Magic Quadrant for MSSPs, North America, 2H05 - Verisign.ch
Magic Quadrant for MSSPs, North America, 2H05 - Verisign.ch
Magic Quadrant for MSSPs, North America, 2H05 - Verisign.ch
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Resear<strong>ch</strong><br />
Publication Date: 30 December 2005 ID Number: G00137165<br />
<strong>Magic</strong> <strong>Quadrant</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>MSSPs</strong>, <strong>North</strong> <strong>America</strong>, <strong>2H05</strong><br />
Kelly M. Kavanagh, John Pescatore<br />
The <strong>2H05</strong> <strong>Magic</strong> <strong>Quadrant</strong> <strong>for</strong> managed security service providers in <strong>North</strong> <strong>America</strong><br />
shows the effects of continued market maturation. Merger and acquisition activity, as<br />
well as the expansion or contraction of service offerings, has <strong>ch</strong>anged the ratings of<br />
several vendors.<br />
© 2005 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of this publication in any <strong>for</strong>m without prior<br />
written permission is <strong>for</strong>bidden. The in<strong>for</strong>mation contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable.<br />
Gartner disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of su<strong>ch</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation. Although Gartner's<br />
resear<strong>ch</strong> may discuss legal issues related to the in<strong>for</strong>mation te<strong>ch</strong>nology business, Gartner does not provide legal advice or<br />
services and its resear<strong>ch</strong> should not be construed or used as su<strong>ch</strong>. Gartner shall have no liability <strong>for</strong> errors, omissions or<br />
inadequacies in the in<strong>for</strong>mation contained herein or <strong>for</strong> interpretations thereof. The opinions expressed herein are subject to<br />
<strong>ch</strong>ange without notice.
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW<br />
When evaluating managed security service providers (<strong>MSSPs</strong>), begin with a clear set of<br />
requirements <strong>for</strong> device monitoring and management, vulnerability assessments, scanning, and<br />
incident management and reporting. Compare your requirements with customer premises<br />
equipment (CPE) product-based services and in-the-cloud (ITC) services. Consider current or<br />
pending IT or network outsourcing arrangements, and evaluate <strong>MSSPs</strong> from all quadrants<br />
against your requirements.<br />
MAGIC QUADRANT<br />
Figure 1. <strong>Magic</strong> <strong>Quadrant</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>MSSPs</strong>, <strong>North</strong> <strong>America</strong>, <strong>2H05</strong><br />
Source: Gartner (December 2005)<br />
Publication Date: 30 December 2005/ID Number: G00137165 Page 2 of 11<br />
© 2005 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
Market Overview<br />
The managed security service (MSS) market in <strong>North</strong> <strong>America</strong> generated revenue of $936 million<br />
in 2004, and Gartner estimates revenue will rea<strong>ch</strong> $1 billion in 2005. Market growth has been<br />
accompanied by two waves of consolidation since 2001. In the first wave, smaller companies<br />
merged to increase devices under management or to gain customers. More recently, the trend is<br />
<strong>for</strong> larger solution providers to acquire security service "pure plays," su<strong>ch</strong> as MCI buying NetSec<br />
and Getronics obtaining RedSiren's assets. Larger vendors buy pure plays to gain the security<br />
expertise (personnel and infrastructure) and to use the "specialist" pedigree of the smaller<br />
players.<br />
The acquisitions are one indication of the continuing maturation of the MSS market, in whi<strong>ch</strong><br />
growth is driven increasingly by the following:<br />
• More activity in outsourcing basic security operations, with a strong focus on firewall<br />
management and intrusion detection system (IDS) monitoring and with an interest in<br />
intrusion prevention system (IPS) functions in the future<br />
• Compliance concerns because government regulations, as well as payment card<br />
requirements, are driving interest in MSS that can provide documented processes and in<br />
reporting that spans vulnerability management cycle activities<br />
• An increasing requirement <strong>for</strong> more-frequent vulnerability scanning delivered as a<br />
subscription service and as part of a larger monitoring ef<strong>for</strong>t, rather than as a one-time<br />
professional services engagement, and as an alternative to maintaining tools and<br />
expertise in-house<br />
Several vendors are actively developing (and LURHQ has announced) security in<strong>for</strong>mation and<br />
event management functionality through their portal te<strong>ch</strong>nology that will allow customers to use<br />
the service providers' data aggregation, normalization and categorization capabilities <strong>for</strong> reporting<br />
only. This allows customers to address specific reporting needs <strong>for</strong> devices or systems that don't<br />
require 24x7 monitoring. This approa<strong>ch</strong> allows <strong>MSSPs</strong> to extend existing infrastructure into new<br />
revenue lines and rea<strong>ch</strong> deeper into existing accounts to devices that support compliance<br />
reporting rather than active monitoring. It also gives them a "walk away" offering <strong>for</strong> prospects<br />
that will not outsource security monitoring.<br />
In addition, several pure-play providers are piloting ef<strong>for</strong>ts to offer monitoring services based on<br />
ITC security devices hosted by telecommunications providers. These services could be offered as<br />
a "powered by" solution that exposes the MSSP to the ISP customers, or as an original<br />
equipment manufacturer solution in whi<strong>ch</strong> the ISP handles customer interface. ITC services (see<br />
"'In the Cloud' Security Services Will Change Providers' Landscape") will allow telecom players to<br />
provide more-potent competition to established MSSP pure plays, but the telecom players have<br />
been slow to make the required business investments and market education ef<strong>for</strong>ts to move<br />
<strong>for</strong>ward.<br />
Gartner also sees increasing competition <strong>for</strong> MSS renewal deals. A growing number of clients<br />
we've spoken with are approa<strong>ch</strong>ing the end of their MSS outsourcing contract and want renewal<br />
bids from competing <strong>MSSPs</strong>. They are, typically, satisfied with the service received. Their interest<br />
in competitive bids is driven by a requirement to maintain their service levels but reduce their<br />
MSS costs, or by a desire to increase their service levels and maintain their spending levels.<br />
Publication Date: 30 December 2005/ID Number: G00137165 Page 3 of 11<br />
© 2005 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
Market Definition/Description<br />
An MSS includes remote, subscription-based monitoring and/or management of firewalls,<br />
intrusion detection and prevention functions via customer-premises-based or network-based<br />
devices.<br />
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria<br />
To be included in this <strong>Magic</strong> <strong>Quadrant</strong>, an MSSP must have:<br />
• More than 200 customer devices under management or monitoring<br />
• The ability to organically monitor and/or manage firewalls<br />
• IDS and IPS devices via a discrete service offering<br />
• Reference accounts relevant to Gartner customers in <strong>North</strong> <strong>America</strong><br />
Vendors that have MSS offerings, su<strong>ch</strong> as distributed denial-of-service protection (Prolexic<br />
Te<strong>ch</strong>nologies) or vulnerability scanning (Qualys), but not device monitoring and management are<br />
not included in this <strong>Magic</strong> <strong>Quadrant</strong>. Others, su<strong>ch</strong> as Savvis, offer MSS primarily to hosting<br />
customers, with limited offerings to others. As these providers expand the scope of their MSS<br />
offerings, they may be included in future <strong>Magic</strong> <strong>Quadrant</strong>s. NetSolve was removed from the<br />
<strong>Magic</strong> <strong>Quadrant</strong> after it was acquired by Cisco Systems. MSS is not a focus <strong>for</strong> Cisco Managed<br />
Services.<br />
Added<br />
We have added Perimeter Internetworking and VigilantMinds to the <strong>2H05</strong> <strong>Magic</strong> <strong>Quadrant</strong>.<br />
Dropped<br />
We have dropped Cisco (NetSolve) from the <strong>2H05</strong> <strong>Magic</strong> <strong>Quadrant</strong>.<br />
Evaluation Criteria<br />
Ability to Execute<br />
Ability to execute criteria are discussed in "Updated Criteria <strong>for</strong> Selecting an MSSP."<br />
Table 1. Ability to Execute Evaluation Criteria<br />
Evaluation Criteria Weighting<br />
Product/Service high<br />
Overall Viability (Business Unit, Financial, Strategy,<br />
Organization)<br />
high<br />
Sales Execution/Pricing high<br />
Market Responsiveness and Track Record low<br />
Marketing Execution high<br />
Customer Experience high<br />
Operations standard<br />
Source: Gartner<br />
Publication Date: 30 December 2005/ID Number: G00137165 Page 4 of 11<br />
© 2005 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
Completeness of Vision<br />
Criteria weights <strong>for</strong> completeness of vision are shown in the table below.<br />
Table 2. Completeness of Vision Evaluation Criteria<br />
Evaluation Criteria Weighting<br />
Market Understanding standard<br />
Marketing Strategy standard<br />
Sales Strategy standard<br />
Offering (Product) Strategy high<br />
Business Model standard<br />
Vertical/Industry Strategy standard<br />
Innovation high<br />
Geographic Strategy low<br />
Source: Gartner<br />
Leaders<br />
Ea<strong>ch</strong> of the service providers in the Leaders quadrant have significant "mind share" among<br />
enterprises looking to buy an MSS from pure-play security vendors, and they generally receive<br />
positive reports on service and per<strong>for</strong>mance from Gartner clients.<br />
Challengers<br />
Gartner customers are far more likely to encounter an MSS offered by a service provider in the<br />
Challengers quadrant as a component of that vendor's other telecom, outsourcing or consulting<br />
services. While an MSS is not a leading service offering <strong>for</strong> this type of vendor, it offers a "path of<br />
least resistance" to enterprises that need an MSS and use the vendor's main services. It also<br />
represents the largest portion of overall MSSP revenue.<br />
Visionaries<br />
Companies in the Visionaries quadrant have demonstrated the ability to turn a strong focus on<br />
managed security into high-quality service offerings <strong>for</strong> the MSS market.<br />
Ni<strong>ch</strong>e Players<br />
Ni<strong>ch</strong>e players are <strong>ch</strong>aracterized by service offerings that are available primarily in specific market<br />
segments or primarily as part of other service offerings.<br />
Vendor Comments<br />
AT&T<br />
AT&T continues to focus on security services, with the result that the company is often in the mix<br />
of vendors mentioned by Gartner customers as shortlist providers. AT&T's ITC offering<br />
complements the more-traditional CPE-based offerings. The company has taken aggressive<br />
steps to demonstrate a distinct MSS offering that takes advantage of AT&T's visibility into Internet<br />
backbone traffic and advanced intrusion prevention capabilities. AT&T is being acquired by SBC.<br />
Publication Date: 30 December 2005/ID Number: G00137165 Page 5 of 11<br />
© 2005 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
As with any acquisition, customers should be vigilant that they continue to receive acceptable<br />
service levels during and after the acquisition.<br />
Counterpane Internet Security<br />
Counterpane has improved mind share among enterprise security managers and once again<br />
winds up on shortlists <strong>for</strong> MSSP buys. By adding professional services, device management and<br />
additional device monitoring capabilities, Counterpane has demonstrated that it is listening to<br />
market demands <strong>for</strong> broader offerings and flexible buying options. The company has stepped up<br />
its direct sales approa<strong>ch</strong>, whi<strong>ch</strong> is key to winning larger-enterprise deals. Counterpane's<br />
<strong>ch</strong>allenge is to find a European partner <strong>ch</strong>annel and delivery partner to replace Getronics.<br />
CSC<br />
CSC has announced that Symantec will take over mu<strong>ch</strong> of the security device monitoring that<br />
CSC had been per<strong>for</strong>ming. CSC will continue to deliver other security services. Partnering with a<br />
pure-play MSSP is not an unusual arrangement <strong>for</strong> a larger service provider, but it does introduce<br />
an additional responsibility to ensure that the arrangement is transparent to customers and<br />
results in better service delivery or lower cost. CSC's organic MSS ef<strong>for</strong>ts are largely oriented<br />
toward government contracts.<br />
Cybertrust<br />
Cybertrust was created from acquisitions and mergers between TruSecure, Ubizen and<br />
Betrusted. Ubizen's MSS ar<strong>ch</strong>itecture will deliver the MSS. Gartner has seen no evidence of<br />
customer defections or decline in service levels following the merger, although Gartner has seen<br />
greatly reduced feedback from the marketplace about Cybertrust. This demonstrates the<br />
<strong>ch</strong>allenge Cybertrust faces in staying focused on MSS (other than managed public-key<br />
infrastructure services), given the need to integrate several businesses, in several markets, that<br />
have a very broad range of product and service offerings.<br />
EDS<br />
EDS offers managed firewall and IDS services primarily to customers of its other infrastructure<br />
outsourcing services, with limited capabilities to deliver discrete MSS offerings. To be considered<br />
a top-tier MSSP, EDS must find a way to use the relatively large number of devices it manages to<br />
develop a discrete, visible and credible security service.<br />
Equant<br />
Equant has broadened its MSS offerings, but this has mostly helped the company rea<strong>ch</strong> parity<br />
with its competitors. Equant does have strong global rea<strong>ch</strong>, however, and it generally receives<br />
high marks <strong>for</strong> support.<br />
Getronics<br />
Getronics acquired the assets of RedSiren. Prior to the acquisition, RedSiren had been largely<br />
absent from MSS deals involving Gartner customers. Its acquisition by Getronics gives current<br />
and prospective customers greater assurance of financial stability. Getronics faces <strong>ch</strong>allenges in<br />
establishing a security brand <strong>for</strong> MSS that is distinct from its other IT outsourcing business, yet<br />
builds on Getronics' global service delivery capability.<br />
IBM<br />
IBM sells MSS as a component of its strategic outsourcing offering and as a stand-alone offering.<br />
Over the past year, IBM has only slightly improved the visibility of its MSS in the marketplace, in<br />
Publication Date: 30 December 2005/ID Number: G00137165 Page 6 of 11<br />
© 2005 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
whi<strong>ch</strong> it typically does not compete with smaller pure-play vendors. Feedback from current and<br />
prospective customers indicates IBM needs to address the "stovepiping" of security data and<br />
provide a more-integrated view of this data by improving its portal and reporting tools.<br />
Internet Security Systems<br />
Internet Security Systems (ISS) has begun to officially support non-ISS monitoring products as<br />
part of its MSS offering. The company has also improved its portal functions and reporting<br />
capabilities, and it has begun integrating its X-Force intelligence and improved scanning<br />
capabilities into its MSS offering. ISS has been working on its operational systems, whi<strong>ch</strong> has<br />
resulted in additional service delivery capabilities. However, as a major IDS and IPS product<br />
vendor, ISS faces the same <strong>ch</strong>annel conflict that Symantec does. ISS needs to rein<strong>for</strong>ce its<br />
messaging to potential customers to distinguish its service capability from its competitors'<br />
products.<br />
LURHQ<br />
LURQH continues to improve its portal and back-end reporting capabilities to address security<br />
operations, management and reporting. The company has added a second security operations<br />
center in Chicago, and it has begun to build a professional service capability and improve its<br />
sales presence. At this stage in a relatively mature market, LURHQ and other smaller stand-alone<br />
<strong>MSSPs</strong> face <strong>ch</strong>allenges in acquiring large contracts from large companies that are looking <strong>for</strong><br />
transparent financials and global support presence.<br />
MCI<br />
MCI completed its acquisition of NetSec in February 2005. NetSec remains the security brand <strong>for</strong><br />
MCI security services. NetSec's capabilities <strong>for</strong> CPE-enabled services, including an improved<br />
portal capability, give MCI a better story <strong>for</strong> security services and complement MCI's ITC. MCI<br />
must ensure it maintains service levels as it aligns operations from its original MCI customers,<br />
those from its VeriSign partnership and those from NetSec. MCI must also demonstrate that it<br />
can focus on security services as a customer-facing business that is distinct from internal security<br />
operations. MCI is being acquired by Verizon. As with any acquisition, customers should be<br />
vigilant that they continue to receive acceptable service levels during and after the acquisition.<br />
Perimeter Internetworking<br />
Perimeter Internetworking offers ITC services to the midsize financial service provider market, as<br />
well as CPE-based services to small-and-midsize-business (SMB) buyers through ISP <strong>ch</strong>annels.<br />
Perimeter has had success gaining customers in vertical SMB markets in whi<strong>ch</strong> reference<br />
accounts are important. The company is expanding beyond those vertical markets via partners<br />
and acquisition.<br />
Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC)<br />
SAIC has consolidated several security service operations into a more-unified MSS offering. This<br />
should make it somewhat easier <strong>for</strong> enterprises to engage with SAIC <strong>for</strong> security services,<br />
although commercial prospects perceive SAIC as being government-focused. SAIC must<br />
continue to refine its offerings and messaging to ensure that its MSS offerings address the<br />
security requirements of the commercial marketplace.<br />
SecureWorks<br />
SecureWorks focuses on the financial service provider market with an all-in-one CPE appliancebased<br />
model. SecureWorks has gained customers primarily via direct sales to a close-knit market<br />
Publication Date: 30 December 2005/ID Number: G00137165 Page 7 of 11<br />
© 2005 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
in whi<strong>ch</strong> "reference-ability" counts, and the company is expanding its partner focus to expand<br />
beyond those markets to those in whi<strong>ch</strong> it has not yet established a reference base.<br />
Solutionary<br />
Solutionary has a well-rounded MSS offering that augments device monitoring and management<br />
with scanning, database and application monitoring, and professional services. Solutionary's<br />
focus on the midmarket and nonpublic ownership put it at the periphery of vendors that Gartner<br />
customers focus on <strong>for</strong> MSS. Solutionary needs to continue to align itself with national (and<br />
global) integrators and solution providers as service partners.<br />
Sprint<br />
Sprint, like its telephone company competitors, offers CPE-based services, as well as ITC<br />
services. Sprint has not advanced its service offerings or portal capabilities at the pace its<br />
competitors have, and as a result the company has struggled to get mind share <strong>for</strong> MSS beyond<br />
its government customers and bandwidth customers.<br />
Symantec<br />
Symantec has kept the core service capabilities it acquired with Ripte<strong>ch</strong> and augmented them<br />
with the consulting services it acquired through the @stake deal. CSC announced in February<br />
2005 that it will use Symantec <strong>for</strong> security device monitoring <strong>for</strong> CSC MSS customers; we expect<br />
that Symantec will pursue and find success with more of these types of opportunities. While<br />
Symantec continues to maintain vendor neutrality <strong>for</strong> its MSS offering, and feedback from Gartner<br />
customers <strong>for</strong> the most part backs this up, inherent <strong>ch</strong>annel conflicts continue to be a negative <strong>for</strong><br />
Symantec when competing with VeriSign and other <strong>MSSPs</strong> that do not sell competing products.<br />
Unisys<br />
Unisys has moved beyond its initial government contract focus <strong>for</strong> its MSS business. The<br />
company has experienced some success with midsize financial service companies and where it<br />
can sell MSS into an existing customer base.<br />
VeriSign<br />
VeriSign has successfully integrated Guardent from the 2004 acquisition, keeping a productneutral<br />
approa<strong>ch</strong> and expanding the device-management and monitoring options. In addition to<br />
direct sales to large accounts, VeriSign has had some success developing a "powered by"<br />
strategy serving other service providers. VeriSign's acquisition of iDefense gives the company<br />
competitive security intelligence offerings similar to Symantec's Threat Management System.<br />
VigilantMinds<br />
VigilantMinds offers ITC as well as CPE-based services, and it has developed offerings that<br />
target the hospital market. VigilantMinds must address the dual nature of its ef<strong>for</strong>ts to offer<br />
premium CPE-based services to midsize and large customers while using its ITC solution to<br />
rea<strong>ch</strong> a broader segment of the market.<br />
RECOMMENDED READING<br />
"'In the Cloud' Security Services Will Change Providers' Landscape"<br />
"Updated Criteria <strong>for</strong> Selecting an MSSP"<br />
Publication Date: 30 December 2005/ID Number: G00137165 Page 8 of 11<br />
© 2005 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
"<strong>Magic</strong> <strong>Quadrant</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>MSSPs</strong>, 1H04"<br />
“<strong>Magic</strong> <strong>Quadrant</strong>s and MarketScopes: How Gartner Evaluates Vendors Within a Market”<br />
Acronym Key and Glossary Terms<br />
CPE customer premises equipment<br />
IDS intrusion detection system<br />
IPS intrusion prevention system<br />
ISS Internet Security Systems<br />
ITC in-the-cloud<br />
MSS managed security service<br />
MSSP managed security service provider<br />
SAIC Science Applications International Corp.<br />
SMB small and midsize business<br />
Evaluation Criteria Definitions<br />
Ability to Execute<br />
Product/Service: Core goods and services offered by the vendor that compete in/serve the<br />
defined market. This includes current product/service capabilities, quality, feature sets, skills, and<br />
so on, whether offered natively or through OEM agreements/partnerships as defined in the<br />
market definition and detailed in the subcriteria.<br />
Overall Viability (Business Unit, Financial, Strategy, Organization): Viability includes an<br />
assessment of the overall organization's financial health, the financial and practical success of<br />
the business unit, and the likelihood of the individual business unit to continue investing in the<br />
product, to continue offering the product and to advance the state of the art within the<br />
organization's portfolio of products.<br />
Sales Execution/Pricing: The vendor’s capabilities in all pre-sales activities and the structure<br />
that supports them. This includes deal management, pricing and negotiation, pre-sales support<br />
and the overall effectiveness of the sales <strong>ch</strong>annel.<br />
Market Responsiveness and Track Record: Ability to respond, <strong>ch</strong>ange direction, be flexible<br />
and a<strong>ch</strong>ieve competitive success as opportunities develop, competitors act, customer needs<br />
evolve and market dynamics <strong>ch</strong>ange. This criterion also considers the vendor's history of<br />
responsiveness.<br />
Marketing Execution: The clarity, quality, creativity and efficacy of programs designed to deliver<br />
the organization's message in order to influence the market, promote the brand and business,<br />
increase awareness of the products, and establish a positive identification with the product/brand<br />
and organization in the minds of buyers. This mind share can be driven by a combination of<br />
publicity, promotional, thought leadership, word-of-mouth and sales activities.<br />
Customer Experience: Relationships, products and services/programs that enable clients to be<br />
successful with the products evaluated. Specifically, this includes the ways customers receive<br />
Publication Date: 30 December 2005/ID Number: G00137165 Page 9 of 11<br />
© 2005 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
te<strong>ch</strong>nical support or account support. This can also include ancillary tools, customer support<br />
programs (and the quality thereof), availability of user groups, service-level agreements, and so<br />
on.<br />
Operations: The ability of the organization to meet its goals and commitments. Factors include<br />
the quality of the organizational structure including skills, experiences, programs, systems and<br />
other vehicles that enable the organization to operate effectively and efficiently on an ongoing<br />
basis.<br />
Completeness of Vision<br />
Market Understanding: Ability of the vendor to understand buyers' wants and needs and to<br />
translate those into products and services. Vendors that show the highest degree of vision listen<br />
and understand buyers' wants and needs, and can shape or enhance those with their added<br />
vision.<br />
Marketing Strategy: A clear, differentiated set of messages consistently communicated<br />
throughout the organization and externalized through the Web site, advertising, customer<br />
programs and positioning statements.<br />
Sales Strategy: The strategy <strong>for</strong> selling product that uses the appropriate network of direct and<br />
indirect sales, marketing, service and communication affiliates that extend the scope and depth of<br />
market rea<strong>ch</strong>, skills, expertise, te<strong>ch</strong>nologies, services and the customer base.<br />
Offering (Product) Strategy: The vendor's approa<strong>ch</strong> to product development and delivery that<br />
emphasizes differentiation, functionality, methodology and feature set as they map to current and<br />
future requirements.<br />
Business Model: The soundness and logic of the vendor's underlying business proposition.<br />
Vertical/Industry Strategy: The vendor's strategy to direct resources, skills and offerings to<br />
meet the specific needs of individual market segments, including verticals.<br />
Innovation: Direct, related, complementary and synergistic layouts of resources, expertise or<br />
capital <strong>for</strong> investment, consolidation, defensive or pre-emptive purposes.<br />
Geographic Strategy: The vendor's strategy to direct resources, skills and offerings to meet the<br />
specific needs of geographies outside the "home" or native geography, either directly or through<br />
partners, <strong>ch</strong>annels and subsidiaries as appropriate <strong>for</strong> that geography and market.<br />
Publication Date: 30 December 2005/ID Number: G00137165 Page 10 of 11<br />
© 2005 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS<br />
Corporate Headquarters<br />
56 Top Gallant Road<br />
Stam<strong>for</strong>d, CT 06902-7700<br />
U.S.A.<br />
+1 203 964 0096<br />
European Headquarters<br />
Tamesis<br />
The Glanty<br />
Egham<br />
Surrey, TW20 9AW<br />
UNITED KINGDOM<br />
+44 1784 431611<br />
Asia/Pacific Headquarters<br />
Gartner Australasia Pty. Ltd.<br />
Level 9, 141 Walker Street<br />
<strong>North</strong> Sydney<br />
New South Wales 2060<br />
AUSTRALIA<br />
+61 2 9459 4600<br />
Japan Headquarters<br />
Gartner Japan Ltd.<br />
Aobadai Hills, 6F<br />
7-7, Aobadai, 4-<strong>ch</strong>ome<br />
Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-0042<br />
JAPAN<br />
+81 3 3481 3670<br />
Latin <strong>America</strong> Headquarters<br />
Gartner do Brazil<br />
Av. das Nações Unidas, 12551<br />
9° andar—World Trade Center<br />
04578-903—São Paulo SP<br />
BRAZIL<br />
+55 11 3443 1509<br />
Publication Date: 30 December 2005/ID Number: G00137165 Page 11 of 11<br />
© 2005 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved.