10.04.2013 Views

Journal of Eurasian Studies

Journal of Eurasian Studies

Journal of Eurasian Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

October-December 2012 JOURNAL OF EURASIAN STUDIES Volume IV., Issue 4.<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Regional Trade Agreements Information System (RTA-IS) (WTO, 2012). The variable includes bilateral<br />

and multilateral agreements. COMij accounts for a former membership in the COMECON. It equals one<br />

if both countries were members <strong>of</strong> the COMECON and zero if that is not the case. The variable<br />

represents the impact <strong>of</strong> traditional and continuing trade relations. As the Soviet Union and its partner<br />

were highly integrated economically, the sign <strong>of</strong> this variable is expected to be positive.<br />

2.3 Econometric Model and Estimation Procedure<br />

One can argue that – due to the panel structure <strong>of</strong> the GMIT – a fixed effects model (FEM) or a<br />

random effects model (REM) outperform the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimates because countryspecific<br />

and time-specific effects are appropriately taken into consideration. Most scholars also agree that<br />

the FEM is superior to the REM. This is because it is likely that country-specific effects and the error term<br />

are correlated, which makes the REM yield biased estimation results. Moreover, statistical test like the<br />

Hausman test mostly ends in favour <strong>of</strong> the FEM. In contrast to the REM, the FEM is not able to consider<br />

time-invariant effect, which makes it difficult to apply in the context <strong>of</strong> this study. This makes it<br />

necessary to use a different estimation procedure.<br />

In their recent paper, Santos Silva and Tenreyro (2006) raised further concerns about biases <strong>of</strong> the<br />

traditional econometric approach. They identified three problems <strong>of</strong> the log-linearised gravity model<br />

which normally result in severely biased results. Above all, the log-model is based on the assumption<br />

that the error terms do not exhibit heteroskedasticity. Also the log-linearisation creates biases as the<br />

transformation has an effect on the nature <strong>of</strong> the estimation procedure. Lastly and most severe, the log<br />

model cannot deal with zero trade flows. Most scholars cope with the problem by dropping zero trade<br />

flows or modifying the dependent variable. Notably, this modifications lack any theoretical justification.<br />

To avoid these problems, Santos Silva and Tenreyro (2006) proposed using levels instead <strong>of</strong> lags for<br />

the dependent variable. They suggest applying the Poisson pseudo-maximum-likelihood (PPML)<br />

estimation procedure. Among others, Siliverstovs and Schumacher (2009) confirm that PPML<br />

outperforms traditional estimation procedures. According to Santos Silva and Tenreyro (2006) and based<br />

on Equation 2, I developed an augmented gravity model and specified it as follows:<br />

α1 α2 α3 α4<br />

α5 α6<br />

EXP ln α ln X ln X ln DW Linder RTA COM η<br />

(3)<br />

ijt 0 it jt ij ijt ijt ij ijt<br />

This relation is estimated by the Poisson pseudo-maximum-likelihood (PPML) estimator. The form <strong>of</strong><br />

Equation 3 makes clear that the data does not have to be Poisson or integer to receive consistent<br />

estimators. Particularly in the presence <strong>of</strong> heteroskedasticity, the Poisson regression estimates are more<br />

efficient and consistent than the least squares regression estimates. Moreover, the PPML method<br />

provides a natural way to cope with zero trade. To obtain a robust variance estimate that adjusts for<br />

within-cluster correlation, I clustered the data by the partner country. This allows for a<br />

heteroskedasticity-robust variance estimator (Williams, 2000).<br />

Furthermore, to check for the adequacy <strong>of</strong> the estimated model, I perform a heteroskedasticity-robust<br />

version <strong>of</strong> the Ramsey Regression Equation Specification Error (RESET) test (Ramsey, 1969). It tests for<br />

the correct specification <strong>of</strong> the conditional expectation. If the RESET test p-value is insignificant, the test<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />

© Copyright Mikes International 2001-2012 105

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!