12.04.2013 Views

The Wreck of DKM Bismarck − A Marine Forensics Analysis 1 The ...

The Wreck of DKM Bismarck − A Marine Forensics Analysis 1 The ...

The Wreck of DKM Bismarck − A Marine Forensics Analysis 1 The ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Wreck</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>DKM</strong> <strong>Bismarck</strong> <strong>−</strong> A <strong>Marine</strong> <strong>Forensics</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong><br />

Gunfire and torpedo damage weakened the stern structure, which was susceptible to failure due to a<br />

defective structural design <strong>−</strong> a major hull structural discontinuity at the after end <strong>of</strong> the steering gear<br />

room <strong>−</strong> as shown to the right. After the <strong>Bismarck</strong> capsized and sank, the structure failed along this<br />

line, leaving this dramatic view.<br />

GUNFIRE DAMAGE SURVEY <strong>−</strong> HIGHLIGHTS<br />

An internal examination <strong>of</strong> some areas <strong>of</strong> the ship was accomplished by miniature ROVs<br />

Jake and Elwood. <strong>The</strong>y surveyed inside the holes in the Upper Bridge Deck and the holes in the<br />

deck over the Adjutant’s Office. One <strong>of</strong> the ROVs also entered the large shell hole in the main<br />

deck just aft and to port <strong>of</strong> the barbette for Turret Bruno (Compartment XV). This was a berthing<br />

space being used as an emergency hospital. Two hundred men were trapped here, below jammed<br />

hatches that had heavy wreckage lying over them. <strong>The</strong>y were killed by the shell that detonated<br />

here. <strong>The</strong> space was unrecognizable <strong>−</strong> just a jumble <strong>of</strong> debris.<br />

A large shell hole in the main deck over the Adjutant’s Office just inboard <strong>of</strong> S63<br />

secondary turret was explored twice. This hole was 0.6 by 1.0 meters and very irregular. This<br />

penetration was caused by either a 406-mm or 203-mm shell which detonated right at or just<br />

above the deck level. Inside the <strong>of</strong>fice, the damage was pr<strong>of</strong>ound, but desks were visible against<br />

a wall some three meters away, still intact. Door openings and non-structural bulkheads were still<br />

intact some 3-4 meters away. This situation suggests that the explosion took place outside, but<br />

penetrated the 50-mm deck plate with a consequent reduction <strong>of</strong> its blast effects. This suggests<br />

that this was a 203-mm high-explosive shell.<br />

A single shell hole was detected in the 145-mm upper citadel belt in way <strong>of</strong> Compartment<br />

VII to port. This elliptical hole was caused by a 356-mm shell from King George V that was fired<br />

from the close range <strong>of</strong> 3,700 meters. <strong>The</strong> shell’s trajectory carried it through a main transverse<br />

bulkhead and the Batteriedeck whereupon it exploded just below the deck level in Compartment<br />

VIII. This was the round that killed CDR Hans Oels, who was leading some 100-200 men trying<br />

to lead an escape to the topside at an access ladder outside the Aft Canteen. This access ladder<br />

led to a hatch on the main deck in Compartment VIII. Most <strong>of</strong> the men in this area were killed or<br />

seriously wounded by the shell burst. <strong>The</strong> blast effect was devastating. <strong>The</strong> detonation created an<br />

overpressure that knocked survivor Seaman Heinz Steeg on his behind, some 7 meters away.<br />

Steeg still managed to reach the safety <strong>of</strong> the port side just after the shelling ceased.<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!