Comparative Politics 1 POL1010 - CAESAR

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Neo-Functionalism’s Roots: Critique of David Mitrany’s Functionalism I Neo/Functionalism is a reaction against Functionalism and the idea that economics and politics can be kept separate and that integration can be confined to areas of low politics Functionalist David Mitrany argued in 1930: ‘peace will not be secured if we organise the world by what divides it’ (Mitrany, 1943: 96). (…that statement obviously refers to the nation state system…)
Neo-Functionalism’s Roots: Critique of David Mitrany’s Functionalism II • Haas – lack of the political makes the functionalist account unrealistic • How is it possible for technical and economic integration to actually happen and for political cooperation to remain absent? • For Haas political motives stimulated cooperation in the first place; sometimes political cooperation is also an unintended consequence of technical cooperation
Page 1 and 2: Theories of European Integration II
Page 3 and 4: Theories of European Integration -
Page 5: Neo-Functionalism and a Supranation
Page 9 and 10: Neo-Functionalism’s Features II 2
Page 11 and 12: Neo-Functionalism’s Features IV 4
Page 13 and 14: Neo-Functionalism’s Features IV 4
Page 15 and 16: Evaluating Neo-Functionalism 1950s
Page 17 and 18: Liberal Intergovernmentalism and th
Page 19 and 20: Liberal Intergovernmentalism Roots
Page 21 and 22: Liberal Intergovernmentalism: The W
Page 23 and 24: The Role of Supranational Instituti
Page 25 and 26: Recommended Reading Cram, L. (1996)

Comparative Politics 1 POL1010 - CAESAR

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?