30.09.2012 Views

Magic Quadrant for MSSPs, North America, 2H05 - Verisign.ch

Magic Quadrant for MSSPs, North America, 2H05 - Verisign.ch

Magic Quadrant for MSSPs, North America, 2H05 - Verisign.ch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Resear<strong>ch</strong><br />

Publication Date: 30 December 2005 ID Number: G00137165<br />

<strong>Magic</strong> <strong>Quadrant</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>MSSPs</strong>, <strong>North</strong> <strong>America</strong>, <strong>2H05</strong><br />

Kelly M. Kavanagh, John Pescatore<br />

The <strong>2H05</strong> <strong>Magic</strong> <strong>Quadrant</strong> <strong>for</strong> managed security service providers in <strong>North</strong> <strong>America</strong><br />

shows the effects of continued market maturation. Merger and acquisition activity, as<br />

well as the expansion or contraction of service offerings, has <strong>ch</strong>anged the ratings of<br />

several vendors.<br />

© 2005 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of this publication in any <strong>for</strong>m without prior<br />

written permission is <strong>for</strong>bidden. The in<strong>for</strong>mation contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable.<br />

Gartner disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of su<strong>ch</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation. Although Gartner's<br />

resear<strong>ch</strong> may discuss legal issues related to the in<strong>for</strong>mation te<strong>ch</strong>nology business, Gartner does not provide legal advice or<br />

services and its resear<strong>ch</strong> should not be construed or used as su<strong>ch</strong>. Gartner shall have no liability <strong>for</strong> errors, omissions or<br />

inadequacies in the in<strong>for</strong>mation contained herein or <strong>for</strong> interpretations thereof. The opinions expressed herein are subject to<br />

<strong>ch</strong>ange without notice.


WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW<br />

When evaluating managed security service providers (<strong>MSSPs</strong>), begin with a clear set of<br />

requirements <strong>for</strong> device monitoring and management, vulnerability assessments, scanning, and<br />

incident management and reporting. Compare your requirements with customer premises<br />

equipment (CPE) product-based services and in-the-cloud (ITC) services. Consider current or<br />

pending IT or network outsourcing arrangements, and evaluate <strong>MSSPs</strong> from all quadrants<br />

against your requirements.<br />

MAGIC QUADRANT<br />

Figure 1. <strong>Magic</strong> <strong>Quadrant</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>MSSPs</strong>, <strong>North</strong> <strong>America</strong>, <strong>2H05</strong><br />

Source: Gartner (December 2005)<br />

Publication Date: 30 December 2005/ID Number: G00137165 Page 2 of 11<br />

© 2005 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved.


Market Overview<br />

The managed security service (MSS) market in <strong>North</strong> <strong>America</strong> generated revenue of $936 million<br />

in 2004, and Gartner estimates revenue will rea<strong>ch</strong> $1 billion in 2005. Market growth has been<br />

accompanied by two waves of consolidation since 2001. In the first wave, smaller companies<br />

merged to increase devices under management or to gain customers. More recently, the trend is<br />

<strong>for</strong> larger solution providers to acquire security service "pure plays," su<strong>ch</strong> as MCI buying NetSec<br />

and Getronics obtaining RedSiren's assets. Larger vendors buy pure plays to gain the security<br />

expertise (personnel and infrastructure) and to use the "specialist" pedigree of the smaller<br />

players.<br />

The acquisitions are one indication of the continuing maturation of the MSS market, in whi<strong>ch</strong><br />

growth is driven increasingly by the following:<br />

• More activity in outsourcing basic security operations, with a strong focus on firewall<br />

management and intrusion detection system (IDS) monitoring and with an interest in<br />

intrusion prevention system (IPS) functions in the future<br />

• Compliance concerns because government regulations, as well as payment card<br />

requirements, are driving interest in MSS that can provide documented processes and in<br />

reporting that spans vulnerability management cycle activities<br />

• An increasing requirement <strong>for</strong> more-frequent vulnerability scanning delivered as a<br />

subscription service and as part of a larger monitoring ef<strong>for</strong>t, rather than as a one-time<br />

professional services engagement, and as an alternative to maintaining tools and<br />

expertise in-house<br />

Several vendors are actively developing (and LURHQ has announced) security in<strong>for</strong>mation and<br />

event management functionality through their portal te<strong>ch</strong>nology that will allow customers to use<br />

the service providers' data aggregation, normalization and categorization capabilities <strong>for</strong> reporting<br />

only. This allows customers to address specific reporting needs <strong>for</strong> devices or systems that don't<br />

require 24x7 monitoring. This approa<strong>ch</strong> allows <strong>MSSPs</strong> to extend existing infrastructure into new<br />

revenue lines and rea<strong>ch</strong> deeper into existing accounts to devices that support compliance<br />

reporting rather than active monitoring. It also gives them a "walk away" offering <strong>for</strong> prospects<br />

that will not outsource security monitoring.<br />

In addition, several pure-play providers are piloting ef<strong>for</strong>ts to offer monitoring services based on<br />

ITC security devices hosted by telecommunications providers. These services could be offered as<br />

a "powered by" solution that exposes the MSSP to the ISP customers, or as an original<br />

equipment manufacturer solution in whi<strong>ch</strong> the ISP handles customer interface. ITC services (see<br />

"'In the Cloud' Security Services Will Change Providers' Landscape") will allow telecom players to<br />

provide more-potent competition to established MSSP pure plays, but the telecom players have<br />

been slow to make the required business investments and market education ef<strong>for</strong>ts to move<br />

<strong>for</strong>ward.<br />

Gartner also sees increasing competition <strong>for</strong> MSS renewal deals. A growing number of clients<br />

we've spoken with are approa<strong>ch</strong>ing the end of their MSS outsourcing contract and want renewal<br />

bids from competing <strong>MSSPs</strong>. They are, typically, satisfied with the service received. Their interest<br />

in competitive bids is driven by a requirement to maintain their service levels but reduce their<br />

MSS costs, or by a desire to increase their service levels and maintain their spending levels.<br />

Publication Date: 30 December 2005/ID Number: G00137165 Page 3 of 11<br />

© 2005 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved.


Market Definition/Description<br />

An MSS includes remote, subscription-based monitoring and/or management of firewalls,<br />

intrusion detection and prevention functions via customer-premises-based or network-based<br />

devices.<br />

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria<br />

To be included in this <strong>Magic</strong> <strong>Quadrant</strong>, an MSSP must have:<br />

• More than 200 customer devices under management or monitoring<br />

• The ability to organically monitor and/or manage firewalls<br />

• IDS and IPS devices via a discrete service offering<br />

• Reference accounts relevant to Gartner customers in <strong>North</strong> <strong>America</strong><br />

Vendors that have MSS offerings, su<strong>ch</strong> as distributed denial-of-service protection (Prolexic<br />

Te<strong>ch</strong>nologies) or vulnerability scanning (Qualys), but not device monitoring and management are<br />

not included in this <strong>Magic</strong> <strong>Quadrant</strong>. Others, su<strong>ch</strong> as Savvis, offer MSS primarily to hosting<br />

customers, with limited offerings to others. As these providers expand the scope of their MSS<br />

offerings, they may be included in future <strong>Magic</strong> <strong>Quadrant</strong>s. NetSolve was removed from the<br />

<strong>Magic</strong> <strong>Quadrant</strong> after it was acquired by Cisco Systems. MSS is not a focus <strong>for</strong> Cisco Managed<br />

Services.<br />

Added<br />

We have added Perimeter Internetworking and VigilantMinds to the <strong>2H05</strong> <strong>Magic</strong> <strong>Quadrant</strong>.<br />

Dropped<br />

We have dropped Cisco (NetSolve) from the <strong>2H05</strong> <strong>Magic</strong> <strong>Quadrant</strong>.<br />

Evaluation Criteria<br />

Ability to Execute<br />

Ability to execute criteria are discussed in "Updated Criteria <strong>for</strong> Selecting an MSSP."<br />

Table 1. Ability to Execute Evaluation Criteria<br />

Evaluation Criteria Weighting<br />

Product/Service high<br />

Overall Viability (Business Unit, Financial, Strategy,<br />

Organization)<br />

high<br />

Sales Execution/Pricing high<br />

Market Responsiveness and Track Record low<br />

Marketing Execution high<br />

Customer Experience high<br />

Operations standard<br />

Source: Gartner<br />

Publication Date: 30 December 2005/ID Number: G00137165 Page 4 of 11<br />

© 2005 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved.


Completeness of Vision<br />

Criteria weights <strong>for</strong> completeness of vision are shown in the table below.<br />

Table 2. Completeness of Vision Evaluation Criteria<br />

Evaluation Criteria Weighting<br />

Market Understanding standard<br />

Marketing Strategy standard<br />

Sales Strategy standard<br />

Offering (Product) Strategy high<br />

Business Model standard<br />

Vertical/Industry Strategy standard<br />

Innovation high<br />

Geographic Strategy low<br />

Source: Gartner<br />

Leaders<br />

Ea<strong>ch</strong> of the service providers in the Leaders quadrant have significant "mind share" among<br />

enterprises looking to buy an MSS from pure-play security vendors, and they generally receive<br />

positive reports on service and per<strong>for</strong>mance from Gartner clients.<br />

Challengers<br />

Gartner customers are far more likely to encounter an MSS offered by a service provider in the<br />

Challengers quadrant as a component of that vendor's other telecom, outsourcing or consulting<br />

services. While an MSS is not a leading service offering <strong>for</strong> this type of vendor, it offers a "path of<br />

least resistance" to enterprises that need an MSS and use the vendor's main services. It also<br />

represents the largest portion of overall MSSP revenue.<br />

Visionaries<br />

Companies in the Visionaries quadrant have demonstrated the ability to turn a strong focus on<br />

managed security into high-quality service offerings <strong>for</strong> the MSS market.<br />

Ni<strong>ch</strong>e Players<br />

Ni<strong>ch</strong>e players are <strong>ch</strong>aracterized by service offerings that are available primarily in specific market<br />

segments or primarily as part of other service offerings.<br />

Vendor Comments<br />

AT&T<br />

AT&T continues to focus on security services, with the result that the company is often in the mix<br />

of vendors mentioned by Gartner customers as shortlist providers. AT&T's ITC offering<br />

complements the more-traditional CPE-based offerings. The company has taken aggressive<br />

steps to demonstrate a distinct MSS offering that takes advantage of AT&T's visibility into Internet<br />

backbone traffic and advanced intrusion prevention capabilities. AT&T is being acquired by SBC.<br />

Publication Date: 30 December 2005/ID Number: G00137165 Page 5 of 11<br />

© 2005 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved.


As with any acquisition, customers should be vigilant that they continue to receive acceptable<br />

service levels during and after the acquisition.<br />

Counterpane Internet Security<br />

Counterpane has improved mind share among enterprise security managers and once again<br />

winds up on shortlists <strong>for</strong> MSSP buys. By adding professional services, device management and<br />

additional device monitoring capabilities, Counterpane has demonstrated that it is listening to<br />

market demands <strong>for</strong> broader offerings and flexible buying options. The company has stepped up<br />

its direct sales approa<strong>ch</strong>, whi<strong>ch</strong> is key to winning larger-enterprise deals. Counterpane's<br />

<strong>ch</strong>allenge is to find a European partner <strong>ch</strong>annel and delivery partner to replace Getronics.<br />

CSC<br />

CSC has announced that Symantec will take over mu<strong>ch</strong> of the security device monitoring that<br />

CSC had been per<strong>for</strong>ming. CSC will continue to deliver other security services. Partnering with a<br />

pure-play MSSP is not an unusual arrangement <strong>for</strong> a larger service provider, but it does introduce<br />

an additional responsibility to ensure that the arrangement is transparent to customers and<br />

results in better service delivery or lower cost. CSC's organic MSS ef<strong>for</strong>ts are largely oriented<br />

toward government contracts.<br />

Cybertrust<br />

Cybertrust was created from acquisitions and mergers between TruSecure, Ubizen and<br />

Betrusted. Ubizen's MSS ar<strong>ch</strong>itecture will deliver the MSS. Gartner has seen no evidence of<br />

customer defections or decline in service levels following the merger, although Gartner has seen<br />

greatly reduced feedback from the marketplace about Cybertrust. This demonstrates the<br />

<strong>ch</strong>allenge Cybertrust faces in staying focused on MSS (other than managed public-key<br />

infrastructure services), given the need to integrate several businesses, in several markets, that<br />

have a very broad range of product and service offerings.<br />

EDS<br />

EDS offers managed firewall and IDS services primarily to customers of its other infrastructure<br />

outsourcing services, with limited capabilities to deliver discrete MSS offerings. To be considered<br />

a top-tier MSSP, EDS must find a way to use the relatively large number of devices it manages to<br />

develop a discrete, visible and credible security service.<br />

Equant<br />

Equant has broadened its MSS offerings, but this has mostly helped the company rea<strong>ch</strong> parity<br />

with its competitors. Equant does have strong global rea<strong>ch</strong>, however, and it generally receives<br />

high marks <strong>for</strong> support.<br />

Getronics<br />

Getronics acquired the assets of RedSiren. Prior to the acquisition, RedSiren had been largely<br />

absent from MSS deals involving Gartner customers. Its acquisition by Getronics gives current<br />

and prospective customers greater assurance of financial stability. Getronics faces <strong>ch</strong>allenges in<br />

establishing a security brand <strong>for</strong> MSS that is distinct from its other IT outsourcing business, yet<br />

builds on Getronics' global service delivery capability.<br />

IBM<br />

IBM sells MSS as a component of its strategic outsourcing offering and as a stand-alone offering.<br />

Over the past year, IBM has only slightly improved the visibility of its MSS in the marketplace, in<br />

Publication Date: 30 December 2005/ID Number: G00137165 Page 6 of 11<br />

© 2005 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved.


whi<strong>ch</strong> it typically does not compete with smaller pure-play vendors. Feedback from current and<br />

prospective customers indicates IBM needs to address the "stovepiping" of security data and<br />

provide a more-integrated view of this data by improving its portal and reporting tools.<br />

Internet Security Systems<br />

Internet Security Systems (ISS) has begun to officially support non-ISS monitoring products as<br />

part of its MSS offering. The company has also improved its portal functions and reporting<br />

capabilities, and it has begun integrating its X-Force intelligence and improved scanning<br />

capabilities into its MSS offering. ISS has been working on its operational systems, whi<strong>ch</strong> has<br />

resulted in additional service delivery capabilities. However, as a major IDS and IPS product<br />

vendor, ISS faces the same <strong>ch</strong>annel conflict that Symantec does. ISS needs to rein<strong>for</strong>ce its<br />

messaging to potential customers to distinguish its service capability from its competitors'<br />

products.<br />

LURHQ<br />

LURQH continues to improve its portal and back-end reporting capabilities to address security<br />

operations, management and reporting. The company has added a second security operations<br />

center in Chicago, and it has begun to build a professional service capability and improve its<br />

sales presence. At this stage in a relatively mature market, LURHQ and other smaller stand-alone<br />

<strong>MSSPs</strong> face <strong>ch</strong>allenges in acquiring large contracts from large companies that are looking <strong>for</strong><br />

transparent financials and global support presence.<br />

MCI<br />

MCI completed its acquisition of NetSec in February 2005. NetSec remains the security brand <strong>for</strong><br />

MCI security services. NetSec's capabilities <strong>for</strong> CPE-enabled services, including an improved<br />

portal capability, give MCI a better story <strong>for</strong> security services and complement MCI's ITC. MCI<br />

must ensure it maintains service levels as it aligns operations from its original MCI customers,<br />

those from its VeriSign partnership and those from NetSec. MCI must also demonstrate that it<br />

can focus on security services as a customer-facing business that is distinct from internal security<br />

operations. MCI is being acquired by Verizon. As with any acquisition, customers should be<br />

vigilant that they continue to receive acceptable service levels during and after the acquisition.<br />

Perimeter Internetworking<br />

Perimeter Internetworking offers ITC services to the midsize financial service provider market, as<br />

well as CPE-based services to small-and-midsize-business (SMB) buyers through ISP <strong>ch</strong>annels.<br />

Perimeter has had success gaining customers in vertical SMB markets in whi<strong>ch</strong> reference<br />

accounts are important. The company is expanding beyond those vertical markets via partners<br />

and acquisition.<br />

Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC)<br />

SAIC has consolidated several security service operations into a more-unified MSS offering. This<br />

should make it somewhat easier <strong>for</strong> enterprises to engage with SAIC <strong>for</strong> security services,<br />

although commercial prospects perceive SAIC as being government-focused. SAIC must<br />

continue to refine its offerings and messaging to ensure that its MSS offerings address the<br />

security requirements of the commercial marketplace.<br />

SecureWorks<br />

SecureWorks focuses on the financial service provider market with an all-in-one CPE appliancebased<br />

model. SecureWorks has gained customers primarily via direct sales to a close-knit market<br />

Publication Date: 30 December 2005/ID Number: G00137165 Page 7 of 11<br />

© 2005 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved.


in whi<strong>ch</strong> "reference-ability" counts, and the company is expanding its partner focus to expand<br />

beyond those markets to those in whi<strong>ch</strong> it has not yet established a reference base.<br />

Solutionary<br />

Solutionary has a well-rounded MSS offering that augments device monitoring and management<br />

with scanning, database and application monitoring, and professional services. Solutionary's<br />

focus on the midmarket and nonpublic ownership put it at the periphery of vendors that Gartner<br />

customers focus on <strong>for</strong> MSS. Solutionary needs to continue to align itself with national (and<br />

global) integrators and solution providers as service partners.<br />

Sprint<br />

Sprint, like its telephone company competitors, offers CPE-based services, as well as ITC<br />

services. Sprint has not advanced its service offerings or portal capabilities at the pace its<br />

competitors have, and as a result the company has struggled to get mind share <strong>for</strong> MSS beyond<br />

its government customers and bandwidth customers.<br />

Symantec<br />

Symantec has kept the core service capabilities it acquired with Ripte<strong>ch</strong> and augmented them<br />

with the consulting services it acquired through the @stake deal. CSC announced in February<br />

2005 that it will use Symantec <strong>for</strong> security device monitoring <strong>for</strong> CSC MSS customers; we expect<br />

that Symantec will pursue and find success with more of these types of opportunities. While<br />

Symantec continues to maintain vendor neutrality <strong>for</strong> its MSS offering, and feedback from Gartner<br />

customers <strong>for</strong> the most part backs this up, inherent <strong>ch</strong>annel conflicts continue to be a negative <strong>for</strong><br />

Symantec when competing with VeriSign and other <strong>MSSPs</strong> that do not sell competing products.<br />

Unisys<br />

Unisys has moved beyond its initial government contract focus <strong>for</strong> its MSS business. The<br />

company has experienced some success with midsize financial service companies and where it<br />

can sell MSS into an existing customer base.<br />

VeriSign<br />

VeriSign has successfully integrated Guardent from the 2004 acquisition, keeping a productneutral<br />

approa<strong>ch</strong> and expanding the device-management and monitoring options. In addition to<br />

direct sales to large accounts, VeriSign has had some success developing a "powered by"<br />

strategy serving other service providers. VeriSign's acquisition of iDefense gives the company<br />

competitive security intelligence offerings similar to Symantec's Threat Management System.<br />

VigilantMinds<br />

VigilantMinds offers ITC as well as CPE-based services, and it has developed offerings that<br />

target the hospital market. VigilantMinds must address the dual nature of its ef<strong>for</strong>ts to offer<br />

premium CPE-based services to midsize and large customers while using its ITC solution to<br />

rea<strong>ch</strong> a broader segment of the market.<br />

RECOMMENDED READING<br />

"'In the Cloud' Security Services Will Change Providers' Landscape"<br />

"Updated Criteria <strong>for</strong> Selecting an MSSP"<br />

Publication Date: 30 December 2005/ID Number: G00137165 Page 8 of 11<br />

© 2005 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved.


"<strong>Magic</strong> <strong>Quadrant</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>MSSPs</strong>, 1H04"<br />

“<strong>Magic</strong> <strong>Quadrant</strong>s and MarketScopes: How Gartner Evaluates Vendors Within a Market”<br />

Acronym Key and Glossary Terms<br />

CPE customer premises equipment<br />

IDS intrusion detection system<br />

IPS intrusion prevention system<br />

ISS Internet Security Systems<br />

ITC in-the-cloud<br />

MSS managed security service<br />

MSSP managed security service provider<br />

SAIC Science Applications International Corp.<br />

SMB small and midsize business<br />

Evaluation Criteria Definitions<br />

Ability to Execute<br />

Product/Service: Core goods and services offered by the vendor that compete in/serve the<br />

defined market. This includes current product/service capabilities, quality, feature sets, skills, and<br />

so on, whether offered natively or through OEM agreements/partnerships as defined in the<br />

market definition and detailed in the subcriteria.<br />

Overall Viability (Business Unit, Financial, Strategy, Organization): Viability includes an<br />

assessment of the overall organization's financial health, the financial and practical success of<br />

the business unit, and the likelihood of the individual business unit to continue investing in the<br />

product, to continue offering the product and to advance the state of the art within the<br />

organization's portfolio of products.<br />

Sales Execution/Pricing: The vendor’s capabilities in all pre-sales activities and the structure<br />

that supports them. This includes deal management, pricing and negotiation, pre-sales support<br />

and the overall effectiveness of the sales <strong>ch</strong>annel.<br />

Market Responsiveness and Track Record: Ability to respond, <strong>ch</strong>ange direction, be flexible<br />

and a<strong>ch</strong>ieve competitive success as opportunities develop, competitors act, customer needs<br />

evolve and market dynamics <strong>ch</strong>ange. This criterion also considers the vendor's history of<br />

responsiveness.<br />

Marketing Execution: The clarity, quality, creativity and efficacy of programs designed to deliver<br />

the organization's message in order to influence the market, promote the brand and business,<br />

increase awareness of the products, and establish a positive identification with the product/brand<br />

and organization in the minds of buyers. This mind share can be driven by a combination of<br />

publicity, promotional, thought leadership, word-of-mouth and sales activities.<br />

Customer Experience: Relationships, products and services/programs that enable clients to be<br />

successful with the products evaluated. Specifically, this includes the ways customers receive<br />

Publication Date: 30 December 2005/ID Number: G00137165 Page 9 of 11<br />

© 2005 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved.


te<strong>ch</strong>nical support or account support. This can also include ancillary tools, customer support<br />

programs (and the quality thereof), availability of user groups, service-level agreements, and so<br />

on.<br />

Operations: The ability of the organization to meet its goals and commitments. Factors include<br />

the quality of the organizational structure including skills, experiences, programs, systems and<br />

other vehicles that enable the organization to operate effectively and efficiently on an ongoing<br />

basis.<br />

Completeness of Vision<br />

Market Understanding: Ability of the vendor to understand buyers' wants and needs and to<br />

translate those into products and services. Vendors that show the highest degree of vision listen<br />

and understand buyers' wants and needs, and can shape or enhance those with their added<br />

vision.<br />

Marketing Strategy: A clear, differentiated set of messages consistently communicated<br />

throughout the organization and externalized through the Web site, advertising, customer<br />

programs and positioning statements.<br />

Sales Strategy: The strategy <strong>for</strong> selling product that uses the appropriate network of direct and<br />

indirect sales, marketing, service and communication affiliates that extend the scope and depth of<br />

market rea<strong>ch</strong>, skills, expertise, te<strong>ch</strong>nologies, services and the customer base.<br />

Offering (Product) Strategy: The vendor's approa<strong>ch</strong> to product development and delivery that<br />

emphasizes differentiation, functionality, methodology and feature set as they map to current and<br />

future requirements.<br />

Business Model: The soundness and logic of the vendor's underlying business proposition.<br />

Vertical/Industry Strategy: The vendor's strategy to direct resources, skills and offerings to<br />

meet the specific needs of individual market segments, including verticals.<br />

Innovation: Direct, related, complementary and synergistic layouts of resources, expertise or<br />

capital <strong>for</strong> investment, consolidation, defensive or pre-emptive purposes.<br />

Geographic Strategy: The vendor's strategy to direct resources, skills and offerings to meet the<br />

specific needs of geographies outside the "home" or native geography, either directly or through<br />

partners, <strong>ch</strong>annels and subsidiaries as appropriate <strong>for</strong> that geography and market.<br />

Publication Date: 30 December 2005/ID Number: G00137165 Page 10 of 11<br />

© 2005 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved.


REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS<br />

Corporate Headquarters<br />

56 Top Gallant Road<br />

Stam<strong>for</strong>d, CT 06902-7700<br />

U.S.A.<br />

+1 203 964 0096<br />

European Headquarters<br />

Tamesis<br />

The Glanty<br />

Egham<br />

Surrey, TW20 9AW<br />

UNITED KINGDOM<br />

+44 1784 431611<br />

Asia/Pacific Headquarters<br />

Gartner Australasia Pty. Ltd.<br />

Level 9, 141 Walker Street<br />

<strong>North</strong> Sydney<br />

New South Wales 2060<br />

AUSTRALIA<br />

+61 2 9459 4600<br />

Japan Headquarters<br />

Gartner Japan Ltd.<br />

Aobadai Hills, 6F<br />

7-7, Aobadai, 4-<strong>ch</strong>ome<br />

Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-0042<br />

JAPAN<br />

+81 3 3481 3670<br />

Latin <strong>America</strong> Headquarters<br />

Gartner do Brazil<br />

Av. das Nações Unidas, 12551<br />

9° andar—World Trade Center<br />

04578-903—São Paulo SP<br />

BRAZIL<br />

+55 11 3443 1509<br />

Publication Date: 30 December 2005/ID Number: G00137165 Page 11 of 11<br />

© 2005 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!