State Government prior to any transfer'. The same study goes on to state that this type of<br />
arrangement will be particularly important in "resolving current and future likely shorlages in open space for<br />
both passive recreational pursuits and sparling activities.•<br />
<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is one of the six main recreational venues and open space areas in Leichhardt LGA. The<br />
others facilities I areas include the Iron Cove Bay Run, the Dawn Fraser Pool, Leichhardt <strong>Park</strong> Aquatic<br />
Centre, Leichhardt <strong>Park</strong> I Oval and the Balmain and Leichhardt Rowing Clubs". In terms of both open<br />
space and size, <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is the largest comprehensive recreational space in the LGA providing over<br />
47ha of open space.<br />
The proposed Land Use Plan recognises the important role that <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> plays in providing accessible<br />
and usable open space within the LGA for the local community. Accordingly the Land Use Plan seeks to<br />
not only ensure that there will be no net loss of open space but rather its protection and enhancement. The<br />
relocation of existing bUildings with insignificant heritage value to more appropriate locations on the site will<br />
have the benefit of opening up spaces and creating more usable and attractive areas for a range of<br />
activities.<br />
9 Leichhardt Recreation and Open Space Needs Study, Strat Corp 2005<br />
Page 25 [
C07155 -<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Economic and Social Impact Assessment<br />
r.TtrIDIt<br />
CONSULTING<br />
the site will be improved. This will be a particularly important factor for an ageing community and for an<br />
increasing demographic of women actively undertaking external sporting and leisure activities.<br />
5.3 Education<br />
As discussed in Section 4, enhanced education can have a significant positive impact to an individual's<br />
wealth and a local, regional and national economy. Education does however also have significant social<br />
benefits. A study undertaken by the GECD'3 identified that there were in fact two main social benefits of<br />
improved education being:<br />
1. Health; and<br />
2. Civic and Social Engagement<br />
These benefits are explained in greater detail below.<br />
With respect to health, the GECD identifies that "the health benefits of learning are potentially extremely<br />
large"". There are three types of effect created as a result of improved learning as outlined below.<br />
• indirect effects on health i.e. via income;<br />
• direct effects such as changes in individual competencies and abilities and changes in attitudes to<br />
risk and changes in self efficacy and self esteem;<br />
• intergenrational effects ofeducated parents on the health of their children's.<br />
It was found that additional years of schooling substantially increased health, well being and health<br />
behaviours. These factors lead to an improvement in the quality of a person's life as well as preventing<br />
illness and enabling more efficient treatment. Each of these benefits has significant health related cost<br />
savings for Governments.<br />
Civic and Social Engagement<br />
Education also has social benefits by improving civic and social engagement (CSE) and interaction. As<br />
identified by the GECD study, this can manifest in a number of ways inciuding:<br />
• by shaping what people know - the content of education provides knowledge and experience that<br />
facilitates CSE;<br />
• by developing competencies that help people apply, contribute and develop their knowledge in CSE;<br />
13 Understanding the Social Outcomes of Learning, DECO 2007<br />
1( Understanding the Social Outcomes of Learning, OECD 2007<br />
15 Understanding the Social Outcomes of Learning, DECO 2007<br />
Page 27<br />
c<br />
c
c<br />
[<br />
n<br />
c<br />
C07155 - canan <strong>Park</strong> Ec onomic and Social Impact Assessment<br />
• by cultivating values, attitudes, beliefs and motivations that encourage CSE;<br />
r!TITIiiJI<br />
CONSULTING<br />
• by increasing social status - this applies to forms of CSE that are driven by the relative position of<br />
individuals in a social hierarchY".<br />
The OECD study also identified other potential positive impacts as a result of education including reduced<br />
levels of crime, anti social behaviour and poverty within communities.<br />
On an individual basis, education also enhances a person's ability to make choices and follow through on<br />
them. Education can also positively influence the 'context' in which people choose to live in and their<br />
opportunities to make choices within these contexts.<br />
Whilst the social benefits of education are often visibility apparent, they are difficult to quantify particularly<br />
in economic terms. A Dutch study" has attempted to do this by assessing the impact of education to an<br />
individual's quality of life. The study results suggested that for every additional year of education the health<br />
state of men improved by 0.6% and of women by 0.3%.<br />
A UK stUdy" found that for adult women, the improvement resulting from a rise in education from no<br />
qualifications to a basic qualification, reduced the risk of depression at age 42 from 26% to 22%, saving an<br />
estimated £200m annually.<br />
In light of the studies and discussion above, it is evident that further education can not only have a positive<br />
impact on ones income potential and the wider economy but can also enhance ones ability to make<br />
choices, maintain their health and the health of their children. The multipliers of these benefits are vast and<br />
it would be difficult to quantify in economic terms. Despite this however it is reasonable to assert that
C07155 - <strong>Callan</strong> Parl< Economic and Social Impact Assessment<br />
I!mDII1<br />
CONSULTING<br />
The proposed Land Use Plan has sought to ensure that the existing Ambulance Headquarters, nurses<br />
facilities and NGO's can continue to operate from the site and support residents of the locality and wider<br />
Sydney I NSW. To achieve this in the order of 24,900sqm has been allocated to both groups and 5 -15<br />
year leases are being negotiated.<br />
Furthermore, depending on the nature of the University campus to be located on the site, there may be<br />
beneficial synergies created between the education focus of the University and the social and training<br />
services of the Ambulance Headquarters, Nurses facilities and NGOs.<br />
In light of the above, the proposed Land Use Plan will not have an adverse social impact through the loss<br />
of these uses but rather create the opportunity for a net positive social impact as a result of potential<br />
synergies of use and training and improved facilities.<br />
5.5 Protecting Heritage<br />
Leichhardt Councils 2020 Strategic Plan (2007) aims to create 'a community where people care and have a<br />
connection with each other, the local neighbourhood and its heritage.' As outlined above the proposed<br />
Land Use Plan will enhance interaction between the existing local community and the University community<br />
through shared open spaces and recreational facilities. The eXisting heritage buildings will also contribute<br />
to this synergy by creating attractive places and reminders of the historic importance of the site.<br />
From a social point of view, the retention of the Grade A and B Heritage bUildings on the site will not only<br />
benefit today's local community but future generations. The Schedule 1 State Significant buildings and<br />
landscaped areas are vulnerable however to deterioration. It is therefore vital to ensure that any future<br />
occupier of the site is willing and financially able to investment in the protection and refurbishment of these<br />
buildings to the benefit of all.<br />
The University is a socially responsible occupier for the site committed to spending $5m to $10m per<br />
annum to maintain the buildings and a $30m restoration cost for the Kirkbride Building. The active use and<br />
protection of the sites significant heritage buildings will ensure their retention for future generations. This is<br />
a positive social impact of the proposed Land Use Plan.<br />
5.6 Sustainability<br />
The site is located approximately 800m from the Lilyfield light rail station that provides access to Central<br />
Railway Station and Darling Harbour. It is also well served by a number of bus routes to and from the City,<br />
the main Sydney University Campus and Balmain.<br />
Accordingly the proposed development is well sited to provide sustainable alternatives for university<br />
students and employees to private car use. The site is also located within a higher density area and<br />
therefore provides a local educational facility for existing and future local residents without the need to<br />
tra\el.<br />
Page 29<br />
[
o CQ7155<br />
[<br />
o<br />
c<br />
o<br />
-Canan <strong>Park</strong> Economic and Social Impact Assessment<br />
By improving the local provision of education and employment, the proposal will capture some travel that is<br />
generated from the area to other university campuses or jobs, It will allow residents of Leichhardt to reduce<br />
travel to these locations, thereby reducing travel times, traffic congestion and associated costs with motor<br />
vehicle travel.<br />
Page 30
C07155 - CaDan <strong>Park</strong> Economic and Social Impact Assessment<br />
6. CONCLUSION<br />
Given that the proposed Land Use Plan will:<br />
• improve the vitality and character of the site and surrounding area;<br />
I!TrTIiJim<br />
CONSULTING<br />
• enhance existing open space and the public's ability to regularly access and utilise these spaces;<br />
• generate new employment opportunities suited to a range of ages and skills;<br />
• support local businesses and the local economy;<br />
• provide improved educational opportunities for local, Sydney and NSW residents to the benefit of<br />
their social and economic well being;<br />
• have positive economic flow on effects to the wider economy; and<br />
• ensure a socially responsible primary occupier of the site who will seek to preserve and enhance<br />
the existing built and landscaped heritage of the site;<br />
the proposed <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan is supported and considered in accordance with Leichhardt<br />
Council's 2020 Strategic Plan objectives to develop a "social, environmental and economic legacy that<br />
benefits future generations". It is therefore considered that the Land Use Plan should be supported on<br />
social and economic grounds.<br />
Page 31 [
c<br />
C07155 - Canan Pal'< Ecooomic and Social Impact Assessment<br />
DISCLAIMER<br />
This report is for the confidential use only of the party to whom it is addressed (the client) for the specific<br />
purposes to which it refers. We disclaim any responsibility to any third party acting upon or using the whole<br />
or part of its contents or reference thereto that may be published in any document, statement or circular or<br />
in any communication with third parties without prior written approval of the form and content in which it will<br />
appear.<br />
This report and its attached appendices are based on estimates, assumptions and information sourced and<br />
referenced by Hill PDA and its sub consultants. We present these estimates and assumptions as a basis<br />
for the reader's interpretation and analysis. With respect to forecasts we do not present them as results that<br />
will actually be achieved. We rely upon the interpretation of the reader to judge for themselves the<br />
likelihood of whether these projections can be achieved or not.<br />
As is customary, in a report of this nature, while all possible care has been taken by the authors to prepare<br />
the attached financial models from the best information available at the time of writing, no responsibility can<br />
be undertaken for errors or inaccuracies that may have occurred both with the programming or the financial<br />
projections and their assumptions.<br />
This report does not constitute a valuation of any property or interest in property. In preparing this report we<br />
have relied upon information concerning the subject property and/or proposed development provided by the<br />
client and we have not independently verified this information excepted where noted in this report.<br />
Page 32
c<br />
c<br />
o<br />
o c<br />
c<br />
o<br />
o<br />
[<br />
[<br />
c<br />
c<br />
[<br />
c<br />
o<br />
c<br />
[<br />
c<br />
o<br />
o
[<br />
Q<br />
r CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN - APPENDICES<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
APPENDIX D: ESD ASSESSMENT<br />
.....J<br />
.....J<br />
W<br />
(J)<br />
(J)<br />
« I
c<br />
c c<br />
c<br />
o<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c o<br />
c<br />
o ooooooo
<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan· ESO Notes<br />
28 November 2007<br />
1.1 Introduction<br />
ARUP<br />
86789/JPH<br />
Page 1 of 2<br />
The design for the future form of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> would follow an integrated design approach to<br />
achieve an innovative and ecologically sustainable development, which will provide a healthy<br />
workplace and learning experience and reduce the ecological impact and operating costs of the<br />
development.<br />
The following is a discussion on sustainable rating tools that can be used in the design of the<br />
new development as well as various sustainable options that can be explored with the view of<br />
incorporating them into a detailed design.<br />
1.2 Rating Tools<br />
1.2.1 Rated Sustainable Performance<br />
The GreenStar rating scheme, a voluntary holistic sustainable design rating tool set up and<br />
managed by the Green Building Council of Australia, is being used to guide the design process.<br />
This rating scheme addresses a wide spectrum of environmental performance measures<br />
dealing with social, economic and environmental issues. Currently the rating tool for educational<br />
facilities is in the pilot phase with a possible official release date sometime in 2008.<br />
A 4 star building would be seen as best practise with a 5 star building Australian excellence and<br />
a 6 star building being seen as world leadership. Within this framework the university can<br />
choose a level of building sustainability that balances their sustainable objectives with financial<br />
constraints.<br />
2 Sustainable Initiatives<br />
The design of the new buildings should focus on the following 5 key impacts;<br />
2.1 Site<br />
• Reduce site impacts by encouraging alternative transport, minimising stormwater, and<br />
minimising negative impacts such as reflected glare.<br />
• Low levels of on-site car parking encourages alternative modes of transport.<br />
• Bike spaces and lockers encourages bicycle use.<br />
2.2 Energy Efficiency and Atmosphere Conservation<br />
Generally, energy efficiency initiatives that will be put in place include:<br />
• Natural ventilation or mix mode ventilation strategies for building cooling where appropriate.<br />
• An energy efficient fayade with low thermal load transmission.<br />
• Energy efficient chillers and air handling units with variable volume control.<br />
• Ability to turn functional areas off when not in use.<br />
• Energy sub metering and energy end use reporting.<br />
• Incorporating new building services systems which are significantly more energy efficient<br />
than the existing building services systems.<br />
• Building management control system to optimise bUilding performance.<br />
J:\86789· CALLAN PARK MA$TERPLAN\OQ06ESO NOTE.OOC CAfUP fO.13<br />
Rev 0.2. 1 May 2003
<strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Land Use Plan· ESO Notes<br />
28 November 2007<br />
• Exposed thermal mass to maximise potential for night flush.<br />
• A focus on commission and handover.<br />
2.3 Materials and Resources<br />
ARUpr<br />
86789/JPHr<br />
Page 2 of 2<br />
• Minimise negative impacts of materials by reusing existing structure and fa
u<br />
[<br />
CALLAN PARK LAND USE PLAN - APPENDICES<br />
APPENDIX E: CONTAMINATION REPORT<br />
.....J<br />
.....J<br />
UJ<br />
C/)<br />
C/)<br />
c<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
D<br />
o<br />
o<br />
c<br />
c [,<br />
[<br />
o<br />
o o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o o<br />
c
[<br />
[<br />
C<br />
Prepared for:<br />
Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority<br />
PO BoxN408<br />
Grosvenor Place<br />
Sydney NSW 1220<br />
Management of Contamination in the<br />
Proposed Development of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
HLA-Envirosciences Pty Limited (HLA ENSR)<br />
25 October 2007<br />
Document No.: S4095301_RPT<strong>Callan</strong><strong>Park</strong>_250ct07<br />
IIMerged<br />
• ....nh ENSR<br />
in 2007<br />
ENSR AECOM
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
o<br />
c<br />
o<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
o<br />
c<br />
o C<br />
D<br />
o<br />
C<br />
o<br />
D<br />
C
"This page has been left blank intentionally"<br />
ENSR IAECOM<br />
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the distribution page of this document.<br />
October 2007 Management of Contamination in the Proposed<br />
Development of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
Commercial in Confidence S4095301_Rptcallanpark_250ctD7<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
o<br />
[<br />
o<br />
D<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
o<br />
c<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o
o<br />
o ooo<br />
o o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
ooooooooo<br />
CONTENTS<br />
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the distribution page of this document.<br />
Management of Contamination in the Proposed October 2007<br />
Development of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
S4095301_Rptcallanpark_250ct07<br />
ENSR IAECOM<br />
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1<br />
1.1 Background 1<br />
1.2 Contamination matters required to be addressed at the Master Plan stage .. 1<br />
1.3 Reports referred to 2<br />
2.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF THE SiTE 3<br />
2.1 Potential development of the Site 3<br />
2.2 Environmental criteria applicable to the development.. 3<br />
2.2.1 Protection of human health 3<br />
2.2.2 Protection of the environment 4<br />
3.0 ASSESSMENT OF CONTAMINATION ON THE SiTE 5<br />
3.1' Stage 1 assessment 5<br />
3.1.1 Objective 5<br />
3.1.2 Scope of work 5<br />
3.1.3 Potentialiy contaminating activities on the Site 5<br />
3.1.4 Potential constraints posed by contamination 5<br />
3.2 Stage 2 assessment 8<br />
3.2.1 Objectives 8<br />
3.2.2 Scope of work 8<br />
3.2.3 Suitability of sampling locations 9<br />
3.2.4 Suitability of field methods 10<br />
3.2.5 Suitability of chemicais of potential concern 10<br />
3.2.6 SUitability of laboratory methods 12<br />
3.3 Results of investigation 12<br />
3.3.1 Development Areas 12<br />
3.3.2 Non-Development Areas 12<br />
4.0 EES REPORT 15<br />
4.1 Purpose of the EES report 15<br />
4.2 Objective , 15<br />
4.3 Key environmental issues 15<br />
4.4 Remedial options for fill rnaterials 16<br />
5.0 CONCLUSION 19<br />
5.1 Preliminary investigation 19<br />
5.2 Requirement for additional assessment 19<br />
5.2.1 Environmental assessment 19<br />
5.2.2 Hazardous materials survey 19<br />
5.3 Management of contamination issues 20<br />
5.3.1 Fill materials 20<br />
5.3.2 Groundwater 20<br />
5.3.3 Underground storage tanks 20<br />
5.3.4 Buildings 20<br />
Commercial in Confidence
5.4<br />
Appendices<br />
ENSR IAECOM<br />
Management of the Site 21<br />
Appendix A : Figures from Coffey Report<br />
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the distribution page of this document.<br />
October 2007 Management of Contamination in the Proposed<br />
Development of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
Commercial in Confidence S4095301_Rptcallanpark_250cto7<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
o<br />
o o<br />
o<br />
D<br />
c<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o oo<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o
c<br />
o<br />
c<br />
o o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o ooo<br />
o<br />
o o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o o<br />
o<br />
1.0 Introduction<br />
1.1 Background<br />
In June 2007, the Minister for Planning, Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority and the University of<br />
Sydney entered into a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding that "... seeks to explore<br />
opportunities to grant a 99 year lease to the University of Sydney to develop a coherent campus<br />
environment ... for use for higher education purposes".<br />
It is understood that the proposed Master Plan applies to the whole of the Site, which is described to<br />
have an area of 61 ha within the area generally bounded by Glover Street, Balmain Road, Manning<br />
Street and Iron Cove, as shown in Figure 1 (Appendix A).<br />
In 2002, the author of this report (Dr Bill Ryall), then employed by Contamination Management Pty<br />
Limited, provided advice to Leichhardt Council relating to the management of contamination at the Site<br />
as identified in the Master Plan prepared at that time. The proposed Master Plan principles allow for<br />
different development options for the Site. Proposed options will have significant impacts for the<br />
management of the contamination at the Site and although extent of contamination remains to be .!<br />
quantified, it is considered that contamination issues can be addressed during the development of the/!<br />
Site.<br />
1.2 Contamination matters required to be addressed at the Master Plan<br />
stage<br />
For the purposes of master planning, contamination issues that have potential to significantly impact on<br />
the proposed development are required to be identified and their impact assessed. These issues relate<br />
to contamination that (i) could prevent the redevelopment being undertaken and/or (ii) could result in<br />
major impact on the redevelopment program in terms of necessary remedial works giving rise to:<br />
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the distribution page of this document.<br />
Management of Contamination in the Proposed October 2007<br />
Development of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
• Unacceptable environmental impacts resulting, for example, if significant remediation<br />
was required adjacent to sensitive waterways or if large volumes of volatile<br />
compounds were required to be remediated;<br />
S4095301..Rptcallanpark_250cI07<br />
ENSR IAECOM<br />
HLA ENSR was engaged by the Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority ("SHFA") to provide advice<br />
relating to the management of contamination of soil and groundwater at the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Hospital site<br />
(the "Site"), situated at Rozelle. The advice was required as part of the master planning process that is<br />
being undertaken as part of the development proposal in accordance with the <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Act (Special<br />
Provisions) 2002.<br />
The advice is based on reports relating to the assessment of contamination on the Site reported by<br />
Coffey Geosciences Pty Ltd ("Coffey") in 2000 and 2002 on behalf of the NSW Health Department as<br />
part of the preparation of a Master Plan for the redevelopment proposed for the Site at that time.<br />
SUbsequently, in 2002 Environmental & Earth Sciences ("EES") assessed the significance of<br />
contamination identified on the Site by review of the Coffey reports for Landcom, who at that time were<br />
considering developing the Site.<br />
The Master Plan will comply with the requirements of State Environmental Planning Policy No. 56<br />
(SEPP 56) "Sydney Harbour Foreshores and Tributaries" that requires, amongst other things, an<br />
explanation of and a proposal for "remediation of the site". In the context of SEPP 56, "remediation"<br />
relates to the processes of identification of nature and extent of contamination on the Site and<br />
subsequent remedial works that are undertaken to ensure protection of (i) the health of users of the site<br />
and (ii) the environment.<br />
Commercial in Confidence
ENSR IAECOM<br />
• Unacceptable social impacts resulting, for example, from excessive generation of<br />
noise, dust, vibration, vehicle movements and excavation of large quantities of<br />
asbestos containing materials and the like; and<br />
• Time and cost escalations caused by the identification of unexpected major<br />
contamination.<br />
r However, at the master planning stage, it is not required that contamination be quantified according to<br />
guidelines endorsed by NSW EPA (part of the Department of Environment and Climate Change<br />
ii' (DECC)). Detailed environmental assessment and quantification of contamination are generally<br />
undertaken at a later time, commonly prior to seeking specific development consent or as a condition of<br />
a specific development consent.<br />
1.3 Reports referred to<br />
In preparing this advice, the following reports provided by SHFA have been referred to:<br />
• "Rozelle Hospital, Stage 1 Preliminary Geotechnical and Contamination Study.<br />
Issues Paper on Geotechnical & Environmental Constraints" by Coffey dated 30<br />
August 2000;<br />
• "Rozelle Hospital, Preliminary Contamination Assessment," by Coffey dated 14<br />
March 2002; and<br />
• "Review ofcontamination and geotechnical conditions at Rozelle hospital site" by<br />
EES dated 29 August 2002.<br />
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the distribution page of this document.<br />
October 2007 2 Management of Contamination in the Proposed<br />
Development of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
Commercial in Confidence S409S301_Rptcallanpark_250ct07<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
[<br />
D<br />
C<br />
o [<br />
[<br />
D<br />
C<br />
C<br />
6<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
c<br />
c<br />
o<br />
[
ENSR IAECOM<br />
With respect to the current Master Plan, the relevant environmental criteria for parts of the Site are as<br />
follows:<br />
• College of Arts and the Development Area - reference to HIL F levels is appropriate.<br />
These levels for most chemicals of potential concern are five times less sensitive<br />
than the HIL A levels;<br />
•<br />
Playing fields and open space purposes - reference to HIL E levels is appropriate.<br />
These levels for most chemicals of potential concern are two times less sensitive<br />
than the HIL A levels; and<br />
• Parts of the Site that may be developed for accommodation purposes - reference to<br />
HIL D levels may be appropriate if occupiers have minimal access to the soil. These<br />
leveis for most chemicals of potential concern are four times less sensitive than the<br />
HIL A levels.<br />
Environmental criteria for petroleum hydrocarbons have been set by NSW EPA at 65 mg/kg for light<br />
petroleum hydrocarbons and 1000 mg/kg for medium and heavy petroleum hydrocarbons, although it is<br />
noted that NSW DEC (2006) Guidelines for the NSWSite Auditor Scheme (Z'd Edition) endorses much<br />
higher levels for medium and heavy petroleum hydrocarbons if speciation into aromatic and aliphatic<br />
fractions is reported by the laboratory.<br />
2.2.2<br />
Protection of the environment<br />
With respect to the protection of the environment, NSW EPA (2006) Guidelines for the NSWSite Auditor<br />
Scheme (Z'd Edition) endorses guidelines to protect the healthy growth of plants, termed<br />
phytotoxicological investigation levels.<br />
With respect to protection of groundwater and receiving waters, NSW EPA has endorsed so-called<br />
"trigger levels" listed in ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh<br />
and Marine Water Quality.<br />
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the distribution page of this document.<br />
October 2007 4 Management of Contamination in the Proposed<br />
Development of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
Commercial in Confidence S4095301_Rptcalianpark_250cto7<br />
o<br />
c<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o
o o<br />
o o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
c<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
3.0 Assessment of contamination on the Site<br />
3.1 Stage 1 assessment<br />
3.1.1 Objective<br />
3.1.2 Scope of work<br />
The following scope of work was undertaken by Coffey to achieve the objective:<br />
Coffey summarised the results of the investigation in Table 2 of their report and referred to the most<br />
significant potential contamination identified on the Hospital site as "Primary potential contamination<br />
constraints", which are discussed below.<br />
3.1.4 Potential constraints posed by contamination<br />
Uncontrolled filling<br />
Uncontrolled filling was identified in "major" areas in four parts of the Site, as identified on Coffey's<br />
Figure 2 (in AppendiX A). However, as discussed below, fill materiais were identified on all parts of the<br />
Site investigated by Coffey and had been placed over the natural soil and bedrock to form the present<br />
levels across the Site.<br />
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the distribution page of this document.<br />
Management of Contamination in the Proposed<br />
Development of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
• a review of existing information relating to the Site;<br />
• a limited inspection of the Site;<br />
• recommendation of a scope of work for a second stage of investigation to<br />
characterise the risks identified.<br />
3.1.3 Potentially contaminating activities on the Site<br />
The Site was confirmed to have a complex history of industrial uses that extended over a period of some<br />
150 years. In addition to its principal use as a hospital, ancillary activities carried out on the Site included<br />
operation of boilers, various types of workshops, storage of dangerous goods such as fuel and<br />
pesticides, bowling greens, a goif course and disposal of waste into landfills on the Site. At least one<br />
part of the Site was identified as having been a quarry that was at some later time filled with waste<br />
materials and which could be ciassified as a landfill.<br />
84095301_Rptcallanpark_250ct07<br />
5<br />
ENSR /AECOM<br />
The objective of the Stage 1 assessment undertaken by Coffey was stated "... to prepare an issues<br />
paper identifying primary constraints imposed by site geotechnical and potential contamination<br />
conditions".<br />
• a review of historicai aeriai photographs to observe the development of the Site and<br />
the surrounding area over the last 50 to 60 years;<br />
• interviews with personnel who had long association with the Site;<br />
• a review of records, if any, heid by Leichhardt Council relating to contamination at the<br />
Site;<br />
• assessment of potential risks that could present constraint to development of the<br />
Site;<br />
• preparation of an issues papers discussing potential risks and their potential impacts;<br />
and<br />
October 2007<br />
Commercial in Confidence
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
ENSR IAECOM<br />
was formerly cultivated (Figure 2). The chemicals of potential concern in these areas were listed as<br />
heavy metals, OCPs and herbicides.<br />
Coffey concluded that contamination from the application and storage of pesticides and herbicides was<br />
likely to be localised and that any contamination from these activities were not likely to present a<br />
significant constraint to redevelopment of the Site. Whilst this conclusion may be valid, if waste<br />
pesticides or pesticide containers were disposed in the major filled parts of the Site, contamination of<br />
groundwater may have resulted. As discussed below, the assessment of groundwater quality and<br />
remediation of groundwater that is identified to be contaminated is a significant matter that is required to<br />
be assessed.<br />
Remainder of the site<br />
Coffey also considered the "Remainder of the site", i.e. the bulk of the Site not addressed by the specific<br />
activities listed above, had a "low to high" risk of contamination from unspecified chemicals of potential<br />
concern "due to the age of the site, the possibility of other potentially contaminating activities having<br />
occurred on the site cannot be ruled out". Coffey concluded that the presence of contamination from<br />
these unidentified sources was "not likely to present a significant constraint to redevelopment of the<br />
site U<br />
,<br />
Opinion on potential contaminants<br />
It is considered that Coffey's Stage 1 investigation identified most of the likely contamination issues that<br />
could impact on the development of the Site. However, it is considered that two important issues that<br />
have potential to impact significantly on the redevelopment of the Site, being the presence of asbestos<br />
and the potentiai for groundwater contamination, were not addressed in appropriate detail, as discussed<br />
below.<br />
Asbestos<br />
Coffey's reports identified asbestos as a substance of concern on the Site as a weathering product from<br />
asbestos cement roofs and other asbestos cement building materials, however, on other hospital sites<br />
within the Sydney region, it has been found that asbestos containing materials were commonly disposed<br />
in filled areas on these sites. The removal of asbestos from filling during development of these hospital<br />
sites and other former industrial sites has presented major environmental and commercial issues during<br />
development of these sites.<br />
On such hospital sites within the Sydney region, asbestos has been identified as:<br />
• bonded asbestos materials, which were commonly used as roofing and wall<br />
materials ("fibro"), pipes (gutters, down pipes and sub-surface pipes), floor tiles<br />
("Iino") and in electrical equipment (eg. power distribution boards); and<br />
• friable asbestos, which was commonly used as lagging for insulating boilers, service<br />
pipes and ducts. In addition, this substance was used as spray-on insulation within<br />
buildings.<br />
The use of asbestos and asbestos containing materials on the Site and any programs in which asbestos<br />
containing materials were removed from buildings on the Site are required to be documented thoroughly<br />
at the development application stage. It is also critical that that the fate of the asbestos waste be<br />
documented. Given the practices on other hospital sites, there is a high probability that these materials<br />
could have been disposed on the Site, particularly since a number of areas of major filling have been<br />
identified.<br />
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the distribution page of this document.<br />
Management of Contamination in the Proposed<br />
Development of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
7 October 2007<br />
S4095301_Rptcalianpark_250ct07<br />
Commercial in Confidence
ENSR AECOM<br />
The presence of asbestos fibres in fill materials presents a major cost and time constraint in remediating<br />
filling containing this material because of the emotive nature of the community and other land users<br />
response to asbestos and the hazardous nature of the fibres that may be liberated during building<br />
demolition and earthworks programs.<br />
However, the Coffey reports did not identify significant quantities of asbestos in fill materials intersected<br />
in bores across the Site and no asbestos was identified in the ten samples of the fill materials from the<br />
Development Area analysed by Coffey. Consequently, asbestos in fill materials may not present a<br />
significant issue at the Site, however, this cannot be stated with any certainty at this time.<br />
Groundwater contamination<br />
It is highly likely that the several major filled areas on the Site could have impacted the quality of<br />
groundwater discharging into Iron Cove. The remediation of contaminated groundwater may present a<br />
major constraint to development of these areas.<br />
In addition, because the Site falls towards Iron Cove, contamination of groundwater discharging into Iron<br />
Cove could be a result of the presence of contaminants in fill materials in parts of the Hospital site<br />
remote from Iron Cove. The requirement to remediate groundwater, therefore, may impact development<br />
of any contaminated partls of the Site that may be contributing contamination to groundwater. For these<br />
reasons, it is considered that an appropriate level of investigation of the quality of groundwater should<br />
have been undertaken by Coffey.<br />
It is noted that Coffey recommended that investigation of groundwater contamination be undertaken in<br />
the short term in a subsequent investigation on the Lower Glover Street Oval, but it is considered that<br />
the quality of groundwater in the filled areas adjacent to Iron Cove should have been subject to at least a<br />
preliminary assessment by Coffey. It is considered that this assessment can be undertaken at an early<br />
stage during the development of the Site.<br />
3.2 Stage 2 assessment<br />
3.2.1 Objectives<br />
The objectives of the second stage of assessment undertaken by Coffey were stated to:<br />
• Further assess the primary constraints posed by contamination conditions within the<br />
Development Areas by undertaking limited soil sampling and testing; and<br />
• Make a preliminary assessment of the nature of contamination in the Non<br />
Development Area by undertaking limited soil sampling and testing.<br />
Opinion relating to objectives<br />
It is considered that the scope of the Stage 2 assessment was inadequate given the number and nature<br />
of the potentially contaminating activities identified in the Stage 1 assessment and given the<br />
uncertainties that related to use of the site, particularly the disposal of waste, the disposal of ash<br />
containing carcinogenic PAHs, the probable use of asbestos and the high probability of groundwater<br />
being contaminated.<br />
3.2.2 Scope ofwork<br />
Coffey undertook the following scope of work:<br />
• Collection of samples of fill materials and soil from locations across the Site;<br />
• Chemical analysis in a commercial laboratory for chemicals of potential concern; and<br />
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the distribution page of this document.<br />
October 2007 8 Management of Contamination in the Proposed<br />
Development of <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />
Commercial in Confidence S4095301_Rptcallanpark_250ct07<br />
C<br />
D<br />
o<br />
C<br />
o<br />
D<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
c<br />
o<br />
o<br />
c<br />
o<br />
D<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o